#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 1598 of 1
Instead we got a dumpster fire of a game that is 2042
I don't understand why we don't have Kyber yet for BFV
that was the only negative that stuck with me from that game
But I guess the demand is that low
Not a single redeeming thing about 2042
loved everything else, but felt the movement was off
Yeah dude
plus menu
Vehicle call ins
Tbh it kinda sucks when you get used to vaulting over objects or when you jump across a gap just to fall down because you hit the edge with your toes
Battlefront 2 was fun too , i enjoyed it somehow , but it became harder to find servers after awhile
Plus menu for tanks next!
if you don't look at the actual mechanics behind movement, then sure. But it's got more complexity than 1 by far
HELL YEA
Movement and gunplay were a huge downgrade from BFV, maps were so bad they had to redo them and that only raised them from bad to mediocre. Game started with no class system and they had to jerryrig one in after their experiment failed.
i too often enjoy the ability to completely unbalance my weapon 
can definitely agree that vaulting was great. All these games seem to excel in very specific areas when it comes to movement, not one has the complete package
2042 had rotten foundations and no amount of updates could fix that, clearly
Haven was also weird map , enemies kill u from trillion different angles its like they just put the buildings randomly here and there
Nah, only talking about the generic movement for casuals, cannot give an opinion about anything advanced since i mostly played on console when i played bf4

i get where you're coming from them
Vehicle combat is so bad in 2042
While the maps are not great...I do think the engine in 2042 is a big visual improvement over the version used in V. Grass, trees and foliage pop in is so much better in 2042 versus past games. Even on Max settings, grass and bushes pop up 10 meters away from you in V
though the changes to turret accel came in clutch
Sure in BFV planes were OP, just another in a long line of DICE being utterly unable to balance air vehicles. But tanks felt powerful without being unstoppable monsters. 2042 it's like driving a parade float
Honestly, I'd hope they'd throw out Frostbite already and move on to something better like Unreal 5.
Planes were at least fun to fly in V tho
2042's were only fun around the flashpoint season
Idk but i like battlefield 3 art style more it feels more realistic
before then it was a slog
anyone want to play 2042 tdm?
!!lfg
ℹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-crossplay #lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
Why in the name of god would you throw out your perfectly fine engine...which you maintain and control...to use some stock version of UE5.
Like I know all the pros and cons of this...but for a company as large as EA, they shouldnt have issues with engine maintenance and upgrading.
Honestly, on console at least, BFV looks better than 2042. And that's the PS4 version of BFV vs the PS5 version of 2042
If you encounter an engine issue in UE5, you are entirely reliant on Epic to fix it
I think bethesda needs to move on to new engine
Tell us how you really feel 😄
Dude is the Elon Musk of video games
Destructively disruptive for his personal financial gain
dead game
what game should we play now
After battlefield 2042 being dead
Not dead but abandoned
whatever you want, 7.2 is still coming next month
Back to BFV
7.1 might have some decent stuff in it
That's why they added EA Anti-Cheat
I just play battlefield 1 and 2042 on cycles
Knew people would flock back to the superior game
of course I'm still looking out for some damn heli fixes, but I think I'm entering a delusional state at this point
what keybinding u use for heli
default
For pitch up and pitch down
still default
u pitch with arrows?
mouse up to point nose up
damn thats possible?
yeah?
I always found it slow
that's what it is off the bat
It is interesting timing they added anti cheat a few days before ending support for the current game
wait thats possible?
I know only one madman who uses keys to pitch
Can those senstivity controls make plane move like same in warthunder lol
ah, war thunder player, I see
I was learning with keybindings and using mouse just to spin
it's me
i didnt even know u could change vehicle senstivity
there are two separate sliders, one for helis specifically and another for all vehicles
all vehicles that means jets too?
literally right next to the infantry sens slider
jets use the vehicle sens as their base, but there's an additional slider that multiplies that for jets specifically
depends how you set up the multipliers, just find something that isn't detrimental and break into it
I think tanks/vehicles in 2042 are fine but air vehicles are so busted, even if you make it your job to babysit their death they can just spend 3 seconds going out of range/hiding and waiting for flares
i have always crashed helicopter to ground lol after flying for 10 minutes
that's just modern vehicles
Liz is Op to control those annoying heli users
Other than that everything useless
In 2 years
I use liz a lot, and the range on her rocket is pretty shit and only the smallest heli gets one shotted
meaning a good pilot will just run away and hide/repair
Unless ur some God and one shot with rpg or m5
though that sraw.... really doesn't need such a high zoom
Battlefield 2042 discontinued at age 2 years and 4 months
yeah
Any lfg ?? Ps5
S7 last season
!!lfg
ℹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-crossplay #lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
Add me bro , this my psn tag
No m1014
levolutions are bad
But cool 😎
even the big weather storms dissapeard with the first season
Bro the weather storms barely even threw things around
Crazy how the last new map was just an Arica harbor asset flip
its still a top 3 map
Kinda poetic in a way
thats kinda sad
Haven is like a 6/10 on conquest
📌
Arica Harbor was one of my favorites. Tbf bc2 maps were all solid for their size.
I guess we have to wait till next year now
It's time to put an end to it ( battlefield 2042)
they existed in S2 though
i hope in the next game we will go back to open maps, in bf2042 alot of them are three lanes
LOL

0.0
Have you played on the prerework maps
tell me that's sarcasm
Sure most of the post launch maps were 2-3 lanes in a horizontal pillar but
Is the next bf coming out at the end of 2025?
Gooodbye 2042~
maybe

🤔probably
spearhead, reclaimed, redacted the all have lines where you need to go, its not as open as in old games
3 of the new maps which 2 of them were 64 only and one of them was just metro but 2042
flashpoint is the best in this game
For getting sniped in the middle
naah
Next, everyone slowly leaves the game and lets the AIs continue to fight.
people really shouldnt be bothered about seasons ending
Still crazy that this game had only 3 primary shotguns
its not like they did much
they did a lot but never really got what people wants
Not bothered and kinda expected
A lot is a way of putting things
trouble is, some people require some kind of challenge / pass / grind to play for to find a reason to play the game. To them no new skins means no reason to play. Which is a rough mindset but I'd imagine those are the folks who are the loudest
few guns, few maps, nothing crazy, game doesnt rly change
next time they really need to put some work in for weapons, gunsmith...what really matters in a fps
I’m mildly bothered because this game only has 3 primary shotguns
Classes and maps
movement
The gunsmith in this game is fine
actually, everything 
weekly challenges still remain, there will be silly events for those people too
that too
just make everything good
tbf there are some things I'd like to see carried over
noo, gunsmith in Battlefield Play 4 Free was better than this
that message was CORPORATE af
2042 could have been GREAT if only it was a complete game
not a combination of half asses ideas
Great if it was a good game
Well I guess this means we’re all gonna slowly fade away into the redacted 24/7 lobbies
And fuck hazard zone
i'm all for that, redacted conquest is fun
with vehicles too though
ironic how the last map we will get was actually part of one launch map. DICE pls
I want to get mad at something else this game didn’t do
The next one must have naval combat
Oh yeah this game didn’t get naval combat
Even though the hovercraft exists and the mav
Bf4 had paracels storm
AND 0 DIVING
Add ac 130 gunship too
and the exodus as an part of the lore
Add a commander mode
2 factions
i honestly don't care much for any of those things
nice to have, but not really a dealbreaker
Give us Heligoland Bight
But set in a modern time
BF2 sequel and we are good to go
Well now we move onto the next phase
Battlefield cold war when?
with different maps, factions...
The speculation and theorizing of a new battlefield
would rather that than dwell on what 2042 didn't do
At least I got 500 hours squeezed out of 60 buckaroos
If the rumors are true then we are getting a battlefield that is NATO vs a PMC(Source Tom Henderson)
the most reliable
Bro what pmc would be big enough to rival nato
Also a f2p battle royal is coming which shouldn't
I told you guys, its NATO vs Disney (gone rogue), they get to sell the BEST skins that way
donuld duck ect
was Nato ever in a BF game?
They can't compete with Warzone
I wonder how the seasonal “storyline” ends
they can if they make it right
We sort of had it in bf2042. The us vs Russia
will we ever find out who Oz was? 
Were they in bf2?
Firestorm died on arrival in bf5
maybe Oz were the friends we made along the way
Hazard zone is also dead
DOA
was never really alive to be honest
US in not nato, i mean they are part of NATO but so are alot of other country
no friends have been made 
it was not free to play and supported
US is a big part of nato
dont think so
us is nato* fixed that 
Nato is created to stay safe from Russia
yes, it is part of NATO, but its not just US
NATO was in bf2 modern combat
didnt play modern combat
Give us bf1942 remake. BF1942 had submarines, aircraft carrier
Ps2 bf2
only the original ''wellcome to duty''
They won’t
Portal doesn't count
The problem with battlefield is they are trying to replicate what's making the most money
The old DICE left for one simple reason that is creative freedom
Funny how portal was also doa
Battlepass and skins
In content
Enlisted also died because of greed
that could be made better then it was
It makes sense to put battlepass in free games only
That's why you have specialists. If they had characters similar to bf5 then it would be less of a problem
Whats the point of paying for game
I wonder how long or will 2042 dip to the point where you can’t find 128 servers anymore
Case and key system is way better
5 euros🥶
ah yes, gambling is so much better
I guess I won’t have to save my bfcoins anymore
not even that i just played it for free with my free months of game pass
lol yes i have 1000 bf coins but idk what to use it on
I’ll just use it on whatever I need a milsim headgear or uniform for
i pre ordered the ultimate edtion for 130€
I just bought gamepass
You’re faith in dice was your undoing
because poor
it was my first BF that i pre ordered haha
I think only game i have actually bought in past 3 years is fallout new vegas
if you need this to play a game then the game is not worth your time.
More people need to realize this
People would preorder the next battlefield anyway even though how bad bf2042 was at launch
Wait at least a month after the release of the next bf
Support platforms like gog
But what does preorder do beside saving the user’s money if they are going to release it in unfinished state
Some Preorder comes with unique bonuses
I got it for the early beta access, but I was unbelievably naive back then
omg preorder exlusive skin wooow
Also they said a playable game at launch is a brutal expectation
so if no one preorders the battlefield 6 will it make any difference if the game will be good or bad
no
aint no year 2 of content you got year 1.7
Cod is getting worse after every release but people keep buying it each year
if anything preorder are a bad thing for the consumer
I doubt the funds they gain 4 months before launch will allow for any signficant improvements in development
havent bought a cod game since cold war
Yeahh so preorder just saves money
If the company gets most of its "expected" sales before the game even releases it gives them justification (to them) to stop working on it as much
you can ask for a refund if the game is shit
I think because people dont have much options left , valorant and csgo all are crap
People were saying they won't preorder again after BF4's bad launch but they do anyway
still got plenty of good shooters besides those
There is also the delta force game is coming which is trying to be BF and COD
i wont tho
But playerbase is dominated by those games
i didnt preorder bf5, 1 or hardline
Not enough reason to get refund because the game is shit
may have more players, doesn't really limit your options though
anyone remember the csgo battle royal, it was so bad it was actually hilarious
good times
I was playing battlefront 2 , 2 years back and only had to quit just because there were 5-10 players per server
Same lmao
Yea i remember it was 2019
that exists?
does cs2 even have danger zone still?
Context
just dont lol
i dont get it how people enjoy planting bomb and defusing bomb since 2000
Like Csgo had a BR
same reason people still play chess after centuries
I pre-ordered cyberpunk and it's worth it.
yeah I had never even played CSGO until the BR came out and they did a free weekend or w/e and wow was it awfulllll
Cdpr redeemed themselves
That game actually was a game
how do i play it
Although broken as hell and in need of many many updates
don't think cs2 has it anymore
thats a good point damn cant argue with that
I kinda grew up with CS like the old ones, then I played Counter Strike source, and by the time CSGO came out I really had 0 interest in playing it
get bored of playing the same game lol
Did counter strike global offensive have an actual battle royal mode
There are also people who bought skull and bones at full prce
Still currently cs and valorant are the most popular games online
ummm if its not in game then they probably removed it
Yel
Yep*
That’s crazy
it was
I’ve never heard of that
it was in the main game not a seperate one
It used to take 10 mins to find a match in that mod
Yes, it's called danger zone
damn
dw you did not miss out
it had a similar economy system, map contracts, loot caches, goofy gadgets like repulsion mines
i wanted to play half life 2 battle royale
The battle royal wasn't the same as other battle royal as apex, pubg
how is the finals
Why does Valve get exception for microtransactions, lootboxes
don't know about it's playercounts but it's still hella fun
When other companies does the same, they get hate
pixel gun 3d
came out on steam recently and its literally pay to win
valve still get hate, it's just been so long it's become normal for the most part. it's the whole 'you can technically get it for free' thing that means it's still around
You can actually profit with CS2's crates by selling on the steam market which is gambling
i love gambling
I’m quite excited what will Enders next video
Roblox’s phantom forces have better skin system lol just win games get crates unlock it

best skin system definitely titanfall 2's
although I can't not have the word 'best' in the same sentence as 'titanfall' so I am very biased
simply put, you level from 1 to 100, then raise you generation (mastery), and reset your level back to 1. So at certain levels at certain generation ranks you get skins
it's just gameplay to get skins
Damn
and all the assassinations and whatnot are just challenges that stay around forever
the only thing I recall being paid are the prime titans, but like.... i'd actually be willing to pay for those
game's too good
I have never really done any micro transaction
I maybe do it if i get time when i get some job after finishing university
it just feels immoral to spend ur parents money or hard earned side hustle money on some skins , there can be better investments
microtransactions are not investments lol
honestly i see no point in buying skins
would rather spend that money on some dlc that expands gameplay potential
Like u can save it slowly and invest it or just save some dollars for a upcoming game
I have a friend addicted to valorant he believes buying skin improves ur skills
They get some superior confident feel and some shit like that
been there, people always talk about that in game
will admit those skins are rather pricey though
no correlation
2042, fortnite, pubg, valorant all have fairly pricey skins but still have battle passes
like u get some currency through it save for ur fav skin
i guess
will battlefield 6 include campaign though lol
We dont even know the title of game
i believe criterion are working on that now
im asuming bf6
used to be ridgeline, but they closed
well we all thought 2042 would be called bf6, bf6 is what people will refer to it as until a name drop though
I feel like they might have already started working on battlefield 6 side by side since launch of 2042
definitely
the next game would have started either a couple months before or directly after 2042's launch
Leaks say it will come on 2025 but it can be delayed
better delay than having a horrible launch
facts
I would even be fine with 2026, just as long they don't release the next one undercooked, that trend with Battlefield games needs to end.
its not a leak
its in their financial statements theyre expecting it in the second half of 2025
i hope they add the destruction like in bf4 atleast even improving it
Oh i thought it was some leak
Destruction is fine, all I care about is good and variety in maps.
Large, medium and small maps
Infantry, infantry+some vehicles and full on vehicle maps
Just like it has been in the past, is that so hard?
I see battlefield 3 even today the graphics impress me
it was too good for 2011
Battlefield 2042 dont give same feels
yes, it is. 2042 has those things, but getting them working together is another story
it's just that 2042's initial design direction steered those systems in a direction that didn't quite land
although, I do still have some hope given the feedback sessions from this game
Bit of an understatement there
Heli's too op. I don't see anything wrong with many AA wildcats.
if u wanna know about what went wrong with 2042 there is video on that by a guy named big boss
its quite detailed
i did not even know anything going on backend
The "BattleFailed 2042" video? It's alright but quite dated, it came out at the time of Season 1.
Since i dont follow news that much
Yep
I feel I already know enough given I've been following along the whole way
What senstivity u use for helicopter
Battlefield 2042 is not getting new seasons
seems like we are getting close to Battlefield's next game (which is releasing 2025)
i just put it on 100
they are also putting more teams on the next Battlefield game
100 for the heli slider, and I think 16 for the vehicle sens? 12 or 16, somewhere in that range i think
No hope next game releases in 2025. Probably summer 2026.
i feel like i will have to practice daily to get good with heli
Hard to see a competent single player and multiplayer being done in essentially 2.5 years.
that's all we have from EAs financial statements, there's no other source we can go off
you will. took me several months to get the hang of it, but i've been flying since bf4 so that was way back then
Is no one playing portal? Player count seems so low. I have the largest search settings possible but only find servers with 8-10 players
are you on last gen?
did u practice on portal or solo ai
so bf2042 season 7 will last for like two years?
And Classes don't forget "Actual Class System" idc if they copy BFV's Class System with its soldier customization again
lol no, season 7 will end with the battle pass...then probably 4/5 bug fixing/balancing updates...then nothing more
Of course, how can we forget the seasonal cosmetic limited time skins that will come
Also a server browser with RSP at launch
there may not be no more seasons, but HO HO HO SANTA CLAUS SKIN
Just loaded up the game, hopped into a match, 40-425
Aaaand it’s over. That was a fun loading screen.
Glad they ended the content for bf 2042. Game is saturated. It's still fun to play it once in a while tho.
Now let's see what they will do with the next battlefield
That sucks, especially when it's a good map. 😭
Love your username your username is the best username
I dunno if his username is the best username but it's definitely a username
Oh thanks
Long live bf4
My first and favorite
WR coming soon
Man, what’s it’s like to be on a team whose vehicles do their jobs?
Random deviation was awful in bf4
Hi guys can someone help me how to fix the game starting from gamepass ultimate? Btf2042
Straight up pretty new to this franchise, I've played a bit of bf5 around when it first came out, and been trying to get more into bf2042. You all think it's a good game to get started with?
what is the issue
Bf4 is peak Battlefield
But he also says Siege is a good game so idk if his opinion can be trusted.
Game already running error
battlefield 2042 support is ending today and they moving on to next month , 2042 is fun ngl but in my timezone sometimse the servers are dead during morning time and i dont know how long will the game be alive even at active time ( in which most players play) but currently yeah its cool
4 was good with questionable balance
1 is better than 5 imo
And no ai bots
Lmao I don't like siege at all.
Agree. Siege is fucking.shit now
Used to be cool back then
Now it's garbage
Fr tho
It fell off since 2020
i think closing game on task manager and closing ea then starting will fix
2018*
or just launching game from ea app
I've heard a lot about bf4, most of my older friends played it and loved it
BF4 was my first battlefield
Is giving me the error before opening task manager 🤦🏻♂️
If you're on PC, I highly recommend waiting for WR to come out
Oh damn
I used to play on my ps3 back then it was amazing. Tbf it's the only bf I played. Tried bf1 didn't like it cuz I like a modern setting with modern weapons.
I am sadly not on PC, I can't afford it because of college lol
when it gives error close it and then relaunch if its not working idk
Yeah
then direct launch from ea will help or just sign in sign out of xbox
Custom portal mode with no vehicle respawn timers, with bots for aim
Rip
If you don't play modern games
You can get something okay
Earlier today I noticed that you could damn near drift the tanks in bf2042, haven't really been into vehicles much
Kinda surprised on those movement mechanics tho
Ok
idk about tanks but getting roadkills with the transport jeep is fun
I'd have to try that out lol
Just to do a lil poll, what's your main go to weapon in 2042?
The legacy guns
None of that vanilla shit
Don't think I've used them yet
Well unlock them
They're way better than other guns
I like the M5A3 because I'm a basic bitch
And the AK5C because I'm definitely a basic bitch
I usually change based off of the map and game mode I'm in, if that makes sense
But my go to mains are the SFAR, BSVM, K30, and the SWS, sometimes NTW-50 depending on if I wanna be a bitch lol
Vhx at the moment
I really have to do more gun challenges lol
Ok
:(
Non of them working
Sorry man idk
Searching the exact problem on google and adding reddit in front of it might give some solution
Reddit has some helpful answers, sometimes lol
I was having some mouse bug recently i didnt find on Reddit so just posted it and it helped
But most of times u get answers without trying
I agree
But anyways
M416. , pkp lmg and ak5c
The pkp is pretty good
Depending on server
I made it through midjourney ai
Back then it was free
Just wrote red panda holding a gun
Since red panda is life
Bf 2025 is bf’s last hurrah
so basically season 7 is a reused asset map, 3 guns and another reused asset map with a jet that was in the game files for a while lol
thats the end
do you think we could see the death of this franchise if the next fails?
cause honestly, i can kinda see it at this point
most maps are reused asset maps
2042 motto
shipping containers galore
and sand bags
then theres just stadium
it is what it is
hopefully dice and the other studios can pull through with a good game
cause i think the hype for battlefield has died down with the past 2 titles
i think there's still plenty of excitement for the series
if they get a good game out first
you can tell because people won't shut the fuck up about how much they hate the previous ones
2042 still has bugged input
the previous battlefields? which ones
$CurrentBattlefield
the current one is awful yeah, compared to previous titles
when it was V people complained all the time about V. now it's 2042 and people complain all the time about it
V is also pretty bad, not as bad as 2042 tho
50-17 with m60 on arica finishing my shoulder fired missile damage mission
jesus
i hope the next battlefield could actually bring the series back, 2042 feels so far off from an actual battlefield game
oh apparently i unlocked the wrapped for the m60 now
Anyway
???
Nothing
whelp, it's been a fun ride, i knew this was going to happen
Leaks potentially revealed plans for the next Battlefield game just as EA and DICE officially pull the plug on Battlefield 2042...
is there a help channel?
Fucking 7
Rude
2042 is 6
isnt it 7? 
1942-bf2-3-4-1-5-2042 im forgetting about 2142 because i never played it 
1942, 2, 2142, Bad Company, Bad Company 2, 3, 4, Hardline, 1, 5, 2042
?
oh right hardline was a thing 
Side game
forgot Bad Company
bad trash console game or bc2 which was ...midly annoying because it was a pc game that still had a hint of console game? 
How do you guys think 2042's legacy will be remembered
as garbage just like Hardline
Thats what i was thinking
Battlefield games typically dont change reception from launch that much, I mean Battlefield 4 did I guess but Battlefield Hardline did not
and I liked Hardline
but the community sentiment remains the same, its a trash game and that's how it is
Although one could argue 2042 was left in a better state than hardline
I just hope the final update adds some sort of offline mode
otherwise 2042 will be completely unplayable at some point
where were you when 2042 was kill
Battlefield 2042 is completely online compared to prior Battlefield games
Yo can you share some of that copium
2042's legacy is Embark Studios first and only video game HAHA
2042's legacy is how not to production/market a video game
"No."
RIP my railgun
Battlefield 7 will learn a lot from Battlefield 2042's mistakes
here's hoping they dont fuck it up
because we know the lowest common dominator masses are gonna will into exsistence Modern Low Speed High Drag Operatorcore
Meanwhile we're this close to have a 2142 sequel at out grasp
Man i am making sure my expectations are at the bottom. Like past the center of the earth and into hell low
reasons I think BF7 will be different, I could still be wrong, is because they literally have every studio on this game which is insane, it seems like they arent joking this time
4 is a mixed bag. there's still a lot of people that will tell you about how much it SUCKED at launch
based on what they've said we're in for another squad-based, half-baked Battle Royale where every Operator has their own abilities and shit
BF2042 can hardly be called a battlefield if you ask me. Music is shit nothing in common with the BF Theme, OPERATORS?! core features missing, most uninteractive scoreboard/squad-system
yea typically Battlefield games, their reception doesn't change much from launch
if it sucked
it will always be seen as that
DICE needs to ensure they launch their next game near perfect or they are fucked lmao
Wasn't that literally the case for 2042? They pulled the plug on BFV, Battlefront 2, and Need For Speed for that
no game is ever perfect of course (unless we are talking about GTA 6, yes it will be perfect)
but Battlefield needs to try as hard as it can
(it will not be perfect)
There wasn't as many studios working on 2042 as Battlefield 7, not to mention they had no idea what 2042 was going to be up until the last 18 months iirc, so it kept changing, where as from what we are hearing with Battlefield 7 is that they have a concrete vision this time
Key gameplay mechanics THEY SHOULD actually have in the next One.
- Weapon Plus System - this shit made playing the game way more fun since I didn't need to enter a loadout screen every time I wanted a new scope
- BF5's general movement abilities
- Maybe commander mode
- Keep the current system of squad buddy revives those are groovy as well
it's funny how much specialists in their current form aren't actually that different from past games from a gameplay perspective
Ever again
- BF5's attrition mechanic for vehicles and damage models - frankly you should be able to literally shoot the tracks of a tank and track it.
but people are adament that they're the downfall of civilization
they arent part of the franchise
Hero shoot mechanics are awful
Nobody cares if they're elite skins
and CoD was class based at one point too, look where operators got them
and 2042 has classes have you played the game?
But there's no reason a recon drone, wall hacks devicves, spot blocking,grappling hooks, and ballistic shields needed to be character locked
specialists + classes, yes I have played the game lmfao
2042 was not a case of "it's not perfect." It wasn't functional for MONTHS. Terrible specialist system, horrible balancing that ripples of can still be felt to this day, every map sucked that they had to rework them ALL, and let's not forget how piss poor the first 2 seasons were for content
specialists are not needed
Battlefield and CoD are both class based shooters, this isnt overwatch mate, go play that if you want that stuff
CoD introducing operators fucked the franchise
COD operators are also IIRC just costmetic things
now its all about $30 dollar bundles lmao
yea
but it ruins the game and the immersion it gives, if we talking battlefield in this instance
from a gameplay perspective that's how the game is. "specialists" are an aesthetic. in 2042 a specialist is a gadget + a passive trait. that's it. there's nothing else a specialist does from a gameplay perspective
no one wants to play Battlefield and see a Mickey Mouse specialist on the field, would be funny tho, but ruins the game
Same way CoD went way to far with Operators in their franchise
you have fucking cat operators in CoD what a joke lmao
Kay so here's the thing - picture specialists are just skins. Now their abilities are class wide. Rao can use wall hacks, Casper can put down spot blockers, Blasco can have Casper motion tracker, and their drone is a all class ability much like the dog
Boom now you have various sub-classes of the main class.
You can mix and match to an immense degree and aren't locked to characters.
thing is doesnt matter how "oraganised" the development of the new battlefield looks right now, its all owned by a greed a monster and there is nothing stopping someone from later down the line just going " yeah that will do, hype is good, release"
that's just specialists again but you've made a different aesthetic choice
that's not a gameplay choice
No you're wrong lol
no you're not thinking
Because ANYONE playing recon can use ANY of the specialists abilities
They're class gadgets
you're not forced into a play style by picking Rao
pretty sure you cant get the wing suit that sundance has for any other character because its TIED to Sundance, that's not an aesthetic thing, that's actually a gameplay difference because wing suits function differently to parachutes
Sundance is her grenade gadget and wingsuit trait
exactly
model swapping will not ruin it
thats a problem
that's her gameplay mechanic
thats the problem
its not Battlefield
it shouldnt be tied to a character
BF5 did it right too with the class specializations you can chose
please tell me you played any prior Battlefield before engaging in this discussion?
Battlefield 2?
Battlefield 4?
You didn't even need those added abilities
at least Battlefield Play4Free... lmao
BF4 had the squad upgrade tree
It's mostly just bad optics. I personally don't want to be forced to play as Overwatch/Apex-esque "unique" characters with backstories in a multiplayer game where there are only 12 different specialists for servers that can hold up to 128 players. Starts to feel like clone wars, and not in a good way! Tarnishes the appeal of Battlefield for me, where you're just a tiny cog in a massive machine of war. If the specialist system allowed you to mix and match heads/bodies while keeping the milsim aesthetic for the factions, while keeping the current gameplay for the specialists exactly the same, then I think it would have been much better recieved.
nothing and I mean nothing should be tied to an operator/specialist/skin whatever it is
2142 even had the original squad leader abilities like the beacon
Exactly
if you want specialists
go to OVERWATCH
I aint playing Paladins, I am playing Battlefield
And that's aesthetics! But it's not a problem with the gameplay of specialists as a concept
I dont care about goofy customization or specialists, I want an immersive movie like experience with Battlefield as that's how it is
customization is less of an issue (as the umbrella is big here)
but specialists are the problem here
There's NOTHING that stops Zayne from using a grappling hook
Or Sundance freebasing Zayne's super cocaine he gets on kills
*which I'd remove anyway that just would encourage a meta"
before they reverted to a class system you basically have a meta loadout.
the aesthetics arguement doesnt work here, because we know what it devolves into
again, see: Call of Duty
the answer is no and remains no
specialists are not welcome
before it turns into mickey mouse and cat specialists like Call of Duty is turning into
no thanks
I would have not argued against it really, trust me, had I not seen what CoD turned into
(wanting to become Fortnite + Overwatch)
it's just proven that eventually it goes tooooo far
and then it becomes goofy as fuck
anything to make a quick buck out of a 30 dollar bundle, amirite Activision
OK so in the next game, DICE introduces class tech gadgets. With tech gadgets, each class gets
- A choice of gadget + trait
- An open class gadget
- A class grenade
- A secondary
- Any primary but certain classes of primaries get certain buffs
there's no reason to defend specialists other than wanting the franchise to devolve into Overwatch and/or Fortnite with how they operate with their skins / legends or how they call it
how does that sound?
some people want new content, some just want new skins - one is a lot less effort from devs in order to get money
my whole point is, I dont want something that devolves into what CoD did with operators
trust me EA attempted that with specialists but 2042 flopped so hard they backed away from it
who gives a fuck if theres specialists or if its classes or nothing or everything - actual gameplay is what matters
really we just need new content
specialists can ruin the gameplay, certain stuff is literally locked behind a specialists not even a class, I could understand locking it behind a class but not a specialist dude
you cant say for sure that one way will work and one way wont because on its own that systems just does not matter, its how it all comes together that is important
Specialists are a unique idea (for Battlefield) but i feel like they need to be in their own spin-off game or something.
Specialists are the result of Battlefront 1 (which was a DICE title) so I personally enjoyed specialists.
I love having that amount of customization for my characters/loadouts.
The issue is, its not Battlefield. Albeit Battlefield has changed so much over the years.
I actually believe no class should get a weapon bonus
Yeah same
BF4 had a good metric a lot of all class weapons
battlefield is shooting guns while lots of other people are shooting guns, cod is small teams running on tiny closed maps, bf is bigger teams on more open maps
in the case of Battlefront, specialists worked for me but that's because of the nature of what Battlefront is, its a Star Wars game, you wanna play based off of Star Wars characters
This just isn't the case for Battlefield, you arent playing to be Obi Wan or something, you are playing to conquer zones and have a good time
If I wanted to be locked into 4 guns i'd go play the shittier Battlefront (Battlefront 2)
It does not fit battlefield at all
Engineers - SMGs/PDW
Support - Machine Guns
Assault - ARS
Recon - Snippers
Carbines,DMRs, and shotguns all being all class was elite
It was a game about Mercenaries.
Carbines - enable recon players to fulfill rolls that aren't sniping. DMRs allows other roles medium to long range, shotguns are self explanatory
Like 2042 might as well have been the Hardline for DICE. I remember Hardline having those RnG pick a perk things.
but that's stupid. in real life there's nothing stopping you from using different kinds of weapons. it feels like pointless categorization and separation
Hardline wasn't a bad game imo, just not a Battlefield game
that's the issue EA has sometimes
actual gunplay is important, the ability to impact the outcome of the game, having objectives to go for, being able to use person skill to achieve something in game, having good balanced, maps that are well designed, technical improvemnts thats what matters - where you do all of that while using a generic soldier, or a class or a specialist doesnt matter apart from how that ties into the above
they forget what Battlefield is lol
Especially if you're a Merc. You're not following a basic combat doctrine.
If you want to use a XM8 as a Recon Specialist, you're going to use a fucking XM8. 😛
like I dont deny having fun in Hardline and 2042 but they are by no means proper Battlefield games
some people say battlefield 1 isnt a battlefield game - its all opinions
"proper battlefield games" lol
Battlefield 1 is a Battlefield game, I mean I dont care for it much (I know I know grill me on that) but it is
battlefield is relatively large scale combat, combines arms, easily accesable game for the matter
most vague and subjective statement ever
But what I'm saying is, if the specialist system was kept exactly the same as it is right now: class restrictions on gadgets, class-specific gadgets and traits, etc., but you were able to completely change characters/customize your soldier to your liking, I think that would be the best possible outcome. Instead of saying "Oh I'm an Assault but I'm playing Sundance" it would be "Oh I'm an Assault, fast-attack specialist" or something. They would effectively be subclasses, I think BFV also tried something like this? Probably would've worked better in the long run for the "live service" as the dev team wouldn't need to author a bunch of new assets and a pointless backstory every time they wanted to add a new subclass
whether that is achieved via classes or specialists or anything else really doesnt matter
Exactly save that shit for a campaign
Multiplayer is about just go out and shoot
Not give a shit about characters with a “story”
Class-based
Focus on war
Tanks, choppers, jets
Destruction (to be fair they both had it but 2042 has been argued it has less destruction compared to prior games)
Hardline didn't have some of what I mentioned, 2042 tried to move towards being specialist based
so go out and shoot then, why do you care if youre using a character or a class or a specialist
subclasses
or as some might call it: "specialization". maybe we call them... "specialists" ah fuck
BF5 did this but the abilities were minor
so everything that 2042 has, gotcha
I cause I have to look at it in multiplayer
Honestly yeah. I hope we do go with a more basic soldier route. I just want to be a nameless nobody.
However I want to be MY nameless nobody. Let me customize her as I see fit (Gimme Liz's new skin as an option and i wont scream in anguish)
Considering BF4 had squad based upgrades that barely ever had an effect on the game
I just dont think there is a need for specialists at all, you are a soldier in a Battlefield that is it
you customize your soldier how you want, its not tied to any character like its Overwatch
overwatch is so different from a gameplay perspective. like not even in gamemodes or objectives, but just in loadouts
Save the characters for a campaign where it belongs
any system can work for a battlefield game, its about doing it right and in coherance with everything else about that title
Like if they want to expand on the Specialist system.. Like lets say you have the 4 classes again.
But instead of choosing a character, you just choose a kit. Maybe one has the Wingsuit. One has the grapple. The XM25 and so on
then you come full circle
look at "tradional" bf class system and people will still argue over which class should perform which roles and have which gadgets and bonuses ect
Overwatch is based on what they call legends or something (characters), you select them before the match begins, cringe imo
Just let the player be their own character lmfao
Fortnite I can understand, I mean that's kinda their only way of making money, they are a free to play game after all
actually a HUGE part of overwatch is changing heroes on the go
Well Overwatch was born thanks to MOBAs.
and ultimates
And MOBA's you play as someone named. Like in SMITE you play as literal gods.
"I wont switch yet I need to use my ult" boi if your pick didnt achieve any results in the last 5 mins, your ult isnt gonna help, just switch xD
Being able to switch is a blessing and a curse
again, aesthetics. you're picking a predefined loadout / ability set. everything else is set dressing
right but in BF no wants to change "characters", we want to change loadouts depending on the scenario although tbf I dont really do that, usually I just pick the loadout I want for the match I am in and stick with it
that's just me tho
you mean the gun attachment system nobody ever uses
A dressing which does not fit this franchise at all
Yeah same. Unless someones teabagging me with a meta gun, or annoying me with them. I just pick a gun and use it until i max it out or get bored.
good thing it's not overwatch then
yep same here
But it’s in that vein
maybe bad people don't use it
nothing is stopping you from changing loudouts, but specialists have their own unique bonus on top of class restricted gadgets which is NORMAL in bf games, so you are literally getting the same plus more
the aesthetics arguement doesnt work, you are just reinforcing my point even harder, if anything, you are arguing for me, CoD proves that operators (being aesthetics themselves) can RUIN the game
Look at all the goofy ass operators they made
Honestly? The gun attachment system is nice. However given the choices you have for the system? Its kinda fucking useless.
Dont need thermals, smoke counters it. For some silly reason.
that's how smoke works
Dont need silencers, people are oblivious.
unfortunately at launch and for many months after using the attachemnt changes actually caused some fps lag, so I imagine a lot of early players trained themselves not to use it
? most guns can go from DMR to SMG with attachments
Dont need grips/lasers because some guns are just that accurate or one laser beats every attachment.
you see the second part, I dont care about allat, none of that, no unique bonus, no specific characters, just classes
you are either Recon, Assualt, Medic or Engineer
nothing more
nothing less
no need for characters
you are a soldier
you are not Mickey Mouse
in which case you shouldnt care who you play as?
why should you be able to customize your appearance at all then, you are just some nameless grunt afterall
We have camos
yea of course I wouldnt, actually I play as Sundance all the time as that's the first character that it put me on when I started 2042
Like the only time I really change attachments on the fly is to replenish my own ammo from the 3 choices I have.
Or to switch to a higher end scope to snipe someone. Thats it.
I dont change grips. I RARELY change barrel.
never changed it really
you wear what the armory gives you and be happy
I just didnt care about it and I think its useless
All this tells me detectiv is that the addition of another layer of things to consider is too much for your brain - having unique abilities adds MORE to the game, if its to much for you handle....
I got promoted for all the challenges I did
customizing an appearance is different, its your own character, its not a specialist or something, nothing is tied to your character specifically
you are a soldier, not micky mouse
you would actually be correct
At the same time, this isnt CoD.
many specialists being shit is whole different story but having them is a good thing imo, I like things to be difficult and having to consider your enemies on multiple levels
right so the customization would need to be on point with war aesthetics I agree and actually, I will be honest here, I applaud EA for not making the specialists ya know goofy like CoD did with operators
Do I like the skins in this game? Yeah.
But its the times. Skins are bound to happen. And I actually enjoy colourful skins. Like that Scorpion skin in the shop right now.
I only like a few of them
skins that match the aesthetics of the game are fine to me, seriously, if it was me years ago, completely fine, I am only against as we have all seen what CoD has devolved into because of it or as Doc likes to say lmfao "DEMISE OF THE FRANCHISE" I find it funny lmao
I like alot, I admit. Lots of future ones, the ones with the screens on them and shit.
paid skins in a paid game just shouts greed and lack of ability to actually deliver anything better but still wanting money
Abilities I have no issue with it’s having a whole ass character with a bio for someone I’m playing in multiplayer and not in campaign that I have an issue with
However one thing I dont want to see though is Crossover skins or fucking Nikki Minaj type skins.
I hate the fact that skins exist and shit but its what plebs want nowadays
but seeing how CoD is just adding ridicioulous shit that makes no sense to CoD from an aesthetic stand point for CoD skins is what reinforces the NO to specialists in Battlefield for me
specifically because of CoD
hence why I keep mentioning them
Skins have existed since like UT or before 🤷♀️
the cat skins dude, the fucking nicki manaj skin lmaoooo
its meant to be CoD man
you are far to invested in this shit, its a video game. play to have fun, who cares what the person looks like
thats corporate greed nothing to do with gameplay, but some people can get sold on "lore", fancy blog posts about a characters background, cool trailers ect - its just a marketing tool but considering it has no real impact on gameplay I dont mind so much
like crazy zombie skins sure, I mean Zombies and CoD goes way back
Listen right? Its funny to me that you can be Snoop Dog or Nikki Manaj. I find those funny but keep them in Warzone or something
And that’s the problem: greed that detracts from what the game is about
But that Cat girl skin? The purple one with the EVA helmet?
Gimme. Gimme gimme gimme gimme
because this is a game about being a soldier on a Battlefield? maybe I want my war games to look like war games
not everything is Fortnite
if I wanna play Fortnite and have a cool goofy skin
I go play that
lmao
I want Catear helmets 😤
and I do play Fortnite btw, it is fun FOR Fortnite but they have no place in BF or CoD
I'd be lying if I said some of those operators arent fucking cool but man I still want that normal CoD experience ya know
Yeah same lmao
2042 can be considered poor overall because they took ideas and just didnt want to think them thru properly or finish them. Specialist system not a bad thing if done correctly. Is a bad thing if you just throw them without considering overall game design
how your character looks has nothing to do with it lol, maybe stop trying to larp via the game and just play it for enjoyment
its not about larping lmao
its about the franchise being what it is
its about soldiers
on a battlefield, the mode is conquest
are you 12, you are just arguing in a circle
Larping is part of the fun
I can spin that arguement on you, you do realise this right?
are you 12?
you wanna larp as mickey mouse in a game?
Some skins I can tolerate (Cat Girl skin, some of the future ones out right now.)
But shit like Zombies? Skeletor (i love skeletor), Hellsing and Lilith? They dont belong in my god damn TDM
see how easy that is
Thing is specialist and skins do not have be one and the same. It is possible to have specialists and not have skins, just like it would be possible to have basic class system but have a ton of skins
also Nicki Manaj lmaooooooooo
why are celebrities in my CoD game
Snoop Dog it makes sense. He plays CoD.
True, I will admit, 2042 actually did it well
i have 0 issue with how my character looks, i could not care less.
WW3’s way of skins is one of the right ways to do it
but who knows what would have happened had 2042 succeeded
but if im paying £40 or whatever for a game, I dont want to be greeted with "buy this fucking battlepass" every time I launch
yea in all fairness
If the game succeeded it would have ended on a better note.
I wouldnt mind the pass if it was like Infinites.
that's another issue itself
But alas, its not. So its stupid.
There's two sides to specialists and they're two completely separate distinct things:
- Aesthetics - the characters each specialist is as well as their skins
- Gameplay - what specialists are as an element that defines how you play the game
Some people can only see specialists as an aesthetic property. They're only characters, and characters are bad, because... idk look at all these other games there's no way they can do characters and not make them giant pink snowglobes or something. Games are entirely defined by aesthetics and gameplay doesn't matter at all in categorizing games.
Others see specialists as a gameplay element. I don't care too much about the aesthetics. I'm more interested in what specialists bring to the table as gameplay elements. And what specialists are as gameplay is extremely simple and well inline with past games.
I want to see specialists continue to exist in Battlefield simply as a gameplay element. Their aesthetics can change I don't really care.
didnt play that but fair enough
Specialists remind me of the scrapped archetypes system from bf5.
But you know. Weapons would be locked to that super specific sub class.
Apex legends has cool skin system - you play, you get box, you open box, you get skin, wooghoo, same as OW1
by the way, they are moving away from Specialists
pretty sure Tom Henderson said this
Nonono more loot boxes.
Yeah sadly.
Good
yeah that's what they say. it could be they're defining specialists as the aesthetic or the gameplay. and given how many people don't like the optics of it i'm hoping it's the aesthetics
They can always rename it. And I'll be honest. I don't believe Tom Henderson. Leaker accounts just do it for clout.
I'm gonna miss all my T1s and shit because I can see 2042 dying instantly when the next title releases.
there are right ways to do skins and there are wrong ways, I aint disagreeing, but the problem is do you trust EA to do it the right way? I mean have you seen Activision lmfao
I really couldnt care if they are doing specialists on roids, or if they are completely moving away from it, what matters is how whatever they do do actually turns out in line with the rest of game mechanics
no, they know most of the community hated it, it was one of the main criticisms of the game at launch
its not coming back
Good
the community said no and EA understood that
Well
More like dice.
that's why again, lets be fair here, EA scaled specialists back a lot in 2042
HOPEFULLY they understood it properly
Keep the abilities remove the characters
True
people complained about optics
and still do
like you eren
umm its not exactly a bad thing to NOT listen yo people at times
If its not the XDR its bad
Vic, when majority of the community doesnt like a thing
exactly
people are stupid, and the dumbest are also the loudest, so be very careful to make sure you actually listening to everyone and not just the loud voices
That logic only applies to Planetside. 😛
specialists dont belong in Battlefield, the devs even agree to this, this is not a debate, they do not belong here period
if you want a specialist type of game
people enjoying themselves generally don't say anything
It's why when I relay feedback I try to be as objective as possible to be honest.
but skins and battlepasses do?
Paladins
except its the same community that screeched there were women in battlefield 5
But no for real, loudest doesnt equal dumbest.
Unless you actually consider Enders dumb.
you think I like Battle Passes
dont get me started
but I am being realistic
Battle Passes are not leaving
no matter what
he could be smarter
The only reason they even exist is because of corporate
they will gladly get rid of the specialists but you know damn well they aint getting rid of the Battle Pass
Fortnite proved that shit is profitable
Hes certainly got some interesting takes but he is more informed than most redditors.
Enders is really dumb, he literally said BF needs a BR game to remain relevant 🤦♂️
I wonder what BR got Call of Duty in all those years
oh wait
I don't think enders is dumb but he gets lost in the moment and hurls abuse towards devs.
Wait that was him?
Wasn't that Dr disrespect.
Doc has a problem of saying that too
I could link you enders video
I'm fine.
never watched him but, are you saying that a popular streamer dude is an accurate representation of the community?
I know Dr would have said that for sure, since he has genuine CoD/BR Brainrot.
he said people who dont agree with him whining about wanting a BR should "Grow up" in his own words
someone who most likely just skims thru to the comments that agree with him and makes it look like everyone agrees?
I'm saying that, being the most vocal about something doesnt make you dumb.
Hasn't the br craze kinda died off.
Kinda.
everything needs to be a BR/Skin based game according to the new brainrot gamers that only play Fortnite and Overwatch these days
I mean I dont hate BR
but I dont want every game to become a BR
not everything needs to be a BR
I feel like only Activision is aggressively pursuing it.
yep
Fortnite is actually moving away from it
although
I disagree with Fortnite moving away from it
I tried Warzone recently and I havent had that much anger flow through me so fast.
So BRs are and will always be a no no.
Fortnite popularised it but now Epic is trying to move as much as they can away from it
I forgot fortnite was a br to be honest.
I feel like Fortnite is actually good at BR, truly the only good BR game lol
their cosmetic sales is hard carrying warzone
3/10ths of the top games on Steam are still BR games
so Enders saying "you need a BR to stay relevant 🤓 " is the dumbest shit I have heard
He's not wrong
though it's hard to tell if COD is warzone players or the other modes
Probably more that BR came seemigly out of nowear and was a big hit, and everyone jumping on the bandwagon has produces medeocre results at best other than the still popular few. A GOOOD new BR will probably be a smash hit, but all we have is half assed approached of just getting A br out there to gain market share instead of getting the next big thing out there
casual gamers love BRs
Helldivers 2 proves him wrong though
or maybe that's because they're f2p, probably.
I mean in the grand scheme of things, I can see why someone would say that.
But at the same time, look at BRs now. Lmao
yea that's the main reason
Firestorm would've done pretty good if it was f2p
yea but not everything needs to be a BR ya know
Mhm mhm
not every franchise in existence needs it
so what you're saying is
not in the state it launched in
battlefield needs a pve mode
I sure as fuck wouldnt play 2042 if it went hard into the BR route.
BR's print money, and console players, which are EA's biggest market share love BR's
nah, I am just countering Enders' point that a shooter game like BF needs a BR mode because that's the only way to stay relevant
you wouldn't be wrong in the case of Apex Legends
Apex is actually doing really well for EA
HZ is more fun than firestorm
ik im not wrong, im literally looking at the financials rn for Q3 lol
Eeeeeh
That's not true. BR is more competitive and harder than a sandbox like battlefield..
it's also not a BR
Console - 423 million, PC - 29 million
that's not shocking though, Apex makes millions
like its got a massive scene
A BR is a BR, I aint touching that shit with a 40 meter stick.
and I dont even play Apex
This too
and I hear about it all the time
If it's not true then why do apex and warzone rake in a billion every year.
thank god were finaly getting rid of this peice of garbage cant wait foor 6 dont fuck it up 
asia!
remember when we all said that to BF5 🤣
I love BRs, my problem is I dont have any friends and I like to be competitive so playing with randoms is a no no so basically I cant play BRs
lmao
Theres nothing competitive in my eyes about randomized weapons, with randomized tiers and attachments.
Fighting a random selection of enemies, who all have their own abilities.
when 6 comes out its "omg this game sucks, 2042 was the best"
fr
i mean rip 2041
