#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 2275 of 1
i love this fuckin meme
Why spam the same thing over and over again when you can post a new Battlefield 2042 related image each time ¿
Battlefield 5
You people need to go to general with this shit
nah

Did y'all hear about the new battlefield 4 coming out

It's awesome
@chilly patrol world war 3
!when
Battlefield 2042 Reveal Trailer: https://youtu.be/ASzOzrB-a9E
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay Trailer: https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
Time: <t:1626973200:R>
Who here is getting steam deck to play 2042 on?
less then 7 days 
ah i saw that

what's the price for it?
Are you claiming that cat jam is not pro 2042? Is that an official statement ?
@tribal wyvern f2p
Well, STARTS at $399
i wasn't talking to you
and goes up and up
SHEEEEEESH
Oh lel
man the quest 2 cost less than that shit
Cap
you mean world war 3?
it's been around since 2018
Lel
it just died in early access
and they're re-releasing it for free
now it's more like bf 2042
Wait... WW3?? Were being drafted?? Aw man, no more Battlefield
But you get access to all your steam games, including every steam game available that is on your steam list.
Yeah
BF 2042... please have an A10
Hello how are u im under the water
lemme tell you a secret
steam deck is sort of a scam if you already got a gaming pc
know why?
I mean look, if they're going to have a little bird, why not the iconic A-10?
you can do the same shit with your phone for a lot less
Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. Not that I can make official statements, but still.
buy yourself a razer kishi, set up moonlight on your phone
remotely access your computer and play any game
even streaming at 120 fps
steam deck is 400 bucks
razer kishi without a discount is 90
i mean i'm all for the concept of the steam deck
it's amazing
but if someone's got a gaming pc already and is just looking for portability they can do this shit for way less with their phone
My phone has more fps then my laptop jokes on you
i mean if your phone's got a 120hz screen and you reach 120 fps in games you can do that
and also
you can stream in 1440p or 4k
you can literally stream 4k 120 fps
to your fuckin phone
Like Kai was caught in 8k huble telescope
it's revolutionary but all i'm saying is you can do better if you got a gaming pc already
sort of like the switch really
if you own a ps4 already there's not really a point to buying the switch
same with steam deck
What if I don't want a gaming pc and I wanna throw it off a cliff though
if you own a gaming pc already not really a point to buy the steam deck
what?
That's what I'm saying
bf 2042 youtubers are alreayd jumping on the steam deck saying you can play bf 2042 anywhere now
meanwhile lots of dumbasses are oblivious to the existence of moonlight
Me
I like ps
I like whatever works best
I like ps
But what about what works best
Fair enough
Cat
btw
I have always had a ps
levelcap is milking the fuck out of any and i mean ANY news of bf 2042
Dog
and even news not related to it
steam deck's nowhere near related to bf 2042 and he sitll made a video about bf 2042 and the steam deck...........
he also spread that fake feedback leak as true and believed it himself lmao
i see right through him
content milker
So when are they going to tell us about the destructive events on each map
they already did
they said there's a fully destructible village on one of the maps
I am legally blind so I cannot see through anyone or anything
Having a tornado on every map is a game changing event
Battlefield 2042 Reveal Trailer: https://youtu.be/ASzOzrB-a9E
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay Trailer: https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
Time: <t:1626973200:R>
it's not gonna be a tornado on every map
you could make a bullshit reddit post about bf2042 leaks, if it get enough likes, levelcap probably would post a video about it
@tribal wyvern
it'll be different each time
LMAO CORRECT
No like levolution like the rocket on Orbital
Wait so if I said aliens were being added people would believe me
We know Kaleidescope is a cod base map because nothing is destructible
I wany ice cream
And on top of that Lemon, you don't get SSD with $399, only the higher priced ones come with an SSD drive on the steam deck.
woooooooooow
i don't think it's all that worth it now tbh
it's a better pick than the switch
If I tear my ssd in half can it still work this is my biggest question of life
but i don't think it's worth buying if you already got a gaming pc
like i siad, you can use moonlgiht game streaming with the razer kishi and your phone and achieve a better result
4k 120 fps streaming
with changeable bitrate and customizable settings
30k
obviously there's no point streaming in 4k to your phone
but you can stream in 1080p or 1440p too
and up to 120 fps
120hz phones are not that rare so it's pretty cool
input delay's not there basically
i planned on playing bf 2042's alpha or beta on it in case it came out in august or late july
buuuuuut after they moved the technical playtest to august it's pretty much confirmed we're getting a beta in september
that sucks really bad cuz that's only a month awya from release
we barely get anything
ea play better not be dissapointing
Fortnite
ppl buy a switch to play nintendo games
nto everyone
it depends on the context
yes
but i mean if you weren't planning to buy the switch just for nintendo games then ye it's a better pick than the switch
but even then
portable gaming pc's, while revolutionary and pretty cool are practically useless
due to remote pc streaming apps you can do the same shit at a much lower price on your phone
sure, it requires an internet connection but 4g isn't hard to come by
and even 5g's available now
i'd say that the market for portable gaming pc's is prob a better subtitute for people that buy gaming laptops
Some people buy nintendo switches to run ubuntu on there...
that travel a lot you know?
Depends on how you want to use it
like if someone travels a lot i can see them buying the steam deck, cuz they own't have access to 4g all the time
but assuming you DON'T travel a lot and you just wanna have access to pc gaming when you do at some point then yeah steam deck isn't a very good choice
if oyu're not gonna use it much don't buy it is my view on it
interesting, this appears when clicking bf 2042 in your library
whatcha doin ea?
At least the error message looks fancy
ye it does
98 DAYS BOYS
jeez that's an awful lot of time
ARGHEUWGH EWUGHE IT'S SO FAR AWAYY
wait wait wait
It depends on how you look at it
shouldn't it unlock in 91?
Ther4 is many different arguments
whyd you preorder w/o playing beta
i'll download it on origin and launch via ea desktop if i have to
cuz it's my choice??????
if i intend to buy it at launch anyways i don't see a reason not to pre order
yall see steams new game deck
imagine playing bf2042 ON THAT
oh ffs
steam deck is prob gonna be very expensive
it starts at 399 but it'll prob have differnet editions that'll cost more
the highest model is 812 CAD
and also it's a 720p screen
you can literally stream your own gaming pc if you own one alreayd to your phone with the razer kishi and stream on a 1080p or even 1440p screen at 120 fps
steam deck's nice, but it's useless, no reason to buy it
i feel like it's more of a more portable replacement to gaming laptoprs more than anything
it's a gaming laptop alternativei s how i see it
its also powered by amd*
so no real reason to purchase it if you got a gaming pc alreadyt
which is kinda cool
i have a gaming pc im just like danggg
i got a 3070 oc xdd
oc?
RTX?
show me your picture of your PC gaming?
yup
uhhhhh
sure
Okay!
the hell is the point of overclocking a 3070?
Oh never mind, we don't have to post the picture because of nitro.
it's already overkill for gaming and you oc'ed it?
you're just shortening your gpu's life span, there's no need to overclock that
for gpus its auto over clocked
He's talking about RTX.
i cant control it
lol
my cpu isnt overclocked
RTX 3070
I know all about PC hardware.
I studies to learn it from PC simulator.
that's called GPU Boost 3.0
my gtx 1070 ti has it too
it's not auto overclocking
oh really???
yes
then ive never oced mine
like ive never actually oced it
I don't even know how to use overclocked.
it increases the gpu's power draw when under load to icnrease performance
ooo
so wait
it's not overclocking
i have a question
do i have to click that or whatever?
or like
cause ive never done that
click what?
it's already activated.............
the oc edition means you can overclock it through official software
if you hadn't touched that then you haven't oc'ed it
okok
and it's just using gpu boost 3.0
then im safe
lemon got that point.
its fine
as long as i havent done it
im good
I only know about PC but I don't do overclock or gpu boost, it's might willing to damage the hardware like CPU and GPU.
ive never overclocked anything so
Your fine
i dont really care about ocing anythong or not
i got worried cause if my gpu is actually like oc'ed then o no
i mean its the oc edition but i didnt oc it
can we move this convo in #technology now?
this is getting out of hand it's nowhere near related to bf 2042
got it
i'm redownloading bf5 on my ps4
and this time
i'm resetting all my settings to default
so it looks good, and it FEELS good
cuz i suck at aiming and stuff
and hopefully i have fun (90% chance i don't)
k
The biggest issue, the most important issue is if EA Dice is going to get rid of the hackers and cheaters. Otherwise, what's the point of buying it and playing it?
and why is why?
Why why is why
The gaming prices is gonna make more and more expensive for every next year and the decades.
is why is? or why is is why why?
Sony adds 10$ ontop of the normal price for every game that is played on the ps5
I agrees
i was stupid since my ages i spent so much money on video games
That'll make $50 or $60
big mistake. get a good a pc
its just cruel how much money i have wasted on nothing basically
rip
the industry ripped me off like they do with everyone
Sony and microsoft don't make money with selling the consoles. The only way they get money is with the gamepass/ps+ and selling games for 10$ more
rip
its sad. those lucky youth people has lots of money and they wasted it on this and now we have the micro transactions and skins and bs passes. F
Ah yes just like xbox gamepass.
It's like I'm not gonna insult the EA and any related about battlefront 2.
well game pass worths it. Xbox is the best anyway. those discounts helped a lot. especially with the gold subscriptions
But yeah it's all lootboxes and anything that's why.
lootboxes are a thing of the past
theres only a handful of games that have a lootbox system
its insane how do they got away with riping people off so rudely
well, they got away by finding a loophole in the laws
i mean there’s a point when they just shouldn’t do the full.
yes the law... i know
its not their problem that lawmakers failed to see them
"civilization is over because a greedy industry was greedy" alright calm it down there lol
games arent really expensive
but yes greed had a great part in it.
cuz you know, inflation
I just wait until the games on sale and buy it lol

yes
I bought the battlefield bundle 100 dollars off
usually there’s always cool discounts
and games are getting more and more complex
benefits of PC
That's an industry lie
so 60e for a AAA game, isnt that bad
there is no reason to raise the price of AAA games
lol, how is it a lie
well in fact most games got less complex by the last years
gaming companies economics
just look at crysis one for example and so many games that were way more complex a decade ago than most todays games
Game's have costed relatively the same to make for decades and they aren't "more complex"
The point is that Battlefield continues to have hackers and cheaters for almost two decades and we continue to wonder why that is.
the tech in modern engines is way more complex
cryengine 2 is ancient
As time passes it becomes easier to make "complex" games for cheaper
and because they can do that and decide to do that
cryengine 5 is definitely more complex and has a wide array of features
in real life the same
We do have anti cheat software.
cheaters and scammers and bs
crysis isnt really a complex game
it was a rather big game for that time
but it doesnt really have that complex mechanics
Yeah that's the point
well it’s pretty complex... the mechanisms and such
but thats just the level size
complex games get easier and cheaper to make overtime
in 2007 and still way more sophisticated than most todays games
therefore the 60 dollar price stays the same
its not more sophisticated at all
fine its not
EA has no reason to ask for $70 dollars, and they can fuck off with that, nothing they have done warrants that price, and they already put tons of other ways to make money into their games
the other half completely throws away the games' concept and becomes a basic on the rails and corridor shooter
its really a sand box with lots of opportunities and possibilities and methoods
tangible
Is 2042 gonna be on Steam?
fluid
yes
not repetitive
it already is

it has great validity
SteamDeck Battlefield
yes, crysis gives you a lot of opportunity cuz the beginning levels are large
i guess its gonna be on steam
and AI randomly spawns
weird
A hopeful competitor to the overpriced Switch
you still need to run origin in order to play 2042
the steam machine was a good idea
I like how they used gordon freeman to shill their console
instead of just making a game

Money
developing games and technology is expensive but yeah
That isn't always the case
i mean the last 20-30 years show the value of the efforts of those who worked on it on all fields
its insane how video games got better and better
Eh
and computer technology
I think video games are going through a shitty period rn
thats your choice as a consumer, because price is subjective, not objective, you decide for yourself if a product A is worth the price that they put
its a recent thing that we humans have this
No longer being treated as art
Price is 100% objective according to market value and budget
EA are literally robbing you
once again
Half life 3 gonna be awesome
they arent robbing me
because i know for a fact that ill play 2042 for hundreds of hours
!when
Battlefield 2042 Reveal Trailer: https://youtu.be/ASzOzrB-a9E
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay Trailer: https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
Time: <t:1626973200:R>
eh idk, Alyx was fine but the new voice cast sucks
1 week
how is that robbing me, when ill be playing their product for hundreds of hours
Because they are charging you more for the same value
for no reason
yes this is life
but i get to decide if the game is worth it to me
always take more and more
not them
they put a price tag on it, and then its on me, do i want to spend 60e on it, or not
and thats a subjective choice on my end
Yeah buying the game or not is subjective, the price isnt
i am not obliged to buy the game
..but we keep running into hackers and cheaters in spite of the anti-cheat software...
so is the price, because you ask yourself is this game worth it to you
When you go to the store and buy something, can you say "I will pay 2 dollars for this brand new game" and do it? no. So price isn't subjective
there are people who are ready to spend tens of thousands of dollars on modifying their car
Whenever I spend money on entertainment I basically measure all my values based on Movie tickets
and then there are people who want to buy a car and not modify it at all
nobody is forcing that other person to modify the car, if they love doing it and if its their hobby, they get to decide if its worth it to them
What kind of shit did I walk into now?
The average movie ticket is about 11-12 dollars (depending on region) and about 90-120 minutes. If I spend about 15- 20+ hours on a game I think it’s well worth its price tbh
well, thats because in your eyes the game is worth 2$ and no more
YOU DECIDE IF THE GAME IS WORTH 60E FOR YOU OR NOT
Battlefield though I usually spend hundreds of hours tbh
Okay, for one, if the price of video games (in the US) rose with inflation, they'd be $120 per game. For two, yeah, customers absolutely have the power to change price.
Bruh your legit trying to use mental gymnastics in order to get around the fact that the price the game is set at is not subjective
Sure its subjective if you think its worth it
but the the price itself isnt
thats my point
It's not set at all. There's no written agreement.
Video games can cost whatever they choose to make it cost.
Yeah and usually they follow a market standard
Notice how most AA games can cost 30-50 dollars but not 60
Which is extremely rare in this world.
i didnt buy 2042 ultimate edition, because to me what i get with ultimate isnt worth it
i bought gold, cuz gold is more worth it to me
my point is, prices of games are not something you can just decide to change
and then walk out with it for 2 dollars
I got the ultimate edition for 90 dollars actually so it was worth to me
because i know i will buy battlepasses, and its cheaper to get them now rather than later, individually
I doubt that tbh
Frankly, all I hear is entitlement. Video games are a luxury that not everyone can afford.
of course you cant change the price yourself, i never said that you can, im just saying that you as a consumer get to decide if a product is worth it to you
Battlepass will probably be 10 dollars, while the gold edition is 80 dollars
not in my region
No shit
Some people are poor
wow
insane revelation
Yeah I was talking about you since you're the one bitching about the price.
even if they are 10 dollars, 4 battlepasses would cost then 40
and the base game is 70
It's been a long time coming for games to increase in price. I'm surprised it didn't happen years ago.
and i paid 60e for gold edition
"Bitching about the price" So if your a champion for the poor then why are you defending the raise of game prices to 70 dollars
lol
I don't even know how to respond to that nonsense. I never said I was a champion for the poor.
Yeah honestly a lot of people expected the price to be increased years ago
rdr2 costed 962 million dollars to make and it costed 60 dollars lol
but no
muh inflation
and they need to sell 16 million copies to just cover the cost
of development
plus marketing
But we don’t know the actual development cost
mhm so why should BF2042, a game that took way less time and money to make, cost 70 dollars
lool
And it also only cost 70 dollars on standard consoles
3 years of development isnt insignificant
RDR2 also came out before a next generation launch
and you can bet your ass that EA will go big in marketing 2042
Yeah, just proving my point, honestly. Entitlement and an absurd misunderstanding of both the industry as well as economics in general.
usually no company discloses how much they spend on marketing
Okay if you are truly the Wolf Of Wallstreet speaking about video games, then actually explain your side instead of just saying "haha dumb stupid man haha lolol im better"
When the fuck did I say any of that shit, troll?
Ubisoft promise me an elite I'll make billions

lmao yeah keep ignoring me asking for actual evidence or reasoning to your arguments
really helps your side kylie
Really Mozzy has an elite
Like wa
He like 4'7
Nah he's 3'2
at the end of the day, nobody is shoving you 2042 down your throat and forcing you to buy it
No shit
gaming is a hobby for me, and if i see a game that i like, i buy it
True
Mozzy bring in less then 1m
Massive i think you need to take a little drink of water alright
and for me, 60e for a game that i know that ill be playing for hundreds of hours is worth to me
and i have no problem paying that much
I can criticize something without being forced to buy it
They clearly have no understanding of what they're saying. No point even trying.
if 60e is not for you, then it isnt
Lol
alright Mr. Moral High Horse
It’s best to just move on from it. No need to get personal
Anyway I can't believe there's no castle elite 😭
you decide if the pricetag that someone put is worth it to you
if its not, then you move on and thats it
It’s okay to discuss things but we shouldn’t be using any sort of personal attacks over this
@simple linden 79.99CDN for bf6 is ok to me as long as i know im getting a good finished product
Y'all play rb6 siege
some people are okay for paying 1200e for an iphone, im not, so i wont buy it
for me that product isnt worth 1200e
Why are you still going on about this
and for some, thats exactly how much its worth it to them
I agreed with you like 30 minutes ago
worth to an individual is subjective
yes
I know
Yeah let’s just move on from it. Conversation was finished
Lol I know I'll just buy year 1 pass for battlefield 2042
why we beefing about phonesss this if bf
just an example
Good
I got two phones, one for the plug, one for the drugs, I got two phones
The gold and ultimate hás year 1 4 battle passes
i dont even remember the second line of the chorus anymore of that what happened XD
lol
that songs like from around bf3 time
I like bf5 end game winning theme in pacific storm sounds like I'll say "FOR AMERICA WE GO" and charge for B objective
Good evening
So its confirmed that we will get operation locker. But i was wondering now... with 128 players? If yes then i dont know how there will be enough space
wow


theres enough space
its a big map its just thst the fight is always concentrated between two flags
Imagine 40 ppl camping on the mg nest just to get killed by 25 rpgs
usually its point c
perfection
i guess they will add extra environment to the maps
same as they did with the bf3 maps
i cant wait to get in a quad and use the elevator and die from a c4 on top
thats possible. in Bfv they even removed space like in operation metro. wasnt a fan of that
so locker and what other maps will get a remaster?
there’s so many good maps. even from bf3
Dice is the best
We might get rework of all past maps
Like bf4 and bf5 metro
Open beta 2 months before release
its also possible that the hub isnt 128 players
that might be possible
Could be, since they’d have to change a lot of the maps to fit the player count, might have to dim back the player count
They’re saying for battlehub.
Oh
Wouldn’t be shocked if Hub is just 64 players
Wouldn’t mind either.
That is not confirmed beyond that it's "classic" maps
Agreed
I'm still confused what the hub is
Maybe we can get cross play on battlehub if they tone back the count.
Old maps remastered/remade
64 players isn’t much next to 128…but it’s been plenty good enough for the series thus far
But like what's the gameplay
It’s been a thing forever, it’s a acceptable player count that still gives enough action.
We don’t know yet.
Presumably, it’s just classic BF gameplay on those older maps
I kinda hope not
I don’t mind it as long as the main MP gets original stuff as well
Then just play the main game mode if you don’t like it
Honestly I like this as an alternative to throwing remakes into the main MP
My worry is people won't play the main game mode
And that the hub doesn't introduce anything new
The finer details of the hub remain to be seen, so we’ll make judgements then
i hope the visibility is good
Highly doubt it, it’s not like nobody else is playing any other servers that aren’t second assault in BF4.
JUDGEMENT


i think 128 player pvp gonna be badass
bet
64 v 64
I still have my reservations about 128 players…but we’ll see what happens
I don’t think bigger is necessarily better
maps wont feel empty with sectors and high player count
But the maps seem to have been appropriately upscaled…so we’ll see
I don’t worry about emptiness, I worry about overcrowding
da mo da boiz. da greater da WAAAAAAAAGGHHH
overcrowding was already an issue since bf3
yea i agree
But on these maps, 32v32 wont be enough
so 64v64 could be the norm for a little while
put pls no 128v128 lol
Oh no I’m not advocating for 32v32 still
I mean just look at Op Locker on old-gen vs. last-gen.
16v16 felt totally fine. 32v32 is a fucking SHITSTORM that isn't fun to play.
I personally think 50v50 might be a bit better, but we’ll see
subjective
HOW DARE YOU
Eh, don't care.
Clusterfucks are good…in moderation.
Unfortunately, Locker doesn’t have the word “moderation” in its vocabulary
Which is exactly why there's only one map for it.
Yep
Op locker, unlike metro, offers chances to flank
metro tho...
The rumor is that the hub is mixing and matching weapons, vehicles, and maps from other bf games
64vs64 sounds action packed
Because any more bullet wall maps would make the game unfun.
i just love it when i shoot the admin and kicks me
mixing seems so weird
The point of Metro and Locker is to be chaotic and nothing more
Battlefield 2042 Reveal Trailer: https://youtu.be/ASzOzrB-a9E
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay Trailer: https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
Time: <t:1626973200:R>
With BF’s scale, it’s honestly a shame in my opinion to close all those people in one tiny map. Which is why I can live with there being just one of those
Fort De Vaux is still the best grind map
getting closer
thats a merkava tank
you know what's better than a badmin, a kd bragging hacking badmin 👌
met one lately 
Well rumor is that both Locker and Metro are in the hub for some inexplicable reason
kinda similar and others confirmed it too
the reason is that we da players love those maps
btw there are other cool cqb infantry maps too in bf4
It’s the same reason wake island gets repeated in multiple BF games
Its an M1 Abrams with slanted armor attached to the turret. You can see the original turret underneath. The angled armor is too high to be a merkava
yep
Did you play the 1942 edition
and most maps can be made the same with reducing the area size
Wake island without the aircraft carrier feels pointless.
Wake island wasn’t that good past it’s first iteration
Guess I’m not playing Hub then

yeah wake island in later games weren't good
Theyre just futurey abrams tanks. Its even called the m1a5 in game
No, it’s just the M1A5 and T25 (or something)
Tonk
T28 actually nvm
imagine a tank in metro 
Im sure there’s gonna be some cool vehicles
oh no lmao
we didnt seen most content
Based on the last weather related news from Europe I think BF2042 should be renamed from near-future to almost-here-future
its 2042 and in bf4 the final stand dlc already had some cool sci fi stuff
I’m already a big fan of the MV-33 Condor and the Russian equivalent helicopter
it should be renamed to now
That Jet-powered Osprey looks so cool
yes extreme weathwr is an issue
an entire city can be made unlivable just after a few hours and days
It's already near-future. 'Futuristic' is a misnomer.
with such ice rains and storms
I really do hope they tone down the rate at which storms happen
its sad
imo the tornado is obviously cool, but if it comes every game, it will get repetetive and a little annoying
They’re cool, but keep the severe stuff as rare occurances
really people would have no other choice but to run
I lived long enough to see Europe having 3rd world country issues. Feels bad.
i think theres a percentage and it wont happen every game
Idk, a lot of people said that about levelution but I still enjoy it immensely
i wonder if we will get double disasters
and be a refuge and go wherever they can
that would be cool
funny
yea i still love the tornado
If the tornado or other game-altering events happen every single match, there's a pretty high chance I'll just pass on the game, honestly. It would get too annoying.
yes like a map with a tornado and earthquakes
and big sky crappers collapsing
also water level rising
It should be like a chance that one will spawn
Loved how they have said it would be chaotic but then we had leaks saying that this feature received a lot of negative reviews
Skyscrapers are designed to withstand earthquakes and tornados.
it will be hard to judge how much fun weather is going to be, like once the novelty wears off it might get annoying, but that will take for most players at least weeks after launch before people start realising they don't like it
based on the huge scale of this new maps I was really hoping for chaotic events on every single match
i honestly don't know lol
in one map and one round like 10 levolutiona
Futuramafield 2042
oh i love futurama
okay but that isnt cool
so no
I want as a player be forced to adapt force to NOT play the map the same way
maybe this building is built like the titanic
surprising nobody, the random event that takes control away from the player is annoying
Well too bad. It's pretty much a given at this point that the skyscrapers aren't coming down in-game. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Wow that really sucks
so u go like conquering point b and then theres suddenly a giant lighting tornado
seems like 2042 is taking away a lot of destruction
People like to play on their comfort zone 😦
How?
Siege of Shanghai proved that collapsing sky scrapers is a bad idea
you run into a sewer tunnel to hide
I know tons of people who love that map simply because of the falling building
Taking away? Literally one skyscraper in the entire franchise was destructible.
but an earthquake happens too collapsing most of the sewers
Jet pilots will pilot their jets and if the game forces them to play with something else then its a bad game design
I mean, there was literally only one tower that collapsed in BF4, and it was a scripted animation
Yeah but you think they would at least slightly evolve the formula
you climb out manage to escape but then the water levels rise and enemies start to surround you
Shanghai became significantly worse once you destroyed the most fun part of the map
despite being bigger
Some event shaping, not taking, the some choices from the player is a cool thing a sandbox game. Inst it?
Will Battlefield 2042 be on EA Play at launch?
Again, you really need to do some research about why this cannot happen. Current technology just isn't good enough for shit like that.
Force the player to explore more possibilities
Every single destructible object in BF history is a scripted animation
but okay
you get out from the water but the enemies corner you. suddenly a giant land slide happens that takes out all of your enemies
sure but not all choices are necessarily fun or good
No
It's a scripted animation
and model swapping
it is possible
very easily
then asteroids from the sky fall
and hit the sky crapper building around you
it worked well in bf4 and xbox 360
It isn't using any dynamic physics objects
War is not fun or good as well but here we are simulating it 😂 but yeah. i get your point as well
Id hardly call bf a milsim.
Earth launches its last hope a giant space shuttle to go to mars as our only chance to survive
but it blows up
Yup. It's def. not a milsom I know
Yeah that's clearly what he was trying to say
Will BF 2042 be on EA Play???
mhm
Lmk if you get an answer
Also, having literally every building collapse would make it really hard to design the maps…
War sounds pretty fun if you’re a drone operator
in the mean time giant mutated locust also strike the map
But its a fair "in between" on the current scenario/ options we have in the market
Okay if it's so damn easy to just run scripts, why isn't 127 AI (not just the bots, the AI itself) offline happening, then? What's your infinite wisdom say about that one?
Nah that'd be Hell Let Loose or Red Orchestra.
most likely not at launch
oh
Ai scripting and storage of data is a completely different process than model swapping and animations
they hardly correlate at all
sun storms cause emp strikes often
never played both, but I will one day
they want to maximize sales and thatd take from game sales
you might get the 10 hour trial though
whatever, at least I get the 10% discount since I have EA Play :)
also it would be funny if the game would have an in game virus
that the players can get and lose health and they could spread it
So I'll be paying $72 CAD instead of $80 CAD
If it's so easy, prove it. You're the one with the ridiculous takes here, the burden of proof rests on you.
wow stuff
Just automatically deletes system32
The second you install
yes like wow stuff bruh
that's some wild ideas right here
So, yes. They could make every sky scraper collapse. Just because they could though doesn’t mean they really should…that has massive map design and map balance implications, not to mention hardware/software hurdles.
You can clearly see model swapping and animating giant structures collapsing barely effects performance, look at BF4 for instance, it barely effects FPS at all
yeah its wild but it would just give to those bf 2042 vibes
It isnt hard to do
its basically 5 years before all out mad max
oh bruh
no embeds
Barely affects performance on PC or console? Because console runs at fucking 30 FPS.
god damnit
Doesn’t mean they should though
never asked for every one to be destructible
Just wish a few were
Im probably going to be the odd one out on this, but does collapsing skyscrapers really matter?
No, it doesn't.
It doesn't matter at all, and I'm legit getting tired of armchair developers thinking they know how shit works.
For "immersion" yes 
Those maps didn't had the same scale from the new upcoming maps and also we have the implications that BF2042 need to run with more quality at PS5 and Xbox Series X/S
ok so it doesnt matter
Agreed.
On both it barely effects FPS, the fact that the Shitbox 360 was locked at 30 FPS has nothing to do with the levelution events
and night vision and thermal
that all comes to bite dev in the boo boo in terms of balance memory usage
it's cool for a few hours, then bad for the rest of the game 
internet connection could be a game mechanic too
This is kind of why I wish city maps weren’t s thing in battlefield because people always ask if the skyscrapers are going to be collapsible
That wasn't targeted at you, Zzzy, by the way. Reading it again made it sound like it.
So is 2042 cross I read somewhere it was going to be
Oh no don’t worry I didn’t take any offense
I won't be buying 2042 right after it releases. After a month or two I will have
good call
Already pre-ordered the game 
Okay then If I am just an armchair dev and have "NO IDEA WHAT I AM SAYING" provide an actual counter argument or proof other than just saying "Well I don't like your opinion because it's bad"
Yep
and your connection to the com systems would be lost and you would lose the map
Pre-ordered the Ultimate Edition 🤙🏼
and connection issues and such
man of well balanced culture
hello bois
Im sure some game designer is looking at this convo and bashing his skull against a wall
good
I would’ve, but doesn’t seem worth it, gold edition seems best, as only 90$ for me.
I think the better question is why does this level of destruction matter
you guys are pre ordering?
I mean I might pre order the game but idk...
no
Of course 
no
doesn't seem worth it
Why not
And, you are the one saying things that are just patently false. The burden of proof rests on you. I'm waiting.
why should we?
because it looks cool and is a staple of BF, which yes is 100% personal preference on my part
i mean just release the game if its good we will buy it like candy
oh yeah wheres destruction on 2042?
because you should see what's wrong with the game first lol
its that simple. give us content
but you do you
bro if im gonna be completely honest i only preordered for the early beta access
Yeah, probably
No I don’t think I will
and the knife ig
If they are false then tell me how they are false
at least twice the amount of guns as seen in bf4
oh boy is this going to be one of those "discussions" where people bitch about burden of proof instead of talking!
I'm only pre-ordering because I know 100% I'll be getting the game, and spending many hours in it. No matter how bad
I did it with bf5 even and I have zero regrets
ok
??
At the end of the day yes there will be destruction and yes it is technically supposed to be different as weather will be a factor in destructive properties it seems. So you will probably get a new experience when it comes to destruction @arctic grove
No. Im waiting for the open beta, reviews on the open beta from non-partnered youtubers then I will decide to buy or not
oh
it’s obviously gonna be a good Ea game this time
But yeah you can’t level a city
I pre-ordered because I'm going to be playing it anyways 
Maybe or maybe not, they might be trying to move away from destruction entirely
the signs are clear
who knows
they haven’t abandoned us
i have a feeling will take your storage by alot
my mw2019 and warzone is like 250gb
I think in their description that talked about how levolution is coming back better than before
it matters that we like their stuff
man that would be disappointing as hell
and willing to spend fortunes
there can be too little destruction, and there can be too much destruction
That's not a problem to me. Battlefield is usually the only game I play, if anything at all. I have quite a bit of space prepped at all times for it
did you knew in lots of places people earn a dollr a day?
The hype is huge. That's for sure... But still afraid of the quality like... too much hype will make me not see the reasonable quality on the final product
oh ok thats good
and they work all day and people live life from less than a dollar a day
granted, levolution and dynamic destruction arent the same. One is a scripted event while the other is much the direct cause of player actions.
Altho, so many good looking games are coming out soon so I may have to sacrifice a few choices :/
No they said there is a "fully destructible village" with 0 screenshots or videos shown, which is just disappointing because as I said the fact that they have barely showed any real destruction makes me think it will be put majorly on the backburner
Im going to be honest I don’t notice a lot of the destruction in battlefield that much unless it’s like the field craters and stuff
so 100 dollar is like 100 days of life for them
Gaming
Totally doubtful.
I always thought the zeppelin falling in BF1 was the greatest destruction in BF
even BFV, which was extremely lacking in terms of destruction, had destruction in the trailer
Yeah. Just seems they're talking about so much, but everything they say is so vague without much proof
What games?
depends. in bad company 2 there are maps that by the midle of the round were entirely just a destroyed city
Since this is a BF game, destruction is a must. But there is a possibility that there can be too much of it, especially since natural disasters are in BF2042
even in bf3
I'm hoping stalker 2 is good, atomic heart, halo infinite
Welcome to "hype".
Fair point
Yup. Literally getting blue-balled every corner
and 4. the building shot till collapse walls destroyed rubbish and scrap everywhere
That’s fair. But I just think why don’t we wait until we see more
it shows what a battlefield is
You're talking about it though, it's working. 🙂
its crazy how cities and environment gets damages by warfare
6 days. Im too impatient lmfao
Is it fair for us to just wait until we get more details before we assume things
I guess so lmfao
😄
We can speculate but let’s not be so quick to say “this is and is not in the game”
but funny that a few hours of giant ice rains and extreme wind is even more destructive
We simply do not know the scope of the features
We simply only know what features to expect to see. Not necessarily how deep these systems go
I never said destruction wouldn't be returning I said it is suspicious they have not shown a single of piece of actual destruction at all
0
nothing
They have shown cars getting blown up sure
word
because its obvious
Yeah I mean like I said maybe they will talk about it next week
i think theyre waiting to show it off
I hope so
Tô be fair we are 3 months away from release
its obvious that destruction gonna be intenser than ever
Actually we are exactly 3 months away
When levolution was first revealed, they led up to it the same way.
No not really
maybe doors that can be openes and closed too
If it is July 15th for you
If it was obvious it would have been in the trailer
Congrats, 3 more months guys
because it’s obvious
No, no it would not. You don't give away EVERYTHING in a trailer. 😄

and the trailer has some destruction parts
That's the point of a trailer.
i think
It is bait.
yeah like a couple props getting destroyed
at least the fans have to talk about something
That's a remind: Anything seen on the open betas might not be fixed until end of the year or next year
"It's bait because I don't like what critical man is saying!111!!"
Everything that has been shown and said is planned and very carefully thought out.
That's how it works for everything.
why people ban me from their server because i destroy the big tower at shanghai
It's bait because that's just what it is.
Can't underestimate the devs
its crazy to achieve what they do
Which everyone already does anyway
the skills the technology the expertise they have
why would they do that lmfao
to create this
I mean idk didn't seem that way for V
Oh probably
its called justice
with so many people each specialized in one or just a few proffesion territory
fair enough
I can’t comment much on recent BFs but I loved BFV regardless. For what it was I just enjoyed how the game played
Same.
bfv is ...
I just want to know more about the actual new mode hazard zone... just that. The fact that nothing leak about this yet means to me that it's one of the biggest "selling feature" in their hands
Okay but you can't argue with the fact that the launch was extremely poorly thought out and planned
BF1 I loved the atmosphere and the feel, but the gunplay takes a bit to enjoy because the TTK I thought was a little sluggish
🤦♂️
Nothing bits the Behemoths
Yes, very much so.
titanfall 2 had a poor launch
The launch was messy but it wasn’t nearly a bad as BF4’s launch. The launches we probably shouldn’t judge
that game is just so underrated
yeah the gunplay is different than other bf games
but I like it
poor is such a beautiful word to the shitcan EA gave to respawn at the time
maybe they had their reasons
It had a bloom factor to it and that’s okay because it was improving from other bf games, it just didn’t find the right TTK for me, but I enjoy it regardless
TF2 deserved a lot more respect from EA
Man I miss tf2
Just watched the trailer again. The only thing that didn't seem like standard fare for any Battlefield title was the bridge falling apart and the cars coming down.
Which didn't happen in-game, obviously.
That's enough motivation to reinstall, thank yall
Visceral also got disbanded
What I'm saying though is that not every single minuscule detail is planned out and said accordingly, prime example being Patirck Soderland and his frankly embarrassing fortnite rants
and lots of good studios but i understand




