#battlefield-2042
1 messages Β· Page 2123 of 1
if it's not fair to judge a game by the trailer, than why are we even hyped for 2042 
it still felt like a ww1 game than bfv did as a ww2 game
BF1 was 1000x more realistic than V
yeah
WW1 is not the same, people didn't grow up on WW1 games
It did not feel anything like a WW1 game lmao
it didn't, ycorrect.
It was a ww1 skin and it played like a ww2 shooter
but to those who played it, it definitely did
like the game, looked and sounded messy, a bit like ww1
but still, people running machine guns in an urban area is lol xd
literally 90% of the weapons used in BF1 were not commonly and or ever used on any front
especially in ww1
correct again
but ur missing the point here
people FELT like the game was like ww1
in reality it wasn't even like that at all
most weapons were rifles the recons used
I won't defend bf1 I think it was the worst game in the franchise by far
would you prefer only having bolt-action rifles in bf1 and bf5?
how did people not feel like the game was ww2 in BFV? you had the tanks, the weapons
thats what people are saying they would prefer if they complain about historical accuracy
why complain about historical accuracy and then only do it for 1 game?
measure your words carefully (jk)
fun, very fun game.
I like the fact that BFV did what it did
bf has never been historically accurate lol π π π π
i like the fact BF1 did what it did
but yes, it felt very lacklustre after a while
If your idea of fun is wanting to drown yourself in bleach yeah
forcing diversity into the game, calling fans who disagreed with their choice bigots, took actual war stories from real life and then removed the real heros in place of some more forced diversity, attempting to change history with their own version and then acting like it was what really happened, etc.
The game shouldn't stray too far from reality, just enouph for it to be fun
yes, thats fun.
i want to play bf1 again at the start when it came out
bf is sandbox game not history simulatorπ π π π
truly an amazing experience
I am Adamaxius.
yo yo, hook me up with an 'MRE'.
I am Terranical.
BF1 Had diversity in areas where there was none in the actual scheme of things of WW1. War stories are just like w/e not everyone even played them. As for everything else, its a video game.
battleifeld has never been realistic in its gunplay or movement or anything
its only been realistic in its atmosphere in the sense that it makes u feel like ur really there and immerses u in it
it's part of the problem
this guy gets it ya ya
yeah
Actually no, historically every diverse character in BF1 had some real world presence
if you take away the "forced diversity" and the "women in war" argument, every single criticism that bfv has is found in every BF game pretty much
that's just not true
armies were not diverse the way BF1 portrayed them
yeah right, i don't think a german askari was fighting in the western front
that black german recon soldier was weird but i didn't care about his colour, just the gameplay.
entire units were segregated


aka, austrians
Germans did actually have middle eastern and African divisions
^

BFV failed miserably in marketing and the game itself was just meh, that plus making decisions the entire community disagreed with was a recipe for disaster
it didn't show hungarians eating
they had their own divisions yes
or romanians being romans
that were not fighting along side western front germans
or da croatians being angry being called serbians
they were fighting in their own campaign
I welcome thee and give thanks fort thine response. I look forward to clashing together and against. Farewell, friend! See you on the field of battle.
yeah but were their A MAJORITY OF IT?
you dont see german askaris in the western front AT ALL
they were used in the german african campaigns in german west and east africa
the gameplay's fine, honestly i liked the gunplay (especially the reload animations and the movement mecanics)
If someone actually can start naming reasons to really hate BFV without using the words Diversity, women, politics. I would love to hear it
Thy friend, I shall see you in the battlefront, thee battle will be LEGENDARY!!
Attrition was BFV's biggest flaw imo
It's meh, not terrible but it's not fun either. They shouldn't have messed with the ttk so much when everyone told them not too regardless.
there is a difference between having a single colored recon character, and having a British soldier with blue smurf facepaint and a hook hand mow down a bald German soldier in a trench coat with a tommy gun right next to another black British soldier with a red beret and a katana
Attrition was actually enjoyable, is that wrong?
I actually liked resupplying my tanks.
yes, the ttk's messed up
why does it matter though if people have customization? @arctic grove its a video game
No not wrong, you just liked it
fair point
people who care about that shit are so fucking cringe
They changed it like twice without the community saying "oh yeah change it, it is terrible".
TTK change in BFV was fucking stupid
listen if you care about historical accuracy in games, you must have not grown up playing ww2 shooters for the PS2
when you say "ww2 game" in the marketing, people are expecting a ww2 game, not a weird customization sim with out of place whacky looking cosmetics
they probably would play shooters on PC
because all of their campaigns were massively historically inaccurate ad they were cool as hell
Which one of them? 
or just play some games like verdun or tannenburg
all of em
They've been nerfing the ttk in bf games ever since bf3, they tried to take a step back with bfv but then wanted to nerf it all over again
okay that was a joke
How does 1942 get a pass then
mostly bolt-action rifles and 1-hit kills
Is someone going to defend BF1942 for having stealth bombers, germans flying zeroes at the battle of britain and jet packs as a in game pick up?
nobody will defend 1942 because to most it doesn't exist
bet
I love 1942
π
also its true cuz PC gaming back then isn't as popular as it is now
so nobody would really know wat bf1942 is at all
it was, just not as internet connected as it is now
and thats how i knew that anything inaccurate in BFV didnt matter because they have been doing inaccurate things 16 years before BFV's release
@slim quiver just stop coping and accept that not everyone has to be forced to like BFV and there are legit reasons why people dislike it
But u havent stated any ffs -.-
Some people here weren't even born when Battlefield 1942 was active
yeah because itβs fun sitting in trenches for hours because itβs βimmersiveβ
bet, majority of those that hated the game just joined in the hate bandwagon because of how the trailer looked
I can accept objective reasons to not like a video game. I will not accept "women or diversity in MY war game! rreeee" as a reason. It simply is just so trivial
I have stated plenty
As I beginner I decided to be the co-drive in tanks and a Engineer in BF4.

Its understandable people didnt like it.. But holy.. You are just reguitating bs i've heard before... "women" LMAO
partaly not 100%
can you also accept being a good mod and not keeping a argument about apparently nothing alive
man its 100% true
I personally prefer more historically accurate games when they are set in time periods such as those, I get it if you are different, that was a more subjective point.
Being a mod doesn't mean I have to change my ideals
Pls just make the bots ai on 2042 based on the skills of the C100.
Which is why im wondering how you could stand BF1
the trailer did not justify the game but my experience with the game has been subpar compared to other games in the series, game was still good though. this is just my opinion, you can have yours.
itβs literally a battlefield game, what do you expect. Play post scriptom if youβre so horny over immersion
wow the salt
since the equipment used in BF1 most of it didnt leave prototype or beyond paper
Robotic arm girl go brrr
because in my opinion it was a lot less out there than BFV
game was really enjoyable and yea hi agree with what u say
Okay so then it was the women and diversity
because as for the equipment most of those weapons were actually used in ww2
no the weapons and other things were also a lot less out there in bf1
Im just trying to understand which part made BFV more out there than 1
What?
the weapons?
but they didn't scream like dying raccoons every time they got shot
Can't wait to do this in BF2042 
no holo sights
BF1 had red dot sights tho
no it didn't
Yeah it did
even the rsc optical had a dot sight
They also have tritium sights.
it was a prosthesis not a robot arm
yea
which was accurate
like what, optics in ww1 were extremely rarely used
any gun that had an optical variant never existed besides recon, and the scopes weren't even always like that
My God, how can you still defend this ??
I feel like Battlefield V had a rocky launch (mostly due to the trailer and prosthetic arm). Then people were too stubborn to change their opinion.
It's like people still trash on Elder Scrolls Online today because if its state on launch.
to be fair the prosthetic was 1940's accurate
its funny because the arm was never in the game
it was just in a trailer
Luckily
I played BFV for a long time and I still never really liked it, even pushing aside all the customization and other stuff a lot of their design choices were really stupid
even if it was in the game, it really wouldnt have mattered
"Luckily" rofl
That's what I mean. People got angy based on the trailer, and then never changed their minds
NO DOTN U SEE?!?! IT woudl haVE RuIneD it
My biggest issues with bfv were the awareness and the scaling/map design
I actually hope in BF2042 they come up with the wackiest customization we have ever seen. God that will be the very best
Yep same
nobody wants that
big pass for me
nobody wants clowns running around like cod
I dont want a clown but I want themed customization skins and everything. Everyone will be so mad over nothing
Then why not have Belle Delphine purple dildo packs ? (like BOCW)
I not defend some people do not distinguish prosthesis from robot armπ
excuse me what
CODm has cos characters but its pointless since there are kids wearing Park of Scarlett.
I just want a nameless soldier who irl time is a bro to teammates.
I want to be fully pink with a pony helmet, so they see my glory when I skydive off a skyscraper
they dont have those
Based on how many compare Battlefield to a realistic war simulator, I can't imagine the outcry if we'd have customization with kitty ears, colorful camouflage, or graffiti stickers
that would be cool as hell, and pink is a cute color
I hope there's team based shaders regardless of what customisation you choose
kitty ears are cute, i have them on my headset rn
would love to have them on a helmet
wdym by themed skins
I don't mind them either, but that's not my point
camper
ridiculous customisation is not good customisation
yeah sure
or tank killer
turning the game into fortnut
or helicopter camper killer
You know skins that follow a theme. Post apocalyptic theme, maybe civilian private contractor themes
I just want BF to finally use camos like Multicam and Marpat.

We already know there's a south lord skin so it's gonna be wild anyway
Ok you're actually a furry
Sith*
I have never heard anyone seriously say they want fucking cat ears in battlefield
insanity
ofcourse they don't
Nope, just a girl
bruh u over the top dude
i like cats, cats are cute
and soldiers aren't cats
Mreow
I want a bipod knife and shbucket in the gold edition.
You don't need cats, we have penguins already
no
battlefield is not a cute game and it will never be
penguin outfit
putting cat ears on a helmet? how is that making them a cat, i dont mean the actual fur ears lmao
well they will probably do it anyways so it doesnt really matter
luckily we have the GM from CoD that was in charge of the live service now the GM for BF doing the same role
I will say BFV's actual skins did a good job at maintaining a somewhat consistent look while also looking cool
We had themed skins in BFV, so chances are we'll have them in BF2042 as well
^
COD's live service was not fun, the amount of grind in that game is ridiculous
oh the grind is dumb
none of the actual skins in bfv were that insane, most crazy one was the firestorm one
and yet everyone complained at how unrealistic they were
i want to kiss u
To be fair, hearing the women scream in bfv was annoying/distracting, but I think I just hated the voices more than the fact they were women
which is why i want DICE to really hit it up a huge notch since its a modern fantasy war in the future that literally nobody can comment on realism about because we have not reached that stage in time yet nor has a war like this ever happened
yes really was annoying
The cinder ones were the most out of place skins. The ones with ash and ember
still don't want cat ears in a gritty war shooter
stupid af
highly unliekly we will get ww3 very soon
As long as they are realistic and relatable to the game and not facepaint robot arm then its fine
its not a gritty war shooter tho
but ww3 is still a possibility in da future
Kitty war shooter
its a sandbox shooter
trailer and lore disagree
mara kitty suit
Just because a guy came over from cod does not make it good
Have you played bf1?
cringe
there is nothing gritty about BF, BF1 is the only game i'd find gritty out of the entire series
Trailer and gameplay rarely represent each other
gritty war shooter = squiad
yes, its the only one that did BF right in terms of atmosphere
What about that trailer was gritty to you? It was mindless fun.
BF2042 was extremely sand boxy in the way they showed that trailer. it was just chaotic and fun
BF aka who gives a fuck about the Geneva convention
I just got done with a 5 hour bf1 session actually my eyes fucking burn
nothing about the trailer was bloody or gruesome or anything
It was sandy alright 
Rendezook.. Gritty AF π
the entire game is literally about starving and poor mercs fighting over the remaining food and energy sources on the planet lol
*Geneva suggestion
And the lore is close to non-existent so far
cap, when I play squad people be screaming down the mic and playing house music
thing is, its just not gritty
The part where grapling hook
Then the guy stab.
Since the other guy have the sniper.
I imagine if he just steal the kill lol.
i 100% bet when we shoot people in that game there will not be blood decals that splatter on the ground and the walls
bro you need the drip if youβre gonna kick ass
that's stupid as fuck
awesome!!!!!!!
BF has not had blood the way i just described
y u care, it isn't even gonna happen irl
Its frostbite 4.0 so it most likely will have things like that
So? That's just backstory, says nothing about the game
I will never understand this bfv hate train....π π π π π
women robot with arm
i have never seen blood splatter all over the place from plugging 20 rounds in someone. Nor have i see legs and arms blow off in BF from grenades
Bad trailer and basically bf1 reskin somehow worse
I actually saw a blood decal on the wall of an elevator after i blew him up with an RPG
who cares , it was never in the game anyways
Oh really? thats interesting
story? lore? yeah says ABSOLUTELY nothing about the game
women with robot hands
The game doesnt have a campaign so i doubt anyone cares about the story
yes
I'd imagine it's rare though, because I reacted to it as well when I saw it
It doesn't, that's nice if you like to read about it but when it comes to playing it means nothing
yeah exactly
Blood gets on guns in bf1 and V when you kill up close
Battlefield besides BF1 has just never got real good grit
this i know happens in bf1
never seen blood on a gun in V tho
again BF1 was a step in the right direction in terms of atmosphere
U dont get close enough! π
the game had a perfect war atmosphere
The Battlefield 1 campaign was pretty gritty, come to think of it
Ww1 is gritty by itself so yeah
Atleast they emphasize that when you "respawn" you just play as another soldier.
This argument is pointless, literally the only thing I'm gunna say is, I really don't want this to be the next rainbow 6 or warzone with the cosmetics, it ruined the entire tones of the game and also broke a lot of stuff like visibility and hit boxes, its just stupid.
its just not a gritty shooter imo. Its a sandbox war shooter.
Never understood the love for the war stories, just poor quality cutscens and mindnumbing gameplay
That was a nice touch
Alright
Go play fortnite then
Unlike COD where you just change loadout and play as Mara with another 5 Maras.
I just want a nameless soldier all i need
the fact that some people only wanted different camos for military fatigues was exactly why i get scared for BF customization
not an argument
Not everything is an argument woman
Freaking yikes
Don't understand the obsession with soldier customisation either, it's an fps you don't even get to see it for the most part
Stop trying to gatekeep Battlefield lmao
Based
Im going to ask you to not try and not be sexist @hazy vector
What did I walk in on again?
me being a girl has absolutely nothing to do with anything
Every time I come back here some new spicy drama is going on.
looks cool in customisable screen
I agree with you on this, I just dont want it to be too over the top, it has to maintain somewhat of a consistent style with just a slight tad of setting awareness like BFV
Poor mods
Give me better weapon customisation over that any day
Im okay with that, i just dont want only camos
true
I think only camos is severely outdated
There is no point in cosmetics either if its first person
I am all for customization
Camos I like is Multicam and Flectarn.
well for guns it is, people just like cosmetics even in first person tho
Thing is, others will get to see you as well. I personally find it cool for everyone to look somewhat unique rather than gunning down the same 3-4 guys
Even if I don't see my character, customization is still a way for me to feel immersed in the game.
its not that big of a deal, but it is nice to have it
again I agree, I just dont wanna see people in clown armor sets and bright pink pony gear, not only does it affect visibility, but it ruins the tone of the game, you can still have cool customization without making things super super outlandish
Yup like you can see it on the loadout screen.
Ah yes my purple glowing led M16 immersion 100%
Oh i dont care about the pink armor stuff, i wouldnt equip it anyways
When I think of FPS skins I think of garry's mod where you change your model to whatever you can make or find. While it does not affect you that much, it makes you look different than others
Oh hell yea pink armor
have they said anything about the specialists, in regard if they are gonna be the same character model or will they all be customisable through ethnicity and shit
rather than everyone being the standard model
Multicam P90 with Yellow M21 Meprolight and Canted See All Nite Sight.
I would gib pink pls
i do think gun skins should be outlandish tho in some regard. Because you wont ever really be looking at someones gun, i just dont want skins that glow or have some lightning effect
People do, thats the problem
I'd prefer if my enemies used pink armor :) would be easy to see them :)
I think the generic soldier look is more enjoyable then everyone running the same meta skins like warzone/fortnite
Pink is for da boys
to be fair, in gmod it has a huge effect on hitboxes and hitreg
It changes your hit box as well actually, some models even are so broken they don't have a designated head
yeah but everyone likes their own thing
oh, I forgot bout that.
Im not against having people enjoy different types of customization, its a video game after all
I mostly just use random humanoids rather than super-unique PMs
I want a full pink suit like filthy frank for 2042 pls
I like the idea of the weapon charms, those are really cute
Yeah
in my mind, seeing a guy in a fully decked out clown armor set would make it go from a war game to a nerf battle
One thing I would like is a stat tracker like csgo
Hopefully custom emblems come back
well with battlefields lack of grit yes
Ngl I kinda want to have random interior decos like in HAWKEN. Just random smol additions to your first person view for shits and giggles
Ooh, i hope we get nerf gun skins
Nope not only unrealistic cosmetic.
Increase of gun weight.

charms are cool, theyβre good in pubg and cod
Sure, but the military game get ruined by this. If you want as a player skins like that, there are games like Valorant allowed for all that colors
Whats with you and grit lol
realism
lmao because it was called gritty haha, i was just kidding
A return of emblems on your soldier/vehicle like bf4 would be nice too but it seems they're just going with that "N" instead
2042 isnt the type of game most go for realism of appearance
but the tone of BF hasn't been somber since 1
i mean theres a giant ass tornado around the map with futuristic vehicles all round
Lol all fortniteish games, br games and games where you can't aim all banished in the dark multiverse.
I wouldn't call a regular tracked vehicle futuristic
from the trailers 2042 looks to be maintaining a cool looking, but grounded somewhat in reality cosmetics system, I just hope it can stay like that
Well to me they looked a bit futuristic
but the problem is people think military games get ruined by a million things. The game is set in 2042, 21 years into the future. Nobody can say whats military suitable or not in that era, thats the whole point. Its not a milsim, its a sandbox military shooter
The trailer wont even look like the final product you guys seem to forget this
no shit
Milsim would be like
To fix your vector suit you need s t r i n g s
I want purple skins for my jets π€
The gameplay trailer?
Right but... I hope the army dont take pink guns in future singing Barbie girl
if cosmetics are militarised, it should look good
If people want realism in customization because its Military, why don't they want realism in the projectiles? like a sniper not lobbing their bullets like a tennis ball past 150 meters
Battlefield 2042
That was made in pre alpha so by the tike we play it at launch it will look much better
I personally do not see a problem with more extensive customization, as long as it is not just flat out clown costumes
I want a multicam bipod knife then.
Or worse. We don't know
They already have the sith lord, there's gonna be some wacky skins
as if gunplay has anything in the slightest to do with customization
clown costume strikes fear into the enemies
well technically since you're a PMC, you own your own equipment, and people even in todays time have anime decals on their guns as civilians. So who knows
did that in pubg
To be honest Id be scared shitless if ronald mcdonald came over with a tank
Even anime sights lol.
it fits into the whole "i want the game to feel realistic and military simulated"
Nah it will look better if you look at every BF gameplay trailer they always look worse than the final product
more and more people want BF to basically become squad
which for whatever reason i dont really get
More people want it to not be 1 and 5
Realistic military shooter
Oh
realistic boring military game
They want to be any of the modern ones
Cmon BF is BF.
Atleast milsimmers appreciate it.
And CODsofters hate it.
B a l a n c e.
Why would people not want BF to be more like BF1 when it sold 11 million more copies than BF4? @hazy vector
When I think of anything """realistic""" I think of arma III
I would rather it was like any other BF than BF1
Squad is a evolution of the project reality mod for battlefield 2
port from arma I think
dude holy shit can you not comprehend a basic line between reality and full on implausible madness without immediately jumping to "OH THIS PERSON MUST WANT SQUAD!!!!"
But thats what people have been saying actually these past few weeks here
I personally loved BF1 and V, both are pretty fun games
Or GTA SA with super wet water
Its all about the trailers and marketing, bf1 was realesed when cod was a shit show so it sold like wild fire
Atleast BFV better than COD:WW2
While EA sorta dropped V early, it still is entertaining. And BF1 is just great
okay I am not one of those idiots, literally all I am saying is that I don't want fucking clown outfits and cat boy cosmetics
Infinite warfare still sold more than BF1 sadly
Sales copies mean nothing if the game doesn't hold up
well im not a boy so i dont share the same interest in your cosmetic taste tbh
Most cod sales are to people who play the game for a month then stop
That downvote is the metal armed girl that got banned by the Server Admins.
But we all know bf1 was better
BF1 is the highest rated battlefield game i believe
got an 88 critic wise
Wat...
don't care, point still stands
pretty sure a lot of people loved BF1
BF1 was one of the worst fps games I've ever played, it was an abhorrent experience
Yeah but thats my point. My point still stands as well, all cosmetic stuff is subjective
?
What do you think it did wrong? I personally liked it
bf1 was pretty fun
Pretty much everything, it would take me hours to list everything I think is wrong with it
itβs the best FPS game if youβre good at it π
Can you at least just list a few more major things? I am honestly curious.
I never played bf1 personally but from what I see its definitely not a mess...
I was better at it than any other bf I play, still hated it
The only difference is, Im okay with seeing any type of customization whether its realistic or not, but other people are not okay with seeing customization that is beyond what they want. if that makes sense
You're missing out just picked it up last week and I've been having a blast
cope harder 
all experienced based at the end of the day. If you donβt like it fair enough
Im not coping though
I have a low kdr in BF4 but its what makes it fun. Since war is about survival not run around and 360 kids.
In Silk Road all I did was be a co-driver on a tank. Very fun.
cope
Suppression, behemoths, elite soldiers, cavalry, headshot multiplier, damage drop off etc
How is it out of this entire conversation ive gone without resorting to what you're doing
seethe
Tbh you seethed more than me colonel
Hmm I see. I personally dont really like the elite soldiars
cope?
Behemoths are cool but at the end kinda pointless since 99% they dont turn shit around for the losing team
I mean you couldnt cope with BFV @arctic grove
They just made the game very easy to be good at and removed pretty much all depth from bf
and here we go again with promoting arguments
I was thinking of buying it since it's like $5 bucks on origin on sale right now... (worth it? if I start from zero now?)
Im not promoting an argument
Id rather have a nameless default soldier that is a loyal teammate in the game.
Than a skin that has a heroic lore but is a toxic gamer doing trickshots.
BF1 was one of the worst fps games I've ever played, it was an abhorrent experience
@tender wind Hello i play since BF2 and BF1 is my favorite :)
I have not tried to sway him into any possible line of thinking, he has his opinion and I have mine
Hmm.. I am not really experienced in shooters and I suck hard at anything infantry, so I cannot really speak on that. Vehicles can kick ass doe
yeah I couldn't so I stopped playing it, at least I can learn to let things go 
Not really tho because you still had a very passionate explanation of why you didnt like it
The vehicles were even worse offenders of removing the depth, they were dumbed down so much
I bought the revolution for $8 it has all the dlc plus premium pass which gives you 27 care packages i started from zero and got good guns already plus 2x xp is on always
I was personally fine with them not being too hard to control. I mean often I end up driving a multi-person vehicle with nobody in
so I just pick the small solo tank
yes explaining the many objective flaws it has was very "passionate" people explain what they don't like about shitty games all the time, doesn't mean they haven't moved on
noice... imma buy revolution then too
The diversity part wasnt really objective, thats just a subjective take
if you talked about game mechanics, lack of content, thats objective
Not about control, just about what they can do, they were far more stationary and everything has mad splash damage, you just sit back and spam
attrition, bugs, lack of content thats all very much objective
other stuff was objective but yet you continually ignore it so you can act like BFV is actually really good π
the real question is, is gold edition worth the Β£80 or should I buy standard
it's objectively bad
If you really need to play a week early then yeah, otherwise no
Idk about that one
Yeah, I get that. Tho infantry has a lot of ways to deal with vehicles, so them being stationary would make them a lot less desireable
too stationary I mean
not completely, poor wording
If thats the case, BF1 is the best BF game ever made
4 battlepasses for Β£20 is a bargain too
Plus with the removal of an engineer class you basically killed any coordination/teamplay that was there
well it definitely had the smoothest launch, so the official critic reviews make sense
I heard BF2042 gonna make vehicles harder to control and stuff
Smoothest launch, Highest critic score, Most sales
what about in terms of battle passes, cause Iβll probably play long enough to see year 1, so it might be worth the extra Β£20 for all year 1 content, surely it would add up to the prices of all battle passes
you name it, it topped em all
You mean Β£30 kind of average for BP's but I don't care about that stuff, just got it for the week early access
I have never experienced said engineer class, so can you shed me some light on what exactly it did that is different from support?
1 had amazing marketing and a ton of content
okay then we can agree, BF1 is the greatest BF game ever
I thought standard was Β£60
Base game is Β£60 gold is Β£80 so its only Β£20 more
according to the objective review score, yeah
nah greatest bf is between3 and 4
Was Β£50 when I checked
tf did that reply for
And just the sheer volume of sales
my b
and that also means BF3 is better than BF4
I would agree with this map wise
4 at launch was horrible yeah
if bf3 had 4's tech itd be hands down 3
i wouldn't call a 88% metacritic score for BF1 that masively better as BF4's 81%
Every battlefield game has majorly improved upon something
battlefield 3 has better score tho
knowing metacritic is a mess
BF3 and BF1942 both had 89% on metacritic
making them the highest rated BF games i believe in the series
I personally dont trust metacritic that much
What did V improve on?
critically that is
nobody takes metacritic seriously
In theory not much, in practice you would be hard pressed to succeed without running engineer yourself and your gunner, quickly jumping out to rep or get an extra rocket off on an enemy vehicle added a lot
but I thought that was 1? twisting the narrative I see..
also user score
aside from the sales people in the dev studios handing out bonuses
omni directional movement, better animations and smoother movement, recoil patterns that you can learn
Well BF1 had the most sales
I personally never jump out of a vehicle im driving to repair since it always gets stolen
like whats the point of me getting out if I am gonna lose it
so statistically its the greatest as people enjoyed it more overall in larger quantity
tbh random recoil was better
BF1942 sales only received a couple million
That's why you have a gunner in previous bf games
I like spray patterns, im used to play CS and it fit me better than RNG bloom
do those sales include people buying it for cheap "because why not try it" 
There were way less gamers back when 1942 released. Games just didn't sell that much back then.
Im talking stealing by allies. Someone just walks and gets in, and drives off with my tank
In my opinion the vehicle combat was the greatest with a greater damage model but in terms of mechanics such as the ammo and aircraft being able to repair on the fly was a bit oofy
If they do they would also count towards every BF game that goes on sale
yeah but that's the problem, it doesn't fit BF's casual style of gameplay, random recoil makes the game a lot more fair to more people
Yeah that can't happen if you're still in it, which you can do with a gunner
True but then you had like games like diablo and such that sold like 20 million in 1998
and it wouldn't show you the people that bought it for 3 dollars, and then played it for 10 hours
it was also on PC only so its even harder to get millions and millions of sales
if 1942 was on PS2 maybe it would have sold differently
Sales are such a poor way to judge popularity when you don't take into account all the factors of the time periods and marketing
yeah having allies that actually can listen and help is absolutely amazing, even if in something like that. In V a few days ago my tank got stuck in a poorly placed ditch, and an ally drove in a small car to make a ramp for me to leave. It worked
Remember Cyberpunk
It makes it more fair but creating a skill ceiling for the gunplay makes it feel better in terms of the player realizing theyre improving with something
Yeah that stuff is enjoyable
Can't really compare the 2 games. Very few had computers able to run Battlefield and had to go to netcafes, Diablo ran on everything.
good point
also, the PS2 did have a network connection but it was a addon. so you'd need to buy hardware to play 1942 properly
untill you bought the slim years later
also grand theft auto vice city basically seized most of the attention in 2002
bf1 sales had also more to do with it being shooter set in the past when demand for it was high and supply low, and the trailer being phenomenal (plus cod being disappointing), not that it wasn't a great game, but the it didn't have necessarily more sales because it was best battlefield...
it was the biggest game of the year at that time i believe
!when
Battlefield 2042 Reveal Trailer: https://youtu.be/ASzOzrB-a9E
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay Trailer: https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
EA Play Live time is an estimate.
owwwwwwww
hype
yeah but the whole cod not being as good. It still ended up selling more than bf1 that year
29 days
also no the biggest game was elder scrolls
because like any cod
ofcourse it did, because it's cod
cod doing terrible still means outselling battlefield
bf1 was ahead for a bit
False actually
Grand theft auto vice city made 1.4 million copieswithin 2 days of releasing and became the highest selling game in 2002 and the fastest selling game in history at the time of 2002
morrowind only sold 4 million copies in its lifetime
oh and now we're suddenly switching to price
can't compare revenue and sales numbers
sorry i used the wrong word
it was 1.4 million copies in 2 days
morrowind sold 4 million by 2005
GTA sold 6 million by 2004
So no morrowind was not that big of a game comparatively to its competitor
Oblivion is when elder scrolls took off
facts
Lucifer: What do you desire?
Me: I... I want... I want a 128 player Base jump in one of the new maps
finally something agreeable
does any one know when is open beta testing ?
yayayayayayayayy i want see new destruction tech on Ea play
I just want to play
lmao its easier to agree with me than it looks
just not about BF games
what's ur favorite gta game then?
San andreas or Vice city
gta 2
i'd even allow IV because i loved niko's character
4 was the best by far imo, almost everything it had was better than 5
4 had the best story imo
San andreas but only because i could replay it on PC. the PS2 version made me want to die after i realised what a drawing distance of more than 3 femtometers looked like
If I cant commit warcrimes in 2042 Im not getting it
wtf gta 5 online best game ever made
Iβve had loads of fun on it
sure bud 
whatβs wrong with online

totally not bioshock, or half life 2, or Mafia 2
no
gta online
Online is fun for like 5 minutes
then you get 12 year old child soldiers flying around on super bikes blowing everything up
online is fun for anything but freeroam
freeroam used to be the shit
lmao, I knew someone was gonna insert oppressor crying
but now its full of trigger happy kids
getting flattened by the armored kuruma or whatever it was
just play solo pub not hard
then its boring
or you get banned for pinking up money bags from hackers
yeah if youβre solo
free roam was fun back when you and your mates got on an explored the map with the cool updates and had fair fights
now its whoever has the most autistic bike
leave session
I see where youβre coming from, but thereβs more to online then free roam
racing was the best shit with friends
GTA online is just SA:MP but modern
Please refrain from using that emote here
Not the smiley one lol
The other one
i am really curious as to what the death animation will be for 2042 π
First we need to confirm guns will be in the game
presumebly just falling over or ragdolling
yeah prob some sort of ragdoll
im sure they will enhance the animation for it though
unless it's the "medic" shouting again
you already could. now even more with the syrette
i just want a close revive instead of shooting with a syringe pistol
well don't use it if you don't like it
Im a medic main so ill probably use it regardless of whether or not i like it
i can only hope that maybe another medic specialist will be in the game
I wonder if the bf5 revive mechanic will be 2042, that was pretty cool
so i can revive at a close range
im hoping. We know squad revives are bad
and if squad revives are back we can bet theres an animation to revive people
I didnβt mind squad revives, provided better teamwork
i liked them
Pretty sure i saw in the Gameplay that Sundance(Wingsuit) could revive a squad mate
Yeah assault am like 99%
will the specialist all have the same character model
as you can see on the site, no
does it have sundance's info?
still not, only the first 3 afaik
I think so
not that i know off. just that you happened to see icons on downed squad mates in the trailer
Not directly iirc
I mean, the medic specialist has a ranged revive tool, I think everyone can because of that
being able to be revived with a injection never sat well with me
@slim quiver why
worse as the not realistic defibs
Battlefield isn't a very realistic game series
It certainly has a level of realism tho
No not officially said but probs looking true
Because we do not allow anything homophobic or just inappropriate language
immersion you mean
battlefield is not realistic
it is immersive
well most of them are anyway
Sundance is gonna be my main fs π
cough v cough

I just want dinos man. Since bf3.. π¦
geonosians
Penguindinos
hopefully there's a t rex easter egg this time
YAS
imagine if it lets you release a t rex into the stadium
holy shit
I will crap my pants


that would be really cool
I'd love a wacky DLC like that
I'd unironically pay $30 for a dino dlc ngl
if it looks good

fr
especially in 4
Which class yβall using on day one
Imma main sundance
the one that looks the coolest
if they made the medic specialist look cool then more people would play it, but no it's like the most generic looking one
literally just a plain shirt
and pants
less people playing medic the better
lol
0 iq
no
medic is the backbone of teams
i hate medics
reviving everyone
if you care more about KD in conquest you are dumb
I wonder if the ka-52 will work like a normal attack heli with pilot obviously piloting and second seater being designated gunner
I absolutely love the blackshark because pilot does everything but ka-52 is also very cool
Being a medic is good and you get xp no matter what
Question do they have double xp in bf games ? Or is that only cod
Medic is the backbone of a winning team straight up
Oooooo nice
bf4, 1, and v had double xp
Me who only had a few hours on bf4 on the PS3 back in 2014 unu
Tbh I wish I played it more
BF4 is more alive than ever tbh
now is a great time to pick it up on modern hardware
if you want
True but imma save up for some more ps+ and bf4 with PokΓ©mon Diamond remake for my switch
this
I play on the ps6 I donβt have a pc anymore
Ps4*
Whoops my bad
Ah yes I am from the future itβs the year 2121 and gta 6 still ainβt out yet and battlefield 2042 killed cod
Police tuk tuk gang


maybe we will have a combat tuk tuk variant
like the tuk tuk boom boom from Just Cause
A tuk tuk with a c4 in the tornado π©π
We can use ducktape to hold him up there
why do I feel like they are gonna add in bicycles just for shit and giggles
Cause itβs battlefield
thatd be great as long as you can launch them with c4
They added a couch to drive in the hardline beta
lol
couldnt you drive that when it released too?
Quick question: does anyone know, when the first beta will happen?
When can we play the beta?
ok another thing, you boys think we will be able to command some large scale vehicles say an aircraft carrier or a submarine?
Iβm not sure I only saw it in Vanoss video
or just a destroyer is a good enough
prob not
sth similar to behemoths in BF1
not expecting sea side maps but maybe it will happen
for such a large scale battlefield, would be a shame if we don't have some big stuff to accommodate it
the big stuff is 128 players
and we need even bigger vehicles
or more!
I kinda wish I was able to create the 2042 cover art lens flare-ish effect for an image
it looks really pog
Well if they could do it you can!
there is probably so much stuff on the internet you can find out on how to do the lens flare
No we dont
Only problem is I dont have a team of artists and a multi thousand dollar budget
@desert ridge ok...?
What would a big vehicle even be?
like I said, sea destroyers are pretty big
y know those orange translucent lines on the cover art?
ye
Is there a specific level I can send pictures ?
I wish I could create such an effect
and they are practical in real combat so no doubt they can be a part of battlefield with such a large scale
Boost the server i think
those are pretty norm for a sea side war, we need BIGGER if you want bigger.
an aircraft carrier might be too big
air craft carrier might be near the sea for planes to go off of it for like the breakaway and manifest map.
imagine some noob takes the aircraft carrier and crashes it in 5 mins
they would be good for a "titan" mode if it's gonna return
if it is a vehicle and not a map prop
Yeah mate put a destroyer class military ship and an aircraft carrier on the tiny lake on the map kalaeidoscope
dude, it's not like they can't add a sea focus map
Yeah maybe in season 2 but season 1 its already confirmed to be no sea maps
for city map, they can have other big scale vehicles
I wanna see a glitch of an aircraft carrier just flipping out like the zepplin-nado in Battlefield 1
likkkee what
@desert ridge see? we are communicatung
Nah
@azure crescent maybe a B2 Spirit but they fly very high irl so idk if they would be balanced
Suez canal map? You could get boats and infantry at the same time
well in bf1 a corpse of a sunk ship flew into the air a few times
A sea map with a huge tsunami event
like those beeg ships
@desert ridge 
@near fiber yeah that's what I was thinking of also
maybe typhoon also
I was thinking maybe they would even have a map in Japan that would have volcano
I was thinking hurricane.
I think the sunny map was in Korean
Godzilla easter egg?!?!
Where it had the tornado
@azure crescent Ayyy... We are onto sth
@near fiber Yeah it was Kaleidoscope in Korea
it's a real location also iirc
someone post a picture of the city on twitter
That idk
The Korean map is sunny and has green grass and tall structures and is called kaleidescope. I think.
yeah it is Kalei
any idea on how many days you get on early beta access
Pre order the game
wait no
wrong question
yeah i know that
probably a month
yeah a month would be the best
seems kinda rigged to only get a few weeks
a month? i was expecting like 4 days at most
the game is massive, man
Watching my bros getting sucked up
we are gonna need a lot of testing

@near fiber heh... sucked...
Let us play the beta until the game comes out 
Heh you said sucked
that's how it works
on second thought, the AC130 we had in 4 was already pretty massive
it can make a comeback
Iβm from the future it will ;)

BF3 AC-130 is SO OP
it can counter jets
Remember they said you could call in tanks? I think it would work the same way as in bf5 where you had the call in system. So now imagine you can call in A-10 warthog strikes?
Btw how tf did a fish get a phone and discord π€ @boreal widget
it's pretty weak
Kinda sus
like literally the only way you could've killed AC-130 in bf3 was either get in a heli and plant C4 and destroy, or ram a jeep on it
@near fiber Shhhhhh....
brrrrrt
how was it weak?
because it had no muscles
I think he mistook it for the 4 version but even in 4, it can be pretty devastating
3X flares for each seat, AA guns on top of the plane, TANK busters on the left side
hell if you got a good team its literally un-kill-able
not really OP it can be taken down by jets easy if you are a good jet piloit
attack from below or behind, almost never got killed by ac 130 in jet
you can't even get close to it with the AA guns shredding you
What console ?
unless you kill it π
You play on
Agreed.
you are not meant to get close shoot from the far
I tried coming from below, got a 105mm to the face lmao
the AC130 weakness is concentrate Jet attack, just like irl
your 20mm do alot of damage if you burst fire
@near fiber I play on PC
UnU
without your guns being over heated
are you talking about BF4 or BF3?
both
the BF4 one got nerfed
fly low and far behind it and just strafe kill it, ez
doesn't have AA guns
@azure crescent
you... just mention yourself
but what if you get shot?
then it isn't so EZ
thats a good idea
gotta watch out from enemy jets though
since you're making yourself a slow moving target
yeah, but it's like doing strafing runs on the ground anyway
a gunship should be vulnerable to other jets for balancing reason. It's virtually untouchable from ground infantry and vehicles
well a good AA can fuck it up tho
oh my god the MP40 is so satisfying to hipfire with
gunship was always free kills and points for me as a jet player
The way you counter the Ac-130 in real life is probably how you do it in game.
@bleak nebula as it should be without good support
exactly
an AC130 convoy irl would always have support jets and stuff
on its own, it's just a big ass flying target for jets
if all 3 seats focus on a AA tank then its over
and ofc you got jets killing other jets
makes you feel protected lol
As im playing BF4 again i really dont understand what the devs fascination with sun being in peoples eyes in this game
lol
god ray sun
they were like "lol you know what would make graphics look good, the sun being in your eyes in every direction"
yeah I hate the sun
why wouldnt the soldiers just have sunglasses on?
trust me, as a division player, having you attack a base with the sun on top of it is a death sentence
it's like having a flashbang on you 24/7
@slim quiver I'm surprised that more games haven't done it like in GTA Online where sunglasses would actually block sunlight in FPS mode
"We need more lens flare"
π

"It's critical that you are visually impaired by the excellent lens flare"
yes it's a good idea
earth smoothie
yeah its insane lmao
no more lens flare
if BF2042 central idea is catastrophe events, might as well include all of it
I hate when games add camera effects
like no I dont want motion blur, dof, lens flare, or film grain
fuck off
that breaks the current lore of the game though
Im sure once the battle pass progresses they will probably have an invasion of america event or something
too many locations to pass up on
they have full creativity over the locations with current setting
they can have a map anywhere and it would make sense
well yeah if they made an explanation for it
definitely need a sea map for tsunami or typhoon
holy fuck I just realized im in a sweats server on bf4 rn lol
im so glad there wont be any movement glitching
yeah
hopefully
I hope they kept crouch running
and I hope suppression isn't like BF4 where you go half blind and deaf from getting shot at by a tiny 9mm
lol yeah
like i actually cant play bf4 pretty much
Will battlefield 6 be avalible with ea play
im too used to BF1 and V
the gunplay in 4 with the movement just doesnt feel right to me
I used to be the same way until I realized how much more content 4 had to offer
with better destruction and maps
theres no climb on my assault rifles its just me aiming down the sights and holding down the trigger at any range. I just cant get used to that
same
I tried logging back onto BFV and I got randomly banned for no reason, so y'know, that's epic
too used to the new movement systems
Bf4 is really crowded rn on pc coz of the amazon prime thing and coz ppl want to prepare for bf2042
i feel like bf3 will probably be better prep than 4
yeah
the movement is even more grounded it feels like in 3
4 has people literally leaping in the air and slither sliding all over the place
2042 looks like 4 with 5's gunplay, at least that's what my expectations are
and I am always ready for a horrible launch
as tradition
i want the movement to be grounded
i didnt realize just how fast you sprint in bf4
you are literally running at like 30+ mph
Besides the floaty bit I think 4 had good movement
I just don't like the people who legit dodge bullets
if it didnt have the vault cancelling the movement would have been good imo
yeah



