#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 3311 of 1
theyve already said theyre putting more penalties for sliding and adding vaulting
Lmfao clown ass
What?
Nice one. But i can handle them, i just hate them so, your point?
huh, well maybe im just built different 😈😈
jk idk maybe i was just lucky lol
people are fine with dice straight up removing core battlefield mechanics
why do you hate them?
what a fucking status quo we live in
Which is not redoing the movement system and class system.
I assume you're too old to know what based means, I was agreeing with PTFO 👍
Because people don’t think specialists will end this game = toxic? Also everyone that thinks specialists aren’t the issue are = COD and Fortnite kids?
anyone else genuinely really annoyed there isnt a campaign? kinda does give evidence to people saying they are rushing it out, especially with the mw 2019 campaign being awesome I wish bf2042 did a cool campaign
its kinda funny. I have never heard ONE person complain about classes before 2042, but when 2042 rolls around, all of the sudden tons of people hate the classes
wack
Lack of traditional classes doesn't remove PTFO though lmao
eh not really. Dice campaigns have never been fun imo
I PTFO'd the entire beta
its not "outdated" lmao
not really. Bf campaigns suck and were added to get the cod crowd into the game
BF1s campaign was pretty good
Because they were never interested in what made BF what it is in the first place, which is fine but damn
Don't invalidate criticsm just because you're fine with regression
You can't choose a main weapon by your liking and your stuck with your class weapons, which works okay until it gets fucking boring and repetitive
2042 as a whole spits all over veteran bf players in order to appeal to the cod and apex kiddies
its fucking sad
thats true but thats not an excuse for dropping it completely, they should have made one that beats the cod campaigns grittiness
there is this new crowd of people who think copying cod makes a game "modern" and is "necessary to compete". Its just sad honestly
unfortuately that is rather true
Ptfo?
Most actual BF fans are pretty indifferent to the lack of a campaign honestly, they're generally mediocre at best and get played maybe a couple times. Generally, people buy BF for the MP, not for SP.
PLAY THE FUCKING OBJECTIVE!!!! thats what ptfo means
I wanted to use SMGs as support but couldn’t in BF4. Engi is ok but would prefer to play support because I like to drop ammo and do close quarters combat.
Play the fuckin objective 
cast thee whom disagree as toxic and cast barrage of insult to expose their toxicity. but their bullying will only expose who is truly toxic.
Contrary to popular belief, Call of Duty didn't invent the military shooter.
Wdym?????¿ BF1942 failed back in the day because it didnt copy cod, are silly???¿¿¿
also how is having specialists instead of classes "modern" may i ask?
when somebody types out theyre laughing it usually means they have nothing valuable to say to the person. Its a cope.
is it the new trend to make every shooter a hero shooter nowadays?
yeah I see ur point, Id just want some more distinct structure and individuality with the specialists, they just seem all the same tbh
I mean a little bit yes
This has been said about every BF game since BF2.
Im a battlefield fan, do I not count? xD and I want a campaign, the campaigns have been pretty bad but why cant they try again and improve instead of just dropping it? on top of making an inferior multiplayer experience.
Maybe? Idk i've never been big on the military shooter single player for games so I'm probably not even a target demographic for that
I'd much rather the devs not have their efforts separated into single player and multiplayer teams
true xDD
this has deviated too much from the core formula
"because cod and apex are doing it"
"Actual BF fans"
But also, once again, the specialists fall under the classes
Why does that make the criticsm any less valid though?

Plus fuck shotguns
I miss playin beta 
haha I agree, but I use them in locker so yeee
We're all BF fans. Just because some enjoy other games, doesn't mean they aren't a fan.
no one ever said that
Same, it was really refreshing and really makes it hard to want to play bf4 now
exactly, thankyou xD
I did not enjoy BF2042 at all (long time BF3 / BF4 fan)
same
in its current iteration the distinction means nothing. Its just a category
it was painful to play
That's a big gamble, and a lot of time better spent on improving the mode people will actually play. Also I really only say "actual BF fans" in reference to outlets like AJS who raised a huge rage over 2042 only having 7 main MP maps and no campaign, when most people didn't really care or even were happy about the lack of campaign
i miss the days before we saw the beta 😦 atleast you had good convos in here. now it's back to OMG LET'S HYPERFOCUS ON THIS TINY TIDBIT and call it an outrage like it was with bfv with its haydays >.<
uwu
I kinda did. I really didn't think to bother buying the game due to classes and tac spring not being a thing, once i looked at the gameplay trailer I couldn't believe that tac sprint was a feature so the game won me right there. I preorder ultimate, the specialist thing is just a bonus for me
this
Nobody is doing that in this chat rn
So it does mean something
It was me, I did. 
They can shove their test. Enjoy what you want.
but AJS is still a fan and he can be annoyed at that coz its pretty poor. just because people are used to poor products doesnt mean we shouldnt stop demanding better
One message removed from a suspended account.
hmm ight fair enough, its ur money
Battlefield is a game about these large battles and sandbox. This has never really meshed well with a story based campaign, and the older "instant action" was a better single player experience. I think this is the deeper reason the campaigns usually missed the mark
Offline with bots will always be better than a campaign objectively, idc what anyone says
BF was never made with a campaign in mind
this
Even though Id like to have a campaign, i think portal and HZ make up for not having one
Idk I think arbitrary games must have X number of maps to be a "full product" is a bit of a shallow way to play games. Especially since this is the first BF game to have 128 players on the map
The most popular military shooter is cross fire
Hope the gunfights are as chaotic as in BF1 for 2042
eh tbf thats actually a really good explanation, I like that explanation :3, yeah I was gonna talk about how arma had a single player but I do think thats true
also the fact that nowadays ppl are fine with battlefield launches and betas being buggy
and seemingly dont care about getting a polished final product
bf1 was the most chaotic bf imo
which is just sad
nowadays
my guy, did you forget BF4 exists? This is nothing new.
I mean, i really liked warzone over bf games due to their slow, heavy annoying movement and glitched animations. I only played bf due to the bf pure chaos moments and teamwork. Both were available in beta soo
Specialists are pretty much just a gadget and a perk that comes into play once in a blue moon. People pretend we're getting the Black Ops specialists or some shit.
a lot of chinese people
Eh not really, restricting gadgets and giving another slot for them would make them much more like classes
why should we be fine with buggy broken ass launches?
the idea of a "final" product is long long long gone. Any MP focused game with money behind it is moving to live service
monte grappa was hell
Genuine genuine question here. Why do people prefer battlefield to something like COD nowadays? dont flame me im being serious.
I mean it is pretty common for a big game like BF1 to have bugs. I mean Bf4 had them, and it turned out pretty damn good
it was 2 gadgets, a perk, and a weapon type. Maybe grenades
Sorry, meant specialists 
i prefer the huge maps
who remembers when engineers were the only class who could equip shotguns? anyone old enough?
focus on objectives and more larger maps where there's time to breathe instead of just spawn,die/kill, repeat. plus the game is basically sandboxy, where you play one match infantry, other time just focus on tanking or as plane etc
I really like the scale of the game. I'm not into BR's so having large maps with a respawn focus is fun. Plus characters like Falck allow me to play a healer role that doesn't exist in cod
BF just has more meaning to it, in COD, its just a pointless bloodfest. BF feels more realistic and for the most part feels like an actual war. COD on the other hand has anime skins, and feels like a paintball game rather than an actual military conflict
Bf games are more open and I feel like my choices matter more in bf than cod, which feels like its just reaction times
i only play conquest and operations/breakthrough in battlefield games so warzone can’t really compare for me
Warzone is a BR, not a two sided military sim
BF has always been about the moments, just like life. That is what you remember. That time you shot a plane with a bazooka, or you and your squad capped the flag to win the round 5vs.20 style. Or when you parachuted down right in front of a tank and dropped some mines, suicide style, but stopped the flag capture. Or you drove that jeep loaded with C4 into the tank, which exploded and the wreckage flew over and took out some enemies. That is what makes Battlefield special.
Personal preference. Some people prefer the arena-shooter, constant-action type experience CoD provides, while others prefer the slower paced experience, with intermittent moments of intense action on a larger scale, and the sandbox that BF provides
okokok thats a good explanation, but how come you wouldnt play a game like arma 3? is that like too hardcore coz its fucking complex
bf isn’t a milsim either tbf
Bigger battles, vehicle game play, and different game modes. There also feels like there’s teamwork were cod feels like it’s just everyone running around for that K/D
i wouldnt call bf a sim
I like both, only reason i preferred warzone over bf was the slow style and heavy movement of bf, now that 2042 is a thing I prefer it over cod, but will continue to play both
BF is hardly a sim. Its barely better than CoD on the front of being arcade-y
warzone isnt just a br now :3 there is basically battlefield on the warzone map which is super fun
I like both
well a game that feels like military combat, milsim isnt the right word
Both is good.
Arma is milsim, most here wouldn't stand playing it for more than 5 minutes
Well they're two different styles of game. COD is for fast pace, close quarter arena like gameplay. Battlefield is for large scale, slower paced, vehicular and infantry combat, ptfo focused.
Comparing the two is kinda silly because they never should play like each other.
its not that immersive either tbh. Even bf1
It’s an arcade military shooter with a good balance of bit being too Arcady
Yeah lmao
okokok thats fair enough, maybe youd like to try arma 3 coz that sounds like something youd like
I think most of the players of BF2042 are anime fans
Idk man, I lost my liking of COD long ago. I have not invested as much hours in COD like I have in BF
I haven't looked at warzone in a long time tbf. But I still really enjoy the different roles that I can fill on a team in bf games. Whereas in cod it really feels like my gameplay is almost all focused on what gun I pick
Arma is too complex. And the controls are actually hideous. Literally every key does something
BF is hollywood realism.
Eh that’s just an opinion not facts
well im on PS4, so im kinda stuck lol
some of you guys would love squad if you have the patience for it.
i don't play arma 3, cause imo modern warfare doesn't really appeal too much to me, but i do play post scriptum or hell let loose. i love the focus on more cooperation and communication in those games. if you don't cooperate with your squadleader/commander, you will be running around like a headless chicken. in games like battlefield, you can still run and gun and have fun. i like both genres, but they're different in gameplay. it's like asking someone why she doesn't play dirt rally 2.0 24/7 when she enjoys need for speed.
warzone isnt a br anymore, there are looooads of respawn based team gamemodes
Most of 1942 fans are my grandpa's age
I tried playing it and it was so slow for me. I couldn’t do it.
Warzone at its core is absolutely a BR still lol
Squad is hella fun
How is BF1 not immersive?
thats very true, I definitely agree with the KD thing
News Flash: BF1 fucking sucks at depicting WW1
Yeah gotta agree with that one
Several people are typing...
Lmao
other than guns how, i agree with you i’m just wondering
thats very true, the core gameplay kinda forces you to be selfish in cod xD
Like your name
why would you say something so controversial but so true?
When I put on power armor or some experimental gun and take several bullets to the chest without dying or raise the dead with a needle, I cant say Im immersed
riiiiiiight so its like you like the mix of more fun sandboxy fun like battlefield but also the milsim strattegy of arma 3/hll? I totally agree and thats why I love all 3, mil sims, bf and cod
Fighting is too mobile, vehicles are far too prevalent, uniforms are largely tacticool (and even include WW2-era gear in a few specific cases).
Well if it was actually like WW1 then it would be boring. BF1 did a different take on WW1, but kept with the core values
I do laugh at people bitching about the armor gadget in game then call it COD when it was in firestorm first 
I mean look at this vid, how can you tell me this isnt immersive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCYjzwSsEh8
Ive seen this vid. Its not immersive
People say a game that is "actually like WW1" would be boring. I would disagree (See: Verdun, Tannenberg)
it actually isnt :3 br is the lowest gamemode on the list, warzone really is its own game now
Battlefield moments were built upon a game that cared about it's own formula. It was grounded, gritty, and focused. This game feels all over the place, like it's not sure what it's wanting to be. The movement has been downgraded from BFV so heavily, the Helis have been made to be so much easier than past games, Classes are not present, etc. Battlefield is not just about it's battlefield moments. Those moments came from games that were trying to be it's own thing. You can rendezook in garrys mod, but that doesn't make it a Battlefield game. Just how I feel, though.
if it was like WWI, a bunch of people would die of the spanish flu
cool
yeah. Bf1 just played it too safe, but it could have gone further without being boring at all
and that's why bf portal exists
bruh
yeah exactly. and i can see the appeal for cod tbh. it's pretty much a callback to the old arena shooters like quake or unreal in a more modern jacket. small arenas with fast respawn and killstreaks. i enjoy warzone in the past due it's the good gunplay of cod in a more larger map, which makes fights last a bit longer and generally gives you more time ot breathe in between the fights to make choices.
I get they took creative liberties for the sake of fun, and to their credit, they did keep the game authentic. They used (mostly) period accurate concepts and hardware, just with liberties taken for the sake of fun.
its just not. Ive played this game before, its fun but I dont feel like Im in ww1 at all.
Core gameplay, downgraded movement, animations, will be the exact same in Portal so that doesn't mean much to me.
no it woun't
really? I always thought bf was not particularly grounded and focused, MAYBE because I didnt play a lot as I was too young I didnt experience it but for me, battlefield is less structured than even the old CODs xD maybe it was different before maybe the cod community merged with the bf community
Well BF1 had to stick with the core values of BF, so they had to take some liberties with the game
u can change everything in portal
They used (mostly) period accurate concepts and hardware
This is such a low bar for authenticity that I cant imagine people saying it seriously
So yes, BF1 does immersion well. It's immersive to...BF1, not WW1.
Battlefields art direction has always been serious and grounded.
yea i don’t really care about historical accuracy and immersion so i enjoyed the game a lot
right exactly, Ive ALWAYS called cod an arcade shooter because youre right because core CODs are arcadey arena shooters
When people say BF feels realistic they're talking about it's immersion art direction.
Huh, I have studied WW1/2 for around 5-6 years, and ive put 250 or so hours in BF1, and it feels like WW1 to me.
Well its ur opinion
Guys
I would say thats kinda true but its definitely more goofy than a game like arma 3 imo
Then clearly you need to do a lot more research on WW1, because BF1 plays nothing like how the war actually went down.
hardline
I just found out now that the marines got rid of tanks and no longer use them? Why did they do that
arma 3 ain't even that realistic not anymore compared to games like squad
Hardline is a spin off.
And thats not meant to be a personal attack...I'm just sayin'.
it's old and need an update
tbf it depends what server you go on, why do you think squad is *more realistic just curious?
I think the word immersion doesn't have an agreed upon definition in the BF community and that just leads to people talking past each other
i've played both and i just feel way more immerse in squad then arma
no, its just subjective. What immerses you may not immerse me.
Hi again everyone! How are we doing.
GUYS can I just say im very very very very proud of you all coz we are actually having an intelligent debate on different games without being idiots <333333
so how do you define the word immersion in context of battlefield games? 🙂
That's....what he said.
I thought I said that?
enjoy it while it lasts
"doesn't have an agreed upon definition" that sounds like subjective to me
Battlefield 1s goal was to be an artistic interpretation of WW1. It was not trying to be realistic in its gameplay, it was trying to paint the atmosphere of WW1.
xDDD very true but im sittin here with a smile on my face coz there arent any idiots screaming at eachother
yea there’s usually an argument every 2 minutes lol
I thought he meant that people disagree on what immersion is, rather than what is immersive. If that makes sense
It wasn't trying to paint the atmosphere of WW1, it was trying to paint a version of WW1 based on what could have, in some theory, been.
exactly 
yeah coz wasnt ww1 very like battle line focused? I thought from my school time it was basically just trench wars
It was trying to do both, those go kind of hand in hand.
Not quite true, actually... did depend on front
For battlefield games (and games in general) I'm just looking to be sucked into the experience of playing the game. So be it the graphics that keep my eyes glued to the screen, the underlying gameplay having depth to constantly improve, or the community interactions enabled by the game
Really just anything that keeps my ADHD ass from pulling up some music to listen to while playing a game
sooo an artistic interpretation of ww1? ;D
The western front was very static, but other fronts were somewhat more mobile.
aaah okok, what fronts were more "modern" like ww2 esque
Immersion in battlefield ( for me ) Is running towards an enemy controlled sector with teammates and squadmates at my side as we fight towards one common goal. Victory.
Some will perish. Some will survive. But everyone on my team will benefit.
I can get revenge for a fallen teammate and then revive said teammate.
All of this adds to the immersion.
they need speed
But tanks and armored vehicles have had trouble surviving against the threat of precision strike and the plethora of drone and reconnaissance systems flooding conflict zones across the Middle East.
The Eastern Front was fairly mobile as well IIRC
Western front and Italian front were very static indeed, but Eastern and Africa/Middle East were way more mobile
wait now I think about it, I know nothing about what russia was doing in ww1, same with china india and japan 
Well no shit it isnt like how WW1 went down, because its a VIDEO GAME, they HAD to take liberties and stretch the truth to make BF1 more engaging and fun. The history is there, in the codex, campaign, operations cinematic intros, other than the abundant of automatic weapons, it still does feel like WW1 to an extent
I love having war historians here
sounds like a good definition of immersion imo ^^
It 100% feels like WW1.
as a WWI veteran, i can vouch for this
yes, but battle lines were only static on a large scale. There was movement on the scale of, say, a battlefield map, all the time. The land was just often taken back or the attack stalls out.
ze fuck ?
Wo
That's the emphasis, right there. To an extent. To a point, yes, it feels like WW1. To me, and to some others, that point is fairly short, a point the game regularly strays past into the realm of artistic freedom. Nothing inherently wrong with that, until people start pretending its more realistic than it is.
@amber kelpgood point
Even on Western front, there were some proper mobile offensives, although mostly in 1918
to me, BF1 just feels like ww2 instead of ww1
how
Cause it terms of weapon setup it is.
BF1's gameplay and combat is fairly reminiscent of WW2-style combat.
all the smgs, battle rifles, etc.
it just wouldn’t be a battlefield game if it tried to portray ww1 realistically
I just want to replay BF3 honestly in portal. Thats the game that made me switch to battlefield and stopped playing call of duty
like verdun or tannenburg
Before that they would stall out horrendously most of time (think Somme/Verdun/Passchendaele)
If WW1 had been a more mobile, combined arms conflict, it absolutely could have looked like WW2. That wasn't the case...until 1939, that is.
bf3 is just a hole different game
sure it would. Ever play bf1918? Its old but it definitely fits the refractor era bf games
And then there was Italy/Austria-Hungary and fifty thousand Battles of Isonzo
Semi-auto rifles, smgs, and man portable machine guns were essentially nonexistent in WW1, but were staples of ww2
the man portable machine guns were a thing
Whole
no problem with it
Man portable machine guns were far from non-existent
i don’t think it would but that’s just my opinion
In fact, golden days of walking fire doctrine featuring exactly these MGs were in Great War
so that's how it's written always wonder how it was actually i knew i was wrong but no one had ever corrected me thx lol
Weren't a lot of the technologies developed during the war?
Yes, but not to the extent seen in BF1. Even the SMGs that were used (namely the MP-18) were still exceedingly rare.
I mean the Chauchaut and the bar of course, but some of bf1’s guns like mg 15 and the lewis were usually operated by crews from fixed positions
well they prefered to use a shotgun to that so yeah
BF1 did a fantastic job of portraying the different fronts IMO. the only missing ones were colonial fronts
They were there, but they were not common whatsoever
radar exist due to war but yes most tech we have nowadays is because of war
here's how I'd do it:
Assault: Revolvers and Pistol carbines (Buffed to deal more damage)
Medic: Bolt action carbines, shotguns
Support: LMGs
Recon: Bolt action rifles
Only about 100(?) of the Hellreigel was ever made
@arctic groveI meant like tanks, that sort of military tech
why not give medic lmgs
bf1 wouldn’t have been a fun game if they tried to be hyper realistic imo
The Germans never used the shotgun, they rather famously spoke out against its use.
they werent fixed positions at all. That was reserved for the bigger ones like the Vickers or MG08. They were crew served, but so were a lot of the mgs in ww2 or modern bf games
i was talking about the americans xD
all those rounds where all players do is write letters and die of the spanish flu
MBT's are likely to go the way of Battleships in the next 20-30 years.
Wait, Battlefield Portal will have remastered BF1 stuff?
i know germans hated shotguns
more like 2
100? Not even close. Maybe 3 tops, and those never made it past testing (which means it likely didn't work).
if it was really realistic medics wouldn’t have guns tbf
Shotguns never really took off in German armed forces in general except in emergency weapon role
i think it will in the future
I must have confused it with one of the other smgs then
germany wanted shotguns banned
i don't blame them has it's a terrific weapon
there’s apparently stuff in the files about it but take that with a grain of salt
has they should be banned
You can get cheaper solutions by throwing an unmanned turret on a heavily armoured chassis and arm it with auto-cannons and missiles for similar firepower.
well, medics were armed w/ pistols but sure. This is still a massive step up from bf1's system tho
but it honestly wouldn’t be fun for a lot of people if those were the weapons
why?
BF1 and Verdun/tannenburg are two entirely different FPS genres. BF1 is more arcadey and fast paced, whereas verdun/tannenburg are more down to earth HC FPS games.
combat medics were rarely a thing at the time.
Medics are allowed to be armed and shoot said weapons, it's just a crime if you shoot at them when they're rendering aid to anybody.
It wouldn’t necessarily be unfun but it would be more niche. Beyond the Wire is pretty accurate weapon setup wise but it’s pretty fun.
I know, essentially the only German shotgun that has seen use in either World War was the Drilling in 2, and even there mostly as emergency/hunting weapon
which was my point…
Ik, I wasnt disagreeing with it
BF1s standard issue rifles mode was pretty fun ngl
ive heard of germans using double barrel shotguns for hunting in ww1. Not issued at all though so Im assuming they were occasionally brought by officers
They're hardcore, but as hardcore/milsim games go, they're very much accessible and fairly easy to play
Back to Basics? Hell yeah man
drilling is also in call of the wild, definitely a fun hunting weapon :3
yeah I agree
Verdun isnt hardcore, it just has a fast ttk
Yeah, certainly wouldn't be a regulation firearm
cause smgs, slrs and everything is fun, just having bolt action rifles and pistols as the main weapons sounds very boring imo
Kind of like how soldiers would carry any sidearm they could find with them for trench combat
well with what we mean as hardcore, we mean more brutal
just having bolt action rifles and pistols as the main weapons sounds very boring imo
Why cant they be fun?
i already think the game has a lack of weapon diversity imagine if it was only bolt action rifles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8M5Y-XpFUI
This video sums up exactly what's been downgraded in terms of visuals and animations for 2042, imo
I think the only (relatively) common smg in WW1 was the MP. 18 and it was still fairly rare
There might be another one I’m forgetting
I don't care too massively for the reduced destruction.
As someone who spends 99.9% of their time on foot in BF4 I welcome always having access to buildings to protect myself.
Well it just wouldnt work with what BF is
the automatico and villar perosa also used, though not as much as the mp18.
Ive also heard of machine pistols but have no numbers
why not?
they can, for a while, they gameplay would become extremely stale tho
does anyone else feel bad about hurting horses in bf1, even though they are pixels
BF has a mass variety of weapons at ur disposal, having JUST bolt action weapons would get boring
yes
Villar Perosa was used a fair bit IIRC
Although it was far from a standard SMG, to put it mildly
why?
Im sorry If Im asking this too much but the answers just seem surface level
God, I cannot imagine COD making a WW1 game
never said it would be. There would be bolt actions, semi autos handguns, shotguns, and machine guns.
Even Verdun doesn't do this, though. It includes some of those other weapons, it just restricts the frequency at which they appear and give them downsides to the bolt actions
it would be boring
I remember when I was shooting a horse with an AA cannon and my mom walked into the room and scolded me for shooting at it lmfao
@sonic schoonerhaha i mean sometimes they take some damage
and hard to balance
why?
@iron bladelol i'm going to have to get used to shooting the little robot dog
plus everyone would use the same gun
I mean, they had that one Zombies map set in WW1, but they just used a bunch of WW2 weapons lol
There's quite an impressive collection of improvised weapons from that war at the Canadian War Museum in Ottawa. https://www.warmuseum.ca/collections/?type=all&q1=all%3A%3A_contains%3A%3Atrench&sort=title&order=asc&view=grid&size=24&page=1
cause if only have like three weapon types available it will be boring because you’re using the same thing over and over again, you’ll just get sick of it
about ze destruction, the bf2042 stuff reminds me a bit of voxels. very precise and pinpoints the exact damage of your rocket, but not as good looking as the more " scripted" destruction in bf1. i mean, you basically deal a set amount of damage in bf1 and it blows up the entire corner of a house always. though physics change the fall of the debris.
I listed 6 weapon types tho
You're barking.
Robo dogs cannot be harmed by bullets.
@bronze thornjust explosives? borf borf
emp solves that
Based the beta they were absolutely harmed by bullets
honestly i wonder if when they finally start using robot dogs irl, soldiers will feel some kind of connection with them because of our hard-wired love for dogs
u shoot the dogs ?
bf games have usually been many automatic weapon types and a few single shot ones. Is a bunch of single shot weapons and a few automatics really that much more reputative?
cause if only have like six weapon types available it will be boring because you’re using the same thing over and over again, you’ll just get sick of it
You couldn't hurt the rovers with bullets in the beta.
Yes you could
I mean bf4 has 7 types and 2042 has 6 sooo...
we already use drones, i think drones are more efficient than using dogs
The Rangers? you absolutely could. I shredded them with MG and DMR
Meanwhile, TIL that Soviets had a special survival pistol for cosmonauts
and each type has 10 or more guns on it
@unborn heartFor All Mankind vibes (much recommended on apple+)
ok. You could do that for ww1 easily. Maybe not shotguns.
But also a lot of those weapons felt the same
They must have a weak spot or something then because. I pumped clip after clip into them and nothing happened.
no u couldn't
much more diverse tho
it would be just a bunch of variations of the same gun like it already is
I still think shotguns would be more effective on the moon.
bolt action carbines and bolt action rifles can be practically the same
@proven igloothere's only one way to find out
same with revolvers and sidearms
most guns felt different what u talking about
ik they’re technically different weapon types but they’re extremely similar
How are BACs and BARs the same but automatic rifles and automatic carbines are different?
Hell we had this in bfv.
Bullet size
oh believe me revolvers feel pretty different one to the other
Apparently you could take you any normal gun to the moon and use it relatively normally. Just the physics of the bullet would be all kinds of weird
has i can't hit sht with any revolver but when i pickup the .44 magnum i hit every shoot almost
i didn’t name those two specifically
Carbines traditionally shot something between a pistol round and a full sized rifle round
u couldn't shoot
not oxygen
u can't shoot guns
@amber kelp i cba anymore that’s just my opinion let’s just move on
without an atmosphere
no they dont. Not today at least
Lets agree to disagree.
but what about railguns?
railguns are different
Gunpowder is self-oxidising, guns work in vacuum.
One message removed from a suspended account.
u can't shoot on the moon it was already proved
oxidizers are built into the cartridge
plus war outside of the earth atmosphere is illigal lol
Railguns propel a metalic "slug" at incredible speeds using compression blasts with various models of railgun.
who's gonna arrest me? The space police?
black ops zombies says otherwise
so rail guns work in space? 🙂
Concord.
Yes, the Green Lanterns.
ask DARPA then
“Fine report me, get the FUCK down here and arrest me” lol
it's true u can't shoot guns without an atmosphere i don't remember correctly why but u can't
most stuff said here is surface level knowledge
how does one play hazard zone?
You could just google and see you are wrong.
guns on the moon don't shoot it was tested
pretty much.
I just like to act like I know what I'm talking about.
when the game comes out
Guns are absurdly small time for DARPA lmao
oh
what are y'all talking about, no one shot a gun on the moon
i thought it was already out
thats what they want you to think
"sorry neil... we have to try"
Still waiting on that invisibility cloak they teased almost 2 decades ago.
Unless...
nah it’ll launch with 2042 on november 19th
Or november 12th if you have gold or ultimate editions.
aight
when you buy the game you can play 2042, portal and hazard zone
thought it was out cause of the announcement awhile ago
@proven iglooaren't they supposedly doing exoskeletons now?
and that the beta had a hazard zone option
They're teasing 🙂
that wasnt available
nah they wouldn’t have it out before the actual game came out
how would you play it otherwise lol
Pretty sure they gave up a while back because of how big the battery was, but it might make a comeback now that we can make them smaller.
Is that true that playing from origin on BF2042 will ban player ?
huh?
Huh
They seem to be mostly doing stuff with AI and robotics right now. At least, of the things we know they’re working on, lol
all bf2042 players will be playing from origin
where this info is official ? any link ?
Have you seen the PLA "exosuits"? Poor guys have a cargo crate sized battery strapped to them.
He’s fucking with you man
ok so that's a new fake news
F A K E N E W S
Origin is EA’s platform, it isn’t going to ban you for playing EA’s games there lol
Battlefield 2042 is available to preorder on both Origin and steam for the PC versions of the game.
Note that it is a preorder. You will be unable to play until the 19th of november for standard edition and the 12th of november for the Gold and ultimate versions of the game.
Heard it really fucks with the knees
M Y K N E E S
So... are we going to get an exosuit specialist?
Im gonna go with .... no.
But like it could be cool. They could have no fall damage or something.
Hell the fuck no there ain’t no way that there’s going to be exo suits
If they didnt have exosuits in 2142. They wont have it in 2042.
they will be called "power armor"
I think its time for me to put netflix on and go watch something.
I will probably be back on in an hour or so.
YOU ARE OUT OF UNIFORM SOLDIER, WHERE IS YOUR POWER ARMOR?!
there’s no news period
The stuff they talked about releasing this week isn’t out yet, is all
I see brother I see
Man BFVietnam heli physics were surprisingly good
The ttk was so damn low in that game though lmfao
Their body armor was their skin
AW shitty soundtrack intensifies
🌪️🌪🌪

bap
ONE SHOT. ONE KILL. READY TO DIE. NEVER WILL.
Honestly wouldn’t be upset. My friends might be willing to try the game again
Yes
Yeah dude 🧢
I mean if you can present proof sure I'll believe ya but anyone can just say yes
Can't wait for the ttk changes people will do in portal
I've come back to voice my opinion on the state of battlefield 2042 being hard-core opposed to the changes before like no bullet drop the class system and less realism. I saw one comment that changed my perspective I'd kinda like to know what people think and that's "It doesn't have to he realistic if it's fun" thoughts?
average hardcore enjoyer
There isn't bullet drop?
Very little
the new bf is kinda trash ngl
yay the chat is back on track
Beta was fun and that's the most important thing to me when it comes to games but it can be improved
Then why are you here?
I feel like if they dialed back the modernwarfare vibe and brought back classes it would be perfect
to see fanboys praising new bf
Odd way to spend your free time but ok.
This is why I'm trying to walk the line I genuinely hated on the game hard
i have nothing better to do so why not
i'm positive you have something better to do
Anyone here remember MAG?
watching clouds...volunteering at a shelter...playing a game
Really? No games you enjoy playing or tv programs worth watching?
You mean to tell me there is absolutely nothing else worth doing other than come here being captain negative?.
That is really disturbing ngl.
I got MAG vibes from the new battlefield lacking in realism but big in scale I will say tho MAG was way ahead of its time 256 players on one server on ps3
BF2042 delayed to 142396487126394817263
New leaked BF2042 gameplay (Hazard zone) (Mods don't ban) (#2042Leaks) ||https://youtu.be/SMabBejF6KI||
hi guuys 2day i plae battlefeld 2032 open btea tek demo
Most important features that need to be added are crouch sprint and lean although I doubt most people would use them in 2042. Specialists could use tweaking and guns need a bit of balancing but everything else was good gameplay wise for me
👍

damn looks real
damn that game looks smooth as butter ngl
sound design is unbelievable
guess he owns a 3090
When is early access?
really sounds like you’re in a war
everything seems boring lately last thing that i really enjoyed was squid game
12th of november.
So..... ban?
I think the slide and tac sprint should be removed but I'm old school

The first battlefield game I played seriously was battlefield vietnam 2004
Automatic.
I think u should be removed
Slide was in 1 and 5 and tac sprint isn't that much faster. All they need to do is nerf slide
!!regular
The Regular role is earned by users automatically who are active in chat and follow the server rules. With this role you can post/embed images, use some bot commands, and change what color you appear in chat.
huh, cool! Cant wait to get it if I do
Uh.. really now?
I just hate the animation
No one runs like that
Cool, I've bssn active for sometime now and didn't.get regural role
**v i n e b o o m **
it takes a while
I really do

Pog
No one runs indefinitely either.
the joke wasn't funny because I could tell that was battlefield 1
ive been active for weeks now and I havent gotten it yet, it just takes lots of time
do u know roughly how long it takes to get the role or can you really say
This is a fair point but the animation just feels clunky
I've been active for months 
Modernwarfares version is better
huh, odd
Ive been here for a fairly long time and I dont have the role yet.
have you been muted before
There is nothing more annoying than jogging while being shot at
I have
LOL
oh alr that probably explains it
its like forbidden knowledge, no one knows
its not just being active, you gotta be helpful to the community itself 
same. it says that the role is awarded to people who follow the rules so we might not qualify
How many weeks till launch for early access?
does one want to Battlefield 5?
what platform
pc
18th or 19th
I feel like they could've went higher with player counts
#lfg-pc ask round there
What lol?
early is 12th
What about rehabilitation? 
Early access is on 12th of Nov
petition for rehab channel
Yea so how many weeks is that from now
Petition for prison channel
what question is that lol
Nvm lmaoo
Hi there! If you're looking for people to join you in games there is the looking for group channels.
#lfg-pc
#lfg-xbox
#lfg-playstation
"Brig channel stockade"
petition for therapy channel
early access is the 12th
Hey guys they need to add a hunger meter to battlefield 2042 if I cant camp and eat MREs is it really battlefield
Give good bots
When you get downed they need a team to pick u up in a chopper and take u to a medical tent for the rest of the match
quick someone say somethin controversial so the channel is active again
BF4 is overrated
Instead of shooting darts into peoples asses can we just have an animation of sitting the person down and going through a quick combat analysis of where their booboos are?
yea and when you die the game deletes itself from your hard drive and you can never play it again
screams incoherently

Truuue
And then Andrew Wilson come to your house with a kolibri and fuckin pops a cap in ur head
but it's a kolibri so it takes multiple shot to the head to kill you so you die in agony
!when
and he slowly whispers ‘immersion’ in your ear as you bleed out from a 2mm bullet
Sounds like a dream come true
"Immersive Gameplay"
PAP
I hate the word immersion tbh
They have an accessory that attaches a gun to an arm so if u got shot in game u do irl
is this good for the playa?
then it fades to black and you hear "Hey, you, you're finally awake"
Battlefield 2042 | Release (Gold/Ultimate)
Releases <t:1636700400:R>
I like the various backgrounds.
immersion 
"Controversial take" to much realism was holding the series back from being creative.
to an extent yes
The worst word that gets used in this community tbh
but hopefully a great pc experience
immersion 
Ok but u can't lie that tactical sprint really looks terrible and breaks ur immersion
then if you tell him you don’t like 2042 he’ll say ‘if you don’t like it don’t buy it’ while he reloads the kolibri angrily
or anyone in the gaming industry because it is used to death, and is almost never used correctly
i mean running faster isnt that bad, just needs better animation
Lmao
It really does
and then he pulls out the only hellreigel in existance and starts kneecapping u
the tac sprint can be immersive in the sense of a manic sprint to cover before catching your breath
I agree it can be
The animation just needs work
That's literally my only complaint
Lmao
Also the cod style notification sounds threw me off
I was like heh what game am I on
Lmao
Animations-ish and making it so that you don't just do it everywhere, give it a interesting purpose
The immersion for me is hearing gunfire & explosions
Makes me relive my glory days
Immersion is joining a server on 1942 and them having Hitting the horn make the jeep fly
I do feel that sometimes the word immersion is used incorrectly.
You can be immersed without historical accuracy or extreme realism.
Yall youngins weren't there for flying jeeps by Hitting the horn
plot twist: this dude wasnt in the military he just grew up in detroit
LOL
Plot twist
I thought that was Chicago.
It just needs to make sense and be engaging. Historical accuracy and realism just achieve this the best, which is why they are the first thoughts when thinking "immersion"
What we're the loading screens like?
Horrible.
Absolute respect. I could never do something as brave as join the military.
those trucks are way larger than I thought
Like 16 hours or something to get to Iraq
I wouldn't wanna ride in an armored vehicle that's as tall as that.
Looks like easy pickings
I feel the heat would be far worse
Don't get me wrong it's solid foe what it did
Mech infantry for the win
We need to get away from the storm!
Beta Players : NO
"hehe 25mm go thunk thunk thunk thunk"
i jumped into the hurricane too many times
They're upgrading to a 50mm
Yep

It's a German made gun
are you short or is that truck unnecessarily big?
I never had a hurricane in my matches :-(
wonder if 1942 remake will be any good 
of course its fucking german
They all are
cool
I only saw the hurricane 1 time in old gen
old habits die hard
Hello lads
oh, so the truck is big, got it
ello
Hello.
epic 
That truck is way safer than a hummer tho
Holy crap the storys I've heard
Riding on sandbags
Like bruh
That's desperation
It really emphasises the point of "military grade" is whatever fucking works and is cheap
idk there is a lot of people with good gaming tastes?
i have seen like 4 ppl in the last two days with some rdr2 pfp
Mines pokemon. Nice change to rdr2.
Hot take rdr2 online is trash
Yep. I'm proof of that. Took an IED.
factual
that isnt a hot take
IED?
gta online and rdr online trash
not a hot take
Improvised explosive device
improvised explosive device
Factual statement*
Ahh ok
You’re going to make me do this. But can the chat agree xero is just ben foster
Basically raggidy ass bombs
Bruh
Rrrrr
those games are fine you just dont need to buy a new one every day
dont wanna end up like on cod server

tell that to the idiots who buy it every year for some team updates
Because Red Dead Redemption is amazing
Never played it.

never played it either

idk why everyone loves it so much
that is a problem
The story is good
Because it's fucking amazing.
you kinda do
its one of the best video games of all time
????
Nah
worth it
Same reason people like FIFA...its the same thing over and over...just with new maps. that is what a lot of people want
guys hot take
Depends on your infraction history here
It is actually quite good if you enjoy westerns
And this is why no one likes you.
RDR2 has really bad gunplay but other than that it’s pretty good tbh
Not my sort of game tbh
is /s serious or sarcasm?
serious
seriasm
shit pants
Improvised explosive devices. A bomb, a big one.
I use it as sarcasm usually
i am getting a mixed reaction here lmao
i don’t think people are playin fifa for the maps
Bruh
No, but they pay/play for the new content..AKA...updated rosters
Got a couple of replies earlier but thanks for replying 🙂
FIFA’s excellent map selection of almost identical stadiums
yes which is why the game makes sense its released every year
FIFA’s Frontline
fifa battleroyale
it shouldn’t be €60 but it should be released every year
That sounds like a real thing somewhere in the world.
its the game where live service makes the most sense
yea but money
an updated roster is not enough to justify a new game
but they release a new game every year because the people who buy them are stupid as fuck
and they know that
no ones going to play last years fifa lol
Sports games lend themselves the most to live service but curiously no one’s really gone for it aside from Konami’s shitty football game
Guys my cat is sleeping on my chest, which means battlefield 2042 will be a good game
they also have a monopoly on soccer games because they have a deal with the real FIFA
efootball 21
they should make it a live service but they never will
why
makes it sound like some knockoff
it’s pes what do you expect
Efutból
at least pro evolution soccer sounds cool as fuck
cause its literally the same game. A sequel can and should be more than that
whats ur problem
fick off
They don't need to. The fucking gibbons that keep buying it every year, buying FIFA points every year for the same guys in different shirts, earn EA so much money. Why would they ever spend effort and money on a live service when they can just make more money by reskinning the same game every year
fack ufd
it should be a live service imo but it never will so i think it will release every year but the price should be way decreased
i cant wait for the day some country decides to fuck over fifa

also the fact that fifa is a gambling simulator and a total waste of fucking time is astounding
and people buy this shit every year
they must have negative iq
people like different games? no way
it is gambling tho
its a gambling simulator designed to prey on addicted kids
and has 0 age rating
LOL
its amazing that ad campaigns have people convinced that they have to buy the newest games to have fun.
they won't, but EA and FIFA seem to be doing that themselves. the extent of idiocy that FIFA players have is extensive, but the extents each other them has gets tested every year until even they realise it's the same shit for 23rd time in a row
Welcome to marketing
no one wants to play last years season tho
why not?
bro if they havent realized yet that they are buying the same game 23 times in a row
they are just fucking stupid lmao
I just wish all games would do away with lootboxes.
it has to he said
because they want to play the current season?
they got negative iq
doesnt answer my question
EA arent buying the FIFA licence again though...unless FIFA reduce the price (FIFA have asked for double the previous licence price)
Case in point that they're fucking themselves
They are rebranding to EA Sports Football
if they lose their monopoly we may get some actual fucking sports games again
LOL
people want to play the new season so they buy the game with the new season, no one wants to play the season they’ve been playing for the last year and the season that is over irl
does fifa ever update or are they always just pumping out new titles
People will still buy it, since they have the team and player licnces
Never been a fan of fifa
when you say actual sports games, would you literally just mean fifa without the lootboxes?
they dont update shit
Ultimate team is such a money maker for ea there’s no way they aren’t releasing more football games
Why are we talking fifa in the 2042 channel?
fifa overall seems like a solid football sim
It’s more than half their revenue iirc
FIFA gets 3 updates a month, special mode and content updates
haha nice joke
thats a longer way of just saying the same thing.
why isnt a past season good enough? Why do you have to play the new one to have fun?
they just release a new identical game with the same gambling mechanics + some new player names and teams

what a moron you have to be to buy the game every year
because believe it or not dummy people sidetrack to other convos every now and then but don't worry sir the convo will go back to 2042 at some point
hate people coming in chats being like why you talking about this __
cus its a public chat
Penguin
Only played the Madden NFL 🏈 on my IPhone, but it’s not better than the Madden platform, so it sucks too
Why are you guys discussing things in a discussion channel smh my head
because i want to play the current season, the season that’s ongoing irl, i want to use the players how they are this season. Also i never said you can’t have fun, i went back and played fifa 09 a while ago, i still had fun
Everyone sure is overly concerned about how other people spend their money in video games.
If there is a way. Someone will take the chat off topic.
Generally it's not frowned upon here as we have only got so much 2042 information to discuss.
Well I would hope a random stranger doesn’t make irresponsible financial decisions for a video game
"why do you want to play it"
because i want to play the current season
this is not an answer and you've said this in 3 different ways
just think about it for a bit
fifa makes more sense as a live service game... but people keep throwing money at it so EA keeps charging full price every year
that’s why i want to play it
why can’t you take it as an answer lol
Never buy a sports game and IDK why is it so hard to do that not buying sports games?
its just restating the question. Just think for a bit about it.
Its actually quite hillarious.
You'd think these people would realise that they didn't earn my money. I did.
Ill spend it however which way I want.
nobody is telling you you cant do something. Theyre saying that its a bad idea.
Remember when plus system was first revealed in the gameplay trailer and people where like “I hope you can’t skip reloads by swapping map types”. And then that’s exactly what you could do. That was funny
bro, ‘why do you want to play it’ because i want to play the current season is that so hard to understand? i restated it three times cause you obviously don’t understand what i’m saying
Thats your opinion. People can do as they please.
never said they cant. Just saying they shouldnt
I can appreciate that but it still comes down to us to make our own decisions on what we spend our money on.
if you dont want to actually think about why you want it, then why are you even responding?
People can set their money on fire for all I care. But when people try to convince me a bad product is fine, then I’ll start to get into it
lad you don’t understand what im saying, i thought about why i want it, i’ve thought a good while about if i should buy it before every fifa game comes out
I thought about why i want it
No you didnt. Youre answer is "i want it because I want it". Thats not a reason.
oh ffs
No offense but you guys should probably just agree to disagree at this point
any new info today?
Im just waiting for 2042 to launch. Im am fully burnt out on all other shooters at the moment and I enjoyed the beta.
Not so far
thats not how self defined internet philosophers work
ugh
Im just asking the man a question.
So, who wants to see secret reloads back in 2042?
It would be pretty cool but I’m more concerned with a polished base game atm
If they’re already in there then have at it
there better be, the devs have put a lot of work into small features like that so i bet they would
unless they decide to sell them
ok let me explain it to you, if you didn’t know the season changes every year. The players get better or worse, they might get better in some fields or worse in others or they could stay the same. Different players could change to different teams or new players could come and sign to other teams. that’s what happens in a season, in this case the 21/22 season. I would like to play the season that is ongoing, (21/22), because i’ve already played the last season to it’s fullest. I spend hundreds of hours at these games so i definitely get my money worth
We are suffering from an FPS drought. Nothing new and exciting has released in the shooter genre in the last roughly 2 years. 2042 will end the drought for me
no, and i am not elaborating
doom
Never played doom
Doom is pretty sick, haven’t tried eternal yet but I should
Aside from this franchise really the only shooter I could get truly excited for is a new Titanfall
Hopefully the next Modern Warfare is good since MW19 was pretty nice
I want the double barrel shotgun in BF 2042 so I can become the doom slayer
but I dunno
Csgo, Tf2, Hll, Squad, Insurgancy, past Battlefields. i am sure you can find one to fit your playstyle
I aint buying any more cod games.
Good for you
its pretty good. Multiplayer is meh but at least its very different
i hope so too, hopefully it lives up to mw2
which is my favourite cod
They’re apparently calling it Modern Warfare II
yeah thats not gonna be confusing.
Do we call iw MW22 or MW222?
Was never into CSGO and its old af by this point. I have played the previous Bfs to death. I want something new. Im also sick of cod. 2042 is gonna be the answer
should’ve just gone with Modern Warfare 2: Two! and just not given a fuck
@amber kelp that’s the best i can explain it to you lad, if you still can’t understand it, i can’t help you
its old af by this point
still on top of the charts. Old games are still plenty of fun
if it doesnt suck, which it very well might
because i’ve already played the last season to it’s fullest.
All you had to say was this. This is an actual reason
I hate CSGO it’s just not for me
Even before the skin trading lootcrate bs turned me off
i literally said that before and you just ignored it lol
trading is the best part wdym, its so fun
look at least in cs you can sell ur stuff on the steam market
and profitable
no I did not. Though I want to ask how much reshuffling all the stats actually does to refresh the game, your stalling and shit has made other people start to get annoyed at this conversation.
If you have anything to trade sure. But I don’t care to buy lootcrate keys and then try to inflate the price of a digital knife skin
youre better off just buying skins. Uncrating usually results in a net loss.
personally I just ignore the market
If you like doing that more power to you
wow, A beta being buggy? who knew
bf betas are generally worse than most betas Ive played
yeah, i agree, thats kinda what betas are for
WHOAH HOLD UP
WAIT
U MEAN
THIS IS NORMAL

Or they would be, if they took place more than just a month before launch
try vanguard, it is much worse
i did say that before actually
no one wants to play the season they’ve been playing for the last year
what does reshuffling the stats do?
you could say the same about actual football lol, but i enjoy it
i got annoyed at this conversation 10 minutes ago but you kept replying lol
vanguard is perfectly playable
wdym
stop fanboying
vanguard at least works
but you kept replying lol
Word of advice. If you dont want to have a conversation, do not have it. simply do not reply or tell me to piss off
Two last word freaks I see
really? did you play it
did you look at the sun?
i played it for hours
Vanguard works cause its a copy and paste of MW19 lol and guess what they got you for another $60 for the same game 😆
Yes. BF having bad launches is also “normal” but everyone has just internalized the pain now instead of asking why DICE keeps making mistakes
it definitely was NO WHERE NEAR this level or brokenness
yes it had some annoying stuff like the sun glare
It had a bunch of bugs, including a funny one where my mg started spewing flames but I saw way more in 2042
but man is it not any where near 2042
yeah, its MUCH worse
Maybe COD is the game for you then, you seem to only hate on BF. So perhaps a COD server would better suit you. 👌
Its video game making, i dont give a shit as long as its playable when it launches
Vanguard had so many visual bugs
Yeah, it had 2 betas that were worse than 2042
Historically speaking, it may very well not be, is my point
i didn’t want to be a prick lol, but you just kept asking the same question and i copy and pasted my previous answer
I hate how so many people are now just expecting companies to release defective games and attacking people who point out that this shouldnt be normal
Got through them just fine
Thank you cuz that’s true facts
explain to me how vanguard even compares to the vid i just sent about 2042 beta
two sides one hates bf one hates cod. Idk why people even pick sides just play the game u want
Vanguard and 2042 are two completely different games.
No it wasn't, and I spent hundred of hours on other cod games
i hate on bf because thats the unfortunate truth no one here wants to accept
hate both 
Ascended Brain take
chad mindset
The simplicity of COD using a rehash of older games vs creating a new engine with a much more vast gameplay experience, safe to say one will have “more” bugs but that doesn’t make it worse
it's the same game they just charge you another 60 each year
didnt have many major bugs tbh
yea same i don’t experience any bugs with it
and was perfectly playable
Yeah it was a meh game
battlefield on the other hand
Good for you. I don’t why you think it wouldn’t be preferable to have polished Battlefield games at release, but you do you
it’s just the exact same thing as mw19
same thing goes for sports games
dont even try to convince me vanguard is near bf2042s beta
2042 does not have a new engine
Ok here people
Bf team is fixing bugs etc for release so why complain
whoever says that is a moron
Yeah falling off the map as you spawn, having giant black squares on ur screen Yeh ran great
who hasnt played vanguard
when I played vanguard there where multiple disaperring items, walls, lamp posts and debris would just flicker in and out of existance, the sun was going super nova and would also flicker, also had this weird thing where it look like a fake png, gunplay in the game is fucked and i shouldnt be able to put a drum magizine on a friggin m1 garand




