#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 4036 of 1
Sounds like karma.
I can hardly practice my sniping with stationary targets.
That's what I said 🤣
they need to try emulating valves AI or something... bots with aimbot moving around like blueberries isnt a fun sight
Why does bfv plays way smoother tho
Damn work is boring tonight. I need to bring my gaming pc to the office
It's great for farming kills to level up your guns though.
Older hardware. Optimized software?
You don't ignore them... But you can work through them... And that's one thing I will give dice .. they do manage to fix them pretty quick... But still game score needs to factor that in now, they shouldn't be in there in the first place... If the game gets better with time, the score of the game should follow a similar system
@orchid root BfV has had more updates
my issue is, is that they cant be fixed if dice has yet to even address them lmao
yeah i feel like that ones pretty obvious
Mackay is my favorite operator now.
I use angel the most
Except he needs a Gillie suit.
2042's ai is impressive in some scenarios, disappointing in others
you mean this giraffe?
🤣
If i remember correctly a dice dev has responded to a compiled list of all the bugs, its also because they just waiting for the next update to send it out all in one
Angel is the best. He's basically every class in one player
I only use Angel for his armor refill ngl.
When they first intoruced him some of the influancers said he was a weak specialist. I knew he was going to be the best
The bots seem to have more braincells than real players in regards to PTFOing in conquest and using vehicles as a team
You basically don't need any squad members
Those influencers are morons... they play exactly like blueberries, just run around lone wolfing trying to "snipe" all match long
They honestly should remove angels load out crate
He is the most generic, most allround, but he doesn't include all the more specialized specialists.
I barley use it unless I need cover
Make it so you can change a single item in your loadout. That's it
Angel is only as good as two players. Anything Angel can do two or more players can do better.
The load out crate makes switching to lockons a little too OP
make it so sundance falls like a rock after 10s in her wingsuit
Fuck no
Broken: the crossplay system, the friends system, the mouse and controller input, pc perf issues, aim assist for controllers, squad system, the ui( slated to be upgraded in the next patch with more customisation options), audio in general, poor maps
Missing: in-game lore about the world, faction definition, stats( rumored to be in the works) proper scoreboard( same), server browser, persistent lobbies with a rotation, platoons, dogtags, melee weapon variety
or make it so heavy projectiles can penetrate dozers captain america shield
No
You're saying make the futuristic wingsuit shittier than irl wingsuits?
yes
Make it so dozer can throw his shield and have it come back automatically
Do you just want all the operators nerfed to validate you playing only Angel?
Lol
Also let the shield reflect tank shells.
make it so wind knocks sundance out of the map and she dies like shes supposed to
Boomerang Shield like the guys from Australia
it already does, bounces them right back at you sometimes
Make it so sundance can give themself a speed boost by farting
Sounds like you have a personal problem with Sundance.
They should remove Sundance grenades
Nah
Def not
they should give any mouth breather the ability to constantly fly behind enemy lines
Hell yeah they should
Stay salty
It's cheese low skill spam. The only special ability should be fly
Sundance grenades aren't OP
I'm not salty I love taking that chicks head off
Then cope
I know they aren't Op she can't do anything by herself
Just yesterday people where complaining Sundances grenades need to be buffed. I swear they'll complain about anything here.
peeling her muffin cap back blue with the K30 vibes
god i hate sundances AA nades, they always seem to lock on air vehicles 600 meters away and miss the very obvious tank that is literally right in front of me
Rip
"AA" maybe, i dont play her so maybe im missing something
Fax and it's so annoying
Sundance is poggins
it stands for Anti armour not anti air
ah
God I hate not being able to use the AA rocket launcher on tanks.
yeah im stupid but not an idiot
tbh her nades shouldnt do anything to heavy vehicles
If i feel like I'm not having enough fun in conquest i just switch to sundance. Fun mode activated
Her skills are trash for people that aren't good at gun play
meh i never know what specialist to pick
Mackay is fun.
I just go with angel for amor and ammo with a spawn Beacon
sometimes i wanna play angell others i just want to go boris
Boris's turret is best boi
And you think it's a bad thing that there are options for people aren't good at gunplay? GTFO
I can't play boris his character makes no sense to me
Sundance is pretty fun aside from her weird ass AA nades that never lock on properly
if you want team play and usefullness then 80% of the "specialist" are dog water
Then play someone else. Also no one asked
If they removed all specialist and just kept angel the game would play great
Turret helps pew pew and gives you über spots, what needs to make sense?

boris is funny but sundance is funnier
@still vault it's mostly his back story and the look of his character model
They should remove sundance and give everyone wingsuit
His character model sticks out you can always tell he looks like he runs with a limp he has a different type of run than other players his skin tone also sticks out in rooms
how do you know theres an enemy boris in the room you entered? You start to hear a bunch of beeps
Make Sundances grenades more powerful and give everyone wingsuit.
Basically he is easy to spot
Keep sundance as they are and buff parachute
They should buff the Indian specialist
make sundance nades lock onto the damn tank infront of me rather than the fucking chopper literally almost half a kilometer away
We're used to being ignored
and his turret will never hit you if you just maintain a light jog
Make falck 18 years old and a supermodel
Rao is awesome though. You just need to get good.
make her pleasant to look at, same with potato face paik
never really put any significant hours in rao so cant say muchg
Nah he's not, he's hacking takes 10 minutes
He's pretty good for anti-vehicle. I see some people use him in TDM though 
Rao looks frail and skinny
No it doesn't. You're just bad.
i dont even see how you can argue that rao is good
It's also a little weird they would pick an Indian as a IT specialist
That's what I use him for. He's OP as fuck for soloing tanks.
Bruh
also weird that youd give your only asian in the game the chinkiest voice and lines
Based
Fire first rocket, hack them, fire second rocket, additional rockets may vary.
His infantry hack takes too long tho
Its already easy soloing tanks, I use rao to fuck with helis
I use Angel to fuck with Helis.
He may be good, but he's the worst specialist for sure
very easy when tanks cant fight back, at all LMAO
Well not the apache that sits at the edge of the skybox, can't hurt that one tho
Theres a good point i havent seen made yet.... probably has been though.
It's okay, can't hurt us either.
It has
All these specialist wouldn't be as bad if we could just cover their faces from the start and remove the voice lines
its called anti armor so at least actually work against armour :(
It can...
Kek
I mean, if the pilot is absolute God and crack shot.
God everytime some mackay ends up in the end of match screen i just go into an rage i hate his voicelines so much
Make sundance anti armor target infantry that have armor instead of tanks
They were pretty blatantly generalizing people by culture and race in this game
I love making people rage. That makes me want to play Mackay even more.
LETS GOO
Are you trying to suggest what they did with the diverse cast is a bad thing?
oh boy
@tame cobalt no
I mean, let's be honest. Russia would never have an ethnically diverse military.
They don't. These are mercanaries.
@cosmic brook you mean no Afro-Russian?
Jewfro Russians maybe.
Welcome to 2042, it's a glorified proxy war with nothing at stake...
No pants verse no pants for the win
I hope for the next map it actually looks like the worlds in ruin
wow this game really died off huh hardly anyone playing
Every triple a fps multiplayer.

That's false
Well it won't. You'll see the aftereffects of a landslide hitting a research facility though. But it's not an area where there has been a war before the match starts
False
And we may get an earthquake event on this map
reduce screen shake slider to 0 
man i remember they advertised earthquakes and tsunamis not just tornados
No thanks the 89 earthquake was enough for me
Then your memory sucks. Sorry to hear
👍 cool I've been pranked then lmao
😂😂 nice name m8 @arctic grove
Every battlefield, battlefront, and call of duty.
I went through the comment section of a Jackfrags video, and it's filled with people calling him a 'shill' for saying something good about 2042. It's just sad that it has come to this.
well good on jack for actually liking a game damn
Not sure if it came directly from EA people, but people have said there will be more events like that coming in the seasonal updates.
Oh cool
The funny thing is, he has been critical of the game. The difference between him and other Battlefield youtubers is that he hasn't been constantly shitting on it.
Earthquake, tsunami, meteor storm, volcano,
There feels like a lot of the community form other games got into 2042 and trash it a lot for not being the same as other games they play outside of the battlefield universe
Remove all the non sense weather events from a multiplayer game, keep that for rhe singleplayer
no
No 

If I'm not wrong, call of duty before 2013, battlefront 1 and two, (the old ones) were good. Can't say about bf though, as I'm a recent fan for two years straight.
That isn't the discussion.
Lol
I'll pay you to talk good about 2042, as after all, I am EA itself
It's high stakes high rewards
The W is at stake, damnit!
That's why I loved bf1 operations, it gave you clear instructions, the map view showing the direction of the push, the objective cities, and victory or defeat having real life or atleast speculative consequences, winning and loosing felt like it mattered more..
Load up your favorite non-binary specialist and get to the war no pants
haha no pants
Again... Nothing is at stake, nothing tangible atleast... But the illusion of choice, and consequences... That's what would've elevated it more imo
It was an illusion in those games as well. You just fell for it in those games.
Exactly, cuz the game tried to pull you in, here it doesn't do that
➡️ 🐐
Bf1 was missing a lot of options from previous titles
I will admit that... It was streamlined and well, for the lack of a better term "casual-ified" a lot
Good
Aka-art once made a video talking about the community form different titles. How during bf1 lifespan there is basically a new generations of players that see bf as what bf1 is while others see it as bf4 or 3. Now we have bf1 and 5 generation and soon to be 2042 who will only want specialist
Good
Because heros aren't In enough games right?
Yes
Can't wait to see what they'll do with the next game, hopefully it's gonna be just as fun as 2042 and also piss off the shitty "community" just as much!
I don't get why cosmetics make people so butthurt.
I suppose this is why I also don't understand racism.
I mean... There's a lot more nuances than that... You've got people like me as well, who came in at the world war era, but heard a lot about the modern era to want to experience that too... Bf1 is the best for me, but I can also see why bf4 dominates... Fucking shame that innit?... We come in hoping to experience what you oldies were so in love with and we get this...
Good
You must be lonely
Oh no the new game made for a different market is a new game made for a different market!
BF3 is probably my all time favorite.
You got the wrong perception of what I think
they don't unless they are cringe and funky
You should always market to a new market but never do your loyal fans dirty
2042 is exactly what the bf4 peeps asked for. BF4 but for today's market
I think your full of it, but who am I to convince you different
Expansive battles. Larger than life. Leave one fight to join another with out ever leaving the server... im not a traditional battlefield player so im curious what else MADE it unique
Vehicles were unique back in the day it seemed too
i was going to respond then i saw your nickname
4 more hours till I'm off work, nothing like being paid while discording
What else made it unique: nostalgia
That's the thing, it wasn't a complicated formula, big battles with 2-4 aspects of combat which isn't arcadey, but also not full milsim-y, it's the fact that battlefield didn't need to change.... For the last 2 entries, they've kinda changed a lot of things.. would've made sense to basically take all of that, so 3-4-1-5, and combine it's best elements into 1 perfect beast first...the reason why everyone says cod is the same because it's allure is in its simplicity, combine with the fact that it's an annual release with very few things changing causes cod fans to say that... think of this, between 3-V how many cod's have we had?
100% arcadey
100% arcadey means NO 1 shot headshots
playable realism
Time to play conquest large on orbital 
I'll be here getting paid
Halo's considered arcadey?
Yes lol
it's a science fiction game
Im having troubles seeing a path from bad company 2 to battlefield 5 without losing fans along the way
Or 3 to 5 for that matter
The jump from 4 to 1 was pretty bad
It wasnt bad but it wasnt for me
i didn't like the idea of 1 being a ww1 game but it still felt like a bf game
I mean, that was the golden era of battlefield.
I regret not playing 1 knowing how it ended up coming together nicely
I know 1 is a great game
They have lost fans... That's why I limited the choices from 3-V, there were separate elementa from each game that the playerbase agreed was perfected( or atleast damn near) in each entry... I'm not saying that game would please everybody, or that it'd cause everyone from 3-V players to come back... But it would've been a damn sight better than this
you like only modern shooters we get it
Im agreeing with you as a whole i just have little questions for my own understanding
The fanbase has had a large impact in ruining the franchise.
Yes I agree
It was split up to much between history field and people that wanted the milisim-ish, current setting shooter
Battlefield 1 sold a massive amounts of copies it was very successful.
There needs to be a #tactical room or something so that people know where to go to talk serious teamplay and to try and make it easier to put a team together
There is no social, squad, team support in the current game
Team together?
As in. If i want to try and play the game seriously with no trolls. I cant just click a button and join in a game where people play objective
I just imagine there is a core base of players somewhere that are open to newbies and try to play the game in a progressiive way
Nah not ranked for sure. Just a server known for teamplay
@drifting willow what do you play on pc or console
Ps5.
I mean, there are clans for that... I cant say a team.. but you could probably get like 6-8 guys so around 2 sqauds playing and communicating together
You can join us when we play if you want to add me
But my schedule is weird I work most nights and sleep all day
Even if the in-game system is dead.. old clans from 3-V days, or even before that exist.. they have their discords, you can search them up
What about k&m support on ps5 for bf42?
They offer a lot of playstyles, all the way from causal to full on milsim
A lot of the old clans moved games because they weren't being supported
True, but there still should be a few
There are a few MOD, TOS etc
That's sony, not ea dice
I think smaller ones like SNS and FOAM still exist
I use to be able to find clans no problem but i stepped away from gaming for the 5 years or so and dont really understand how to go about finding open clans like i did before
Or is SNS a big one?.. I don't remember... Don't even know if they're operational now
I have a chat with a few people that constantly play from all the previous titles
It's kinda funny I've actually met people in real life I've met through bf3 and bf4 and bfV
Thats what im talking about towntax!
It's rare but a few games I've made some real life friends 😏
I used to but got sucked into a career for a bit and lost touch with it all
I mean... The current bunch of guys I run with I met during early bf1... They're absolute windowlickers
But I like them all for that fact

Ya. Time seems to flatten out casual differences
Still going on i see
Okay. I was hesitant to try SVK after getting so chummy with the DM7. But I gotta admit, this thing slaps.
SVK OP
Orbital conquest large tho 😍
Svk good
Svk is pretty much two shot kill
Orbital is a good map actually it got lot of hate during open beta lol
We didn’t know it would be one of the best
True that
Orbital got shat on before people gave it a chance. It's a very well designed map
Bruh it’s terribly designed, but the best in the game in comparison 

We need a map that's more indoors cqc like operation locker
It's a great mid-range gun.
💯 hope the new map is more like that
150-250 meters is mid-range right?
Tired of these cqc maps that are set outside mostly making it not feel cqc
We have a leaked image of it, guess what it’s like
@dusky blade a field?
Yeah, I'd stretch that to 300m
Is it ? I haven’t seen it lol
It’s more open than any other map
Wtf
nooo
To be fair, it's a concept art, not any actual image, that too a very old and crude one
They haven't been giving us indoor cqc maps for a long time
BF1 had lots of CQC places
Is the flashlight actually useful?
I was playing bf4 than
No
Addicted to helis and jets? Top tier pilot? Leaderboard hunter? Dm me for more info to join the best air community in battlefield.
Fdv, Amiens, Argonne, middle of suez, paschendale
The one cqc bf1 map I remember is the forest one and the setting made it not feel cqc to me
The setting outside makes it feel more open than it is.
Every single BF1 map has close quarter areas
Most maps do
Bruh but it wasn’t open
Even Sinai has the B and C points
I don't know what to tell you the map didn't feel like a good cqc to me
It was one of the best maps 
bf1 =#other-games
This is #battlefield-2042
I loved it personally
Ok
Argonne isn't a small map per se, it's a mid size map, but it had a lot of trenches, cover, chokepoints and topographical differences that you could use to force quick and close gunfights...
Pearl market, operation locker, metro, outbreak, flood zone, propaganda, sunken dragon, zavod all great cqc maps
I don’t recall many trenches, more stuff like terrain deformation, fallen trees, stuff like that
Why not 
Front of D, and A, D has the most trenches infront of it... But yeah, it didnt have too much of that
Iunno think it was the game in general at the time I wanted it to go awya
Ohhh yeah there was one area with trenches, it was handy for when you’re losing terribly and need a place to hold out lol
BF1 man, a masterpiece
@dusky blade did you start playing the battlefield games with bf1?
Damn it's not common for me to run into someone that played previous games and think bf1 was the best.. Like I said the game looks nice.
Least favourite would be BF3 or BF4
Maybe 1943 but it doesn’t really count
It’s not really a main line game
this game really isn’t worth the price is it
Bf3 was cool I remember when bf4 was new people were pissed about the change in spotting. The spotting as continues to get worse each game
if you were there back in the day you’ll remember how much BF3 damaged the franchise.
It was a DISASTER
No one wanted the 3d spotting or whatever it was in bf4 everyone thought it was easy mode and hated it
Better than 2042 at least. You need to get the tiny dot directly on the target, and it tags their position for 3 seconds
always packet loss.........
Sundance grenade kills are v hard to get in conquest
Never gonna get that t1, but i want that tier 4
Just keep spamming
Conquest large is sickkkk on the good maps
Grind t1 skins on breakthrough
Can't
People pile a lot in maps like breakaway first stage
Breakthrough has been dead since day 1 in my region
Oh rip
It'll probably stay dead at this rate
It's not dead for me
Are you in his region?
Been playing quite a bit 128 player Breakthrough the last couple of days. It's pretty cool and quite different than conquest.
Breakthrough can come alive in my region if they add a server browser
Idk his region
Conquest definitely feels more casual
We were talking about his region not yours.
Ratio + based
What is the logic around that? How would the server browser help?
When is the next patch due?
Next year
I just learned the pistol has attachments.

January? Summer?
January but not confirmed it's my guess
If people see the breakthrough game in the server browser they'd join it. With the current matchmaking, everyone has given up on the mode so there's no chance people will fill a server
Most likely the end of January, but will you still care at that point?
I don't think it will be end of January lol
Anyone that doesn't agree with a server browser is just flat out satanic
People usually sort their server browser searches. If they usually don't find anything they will stop searching and the result will be the same.
Imagine defending the lack of a server browser.
Cool, can still join nearby regions..
I don't see why not. Sure, its not what I wanted but its not like there are lots and lots of games out there offering the same kind experience.
5th friend joins chat. What sever you guys on? Ummmm
There's a difference between defending the lack of a serverbrowser and disagreeing with what advantages a serverbrowser actually bring.
Too bad they can't join your squad because the squad sizes are tiny.
Idk what to tell you, server browsers are extremely beneficial for less popular modes in low population regions, i know just by comparing my experience with bf1 and 2042.
The biggest issue I have so far is the lack of explanation between weapon attachments. Like, I doubt the average Joe is gonna know the difference between bcg and a rattlesnake.
@violet sluice it's weird people join chat to play realizes they can't play with us and leave lol
Heck, I only know from a completely different gaming franchise.
Someone is being rude to me in game chat
Report to the internets!
Can't be 2042, there is no in game chat.
Lel
I told my team to use soflam so I could target tanks with my jet in game chat but someone said they would blow up my jet I want him banned
Sever browsers offer players the opportunity to find what they want to play, and fast. Matchmaking has always been hated by pretty much every fps player, and that will never change. Tell me what benefit not providing a server browser does other than hiding the amount of players playing the game.
Can you request orders aggressively?
We are giving you guys crossplay now so you can play with all your friends.
You must now make it your goal to piss that person off even more.. 
Time to swear but get censored
You mean beyond being a spammy idjit? 🙂
But it can only be 4 friends and if your not on the same platform you can talk
Yee
Most people prefer Discord anyway.
Nah, I've pretty much given up on playing the objective with randoms. My squad is spread to the four corners of the map always
#next-gen
@cosmic brook yeah old Gen console players love discord
Use Skype
@violet sluice I have next Gen
#woosh
Lol. Multiplayer is a lot of fun when you're in VC with your squad.
Hey actually I haven't tried yet. Does next Gen Xbox and ps5 allow you to talk in game chat than?
just checking ...K30 when firing is not very manoeuvrable ? got a new logitech 502 hero and I can ADS ok, nut when firing ...left and right seems to drastically drop DPS
No
Some of the advantages of not having a serverbrowser: more even teams, less leavers, quicker filling servers, less people in queues, quicker joining experience.
Since you didn't ask for disadvantages I wont list some of those.
Do consoles support Discord? If not, there's the app for phones. Problem solved. Sure, its not ideal, but its all according to DICE's masterplan.
I mean, there's text chat, but not voice chat... If you get my drift @arctic grove
People see captain's hardcore with 3 people in Qué and still join because they know it's a good server
server browser still so much better
The Qué is no advantage
only that you could vote for the map u want to play
And how do I hear my m8's on phone while listening to game audio?... Earbuds in the phone, put that in my ears and then put the headphones of my controller over my ears?...
Its all i play for now. Find it better for progression but im probably wrong
Levelling up my guns against bots feels like cheating. But I'd also rather just focus on objective in multiplayer, not farming kills.
Yesterday had the ghosting bug affecting a team mate: https://youtu.be/5-L81kLuFZk He was following me and rezzed after I went to pick on his ghost's nose and getting shot.
and if you think about that you have to leave after every game in order to queue again, servers were you would stay on the server wouldn`t be a disadvantage either in terms of queue time
Rereading those advantages and they kinda don't hold water
So how does matchmaking make more even teams over server browser that is?... And how does it ensure lesser leavers?.
, @prisma anvil they are match making by skill base
Yeah, I know where you're coming from and there really isn't a valid excuse to omit chats. Playing with Nintendo Switch we usually have Discord open and phones on speaker. Not wearing headphones. It is a damned bother, but at least we get to play together 😐
Basically dice is telling us we will have more fun if they pick rather than us
How does any of those things equate to the lack of a server browser? Also keep in mind in 2042 you can't switch your team anyways so that point is moot. Why do more people leave servers in your mind with a server browser?
I mean have we confirmed it somehow? Cuz if not I'm having a hard time believing that... How would you balance infantry against vehicle guys?... What about spm through kills vs other actions?..
This game feels like Apple designed it.
@prisma anvil based off player stats we can't see because it's a Legacy feature just like the server browser
Damn..... I don't relate to that but I do feel bad, that's some serious loops you gotta go through, jesus
You can have a button to auto join players into the skill base matches and still have a browser
You can also have auto balancng
On PC you can switch your team in-game. But, it requires that your social party teammates don't have their teams full. When you leave your current team there is a HIGH CHANCE you'll find them. This being DICE, this doesn't work 100%.
@violet sluice auto balancing by squad each map on the same server
Like every fps game does
That's not switching teams, that's switching squads.
Oh, crap. Yeah. Soz
Yeah but you gotta have a stat(s) that serves as the basis for the balancing right?... How do you calculate that?.. not being argumentative.. just asking, could it be based off wins-losses?...
At this point you are trying to justify a poor decision.
You can't tell me not allowing your 5th friend to join your match is better than getting him into his own match by himself better
@prisma anvil true
- @violet sluice Quick Join instead of a server browser prevents more than 4 people stacking on one server. Also, the server can behind the scenes balance the teams so they are even (don't actually know if 2042 does this but it is an advantage of it nonetheless) - More even teams make people less likely to leave.
Again, there are ofc. also a bunch of disadvantages of not having a serverbrowser, I actually like serverbrowsers, this is just about gamedesign.
team stacking was one of the most annoying things in the old BF games lol
It's a casual game
it is a casual game
And there should be a balance after each round
Meaning if you had 2 squads of friends the other squad may be on the other team next match how is that stacking
DICE's idea of balance is how you often lose of win games by 900 tickets
its good to prevent people like team stackers (who treat the game like a professional tournament) from pub stomping
Preventing stacking to you, preventing clan matches to me.
This make no sense previous titles switched squads around
lose OR win, I meant
portal exists
Portal exists with out being able to switch teams
Portal is not the answer though.
why is portal not the answer
yeah but that just requires a minor change
Indeed. I just showed some of the advantages and as I said there are disadvantages too.
Portal is a tacked on game mode. The main game is AoW.
The advantages aren't enough for the change to be good
Did anyone know that you could put medic and ammo crate on casper's drone
as you said, you personally like serverbrowser and thats how the main part of the community feels like. So I ask myself why you are arguing against it and trying to defend incompetend dice for leaving out so many "legacy features" that were included in all the previous battlefield titles.
its not about game design, its about how you threat your community, and dice is doing a really bad job at that.
Clan battles is a side event that only a small portion of the community takes part in. The casual AOW mode is the main game. You can insert clan battles and your own custom rules into portal
I get the reason behind leaving it out. It was a bad choice though
Yeah but you gotta remember, they killed off clans, squads are limited, and even still, you can technically circumvent that and get upto 8-9 people in a game , I've done it(it's just bloody obtuse).. not to mention the playercounts been doubled... Also, isn't the entire point of a bf game to play with friends, I know stacking was bad, but you know how you countered it?... By playing with friends... But yeah I see where you're coming from, we need data though, whether this actually made games more fair and balanced, but I will still maintain that SB is necessary as bf games wouldn't have survived without it outside of the us and eu
@slim quiver at this point your probably right since they got shunned away
You also can't earn mastery from portal. Clans won't want to play that.
That's a failure on your part. If you can't distinguish between an discussion where you weigh both the pros and cons of something and people "defending" something that is on you, not me.
I don't totally believe it was a small number of the community
clan battles in general was just very small even in the previous BF games. It wasnt the entire community. The older older BF games had more clan presence than the newer BF games
This 100% The way DICE makes me and my friends jump hoops only prevents us from having a good time. We have around 7 active players and getting everyone together is starting to wear on us. And, we don't like to play the game with randoms. Thus, we don't play at all. Just according to DICE's plan!
@slim quiver it wasn't small. Do you have the numbers?
back in like the BF 2 and BF1942 days there was way more clan hosted servers and such than there were later on
@slim quiver there was clans up until bf1?
so are you saying the majority of the player base participated in clan wars
BF1 had some clans too
because if that was the case BF would have actually had a fairly large presence in esports
@slim quiver not clan wars but social clans
Bf1942 clan was the entire class playing in computer lab.
and some more
Are you insane? Clan battles were huge in 1942, 2, 2142, 3, and 4. But 3specially in 1942z and 2. Clan battles are still huge in other games. The limitations placed on players in this game has all but effectively killed any sort of competitive scene.
Bf4 has a large clan community
social clans are not sanction scrimmaging between groups. Social clans are just basically the same thing milsims have done or day of defeat has done where someone hosts a server and you become part of that community
Same for me, our group at the max has like 10 guys in it, it was such a pain, we only got 9 guys in into a game, and the 9th guy basically joined as the game was ending.. like at less than 50 tickets... It's such a pain
Bf1 even had a lot of clans
BF2 in internet Café 
you could literally still have a social clan by adding options to switch teams on portal and having someone host their own clan server
Yeah, it is such BS. But, when you get everyone together and can actually play together... it is SO MUCH fun. Fuck DICE.
I guess number of active clans is directly proportional to how successful the game is
I'd say that Portal could use RSP and it would make more sense then
But you can't interact with the other team so it effectively goes against the 'social' aspect of it.
Dawdamn this game is amazing
thats why i just said BF2 and BF1942 had more prominence in clans and eventually started getting way less of a presence. This game is pretty casual so 2042 never killed any sort of competitive scene. The structure of the game itself killed its own competitive scene throughout its lifespan
I still think it was a huge mistake to scrap Battlelog. If nothing I would have wanted it improved to further enhance community building within platoons, organized tournaments etc.
If you look at portal mostly all you see if game modes that should be permanent game modes offered by dice instead people just make game mode dice refuses to make now
trying to grind for dozer t1 
Just had 3 amazing conquest large matches in a row on orbital, renewal, and manifest
Even tho talking about numbers clans were probably not the majority of bf playerbase. But the clans were part of the most loyal bf community on which dice is shitting rn by leaving out everything previous titles included. And that is just sad.
being in a clan doesn't equate to loyalty
This game needs a map editor made public so the community can make maps instead. DICE no longer knows how to do it.
It does a little
I cant really talk about battlelog as I started from 1 and have only a small amount of info about the previous games, but I guess bf tracker kinda filled the void of battlelog I guess,
Also all the old BF's had awesome communities because they could make their own maps.
It's more unlikely to happen imo
I have played BF since 1942 and on and I can easily say is there are more loyal BF fans that started playing BF like 5 years ago than me
the amount of titles you played also does not equate to loyalty
Wasn't Battlelog that browser thing? Man, that was awesome.
That was before frostbite minus Operation Outbreak
BF Tracker is not even close. Battlelog was much more than stats.
Probably not, not saying it is
BFstats was great
even existed in hardline
Yes it was before frostbite and it was better.
imagine pay 90 euros and smgs are more powerful than ar
I'm just not qualified to talk about battlelog
I remember a lot of mods back then
@slim quiver what about making content for the community to promote the game, teach others about skill Technics not normally known, spending time setting up private events to keep stuff fun in the game. Not loyalty?
and need to wait one month to fix the broken pkp
Hi, anyone know how to get our friend invitation code ?
Desert Combat was amazing for its time. That oilrig map was so much fun.
Also the amount of mods people made for 1942 was rivalling Quake, and UT at the time.
For this Discord server it would be https://discord.gg/battlefield
I understand clans are the all in Battlefield games but using the server browser as a example it was mostly about friends wanting to play that are more than 4. Battlefield really shouldn't be controlling how we play now
if you're a content creator thats a little different. You're taking the time to actually post in depth stuff about the game. I could have joined a clan at any time in the 19-20 years almost that ive been playing BF, and it wouldnt have suddenly made my loyalty to the game any higher
Yeah just saw some of those yesterday it looked insane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l0biWQrshI
If you'd like to support this project, you can become a patron and watch future documentaries from me before everyone else! https://www.patreon.com/Nick930
A full history of the Battlefield franchise. From Refractor Game's humble beginnings with "Codename Eagle", to DICE's most recent "Battlefield 2042."
Guest Appearances Include:
-NeebsGami...
Bruh moment
no, it's for my friend, i'm on pc and him on PS. When i search his username i find nothing and him too
@slim quiver I'm not in a clan and haven't been for years. Those guys do deserve a little recognition and I do think it's awful the way the game is treated them
crossplay turn on ?
yes
I couldn't care less about the t1 stuff tbh. Not motivated by that kinda "achievement" stuff and most of the actual t1 skins don't look that great
if he is on last gen you cannot add him, only new gen and pc can play together
I just saw a petition for continuing live support for bfv and 17000 people signed. People are really desperate after 2042.
I would say having regular people to play with will indeed make people more loyal to whatever game you are playing.
he on ps4
he will need to be on ps5, last gen is exclusive to their own platform
Old consoles cannot join PC or new console games
oh bruh
Bf games have come and gone just like fans have come and gone. Theres not a whole lot of people left who started in the 1942 days. Can't say that those people aren't loyal just because theyre gone. They were still fans regardless. If clan members should get a special recognition, it should be more the old fans should get the recognition. Which they did with portal
@slim quiver what battlefield is your favorite
yeah luckily portal makes this possible
1942 or vietnam
having no other games to play will make you the most loyal
3rd favorite is either BF1 or V
Personally zy, clans didn't really directly correlate to loyalty, it just menat you had like minded people to play with, and most of the times, you stuck with those guys even if you get kicked or the clan gets shut down, playing with friends increased enjoyment and that in turn made you like the game... So it's indirect..
BF4 is GOAT
This game is fire
I agree. I think there are battelfield fans for specific timeline. Like ww2 fan or modern fps fan
But we are in 2021
@slim quiver I really didn't want to like BfV, but I do a lot lol
agreed DICE should give me a gold name in 2042 along with flashing custom banners
Yeah it feels like playing BF2 after BF3 it's kinda aging
Idk why you wouldnt want to like it, it is mechanically probably the best BF game in terms of how it plays
2042 Conquest large on the good maps 🥵 🥵 🥵 🥵 🥵 🥵
yeah like I dont understand the point of rewarding loyalty
Do you think that for an update, ps4 and pc will be able to play together
especially to just people in clans
No
Have we gotten ANY word from the new studio heads at DICE regarding 2042?
yup this
no DICE have been explicitly clear last gen is exclusive, this will not change
@slim quiver I wanted something modern. I was upset with the rent a server stuff and no HC mode. Over time the game became one of my favorite and I love the planes
not enough people realize how many old fans quit after BF switched over to BF2 or BF3
The versions of the game are not compatible
Yep so true
Loyalty is important in both business and our personal lives. ... Loyalty is valuable because it allows us to take the risk of predicting the actions and behavior of people we trust. 3. One may not always correctly decide who to be loyal to, and some people may even disappoint us or deceive us when we are loyal to them.31 Mar 2016
Hardcore is another thing that was getting minor population in
Hardcore simply was not a massive part of the community
BF2 hardcore players literally made project reality for this reason
Bfv fans prefer hard-core but I Don't think bfv is majority of the community
they simply wanted a more hardcore experience in a game that is inherently very casual
when it comes to video games and consumerism, there is always a new audience
Vince unleashed 
if I don't get my golden plated name in 2042 I'm #gettingarefundgreedyEA
I want a golden plated name
Yes, and chasing that audience is fine, but only after you know that the old guys will definitely be content, maybe not happy, but atleast content
@slim quiver they could have really made this game more HC with a casual aspect it wouldn't have been hard
This game meaning games
BF5 was little more hardcore imo and people didn't like it
They could have done at least 100 things much better than they did. It's sad that 2042 has the Battlefield name slapped onto it.
Attrition and fortifications
the range of smgs in this game is ridiculous
2042 was destined to fail when it began as a battle royale, then got remade into an arena shooter with characters with supadupa skills
This shit was so far removed from what a Battlefield is, well, was
think about it this way: How many fans of the game will not like this game and yet continue to play it anyways? Im betting its quite a large percentage. You can tell just by taking a basic survey on social media. We have people on here, reddit, twitter that complain daily that they hate the game and yet they load up the game daily and continue to play with hundreds of hours of playtime even though they come on here and tell people theyre not having fun. Why is that exactly? Well they will either tell you :
- I dont have anything else to play
- I only play battlefield really
- I want the game to be good and i will stick it out because im hoping for change
- Change will make the game better
- The patches have made me want to play
The fans that will leave this game will be massively outnumbered by the fans that will continue to stay and play regardless of whether or not they have fun and the people who have left will be replaced with a brand new audience. This is how every game that has multiple iterations turns out
I love bf 2042
People are saying 2042 is a hero shooter well I can prove them wrong
I like Manifest it's my favorite map
Unblocked
I think what I like about battelfield title is that every new title has different mechanics and different setting. I might be controversial but I like the challenge dice has tried.
I tagged hero shooter in my search on steam https://store.steampowered.com/tags/en/Hero+Shooter?l=english#p=0&tab=ConcurrentUsers and I see no battlefield 2042 in sight checkmate
Mine too! It allows me to teleport! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-L81kLuFZk
I don't use smgs so it doesn't bother me
I use Assault rifles
Point is 2042 is just a new BF title and the same thing will happen as every BF title before it will. people will complain for a while and then people will say its good
Anyone who says manifest is one of the best maps is based
People are gonna love it when the next bf releases
It's my favorite map in the game
BFV took 3 years and the release of 2042 for the community to say its a good game
well my problem is how easy smgs snipe me from a distance when i use AR
Even if dice has done everything community asked for and like every mechanics in the game, there are still people who will complain
Crap, wrong video. This one: https://youtu.be/lVtAUDe2V5w No other map has this weird shit going on 😄
What are your fav conquest large maps
Lol that's weird shit they gonna fix that next patch
@tame cobalt in 2042 manifest
But if smgs will be weak they will use ARS so it doesn’t really matter
Unless you are really into realism 😉 😉
Nooo! I like weird shit 😄
realism and immersion
And second?
@rocky cedar I gave you a like 👍
Thanks mate! Appreciate it really! 🙂
thinking like that they there wouldnt be a problem with full auto snipers on bipods -.-
LMGs?
@tame cobalt honestly couldn't tell you I guess orbital
Most people won't play with snipers tho
PKP absolute beast
Pretty much all of the things people are complaining about not being included in bf 2042 main game are things that only a minority was playing. Thats the case bc the battlefield playerbase has so many people that dont really play games at all and just get on, play on or two games and get off again. They don't even know what hardcore etc. means, bc they just play whatever the game shows them as "the main game".
Does this mean u should leave the things as server browser, hardcore, etc. just out in general bc the majority of players wouldn't even notice?
I dont think so bc the people that actually CARE about the battlefield franchise and are complaining are just completely threaten like bullshit and ignored. And if you do so with your "loyal community" you won't really get a community in bf anymore bc those people will quit and start playing other games instead and the only people that stay are those who play 3 games after a work day and get off again.
So overall dice is literally ruining the community they build over bf3 and other previous titles up to now.
Discarded, Manifest, Orbital. Favourite maps with 2042. I don't think Kaleidoscope is as awful as people make it out to be, but it certainly is weak. You can have good games at Kaleidoscope but it requires that 90% of the 128 players aren't jerking eachothers around point D 😄
😂😂 This game is amazing, I got stuck on bug can’t even resurrection
There are people who will complain no matter how good the game is.
I don't really think any of the maps are bad. There are some that I feel nothing about
Yeah I think manifest and orbital are the best cq large maps in the game
I want maps like Whitehouse in usa
That lawn would get rather crappy with 128 people shooting each others with tanks
The AA cannon in the MAV is mad OP
That's true. But look on the feedback given to the game on Steam and you will see that its not about some people that are complaining.
I mean game sales dropped since BF3 and then sparked back up after BF hardline again and then dropped again. It doesn't really matter what state the game is in because the battlefield community is absolutely fickle and picky about any title that comes out. This is literally nothing new, and no the loyal fans will not stop playing en masse. It will never happen, if it was going to we would have already seen it happen.
Sad thing is right zzy, we just say the last game was better cuz the current one is a downgrade... Happened for bf4 to 1, and 1 to 5 and now 5 to 2042, like bf1, great game, but even I can tell gameplay loop was simplified, a lot of shit removed, less guns, less customisation, but atleast bf1 had a decent chunk of new and well done things... 1 to 5 was just a straight up downgrade in every aspect except the gunplay and movement, and 2042's an even bigger downgrade from 5 but for different reasons... That's the thing, the guys who're now enjoying 2042, it's gonna be the same for them when the next one comes out, and then the next one... When does it stop?
we have people that literally say they hate the game with a burning passion, they complain every single day and have been doing so since early access release and yet they STILL log on and play the game daily
Lol
the idea that something like this even occurs tells me the community is not being killed by 2042
People need an outlet. This is easy access for them
I get why not everyone is a fan of kaleidoscope but IMO it's a really fun cq large map. Just a fun little playground with some cool flags to fight for
why even complain if you're actually able to log on and play something you hate for 6 hours a day

it makes virtually no sense. If i hated something, I simply wouldnt play it
Average fps gamers. This game is so trash, proceeds to play for another 12 hours
I like the game but hate some of the design features.
yeah exactly this

I feel like I get pressured to play because of how much I paid for the game
which topic now? did i miss something?
I already think it is good. Ofcourse there will be flaws but i adore the game regardless because i have been looking forward to it so bad. Also the graphics are amazing. All the details?! wauw
I think also a lot of people don't want to give up on battlefield because they know it's potential and it is fun
Usual, game bad, me no like, dice fix
i meant to react to Zzzyy.. forgot the ping.. oops
spending time playing something you hate for the justification of the money you spent is bad. You are literally losing in return, you're losing time that could be spent enjoying something you like over some money that will be replaced
Conquest Large maps
A tier: Manifest, Orbital
B tier: Renewal, Kaleidoscope, Discarded
C tier: Hourglass, Breakaway
its like going to a job you hate for free
Yup
you sit there for hours playing something in your free time that should be enjoyable but isnt, only to say "welll at least I put 200 hours in to justify the cost"
I can imagine even during new year party. People will come down here and say "game bad".
Maybe it's because I am broke.
People will get drunk during new years, chat will be extra spicy then
CQ Large on Renewal has grown on me. Honestly a very cool map
I can't wait to get drunk
Maybe when they will turn drunk they will say 2042 is good
i spent 100 dollars on the game, i havent played it since Nov 23rd and I feel 100% fine. I stopped complaining about the game and I moved on to play other games. My sanity and disappointment were basically washed away
jeez, then I'm gonna get something instead of popcorn. Sounds fun .. lol
I've made some conquest 32 layout concepts and posted them on reddit if anyone here uses that!
Let me know what you think 🙂
I already have some spicy water for that night
I wish content creators could do the same. I can really see that they are forced to play the game.
Mods are gonna have a field day that night
well thats because they make money
if someone paid me money to play a video game i hated
id do it too
Who wouldn't
Conquest 32?
not a bad idea tbh
Money talks people do stuff they hate for it
this
except guess what
the average player isnt making money by playing
so if you hate the game, stop playing it
I think im gonna get big drunk too.
you wont feel the need to spend even more time complaining about the state of a game you no longer are getting frustrated with
That's pretty sick not a bad idea at all
you will just walk away from it
Depends on how much money and how much time
And that's why I don't listen to influencers too much before release.... Cuz they're content creators, not reviewers, it's a job to them... Offcourse they're gonna be overtly positive
You might be right with that but the feedback still shows how unsatisfied many people are about how dice designed this game. And in my opinion to say "yeah we know that many people of our community will get mad about the game and want things we had in previous titles but the game still sells well and the franchise will survive that somehow" is not the way you should start developing your game.
But maybe I am just weird.
until we see the sales and if the game is thriving or not, we simply just wont know
who knows this game could have sold 20 million copies
we simply do not know
the silent majority outweighs the vocal minority
Retailers who bought hard copies would be majority
Could be, but highly unlikely, I'm betting it probably sold equal to or a bit below bf1
Ye. but you cant ignore the feedback on steam. I mean it is one of the worst reviewed games ever 😂
digital sales are actually much higher than physical sales
@prisma anvil me too.
digital sales have been higher for most games for years now
You can't request facts on if sales are this and that and platform percentage than say quiet majority stuff with out the numbers
digital sales are actually usually better too because people have access to them immediately
without having to go out and get a copy or missing a release night
Yeah digital is obviously gonna be high
while digital is simply right there and unlocks immediately
But I don't think we're getting an official sales count anytime soon
Also, there’s simply the whole thing where the larger the sample size, the more representative of the whole it is.
it could be months
maybe not even until 1 year
Yeah, its all about how you approach the maps. Not every map can be played the same, or otherwise your experience will be shit.
I'm betting 6 months
Doesn’t matter if the people talking online are a minority of players, they’re still going to be a fairly representative cross section of the player base
True
they can provide a snap shot of what we can make a generalized statement about the player base yes
Where do we have to look to see if the player base is happy?
but either way apparently EA said its performing in terms of players better than BFV launch
Cuz now they're in full damage control mode, they cant release anything that might put the game in a bad light.. or atleast try to not do that..... But it can be thought that since they're not celebrating the launch as the most successful one yet, it probably wasn't that good, might've undersold...
so either way its probably doing pretty well
Sales are usually mentioned in EA's earnings calls, no?
Does refund get deducted from sales.
Next big one isn’t until the spring isn’t it?
I am pretty sure a lot of people refunded the game
probably not because at that point its through a retailer store
It would help if they playtested their patches. Last one had a interesting bug disabling mouse's vector movement.
maybe
Something you'll have to ask EA Investor Relations
Using the towers to base jump is a key part of what makes conquest large on kaleidoscope so fun. That, and the fact that the objectives are all pretty fun to fight for
EA's stock is a 78% buy
unless PSN, Xbox store and gamestop, best buy, amazon ect provide them with details
Again, they could, but that would mean the patch would be held back for weeks, atleast 2
they could probably easily track origin refunds
as for anything else probably would have to inquire about the information
You got to admit that the player count of 2042 is lower than the playercount of bfv on steam rn
You can't claim them being in damage control mode while they're still shoveling shit. Like, disabling mouse is such a fundamental flaw that they're either incompetent or just don't care.
Balls
Sample size pops up there as well though as they can likely approximate the same figures for other platforms from the Origin figures
I'm surprised I've been able to go all night with out coffee
😳
thats just steam tho so it doesnt mean much

@tame cobalt what makes you happy?
There’s nothing inherent to which storefront somebody uses that makes them more or less likely to refund
not true at all
Playing video games i enjoy
Hell they mightve even known about the mouse issue in the patch, but to fix it in the code might've/could've fucked up some other major aspect, that the user wouldn't directly be able to fix
some store fronts are insanely strict about refunds
What games do you enjoy
steam is probably the most forgiving refunding on the market
Thanks, I think CQ128 is fun but there are times when its more fun to have a more focussed experience. The maps themselves have some great locations, just about putting the right focus on them to tune the balance with vehicles and infantry in my opinion. The same way it was in BC2,BF3,BF4 etc...
Battlefield 2042
you have 2 hours to test the game, anything under 2 hours is an immediate refund, anything over 2 hours needs to be approved
and you have 14 days to do it
Again, you gotta remember, 1. These aren't full experienced guys 2. Frostbite at this point is like a tangled ball of yarn
Nice i too enjoy said game
Based.
Cope
Playstation doesn't even refund if you start downloading the game lmao...
My games for 2022 = Bf2042 and DayZ
Really? 😄
sometimes steam even offers more lax refunds on games who have been critically hit with very poor review scores
And yet, somebody who truly wants a refund is quite likely to jump through hoops regardless.
And then there’s the matter of refunds post-launch vs cancelled pre-orders
???
Yep.. if you start the download it counts as using the product and you can't refund it anymore
playstation is extremely strict on refunds
sometimes its not even worth the hassle with them
Sounds pleasant
I've gotten 2 refunds with Playstation
Now, certain people might've gotten refunds on ps even though they mightve played a bit... But that's non standard
wha? how come I refunded a game even though I played the game
I got 2 or 3 refunds that I have over 2 hours playtime in ps.
consensus maybe
One was call of duty after I played the other was Insurgency sandstorm
2077 got a lot of lax refunds on playstation
so many that they took the game off the market
Tbh my main gripe with BF2042 in its current state is just the lack of content in the base game, portal is nice but just wish there was a lot more to do in the base game :/
2077 was 35 worse than 2042!
It’s ME Andromeda all over again
Yeah cuz cd told people that sony would... And sony, thus to fuck with cd, took it off the market
pretty much
Honestly my issue is the lack of features we've grown to accept Grez, That and the awful maps.
Most of the maps are good
Its in a really good state now, just got it a few days ago, still a lot of visual glitches, but nothing game breaking so far, its been fun
orbital is good
Yeah Orbital and Manifest are great maps
Ive grown to accept I do not like the game and I simply will not like the game and it was best to quit 1 month ago and it absolutely worked and i am happy with my decisions
Orbital is great
I'm not tripping on no maps give me the features!
I upgraded my rig to play the game but I didn't even buy it in its state 😄 I hear its a lot better now but still has ways to go. So, I'm not touching it for another year... after which I think I'll just forget it because they'll surely stop fixing stuff.
Did 2077 ever get a proper law enforcement system?
2077, what was that game again? lol
Tbh I dont mind the lack of a scoreboard etc etc, I just wish there was a public API available for those who do care
Based.
it is
Yeah same Zy I feel better not playing the game in its current state.
cyberpunk
I know, but 2077 is lost and forgotten
havent played the game since november 23rd
i just play other games and im 100% happy
I only like hourglass when the sandstorm arrives
This.
idk I still enjoy it
Might be time for EA to consider switching to Unreal instead of relying on Frostbite for everything
I really regret buying it.
however, the scoreboard is a good way to spot cheaters, and in this case how many bots are in the game
I'm gonna give the game a try when I get a PC so i don't get swamped by PC (Plus don't fight a broken aim assist)
Should have worded that better. You know what i mean
you can see bots in the player board or list
Nah it had a BIG comeback recently, quite a few players were playing in the last month, its much better now, just a shame it took a year to get where it should have been on release, hope the same isnt said for BF2042 in a years time
2077 is also slated for first batch of DLC first quarter next year IIRC
Search your feelings, you know it'll be true.
Give it till summer I say
I might have to install it again then, but the story didn't really interest me. Unfortunately...
i was not aware of this
Ngl, I just come here cuz I like talking to people and sometimes there's some actually good debates about features and things they could do.. plus I've actually come to enjoy some of the guys and gals here.... I'd recommend just going back to older bf's, trust me, you'll have a hell of a better time if you do
Why you gotta make me cry fam 😢
yeah thats fair, I regret buying 2042. we cant win them all
Yeah sadly 😭 ( Luckily I enjoy 2042)
I regret trusting ign
Man, sorry. Made myself sad, too. Gotta go make some coffee.
I skipped 2042 precisely because the reveal trailer and first wave of news sent up a bunch of red flags to me
not really done much of the main stuff yet, been enjoying the side missions too much, plus after the disappointment in FC6's story I doubt it can be that bad
I havent trusted IGN since they gave alien isolation a 5.9/10
I dont really regret buying it, i even bought new hardware anticipating the game, just disapointed atm. Hope it improves and that the playerbase stays/grows
As a general rule, marketing that is overly reliant on crowdpleasing gimmicks is a big red flag.
Glad you do!
I think most people regretted after they saw the discount
My red flag was the beta, immediately brain went "wee woo wee woo, looks like some fuckshit is about to go down" and thus i didn't buy
Oh i didnt care about the discount
i wouldnt pay 20 dollars for 2042
I promised to myself I won't buy another Ubisoft game lol. Till they prove themselves
I bought it in turkish lira and I got it for10 dollars
Yeah honestly I would give BF2042 a solid 6-7/10 atm, its not bad, its just not where it should be, and a lot of modes are just unplayable, hazard zone is fun but unbalanced, the 128 player modes are just death by helicopter atm
Can't wait to get more epic content in season 1, 2, etc
dude the newer assasins creed games are great
hype
They aren't bad! But it also feels really empty at the same time
was watching a video comparing FC4 to FC6, my god, FC4 is so much more detailed its hilarious
legit
True grezju, if you look at it objectively, it's a meh, not too bad, but nothing great to write home about either .
Best conquest large map. NOW
And I love the FC series, but these last few games have really put me off from the franchise.
I was supposed to write a review but decided to skip it due to how fracked up the beta was. Still, I got the game with my own monies because I was intrigued how things would develop, and write shit about that. And, make videos on my channel etc.
Indeed thats my biggest issues atm, if BF2042 was a f2p game I would be more than happy with how it is, it certainly beats warzone, but as something that costs near enough £50, not too happy
The tornado was probably the first big warning sign. Like Levolution in BF4, I immediately recognized it as something that would be kinda cool the first 5-10 times, and then a boring or annoying gimmick thereafter.
same here, FC6 is way better than 5, but its no FC2/4
Tornado really ruins a decent push from attackers in breakthrough
That I can agree with, but still I wouldn't buy it lol
I like the tornado ngl, really cheesy way to move around as a sniper in HZ lmao
Dude, I played with 2 accounts with the ea play trial during launch week and I almost thought about doing an almost 3 hr long review/rant on YouTube, I still have the script
Like, the skyscraper collapsing in Shanghai is probably the most pointed to Levolution, but the map actively plays worse after it collapses, and by the 100th time on the map it’s just a gimmick that doesn’t actually contribute much to the game.
But hey, it looked cool in a trailer.
anyone wanna play?
5 was a joke, probs the worst one of the lot for me
i think some of the missions were repetitive
genuinely preferred primal to 5
but montana was a good setting
4 and 5 are them trying to recapture the success of 3 with the same formula over and over. 6 kinda moved away from that but not enough.
True, I'm gonna wait.... If my worries are correct, before season 1, there'll be another discount, and I'll probably pick it up for 20$ or something... Or maybe later, they should've just gone ftp
That and all the "old build" jargon... That was immediate bullshit alarm for me
Think I'm going to build a fpv Drone
Hazard zone should 100% be f2p, and maybe even all out warfare too, only one I can understand being pay to play is portal
Lol I guess I am the only one who didn't know about advertisement in battlefield 2042 ?
nah 4 was good, 5 tho, my god was it dull
portal should be free to play
5 i think is still good
Hope exposure is at least a B tier map. C tier would be disappointing
but i feel as if it could be easiar
Same. If the purpose of a open beta is to find things that QA hasn’t yet, and to play test balance on a massive scale, using an old build actively defeats the purpose because all the info is out of date and reports will be made for problems fixed months ago.
as it is now, agreed, but when they add a load of content down the line, its gonna be basically a whole new game that is gonna have so much more potential than a standard game, so I can see it actually being worth to pay for
Yeah and the whole game should be too, what a good idea lol
I made a quick somethingsomething after the launch and tried to stay positive. I still think this thing can turn around and there are LOTS of things I like in this game - like how you can change the attachments of the gun situationally, which was a damned HUGE deal to me https://youtu.be/3rKpLZ9GlQg 😄
I've said this before right, but it would've been infinitely better if they went the cod route and just did a trigame remaster in the new engine... Like full remasters of bc2, 3 and 1942 and just sold that... Hell next time, they could've done three other games, like bf4, bc1 and vietnam
and thats why it should be for free for ever with monthly content updates otherwise they will never come close to warzone or apex ^^
I think we can wait a while for that
Only way I’ll get 2042 at this point is if they massive change course on the design philosophy or implement 2142 in portal.
make portal free to play with lifetime support. stop releasing new battlefields. just make it Battlefield: Portal
send me the script
2142 2142 2142

I miss my PAC hover tanks and mechs
I like only getting the best content from the games
tiger best tank
I agree but at the same time I can see portal actually being worth paying for down the line if that makes sense, whereas HZ and all out warfare I cant see being worth $60 no matter how much they add content wise
anyone wanna play?
Or wait for BF1 to be added to portal hopefully with a revamped Monte Grappe and St. Quentin’s Scar
they could make portal the perfect battlefield also for the future. make it for free with monthly content updates and add a seasonshop so people can buy skins to monetize the game
Monte Grappe with 2142’s mechs would be hilarious
First bf1 maps in portal will be amiens and scar
F2P model is by far the most successful model to use, no idea why all games dont use it honestly
battlefield needs it as its dying otherwise.
(8
Even games that only last a few months make more than they would as p2p games by going f2p its crazy they didnt go f2p
Got chase that biannual lump sum profits sugar rush for investors
f2p model is the best. when people like the game they will always buy skins
E
Also, F2P long term requires committing a team to that project long term and not shifting them over to other stuff
Nick930 documentary dropped.
not even the skins, its the battlepass which EVERYONE buys, literally everyone
true
Bf isn't f2p for the same reason fifa isn't f2p. People who want it buy it
i'm gonna rate BF2042 a 20/42
wow
no one minds paying $20 for a game they love playing, and the illusion of f2p makes you lose track long term of just how much you spend on the game, like I feel I only spent $10 on warzone, but its probs closer to $50-100
thats not true. fifa does 90% of the money with ultimate packs
i need to find it, it was handwritten and i've probably shelved it somewhere by now
i mean, for all i knew it couldve been an old build, but i still saw the fundamental issues with the game and those along with what they said just rubbed me in the wrong way.
yeah but with a full remaster you dont have to wonder what the "best content" is now do ya?....for you something mightve been great, but for someone else it mightve been something else..
I don't have to wonder what the best content is, the devs will figure it out
All hail the devs
They dont need to, people are telling EA what they want, all they gotta do is listen, its simple
just saying in that case, they couldve satisfied everyone who liked that specific game with all its content..
But in all seriousness, a dev has very little say in most anything. Everything that went wrong with 2042 started and ended with the management. It was a mess.
Its not a fault of the devs either way, I can guarantee they want to fix the game and do what people want, its EA that fuck ya!
Listening | Simple | EA
What?
lmao
glad one of them are listening and removing c5 drones
nah, devs share a small part of the blame, its a very small part but its still there.
He/she will get fired from taking initiative and listening the community!
If i get a new version of bfv i don't want fjell or hamada or narvik to be in the game at all. They pull the overall quality down
they defo share a part for the bugs and glitches, but equally they fixed those so fast for the most part, where as gameplay decisions lie solely on EA
nooooooo
i mean, we arent getting 1 or V anytime soon
Just as an example. Plus i love playing 2042 tdm on noshahr and caspian and botb and would love to add some of the great rush maps to 2042 rush, and you don't get that with a normal remaster
i say that, cuz of the dev/s( that person was a dev right?) who lauded the new ui, scoreboard being so great and in the case of the scoreboard an improvement over the past..correct me if i'm wrong
I would kill for a BC2 remaster
Goodbye
I just hate the big drive by EA and Activision recently to hide peoples stats, actual joke
i mean remaster in the sense of bigger portal basically, with all the content from 3 games
they're making disney shooters now, basically they don't want any negative emotions
Eh I wish there was the choice to select a score board, but honestly if there was just a public API available I think 99% of those sort of issues would just be accepted as they are in game as an API could make up for all the issues for the people who do care about those things
let's see how that pans out, seems like they're kinda playing with fire though and public opinion is turning quick
I'm still waiting for the lawsuit due to false advertising TBH
explain this api thing a bit will ya?...i'm in the dark about this
WTF
well... sure. that would've raised the budget doe
my own smoke grenade killed me
Do you imagine it would sit well with the managers if a lowly dev drone would say what he/she things publicly? Even a team of devs can't influence much anything because they're just realizing someone else's plan. There has been news about how half of the devs were new at DICE going into the 2042, but really, to blame anyone else but the middle management is an injustice.
without AOW or HZ, it really wouldnt
to put it in simple terms its something you can ask "what's this players KD, total kills, kills in this game, deaths in that game etc etc" and it will spit out an answer, I can send you an example of what you can do with it with warzones API if you want?
No
Never
coming soon? https://battlefieldtracker.com/bf2042
battlefield 2042 best game 2021 reviews show it
What is this behaving and can you tell me about it!
There is rumours the API for BF2042 will be released march 2022, but its just rumours unfortunately
Figured.
and somehow still nominated for best games you suck at
Well, part of it, it's this thing where people are nice to each other and respect others opinions.
remind the guy above you, thanks
imagine respecting people
Yeah. =/
That would be pretty great, but I'm not holding my breath. I would love to see my development statswise 😦
for real, I love the warzone stats sites, one of my favourite things to grind the leaderboards on, shame there is no reason to grind BF other than for a red skin on a weapon
i know what you mean, and i get that sentiment, but some decisions werent made by ea, youre a fool to think if EA micromanaged dice that much, they probably just gave guidelines and general things they wanted to see and left dice to implement them....certain things are dice's fault...now a singular dev shares a very negligible part of teh blame, but they do share that part....and that part should never be taken away....i will still say both the higher ups at EA and Dice take the most blame
What is this respect and can you tell me about it!
That is why I mostly play with just friends and chew the fat. And, drink lots of whiskey.
You can tell when you come across a warzone player in Battlefield because they always try to squad down right when they see you
Any tips for getting master for Boris?
@main patrol use the repair tool to keep his turret alive
Oh, I am definitely not referring to EA. DICE screwed this pooch on their own. EA were just the moneymen. This is absolutely on DICE's own middle management for not being able to lead a project into a success. Sure, it might've already made the money used in the development, so I guess in that sense the game is a success.
These weirdos are only moving out when they are in squad but don't come at you when they're alone, pure cowards they are
ahhh..so kind of like bftracker....nah, that can maybe( even then i wouldnt) replace the stat page, but not he ingame and end game scoreboard....
Tbh havent played warzone in months, game was giving my migraines with the amount of stress it causes, has a damn near negative skill gap
Respect is kinda like singing "Living On A Prayer" with a bunch of random people, and if someone is off key, at the end of the song, you tell them good job, shake their hand, and walk away.
Maybe 2042's casualness is better for you!
its less to do with replacing it, more a compliment, so if you did want to see more detail you have the option to
oh i'm pretty sure they made their money back, thats easy to see, but i dont it was as good as they hoped it'd be
Man I can't wait to get off work and play
i mean, we had that with bf tracker, we had the ingame page for general stats, and the tracker site for more indepth stat, with long term curves, match details, and leaderboards,
Respect looks so deep and important, is there a way to learn this new ability ?
Oh I am loving 2042 atm, honestly dare I say it I wouldnt even mind if they buffed aim assist and SBMM, its so lax atm its low key boring, although defo prefer lax to warzones aim assist on steroids
Buffing aim assist to the point you don't have to aim
Most certainly not. Even though we avid fans are the loud minority, the quality and the state of 2042 cuts into the next BF in to an extent. Considering the long term and milking the franchise 2042 was an absolute failure.
otherwise known as call of duty
@frosty gorge on console aiming is better with the assist turned down
cuz the issue is, they talk about long term, but havent done a single thing yet that would help this game in the long term, so its kinda hard to believe that
Start playing Living On A Prayer? Idk. 
100 % this. What they say and do are the polar opposites.
Tbh aim assist aint too bad on console with the lower FOV, the rotational makes sense, on PC with 120 FOV rotational is clapped
we talking about mw?
Ho I didn't think this song was real, is there a minimum lvl to be able to look for it on YouTube or a cheat code maybe ?
warzone and COD in general, MW MP isnt too bad imo, CW/Vanguard however
Anime skins and laser bullets go brrrrrr
yeah, mw2019 and apex isnt really a good example of balanced AA
Apex isnt that bad, way better than COD in general
Bf2042 hardcore defuse, no aim assist 60% health, friendly fire on
You mean rush or the defuse mode from bf4 ?
I like how the lead developer hasn't nerfed the PKP
Your avatar fits your line!
@mental delta rush is fine but defuse from bf4 is my one love
2042 was the second best selling Battlefield game in its first week. That doesn't mean that it's a stable game, but they certainly made a lot of money of it.
do you guys literally need someone to tell you that shit is blatantly broken or is this some kind of shitty game meta you're pushing
No advertising
The gamemode in 5 vs 5 ?
@mental delta yes
imagine thinking the pkp is fucking balanced when it's a 200-round lasergun
Its the age of gaming we're in: release now, fix later (maybe)
I played it only 2 times I think and it was when the game released, idk the objective of this gamemode
Minimum level is birth. =D
SVK is more op than pkp 
I'm not noticing much issues with the pkp I haven't played it yet or being killed by it much
yes but I only have 3 hours played on FPS games but I want to be as good as the people with 10000 hours played already reeeee
can take out a whole squad under 5 seconds if you know how to aim

