#battlefield-2042
1 messages Ā· Page 4411 of 1
How about you both calm down and stop
This is the day
He will never stop defending that game
seems to be a common thing on this server 
I don't think so
I thought it was confirmed
I love you
It said "at the start of the week" sooo
anyone still playing 2042 is just being desperate at this point tbh
who would expect people saying good things about a game in a channel made for that game
the player base is below the dirt rn and dice are silent
patch day is tuesday or wefnesdya im pretty sure, never on a monday
Patch notes
not to mention almost nothing has changed since launch (7 months ago lmfao)
they have literally been talking about the patch for the past week
Loads have. Gun play, modes, qol
then they go on their 6 month hiatus
400 individual fixes š¤”
If you actually played the game you would know
well im just gonna wait and see what happens after the update
gonna be fun watching dice break 600 things
it'll go down like BFV but worse, they'll drop support as soon as the two year period ends
there has been 0 content since launch
There literally hasn't
leaving 2042 with no replayability watsoever except for maybe it's Portal mode, however they're planning to improve that beyond it just being a base game reskin or stuff
launch was on November 19th 2021, not 7 months ago
6 months ago whatever, my point still stands
*5 months
"Battlefield 2042 enthusiasts waiting for someone to make a small mistake to rage"
it already died
LOL god youre so dramatic, go outside and run around a bit
It has, modes, qol, balance, bug fixes, bloom and gun play fix, skins
oh yeah and that groundbreaking scoreboard
all games are will die, only exception is Minecraft I guess
still doesn't play like a good Battlefield tho
and literally zero content
It does to me
i mean tbh i expect more from a "live service" in 2022
I scrolled and you was arguing earlier....don't you have stuff to do
what if i dont?
2042 fans when they run out of arguments 
Or do u like having bf that much
Ok. It satisfies me so I'm happy
im the last guy to hate on bf
so you're an egoist? 
"minority"
Dunno even know what an egoist is
good talk lol
if it played like a good battlefield ea wouldnt call it a failure and the game wouldnt have a hard time breaking 2000 players on steam
He wouldn't get it.
Noo you see, as long as HE's enjoying it he doesn't care. Way to have a view on the world. lol
@arctic grove do you still play BF4 btw
yea i do
are you a fellow farmer
I was planning to download it xd
or fellow ground ant
objective facts and integrity play a subordinate role in shaping the publics opinion compared to personal beliefs and opinions
Ight enough cringefield for me, you guys have a great day
have a great day
no u
sorry, those are brutal expectations
its too brutal in fact
we will deliver patch notes in 12 months and deliver the actual patch by 2042
who are you to expect dice to deliver something as simple as patch notes on time?
old dice devs are coming together to talk for a new company
patch notes on time? THATS TOO HARD
they barely managed to make a scoreboard and voip in 6 months man
come on cut the indie devs at dice some slack, obviously patch notes on time are too hard
dude
i agree, indie devs are putting too much love and hard work, cut them some slack guys
tomorrow, today is still holiday
whats wrong with pressing a button and publishing patch notes?
not like there is some hard work involved here, literally a button
is simply that today is a non-working day
Itās a holiday. Vacation. Nobody works.
what about if it's a red button?
how else do you publish blog posts? its already been typed out and finalized most likely
all it needs is to be published on ea's site
several social media platforms that need to be updated, websites that need to be updated with the information, they need community managers active to answer questions about the patch notes/updates otherwise the community will just talk shit on them for not doing that
community managers active to answer questions? lmao
they already said they wont answer any more questions
if it was as simple as them pressing a button they would have done that by now
also what community managers? i have never seen one
don't push the red button tho, never ever do it
ok fine you write a quick tweet with a link redirecting to the blog post attached to it, anything else?
@arctic grove
they wont get paid for that, so why would they do that
it is a public holiday lmao what dont you understand
People really complaining a company doesnt work on an international holiday now
i doubt the community managers are getting paid much anyways considering the awful job they have done
imma just post
š Do not harass users who express enjoyment for the franchise. You're free to express your opinion (positive or negative) in a constructive manner, however disrupting the chat and abusing users who have their personal views won't be tolerated. Constructive criticism & feedback is always encouraged, spreading toxicity while providing no useful, constructive feedback is not allowed. Our full stance on this type of conduct can be found here.
Alex talks to the fans but yeah never seen one
thats a weapon designer
im pretty sure dice and ea treat their employees better than average for the industry they are in
emphasis on Constructive criticism & feedback is always encouraged, spreading toxicity while providing no useful, constructive feedback is not allowed
i mean when a weapon designer talks more to the community than the community manager
the community managers are active on the forums
Yeah thatās why I said not seen the other one
ŠŃоблема?
they get paid to be active on forums and social media, not to do Q&A's in a community ran discord
they have literally gone for months without saying a single word about the game
gotta be the easiest job being a community manager at dice
have you even been on the forums?
just because you havent seen it doesnt mean they havent been active there
yea i just skimmed through it and have only seen one post by a community manager
@Embroyonicend_ Patch Notes in a few hours time, Update will follow tomorrow once the team is back in from the holidays.
just on the first page of the forums theres 7 posts with replies from community managers
Sorry, on the first page of the general discussion section of the forums
didnt you tell me they wont publish the patch notes today because its a holiday?
Imagine releasing 2042, and then expecting to be able to take vacation. lol
clearly dice thinks otherwise, because it really doesnt take much work at all to do it
on the technical issues section first page theres 23 posts with replies from community managers
if publishing patch notes was actual "work" they wouldnt do it today no?
We said you shouldnt expect them to because its a holiday, them still doing it is just a good thing
Or atleast thats the point we were trying to make
i have no reason not to expect them to but it really is just as simple as pushing the button on an already written out wall of text
not really....
didnt expect it, was wrong, props to dice for doing it anyway
Does it hurt?
when i fell out of heaven? not really but thanks for the compliment
Finally...this update better be worth it...or else I might be done with this game's BS
Soonā¢
hmmmm i wonder
I would search the steam charts and see why...
what could it possibly be? let me think
yes really
I learned my lesson, I will never pre order a game again
its undeniable evidence that this game's player base is dwindling very quickly
i hate that people seem to think that the steam numbers are the epitome of concurrent player numbers.....
Still
because logically it scales to the entire picture
why wouldnt it?
They are not exact, but a direct reflection of the trend of players.
It gives a rough representation of whatās going on
steam accounts for around 19% or sth of the entire player base
not really, a vast majority of players use origin/EA desktop, then theres players on epic store, then take the amount of players on both generations of consoles..... so no... it's not
https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/u63b6c/me_protecting_my_team_with_the_mobile_aa_and/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
what it feels like when in the Hellcat
This is where I am supposed to believe that there are huge numbers of people playing when I can't even find a match...lol
lmao origin is dwarfed by steam in terms of traffic and user base
also steam players automatically count as origin players just so you know
While true, when you compare Steam Battlefield 2042 numbers to Battlefield V numbers, you can sort of see the trend and assume a similar ratio on other storefronts.
That comment was expected. I just wish it wouldn't have taken so long. I was expecting more with the time it took to type that.
also who the hell buys battlefield on the epic store
going off of steam numbers its pretty safe to assume that the total player count is somewhere around 8000-9000
Carpo, apparently you have the numbers, so can you let us know the player count..because people are always saying they can't find a game.
and im being generous here
steam numbers are the epitome in 2042s case cause most purchases and preorders of it ran over Steam
and its the biggest pc platform by a GIGANTIC margin
but origin players arent counted on steamcharts....
and usually steam overshadows origin yeah, but not for a franchise where the majority of players played on origin before the games were released on steam
and afaik theres no standalone version of BF2042
nothing comes close, origin is a speck of dust in comparison
most people still only play and buy BF games on origin
this got me laughing
except Origin is linked to Steam when you preordered it there
thing is if game that i want to buy is available on steam i will never look for trash like origin but sadly when u play battlefield origin launches anyway
If you shill long enough, you will start to believe it!
The steam version launches trough origin, but the origin version doesnt launch trough steam
So origin players are not represented in steamcharts
it literally requires you to have steam running if you bought it there
Imagine continually finding anyway to shill for BF2042.
some do it to piss people off and it works
I don't get mad. It makes me laugh at how stupid people can be.
I do understand it is not their fault....so I understand.
you can play 2042 without even having steam installed
yes
if you bought it on origin, which most people havent cause they preordered and bought via steam since it was most advertised there
no, the majority of players bought the game on origin
i was big dumb and bought it on epic instead of origin 
Proof.
if you perpetuate the lie long enough and see others believe it, you start to become delusional and believe it too
Well if someone has every other bf game on origin it would make sense that they got it on origin as to not make it confusing
^
Waiting for that link...
theres no proof of it, but its just logic
go figure why its so hard to find games in 2042 and why steam numbers are so long at the same time
the self-perpetuating cycle of validation
just as how you have no proof that most people play on steam
Tom Henderson did say 16% of the playerbase was steam 
if you believe him
there is no reason to believe otherwise, steam is singlehandedly the largest pc platform by a huge margin
and logically most people go onto steam to buy pc games
its not mental gymnastics, its simple facts and logic
I have proof how many people play it on steam..that is the proof I have. You have nothing. Are you hoping the shill will get you a mod position? lol
not when they own the rest of the franchise on a different platform
These mods be funny. I think they are trolling us.
exactly, you have no idea how many people play on origin, but logically, its more than steam
ever wondered why bf got a huge player count push when it arrived on steam?
theres a direct connection between how empty the games are and how little the playercount is on steam
Logically you have no proof. So..there is that.
you can go figure that out yourself
breaking news for bf2042: nothing new here, play something else
but go on keep telling yourself you are right.
neither do you
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
we have steam player counts and hard numbers, what do you have?
wheres the hard numbers of how many people are playing on origin
thats what im asking you
so you dont know
can you guys complain about women now like bfv
this is getting boring
never said i did
you said you had hard numbers
complain about Sundance being in the game or smth
thats not my line of argument anyways
why are you arguing about the numbers playing- the game is a failure with regards to quality
who cares how many are playing? dice dont
yes i have the steam player count, steam statistics and tom henderson's statement (most likely reliable)
Failure in quality = low player base.
yea- but that ship has sailed, im amazed peolpe are still using this chat
tom hendersons statement says that steam is 16% of the pc playerbase
so that kind of undermines your argument doesnt it
damn
add to that ps4, xbox one, series s/x and ps5
you will see it adds up and that origin represents only a small fraction of the player base
it doesnt hold a candle to steam
What platform are you playing on? and region?
if steam is 16%, then origin and epic combined are 84% that would mean theres AT LEAST 10k players on pc, so how is steamcharts an accurate representation of that
10k for a game like this is a failure still...
which is not the point
I am so glad there is a block feature, and I don't have to see that the person messages..lol
today patch notes?
because ofc it makes total sense that origin and epic make up 84% of the entire player base
in a few hours
such sound logic, man i have been enlightened
affaik its 16% of the pc playerbase
there is no reason to believe that
unless you want to sugarcoat the situation and be disingenous ofc
it does, since origin is the preferred platform for battlefield games
Technically speaking, the steam playerbase is also the origin playerbase since it has to launch through origin anyway
This conversation makes no sense anymore with people being blocked. I am out of here. Enjoy your BF2042 games that do not exist.
So origin has to have more players anyway
maybe dont block people when you cant have a normal argument?
Active Users was 1.67M across all platforms.
Concurrent Users was 269,000 across all platforms.
Steam players appear to be around 20% of the player base [...].
I just want to know if you guys claim there are so many players, why do people continually have problems playing a game? At some point you have to admit to yourself the truth. I know it hurts, but you have to do it. See ya.
there you go numbers
and that was during the holidays, which is absolute prime time
nobody denies the game is dying, we are saying that steamcharts is in no way representative of the entire playercount\
it is representative, as it shows the overall trend of the player base
finally voip tomorrow so I can blow into the mic and be annoying
you really are hopeless
ThE GaMe iS dEaD
you just want to perpetuate that lie of yours so that eventually believe in it you yourself and take it for granted as the truth
Like god intended
that was in december, its april now
and the game regularly hits 1000 players or below that on steam
The game was dead then too
its generally known that steamcharts isnt an accurate representation because there is literally no way of knowing how many players there are in total
Hmm i just loaded up into 128 BT, got straight into a match š¤
seems like reading comprehension is a problem
its just used by senseless haters to try to say what everyone already knows: the game is losing players
photoshop
I'm having a deja vù.....
how about this: the game isnt even in the top 50 in player count on xbox
Thatās just a trick by EA, they made it only APEAR like the game is full
and is there a playercount for the #50 game?
maybe change the tune now.... it's getting boring
Yeah, and PUBG has bots to..
and fortnite 
no bots in there 

Stop it! Youāre going against the narrative!
Of course you will say that...You have to stick to your guns...anyways, I gtg.

Noā¦dont goā¦.stay
ok.... clearly in the clip it's 64 players v 64 players ... but you do you ...
its not like he literally shows the player list in the video or anything
do you need the player count for the #50 game on xbox? just it being lower (likely MUCH lower) than that is enough to assume the game is on its deathbed
yes, you do
if that #50 game has a million players, 2042 can have anywhere between 0 and 1 million players on
like i said steam being roughly 20% of the player base entails that around 6000 people are playing in total rn
thats below abysmal for a high profile AAA game like bf
I have been getting the aim sight bug in portal more often
so 2000 is 20% of 6000?
i wanna see that shiet in the notes today
ok
excuse me 8000
Iād like to see some jet fixes in the notes
and to be generous lets make it 9000 players in total
2000 is 20% of 8000?
10,000
And if Iām extremely dilusional some changes to the weaponry
you are getting closer but still a bit off with the math
the rear cam for jets in portal is so druggy
whatever, thats a pitiful player count for this game and could be considered dead by AAA standards
But as you have said before that post from henderson was in december, we dont know how that percentage changed
steam could be 1% of the playerbase now for all we know
i dont see any reason why it would change
this is something nobody disagrees with
Math is hard
But that doesnt change that steamcharts is not accurate to the entire playerbase
all the casual players have quit by now and only the dedicated hardcore ones are still left
Not again, this word already haunts my dreams š«
Does someone now how to get the delay gone on ps4???
what kind of delay
soonā¢ļø
Movement/shootingā¦..
get better internet?
using wifi or ethernet?
Why did I miss out on that shotgun skin dammit
Ethernet
still active up until thursday!
he means the 12m skin
oh.... sadge
what's your ping when you look at the scoreboard?
I have the super rare helo skin 
sell your account
same š
let's sell our account for $100,000 when people call this game underrated and play it again
Im pissed i miss the tank skin
Does Sweden have today off as well?
yes today is still a holiday in SWE
We have an extended bank holiday, so most people are off work today
Aight, so no patch notes today then Iām guessing
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
there is
aye, they'll be out in a couple of hours last i read
There is cause I asked the CM and got a yes
Even while they are on a break?
@Embroyonicend_ Patch Notes in a few hours time, Update will follow tomorrow once the team is back in from the holidays.
117
Cause thatās how Twitter works

Oh nice š
Anyone else hopeful this will be the start of the turn around for this game?
me
Well I donāt doubt everyone is hoping for that to be the case
actually pretty curious
oh wait, wdyem with "turn around"?
@bleak nebula you looking out for jet changes too?
hopefully, but I kinda feel like it might not be high priority since there are enough other stuff to fix too
Yeah thatās my concern too. But some decent jet changes would be enough to bring me back for a couple weeks maybe
i wouldnt trust dice with anything rn
No camera roll toggle genuinely makes me nauseous though
same
who says that the 16% number isn't just copium PR
if i've learnt one thing in the past decade, it's that video game companies love their PR
money*
and ultimately their shareholders*
money*
good PR equals good stock activity
preorders
I also hope for some sort of balance changes are being made to vehicles in this patch, the latv shouldnāt have a cannon on it 
they did say something about vehicle balance
didn't they say they are gonna change the nightbird to a different section
One of the better looking skins that's different than the rotation - add it with the t-rex charm and good to goo
The nightbird needs a nerf itās so annoying
it needs an actual flight model
so not every schmuck is able to pull 60-0 games with it
If im able to easily go on mad streaks, someone who never learnt to properly fly the scout in bf4, then you know itās too easy to use
exactly
it's a thing with all vics in 2042, just way too casualized and toned down on the skill floor
Iām not afraid to admit that I should be really bad with it. But I tried bf4 after quitting 2042 and the difference was astonishing
Iām learning now how to fly the helis better, but 2042 just does it so badly
Also have you noticed how the tanks in 2042 have no angular damage multiplier? You could hit the side at any angle and deal max damage
tanks in general drive like ass in 2042
You need no consideration for getting into a position that allows for a stronger impact
and aiming the turret feels like you're playing the Ground Assault vehicles from Modern Warfare
I donāt know what they play like but the turrets are incredibly slow
tanks need more power to go uphill
other than that they are balanced
tank turrets turning slow makes it so its not overpowered
and you can always speed up the turning by moving the actual tank
didnt know that turret rotation in the past battlefields was overpowered 
thats a new one
Well you could do what 4 does and not have any turret rotation delay so you can be accurate when aiming
When you can 4 shot a tank with an AA tank while the turret can keep up with a tank moving away is pretty overpowered yeah
Waiting for note...
then don't have the AA tank 4shot an MBT
instead of nerfing the turret rotation on all tanks
or slow down the turret
game design
its perfectly fine when you actually move the tank along with the turret
means you actually need to do something other than aim
makes it harder to use properly, so its "bad"
expected you to say that, just proves my point
something isnt as easy as it used to be so its bad now
its clunky and unsatisfying to use. Everyone is used to the same similar vehicle game play from literally every previous title of the franchise
how is it clunky?
its shit game design, you can shill it as much as you want
you want tanks in a game, expect to use it like a tank is actually used
this is literally you right now
im driving modern MBT not some WW2 tank that doesn't have electric turret drives
the turrets move about as fast as a modern battletank moves
MUH realism
its not even realism
seems like you expect tanks to be able to recreate the helicopter meme
I kind of expect tanks to be unrealistic which is what they are
you cant just have your turret take 10 seconds to turn the other way when you also need to have your tank in position to reverse it outta a hot zone when people start swarming you with RPGs
To be fair itās better than tanks just sitting back and sniping like 20 people with 1 shell
Best tank clip ever is the one where they launch it in the path of a jet and blow it up with the cannons
this again shows that the devs don't know what Battlefield is, completly buthering the fast paced and dynamic vehicle gameplay for unnecessary supposed game balances which ultimately raise the skill floor and lower the skill ceiling
its not that hard, you literally can make it faster by doing one simple thing
by playing BF4 yeah
Turning faster, duh
I mean, if you know how to operate tanks, it really isn't difficult.
if you get stuck simply by turning your tank its not the tank that sucks
BF3 in portal is really good remake. I hope they add more maps to bf3 in portal
If you get stuck by just turning your tank, you aren't aware of your surroundings and put yourself in a position where you can't turn free and clear.. that's not a developer issue, that's a skill/user issue.
so slow
To be fair this game is more for vehicle players than any battlefield game in recent times
literally go play BF3 or 4 and then this shitty game, you'll see what i mean
literally what i said before
just because it takes a VERY TINY bit more to do the same thing, doesnt mean it sucks
Ppl put their tank in the middle of 20 enemies without moving then get pissed off when it's disabled in a matter of 3 seconds
Yep, that's a skill/user issue, not a developer issue.
yeah I actually had fun on bf3 maps in 2042, then I went to play bf3 again, and realised bf3 is still way better 
unironic use of "skill issue" i like it
people just wanna kill the whole enemy team without dying. is that too much to ask for smh
You're comparing apples to bananas on this one.
BF2042 is a whole new dev team. BF3 dev team had years of experience under them at this point.
2042 casuals who cry about vehicles being too OP when skilled users can actually use their aim, pulling the skill issue card 
Ć
If you think that turret rotation is slow, donāt play any game that actually designs tanks. That rotation is lightning speed compared to other games
Vehicles are OP
You canāt blow someoneās head off with a revolver when theyāre in a tank
only say noobs
we need wd-40 gadget in 2042 for faster turrets
.... yes
but games don't need to have the same devs to be compared
says the person that cant turn a tank without getting stuck
When it's a franchise game series, yeah you kinda do.
the vehicles being OP debate existed since BF3 when they raised the skill ceiling to reward actually good players
It doesnāt rotate on a dime!
oh no i press "A" while in a tank and now im stuck
Well BF3 jets were broken
but yall noobs
Every single bf game has an unbalanced vehicle type
devs always leave and join, so its never the fully the same team anway
Itās been that way since BF1942
With submarines and SPGs
BF3 jets were definitely broken
BF4 attack helicopters were broken
imo jets are too OP against ground vehicles
They are
all you have to do is fly by twice and any vehicle is dead
You're correct, however, when a very large majority of the development team decides to leave, thus giving you an entirely new development team to work on an engine they've never worked on before, it does make a huge difference.
Yeah but jets I think normally body vehicles quickly
the fact that a single jet can pretty much keep an entire battlefield clear of vehicles by spawncamping them says enough
there has to be a way to block those missiles
But to retort this; if the management listens to their developers and actually cares, your retention & turnover is practically non-existant.
Sure, you might get one or two people who will leave and go do their own thing; but a majority of this started, IMO, with "if you don't like it, don't buy it."
Post the video of the jet running over 20 people at spawn and bouncing off the ground only losing 30 HP
I would say Little Bird made a slightky stronger case, but both were pretty oof in their own way
almost like base AA in BF4 existed for a reason
Remember BF3 jets tho
fair enough
Actually, this part is not true in gamedev
āLook like I win againā
weren't bf2 jets stronger?
Jesus, that was rough. I hated being spawn camped by aircraft in my main spawn.
yes
Yep, good luck killing them murder machines
especially the AIX ones
ever time i spawn in a tank and hear the beeping as soon as i drive 10m i just leave, fuck that
I liked how bf5 handled vehicles outside of attrition.
patch notes when
Attrition is bs but I liked how the fighters needed bombers to stay up and bombers needed fighters to protect them.
I liked attrition tbh
I'd like to retort; I get that development teams have deadlines. However, just like with any job, your management team can be good or bad.
If your management team is bad and the workplace culture is bad because of it, you're more likely going to leave.
I think attrition was one of my favorite aspect of that game
Attrition ammo wise was alright but health wise it was shit. For infantry.
most battlefield patch notes get posted at 11 am eastern, can we expect the same for today?
10 minutes later than 10 minutes before they come out
True
Obviously, but even with good management teams quit rates are way larger than a couple people, for multiple reasons
Vehicles like tanks are pain since it lowers the pacing, some asshole blueberry can just blow up your supply station and there. No health or ammo.
Health attrition was a pain
And continuesly do it.
Ammo attrition made supports useful and engaged constantly

Thing is, I like what they did to circumvent it but they could have done more.
Make us scavenge health packa from dead medics.
Health attrition had positives and issues
BF1 had good vehicles besides bomber planes and the quick repair sometimes annoyed the shit out of me
I liked how it made people slow down and think a little bit between engagements
Not that heavy bomber piece of shit.
Oh no, I get that - sometimes the direction that something is going isn't the way they like, and they leave. There's multiple reasons why, probably too many to list, but when a development team isn't listened to; I'd imagine they'd want to leave and go somewhere else.
I liked not having to sit 10s behind a rock if there was no medic behind same rock
That shit was disgusting.
Fuck that heavy bomber
Emphasized making sure you were ready to go
Pre nerf 88a was just as bad if not worse in another aspect.
This
But still.
Actually, main reason is that worldwide temporary contracts make up a major chunk of gamedev workforce
Or sometimes they get offered a better opportunity elsewhere. That happens too.
The heavy bomber in BF1 just glided over the map and would kill like 29 people
Thing is, I liked using my med kit to jump start my healing.
I think attrition and resupply can still work for aircraft. Not sure about ground vehicles
But well.. without it and only healing 30 health without it just not fun.
Contracts are also a thing, yep. I'm a contractor myself.
Also, industry is expanding. Plus, people do all they can to avoid feeling like they're stagnating
The pacific handled aircraft attrition extremely well.
will may have any updates
I think if aircraft had to fly over a captured point to resupply it would be a reasonable thing
Ground vehicles though? It's shit. It's depressing.
Possibly but wouldnāt hold your breathe
Yeah you had to fly through a sky hook.
Donāt get me started on pacific map vehicle balance
Believe it or not in their current state, pacific planes are more balanced than European planes.
Trust me, I hate being a contractor. My pay isn't great, I get one week of PTO a year. In 2 more years, I go to 2 weeks of PTO.
One plane is not better than the other so obviously.
Solomon Islands also would annoy me because there was so many LATVās that the first point becomes hell with how that auto cannon would work
Aircraft having unlimited ammo always seemed weird to me.
I think if they could pull it off restricting the airdrop/vehicle call in system on 2042 to only work within captured sectors would be an improvement too
you should only be able to call in a range after a kill streak
It was easy to avoid them until the 2nd point
The 2nd point had LATVs that would just glide around
I remember when the spitfire had I think a thousand fucking rounds of primary ammo lmao.
Then theyād be useless by the time you get to middle island
And then you get calliopes hailing you with rockets
At that point things become spicier.
I've actually never had a problem with tanks on that on sector 3 since... I dunno. If the tanks provides overwhelming support the first point gets taken easily, and when they're on the second point they become bottle necked and that.
Give me a Bradley, and it's game over.
And even when they can't push the first point you can easily hide from them.
Bf3's IFV's were scary.
I still remember my first experience with one, actually scared the fucked out me.
I was a beast with them in 4
With the DOM DOM DOM.
Yeah, although it had miserable damage
The 50mm should be on these not on the jeep
At launch the spitfire with the 8 303's could one frame infantry and 109's if I remember correctly.
What's the best gun in 2042 design and animation wise
30mm with explosive rounds on 109 was one exception
Dogfights are a bitch lmao
Are there some absolutely cracked aircraft players at dice? People who really have mastered the heli/jet and have deep knowledge on it
I can't dogfight for shit, but I love to bomb.
Nvm the fact that rockets instantly resupplied. Yikes.
I don't know about know, but I know there were until very recently, at least
doubt it
I think people who test/tune them would become quite skilled and familiar with them
I'm not DICE, so I don't exactly pay attention to employee roster on a daily
Oh ok sorry
there's still a few who play BF4, that i know
But at very least there were pilots who were top 1%
And absolute hell to fight against
SkyIsClear's clan has one or two Dice devs
but basically no competitive jet or helo pilot plays 2042 for those vehicles so.
A group that Iām in a server with have been suggesting stuff for years and none of it ever gets through
I'd like to see the meetings of back and forth about aircraft balance lol
Gotta be one of the most contentious things
"noobs cried about jdams and stealth jet gunning them down, lets make jets utter shite so no feelings are hurt"
Hmmmm Iād probably be leaning towards the AK24 if it kept the C clamp grip thing from the beta
Vehicle babies mad
Tbh, planes have always dunked on people with ease, just varying levels of it
However atm Iād probably say the tan bolt action or even the PKP
āNOOO HOW COULD YOU RUIN MY FUNā
when pacth?
2042 jets are probably the weakest against infantry in a long time
As plane has a very simple and magical solution against anything that isn't a plane
"noobs couldnt aim smaws and stingers at helos, lets also make those unrewarding to use with a skill ceiling right above the already low skill foor"
"yes this is battlefield will be good btw"
Which is getting out of range within seconds
Yep.
Gvt for me just cause I'm a sucker for bf1 and bfv
I think it's ok for higher speed jets to not be able to do much to infantry
Yeah cause thereās nothing they can do against infantry
Shame that anyone with one brain cell could stay out of effective range and/or line of sight of both in a helo
Just like stingers and soflam are minimally effective against jets
Itās funny when people who like vehicles in battlefield rarely play other games where itās vehicle vs vehicle. Makes me wonder if they just want to farm infantry all day
Since they just gtfo fast
yeah thats literally the counter
Planes do be like that
are you not supposed to counter stingers?
I like jets, but air superiority is often not a popular game mode 
Counter that is about as "skilled" as breathing
Thereās a reason for that
about as skilled as using stingers i'd say, instead of fighting the other helo with your own
It depends.
Games that are pay-to-win aren't really fun to me. So WoT/WT? Yeah, no. I like even footing.
Air superiority was never popular because they werenāt able to farm everyone
Having been on both sides for masteries, Stinger is tougher to use than any air vehicle
LOL
To be fair those games arenāt p2w anymore theyāre just Grindy as all hell
I've seen some weird stinger and recoilless with soflam behavior where missles go wide and then loop around and dunk on the heli
I don't think they should do that, at least not m5 shots with soflam
šø
Air vehicles can be used for efficient farming even with brain smooth as ice rink
I honestly haven't touched WoT/WT in years because of it.
All players being able to use stinger without class restrictions make it harder for helis. Rao is a big counter-heli as well
Yeah itās just Grindy
@unborn heart plays basically for free and itās not p2w anymore
Well that's better.
And those canister launchers on the mav and tank can boop a NB in one shot almost
The premium ammo is just more expensive in game currency
Plus the random AI deciding to hit you with a recoilless from 400m
That's good. Glad they changed it.
this sums up 2042's development šø
Yeah, doing just fine. Especially uo to tier 6
Itās a good and bad thing tbh
ah thatās fair, it is pretty slick. What do you think the best animated gun in Battlefield (The whole series) would be?
The bad thing is, if youāre a heavy tank player you get penād instantly now
Would be a shame for the narrative if I didn't work on 2042. Oh wait
Because everyone has premium ammo
Wouldn't be a shame if 2042 was an actually good game, oh wait
Speaking of the Gvt tho, Iām really hoping they add an old western style repeater skin for it, it would look sick with the cowboy McKay skin
Itās funny how the vehicle main is mad at a game where the maps give vehicles the largest advantage weāve seen in a few years
There's still a decent amount of fun I get in it, although usually more from certain specialists
Literally infantry just running around with almost nowhere to hide
Won't make the game less dead or bring more of your fanbase back to your new releases.
You think so, for helis? I think there's a lot of maps that have very little air cover to break locks
Getting chopped up by auto cannons and rockets
It's called skybox
Heli can quite literally stay out of Stinger range
With ease. And still murder people even after 30mm nerf
That's why there needs to be more shit added to the maps. Trees, mountains, rocks, buildings, just additional cover in general.
Youāre giving me dĆ©jĆ vu from all of the things people have said after every battlefield launch in the past 10 years
Little birds are strong and assault chopper was pretty fine. Tho theyāve been nerfing them slowly
Jets arenāt just infantry farmers. Players with decent Gamesense actually play to help the team
Yeah I agree, like zavod had all that tree cover
Zavod was nice.
Assault chopper feels pretty useless tbh
It's funny how plebians, who never got to experience the satisfaction and learning curve of BF3 and 4 air vehicles, think that 2042 is the absolute pinnacle of game and vehicle combat of a franchise.
zavod was really good yeah
I agree, Iām pretty annoyed they have resorted to outright cutting parts of the map. Imo they just need to make them more packed in certain parts
Easy prey for jets, NB, and the transports
Air vehicles had bugger all curve outside dogfighting in 3 and 4
Zavod felt like a bc2 map, it was really fun
I think, running simulator 2.0 isn't what the game needed. Sure, bigger maps, but you don't need 5x the size of Hamada.
It's simply easier to remove than have to add more stuff, from a cynical point of view
you clearly never played those games
the absolute state of Dice/ā¬As dev team š
They arenāt 5x the size of Hamada. The running portion is greatly exaggerated, most of the time you can get to another point in under a minute
About 3,2k hours combined in both, actually
how many of those did you spend getting farmed by helos or jets instead of learning how to become a farmer?
that's why I was a no life dogfighter in those games 
Not many, as I worked through quite literally every mastery in game for both sides
Breakaway is a big ass map.
Looking back at your at your statements, that's believable LOL
That would be BF1942
I'm sorry that I dare to say something bad about the aspect of the game that always had the lowest floor
I hear a lot of high level pilots say that the air gameplay in 2042 is simplified but I have no real experience with flying much
It definitely is. It also happens to be one of my favourite Battlefield maps and i main infantry
In the meantime, might want to try a bit more concrete arguments than ad hominems
Thereās tons of infantry areas on Breakaway
I like how you use the word plebeian though incorrectly. Only a plebeian wouldnāt know how to spell it
If you can call using a jet as taxi to the next best flag a "skill floor"
or crashing your helo against an AA
or losing every dogfight
NOOOO MY VEHICLES
MUH COD
I think if they condensed the maps, added more cover of all sorts (buildings, rocks, trees, barricades, etc), moved the objs closer, it would be considerably better.
I just really wanna enjoy this game with full progression and weeklies on solo/coop this update. Would make it playable again for me abd a few people
I like both games thankfully
I learnt to fly in bf1, and got somewhat decent at dogfighting. If 2042ās jets werenāt so horrifically bugged more pilots might try it out
deffo is very simplified and boring, I don't even touch air vehicles anymore as somehow who was air vehicle main in previous games, in 2042 I'm infantry only player 
But the actual mechanics are just poor
^^^^^^^^^^^
And seeing the infantry experience for 2042 it's just pain.
And yet more projections completely unrelated to reality. Still waiting for actual arguments
And the weapons... just dull
Yeah I learned to fly cause of 5 when the pacific came out.
I actually wanted to take it more seriously then.
it's more fun than playing vehicles for me atleast
Hey, lets take a complete BF4 noob fight it out against the best player in SkyIsClear's clan
Sitting in a Bolte turret and getting that 100 kills in a game was funny
When infantry is more fun than vehicles than something's very wrong.
we'll see how there's no learning curve to air vehicles
Funny how you clearly didn't bother to read what I said
dogfight won't even last 20 seconds
BF4 was a shit game btw. The mechanics were absolutely garbage in terms of gunplay. Movement was heavily broken. So I guess being in a vehicle was the only play
Nvm the rats that sit backwards in their bolt a hundred to two hundred metres away just shooting people.
Having been on both sides for masteries, Stinger is tougher to use than any air vehicle
As I said that dogfighting was literally the only thing in BF3 and 4 air experience that required competence
you're clearly talking out of your ass
Make boltes take double damage from the back, Instantly kill them with a rocket launcher, I don't give a fuck.
Yup
Then they drive 70 mph
While everything else could be done perfectly fine by a potato connected to power cable
I feel like bf V did infantry gameplay the best, and bf 4 vehicle gameplay
I wouldn't even mind with the LATV Recon had that power cause of how little armour that has.
bro your context is wack to understand
I would like to hear how using stinger is tougher than an air vehicle
I guess hitting them with a stinger is a challenge since they can always break it off.
I think that's a pretty odd take considering stinger is just looking around and holding a mouse button and clicking
Stingers are piss easy to use in BF4
you point, click, forget about your target for a minute or two
battlefield friends
I found in bf4 the stinger was best used as a deterrence. If I jet goes to strafe you, target then and more often than not theyāll break off the strafe
I wouldn't mind a flak like cannon for infantry, Just something to drive the little birds away at close range.
^^^^^
People expect it to kill when in reality forcing them off a strafe is just as good
dodging stingers also isn't an easy to learn skill
- Stinger is easy to outrun or break, making it borderline useless, as it has poor velo. And that's assuming it even has range
- You lose any counter-ground capacity, which means getting around tanks goes from mildly competitive to screwed
I respectfully disagree then, I feel like having considerable distance between objectives is a long standing occurrence in Battlefield maps which only began fading in the recent games (which still had really fun maps though, just a different style.) I just feel like to provide the players with a feeling of an actual large scale battlefield (especially in modern day) it is important to maintain some degree of exploration while travelling between objectives, imo adding cover between objectives is totally viable, but I really disagree with reducing the maps to 3 lanes by cutting out all the other locations, thereās a reason people hated on the old cod map formula
Outrunning was more of a 3 thing
Igla was k once it got the buff late into 4, mostly as lock switches and empty locks gave you a fighting chance, albeit a very limited one
yes if noobs use stingers at like 5km distance
In 2042 it's more common to flare and retreat from a stinger only to be harassed by yet another stinger player in another sector. Increased player count and open loadouts has made stinger harassment almost constant
once theres two or three people packing stingers it becomes progressively more difficult and rewarding to dodge them depending on the map
Excited for the patch ??
or when an actually good player uses stingers
Modern engagements aren't more than 600m. Running around for 5 minutes between objectives isn't very fun.
No, some content would have been nice
Hardly, especially if you actually book it high after attack. On release, I would agree, now it's simple
I feel u š
yes
Especially as actual flare effect duration is longer than what visuals imply
weapon overhaul?
Especially in a fast paced arcade shooter
By the time flares stop blocking new lock, you can easily cover 500-600m
It's even less fun running between objectives in 2042 and getting killed by some fucking asshole in a bolte or sniped by some fuckhead in an attack helicopter that was just flying by.
Should be more weapons, here we are in april@almost May
If I wanted to run around without shooting everyone for 10 minutes Iād play squad
So thatās not just me thatās experienced that
real flare effect duration is what equipment tab shows you
Iām not playing a tact shooter
we all know 2042 isn't trying to be the fast paced and good Battlefield shooter experience everyone appreciates
Going from 2042 to bf5, Taking the plane made me realise how well done the maps were LMAO.
it's trying to be CoD and R6 with vehicles and huge ass maps
That's CoD for you
exactly lmao
I get to shoot people immediately
Bf5 is more r6 based cause everyone fucking lean spams.
R6 is more methodical.
Well, In my region anyways.
Rising storm 2 is instant in the battle, wish theyād make another soon
Yeah, you literally claimed BF is trying to be two games that are faster paced than BF to prove it isn't trying to be fast paced
So if 2042 is like cod, idk which cod it would be like
They are
thats why u gotta uninstall and throw BF4 on instead 
Game is called ā83
United Offensive might get a slight nod here
I hate BF4 so Iād never reinstall that
There's no fun in running through piles of nothing with no cover. If objectives were closer and the map was made around it wouldn't be pain.
Yea but itās Cold War, meh
So we have a date for the patch notes?
Very slight
Fair
It could be interesting
Kinda ironically, Bf5 had the lowest movement speed alongside bf1 but it has the fastest pace in all the battlefields that I played.
Though I'd count hardline in having a fast pace too.
Using the G3 in a tactical shooter thatās action based? Yes
Can confirm
Thatās why I liked both of them tho
Nahhhh Miki it's about that IMI Galil.
You donāt run around for 5 minutes though
Even with the lower movement speed
Don't forget your baby like that.
Iām down to try it, sick of AAA companies wrecking their franchises
It's curious that in terms of kill opportunities in similar time frame 1 was leaps and bounds ahead of any other BF of the decade
Somehow BF1 and BFV youāre constantly in action with slow movement speed
Nah he's right, You run for 5 minutes because it takes you two and half minutes getting to the objective and then you get killed midway, Therefore you have to run all that way again.
But you do. Me going between 2 objectives on Hourglass takes about 5 minutes on foot.
people who complain about the amount of walking in 2042 tend to like the meat grinder maps
Map design is the key problem with 2042
I might actually say that 128 players caused the map design as well but there could be good 128 player maps
Maps were just better designed, Even if bf1 had more open spaced maps.
which is when DICE tried to emulate COD
mostly cause you only start seeing infantry at very close range since the spotting and visibility in V is doglooo
I do like meat grinder maps and open maps
BF1 made open maps feel like there was a ton of action in them
Because there was
so everyone just runs around the maps
it's not difficult seeing people in a range in 5.
BF1 was incredibly meat grindery lol
I actually don't like meatgrinders... large maps are my favorites. Issue is, there are no lanes of combat
Though I speak with my eyes being adjusted to it.
which, was fitting for WW1
It was great ahh
I noticed that since I just end up shooting at the same shade of rocks without thinking.
Even if you took maps like Bandar in BF3, it had multiple organic lanes of engagement
Grand bazaar baybee.
BF1 and BFV had proper infantry engagements
Where you could get fairly consistent movement forward/back with a bit more condensed combat and movement
bf3 had great maps
Be shooting like 4-5 people in a trench
based as hell, I like the points in most of the 2042 maps because there's so many ways to get to them, so it makes them not meat grinders!
Then seeing another 4-5 people
Now I have flashbacks of turning a corner on vanguard and I just see 6 to 9 people staring at me Miki.
besides the lack of cover, i think 2042 maps are my favorites design wise
Generally, my go-to approach in any Battlefield is to fight for flags on circumference, as you can make better impact at larger benefit
yup! rotating from hotspot to hotspot is the best way
My issue is when you do clear and cap a point, for most points on the maps in 2042 there's no reason to stay there and defend it, because nobody will be coming to contest anytime soon
I usually fight where the action is.
I like kills, I like action and that happens where the flags are.
If it's 15vs15, whether you are there or not makes a minor difference. If flag is 3vs3, you become a major factor, and you can gain the same benefit of point bleed from flag capture at lower cost of manpower
10 minutes later.
So you end up running and running to the next or trying to get a vehicle if your call in isn't timed out
It's how I hit big clips from time to time.
some of the best firefights ive had are on flags with like 10 people on it lol
The games over
Kinda depends on sector, I'd say
the sectors are wonderful
That's why I like Breakthrough on V.
YEA THANK YOU
Breakthrough the action is consistent.
A fellow breakthrough player
i love breakthrough, 128 breakthrough is really fun
General issue is that team that is too obsessed with certain flag will typically lose by dropping everything around it
That's the best part about it.
Like on kaleidoscope the data center is fun to fight in, but nobody is ever there. It's a hike from any other point on the map
I'd play breakthrough more if it were played more.
boooooo
I don't like sectors tbh
Always in the action
Curious, that's where fights would often involve 10+ people per side for me
I used to play breakthrough all the time on release when it was actually popular.
i know im a minority but i love most of 2042's design decisions
Before 2042 it'd be an uncommon playlist.
You OCE people are screwed.
yessss thats where all the best ones are
I mean we at least have conquest and ways to enjoy it.
That's all I play
and the rooftops of the two points, with the ziplines between em
I can't hear you over the sound of my rifle wiping a squad because I have an option to flank
I play operations only in BF1
and the point below the two towers
I found a way to enjoy conquest and I can consistently score 15 to 20K worth of points a day cause all I do is attack objectives. :)
In a way, I've found a way to have fun on conquest which is kinda ironic.
Did someone say conqueā¦ā¦.zzzzzzzzz
I did, best mode
^
I nearly hit a hundy bomb on TDM a few months ago.
Joy of Conquest is that it puts more emphasis on your general positioning
Team swapped cause things weren't looking hot for the other side, They kept reviving each other. I had my fucking BAR out LESH GO.
Grand operations was awesome
Instead of just mindlessly running around with The Brainless Blob
I prefer breakthrough because I'm not being shot in the back all the fucking time.
But conquest is an alright mode since you can just cruise on it.
This too
Plenty of room to find somewhere cozy and fall asleep
Breakthrough was fun, because it fixed my depression.
It killed any brain cells I still had from lack of use 
Maybe if the enemy has a respawn beacon but once you clear that out they are going to be running at least 300m to get back at that point once the squad is wiped
Camping in conquest annoys the shit out of me
Grand Operations took the āoperations took too longā complaint from BF1 and made it actually take way too long
LOL
I just like both, battlefieldās gameplay and strategy is what attracts me to it the most
Me like to bang drum
Finally.
The magical thing is, in Conquest you can do that complicated thing called "going around someone"
4pm, on the dot
ITāS HAPPENING!!!!!!!!!
Cheers!
I like Airborne from BFV but I wish I didnāt have to play Grand Ops for it
That sounds hard
Letās give this a read
Have you updated?
"Assists can now trigger when a teammate kills an enemy and either of them were covered in smoke you deployed." that is fun
patch notes today, patch tomorrow
Can never say no to use of smoke getting some love
I see
For some reason I canāt scroll through the notes on my phone
Lmao, the C5 drone seems still out there
No performance improvements or optimization?
Anyone else struggling to scroll through the notes?
@pine roost
LET"S GO!
:0 my time has come




š
Wait, actually I donāt think thatās the same thing. Thatās specifically just the third person camera for portal vehicles
here comes everyone
yeah
i wholly approve of this name
How do I open my scorebord on ps4
oof
Should be by holding start, Enrique.
finally
wait... this was an actual thing...wtf
Thnx
2042 is the greatest battlefield game ever
Sundance
Fixed Anti-Armor Grenades that locked on to targets which were too far away
Anti-Armor Grenades now filter by angle and distance in a more accurate way, and have the same priority for air/ground vehicles
YEEES
@shy latch I have 15 ping
Scatter Grenade detonation timings adjusted to let them explode quicker YESSS
this is may the last chance to bf2042 or almost every player will leave
I wonāt lie this is more significant than I was expecting
Thank you DICE - good job with keep working with the game, I still have hope for it!
Season 1 will add maps and weapons but itās not going to change the core of this game. If people are waiting for that theyāre waiting for a new game
Of course, this is assuming a billion other things donāt break when the patch goes live
There are lots of calls for relaunching the game
Specialists will still be in, nothing is just going to completely change how the game operates
YES YES SCATTER BUFF
VOIP
FINALLY I WILL BE ABLE TO GET TIER 1 SUNDANCE WOOOOOHOOO
then 2042 will defo die before the end of this year
Thatās big that to me makes me wanna play now š
SUNDANCE WONT BOUNCE IN THE AIR LIKE A BALL AFTER HITTING GROUND SOMETIMES
the earlier the better anyway
You can abuse high powered which does 26 damage and has infinite damage, They might change that but still.

AND SMART GRENADE BUFF, and emp assists will count more often!!
And I could care less. I stopped playing the game November of 2021
I bet someone in the dice team loves C5 drone
Iād have to say uhh prob bfv kar98k or the bf4 deagle
YES! I love Sundance she's my favorite specialist!
they should just focus on making a new game
I still hope we get the points system back. āExpā is just so unrewarding and not as satisfying as points
POG NEW PAIK AND RAO BUFFS
To be fair the main devs are probably working on the next game
Itās not like the whole team is still working on 2042
Knowing what I do out of game dev, They're floating ideas around for the next one. Throwing rough sketches on what to do.
im still disappointed on no new performance improvements or optimization
Yeah nah the main team is working on it still.
No one will buy next battlefield - if they master 2042 players will be back
Idk about that, once a game releases people usually move onto a new project
Highly possible, the game probably will be abandoned after season 1
probably gonna use most of feedback for next game 
they better be

patch notes for 4.0