#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 805 of 1
Don't think it should just disable a lock regardless of its use.
One massive thing the jammer does is hide the signature of whoever is under its effects.
Very good game
Next BF should be 256 players 
maybe we have the technology to do what a PS3 game did 13 years ago
yeah
make the tickrate go below 45hz
and remove destruction altogether
we can't even do 128p well, why do 256?
bf planetside
We need 1000 player The finals
why did they ever add the sph.
Make at least some cover indestructable
they probably just thought it'd be funny
They certainly look down on people who don't like explosive spam if Straatford's comments on people saying it should be reduced are any indication.
it just feels like play irish or die now lmao
Pretty disappointed they nerfed the SPH
Community Manager Of The Game By The Way
yeeeboooiii he got wrecked
never played a bf with explosives this busted and annoying
Hopefully all the transport vehicles will lose explosive passenger guns
probably has something to do with the fact that you can just toss a grenade launcher on your gun any time you feel like, mid-life.
Don't really think that makes a difference when you can spawn with one.
DICE just needs to add mortars, that'll fix the explosive spam
???????????????????????????????????
there needs to be an attrition rate for the defenders in BT otherwise sites like C1 on Exposure will never be taken
how will that fix it and not make it worse.
Allow us to equip the one off the MAV on our players
how will it do that
those things seriously need a nerf
Correct
those mortars on the tank and mav are like nukes
All the Explosive vehicle rounds need a nerf
not the main driver shot
but the 30mm, 40mm nade, 50mm, and mortar
yk after being blown up 50 times maybe the flashbangs in mw2 arent that bad
If anything. They need to look into how lethal explosives are.
Frags are in a good spot, all throwables are pretty good imo
Grenades have a short as hell fuse timer with a gigantic explosion, Grenade launchers have a stupid kill zone.
You can't even run away from a frag grenade when it lands on your feet reliably.
That's the point isn't it?
No.
they really should, especially due to the incredible amount of them there are in this game, and responding with "we have the fun police on speed dial" to reasonable complaints about this does not help with anything.
You'll be sprinting and they'd still kill you.
It's even worse when this shit is coming from the Community Fucking Manager
He says that when stuff is getting changed
I'm sorry it just strikes me as him talking down to someone with reasonable complaints
and it's something that really annoys me especially considering his role
Okay? I mean, that's just how people refer to them when they nerf stuff
im thinking they add routes on the map from the enemy spawn to the point and if all routes get cut then the attrition timer starts ticking, and when it runs out you are forced to pull back or you will be killed in 30 seconds
Last sector is supposed to be the hardest.
Too bad it's the opposite on flashpoint
First sector? easy, second sector? hard, third sector? easy, fourth sector? hard, final sector? easy.
not impossible?
which it currently basically is
Which map?
Exposure
until they fall back behind the middle wall
exposures last sector is pretty hard but if u just spam a 30mm latv into there its free because the devs cant balance tranpsort
and then tank does nothing
Blame the tank driver
until someone with a jav from on top of the mountain
afaik blasco doesnt destroy aps
and aps is the main thing stopping infantry from actually pushing
Casper
use casper
Exposures current layout sucks yes but generally with breakthrough the last sectors are meant to be the hardest for the attackers.
caspers drone bearly fit in the thing and are way too seeable plus theres a shit ton delay between charges while that irish can place 2 aps down
3 casper
sure, 3 casper but good luck coordinating that with randos
meanwhile the dudes dont even need to coordinate to setup a defense
I'm sure there are a ton of ways to clear out an APS
You can use a casper, can C5 around the corners
can just shoot people
30mm
Casper drone
Dozer run
ive just gotten bf2042 cause its free this month with ps plus. not having the ability to cahnge zero distance with snipers is hella cringe
aim higher

your first mistake was trying to snipe in this game
or they just shouldnt of removed a feature thats been in every battlefield prior
welcome to modern gaming
zeroing only enabled more cringe behavior so i can't say i mind it's gone
Now I do cringe behaviour... but with skill
zeroing only?
tf does that even mean
you could still manually adjust with the ability to rangefind
no excuse for it to be absent
all it did was enable cringe behavior.
zeroing (feature) enabled low effort sniping which creates a bad gameplay experience for everyone around you
Sniping 🤮
u still gotta know the distance to zero too and 90% of the time you still ahd to adjust ur aim to hit even with zeroing
and what do you think you're doing while you're trying to figure that out?
Ew cod
no zeroing makes sniping harder
Ban yourself for saying that
i want to stop getting plinked for 80 by idiots half a mile away from where i am
maybe just dont get sniped and stand still
i mean like its pretty simple
i would understand the lack of rangefinding in 2042 but the snipers dont even have any drop
barely any drop at all

snipers in previous games had hilariously exaggerated bullet drop because bullet speed values were set incredibly low. presumably as a balancing thing.
Personally, I find the practice to be not worth doing in a game like this. You have to have really good aim and awareness to do well with it, which most BF players don't have, and the benefit a good sniper brings to a team is very minimal.
cry
you cant deny it
what, he's right.
even with cope
i coped for too long
2042 still is lackluster
waiting for the next game
Wow a rifle meant for a range actually good at it?
just gotta say
DICE just needs to remove sniper rifles already
sniper rifles belong in battlefeild
just not bf 2042
doesnt fit the gameplay
and speed
I don't think they do. I don't think they add anything to this or most FPS games, to be frank.
it has larger sized maps
nah they've just annoyed everyone since forever
yea they dont fit
Eh they're a ranged rifle that's worked on a game where the soldiers could run just as fast.
That's up to around 150m, past that it drops off significantly, until around about 800m where it's off the 6x scope
this is an absurd take
and you're surprised?
nah he finally has a take that's based
and i could do the same with an ak
Skill issue?
with laser precision
BASED TAKE #REMOVERECON
so why use a sniper when i could use an ar thats better
shut up, you
How about nerfing the SFAR
recon isnt a problem. bad recons are annoying but a good player who gets headshots isnt an issue
naw
Cause you can't take those extended ranges?
nerf every gun
i wouldn't mind snipers if they had mechanics that didn't reward being braindead

im never touching 128p again. there was a level 999 orbit camping with a 30mm apache
HAAAAAAAAAAA
oh. I think i've seen him.
agreed
That'll happen in 64p tf you mean
level 999
naw
anyway
Ah nice you can do that in 2042? BF3 throwback
it will probably stay 128
just join the 64p playlist
cause i know damn well the maps will once again suck ass
"Hey guys, let's go backwards in our technology"
hes gonna buy it no matter what
I WENT TO 128 FOR 2 GAMES AND GOT BOMBED FROM ORBIT BY A TACTIC FROM THE ALPHA 
just without old gen consoles
going to 128p broke battlefield
fuck that, give me a 24-32 battlefield with some maps that aren't hot garbage
you could make an entire game around bf1 frontlines
its still alive
128 is the only thing that makes this game worth playing
Give me 256 players. Double down
Bro what?
Yeah.... 16 months after launch
500 v 500 fuck it
no bf was ever free
just like bfV was on EA play Pro
it aint free last i checked
Planetside 2 but not boring, DICE make it happen
nah triple down give us 384 players
Exactly what we need
meanwhile preorders payed over 100 dollars
1000 Players per team
you still pay that subscription
500 v 500 you getting a png of a potato
which means it aint free
the game isnt free? you have to keep paying 60 a month every month to have access to battlefield on ps plus and ea play…
the sub is like 5 dollars
Battlefield MMO
and like 1 $ for ps plus
you will be shocked to hear that all the problems planetside had are present RIGHT NOW in 2042
Now that is a BATTLEfield
that shit is free
bro you’re fucking high
no
In some regioins ps plus is 1$
planetside 2 but not boring (lmao good one)
Damn... maybe i'll like planet side (I did when I played it 6 years ago)
just face the facts
the #1 problem with PS2 is the existence of friendly fire, so NOT YET
the steam store gets it to 15 bucks
planetside 2 cannot ever work
it's 11 years old, dead, and dying under crippling technical bugs
game is "free" if you have ps plus this month or have gamepass
Let me explain my rationale on this. Sniping as a practice mostly focuses on stealth takedowns of high value or ranking targets from a distance. In my honest opinion, this practice does not gel with a video game where people respawn and can get revived even after being shot in the head. Like i've said before, sniping takes a large amount of practice, decent aim, and decent awareness, things that most BF players do not have. It largely just leads to people not really contributing much to the team while trying to cosplay as Chris Kyle and barely hitting any shots while doing so.
It is due to this that I feel that sniping and rifles primarily associated with that practice do not need to be in the game.
tldr?
I am not giving a tldr, you're gonna read it.
Hell yeah. 1000 player teams, the finals style destruction (with some indestructible stuff so you have cover), vehhicles, classes, and squads, and then boom... Battlefield
500 boins should I double it and give it to the next person
"bad players cant hit shots so we cant have sniping" ?
man fuck that i am gonna hit some heads
please actually read the statement.
i read some mumbojumbo about hvts and shit
no one here can read sorry
naw
i did. its just me joking a little bit
meanwhile i run around in close quarters with snipers
either way theres nothing broken or wrong with bf snipers (besides bf1)
EA should buy out The Finals just to shut it down
higher effort required, higher rewards
if you want anything larger than 128 go play planetside
You realise the entire point of that studio was cause they didn't want to be with EA
and they still made a bad game
No. We may not have the tech rn, but in let's say 6 years we might
I just don't think the practice fits or really works with BF. It's higher effort for fewer rewards, because reasonably, what impact could a sniper possibly have on a match where people respawn and can get revived even if shot in the head?
Hell, 6 years ago we had hardline (by the time 2042 came out)
The Finals is a threat to my Battlefield waifu, it needs to be eliminated
actually do not play planetside under any circumstances
Oh are people actually saying this?
no just me
The Finals is...not something that BF players are gonna like.
That's like saying siege is destroying BF
good news, it's shit and will be forgotten about in 3 months
Tf is finals?
YES
the finals is literally a tech demo of unreal more than it is a game
Sounds like some wack boss
literally nothing matters in any battlefield game. i dont care if snipers are not perfectly viable in a game of all top 1% players, they work just fine in any regular lobby @eager spire
Anyone remember WW3? Probably not 
No idea what it even is
you know the matrix UE5 demo? its like that but you can get shot by a dude invisible with a glock
The finals. Made by embark studios. Is a 3v3v3v3 game tournament game where you can blow up the entire map
it's an FPS
That sounds dumb
wow that sounds horrible, they just should close up shop
100% it's gonna flop
Happens every night
DONT WORRY THO, THE STORE AND BATTLE PASS SYSTEM WORKS IN THE CLOSED BETA 
im not joking
Remember blood money in Hardline? Yeah that is the gamemode
I'll bet 100$ that the game dies in the first 2 months
WOW CRINGE
I mean it's free so probably not
gameplay loop looks pretty good imo
its free 100%
do they work, though?
its published by nexon
Take the bet then
aka its gonna be fucking hell
do they not work for you?
@stiff pollen There it is dood, the #1 sign it will be destroyed
I guess they work on a technical level but do people actually use them well, or are people just trying to cosplay Chris Kyle while being shit at aiming?
arc raiders i have some expectations but DICE also has shown time and time again they have no idea how to do coop let alone an engaging pve game
Seeing as it's free, has a good gameplay loop, and at a technical level is amazing, I'd say it'll be fine
like i used the most recent "sniper" and it was a fucking joke how much impact i could put out in a game
Died not even a month later
but yeah the finals is gonna hyperscape itself
Nah it'll flop
that railgun is insane
That's due to them shutting the servers down due to not being able to support the player base
splitgate didnt even die
they announced they abandoning it to work on a sequel with their seed money
Lmfao yes it did
they got 100 million dollars to make a sequel?
eh, the gameplay loop leaves something to be desired, visual recoil and clutter out the ass, confusing gunplay and some questionable balance choices[The strength of the medic beam]
Splitgate suffered the issue of being a college project that the devs could not keep up with. Hence them making a game studio and then making a sequel
oh so it died for a sequel that will never be made 
yes
A game doesn't just get abandoned in like 2 weeks
they took that money and ran 100%
Well that's fine? Half of that can be changed via the time it comes out
if the game is crossplay why i cant play with ps5 players?
and the second one will prob die too lol. splitgate only did well because cod was at its lows
or the ttk
Gameplay loop can be fixed with more gamemodes
i dont think they can fix the weird movement delay stuff
Enough talk. 100$ the game dies in 2 months
and hype for halo was high
@bitter trellis If you're on last gen you only play with Xbox One/PS4
Maybe not, that could be server side
finals looks like a dead in 2 months or maybe worse like a hyperscape situation
personally i don't think the amount of visual clutter The Finals has could ever be considered okay by any metric, plus there hasn't been any indication that they're planning to address either of these concerns.
LUL Hyperscape forgot that existed
like i said, i think the finals is more a tech demo of ue5 than a game
its got all the signs
amazing visuals, cool premise
Well Embark have that other game, I'm sure this was a test for that. But if they can fix something in it to keep it valid then go for it
hard to run and kind of annoying to actually play
arc raiders is a PVE game
They did state they have listened to the player feedback and are working on stuff
so that actually has a good chance
what stuff in particular, though?
thing is most people i know... they either play destiny, DRG or PD2 or L4D for their pve itch
No clue, but that's up to them to choose. It's their game
yea but it looks to have genuinely interesting enemies to fight unlike most of these pve games
we'll see tho
true
If they feel changing the TTK or visual clutter takes away from their vision then power to them
No one gonna take my bet?
but that can just be equated to monster hunter
How about this I'll pay the 100$ and you don't have to pay anything
im not betting 100 bucks but the game will be dead outside of maybe asia
I mean the game will be dead in 3 weeks when the beta ends lmao
I think if the visual clutter is part of their vision then they should fuck off.
genuinely what the fuck.
Exactly my point. Game is gonna flop
muzzle FLASH
Clearly it's in your vision if it's visual clutter 😉
aint it dog
I'll have bragging rights
remember visual clutter was a part of battleborns vision 
i just destroyed 141 projectiles with the aps
like nah mate why the fuck would you intentionally have shit that makes things difficult to see in an FPS game
No clue. But again, it's their game
someone else said this best: "i feel like the finals was embark showing they could do better destruction than battlefield on an engine that wasnt frostbite and thats really it"
i love crossplay games where i cant see and aim assist ignores all that visual clutter 👍
I mean, stupid take
why is that a stupid take
if it's their game, then i'm just not gonna play it /shrug
EA could do the same in a tech demo too
that seems fairly reasonable considering the circumstances
you mean, a game with 12 players has more particles, physics, and assets than a game with 128p 😱
Don't forget about vehicles and AI lmao
the question that isnt really answered yet is if the destruction is a genuinely good and enjoyable thing, or if its a dumb gimmick that really just makes for shitty maps
and doesn't have much else to show for it besides that? and the gameplay is mediocre?
and so far the mode looks like a fucking snooze
That bit is up to personal preference
To be honest, the destruction does seem very gimmicky, and it can lead to very annoying circumstances?
The Finals really only seems fun because of the destruction ngl
Valperaso moment
it's alright, there are way too many other things wrong with the game to come to a serious conclusion though
I don't think the destruction helps. I like the map design, but i don't think the ability to blow up everything helps.
The small player count and mediocre gameplay in the Finals really pushes me away
I don't think you'd want a larger player count in this game.
Blame the small player count on the destruction. Just like how people blame the large player count on 2042 destruction
God imagine the server lag with 32p in the finals
the finals has me excited for their next game if they do a more normal team fps concept
but im not excited for the finals
Thank you further proves my point
Honestly I'd be down for a 6v6 capture the flag mode
plus, you have to consider that destruction and player movement are server sided. If the server has issues, then everyone's getting hit with issues.
Maybe it's called The Finals because it's the last game they're gonna make
I better be the first person to say that
Hopefully
There's very few games that make it big nowadays
and i've heard of situations that actually cause the servers to lag mid-game, like the crates that spawn a bunch of the foam barricades
We'll have to wait for the open beta to see how the servers stack up
also if the general performance isnt gonna be better, yikes
I know, and they can probably be fixed
directx12 moment
Performance issues in a state where the game isn't finished? Color me surprised
100% will be fixed. They already spoke about the desync and server issues in their discord I belive
2042 mindset 🙂
not in any detail.
this isn't garden variety performance issues, this is "$3000 computers are struggling on low" performance issues
i hope it isnt "the laggy destruction game" but it looks like that so far
2042 always run perfectly fine because I have an ALIENWARE with RGB and my gamer chair helped
The LED Lights gives 1fps for each light
Alienware logo fixes all stuttering
Well it has an optimization issue where low has the same fps as high
Oh yeah at a LAN party some time ago someone did bring an Alienware desktop and Holy Shit was it the loudest one of them all
RTX is forced to be on if your GPU supports it, there doesn't seem to be a way to disable it.
That's definitely going to be fixed
It was the loudest because it was the most POWERFUL PC there amirite
there's also forced resolution scaling which is... strange
and NOT just because it had zero airflow
We had 12 computers in one room, and you can hear the Alienware when no one was talking lol
i have a 13700k and a 3080 and im on ultra and getting 110 or so fps at 1440p on the finals. biggest issue imo is the game is clunky af
yeah. I think someone else said that they moved to UE5 inbetween the alpha and closed beta, and it certainly seems like they just moved to UE5
very weird, very icky things going on in the settings panel give me very little hope of future improvements
I've heard movement is a lil meh as is the gunplay
Movement is a bit eh, mostly because it is server side.
movement on the heavy sucks but hes the best class
cause rpg can one shot 2/3 classes
UNtil you get 1 hit by an invisible light class
😈
Like, I get what they're trying to do with making the movement and destruction server side. but I don't think the servers can handle it.
if the game has tdm at launch ill play it
That's what I said lmao
they haven't talked about other modes.
literally 0 mention
Also not a fan of the art-style tbh
I mean there will obviously be more modes and weapons
what? Stylised realism?
I don't mind the art style. It's one of the few things i like about it.
i like the destruction stuff. the 3v3v3v3 with team fortress 2 style classes is weird to me
It's like mirrors edge with bad movment

Mirrors edge flopped too
So, you mean, not Mirror's Edge
Best game DICE have ever made
Mirror's Edge was good, put respect on it's name.
Well it's colourful and realistic, but slightly clunky
Don't people swear by bf4 for that one?
like a beta mirrors edge
the player models remind me of loadout if they weren't joking and actually made them look like that on purpose
i don't know what you mean
Squid Game FPS
BF4 was ass and full of clutter. Half the guns are copies of each other, half the maps suck, and launch has honestly been the worst one technically
minus the realism
I guess it's just not something i ever notice.
The panda outfit ☺️
Well to be honest medal of honor had to have been the best
Strictly based off the campaign
Mirrors edge 1
Mp was decent
Nope
Give us a new Medal of Honor, EA.
New medal of honor would be top tier
MoH 2010 MP was basically reskinned Bad Company 2 and you can't change my mind about that
The newest one was amazing
It'd be compared to COD and be canned
Because it basically was
100% it was pretty good too
eh
except without any of the cool bc2 stuff yes
MoH would die out in todays gaming market
Yeah that's why they gotta stick with the old formula
idgaf
And hopefully not go the insurgency sandstorm route
tf you mean, it was a 6v6 3 corridor MP
Yeah we don't have campaigns like they used to
Yeah but the movement and flow were different
MoH warfighter had great customization for weaponry
Warfighter was good too
Every FPS campaign we have right now is "X characters fight Y characters because Z weapon or plan we actually don't know until they reveal"
eh
The COD MW effect
We realistically just need titanfall 3
Vanguard, Cold War and MW are the same base plot
this has been around since before MW
Oh no, this guy is a terrorist and will blow up a city, we must follow him, then kill his generals, then win
Haha classic
Or maybe we don't win 😳
its funny to me how so many people keep mentioning something that will never happen @limpid pond
I said we need it. Not that we'll ever get it
Apex legends 2 is more likely
I'm still really annoyed at how MW19 was talked about before it came out
Strip the recent CoD Campaigns to just their plot and they're literally the same story
IT'S GONNA CHANGE COD ENTIRELY BOYS
if it was gonna be good why did it get cancelled
Canceled it like a month ago I think
Welcome to action movies lmao
People at ea getting let go
"oh, it's a story about the effects of war on civilian populations", "oh there's no clear good or bad guys, it's all shades of grey morally"
It's always good guys need to stop bad guys from doing bad things to people
PFFT
Same reason apex mobile and the new bf mobile game got canned
"it's silly to get political about video games"
you're laughing but those are actual statements
Didn't people say this about Fallout lmao
BRO FALLOUT IS APOLITICAL
the bf mobile game looked massively mediocre, and i never understood the idea of putting apex on phone controls
What’s up boys
It's simple. Mobile games make more revenue than pc and console combined
That's why they wanted to go the mobile route
"It's okay brother, do another jet hit, you'll feel better about how capitalism ruined the world"
but not if the game doesnt work for that control scheme
yes, but the difference between people saying that about Fallout and the CoD MW19 devs is that Bethesda didn't say that shit before Fallout 3 came out
apex is not a phone game
Infinity Ward did.
Doesn't matter. It made millions already
Mobile games generate more revenue
Remember when Sledgehammer said Vanguard was immersive? @eager spire
That's how it's been
yeah the finals is super fun! i enjoy a... two man team of only heavys using rpg's and flamethrowers exclusively

screw that
not playing online mobile again until the ethernet cable gets popular in it https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/714165722430832680/1049299071736762398/main-qimg-b0831fdbe31cac9864b65ebbf0d83190.webp
Vaguely. I didn't look at much promotional material for Vanguard because I wasn't that interested in it
both of the mobile games got canceled, its not just free money if they make bad products
They got canceled because of lack of money from products like 2042 not bringing it in. That'd why
Not everything that gets canceled automatically means the product is bad, just saying
I still think a 6v6 gamemode would be better
wont happen
They're gonna cancel a mobile game before they cancel a major title in their series
until the games dead
But the BF mobile game was finished
thats silly dude EA is flush with cash. fifa and apex are doing great
Okay guys give me one second
It was canned cause it was ass
flush with cash =/= spends money on stupid shit
According to EA, the game did not meet its expectations. Respawn Entertainment highlighted the lack of a high-quality stream of post-launch content support as the main reason behind the cancelation of Apex Legends Mobile, a game that had only been on the market for three months
I can sight more sources
Their sports games have always been their main sources of revenue, Madden and FIFA
Give me a few more seconds since you are all very educated on the subject
okay so they were making shitty updates to the game
Hold on guys there's more since yall are very educated
EA wouldn't go ahead and make a new a new Alice in Wonderlands game
We’ll have to keep waiting for a new single-player Titanfall.
pls no more articles with zero details
Hold on guys there's more since yall are very educated
Gamers want Titanfall Single-Player but it won't do well
none of these say anything
You mean EA cancels games they think won't do good 😱
That goes for most game publishers really
https://www.smartprix.com/bytes/apex-legends-mobile-cancelled-battlefield-mobile-also-dropped-by-ea/
They say everything you haven't read a single thing
dread we are aware that it has been canceled none of these provide any clarity
Have you ever thought that EA is just moving away from the mobile market like a good lil publisher
Hell, it's not even just game publishers, Movies are the same way
It does. It specifically shows and says the games are canceled due to lack of funds
You said they're rolling in cash
no they only vaguely mention quality concerns
So much for that
RIP Spellbound. I really wanted to be a dragon flying wizard with a hoodie
I heard that Apex Mobile got shut down because Tencent(Who were responsible for development and post-launch content for Apex Mobile), wanted a larger cut of revenue than what EA were willing to give them, so they just decided to can the whole thing.
ea of them
btw remember when Microsoft bought Activision and then Phil Spencer ( I think ) said they're gonna make Raven Software actually do something instead of forcing them to be whipped by Infinity Ward?
EA in total is doing really well. those mobile teams were not
so they got canned
the future of huge gaming revenue is mobile and ea screwed up big with apex and battlefield
It was also said that the new titanfall game got canceled because they are letting people go at ea
probs too many projects getting made that causes one for another to get the funding and the other one just gets buried
Therefore aka no one working on the game
Canceled
As I said
Before very educated people said otherwise
As if. I don't even touch my phone for games
YOU dont
As if I'm gonna play an FPS on there
The issue is people do
asia... middle east... etc
Other people do
India
I'd rather see EA push into the VR space
Medal of Honor: Above and Beyond
Star Wars That One Pilot Game I can't remember the actual name of
they did just make a moh vr game
VR hardware would need to be more accessible and easier to run before they'd do that.
Too bad it was mid
Need to use the PSVR2
Mobile gaming generates more revenue
that's a beautiful headset
I mean, EA can probably make a Need for Speed in VR
ads
Just give VR support for the latest one and it's a W
Gran Turismo has VR
VR is wack right now, not enough of an install base for many devs to support big titles
God imagine ubisoft make The Crew 3 with VR support
Huh?? Yeah but that's not factored in because other companies pay for those ads
This is consumer spent money
Fuck yeah, statistics baby
First time playing today, this games pretty fun!
Kills are very satisfying
The divison 3 will never happen either
3 divided by 3 =
Most games are getting canned by ea due to lack of money
10
dam
Division 10 confirmed
EA? NO MONEY?!?!?!
I don't think you know how much EA earns just from their sports entries
i love that they call their games "an ubisoft original" that shit is funny
I know. Hard concept to learn. This is what happens when you put businessmen in charge of a product they don't use and only think about cash
Plus, the new need for speed game is just a chefs kiss
well thats just cause ubi is going under
Don't worry rainbow six seige 2 will save them

Troll btw
It probably would
Don't wanna hurt very educated people
8
That won't save them
They gotta push more skins and a new r6
We all seen how extraction went
What about XDefiant?
Even though that game was fun
Lol
Imo
Was this the tomclancy not tomclancy game
its officially not tom clancy anymore
XDefiant seems to be going on
Tom Clancy hasn't been Tom Clancy in years
I don't know what's going on with it, but i do know it still exists
they got BTFO'd by the community for making the game a punk rock game with XD emoji in the title
and is still being worked on
Breakpoint is actually great now
Literally, because he's fuckin' dead and Ubisoft is dabbing with his skeleton
i got invited to xdefiant last week
been getting ivnites for months
i just dont care to download 70 gigs 
no recent ubisoft game is great
I know it has one of the former CoD devs working on it
I rest my case
arc raiders
damn thats one i cant contest i havent played that one 
yes we know
It's over saturated and sub par
is the crew 2 good? i didnt like the first one
PFT
I just love driving, boating, and flying round america
Mark Rubin, that's his name.
Shit's fun
I had fun until I finished I think the gt line or something like that
This is what he had to say regarding his work on xDefiant.
Then it was really grindy and not very enjoyable
The finals looks like the destruction this game should have had
DICE should make a split/second sequel cause I have no clue how made it
eh
Why I just drive around
Cross country trecks
If you like just driving around then it's a great game
Split/Second was made by Black Rock Studio. I have bad news for you.
It's huge and quite beautiful
Black rock 👀
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
And there were plans for a sequel.
Anyone feel the new weapons are op? Specifically the assault rifle?
nothing beats it
Yes but shush
don't tell the devsFun police

Bsvm still brokey 
Ar has no recoil bruh
they'd probably have to buy it from Disney
DICE should make a BF game with mirrors edge movement
disney would sell
and I don't think Disney even remembers that they have it
Good, cheap property
yes they should make battlefield titanfall crossover

2142?!?!?!
oh niiiice my entire team left
that just has the titans
not the movement
I would take that bet
I mean, people would complain that a 2142 sequel with titans and movement would be "copying titanfall and advanced warfare"
Cause they're all idiots
I was saying it might be another Lawbreakers incident
i dont have any sympathy for small team games that require you to have teammates and no fill
making an advanced movement battlefield would be major funny but i also dont want another Hardline situation
I don't think the finals will be dead, but will probably half it's player count in a month, and stay at that for a few months till they drop a new map
the casual bf gamer does not want titanfall movement, that shit is clear
I could care less what they make as long as it isn't half baked
I do
okay but they want to make money and people didnt buy titanfall 1 or 2
Titanfall with 128p and full destruction = fun
Potential not casual?
I mean... what does casual even mean you know?
I'm not a pro that's for sure
maybe you are an enthusiast
Could be
that's why you go all in on the titanfall style. make it like how Persona 5 Strikers is a Persona 5 x Dynasty Warriors crossover. Titanfall but big maps, big player counts, with conquest etc etc
Kinda like how Star Wars Battlefront is almost a Battlefield game except in name
Seriously don't know why other studios aren't using the large player count capture zone
You can make the most unique thing and people will say it's copying a different game
That's anything
Yes that's my point.
More common in the tool world
The Finals: a completely unique gameplay loop and art style = literally battlefield
Tools everyone compares to one or two others saying they just put both together
There are people actually saying that Hi-Fi Rush is Forspoken lol
Huh?
Aside from hit thing with thing that's where the comparisons end lol
Yeah that's the thing I'm saying, people will say anything is anything even if they're nothing alike
Oh yeah I agreed
Just to downplay it in any way they can
Imagine people were saying stuff like this in the nighties. "Bro doom is literally just Wolfenstein 3D with demons wtf man"
I just said that's anything because any item people do that to is all
I mean, that was a thing
But they weren't mad about it
Thank god
Because it was the same developer and Doom was an upgrade in about every field
doom is just wolfenstein 3d with demons wtf man this is cool
Yeah that's more like it
yeah my final verdict is if the finals isnt dead within 2 months ill be shocked
i cant see any game with infinite invisibility for a speedy flanker class being a good idea in 2023
Definitely gonna be an indie title
I think it would be sick to just chall random areas with a titan then boom you can get out and swing around and kill foot soliders
S6 2042 brings titans 😱
Would be hype. Not one you can get into
just like the ranger
but bigger and with missiles
bruh what
😈
That'd be rough but cool
if they made 2143 id play the fuck outta it
I think if they toned down the visual clutter as well as the visual recoil and nerfed the healing beam, as well as improve performance and stability across the board, The Finals could be a fine game.
if theres a mech i better be able to pilot it
Way to many balancing issues would come from that
That's why apex doesn't have mechs
To many balancing issues
Isn't the story of Apex like... a training program to be pilots?
Maybe EOD bot style
its a tournement held by a former pilot
IMO that should be what Boris turret is
No apex happens after the war
THEY'RE CALLED TITANS
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
which turns out its being ran by the literal underworld crime syndicate
I know what they're called but apex isn't titanfall and you can't tell me otherwise so mechs it is
HOW DID I LOAD INTO AN INSTANT LOSS
I mean the Apex Predators were bad guys in Titanfall 2 so is that a real surprise?
Aperture Leggings
the aussie dude is just the face
Austin dude??
A guy who lives in Austin Texas
Better say his name
Okay so wish list: Boris is allowed to look through the eyes of his turret and shoot with it like that manually
Stone Cold Steve Austin
Nope terrible idea
To many campers at that point might as well create a trench style map
idea: scrap boris entire kit and revamp
Just two teaches and the only playable character is boris because that's what will happen
Scrap speclaists
In my opinion bo3 has been one of the only games to do it right
automated turrets are terrible
100%
rework boris or leave him shit
Terrible idea shouldn't even be talked about
Boris should just be removed all together
I mean his turret does 0 damage
would be a cool idea
i dont need prone boris players controlling turrets
Now have someone control it boom different story
Exactly
Like I said might as well make a trench map
i need players moving around because thats fun
Well let me hold a button on his turret that let's me do stuff with it idk
No just remove boris
He's literally a camping operator
There's no legit point in boris. You never see boris players actually contributing like ever
I don't even remember ever seeing a boris player in top 3
i think making the turret anti vehicle is definitely the right angle but it is pretty useless still
It's only use is being conveniently placed when you're one shot
Or randomly registering you from 200 feet away tryna flank
I am the one
Double it's damage against vehicles
Gotta show proof
What's your ign
Proof in your Pms
Same as my thing Discord
I see that but I meant like top 3 as in like for contribution
Ohhh idk wtf that means
I can play boris not use his torrent and get top 3 too
Like you get shown at the end of the game
I mean his turret actually does nothing
I almost always get most kills or revives
Don't even think it has a category at the end
if they buff it too much it will make all vehicle play frustrating too, its hard to make him useful without making it way too op if half the team were to spam it
So... double his damage, half the health (against vehicles)
I'm talking for like most kills, revives, objectives captured, assist
it would be really nice if Boris turrets did extra damage to hind/condor at least
Maybe make it so it locks onto air vehicles only, but does a ton of tickle damage
Like thing 50cal damage
Bruh you got like 600 kills as boris
not ntw
He's literally useless
Yeah I just started using him
That's why I said remove him
don't diss the big boy
He's my lil storm trooper
That's why 80% of boris players prone next to their turrent
That's to get the additional range and accuracy from his turret
Just noticed ww3 will finally introduce revive mechanic in one of its upcoming Updates. For their remaining 3 Players 
YOOO
BF KILLER?!?!?!?
Which still does nothing except be annoying. Simple. Remove him
It did suicide
i donno why they haven't given up on that thing.
Battlebit isn't even out yet. Literally dead on arrival 
Probably will be in OCE actually
Battlebit had a good start but it has too much milsim crap. So another game to die
Unless a few of the squad guys hop over
People just call it the battlefield killer because haha big maps and playercount.
It's got really crappy ttk and gunplay from what I tried
lmao redditors
But I won't deny I had fun on it.
It has much more than just that
i think it has potential as its own game. but its no battlefield killer
Never even heard of battle bit
After my playtime on it all I just see it having are the maps and playercount yet the gameplay is completely different.
Set out to be a arcade milsim. The gunplay is like COD 4, but you die to 1 headshot or 2 body shots
Holy hell dude please don’t tell me they’re serious
I know transports are cursed but at this point we’re on the road to attack helis dying in 1 rocket lol
I've heard of project zomboid which is sad cause that games probably smaller than it
Transport just needs no explosive passenger seats
fixed
Movement is good. Gunplay fine. Ttk fast. Heals and revivs extremly slow.. bleeding sucks and slows the gameplay Down. Buildings having to many Windows and Storys. You have literally to look out for 100000 corners before moving
So a worse squad basically
Replace it with 2 standard passenger seats
Yeah but squad makes sense
or just throw another 7.62 on it if it's such a big deal
Battlebit only got compared to BF for its destruction, vehicles and player count
Besides that, mechanics and gameplay function way differently. It’s literally meant to be an easier to run Squad from what I heard lol
A Mixtur of squad and bf
It's a milsim relastic shooter
its squad lite, with some more gamer movement
literally anything would work lol
Squad lite with Cod gunplay
Squad is a good game
they could change it to a drop seat
Don't think battle bit has destruction at all.
Especially galactic contention
Not that I noticed anyways.
Galactic contention top tier
But hey. At least the mouse input was decent lol.
Better than squad
Ye if u want decent milsim game. Go squad. You want casual sandbox go bf. In between games are mostly dead
Best milsim is galactic contain
subsonic, high power, standard, close combat and armor piercing rounds
Contention
2042 has portal so like, you can make a milsim lite in that
Top tier
Battlebit was made because the guy who made it couldn't run squad.
frag rounds are in portal on the shotguns
I think
hecc even gta online has explosive rounds for a sniper
explosive crossbow bolt

Ww3 map Flow is aweful. There are no hotzones. And you cant spawn on flags which are under attack. So you have to spawn further away.. which makes the game a running sim. And less fighting. Ww3 is such a sleeper experience
crossbow bolt is cool and all
That's what I've heard about battlebit too
the classic conquest experience, but worse lmao
You spend most time running in these games.
"Okay bro, we have 3 flags, now, the map is 10km^2, and we have 256players... where do we spawn them?"
I still don't understand the 2042 running sim stuff
it's not bad
There's enough vehicles in the world and the call in
2042 is not that bad in terms of spawn on flags.
the distances are definitely larger in this game
Yeah but that's due to the double player count
the barren area you have to cross to get to the next area
I don't really like how people talk about Battlebit and try to sell it to Battlefield players as if it's a comparable game
They overdid the maps and they turned out shit.
cause it's not really, it's more like Squad. The average BF player ain't gonna be into this.
At least the maps are good now
not one bad map (renewal doesn't count)
No excuse for them to be shit from the get go.
I like discarded anyways



