#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 1666 of 1
now i gotta find a new server to boost ngl ngl
why do i keep getting a pop up that looks like it comes out 2010 when i try to launch a battlefield game
asking me for my login
So that's why I win so many fights in hazard zone

Many of us boosters should be regulars anyway, but the old bot for adding regulars was useless
16,000 messages and counting for me, what more do you need to do to be considered a regular lol
im guessing there was a 3 hour period or something in the last few years where you didnt send a message
Understandable hehe
Its nice with a 2xp weekend when the servers are having major issues lol
2 of my friends had a game crash to desktop without any errors an hour ago
fun stuff
the last update messed something up
im just having connection issues, dropping games and just refuses to connect again
No. That was removed in v7.0 with the suppressor overhaul.
seems the servers died completely now.. good stuff
ah kk nvm
Only with heavy suppressors. Usually it just removes tracers and lowers detection distance on the map, with its effect being amplified with regular suppressors
Actually I’m not sure on the distance part without suppressors
So not with the wrapped suppressor?

no
They should buff the NTW 50 methinks it would be funny
some of these invisible walls piss me off
I clearly shot someone's head but it clipped on some boundary outside of the box he was very much exposed out of
what's the point of using Rao on enemy aircraft? I disable stuff but the pilots just shrug it off like it's insignificant
enemy tanks and light armor seem to be annoyed, but aircraft just don't really get anything worth messing up
i mean if the pilot is decent they're gonna know to not hang around an area if their shit's getting disabled.
it's still annoying because they can't really do anything and also it's really hard to determine where this is coming from.
funny thing: I disabled the same heli at least 3-4 times in a row while defending objectives in BT
I just don't know WHAT parts get disabled on those things
so because he just didn't try to avoid the area and kept sticking around, I thought Rao just didn't really do anything to it
i don't remember either
i don't play 2042, you'd have to ask someone that did.
because i don't like playing video games that don't have functional mouse input.
There just aren't any engineers trying to take out the disabled vehicle
Or there are boris players using javelins or something dumb
There is some kind of bug that disconnects you from the match when you switch squads
Has happened too many times to not just be a coincidence
Honestly
I get real pissed from this AA stuff
Can’t even fly a fucking UH-60 in Conquest without it getting shot down within 2 minutes
why does this game have to use 2 launchers and even after that , i just get the satellite cinematic without actually connecting to the server
why can t i use the desktop shortcut
why is the bf4 bug of sounds and graphics not loading in still in this game
hardline dind't have it
If you have the same bugs across games perhaps it's' time to look away from the games for a reason
To anyone still struggling to launch bf through steam and the other ea fixes haven’t worked; try clearing your steam cache in the settings and change your download region on steam, worked for me
what do you mean
the textures and sound taking a while to load after entering the match only happen in 4 and 2042
it never happened to me in 1 or hardline
So you might have an issue that only affects those 2 games.
Works fine in 4 and 2042 here.
still doesnt explain why i have to use 2 launchers
ubisoft is guilty of this too
why do they need an additional data tracker
You could turn it around. Just because you buy the game on Steam why does Steam need to run? Why can't the game just boot and only use the launcher that is used to handle the social aspects?
But other than that I agree, 2 launchers are annoying
you can boot games without steam
And just adds to any potential things that can go wrong
i think gog does that too
GOG doesn't lock its games down to the launcher, Steam does
yeh , that s a good thing about gog
why do games need launchers anyway
ive just remembered bf4's browser server menu
which wouldnt work on opera and some other browsers
Battlelog was brilliant and ahead of its time.
why
But should probably have come with its own browser instance too so people could have avoided some of the bugs that appeared.
wasn't it just a server browser
Platoon management, forum, social feed, weapon and loadout config etc. etc.
Also added the option for the in-game map so you could have it on a secondary monitor.
Overall just brilliant for multimonitor setups.
given it worked
Never had big issues, but then we are back to it probably should have had it's own browser included.
do you have any expectations for the next bf game
given all the 'return to form' bs
I dare not expect anything 😄
I don't mind their gadgets, but should be more regular soldiers for my taste
the gadgets are alright
i wish the recon ones were more 'active'
the most interactive one is casper's drone when it's full of c4 lol
c5*
The anti-spotting gadget is pretty nifty
Flying drone was ok until they removed it's emp gadget
You could target vehicles and gadgets and zap them
Great for destroying spawnpoints and annoying camping tanks
yeh
my wishlist for the next bf goes like this
ditch the operators
1st person melee kills
the fortification mechanic and movement from bf5
more distraction
and expand the control gamemode
have more tanks but make them more fragile
so the game can go from infantry battles to mixed to vehicle vs vehicle , all while the map is destroyed but you can still rebuild
it s shocking how static the maps are in 2042
First they should work on gunplay that feels and sounds good with some recoil
Mostly cause if they ramped up destruction there’d be no cover at all
that s the point of the fortification mechanic
And I’d rather actually have some part of the map left to fight in
enter bf hardline
Yeah fortifications remedied that a bit and I liked that
I never played hardline
Hardline didn’t have destruction?
it had a milder levelution
it was amazing
Levolution is gimmick mostly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5l17nnVMp4 good stuff
How can people trash about 2042 destruction and say hardline was better when it didn’t have destruction
i feel 2042 has 0 destruction
I have like very few hours in 2042 and it has decent destruction
Hardline didn’t have any
it literally had
But than how 2042 has zero destruction
stuff like hotwire and blood money didnt need it
i never said that
People play 2042 with eyes closed?
Everytime I see an oil tanker in real life I feel the urge to do a battlefield hardline moment.
i am playing breakthrough on the swedish map
spearhead 
and apart from the walls of a few houses , the map is very static
I don’t know I hope it’s not the flattest map
Spearhead is pretty good.
The first map that actually felt like a map
It'd be nice if there was a game build around destruction. But thankfully it's not the basis for everything.
it s has a lot of terrain
For me it’s like a secondary priority.
but even so
in bf1 you d get plenty of holes to hide in
also , i dont like the melee killcam
I tbh hate all the 2042 maps
they are not all that bad
They look good tho
you said you have very few hours in 2042, did you even play all maps
Renewal still feels like such a travesty
huh
All of them
It just feels like a superflat with like 4 somewhat fun areas to fight in
Renewal.
Breakaway I find fun in weirdly.
It’s set in Middle East
It's not the best map in the game but it's probably one of the better ones on 128p with orbital.
Africa Harbour
i feel like most of the maps have a pretty cool theme but they play like ass
Issue initially was how they had to rush the game.
And the idea that the maps have to cater to everything.
They eventually broke that off starting with reclaimed.
It sucks how there are only a small handful of maps I actually enjoy, but I can’t play any of them consistently due to no map filter of any kind
Which I will say is one of the best maps in the game.
Unfortunately.
We know why
cod?
Sell those fancy animations
i ve never played any cod besides waw
they suck
the titan executions were awesome
bf1 had the best melee takedowns
I don’t necessarily mind third person ones, but they absolutely should not be forced if you melee in the back, and shouldn’t take 5 seconds to complete
Bf5s were the same but they had animations for people laying down on their backs.
Third person animations is cringe anyways.
feels more personal in 1st person 
Variety is cool and all but they broke a system that never needed fixing.
Let’s just be glad we don’t have counter knifing still lol
booo
yeh lol
he's a cod shill
that explains alot
we will never get a battlefield game with such as good presentation as bf1 
Bf1 was when dice got to enjoy a consistent vision.
And the folks behind it had to pitch it several times, shows they really wanted to try their hardest with it
i hope they reconsider the player models , i hated the circus that was bf5
Using bolt actions were fun in bf1
its the only battlefield 1 enjoyed can do banzai charge which is fun but when missed feels sad
Bf5 was fine with that.
johnny america fighting against the pahntom of the opera and his japanese waifu in greece
yeh , i wish back to basics was more popular
Battlefield 5 character models are highly detailed
still better than cod skins 
Not wrong there.
a few years ago , they game away the full game for like 3 euros or something
and half the team was johnny america
Yeah I bought it and played 5 hours
of course the enemy team couldnt do anything against the tom cruise cosplayers
5 maps are also boring
they are huge
lots of dead space
but the running mechanic , the fortification and the squad leader abilities were cool
I liked bf1 maps the most
Will admit the requisition points and call ins did a good job in pushing more squad play in my eyes
Only thing i disliked in bf1 is the automatic weapons feels so bad but bolt actions balanced that out for me
Yeah all you need is a Lewis
But it’s ok there is always a gun like that in every game
u can snipe whoever u wanted
yeh , for me rn in 2042 is the svk
2 shot dmr lol
As I said there is always a weapon like that in every fps
You got ak in csii
mp5 in mw19
the ak is balanced in cs2
because the ct's have the defender adavantage
and then it can be picked up by the enemy
That’s true
Insurgency sandstorm is a nice game I see people playing different weapons
Most of the weapons do the job in few bullets maybe that’s why
people playing different weapons? no way 
if u like insurgency , u should try out rising storm 2
I enjoy modern warfare that’s why I enjoyed modern warfare 2019 a lot
modern warfare as in actual warfare
or the game
the game
never played it
Like ww2, modern warfare and futuristic warfare
So I am choosing modern warfare that is close to present day
I hope I explained it well
ah i see
Hi guys, imma make this as simple as possible:
battlefield 2042 error code 1 8600 1s 66003S 1057125876O:0
Apparently my battlefield 2042 had received this error just on day one I download it, and all my other ea games (battlefield 5 and nfs heat) can't connect to their server either. I apologise if this is not the topic suitable for this channel, but I really need some help for this as I had already tried any convention ways I can think of but still can't get my games working
i not sure if this gonna help (since its all my games from ea origin cant connect to the server) but ye imma wait first
origin isn't supported anymore, it has been deprecated for over a year
huh? i didnt know that lmao
Hi. How can i connect to europa servers? Always i connect to middle east servers and no one players there
i got the game from xbox gamepass
There's middle east servers? lmao
yeah hasn't been supported for over a year my guy need to use ea play
I get kicked always after match started 😦
Is there any eta if it's working again?
so is it means that the original ea launcher no longer supported?
my games still unable to went online unfortunately, imma try to ask ea answer hq for further help
happy realization day, we exist.
fire
hated that change
Sigh. I fucking hate how the BSV, a dmr, can be modified to become an outright assault rifle while still retaining dmr power
Like that is such a stupid oversight
anyone else get that weird bug where the game sometimes spawns you as a different class than you wanted
like my previous life was engineer, I respawn, I come back as medic
its classification as a DMR is dumb if you ask me
Thought it was a bug too but accidentally pressed L2 that switches class
download the ea app and try to log in
i already tried that unfortunately
at this point my 1 hours and 17 minutes of gameplay in bf 2042 are purely seeing those bs error code lmao
I'm on keyboard
never plugged a controller in that computer ever
A few times I've chosen a class at the start of a match but went into the collection screen to look at something on a different specialist. Doing that switched you to that specialist without you intentionally choosing them in the usual screen
On the next respawn of course
I never went in collection either
okay what the fuck
W and C can change your class left and right
you legit
cant unbind them
it's nowhere in the settings
Why would you even unbind them
because I don't want to change classes in the spawn menu with the keyboard ?
I use C to open the map (which opens the scoreboard instead in the spawn menu)
but if I view scoreboard in the spawn menu it changes my class selection
I just use my mouse to do it
If you're in the spawn menu you're already looking at the map 
yes
I understand that they swap the "view map" key to view scoreboard
... though they could just make the key do nothing
however it SHOULD NOT change your character selection
I guess I'm the first person to notice it because I'm the only guy degenerate enough to bind C
and no one binds anything to Z (W on my french layout)
anything set to France is an L

still 100% success rate for getting made fun of the moment people find out I'm french
It kind of says something about Haven and Stadium that trying to spawn on a point under attack will drop you in basically on top of a completely different point
One that might very well be enemy
Dude i swear im getting 1 shotted by the PP29
That gun is on and off for me and only use it on 128p, rather stick with AM40
The bizon is so weird
In games in general
Sometimes it takes 9 shots to kill
Then it just 1 shots
The M5 is so mid tbh
csgo moment
mw3 moment
next BF only next gen?
probably
would make sense, but with a free to play battle royale i highly doubt
Don’t see why not they can make maps smaller for old gen
please no live service bullshit for next game
and we dont care about your lore and blog posts
hire programmers not interns to write up stuff
ah but look how popular live service games are! Ignore any and all evidence otherwise, they make tons of money so they must be loved. (do not look into who spends the majority of that money)
Trust bf1 and 5 had small story’s that’s better then nth
And to be honest battlefield can be better if they put there head down and done what they want and not follow everyone else
Loved firestorm but behind a paywall nah
think they succumb to the same issues many companies do and thats the decision makers being very out of touch with reality
as well as decision makers being people who simply havent been sacked (ie have been there a long time) instead of people who are actually good
Lore is a good way to keep tone and consistency across the game. There is also people who do like the lore 🙂
Building out lore and posting blogposts is not going to take away from other parts of the game, and hiring more isnt just magically going to fix things.
Bro NEEDS that early playtest invitation
Yeah god forbid DICE try to explain the conflicts they invent
Yeah i actually spent a lot of time reading the lore, it’s neat
It's like telling star wars not to have any lore in their next game
lore is the new bogeyman
Thats just it tho. I get your sentiment but based on what ive seen and experienced with 2042 it seems like it does take away from other parts of the game, and it further feeds their marketing war machine. Instead of focusing on actual game design, they appeal to those who like lore, use it for to get more sales, meaning they get there money for doing nothing, furthering their greed as they realise they can sell the game without even focusing on the game and make more money from doing less
I would rather they try to ground the lore to make sense
Star wars started off as "lore" basically, a cool story, that later got turned into a game.
Battlefield started off as a game, and now they are trying to fill in the gaps with lore
Don't matter how it started bud
Lore is factored in later, its gameplay first. This was mentioned in the Narrative Q&A a while back.
Any idea how to get permissions to post video links in the community creators section? I'm a creator in the community with clips.
This is objectively wrong, lore does not come before game design.
no but in the case of 2042 in came instead of it
instead of fixing things or improving the game, they released new lore posts to get people excited
The people writing the lore are different than those working on the actual game.
those poor unpaid interns
So you resort to saying this when you clearly aren’t familiar with how game studios operate.
…
Unpaid interns?

How do i get the green skin for the rm68, which makes my supressor squared?
With how things are going, I wouldn't be surprised if EA lays off a bunch of writers and just uses generative AI for writing lore in the future.
I still think we might even get AI generated maps. EA CEO seemed keen on using it.
That was a season 4 skin
When do you think the next bf game will be?
Eventually
I just had a fun round on valapariso or whatever the map is called
Game must be broken
Does anyone use DLDSR @ 1440p here?
wtf is DLDSR

i wonder which one 
All of them
anyone know how to fix the persistant data error
anybody else consistently getting their gpu killed with this recent update?
getting green screen after 30min of play
now the game wont even open, guess that problem fixed itself
bro knows what’s up. med crate too
mackay+casper might be cookin too
C5 casper’s still decent ig
feels slower than infantry tho
could try running the xb1 ver on it thru xbox app if you don’t mind sacrificing graphics
it’s def lower quality graphics, figured that one out through the tip of the spear dozer skin
normally you can clearly read the word espinoza on his chest
it’s blurry for the xb1 ver
played it 2 yrs ago, can confirm.
it also ran on like 30 fps unstable.
few lag spikes here and there
adding the med crate as the gadget like i said does work
I would never dare reenable that malware on my pc 
I did get it working again, had to reinstall anticheat and change some app settings to start as admin.
is there a way to always have the bipod deployed?>
I hate how getting revived makes it fold up
Must be something to do with spawn states
Because getting revived is essentially a concentrated respawn, mechanically.
There is fr something going on with squad leader not switching when they are inactive
do alot of people still play 2042?
yes, i do
i just wanna be sure before i decide to download it again
download and we can play
More than you can imagine, this is the best ever fps. All the other devs are jealous
Stopped playing.
Since there's no IRL players going on here.
U think it’s all Bots ?
algum br?
Yes
Certain times of the day it's hard to find a full lobby for certain modes
But that's at like 3am lol
lol i would never play at that time
report system is super broken, https://battlefieldtracker.com/bf2042/profile/origin/NFROZEEEEEEEEEEE/overview this guy low lvl with high k/d and 70% headshot of m5, still could play for 16 hrs
nice job !
? It says 5 hours
Ran it last night and at some point the conquest lobby’s were empty😭
😠
Still stuck with the "Please launch your game from your distribution platform" error.
None of the suggested fixes from all over the internet did help yet.
it's very buggy this week, repaired the game also didn't work
does someone wanna team up for a tank or heli squad? Im on PC, just dm me 😉
Team is aware of this and are working to get it resolved ASAP this week. Sorry for the frustation it's causing you!
im getting failed to connect to sservers but i have either net any options
joined a redacted game in progress and half way through i just started getting rubber banding issues 
so not sure being able to connect to a server is a good thing
Never heard of rubber banding issues at Redacted of all places
why would rubber banding be map specific?
after not playing 2042 for a month i lost no skill
honestly i think i played better than before
Isn't that long of a break
i went months 
and still managed to get podium finishes (playing support for ez score)
Smaller map = more player concentration in one area = more server strain = more potential issues (Including rubber banding)
If you put a 128P conquest or BT mode intro rotation, Maps like Redacted will have the most issues (As lots of us have seen with FNB modes in the past)
People don't remember how awful 128p BT was
Why wouldn't it be?
Actually think a lot of the squad order system got messed up in the update.. the 1 minute timer for defending doesn't show up and the current order doesn't show up on the left side of screen
You're right. There wasn't enough players
Should've been 256

yeah, definitely might have been screwed
just reinstalled and im still failing to connect to sevrers
ah right, i forgot 2042 split its maps into two sizes
because rubber banding is an issue caused by your connection to the server rather than by your PC's strain running the map
128 in general 💀
Beautifully executed #BattlefieldHighlights 🫡
Be sure to send us your epic gameplay moments from the #Battlefield for a chance to be featured next! 🏆
512*
on each side you mean
One question
nah, on each squad
Why does haven have like 5 different angles at the same time
i mean
There is always someone looking at you no matter what
But the visibility is beyond awful?
tad bit small
It reminds me alot of azhir cave from mw19
yeah
BF7 needs proper map design man
stop designing maps for the trailers and start designing them for gameplay
idk i don’t have this problem
i just get pelted by 9 recoilless M5s every time i get an air vehicle
Personally i get quickscoped by snipers every 25 seconds on haven
…from like 100 meters away
ig play like dozer, mackay, or irish
No bro the problem is that haven comes up 8/10 times
maybe sundance if you aren’t always getting hit with the recoilless m5’s like i am 😭
blud is talking about bf7 when we not even had bf6 yet

2042 is BF6
sob-8 blocks snipers, same with irish’s cover
BF being numbered is considered the military theme
At least
Set in modern time
I think....
can anyone help me with the game not launching? it says:
"Please launch the game from your distribution platform. If the issue persist, please repair your game and try again."
I am launching via steam?
click in play
Nothing better to play right now 
deve ser
Touch grass then
FPS Games suck
What’s that
Idk
@zealous loom your is br?
What do you mean
not all of us are waiting for bf7
I’m enjoying it

I am pretty sure 128v128 would work if maps had poi scattered around like that ac 130 trailer in bf3/bf4 or a levolution that halved the map so as so vehicles would have to go around the central point...
I think what i feel while playing the game is an emotion that resembles enjoyment, thats what i can say
but bf5 is ww2 and bf4 and 3 are modern
2042 is not toliet water cope rn
my camera is below the ground in vehicles looking at nothing, how tf i fix this aside from passenger seats, that also barely helps bruh 😭
is that really a boast tho
Worst game of all time vs the worst battlefield
hardline mp
cod is just objectively bad methinks
mw3 worst game of all time.... i mean it is bad but i wont go that far
Kind of weird they used numeral
there are worse games believe me
CoD matches being rigged 
idk man i uninstalled after losing 329 matches in a row against the very obviously rigged matchmaking
cod is ruim
i did not get one win since season 1 back in….. december 2023
bf is melhor
2015, BO3
Are we calling the next game BF6 or BF7 im confused
mw3 is a good game
no
the 2011 one? Yes
the only bad part is the campaign and if we are comparing it to 2042 2042 doesnt even have one
the 2023 one? I actually think launch day 2042 was better
My brother in christ they’re charging 70 dollars for overtuned matchmaking and slide cancelling
nto as bad as 2042 onlaunch
60 dollar for buggy game with like 20 weapons
and shitty maps
atleast mw3 got alot of content
okay it’s true, launch 2042 was hysterical and im being theatrical
Most of it is unusable though
there’s 3 viable guns and they’re the…. Advanced warfare ones kekw shg
anyway
Is it bf6 or bf7
Hard to enjoy any fun in MWIII when you face Iridescent players every match in pubs
i went 7.0 one day in december 2023 and the matchmaking is still mad at me for that, i had to uninstall cause i was consistently playing against 2.5-3.0 kd players as a 1.35 kd
jesus
also they made the f2000 meta... lol, lmao
If you’re in any way above average, you’re royally fucked so the bots can have fun and spend more money on skins 
playing mackay as a knife wielding lunatic rn this is chaos
bro the last bf numbered that way was BFV..... we are not at BF7. why are you struggling to understand this? lmao
why are you upset
if they do go a numbered route like that it will be BF6
you could have said bf6 and ended the conversation there
not upset just laughing at how you can't work it out
understandable
haven/discarded look like the 2 best maps for this tomfoolery, you can’t do it on redacted
you get gunned down like instantly
if we are unable to play the event because of this issue, are you guys going to help compensate us by giving us the helicopter or what? because this is like incredible frustrating -.-
Is this game dead? I downloaded it on console and was the only one in a server for both 64 and 128 conquest
At the cost of overall quality
you can play other gamemodes to get it
i ran like 15 solo/co-op (against the A.I.) matches of conquest and got it.
First game, first clip https://medal.tv/games/battlefield-2042/clips/iGA6fcql1UzNwrj-E
cooked
you might be cooked
but
that was a good shot
It didn't for the last 6 or so maps/seasons. The only post release map that has different sizes is exposure, and even hourglass remake is the same size on 64/128 modes now.
Hotfix #8.1.0.1 is now live for PC platforms on #Battlefield2042 and comes in at around 500mb.
A restart of your game may be to pick up this latest update.
Stay tuned for any further updates regarding this issue. 🫡
A fix for the issue where a small number of PC players are experiencing an error when attempting to load #Battlefield2042 is on the way!
The team is working hard to get Hotfix #8.1.0.1 rolled out on Monday, 16th at 08:00 UTC for PC players.
Stay tuned for further updates.
Gg
Anyone on
I think the length of flares should be based on how evasive the aircraft is
Nightbirds get the shortest amount, while big fat Condors get the longest
Stealth choppers also have it super short because they spend most of their time immune to missiles anyway
Bro still angry against aircrafts 
I will be as long as they continue to get preferential treatment from the devs
They nerfed lil bird so much. It barely do anything to the people 
Having shorter flares means more hiding away from players 
Flares aren't really the issue.
Its a systematic issue with how the gameplay loop around.
- Lock-ons
- Target acquisition
- Flaring mechanics at, during and after lock-on
- Lock-on missile projectile velocity
- Damage and affect of lock-on missiles
- Poorly designed gadgets and specialists relating to spotting/lock-ons
Air vehicles in this game are pretty trash, cos there are dozens of combos of things that can take them out
That and most of the maps arent designed in a way that allows for a decent air to ground/Ground to air engagements, even if those mechanics were solid
The insane amount of rss you have in game to combat aircraft is insane. Way more than every other past BF game 
rss, im not aware of this term
Anything you can use, like lis, soflam, AA, wildcat post insane buff, ect…
They done more thing to buff AA overall compared to a heli got shafted to the ground.
Yeah, not even counting the fact that a single Rao can keep most of the air in a map continuously locked on and targeteable buy any launcher. 😄
Why they even bothered adding the soflam or tracer dart, when that is a thing in the game ill never know
anyone else hate the uh-60 update
it just feels lame and boring compared to the old transport helo
Its an actual transport heli, so no, I like it
Plus rao can counter the stealth heli. Unless you use lis to insta kill it, if not take it out of stealth by dmg it, same with wildcat. One bullet hit and it’s out of stealth.
As soon stealth heli is out of the stealth mechanic, it’s vulnerable asf
Everyone insta lock on and kill it. It’s wild to experience. Even from spawn, you just insta dead
No
Yeah you have to be insanely good, or have an incredibly incompetent team against you to do well in a heli.
One thing still upsets me to this day is the massive buff they did to wildcat
The range that it have aka 700m is still unbelievable
On portal maps. Is 80-100% map coverage. 2042 maps is almost 50% ish map coverage. Can’t do shit when it out in the field. Get locked on about a country away, universe away from you
AA bullets have almost to no dmg drop of is wild also for wildcat 
Tried pre and post buffed wildcat. Post buff makes me feel like I’m handicapped 
If it was so fucking easy why doesn’t everyone do it
You’re out here claiming the soflam is overpowered but it actually relies on the single rarest commodity in this game: actual fucking teamwork
Oh and people who actually look up. Which is somehow rarer.
People don’t always want to 24/7 main AA or anything. People mind their own business majority of the time
The whole point of the soflam is that it turns every rocket into AA
And they won’t even do that
The tools is there clearly. Not everyone wanna run a engineer
Huge chunks of any team are engineers
Speaking of soflam. Most people know the trick 
Half of them seem to only play for the goddamn stupid sentry gun that never works
Of 2 hitting everything
Cod bro. People is used to playing cod/warzone
UH-60 pilots are. So bad.
The guns are amazing but oh my god none of them know how to stop crashing it
I’m not even a good heli pilot at all but I can keep the damn thing in the air at least.
One of BF2042 biggest misses in terms of content at launch was the lack of light air transport vehicles
Modernized UH-60 or UH-1Y would have been way better than a 6 seats aircraft like Hind and Condor
Thing is I actually do like the big ones
The problem is with the hind specifically and how it’s way too agile for its size while the condor lumbers about awkwardly
Literally no one uses the soflam, how could it be overpowered, and who even said it was?
You did.
Why would anyone use it, when they can have it, and more with Rao
No I didnt, I said Rao is
Because Rao’s hack doesn’t mark targets and has not done so in like a year
What, yes he does?
Soflam can be op if used correctly 
People just don’t know the combo/trick
I just never done it because I need a second person. Solo gamer here 
Ummm 🤔 yes
But there is a hidden combo that can delete any vehicle out there. But the sad part still requires team work
Is there like a better and quicker way to delete vehicles? I just go the engi guy with 1+ rockets, rpg, anti tank grenade and underbarrel ap round so I can shoot at anything I find that moves other than planes and fast helis
landmines could work depending on the map
and mode
huh?
I can never get a car/tank to go over them :(
did an update come out?
yes
real

Yes, 2 hit any vehicle in the game. But it requires teamwork with soflam
you can 2 hit a tank?
does it include the javelin
He gets it
Anything
so soflam a target then have someone javelin it?
how much dmg does the javelin even do? It didn't do much when I was using it
I mean it did decent, but it wasn't giving me enough dmg to 2 shot things
The javelin gets a huge damage boost when hitting marked targets
lmao
Do you still not get assists when using the soflam, other than that useless 10 points of XP?
Whats up with the Servers? cant play since yesterday its says unable to connect to server. Anyone else got this issue?
Nope.
It's absolutely absurd. You get more for just clicking a button than you do for sacrificing your own time and safety to mark targets
Soflam was crazy back when gadgets were universal, one recon w spawn beacon and soflam and then 1-3 angels with m5s lol
About 80-90. But no matter what guarantees 2 hit
Set for health pools above 140-180ish for vehicles which is condor and hind
But still wiping a lot of vehicles off the floor
All the uh-60 chaos servers are empty for me and theres no way for me to get the rewards
Any way to get it?
Thx
Yeah some of the scoring in this game is honestly weird. Like guide and assist a rocket for 10xp, but place down a blasco device and you get 15xp for every player in the radius, then also score and assist XP if one of those players gets killed. Bizarre
?
?
?
cant connect to servers since yesterday, is anyone having the same issue?
NA console is good
i was able to connect im on PC (NA)
normal modes work too
Those servers are crap anyway. The UH-60 is in no way a suitable replacement for a proper gunship when trying to break an actual defence line
i did 14 matches of AI conquest then a match of AI breakthrough to get it because I had that problem too
yeah it’s pretty cheeks ngl
You get 1 tapped by recoilless M5’s anywhere below half health, it’s big as shit, and unlike the MV-38 which also has that problem, it’s also slow and has no firepower
Even using it on haven I got shot down like 6 times with it
Does server browser count? 😭
it’s good for squad transport, but consider the following vehicles for that: LATV4, MD540, EBAA, LCAA, MAV, EBLC, CAV, and either side’s gunship or tank
all of which are better than the Blackhawk
It's a good way to shit on rooftop campers. Those side guns are no joke.
fair ass point.
if you’re playing recon, I don’t really about high up spawn beacons as long as you’re not being a boring ass sniper. You can do the classic C5 Casper drone tactic which is funny.
or run Blasco and help people/vehicles by objective
even Rao is a lot better actually doing shit than just boring ass sniping.
Specialists are also out this time around. "So I wasn't there for 2042. I don't know what the rationale was, but for me, it's like the team tried something new. You have to applaud that effort. Not everybody liked it, but you got to try things. It didn't work. It didn't fit. Specialist will not be coming back. So classes are kind of at the core of Battlefield, and we're going back to that," Zampella says.
Holy article full of W's
"Yeah, the 128 player, did it make it more fun? Like...doing the number for the sake of the number doesn't make any sense. We're testing everything around what's the most fun. So like you said, the maps, once they get to a certain scale, become different. It's a different play space, and I think you have to design around that. So we are designing something that is more akin to previous Battlefields,"
"I'd rather have nice, dense, really nice, well-designed play spaces. Some of them are really good. I can't wait for you to see some of them."
Bring back the CTE! 😄
It's unclear when the next Battlefield will release, but there are signs that EA is ramping up for 2025, having entered full production earlier this year. According to Zampella, EA is "play testing the game every week" and plans to launch a community program next year, though it's unclear if it's a closed beta or something else.
"We have a program that we're going to announce next year around getting more community in, because that's kind of the core of what we have to do — get the community back on our side, get that trust back," he says. "So I think we're in a really good place. Is it challenging? Of course, but it wouldn't be fun if it wasn't."
does that mean no 128 players or does that mean if they do 128 they just wont be dogshit?
Hopefully the former, or do as they do in portal and make core modes 64, but allow custom games with more is probably the best case scenario
no 128
They’re doing 64!
there's nothing really surprising in this article
128 was dead and we had unofficial confirmation for a while now
nice
Vince Zampella sat down with @IGN to discuss the future of #Battlefield, confirms a modern setting, and teases a community testing program. Read the full interview. 👇
https://www.ign.com/articles/exclusive-first-battlefield-concept-art-revealed-vince-zampella
Its good that interviews like this are bein done now, and setting some official expectations tho
I mean I said from the start 128 was a pointless dicksize brag, brought on by panic cos they COD game that was coming out increased their ground warfore to 48 players and some shellfishIQ suit was worried about loosing some customers
it was always just a marketing gimmick
thankfully zampella has his head screwed on and ignored everyone trying to pretend it was good to do
is that, battlefield news?
yes
really keen to see how this goes with vince at the helm
battle royale confirmed
why are you surprised
This article kinda answers a lot of questions and removes most worries I had about the next game. Its mostly what I/others expected to hear...but its good to actually hear it
they literally hired the creator of warzone
Im not seeing anything about BR? Am I blind? 😄
Appreciate what he had to say about 128 and specialists. just a no nonsense response
didn't see anything about a br either
this community involvement plan sounds good though. Always missed the testing environments
we'll have no confirmation but it's definitely happening Bryon beede is not hired as a GM unless they're doing a BR
although I think we learned from 2042's tests that lots of people struggle with ndas lol
Modern settings are so fucking boring
Sure it's done a lot, but I do prefer them over historical settings
Also is this like round three of the devs teasing 2143 just to go and do something completely different
wait i've just noticed there's a separate role for ripple effect staff
They're openly setting up the EU vs PAC conflict and everything
Well hiring a GM from elsewhere can mean many things, not merely that they are doing a BR.
Dude was previously a lead/manager of the live service and road map for COD so may have been brought on board to assist on those fronts. The live service has not been amazing by any stretch on the last 2 games.
Modern setting
Classes
No 128
Smaller maps
We're so fucking BACK
can’t argue that
In 2042 it is more likely a continuity thing than a teaser
he was the architect behind warzone, not just the lead manager, it wouldn't have existed without him
there is going to be a battle royale of some sort it's more or less inevitable
Also I always see people going "oooh they should remake BF4" no go fuck yourselves why don't they remake 2142 huh
Something actually old enough to warrant such a thing
I dunno, I have nothing against them doing a BR. I just don't see it as defitive proof of it happening.
Every attempt they have made at including a BR has failed instantly
like BF4 was my first battlefield game, and I think seeing their older games getting a good remaster first would be better because new people can experience it without retro consoles
doing multiplayer remakes never really made sense to me. Doubt it would actually please anyone if it did happen
Firestorm was great, 10x the mode hazard zone was, but got zero support. Was literally sent out to die
Could it be Rio?
if the game in question is super old then its a great way to boost a population and improve the tech involved. (or if you are activision, to shove mtx into an old game)
It looks like northern Europe
did they say anything about going to back to actuall expansions vs pathetic live service bullshit excuse to do nothing but make skins
Do you want new maps to become unplayable within months
Idk.
I want to say its the balkans, everything has been pointing to that, but I cant pinpoint a city that looks like it.
Yeah, it looks like it could be a city in Croatia or Romania 😁
if you mean premium it's definitely not returning
kinda sucks, but im happy to hear alternatives
there isn't an alternative to the 2042 model
it is a matter of fact that premium is how you destine a game to die
2042 model is really good imo
Northern Croatia might be it.
not rly, could always just organise it differently, make the 1st xpac included for all as 3rd comes out ect, those who pay simply access it first ect
They were looking for Croat VAs right?
nothing wrong with people paying for quality content
nobody's paying $60 for dlc expansions anymore
id do it.
it's a dead business model for a multiplayer shooter
copium?
Markarska, Croatia for reference
dlc is small, expansion is big hence why I use expansion not dlc
aka "I got dragged into this shit, I need to make the fans happy" 
if its worth the money its worth it
Old days it was good. Not anymore 
yeah you and everyone else here are core battlefield players, outside here, that falls flat
its not just not worth it cos its "extra content" its the size and quality of the content that matters
So are they going to include more factions than just fucking America and Russia this time
there is an echo chamber of people here who will tell you premium is better, it's just not the case
Because I cannot take Russia seriously as an actual threat
and again, paying to keep a game continually adding stuff for years to come makes sense
Now you have live service as the business model. It also helps them rack up a lot of money. Plus the store
but that's not what happened
the premium maps were made before battlefield 3 and 4 launched
so make it happen?
Russia is supposedly not even featuring in next game
make what happen?
But it might be a PMC instead
your saying, they did it poorly before so dont try again
So no kh101 missiles
people are sick and tired of the standard live service, even just premium is a breath of fresh air.
I dont think theyll do it, but I really doubt theyd be crucified for it
do it in a better way then
Bf1 had a good premium system. As long as one squad mate had it, all members could play the content.
they wont do it because it segments the playerbase
seee, now that is a solution
no I'm saying it's a ass business model, antiquated, and this franchise needs to attract players who aren't hardcore to every single thing game for the franchise to survive
Premium with the rise in prices will not be good
I can still play DLC for battlefield 4, BF1 had a weekly free rotator and let it carry over with squadmates, this is a solved problem.
I’ve been out of the BF loop for a while, but that read sound very promising.
mmm yeah thats a good point actually
I doubt premium will return, but the content amount (Maps and weapons) in the next game needs to be better
its ass business model if you make it ass
Player stand point is nice. Not business standpoint. You give people free access if they play with you. Not making much money for devs
The content wouldn’t change, it would just mean it’s more hidden behind paywalls, look at payday 3
EA did not ditch premium "for the playerbase", they did it to make more money (or try to atleast)
you might want to pay $60/70 for dlcs, you're a minority
if you dont want to pay then dont, problem solved, at least I would get real new content
It’s making them a lot of bank 
I'd wager they made more money on skins sales in 2042 than premium sales from bf4
Why the hell are you guys arguing about the pricing model, it will obviously be live service again 
pay what, the game isn't out lol
COD HQ
they literally hired the Warzone creator, come on lol
for apex probably. I really doubt 2042 is making bank
I rather the live service so that I can play the DlC's without praying that the 5 percent remaining player base 6 years after release has the premium.
Makes me want to cancel my BO6 preorder 
sorry I didnt specify hypothetically speaking when we are clearly talking about possibilities for the next itme that obviously isnt out yet
yeah good luck convincing a game that doesn't exist that they need to pay $70 to access the game and oh by the way premium is another $60 so $130 for the game effectively is a fantastic way for a game to die before it launches
Oh obviously. It more about the principle of it.
Theyll make it live service so the minority of whales with no self control can outpay the rest of the playerbase
End of the day, I don't care too much what they do. I just want a good game we can all play for years.
4-5 skins is about the price for all dlc map packs. I can tell an average person buys way more than that
I can tell an average person buys way more than that
lmao
I'd rather have nice, dense, really nice, well-designed play spaces.
Also take in account the premium for the Battlepass
Please to dear God no emphasis on meatgrinders
if that's what he means then I won't buy it 
he is saying this in comparison to 2042 maps.
I do hope there is a meatgrinder map at launch tho.
live service just means copied and pasted containers again 3 times a year
also why are people pretending like you can still play dlc maps today you only decide what the servers want you lol
final stand, all those maps are dead
because I can play dlc maps today.
Final stand are you high?
If he means like BF3/BF4 urban maps then yes please, thank god they finally learnt that people actually love those kind of maps
A meat grinder map is great to have, more important is the return of browser and server admin/player tools like map voting, team swapping, etc.
Maybe its platform specific but I have no issues with this on bf4.
hell i can still play dlc maps in battlefield 1942
(you) aren't going to get a game going, playing doesn't mean an actual server
I can play full dlc maps today
I didn't say you couldnt
persistent servers pleaseeee
what is server owners selected their maps based on what players like
yeah server owners dont rotate trash and the players dont vote it, thats true for base game maps as well.
and maps that dont get used are simply less popular maps
no the main reason is probably half the players who want to play didn't pay for premium to begin with and can't play the damn content lol
projecting
it's not projection if dice said so themselves, so go figure
legit projecting. There are servers that have all map rotations and these ones dont get voted for
when justifying their new model?
no that's just what they said eons ago when 4 was still in development
yes surprise a game that's a decade old like 3 and 4 is played by it's loyal players, that doesn't change that a massive amount of players didn't get to play them for years to begin with cause they didn't buy premium and moved on
cause they didn't buy premium and moved on
they chose not to buy it. They didnt "not get to play it". Thats like saying I "didnt get to play bf4" cause it wasnt f2p
no, it's not lol
its exactly the same
"they chose not to buy it" is the damn problem
it isnt
people who want more bf4 bought more bf4, and there were plenty of times when the dlcs were ludicrously cheap if not free
yes because it was close to death, again, doesn't change anything
most bf4 servers at the moment are mixed servers. Same with bf1. We can play these right now, this isnt hypothetical
people who bought premium are not special and are not entitled to special treatment
Wooooo let's go next battlefield won't have specialists
they bought a product, deco.
ok? lol
thats not special treatment thats a transaction
Where tf can I squad/meet bf1 players
"oh people who bought bf4 dont deserve special treatment, why cant I play it for free"
they are literally nothing alike
it is identical rationale
don't pretend for a second that a game that launched, with staggered dlcs, is somehow equivalent to that
it is
right
I wonder if the next BF will have AI
I'm sure battle packs were aswell then because "those guns were there earlier"
nah battlepacks suck.
don't justify bad arguments because you prefer the thing
Hope not, will not play if it does
AI? as in chatgpt? Great idea 
Battle packs do suck
it is identical logic, deco.
Hopefully it’s popular enough to not need it 
then so are battle packs
but you don't seem to like that
battlepacks suck because it is in game gambling and you cant pick what you want.
Alt history Cold War Gone Hot in the late 60s would've been cool
Make it Vietnam war so I can sit in a bush and it’s historically accurate
ah I see so youve double down to being obtuse. Broken man
the point is you don't get to pick and choose
...
wait youre conflating it with the server owners?
conflating what?
are you comparing the random nature of battlepacks to the server owners selecting specific maps?
no
Server browser and rentable servers back would be fantastic
I'm just using your line of reasoning that's all, which is valid in this context to highlight it's a bad argument
Concept arts looks fire ngl
then what does "you dont get to pick and choose" mean?
Like legit I think theres just been a breakdown in communication
see above
?????
Sacrifice the tornadoes
Vince is da GOAT, he won't disappoint 
The man is speaking in riddles

you don't get to pick and choose bad arguments, because it suits your particular narrative, "it's identical logic" if is the case also applies to battle packs, because it's the same context of argumentation, be neutral, is the point
because it's a bad argument from the beginning
The concept art looks like it’s depicting Europe. How I know this? The houses are close together.
I don't know why they stopped doing server rentals. $60 for 3 months, they were making bank for what had to be a negligible additional cost
ehh
well they were for a time but they never increased costs
whether they are today, who knows
Heard the news, some are info made me relief like return to Classes (thank heavens) and return to 64 players
if is the case also applies to battle packs
but the issue with battlepacks is a different root problem. The issue with them is that it is in game gambling, which buying bf4 and bf4 premium are not.
so, no, your reversal doesn't work.
Deco, you are out of touch
different root problem
as are with launches, and the premium model, but you seem perfectly fine to tie them together, when they are nothing alike
The servers players could rent in BF3, BF4, and BF1 were just pulled off the line virtual servers.
I'm glad you're understanding the issue
explain how the root problem is different?
Seems we’re good so far from what we’re reading?
illuminate me
BF1 had rentable servers?
Only Pc?
2042 also seemed good. Im not getting hyped till the beta is in my damn hands
because you're paying for access to a game that exists, premium was a pre purchase because the game content didn't exist, you were not buying a product, you were buying something in the promise of gaining access to content
valid
they're not the same thing
BF3, BF4, BFH, and BF1 all had rentable virtual servers on all platforms
you can pre order bf4 as well.
and how is that at all affiliated with the premium discussion
I understand all the other titles but I have never seen it on Bf1, that’s wild
i swear if you continue this whataboutism again then there's no point continuing
because the difference, according to you is, and I quote
you were buying something in the promise of gaining access to content
which is what preordering a game is
theres no whataboutism youre just reaching
What about we all got along 
nobody mentioned preordering
thats what premium is deco. You preorder 4-5 dlcs
you were buying something in the promise of gaining access to content
there's no discussion here, you are somehow correlating preordering a game, that's already out, to a discussion about the premium model
and no "they are alike because it's a promise" doesn't count either
you can refund a preorder, you cannot refund, buying premium
There are still questions that they haven't answered yet (since it's reserved for the full reveal and gameplay reveal) like will the Vehicle Spawns/Gameplay/Physics works similar to BF3/4, where the vehicles are depended on what map are you playing meaning not all maps have all the vehicles that you can spawn and it's gameplay and physics will play similar to BF3/4 especially the Heli and Jets with the 313 turn rate mechanic?. Or the Vehicle Spawn will be similar to BF 2042 where every maps lets you spawn every vehicle that you wanted (I know some maps doesn't let you have jets but "most maps" let you spawn every vehicle) and it's physics and gameplay will be similar to BF 2042?
I hope the Vehicle Spawn will be similar to BF3/4 where it depends on the map you are playing and you gain extra vehicles for capping a certain flag on some maps
Same goes for the gameplay and physics especially the Heli and Jets
Fair. You should be able too, at least until the 1st dlc comes out.
That said, this detail does not derail the main point nor does it make the comparison invalid. At the end of the day you are still buying this promise of future stuff.
and, once that stuff is out, then its just a straight "i want this, I see everything here, Im going to buy it". Fairly straight forward.
yeah maybe 2 years after, that's easy to say in hindsight some 8 years on
Imo premium from BF3-BF1 gave you great value. 4 or 5 dlcs with 4 maps each. The only problem was that standard edition stayed at like 10 maps I think
Ight, all along the hopium train
who else thinks they'll announce the BR with a small section at the end of a blogpost next year with the trailer? 
Yes
Probably want to retain as much as the goodwill as possible right now
standard edition got the extra french maps at one point
plus the free rotator
I hope the BR goes well but i really dont care for it man
Warzone sucks
whats this going to bring
All we have going off is henderson's article. 
Is it 2025 or 2026
Ima be real, Im not booting up BF to play a battle royale. I have many much better options if I want to do that. A battlefield BR is not bringing any value to the customer
For which title? I only remember BF4 getting 3 free maps post premium dlcs
@uk-deluxe
BF1 got the two extra french maps
25 is the most likely I feel
Ah
fuck we were feasting with bf1 dlc.
CoD is kind of fucked for 2025 but GTA 6 is a bit of a concern no?
I think that standard edition BF game should have min of 10 maps at launch and min of 20 maps at the end
if it even comes out in 2025. But idk, GTA 6 probably isnt launching on PC and is a very different genre.
What do ya mean by concern 
people seem to imply that GTA 6 launching will make all other games flop
only if they are releasing the exact same weekend.
cause “everyone” will be playing gta 6
For the record, not me
Ill play the shit out of both GTA6 and a new BF game
I also wonder about the Class structure whether they will go for BF3/4 classes: Medic, Support, Engineer and Recon or BF1/5/2042 with Assault, Support, Medic, Recon, and Pilot (BF1 only had this)
My guess, all time peak will be somewhere near the one of PUBG (3,2mil on Steam) and then it'll eventually drop to somewhere GTA V is now
that comes with the assumption that everyone will play exclusively only GTA 6 for months
when that's totally incorrect
Even BF4 and GTA V released pretty close to each other, no?
not to mention it won't be f2p
ikr but there’s a small group of annoying people which i hope EA and Dice don’t listen to who are claiming “GTA 6 will be the only thing people play”
theyll actually only play gta 6 for 3 years and the gaming market will crash and the economy will suffer and the peoples republic of china will collapse and
gta also has alot of expectations, so its gonna underwhelm regardless
BFV and RDR2 too
Bought an Xbox just for GTA VI
lmao
Wouldn't be surprised if it's Cyberpunk allover again
Was RDR2 that huge compared to GTA? I still feel like GTA is still their top dog for me at least



