#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 1877 of 1
A War Story like campaign would be kinda cool for a modern BF imo
that is bound to change
different scenarios all over the world
it’s too plain imo but still good
Maybe for a few missions
@grim nacelle MW2 only worked because of the campaigns preceeding and proceeding it.
could be expanded too
Well hopefully it's either Battlefield or Battlefield 6
Battlefield 2042 is the lamest title
This tweet lines up so well with the recent DICE teaser image that its all but confirmed https://twitter.com/_Tom_Henderson_/status/1384437271869497345
https://twitter.com/bravoINTEL/status/1400830489930444813/photo/1
The ui from the supposed leaks are almost indentical to BF4
i highly doubt DICE and EA will bother with 2142 as much as I'd like to see it happen.
Too many glitches
well, judging by how this is the biggest battlefield they worked on, surely there is going to be the best campaign in the franchise
all BF campaign’s imo were not fun to me
this one hopefully can make a change
2042 is a much better title
I'd say best campaign and emotional one is medal of honor reboot and warfighter
abandon campaign. Add a bot mode for those who want it and focus on multiplayer
If they do that the price has to come down
no it doesnt. Not if the lack of single player is supplemented by more multiplayer content
Tried to i waited 7mins and abandoned lmao
they may not due to advertising, but they really should
The campaign is big chunk of the game, if it's missing there's a lot less money spent on the game in general
The only bot they can add is co-op survival mode and I want it for Battlefield games and the upcoming BF6 since they only one time they add co-op survival in bad company 2, except it sucks and it’s not connected to the multiplayer to help you level up.
because the multiplayer is the vastly more played portion of the game, and the linear level design of the campaign meshes horribly with a game based on large scale battles.
So it has to have smaller price or we are just using us as a money milking machines
not really. Most people dont even touch it.
People playing =/= money spent developing it
Campaign serves as world building for the MP.
Therefore it’s probably needed for anything going on to make sense
- the price of a game never coorelates to its budget
- the money spent on campaigns would go into multiplayer maps
they need to make a good campaign first tho
I still need to play the singleplayer of BF1 and BF5 😳
not many ppl touch it as it is not that fun
OMG, the hype is real!
exactly. Multiplayer maps have far more replay value. Theyre a better use of resources
Have you ever seen recent AAA games that costs less than 60$?
I think V is actually a good game.
yes plenty of indie games are above 20. But AAA games have a vastly varying budgets. If it correlated to budget, it would not always be 60
Games today have editions
something that is played multiple times is 100% a better use of resources than something played once
Ubisoft is the worst offender of this
and they also dont coorelate to the budget of the game.
Yea but they generally are very bigger compared to the rest, the games have an entire campaign and multiplayer in them and still manage to be profitable
Yeah lol
I hope the MP will be really good, just played BF4 again and I missed those times!
I don't need to give more money to EA's share holders
I brought rb6 siege advance edition at GameStop
I wish to keep it for myself
No thanks
For example: If the price of games coorelated to the dev cost, then Cyberpunk would be 2x the price of MGSV. Its not
Those games still are profitable
Why can't I see EE chat anymore
yeah? Not really relevant to my point
If anything it's shows that AAA game need to lower there price
It's relevant to my point
what is your point then?
I refunded it
60$ for a multiplayer only game is too much when a good chunk of the cost of development is gone
I never said that dev cost would go away. I want them to put the resources that would go into campaign to the multiplayer. making the multiplayer bigger
Whats mgsv
metal gear solid 5
Youtubers need content my man
They don't need an infinite amount of money
BF4 sost 100 million
??
Cyberpunk only failed on last gen console
To make up for that
No campaign is fine. Just make a good fucking game. That’s all I want.
Especially with microtransaction
You need to sell at least 1,666,666 copies, each costing 60 bucks
this
doesnt relate to my point at all
"This is battlefields campaign..." YouTube videos lol
I'm explaining why i don't agree with you
ok but your reasoning does not connect to my point at all.
That more money=better multiplayer
more money would equal bigger multiplayer. Quality would probably be the same
I'm buying ps5 for it
I don't think you understand the cost of the development of games
Better performance on série x tho
What do you guys think... Will the new Battlefield game directly on Steam, or only on Origin for a certain time?
Im in it for exclusive
if you took the people making campaign content, and had them make multiplayer maps, its not like they would be twiddling their thumbs all day. Theyd make a damn multiplayer map
EA play and Xbox game pass
I don't know to put it in a way you would understand, what you described would still take less resources than making a single player campaign
Ps now don't got that yet
This

I enjoyed BF3 and BF4 campaign and I played them for the first time 2 weeks ago
I liked how doing only headshot reward you through the chapter.
And I like the cover to cover tactical gameplay of bf3
I dont think you understand what Im saying. Take the resources from campaign, and put them to work on multiplayer. The result would be that the size of the multiplayer increases by the amount of content that manpower could create
Besides dice been working with next gen since year ago idk if it be on last gen
Battlefielf without SP is like COD without MP
Campaign can create lore like the campaign of mw2019 did for warzone thoughts season 2 to season 5
If BF doesn't have a campaign, the MP would be sour. Like BF2142
You don't understand that doing that takes less resources than making a campaign
theyre not incompetent. Its not like they would design a single player map and slap multiplayer on it
!when
Didn't bf5 kinda did that with pacific and elites
And I think bf6 will have an heavy side toward special force group. So the battleroyal can make sense and the lore can evolve and be viral on social media
"transferring resources takes less resources than the resources you transfer"
lol
It doesn't work like that dude
@next isle pog
You have no idea of what you are talking about dude
nah its like Cod without singleplayer. as in nothing of value is lost
that is literally what you said
Minus SF bf5 started the lore part in war
COD SP is best man
Modern Warfare trilogy?
My theory is the main story of battlefield is special force NATO union vs some eco-terrorism eastern eurasie union
up to blops 2
MW2019 still good. The SP and COOP
Eco terrorists lol
Instead, the BR and MP ruins the storyline
The natural disaster are provoked through a satellite like the movie geostorm or like the ODIN from. Cod Ghost
Or it could be a continuation of battlefield 4s war
@wise edge nah the wrong reply makes that comment infinitely funnier
USA vs China
Ok
Bad company 2 had a bomb that can create tsunami
so what I get from this
- if you make a single player map you become incapable of designing a multiplayer one
- campaign is just as valuable as multiplayer even if it has inherently less replay value
- transferring resources takes less resources than the resources you transfer
Fuck maybe Im having a stroke
From the tweets dice sent out it seems to be bf6 is nato vs brics special forces but it sounds united states was attacked
USS raven rock
The man is too sexy
yes. That doesnt mean that someone who has made a single player map is incapable of designing a multiplayer one
!when
👀
wait a minute, do you think that im suggesting, were they to already be working on a campaign, to turn those campaign maps into multiplayer ones?
Cause if theyre already making a campaign then the cats out of the bag. Too late, may as well finish it. I am saying that they shouldnt have made the campaign in the first place
Injecting more money won't always have an noticeable improvement
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH! ⏰⏰⏰
It probably wouldnt change the quality but it would certainly be larger.
Its an injection of manpower specifically
What does larger even me?
more maps and items
Microtransactions pay enough for that
I should clarify, this is an injection of manpower specifically. Mtx revenue isnt going to increase the team size. Its not going to make more content
it would make it bigger
An injection of manpower doesn't cost as much as developing a campaign
its the same manpower that would have gone into the campaign!
- "transferring resources takes less resources than the resources you transfer"
I am having a stroke my god!
There's more to developing a campaign then the manpower alone
The salary of the developers is probably the cheapest thing in the development of a game
👀
writers can write for other things. codex entries, operation monologues, in game dialogue
a lot more talent goes to waste in these crappy campaigns
Because the Corporate overlords doesn't let them do a good one
ive played bf campaigns before and I have no reason to think it will get better
I usually enjoy the campaigns 
They're a nice small thing even tho Multiplayer is why I buy it
its getting smaller year by year
It's sad to see that a few years ago a AAA game without a good campaign was taught to be a scam
which was bullshit cause a game doesnt need a campaign to be complete
it means its getting less important
Execpt when it's same price as one
already been over this
Im not going in circles
Execpt you wont understand
xd
Don't even bother
I do understand and I understand why your wrong
They couldn't even understand my words
its been idk how many minutes i am trying to explain to you the same thing
who are you talking to
Not you.
It just keeps flying over you head
i am trying to explain to you the same thing
because your reasoning is flawed and incoherent

Lmao what?
I like good campaigns
if you dont want to, leave
Dude you clearly have no idea of what your talking about
then dont bitch about the time
is that all youve resorted to. Just crying "you dont understand"
Because you head is too thick to understand what we are trying to say
wait whats goin on
-crying about the time yet doesnt leave
oh are we talkin about campaign
The dude wanted no campaign, I said that if it happens the price needs to be lowered
BF shouldnt even have a campaign. It can still stay 60 dollars tho because live service
Because live servive...
as long as every DLC is free

and Im saying that if more multiplayer content is added then the price shouldnt change
you realize BF is going to be a live service right?
18
they talked about it at the earnings call
That should be a given holy shit
What in the fuck is more multiplayer content
maps and items
how is that unclear?
more multiplayer content is more maps and weapons and factions and vehicles
and customization
Right..
BF needs a campaign to set the stage for the MP, otherwise there’s no worldbuilding and you have no clue what’s going on
so basically everything the game has to offer
we do know whats going on
its right after BF4
We actually don’t know that
Operations and codexes did far more world building than bf1's campaign
You know what Gamers deserves to pay 200$ for a game that wasn't even finished
thing is, why waste effort on a campaign when its going to be mediocre?
I want war stories, maybe a few missions. Different scenarios
^^^^^^
Different viewpoints of the conflict
why would they even bother with the resources
Idk like try to make it good
everyone complained about BF1 and BFV campaign and BF4 and BF3 campaigns were pretty mediocre
these guys seem to think the single player dev team is completely incapable of making multiplayer stuff and would instead create nothing
why would they put the effort into fleshing out a campaign when the drive of BF is just multiplayer
Because that game is based in reality, it doesn’t need to do worldbuilding in the campaign. Everyone knows what WW1 is and roughly who fought in it. That’s not the case in a future, hypothetical conflict. Who are the belligerents? What are the stakes? On top of that, why should the player care?
There's game that cost like 10€ that have stellar single player
yeah lmao i dont get that
couldnt the ops and codex flesh out the lore of this world?
What Remains of Edith Finch
They are just lazy to make you pay for shit that isn't worth
that doesnt mean the devs are incapable of doing either process
Not the same as a full blown story could. Codex worked as an extension to already existing knowledge.
thing is, Battlefield sadly had their last good campaign in BC2: 11 years ago
I disagree. The codex and ops covered much more of the war
That's an even better reason to make a comeback
not really
if theyre going to come back and develop a good campaign, just make another bad company 3 then
how many writers vs how many level designers, programmers, and testers are on the singleplayer team?
Like seriously few years ago games costed like 30-40€ finished and with a good single player and campaign modes
SO? Hire good fucking writers
and theres no sign of that returning
They have the budget
common sense
Either way, wouldn’t you rather experience the world rather than just read about it? The concept of show, don’t tell comes into play here. That’s where the crucial difference comes in between a historical and a future setting.
they are putting their development into turning BF into a live service
everything will be centered around the multiplayer
Wouldnt I experience it through multiplayer?
2142 did a great job at this
they literally talked about BF becoming a refined live service literally in the earnings call
Then don't make us pay for the non existent campaign
you arent paying for it
Yes you are
look
Titanfall 1 actually kinda did a single player and multiplayer experience
BF1 dealt with a preexisting setting everyone already had some degree of familiarity with. That’s not the case with this sort of setting. You’d experience it, sure…but I’d be shocked if it’s just me who experiences a world much better when I understand what’s going on in the context of a MP match.
we understand this. What you dont understand is that devs are not one trick ponies.
We have different opinions on stuff.
One group likes MP more, one likes story content more.
There's literally no point in arguing.
they could pull a titanfall 1
You're going in circles.
doesnt mean they cant adapt or work with the multiplayer team
Tell that to the rockstar devs that formulated RDR2 campaign and also formulated all the quests and every cutscene dialogue for RDR2 Online
Idk man, i only wish to not pay for shit that isn't there
how about 2142 where the whole coarse of the war is shown with only a bot mode?
Take Star Wars, for example. It’s a completely fictional setting. Battlefront works because the game is set in the larger context of the Star Wars universe. The player understands the factions and the stakes, otherwise it’s just space bullshit and flashy stuff that doesn’t make a ton of sense.
^
impossible. When given the task they froze up completely and accidentally made single player content
Some of you need to calm down lol
what context could people possibly not understand about the next battlefield game
I’m not saying they couldn’t do it without campaign. I just personally feel that task is best accomplished through the medium of a campaign.
Little war stories in different countries, scenarios, from different perspectives and whatnot is all you need. Those episode'esque missions could be continuously added throughout development or even a few weeks after launch.
We don’t even know for certain when the game’s set. If it’s set after BF4, what’s happened since then? What’s changed? Why is the world still fighting?
A campaign would certainly do this. But in my opinion that is a lot of time to put in just to explain the context of multiplayer, which many players may not even need
Im going to be honest, i played the BF1 campaign and BFV campaign, and I was wondering why they didnt just scrap that and spend way more time on everything in terms of content, hell BFV really could have used it
the world wasnt done fighting in bf4
all you do in the BF4 campaign at the end is destroy chang's ship
the war still waged on
It isn't because in the last game they couldn't bother to make a good campaign that it should be the norm
Then don’t you think it’d be interesting to explore what’s happened to the world in years of conflict in that scenario?
There’s so much to explore, it’d be a shame to not go in depth with it
And, to that end, I believe a SP campaign is the best way to experience that
i think it would be more interesting if they fleshed out the game most people will be absorbed into for the long haul, so i dont see people on reddit complain it lacks content and its like BFV
it should be the norm because the campaign is a waste of time. You dont see people complaining when single player games have no multiplayer. Why must the opposite be true?
Singleplayers make people more attached to games, either because of immersion in the story, the characters or the entire setting the game is set in. There is no denying that as it is statistically proven, also why some games have a greater drawback on player counts than others a few months into release. If you make someone really enjoy the campaign enough to think/talk about it, they are more likely to play the multiplayer longer afterwards.
millions of people do this @arctic grove
100% a lot of people are
I smell stupid takes
you know how many people actually do not finish a call of duty campaign lmao
people will play games EASILY for just the multiplayer
I don't care that you think that single player is a waste for me it isn't, games shouldn't to conform to what YOU like or don't
vice versa kid. they shouldnt be pouring tons of effort into what a minority of players actually care about
But how many people in comparison do you think DO finish a call of duty campaign?
If they want to keep high player counts for a longer time a singleplayer is a good way to get people psychologically attached
I know I’ve bought several games there just for the campaign.
Then why are you trying to say that i should pay more for less?
There has always been a campaign
original bf games just had a bot mode
why should I have to pay for a campaign?
Counter strike never had a singleplayer until condition zero(sold the worst) but it never stopped that game for being one of the most popular fps games of all time
I think you guys should call it a day
Doesn't matter if you play the campaign yourself or you watch someone else play it, if it immerses you, you are more likely to keep playing than if you just jump into a mindless multiplayer shooter. Those that jump directly into multiplayer are statistically less likely to play the game as long as those who do the singleplayer(or watch it).
you are more likely to keep playing than if you just jump into a mindless multiplayer shooter.
any reason to believe this?
Dude the entire argument started because you wanted to keep paying 60€ while there is no campaign
who knows at this point. a lot of people have complained about the quality. MW2019 was good tho so who knows
That’s also true, there’s always been a campaign. DICE would catch a good degree of flak for not including one, especially given they’ve had this long and this many studios working on the game.
Other than it being statistically proven?
I wanted to pay 60 for more multiplayer content instead of 60 for some multiplayer and some campaign
It's psychology one on one dude
can I see the statistics?
DICE caught flak for having mediocre campaigns lmao
Sure, pay me for my time though, I will find you a study on psychology in terms of attachment through immersion as well.
Now give me sources for all your arguments
Mediocre campaigns are for the most part normal for BF as a series
Why would you pay so much for a mulitplayer game
I didnt make any scientific claims
yeah since past BC2
The whole interest is in the MP, but the SP isn't plain shit
They'd probably catch more for not including one at all, especially considering how long they've had to work on this game.
Cause I want a lot of multiplayer
BC2 was the last good campaign
By saying others are wrong and you are right you are making what you say be presented as "fact", for it to be fact it means it is proven.
Half of the money will to the share holders in that case
and how many studios are on it too
more people are going to be looking at how much multiplayer content there is at launch
I dont care. That happens anyway
which btw criterion was brought on to handle post release content
By the way, you do realize the SP and MP have two completely different teams working on them, right? Its not like working on SP is going to actively draw vital resources away from MP, especially with this big of a team working on the game
Your opinion might be that a singleplayer doesn't matter, but stop presenting it as fact unless you have something backing it up.
So you want to pay as much so they would let a fraction of the money being put vack in the game
thats why i dont think theyre really working on a fleshed out campaign lol
Its not like working on SP is going to actively draw vital resources away from MP, especially with this big of a team working on the game
The single player guys can work on multiplayer. Its not like game designers can only make one type of game.
Still, don't you think the omission of what has been a standard mode in the past would be a rather glaring one to a lot of people? I think a mediocre campaign is better than no campaign at all
I want to pay for multiplayer instead of some multiplayer and some crapot campaign
why would a mediocre campaign be better than no campaign when its just work wasted
Writers and cutscene designers be damned, I guess. Also, SP level design and MP level design are two VERY different animals.
Most people on the single player team arent writers
There's entire multiplayers games that are being updated and developed with a fraction of what Bf gets in microtranscation alone
why would you want something in a game people will meme and complain about
Better than no effort put in at all
not relevant to my point
Remember: its manpower not money
Guess thats just me though
idk that effort could have been allocated elsewhere to bolster something people already like
Guess DICE can't take a chance at creating something amazing because of the moderate chance of sub-par reception 
Wait... don't tell me ur argument is that ppl are gonna meme and complain if there is singleplayer but be completely fine if not... please don't 
ehh other games have 1 team handling both
Yes it is,most of the money put back in the multiplayer will have almost no effect on the quality of the game
oh ofc not, they will do both
With this big of a team, that can't possibly be a pressing issue.
because nobody is ever happy
I will be annoyed if we have another manpower tumor drain from multiplayer
we arent developers for DICE so we dont know and with covid screwing everything up who knows
With the amount of studios working on this game, I will be shocked if theres a press for resources or need for bolstering anywhere
who pinged me
so what would the single player game designers do once put on the multiplayer team?
Rarely how studios work. They have a budget for multiplayer, if they decide to also make singleplayer it would have its own sub-budget.
they brought criterion on just to handle post release content
Welcome to BFD...
still bitching about time, still not leaving.
Probably work on something that wont have any impact
like what?
Nah it is rather comical that this has been going on for an hour with still no resolution
Remember when trinova and nyphon argued abt why SLRs are better than bolt actions for AN HOUR AND A HALF?
LMAO
I'm hypeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed
Money =/= quality of the game
I think the whole point is not every dev has two teams working on separate things. Companies can have a Team A and Team B work on all elements of the game, it may be separate roles but they all develop in a way that molds the game together perfectly
I need lars now
cause theyre broken records.

BFV is a trash game
The developers that worked on the singleplayer will either move on to a new project or join a maintenance team.
answer the question. What would they make?
go play on your ps4
definitely not the case for all games
and bfv is a trash game
Its funny, because the general trend is that people who say BFV is trash generally haven't touched the game for more than an hour
There plenty of examples of games where they millions only for it to be a giantic tured
answer the question. What would they make?
Tell me for a triple A studio what they do then, get fired? 
I don't like BFV
played it for like 40h or something
let me check
Nothing they are single player guys not multiplayer ones
You must not realize how Dark souls is actually developed if you think devs working on single player going to maintenance. From software @thin rain
See theres a difference between not liking a game (which is totally valid) and calling it outright trash
so they get put on the multiplayer team and just twiddle their thumbs? Fat chance
the PVP multiplayer is built into the single player experience
30 actually
they all work on the same project
Especially when that game has some notable backers
he was dodging the question
still the game is trash
You know
where did he go
I was in a boarding school
yo
Not every game is developed the same way, franchise games always have the devs move on to new projects(start them up) when there is no need for 100% of them on the same thing.
and if we didn't like the food the kitchen served us
thats why i just said not every game does what you said they did
and we said "The food tastes disgusting" "It's trash"
Franchise games do though... they move on
Not every game development will be the same
I mean, if you don't like the game, you don't like the game. Doesn't mean everyone's gonna agree @misty lake
5h only
We'd get in deep fucking trouble and have to say it to the kitchens chef personally
Always say that YOU don't like xyz thing
So then by that logic, why are we even talking about BFV in this whole debacle?
Yes, that's why i am saying that putting more resources wont always have an impact on the quality of the game
You prefer something else
yep
don't generalize
BFV is largely criticized for its lack of multiplayer content, thats why it was relevant
am just saying the game is a trash game and a guy was like NAHHHH
BFV's development conditions are evidentially waaaay different than this game's.
explain to me why they would be incapable of making multiplayer content
I understand that single player is a different process. Why does that mean the singleplayer guys are incapable of multiplayer maps and going through that different process?
Because he (and I as well) disagrees with your opinion? I'm failing to see the issue here.
i mean the whole point is they still spent time on a campaign that could have been completely discarded
BfV was developed in 18 months lmao
But then the game would've just been criticized for not having a campaign in a WW2 game.
still wouldnt have been criticized for 3 years about no content
DICE had to pick the lesser of two evils here, and they'll do the same again this time.
you know BFV was criticized before,during, and after
If you ask someone to make something that costs 700$ and you give them 10000$, there's 9300$ that will go to waste
I seriously doubt ignoring a campaign would've magically fixed all of BFV's content issues.
BF1 was really fun
that doesnt answer the question at all
Like I SERIOUSLY doubt that.
whos to say, it just would have freed up time they were already rushed on
yeah but not like bf3
Yes it does use your brain cells
I didn’t play bf3
I got BF1 as my first battlefield then I bought bf5 in beta and then bought bf4
I say its pretty unlikely that we'd have gotten much more than what we got.
@wise edge why should I take you seriously when you keep dodging the question. Ill ask again.
Why are they incapable of making multiplayer stuff?
what are you doing go play the game its super fun
Bf3 is still active?
Because designing content for MP and designing content for SP is two VERY different animals.
It's about their whole job changing and that also means pay, hours etc might change as well
why are they incapable of the different kind of work? (not the writers, I mean everyone selse)
I am answering your questions but you are to thick to understand
murph
you can find some server's
youre not
Yeah, fuck the writers.
Their work doesn't really differ
Holy shit dude
answer it directly
Is my english not understandable?
"Disregarding the most blatantly incapable group of people, why would anyone be incapable???"
Am i speaking Chinese this whole time?
I am asking you why they cannot do the job. Answer this question
ni hao
its also likely the smallest
you can find some server's
on pc
i dont know on ps3
大家说中文:)
answer: theyre not
japan
Ok, what about cutscene artists? What about SP level designers?
Because it isn't their job
people are not forced into one job for their whole life
look guys
I am confused what is even argued at this point
who knows
The writers work, yeah
They aren't, but people tend to specialize in one or two specific things in their line of work if they're any good at their job.
Level design? Maybe
Then go pay their reconversion
But you can easily move most people from SP development to MP without any major problems
The engine is the same
sure but were talking from game designer to a different game designer
You do realize that SP level design and MP level design are two vastly different animals, right?
@jagged otter the most reasonable one here
Wait... so you're saying both teams know programming!? omg!!! 
you must not know what gaming journalists are like
Well, I don't like most of your takes
what i mean is
but that one is kinda right
you can be in graphic design
hahaha SKB
and be a gaming journalist
gotta give credit where credit is due.
I know gaming community managers that were never even graphic design or communications majors, instead they were literally history majors
what was your point then about specializing
because people specialize through education and then end up doing different things all the time
SP levels have to be fun to move through (emphasis on through), often have to look different or have different mechanics (triggered events, AI mapping), and have to tell a story of some kind. MP level design is completely different for a plethora of reasons, especially with Battlefield.
I know people with no education who are successful in software development
@jagged otter, @radiant prism Thanks for being respectful and coherent despite disagreeing. And thank you for not driving the conversation in circles. I'm going to head out.
It think it is craming people somewhere were they aren't needed won't have any meaningful impact
Can't box people in that easily
In the context of game development, though, you're going to want people with experience if you want the best chance of a good product. Trying to switch someone's focus mid-development isn't often a good idea in this context.
Putting SP guys with Mp guys when they don't nees their help won't make the game better
Okay now this i agree with
Exactly, especially with this many people working on the game.
Most of the problem of game is solved with more time not more manpower
cyberpunk was a good game, just nothing revolutionary
Hoo boy
it was just another action FPS rpg
Their developers are still recovering from their unpaid overtime
but the side stories were pretty cool
or is it just you 
I don't understand how Cyberpunk was that hard for them to make, anyone know about that actually?
a lot of complaints about cyberpunk were personal. If the game didnt work for you or you played on old gen.
If BfV had more than 18months to be developed it would have been a good game imo
Uhh...a number of reasons probably.
Huge expectations, probably
Like the quality was so bad though
it wasnt, they literally admitted they focused on next gen and PC more when developing the game and severely neglected last gen
Expectations that probably would've needed at least another decade to meet
It tries to be a lot of different things at the same time
I only watched the game, but when I was told it was triple A and they had yeaaaars to make it, so many simple things wrong
"quite"
Without the proper time to actually make it
Something as simple as a car turning it would drive diagonally from the direction of the wheels....
The game probably bounced around development hell for a while
the thing is, GTA V Is the 2nd best selling video game of all time, and if anyone remembers how that game was at launch and then waiting 3-4 years for heists to actually show up in the game which were promised before release. Cyberpunk has nothing on that game, yet nobody mentions that, or when skyrim was unplayable on PS3 for almost a year because of crashing, file corruption and everything else under the sun
cyberpunk 2077 on ps4 was a disaster lmao
1 year
Cyberpunk devs got too much hate for something that other games have won game of the year after committing the same crimes
The game couldn't even be lunched for them
lets goooo
GTA 5 on PS3 took centuries to load tho
it would crash immediately
Goodnight my dude
i played gta V on xbox 360 and the same happened
either way i guess what im saying is the devs got too much hate
GTA and Skyrim devs got off easy
in fact skyrim won game of the year before you could play it on ps3
i remember if you accidentally walked into water your ps3 froze
gaming community has become too spoiled in the sense where they play a game at launch and expect it to work immediately


Imagine bf6 is a updated battlefield hero’s
It is solved boyz
What?
lmfao
We had that down 1-2 hours after they got released
Those are just guesses
Nothings solved
Yeah you're right
Would be cool if it's building for something huge
it's just a bunch of rectangles

I see it tbh
I must've taken the blue pill then

I think they are talking about this (look at OG again after checking me fkd up lines) https://gyazo.com/06b602dccfea3c094a2050544abb3356
I found a similar much clearer shape in one of the frames when I was going through it earlier
can anyone tell me what the result of those videos were, or are they not done yet
nothing
Great
SKB knows, keep bothering him until he tells you 
Maybe slow them down/reverse them
What videos?
There were green lines, thought they were morse
Tried all kinds of filters and stuff too
yup
We tried reverse and slowed down
nope
Hold up, what exact shapes did you see
That doesn't make any sense
Wait what videos
Teasers
Well minecraft disc 13 was reversed and it had a story
Oh the ones that came out today?
Videos without audio don't work like that dude.
Yeah there were distorted images found in a few of them
Audio? Maybe
Attack helicopters, skyscrapers, and I think a soldier or two
Video? Nah
Did you flip them 180
I know what you mean
They didn't need any manipulation, a lot of stuff was discovered by just pausing it and looking at it frame by frame

alr then- what are we supposed to expect from that
nothing
What do you mean by expect?
it's a teaser
exactly
Like this one, there appears to be an attack helicopter in this frame from one of the videos
Another has a skyscraper
Theres a variety of them, some of them clearer than others
I'd imagine there'll be something tomorrow too
There is also another image showing a woman comforting her child(?)
Yeah, its the hype thing they do in the leadup to a new game
There is lots of games that do that/did that
I recommend checking Tom Henderson’s Twitter (
) to see the pic
Hello 2004
idk what year that song came out
We already have the M-60, technically
the fg42?
hyup
Yeah I know I’m just being a dick

I’m disappointed at the lack of gecko emotes
same lol
smh
!jumbo :sh_Gecko_dance1:
⚠ Invalid emoji
Fuck
epic emote failure
the individual "gecko is bad" has failed to insert a rather mobile picture of an animated gecko dancing in the channel #battlefield-2042 of the battlefield main communication hub, let us laugh at his common error by pressing the picture of a star under the reply of his emote failure


Look to be fair, I once spent an hour and a half straight in discord VC reading the Wikipedia article for the treaty of Versailles
You tell me what the bigger waste of time was
And I was there
Cut Scene From Battlefield V The Last Tiger
Subscribe for free: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCORc8MfxPUELJfPVs1e5YLw?sub_confirmation=1
#PeterMuller #tiger237 #tiger131
Watching a 10 hour video

That loops
Check #game-news
yo dice
which one of you on this discord is making those clips and sending them to people
probably none of them actually
The only thing I’d watch for 10 hours on loop is Jurassic Park
Id even accept Jumanji (Robin Williams Edition)
Not funyby.
1 teaser a week be better. 1 teaser a day we would basically know everything by the time the game comes out.
!when
Actually only 3 days 
Oh
They mean one teaser a day until the 9th
Nein, they meant they preferred one teaser a week
Which unfortunately is wrong due to the fact that there is 3 days left

!when
pog
I would love to see a walker in the new battlefield even if it is one of the first models
Oh you meant that I meant that you meant what I meant
Ah okay


!when
!when
!!when
Reveal June 9th. https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/1399742535942258691
Is there a reason that the server image goes red now
Your in a war with 9 worlds
lmao I love your name
😎
!when
There should be a Battlefield 6 live countdown
You unfortunately need a regular role, meaning you have to be in this server for a month or so AND be a good boi in the server to acquire the ability to use bot commands and pics, etc
wrong
yeah i dont think i was a good boi
you need a role that has embed permission
fair
nitro boosters have that perm too
very reliable
Thanks
Indeed regular and or p2w reg known as nitro booster
Hows 1t 6oing
Nice Profile Pick I like it
Thanks
all goods
Just hang in there people, the revealed trailer is getting close and I know you all want to burst out of excitement and I can't wait too.
83 hours remain
:Pog:

pog



!!when is bf(soon) revealed?
Reveal June 9th. https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/1399742535942258691
!when
!!when
!when
!when
!when
!!when
commands are regular only
!!!!!!!!!when
!when
damn
Its fair
!when
dont you love it when youtubers overhype clickbait bf6 “teaser info” when nothing new is said throughout the 10 min+ video
We are so close yet so far, I’m overhyped for this reveal
when is release date? maybe 2022?
!when
Holiday 2021, we’ll probably get a release date with the reveal
!when
EXCITING!!!!
!when
!when
poggers
9 pm here
Wa?
o
!when
!when
Thank
yw
!when
!when
:(
Same here 😦
we are not worthy
!!when is daffy worthy to see bf(soon)'s reveal?
Reveal June 9th. https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/1399742535942258691
wow, that's pretty soon. lucky daffy!
!when
hah
where did you get that from
i'll whisper you two a little secret, commands are only for regulars ;3
or server boosters i believe
ah
so we arnet worthy
you may not be worthy to suommon zeppelin yet, but thou are worthy battlefield members :3
!when
!when
i think it works for the mods or the others...
!when
it only works for regulars and server booster people (or mods/adminds stuff)
huh
!!regular
ℹ️ The Regular role is granted to active, positive, courteous, and resourceful guests of the server. This role is earned, not given, and is conferred at the discretion of the server staff. With this role guests can post/embed images, execute a selection of bot commands, and change what color their name appears as in chat.
ngl i'd share a lot more of my videos if i didn't have to make people download them when i share

for instance today when trying to get away from a plane in bfv I landed in the water (still in the plane), but it was shallow enough that it stopped me and i landed on the beach. A friendly tank came out and spent a couple minutes trying to push me so i could aim my aircraft the other way, only for us both to get destroyed by an enemy tank :c
i mean in bf1 me and 2 other guys was getting on a car i went on top and then i wanted to be passenger and the moment i went in passenger some guy in a tank shot us and we died
has anyone figured out anything about the emergency broadcasts?
idk. heli, buildings, plus some theories for the other harder to decipher ones like a factory location with a car
Pretty much just assorted images yeah

wait how
guessing someone deleted their message
saw this on twitter
: `A new unverified #Battlefield leak claims:
• The next game is called 'Battlefield 2042'
• Open alpha/beta coming later this month. https://t.co/HYtTazrtfz`
thoughts?
keep your hype to info from #game-news. any info outside take it with a grain of salt
yeah
what's that link to 
although BF2042 was a name that i had thought as a possibility before any leak pointing towards that direction
id quite like that as the name
oh also there was that thing with the 3600 hours = 150 days = 21.42(rounded to 21.43) weeks
which is very interesting indeed
battlefieeeeeeeeeeeld




bf5 ugh

also for any EA folk or whatever reading, the battlefield.com site for canada doesn't show the updated design like the other regions :(
!when
!when
Can't wait to farm all the noobs
Did you guys see the new videos
wonder what tomorrow's little tease from Battlefield will be
One pixel from the game
yeah, loving it
like a lead up to the reveal
From Battlefield?
Today: the distorted video clips

pls tease some of the music next Battlefield
I was shitting on the PR team a while ago for their vagueness but now I must say they are doing a good job hyping up the game
It definitely has a distorted electric vibe
I’m expecting a more warped version of 3 or 4
For the main theme
Bf3 soundtrack main theme
Yeah
That would make sense if this is near future as many believe
But then again
id even just want a "DUN DUN DUNNNN DUN DUN DUNNN" little music tease (just the BF beat)
They are probably going along with the main idea to garner support for their “leak”
If they don’t call this game battlefield 6
We riot
Unless they go to bad company 3
I’m pretty sure it’s been confirmed to just be called “battlefield”
Which I have nothing against

They can’t make this game battlefield only
Because what’s the next game
Going to be
It’s because they are doing a soft reset
Battlefield 1
my guess would be either "Battlefield", "Battlefield 2042", or "Battlefield 2143"
Battlefield hero’s 3
2042 sounds very likely
The videos shown today show a at least somewhat modern setting
So I’m betting on near 2030s
Or around
Wait what
i would be into 2042, it just has that ring to it and relates to previous installments while also making sense time wise
Yeah
where can I find video
Jack made one about them today
It’s only 4 minutes long
Fast watch
plus BF2042 is better than just BF - just battlefield could be confusing when searching stuff up about the game
oh
EXACTLY
Yeah, thats why I was hesitant to believe it would just be called "battlefield"
CoD Modern Warfare worked because people called it MW19 (for 2019, when it was released)
and i dont want this Battlefield to be called BF2021
when it technically has another setting yknow
Yeah
its definitely plausible but yeah
BF2021 is just a blanket term to refer to this year's release while we don't know the official name
I still think it’s battlefield
Guess we'll find out in....
As that’s the only title we’ve gotten
!when
^that long
As long as it's modern, I'm happy
yeah and im quite optimistic about the modern + near future twist
quite a lot of potential
Robot dogs
I’m worried they will end up makin a futuristic game but with 3 and 4’s aesthetics
!when
!when
!when
Oh snap 1 minute passed!
!when
It’s a reality atm
!when












