#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 1351 of 1
Ah okay, that explains his identity.
He's a person who suffers from growth defiency
And lives in a region of Russia
Basically became a celebrity with his height

Ah.
Yeah he's like 24 now I think?
Alot of videos have people treat him like a toddler


Imagine how much better this would look in first person.
I really don't know that it would look a ton better in 1P
yeah you’d just see like. your fist a few times
I wouldn't mind the option but I think thats just nostalgia talking
I hate how it kinda loops.
Thats the gif lol
it does loop surprisingly well though lol
I don't think the framing is very good in 3p
A takedown animation designed specifically for 1P would look good, but the takedowns we have here are designed for 3P
I don't understand what you mean. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ighr-Rqu_9g
It's definitely made for 3p and not 1p, i just think it's ugly in 3p
Yeah thats what happens when its up against a wall and the camera has nowhere to go
^
I wouldn't mind having the option
A toggle would be pretty neat tbh
As much as take downs are obviously inspired by MW19 takedowns, I also think they're cool.
I don't think they fit the pacing of bf
That is also very valid
I do like them in a vacuum
Some of them take a hot minute
They take a bit too long generally imo.
Also directional animations are sorely missed
Especially for 2042 when you can obliterate someone with a pistol in 0.3 seconds
I wouldn't mind extended takedowns from behind, but quick front/side anims were nice to have for CQC situations
Agreed 100%
Will say tho. Glad we got new stuff in that department as opposed to BFV literally piece for piece reusing BF1's animations
Barring the on-back takedowns
I never played BF1 and it's been too long since I played BFV so I can't really say much about either.
The melee anims in both games were identical. The only difference was that since you could lay on your back in BFV, there were a few melee animations for those poses
Ah okay
They did actually improve how animations interacted with terrain, but it was still the same anims
Like you wouldn't push bodies through walls during anims anymore like in BF1
Neat
Season 6 Early Access Multiplayer Gameplay today.Best Battlefield 2042 Settings youtu.be/xNnZ_HSWkjoDrop a Like if you enjoyed the gameplay. Thank you for Wa...
S6 preview streams goin live :)
I wouldn’t mind them if if they were optional. In titanfall the executions look great, and I love pulling them off. But you can just tap melee to pull off a quick punch, or hold to execute
yeah I agree there
That would be a good system
Cool stuff if you want, but tactical options too
The first person ones were great cause it’s quick and efficient, didn’t disrupt the flow
And while the third person ones look cool, it sacrifices a lot for the flare of pulling them off
That's actually a really good idea, having a "quick" and a "styling" option.
Especially when some of these takedowns are a fair few seconds
You look at the bf1 club and it’s just bonk, here it’s an elaborate 28 stab wounds
Yeah
Yeah imagine trying to melee multiple people and that animation plays in the middle of the spree
You’re a goner
I have had that happen more times than I would like to admit.
Thats why you just gotta be smart with it
But also
DICE pls
quick options
And tbf there are quick options but like lemme have some flair if I want to without sacrificing that ability
Like this is just as quick as anims in previous games
when is season 6, tomorrow?
yep
Tomorrow at 12 PM CET afaik
S6 preview streams are going live now actually
Quite a few creators starting streams
thanks
I’ll be at uni 
No chance
Uni is fun
I always call her Maria Fart
That's what she says when she "reports for duty"
Fun vs. fun.

Tbf that isn’t a bad analogy for a growth mindset
That's zoomer philosophy.
Eloquent.
Alongside the hit saying: YOLO.
And "fuck it".
yolo swäg motorväg
Dude, people who don't swear are the same people who go on killing sprees for no reason one day, I don't trust you.
Read my status
Maybe they're just good at FPS games?
EXACTLY


Bro i dont understand why DICE is making S6 15 weeks long.
Its not like they will add alot of content for S7.
Still can't get a non AI lobby
I just got a non-AI lobby.
Lucky
My AA rockets kept the aircrafts at bay.
because it’s christmas
How long was s6?
Because 16 weeks later is Christmas and new year so yeah DICE Vacation mode
16 weeks later isnt
16 weeks takes us past that which is logical
the standard 12 weeks takes us to i think boxing day lol
They will on vacation which 16 weeks
i think you’re missing a couple of words that give that sentence meaning
feels like they’ve been on vacation since they started the game 😂
"Why dont they just work through the holidays" Battlefield reddit
I guess you’re understanding right
I hope some people do have some semblance of respect for their well being on Reddit
you should tell that to the twitter people instead 
:clueless:
This quote is exactly where the "Brutal expectations" reply came from...reddit complaining that they didnt work through Xmas to release more patches
So many people take that quote out of context it’s rather annoying at times
So people don't complain about lack of season
How do you feel about the boris buff
You mean lack of Content
They will do that regardless
Better than nothing. After 2 years later.
cant wait to see how tonedeaf the next battlefield is
We already got a hint. DICE is building a "Battlefield Universe". Sound like they trying really hard to make a live service model based off Cod. How everything is interconnected.
Would be dope to see and play it
A live service model with a fraction of the player base
"Just a little bit more sir, I'm very hungry"
BF live service, I will play a lot compared to cod ngl
Unfortunately I think EA has done what EA does best to game series that were great a few years ago.
COD will die sooner or later bwahaha 
One day
Not before Battlefield though
Battlefield will outlive COD 
Yes
outlive Bob
Already has 

BF will outlive COD long live BF 
I would prefer it if it did but the gameplay just doesnt suit the average person
BF will always be the best shooter
Amen to that mate 
All I know that, MWIII is fire 🔥, but to help me pass time to the next BF game. Next BF game imma main it a lot.
I feel slightly uncomfortable whenever someone says "the next game is going to be much better" or "i'm going to enjoy the next game much more". Just seems like a sort of Führerbunker-mindset but on a much less damaging scale.
I didn’t know you were a comedian
Pretty much every Battlefield game I have played (BF4, BFH, BFV, and BF2042) had really rocky starts.
Well it's more damaging when someone tries to compare it to other games 
bfv peaked halfway through
i genuinely think the next game cant be as bad as 2042 or they'll lose profits and they're definitely going to want more of those after 2042
Battlefield is in it's own class but that does not mean that they are automatically excellent.
I don’t know how you can say that when you have no idea what the next game will be like lol
Pretty much that's the reason I say it.
based on experience? bad for the first 3 months minimum
‘The new call of duty that they release 3 titles down the line, in 2027, is gunna be soooooo goooddd!!
I’m not. But it will help me pass time till the next Bf game.
You sure about that? Because when you tell me that MW23 is “fire” I can’t help but laugh
You can also pass the time by watching paint dry
Would probably be more entertaining
I hate cod live service and skins but at the very least they releasing with alot of content.
Something DICE been lacking since Bfv.
Should we really go with the whole “quality over quantity” debate?
Bro Battlefield failed in both categories lmao.
Nothing to debate about.
HAHA Battlefield didn't fail COD did 
Are the servers down?
2042 was objectively a failure from the standards they were clearly aiming for
Hz was DOA and Portal was completely ignored.
You think we would at least have 2 maps b
now that all maps are done with the rework but no.
Yes, OG maps from multiple cod games with its corresponding weapons as well. Zombies and mostly multiplayer movement. Sledgehammer and Treyarch is the best devs that Activision have.
If portal was ignored then why did they stop the full XP? 
gunplay changed multiple times, classes were bolted on top of operators, vehicles got a weight redo as recent as the upcoming patch
Because you can buy extra XP boosts with real money
We havent gotten a single portal map and i dont think we will.
In other terms not abandoned 
They're all on the next game by noe
I’d replace Sledgehammer with Infinity Ward
What's the best way to level Irish?
Breakthrough
Facts
I don't think kneecapping the mode counts as not abandoning it
XP was limited so players didnt complete the BP in a day with XP exploit servers
^
Also I don’t think that after Vanguard just slapping zombies into a product is a net positive
so they gimped the whole mode instead of solving just the XP exploit
Sledgehammer made vanguard
because they didn't think it through in the first place
there's still no server browser outside of portal
I liked the idea of Portal but it's execution was quite poor.
If DICE supports 2042 all the way up until the reveal of the next Battlefield game what’s MW23 gonna do?
IW is Garbo. They haven’t been good since OG MW2.
They have already stated that won't be happening 
What would be the point of a browser on the current All Out Warfare, every game is a single map and round. They need to move everything to portal
Then cod 2024 comes
That just makes it worse
and then cod 2025
You are aware that Infinity Ward is responsible for MW23 existing at all, right?
I would hope so
It’s their engine, yes but they aren’t working on the game.
That seems pretty dumb
Are they at least sending some devs to work on it?
If not this would be if Criterion made their own Battlefield without the help of DICE
And before you mention Hardline
DICE helped with that
At most IW is working on the backend of MWIII. But not the content and the changes.
Development is led by sledgehammer games in partnership with infinity ward
It just seems a little strange for IW to not be the main developer for their own series
Sledgehammer is Multiplayer, Raven is WZ and competitive, Treyarch is MWZ, IW is campaign or assisting Sledgehammer on the game.
I think sledgehammer is campaign to, I could be wrong
I fully hate COD 100% [not going to mention the bad word] 
Also why are they remastering MW2 maps for 23 and not 22? Especially when 22 is also called
Modern Warfare 2
Because it’s easier and mw3 is being rushed into a full game
Like how they did it to MW19. Took MW2 maps to MW19.
Even still that was like 2-3 maps
It's just the same game every year with past maps sprinkled in
Activision for some weird reason likes to backtrack.
MW23’s map pool is large chunk MW2 maps
People are gonna buy it anyway
Aren’t all of mw2 maps in mw3
Why put the effort in
Mw3 gets all of mw2 maps
MW23 have all 16 iconic maps from OG MW2 as base game. Plus 4 maps and 4 weapons per season (from different cod games, weapons is also from that corresponding game as well)
So basically the whole game is nostalgia bait?
Yes
Yes, but also is what the community been asking for as well since MWII codNEXT event.
That’s exactly why they are rushing the game out
Who the hell even was mw22 villain
Especially with the updated fast movement again.
Some Iranian guy I think
So they can make something that addresses the complaints while not throwing out the people who like the mw2 gameplay
Mw19 villain was some boring Russian general
And?
That’s the name of a gun, silly
Shouldn’t Shepherd be dead by now?
here cometh thou money
Different story
Fairly sure someone dying means nothing in those storylines
Also the biggest kicker
Isn’t the mw2 main cast filled with plot armor
I’m just saying, Ghost should be killed off, at some point.
This game has no visual difference from MW22
Alex was supposed to die detonating the gas but he somehow did it without dying
Dude 141 should be reduced to Price by the end of MW23
It’s using the same engine, lol
Ayo don’t question it, just consume product
Mw is really squeezing the if they don’t show the body they’re not dead
So is Vanguard but I can tell the difference between MW19 and Vanguard
Press [E] to consume
Bruh
Vanguard is really not good
Even MW22 and MW19 I can tell the difference
But between MW22 and MW23 they look identical
Even BFV looked different from BF1
MW22 is updated engine from MW19.
Doesn’t mw3 look worse than mw19/22
It’s in beta lol 😂
Most of the time the same engine can look vastly different, depends a lot on the texture stylisation, animation design and overall lighting setup
Hey man
The game releases in a month
Press [X] to doubt
2042 is still in beta
Nuh uh
After Hourglass rework we’re in the release build
Anyone notice that we’re talking about mw3 in the battlefield 2042 section
That just means we're out of map beta
They can fix up a lot and update a lot. But beta doesn’t give you what the game will exactly be like, unless it’s MW22. They didn’t change much set for anti community the game.
Gameplay beta remains
Yep 
It just confuses me
Shhh 🤫
There’s a reason this game has been titled $70 DLC
It’s a step backward again for CoD
Inflation?
Because it was meant to be an expansion (probably)
When MW19 released people were happy because the games didn’t all look the same
And now we’re back to square one
looks like it plays fairly different though
Yet again bo3 zombies proves to be peak cod
Tbh MW3 is a whole game.
I honestly don’t understand why games (but mainly cod) feels the need to make 3-5 games now for all their ‘franchise’ games. Like OG modern warfare, black ops, new modern warfare…what next
Please give me a reason why I should play MW23 over MW22 and MW22 over MW19
Campaign
BO3 engine is beautiful asf. It’s absolutely amazing 🥲
because people keep buying them
next up, re-do the black op series
They're copying what happens with sports games
That’s not good enough to rationalize a $70 price tag
And maybe a little bit of the multiplayer
Unless it’s a game like RDR2 or GTA6 you need more than a 5 hour campaign to have a price tag of $70
Well you might as well wait for it to be 20-30
I wouldn’t play it if it was free
^
I would
2042 is already doing much more interesting things gameplay and lore wise than CoD
So yeah I’m sure that 1 map isn’t enough
interesting is one way to put it
But redacted looks fun as hell and narratively exciting
They’re fixing the recoil
They’re buffing tanks
YOU WILL NOT TALK ABOUT 2042 IN THE 2042 SECTION
They’re doing better balancing
Why don’t they switch up the theme and setting every game. Some real new shit everytime, would make it so much more interesting lol. Recycling the mechanics AND theme is extremely boring, I only played MW2019 and didn’t bother with mw22, vanguard or even Cold War coz they all look the fucking same as more recent games setting wise and mechanically look like clones of mw2019. They don’t even switch up the UI much. Like Jesus Christ it pains me how people don’t complain about what cod are doing every game looks the fucking same park a slight reskin, and even these new modern warfare games aren’t even bothering to slap reskins on 😂
😡😡🍊😡😡
TL;DR: game is the same as the last game
The games are the same
Since mw2019 they’ve barely changed a fucking thing
Bell we’ve got a job to do
You wanna know what’s really weird?
Cold War campaign was very good
MW19 visually looks better than both MW22 and MW23
I'll probably still buy it. I liked the MW2 (2012) era maps
2009
They’re somehow managed to make 4 games (soon to be 5 I’m sure) all look and feel identical despite having 3 different themes between them lmfao
Battlefield doesnt need to make another game. They can literally update the graphics to current gen for bf3 and bf4 with all DLCs and it will sell.
In fairness BOCW uses the older engine so there is a visual difference but yeah I get your point
Cod ww2 is better than cod vanguard. Fair enough Cold War is a cool setting for cod, but that felt and looked the same as mw2019 anyway. As for mw22 and soon to be mw23 I don’t even gotta explain why they’re copy cats
Your a slave to history... even after calamity you fight against the only order who can guarantee the safety of your people... you solely are responsible for this!
[Quote from another game and not a insult]
EA Dice needs to hire some Indian call center farms to up the player base
Until people want bf6
except i wouldn't buy a game that I already own if they've only upped the graphics
Tbh, a full blown remastered BF4 will be amazing. Thing about Dice, they don’t remaster games. And some EA games have remasters as well.
New games are nice though, the same shit gets boring man you don’t want that
I don’t anyway
If Bf6 is in good hands then yes
Bf2042 theme is really nice and is original
I’ve said it before
And I’ll say it again
Remasters are the epitome of
“We’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas”
They already go RAO Lmao
Yea lol
Naughty dog rn
BF2042 theme is amazing. Modern with some futuristic elements.
Everyone wants bf4 to keep getting updated. That makes me snooze at the thought give us more new stuff
Great concept but executed poorly
I’d rather DICE experiment and innovate than just rehash the same game over and over again
which map best for getting the Rorsch 12x scope?
Except when the game can’t be played on modern consoles
The best Battlefield to be released
DICE
Exposure or Renewal
I prefer bf1 personally but bf4 is very good yes
If you held a gun to my head and asked me whether I would play with specialists or a remastered BF4 I’d go with specialists
Do you feel like a hero yet?
Sure it’s not the best but it’s different and engaging
thanks 
Yea
Can you even remember why you came here?
I don’t understand why people are asking for a BF1 remaster
To shoot the bad guys
Also the most content we have in 1 single BF game, the mechanics is very realistic. The devs put in so much work into BF4
How many Americans have you killed today?
I like specialists. I know hot take. They’re new and brings a new dynamic. Makes you feel a bit unique to the guy beside you
Probably 12
Why do we need a remaster for a game that looks this good
Not my fault
It was the era right before the gaming market got extremely greedy
Sure I’m not a fan of the gunplay but it still has merit
Bf1 does look better than 2042 slightly and no it does not need a remaster lol
BFV was supposed to have specialist, then they moved the idea to 2042.
Where
Collateral damage can be justified, if the gain outweighs the cost. How much do you think Adams and Lugo are worth?
Where did they say it was supposed to have specialists?
The only games that deserve remasters are games that are so old, that it would be genuinely refreshing
I ain't no hero i'm only here to make the sky 🍊 
Are we pulling things out of our asses again because I can do it too!
Freedom is what you do with what's been done to you.
Did you know that DICE was originally going to include the British panjandrum in BFV but it slipped through the cracks because they couldn’t get the physics to work?
Probably 1.50 dollars or 3 I don’t know what a lago and an Adem is
People want remasters of games that are already S tier very good. Those are not the games that need to be remastered and that is setting you up for disappointment.
I exist and I find it nauseating.
Did you know that DICE was originally going to have Tom Brady be a specialist in 2042?
We need bf2-4 remaster maps with the option of 128.
No we do not
Were you aware that in BF1 they were going to include a prototype gun?
Is it not annoying to type like that
We had elite skins. They were testing the waters.
I find it boring
If you want that so bad play fucking bf4
Adams blames Walker for Lugo's death. It's his fault they didn't leave Dubai when they had the chance.
Nope 
That’s not really on the same level gameplay-wise as specialists
That’s just funni characters
I don’t wanna be 5 years later still playing remastered bf4 maps
Shit we in Dubai imma bust a nu-
graphics are shit on the xboxone
nut
Call in the white phosphorus
Like if DICE wants to do a few maps from BF4 or BFH in portal that’s fine
If Lugo were still alive, he would likely suffer from PTSD. So, really, he's the lucky one.
But it’s limited in capacity
it's at least annoying to read
Oh hey, neat, a reference to the same game. I can stop now.
Who the fuck is lego I didn’t check the manual
Lego ops the lines
Battlefield 4 doesn't look half bad still on PC
I get real tired when people make shit up about BFV because I’ve had like an omnipresent level of overview on the content development for that game
I think it's one of the other dudes in the squad but honestly don't remember
1440p or 4k resolution looks nice
So when people tell me DICE was planning on the eastern front I laugh
Crimson 1 coming in to drop white phospherus DANGER CLOSE! 
Because the existence of one Russian LMG isn’t proof
I have not played spec ops the line and I heard it’s very unpolitical
Like mw2
Had a bad launch with missing content
A Vietnam theme for the next battlefield game would be brilliant. Haven’t had one of those in ages. Ww2 and ww1 we definitely do NOT need more of right now we just had 2 amazing ones covering both settings, and modern warfare could be fire for sure but we had a shit load of modern games prior to bf1. More futuristic shit could still be sick though, like even further in the future than bf2042
I’m not going to deny that content was missing from BFV
We also were cucked out of Soviet faction.
And there it is
I literally had a soap box moment about this just now and it’s ignored
Season 6 when
Agreed. Battlefield vietnam needs a remaster.
Literally tomorrow
Absolutely.
cold war would be superior imo
It doeessss notttt neeedd a remaster please stop saying that word Boris lol. We need a NEW Vietnam game
Tomorrow 
A korean/vietnam theme
i think "war is bad" is pretty political
What time, it's already almost 10th
Just a reminder that Casper mains are countered with Rao & not Blasco
Here
Where is here
Nah you are trying to make everything woke
GMT+4
12 PM CET for the Battlepass iirc.
You don’t understand
TRUE
STOP WITH THE PRONOUNS 😡😡😡😡😡
The fact that a CM went on Twitter and said that Sundance is Bi means Battlefield is woke!
Does rao destroy drones ?
Ion got no battlepass
Yes
I got bf 2042 on steam

Don’t know how I’ve never tried that I’m literally tier 1 rao
What do I look like? HeelsVsBabyFace?
First of all
I’m not British
Thank god
Sundance isn't bi anymore because they took away the AA grenade
It's annoying with how many drones they put up
Nuh uh
It doesn't destroy it, it just makes it so it can't move. So you just shoot it
Fuck you dreyfuss that’s second time you’ve insulted brits when I’m right here
Second time TODAY
I hope Godzilla comes into your country
If it makes you feel any better I also hate the French more

What about Canadians
I'm pretty sure everyone hates the French... Even the French.
They get a pass because they’re not terrible
@red zinc they're just upset that I told you how to counter their main Op of choice so, they lying
Battlefield needs a Mountain Dew , Monster, Doritos partnership
Well no it doesn’t make me feel better. French and Canadians are our boys. You just violated the whole squad man
Maybe get Frito Lay on board too
We really don’t
Dr Pepper I’d be down for
MUM GET THE CAMERA MUMMY!
Her literal pronoun is Fre/nch

🤣I always run rao coz tier 1 is drip. I always go for drones so that is very clutch information. I will not let you down soldier, those drones will be getting blipped constantly
Thanks Mozzy
I already hated Sundance because of her ability plus C5 makes tanks unbearable
c5 should never have spawned with a 3 stac
C5 and Squrrel suit is too OP. She needs a C5 nerf
horrible balance
I’m a British Sundance c5 anti tank main. How does that make you feel truly. I’m not joking either lol @calm bison
Hey did you wanna use the Armata or Abrams? That’s too bad
Next battlefield we get c6 , stay tuned
One time I got frustrated with a camping tank on rush xl in caspian border so I jumped off a condor with Sundance and c5 to the tank
I will throw you into a KFC deep fryer
To be fair without squirrel c5 tanks are also fucking op in breakthrough at least
I see tank mains in breakthrough regularly go like 100-0 lol
So strong
Ok not regularly
I do regularly see them get 80 kills or more though
I see it regularly
Wait until the EMP change comes in stopping your tank dead in it's tracks easy C5 kill 

Not 100-0 tho coz I usually kill them ince or twice 😀
Ranged AT tools are incredibly weak, c5 is overpowered
Exactly. Balanced 😀
It leads to squirrel suicide charges being the only thing that actually kills tanks
Mmmh what if we got Karkand back 
Yea and 99% of people don’t do that so
When you DO get killed by it it pisses you off a lot
But realistically you don’t often
Only when you run into me
To be fair I understand why they camp since it's so safe and pushing is so dangerous
If a Sundance dedicates to that role against a sweaty tank main they’ll go very negative KD
but it's just shit gameplay for everyone
yeah exactly its not fun
Squirrel Suicide Pack? 
No I get it but that’s why c5 is necessary. Ranged AT unless there’s multiple people doing it, won’t work
I actually find it fun😂
Ranged AT: Low risk, low reward
C5: High risk, high reward
Playing Sundance I mean
Against the tank main campers
It’s like gambling
You just keep going despite KD
Until you get the kill
And then you insult them on chat
Ranged AT is a decent risk against any of the vehicles with an explosion radius
Despite being 3-18
Whitty needs all battlefield games remastered
C5 is unironically too easy against vehicles that aren't camping
Ban Boris please
Ranged AT is poo and on poo operators
Ok but real shit we need bf5 remastered
That is true
If you get smoke down it’s a free kill
STOP WITH THE FUCKING REMASTERS
But bf5 needs a remaster
Change c5 so you only spawn with a 2 stack, increase tank firepower and maneuverability, increase ranged AT damage to tanks
2042 need a remastered kekw
No, no remasters.
Tanks aren't immortal, they die to AT methods irl
Graphics are already on par what are you on about?
but they also do a shitload of killing
It has already been remastered lol
its more fun if everyone in the game dies a lot
We don't need another fucking WW2 fps game
We neen WaW remastered
True, more modern games.
cold war would be my ideal for the next bf
I’ll kms
Bet
Bf5 needs a remaster man I hope bf6 is a bf5 remaster. Could use better graphics, but everything else can stay the same we just the sweet remaster because I miss that game
Been so long
Honestly with the lack of cold war fps games that's a good idea
I mean I can skydive for fun lol 😂
ww2 was fudged with bfv, 2042 has made it clear dice sucks ass at near future, cold war is nice mix between modern and older tech
It's too fucking early for a remaster.
We need a vietcong/korean war
Vietnam is such a better setting than Cold War why not Vietnam. It’s the sickest setting
Brother in Christ I’m joking lol
less drone bullshit less untouchable jets more infantry vehicle interaction
They're in the trees, man
At least we will have Hueys
I’m doing a parody of sir Boris the hero shooter
vietnam is just ww3 in terms of fps games
BC2 Vietnam is good 😌
Also another reminder:
Tanks are never the correct choice for breakthrough when you don't have a Ram active.
Why?
Because if you set the Ram correctly you are a mobile immune beacon for everyone without a limit to who can spawn on
Vietnam is good but it's been used so many times, a Korean war, or a Afghanistan war should be included
this is another reason vehicles are shit and unbalanced
It be nice if that game was remastered
How’s it been used so many times though ? I can only think of like 4 Vietnam shooters off my head tbh
Meh. 2042 already remastered it tbh
Early GWOT or Gulf War would be insane.
worst take ever
need cold war so we can have ac130 inbound
Rising storm 2, battlefield Vietnam…what else
When has there ever been a Korean war game
Only issue with Afghan is how empty and open maps would be. It be nothing but Hamada maps.
Oh true
BF2042 capped at 90fps?
vietnam has only had one game and one expansion in battlefield so not really overused...
never doubt dices ability to have 0 relevant maps to a location
It was a joke
my ideal is vietnam
No…
Vehicles will never be balanced in breakthrough.
As much as I would like to be on the defending side with a ram, a tank, a helicopter and a brawler like the attackers do in exposure... We all know it would be a dead standstill
Nvidia control panel?
a spawn beacon on a vehicle where you have the choice to pick something else will never be balanced because the spawn beacon will always be better
the only way to balance that is removing player choice of vehicle
City maps
City maps would be awesome in Afghan or iraq
And zero on Korean war
If you want to be honest with yourself, the brawler is already a spawn beacon that can tank explosives
or removing the spawn banner
Well, could go with Iraq 2003-ish. I hear Fallujah was a crazy place.
i also hate brawler for that reason
It seems like a very limited war to make a game off to be honest
That’s probably why
True and a Strike of Karkland remaster
true but vietnam is hardly overused in battlefield
Operation Desert Storm maps.
The brawler wasn't like that until I called Dice out on their bullshit for their description that they themselves couldn't even follow.
Aka I called dice out for not being able to be a man of their fucking word
bf3 already did strike at karkand remaster
Dice lies constantly
I don’t know though I don’t know loads about Korean War to be fair so don’t crucify me for that take lol
Well in the game industry, anything cold war always includes Vietnam first and sometimes only
This was established by bfv
Well it took them 3 days to fix it once I complained about it
Wait until they give the MAV the same treatment i'm calling it 
Join the team and become a Dice Dev
Then DICE shouldnt have a problem porting the map to Portal.
I think early GWOT years would be best, a lot of options.
true and then gaslights people who call them out for lying
America dropped a billion tons of explosives and destroyed 90% of all structures in north korea
Bro Rao, plus soflam, plus ntw will annoy the fuck out of vehicles
Tbh I don't see this making good gameplay unless you like getting bombef
maybe but we should be discussing bf in a bubble
First you got disabled, then locked on, then hit to counter the repair ability
Why don’t dice make another new title. Something not historical accurate like 2042
bad idea
Why?
DICE should make an alternative ww2 game like Vanguard 
They are making a new BF game. lol
It's not just Rao's hack that disables your tank it's also the EMP grenades as well
You cant just port maps across engine versions. You essentially have to remake them.
Asking for ports of maps from old games, is like asking for maps in an Unreal engine 2 game to be added to an unreal engine 5 game.
Frostbite was at version 2 with BF3...its at something like 6/7 now.
because after 2042 they're going to never do that again
a cold war gone hot is the closest imo
True
didnt dice stop numbering frostbite like a decade ago, so its still frostbite 3 technically
No:
SOFLAM
RAO
EMP GRENADE SPAM
Will annoy them
No one ever uses the NTW and no one ever uses the SOFLAM
It's gotten so bad that I'm going in public sessions and telling everyone the soflam makes all rockets targeting
And like clockwork all of a sudden I see nothing but painted targets and rockets flying at these mech mains
So true. Just sad that they have alot of studios working with DICE and they dont have the tech ir maybe manpower? to port maps.
I mean you do ask for this tactic when you want to be a bitch and hide behind the uncap
Or just having armored piercing rounds to counter the repair
the issue with soflam is that Crawford and boris suck, every vehicle has thermal smoke, and Lis cant lock on to soflam
BF3 maps with 2042 era. Is very unbalanced. It’s prob not worth dice time remaking maps.
Lol people having issues with Rao's hacking disabling vehicles not realising that EMP nade spam is going to nearly permanently "Stun Lock" them so they can't move at all.
i don't think the damage states will persist past the duration of the emp
if they do then vehicles are just going to camp even harder
I've recently started using the EMP grenade along with RAO just to run up next to them, throw C5 and call it a day
3 c5 on spawn is still too much
Caspian Border 128 played very well. So did Arica Harbor.
they just can't balance this damn game
Not*
Considering every fucking tank in the game sits in the back aka the uncap
Same goes for the wildcat
Even though I would love more maps to be added to this game, I will say this...
Its probably for the best that all the work, new maps wise goes into the next game TBH. 2042 is orders of magnitude better now than at release. But at least in respect to it being a hit blockbuster game...that ship has sailed. them pouring resources into adding more maps is likely a bad investment (Both bad investment of their money, and of the time of their developers)
They sit in the back because of the c5 being too strong
My ultimate holy-fuck-yes Battlefield game would be set in a fictional Baltic Sea conflict in like 2025-2030 range. Maps in eastern Europe like Poland, the Baltics, Kaliningrad, Finland. Leaves a lot of doors open for shit like naval warfare in the Baltic Sea region, could expand to include Sweden as a theather of operations, most likely Gotland. Possibly a "sneak-attack" by CSTO into Great Britain or some completely bat shit insane off-the-wall scenario, say the SOSUS system fails or some bullshit and CSTO starts venturing into the Atlantic. Could have China introduced as another faction after release, taking advantage by invading Taiwan and India for whatever reason.
C5 wouldn't be that much of an issue if people actually squaded up in tanks
With up close AT being available to 3 classes out of 4 and long range AT only being available to 3 operators (and shit) its no wonder they camp
Not really, all BF3 maps with 2042 era is always one sided no matter what. It is useless to go into a match just to flat out win or lose.
IMO, tank APS should destroy C5. C5 is way too powerful in this game IMO...and 9/12 specialists have access to it
problem with your statement: we have no clue if the absence of maps on this game means any maps for the next game. frankly, it probably doesnt
It's not too strong, the tank is meant to be a defensive vehicle. It was never meant to be offensive.
Meaning the tank is supposed to roll alongside its troops
The only offensive and defensive vehicle that exists is the RAM or Brawler
APS did destroy C5 at one point, but they removed it because people would camp with Irish APS littered around their vehicles and nobody could touch them
someone couldve said that during battlefield 5s lifespan, but they wouldve been wrong
It will be when every single person spawns with enough c5 to solo any vehicle from max health
Tanks are literally heavy offense/line breaking vehicles. where do you get the idea that they are defensive?
Well if the new YUV-2 Pondhawk (Yes it's Pondhawk and not Pondehawk) allows you to fly inside the HQ area you can have a passenger throw C5 at the camping tanks and wildcats XD
Has 3 c5 or c4 always killed a tank in the bf franchise
It really is not hard to get past a couple of people and rapid toss 3 c5 at a tank, instantly fucking it from max health
Basically, yes
since bf3 at least
probably back further
but i cant remember that far
Yes, but in older games you only spawned with 2 c5
Then the vehicles can't have the fire power they have or then it's op
Because of the forced gadget slot being taken up by an operator tool in 2042, you spawn with 3 c5
older as in battlefield 2 right
older as in bfv
you got 2 sticky dynamite
You could resupply to pick up a 3rd but it was 2 on spawn
oh i didnt remember that
I wouldnt be against players only spawning with 2 C5 tho. But vehicles liek the wildcat/light armor, and helis should all be destroyed by 2. Leave heavy tanks, the MAV and brawler as being killed by 3
You could double dynamite, AT nade, PIAT combo enemy tanks in bfv for a kill
in 2042 you just throw 3 c5 and they die instantly
Or if you can walk up to it then hit the C5 with a melee (Your going to die by out of bounds anyways) and kill the tank and in there killfeed it says they died by "Melee" XD
thats a lot like the older games tho tbf
the issue is you cant run c5 and a launcher on anyone other than Lis
Not a issue*
Infantry were slower and more vulnerable in older games
the tank firepower honestly isn't that high in 2042, they just don't die
so they can continue to farm
fair enough
launchers were also stronger in older games
2 shots = No target
and had a ton of ammo
idk what this means
Tbh longer-range AT weapons definitely need a buff because no one uses that shit, the only AT most people use is Lissiles.
How do you play the new redacated map?
You wait until tomorrow 12 PM CET.
You can play it at 4 am tomorrow
half the issue is that the only operators with access to long range AT are boris and crawford and boris is fucking useless
It means the tank has more power than your opposition: C5
season starts at 8 am
kkk thanks all
Pretty much, yeah.
Engineers had much more heavy vehicle offense in games like BF3/4, but it wasnt all direct offence like launchers/C5 (Like being able to take a launcher and AT mines at the same time in 4)
Honestly I played Boris the last few days for the phantom revenant challenge and he isn’t bad
arguable? I'm never afraid of a tank that's advancing because its actually entering c5 range
His gadget poopy af tho 
Which are shit I'll give you that
I'm only afraid of camping tanks because I can't do anything to them
Boris is his gadget
Do scouts have access to c5?
His passive only effects his gadget
Nuh uh he’s also the only Russian in the game
Never play scout that much
Im more afraid of the Brawler than any tank in 2042...and thats a bad thing IMO
In 2042? Yeah.
His gadget is ass
Everyone has access
Damn, so moving Mackay there won't do much
i remember when takes were scary
Because all the morons will camp his sentry harder 
Imo vehicles are more fun when they kill harder and die harder
Not every class has access to C5 only Support doesn't have access to C5 unfortunately
Boris despite being useless is tricky to kill as you gotta pay attention to the turret as well
Dice refuses to just remake Boris and instead further incentivized people to camp with his sentry so they can get TF2 turtle engineer’d by getting insta gibbed
yeah
I don't mind my whole squad getting blown to shit by a tank if I know the tank will also get blown to shit by rockets
this is why people like playing maps without vehicles in 4
Support would be broken if they had it considering ammo drops
Yes, those extra 5-6 rounds are a nuisance to get in.
The issue is that right now the tank just blows up 1 person by 1 person while sitting on a ledge 300m away
Boris literally suffers from TF2 engineer turtle syndrome where if you actually stay near his sentry you’re gonna get blown up within 10 seconds
in the older games if you drove a tank in the wrong spot 6 different engineers were ready to smaw you to death lol
I encountered someone using the Boris turret as basically a motion sensor though which was quite interesting.
Boris should’ve gotten the extra rocket trait and Crawford keeps his repair trait
That’s what I did in the alpha
Bfv suffered a ton from borderline untouchable vehicles for most of the games lifespan and i genuinely thought dice couldn't make it that bad ever again
Was super busted
and then 2042 released
Oh yeah I remember when Boris was busted at launch

Boris wasn’t even busted at launch he was just a better recon than engineer frankly
Which is countered by Blasco
fuck knows id rather have hack bracelet than boris's fucking peashooter when im fighting vehicles
I’ll be real I’d rather Boris gets like AT mines or something
Honestly the specialist I want in scout is Mackay
Magnet mines that can hit both ground and air vehicles or some bs
i genuinely am pissed theres not a single character in the game that can take a decent dumbfire launcher and c5/AT mines
man getting all the attachments for the Rorsch MK4 sure was boring lol
Idk man his shit seems more suited in assault personally.
we needed 1 more engineer for this fix.... 😔
*guy with shield slides in DMs
Lis cant dumbfire so you get frozen for a second when you shoot which gets you killed often and her damage is poo vs tanks
Tbh he's too busted as assault, moving him to recon is a bit more suitable
mackay cant be recon because of spawn beacon
If it was me Boris would be a mine layer specialist instead of sentry but that’s just me, I know playtesting wise you’d just have dudes picking him to mine vehicle spawns 
Yeah, this.
Embrace the grapple
fuck no im not dealing with 50% of players on top of every structure in the game again
not unless we ALL get grapple
also recon still gets c5 so it doesnt fix vehicle balance

I'm guessing BF4 you had that issue?
There aren’t any sniper Mackay players anymore they all left or turned to PP29 Mackay
I wish the SOFLAM wasn't so shit personally.
Glad pp29 is getting nerfed
Is it
Had it in 2042 prior to mackay not getting beacon
I forgot 💀
A lot of things are getting nerfed
Soflam is so ass in 2042
Wasn't this the shit you were just complaining about?
What would be nice is if the spotter seats in vehicles designate targets as well
PP29 has been nerfed like 3 times it ain’t gonna do anything
It's never used because nobody dares read the description to find out it makes all rockets targeting
I can complain about multiple things at once
Need three players to help me get Eidolon, everyone gets it when completed; doing it tonight at 9PM EST. I have the notes written down & ready to go, should only take around an hour
It's never used because every vehicle has thermal smoke/flares and 60% of engies arent carrying a launcher that can lock on to it
The problem is that "all rockets targeting" is useless when no one uses rockets other than lissiles, which brings us back to the AT being shit
Cos they suck vs C5 on 90% of the maps
I mean it is funny considering every session continues to blame everyone else but themselves for the lack of anti-mech personnel.
And then when I chime in saying the sofan makes all rockets targeting all of a sudden. All you see is painted targets and rockets
I have spent entire matches telling people how soflam works or being focused by soflam in helicopters with no one utilizing it
I kinda wish everyone could see the lock-on square because I would immediately switch to engineer if I knew someone was locking vehicles
Soflam ain't ass, it's just no one cares, with people who care it's a force to be reckoned with
They've turned into Falcks and pp29's anyways.
I'll focus on helicopters when I tell people I'm painting mechs. Sometimes I get responses with a few rockets sometimes I don't.
But often that helicopter decides to leave the area
Soflam is ass when smoke and flares exist
You can run anything on falck and go positive
Yeah that's true.
Falck need a nerf on her self heal
In the earlier days everyone use to see the targeting box but they changed that now so only people who have a AT/AA launcher can see them
I stole a heli from the enemy in breakthrough and a really dedicated recon spent the entire round keeping me perma-soflamed
No one utilized it at all
I've always complained about the soflam. My target: stealth chopper
Angel will be gaining some relevance.
and people with soflams
Same here honestly. It'd prompt me to use the SOFLAM more often if people other than those carrying the rockets could see me lasing them.
Its just way easier for 2 players to take an AA/other launcher to kill X vehicle...than to take a soflam, and have to co-operate to defeat it
How does soflam work
It's a painter.
Literally just locks on.
why
Medical bandages.
oh yeah
Quicker heal than falck.
I’ve used it but what does it do
OH
But a bit quicker than the lock on launchers
Why bother with Angel tho, just continue to take Falck and ammo pouches/box.
I'm glad you've asked:
These soflam utilizes light to paint a target.
So riddle me how a stealth chopper that is visible to the eye is incapable of having light shined upon it to make a target....
The VHX-D3 was a lot of fun to use. Looking forward to the live release.
Disclaimer: I'm not part of the EA Creator Network nor am I an EA Partner. I was invited to attend a capture event for Season 6 with a numb…
💖 31
Also shows off the new assault rifle.
So what launchers does it allow lock on for
all of them
Rpg?
All
yes
RPG can lock on through walls.
I wish the SOFLAM would be an actual SOFLAM, i.e. not be disrupted by flares/smoke but require direct LOS continuously.
Not a single person at the s6 playtest besides Flakfire was abusing 12m auto shotty
Lol wtf how does that physically work 😂
Some systems don't require a consistent line of sight
By the looks of this new AR...its gonna be RM68 2.0
If I ever got invited to a dice playtest I’d use the most busted thing possible and just ruin the entire session

It sends out a laser.
Which has been my complaint the entire time regarding it and the stealth chopper
This laser is used as a reference point by launchers.
As in how does an rpg7 heat sink
I mean for the SOFLAM to maintain LOS. I realize there are LOAL/LOBL that are F&F.
Remember when people were bitching about claymores being added
They’re irrelevant
Yeah no it makes no sense with the RPG.
It works on all Launchers but one launcher does get a damage buff from hitting designated targets and that's the Javelin
I still haven't died from them
I hate their addition but they’re barely used
I've used claymores offensively but I forget they're a thing.
Some RPG systems have tracking systems
because the javelin is so slow it's a miracle if the rocket actually connects
Since spotting was changed to be more like a 3D spot...lots of the 3rd/4th seats (Like the 3rd seat in an MBT) are basically just useless in 2042 now. Those seats would be better served by becoming a soflam IMO
New map may be claymore heaven but idk
Dozer would be big, Nvm the potential EMP spam.
Not the one in this game though. I mean look at it. Point out the tracking systems on that thing
Yeah i know
After his nerf, idk
Dozer's flak jacket is not getting touched.
It did make him easy to break his knees
I'm not the one to disclose certain types of information like others have
LOL.
There is a munition being developed for the Carl Gustav M4 recoilless rifle that the Recoilless M5 is based on that is capable of being laser guided. Called the Guided Multipurpose Munition or GMM developed by SAAB and Raytheon.
The most sane warthunder player.
What the heck does that mean lol
Nah they’re still great seats
The person above this knows what I'm talking about
In what way?
Remember the 3D spotting system is the same as BF4’s where you lose the ability to spot if you spam it. Those seats let you spot with spamming
Motion pulse is still really good.
I use em all the time
Genuinely it's really good.
If you aren’t playing caspar you can rack up a ton of spot assists with the spotting seats in vehicles
It would stil be FAR better if it were a soflam, from which you could 3D spot anyway AND designate targets
Sorry but if you're trying to say that the RPG-7 has a guided munition option you're entirely wrong.
My friend and I broke bf4 by using the Soflam and guided shells on the MBT.
I don't blame people getting pissed at us.
Ngl I had a fun time doing the same.
Cause fuck it's cheesy.
I never really got why they nerfed the tracer dart so hard...it not like anyone was really using it anyways
Is it as cheesy as the bf1 mortar tank in spawn killing people on the objective
Tracer darts were crazy at release.
And the bugs and associated with it.
Yeah you could say.
It was fun tho 😄
Doesn’t make much sense why the m5 can lock on physically speaking either lol
The biggest bug that affected painted targets was that tanks literally couldn't predict it when a Javelin could lock on and fire.
But who cares
Why?
I wish javelins just always did top attack, and didnt require a paint to do that
I miss Y1, breakthrough while throwing massive amount of motion sensors and using Paik. XP farming for days.
A constant top down attack would be a scourge.
No one uses javelins now tho.
Lock ons are awkward in themselves.
Because no one uses Soflam or Tracer darts that's why Javelin's have improved damage against laser designated targets
Make it top attack and balance a bit. I loved when javelins used to do top attack and kill any surrounding infantry on a vehicle hit before (In past games)
Tanks just thermal smoke and/or APS now...so lock ons are just terrible tho
The biggest shitters in the game use the javelin and think they’re effective but in actuality I pop aps and thermal smoke one after the other so out of 4 shots they can maybe get 1 in at most
When if they just used the damn M5 they could’ve gotten 1-3 in
This
Fair enough can’t say I’d seen that before and it would definitely be out by 2042 🤙
I was basing it off the rifle its designed off
If Javelins could lock on to painted targets through cover but have reduced range (with the current adjustments to tracer dart) that'd definitely give it some use again.
Which is EXACTLY why I wish they were actually laser designators and not using some weird lock-on system so you could continue locking on targets through thermal smoke and shit but would require on-point tracking throughout.
Laser wouldnt really help against APS, but I see your point
Wdym? The Carl Gustav?
Tanks in this game are pretty crap tho...so ill wait to see how they behave in 6.0 before asking for other changes
Laser would not help against APS, no.
I really wish the Recoilless M5 would have the GMM available in LOAL mode tbh
I still think they should make the MBTs and MAV have the same explosive resistance as the Brawler (Take less damage against C5 and AT mines)
Yea
The MAV doesn't need to be anymore tankier.
It still dies to 3 rockets from the rear and 3 C5s.
It's a shit experience to fight as a tanker.
Yeah, the GMM is built for use in the Carl Gustav. IIRC it was initially called the Carl Gustav Guided Munition Guided Carl Gustaf Munition or something like that but was then adapted for use in AT4's as well.
C4 is the only reliable way to deal with it.
Thast why I said only to make it take less damage against AT mines and C5. No change to other damage types
And the chances of getting 3 rockets off is very low.
It just needs to lose the guns and I wouldn't mind its health.
Or jet ramming it and sending it flying XD
But vehicles like the MAV, RAM and brawler all have loadout problems of their own (Too many gunner seats/potential setups to be readable)
Just have lasers pointing out.
RAAAAAAAAAAVE
It sounds so dumb but I think that in itself will help readability.
It would be a much cooler vehicle if it were just covered in HMGs and miniguns...then one explosive seat as seat 2
If it was a bf3 mav it would be less irritating.
Instead of explosive options for all 3 gunner seats.
The bf3 mav was powerful but t least everyone was forced to get out.
Yup, it was great (The AMTRAK)
I'm aware what it was but at this point I'm not really concerned.
I run 50mm and 60mm Mortar pod on MAV XD
Try it
Like, im totally fine with heavy armor being tanky...as long as it doesnt have annoying bullshit weapons that I cant outplay. Stuff like the mortar pods, flame nade launcher, ETC
Dont even get me started on Brawler having close defence system and APS at the same time haha
You listed what can be out played...
Flame nades literally go through walls and cover.

everything but lissile
The RPG-7 does not have any guided munitions.







Am I doing it right? @wary oak 