#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 1704 of 1
Neat
Yeah when Fortnite took off they axed both Paragon and UT4 permanently.
At least they gave Paragon to another dev team which they now call it "Predecessor"
UT however is treated like a fucking prized slave and EPIC wont give it to anyone. No licensing or anything.
And thanks to their engine, Unreal Engine. They now have zero reason to make games again.
Unlike Valve I actually wish EPIC goes under.
I need to start using the railgun again when I’m playing solo
Did they even play test that
Everyone having launchers was a disaster right? Who thought that was a good idea
They did release Unreal Gold and Unreal Tournament for free last month.
They need to just give the IP back to DE.
Just gave the owners of the website OldUnreal permission to host installers for both games on the website, comes with all the OldUnreal patches to make them playable on modern PC's.
So, that's cool at least.
Also if its from GOG: I expect nothing less from GOG. Theyre good people.
But i'm pretty sure you cant buy any Unreal or UT on any other store.
Hell you CANNOT buy Unreal Championship on Xbox.
And yeah i'm not going to have any hope that EPIC is finally turning a new leaf with that. Ive genuinely lost all my faith in that company
they should add omni movement to battlefield
God dammit EA DICE place me in a TDM where the match isn't almost over
Its like the most useless feature in any game ive seen and its basically just saying "We want an Arena shooter but the kids dont know it yet"
Jeez - first they remove persistent TDM then they bork the spawns.
you are wrong
About it being a useless feature?
I don't think omnimovement is a bad idea. Sprinting in any direction can be fun and interesting.
Though lacking the ability to bhop limits possibilities.
and also jumpshotting sucks on KBM.
CoD is not even the first game to have the ability to sprint in any direction, Half Life 2 works like that.
When it comes to a game like Battlefield? I don't think it'd be a good idea.
And yeah Half Life did it and thats fine.
Maybe side strafing I can see it being helpful or good. But backwards? Eeeeh.
I'd just rather not tbh.
Especially if we add sliding to the mix. Because if we can move one way and quickly do a slide another way then i'm just gonna start shotgunning.
BF4 had airstrafing.
Which I cant complain about considering the speed you naturally go
And also because i like my old school mechanics.
I think BF4 was basically peak when it came to infantry movement.
Sliding was not technically a mechanic, but you could still slide across the floor if you landed from a jump while not holding any movement keys.
I thought that was just done by sprint into prone? Because you DO some sort of slide like that
you're probably thinking of like, going straight to prone next to a wall or something.
Which is not what i'm talking about.
And yeah BF4 is pretty much how I picture Battlefield being forever in terms of movement.
Sliding in 5 was fucking silly and then they nerfed it in 42 and it became almost fucking unused.
And yeah maybe. I just know theres this weird fucky "slide" you can do
BF1 was the start of sliding being a mechanic. It was good. And then they nerfed it so hard it's basically useless.
well now you know
there was
there technically still is but there's no point to ever using it.
I know in 5 you can slide into a jump which is.. Stupid. I dont like that game 🤭
I mean, I don't think BFV was bad in terms of movement.
It was bad in terms of gunplay and other changes to mechanics that nobody asked for.
Nobody wanted Attrition.
It did have fluid movement. I'll give it that. It was actually 10x better than CoDs.
Nobody wanted Spread to Recoil Conversion.
I did like the changes they did to LMGs. The one game where i'm actually accepting that I died to a LMG is when you cant fucking ADS them without bipods.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I never really had a problem with LMG's
realistically they were slower AR's.
My issue with them is that console is riddled with them.
You lose gunfights simply because they output more damage faster with less effort.
On PC i'm sure I could just beam a guy on the ground ezpz but on console you have to fight the aim assist, recoil, flinch.
Assuming your shots even register because the hitbox is so fucked and 90% of a player is gone.
I hate LMGs. And I hate Prone.
I also hate prone, i think DICE was based in Bad Company 2 for not having it.
oh i don't play console so i wouldn't know
Yeah i'm cursed with not being able to play the objectively better platform so I got actual Dads to contend with and jesus christ.
They're fucking everywhere too.
yeah at that point i'd just give up and not play battlefield on console
I could literally be strolling around and theres one in a bush 200m away sniping me better than the guy with the M98 or SRR1
Funnily enough ive only ever played Battlefield on console 😭
BF3 is when I started. I wasn't even in highschool yet so I kinda just dicked around more than I do now.
Like recon with soflam and STAFF shells or whatever on Caspian.
So many jets rammed me.
I remember liking BF3 at some point.
I don't like it that much anymore.
It has not aged well at all.
I played it not too long ago with the 360 version and the ximmers.. Jesus christ the ximmers.
Literally just instant 90 degree turns everywhere and beaming people.
Like I used to run high sens but to be able to accurately beam people needs so many micro adjustments on your end its basically just handicapping yourself
Also the second I found out ALL of my guns I owned including the black camo was gone despite me owning them I decided to immediately uninstall.
That and no one played on the DLC maps.
- Please don't call me sir
- No.
I uninstalled 2042 because last gen version is dead and filled with ximmers so no thanks
No.
Why?😂
not shooters anymore
Ravenfield
Ah
with all due respect you need to chill, you've @'d like 5 different people with that same message.
Me, Alt, vfc, clef, and icedemonslayer.
not much, been stuck into atlyss since that's the one fun game release that's happened all year
You play ghost on 2 machines at once? Impressive
It you havent tried it yet but Risk of Rain is reasonably fun.
Assuming you like pain.
I donno why but I thought your profile picture was the demon core
Anything besides Royales and Single Life ones.
Unless its a Rogue Like which Rogue likes are actually fun.
because i like wolves.
I’m not even sure what that is
i think wolves are cool
Clan Wolf would approve
Am I bad for not knowing what that is
I don't care
not really
Its okay its kinda obscure knowledge and it became an even more obscure meme
Wait what lol
Wheres my kinder egg demon core picture..
The hamster could be made out of it we don’t know
The angry ball is 100% a demon core
why are you telling me this.
Ghost mode for this lil guy is demon mode
why.
‘I can’t say on here’ - proceeds to say what happened

S22 is almost at a T1
Why would you think I wanna know this?

Thats dasher’s signature line!
@gilded goblet Control your fucking guy, dude.
You coulda T1'd the 12m in a week when redacted 24/7 was out
Its how I T1'd the VHX. If I didnt save it for last I straight up could have done it in less than 24 hours 😭
Is there any way to play other Servers on console ?
Alright so the 12M is actually really congruent to my playstyle
no it's just that guy being a weirdo for no reason
Lol wtf
What's the best engi for anti armor? Using Lis or the extra rocket ammo guy?
They joined the server today and I can only safely assume the second they got their roles they went on an at spree.
Crawford because RPG and AV nades > Lis in short term vehicle hunting.
lis is really only good at killing aircraft unless you have multiple lis players
Lis is best in groups or when finishing off vehicles.
Yeah Crawfords easily the besf AV engineer. You just cannot ignore a crawford lobbing RPGs at you.
i always used mackay to kill tanks but i think assault got nerfed a tad
Yeah they lost 1 C5 brick
and the scar no longer has 3 ap nades
Which its.. Not what I woulda done but it did the trick.
Wait
Rpg better than the recoiless rifle, for anti armor?
Yeah it does more damage.
Huh wow, is there a catch
It has one less rocket than M5 has more drop but it hits like a fucking truck.
Otherwise why would anyone roll the recoiless
you can reliably 3 shot tanks with rpg, the other one does less damage but you can hold an extra one
Ahh
its not really well balanced imo you should always run rpg for anti tank
M5 has little to no drop, has a sight that accurately tells you where the missile will drop and it has more rockets.
Weird, ty for the advice
They both can lock on to marked targets btw.
Dont ask me why or how a RPG can lock on but uh. Yeah.
they didnt want to even add rpg but caved after the community memed on them for having it in a trailer
future technology
Its straight up just a RPG from the Gulf War 😭
future warhead that looks exactly like the old ones 🤔
I never knew the m5 was just borderline inferior in every way
future technology, the lock on tech is in the rockets
don't ask how that was able to be produced in a world ravaged by climate change
What type of fucking NOD Rocket squad nonsense is that 😭
actually don't ask how anything in 2042 was able to be produced
i don't think DICE actually thought about any of that.
You reminded me just how uninteresting the lore is in 2042
When it comes to Nordvik stuff i can understand
Yeah, you're welcome
I think about the failed potential in that concept constantly.
missiles having connectivity with other targeting systems isnt even future warfare
I think DICE stopped thinking around Season 3 when it comes to the lore
Like
but i dont know of any rpg that does that right now lol
I was gonna say i dont know a single rocket that can lock on by itself
I aint a military woman 😭
I remember before 2042 came out when people were finding out that the game was gonna be set in the future and it was gonna be like "Oh, climate change is devastating the world and a lot of people are being forced out of their homes and that's why the No-Pats exist", I swear to god I saw an article about how climate change being a thing is just a setting detail it's not political at all.
Not that I think they were planning to actually make any sort of point, even if it would be interesting if they did
Wasn't that how BF2142 existed?
As we watch as the Toronto area becomes summer hot in the middle of winter another year in a row and watch as Carbon Sinks fail because lo and fucking behold we are cutting down trees aka our natural carbon sinks.
theres some vague things that happen that cause an ice age yes
but 2042 has magic technology that fixes things so idk anymore
I don't know, i never played 2142.
Yeah 2142 is basically just "Ice age 2 Not so Electric boogaloo" so everyone started moving south.
I.e Africa, Australia and Brazil all became the new homes for EVERY human.
Its pretty much why we only ever saw Siberian Wasteland #300 and Africa for the map selection.
In 2042 its a different story thats kinda done poorly. For many reasons.
the "end" of 2042 doesnt have the world headed toward an ice age so its a bit odd
The end of 2042 is basically a reimagining of the Coalition start since the Last Stand DLC is retconned/not canon
The Eurasian Coalition or whatever it was called I forgot.
Would be more interesting if it wasn't.
everyone gets to live together in africa and climate change is fixed due to tech
but then again there are like 17 other things that would make 2042's setting more interesting.
ah yes, technology fixing climate change.
its pretty much a hilarious fantasy
every techbros fantasy.
I figured they would have made the Ice Age a "America did it" thing like they hinted at with most of 2042's shit.
Expecting a lot there, that would mean they'd believe in something and take some kinda stance.
I mean it was bad timing if anything
yeah there was the very brave "america general gone rogue" story but they werent gonna go anywhere serious with it
Yeah.
nevermind cod4 did it ages ago much better lol
oh yes, it's always some random general that went rogue
also MW2, not CoD4.
Like I said, bad timing. I enjoy the idea of "America gone evil" because really, 2042 is straight up that.
But with thr Ukraine war i guess they didnt want to push it past subtle hints because yknow.. Anything that makes Russia look good is going to get you alot of hate.
And I DO NOT blame DICE for it.
how would that make russia look good
taking any stance at all during an active war is just a thing i dont see them doing
bad luck for them having their game involve those parties 
Because Russia in 2042 is actively defending what is essentially humanitiarian things and actively wants to protect its people.
They even destroyed a super weapon America made that CAN fuck people over.
And also they werent the ones experimenting on non US Citizens
People will take that as Glazing Russia. Because people are stupid.
I see.
At least thats how I see it.
I feel like commenting on the military's effects on climate change would've been an interesting thing to do, especially since the US Military are one of the largest contributors to that.
its a drop in the bucket compared to regular industry
It would have but again given that the game released around the Ukraine war it just seems like a bad taste thing to do
I think
I'd like to see a source on that, I am pretty sure that's not entirely true.
Also yeah considering America actively spends hundreds if not millions on munitions and actively test fires them for training or drills.. Their impact on climate change must be fucking high.
Like, I know regular industry is a significant contributor, but to act like the Military is a drop in the bucket compared to that seems unlikely to me, especially considering the amount of money that gets put into the Military Industrial Complex.
Hey guys are we ever getting 128p conquest back?
No.
The only recent thing I can see being okay for the environment are.. Funnily enough: Drones.
As theyre 3D printing those.
Shit
well that military industrial complex? our other industries make it seem tiny
And the only thing thats going to harm are the stupid bastards who have to breathe in the Resin fumes.
what'd you think i was talking about when i mentioned the military
also that's still not a source
you can look up details yourself i am not google
you're the one making the claim!
our economy isnt reliant on our military spending/military industrial complex
this is so annoying we lost 128p
with how much we spend on it you'd think it is.
Lowkey even less reason to reinstall 2042 if i get a Series X now if 128 is actually gone lmao
ik they better add it back the game was coming back with all these sales
the global stability is an investment that pays dividends economically
The maps are way too big to not have 128. This is just the same old problem with the franchise its had since forever
For real
10/10 would pet
I can already smell it
I want wolf
I'm not a dog person. If its not a big stupid lizard I dont want it.
Unless its a really small dog that just yaps. Those are fine.
Did they add a punish to the squad for dying all at once... in a TDM?
i think thats just an overall 2042 "feature"
That wasn't a thing until recently
Oh hey look at that I can Pre Load Delta Force on Steam
Some days, I wish submachine guns were nerfed into oblivion.
Of course, the reporting of military emissions is only optional, likely because the US asked for it to stay that way.
My continued patronage of BF2042 is really coming to a head if updates get released that make the game experience worse to deal with each time I bother loading up a match.
so these numbers could be off because I quickly looked them up but total emissions in USA in 2022 seem to be 6,343.2 Million Metric Tons of CO₂, and the military was only 48 million tonnes
residential and transportation produce like half of that
in war time it would go up though
Where are you getting that information from?
the EPA
actually that was for the first number, let me get a proper source for the military
Hello
I just had a game session that left me seriously questioning if it's worth even bothering playing the game at this point.
rip
I wanted to keep going until I got a T1 for all the guns... but that's probably not going to happen if I keep getting one-sided matches be they favor or disfavor me, nor will it happen if I wind up getting totally outclassed using the 12M auto somehow...
I would've been safe to assume that the 12M is basically easy kills... but then after one 40 kill match I have matches where I get my ass handed to me sideways and barely achieve 1 KDR
Like, this is the gun I have to get 801 kills to T1 with it, and every match is apparently going to be a total slog. Not exactly confidence inspiring.
@fervent rose unfortunately i did not think to copy that long spiel somewhere else, I did not think it'd get removed. So, uh.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
its cool I read it
On the other hand, once I T1 the 12M, that'll be the last shotgun I ever have to use
it would definitely change in wartime though
That and the SCZ-3 are the CQB guns I have to T1 yet
Its a bad game,quit
it's not
but that pre load delta force button tho
Maybe I should quit tbh
if you still find it fun go for it but the game is dreadfully boring to me at this point
is the SPH launcher any good nowadays?
SPH is the most overpowered gadget in the game, bar none
original sph with 2 ammo per reload was nuts
yeah I heard it got nerfed hard
which is why I was curious if it's worth using still
it was the most broken zone denial gadget ive maybe ever seen in bf
but now its relatively balanced i guess
If you want cheap kills, it is definitely worth using
ya its still an op noob tube
is it better at killing than using a gun tho
older ones had much lower velocity
since I know he grenade launchers just suck
yep
scar with 9 nades was disgusting pre-nerf
now they're slow velocity and you get 3
the HE will still kill people but its good that underbarrel gl isnt a free kill gadget
burning dozers with 40m incen was also highly enjoyable, having 3 per spawn was so nice
yeah I'm not surprised it's nerfed lol
it's just mostly shite compared to other options now
it's one of those things that's either awful to deal with or just useless
I need help, I’m semi new to battle field I played it very casually for a few months but what is the key bind for opening that little menu in game to change ammunition, scope etc. cheers
Try holding T,
Thanks
Info from a picture during the beta so hopefully it hasn't changed. (I'm console)
No it’s the same
Thanks
I'm sure posting that in every channel will help
im in vc 1 if anyone wanna join
is there like a certain game mode that i can use jets?
Yo
Every conquest map except stadium, haven, redacted, and reclaimed have jets
And maybe discarded in 64 conquest. Haven't played that in a while
If you want to just fly to get a handle on controls, you can always just kill bots in solo/co-op conquest as well
thankyou!
Update #8.3.0 for #Battlefield2042 is now out across all platforms,
You may need to reload the game to pick up the latest update if you have already been playing and are yet to receive it.
Thanks for your patience during the rollout!
I love updates

The hell was the update about
Hey noobs
Hi katto
No cuz i got excited about updating my game to see anything special but for nothing:c
don't be expecting "content updates" for 2042, if that's what you're thinking
None of their links ever work
Kattos
is the holiday protocol update today
There will be some minor content in future. In the form of new vault weapons and vehicles. But that's about it.
No new maps, unless they make some more night ops versions.
My bad kattos
No problem sug
Eh?
oh i c, i had high expectations
The one on the bf comms twitter page goes to a ‘page not supported’ error. Been doing that for the last few patches
Had to manually search them myself to find them
It should expand into an article 
https://x.com/BattlefieldComm/status/1862512465017208851
Let us know if it isnt!
Unable to post images but the posts just have a link, x.com/i/article something or other, which when pressing has the page not supported thing
Tbh though it could be on my end as I’ve not updated Twitter in eons
But I wouldn’t have thought that would stop a simple link from working
Yeah, there's a high chance we'll be altering the relay bot with something else at some point. X is becoming quite... the thing.
Certainly something
This page is not supported.
Please visit the author’s profile on the latest version of X to view this content.
Even when in the web browser version for some reason
I couldn't use the ammo station on the BF Portal. Is that an error?
We're switching it live like, riiiight now! 🙂
thank you! I've been looking forward to this feature for three years!
Yeah team switch would have been so handy when I first set up a dogfighting server
32gb small update :(
Today we have made some additional changes on #Battlefield2042 outside of the Update Notes;
▫️Battle of Bulge - Breakthrough Variant
▫️El Alamein - Breakthrough Variant
▫️Airfield - El Alamein - New Conquest Variant
▪️BSV-M Portal Block 'InventoryPrimaryWeapons' temporarily disabled pending a future update.
🟢 You are now able to select the ability to Team Switch within Battlefield Portal Custom Experiences.
🟢 You are now able to have Ammo Box Stations on Custom Conquest, TDM, and FFA experiences.
n0fps
very n0
Is there no double progression for ribbons this week in a specific game mode?
Has it been confirmed ?
any gangsters in chat?
I hit a store when I was 14 but that's it I think
I'm with the discord mafia

hey guys, i own a gang
No
Vehicles yes. The weapons part is an educated guess based on balance changes in the past.
i have a gun and i got 60 kills and now i should get a attachment but i didnt can someone tell me how to fix it?
Get the next mastery, they will probably show up. IF they dont, open a ticket on the support forums
Anyone know where someone can reach developers if they experiancing issues with the game?
2042 is issue free bud
We are free from the tyranny of Dozer mains.
Finally a reason to put my AP rounds on my third slot again.
I think its mostly a meaningless change for AR because of low bullet amount (Not even enough to get dozer to 50% HP), and on LMGs where it would actually be useful...it takes too long to change belts for it to matter 90% of the time
Id prefer Dozer be able to shield bash 40% faster, but their bash do 90 damage, instead of 100.
The most annoying part of dozer is getting one hit due to dodgy hit detection
One hit melee is really annoying, especially when a dozer player also is largley protected from damage from the front
I mean that SMG bullets don't have armor-piercing options to bypass Dozer's shield update.
Was this always on Portal?
Im guessing its related to the visual colors of friend and foe we had in the last event, but it has 3 undefined options
I like how stealthy this skin is.
how often do bundle sale occur
Not all that often in my experience. they are on sale ATM due to the black friday/cyber monday timed sales
mm alr alr
Just came back to 2042 , I haven’t played this game a ton since about 2021 , I prefer BfV . Anyways I legit can’t find a game , it just loads me in solo lobby’s , is the game just dead or am I doing something wrong?
Make sure cross play is enabled in general settings. Apparently it has been defaulted to off, which results in never finding games.
Okay , thank you
Let me know if it was set to off, as it wasn't the case for me. Would be good to know if this was the cause for you tho.
@vital quail you again
anyone else not getting on the new get ribbons get rewards? im playing the playlist global conflict, three seperate matches now but no progress
?
i feel like the grappling hook in this game is prety subpar ngl
like its range just feels
very limited
it was nerfed once or twice
ineffective and failing to address the actual issue of free verticality
Lol, you messed up the game and especially Dozer in the latest patch. Was it ment to reduce his movement and the patch note was wrong or was it a potato behind the coding messing up the values 
Are you a dozer main or something bud?
whyyyyyyy
i love vertical mobility
the cooldown was plenty

Not at all. Are you an Anti-Dozer or one of the players who gets scared by him or something, bud
noone else experiencing not getting any ribbons on the global conflict rewards??
Why did you delete your message and ping me again?
whats the yap about
You seems a bit speeded. Calm down and contact me in private if you like to discuss my personal being
No you started this conversation in public no need to get private
You don't ping people then delete your message right away expecting me to continue it's very immature kid
And i'll stop the conversation - so let's finish it there 😉
I really don't know what his is on, i just wanna shout out that you mixed things up in the patch. Either the patch note was wrong or the adjustment of Dozer went wrong. That's it!
I will get it investigated, thank you.
And again a reminder for us all to be a bit mature and be cordial to one another - things don't work any other way.
What's the issue? If you don't explain it, it's difficult to even know what it is, or of it is an issue
Roger that 🫡
Hasn't there been a movement speed penalty for Dozer for awhile now?
When he has the shield out
Update notes should definitely be accurate, its on our team to write them :))
If you talk to me, yhe patch note said decreasing shield draw time with 80% In reality the drawtime increased massive and the movement in general is very slow with the shield drawn
Ah, okay. So in that sense it's correct - decrease as in slowed down. That's a matter of verbiage and i'll note it for the future 🙂
The wording just makes it confusing to me
That's what I expected it to be tbh. Same with most of us here. They are getting nerfed so you can't take the shield out in the middle of a fire fight to win where previously losing.
Maybe showing time to deploy values could clear this up for cases in the future.
I think when it's in reference to speed, decrease and increase of such speed applies - but again, we'll work on that for clarity.
80% is also quite high in 1 change imo
they cripled my beloved dozer ç_ç

6000... shield... bashes...
Honestly Crawford needs a buff... he DEFINITELY needs 2 more rockets in his passive... /s
Hi, thank you for your feedback. This is noted and will be sent through to the team, keep it coming. 🤖
Make it 5 more
Dudes just gonna be a walking bag of fireworks
The field upgrades in bf4 did have a max of 7... so...
Game looks less buggy now
As a balance to this, just make the rockets appear on his back so whenever he gets shot there he instantly explodes like in in the Just Cause games or something
Depends on the values. It was 0.8 seconds before. An 80% increase only make it take 1.35 seconds to deploy. Considering it's defensive capabilities, it makes sense for use of the gadget to be a proactive, rather than a reactive tool. Hence the change.
Before it was too fast and reactive. Too easy to equip in the middle of a fight and gain an instant advantage in a 1v1.
Sometimes they do have to move out from those corners and hallways.
An 80% increase on a value like 4 seconds would be too much, but at lower time values under a second, it's not a big increase, time wise.

I know a player who spawns and take it out immediately haha
i think this dozer change is funny
The dozer change will only punish quick swappers which is good.
And over reliance on the shield. If used for team play you should be fine. Maybe you'll get pricked by the weirdos.
Let Dozer slap on their own C5 to their shields to balance it.

It was amazing
Give Casper’s drone EMP again. It feels pretty useless without it.
I didn't know cause well... yeah.
Let Dozer strap a claymore on his shield.
Spotting is busted but they should have just cut out its vehicle interaction out for emp.
Let him also throw it like captian America because why not
I once original EMPed a tank 8 times in a row. It was magical.
There's a mode that allows you to do that 😅
As well as instant reload RPG's 
EMP that destroys gadgets, but only let it target placed gadgets like spawn beacons, spotting stations and blasco disruptors
an anti-recon recon
That’s 99% of what I used the EMP for: destroying spawn beacons.
Yeah, it could also lock vehicles and aircraft, but they didnt have a special tone. So people thought they were being locked on for rockets
I’ll even take the drone having the ability to shoot a vehicle dart close range than have nothing.

Honestly, I kinda wish the dart pistol was a recon only secondary, and not a gadget.
now with the slower shield, is harder to throw knife when they turn around to escape
Doesn’t the dart expire after awhile or death?
Ive only used it a handful of times TBH, so im not sure. I know using flare on a vehicle removes it
That’s lame considering the pistol only has like 1 dart per life.
I've always wanted to dart an unsuspecting recon and have someone shoot a javelin at them
You mean dart a friendly Casper drone and then get close enough to an enemy to get splash damage from a naval in?
I think in a game where weapons are class locked totally, they would be able to make the dart pistoll a secondary for recons. I just think recons are a bit underpower when having to choose one tool over another, compared to other classes and their gadgets.
*javalin
Boris is still the worst specialist by far tho haha
I've assumed that because the lock on symbol shows up even if you miss a vehicle, you can still lock onto the dart
So you just shoot near an enemy and then lock onto the spot with a javelin
Id also revert the change made to only show lock ons when you have a launcher equipped. that was a bad change for team play
Literally no one knows when things are designated these days
Assume a stinger would also work which would be just as funny
Shoot a dart down a hallway on redacted and have a javelin/stinger lock onto it...
Make it so the dart pistol has an infinite laser with super high projectile speed if they want flares to make it useless. And increase its ammo count to 3 at least.
Did you see that apparently 2042 will receive some useful news? I was just on YouTube watching a video of a guy explaining the new update that arrived And there was a moment in the video where he said that now when you are on a plane with other allies and the pilot abandons the plane you will receive a message asking if you want to take over piloting Because sometimes when the guy abandons piloting And sometimes you only realize this when you notice that the plane is falling
That way it has at least one chance to take down a vehicle.
They brought back conquest lfggg
Oh nice, so they actually added the new Conquest layout for El Alamein as a totally different map.
the older version is great for tank and air superiority, so thats pretty good news.
Next up, we need a Portal modifier for "Tickets removed on Sector Capture". with the option to set it to 0. That would largely fix Conquest scoring for me in 2042.
Dude I still don't understand where's the BT val and Caspian border that'd work so damn well.
It says "Shield Deploy time has been lowered by 80%". For me that means that the time to deploy is shorten by 80%.
It means the opposite, so glad thats cleared up 😄
Guys i was wondering how to unlock crawford? I bought a bundle for it but idk how to get it
There should be info on how to unlock on the classes/specialist section
Oh alright
Or if you type this same question into a search engine, it will probably tell you how
I dont know off hand
i searched it on google and it showed me if you hover on crawford it works but it doesnt
Google shows "Repair 500 vehicle damage" and "inflict 2000 damage with vehicles" as the assignments to unlock them
I just found out how to do it by checking the specialists tab thank you by the way
I unlocked them during the season they were added, so ive never seen exactly where it appears haha
Ah fair lol i only started recently
August 2022...damn thats a while ago since they were added haha
Lol yeah
Trying the AP against dozer
Lower a time is to make it shorter.
With dedzig
Ntw with kill any dozer with a shield with a headshot
And it can go through the dozer and kill another dozer with a shield
If he was also hit with a headshot
Vehicles can't pen dozers shield lmao
Well except a small few
Crawford mini gun can pen it
close quarter is back. I guess they couldn't resist the pressure, nobody likes those stupid big maps. redacted is literally the only playable map in Battlefield
When Crawford was originally a support class but got moved to engi later?
If you look at the community calendar, these modes were scheduled to return this week for the past 2 months. so there was no pressure application based mode return.
https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-2042/community-calendar
Hey how come there’s no portal servers for BC2
On PC I can only see one server in the entire game that’s got players
Anyone on who wants to hop on a game?
Tips for mass control in a spot? Should I do sentries?
How big of a help to the team is spotting? Like using recon drone, soflam, spotter seat etc
Ok finished the testing with dedzig on dozer
Best gun to use against dozer is ntw
Only gun to one shot kill him from any range
Also there is no range where the AP doesn't pen
AP will always pen dozers shield
And it will go through multiple shields
Crawford can counter dozer with the minigun
I wanna get the guns you recieve from the elite upgrade dlc. How do I find their assignments?
Video of the testing from a different pov
I shot the ntw here
Dozers are cooked
Redacted ntw corridors is about to go crazy
Dozers are usually what holds/pushes up in that scenario
Headshots one shot and body does around 72
True, but you rarely see a player running the NTW, and Noone is gonna specifically run it just in the event of a dozer appearance
I do like one shooting people
It is a big indirect buff to the NTW tho.
Hey everyone! I'm a BF vet since day 01, however I've been out of Battlefield for a loong time. I played BF5 briefly when it came out but didn't like it. Just bought 2042 and BF5 again. Enjoying 2042. Just played one day.
I noticed no one uses comms, in game. Is this normal? What's a good server to find a decent squad?
#lfg-pc #lfg-crossplay to try and find people here
It is normal yes. (That no one uses comms, be it voice or text chat)
Such a fuss was made that this game didn't have voice chat at launch when I can count on both hands how often I've heard a player use it in BF3, 4, 1, V and 2042 😅
Optional proximity chat would be fun to see in a Battlefield game tho.
Gah. I miss the days of Bad Company 2....
Yeah, then you have random raging players occasionally.
99 percent of me chatting is telling the team to uninstall and pick up a coloring book
One player just typing paragraph Noone is reading haha
Casual fps game init.
to think that a thinking, capable homo sapiens behaves in this manner, makes me ponder life
i've seen this one round where my teammate and an enemy was sniping together literally 10 ft away
the whole game
I'm glad it's still like this tho. Cos the alternative is whatever COD has become. An unplayable mess of sweats
I guess I'll try and find some players here. Are ther any hardcore servers?
we never really knew how good we had it back then
hardcore servers are usually in portal, but most cases are empty
there's like 10000 percent dmg
servers named afghan milsim and shit
god, the money i would pay to play BC2 in its prime
because the bc2/1942/bf3 modes are horrible
with all its goofyness
I know right? I wish they would remake it ... Bad Company 3.
Modern dice would ruin it
I used to spend days in that game. What a perfectly balanced game it was.
So im hoping they never do
Well, it could work if there were a ranked mode. And it had a similar ranking system to something like overwatch. Your rank, and players you play with/against is determined on a 20 game basis. Every 20 ranked games you get a new rank, and group of players to compete against based on past performance.
Gauging performance is the tricky part in Battlefield.
yeah the EA response to new battlefield contained words like empower, diversity, innovate, elevate
so
i am not
expecting a gem
buzzwords dont make good games
well ofc they gotta elevate, they hitting the dirt rn
innovate? we literally all just want bf 3.5,4.5
and they still are lost
diversity....oh god
another subdance
we do want innovation, like new great maps
we just want iterative innovation
not stupid
yeah i want the game to do good
Well the only thing that mentioned diversity recently is in relation to the teams they have working on the next games.
I'm not against diversity in BF games either. I just think we should wait for the next game to judge it. Be that positively, or negatively.
but these guys fuck up even things that players like
they are the masters of self sabotage
i don't like people who get mad whenever the word "Diversity" comes up.
Just seems like a red flag to me.
If they didn't learn from 2042,they will never learn. It's my belief that they have tho. Based on changes made to this game post launch and info we have on the next.
DICE definition of diversity doesn't seem to be with anything related to the game in a positive way
i like diversity if it adds something, instead of it being just treated as "oh yeah, it's diverse ig"
I could give 2 shits about how diverse the next game is, as long as it's a good game.
^
I like diversity if it adds something
like what, exactly?
women in bfv didnt ruin the game but it was also sort of nonsensical given the setting. i really dont care at the end of the day tho i play the game for the gameplay
idk dude, how do i explain it. i just want a good game mechanics wise
diversity doesn't have anything to do with game mechanics though.
here's the thing. if the game is shit, then some of the personally unnecessary aspects like that, will look like a flaw
if they make a good game? it's just more flavor
that really is true
It wasn't nonsensical at all tbh. It's a fantasy game. The stupid part was how hard a stance on it they took. Like there are always going to be trolls and weirdos that critique you for having women in a WW2 game(which again, I am all for...I don't care as long as the game is fun/giod). But IMO they should have just ignored them and avoided unnecessary drama.
if a game is shit, that doesn't mean the diversity is part of the reason why it's shit. It genuinely has no impact on the actual quality of the game.
I just don't understand the whole "I like diversity if it adds something" bit
it doesn't make much sense at all.
It kinda does
Simple as that
i probably misworded and made it sound worse
i mean you kind of just made a nonsensical statement
No matter how you word it this dude will make you sound like the most racist person ever
but i just want them to prioritze the game mechanics, before worrying about appealing to something
Exactly
Okay that's fair.
that sounds a lot better innit
why make a ww2 themed game if you're going to just ignore the history to put in some weird fantasy. just make a totally fictional game and it wont be nonsensical anymore, its really simple
Thats why bf5 and 2042 sucked,they were more focused on sending half assed messages instead of making a game
^ this would have also opened path for more creative directions
wolfenstein world theme
Not going to get i to this tbh. Cos it always ends the same way.
Same happened with saints row reboot
you know there's no good argument it's just a personal choice that they made
Trash game
i think it would have been cool for bfv to take a wolfenstein approach, and go full steampunk
YES
I talked about it so much a bioshock battlefield game would be so good
A steampunk battlefield sounds interesting
if bfv was alt history it would have been fucking dope
You saw what happened with hardline
Battlefield fans don't like change
hardline was underappreciated because "cops and robbers"
speaking of wolfenstein, you guys remember when people were mad about Wolfenstein 2 TNC before it came out
Whiney ass fans that only preorder crappy games
that was kind of weird.
and the balance team was terrible though lmao
TNC?
rpgs were completely op right
Still better gameplay than bf4
well.... that could be personal taste
Na, cos I'll say "plenty of women fought in ww2, and as Battlefield wants to capture a partial female audience and cater to them...avatar wise, including female soldiers is perfectly fine"
But you will just reply something along the lines of "Not many women fought, blah blah, they should make it men only as they were dominate forces in that era"
Wonder what gecc local dozer main will think about the dozer nerf. Haven't seen him in months
Just go with the ntw
or
It'll one shot them to the head
just slide to the side and blast their nuts off
Or Crawford
Dozer isn't enough of an issue for me to care this much, or to learn and get good with one specific weapon
I think the Dozer nerf is very funny.
Did ye test AP underbarrels?
I still find it hard to justify why he was put in the game at all.
I rarely run into them anyways
What would be really funny is they put the AP change to Irish shield
Checkbox specialist.
Like if you are trying to design X amount of them to fit a game. A big guy with a shield is very marketable. Soldiers like that appeal to many players.
"the grunt" always gets picks
mostly appealing to people that can't shoot people but wanna feel like they're doing something.
i just play dozer without shielding much for tier 1 rn
Would be fine if it was alternative history
isnt bf1 almost steampunkish
it feels that way at least
Or people who like to troll. I mostly don't like that their melee is a one hit kill. IMO it should be faster but a 2 hit.
its like a different style of ww1
well, the weaponry they use is definitely not historically accurate
not every troops were given mp18s
see, that alone would disqualify the concept for me. That and wallhack specialists.
Yes mainly because the guns they used irl were no where as much as bf1's
but, you can suspend your disbelief from its discourse of history, because the game provides immersion
If bf1 was 100% historically accurate with the guns then we'd be playing with 5 guns or something
and in slow trenches
Selective fantasy is fine, as long as it's not women in combat. /s
so yeah i feel bf1 is kind of steampunk
if bf1 was 100 percent accurate the maps would just be slow trenches and charging into rifle fire
ye
Keep nitpicking
we already got steampunk bf
yeah I wouldn't consider your argument very compelling as anybody with the data knows your position is hard to defend. However I will say that if the canceled Russian expansion included playable female characters that would have been really cool in a unique way. And anybody complaining about that would be a massive troll.
You're so itching to call someone an ist or a phobe its sad
Yes
Na, I'm not that type of person at all.
no reason to argue lads, we are all mature battlefield players
You'd know that if you spent any time here outside of troll posting
2042 was just inconfident with its setting
They wanted to be futuristic but they were too scared to do so
We need battlefield breaking bad edition
it's everywhere
more problems than just that lol
it's so bad
it's like they hired a 13 year old boy to make the plot
the setting and lore wouldve been solid
the 2042 "lore" is incomprehensible and then it all wraps up due to magic technology
Disagree, it's a game that simply was not ready to release. It needed at least another 12 months. The lore and story was relatively fine. Same with the era.
BF1's Russian expansion had female soldiers.
its one of the worst attempts at a background story ive ever seen in a videogame
In fact it was the first time women were playable in a Battlefield game.
Why do people pretend to care about lore in a multiplayer fps
bfv
oh
nvm
i don't actually care, i just like making fun of bad writing
But I think even with another 12 months, the game we would have gotten then would have been worse than what we got 12 months post launch. Player feedback and backlash was required to right the ship...or right it as much as it could be.
BF1 came out first, Johnny. :P
well because past battlefields had a decent campaign
the specialists was the real kiss of death
took away from the war feeling with that winners circle rip off, cringe voice lines, and shitty skins
is this cod or battlefield lol
it also has the worst feeling mouse input i've ever played
I think if we got what we had now at launch, with class locked weapons... A lot of players would have been fine with it.
I couldn't name a single character in the bf1 or bf5 campaigns
bf3?bf4?
thats not a glowing recommendation though, is it
doesnt seem very class oriented to me lol
I mean bf4 is easy as irish is still a relevant character
theyd have to rebuild the game for it
well bf4 was just a campaign with pac, hannah, irish, recker, yeah
if bf2042 releases in its current state, its still got one of the worst map lists if not the worst map list ever
I just hope they abondon this series of characters, the existing story and lore for the next game. Do a full reset, just call it "BATTLEFIELD"
bf3... can't rememer too much except dima
Because that is historically accurate,yes
no
Notice how its only the russian revolution the female characters are playable m
calling it battlefield alone has the implication that its the final game
and keeps it as the saem live service slop
that no one fucking wants
Yeah because they weren't exactly focused on one set of characters or story
Not at all. It just shows it's a reset, and is far more marketable that calling it Battlefield 6,or whatever
wdym, i can't wait for season pass to contain a cute anime girl so i can slide around with an mp5 with some 2d chick on it
name is irrelevant Battlefield, Battlefield 6, Bad Company 3, i dont care. make a game as good as bc2 or bf3, thats it
live service can be done well
please bring kitswitching back
almost never, the older battlefield style of paid dlc was much more quality
Bf3 was bad outside of urban maps
i mean yeah helldivers 2 but other games like DRG work great with live service models inputting tons of new content
live service includes usually that shitty skins, and poorly made free maps once a quarter type stuff
Big maps in bf3 were just warthunder with infantry
and a battle pass
Just feels like the right time to do a reset. New teams, new leadership, new management of the franchise.
this does not belong in BF
i dont think a bunch of DLC is gonna help
i would much rather pay season pass
think you completely misinterpreted what i meant
not a bunch of DLC but rather the same stuff we had for BC2-BF1
that creates responsibility for the devs to make content
call me old fasioned but i like my games to be a one time purchase yknow
BF3 vehicle gameplay was actually good back then and people liked the variety of having big vehicle maps
focusing on one thing only is the wrong move. gotta cater to everybody
same, i just want standard or premium edition
with respect this model has ruined modern gaming
i buy premium? i get extra content
because it always boils down to that shitty cod style
simple
you drop a fat five tenners on the standard edition and boom your done
no more money spent
johnny, i said the wrong thing
You mean from bf2?
i have had enough DLCitius from paradox games
i meant premium pass lol
BF3 placed the big open areas for vehicle combat in the middle of the maps, with infantry spaces around those areas in which you could fight/move between. While 2042 placed them in between every flag and hoped for the best.
it was in bfbc2, bf3,bf4, bf1.
idk if there were other titles but
the most smooth was bfbc2
You mean classes?
searching kitswitching streaks bfbc2
you pick up another person's gun, you change class
that feature was last seen in bf1
would show people getting multikills from picking up different kits
Like...ah yes, I'll just run across this open area with no cover while getting blasted by heli 30mm and bolt 30 and 50mm. Basically 2042 at launch
Understood
i really liked bfv non kit switching tbh
tbh i would love another far future battlefield like 2142
can we get battlefield on mars
it can be REALLY abused
for the funny
Sounds like bf3's open maps.
it wasnt ever really tho
i would spawn as medic, kill an assault
i played like 1k hours very few people bothered to change their gun
Did people forget about heli hovering in bf3 or are they just nit-picking now
Let them make a good BF game set on earth first haha
then pick up a sturm 1-5, or 1907
i want to fight on the moooooon
yeah a sturm1-5 on medic is so nice
while firing fast ttk weapons
da mooooon
honestly dice's best bet is to try and recreate BF3 again with BF1 graphics and movement
bf1 movement? gross
bf3 movement is genuinely still great and doesnt need to be downgraded into bf1 movement
"we have heard the community's opinions, and decided that the next battlefield will be BF 3042, with ass boosters and mana magic"
Bf1 running just felt slower is all
bf3/4 is a little clunky
no jump shots is a non starter
well they nerfed every aspect of movement in bf1
and looks stiff
bf1 movement is trash
You want bhopping?
enough of this ww2 stuff
battlefield: 1802
shit
i can live with it, but i'm also fine with BFV style where you slowdown after 1 jump
no jumpshots is awful fps design
brand new dlc weapon: british musket with a whopping 2 rpm
I think they should do something like,one battlefield release is modern and one battlefield release is either based on history or fiction
make bf portal good essentially
why not just make a master chief collection kinda game
roll all the previous games into one
add some QOL
and remaster and rebrush the graphics and visual design
if they could have done that, they would have already
it's too expensive
nothings too expensive for a AAA studio
i thought we already knew this
they've talked about how map remakes are not easy in the past, and that was over 5 years ago
didnt skull and bones cost like 200m dollars
it is 100% out of their budget to make a MCC style game
yep
A lot of battlefields design reminds me of a quote made by the terraria lead dev, about what kind of community you want to foster.
The context was that he wanted to add an electric chair to terraria.
Like oh what do you want to teach the players that's good.
i just think a battlefield collection would be neat
of course it would be
It would though battlefield is known for multiplayer and would fracture everyone.
Really hope they go bankrupt
i just dont think you understand how expensive it would be to remake all the old maps with high fidelity
I don't even have hopes for bf6,its gonna be shit
considering how dice hasnt been releasing a new game for 3 years i think they are working on something
or at the very least making sure their next game is not
poo poo
Wow hot take
Game development doesn't mean anything
dw, they'll blame that the engine is really hard to work with again
agree lol
if game developing was gonna be that simple, hell i'd have just hopped onto the industry with zero knowledge like the,
dice never fails to disappoint
if the 2042 mouse engine bug is in the next game...
Sick and tired of hearing their bullshit especially after the release of stalker 2,not perfect i know but its better than alot of games out there
i swear
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
i mean considering how EA jumped from 5 to 1 in like 2 years its certainly possible
The lot of devs know what they're doing its the higher ups that pushed for the shit unfortunately.
I CANT WAIT TO HAVE MOUSE THAT FEELS LIKE IM DRAGGING IT IN MY DOGS DROOL
yeah
cut back on the executive meddling
have a definite vision from the start to the end
and give it time in the oven
Yeah let's just state a game that hasn't been revealed yet, that had no images of it shown and that we aren't even sure what it's about, is shit
never let them cook after 2042
they could have fixed some bf1 mechanics and i would have still played it
tell them what to do
Well,5 to 42 was 3
So 2042 then
bf1 is visually stunning, but plays like complete dog nuts
idk i cant comprehend the numbering scheme for these games
I mean you're the dude who said GTAV and RDR2 was shit so I ain't even surprised with your bullshit
why did 1 come after 5 and why is there no 2
I know you're trying to be hopeful
But lets be realistic here
👍
It hasn't even been revealed yet WTF are you on about ?
we havent actually seen anything of the game and its too early to make judgements so lets wait for them to show off the damm thing?
2042 is a good reference to go by
Pretty sure the 1 is because its world war 1,and it's not a sequel to bf4- wait,still doesn't make sense.
yeah i mean everyone has very poor expectations, but
"Yeah this cake fucking tastes like shit, I mean I haven't eaten a single bit of it yet but it tastes like actual turd"
no reason to keep getting depressed about it really
this is such over dramatic drivel
theres tons of great games released every year
Wait has dice ever directly complain about frostbite? I know the anthem devs have but to memory not dice recently.
i mean if you exclusively play AAA games from EA and ubisoft i guess so
lol can you tell me any positive about modeern gaming
sure
I don't know if you know,but bf6 is being made by the same people that made 2042,same publishers too
i do not, im saying the big devs are shit
Baldur's Gate 3 is fucking amazing
Just play single player.
Elden Ring is amazing
the indie industry and the AA industry are booming right now
but the big devs run most of the games people play
there still a bunch of amazing AAA releases dropping
Single player games have definitely stayed strong.
yeah ill give you that
Sekiro is god's gift to action games
BF2042 is the worst shithole they could have ever dropped, trust me after a game like yhis they won't want to fuck up again
Tom Henderson and other devs said that with so many of previous bf developers leaving, a lot of the new employees had no idea how to work with the engine
people said this about bfv
sekiro is the best action game anyone has ever made and its modern
and fixing it to a workable process took them a year minimum
Mechwarrior, terraria, doom being great games you can mod even.
no more bf3 devs
BF2042 was made hy the same people who made previous BF as well lmao
modern doom is fucking metal
These games aren't exactly new.
they are awesome games
and vince zampella is meanwhile spouting pure nostalgia bait hopium
What kind of shifty argument is that ?
"le peak of the series was bf3/4"
no more game-passionate devs*
No it wasn't,tf?
2042's engine was a forceful upgrade by the previous higher ups before Vince came into play.
yeah the development was severely affected by the covid pandemic and the frostbite upgrade
it just feels like shit, you know. to see the games you love turn to dogshit
He's right though single player games are appreciated a lot
no, but you would never get the studio who invented an engine to (complain publicly) that their own thing is bad if so, though this conversation is a bit everywhere
Bf2042 completely different devs with same name
Yes it was
diablo, battlefield, cod...





