#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 688 of 1
Best part is when stuck pops up in screen
The “stuck!” notification is so dopamine inducing
Unless it happens to you

whats the best smg that is not pp29?
PBX I suppose
which one is better though
Like between the PBX and PP(
)29 which one is better?
ye
I’m not sure, that’s probably up to stat stuff like damage drop off and what not
If you ask me personally I’d say the PP cause ammo capacity
pp bizon stands for:
Pistol Machine gun Bison
or
Pistolet Pulemet Bizon
That’s interesting, I didn’t know that
ok well, i’m gonna unlock it in 4 levels
ye, it’s a russian gun too
Oh ye I know country of origin but not the full bame
and the pp bizon is think is pp19
Name*
there is also pp vistyak
viytak
vityak
there
bf2042 is pp29, current is pp19 and another model is pp vityak
You mean vityaz
64v64 eod bots only when dice?
Fun to piss people off with tho
ye
I dont bother shooting em. Just lis rocket
Takes 2 c5 to destroy eod bot
Its another too much hp and agility
Pick one
Look for an ammo crate
Lay down
Unlimited eod bots
UCAV camp
Except it's visible half the time
The other half it spends under the ground
Cuz it keeps clipping
Feature
Mmhm
I havent seen em too much i just saw a few once and i just started rocketing em
300hp too much for eod bot?
They're fast, small, and durable. Id say pick one of the three
Dude look @limpid pond
https://twitter.com/temporyal/status/1623305651370827776?s=46&t=Jw_DUUIj7ax7Fc6pmKQDUQ
doesnt help that the eod bots hitbox is jank
and that it sinks into the ground randomly
Is the eod bot op tho?
Not a hitbox problem its just tiny af
Broken, yes, but op?
Powerful is less than
Overpowered which is less than
Broken which is game breaking
If something is broken it means its so overpowered it breaks the game
Buggy then
Yea it seems to be bugged and overpowered
I don't think its wildly overpowered but it's probably too strong for what it is
Plus considering you only get 10xp for destroying it and it can go on killstreaks
Was it this powerful in previous games?
Same case for the EBLC-RAM
EOD was way easier to shoot in previous games
Thing moves around like a casper drone and sometimes clips through the ground
If that gets sorted out I'd think it's in a pretty good spot
Crazy they even nerfed the health from 400 to 300 too
Yea like aside from ground clipping, the speed and durability i saved some guy with two going after him They're a little too fast i think
I tried shooting em but all i had was the rail and p125
Bruh it takes two c5 to destroy 1 eod bot
Yea i killed em with a near miss with a lis
Eod bots are like mini tanks
Real eod bots are expendable bots not indestructible
it is you donut
In what way
first
lack of toxicity
Just because you had a good time with it like 15 years ago
Doesn't mean it's better
and abusive in game content
Cuz no one plays it
micro transactions
and over complicated content
wearing the game down
So the problem of gtao is
Too much content?
and lack of missing modes from GTA 4 and episodes
like cops and crook
witness protection
Anyways the mods are here
mafiya work
Gta 5 online is exploitive as all hell.
Want to have fun? Shark cards
Low on money in gta online? Shark cards
Or like 10 types of money grinding ways
"Gta online is bad cuz I don't know how to make money"
Nah its got plenty of other reasons its bad
gta online is bad, simply for that reason you can pay for all the currency in the world
I mean yea it's not great
its pay to win by design
and GTA 4 is not
you just play
Gta online is pay to win
it's that simple
just like rdr 2 is
Only if ur rich asf cuz shark cards are hella overpriced
why can't multiplayer be this dead ass simple
rdr 1 multiplayer still better
I was gonna say its physics are ass but this works too
i dont pay for stuff like that so my gaming spending can be used on actually games and hardware
Why would anyone pay for shark cards
rdr 1 had way more personality than 2
They're just generally not worth it
And it's easier to make money in game
YOURSELF
There's people who buy those runescape bonds en masse so they can get a party hat
Maybe not pay to win but they certainly get ahead
Why play a game that's pay to win?
the difference is if its provided by the game to pay real money or not,
mental people
remember when 15 euro dlc packs where standard
Consider like each bond costs 5 dollars
And each bond buys about 75mil gold
And a partyhat is like 10billion
now we sitting in a game that gotten like 3-4 maps a year simply because of live service, because they dont need to monetise the content we play with
How many maps is enough
And mw2 is getting 1 year worth of content stretched out to 2 years
This is how modern gaming be
Mw2 is actually getting year 2 content
Yea pretty much "continual development" is the norm
Kerbal space was getting updates for like 7 years
you talking about mw2, that was a fully fleshed game, with campaign, co-op, multiplayer for 70 euro
Sledgehammer games is handling modern warfare 2 year 2 content
dmz and warzone is free
Minecraft is still beibg updated
and what about advanced AI bots for multiplayer
warzone already getting a new map,
So was mw19
99% of its content being free
mw2 also had like 8 studios working on it
In bf2 bots weren't great either. They just kind of attacked to a point. A few would go flanks but most would be stupid
Building 21
battlefront or field?
fuck, i played that and forgot it was added lol
Instant action plus mod allowed bots on more modes
Field cause why would...
It will be back
yeye i know
but point being that whatever the FREE package of mw2 offer, already gotten more content than bf2042 did for 60 euro up front
they NEED improvements
why'd you think I'm using VU for bf3 to play bots solo
Funny thing is mw2 year 2 content is gonna cost $70
y
I used to like setting up scenarios of me vs 100s of bots and sneaking in to steal their vehicles
cause I want PvE
ahh yes light ball looking into the future
even then
if its mw2 third edition
i dont mind
my issue never been paying for content
mw2 was rought the first month after release, not gonna lie
but they been fixing most critical bugs even before season 1 started
Sledgehammer games is handling the year 2 content tho. Given their history....wooo boy
can we agree an actual attack jet would be cool?
like a futuristic a-10
i want that
nah
hell nah
bring back gunship instead
criterion was one of the best racing games makers before working on 2042 and its car controls
What job would an A10 do that a chopper wont
brrrrrrrrt
Besides be faster
thats what
imagine focusing on one thing, and spitting out hovercraft being able to climb vertical walls
They wont make it powerful
So like the gun would be basically the wildcat AA spammer
i dont care honestly i literally just want to hear BRRRRRRRT
i am a simple man
very very simple
Then play a minibird
it doesnt carry the same level of power as 30mm
the bf4 a-10 scratched that itch
granted i suck with it
but it still sounded amazing
A10 was kind of a good attack plane.
that would require commander
and?
just use bf3 gunship system
i never got super good with it
capture this point for the ship to spawn on your side
what's the problem
Shoot people with 20 amd 50cals in this game and its like "ow ow i better get my medkit out"
disclammer i havent played bf3, just 4, V 1 2042
lmao
ok mate
Should I update to new nvidia drivers
Or will it cause the textures in 2042 fail
not sure, im using amd card
Id send a vid of how my game looks rn
(no image perms)
well
what's the last driver version
give date
Uh
Today
Right now
????
your current installed driver date
I know people WANT an A10 thatll blaze guns and bombs killing 6 enemy tanks in one pass, transform to robot mode and cut an enemy fighter in half with its sword mid air, transform back and launch flares to evade the 100s of enemy missiles, them do it again in the next pass.
Wont happen
Dec 1. I rolled back cuz some dude said it'd help
they never done that
They do that. Me and other players have this issue
what dlss
Maybe not you but it's an issue
I only have 1060

3060ti
are you playing the game off a harddrive ?
i havent had an issue with amd drivers in BF specifically
what about classic games
amd drivers usually break everything XD
No it's not a hard drive issue. But no, I'm on ssd
no idea how you can have that issue
Like the game uses far away lod models on stuff that's 2m away
never seen texture issues in bf2042 as a driver issue through nvidias log ever
The solution I'm gonna try is clearing directx cache
Cuz some dude on reddit it'd help with low res textures
I'll update to latest drivers too ig
https://youtu.be/6pV93XhiC1Y dlss 3 info
I heard dlss 3 adds more input delay
I know its a trick to retain visual fidelity while improving fps
Dunno if it's a problem with nvidia reflex boost
guys, I'm not rich enough

isnt that 40 series only
Dunno
But this game needs to unlock the dlss version
Cuz it's in the easy anticheat rn
And we can't update it manually
its like 10-15ms, its less than one frame at 60fps
properly the same 10-15 ms
why im screaming for dlss 3 is simply because its also giving better performance in cpu bottlenecked games
Why the fuck does windows keep bringing up update pop ups in the upper left corner that are impossible to close or click on
Oke nvm
remember to keep the system updated
it was some yandex music update thing
damn
yea idk why windows is asking me to update it and not yandex
Oh damn 10 extra frames in the lobby suddenly
Hat jemand bock?
Scrooblek?
Gonna ask did DICE mention any tick rate on this game?
45hz..
Wait fr?!?
Yeah I swear florian said it.
I was expecting a 128 tick rate or 64
you want pro or small scale tick rate for a 128 player game?
thats a lofty ask
hell i dont even think a lot of comp games have more than 64 tick rate servers either...
Only few like faceit csgo runs in 128 tick rate iirc and valorant also. As for Battlefield honestly gonna expect 64 tick rate cuz in BF4 community servers run in 64 tick rate
you can see it in game with the fps counter too
its labeled slightly differently but its there
yea.. all previous bf titles didnt have 128 players.. thats a lot of information to process
bf4 is about to have one
Wait what?!?
needing to downgrade server hz for 128 was such a clear cut example of why 128 was a bad idea
128 players on those maps sounds terrible
WW?
Wonder woman
Aight
i mean... 60hz to 45hz is not a problem at all for a game like bf...
80% of 2042 gamemodes are 64p now tho
even if thats true (doubt), what does that have to do with anything?
they arent gonna program two netcodes for the different game modes...
that we actually have surprisingly many 64 or less player modes
irrelevant to the topic..
not for 45hz?
bfv netcode was much better, the hitreg graph pisses me off in 2042
reason for lowering the bar to 45hz was 128 players
two types of tickrates!!!!!!
bf4 could have different tickrate based on the server
(baffling)
the main point of the feedback is to not make the same mistake next time
upgrade the hz, not the player count
you could even filter what tickrates you wanted to find servers with
128 was so dumb
you think they would code for two tick rates in a casual sandbox game? you guys have... brutal expectations
BFV netcode was really good in my experience
i would not expect them to lower the bar so much in the first place
i agree. 2042's always been a downgrade in bullet hitreg
and the server graph proves it
"so much" we lost 15hz, or 25% of normal tickrate for 128 players...
Agree I had tons of hitreg issued in 2042 compared to previous bf games
yea i dont want a downgrade either, but this isnt the game to really be concerned about that and its obvious why its 45hz...
nobody is saying it isnt obvious
they double the player count and they mess up the feel of the game
ehhh it seems like yall dont understand
For now 1 gamemode that has 128 players
1 official gamemode
what do we not understand
yea.. just THE main gamemode of every bf title and likely the most populated...
a lot.. im not gonna list it all or take guesses
You're really annoying to speak to
Source: I think so
128p conquest isnt the entire game
never said it was, but conquest has always been the main game mode for bf titles
i wonder why...
Hes not wrong
might be the weird vague comments and evasiveness
nobody else in this discord bothers me
everyone else is cool af
every time ur in chat I always see you arguing with someone
or it might be that im reasonably calling out bs and you just so happen to be saying a lot of bs
what bs
its not like we had this server browser a decade ago to filter out what tickrate we wanted to play with
Does anyone know what the “technical weapons” in 2042 are? The one for the multi kill objective this week?
utility
If you won't answer me when I ask you what I said was wrong, you arent calling me out
you're just being annoying
pretty sure that was because we had player hosted server?
u mean tactical weapons?
@arctic grove yes tactical
needing to downgrade server hz for 128 was such a clear cut example of why 128 was a bad idea
these two things do not correlate
youre just trying to tie anything to why 128 sucks in your opinion
I have no idea tbh
@solar obsidian oh like shotguns?
we had, but you also searched for the official ones at the same time
yes but the official servers all used the same tick rate...
thats the point of my comments..
because its still good enough and understandable considering all the factors...
25% downgrade isn't worth it, not at all
hell id argue its more than good enough considering bf is a casual sanbox shooter
When people are used to things working in bfv/bf1 and then play 2042, they feel like the game is busted
well guess what, it isnt good enough
it definitely is a stupid move
when there are a ton of games that have a 50% tick rate reduction from previous bf titles...
as players are constantly complaining bout shit netcode
way to pick the bigger number to try to prove a point when other games are worse in that regard
yea tons of games have trash networking performance, and?
we should be happy that bf goes that direction?
@solar obsidian @arctic grove thank you
barely any games that focus on online play degrades there tickrate
you would be surprised how little effect it has
which game have degraded them over time ?
or sequel
but Nyphon has already gone into why and how
yea its pretty unusual to see a franchise go down in networking performance. brand new games like Apex being a BR are a different story
so kinda pointless to keep going on about this
nice assumption, understanding why a tick rate reduction exists and it being good enough isnt me being happy about it.. i DID just say that i would rather not have downgrades earlier
ea doesnt have that
yea not a lot of titles increase their player count.. especially from 64 to 128 players...
the competitive mode ?
like... nothing is comparable..
they tested it back in test servers in bf4
5v5 comp yes.
even was in the server filter but was never able to find one when released 😄
Yeah, I know, because 2042 is such a ridiculous change from the previous experiences
That's the whole point of my feedback. 128 was a ridiculous idea
ridiculous? lol ok
warzone went from 100 to 150
and taking a 25% server hz decrease for it? wildly bad decision
you like using exaggerative words
do you know warzones tick rate xD
aint it like 10 or something
something around 15...
It's not hyperbole to say 128 was a ridiculous decision based on the maps and modes they had conceptualized at launch
lmao
and its not even persistent 150 players...
people dont realize how impressive 128 persistent players are
yet so many people here talk like they developed the game..
ahh yes
128 is technically impressive
128 players impressive
gameplay wise it is not impressive
meanwhile planetside 2
ps2 is also laggy shit
nothing is hyperbole based on conception. it is perfectly reasonable to say it's shit when it wasnt planned or executed properly.
absolute shite
i always love when people bring up ps2 as some counter like it doesnt look like a ps2 game that runs like shit...
what next, battlebit?
its more funny you focus on the player number when we are talking about tickrates, and at the same time say the degrade in tickrate dont matter, and also praise the player number as some great achievement
128 just made conquest maps worse to play
256p mag on ps3 was the sh**
i used to play bfv conquest, now im a breakthrough main in 2042
128 player breakthrough was such a shit design they gave up fixing it
its not funny at all... its understandable that the tick rate drops when the player count doubles... the player count is an achievement, especially with its 45hz tick rate...
yea i wouldnt be a 2042 player if 128 was the only breakthrough
like.. how does your brain work?
but then explain to me why we have to settle with that in 64 player matches
(nothing i just said about the impressive player count means it was a good call or that i prefer it)
because devs arent going to create two sets of tick rates... like i said/suggested several times already...
why? likely because its.. again.. A CASUAL SANDBOX SHOOTER WITH A GOOD ENOUGH TICK RATE ALREADY
aint server hz tied to several game elements
idk how many times i have to reiterate these points...
afaik yes, but i really dont know, i barely know html xD
just assume any fps thats got a multiplayer platform has a tickrate of .02
actually i probably dont anymore, its been since 2009 since my last class
no idea what .02 is.. but mp games have drastically different levels of tick rates
0.02hz
warzone is literally around 15hz, most hover around 60hz, and in rare occasions we have 120hz, which i think 120hz is used for pro leagues
i remember when bf4 had the different tickrates
that was because of official and rented servers
indeed
idk a single game that provides different tick rates
good times but no more
official? i dont think so
atleast not officially
thank fuck for community servers ❤️
you can do 128 through faceit/etc right
honestly, unless youre like a top 1% player tickrate isnt really going to be a problem unless its sub 30hz
even then people are playing warzone fine...
anyone tryna game some 2042 na e
i have top 1% hardware, guess i could take advantage of that
there's more to netcode than just upping the tickrate
bf4 showed us that
you couldnt tell if you were on 120 or 30hz server
or 60
and i havent really experienced bad hit reg in 2042
after this update ive had several instances of absolute shit hit reg
nope
or the servers were having issues, which has nothing to do with actual hit reg
or he is hiding behind the bulletproof fishingnet
valparaiso moment
they probably run AWS servers like all other games and they lag many times a week

now remember this has not been fixed in a year
on a mode without new maps
and it wont get fixed
10/10 i laughed my ass off taunting a sniper
portal devs are also discord mods
maybe, but also I wish the tickrate on drones you were looking at were higher
so hard to hit when they're flying everywhere lagging up a storm
teleporting drones is a feature
i wonder how many people attribute spread to hitreg/tick rate/netcode...
What a time to be alive
Why are they asking for feedback on twitter but not in #948574259209437264 
Do NOT listen to the opinions of twitter addicts wtf
In the podcast they mentioned they looked for feedback on Discord as well
because more people use twitter i guess
twitter are the ones not playing
but it was so low-quality that they settled for twitter, I presume 
Just because they don't use #948574259209437264 right now that doesn't mean they are not stalking this chat, listening to your whine and whatnot 
i bet they have better things to do

they've got a bot logging everything in chat, and associating your discord username with your EA account 
i mean, my name is the exact same so go ham
still a casual
same, been here over a year and been posting regularly 
I'm directly connected to Mr. Dice himself, I will let him know of your woe
been here long enough that people recognize me in-game and ping me here when they find me
no regular role
I have zero control over the bot, and its not the amount of posts, it's the amount after the bot was enabled + the quality of the posted stuff and some other stuff minus any bad behaviour
i wonder where on the point scale i am
bad behavior
I was warned once like last year, and the bot muted me on accident another time. My record is tarnished, I'm ruined
lel
same here

Oh damn, I thought I had at least 10,000 but I have 7K 
i can get 10 thousand frames
loads up game, render some black screen before menu
watch your frames go absolute wild
Well, if you're running the game at 120 fps, just wait 83.3333 seconds and you've got your 10,000 frames
run the game at 1.2 fps instead
i wonder how low the frames can be locked before the game actually fucks stuff up
can i get more fps with a 60 hertz monitor?
You can't display more than 60, but you can run games at higher fps.
M5 Recoilless
Javelin
m5 recoilless is so annoying
Pre nerf SRAW pls
Using a lis rocket to loop around for 80% of the fuel to hit somebody 40ft away
We already have Lis so what’s the point
the fps your computer generates has nothing to do with what your monitor displays (unless you use vsync, which you shouldnt)
Lis is more tv missile not wire guided
Recoilles would be fine if you could have lower magnifying sight for it
You vsync if running too many fps beyond your monitors display van handle bogs you down
if you have say 120 fps but only a 60hz display. the game will display at 60hz but feel much better in terms of input. and you wont have any issues with frame drops so your 60 will be perfectly smooth
No point running 120fps kn a 60hz monitor
not true.
Lower latency
Just burning resources that could go elsewhere
it does not have lower latency
the endpoint for processing latency is the monitor, it is higher at lower refresh rates
I want the beta sight back
doesn't matter how high your framerate is in the background
It effects system latency
there is no effect on system latency, because that is not a thing lol
It is
There's not some secret benefit of running 200 frames on a slower monitor. Itll only display 60 of em in 60hz
Even nvidia performance monitor can show system latency
its not a secret, and yes there are benefits
that is not no system latency
You wont likely notice all the tearing when one half of the screen displays a different frame usually
that is the total processing time for latency
there is no thing called system latency
What benefit beyond rendering frames that wont be displayed will you get
Its like drawing a flipbook and then throwing away half the pages. You did the work of drawing them but wont see it
ffs
Have y’all seen a lapse in Warzone content lately or is it just me? I’m seeing a lot less WZ stuff on YT
it does NOT reduce input latency
you know what reduces input latency? decreasing the processing time of the buffer size
that is the REFRESH rate
If input is tied to the frames drawn instead of the telemetry of the data inputs maybe
you can't defy the laws of physics so stop trying
Idk but the paik skin that is in the new bundle is badass af and I bought it
The data like hitboxes and control input isnt rendered in dependence to display. That'd be nuts
Or you are wrong
there is though? there was a whole test with several pros about this
Server side computing is why
what
reflex is an in engine pipeline it has fuck all to do with your input
There is
It definitely lowers the latency these people are wrong
It's tested and proven
so many latencies
you know why reflex lowers input latency? because it is a dynamic frame cap, it has nothing to do with your input whatsoever, stop making up stuff
Effects input
its a genuinely smoother picture too. its not just input
we need to make computer science mandatory in the education curriculum so gamers stop reading marketing terms and believing things which is so beyond real to be in narnia
like what you are saying is beyond the laws of physics
it's not some black magic

Saying Nvidia marketing is lying, thus doing something illegal now? 
Silly us, believing measured system latency is actually measured system latency
lol Nvidia marketing graphs are always the funniest
i have a 2070 super
Though system latency isn't a thing yet both pictures say system latency
here's how you get reflex without switching it on: set your frame cap to 144
there you have reflex

And?
so, how do i add the framerate increase? tbh, i get 300 fps when loading 💀
People frigin callin me in for nothing
it's kinda funny because where it does make a difference is where it doesn't matter, single player games
Huh?
reflex changes the engine pipeline that inputs are received through, competitive games are already ultra optimised for it, so it makes no end difference to a user (unless they haven't capped their frames)
in which case that's what it does
single player games don't have that, so it has a substantial difference there
How does singleplayer differ from multiplayer lmao wtf are you saying
Because your machine controls the telemetry calculation

because it’s singleplayer
You run singleplayer 120fps its same latency as multiplayer 120fps
singleplayer needs no wifi
the misinformation
When you give inputs your computer renders the game based on the inputs coming in from the server and tries to make your input match.
Occasionally in times of lag like packet loss, the server will see your inputs dont match the accepted server data and will undo your actions and rubberband you back if its not acceptable
it's not that difficult, the engine priorities are different, single player game focus on fidelity and game detail, multiplayer games care about the end experience for the user
different genres, different development priorities
So multiplayer breaks the physics
As an example
Youre lagging and popup sniping.
You press crouch sfter firing stand and shoot again.
The packet for crouch is missed and you die because you got sniped. From your perspective, you ducked in time.
From the enemy perpective you stood there and waited to get shot.
Doesnt matter if you rendered it at 500fps
.. no
what
have you seen the processing latency of the top single player games sold?
the red engine? crytek? they're all shit for it
better yet, go see what happens when you put reflex into them
@ripe hedge
Yo Thank you bro
@arctic grove
Let's go Alex added the apc9
The best gun in the world
Hopefully he adds an m9a3 as well
Please only ping people active in chat
My bad
I can't believe he actually added the apc9 this is gonna be great
Same hope it arrives in s4
I would imagine Alex is quite busy with feedback, numbers and spreadsheets by now 😄
add the super shotgun next
Add to what
comparing the mighty bfg to that simple pea shooter lol
He even gave you a heart reaction
That’s pretty damn cool lol
Alex literally is the best
I'm gonna sweat my ever living ass of with the gun
I'm gonna frame it on my wall with Alex's pfp😂
Alex, if it’s something you can talk about… any chance SMGs will get a headshot buff? Or some other type of general buff? I’m not good with stats and what not so I’m not even sure if they need them. I just hear they’re in a very bad spot
So its just another high rate of fire smg
The smg hs multi def needs a buff but they should also have higher recoil so they're bot abused
it's the apc9 bro
hehehehha
THE apc9
dlss 3 stealth update
Only one of the literally most versatile smgs ever made
apc9 mad sex
Meh
It's a Swiss smg that has 4 variations
im so shit man 23 kills and 11 assist in conquest
It was adopted by the US army back in 2019 due to to high regard
ur fine
It was?
at this rate just add the M18 to aow istg
I thought we were adopting something from sig sauer for smg stuff
we adopted the mcx iirc for rifle
Yep. The US army adopted it as smg of choice back in 2019
Rather get lower rpm high damage one
yeah but still
That’s cool
You hear or you feel or you know?
Yeah the US army uses it for security when transporting things
Definitely heard cause I've said it for a while
Ye I’ve heard it from dread mainly
Alex, my favourite developer
feel
But that’s about it for me personally as much as I know
cause it takes like 6 billion headshots to kill someone with an smg
need one more lvl for the scar its a very good gun right?
especially through vehicle windows
If smgs had a tad higher hs multi with more recoil people would still use them but they wouldn't be a dominat class over the others
i wonder if the M5A3 will get it's name changed now that the US has officially designated it
I think they already did
I do believe the range at which they're viable should extend to about 40m possibly 50 since alot of smg fights are from 0 to 50m
I heard it was the xm7 or something like that
yeah irl thats the name
it was XM5, then it turned out colt makes a carbine called the M5
so now its the M7
you dont even need to change the range
so in game it would be the M7A3
just a tad higher headshot multiplier
where can i use xp boosters?
pretty wack that 2042 actually correctly guessed it's adoption
so you get rewarded for accuracy
I never thought I’d like a rifle more than the AR15 but the xm7 is so damn good looking
I wonder when they’ll be on civie markets….. 
i do find it funny that the EVOLYS is in game even though it wasnt chosen for NGSW
tho the XM250 is pretty similar looking
oh right what i was here for
it'd be cool to have the miniguns get changed to match something like this
since imo i feel like militaries by 2042 would be using quieter miniguns
i just dont see how mp9 with 2x headshot is a problem, but am40 with 2.15x is not
it doesnt make sense
it's an M134 chambered in .338, has a thousand extra yards for range, somehow they managed to suppress it
also it has onboard power so we can get a carryable minigun for 2042????
A portable mini gun would be a good battle pickup
or heat seeking rockets for infantry

I want more assault rifles
theres never enough

I want the gunship
ai using specialists when
getting hit by 8 tvs the second you enter a condor
I could only imagine what horrors ai Lis would make
How long do I have left to completel the seasonpass? I dont see a timer
About 3 weeks iirc
Should be in the menu in the top
near dead on accurate to hit your vehicle
damn thats too short for me to complete it

i hate this fomo bs
How about you just…. Buy it…..?
/j
or
how about you don't care about it

I’m regretting that hiatus I took
I’m probably just barely gonna finish it like the last week or so
I will never buy any battlepasses again
2042 was my first
It’s best not to tbh
I haven’t bought MW2s battlepass despite how tempting it is
how about you only buy the game
nothing else for that game
Just cause it instantly will go from just being something you passively progress through to fuck I need to actually play the game otherwise my money was poorly spent
damm hogwarts is massive
This is the reason I cant complete
Ye I know, just talking about my experience and thoughts I had since I have 2042s y1 pass
i turned off my minimap for maximum immersion and legit how do ppl seriously get around this castle its confusing af lol
those that played previous games or a huge fan of the castle

I thought about disabling the minimap but I would miss all the sidequests
yea perosnally its part of the fun u know
if i have a minimap im like inclined to always stare at it and not at the beautiful architecture in front of me
all the years of bf games made me always look at my minimap lol
I always do.
gotta be on the lookout for enemies that flanks
yea its very hard not to avoid looking at the minimap
its like the natural thing to do lol
like if it was bf4 claymores with the wires i understand but its lasers man
holy the scar is good
in my eyes its a scar xd
we just had a rush game that didnt end when the attackers ran out of tickets
it would have gone forever lol
could be an insane glitch but maybe a cheater

nah
how is the aks74u?
iirc it has pretty low recoil, i like it
You hardly see claymores in BF4 and you get killed not knowing where it is
Then 2042 comes along and its like "Oh you saw my lasers? BANG."
bro destruction is extremly important
not over those other options
and also we dont know their definition of "destruction"
it is hhahah
Interesting
Menus and interface similar to 4/1/V would be nice I suppose
saw a post saying this game had a "bright future" based on the quality of the skins alone
can you imagine if they put as much effort into making the game functional as they do with the cash shop skins?
still waiting on mouse input and map layouts that aren't hot garbage
like, basic functionality
Well yeah. But it’s not like the work done itself also isn’t good
I’m also going to infer again that there’s two separate groups of people for both skins and netcode for instance
There’s a new skin bundle every week and an update every month, so the pace at which both are working also isn’t staggeringly different
survey time babyyy
idk, i still feel like this should be sorted for $60 + battle passes + cash shop items + tip
bad take
destruction is important to people who don't really care about having a playable shooter, which is a lot of them apparently
Well, theoretically they could have delayed the game for a year and that might have prevented some problems. But who knows tbh
Some things they got purely from player feedback so it becomes a gigantic theorizing thing
Gotta get that Christmas money tho 
they need to get the community back into the game tbh
Destruction has always been a selling point of Battlefield though
platoons, server browser, custom games in portal even with the simple addition of BT which they havent added for some reason
While I agree that it’s been done too much in the past sometimes, it’s still important for battlefield
Although I don’t believe we need 100% destructible environments or some shit like that
Destructible cover is just painful
they should just add that desert map from bad company where you could level everything and you have an empty map at the end 
I never receive these because DICE fears my opinions 
that's what hourglass is now
literally how
empty desert map 
I would suspect by ui they’re referring to remaking it for an aow server browser…
have you figured out how to blow up the worthless bridge and towers they have?
even ssaying you only play cq. you just said nobody goes there so it doesnt matter
that means it matters
bc nobody goes there

dead and irrelevant play space doesn't matter
you could wipe out 70% of the playable area on these maps and it would be an improvement
What’s up with the controller settings for this game like I play bf4 and can be top of the leaderboard but when I play 2042 I can’t hit shit
it's a skill issue
I’m not even 19 Lmaoo
basically newborn

destruction is something that I personally find it's nice to have a bit of, but not too much.
What would the point be in designing good maps when everything that could make it good can get stripped away
2042 has input issues everywhere, don't take it too seriously
Hell
Does it really
Like, destroying small ish sections of walls while maintaining some level of cover is a good balance. Bringing the whole thing down is a bit much
Even on console we’ve finally received the input hammer
Some interesting anomalies happened when I played
Nowhere as bad, but I felt it
has been fine on mnk for me
It just feels clunky when I play regardless of the sensetivity
Cause your on MnK Lmaoo no offense
2042 has been shit with mnk for a long time
If I could run 2042 on pc I would choose it over console tbh
It’s alright on console, just felt it a tiny bit
it only got good like 2 months ago
Rly and yet people where still dropping 100 kills a game
I feel like the updates surrounding 3.0 have made the greatest improvements to mouse input
60fps is a pain in this game
ye it is
laughs in 169 fps
that one where they fixed high Hz polling rates, followed by even more fixes, then the recoil fix and now it actually feels somewhat responsive
the oddities come when the game stutters, then it loses some mouse tracking which is very annoying
that’s why I wish I could play MnK and not console tbh
I’m on old gen console too Lmaoo so that’s prob a big issue as well
oof
thats literally the issue you having
aint that shit like 30fps
you playing a shell of a game
Could never find a ps5 so I just gave up I’ll just get a gaming setup in the future and play most games again
lol
sucks that we wasted the "no games" joke on ps3 when ps4 and ps5 have been way worse
and now they thinking of ps6
the same people are still going to buy it and the yearly fifa release
PS5 to PS3 backwards compatibility when
@arctic grove super late to the topic, got stuck in a meeting but kept thinking about this
Thanks to Nvidia for sponsoring this video!
For more information on how high frames and refresh rate help in competitive gaming visit https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/geforce-gives-you-the-edge-in-battle-royale/
To get the best GeForce graphics card for competitive gaming visit http://www.frameswingames.com
Subscribe to GeForce YouT...
60hz/300fps does better than 60hz/60fps
@spiral folio above
Do they use the same computer and will the computer bog down ever
i just lock my fps to my 144hz monitor
pushing as much fps as you can, no matter your monitor, will be better for performance
Becsuse if running a game at 200fps will overheat your computer its probably better to not run it that high.
Because processing excess frames wont help
of course unless theres negative effects like screen tearing and its distracting or whatnot
Which was my point the whole time thanks
video literally shows processing more frames helps
literal pros, saying it feels better and the numbers show they do perform better...
i’m gonna add 100 fps cap
good thing i timestamped and it takes 1 minute to get that conclusion
So precise
or you know.. ive typed the conclusion of the video so you can just read it and take that knowledge...
the way I understand it, higher fps reduces frametimes, which reduces the interval between you moving your mouse and the effect rotating the camera in game, that reduced latency can definitely be felt even if the refresh rate is low
The conclusion is overuse of processing makes good feels
shroud "60hz/300hz is definitely easier (than 60hz/60fps), theres not as much.. input lag as id explain"
shroud goat
yea, people here should start arguing against shroud that hes wrong xD
I think what youre saying is basically because capping at 60 mean any dip in frame rate will lower you below 60 where if youre processing at 120 and it dips below 120 youll still always see 60 frames
that's not necessarily it, the frametimes are the biggest factor, that input lag that shroud said he feels
im saying theres a benefit to have more fps than your monitor.. thats it
Input lag would only matter on games tied to framerate, which is very specific
i dont care WHY, i just care that there is a difference
framerate is a byproduct of having expensive hardware to brute force shitty software
This is precisely why i dont take the word of a sponsored youtubers opinion
what are you talking about...
Its literally sponsored by the company selling the thing he's testing
And his conclusion is basically "sure get the newest card because more frames is good"
because it's true
https://youtu.be/msOWcvoIC8M?t=158 watch this for some more info if you fancy
The time it takes a game to respond to your input must not only be low, it must also be consistent to allow for an enjoyable gameplay experience.
In today's video I will show you how the frame rate and refresh rate affect the amount and variation of the end-to-end system latency that will make or break your gaming experience.
► Sponsor:
This v...
he figuring it out
Even if it were, its being sold by the video claiming to test it. Its about as reliable as a chevy car getting a JD power award
if thats youre interpretation of the video and its conclusion.. good luck in life
(Chevy sponsors JD power awards)
you can get about 300 fps with a 1060 in a vast majority of competitive titles...
I've rarely hated a game mechanic as much as BF's vehicle system
if you don't have a solid 4000+ hours sunk into the vehicles of the previous BF games, you aren't allowed to play the aircrafts, simple as
it's especially true with jet fighters, you cannot, like, you cannot play the fighter jets because the enemy jet is already on your six when you spawn
even if he isn't, the jets' health is so fucking low that you are dead before you've even located the enemy or managed to aim at them
Its basicslly them giving themselves awards
by no means is that a "buy the latest card for more fps"
its apparently tin foil hat time
I wonder if they'd be able to come up with some form of AA that is located at your base to potentially stop this kind of problem
Jets dont fit in the game unfortunately
Theyre in the game cause if they didnt
"Why no jets?"
About why the minibird is in the game
They literally stopped using em years ago
really only the case for air vehicles, DICE managed to make them competitive for non shitbuckets in BF1
You are talking about playing on two different generation of games bro, like saying the racing mechanics on forza motorsport 3 isn't different than the racing mechanics on forza motorsport 7
connection dropped out mid game and now my EA play is bugged and battlefield is giving me a persistent data error and wont connect 
jets are one of the aspects of their rock paper scissors balance methodology, it just so happens that they control so awfully that they can't perform any task consistently well
I used to play golmud and sit in spawn, wait for vehicles to fly by and spot them and watch the ciws destroy them
Theyre totally not
Jets fit in battlefield like a horse in a basement
People like horses but it wont perform well there
Spawn ciws was good for a fair chance for a losing plane to get another chance in a dogfight
Planes in bf1 worked cause they basically filled the role of helos too
guys what is flight assist ? when i use it i dont feel anything
If you didn’t destroy a plane over the middle of the map, too bad for you
I think flight assist levels you off sooner
planes in bf1 did everything well
They were even easier to kill
CAN SOMEONE TELL DICE NOT TO REMOVE EXODUS CQ. thx
jets in 2042 are designed for anti air first, with anti armour as a secondary and infantry as a sort of last resort. If they changed some mechanics they'd perform so much better
Most use i get from a jet is hovermode vs bots for just shiggles
I for one am very glad Jet's are garbo in 2042, barely anyone wants them to be good
They used to be a full ground vehicle counter
literally two changes off of the top of my head that could make them more fun without needing to change any damage values or whatever
still get triggered over BF4 Jet shitbuckets, literal scum 
All you needed was two strafes directly top down to kill ground vehicles
Give the f35 minibird agility in hover mode
It takes a bit longer now tho
back then you'd hardly see the wildcat which only accentuated the problem
And instant mode change
and now the wildcat isn't even a consistent AA. carrying on from what i was saying the other day
maps are so big wildcat's are a non issue, easily avoided
Wildcat is pretty cursed now
You meant m5
song 10/10
video 3/10

Lmao
Need that angel mouth sync
is anyone also sad that they didnt add thermals for the throwing knives? 
Do dice know about grenade splash going through quite literally every surface in the game currently?

Maximum trolling
Primus is good



