#battlefield-2042
1 messages ¡ Page 1068 of 1
Man I'd love to talk to the guys who decide the spawn positions for contesting objectives and ask WHY WE'RE PLACED IN THE ONLY PARTS AROUND THE OBJECTIVE WITH NO COVER IN FULL VIEW OF DEFENSIBLE POSITIONS
IF YOU DON'T WANT US TO RETAKE THE OBJECTIVE THEN DON'T LET US SPAWN ON IT WHEN IT'S CONTESTED

7th comes the New season, on 8th a have an exam đ
I never saw a guy hate one of thing in the game like this.
BF Will have to wait
there's a few of us
PTFO IRL
Oh no I hate many things about this game
This is just my daily venting
That's kinda sus

the most comical spawn placement ive seen in a game is tehran highway B flag
literally spawn right behind enemies
and then they spawn behind you
or you spawn in the open surrounded by 5 enemies
its funny if they dont notice you tho
oh right I'm not allowed to dislike 2042 plz dont ban 
I mean he doesnât mind

Ngl game is really mid just need lads to make the game fun
everything is fun with friends tho
I mostly play by myself on 128 conquest and do dumb shit, yet end up with most kills somehow
Wish I had those

Ngl I have more fun playing bfv by myself than 2042 sadly 
you and me both
well i have a decent amount of friends but most of them dont really play video games
I had them but they didnât really wanna play battlefield with me and they stayed with cod and well abandoned me 
I should start sending random players friend requests so I get some people to play 2042 with
Its definitely more fun than alone. Older ones have been good solo but 2042 isn't
Thatâs the plan everyone should do
Agreed
fucking npc medic standing over my deadbody and not reviving lmao
and if they do revive, they either
- manually pull out the defibs and tap, giving you only 20hp and you immediately die
- revive out of cover, in full view of the enemy and you immediately die
I was in a breakthrough match the other day and some guy went "revive pls" in chat, later in the round I died next to him and he was Angel, and he of course didn't notice
You don't have friends Angra ? đĽ˛
Most of gun/vehicle/specialist skins that aren't camos are bad in this game
I mean I do got some co workers that i may call lads but idk 
but I do mean irl lads
That's sad ngl 
Everyone deserves irl lads
true
Just need to find some that arenât shady or refuse to do shit
and so on and so forth
But it is what it is sadly 
All my Lads Play cod/warzoneđ
I need a competent squad ngl
1 Week till even more busted M16A3 ayayyaaayayaya
All my friends play destiny 2
theyâre kinda good
but I still donât go anyone to play withđ
Was there a buff/nerf patch already specified? I only see vehicle changes
It's somewhere in the server but some Protal weapons are getting 2042 attachments
M16 is gonna be so fucking broken it's gonna be great
Iâll give it a shot, right now, nothing comes close to the RM68
I can see the RM68 getting nerfed.
are my posts showing up?
I hope so, can't stand this gun
nerf already confirmed
skill issue
fair point
rm68 users gonna be so homeless after nerf
it's going to be like the BSVM nerf
just sliiiiiightly worse
but enough so people go back to sfar
If they nerf the rm68 then itâs back to the sfar or whatever
People are gonna use whatever is the most powerful gun
Thatâs literally any game, not just BF lol
Refuse to do shit ? What do you mean ? 
People really got skill issues
Itâs not really a skill issue
Itâs using the best weapon, if you use some gun and itâs a 5 shot kill vs a 4 shot, why are you using the 5 shot gun
Because the 5 shot kills gun may look better ?
I mean I guess
But if you want kills, then by logic, youâll use the best gun
Or youâll give yourself the challenge of unlocking t1 on non-meta guns
Nothing wrong with either approach? But itâs not skill issues lol
Guns were more balanced on previous BF games though, sure some games were good af and some other mid, but on this game some guns are just cheated af and some others shouldn't even exist
There are always âgood and bad gunsâ
But if youâre using a bad gun, youâre likely losing any duel unless you get the drop
Is there a open screen adjust option on 2042 bc parts of my screen is out and not fully in which kinda annoying
Meta vs non meta really does come down to map knowledge and reading/knowing your opponent honestly.
Which if you're both on equal footing its probably going to be the meta users win unless you get a drop
But theres nothing wrong with using non meta
cant make the shit up...start of a kale match, condor pilot hovers to the top of the C2 tower...bails out
i parachute down get a kill, die..look at the map and 5 people (all 3 squadmates included) are camping on roofs 
time for a new lobby..fuck that
That kinda says it all, add me on PS if you want to though 
the difference between 2042 good guns and older bf good guns was that older bf guns were better in different scenarios
You're losing any duel no matter what gun you're using if the enemy got a RM-68 anyway
The RM68 is the King of All Trades
rm68 wins against every automatic at basically all ranges
everything not an automatic is inferior to an automatic outside of svk and bsvm and they both lose to rm68 apart from at like 75m maybe
it might even beat them there
there's like 2 smgs that beat it within 20m
pbx has with the ammo type that has been "bugged" for over a year and the ac9
they only just beat it
and then its way superior to them outside of 20m
even just in bfv there was a niche for basically every weapon
there were a handful that were inferior to all alternatives but basically everything had something going for it
this doesn't apply to 2042 at all
accuracy and recoil is pretty irrelevant outside of a couple of lmgs and the smgs
which makes everything based on rof and damage values
of which the rm68 excels in both areas
so its just better
the devs have literally no excuse for fucking this up
_ _
takes 2 minutes of comparing values on a spreadsheet to go oh yeah this is fucked
Oh no Enders said something positive about the new map now he will be called a Ea shrill and got paid to promote by redditor
why should you care about any of the peoples opinions you mentioned
oh yeah...losing to an rm even up close..rip xm8
when does the new season drop
!!when will new season drop
Soonâ˘
there ya go
thank you!
bruh i just left a caspian match why are you putting me in another round of that 
Next week
Thank you!!
start shooting someone first...they turn with rm and still kill me
jesus christ dice
I don't mind the RM68 personally.
Primarily an RM68 user.
I just want to unlock it before they nerf it lol
That's why I use the acr 
I'm glad weapons are unlocked so if I get pissed off at the RM68 users I can also pick it and then we'll see who's better 
RM68 is fine for me and I usually use it
I used to use the DM7 exclusively but the RM68 is so ridiculously appropriate to my lack of defensive skill that I perform better in every situation with the RM68 compared to the DM7.
lmao alright starting off 3-7 in that match, im just not going to play right now
too much bullshit
Better luck next time
dying to an RM twice over and vehicles 4 times..yeeeah not feeling the game
You have 1 week then
so is season 5 not launching with the vehicle loadout update? they worded that weird in the development update
thinking about just waiting til the next season and doing the unlock challenge. I dont have the time to grind that much these days
I finished this season's BP so I'm waiting for next season too lol
Iâm still not finished
gitgud?
More like play more 
havenât played since like a month now
and that was when I installed it
my condolences
the dm7 is not treated well by dice
I like using the SVK
svk is very good
ironically ive played more since i finished the BP 
thats only because i had the dumb idea to become lmg main
Thank you for your condolences.
It most certainly is not.
wtf
Apparently the DM7 is still the weapon I have vastly more kills with. 3045 DM7 kills compared to RM68 at 1774 kills.
how
controller or mouse?
I hate the DM7 it's horrible and can't understand why anyone else would like it
Mouse and keyboard.
your fire finger must be absolutely monsterous 
I also got T1 with it so you can trust me when I say I have experienced it
dm7 is another case of "an AR can do it better"
I didn't like it initially but due to being Arma-damaged with only using semi-auto, I chose to (rather than adapting to full-auto weapons) go with the DMR to deal more damage with every (albeit rare) hit.
My gf seems fairly satisfied with it for what that's worth.
yess
Yes, I much prefer the SVK or BSV-M since they hit so much harder
Also; subsonic ammo.
I should use th am40 more
The SVK is tolerable, the BSV-M is okay. I think the biggest problem I have with DMRs in general is that I am very aggressive in my playstyle and therefore am constantly handicapped by having a firerate cap.
So instead of using the DM7 you should... Fix your Arma-damaged brain and go full auto
you shouldnt have an issue with the bsvm in full auto even up close 
short barrel is op
That's why I use the RM68 mostly these days.
I have had a lot of fun with that configuration, not going to lie, but there's something about it that just does not sit well with me.
the fact its absolutely broken?
i honestly dont even get why it has barrel options lol..dice should have just made it a regular barrel
It feels a little cheap to use it in that capacity, yes.
once you get the HP subsonic i think is what i run, its just a monster
Yeah.
The main attractive point of the BSV-M for me is that it has subsonic high-power ammunition.
it was hyper stupid pre nerf, full auto lasering people at 100m..
Don't think I have used it since the nerf.
i used it, might have t1'd it dont even remember..after not touching it for a long time..and it was still busted
Yeah, balance is not the strong point of this game.
In fact, I am not sure what is the strong point of this game.
same with the avancy, i used it a bunch when it released and stopped because it felt so scummy, just finished the T1 on it days ago, still strong af
dm7 subsonic is flat worse than bsv subsonic
Agreed, still prefer DM7 subsonic.
i admire the chosen pain
I get along with the recoil better with the DM7 using subsonics and a suppressor.
this is my favourite thing anyone has said about 2042 because i'm thinking about it and i genuinely can't name anything
I feel slightly honored that it's your favorite thing to be said about the game.
gun balance is fucked, vehicle balance is non existent
map design uhh...yeah 
surely dice got something right, and improvement from bfv?
not being set in WW2
ig the weaponry was kinda limited
Twitch drops would be a good addition
after going to ww1....2 wasnt exactly that much different due to how many full auto things dice put in ww1 lol
It'll get more people to watch and play
Yeah. Call me idiotic if you want but because I have studied the World Wars religiously since an early age I found the prevalence of prototype weapons rather discouraging in some way.
I think most historical setting games suffer from that inevitable accurate inaccuracy.
i get why they went and did it...bolt action only gameplay on a large scale like that would have been boring
but at the same time it just felt like a ww2 reskin 
In the sense that they want to balance historical accuracy with player choice. Which ultimately ended up in a system that doesn't really fit either party.
Concept of 128

Meh.
On a, perhaps funny, sidenote; I'm not sure what BFV would have looked like without the absolute crackpot workshop that was the German Waffenamt research & development division.
Unsung heroes of all arcade WW2 games.
It makes me so sad because there's definitely a role for the Nightbird but it's just too well armed and too maneuverable. It should be this scrappy little transport helicopter that does hit and run but instead it just makes a mockery out of the game with on board repairs and the fact you can fire rockets from it.
K30, RPT, DM7, SVK, 12M Auto, or one of the snipes, which tier 1 do i go for next?
Hear me out
Next battlefield
Medieval
dm7/snipers would be the hardest to t1
yeah i think i should go for that
BSV-M
Maybe i do all the snipes at the same time to get good at them
already have it tier 1-d
I think we already have that with mount and blade 2
Knights on motorbikes
Or chivalry 2
Or what about a really infuriating Battlefield with gun jams boots laces getting tangled with eachother and you falling
Randomly tripping on rocks
Actually i think i'll decide based on which skin looks prettiest
that's a smart play
Been using the 12mm and itâs fun af to use it just feels lazy af
12M auto has a damn sexy T1skin too ngl
Should i challenge myself to t1 it only using slugs?
I bought the battlefield bundle on steam (it had 4,1,V). I've just downloaded and played BF1 with some friends for the first time and they all said it was shit (gunplay, vehicles, overall "feel") and that BF2042 is way better (they've been playing it a lot recently without me). To be fair I wasn't all that keen on the BF1 gunplay either. Before I buy it, is there any truth to it? We're all new to the BF franchise. Just asking before I buy ANOTHER battlefield game.
they're talking crap
don't pay any attention to them

one of the commonly agreed upon traits of 2042 even among people who like the game is the gunplay is horrendously shallow and the vehicles are very poorly balanced
Releasing the season 5 trailer last friday was a huge L, they should've waited until this friday. Now the wait is unbearable 
On the one hand I wanna trust the fanbase. But my friend group are all telling me that the BF fans are just salty because of how bad the 2042 launch was. And I definitely agree that there's a big difference between being a long time fan that's been totally soured, and some completely fresh eyes to the game and franchise.
what is the new map based on in past bf
we'll see about their game tastes...
They like COD a lot and some reviews say that 2042 has very COD like gunplay. Is that true?
It's significant, I'd say the strong point of bf1 was definitely atmosphere and bfv was probably an attempt at having variety of player choice (reinforcements, fortifications, upgrade trees for weapons and vehicles, poorly implemented combat roles)
all 2042 really has is 128p and that can be directly linked to basically every single weak part of the game (maps gunplay vehicles etc); it's got nothing it really can hold up as it's defining trait
it feels vaguely like someone tried to copy the original blops and failed if i had to compare it to COD
I didn't buy the game at release, I got a year of EA play about 4 months ago and the game was not impressive to me at all
I'd give it a 3/10
Yeah apparently there weren't even classes at launch until recently lol
had they not abandoned portal and improved the ai bots
I'd say it's relatively okay
i played shortly before classes were added and for a little while afterwards; imo, all it did was make dealing with vehicles a massive pain in the ass
the class system is very clearly just bolted on top of the specialists
nah i hear from vehicle mains there are minumum of 33 lis' every game of 64p matches shooting rockets at them 
imagine that, but UCAV
thats hell on earth
If I had to guess why anyone would say 2042 was better than 1 in every way, it might just be a setting issue. I suppose the feel they were going for with WW1 guns is that they're supposed to not be zero recoil laser beams. These videos I'm seeing of 2042 gameplay seem to be people standing upright and full auto beaming from mid range.
you can beam to 100m with any assault rifle
Lmfao wtf, opinions are cool but theyâre totally wrong
while strafing
guns have absolutely minimal recoil and spread
which leads to a lot of them feeling samey
I see that's probably it then. If you don't like dealing with inaccuracy then 2042 will probably be your favourite.
lmg is an AR with 10x larger mag size that has slightly higher recoil and is slower to fire out of sprint
Starting to like playing as Casper ngl
Iâm so confused đ
smg is an AR with worse range, a little bit of spread and slightly higher rof
thats my least problem with the game
Is c5 drone still a thing?
yeah but it gets heavily slowed with each c5 on it
Damn thatâs lame
What's the worst part?
People heavily overexaggerate BF1s gameplay and just kind of apply a very blanketed âimmersion over gameplayâ thing, which in general annoys me since DICE 100% listens to shit like that (and itâs why theyâre so out of touch), a more realistic explanation is it has dated gameplay mechanics but itâs certainly more enjoyable than 2042 since not only does it work but itâs immersion building and atmosphere really makes you feel like youâre in the war
2042 gunplay and movement is the direct result of BF1 and V doing something good and getting shit for it regardless
nit picky feat: lack of offline content and AI bots
I wouldnât consider those nitpicks tbh, games feel more like temporary licenses with how you canât even play some solo content without being online and connected to servers the devs own
movement is a downgrade in 2042, wth?
come on
I just looked it up and found out there's no campaign
No campaign was disappointing considering dice actually created a solid sounding story lol
Wait you only started playing this in the last six months?
what game?
older BF had campaign
2042 does not have campaign, but bots for Portal
2042, you were mentioning no offline stuff
I mean, bf4 story sounded cool
Shit in execution
But sounded cool
I think it is, itâs generally lighter and stripped of any drawbacks and movement mechanics
You just slide jump everywhere
from Bad company to today, they dont have any way to play multiplayer modes offline
Canât even climb 
rip FP animations
Itâs all designed to be as trendy as possible IMO
the bandwagon travesty
they sold out
for quick garnering the fans
- Devs play Apex Legends once
I think it would be cool if it really emphasized on the grim world of 2042
lets remove some silly spec
and cosmetics
Yep precisely

and that may do the trick
I hate specialists but I admire dice sticking to at least being somewhat serious with the cosmetics
I hate the general trend in mtx fps to have the goofiest shit lol, they barely have consistent themes and just makes it feel like TF2 or something
or apex
I just looked up specialists. So it's like Siege? Hero shooter stuff
yep
btw
siege is now a dog shit game
it used to be cool back in the days
now its hot garbage
I know some people say gameplay is most important but the general theme, atmosphere and aesthetics are imo more memorable aspects, but at the very least objectively are just as important
so 
as a player that focuses more on design style and atmosphere
yes
Siege just seems weird now, some of those operators look like they donât even belong in the game
blame esport
And the âskill gapâ is genuinely killing it lmao
and the director blokes of the game
Yeah I redownloaded it a few years back. Some albino bitch ran at me so I shot her but she vanished because in the Siege universe they've weaponised Schizophrenia.
remember when siege used to be dark
and have realism tone
remember the trailer?
remember the opening intro?
Trailer to launch was crazy
remember when the game was focused on this terrorist group?
shit hit the fan real hard
all those efforts and lore
out the window
oh yeah, the one coop campaign mission
yeah no way i was buying this game, i started playing when it was added to ea play
Sorta, it was just a poorly executed corporate cash grab that didnât belong in battlefield
So how long did you play it before swearing it off
rememebr when soldiers yelled
and they sound like satirical, war cries

Yes 
Can't even run medic anymore. No one waits for revives
Lmao just looking up the characters and I'm seeing that the guy from the wire was one of the specialist
I think thatâs why BFVs revive screen pretty much forced you into being revived by medics, they just canât make people depend on others in this game 
And BF1 medics could revive an entire team in 3 milliseconds
yeah, Irish is valid since he was also in BF4
March 10th, 172 hours
My friend just bought me a one month subscription so I can try BF 2042 with them.
Just seems like a lot of hate for such a short time playing. Are you a long time bf franchise player?
Almost scared I'll like it given how much shit talk it's getting
That's why Mackay the goat
Oh man donât get me wrong. Go into it open minded and see how you enjoy it and how it plays for you
idk if this game would make it worse or...
above all, try it out and make up your own mind
No doubt
I admit it has issues (mostly nightbirds) but I really enjoy it
Yeah I want Putin to show up with a lightsaber mid match
...neither of those things would fit in the game
Yes it would
in battlefront?
...on the battlefield
who are they anway
where ARE my soldiers
with balclava mask
goggles
and bullets around their neck
I played bfv for a long time yeah
I hope you find a game that you enjoy as much as you did bfV
only bf5?
(I can't wait for DICE to release bf5 so we have a ton of confusion between bf5 and bfv)
Did you think the next game would be bf6, but were surprised to find it was 2042
think? yeah. surprised? no
Idk whether to be happy or sad we are continuing 2042
Their decisions keep proving that infantry being able to solo anything and everything is the priority
if you have the choice, be happy
be sad 
Already am
this is just how it works out sometimes
128 players max
Anti tank grenades exist
anti tank grenades are so 1918
do anti tank grenades do less damage to infantry?
even more anti vehicle options YAY
didn't we already have anti vehicle grenades... like, since launch
you dont get it, these are anti tank grenades in the year 2042 so theyll be op
as if mackay and non support/recon players being able to equip c5 wasn't fucking aids enough
woah, are you insinuating that assault shouldn't get c5?
i'm not insinuating, i'm saying assault shouldn't
well recon did steal supports c4
do you want TORs and AAs eternally camping in spawn? because that's how you get it
And how do you get rid of them?
I dunno about you, but I spawn as Sundance with c5 and take em out
the entire game is one mechanic excusing another
sundance with c5..
yeah, almost like it's too easy to just bumrush tanks with c5 now
because what's gonna happen if you fail
I wouldn't say it's easy, but no it's not really difficult
it's the fucking definition of eassy
you have two specialists on assault, one that can wingsuit and one that can grapplehook
parachutes are insanely maneuverable and you can cut/reopen them at any time
oh god are you saying we should just parachute into the enemy spawn
you are given literally EVERY moment to rush armor with c5 like a bitch because the devs didn't think "hmm, maybe making it this easy would be a bad idea for vehicle players"
all the while they forget that vehicles are meant to be actually strong
it's like one guy put it
sounds like this game sucks
I'm a vehicle main, and while I don't like it when sundance c5s me, I don't advocate for their removal
2042 is the wet dream of every loser who exclusively played bf4 infantry and cried about how they can't solo vehicles
I adjust my tactics and kill them next time they do it
But I guess if you only want to play one way, then everything that prevents you from doign that is bad
anyway fuck nightbirds
ah yes I'll suddenly be able to look 90 degrees up to shoot a parachuter who repeatedly attempts to c5 until he gets the kill
or maybe the other 63 players who can also do the exact same thing when they feel like they want to solo a vehicle
But not impossible, just keep your eyes open and don't fall into tunnel vision
no offense but "I adjust my tactics" sounds super cringe
I've rarely found more than one person to try twice
how would you phrase it?
that's because not only is it that, it's also just a re-hashed "get good haha you can shoot the Lis missile just fine"
accurate, i know
anyway I'm gonna go play 2042 instead of bitching about it
i'll pass, this game's going downhill by the update
in most other available ways
example?
i'm sure you do enjoy it, since you are one of those people who sundance c5 vehicles
Only when they sit in the spawn and camp
and never question how stupidly weak vehicles are against literally anything infantry has
Rarely when they are in the field. Because it's much harder to do
"adapt" is a bit less larpy i guess
not the greatest still tho
ok
I adapt and overcome
Whats a good gun combo to go with zain
quitting the game
im good
love the attitude Goblin.
I've heard good things about the rm68
it was always bad
I enjoy the SFAR
im geting pretty tired of it, super easy to use lol
unfortunately I always try to see the light at the end of the tunnel, but as it turns out it's just a steaming pile of shit
whoever said it was broken wasnt wrong
You could try the SFAR, RPT, or ACWR
i have the sfar what attachments do you rock?
im on the pessimistic side of realist lol
grenade underbarrel, kobra sight, I think stubby grip and extended barrel
Just run arcom with the drum mag and the sight you want on the scar.
wait not stubby grip, that's the underbarrel
honestly though, i really, really tried to enjoy this game
Why don't you go find another one?
i had fun moments but it just gets fucked with every season and core issues aren't being addressed
tor spawncampers, c5 being ridiculously easy to use and being literally the prime cope choice to wipe out armor almost effortlessly
lis
so... why don't you go find another game
among other things
Don't tell me it's because as bad as this game is, it's still better than the alternative
c5 really shouldn't have triple now that anti tank nades exist
nobody's talking to you
Then why don't you talk to me
once again c5 shouldn't have been on assault especially in the first place
Hey Kristopher, I'm doing alright
thats great
yep. Fuck nightbirds
exacerbated the issue of people insta-locking mackay and sundance to fly over to vehicles on any part of the map
i agree with this conceptually
sounds like you could use some copium
â
I bet you're the kind of person who disagrees with verticality in this game
great strawman btw
I'm not sure you know what that means...
solid argument, any complaint about shitty balance is copium
Mackay and Sundance needs a nerf
what kind of nerf
flying characters having access to c5 is cunked
do you notice how on 4 it's just that much harder to c4 vehicle players
No c5 for assaults. That should be for Engineers
and how if you need to c4 someone, it's almost always a jeep used
and recon. and support.
what kind of playstyle is best with him? passive or agres
Recon is a pass but support doesnt really need that for its role.
I wouldn't know, I never play passively lol
I'm always pushing objectives and campers
c5 in 2042 compared to 4 has absurd throw range and is allowed on the class that hosts the two specialists with mobility tools that make them able to traverse the map exceptionally well
Using LMGs as am Engineer still feels like crap. Recoil is bad.
is the sfar good in close quarters
Not sure how the stupid passive perk is supposed to work.
ehhhh. I also run the shorty shotty
parachutes in 4 also lack the ability to be cut and are far less controllable
parachutes in 2042 may as well be fucking actual wing gliders
that's how they feel
im gonna have 3 gls in my loadout lol
the very least they could do is limit maximum c5
Take C4 and mines from them and theyâd be better
they do.. to 3
So many sundances that take team helis just to go like 500 meters up and then hop out and glide across the map to target 1 tank

The issue this is that two engineers have fucking dogshit gadgets and require rocket launchers to fill their only free slot
Just bullshit balancing
classes were a mistake
REMEMBER WHEN VEHICLES TOOK TEAMWORK TO TAKE DOWN
DICE gaslighting
SO DO I
If the game had been built around classes, it would work, but tryign to add them on post mortem is just fucking everything
You spawn with 3 and 3 is enough to solo any vehicle
i remember NOT being able to consistently solo vehicles because of a fucking wingsuit and grapple hook and wing glider parachutes
Yup. Only good engineer is Lis
Opinions are cool but like, classes and gadget balancing used to be so much better than open loadouts
Facts
With the addition of anti tank nades the maximum c5 stack should now be 2
what bf game can i not solo tanks in exactly
âbut muh freedomâ good, why do you need it, assaults donât need snipers lmao
BTW mw2 has a lot more players than BF2042
notice how I said consistently
Battlefield 2042 players says mw2 sucks
yeah I do remember being able to solo vehicless in bf4
Youâve always been able to solo tanks but the difference is it used to take so much more effort
or perhaps I should have used the word effortlessly instead
In 2042 itâs hilariously easy
Yeah remove C5 off of assualt
oh i dont argue that 2042's balance is out of wack
that's putting it lightly
but "tanks should require teamwork" is a load of bullshit
engineers used to have 7 rpgs per spawn in bf4 if i recall
with the anti-tank field upgrade, yes
but in that game
I doubt the rpg will be any good when it's added in season 5
okay and i also solo'd many tanks in bfv with both support and assault
The issue with being able to solo tanks in 2042 is that prior to anti tank nades we only had 1 slot that could actually damage tanks, so 3 c5s was required to solo a tank
Specialists unironically broke it
Its a fundamental balance issue
We had no anti tank nade
comparing infantry's ability in 4 to solo tanks to infantry's ability in 2042 to solo tanks is disingenuous
good fucking luck trying to kill a tank as easily as 4
The only specs who have a main gadget slot that can hurt vehicles are sundance and lis
ESPECIALLY if they're competent
it's not "disingenuous" to discuss how engineers are poorly balanced in this game compared to mackay/sundance
not at all actually
In BF4 you had 2 simple solo anti tank choices
Sneak up successfully, or c4 Jeep
C4 Jeeps were pretty reasonably countered and BF4 didnât have grapple hooks or wing suits to make sneaking up on tanks brain dead ez
no, let's get back to how you were talking about engineers being able to carry 7 RPGs in 4
Rockets always took teamwork though
no, they didnt
Or required a tank to already be low hp
because that was a disingenuous comparison
uh, what?
shoot em in the ass. 2 shots
Once a tank realizes a player is lobbing rockets at it, they usually donât have a very long time to live
done
Therefore either several players used rockets or one guy did and got turned into mist
assuming you don't get flattened by an AP shell or the gunner
yes but theoretically it worked
and assuming you hit the tank straight on from behind
you're acting like the moment you shoot at a tank you are dead, sorry thats just not how older bf games worked
at NO angle
obviously?
it doesn't theoretically work in 2042
even under ideal conditions you can't solo with rockets alone
it's like some people didn't actually play the older games, eh?
which is why you have to go to c5
mfw I just APS the second RPG shot and just turn your ass into paste
Unless you have the gift of incredible indestructible cover assets, donât expect to live long enough to solo a tank with rockets if itâs full HP and the player has a brain
it is asorta
i mean you could hide but if your one guy that tank will have your ass
sooner or later
Hence I said unless the tank was already low HP it generally requires more than 1 player using rockets to kill a tank, this isnât very complicated
Its not about whether the tanker counters it practically, it's about whether theoretically under ideal conditions you can solo the tank with those rockets
"hehe, i played the game more than you did, tanks are soooooooooooo easy to solo bro just do it"
You can't in 2042
hahahaha
You can in older games
but heres the thing. in 2042 you should be able to play engineer and solo vehicles
i'm arguing with a dumbass
instead you play sundance/mackay and its easy mode
^
I thought you weren't talking to me anyway
it really depends either way I guess, because nothing changes a tank at 20 HP being killed by a player shooting 1-2 rockets at it
thatâs just how the HP is to begin with
your argument was exceptionally stupid
so i felt the need to respond
forcing the class system onto already designed characters really fucked things up
but 1 player with rockets could never solo a vehicle if it wasnât already weak
"guys i was only pretending to be stupid to get that guy's attention"
"could never" man the avg bf player is not that good
i thought you were playing 2042?
Not at all, if I'm acting stupid you'll know it
or are you sitting in the respawn screen the whole time
don't I already, bro. don't I already.
Apparently not
Iâm confused if this is a dig at me or at other players
infantry players i stg
look at it like this; if the tank player is afk can you solo it with rockets
in old bf games yes
in new bf games no
it has nothing to do with you, why would you take it that way
bfv mitigated this with giving assault dynamite and AT nades
2042 gives you fucking nothing
so they gave c5 a 3 stack on spawn so you can solo vehicles
i have no idea if you're an avg bf player, but i do know avg bf players hopping in a tank are easy pickings in any bf title
Fair enough, and donât worry I didnât take it personally, it was just a general question since I was confused
creating a horrible instakill at close range with high mobility specs, but its a fundamental design flaw that comes from the top down with specialists existing
the m5 recoilless cannot solo a tank in 2042
although it would be fair to point out its insane velocity
boris and crawford have no realistic way of finishing a tank off once theyre out of rockeys
Buffing its velocity instead of its damage or its ammo capacity was fucking stupid
Dice design
Sometimes when I leave a game and automatically go to the lobby, the game just won't load and I'm on a dark screen and then I have to restart the game, how else does that happen? any predictions to fix this likely annoying bug
This is why the rockets are shit
yes this is also part of the broken game design
The vehicles are balanced around 128p
duh, same studio that thought the tor tank was a good idea
So its 128p and specialists both making design issues
128 player balance is hilariously bad
i think it was meant to be a stopgap for anti-air being shit, but that would imply they were thinking at all
Yeah rockets usually have lower velocities and shorter ranges in bf, they basically did the opposite for 2042 cause just how large maps are and stuff like that
i think vfc is right that the m5 velocity is mostly for air targets
rpg better have more ammo and is slightly harder to use
I think they did it to deal with camping tanks
They claimed engies could take out vehicles at any range when they were describing classes
Finally got PKP T1
Which is obviously not true
waiting on warsaw revamped tbh
But the velocity buff was their reasoning behind being able to shoot them at tanks miles away on the maps designed for 128p
If they gave a shit about aircraft they would have nerfed flares
The lis buff was their answer to aircraft, which they immediately reverted because aircraft users got mad
lis shouldn't have been there in the first place
soflam should have been given its proper due buff
To balance the game at this point would require reworking half of the game all at the same time because things are so poorly designed around interacting with each other
It was just stupid to begin with, 600 meters range + decent control in boost mode
You could catch up to condors in jet mode
Opinion - Javelin on a painted target should go through flares like BF4
It definitely wasn't a good decision but it showcases how they have no fucking idea what they're doing with the balance in this game
That's good imo
based as fuck
@safe bramble come look at this take
a good take on soflam
Oh yeah for sure, Iâm just generally commenting on the Lis buffs looking back at them since I forgot they had the audacity to pull that 
Is that only with the tracer dart?
They rolled that back SO fucking fast
A painted target is anything that has a lock on symbol on it
it was a wild buff that wasnt needed, like the paik season 2 thing
Imagine they buff Mackay 
I gotta be honest
Dice is good at buffing things that dont need it
They ruined Dozerâs mastery requirements
Instead of incentivizing players to think and use his shield
1 step forward 10 steps back
Look at the g57
Oh yeah the paik buff lol
Like why
We have to get CQB kills
Then again legal wall hacks from the beginning was dumb and led to deaths that are just wrong principally
We need better melee mechanics
throw smoke and press hero ability to shoot everyone through the smoke without any effort required
Legal wall hacks can be great when the game is done well
paik was very funny
Paik is not done well
Paik was worse on launch than now IMO
Basically a buffed version of pathfinder from apex
Blacklight retribution did the best legal wallhax I've ever seen
Tbh i wouldn't have minded specialists if we also had the ability to play as regular soldiers
Pulse knife from tf2 was kind of neat also
Paik is just solo destructor
Oh I remember people using paik and the saiga shotgun pre nerf. Good god
Some sweats still use her and it makes me want to delete the game
Then again season 5 content isnât the best and my y1 pass obviously expired so I have no obligations to play
This entire game literally encourages going solo lmao
It worked in backlight because everyone could do it, it worked in titanfall because mobility is huge and you gave up other things for it
I am free
Absolutely unstoppable
It doesn't work in battlefield
Sweats who use paik with the 12m auto 
The saiga is nowhere near as powerful as it was
Itâs still weird because itâs pretty hard to keep it semi relevant without making it kinda busted
thats true but its still bogus compared to the other ones
Cause obviously 2042 isnât for shotguns
Funny thing is they nerfed all the shotguns just to nerf the saiga making the pump shotgun unusable
I have no idea why they adhust all the shotguns at the same time
Probably some dogshit programming where they share values
Either the programming sucks or they are unbelievably bad at balance
Both options are not good
Pump is insanely bad and they have no intention of buffing it
Boris is insanely bad and they have no intention of buffing him
Tor is insanely good and they have intentions of "not shifting the problem"
They nerf irish in the least effective way possible at dealing with his issues
Least thereâll be less people camping in tanks behind aps
But, now his Aps is gonna be mostly useless
Right on the cusp of new grenades being added
I doubt it, they nerfed it to be shit with infantry but not for tanks
People are still going to do that as tanking in a way other then being a pussy will get you laid out
You can still place two APS
Well, Iâm just gonna keep huffing hopium in the corner
we still havent seen if you can stack 2 in one spot to mostly have no cooldown
Hopium lmfao
and im pretty sure you can just set the 2nd one down while the other one is in denial mode to do that too
Why do you think Boris is bad? Just wanna know
AI turret basically useless?
The turret is useless
the turret is useless and his passive is useless
They have intention of nerfing tor but they literally don't know how to do it because its fundamentally broken
yup i made the joke from there lmao
Admitted by devs themselves
he is one of two specialists that can use the m5 recoilless and both of those choices suck
it's like dice wants to add so many explosives that the only valid way of tanking is TOR camping
legit
Itâs garbage against infantry. Itâs got pitiful health. And barely does ANY damage to vehicles despite them making it target them more often than infantry.
just give boris an anti ground vehicle throwable
I have literally only ever used the armor for an achievement. Otherwise I wouldâve never done it.
Itâs stupid and shouldnât even exist anyway
the armor plates?
such a stupid idea in a game thats not a br
the angel ammo pouches giving armor was hilarious balance though
alot of things in this game was a stupid idea
gg dice..glad you thought that through 
There is no good reason to ever use it over anything else
whenever i think dice is going to make a competent change, i remind myself that the TOR still exist
selfish dps that sucks?
I suppose
I donât really play assault much.
Almost never really
Iâm a support or engineer guy
theres certainly no good reason to run it over sph
Everyone else already said but yeah boris turret is complete garbage and his passive is focused entirely on his turret
Or C5
sph is such a silly free kill generator
I wish Borisâ passive was like, increased accuracy with rocket launcher without ADS or something
i was just using that on zain
Yep
Like anything that would make him an enticing engineer
someone on a crawford turret was around a corner...2 into the turret, killed the guy and another behind him 
ive said it before, he should be the Launcher Specialist and get bonus ammo
clear anti tank boris, clear defensive crawford
Like Lis has the vehicle paint trait, Crawford has the speed vehicle heal. He should have a launcher perk
that makes too much sense for dice to do
Heâs an engineer that doesnât even feel like one
lis is AA engie, crawford is defence/repair engie, boris should be AT engie
theres more than enough rounds where tanks feel like they never die in my experience
a crazy idea here, they make the tanks less like immobile death traps, while also making engineers have more fun options to destroy them
i guess i have to play a healer + res bot + killing machine + anti tank the entire match 
Quicker fire. Idk
m5's only inaccurate in hipfire anyway
The M5 sometimes shoots off target while hipfiring.
boris being able to hipfire it perfectly would be kinda legit
Thatâs what Iâm sayin
Give boris more launcher ammo or faster reloads as a passive, change turret to only aim for vehicles and give it high short range damage but bad at long range
Well if the RPG is like how it is in portal itâs gonna be wild.
Iâve had it happen many times
Iâve had it miss when it was close even.
yea it has very random hipfire dispersion
Since boris cant use c5 or AT mines, change his turret to act superficially in the role of either of them
Boris turret just shooting down jets at mach 6
it is still very funny how you can get Lis with c5 and infinite launcher ammo vs boris with 3 shots
No lis is already AA
I mean, it is. It just does like 1 damage barely
His turret is so bad it doesnt count right now
Has the dps of liberator with AP rounds
the only time you die to a turret is if you are low hp and being shot at by multiple enemies
I die 10x more to the fucking dogs
having an ai turret in the game at all was another specialist mistake
I feel like giving the turret any actual damage to anything bigger than a CAV brawler might be a mistake given how often you see turrets
The turret is stupid as fuck but right now it needs to function in the role of c4/AT mine
Gimp its range massively but have it output up close
it could also just do more dps over time for repeated shots on target for vehicles
I can see situations where turrets are hidden behind walls and then you get fucking gibbed
You see them often cause Boris is like the default engineer choice if you wanna use a launcher. Even if technically Crawford makes more sense to pick.
the tickling damage isnt enough for anyone to worry about
That and people for some reason love the idea of a gadget that plays for you
Thats the same as an AT mine right now
i know it sucks in some scenarios but the turret needs to replace c5/mine when it takes their slot
I canât tell you when the last time my turret killed somebody.
they were huffing the team fortress 2 nostalgia a bit too much
im just glad theres no fucking invis cloak
At least no one runs AT mines
Shit Sundance may as well be invisible most of the time
There is no world where you pick c5 or mine over rocket launcher right now
No one runs AT mines because they can't
They show up behind you like theyâve been stalking you for hours.
I run AT because no one expects it uwu
The only spec who can reasonably run mines is Lis
Its a waste on boris or crawford
So their gadget has to replace the role
Thereâs no chokepoints
It doesn't for crawford and it never will
No obvious routes. Tanks donât move anyway
mines are very effective since their size change
So they have to change boris tureet
but most tankers are taking so much chip damage they dont move up. and they cannot dare get 25m from a mackay
Yeah imma be honest. They should not allow MacKay to grapple tanks
its been nerfed in a couple ways at least, but ye
c5 needs to not have 3 stacks
I even run it on Boris but I rarely play him and I feel like a cunt when I nail someones head with the M5 lmao
Thereâs just no scenario where that feels fair to a tanker
i will say that i kill far more mackays than die to them, by a huge margin
but most people are too scared to hop out
and it was a lot more painful with the original mackay distance
30m grapple range with c5 
mackay still needs a hard range nerf on that grapple đ
Now AT nade exists they gotta drop the 3 stack of c5
but they're not going to
it fucking sucks that you can brainstorm ways to balance in here in 20 mins
and they get paid to spend a year going uhhhhhhh idk man
nearly 2 years to take the explosive spamming jeeps out of the game
*add
back in my day we hand-delivered explosives to the enemy in jeeps, right on the hood
Whats up everyone?! I hope everyone is having a wonderful night tonight.
Try to reboot your system
Thats weird.
anyone know why deathmatch say limited time only?
will it be gone for good or something?
Maybe shit is changing next season. But idk
I hope you seek the answers you're looking for
thanks
Of course my friend
MP-28 gets no love even though it still slaps 
It's only downside is it's slightly longer draw time
and that longer first mag reload
@pastel dust check ur dms

it has said that for a long time now
have to spam click
i hate spam clicking
glock just works
Good lord 6 days in Fallujah is releasing LETS GO
when will the pc and console version come out
!!when will it come out
Soonâ˘
Delete system 32
When
U cant delete that
Like zeppelin says soon
looks like army version of ready or not
and i cant wait to do the exact same thing i do in ready or not

_ _
Itâs because the Glock has burst fire and can 1 tap, plus superior handling and hipfire
Almost no real reason to use it unless you like how it looks
glock and super 500: can randomly one shot people
m44: can one shot people but has awful soft stats/requires aim
the rest of them: cannot one shot people
this is the definitive pistol tier list
Anyone excited for Zavod 2.0???
zavod with 128 people shooting you from 128 meters away, oh joy
and infantry breakthrough is gone from the game wooo yeah live service
glock can 1 shot?
one burst/one click
ah
who made the rao passive work in vehicles? i just want to talk to them
does someone know or remember how much bf coins the bp was with tier skip? 2100?
the rex also one taps but god the irons are terrible
At least we got Infantry CQ
I haven't bought the S4 BP but I can purchase one with 4 rewards unlocked instantly for 1000, and the one that unlocks 20 tiers of rewards is on sale for 40% off at 2400, original price is 4000.
thanks!
ready for grapple + ap grenade + sph launcher + c5 + at grenade?
c5
Why no new vehicles in season 5?
i think the at grenade will only be avaiable for engineers
sunce crawford uses it in the trailer
and hes an engineer
maybe because of the vehicle reworks or dice just forgor
Season 5
yea but is it 5.0 or 5.1 or 2 or what
Yes
Yes
no snacks for you
Do you think they'll ever actually bring out more portal content
Felt kinda abandoned
doubt it at this point
region?
Europe
should be finding games then
I get an error after a minute
maybe check firewall settings?
Also check your game to see if it needs repairing
also update gpu drivers
it's always 2042, man
wanna bet
It's rao isn't it
on the cover it shows some Liz Legendary (?) or Epic Skin, but I didn't get it.
Elite edition doesn't include the tier 100 skins from the old BPs
oh okay..
Elite edition includes, the 4 seasonal specialists, season weapon unlocked (i think), and a lost world rao bundle
yikes, I only bought it cuz I wanted to have the Liz Legendary Skin from S1 or 2
nah I finally got the Vehicles unlocked I never play anyways so I got everything
if I read it correctly they'll have a Liz Legendary Skin is S5?
Check the website
The battlepass part
IMO could of just got one from the store
I guess it's a yes
Battlefield is kinda p2w
wot
Pay to win
yeah how?
When you buy battle pass
i already know what p2w means
I though you dont know
how tf did you come too that conclusion
thats not pay to win
For me kinda
its not
Even a little?
nope
Its p2w for me
well your idea of p2w is wrong
Nope
you know double xp runs literally every other week at this point right?
Yes?
and that's for people who don't have the battle pass?
But if you buy battle pass early
either way pay to win means you pay to get an advantage xp boosters do not give you any sort of tactical or strategic value at all
Its only me opinion
Bro you can unlock most relevant weapons in less than a week of playing :))
It's not p2w at all. P2w would be if said content was only obtainable with money or required very long grinding, which is not the case.
You jump in one of those rush xl playlists and get eveything unlocked in no time
your opinion is wrong
Attachments take a bit longer, but you can't buy em with money
My opinion is my opinion
it all comes down to this, regardless of the opinion lol
P2W would be paying to get an otherwise unobtainable advantage over other players


