#battlefield-2042
1 messages Ā· Page 2231 of 1

Ayy itās Dutch!
Is there just a whole collection of these
That depends. What is expected of me and how many gyros must I consume?
All the gyros
well #battlefield-2042 lets spin the wheel and pick our unrelated topic for today!
And the winner? "Why you should fuck Ryan Gosling"!
Tune back in tomorrow when we choose between the economics of Bhutan and Bad Company themed ASMR.
That was never a topic
I mean why not right?
š®āšØ
i thought nito was a bot for a sec XD
Okay and whatās your benefit package look like? You guys got matching 401k?
Acts like one
hi

No we only got 200.5k
i am a bot
god mornig
god mornig indeed
kloud we have unlimited gyros and free toilet paper
Hello bot
Holdup I gotta go look at what Ryan gosling looks like I kinda forgot

Ahh no Ryan aināt all that


dang rip the embed
No wonder they said that gif looked like him lmfao he looks exactly like that guy 
Iām a little slow ok guys donāt worry
YOOOO wassup dutch
Embed fixed
Sup bro
how r u able to post gifs?
Heās got privelage
!!regular
ā¹ļø The Regular role is granted to active, positive, courteous, and resourceful guests of the server. This role is earned, not given, and is conferred at the discretion of the server staff. With this role guests can post/embed images, execute a selection of bot commands, and change what color their name appears as in chat.
damn
crap i dont count as positive or courteous
Lmao
salty we're taking over!
Nice
rlly
What happens
?
I love your username chaddle
DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN
DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN
You guys ever wonder why the people in Australia donāt warn the Americans about things? Such selfish people
They are taking over
Oh god
australia is on fire no one cares what they think
I know right? Like they couldāve warned us about 911
soon we'll replace tps
oi
For realā¦
half of australia burned down last year you have no lands
Everyone's a fucking Gyro!

Chill dude
Whatās Gyro?
gyro is best gang
/flex in aMURIcan
sorry im on steroids and an antibiotic fighting covid delta so im aggressive
moving on
what
damn u got delta?
i just got the normal covid
Dang thatās rough, my mom just got covid but itās just normal
i lost my taste and smell shit was weird
no its bad guys, realy bad. i feel like my left lung was lit on fire and then mr. T took a shit on it to put the flames out
Good job mr t
and im vaxxed

so yeah prolly woulda died
pushing 40 in age
boomer gamer
lmfao
waitā¦. Your left lung caught on fire š®āšØ
Praying for you bro
You old fart
im recovering
ancient gamer
but it took me down a notch
ngl
just a notch
Atleast you have family.
Family is all that matters
weow.
yeah i actually installed the internet on my dell pc. had an intel like...430mhz processor (yes, hundred)
I swear you and your family 
from a disc
i wanna see an 80 yr old gamer rendezook someone
Lmfao
thatll be me in the nusring home streaming with my vr in about 20 years
just wait for it boys
You donāt have my permission to die airman. We need you out on the battlefield come October 22
As long as they have family, they can do everything.
dude air force pumped me full of radiation and anthrax so it was gg before covid anyways
uncle sam can smd
Wilde lurking 
youre 40?
What did you do?
im 32
im 16 young gamer vibes
Can you dumb it down for me lol whatās afsc?
its a job code for the air force
google it kid
i didnt have google
š
hahahaha
@dull rock isnt the bf series 17+. out you go
air force security corps?
Air Force Cyber Surety
SHHHH lasagna
tldr
i played 1942 on launch night
damn that old??
that old son
wow
that game is a relic for me
Aight thanks
What have you seen
Ah is that what you did?
two recessions, two pandemics, numerous day one launch catastrophes, george bush AND clinton presidencies, katrina, 9/11 of course from my classroom in 10th grade....
unfortunately
Gotcha, nice
jeez you've been through some shit
Bro i wasnāt even a thought when 9/11 happened
You probably were
don't mention the word agent orange
i lived this world at 15 years old and cell phones didnt exist
The guy from the Punisher TV Show?
it never got this hot, the sky used to be bluer, the sun yellower
fuck
the other kind
what other kind
Yeah Iām pretty young, Iāll be 16 in like 2 weeks
agent orange the chemical used in vietnam?
Wasnāt that basically napalm?
idfk I didnāt pay attention during history
bingo
oh i was there for y2k crisis. everyone thought the world financial computer systems were gunna fail due to a binary coding issue and the year turning "00" for the first time in modern electronics. and yes, everyone bought all the toilet paper back then too
that was a fun one
Bruh the toilet paper is so stupid
not rlly it was more like white phosphorus bombs but it was severely toxic and dealt alot of friendly fire
it was far worse than napalm
believe it or not
Oh dang

Is that the stuff that would like still burn under water?
no
you guys have great opportunities ahead of me. me too. hell im not THAT old. but the digital frontier....now thats exciting. thats the new sailing the world. space? pfft. cold, dark, no oxygen. but digital space? mmmmhmmmm
We learned about one of those in history a while back
the agent also called genetic mutations in survivors of the chemical.. which means they developed cancer and other diseases, worse yet, it turned out to be hereditary - so their offspring would suffer the same effects
Dang thatās pretty bad
consider it a "spreadable cancer causer" really
if youre unlucky enough to survive you're cursed for an eternity
also the older I get the more I realize how harmful organized religion is. was born and raised a catholic altar boy. i got lucky tho and wasn't abused. hold school farmer was my priest. cool guy actually. gave us 100 bucks on christmas as kids. was a big deal cuz I could buy extra controllers for my nintendo 64 and the buddies would come over and play goldeneye and sneak playboy magazines
my world was so small back then...
We are completely off-topic. I suggest moving to #general.
general kicked me out
š
no one wants an old boomer around
ill settle down. you boys enjoy your gaming
Idk how we even got to this point but Iām fine with it
oh I was just fuckin around idc what channel you guys use
See ya later
world War iii btf6 war of warfer
have you been drinking
see how good drugs are?
oh hey wilde
I could tell when the indicator stopped haha
You know whatās better than drugs? Family. Family is the best thing ever
I turned 28 on the 25th of June and used my birthday money to buy battlefield 2042 so now I have a lot of extra cash of my money
Wilde was about to merc us all and then steal slothyās family
š¦„
ez
I'm omw to the gym in an incredibly crusty bus, I couldn't start my day worse
did you get your fingers checked out
After that itās your family though
Hopefully you got family by your side.

T'was a pinched ulnar nerve, solved itself
you playing a dangerous game
But this bus messes with my ocd
Just uncrust the bus
not get the train?
Just returning your baby
Nice kicks man
Bro that looks clean compared to our school buses
Thanks bud
Thatās like spotless compared to them lmao
look your lace is out of position
feet.
Except for the urine stains
what
Oh....
wow
You gotta take a leak when you gotta take a leak
If you get what Iām saying
:noleaks:
Gots to see it through my boy
battlefield 2042 world war
Cant say Iāve ever seen someone wear those type of flipflops with jeans before lol
you could be standing on one
then your shoe now has urine on it
No, please
Atleast it gives it an extra spice to it
What are they supposed to be called then?
š¦„š«
I think sandals
yeah you won't even know either
Same difference
Unless you smell em
Potato Tomato
š®āšØ
just walking out about dripping
^
Jesus Christ guys, let's not derail further lmao
Get that yellow racing stripe
š
Wilde is having the biggest midlife crisis of his life realising the possibility now
lmao Battlefield has sprinting
Donāt worry Wilde. It gives it an extra spice to the smell
put it this way wilde
Can we stay a little on topic of battlefield
sticky shoes are the best shoes for battlefield you know
It makes him go faster because thereās less grip just like smooth tires are better for racing
They have to drink water or they wonāt get to the pond soon enough
I think itās the other way around for shoes

No idk what youāre talking about
Meh Iām probably wrong
Cars and humans are obviously the same
Yeah

you run and swim faster fully geared than an olympic athlete in the bf series. love it
I never realized that tuktuk guy was a mod until now
Yeah lmfao
i wonder what they'll talk about tomorrow
What time is the talk thing at
ā¢ļø
Can you fire from every seat in the vehicle and can you spawn airborne
its 4 o clock in the morning and the sun is already up again. why am i not sleeping. i blame battlefield
someone link the hype trailer
Yeah I mean even if there's not a weapon there you can still use the power of imagination.
Someone link Link
someone link that guy reacting to the rendezook


They had a snow map and everybody was parachuting but idk if that was the beginning or they jumped off a cliff but Iāll use my imagination
That's a good question. Would be interesting if they had some sort of mid air spawn like BFV with the bombers
I hope that the kit system from 4 is gone for 2042
so is ripple effect just a bunch of guys who left DICE to make their own studio or is it just DICE LA renamed
Like you get a rocket launcher in one point of the map and it dissapears
You dont keep the rocket launcher.
I want that gone from this game, I hate it.
DICE LA got renamed
vince zampella from respawn got brought in to reorg the studio and this is what it is called now
Yes it would but Iām positive they will break my knowledge with dice using real military intelligence officers or something that helped make the game
"Ok, I really have to explain, because it bothers me.
After DICE LA saved BF4, all the important people who spearheaded the project at the studio either left DICE to other EA studios or directly to DICE Stockholm. Hence why David Sirland and co were the leads with BF1 and BFV.
Sure, some old guard still at DICE LA, but itās a brand new group of people. And with rebrand and reorganisation that just happened, this is a new studio. This is not the studio that saved BF4.
That being said, doesnāt mean they wonāt make something new and amazing."
Quote from a Reddit so don't take it as gospel
from respawn huh
the guy who lead the reorg is from respawn
so you got old cod devs and old battlefield devs working together
this'll be interesting
its not really old cod devs
Vince Zampella sounds familiar...
those are still at respawn
Hmm...
Yes here's a picture of Zampella 
its really EA brought in an experienced exec to help that studio grow and reorganize after its been basically slowly going under attrition basically since the day it became DICE LA
damn they managed to squeeze 128 players into 41 gbs of size
?
Wait-
in reality we are just getting a repackeged and updated bf4 game pumped with cash shop currency and specialists
but im cool with that
ps5 alpha is said to be 41 gig
141*
key word alpha
yeah
2 maps
I bet the downloads for this game will be 40 gigs per update
not full game
Or worse than Mw2019
you are going to need to buy a 1TB ssd for each expansion
Except we'll get some good shit with said updates.
look if its not 100+ gigs at launch like modern warfare then im fine with it
Like big ass maps.
it probably will be around 100
id argue that playing BF4 with all the updates and improvements made over this last gen is more than worth the price of admission
i mean fuck i'd just uninstall my other battlefields anyway for some space
like its really quite night and day between 4 and 5
considering BFV is 90gb, 2042 will be 100-110
Iāll probably delete Cold War when itās out
you guys know the battlefields are actually pretty decently optimized right
ok have fun with your bloated storage then
I mean I do have 4TB of SSD capacity so it wouldn't be that big a deal
for the size of the game, this is nothing
sata is fine, NVME and M.2 are an extra 100-200usd
!when
note that NVMe is not a type of drive protocol**
Someone do !when
do yall want commander mode in 2042?
M.2 SATA drives exist
only if we have tactical geniuses like you leading us.
Itās in like 15 days
ā¤ļø
I do but I'm certain it's not happening
was 99% unused in the main game
15 hours live play ea
they even had mobile support and nobody used it
Miss the commander mode
Wonder why they deletes it
Make sure you have a warranty on your console when you run bf2042
whats the worse that could happen
cyberpunk 2077 ran perfectly on all devices with no issues im sure itll be even better with 2042 am i right
128 player could make it break unlike a Pc
64 players on old gen
32 players on Gameboy
Pc master race joke
I've had my blood infused with DDR5
Imagine BF with the cyberpunk dong bug
dong bug
100 bucks rn
Why isn't July 22 here yet?!
Just please no gloves like cod in bf2042
thats actually quite a lot missing
Just enjoy this waiting time, when the game is out you can never go back
nice
I mean I can because I can time trav....nm
new comedian
Also there are like 3-4 more specialist on ea battlefield . C o m in the ultimate package desert ice and other ones
Anyone know if you preorder a physical copy if you get to play the beta?
If you buy physical copy of the game you get digital Beta and if you buy digital copy of the game you get physical copy of the Beta
Only digital will give early beta access I believe
Unless this is undercover boss and everyone but me stops chatting
I get a ea discount for being nice
Oh I see thanks Iāll just wait till it hits open then
See you tomorrow seinora see ya later alligator after while crocodile š
those are just skins for sundance, boris, and the radio man
it was 99% unused because it wasn't engaging, there are many ways to fix that
there is just a fine line in making commander a supporting role, but giving it a small arsenal of lethal weaponry to feel like you make a difference on an advancement of the team
Unfortunately, cruise missiles just took too long to be tactical, and I think most people used them for clearing snipers, but man I had one lineup where I cleared two lavs on the bridge on floodzone, and that was rewarding
Moments like that make commander mode fun.
BFV's squad leader system was much better than bf4's commander
why is that
cause it introduced the same ordinances as commander, made squad leader more meaningful than "click an objective" and most importantly let you see the effects of your commands in person
Commander is much less personal than calling in a v1 on a point right in front of you
obviously you haven't used the 3d mode xD
I think having the position separate can allow commanders to see uncontested objectives, and point their team there
its a much more table top view, and the decisions should be more well informed
sure, but thats not really fun for the commander
I wans't completely against bfv's choice though
kinda makes him a glorified MAV
I think a combination of both would be cool. Like keep most of the squad leader stuff how it was in V but then also have a commander mode but the commander would just keep the scan mode - not the UAVs and it would be focused like 99% on just coordination and directing squads where to go.
interesting point, maybe its just a preference thing
thats too unengaging though, you are going to have the position unfilled 90% of the time
Commander mode needs to feel supportive enough where you shift teamate engagements in their favor
and thats what UAV provided
!when
Battlefield 2042 Reveal Trailer: https://youtu.be/ASzOzrB-a9E
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay Trailer: https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
Time: <t:1626973200:R>
commander position works better in games where squad leaders actually give a shit.
I don't think so. I think it will attract a different kind of player - one who just wants to commadn and direct and see a birds eye view of the battlefield
- squad leader spawns only (along with normal spawning on objectives and vehicles and what not) this encourages squad proximity which leads to obtaining squad leader orders
- if orders are not accepted with 1-2 minutes, squad leader is demoted and replaced with a hopefully competent leader, we filter them out
those two suggestions and you have compliant squads
a RTS player ya, I get it, but there needs to be more than just orders I think
if orders are not accepted with 1-2 minutes, squad leader is demoted and replaced with a hopefully competent leader, we filter them out
This will simply cycle the role between everyone in the squad
Thats not a good solution
then it stops cycling lol, but I am sure the results will be better than what they were in bf4
what if the commander is bad?
Well there would be - you would still have the scan. And maybe you could drop supplies too - maybe even smoke barrages.
it just needs some action required, so it know that you know your responsability
the big difference between BF and say Squad is that, in squad, the teamwork is the primary source of fun. Game just isnt enjoyable lone wolfing.
BF, as a sandbox game, is fun in many ways, and because of that relying on randoms to give a shit is impossible.
ballistic vests, sam turrets, emps, juggernaught suits
there is alot you could add
there should be a couple lethal weaponry for the commander to take out problematic targets though?
I get it that its a sandbox game, but it doesn't mean it can't be team oriented and somewhat coordinated
just not as much as its siblings
winning should be a bigger part of the game imo
Maybe like a once a round missile or b1 bomber strike but I would really limit the offensive stuff so that people don't complain about being killed by commander - and instead focus on coordination which with 128 players will be kind of important
just like operations were in bf1
Yep I completely agree there is a fine line in making it OP, but still needs to be engaging that the spot is filled
I agree ^
I donāt pay attention to squad leader orders
no. Lean in on the player freedom. Large, coordinated games are done much better by the tac shooter genre. The best part of this game is the freedom and sandbox, and that should not be discouraged.
I play how I want
you arent alone
thats what I wouldn't force players to be micromanaged
but passively have them spawn on leaders who are attacking ordered objectives
if a commander is repeatedly giving me orders I find it annoying and will leave SL
scroll up a little and u can see
thx
I think there should be commander and non commander servers to serve each preference
I agree with that
I never found it annoying
I always just got in a habit of accepting them
I donāt think there should even be a commander position in a squad
could be neat. Perhaps a "coordinated" mode where only the winner gets rewards, but theyre much higher.
whether or not I choose to listen to it
I wish there was better in-game communication or at least that people could opt in and out for it
I agree that its freedom and sandbox, but don't people still want to win?
g i v e
** p r o x y c h a t **
proxy chat would be annoying
nah. I just want to have fun
too many issues with proxy
not many people on PC use mikes I found out
ppl dont know how to behave
best part of proxy chat
Man, I'm excited, but just got reminded how fucking annoying tanks are in the BF franchise
Do any of you guys remember in BFV beta there was an unlock for planes called "wingman" or something like that? It got scratched from release. I wonder if we will see unmanned combat aerial drones
nah, if we got that I'd wanna ban anyone who breaks the rules instantly
I wonder if you are in the majority or minority
if people care about winning that is
Having Battlefield turned into the reputation Cod has sounds bad
Let's hope that tank using IRNV don't have the capability to see cross map with it
that rep was just old xbox live. Ah good times
but in battlefield, I care more about winning
hm, maybe there should be a specific more competitive gamemode
nah
ok.
I care about getting bow kills
platoons u mean
we are already getting 128 player servers
how big is a bf platoon?
Double rendered sniper scope
if you divide the community even more by adding competitive and non competitive its gonna get risky in terms of activity
I don't remember the player cap, but its more of a giant community
needlessly intensive and adds next to nothing
I hope they make IRNV and FLIR useful. I know infantry hates it but when I play a modern game I want that kind of stuff in there.
But looks sexy
I hate it so much, as someone who hates playing in tanks, and solely plays infantry
they already were useful in bf4 tho?
so do you think the role of a commander is just completely irrelevant from the game, where people just capture or not, its up to them?
It feels like such BS when someone plays infy in a giant piece of metal that 25% of players can do nothing about
Flir = yes IRNV = no
true
No, I think having commanders is a fun element, but can't say it makes or breaks it for me. But it is a game, and I care more about having full servers than having everyone pretending it is milsim
If we take the two extremes
Yeah same, they said they are pushing teamwork though
slightly coordinated, but not over the top like squad
We will see
teamwork, yes thats what I want
I mean thats the game though right? But for people like you I hope there are community servers where you can have tankless versions of the maps
squad isnt over the top, its peak
They should just reward teamwork more tbh
its about the teamwork more than the combat
It is the game, but it still isn't fun for anyone but the person in the tank. Tanks aren't holding objectives or taking out other tanks, just getting a killstreak on infantry
see I still want combat tho
Even if you get like 4 kills its still very fun to play
if ppl figure out they get more points when in proximity of their squad AND following a squad order they get way more points
they will do it
lol
wow nethrex did you read my reddit post
no
I literally said the same tthing lmao
I hate reddit
IMO, Tanks are far too tanky in battlefield
I talked about the points for that behavior being reddeemed for vehicles
what do you think about that?
- using extrinsic rewards instead of making something intrinsically satisfying
cringe and bad game design
I know that is controvercial
well being on top of the leaderboard and ranking things up faster should be reward enough :)
But I think it's true
tanks in bf are made of butter
maybe so
Four blows from a RPG to take out a tank when one good hit would do it IRL?
tanks can be tough to beat until you get a couple engineers together and then it's game over
So how would you make it "satisfying" to push teamwork?
if you can solo a tank as infantry whats the point of a tank
no
the in game rounds would not even pen an MBT
They shouldn't be holding objectives since that's not what they are there for. They do cap them though. They Definitely take out other tanks (don't know what games you're playing where they don't haha!). Part of making them balanced is controlling repairs and this is where incorporated the BFV system would help combined with making sure the repair tool doesn't repair too fast and has limited ammo
And, describe in game rounds? Would a Rocket Propelled Grenade, on a direct hit not take out a tank? Demobilize it's treads? Affect it's function?
I think I would like to see both requisition points, and commander in bf2042
i hope vehicle drops are only by squad leader
and unique vehicles are available for carrying out commander orders, or just capping objectives in general
Honestly, my frustration with tanking is just how awful they are to fight for an infantry player, especially with FLIRs and IRNVs. Even peek your head out, and get demolished in a single blast of HE or Sabot Shell. I just got out of a game in which the tanks did nothing to fight other tanks, just rolled up and stomped the infantry. Cross map suppression in an LAV, with nothing you can do to stop them.
or heals, resupplies, repairs, squad proximity bonuses, etc.
Could give problems, because ppl who want vehicles will want their own squad
limit number of squads xD
Bfv tanks were dope
but ya thats a good point
Or are dope
so, do you think requisition points individually?
I would leave the game if I was stuck with an awful squad leader and couldn't change it
Generally, I see tanks as being more of a damaging resource, something you need to protect then a bullet sponge. They have massive guns, that can shred infantry, but they have limitations, and risks to using them.
there definitely needs to be a way for members to demote their leader
Yeah
Add ways for infantry players to kill/disable tank positions
I think BF4 is doing it okay tbh
I agree, but I also would like to see demotions for not accepting/rejecting commander orders tbh
orders need a cooldown to prevent commander spam too though
as someone else mentioned
If I ever see this I camp the anti tank rifle, take a shot, then redeploy, and repeat
They were, I agree; but they also didn't have FLIR and IRNV.
i guess its in the devs hands now
That's why there needs to be no auto replen health for vehicles. They're bring back auto replen ammo which I disagree with but if they do the same for vehicle health then I really have to question their wisdom. You shouldn't be in the positions you are describing in 2042 if they keep auto plen out and make drivers self repair or get outside repairs
as long as it's slow, I think its balanced
you just need teamwork to take out a tank
Agreed. Generally, as a rule of thumb, a tank should be no harder to take out then the people within, combined.
you can't expect to solo it
IMO, ofc
The issue with saying this is that teamwork is rare to find/
You aren't gonna have teams that communicate to take out tanks often
not so much teamwork, just other people with rockets also firing lol
or hell even a jet attacking
the tank just needs to be overwhelmed with numbers
and distracted
I never felt tanks were OP in bf4, but I think yall are talking about bfv which i have no clue
got 5900x and 3080ti today, i'm ready bring battlefield 2042 to me
It's just a bad mechanic because it is damage negation - you're undoing someone else damage without having to put in any effort. Healing and reviving should always be more difficult/dangerous than dealing damage
I am referring to BF4, as someone who generally doesn't play engineer often, having a dislike for pdws/gadgets
I never felt the need to have a 3000 series yet, my 580 is doing just fine xD
which 3080ti did you get?
taking away auto repair so you need to get out is a good idea, and combined with brief enter/exit animations could help a lot with balance
You have to retreat for it to be replenished, and if you get damaged auto repair is disabled for like 10 seconds
It was really only good if you were traveling to another objective with no threats
Yup! To be clear I would still allow drivers to self repair up to 50% from the inside but after that they need to get out and repair or have someone else do it
I guess one thing to consider is how vulnerable someone using an RPG is. The majority of my kills when sniping (being a shitty sniper) have been on engineers with rocket lauchers
The important thing is to use different angles
don't just fire a rocket from the same place twice
the tank can't line up their shots and predict you fast enough
its like wack a mole
No worries. There's actually not much difference in terms of performance between that and something like the Strix versions. Just a few frames. Congrats on the new rig!
They can use their main cannon to hit you from behind cover, the second after you fire though, killing you with splash
only if there is a wall behind you, you will die from splash damage
make sure to stay in the open where they can really only shoot the ground
or have the shell directly pass through you
Or if they fire at the floor next to you. Died plenty of times that way.
gunner will rek u in the open tho
I dunno, I really think bf4 had tanks balanced
otherwise don't engage when you are alone, wait for the tank to be distracted by other players or another tank and team up against them
yeah I've never felt overly frustrated by tanks as infy in bf4 and they're fun to drive too
The in game RPG fires HEAT rounds. Theyre great against other armored vehicles, but MBTs are very strong. Best you will get is a disabled track.
To penetrate an MBT, you need a far more powerful Tandem round
the only way you should be able to Solo a tank is if you get several shots in its rear
The big difference is that auto repair you can keep moving and attacking - With self repair you are stuck and vulnerable so it was a true pause - a way to provide infantry a real genuine earned relief from tanks since they had to really retreat and not do a fighting retreat.
or plant 3-4 C4 on it
thanks man!
Pardon me for not being military lol and not knowing that. Question in that sense then; why wouldn't a soldier in BF4 be using tandem rounds?
Or seduce the driver with sultry teabagging
probably bc they're rare/expensive/whatever, although @hardy kestrel tanks in BF4 don't have reactive armor by default since it's an upgrade
I mean ya, but all it took was even a small amount of damage to disable that, but I wouldn't be mad if they went back to self repair, but I did prefer autorepair
I usually always retreated and used my repair tool anyway
there really are alot of ways to die in a tank
heat rounds are still the primary AT weapon across the globe, because Tandem rounds are expensive as hell.
Also you can in bf4 with the javelin.
Then why does the Javelin do nothing in terms of damage?
it does 30?
Balance, probably
Because it has family
cause balance. If the Javelin had damage proportional to the rpg it would be completely broken
Thereās a difference between realism and good gameplay
talk about being vulnerable by maintaining lock on a tank
squad doesnt even have the javelin for this reason
javelin was only good for camping on a roof
Here is my thinking; Thinking of tanks like medieval knights in modern warfare is a mistake. They really aren't, realistically. I would argue that a fun and more realistic gameplay experience could be had if tanks were made more succeptable to infantry anti-tank armaments
like 40mm?
idk that that would be more realistic lol and might be too spammy with 128p
fair enough. however, I would like to see the frequency of AT launchers in 2042 before I make that call. The new class system has changed the context of how bf is balanced.
Fair, of course
Really, I am just sick of getting rolled by a max level tank with every implement in the game to make them unable to die, going 50-0
IMHO, 90% of the people who claim AT is too weak always engage tanks from the front. In most BF games, you do WAY more damage from the rear of a tank. In BFV, for example, you can do almost 50 damage in one hit with an AT launcher from the rear.
Being a second away from getting a kill, and getting flattened by a tank round from out of your range, after being spotted by FLIR optics.
facts, all about positioning
I do know that tanks are easier to kill from the back, that is true; but a good driver/gunner won't let that happen.
jihad jeep?
thats the best way to solo them
That is the only way to solo them lol
Or sneak up behind. Use those flanks
Consistently
I've attached m2 slams to a tank and rpged it that way also
Good tank drivers require teamwork to take down tho
Hey all
as they should
this ^^
As they should tbh yeah
Beat me to it lol
As they should; but it shouldn't be onesided, IMO. Keeping a tank alive, and getting it to it's destination should too be a team effort.
Yeah ofc
One man in a tank should not outclass a squad of assault, engineer, recon and support.
At the same time though, tanks on their own are supposed to be a threat. If tanks are useless without other infantry, theres next to no point to them being in the game
I loved using tanks in BF4
but getting a terrible gunner meant I cant push anywhere
almost worse than having none
Depends, if they are in a crater all huddled up then they need to eat their AP shells and go to spawn screen like good little boys and girls
Very situational
Yeah the whole vehicle vs infantry in bf4 was kinda dumb
If you didnāt have vehicles yourself
It was kinda doomed
I firmly disagree; personally, I see the tank as just another class of soldier, as I do other vehicles. They shouldn't be god tier, just better and worse in some and other aspects. Their rarity (thanks to limits) allows them to take on a bit more value then a common soldier, but not to the degree we can see
But even in an open field, spread out.
Cmon I saw plenty of infantry have big games
Can't wait for all the whinging from the CoD crowd about how vehicles are "OP" when 2042 rolls around
I think the tank wins the majority of the time
I mean I like vehicles a lot
Tanks should always win long range, but when they have to go to a capture point they become vulnerable
If I wanted to play an FPS where I was rewarded for having stellar aim I would not play battlefield š¤£
If enemy infantry are trying to engage a tank in an open field, the tank should absolutely win that engagement
against infantry that is
I feel that battlefield is probably way more fun when you have a group of people to coordinate Things, with randoms itās kinda bad
actually you know what? The javelin should be a pick up weapon. Having a tandem warhead plunge onto the weaker top of a tank with the combined force of rocket propulsion and gravity is the closest thing irl to be smitten by god.
would be a fun as hell pickup weapon.
I wonder how they will handle vehicle criticals in BF2042 - Will it be like 4 or will it be like V where you targeted the area to damage it?
That is what I am talking about
None of my friends play this game though sadge
Create something that can pose a legitimate threat to a tank
Hopefully like V, making everything like BF4 seems like a big step back to me
We already know you can damage specific parts
If you target the right track on a tank, the right track is damaged
oh, been a thing for a while. AT guns in bf 1 and V as well as the tank hunter pickup.
Like what if if you attacked itās treads it would stop moving or hitting a certain part would cause it to explode after 30 seconds
In what situations does an assault, support, recon and enginner beat a tank in fair combat?
Honestly I think everyone going back to BF4 to "prepare" for BF2042 is making a mistake. Its got a much bigger chance of playing more like V than it does 4
Because the gameplay loop rn is that the tank players will fire at you from across the map and the second they take any damage you just get your engineer to heal you rinse repeat
Imagine if either of the tanks in that game had FLIR
I feel like the vehicles should undergo status effects
Dont have helicopters and jets in BFV tho ;)
Not in an open field, thats for sure. Trying to head on a tank is and should be suicide. Playing it smart and utilizing flanks, as well as just generally overwhelming with ranged AT weaponry as a team (ideally from the sides or rear) are also viable
Jets were kinda weird no?
Also lets face it, BFV's planes and BF4's jets are functionally identical
I feel like they have almost no effect on the outcome of my games lmao
nearly
Pekora
if the jets have air superiority those helicopters become nearly impossible to use
I see
Siege of Shanghai 
perhaps I just never notice it
APache
What AT weaponry? In BF4, the assault has, at most a grenade launcher that does little. Engineers get all of it, but one Anti-Infantry warhead and that isn't a problem. Sniper and support have C4... but just back up.
Dude my favorite thing on siege of Shanghai is just BASE jumping from the skyscraper to point A Or E to backcap
š ±ļø
I feel like attack jets were more vehicle focussed while stealth was very much anti air with a little anti vehicle. Compared to BFV where the planes did a lot more close support against infantry.
One thing I hope is if you snipe a heli with an RPG or SMAW, it goes down instantly.... hitting one of those rare shots to do only 70% damage sucks
This, for sure
I want to see a whole new series of Battlefield friends!!!
Then get multiple engineers, hit it with rockets from multiple angles. Those Snipers and Supports with C4 could also try to flank the tank, C4 it from behind, and blow it sky high without it ever knowing what hit it
What I want for Battlefield 2042 is just like, more incentive for players to work together
Thatās pretty much it
Engineer though, being the dedicated AT class, takes on the brunt of the responsibility
any new 2042 leaks?
Because tank duo > no tank duo
Nope
If the AI bots regularly drop ammo or health they'll be better than 90% of average players I'll be honest
I don't really like that - maybe with the RPG since it is slower but with the SMAW I feel like thats too punitive
So, in order to take out one person in BF4, you need to get your entire squad to dedicate themselves to the task, get a situation in which you can flank and not be seen by their FOV in 3rd person, and to ensure they all have the correct items and equipment to take it on (I know that I for one don't run c4 on my supports.) Only for them, even if you succeed to respawn, take a new tank, and not fall for your tricks again.
70% is too little tho
Will this game support cross play?
Uhh...yes, actually. Because that individual is in a tank, and tanks should always beat infantry in a head on, one-on-one fight. Even a whole squad should have a somewhat tough time dealing with a tank, but naturally fare much better, especially with more RPGs, and even better if that squad is backed by additional teammates. The tank is, on paper, absolutely supposed to win, because its a tank. They're supposed to be a threat, one which only teamwork can take out.
Tank shelling your objective from a distance? Good, he can't take it without coming closer. Stay clear of him, draw him in, and ambush him from where he least expects
You have to factor in all the other things shooting at it though. Flying with 30% health in chopper is pretty much a death sentence in a large portion of scenarios
I know in BFV taking out tanks can be done solo quite easily if you can get close to a tank, or even just behind it with the right placement, and that only gets easier with a squad
But you are rewarded nothing, why would I waste my shots on it if I have no chance to take it down?
If a Heli gets hit by RPG or SMAW it is because they either got really unlucky
or they made a mistake
I hope squad leaders will have the ability to call in a UCAV strike on vehicles with homing missiles - I think that would be really useful and a good way to reward squads with a lot of PTFO points
Rule of thumb: stop trying to engage tanks A) from range B) from the front. Thats where they're strongest. Put them in any other situation, and you'll find the odds much more in your favor.
I think you are giving tanks far too much credit. Tanks, whilst obviously a threat, have weaknesses that can be exploited. Armor can be punched through with rockets, and crew melted within. Tanks break, weapons jam, and treads fall off. People can jump onto tanks, and drop grenades into them. A tank, though it is a tank, is still only driven by one player. Whilst I agree with you that in other situations it is easier to fight a tank, generally you don't get that option
You don't engage a tank at all, you die anyways.
You engage from behind? Get shot at by their allies
Or by them for even approaching.
no reputable tank squad is letting ppl throw grenades into their tank bro
Nah its not that impossible at all
Can you effectively explain to me 1) How 70% equates to nothing? 2) Are you disputing that flying with 30% health is not extremely perilous? 3) Even if the chopper doesn't die you force them to retreat and then that slows their DPM
Fair. I went a bit hollywood there
My apologies
if they are not moving much they are somewhat easy to hit, if they are hit or keep getting shot at they are forced to move back
But the same idea applies.
And thus, most BF games reflect this. BF4 has mobility kills, BF1 and BFV have part disables that can cripple a tank when they pile up. Also, how would you suggest this get fixed? Theres no way for the game to really just hand you a way to make tanks easier to kill without completely busting the viability of tanks.
If it goes down afterwards you currently get hardly any reward for it, in BF where they can sit on the side and repair it instantly as well lol...
I expect Penguin Charms
Bee ok bye
I would suggest we alter the role of tanks entirely. I would argue that a tank should be the center of an attack, an aid to an attack but not an attack in it's own right. Like everything in battlefield, it is something that aids another thing, and not a thing by it's lonesome. By making tanks easier for infantry to remove from the field of play, they become more valuable, more important to defend.
By tanks being easier to kill they become less valuable
not more
unless you make them kill infantry faster as a way to balance it
Not if you give them stronger capacities offensively.
I am not sure I think that is better balanced
Which I would argue is fine. It still takes a team effort to take out a tank, but it now takes a team effort to defend one as well
Its a necessary evil, in my eyes. Obvious hyperbole here, but if you were to encounter a tank and be able to destroy it easily in 1-2 rockets, it would be a whole lot of "oh look, a tank boom anyways" and there'd be no real reason to ever get a tank because you'd just get deleted. Letting tanks be, well, tanks, spices things up. The presence of a tank makes you change things up, stop, and think about the best way to handle a situation, or even to bring up a tank of your own. This makes destroying a tank incredibly rewarding. You, a little fleshbag, have taken down this iron titan with the help of your teammates (or even on your own if you've done it right) and killed a couple of enemies in the process. If the game just handed you easy wins, the game would get boring real fast.
Its part of what I like to call the "Oh Shit" factor that makes the game more exciting.
If tanks were broken by even 3 rockets idk if I would ever be in one lmao, u either have to camp in spawn or some other place super far from combat
Perhaps. My issue is that, in my experience, that opportunity comes absolutely never. For me, the experience is more; Trying to fight infantry; Tank Rolls Up; Ohfuck, I have nothing I can do here to deal with this, guess I'll fucking die then. Repeat, Respawn.
No doubt it is fun to take out tanks, but if you can't take out a tank, then there is no fun in doing so.
Lets face it, given the way most Battlefield games play, making tanks rely on teamwork to survive would leave a lot of tanks without teams. Making them weaker makes them a burden, and ultimately taking control out of one player's hands and making them rely on someone else just isn't fun in the long run.
In my experience, the most frustrating deaths are those where you feel like theres nothing you could have done. Making tanks weaker because they need to be protected would lead to incredibly unrewarding gameplay
Thus, tanks command a certain confidence
But making it so you need a team to defend them creates the same problem in reverse; it leaves a lot of tanks to run rampant, as you cannot reasonably rely on a team to deal with a tank with you leaves you relying on someone else, which as you said, isn't fun in the longrun
if a tank rolls up on you while ur on your own and you die, that is not really unfair either. The odds were against you. Spawn back with an RPG or smth
idk what game you have in mind, but in BF4 one man can definitely mess up a tank
they are forced to retreat
I just know my experience is different then yours then, generally.
Fighting tanks, IMO fucking sucks
Except for the fact that many people will specifically go out of their way to deal with tanks, because killing them is, generally, very rewarding. For one thing, we're practically ignoring that tanks are often ripe targets for aircraft, not to mention the fact that friendly tanks exist.
Imo what sucks is that you have to play engineer in CQ
imo the reason tanks are so damn annoying is because any damage you do to them can immediately be reversed
Meaning if you dont take it out in one go you might as well have done nothing
Most CQL maps, especially recently with the influx of new players... if you are not engineer to blow things up, you will get destroyed.
this summer is gonna go by without wasting it on 2042 
But if they are forced to retreat for a minute or two you can capture a point, now you and your team can spawn there and more firepower becomes more danger
to the tank that is
Ok this debate has been good, but I really need to go soon 
i mean it is a tank 
But they dont have to retreat
Thanks. My mind isn't changed, but I appreciate the time, and get your perspective
in BF4 they do
They dont repair fast enough
I never had that happen to me where they succeeded in that
This. Sometimes its not necessarily about killing a tank, its about forcing it to fall back and knocking it out of the fight, if just for a little while, giving you and your team to regroup, rearm, and reengage.
If they get out they die
Really, I just hate that helpless feeling when a tank rolls up and you don't have exactly what you need to take it out
And you just get OHK.
You just have to be smart about it honestly
you can get 2 shots in on a tank before it is sure where you are even at
that is minimum of -40%
And then youre dead
no
Yes
Well maybe you, but most of the time I would not let it kill me no 
Thats something you have to be conscious of when choosing classes IMO. When I choose medic, I do it with the knowledge that I myself may not be able to damage tanks much. However, with smoke and heals, I can do my best to keep my teammates alive to deal with it.
Because their big fuck off cannon lands in fucking cuba and still kills you
Thank you for healing and reviving people, we need more like you D:
It's an issue of reliance, I guess. Also, I appreciate your medic-ness.
Medic was more of an example tbh, I'm not much of a medic main
Ah
I sometimes have to spend my final 10-15 bullets annoying support players and knifing them etc to get them to give me ammo
Cya mate!
I know how we can fix support players not dropping ammo
you should be able to just grab and hold onto their leg when ur low on ammo
Just... backpack ammo like BFH?
That is a lol
that'll teach 'em
Thanks for listening to me rant, Neth. Honestly, I just got out of a game of BF4, in which a tank went on a 14 kill tear just hunting infantry, before running away to it's backline where nobody could touch it to heal to full, whilst our team had no tank, because not everyone likes to play in them lol. The other team held total vehicular supremacy
I tried to sneak up with C4, but got Flir-spotted and OHKed, again and again.
So this rant was inspired by that, sorta.
No worries man! I understand how it can feel haha... unfortunately have to admit I am often on the other side of it as I fell in love with BF4 tanks since release. Sounds like they had a better team than yours by that alone tbh, that is what is hardest about the game. Sometimes you get a group that is really new and dont really know what to do haha
Sup bro
When your enemy has air superiority and really good jet pilots... ugh... that is the worst tbh.
Heyu
Yeah. Especially as someone who is the only BF player they know IRL, and who is less then comfortable playing on mic with strangers, so good teamplay simply doesn't exist kek. I always end up just plopping into silent squads, who never stick together
Yeaaa bro especially when ur jumping out of the jet then sniping at a pilot then jump back in the jet hard asf to do
Ahh yeah then it isnt easy! Hard to find players for a squad at random while playing. Was going to say you could find a group here, but the no mic part complicates things haha
Yeah. Plus, as someone who far prefers recon play to assault play, it just aggrevates the problem of trying to fight tanks.
Ahh.... yeah then you wont have a good time lmao
Yeah.
When I play CQL I am engineer 90% of the time because I feel like no one destroys enemy tanks etc. otherwise
I can't tell you the number of times a tank has sniped me from sniper ranges using their shell, wiping me out instantly whilst I could do nothing.
What time is the thing?
And I know it's fun for the tanker, because obviously that is really fucking fun to just wipe infy
Check #game-news if you mean the thing today :)
But for the player who gets wiped, repeatedly, it's far less fun
Definitely haha, thats what makes balance in BF complicated. If the enemy team has air superiority AND the better tankers. You are gonna have a terrible time
Getting shit on alot contributes to getting better
And it happens far too often for my tastes, tbh
Maybe CQL isn't for you then :p
It was what got me to put down BF for the period I did
Yeah I mean, maybe you should play more infantry based? Unless you find a squad to mess up the enemy vehicles haha
That is the problem, right there. I'm a recon player
CQL is where the dopamine hits really come; 300M Headshots, supporting your team on the objective
true
Tbh, you wanna annoy a tank, just get that laser target thingy
Haha, the PLD?
yeah
Use it every game
BF4 wasn't even a great game for its time in terms of balance and mechanics. I'm mildly optimistic that some of the lessons learned from previous BF's will make their way into 2042 and make vehicle potent without being needlessly oppressive.
its the most annoying thing in the game if you are in a tank
I think BF4 tanks are absolutely amazing though
was top 10 on the leaderboards for tanking when the game first came out, until I finally went to bed 
Though, because the tanker can see which direction it is coming from, and thermals are just ridiculously good, that is a one shell solution to that annoying beeping
Depends how far it is ;) preferably you want smth to hide behind
When people do it on top of a hill or a rock that is super frustrating
hola friends
o/
fax
As someone who is pushes up glasses an expert at being wiped off the map by tank shells, I want to let ya know that the blast radius on AP tank shells does wonders to deal with that.
allo
lmao!
can we all agree that the guy sitting in spawn with an aa picking off planes has no life
Even worse is the mobile AA who uses it only to destroy infy
they are certainly taking advantage of something that is way overpowered at least
I feel that
on the zavod map especially
You aren't helping your team at all
They are such a pain lol
All you are doing is focusing on your own KD
And it is even more annoying for those who want to fight it
Without engineers
im talking ab the ones in bf5 and bf1
imagine caring about KD in conquest
everyone who touches the mobile one in bf4 sucks butt
I only grab the mobile AA if I get very tired of the enemy jets 
That is fair
Don't forget people, tomorrow morning 10am PST Dice LA (Now Ripple) will discuss future of FPS and most likely #battlefield-2042
It is also the reason why I am generally less a fan of vehicles in multiplayer games like BF: Because they're a limited resource, I don't want to waste them/take them up for when people who actually know how to use them really fucking well want to use them.
Same happened in battlefront for me, and when I was learning to fly jets
I mean it is okay to want to learn
I'm at work...
Im only bothered when people use it for transport and leave it
Those that take jets just to get to a capture point are annoying
(where they jump out)
Those are the worst
IK most aren't bothered, but it's that silent thought of well, that tank/chopper could have been better used by someone better then I at this game lol (Also fuck those guys, who use attack vehicles as transport vehicles)
Gotta learn somehow :p
True, but doesn't make it any easier kek
On Siege of Shanghai if the other team has a good attack heli and the same two new players keep taking yours and dying though.... š
Frustrating
That is it
Right there lol
Anyways, I too need to work tomorrow, so it is time for myself to sleep
Gnite mate
Thanks for the discussion, I appreciate it. GN!
our expectations for 2042
I still remember the first time I played siege and seeing that tower go down
and the paracel storm map
man it was amazing
truly
wonder if destruction will be dynamic. Like if u blow out a side of a building it falls in that direction
poor cpu
scripted events. dont expect much from aaa studios these days
they here to milk ur wallet. thats it
teardown is all dynamic. just no smoke effects if something collapses
are they going to show gameplay tomorrow or what?
i think so, maybe a few teasers
lol
Anyone else worried about the no weapon locking
and specialists
whatās the point of a class if thereās no specific role to play
No weapon locking?
what could go wrong
Ooh yea. Itās an interesting change, considering how BF has almost always stuck to the traditional way.
A complete overhaul would be wild
specialists are just classes renamed, assault, engineer, recon & support
10 specialists at launch I believe
I think specialists dumb
but if it works Iāll be glad
I think bf4 had a good weapon system where each class had one weapon class where only that class could use it
But the rest were free to switch around
I think everyone will get used to it pretty quick



