#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 1602 of 1
The game is dead, bro
there will be no new content (Maps, weapons or vehicles)
I see
Just QoL updates at best
Not yet I'll wait until things actually end
Season 7 has another 2.5 months...then whatever QoL stuff they add after.
Is Battlefield V still lit
Its still OK...if you played it at its launch...it plays very differently now to then
I personally dont like it all that much after the last TTK changes they did.
But its still a good, fun and enjoyable game for the most part
I'll admit, the trailer looked pretty dope
why ?
Too many weapons are crappy now if you want to be competitive.
Who else saw the Gol Magnum skin in the trailer?
Most SMGs are terrible and/or not viable
It was extremely visible
Looks like a generic skin that goes on all the guns
I see Sundance skin... So that's insta buy from me.. 
All skins are purchasable except 1
Sad
Tbh, you only need T1 Sundance skin, the white one, green one which isn't that good tho and Idk if there's one for desert
Tho I rarely bother changing skin based on map
with that kind of system they could really profit in the next game. Skins locked per map. For example a desert map you can only choose skins which are for desert, you cant have a winter skin on a desert map. Milion skins to sell haha
Frontlines! 
lul. I had similar idea that they could mark all maps with one of 4 biomes (urban, desert, green/jungle, winter) and you could set 1 skin per specialist for each of biome so that you don't have to manually change it
But I want to wear my skin that is a bit on fire when in the snow.
exactly, would be a perfect system tbh....fresh feeling every map
https://gyazo.com/0b5d77b13a17305cf085543aa60f037e In this image we see 2042 season 7 cancelled announcements and then a brand new event trailer right next to it all. So weird man. We are gonna be fighting so many damn bots in this event cos so many people won't realize that the game is still getting updates for a little longer thanks to DICE prematurely announcing support being cut
no you dont
Keep quiet, they're gonna add cold system and that skin is gonna become p2w
Just started bf1, and holy fuck I'm in love with it
Tho I wonder what it would feel like if winter multiplayer maps would feel like the BFV mission where you have to walk from fire to fire lol
Narvik mission
Yeah
time code ?
I don't get why they announced it so early
Not to mention it's not doing EA any favours either because a lot less people are going to be buying skins during this event and the next one and just in general
@robust vapor average match for me when i dont have tep sal pelican or you 
likewise
each time i play conquest the rest of my squadmates are like somewhere else on the scoreboard

bring back attack helos for BT
Ok here's my theory. They wanted an opportunity to sneak the season 7 support being cut announcement in under as big of an announcement as humanly possible. So my guess is the new team (dead space guys) working on the next battlefield was probably going to be the biggest announcement they'd be making for the next year or 2 so they had to sneak it in with that announcement and that's why it was announced so strangely early because they were never going to just make a post specifically talking about support being cut.
It's pathetic, but they always do this shit. They're terrible at communicating and they don't understand that SNEAKING in these announcements result in bigger backlash than if you were just straight up and clear with the community at the perfect time.
What are you even talking about
Do you have any reading comprehension? Like at all?
Yes and you're living in fantasy land
Please elaborate then
No
Then you're an idiot then.
Feel free to continue
I think it's funny that they're gonna get away with cutting support after a total release of 8 maps.
they are not getting away with anything?
Remind me of that after the next bf release sells as well as it will
~0:33
dang you're right
so i presume there is no point in saving boins this season as there isnt going to be another pass
found my next favorite playstyle
blasco + dmrs
post up in center of the map
become toxic
now if only more engineers tried firing at the aircraft that i'm designating, then it'd be heaven
yes
"We won't support the game anymore but we'll keep taking your money" is all I hear
Then don't give them your dollars
Need to keep designating em after they pop flares
Its a self fufilling cycle. Noone runs soflam, so noone checks for soflam, so soflam gets nothing done, so noone runs soflam
but I run soflam
I /
a forward slash and an italicized I are the same
the I is just slighter smaller
exactly, people who pay for skins are the reasons devs can focus on fluff instead of content
They stop supporting for the good cause but it was too early to announce it to me
I'll be honest
I've been waiting for this end of support announcement since season 4
And I'm fucking happy it finally dropped
I've just been asking for that since season 5 even released
BF2042 isn't really my cup of tea and I'm glad they're stopping to support it
However
I hope the announcement is gonna be followed by some infos on what's to come in the franchise next soon enough
this was my take aswell as they originally said atleast 4 seasons i thought it was gonna be 4 and done
Yeah me too like a lot of people, unexpectedly they kept going on
But now the main focus has to be the main game
They have to deliver some fucking good game because it's probably last chance
i guess it was more of a lets do afew more so the next game people still might purchase
I don't think a lot of people understand that we haven't had a critically acclaimed BF game since 2016
was that bf1?
In 8 years only 3 games released and only 1 was majorly appreciated
Yes
yeah tbh bf1 is goated
people say game play and that sweet spot mechanic is dogshit but tbh its a game that i will always say is worth your time
Expectations of the community about the next game are high and low at the same time
they need to go back to the way they did the enviroments for bf1
It's objectively a really good game, far from being my favourite for personnal reasons lol but it's really good
lets put it this way if i had to pick a game from the last 3 to recommend to somebody i think 1 would be it everytime
again though most people loved bf1 just for the environment and atmosphere
I agree, it's the most immersive game which came out recently enough
One of the main reasons why BF2042 isn't really my thing is because it has no immersion at all
Setting could have been cool but they didn't make the good choices to make it look good
Subjectively immersion only gets me so far. I don’t like BF1s gunplay so I didn’t mesh with it very well. It’s a good game just not one I enjoyed subjectively.
1's aesthetics are clearly its best part, but the rest of the game is also very good. It has one of the best sanboxes in the franchise history and IMO its gunplay is underrated.
I think sweet spot only works for ww1 and 2. In practice its more of a buff to iron sniping which lets scopeless bolt actions compete against other weapons without being a 1 shot close range.
skinz
Yeah, gameplay matters to me much more than aesthetics and immersion
2042 is fantastic at combining chaos with predictability. It never feels like anything really happens without something else signalling it first.
I think the maps of BF1 make its gameplay a lot better than it would be in the maps of 2042. If that makes sense haha
Argonne Forest my beloved
2042 maps 
the only one that's kind of predictable is spearhead and the rest are a crapshoot
yeah running in those trenches can be insane
Any news when the stealth bomber vehicle is getting released?
Update 7.2 in May
I also think the weapon sandbox helps as well. Theres little to no ARs so everyone has strong strengths and weaknesses
Yeah, that makes sense too.
Not too long then cool
ARs on all classes makes variety of weapons encountered pretty rubbish in 2042
Comapred to past games that is
The last vehicles i have not t1 are the stealth helis and the jets. And ranger 😅
I wonder how it would play out if there was an AR class that just had no gadgets or only 1.
That way it bakes a weakness into the weapon without actually making ARs bad
Gives me a month before new vehicle to hopefully t1 the stealth helis
most people would play the class for ARs
Theyre so squishy though you get prqctically no time to react to certain threats
I’m pretty much always using an AR besides playing recon
I use lmgs mostly, i just like prefiring people for 200 rounds lol
I think there could be a way to make the other options more appealing. I dont think "everyone will pick ARs" is completely set in stone
It is, yes. I just dont think its insurmountable. If the AR class cant heal, cant deal with armor, cant resupply, and cant spot it may do the trick.
Of course, thats assuming you dont want them to be too common. You may want one class to be more popular for one reason or another, so giving them an AR could be a good tool for that
Other games also had a much more diverse combined arms gameplay loop. To the point that engineers (For example) didnt mind only having SMGs/carbines/shotguns in BF4, because their main role was killing vehicles, or being in/repairing their teams vehicles.
I like having the weapons restricted to classes I think.
If you locked 2042 to only have SMGs on engineers...you just wouldnt have any engineers cos the infantry > vehicle meta is so weak
we don't have any engineers anyway!
I do to. I like restrictions, it makes decisions more interesting
Same
I don't like being told how I have to play the game
Jesus this games loadout system was a mess at launch...any weapon, and gadget on any specialist haha
Idk, i feel air vehicles>infantry, but infantry<ground vehicles
WTF were they thinking, honestly
the cynic in me wants to say it was to make weapons skins sell more
It was shit for everyone. You never knew what any other player was equipped with, or their capabilities at any time
my problem was that it made every specialist feel the same.
Tanks etc get obliterated by a coordinated team of intfatnry. Air vehicles have maintained the same place where the skill gap of air vehicles prevents a lot of people from understanding the counters as infantry. If Rao and solamente were still common, it would be more eveb
Soflam
Yeah I’m no good with the planes
I don’t mind doing repairs and blowing them up though
balance on air vehicles is shite, its just to easy for them to get away and reset
lock on from launchers gets thrown off to easy (while aiming to get a lock), range is shit, air vehicles can get out of range very quickly, the sky ceiling is huge, they can go outside of the map from the sides too and hide
Its always been that way, unfortunately. Thats why i decided in bf3 to git gud at flying lol
2042 has a problem w trees/little cover blocking lock ons too essily though, small branches of trees shouldnt interrupt soflam designation/other locks
ONLY IN BATTLEFIELD
My fucking eyes, what the fuck DICE?
Music: Paul Kalkbrenner - Steinbeisser
lose_round.ogg from BF 2142
DiscoField

Looks normal to me
needs a seizure warning fr
Oop :x
fried gpu
ngl this is actually cool
Where my LMGs at?
well that was a first, just used an invisible zipline
eyy
More 139 Levels to go...
No more content = No more Vault Weapons
I wish we would see S8, but I don't wanted new Vault Weapons so its good that it would not be added
i was wondering about that from the trailer. are they actually going to make vault weapon skins now?
just the one 
hi~~
Who else thinks the next Battlefield will be called "Battlefield 7" because season 7 is the last season :)?
more like Battleskins
Deleted 2042, now I wait for the new one 
That’s certainly a theory
It will be called
You might be waiting a while
2025 rumored
Yeah at least a year and a half waiting
Maybe delayed until 2026
Pre orders already have access. This is the best BF game ever made
I love BF6
I have no high hope for next bf tbh. It will be like battlefield 2042 verison 2.0 probably
with battle royal
Sup duckies
hello fellow duck
end of support so no 


battlefield shouldnt have a battlepass
well they did have a habit of putting OP weapons in the battlepass which owners unlock faster right, and then taking a very long time to patch those weapons
so there was a disting advantage for some time
Oh yeah, pretty bad with the VHX on launch with S6
avancys was busted too if i remember correctly
also redacted is such a braindead map, its chaotic for sure but very braindead
invite jackfrags he will make a good battlefield game
if you play it on solo with a mg you can just farm kills
thats how i gained like 9 levels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7D_qSuQRSM go to 6:10
any weapon will work actually
That's every meatgrinder map
Locker and metro etc
If they do have one it shouldn't expire
Halo approach would be cool
if they add battlepass in next battlefield game same thing will happen as 2042 cancelled
True
I will say this tho
It's not as bad as loot boxes
battlefield is not a battlepass game
I prefer season passes over the loot boxes any time
Majority of bf2042 development was making it a battle royal, that's why the outta place battlepass lol
dumb thing to say lol
every game make remastered
to be fair a lot of people are sick of microtranasctions in any form, and while it is fully acceptable in free to play games it definitely feels out of place in a paid game
bf4 makes me very sexy
Make a fun game = people play fun game and they don't care if there are season passes or not
yeah lmao
people gotta learn people play games cuz theyre fun
not cuz of battlepasses or microtransactions or anything
imagine charging full price for a game and then every time you open it it asked you buy a battlepass
Yeah, but I still prefer battle packs like in bf4
But the weekly challenges of the battle pass are fun, but I think you should only unlock skins from them
i mean, its reall cool to see what is has to offer
we play to kill not to win smh
Not in game weapons, for a solid week after season begins it's pay to win game with whoever buys the battlepass can obliterate you with the op weapons lol
yeah but they way 2042 did it is wrong imo, having it in the store or even a window in the main menu sure, but you cant do anything until you close the window that opens every time you launch and covers the whole screen
Remember when riot had a bunch of drama about work conditions? No? Same...
No one talks about it because they make good games
But blizzard....
and I prefer to win than kill xD
They don't make as good of games and people talk about everything bad
I like it when a full game is released and then DLC packs are released quarterly and there is no other form of MTX
im done with the franchise lmao
I prefer having fun over winning 🗿
i got bf3 rm and battlebit
I gave up after Bf5 was cancelled
do you own 2042?
Saw others play the beta and said nah
trailers? top notch
game? not too shabby but not good
A triple a game company with no score board
I justify premium as a sort of service, you do pay full price for a game when it’s new, but you know what? You get a buncha shit to do for like 20 dollars over the next year, with each DLC spaced out about 3 months
People have just as much money to spend on way less in the form of skins, they can afford premium, let’s be real
That would be severely unprofitable
what they should do is actually have a decent plan adn shit already made for future seasons
but eh im not ea
Either premium or an actually decent live service model where it’s not an excuse to release a game broken then work on it to an acceptable state
this is how 2042 shouldve released
I don’t think so only because the best selling Battlefield game also used this system
but they just fixed the game and dipped
Also the battlefield games we all grew up with were using them tbh, live service is a newer industry thing
live service games are so ass
I don't care about EA's profits, I care about whether the game is good or not, the model I prefer lends itself more to games being made good to begin with
or just the live service model
Maybe then, but not now with how expensive game dev has gotten
The only time premium really split player bases was when people picked up the game 3 years later to find out premium was still being sold full price, which definitely isn’t a great deal. Premium should be included in post support editions of the game and it’d be fine
the old system of expansions or the premium expansion pass was the best - only most popular counter argument is that it splits the population but that only becomes a real factor YEARS later, at which point it can all be heavility discounted anyway
^ true
I don't care about EA profits
Well you can say bye bye to BF then, because the moment they don't deem it profitable at all, they'll scrap it.
What a stupid reply
Yup
basic solutions but ea doesnt see that because all they see is the green paper
not stupid, I'm being realistic
Corporations are very touchy with money anyway, vanguard failed to meet activations goals but sold 30 million copies
ea is like watching a gambling addict on a slot machine
gamers don't understand economics, don't even try
because its broken
i dont need to
That's still good
if the base game is solid then thats plenty of enjoyment for people. I understand not every had money to keep spending but some things are worth paying for, at the end of the day you get what you pay for, and again if they base game is solid then people who cant afford the new content straight away still have plenty of enjoyment to be had and can pick it up later on sales
30 million potential people playing MP + Warzone
Many more people buying passes and other mtx
True, what I mean is it’s good but somehow not activisions goals, therefore EA could deem BF non profitable way sooner
If COD had no mtx and Warzone didn't exist, then yeah, I'd call it bad
No, stupid, and also bootlickery
Gamers when I tell them how expensive games are getting these days (over 400mill) and why we can't have games with 'No mtx or battle passes' (I'm being stupid and a bootlicker)
Damn I predicted what you were going to say

im a pirate
arr
damn you can pirate 2042?
The best post launch content drop was Diablo 1 Hellfire
Then why the response?
which is anything over 50 quid
how much of that 400mil is to pay developers and how much is nothing but fancy marketing
im not broke
95%
Not me lol, I won't let Dice get away with this crap ass game BF2042 (I got 500 hours on it), they won't be safe until I get a good game
Damn I predicted you were going to say this


real
Not much probably.
youre telling me nearly 400mil was paid to 2042 developers in salary?
i got 600 hours and im in an abusive relationship with it
advertising
oooohhh ok
i dont like the game but i play it
I thought you meant devs got it
nah
Had to drop it after 300 when stupid shit like the recoil bug kept popping up and persisting, and just how much is missing from it
fair
AAA game btw
Story of my life
its the bigger problem of modern day gaming, why make a good product when you can just make a few graphically good areas and get a trailer out of it that makes the game LOOK really good so people buy
and once money has changed hands theres no fucks given
I liked the game enough to buy the S6 season pass and one pack of BF coins to get a skin
Now S7 is dogshit so I don't want to play anymore, but I spent the money already
That's how Blizzard works, not EA,
Because at least EA knows that they lose trust
i bought the s7 battlepass because i liked the tier 100 skin
didnt know it was tier 100
im not playing the game
pixelmon is more important
EA at least tries to fix stuff
I have no real problem with an optional battle pass...as long as a seasons content is not 1 map to tide me over for 3/4 months.
Blizzard doesn't
If gamers preorder it up, I can't blame them 
how did you not know it was the final tier skin, all the skins and where they are are visible from day 1
Crimson red or whatever is a joke 
what the fuck did they try to fix with 2042, had like 5.5 people working it dripfeeding us shitty maps and reused weapons
i read the thing
log
thing
I also have no real problem with the season events. As long as the modes are good. Frontlines is a really fun mode
well next time double check ;)
If they didn't have a seasonal model with a battlepass they would instead have to release good paid DLC packs with multiple maps and just in general do better because copies and DLC is the only way the game makes money. Seasonal model sucks
Frontlines is fun but they're not giving us much for playing it
I'm saying they at least try to do something about it
Unlike Bethesda and Blizzard
i didnt see no tier 100
I guess they really are scraping the most they can to give the game somewhat of a sendoff
"you guys have phones right?" 
moving on and leaving a skeleton crew to keep making skins isnt trying very hard
just scroll to the right on the pass screen
The next game is going to have battle pass and skins. It just also needs to have actual content like maps and weapons every season...or just go back to premium.
Paid game with quarterly DLC was so much better
im lazy
i forget to breathe sometimes
expecting me to scroll to the right is like asking a guy with broken legs to walk
Go back to premium and watch people cry that "EA is being greedy, CHARGING us to play on the new maps and use new guns when they should be free like COD and Fortnite! ?"
do a minecraft and pay for it once and not have to pay again
unless ea does an account migration
They don't need to show up if a battlepass and paid skins are used unfortunately, next game will be just as incomplete as 2042
40 DOLLARS FOR MAPS ALREADY MADE? AAAAAA
as long as dlcs add an amount of content clearly worth paying for then its not a problem
"40 DOLLARS FOR BF4 MAP PORTS??! LAZY DICE!!"
The BF3 and 4 DLCs were awesome
ubisoft is basically doing a premium pass for starwars outlaws, 40$ for early access and like 2 more missions, people are seething with anger
EA Shareholder insight:
they moved away from premium pass because it divided the community and people have different opinions on how it should cost
"singleplayer games should just have dlc, not mtx, I'd pay for it no matter how much it is"
Ubisoft does exactly this for Outlaws
"REEE, WHY CAN'T THEY JUST HAVE MTX, $40 FOR NEW MISSIONS?!"
if the game is good, there there will be enough players to fill both dlc and non dlc servers
It's like the whole Dead Space drama idk if you're aware of it but it kills me
and after years the price can just be dropped significantly
That came from someone who's barely right. Who makes alot of 'predictions' on his podcast
EA shut down his rumour, and a few hours ago Schreier backed them up
to be fair, they have both a season pass and the mission dlc
but still yeah
and knowing how pre order missions have gone in the past, I can't imagine it'll be worth it
Ubi dlc missions are either incredible or atrocious. No in-between
The team that made Dead Space are working on Iron man anyway. Any addition from Motive towards Battlefield will come from a new team they are building.
I can be happy in the thought that I've never played any of them since i've never pre ordered them B)
I've played some of the AC ones. Some were better than the base story, and others felt like a waste of time
yeah, 2 different teams, internet already freaking out because durrr they cancelled dead space 2 remake, meanwhile dead space 2 remake wasn't even started

"guys, the evil EA executives forced them to work on Iron Man"
"the studio heads couldn't have preferred to make an iron man game first before heading back to dead space surely..."
Wait there's another drama I ain't aware of lol ?

yeah the "dead space 2 remake dead" guy was pulling this statement out of his ass
dead space 2 remake is literally not a thing
Love how he doubled down on it too
they haven't even thought about it
gaming journalists lmao
And of course you have weirdos on the net saying things like "You want to tell me that after making a popular remake in Dead Space...they just decided no not even consider making a Dead Space 2 remake!!!"
Like of course they would have immediately considered it, but they likely looked at the sales of DS1 remake...weighed that profit vs the cost of making DS2 remake...and decided that right now, its not a good idea. DS remake didnt sell very well it seems
I was talking about the fact everyone has been whinning since they pretty much confirmed Dead Space 2 remake wasn't in their current plans because Motive had been sent to BF development lol, people say EA is dumb for not making it because Dead Space 1 remake was critically acclaimed, though thing is : it apparently didn't sell well
So as much as I hate EA there's absolutely no point for them to make a game that didn't sell well
Or they probably didn't want to make another DS right after finishing the remake
i'm angry they haven't done another mirror's edge
If the first game didnt sell sell...the second will sell worse.
And DS remake actually did sell very well in the first 2 months of 2023
Lol I didn't know someone claimed Dead Space 2 remake was a thing at some point, it can't have been cancelled if it never had been planned
yeah exactly
Yes that's the whole thing, yet people think that just because they liked it there should be a second one
Like most games, it likely had some concept art work done for it...but its normal for studios to concept things for potential future games.
dude just foamed at the mouth calling EA trash for forcing Motive to work on battlefield
Personally game looks interesting but too expensive
games get cancelled or re-directed even after playable concept stage
watch dogs had 6 different playable concepts before they settled for the one we have today
ass creed also had multiple
Lmao it's just normal to me, it's just one of their biggest franchises and one of the only they didn't kill yet lol, idk why they shouldn't do everything they can to make next game good
My favourite example is RE4 having gone through the dev cycle almost 6 times until they got something they liked
And then they took the scrapped ideas and we got devil may cry 
It's some intelligent move right there lol
Might as well used things you already created
They could reuse some BF2042 concepts for next game
if only valve would release half of their cancelled projects 
they have no shareholders to please so they don't release shit
I mean even if they did why should they
Steam is an infinite money printer
Their existing live service like CS and dota also print money
They are banking on CS2 and steam
Valve is getting away with gambling
They don't care about TF2
DellGPT is back
What happened to your YouTube channel?
40$ for early access and like 2 more missions
This is not a good deal at all
Ubisoft said get comfortable with not owning games
It's 40$ for early access, the missions, the season pass
Good deal or not depends on how you value 40$
oh 2 missions and the season pass
Then they'll be comfortable with going bankrupt and being forced to sell their entire company to Tencent

I will be comfortable by not buying their games
I think r6 what the last ubisoft game I bought unless im missing something
Fr me to lol, there's absolutely no Ubisoft games I plan on buying rn, except if next Far Cry is good maybe
have 0 fucking intrerest in assisins creed
Fc6 was a let down
far cry generally isnt worth it, once youve done a few missions youve done them all
There are already leaks of AC red is out
apart from that does ubi have anything popular?
Ubisoft can get in the bin tbh...scummy business practices deserved to be punished.
It was one of the best open-world franchise and it went down progressively, imo it reached the lowest point with Valhalla
Can someone smart translate that for me..? 
Far Cry 6 is the worst Far Cry ever made but it's some incredibly fun open-world game imo, it's dense, relaxing and it has a lot of content
It's just not a Far Cry at all lol
tell him if he was a real sensei he would be as at least as good as you
You're about to get absolutely BANNED
I think last one I played was the himalays one with the heroin making fake nepal country
Xdefient a f2p cod alternative is coming
but I think ive seen reviews for newer ones that say the missions are still just copy and paste basocally
4th one then, well it's a really good game as well, I might have a preference for 5th one though over 4th one
EA is coming for you bro
yeah I did actually enjoy that one, but I was limited to console atm the time so not as much choice, and while I did enjoy it, the missions were repetive and as far as I know it never got any better
devs nowadays think imrpoving the graphics = new game
Oh noooo, I'm so scared now 
Yeah it got more repetitive over the new episodes, it's a bit more dense now though on many aspects
Well I ain't the one you have to tell that to, tell that to user named "Pso-Sensei"
yeah probably not for me then still, I struggle to finish games (even ones that I think are incredible) yet alone repetivie shit

Yeah I get that lol I do the same, there are games I like but I don't finish them
I think the last game I finished was divinity original sin 2 and the previous pathfinder game
I didnt even finish BG3 xD
Hi there, what do you think about the pure infantry maps? I love playing them
I hate redacted
maybe not hate actually, as it is fun to play on but its so one dimentional
I like CQ cos you feel like you can be responsible for turning the tide of battle based on strategy, going for X flag or defending one ect, but in those meatgrinders its just fight at choke x100
Idk those games lol
Gn y'all
gn
Thanks
BF2042: "was I good game?"
Death: "you weren't even half-baked"
youre so bold and brave
its still a "good" battlefield game, we mostly all play it here, its just hard to overlook the bad points/decision making thats a part of it
and for 7.5 - 5.5 people it is an incredible success
no obviously it's the spawn of satan with zero good qualities
Most of my complaints come from the skill of most of the people that play the game
bf4 still bestest game ever 
you reserve the right to say that compared to battlefield
Ah, you also had a screacher in chat today
but the best game there ever was, was darkfall
The bunch of gameplay decisions just infuriate me to no end to be honest.
When the game plays well it's fun.
2042 will go down as a sub-par battlefield game...it brought nothing new, exciting, or fun, and was overall a poorly executed mess.
Just the playerbase is ratty as fuck as well which exacerbates the bad game play decisions.
They tried to do too much, and did none of it well.
nothing new
nothing
new
I've recently had someone I can play with and rely on and I've had the most fun on any battlefield ever while with them
Without them it's a slog
yeah I almost never play solo
it's funny because 2042 is the one game i can tolerate playing solo
and I play solo most of the time
Wait, when did it play well? I'm not being sarcastic, did they actually make a good change and I missed it?
Even the smallest thing such as driving the latv4 with the flak cannon is pretty much night and day different when playing with someone
Because everybody is playing it solo, and not working together as a team/squad, it's the easiest title of the series to just lone-wolf.
which is crazy because everyone else says it's a slog!
From what I've seen, BF1, 4 and hell even V still has all the players that're good.
I was defending a flag alone trying to drive it around last night while also shooting at the nightbird
Doing 2 jobs
BF1 has possibly the sweatiest players...that's a game where teamwork matters
I'm just glad they're finally moving on to hopfully a rebirth of Battlefield with games that're good.
Just remember kiddies, do not pre-purchase the next game! 😉
People give me crap for 'being upset and taking it so seriously' but BF1 needs that level of insane dedication or teamwork, otherwise you get gunned down by people who have no life.
No serously, there's people that've done nothing but waste an entire year of their lives playing BF1.
During all of the Melbourne lock-downs, I pretty much only played BF1. It was a very popular game at that time because it was only $11, and it's fair to say I got my money's worth, haha!
got that early enlister's edition.
steelbook
Also, how's Australia this time of year?
Depends where you are...it's a whole continent with different terrain and weather! It's cool, damp and miserable outside this morning where I am.
East Coast moment
I've got to work this afternoon, so traffic will suck with all the rain we've had...people have a lobotomy with regards to driving skills in the wet! 😛
I think thats the case with most games lol, and considering bf1 is now quite old it makes sense that only those most dedicated remain which would indeed make it difficult for any "new" players
When lockdowns started and I began playing BF1, it was clear there were a LOT of sweat-lords. I persisted and became really good, even being a mod for a server. It was sooooooo much more fun to play than 2042...a gaping chasm of fun to play
Plenty of rats in those games as well
man you think you can just play a simple round of haven....except half the team who has been looking at B for multiple minutes cant push into the fucking point to cap..and we lose C instead
holding 2 caps is just too hard
people always say this for the current release
"i don't like it so it's objectively the worst game of all time"
The addition of Haven has pretty much put me off playing 2042. Every second game it gets put on rotation, and I can't stand how bad that map is. I wish we could select what maps to play
I lowkey like haven, its poorly designed but it offers a challenge
It's a sniper-fest, with horrible flag locations, and has awful "flow" to the design
the flow is to just play mackay 
at least it offers possibilities
it needs vehicles to break up spawn locks
just some simple transports to get people moving around
light transport cant exist sorry
i like redacted ngl, storytelling elements are top notch to explain what happened in the herbrides (and cuz its a meatgrinder)
gives me some scp vibes too
infantry fights are fun, I just literally get bored of it before the match is even over, just the same fights at the same chokes
Redacted is fast-paced, which makes it more engaging than some of the yawn-fests of other maps
Make it a free monthly
If other maps are yawn fests you probably aren't playing to maximize engagement
essentially
skill issue
Nothing whatsoever to do with skill issue, the majority of maps in this game are pretty mediocre in design and gameplay.
Not really, 2042 was more DOA than a decapitation call.
we needed shroud and the doc to make 2042 maps fr fr 
here's how you find people to fight:
- Go to the objective you don't have
- Done
In Redacted you're basically always standing on top of an objective
but that's boring and doesn't lead to very interesting gameplay
The point I'm trying to make is that Redacted is more fun and engaging than most other maps. There's some absolute snore-fest maps in this game.
In a game where there's nothing to really do other than Tier 1 weapons, the grind is more productive in Redacted
no
Personally I'll be glad to see the end of this game and never return to it. Very sub-par release title.
and look ea, i get its the future, but that doesnt mean the sights need to have 6g wifi tethering with a hotspot and clash of clans bro 😭
like
its a good game, but i feel they focused too much on the smaller details
sights with wifi connectivity exist today
How come they do? What does the wifi connectivity do for a scope
keeps track of your epic kill streaks? duh
WiFi for smartphone (iOS and Android) app connection. Use phone or tablet as a live viewfinder, adjust all settings, update software, initiate and share recordings and photographs.
Kinda
They also capture video as implied
thats gotta be an expensive unit 
It also has night vision
oh sick
i genuinely didnt know that lmao
Manifest
we had night operations in BF4
No, because only effort that's gone into 2042 was the money leeching cosmetics
'game's broken'
'here's more cosmetics'
hey, atleast they give us something
it takes a bit for bug updates to actually be fixed lol
they gotta make sure it doesnt re-break the game
misery and buyer's remorse?
Could not give a flying fuck about skins and all of that nonsense...providing a satisfactory product that people have paid for (ie the game) should have been their priority. Pure unadulterated greed.
didnt they just have a sale where you could get it for 9 bucks..?
ahem, sorry
THE ENTIRE AVALIABLE BATTIFIELD FRANCHISE ON STEAM
wait you mean Bad Company 1, 2 and 2043?
i said avaliable
We lost three amazing games' multiplayer functionality.
2042 cost us Battlefield's legacy.
not really
battlefield still has a legacy, albiet not a good one, but one
Those great games were killed to peddle the shite Portal mode. Know how many of my friends or anyone else says brighteyed 'hey let's ahve some fun on portal mode in 2042'? Not a single one.
I bought a PS5 the other day, and had to laugh that 2042 was the cheapest new game on the shelf at $19AUD. Says it all about this game really.
do any of them own 2042?
i meant on steam
lol
free monthly for PSN users.
what
Got it for free and still paid to much.
Every month PS+ subscribers get three or four new games, 2042 was one of them.
It cost me storage space, and worse still time I'll never get back.
isnt the base game no charge at all..?
uninstalling:
I did, I got storage space, but never time returned.
did you get the game or was it given to you?
I'll keep 2042 installed on my pc for those rare occasions I want to play it, but from here-on, I'm putting my time into Gran Turismo on the PS. I'm just fed up and bored with 2042.
ok but atleast its not cod 😭
2042 > mw3
bf5 > vanguard
Yeah that's what I feel actually.
That alien like feel.
fr lmao
i like to think we're some mtf and we're fighting ci
these game modes are always dead in every shooterbecause people just use flashlights and ruin the game mode
nothing worse than getting hyped up for nightvision game mode just to be completely blind in both eyes due to every other teammate and enemy
eh
yeah
maybe ir lasers?
and im just blind
what if certain maps/flags had "chemical spill" type thing and when exposed you only see in black and white
of all the gamemodes people could ask for, they keep asking for fucking 128 tdm ("rush xl")
i dont think i'm mentally prepared to see rush xl mains call frontlines bad
i might have an aneurysm
bro, just be happy with 128 conquest
smh
can anyone help with this error unable to load persistence data
I wish we could give feed back about gun balancing before they actually stop supporting Bf2042 for good.
Like feedback here inside of the forums,etc
That wouldn't be a bad idea to be honest.
But it just depends on the parties willing to open a thread.
Can't wait for stealth bomber
Wildcat mains will morb
That thermal smoke ain't helping you

I'll be getting more things to Lis rocket then
Oh that takes me back lol
I remember when people tried so hard to recreate this at 2042's launch
Also Hokum melee > Apache melee
And it the physics just kept breaking
Finally T1'd the LCMG
Hell yeah can't wait for the new Sundance outfit next week. 😔
I think you guys might have missed something
They are adding an exclusive skin
For a vault weapon
Like holy shit
wym?
As that's been stated yes.
The bundles with the Ak5c skin, P125 and SCAR skin I only care for.
I don't use skins.
I just started playing this season.
I just want a cool tactical looking sundance set.
Oh boy ANOTHER Sundance ski
as someone who has 0 skins for her.
Theyre like Lis. They both get too many skins (Boris too and angel/Rao)
Like wheres the Zain skins wheres Dozer who should have the Coalition skin
Also someone make this NTW death make sense to me
Oh I'm sure you're right.
Bro where my exclusive M16 skin
I just am glad to have a skin that I like the look of for Sundance now.

Also what's a person gotta do to get a screenshot channel around here? 😔
Is it ever bad to not run an underbarrel option?
Like using the default nothing balanced performance thing?
Those are for when you're in a pinch
Or to simply finish off an unguarded target
perhaps you misunderstood the question.
Also AK5C with CQC Ammo might actually be the best version of itself right now. It has no recoil. It fucking shreds. And its range is not bad too.
Ah so from your context without it is fine too
Oh you mean like, running a gun with no underbarrel/grip/laser?
Certain guns are fine without it tbh
RM68?
Eeeeh
I really don't like the underbarrel launchers, I dislike the lasers, I dislike the grips.
VHX
I've tried LWG tbh didn't notice much difference between that and nothing..
Naked VHX performs astonishingly better
Talking about RM68
It's the same for RM68
I prefer RM68 with the LWG since i'm always moving. But the difference in accuracy/recoil control isnt super different
Well from standing versus moving*
Like its probably better with the MGL or STNR, whatever it gets. The only downside that gives is the laser.
Install Lazer on your head @fresh lintel
I'll install a bipod on yours 😤
I still can't get over how SHIT this game looks visually.
New devs and a new engine i think?
Plus also Last gen probably holding the game back.
Also IMO: Despite being worse visually than BF3-BF4, graphics dont make a game and never will (even though good graphics are always welcome)
Game looks great on ultra
Yeah, maps and aesthetic aside, 2042 looks a lot better than any past game...fidelity wise.
Do you guys think that the SRAW deliberately is being made dip down, then up when fired?
I find this very annoying as a rocket launcher, IMO it should be the other way around...even if thats not totally realistic
yup
to simulate its shitty behavior irl 
Its super jarring, especially paired with the high magnification. These are the cases where IRL performance should be ignored haha
it was so shit they stopped production after 1 year
What I hate is the fact you have the same operator on both teams which can create alot of confusion.
Like it should be that your character can be the operator but when you look at an enemy with the same one thier model shows up as a easily distinguishable model. Like in bf4 with established class models you knew who was friend and foe
In 2042 you can't tell none of em apart
you can definitely tell them apart, they look very different from each other, even with their varied cosmetics, also big red fucking name on top of their head
I personally got past the whole clone wars thing almost immediately...but I can see how for some its a deal breaker.
I still often get tricked by it when I see a player with the same model as me.
What I mean is when you look at them they should look like a mercenary soldier model instead of an operator so you definitely 100% don't mistake em for a team mates. That was a big problem in the games early days
I would prefer a faction based system...even if each faction had (For example) Assault, recon, support and engineer...but each of those factions and classes had customize-able soldiers in the same way 2042 specialists do. Like having different body types/genders, ETC
I stopped playing since all 2042 is is a cod clone at best. There's a reason why all previous titles had those factions. You knew even from a distant if that guy is backing you up or being added to your score.
there's a bright red marker lol
2042 is very different to COD. I really dont see where people get that from if you have played a significant amount of both
^
hurrr because cosmetic
that's their entire argument
Even cosmetics wise they are not alike. Yes both have skins...but 2042 did an (IMO) exceptional job in keeping the skins on theme
The ttk mathes what cod is. They definitely tried to copy them and it got them alot fo backlash as it does not feel like an actual battlefield game. Just another cosmetic fps
No it doesnt
I have 1k hours with mw2/3, it's nothing like cod
TTK in 2042 is WAY faster
Isn't the ttk similar to other bf games
And weapon variance/balance is much better in 2042
faster than the median bf game
Outside of the new seasonal guns...weapon balance is generally pretty good. Especially now that SMGs are usable again
You can do well with 90% of the weapons
I fully disagree. As someone whose played every game in the franchise since the very first title. 2042 is so far left field from what dice is good at that it's surreal they can even call it a battlefield game
Again versus COD where only about 10% of the guns are competitively useful
dude missed hardline lmao
you think 2042 is bad you're 6 years late
Agree...2042 is very different to past BF games, but unless you only play TDM, it is nothing like COD
the players who compare 2042 to COD are the players you find on the aircraft carrier for a whole Rush match
Like...if you choose to only play as run and gun assault and never try to play any other way...I can MAYBE see how a player would think 2042 is like COD.
I play hardline still since I'm one of the of old CTE volunteers I still have our clan tag and our logo. Likely the only one who still does. Same for bf4
you're not special for playing the cte
But there are dozens of ways you can play this game, dozens of ways you can affect a round versus just "Getting kills", which is what COD is 95% about
When you put over 1000 hours into testing says otherwise
What did you help with
you think youre special? lol, dude I played the cte aswell and have countless hours on 3/4
Aside from just playing alot
Experience doesnt magically make bad opinions better
Gambling is great
In bf4 aloft of weapon of map testing looking for glitches and potential items of concern like popping under the map due to code issues. Anything that would cause potential lag.
Same with bf1
I dont factor them as loot boxes...even tho they could be purchased. They were mostly a waste...and I only have issue with loot boxes if they deliberately make the things inside them harder to earn versus just buying them
Plus the battle packs were also earnable via game play
Doesn't make it better
I do miss battle log...as jank as it was
they're as close to loot boxes as can be just reskinned, anything which has a luck based factor and a randomiser, DICE knew exactly what they were doing with it
In any way
they even went out their way to literally lock attachments for guns behind them entirely
The way battlepacks worked were that a paid pack was the same as an earned on and the rng was the same percentage.
Diffrence being you paid to get the packs quicker and bypass the game play part. But buying them didn't guarantee a good drop
you bought, the gold ones
the ones you "earned" the vast majority were bronze
don't pretend it wasn't designed as a predatory gambling system when that's exactly what it was
if you die on this hill that they're fine because they can be earned ingame you're no different to the people who defended gambling systems in overwatch
You earned a gold pack every 5 level ups in xp. Assuming your good at grinding you could easily earn a 5x pack in a day
and it changes, nothing
You should play some phone gacha games
Keep in mind these packs are cheap and entirely optional. Your not required to buy them to enjoy the game
Battlepacks basically didnt affect the game at all tho. Most people never even bothered with them
yeah unless you want to use the attachments for weapons which you couldnt use lol
you know, that small thing
lol didn't they lock attachments behind the packs?
yes they did
It was an attempt at loot boxes tho, thats correct. But it wasnt bad enough or affecting enough to care this much about it haha
not unlockable through kills or damage had to get them through the packs
the best ones, I wonder why
Camos, attachments and xp boosts
if you have the premium pass you get free packs all the time but if you don't then it's quite shitty
Probably some more things
The breaks and suppressors were all more of less the same. Just cosmetically diffrent. As for optics the ones locked behind packs weren't even very good ones
??
Weren’t they just different names from the ones you could get from kills
you're pretending the coyote wasn't good?
Statistically more attachments in bf4 were about the same states. With very slight differences in them
man battlefield gamers really are the most powerful defenders of shitty systems sometimes because they have a nostalgic view about a certain game they liked in the franchise
Like stubby grip and potato grip did the same but one was from battle packs
paid shortcuts and gambling are all fine because battlefield 4 is a good game
just ignore them something something
But...werent weapons battlepack attachements unlocked by getting kills with that weapon. You didnt need to buy them
To prove how easy it is to bypass the battle packs in over 7 years off game play I've bought maybe 6 packs total. Plus with the addition of the shortcut packs the battle lacks became obsolete.
Very few. And only brinze
You can buy bronze?
yes
I paid less then $8 in 7 years of playing. I don't see how that is a problem
you can buy bronze silver and gold
what?
you don't see how gambling systems in a triple a game are a problem?
Again...didnt you unlock all the battlepacks for any weapon at like...450 kills or something?
So who cares
what's ironic is battlefield 4's system for unlocking attachments is closer, to modern warfare 3, than any game in the series
Deco is just trying to make a problem out of a nothing burger. If 8 bucks worth of bronze packs in 7 years is a big issue then it ain't the system that's the problem there.
Battle packs were never predatory at all
right lol nothing burger because you have red tinted glasses about one title in particular
DICE could add paying for ammo in battlefield 4 and you and others would defend it to the hilt if it existed
Youre kinda making a mountain out of a molehill here tho.
2042 got such a bad rep for being the most lackluster title in battlefield history. It has collectively had less content then any previously title.
I see deco is one of THOSE people.
?
It was very easy to unlock all battlepack attachments through gameplay
Dice has pit more effort into paid cosmetics then the actual game itself. The same thing call of duty does. They only focus on Clown costumes.
Think back to the trailer. Remember how all the soldiers on both sides had the same armor types? Where are those cosmetics as a default for both teams?
Yeah but players should have that option as well. Or at least in setting to set enemy players as default
Ideally yes, but its not the way this game went
Operators was the worst thing they could ha e done. It broke battlefield tradition and it was not recieved well
So you buy them
BFV basically had opperators also
Not really. Yeah some of the cosmetics were ugly looking but you could still tell one from the other.
For me personally playing a historically accurate game is more entertaining then anything else. Which is why I hate any cod past call of duty 3.
Bfv was supposed to be historically accurate and they botched that up so horribly
I doubt most people would have cared all that much if this game released with the class system it has ATM...and instead of specialist, you had a choice of soldier appearance...with the existing specialists being those appearances...and of course had no specialist gadgets. Instead you were allowed to choose gadget 1 and 2 from a pool of gadgets. Also instead of specialist perks...you had the option to chose which perk your soldier took into battle.
BFV was absolutely NOT meant to be historically accurate. Where in hell are you pulling that from?
That sounds like a nightmare to balance
No harder than past games.
Some perks and specialists would obviously need to be changed and balanced differently. Like dozers appearance and perk for example.
It makes sense on him ATM, as he essentially wears a bomb suit
Imagine Dozer shield with Zain regen
Dozer shioeld is a specialist gadget. It wouldnt be in the game
At least not as it currently works.
Same with Grapple hook/wingsuit.
Those IMO should not return to the franchise, at least not in their current form.
Wingsuit should at the least be a gadget that also requires the use of a parachute to not die on landing
Well here's hoping that the next Battlefield will be equally as immersive as BF1. A game that released 8 years ago. Before Battlefront 2 and before BFV.
2042 would have been better suited releasing in 2015
the game we have now, yes. the game we got on release should not have seen the light of day
battlefront 2 was pretty immersive, all things considered
bf5 was a clown show
I hate the sliding spam so much
Battlefront 2 is mind blowingly beatiful to this day. The fact that 2042 wasnt even on the level of immersion as the game that came out 1 year before battlefront 2 is insane lol. 5 years apart and it isnt even as good looking
I think BF4 Remastered would be awesome
I think it would be unecessary
Imma be pissed if they just jump to 2142 for next game. We need a GREAT present day batlefield before we worry about future stuff
Doubt they will move to the future
how are those operators 
They're just skin presets, nothing more
or skin bundles
you can have elites be any class you want
finally someone says it
the only way premium pass could work nowadays is if it only time-locks content
but then people will complain about "hurr paid whales get early access to cool shits, pay2win reee"
battlepass already time locks stuff
I mean also including maps and other shit besides weapons
for people who don't care about money, premium pass like back in bf4 is probably the best choice, they pay extra for extra, regularly fed content
but gamers don't have jobs
we all know that

that would be impossible
The premium thing was mostly solved in BF1. Play in squad with a player who has premium > you can play play all the maps.
I still think live service isnt the issue. Poorly planned live services, with not enough seasonal content is the problem. With enough time and planning, they should give at least 3 maps per season. Those maps can be new, or remakes of past maps.
makes call of duty players go outside
At 40 health in the helicopter and land soft as fuck on the carrier on noshar.... instantly blew up from the collision
???
one massive improvement they could do instantly and would bring in even more profit is non-expiring battlepass
fomo is no longer hip
be like halo infinite 
yeah imagine if halo infinite actually had good content for their battlepass
would be a perfect system

seriously just let everyone buy the previous passes now, might as well.
Except the ultimate pass only stuff or whatever if you really want to keep some of that 'exclusive 1 time only' skins I guess
i have those lol
it's always dumb af to gatekeep content in a game you are ditching soon
they gave them out for free during s5
How would you make persistent battle passes work in relation to weekly missions? Missions would give you a form of soft currency, on which you can spend it to progress the pass of your choice? (Helldivers 2 basically does this)
i have a feeling it goes to a system like bfv
or just exactly like how halo infinite does it
weekly and daily missions give exp toward the battlepass
Which pass tho
how fast you progress them doesn't matter, since there's no longer fomo
the one you choose
you have to select which one you want to progress
Currency based seems easier to do
and you can swap them around
yeah helldivers 2 system is also nice, too little currency tho, it's insanely grindy
Its really not grindy at all. Playing one operation at a higher difficultly nets 32 warbonds
then you have 25/35 from a major order, which is community based and granted almost daily...then a daily mission that gives 15
one operation is like 3 hours isn't it, the randoms I play with are soooo slow
it drives me up the wall with how slow these people play the missions
Na, you can choose to make an operation longer bu doing all things on a map...but even on suicide difficulty it takes no longer to do primary mission than difficulties below it
You can do most missions inside an operation in about 10 mins
With there being 3/4 per operation
that's how I would run it to farm medals, but the randoms I match with are out here collecting requisition slips..
you get 5-7k per mission, why are you going around collecting slips of 250
lmao
it's insane
People mainly complete a map to try get all the samples.
Noone really gives a crap about requisition points, as you get 5-8K on higher difficulties
But getting warbonds is only slow on lower difficulties.
IMO...having daily missions is nicer for retention than weekly missions.
hello i am looking for a small sqaud to play with for fun. If you are down hit me up. Dm's are open
I complete the map for it is my duty to Democracy to ensure the planet is secured and all efforts towards liberation are undertaken fully.
How
Gunships supposed to have a zillion health
Missile launcher?
I hit an enemy big helicpter with 3 AA rockets in a row yesterday and because they had passengers they just out repaired my dmg
Sounds like squad play worked as intended
still poor balance tho, on a tank youd have to be standing relatively still and thus a much easier target in order to achieve that
How is it different to past games, where a UH60 with 2 repairing passengers could do exactly the same thing?
I cant justify poor balance for air vehicles ok just because its always been bad?
Its not bad tho. They survived because they applied team play. 3 players should not "just die" because you feel like they should
Helicopters in older battlefields didn't have so much health versus these imbalanced ass transports.
That's the distinction between a venom and a super hind.
Nvm the weapon systems being completely different.
I get that they did the right thing in that scenario in order to survive but I still think air balance is terrible and a lot more could be done to minimize that effectiveness
Also seems like a bit of a skill issue, because if you are in an AA...and you have a transport heli in view for long enough that you landed 3 direct missile hits, how did you not kill it with AA cannons paired with AA missiles. If its the RAM, then the RAM is not an AA, its a suplimentary AA damage provider
I used my handheld AA rocket launcher
Then its even more balanced than you claim
¯_(ツ)_/¯
A single soldier shouldnt be able to kill a transport with 3 players squaded up
ummmmm ok
I get that as a soldier playing...its not the most gratifying outcome...but I really dont see an issue here
A single smaw could snipe a helicopter.
Didn't see many people complaining about that.
typically no one enjoys "turtling" mechanics, especially when its a highly mobile turtle that can also use flares and hide outside of the map
Even if it didn't directly kill it would have sent the helicopter off balance and crashing into the ground.
I do agree that this games transports are a bunch of BS...but inside this game in isolation, I have no real problem with this occurance.
There are multiple tools provided for dealing with them. I do hope we dont get transports in this design in future tho
Bring back the classic transports, like the aforementioned UH60
Lots of things could be done to make it more challenging to the heli, just sitting and healing it thru dmg isnt fun gameplay. Max repair amount within a timeframe, reduced MAX health after being repaired X amount, reduced mobility during repairs
A transport heli IMO should take 2 AA missiles, 2 dumbfire missiles...or 1 direct AT tank hit to kill.
I recently unlocked the Smaw, havnt tried it tho, I heard people saying that its dmg is bugged?
You mean SRAW?
sure xD
hind takes more damage than condor
Same damage as M5, less ammo...same reload speed...terrible zoom level
oh eww
SMAW is the hitscan launcher from BF3 era
Its insanely broken and hilariously fun in portal tho
ah its only a portal modes weapons?
Its not actually hitcscan, it just has such fast projectile velocity that it feels that way
give me back the gustav velo before the nerf
fair enough, although if its not available in normal game mode I dont really care
I only used to play a portal game mode when they kept taking CQ 64 out of rotation
I like the M5 as it is now. I think they did a good job of balancing launchers...at least the dumbfire ones.
The SRAW is just awful tho. It needs its velocity to be faster, the zoom changed to 1x and its reload speed to be faster than any other
I used to use the M5 a lot when I previously played like ageees ago, but now ive been maining liz
its nice to be able to keep the pressure on vehicles
like even if they break LoS
also quite funny how much of a grudge heli pilots keep
it is obviously wise for them to hunt down the guy trying to kill them
looking at my stats tho, ive only killed 155 vehicles which doesnt seem like a lot 😦
I only have 945
2386 for me
so how is it to discuss a dead game?
S307
I stopped counting at S390 something. Lol
Level means next to nothing to me TBH. Its just something that randomly pops up now haha
First use of the SRAW netted me a Little Bird kill, then I swapped back to the M5 because everything after that was uh… less than to be desired
True lol
Not that it needs to be anything more either. But it would have been cool to get something at the end of it. Like some reason to get to S1000, other than the pretend prestige of doing so
I mean its just an indicator of how long someones been playing



