#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 2240 of 1
I hope the guns in this game are extremely good
Unlike the ones in BF4 where if you miss one pixel of a dude in a gunfight you are practically dead.
They should add the Usas back
I just hope they sound good
3 and 4 were good for the time but the guns sound pretty shit compared to BF1 and V guns now
I definitely expect them to but I doubt DICE a lot now
Rocky track record for me ever since after 4
What came after BF4 outside of Hardline?
I dont know their track record outside of the big ones
Hardline, 1, V, Battlefront 1 and 2, and Mirror's Edge sequel
All of that was either disappointing or straight up bad for me
Played em all
I don't think they've gotten anywhere close to how good BF4 was since then
And I won't deny that 4 was totally awful at release when it came to stability
BF2042 system requirements? anyone?
!!specs
Currently there are no official PC specifications released by DICE for Battlefield 2042.
Any specs floating around the internet are just assumptions or rumors.
RTX 9090 with 10 gajillion gigaflops
OK who brought up technology
Exact opposites for me.
Oh yeah?
BF1 was such a breath of fresh air. Nailed so much in that game
Atmosphere. Sounds. Immersion. Interesting setting. Operations. Great DLC
I don’t like BF4 at all
anyone know when the next gameplay comes out for 2042?
It's too stripped down for me in a lot of ways but it's probably the one I like most out of every game after 4
22nd
Only problems I have with 1, is Cavalry being stupidly OP. Random bullet divination, and Suez
Whats wrong with suez
cavalry sucks idk what you mean]
@wide shore I completely agree but you always have to worry about cheaters though, they suck.
Yeah Calvary is ass
Not on console. Those dudes go crazy on them horses
Nah on console they gun down the horse, 24 magazines a sec bro they get ripped apart
on PC, the cavalry gun is basically unusable while youre on the horse, which leaves roadkill and sword kills, both of which are basically just luck
I don't like how weapon lists were padded out by variants and that we lost attachments or how BF1 has some of the most accurate hipfire I've ever seen in a BF
More specific things like dynamite not being sticky really bugged me too
Lots of issues but those come to mind first
Even those explosive anti tank guns they use it on horses
Idk man. I see people going on big streaks on cavalry a lot
Probably with the anti tank nades
Especially since some people got good using those grenades
Cavalry takes a lot of skill to use to its fullest but it can be strong in the right hands
Lance over sword for sure tho
I don’t think allowing them to heal while riding was a good change
I like the elite classes over battle pickups
Calvary is really exposed
Unless the person is very good and used to retreating efficiently they will get gunned down before they reach enemy lines
Maybe. But they’re fast and nimble. Most of the time experienced players will be gone the moment they get hit
It does suck that one of the best ways to kill a horse requires you to be immobile
Never was a fan of AT guns making you bipod up
I definitely prefer the days of one man taking down a vehicle with ease in BF3 and 4
I was always taking shit out with C4 as a support
So fun
AT nades in BF1 were incredible. But in BFV it’s like hitting a tank with a wet fart
Ricochet is a bad mechanic imo
Have you guys used the mortar on the landships
Only good at gadget in bfv is the lunge mine
I don’t mind ricochet. I do mind how much armor BFV tanks have.
I agree about that
Riccochet sucks
It's insane imo
Once I hit a tank for THREE damage because it riccocheted
Or how it feels like the “weak spots” only work like 10% of the time.
Low armour 
Whoops sorry ping
Vehicle campers have it too easy
Especially since you ain't getting any kind of teamwork from randos
If a tank gets snuck up on and killed by C4 then he deserved it
I’ve hit a tiger with 2 piats, a AT grenade and a lunge mine all in the ass, and didn’t destroy it. That’s just insane
Don’t use piats lol
Yeah that shit is ridiculous for sure
I thought the PIAT has the strongest anti-armor?
It does do the most for launchers
I mean, somebody has to. Can’t rely on blueberries
Randos will let a tank eat the whole match
They really don't care at all for some reason
I always try to ruin their fun hard
Anti-tank is fun
I hope 2042 doesn’t have quick repair
Same
Just pressing one button and getting like 20 health back instantly is kinda dumb
I’m fine with repairing inside the vehicle, but that mechanic is wild
Probably just track repair
Let em have unlimited ammo again and all that shit I don't care
Just no EZ mode repair
Make those chumps get out and do it
Yeah that shit better hurt and/or remove ricochet
Heavy bombers in BfV was disappointing
If I shoot a tank up the ass it should be devastating
I can’t fly worth a damn.
Agreed
I like choppers, especially little bird
I'd only occasionally use jets to take out a tank or something
There was never an issue with weak spots until 5. It’s so inconsistent
Oh, yeah. I was decent with choppers in 3 & 4
I couldn’t take out a tank as infantry in bf4 
Rendezook cringe 🗿
#speedrun
The only way I did was the c4 buggy thing
Support in 3 and 4 was the anti-tank king imo
While in bf1 and v it was much easier to just sneak up and destroy it
C4 jeeps were fun as hell too
I surprisingly didn’t use much support in 3 & 4.
I started being a support main in 1 & 5
I usually played engineer.
I was main assault in V and 1
I hated the crazy ass bloom LMGs support had in 3 and 4 but you got used to tap firing and making use of the bipod when possible
Like support a lot in 1 but it feels so bad in V compared to the rest
I still play it tho
LMG and MMG being separate doesn't work for me
1 feels pretty balanced as far as classes go but V needed some work imo
Yeah, I thought the MMG mechanic was cool at first. But, idk. It’s so handicapped at times. Don’t get me wrong, you can still rip with an MG42, but every time I use an MMG I just wish I could use it normally
Shame we never got the LAD LMG
Pretty much how I feel
Damn I didn't even think about the LAD not being there
I'm glad support at least got shotguns and carbines
I used it in the training area when they accidentally added it. Felt good to actually ads with a big mag MG
Thats what I love about 1
Running around with the Perino is so fun
I'd honestly be shocked if they did LMGs that dirty again in 2042
Fingers crossed
I hope not. I don’t wanna stop using LMGs
Me too
LMGs and shotguns are generally my favorite
Even if they’re not as cool as they are in WWI & WWII
lol definitely
There is some cool modern MGs though. MG3, M249, PKP
I think a double barrel shotgun has a great chance of getting in but I'd be surprised to see a relic LMG
Hope so tho
Be interesting to see what they’ve got in store
I hope we get a stoner
I’d love some relic guns.
I want some LMGs with AR dna
I used to love the MG36 with the testicle mag
Number 1 LMG I used in BF3
I just hope we get gun attachments like 4 instead of how we got it in V
You can see the attachment system in a trailer if that's what you mean
Apparently you can swap on the fly
Dice be like: Whoops! All rail guns
Yeah, I wonder how they're gonna make the swapping on the fly work without it being too gimmicky
Same.
I feel like it's something you won't mess with all that much unless you're going from a massively wide open area to something more urban style
I don't see myself doing it much
people hate change
My most used LMG in 3 is apparently the M240B
You’d probably have to do it considering the scale of the map, I believe some of the objectives take place in tight places
I mean if the maps are as big and diverse as DICE says, I can see a lot of scenarios where you’ll be moving from close to long range combat quite a bit. If used correctly, it could be very beneficial.
Kinda like fortifications
It’ll have its niche
The M240B was so good
Forgot about that one
One of the hardhitters up there with the M60 and PKP
Yeah I like that a lot
G3 and SCAR all day
chauchat was my baby in bfv
I played BF3 recently and had a 120 kill game on Seine with the G3. Thing is a monster
Is that the French weapon
My favorite in V is the Type 11 purely on aesthetic but yeah the chauchat is good af
Yup French
The one that is apparently shite irl lol
I’ve used it quite a bit in V as well. I think the Bren takes president over it for me in that game.
i dont really use the bren ever
I really like that lines of the chauchat
Just a damn tube
Love the type 11 as well. Both Japanese LMGs are severely underrated
Ive never used the Chauchat. How good is it?
It hits like a Selbstlader 1917 but automatic-ish
It's a 3 bullet kill out to a good range
Almost like a full auto DMR for support
I'll think about giving it a try then
the recoil is very random but it is easy enough at close range
just make sure you have cover to reload behind
Good gun for tap fire at range
Kinda like a LMG version of the Grease Gun.
ah ok
If only the grease gun had some damage behind it lol
I do still like it tho
That with the suppressor is fun for flanks
I haven’t had much problem with the GG killing slow. I’d say it’s the exact opposite
It shreds. It feels good to control. Shot one irl for my birthday this year. It’s a little beast
I feel like it's pretty noticeable if you use almost any other SMG
Thats pretty cool
It chugs just like it does in the game.
Vehicle stealing is pretty much a problem in every BF game. In the gameplay trailer, they come from the sky and drop down when you call in a tank. You know damn well people are gonna try and steal

Ill occaisionally do it once in a while maybe lol
Tbh I don't really like any of the SMGs in V
They're almost all so ugly and have the side mag and useless bipod
They have no drip
MP40 still pretty nice to look at tho
side mag sexy tho
I like a lot of the BFV SMGs. I’m a big fan of the side mags too. Lol
Imo, in BFV in a way, every single gun feels the same
The MP18 in BF1 is one of the nicest looking guns ever
that seems like too many
15?
Maybe 10 per team?
max maybe 7 or 10
But definitely not higher than 15
even thats a good bit
Idk. 64 people on a team is a lot
How many tanks are there per team on Golmud?
7 per team?
They definitely do have a lot of similarities imo
Too many SMGs are samey
I guess the side mags isn't the issue, it's just that so many frames are so basic and utilitarian
Of course I get that being the point
Don't need a sexy gun for war
Especially in WW2
Yeah, a lot of SMGs were built on the cheap in WWII
There should be a lot per team, but imo it should not go over 15
The Sten and the Grease Gun are both basically tubes
So 15.
15 is too many
I’d say it’ll depend on the map
WHAT DO YOU MEAN TOO MANY?!
MP40 is the only SMG I even have gold in V
Sometimes I'll use others but I have to look what I'm shooting
I'm more of a Tromboncino and Jungle Carbine guy
Those are sexy af
Its 65 goddamn players in one team bro.
ok so on panzer storm each team gets 8
Breakaway will definitely have more than kaleidoscope
and panzer storm is hated for that
so if you double players and tanks
you get what you want
For Kaliedoscope and Hourglass, id say maybe 10
Well, Panzerstorm is also just a giant field
It will be impossible for anyone to get vehicle if its less than 15 of them
there are non tank vehicles
how many do you think there should be?
15 or slightly less
not everyone needs a tank
Like 13
The infantry won’t be as exposed on a map with skyscrapers and such. As compared to Panzerstorm where most of it is wide open.
15 max
15 is way too many imo
But you damn well know everyone is gonna go for a vehicle
And if its just like 10 tanks they are gone in an instant
if there are too many tanks it will have the panzer storm problem of not enough infantry
How will the vehicle selection layout look like?
Well, the setting also allows for more diversity in vehicles. Armored cars, Jeep’s, transport/attack/little bird helis, jets, lavs, boats ect
they are already gone in an instant on every bf game
Like BF4 or BF1 and BFV?
But atleast you get the chance to get the damn tanks later in the game
bro what
It will be like Galactic Assault all over agian
i never get tanks in 5
I do
It’s kinda a shame squad points aren’t making a return. I like that system in V.
there should be a ton of tanks
it just isnt balanced
WHY DID IT AUTOCORRECT SHOULDNT
Bruh
i hate autocorrect
Your phone wants moar tanks
yeah

Kaleidoscope and Hourglass - 13 Tanks
Manifest - prolly none or at least 4
Breakaway its ice, but maybe 15 max
Discarded - 10 or 12
Renewal - 13 maybe
Orbital - 10
My opinion on how many tanks there should be on the 7 maps. Modify if youd like
i dont remember the maps
Which one is manifest?
docks
Manifest is the dock map
The shipping containers and stuff
Discarded is the Egypt map
Discarded is the boat one
Right?
Nah its india
...
Renewal is in Egypt I believe
Renewal is egypt
i uhhh tried to go to the battlefield 2042 site to see the maps again, and it autofilled the link so i was like cool and clicked it
I'm so damn confused with the map names
its just a stream of noot noot saying noot noot
I hope a few of them get different names
whats wrong with kilioddoalcscope
Orbital and the two city maps can keep their names
I always fail at spelling it. Lmao
Kaleidoscope - South Korea
Hourglass - Qatar
Orbital - French Guiana
Discarded - India
Renewal - Egypt
Manifest - Singapore
Breakaway - Antarctica
I think i got it right
Hourglass is a perfect name for the map it represents
I believe so as well
I still think the names are odd af.
I agree
For a lot of them
just the names in general or good
I dont get why Breakaway is called Breakaway.
I’d say the only one that doesn’t make that much sense is Breakaway.
yea i agree
The rest kinda work for the theme
Will the ice caps... Break away mid match?
ooooohhh shiiit
They might. There’s that one BF4 map that does
I dont remember that map
Hourglass and orbital fit the most
It’s one of the maps in the final stand DLC
I dont get wtf Manifest is supposed to be by its name
bro that tower better fall
bro that tower better fall
Its major american supply lines
Most of the supplies Manifest there maybe
"Oh its probably a manifestation in some place gone wrong and the army got involved-"
Rusty ass shipping docks.
It was the map Hammerhead
I dont get wtf Kaleidoscope is supposed to be by its name
You could break the ice in the submarine pen
If the map itself had a gimmick where visuals get tripped up maybe it would make sense.
I think it kinda represents the wacky glass structure in the middle
Orbital makes a lot of sense
cause... big rocket go into space
if the tornado goes close it triggers an event👍
how did i not see this before
renewal
Renewal makes complete sense to me
yeah i get that one
Tf is renewal again?
as well as the obvious one orbital
egypt map
I dont know how it makes sense from the image we got of it.
i dont get kaleidoscope
It’s the Egypt map, where the map is split in the middle. Half is a desert, the other side is grassy and such.
Have map names been changed before a BF game's launch?
dont know
I think its because of farmlands and energy that are being renewed there
Not that I’m aware of
we do see alot of solar panels
Not counting one's changed due to controversies
What changed?
Before a BF game launched
Because I dont get like the naming convention for a lot of the maps in BF2042
I think we’ll get more used to the names when we’re actually playing on them.
Hourglass and orbital being the best ones
This is the first time in a while we've gotten to know the names of each map this long before launch IIRC
i think im going to like every map this time around
FLOOD ZONE
Prolly cause DICE thought they sounded cool lol
CASPIAN BORDER
but when it floods
I mean, BF4 also had Operation Outbreak. And it was a jungle map.
thats like the best part
SIEGE OF SHANGHAI
Those names are cool
Atleast Siege of Shanghai isn't called SEASIDE MIRAGE
DICE had a bit of an obsession with “Operation” for a while
Or some shit like that.
PARCEL STORM
ROGUE TRANSMISSION
See those names are understandable
GUILIN PEAKS
Just by their name alone you can get a lot of their concepts
wavebreaker
SUNKEN DRAGON get it because its underwater
lumphini garden
Manifest and Renewal dont give me any creative ideas.
PROPAGANDA
Operation 925 paints a great picture 
dude i forgot all about that map
now I want to see it in 2042
EPICENTER
Which maps did Aftermath have?
Back to Karkand was also a great DLC
dont you just hate youtube
DEATH VALLEY
I wish I got to enjoy the big map DLC more. But those maps were dead on Xbox 360 do to the player cap
-_-
Bro I can smell YellowFlash2's alcohol grease from here 
Battlefield 2042 pushed to go political by IGN! Developers give them the FIN...
yes
Ger
TheQuartering did something similar
Gotta love these "commentary" channels going out of their way to rope random shit in to "own the libs"
Those two are brothers from other mothers
Like I agree with a lot of shit but not everything is political my gee
People also watched
I hope the battlefield hub leaks turn out to be true. I wanna see Arica Harbor on the new frostbite engine. 
BF5 didn't suck JUST because of its historical innacuracies for the sake of pleasing morons who need their messed up history fix.
Arica Harbor is a BF3 map?
Never played any last gen games
bad company 2
I remember watching a vid by IGN
It was about games we are excited for
I never heard BF2042, Halo Infinite, or any of the big games in that list
But back to BF
I don’t think BFV sucked at all. I quite like it. But it’s definitely very flawed. And you can tell they just gave up on it. Which makes its death feel so much worse
I like it too but I can see its issues
Yee. Arica Harbor was one of the best infantry maps on BC2
BFV's problem wasn't even the fact that it was political, it was the fact that certain individuals tried to play off their depiction as accurate and openly alienated players over it. Thankfully those individuals are gone now
I would’ve preferred Panama Canal, but I can see why they’d choose Arica
Wtf
it makes me wonder if the maps would have any visual changes
I mean, they’d have to
White man
People would probably spam the word if it wasn't on automod lol
@craggy marten Lets not attempt to bypass our filter.
Oh, so that part of the BF5 chat thing didnt cross over
Bro you guys have a game set in WW2 and you dont expect people to talk about some parts of it
If the BF HUB is real. And it does get updated. I hope St Quentin gets added.
Whats wrong with that?
He's not an EA employee, he's just a mod lol
I know
That’s not a bad idea 
People know what you're talking about when you talk about the Germans in WW2, keeping that word under automod is probably a necessary "evil"
But acting as if I commited a cardinal sin because I tried talking about an aspect of a botched historical game- like, what.
Fuck it-
The german story section with the tanks was good.
It definitely is. You can’t trust people on discord.
No one is acting like you committed a cardinal sin
Lol
But christ atleast let me name the damn army, why dont ya? Lol
I mean, it was technically the name of the party/regime...whatever
We're going in circles here, let us move on
Not much point in debating this stuff
2042 good yes?
Could just call em the wehrmacht
On that note actually...I'm a little nervous to see how the CoD crowd is gonna react to 2042
Pretty good
Can say because i'm part of it.
slide canceling in 2042....
Some of them are hella excited for it, but idk man..
Heh, a lot are probably gonna get destroyed by vehicles and probably leave like they do every new BF release.
I can see some people transferring from warzone over tho
I got BF4 when the 2042 trailer came out and got its DLC after a few days
I think a lot of them are expecting it to just be CoD but bigger...whatever that's realistically gonna mean. I think they're expecting some perfect game, but are in for a hard taste of reality in that Battlefield and CoD play VERY differently. They're in a for a bit of a "culture shock" if you ask me
Meanwhile I never got the DLC for B03
50 bucks for all of those maps, jesus christ
CoD and BF are completely different games, i agree
When I switched from Bo1 to BC2 it wasn’t too bad. Definitely different tho
But I fell in love with them Gun sounds and destruction.
They cannot forget that in BF, it aint 6V6, you are going to fucking war
Most of my cod friends gave up on the game after being shit on 24/7 because of bad positioning
quit BF?

Yea
jeez
I mean what did they expect?
I think if I'm reading reactions right from a lot of people right now, BF is like some kind of liberator to them...when thats really not what this game has been marketed to be. This game has far and away been marketed as a love letter to long-time BF fans, it really doesn't seem to have targeted the CoD crowd so much. Like BF1 and IW 5 years ago, I really think a lot of the pro-BF hype train is really just an anti-Cold War/Vanguard hype train in disguise.
Some people don’t get how run and gun doesn’t exactly translate. Or that jumping shooting and flick shots and all that crap doesn’t translate either.
CoD but bigger, I guess
Running and Gunning is certainly a thing, it just looks much different in BF
It aint 6V6, its war
completely different things
Just go look at Dr Disrespect try and play BF4 rn. His gameplay is so out of place.
how does he play?
Jumping, flick shotting, doesn’t tap fire at range
Any CoD streamer, tbh. Been watching one guy in particular recently, he's done just about nothing but struggle at TDM for the last 2 weeks
A lot of cod players are more fast pace. Tactics take a big place in battlefield ofc but strategy is also very important which is something cod isn’t really focused on.
full autoing at range?
oh
Having actual recoil is rough for them too lol
They’ll get used to it. So long as they keep at it
Yeah, but patience isn't a trait I'd attribute to much of the CoD community
Skill in battlefield doesn’t come in 2 hours lol
I feel like going to TDM isn’t the best place to start.
You’re not really preparing yourself for the actual experience.
Its really not, TDM on BF is rarely ever good
I usually just stick to conquest and occasionally rush
CoD is a ?V? arena. Battlefield is war. I can see why they struggle a little bit, no offense
Yeah I’m a conquest guy all the way. Operations in BF1 as well.
I legitimately think that if someones gonna play TDM, they should actually just go back to CoD. Its legitimately going to give you a better experience there.
They need to understand that k/d isn’t the main objective of the game (aside from tdm)
yea
Yeah
A lot of times I see negative or neutral players on my team rank top 10 or top 5 lol
There is positioning, knowing when to push and wait, etc
You never have to worry about your K/D anyway, so long as your positioning is good, and you’re on the objectives. Kills just come.
There's something really great about cooperating with a squad to achieve victory with everyone just covering everyone's back and constant streams of information
oh hell yea
I love the combined arms aspect of it. Makes it all feel so big
There’s really no shooter like BF. Ask MW ground war.
Pushing an objective on Breakthrough with 10+ people around you, a few tanks thrown in and planes fighting overhead...simply amazing
Remember when people were toting Ground War as the Battlefield Killer?

adds to the chaos aspect of BF
sometimes you dont know wtf is going on
Funny, because all Ground War did was emphasize just how good DICE was at making BF, even when the most recent title at the time was a "bad" BF game like BFV
What was ground war even like?
BF1 Operations is one of the single most chaotic war experiences in gaming.
So whats the deal with Bad Company and why is it so beloved?
Can anyone explain to me in #battlefield-legacy-titles
Big map, scattered objectives, no thought put into why that actually works.
Bad company campaign 🤤
Basically, Battlefield without any of the minor details that make it what it is
oh god
Actually I say scattered objectives...it was honestly more linear
Btw it’s like 2 people trying to capture an objective and the others are trying to hit 360s
It’s very unique. Doesn’t take itself so seriously. Fun campaign with funny characters. Plus it was the first good Battlefield games on console. And the first BF games to have “dynamic” destruction. Plus the gun sounds in Bad Company were insane.
Ok wordsplaining time, bear with me here
Oki
Basically BF4, but with a little goofiness to it
The map I played was like a big, vertical oval. There was one objective in the middle of each end of the oval, then three more objectives in a sort of triangle amongst some big buildings in the middle. There was a big cliff over on the right side with absolutely no objectives over there.
Can anyone ellaborate on said goofy aspects?
0️⃣

That sounds like a lot of lost opportunities
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIC-MrwUnH4 @craggy marten
My favorite Bad Company 2 single player moments. Comment on what you think of them and what is your favorite moment.
You know, I got a video that will perfectly explain it.

who here is preorder gang
I'ma wait for more info
@arctic grove сервер по гендерфилду
Also I'm broke
July 22nd is make or break
I’ll preorder gold when I got some disposable income.
Just like gameplay details
If the Veterans say its good it will be good
But I'm not really picky, main issue is finding some money
i mean. its the heart of battlefield. look at the reveal rende
Details second
ive done the hillbilly version
I would love to pull one off
Elaborate
Has anyone pulled off a jet swap other than stun
I’ve never seen someone else do it tbh
i jumped a four wheeler into a chopper but was too low so I jumped and got in right as pilot died and saved it
Most epic thing I have ever done is snipe a heli pilot, or no-scoping someone while riding on the back of a jet ski in BC2
I usually just resort to hitting planes with AT launchers
Hitting planes in bf1 with the field cannon
I want good weapon and map variety
English please
Ok
ive skipped all the battlefields since 4. and im proderering 2042.
Я могу сказать что я гей😆
i know a good game when I see one
I'll preorder when I get money
Idk
Because I would love to be able to play with my ps5 friends

Wait until the EA stream or slightly longer for that to be revealed or deconfirmed
it looks like old gen and new gen will be separated
I hope not aim assist doesn't belong on PC servers, also if community servers are gone def not getting 2042
I swear, if BattleHub is real and as good as the rumors make it out to be it practically killed COD this year
BattleHub is basically old maps from the past BF games but with vehicles and weapons ranging from WW1 to modern day
Its supposed to be REALLY sandbox like and its made intentionally bullshit in terms of "Oh this WW1 tank cant defeat a main tank"
Its like a game of Rock, Paper Scissors, except its more like WW1, WW2, or Modern
id like that more if it was force randomized
What
ooh
I hope this rumor is true because DICE said the mode we dont know about involved old maps
get a random gun every kill
In their Ripple effect rebrand stream
i wouldnt mind some super arcadey modes
Rumor is Arica Harbor is back
The amount of time I spent sniping people from the top of the factory on that game
Yee. I know. Not surprising. People played the shit out of that map. Me included
Pamela Anderson from Baywatch? You got it man!
Never played BC2. Will be interesting to see what all the fuss was about
I'm tired of living a hell called waiting for July 22 😓
Hopefully if the leaks are true, it still feels like it.
Only 12 days more boys
It was pretty dope for the time ngl. Vehicle upgrade balance was stupid since you only had one slot but maps were pretty awesome and the destruction was legit
Worst part about BC2 was not having restrictions of where people could go.
Now, the thing that bothers me is that both Metro and Locker are on the rumored list.
Now, I like Metro and Locker, but they are effectively the same map. Feels repetative
Spawn trapping was disgusting on BC2 conquest
Players could legit walk into your spawn, stand there, wait for you to pop in, kill you. Steal your tanks and helicopters, and just sit in your base.
Also, shotguns with slug rounds were better than sniper rifles.
Honestly DICE revealing what maps are in the hub is going to feel like when Smash Bros announces their character roster
Ah yeah I vaguely remember. I spent like 95% of time in rush though back then
Also, if you weren’t using magnum rounds you were basically at a disadvantage at all times.
I do miss getting a free knife kill on people who were using the UAV though.
kinda doesn't matter to me much until they clarify what the mode is about. I mean if we're going to have ww1 tanks vs abrams then count me out (happy for ppl who like that sort of ish though) Just not my thing
Yeah that UAV console was adorable - I always felt guilty knifing someone - they looked like they were having so much fun there
Im sorry but I cant understand how anyone isnt excited for that. Id probably play the hub more than base game.
The UAV was really good fun when you had the gun spec
And if you had a friend to watch you so you didn’t get knifed 
I can see it being an immersion problem than anything else
something tells me the hub isnt trying to be immersive
I can see Guns not being locked in that mode. But I think vehicles should be specific to the map
Really? Wow, yeah its weird coz I like the idea of sandboxy stuff like having a low grav mode or 2x speed mode - but having vehicles and soldiers from different eras just sounds like a bad acid trip
That’s fair. And you’re right. But that could be a turn off for some folk
it sounds like a really good acid trip
But thankfully the hub is a separate mode. So everyone gets their share of the pie
idea: blimp on Siege of Shanghai
I thought all dice la said is there making old maps how do you know thats locked to a different mode they havnt confirmed a bf hub yet have they
Shanghai tower falls onto the airship
cause it confirms a tom henderson leak
*nearly confirms
They haven’t. We’re just speculating on the leak
i mean, hes been pretty damn reliable so far
He seems really trigger happy on every rumor he hears
I hope we have the option of containing era stuff so that people like Nito can have their fun and then ppl like me who just want to have 2042 stuff on Kharg Island can get theirs
but yeah Henderson does seem to shill DICE a bit
isnt that just base game?
I dont see why they would want to split the playerbase would make more sense its all maps just for 2042 n its base game modes
He hasn’t been wrong yet. So there’s not any reason to really doubt him. But that said, it is a leak, so you can’t put all your stock behind it. It’s just speculating and stuff is all we can really do rn
So I am assuming that the remake maps will be part of the Hub thing and not part of base 2042
yeah
I think there is a good chance the hub is 64 players max due to map design issues
Why would they want to split the playerbase like that though
I think the rumor was that most would be 64 players. yeah. Might be a few 128s but mostly 64
If the leaks are real. The game would basically be split in three modes. All-out war (conquest & breakthrough 128 players), Hazard Zone, Battlefield Hub
They already got base game and the squad based mode another mode sounds weird if its just base game mode but for nostalgia
the hub may be a warzone type thing where it extends to the next bf game
More content is never a bad thing. Especially since they’ve touted how ahead of schedule they are
And a 4th hidden mode: BF VR Chat
hes not against more content, he just doesnt understand why the hub and base game are seperate
I think a bfhub makes more sense as a mobile game to compete with cod mobile
No.
Yea ik it sounds bad but that makes sense to me
Well, remade maps wouldn’t work in the main game with 128 players as they’re mostly all built for 64 or less.
Arica Harbor for example is small af
So what about ps4
Even on rush
nah fuck it. 128 metro
Is there gonna be no bfhub cause its all 64 player
?
So no point of splitting them up
Not really sure tbh
Honestly I'd like a mode or at least a custom server option where player health was like 9999% so 128 players could just roam around the map and do goofy stuff
I mean we got bots and servers were free on bfv so could just host a peivate one
But in bf4 people defs hosted easter egg hunt servers
There’s also apparently a training area.
I joined a few of those to look for the Final Stand tags
Bf needs a training area always spend so much time in there tweaking my settings
That's my passion project right there. I pray we get a really good test range this time
Bfv test range u could coop in aswell
Was so good for testing things
Just wished more air room for testing jets
And I also really like the idea of just doing private bot games. I mess around in BO1 combat training even to this day.
bfv test range was pathetic - only 4 vehicles, couldn't use upgrades, couldn't choose class - absolute certified trash
Battlefield 2042 Reveal Trailer: https://youtu.be/ASzOzrB-a9E
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay Trailer: https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
Time: <t:1626973200:R>
It’s fun to not try so hard all the time.
Yea you right they never updated the test range for the new vehicles
But bf4 wasnt that many vehicles so was easy to account for them
Bf4 also didnt add the new vehicles tho
well there were a lot but they were all clones
What? They never even included the old ones, lol! You got one tank and one MAA to choose from and then two planes
Kinda like how enlisted is for me rn. Easy to digest game. The bots are dumb but it feels good to rack up 60+ kills on Normandy with an MG42. Can just turn off your brain and enjoy the game for what it is.
motorcycle, bomber, hovercraft, hover tank, snowmobile, buggy
I never used the BF4 test range cause the game took forever to fuckin load it.
Yea to the test range hipefully they do add all the vehicles but bfv was defs as upgrade to test range
Turns out if i enabled admin access to the bf4 exe it loads 4x faster
It did?
Wish i knew that like 7 years ago
Ye even on ssd i always was last to load in
Until i allowed admin access
I play on console. So yeah. BF4 load times are abysmal. So is BF1.
Bfv is smart how it hides the loading
BFV was faster even on my old HDD. But on the Series X it loads dumb fast.
I play on console too... Maybe our standards are diff
Maybe you dont remember cause it defs got way more optimised with there newer stuff
Idk. Maybe I’m just used to the SSD life now.
Even on pc
SSD just changes all that, 100%.
It is very nice. And with 2042 actually being optimized for newer consoles, it should be even quicker to get into games
Absolutely.
Cause RN if you’ve got BFV on your SSD, you still gotta wait like over a minute to start playing.
Cause everyone else has to load in
Yeah that's why I am not going back for HDD for my games ever again.
with 2042 actually being
optimized forhandicapped by newer consoles
I have a PC with an m.2 NVME SSD and it changes a lot of things.
Any fears of hacks for PC since source code hack? Anti-cheat?
yes why isnt this discussed more often.
Source code hacks aint much of an issue for online games
team fortress 2
@soft kayak not sure if sarcasm or no lol
Csgo was fine
Not like hackers wouldnt find a way to break shit anyway.
no sarcasm
tf2 has been infested by thousands of aimbotting bots since its source code leak
Everyone was freaking about csgos source code hack, but that didnt mean shit since they couldnt hack the servers
Tf2 got an update that fixed the bots
and theyre still there
Tf2s problem was that it was neglected
I’m just hoping that they have an option (if crossplay is even coming) to turn off pc to console crossplay.
And since we don't know if third party servers are a thing not like we can jump ship to unofficial admined servers
It's always been neglected oof.
God I hope not.
the tf2 classic mod is getting more updates than tf2
Thats why csgo was fine because they got a team on that still tf2 has like 2 people who jump on n off of it
I am from Izmir. I did ancestry dna test and learned i’m 80 percent greek. My whole world has changed. I tried to commit suicide but couldn’t do it. Now i have to live like this. But after that i decide it is a zionist game. I suggest people don’t do dna test it’s lie bcs i’m 100% turkish thnx
I’m not looking forward to keyboard/mouse vs aim assist wars.
Okay?
I'm on PC and I think it's fine
Keyboard n mouse will always will

console is fresh meat
Nah, it would be a great opportunity for 128 player servers to be filled up much quickly.
People treat aim assist like its aimbot cause they dont wanna admit they got destroyed
Forced crossplay is a way to go, and this is mostly a casual game (in my opinion).
Keyboard and mouse is easier
Cause ur not rotating a stick in a vague direction
You can be more precise with a mouse.
Ur moving a mouse exactly where u know a shot is gonna line up
it's not even that, aim assist of any kind does not belong on PC servers. Period.
mouse is much better for aiming. FPS games were designed for PC first, and halo was the first to really get it working on console
And still miss, hah.
Cross-play w/pc good or bad?
Theres a reason why controllers need aim assist
@violet inlet what makes you say it isn't much of an issue for online games
controllers, however, are much better for movement IMO
Plus the keyboard allows for a lot more movement. Unless you have a controller with back buttons, it’s very hard to jump while looking on a controller.
They need crossplay but input locked to what ur ussing
So i can play with console friends on pc
If i use a controller on it
Let’s just hope they do crossplay at all
they do not have aim assist i am console player and no aim assist
Cause idk why it hasn’t been addressed yet
they don't need cross-play, BF4 is still doing fine
only on campaign do console have aim assist
Cause source code is only for client side not server side
based turk
lmao
Battlefields have aim assist tho on controller
IM THE ONLY BASED TURK
Even on pc theres an aim assist option if u use a controller

👀
Lol
🇬🇷
Bogos Binted?
BF4 is only doing better now on console because of the 2042 hype. It is gonna die down again once the game launches. Last year the only servers I seen on BF4 were 24/7 Shanghai/Golmud/Locker 1k ticket servers.
real erdoğan
yes
I may be wrong about aim assist tho i never tried a controller on bf since bf1 on ps4
how to get better at battfields games?
Also BF4 came out in a time when games didn't widely utilise crossplay
aimbot
Not to mention, rounds in 2042 are gonna have twice the player count. And unless dice wants everyone playing against bots in 2 years, crossplay will absolutely help keep the game alive.
but what if on 360?
@wide shore unless they put the bots in because they cbf with crossplay
im not trying to go against pc tryhards on console

I feel like they want the success of cod mw and are gonna do what that game did right
I can still get a 70 player match on 1942, a game with no official servers and no store page on origin
But I suppose players bring revenue not bots
Every game will have a niche
Erdoğaann bey
it's not as if the game will e completely unplayable without full servers
point is that these games last longer than youd think
Nasılsın moruk?
There are no 1942 servers in au tho
F
spawn trap the bots
But it won’t be the full experience.
1942 is how old now
19 years I think
Yea that's pushing it abit
i barely notice the difference between full matches and matches with only 10 players
not on the multiplayer servers
in bf1
I definitely do.
in bf5 it can be noticeable
I'm in Australia too and I think it'll be fine
And I'm sure in this day and age they'll use crossplay
Yeah, same.
Except for maybe older gen consoles
1942 n bf2 have bots tho so i can still play those games, if they didnt have bots could never play them
anyway 32 players seems like it's enough
there are still servers
that's about as many that are needed for a full game
Not for me
oh right au
Games grind to a halt if they’re not full. And on 2042 where maps are probably twice the size of BF maps we’re used to, it’s gonna feel like a ghost town if it’s not over 100 players
Yea is super necessary
bf1 has not grinded to a halt
Bf1 still has full servers
bf4 servers feel fine with 40 people. 2042 would do fine with 80
You can still find full games on BF1 tho
He talking about like 6 years down the line or longer
he is baiting you
server limits are like 32 people though
If this game stands up to anything like BF4 then I'm sure a solid player base will be of no concern for years to come
all servers ive played in bf1
I believe so too. Crossplay would just make it much easier for that to be achieved.
and if it doesnt, then no point in keeping it alive for years anyway
U may be playing on tdm or small player count mode in bf1
he is baiting you dude
32 players is not small
Well they said they wanted 2042 to be a "games with a service" kind of game
bro i literally said that 32 players is the max player count
So that hopefully means they'll look toward the future
Yea bfv was games as a service to but they abandoned it
Yea but bfv was a shit show
Bf2042 they wont let that happen again tho
this is EA. Having faith is a mistake
is there anything good about bfv?
uh not really it's more like dice
RIP Russian front. 
movement, skill trees, gunplay
I think they know this battlefield needs to be good expecially after bfvs controversy
Good destruction, good gunplay
lot of good things in v drowned out by a bad package
I love V is my fav battlefield, but u can tell they really fucked up in some places
Squad revives, fortifications, not needing to carry a syringe as a gadget to revive.
And didnt make up on their promises for the game
Biggest one for me: BFV factions arent literal clones of eachother
Bfv was amazing it was how they supported it imo
And BFV movement is some of the best feeling FPS movement out there.
Remember they were saying the coop mode would be randomised and different every time
Syrette gun 
bfv suffered from lack of content, balance issues, bugs, and inconsistent atmosphere.
Oh, and contextual 3rd person animations rule too
But then the coop came out n was some dog shit
Bfv feels like the most balanced to me tho lol
I play every class in that game
I also think the squad point mechanic was cool af also
Yea bfv is awesome just needed better support
BFV actually had a lot of great stuff.
Assault in bfv is just good in almost all combat situations. Meanwhile support has a ton of different roles slapped onto it that leas to an unfocused class nobody plays
The only game where people actually use smokes properly because they encouraged it in the base medic kit
@soft kayak it seems to me people don't talk about hacks and anti cheat because they're probably not overly comcerned
after bfv they should be
looks at my 207hrs on support 
Support lmgs n mmgs are insane and the ammo box to refill gadgets is essential in an organised squad
But like it was said, they really need to hit this bf on the head
Brah the bar in bfv is insane
in an organised squad
Sir this is battlefield
If you're in au, I'll be your mate
Ye bro im in au same user name
I am taken a break tho cause last two months have been bf non stop
Lmao, I sent you a discord friend request
Yea i got it bro
Nah. BFV suffered from killing support early. And a stupid TTK change.
I'll hit you up for 2042
Yessir
liberals you say?
the libs
it could have had no liberalism and still be a steaming pile of ass
fair enough
Yea the negative back lash of the ttk change destroyed all the good will the pacific update got
Like they shot themselves in the foot so bad
Plus they should’ve just used the E3 Trailer as the launch trailer. Cause the BFV reveal trailer was dogshit
Why would they do that? The one time where people were praising the game
Unknown battles would have been cool if they were portrayed properly and if the player was given context like in bf1
Infinite Warfare trailer > bfv trailer
all i know is that bf5 had a woman with a claw in it and that looked stupid af
I like the maps in bfv tho are maps not in every other ww2 games
One of the things that I took away from the July 8 EA presentation that scared me was they talked about the Live service in sort of 3 month increments and I suspect they were talking about content. And that's fine but for me the real vision and the big benefit to consumers for a Live service is not having to wait 3 months for a patch to fix bugs and balance issues (bugs especially) - The industry has GOT to get better in terms of having faster turn around times with bugs/balance stuff and 3 months isn't going to cut it
I think maybe they are better off doing modern or post modern times stuff
I feel like the TTK change is what actually murdered the game. If they had not done that, a lot of the playerbase I feel like would’ve stuck around. Especially since the pacific was received so well.
I dont think it will be 3 months with no patch, just 3 months between updates
i think the teams that worked on 5 should be flushed from DICE
Thats how bf has always done dlc tho just this time dlc is "free"
and never rehired
in bf1 it was 6 months between dlcs
Nah. BFV has a lot of great stuff. The marketing team though, maybe.
Didn't 2042 have different staff? Like the guys that worked on bf4?
No thats ripple effect now
Ah
They are making the classic maps
All of DICE worked on 2042
Maybe that will be true this time around but for BFV the vehicle bugs lingered for MONTHS - and I mean serious stuff too
sure. BFV was also a trainwreck in most aspects
Yea bf2042 was all hands on
A TRUE live service needs to be much nimbler when it comes to fixing bugs - like 1-2 week turnaround
Stockholm studio worked on both BF4 and BFV. Let’s not act like BFV was made by some lesser studio
Maybe a month for bigger stuff
Kloud it will be updated all the time
any game does
The months are just the dlc
They will not patch op characters tho so most people buy them first lol
It’s not like folk who worked on BF4 were just sitting in the wings, watching a different studio make BFV. Then came back to work on 2042. Lol
I wish
Let's hope so but traditionally that has not been the case - you've gotten a few bug fixes but no where near as many as should have been cleaned up
"the stasis effect": where profit incentives lead the game to be purposefully imbalanced.
In 10 years the fps scene will look like China's
lmg, deployable cover strats tho
Not every game is gonna be a hit with everybody.
I hate BF4
But everyone else loves it
I fucking hate that shit
Bf4 balancing was pretty ok in my books with the odd exception
why
Guns wise
It's one thing to unintentionally launch a weapon and have it be OP but you know all too often it happens purposefully
I don’t like the maps, don’t like levolution, don’t like the gun balance, don’t like suppression, don’t like all the lock ons.
I see
Bf4 assualt weapons are obviously the best tho
Don't like lock ons?
For those that dont know: the most played fps game in the world, currently, is a free to play, pay to win counter strike clone called "Cross Fire". Most of China's multiplayer gaming scene is like this. With the slow push to mtx and free to play, id bet we're heading down that same road
Oh boy do I have news for you
It’s not that I don’t like lock-ons. It’s just that there’s so many things that can lock onto you.
Half of my BF4 tank gameplay was accompanied by the sounds of lock-ons.
use the ecm jammer
Yea but that's china for you. They banned cryptocurrency just to release their own crypto coin
You are sadly correct - there will be attempts to resist and perhaps it won't be blatant but I agree 100% that the lure of cash will be too strong to resist. And Lawmakers will take a hands off approach to regulation because it is entertainment and "just games" and the VG lobby will be strong enough to push its weight around
Tbf, I’ve found the active shield to be more useful
This has nothing to do with the government. This is just the most profitable way to sell games, so long as the people accept it.
I went back to bf4 and realised the vehicles were alot more balanced than i thought
I hear you. For me that's part and parcel with playing a modern warfare game.
Like u kitted out a tank for vehicle destroying or anti infantry couldnt be best at both
But i hate playing as infantry on the maps with like 8 tanks a team or something
youre gonna have a hard time finding a legal justification to ban p2w games
Bf4 had less tanks so easier to balance imo
Not gonna lie, anti vehicle rounds still work pretty good on fleshy meatbags
It is. And it’s something I’m just gonna have to accept with 2042, and I totally understand that.
Not about banning per se but about "truth in advertising" If something is P2W it should be more clearly communicated. It's tricky because on the one hand I REALLY support freedom when it comes to what game artists want to do. Like there was this one game I can't remember but the developer could actually come in and mod your game and make it different just to spook you and stuff and it was decried by some as him playing God and I think that's crazy! Doing innovative stuff like that is what gaming is all about! But on the other hand, this sort of stuff that the Chinese companies (and others TBF) are doing is clearly manipulative and toxic. There should be more transparency required so that consumers can make educated decisions.
Yeah, good luck rewriting all of advertising law for that.
You're a wise and chill dude and that's a mature and honest answer. MUCH respect 
BF4 vehicle experience was just getting locked on 99% of the time
I loved annoying the attack helis with the Igla
I seen an article that said real life ads are coming to games soon, that shit's gonna be annoying. Freaking ads everywhere these days with no escape
I think it’s also that BF4 never really felt like the perfect storm to me. There was always something, whether I didn’t like the map, or the gunplay ect. 2042 looks more promising in regards to maps and if the gunplay and movement is as good as BFV lock-ons can be easily overlooked.
For me, that is
That's already happened with one of EA's latest sport games.
That already exists. Lots of games have done it,
I have no problem if there are like billboards and passive stuff but making me watch ads in game?

Hell, in the Skate games you got ads for like Monster and Miracle Whip and shit.
I remember a few years ago a WWE 2K game had a season pass, where you didn’t even get the content. You just paid to buy the DLC at a discount.
earn more in game currency to display an add on your tank
Pay for ad space on the top of the tuk tuk

We better hope nobody from EA is reading this
Part1: I think a big part of the annoyance beyond just the lock tone was the mobility/critical hit that came with them - instead of them being 100% of the time they should have been like 20-30% and then it wouldn't have been that bad. Part 2: The ARM was so bad for so long and then they finally made it a lot more reasonable BUT then they made the PRM missile like 10x worse because you could fire, then switch to guns so the lock was off and then switch back to missile and get the lock again and then the target had like .5 second to react and then they get hit with a missile that did like 1.75x more damage than the ARM, lol! Don't know what they were thinking!
Ngl I wouldn't entirely mind having a miracle whip ad on my tank. It would be truly demoralizing to have a pride obliterating death courtesy of Miracle Whip
JK of course

