#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 2081 of 1
y mean the nda from the alpha?
and he said open alpha same month, jut later in the month right
Hype tho just to get some gameplay
before the trailer was release the commercial material was release on PC by accident, some people saw it
Like 60% of Americans took a day off on GTA V launch day lol
however, we know content creators get to test it in july
it was not a leak
oh I see, makes sense
so it's not that far fetched to think the open alpha might happen after that technical playtest in late july
Really can't wait to let my pc loose on the battlefield
you know the dude leaked this stuff jun 5th, we didn't know about the technical playtest before that
The technical playlist has an nda
oof

so it's possible that his info was right, BUT the dates weren't, as they were changed
open alpha is too unrealistic
technical playtest might be the jun 15th test he was talking about
The technical playtest will be like bf4's white box test
that will damage more than help
Closed alpha is the battlefield way to go
and open alpha after that test could mean late july as an alpha date
"cyberpunk 2042"
Helped out in 1, 5 and I wanna help for 2042
this is SPECULATION do not take it as guaranteed
however it is entirely possible for this to happen
I’m taking it as guaranteed I do t care

lmao
however it is entirely possible that they change the name to beta at the end of July...so my things I have typed today line up with what Dice has said
ok then
why would they change the name of the alpha to beta
ye, i mean that one. thing is, most nda are set up so even if it drops, you are not allowed to talk about what happend in this test. (depends on the company and what the nda states directly) Ubisofts nda as example is set up like that. everything that happens in the alpha, stays in the alpha
and beta would be more suitable to happen in august as it did with past battlefields
My speculation is that a closed alpha will happen and no open alpha
i feel like the most suitable date for an open alpha to happen is late july
Well if you are going to judge off past battlefields...open alpha is not happening at all
what is that based on
Since you'd want people to actually playtest and help identify bugs
juging when alphas and betas happen based on past battlefields doesn't include how they did the formula in past battlefields
i mean look at cod
cod neverh ad open alphas
and no one thought of an open alpha happening for mw 2019 and cold war
but in the end, they did happen
very true
what did you do with big chungus
Having an open alpha would yield not many opportunities for identifying them as you'd just get people going "oh look, free playtest"
i know youre the sus imposter
silence nigel farage
when the ops is a sussy baka
now we're talking someone that reads m shit and understands me
in my eyes, i don't think their will be an alpha that players like us can play though
now i'm using whath appened with past battlefields and the leaker's info to determine the DATE of an open alpha
But people did think an alpha would happen with cold war
not if it'll happen or not
cuz it can definetely happen since it's meant to be kind of unexpected
I was simply countering that you were basing august time frame as it was with past battlefields. If they put in an open alpha, history doesn't matter at that point because it has never been done before
i was part of the cod fanbase and folloewd every step and speculation and everything, noe one though it was happening until it was leaked on psn 2 days before it was announced
thats why yo shoes raggedy
open beta will be either late august or early september
i'm using the past time frame because the release date was basically the same as it is iwth bf 2042
mate I was too and in the same server as you lol people thought it would happen because we got an alpha for MW
which means the time frames would match the old ones
what server were you in
cod ogs
ah ya got me there
Look at mutual servers
A closed alpha still sounds the most realistic out of it, not really much with an open. Mainly a stress test, but sounds better for the betas
i don't remembe anyone thinking that though
look man, at the end of the day this is speculation based on a leak
alphas are not meant to play and have fun
maybe not there I'm not sure but just in general online and everything it was kinda expected
take this with a grain of salt
its for testing
but don't take it with a sea of it
just remember that there is definetely a chance of it happening
I am just going to go off of what they have done for years. Closed alpha, then beta later on
you test and write a report of it after the test to state out what you found that needs to be fixxed
cod neverh ad open alphas for years
I've always loved helping out in alpha tests
and surprise now the new cods do
they can do it man
don't act like since they didn't do it in the past there's no chance of it happening
thats cod. This is Battlefield
i'm using it as an example man
when is the beta?
I mean....you have made your statement lol, we all heard it, and if we disagree and doubt, you are still firing back each time "IT COULD HAPPEN, YOU DON'T KNOW"
i don't know, i'm jut speculating when there'll be an alpha is all
we hear you...lol it could, is that what you want us to say ?
yes, thati t COULD happen
but also couldn't
glad we're on the same page
anyways that's basically all i have to say
k bye!
so we having an alpha test?
like based on that leak the best i can come up with is that an open alpha is coming somewhere around late july and possibly announced at ea play, however this is speculation absed off a leak
so nothing official
but it COULD happen
i didn't pull this out of my ass
we could be
oh i see.
i didn't pull this out of my ass though
This is only speculation. Nothing more
a leaker on jun 5th leaked a bunch of stuff regarding bf 2042 that he got right however he gave us some dates on when content creators would be testing the game and when there would supposedly be an open alpha
So my speculation is that we're not having an open alpha, instead having a closed alpha.
however i speculated on that leak since some of the info had placeholder names which means that the info that he provided that hasn't come true yet could've been moved back
and since we now know when the playtest woudl eb for content creators, whcih is july, i speculated that maybe the date was changed to be somewhere late july
but this is speculation based off a leak, so do not take it as confirmed
however it is plausible
im okay with not having a open alpha tbh, they said they will give early beta access to people who preordered so.
beta would most likely be somewhere around august
past battlefields released around same date bf 2042 did and betas were in august
so i mean that could be when
this is more speculation though
there's no real official confirmed date for the beta
so. "open" alpha. 3 weeks later open beta?
more gameplay will be revealed with ea play right?
most of the time you don't want the general public exposed to alpha builds, sometimes they work well, sometimes they don't, but there are always problems
and other tuff yeah
more infos, yes
yep
that's why they slap a constant watermark saying it's a work in progress though
yeah totally agreed.
yep, alphas are for testing only. not for playing and having fun 
No the water mark, is always your name so if you stream it, they see that it is you
i remember it saying work in progress build too tho
Your name, UID, Date iirc
the watermark from div2 tech alpha was the most annoying one i have ever seen
anyways guys don't make fun of me for speculating
work in progress is written on half of the menus, but the actual watermark on gameplay has always been your name, date as well
like the leaker got all the stuff right, i have faith that an open alpah or at least a playable public build will happen somewhere in july
nothign guaranteed
but me PERSONALLY
i think it'll happen

If the leaker gave dates and those dates have passed, than he did not get all the stuff right lol
i think you are here just seeking attention lol
I still stand with closed alpha, select trusted handful which helped with BF1/5/other shooters and then a beta down the line
^^
ok
tf do i gain out of getting attention
I cannot wait to see the gameplay from the new modes
hopefully they come up with some good stuff
I'm still super curious on the specs
All these posts about "Ooh I hope this weapon gets in" and I look at them and it's just
Another fucking AR-15.
Covered in attachment rails.
Again.
I would rather have less weapons if that means better balance amongst them
quality over quantity
I hope they add the M26 MASS
Nah, gotta roll with the M26 DART bro
Also why the fuck is every rifle prototype in the last five years coloured in tan
I remember 1shotting people with it on Metro, very satisfying
Throwback to the flashbang launcher being fucking OP, 1 shotting poor people with that too lmao
Like this is exactly why I didn't want to go modern
Lots might look like that but they aren't necessarily
Nobody makes distinctive weapons anymore.
like the hk416 isn't just another ar15
Did I hear the USAS-12 with frag rounds?

Was the USAS 12 op?
They're always derivatives of the same three guns
Beyond OP
usas 12 was godly
So OP it even had an episode spotlight on BFF
I have use the USAS 12 in BF4, but I never thought of being OP
at some point everyone was running around with usas 12
It's a fucking assault rifle firing shotgun slugs.
Sniper rifle*
It was USAS beats everything
and grabbling hook or speed stim
No wonder they turned it into a pickup.
I stopped after 700 kills, I wanted to keep some of my honor
You got 700 kills too many for that mate 🤣
Hahaha I know
Mine was atleast 400
Please refrain from doing this, check out our #500058972234055710 😉.
clapped
I'm going to hit that service star with the AUG tomorrow.

Do we have any guns confirmed? I’m a big SCAR fan
So if this battlefield has the SCAR I’m in

Only a few weapons from the trailers. I don't think SCAR is one of them atm.

@rocky apex ight thanks, sorry 🙂
I wouldn't be surprised if they added SCAR.

what a change from bfv to bf2042 tbh
I hope they will
have a date for beta test yet ?
What I think would be a funny aesthetic is Future, but from the perspective of like 2000.
So everyone's running around with OICWs and shit
Not yet, will probably be announced at EA Play (my guess, mods don't know shit
)
Battlefield 2042 Reveal Trailer: https://youtu.be/ASzOzrB-a9E
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay Trailer: https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
EA Play Live time is an estimate.
scar-42. shoots lasers. 👍
@sharp sparrow Flakfire made a video of all the confirmed weapons seen so far
Become a member: http://www.youtube.com/flakfiregaming/join
Battlefield 2042 reveal trailer is here - and I finally got to dig into the 4k version - it reveals even more details on weapons and attachments. Here's everything we know. Which was your favorite weapon? Is there anything you'd like to see in the game in terms of guns and attachments?...
Probably even more since the gameplay trailer though
BF4 player count gained +1,879,6 players in just last 30 days
I got my boyfriend to preorder the game to so we can play together

The scar is in the trailer but for some reason it’s two entirely different colors?
Oh really? Nice, maybe different variants? Or just camos.
It’s the standard desert color for the upper but the lower is a dark grey
Custom colour zoning perhaps?
Scar l and h possibly
You see that video that got shared earlier with flakfire?
Who knows
5:37
Like with hardlines custom paintjobs suite
Gun bench was good
Honestly, BF4's weapons play so same-y that I legitimately choose them based on appearance rather than performance
^
That’s why I use the SCAR
I like the slower fire rate and higher damage that usually goes with the weapon
is M16A3 good?
99% sure this is an airsoft rifle but the point stands that mixing and matching the colours isn't anything special.
Though the SCAR-H kicks ass because it's an AR and it's firing big proper rifle rounds
And can look pretty sick 
Suck shit, M14.
All we need is A-91 to return really
Yeah but you see the two color differences aren’t that far apart?
I like running with DMR's though
Will most likely benefit when launch comes around
M416 is honestly my fav assault rifle
Huh so the h is still used by the u.s but they plan to substitute the L through conversion kits
Ak47 is best
They still use the H in the US?
That would be so good
I can predict one thing though
Apparently so
The most prevalent weapons will probably have super high ROFs
The L just has a foldable stock which made it better for breaches
Because half the playerbase has no thoughts outside of more boolet good
I still prefer the H
Scar H

Yep
Modern warfare 2 was a good campaign miss those days
And what's the bloody point if it's firing that crap.
Actually the L would be have been cool to see in hardline
May as well stick to the regular-ass rifles.
Yoo drew the tar 21 was cool as hell too
I remember the TAR
Interventions and rust
The Tar 21 is a prototype version that never saw mass production
I really liked the slower fire rate higher damage weapons
So they're gonna need to put in the actual Tavor.
the US army only buys Scar Hs anymore
WASNT there issues with the SCAR L and the foldable stock?
Figures, no point procuring a whole new rifle if it doesn't do something new.
No it's just 3x as expensive as an M4 just to fire the same round
True
What's the difference between you and your grandma
and when they started buying it the ACR project failed
so they didnt want to dump more money
i think
The SCAR H, far as I can tell, is designed to make firing whole-ass 7.62 a manageable affair.
Which I can applaud.
I would love to own an fg42 but I can live without it
FG42
i hope for akm in game
Pawatwooper wifle! 
Itd be interesting to see if they add a future fictional m16
Or one highly reminiscent of it
Yeah probably. Fucking Infinite Warfare literally just had a Space M4.
At least their Space AK was an energy weapon.
infinite warfare wasn't that bad of a campaign the multiplayer was extremely mediocre and zombies was shit
wonder if they have any boats in the game
I wonder what kind of futuristic stuff we'll see
2042 is far enough into the future they can go bat shit crazy imo
Infinite Warfare had the balls to actually be right proper future
None of this speculative shit, actual space battles.
And I can always vibe with starfighters.
in fact infinite warfare has the longest and one of the best cod stories out of them all but obviously the old mw and bo games were better
I mean, we got a bunch of Star Wars games for that
.
Battlefront fucking sucks and Squadrons has the wrong kind of control scheme.
star wars games are all buggy and unbalanced for defence side
Didn't battlefront get really good after EA fixed the core issues?
They didn't fix the core issues.
had potential but they went lazy
And Squadrons I've only heard positive things about but I haven't played either so no idea.
All they bloody fixed was the stupid loot boxes.
Squadrons looks to be fun but its too late to get into it
Just need games to last me a long time to end the pain of waiting for time to pass.
Battlefront still has shit mobility, star cards, ridiculously OP heroes, terrible gunplay, fuck all weapons
Bad level layouts
It launched last October, how can it be too late to get into?
Oce very small region plus it wouldn't be my game to get into
It's a niche game that is entirely reliant on matchmaking.
Fun as fuck in vr tho
I love Halo 3 ODST
Fair enough. I honestly don't think I would have gotten into games as hard as I did in my teens if I had low population servers.
Im kinda surprised I sunk a lot of times into black ops 1 and mw2 past their prime times
But w/e
I cut my online teeth on TF2. Good few servers, which all disappeared completely when the fucking matchmaking update happened.
yeah OG TF2 was awesome
Blacklight Retribution was the FPS game that got me into gaming like really hard core lol.
It was the best before they started adding a bunch of items
Gimme 10k sherman and panzer iv kills and im properly done! Could probably push for 50k fg42 but eh.
That game was amazing
. I'll share some footage in #other-games.
Guys
You mean Titan fall 2?
Mate
Titanfall 2042
What's up!
Lmao
I like Titanfall, I really do, but this is Team Fortress.
Ok I see
Haven't played it properly in years though, there's just no good community servers anymore
And also for some fucking reason every server in America is spoofing their pings to look like they're actually on the same continent as me.
So I can't even find what few Australian servers remain.
Is Australia nice
Anyway, they really should've just skipped ahead to 2143.
Nah
I really can't bring myself to care about a modern era narrative from these people.
Think 2042 is the sweespot for this game
We had bf4 final stand, so it fits well to go to 2042
yeah fits in the narrative...
I personally wouldn’t be very excited about a futuristic setting atm
A whole-ass Titan
Like, far off future I mean
So you guys have seen that image for the BF2042 ultimate edition, right?
Yes
After cod overdone the futuristic and historic, a little bit in the modern era for battlefield sounds great
And proxy wars? What is this shit?
I'm a really big fan of this setting
The only modern/near future warfare narrative I work with is Ace Combat.
it happens is real life man... just google it... it's plausible plot
i just hope the game has close quarter maps too and not only focus on scale
I liked BF1, but they should've changed the setting for 5
Because they actually made an interesting world
Futuristic war that isnt too far away from the current age/bf4
Doesn’t look like it atm, but I agree and hope so as well, eventually at least
I just hope it can balance those engagements well
Like if you just wanna play some team death match focus on aiming practice in small maps
2042 is perfect imo, it’s modern but also lets them experiment and be creative with stuff
There are gonna be the big maps but I hope the submachine gun plays pay off
Think of how long it'll take you to learn the ins and outs of every map given their scale lol
I wanna grapple hard with the k30 vector
Ace Combat had trans-continental railguns shooting down aircraft in 2004
Yeah youre gonna learn which routes to take
Campers will have a hard time learning
rushing rambo's too
there was no current gen battlefield game on WW2 while we still had bf4 and bf3 at the time for modern settings and WW1 with bf1... so its easy to see why DICE went for ww2... it's just that the execution wasn't in the right direction...
After a few dozen plays youre just going to optimise your routes yadda yadda
It sounds like a lot of the maps will have different areas for the different types of combat. Like recently I think one of the devs said something about the stadium in hourglass being meant for close quarters
I love that feeling though, playing a new map for the first time knowing that I’ll eventually know all the ins and outs
2010, an orbital nuke-firing satellite
I just can't wait to pick up my friends in a scout chopper and take them to other parts lmao.
Fucking 1995, a superlaser!
chopper < tuktuk
Theres always something that feels good using the scout chopper for more than killing
Base game BFV sucked but I really liked the Pacific theater and wish they'd had more time to explore that
Base game BFV was good and I hate how everyone bitched and moaned because ooh no it didn't have muh muricans
God, should've had Eastern Front first...
fdijfoiaoifsaduofhsdjfsdj
Just gotta tornado yourself from one place to another
It should've had Eastern Front yeah
Use it as leverage
Drive straight into a tornado. Profit.
Actually I do wonder if it'll overpower jets
Like I don't give a fuck about Omaha beach, jesus.
yeah even the war in the pacific trailer was looked like a revival of dice's image (ignoring the fact the americans were invading wake island
) but they stopped after it... wtf... I thought we would really get an eastern front and russians..... this was going to be the battlefield with most factions and variety and shit...
They were invading Wake Island because it's a hypothetical scenario where they didn't bypass the place.
wtf is a titan
the big spaceship kind of thingy in BF2142....
I really like to play with vehicles there
Oh right now I remember why I utterly despise it
So in 2042 is just any class allowed to run rockets and shit? Or is that still limited to the specialists who fall under the assault category?
well go play there then lol
no, anyone can use it
Looks like any specialist atm
Wake island for conquest assault is incredibly fun.
Because there's always some fucking moron parking himself in the middle of it
everyone in your squad can use it
Sucks on breakthrough though
I was just explaining it.... never played 2142...
I am just joking with you
As far as we know, any class can run a rocket launcher which may cause some balance concerns.
But it depends how it goes.
but there will be no titans, prob no carriers too
yo
nah it is 100% broken
So like
I hate it
I dont have a problem with classes having rocket launchers its just that its the specialists that have the class name attached to them without anything to properly balancing them out
let's just check it ourselves in beta.... but yeah given the choice....
RPG will be the gadget always...
Yeah
I don't usually vibe with on-map runways, they're more trouble than they're worth, but a map with two carriers would be pretty neat. But only if you do proper catapult launches.
Or, in the case of the Russians, the Cope Slope.
Don't we already know a majority of the specialists? You have the main 4 that were revealed, then you have Delta the riot shield dude and Sundance I think their name is called, and finally there's the specialist with the robot dog
look if you don't have a problem with a full team using rockets and ammo packs I would recommend to think again
Maybe it'll just assault will be the rocket launcher class while support will keep to med boxes and ammo boxes
DICE will collect a shitload of data from the open beta, just wait and play the game. I never see the point of obsessive negative speculation
we know their faces
only one to go
I'm concerned with both sides looking the same because they're all the same people
Getting locked on by 12 assholes doesn't sound fun at all
What idiot came up with that
fly into all of them. 
This ain't Titanfall
Ig we just have to hope there'll be enough skins to make it different
BFV was already pushing it with its lack of proper uniforms and it still improved by the end
well I imagine there will not be locks on gadgets, the only ones you pick from the ground
forgot the name of that
Battle pick-ups?
Because at least you could learn the outfits available to both factions
yeah thank you
I want AA options that can't just be magic'd away with ECM spam
I really liked the theory of cosmetics in bfv, I hoped for a evolution of than on 2042. But fuck that lets have the same guy on both teams
yeah... 2042 and stingers will only get advanced by then...
First post in the discord chat. Did Dice ever give any info on the smaller game modes like Domination or TDM? Just curious if they are still going to be other choices to Conquest or Breakthrough. Thanks
as a gadget? don't think so
Maybe there will be a specialist that specifically has the lock on gadget?
Currently doesn’t look like it, but might change after launch
if everyone can use them, and they can, it would be a major problem balancing the game
Huh, interesting, base vehicles are present
not yet... they haven't revealed hazard zone and [Redacted] so lets see
Give me a Fliegerfaust and I'll have the skies clear in five minutes.
they have to put in tdm and dom like what
We’ll see I suppose. I always hated using them anyway. I want SRAW and RPG
like i dont see why not
I THINK they confirmed Domination
you cant equip both rockets and ammo packs. Its one or the other
On their website under Modes they’re only showing Conquest, Breakthrough, Hazard Zone and the 4th unknown mode
Tank and helis
They always say "conquest and breakthrough". They dont even add an "and more" to the end,
With three speedy boys
Man has 5 rockets?
I really hope they don't fuck it up with this specialist bullshit. Sad thing is I already know for sure they will fuck it up
@lofty relic @obtuse gust Thanks I'm mostly a Domination player so I appreciate it
What about RUSH!!!
isnt that the same as bf4
Hold on, 70 quid?
"Grenade"
Rush is a classic
I wonder what else will be considered a throwable, AT mines?
Same back in BF3. I hated it in BF4 though, so unless they have any good Domination maps in the making I don’t mind being without them
That would be interesting
Man I haven't played BF4 in a hot minute I don't recall
well what will the classes then signify if the ammo/medic pack/rpgs are not locked to that category.... If I am low on ammo/heath who would I run to.... and whom to call out for taking out that tank when I don't have that RPG?.... many doubts 
You pray.
What’s the point of negative speculation? Just wait and see, you can’t affect it
the same, small nades, impact ones, molotov maybe? at granedes
For domination they should just make a small cut out section from the conquest map
Assault: gadgets based on pushing
Support: gadgets based on support
Engineer: constructibles
Recon: Sabotage or intelligence.
You can identify a gun based off their gun, with the operator becoming used to over time in dependence of figure.
BFV took away class identification. 2042 took away classes.
well they are doing a game to a public, and I am pretty sure it is the wrong one
same thing with bfv
they did a game to the wrong people
They did that in BF4 and imo it turned out pretty terrible, made me stop playing Dom
The grappling hook guy is a light capped soldier so you'll know who it is. Or the medic being a slim short haired woman.
@lofty relic I hear you, I went to that because Rush has only existed as limited time mode which honestly really really sucks. Breakthrough is Rush like but BF3s Rush is literally the best
what does this mean?
Like I made an effort to make sure my classes in V actually look the part
falk can wear a helmet. Best to look for the medical equipment
But then I encounter some punk in a longcoat, think they're a sniper, and then they whip out an SMG
yeah I hoped some characteristics from each class would remain even with customization, but I guess this is a bit too hard
Im looking forward to stuffy boy
Each one has different skins that can completely change up how they look
they are doing a game to the critics, not the actual players
What do you think about my point of BF4 classes actually not being as effective as people make it out to be? A lot of people seem to think this specialist system is going to ruin the "classic" 4 battlefield classes but I think that system wasn't really anything special to begin with it just ended up with people playing majority as one class
I'M LOOKIN FORWARD TO THE GUY WITH THE TURRET
I just hope there’ll be fun close quarters encounters in the different sectors of the map, before we get any smaller modes
he is a bit too old but I like him
SA guy too
BF1 had the best classes Send Tweet.
I hoped the same but see this
:
Theyll have a general theme to them
@lofty relic The Stadium in the trailer could be a good start
i liked it lol
so whats the point in classes if anyone can have a sniper rifle or medkit
I think a lot of people are misunderstanding the specialist system. People are compring them to heroes, but really they just have a unique gadget each. I don’t think it’ll be much of an issue, just a slightly renewed system. Who knows
Gadgets mainly
but they are, the main weapon, their gadgets, their passive ability, all that is different from each class
Exactly
Oh god I forgot about the fucking sentry guns
Can't wait for every fucking sniper to have one
no no no
I really would like if the specialists were like in bfv, where they are cosmetic only
I know the specialists have their own gadget
These categories still work for the specialist gadgets.
For example: the two engineers can make a sentry or deployable cover respectively. As far as we know, nothing like that is in the open gadget slot.
Supports meanwhile are the only ones who can equip two support gadgets, or pick a damage dealing gadget and still be able to support.
so you can play as your soldier or as a pre made one
Did you play the ones in BF3? Completely different experience imo. Those maps were tailored for Domination, lots of verticality and fun gameplay
Like even if they don't kill you, they're bloody well notice because Boris's perk alerts him when his sentry engages
why not just have specialists and not specialists and classes
@lofty relic They did a better job on BF1/5 with better map offerings but....it was still BF5 🤣
a bit more convincing explanation... hoping for the best this time 🤞
yeah like 8-10 years ago i play bf3 been awhile so i do not recall
True lol
Reminder the B-52 will still be in service in 2042
Ah, I'm referring to the Close Quarters maps; Donya Fortress, Scrap Metal etc
I just hope that AA isn't so god damn overpowered in 2042
Where are my heavy bombers firing dozens of standoff missiles into an area
I dont think this will be the case. Assault snipers and Casper snipers are also going to be pretty common, and Id bet there are other specialists that pair well with sniper rilfes
Will the ability to switch attachments on the fly be a issue or will it not be a big deal?
FUCK STINGERS FUCK MOBILE AA FUCK FUCK FUCK THEM ALL AND FUCK HAVING TINY ASS MAP BORDERS FOR JETS
If Battlefield 6 is gonna be just multiplayer, I can only Imagine what GTA 6 will be like
Fuck helicucks
💪
Battlefield
@arctic grove if they did a bomber I imagine it would be the B21 Raider and TU160
Wasnt canal a good one the one with the shipyard look
10
I don't see any links b/w them what do you see?
10
Attack Helicopter is the worst vehicle in the game. Prove me wrong.
Muh B-21 raider bro
💪
Nah
I think that was just TDM kill farming, I hated that personally, it was nothing like the DLC maps. Mainly missing verticality really. Like each DLC map had 3 floors
on the receiving end yes...
yes most likely
They should give the loosing team a gunship or somthing mid matches in 2042
they were fun tho
Y'all think there might be some type of explosives specialist?
@arctic grove sooooo.....bring back Behemoths?
Specialists
3 assault
3 recon
2 engineer
2 medic
i don't recall them but i believe you
YES
no. Explosives are probably open gadgets or throwables.
So far only one specialist has a gadget that actually deals damage
I feel like most of the time behemoths etc didn't help, people just used them to farm a few extra kills. But there were some exceptions, and I liked the core idea
I liked being able to spawn there and jump out to flag
it doesnt matter if they helped. Theyre fun AF
a flag
It was this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9N853JrG_0
Battlefield 3: Close Quarters is a themed expansion pack bringing the team play of Battlefield 3 to tight indoor environments. The frantic close quarters infantry combat is amplified by unprecedented high definition destruction, new ways to play, added persistence, and new weapons.
The HD Destruction in Battlefield 3: Close Quarters lets play...
do we know that the asian chick is a recon?
I mean sure, but I dunno, the point of them was to balance things out a bit
idk what does she do
yeah, but I dont really care about that. Ultimately they were a way to make losing a match more fun, which is much more important
we dont know. Ive just seen it thrown around that she is a recon
True I suppose
fun > balance
yeah that would be awesome to see in 2042 that brought back memories
lol
I know right
dang 2012 boy times have changed
For sure
hmmm...
@arctic grove Fighting them was really fun I'll give you that, but your gunna need more then bombers and gunships, maybe add a Submarine, Assault Ship?
Looks photoshopped
Honestly, just make all of these map spawns. Imagine both teams getting one
hmm really?
Anyone want Commander mode to return?
I want but it won't be there in 2042 sadly
never tried it
@soft kayak Kinda like the Carrier Assaukt mode?
nah. It was boring to play and squad call ins were a more fun way to add missile strikes and whatnot
we better have f22 in bf 2042
More like the Dreadnought v Dreadnought fights in BF1
bf1 good game
@soft kayak well the cruise missles were fun, same with the V1 rockets in 5.....I mean they could make it work the same in this, I mean....Hypersonic Missles should appear in some form 🤣
agreed. But calling it in as a squad leader was way more fun than calling it in as a commander, cause the SL gets to see the missile land
yeah you can do that.... easily .... but he's an EA Game Changer too

since I dunno what this is I'm gonna say definitely do not put it in the new game
I've only missed out on BF1 and BF5, meaning that this feature was in one of the two and they were both trash 😄
If it wasn't in BF4, don't go adding it.
It was a thing in BF1
@soft kayak True
Yeah, don't put it in the new game. If it came after BF4 just say no.
I mean I wouldn’t want it personally, I get why some do
so you've not tried either game but you still say they're trash?
interesting
i liked behemoths in bf1
Lol, that’s not how things work
@sick ridge BF1 was fantastic, BF5 wasn't lol
All games are DICE, EA is the publisher
EA tightened their grip or we wouldn't have got those garbage games
That’s just speculation on your part

garbage games
"I've only missed out on BF1 and BF5"
the devs saying they're returning to what they're good at is kind of confirmation
Or you know, maybe the devs were tired of making modern shooters and needed a break to feel passionate about their work?
or, likely, the pencil pushers above them wanted a world war shooter
Its faked mate
anyone who has loaded a team in previous Battlefields should be able to move on with the squad to bf 2142
Yeah sure they did, according to you lol
This doesn’t make sense
since when are little kids interested in either of the world wars lmaooooo
They could release a re-skinned BF4 and it would be a better game than the last two.
agreed, bf1 and bfv werent nearly as good as bf4/3
Any arguers against that? Cause you're dumb
kids are more interested in modern warfare lmao
@sick ridge BF1 was the game to make at the time. A few Ww2 games were coming out and they went even further with it. And it had very little politics in it. They crafted the game taking great historical facts. Bf5 basically changed the history to fit the political climate.....a major reason why it sucks. Technically the game played great but they shot themselves in the foot
that why u interested in it damn
bruh what
Hola everyone
It’s clear you know little to nothing about game development. Anyway, I was about to watch a movie before you tagged me, enjoy your.. passionate argument
you really got me there
Eh bf1 was pretty good tho ngl
crying rn
look at cod..
Vanguard is Ww2 sooo
sigh… fair
I haven’t played battlefield since BC2, did I miss out on something?
Cod is being shit on a we speak
@fringe gust 100%
im sure thats bitching from old fans to go back to WWII setting and do it right
Look at any comment section. For a new cod update and people are tired of it
yeah when i was in school all the kids were hype about the modern shit. no one gave af abt any world wars lmao
After e3 everyone’s lost patience with cod
Cod players hate any thing that isn't modern warfare but also still consume the spit that activision develops
After CW release you mean?
el novio se fue corriendo cuando vio mi pistola
Yeah that too lol
yeah E3 didn't have much to do with CoD tbf
Because they arent fixing anything and keep adding dumb stuff that breaks the game more
@arctic grove Honestly all that Dice needs to do in that case is just remake 1942 or 43.....that's really it
XD
They weren't even there I don't think LOL

Exactly
right as COD is making a new WWII game?
They ruined the atmosphere of Cold War with all the stupid skins
Now every game feels the same
and cold war ruined warzone
along with zero anticheat
Just a bunch of clowns running around nowadays in every cod
The non existent hype for the next WW2 cod should tell you the opposite
Yeah I missed the mw guns and shit
so HOPEFULLY the anticheat for 2042 isnt just EAC
warzonezzzz
when CoD announces and you don't hear people talking about it 
Battlefield god
I know its easy it's just that him being an EA gamechanger raised my eyebrow... either way we won't know anything more about the game just now....
thats what they get for spamming cod every single year
They made announcements?
@arctic grove No, just in general, if they every decide to go back to WW2 they just do what they did with 1943.....a side project to the other games that's cheap to develop
I saw something about it being WW2
or another old setting
Not to mention titanfall 3 could be announced soon
They leaked info on the next map before the battlefield release trailer and nobody gave a penny to them…
Probably next year tho
Lol
What's kinda odd on CoDs part though is uh...they've already done the world wars and the cold war with really successful games. They can't go back.
Cod is the game that holds people over until one of the next battlefield or halo games come out
Which now halo might be an actual contender again
With their new trailers
They lookin hot
honestly a REAL new map is nice, but then they are gonna ruin the game more with vanguard integration…..
@upbeat urchin From what I heard it's an alternate history, like if ww2 continued past 1945......which is honestly more stupid then Infinite Warfarw
future bro. nevermind that future ones were the WORST games
Infinite Warfare was lowkey fun when it came out. Didn't feel like a cod game. Nice refreshing futuristic shooter.
It was more like playing a scaled down Titanfall
Not really, for me I preferred it because it was a casual game to play drunk in the evenings, now everyone is sweating their asses to go positive due to sbmm
@sick ridge I borrowed it from a friend. The campaign was fun....the MP was aweful
Nukes
I might be biased because I was an animal on that one, jetpacks are an unfair mechanic
Yeah that’s true too, they’ve completely lost touch with their strong suits. If cod wasn’t sweaty I’d actually enjoy it
i thought that leak was confirmed false?
Because at the base the guns and maps for cold war are good
But sbmm
Sucks so much ass
@sick ridge Depends on how it works.. I hate it in CoD but it's necessary in Titanfall
@arctic grove If it was I was not aware
The only thing cod can do to compete this year is release mw2 multiplayer
Remastered
bfv is better
And I hope they get pushed to do it
also the cold war guns being generally better than MW guns in TTK and accuracy, plus them refusing to nerf hypermeta shit like the FFAR
Bfv sucked ass ngl
It absolutely failed what it was supposed to do
@fringe gust If I want to die by a knife lunge that starts from 10ft away I'll play Halo....at least that one makes sense 🤣
And be the bf1 for a ww2 game
bfv had good ttk and gunplay
🤡
Problem is i am educated on what ww2 was and can’t stand bfvs interpretation of it
it only lack on content
exactly
see? based department
Maybe in the beginning
Considering the amount of OP things in that game, I think it’s best if it’s stays in my memory instead of going up against laser beam ACR, spammy M21, one man army and commando pro
@chilly bramble yeah it did for the most part but the SMGs are trash
Half of the dlc guns for bfv were reused from bf1
yeah like
Took a year to get a garand in that game
the selbastader
That’s all I gotta say about that
bro. Everyone was a special snowflake with high RPM weapons, OK?
Battlefield 2042 Gameplay NEW Details. Hazard Zone and Fully Destructible Village, More! Things are getting SPICY! Leave a LIKE and a comment, thanks for watching.
woahhhhhhh
I just hope the upgrade system of 5 is completely removed that was just so dumb. But the Plus system sounds great on paper...could also have it's own issues in regards to balance
We are all pretending that Jackfrags hasn’t played the full game already
they should pin that in game news fr
they didn't tell us they were putting out an extended cut
Like how its a ww2 game with no eastern front or d-day
Bfv ttk was to fast too
Or the upgrade system
Exactly
https://youtu.be/jTIDRJP4bW0 so it seems all out warefare is going to incloud Air - Land & Sea
► Liked this video? consider subscribing :)
https://www.youtube.com/c/DANNYonPC?sub_confirmation=1
► DANNYonDISCORD! https://discord.gg/SUxAbeX
►Join my Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/DANNYonPC
► Buy my shirts! https://teespring.com/nl/stores/dannyonpc
► My twitter - https://twitter.com/DANNYonPC
► My PC - http://pastebin.com/Rv8uYACR
► Dont l...
TTK in bfv is perfect imo
God dice shouldnt have betted it all in the live service
@arctic grove They went the route of Mass Effect Andromeda and gave up on it
Jackfrags acting like he's not literally a DICE developer
hmm did bf1 have any 'rear-facing' soldier key art?
Not really it makes it feel like cod
Which is why the Live service is my biggest fear
TTK alone doesn't change the feel of the entire game lmao
Short-Medium is good, long-range for smgs could use one less bullet to kill.
Smgs aren't intended for long range. One of the things bfv did 100% correct is the gunplay
Bfv just wasn’t fun for me
the one in the trailer with the airship?
With recent Warzone experience in mind, yes it does
I know they arent, but still.
It absolutely does
Are you high?
They did such a piss poor job on 5...dosent matter how good 2042 is but if it's run similar then seriously go back to Premium.....not idea but at least we'd get a finished product
So, I get how huge maps are broken up into "clusters", but does anyone know if these clusters will always be playable on the map? Or will the playable area change as the game goes on?
I've never played warzone. Or CoD. I love bfv in its current state. Not as a ww2 shooter, but general fun arcade shooter
Yeah see
Wow yeah okay you have awful taste then
😂
BFV as it currently stands is utterly unplayable
Yeah well some of us wanted a ww2 shooter and can’t stand the sight of it
So have fun over there
With a TTK measured in eons compared to release
wait a minute this video is really concerning. They're saying we're getting back small scale destruction like the villages in BF4 but NOT GETTING BACK large scale destruction like skyscrapers???
I could name cod games better
Better prepare for hating 2042 then. I can guarantee you movement and gunplay will feel the sameish

sounds kinda fake
BFV TTK is the worst in any game ive seen so far
because there are no good COD games
ever
BFV plays like an arena shooter outdoor
This is a valid point.
hope its a sarcasm...
no
Black Ops 2, Modern Warfare
The movement looks like a mirror of 4 and the gunplay about the same
🥱
Cod 4 all the way to black ops 2 is good
BF2042 will be the arena destroyer
the original MW 1 & 2 sure, not the new one
Yes the new one too
hell no
I just hope the weapon list is also just as diverse as 4
thus
What large scale destruction was present on BF4 besides the shanghai skyscraper collapsing?
I hope not. 4 feels like a slugfest to play after V
MW2019 was actually very good
The gunplay was phenomenal and the weapon customization was 11/10
bf4 is alright I guess
Plus Caliber conversions are a thing
only baby boys are CoD players 
Youve already said this
Good, that's what it should be.
Playing like Battlefront or a fucking hero shooter was awful
For me who hasn’t played battlefield si c’è BC2, can anyone explain me the raw problems of BF1 BF5?
It really is a decent game in its current state. Best in the series for gunplay
See you’ve obviously never played bf3
Does anyone know if all map clusters will always be playable on the map? Or will the playable area change as the game goes on?
that's it, but I was expecting vastly more in 2042 like every single skyscraper able to be leveled
I can respect bfv as a game
like bf2 but a little more simplified
Caliber conversion on Snipers might worry some
Unrealistic expectation IMO
But to say it’s the best in bf series is dumb
can't be that hard to program things to crumble eh
do it then if it's so easy eh
But its hard to make it look pretty at the same time
takes 10 tank shots, falls over. Something along those lines.
TL;DR. V was not the ww2 simulator we hoped for. Also it had massive problems at launch. Bad support. Low content. It is currently a fun game to play tho
But a lot of people hate it because of its state at launch
YIKES
how many tank shells you think it takes to knock over a skyscraper? I'm just ballparking lmao
Honestly I can respect players that keep the game alive even tho it’s mess of a launch
Everything that came after made it worse and worse
Fear more that for the LMG, switching from .308 to something like 6.5 cm might be scary
Especially the lengthening of the TTK making only high RPM or OHK guns turbo meta
I think it'll look like bf4 but better, but play like V. It's almost unanimously agreed that V has outstanding gunplay and flow. You are of course free to disagree personally tho
Idk I prefer the methodical gunplay of bf4
Where you have to pace your shots
Considering the movement speed in the gameplay reveals looks dialed back to 3 and 4 I'll welcome the new movement changes from V
Bfv felt like spray kill to me
The movement speed being stolen 100% from EAfront 1 and 2 made it feel absolutely not at all like a Battlefield game
Magdump to kill
2042!
Maybe something in between. Idk. But it's interesting that a game such as V which git do much hate, was praised for its gunplay by the majority of the community. Dice has noticed this
Oh god im scared now
as long as they've fixed the vaulting issues from BF4 I'll be happy. That is the single largest annoyance I notice in day to day gameplay
The gunplay in V is dogshit too so its hilarious that it is allegedly getting praised
😂
MW2019 is the bar that needs to be matched tbh
That, and vehicles not crashing through objects
THIS
I'd implore you to try that, but Warzone is unplayable now ever since they integrated Treyarch's new game
Yeah that
@upbeat urchin .308 to 6.5 isn't what I'm worried about as 6.5 is just a better .308. But going from. 308 to .338 or .50BMG whole different ball game
Poor treyarch. Made a neat campaign but then activision ruined other games with the guns
anything
We will see. I just want a fun game. Not trying to stir shit up. I liked the gameplay in V, nothing wrong with that. Some people yikes and sheesh me but few proper arguments back
Thanks for the complete lack of refutation
Mw is awful in map design that’s what holds it back
MW2019 gunplay is top tier
And sbmm
Yes, catering to shitters
This is BF, not millisecond ttk
🤡
The gunplay is muah
So bullets actually being like bullets is bad?
Ruins the multiplayer
Oh so you have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about then
Incredible
TTK =/= Gunplay
No
😂
Yeah this is very true
Because with Sniper Rifles you could get a combination of BF1\5 sniping...which we did see in 5 with the Boys Anti Tank rifles
So a combination of long range sniping and closer range sniping with a 1HK
Have you played any of the battlefields before 1 and V?
The TTK was always quite fast
TTK in BF4 is definitely not that fast
no, it isn't. I play it daily.
😂
yeah 4-5 not 1-2
It’s fast at close range and slower at long range
That’s the balance
At range you have to actually learn to shoot accurately
but most rifles arent oneshot in MW2019 either?
And pace your shots
MW's ttk is just slightly lower at like 300ms
BF4 is 410ms
😂
They're very close
If they make it anything like MW they're not gonna have a playerbase, yall can stay in dreamland lol
MW2019 ttk is around 200ms, some guns like the Val and the MP5 are around 150
Reading now that it seems like there is normal sprint and a cooldown sprint. There was a slide in the gp trailer as well. Looks like it's gonna be fast paced. So little gunplay tho
Yeah I'm not going by SMG TTK
Oh they most certainly will
No, I can promise you they will not. Goodbye CoD child 🙂
@fringe gust It would. I loved it because it forced Snipers to play objectives vs pitching a tent trying Base to base snipes.
But BF5s had a really good velocity, accuracy and damage. You could find a good middle ground with the bigger rounds so it's more varied it just needs to be balanced right.
BF5 actually did a nice job of that with the bigger/heavier guns so well see. I have a feeling the Barret MRAD will be the rifle of choice....it's going to be in the game it has to be and that gun has caliber conversions built in.
I just want a revamped bf4 lol
Okay Mr. 10 year reaction time
lol
You sure?
Yes If there’s one thing I don’t like about bf4 it’s the sniping
It’s just time consuming
The Val is an AR, the an94 has a potential of 110ms with the first 3 rounds, the m4 is around 200
why are you here? Go back to CoD Cirno lmao
And not very effective
@arctic grove You've seen me playing BF4
TTK is very similar to MW
They're not gonna cater this game to yall, I dunno why you're thinking they MIGHT
snipers deserve to be shoved off that roof they sit on
Because I've played Battlefield since BF2?
Indeed it is
For some reason I read Val as Vector while I was skimming my b
Cod is shit lately
lately? has been since the end of the 360 and PS3 era
@sick ridge Ummm did you watch the trailer? It was directly catered to Battlefield fans
yes, thank you for restating what I just said
wont be catering to cod kids
@sick ridge I had to play captain obvious 🤣
It had it’s moments after… WW2 wasn’t bad, bo3 zombie was awesome and MWR came with a strange halo type game attached to it
When is the next reveal? July?
they gonna be reeeeeeeeeeal mad when they realize it's still a BF game, feels nothing like CoD, and they can't migrate here from their burning franchise 
The only thing I ever used jets for was flying into rooftop snipers
Are you literally 12
Jesus christ
People can like both
Mw 2019 was a failure to revive cod
they do those little briefings every tuesday so I'd think they may show some gameplay in those eventually
To its former glory
It was the best selling cod in years
Oh okay. Cool
COD still top shooting game for 10 years numbers proved it lol
Using the Val is cheating though because that has spastic low ttk
And AN-94 is if you're tapping the hyperburst which is pretty close to cheating here too
Warzone budget estimated 1 billion
But it failed to capture was cod used to be by adding sbmm and making it sweaty af
At this point if Disney would make a casual shooter about the Loony toons I would play it






