#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 388 of 1
OI
Hey!
what's good
I reckon he would be aware.
Stuff is good.
What about on your end.
That being said.
i refuse to believe this lmao
Way, guess my M44 progress.
I know,but just wanna be sure haha, it's my last AR i need to T1 (SFAR) and it's driving me nuts
No, still under T2
Give me your account and I can get it to tier 1 within a day.
Found something relevant and only 3 days old. Many of us were looking for that sweet sweet trailer song from the Master of Arms trailer. 2WEI has done a good one. GG Dice / EA
Check this out everyone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wGOigKCq28 if you haven't yet
Unfortunately my hand hurt after a straight day of clicking.
Oh yeah, Alex can we shave off 10 kills from sidearm masteries, pretty please *puppy eyes*
My last AR to T1 is the ACW and... Falck has some things to say about it, so listen up it looks like she's going into story time 😂
@lucid goblet @ripe hedge BANG BANG BANG.
Avengers Easter egg
One thing that makes me happy is the fact that the operators practice trigger discipline.
Shes like
I have an idea
Way broke his finger after that 
😂 rapid fire mod on your fingers now eh
Way literally is the persistence error in a server
My entire hand was in pain.
At the end.
Luckily it healed in the following morning.
"hey my hand is good"
@next onyx https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wGOigKCq28 🔥
Ayo!
Hat off to whoever decided to pick that song for the trailer, well done
Ye.
does anyone else have an issue with the LATV loading a low poly model with no animations?
679
Theyve been that way for me since S2 started basically
and my game is on an m.2 ssd
no teasers for the next season yet?
Most likely next week
damn it...
Theres 2 weeks left of this season
I am now awake
Sus
that's not a teaser
That song really makes Charlie Crawford want to inspect his PF51 side arm and AM40 assault rifle as he rolls into a stranded cargo ship with a Polaris RZR after the AO has been cleared out by an EBLC-Ram escort, only to have immediate contact with hostile forces, forcing him to throw a concussion grenade and shift the cards in his favour.
that's just a rumour
Passive aggressive teaser
I tried to post a screenshot from my steam of the LATV, but got timed out 😦 started in season 2 for me too, but my games on a sata ssd
Everything Temporyal has leaked has been true
Send to me and I'll post for you
It could be the name of the map or the season.
You can't count with everything tho
We don't know.
For now.
We wait.
He's going to fully reveal these things when these things have been revealed anyways.
Yeah, its just 2 weeks until Season 2 ends
would like another event like the liquidators except without the paywall
Eh the liquidators event in general was pretty trash. I found myself only playing to 100 ribbons then back to breakthrough I went
I want https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vRujrdsfXw this trailer song available on the in game radio station. Hayaku!
From what I hear alot of people did the same
i think it was fine just disappointed that basically all the cosmetics were just bundles
I got 0 ribbons at the event
Ehh they could have done a tad more with the event. Cosmetics wernt very good anyways
I got 100+ in the first day... 
That was me in 3 hours
the one cosmetic i wanted was the m5 weapon skin and that was in the store
It wasn’t even worth it
I’m glad I didn’t
There we go, now everything I've ever leaked will have been fake 😄

But it doesn't exist ?
This looks like a PowerPoint I tried making for science class in 7th grade
You tell the C5 to tell my M418 that 😄
I abused the 8v8 mode for fast smg T1 masteries since it allowed me to drop 25-30 kills a game in 6-8 minute matches
Eh cod fan base is more dedicated to cod then the bf fan base

Yeah I didn't have much to master since I mastered almost every single gun during launch
M416 would be cool to see again.
Lol yeah but I mean it would take time for them to create a whole new weapon, they would have to change barrel and stock, I remember seeing a BF2042 version of M416 during season 1 though, I think it was made by Dice
what the fuuuuuuuuuuuckkkkkkkkk
Be cool if they added the honey badger to the game
Hey Alex a bit of a question on your opinions. It's not about this game but stuff.
The clip won’t load for some reason. What did he say exactly?
Do you think that support should use battle rifles? Or should it be an assault weapon.
Basically mw2 visuals are good but the overall game sucks
How dare you mock my 1 minute power point like creation 😄
I’ve already unlocked gold camo on 5 assault rifles in MW2
Machine guns

Nah you did good. It would take me 5 back in 7th grade
ur not gonna like my answer
Machine guns
I mean I do want to hear it out.
Assault should use battle rifles
Even if I'm not going to like it.
Support is already in the action so why not give them mobility speed and faster firing guns
Gun freedom... right? Plz maintain
I'm not a fan of machine guns for support as much as I love it.
Battle rifles ? 🤨
Smgs for the W
A machine gun is support tho
DMRs etc
You give suppresive fire
Like M27 IAR ?
Ha yes
They're assault rifles with longer barrels and larger mags meant for more accurate bursts of fire.
but now you're splitting hairs Way lol
Nah that only happens in real life. This is a video game where most the gaming community cares about individual effort nowadays
PKP still gives suppresive fire in this game
Bf5 lmgs were pretty much more snipey assault rifles that differentiated themselves well versus assault rifles.
Even if the difference was small.
No no mobile network no fucky wucky.
Bfv lmgs were cool
"someone asked me this earlier, 'do you think this is better or battlefield?' i think Battlefield is much better than this, actually... The new one... Am i crazy for that?"
@next onyx Support isn’t for combat
A support can be just as viable in combat.
Well it is but it’s more to ‘support’ your team
Like lmg’s to give suppresive fire
That’s for assault and recon
Assault rifles are more aggressive. Battle rifles are more passive.
all classes are for combat, actually. or at least, that's how classes SHOULD be designed
Battle rifles would more fit with engineer
If they get rid of my smgs I'm gonna give every one of the devs at dice a colonoscopy myself
To be honest I have no fucking clue how engineer should fit in since assault and support do it better.
Engineer in this game instead uses high tech for other shit.

A what.
Colonoscopy
I get you're passionate and that but please don't make those comments
Yeah I know what you said and I unfortunately know what that is.
Colonoscopy
Alright will no longer say that
posts definition
Lmgs should work as lower mobility options for support, hey you want lots of ammo? Here you go.
Battle rifles low mag high powered ranged alternatives work in the same vain.
Smgs or nothing
I've had a colonoscopy
Please.

Either I wanna shoot you with an smg or stab you with a cane
1 of the two no run around slow as hell with a fat hunk of metal
Support is supposed to be like some sort of logistical unit
gamer mad. makes threats
Not close range combat

No way
Versus assault rifles.
You use a scar h and fight a guy with a m416 up close. Who will win?
M416.
Scar op
Higher rof and same power.
We get it you love subbies.
I'll ban you
What's the issue anyway?
Can’t ban a Dread

Augh wrong emote.
WAY YOU SUSSY
I have a purple name I can do whatever I want
Spinny.
cap
I would advise not posting that again.
you payed for the role, i got it by chatting
WHY?!?!??!?
Wait really?
are people crying over arbitrary issues they can fix in portal?
You are aware on the origin of the meme right.
k
Regardless of "what goes into which class" which is a lovely discussion, i personally, (reddit i know you are screencapping this, read that again, PERSONALLY), think that Sub-Classifications of the same weapon type are pointless. Carbine, Assault Rifle, Battle Rifle, its the same... its just fancy words to infer the type of cartridge they use, but the usage of the terms varies WILDLY between manufacturer, region and even individuals. So classifying "what is an AR and what is a BR" is an exercise in arbitrariness in which i have no willingness to participate.
I also feel that it dilutes the experience a bit. Instead of having one big varied pool of "Assault Rifles", some of which are big and heavy using fully powered cartridges by default (BR's), others light and using medium ammo (Ar's), others even a bit older that only have single fire (Carbines), you basically artificially restrict yourself to 3 smaller pools of homogeneous weapons that arbitrarily fit your description of what is what. So less variety within an archetype. Reduces the chances of picking or making weapons more "unique" than others.
alr @next onyx i got the meaning
That's fair. You'd rather have assault rifles straight up to allow more variety within that category am I reading that right?
Alongside the other things too.
I guess hardline kinda spoiled me like that.
Correct
I completely agree with you.
i'll never post it again on this server UwU (but i will on my top secret server with other bfd members
)
you cannot
I already know I gotta be ea staff
My mindset is for Support have these assault rifles that have some range and play differently while assault has err... assault rifles that allows them to push.
It's funny cause you say I don't like your reasoning but I mean, I kinda don't don't.
But like can I just apply lol
You need to actually work on the game to get the role if you really want it.
Nope. Strictly subs homie. Support it good the way it is
^
Enforcer which was bfh support really made me appreciate what they tried to do.
Bf5 support in the same vain too.
my urge to post the homie gif 💀
Because their lmgs were assault rifles with more accuracy and that was that.
I'll code more subs into the game then code a legit sub under the map with pickles lettuce and sugonde
My M44 is 29 kills short of T2.
makes sense because lmgs also aren't there to begin with
there's only one which is a battle pickup
Use the new sugonde field upgrade
@ripe hedge I guess where I am coming from is that I wish for there to be mag fed LMG's in game instead of it all being strictly belt fed which just means we get super long reload times.
An RPK74M, M27 IAR and something something are the more reasonable guns to use for a support player like me.
But it's like... why play support if you want mag fed lmgs.
Ez. Unlimited ammo!
And super snipey guns.
AWS, MG36
In all realism if you're playing medic support you don't need a lmg
XM8 LMG.
You should be up front reviving people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_cartridge just give us these and let us throw them however we like
And a combat medic gets in their faces.
I've switched to medic recently and I run throwable smokes with the smoke grenade launcher and a smg
I do feel tho that if you revive someone you should get a minor map ping like paiks scan ability
But only 1 time and no the multiple scans like her
Forces people to revive to get info and can overall strengthen medic performance
It would be cool if that if you killed a medic on bf5 and picked up their ammo pack you'd get a medical pack back.
Reminds me back on bf1 with the scavenger perk if you stabbed specific classes they'd drop various loot.
Three mines if of an assault, three bandage packs if a medic, three if a support and I'm not sure about recon.
I'd like a gun called "hand" which has like 5 damage and very little penetration. Ammo is rocks
I don't remember
single fire
There was a handgun on bf5.
Just add a slingshot
A literal handgun.
Handguns are fun tho
So is being pushed out of bushes while prone and not being able to move backwards while prone into bushes or on rocks intentional or not? Because Carbonic has me confused.
That, i agree
I agree with that too
A 60+1 RPK 74m is personally all I need out of an Lmg.
Or a 40 round bren gun that has almost zero recoil.
Just bring over the FG42 and Way will explode
Gimme the bf5 FG42 into 2042 with a 35 round mag option and I'll be a happy support.
Personally all I ask out of an lmg or IAR is something that gives me range and accuracy with the loss of handling.
All I ask rn is the an94
but, we are still going to be able to sundance around the map with any weapon I want... right?
Yes
k good, carry on
Im pretty sure the BF4 dev for weapons had a similar philosophy on the old Battlefield forums when people complained about all classes getting DMR's, Carbines, and shotguns alongside their signature weapon class.
I did not like the way BF4 handled that one bit.
On the other side I really liked how BFV gave each class a varied pool of weapons.
ARs and SARs for Assaults, SMGs and bolt action carbines for Medics, LMGs, MMGs, and Shotguns for Supports, Bolt action rifles, SLRs, and Pistol carbines for Recon.
It’s kinda like how in the game right now, the AKS74U is considered and SMG and has that headshot multiplier, and the ACW-R is considered an assault rifle and has that headshot multiplier. But unless I’m mistaken, they’re both carbines.
All kit weapons were good.
Modern Warfare 2 2022 is the first game I've seen that's properly classified the 74u as an Assault rifle
Battlefield players always out in force to remove freedom from their game.
Too much freedom erodes the class structure
The 74u isn't an ar. It's a carbine. In deployments it's been used as an SMG and assault rifle.
Took em long enough
Freedom is good.
Not always
with arguments like "class structure" or "nostalgia" lmao
Pdws as all kit weapons is good.
also Way I got like 40+ kills with the F-35 last night
"teamwork only exists with classes!" lol
Using the VTOL mode
Good gecko.
2042 proved this
How did you not get hit by a rocket.
Oh I did eventually
Ah.
sure...
But it took em till the second to last sector on Hourglass
There’s gonna be just about the same amount of medics running by me in season 3 as the last two seasons.
A slight increase in projectile velocity would be nice
And default bolts max dmg should be increased to 120 hp imo because they are useless against people wearing armor (slow reload)
@ripe hedge
Some nice evasive flying and using range to my advantage
Team work does exist but the level of teamwork is the same versus the older games.
Carbines are ARs with shortened stocks and sometimes shortened barrels. They fire the same cartridge size as their big brothers
The 25mm cannon is still pretty good over long range
^
I'd grind out for tier 1 scout choppers but I can't be bothered.
I am aware what a carbine is.
They're good for at crews because of their size and power.
Submachine guns by definition fire Pistol cartridges, so the 74u was never correct to be in a category called SMG.
PDW, sure that's a more nebulous term
Bf3 it was a carbine and in bad co 2 it was a pdw but that's for a completely different reason.
hopped on Battlefield 3 this past weekend for some conquest large. Did not see a single assault class. Went to metro. Multiple squads of only assault.
everybody just revive spamming cuz it's broken
Personally all I care about is that if they've made it an smg. It should have the advantages of an smg.
They’re dumb then. The m16 is busted
https://i.ibb.co/brBpWNr/image.png
How is it that some people have their opponent's red light shining so strongly, while most others, like me, only have it shining normally?
Based
I still remember spam reviving people and getting my first revive ribbon.
"Huh this is easy"
I wish the AKS just killed in one bullet faster. Cause rn it takes 5 body shots. It can’t compete with the other SMGs at all
Especially with its 600rpm
It would be cool if it were just a carbon copy of the pp29.
anything that gun can do, so many others can do at greater ranges or same range on engineer. Scar H for example
and on the other classes too so
I understand why class weapon restrictions can't be jerryrigged into 2042 , but I really hope going forward we don't have the all classes can use all weapons thing continuing
engineers were definitely not complaining in BF3
I love using it. Cause the AKS is a sweet gun. But it gets outclassed very easy rn
The aks reload makes me feel things I shouldn't.
This is extremely reductive and ignores the vast difference in manufacturing process, reliability and overall quality over the historical Carbines vs Assault Rifles. They were light and smaller to cut down production costs, not to help the soldiers in any meaningful way.
Maybe in the next battlefield game something similar to BF4's weapon distribution can be done? So that way players still retain their classes identity but continue to have other options
In a good way? Or a bad way
I'm not sure if the feelings are good or bad that's the issue
Pssst minor ac42 buff plz 🦹🏻
Cause I think the reload is one of the few examples of a reused animation looking good.
Just wait for the AN94 and it’s sweet sweet 2 round hyperburst 
I had fun turning M16 into a DMR-like thing though with heavy barrel. Also running around flag capping is great and all but, when you can just sit on a mountain side and snipe people with anything you can throw together, you quickly realise that it's way more fun than meat grinding
The an94's recoil is gonna be reduced sincd people are gonna complain and it's gonna outclass the ac42 for hyper burst.
I was agreeing with you that carbines should be pooled in with BRs and ARs, unless I misunderstood what you were saying.
K30 burst mode is pretty satisfying - it can shoot about 300 bursts per min
In the dev stream, alex said ac-42 is at a perfect spot for balancing, so good luck with that 
preach
Since the underbarrel fix on portal guns last update, it doesn’t kick at all anymore in burst
You should try it
Using it with the grip?
I might just run foregrip hb.
Maybe I’m just used to it. Lol
I don't feel the difference with the fore grip.
Infact I don't think fore grip functions as intended for most of the weapons.
With and without the foregrip I get the same recoil patterns.
Idk before last update I feel like it kicked way more.
what platform are you people playing on where you're having difficulty controlling recoil?
I don’t think I really have an issue with any guns recoil
Though I haven’t used the PKP in a while. Lel
I find every gun easy so the only reason I really change anything up is for looks lol
Took out the AA Wildcat to destroy the stolen Super Hind and after that destroyed few of their aircraft and they stopped spawning them in completely
AC-42 with box silencer carbon series mmmmmmmmm
I wish you were on my teams on breakthrough.
Don’t
I feel like I’m the only one targeting helicopters ever
It’s so hard to get the AA Wildcat when needed
Everybody runs it with the 40mm
Don't be sad.
Oddly they didn’t bring out the stealth heli 
But the two person attack heli did get me down to 18hp.
what were you using?
Just the 30mm dual cannon and AA missiles
what game mode? Conquest 128?
Breakthrough Orbital, Attacking side
I don't find any reason to use any gun except the Scar. It's good up close,it's good at range, it's got a versatile UGL, why use anything else?
So there was a hill they could heal behind that no one could be able to shoot at them, or even the big building.
it's not pretty
SVK, AC-42, BSV-M(VSS), SWS-10
pretty guns
AC-42 is ugly
you take that back! lol
it’s a bullpup
Famas
@ripe hedge
There's a roughly 150 ms difference in time to kill in the 30 - 75 m range between the ac42 and the sfar (hp rounds)/m5a3 (hp rounds + shortened barrel). Imo this difference in ttk should be lower (50-75 ms) because the ac42 is unforgiving - bursts have to be timed perfectly and it's challenging to down moving targets (running/strafing) with the ac42 (delay of ~225 ms between bursts and 75 ms between shots from a burst - eg only a single bullet from a burst might hit the moving target)
Famas is ugly
AUG is tired of you objectifying it. Aug rights. they're more than just your fanciful material
looks like an AUG A3 SF, the best one imo
No u
thank u papi
How dare you

they have a terrible opinion, don't worry.
they?
do you prefer it instead
no
it has a terrible opinion lol
I sexually identify as a Javelin missile launcher
F2000 is probably the best looking of them all too. sci fi-est of weapons.
bitch i'm a bus transport
Of course a javelin wouldn’t like the famas smh
but only in a very specific configuration
replace bus with flying tank
Damn. Speaking of Javelins
Aug better
Heat seeking transport
I would love to see the F2000
That gun has kicked ass in every game it’s been in
AUG would like it if you would stop comparing its brethren in such a shallow manner.
AUG is queen 👸
how can a game like 2042 not have a gun that was clearly made in 2042, the F2000, but brought back in time to present day?
but I guess the AR category getting kinda stacked now. we need more DMRs
Because lawgick
I like you

we can call it, the FS2000
God it’s so stupid
wait really?
Yeah lol
You would think they can’t make a worse WW2 game than BFV
And then they prove me wrong
I think it would be cool to get the scar DMR version.
Vanguard has aw gun too 
Hey bfV is good
Laser gun
I think people are realizing slowly that BFV wasn’t that bad of a WW2 game outside of women existing
“Women in my WW2 game? No that’s bad!!!”
The same mfs when battlefield portal was announced: 
Like the most egregious thing about BFV is women and Japanese fighting for Germany
meanwhile in CoD WW2 and Vanguard
Like we’re ignoring the gold plated guns and shit. It’s just not that bad lol
facts
Gold plated guns is not that bad considering BF1 had them as well
BF1 is frankly worse on the historical accuracy scale than BFV
but we know why certain people make a big deal out of it
And I will die on that hill
we got an actual "how dare women in ww2!" person? lmao
No no that’s just what the cartel does to guns. Don’t you know the lore behind BFV? We’re all cartel members recreating WW2 battles
Lol
BF1 players trying not to brag about their immersion and setting challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)
Whoops mb forgot about that
Playing with guns and vehicles that were never used in ww1: OMG SO IMMERSIVE
Adding a character creator system that lets you choose gender: DEY RUINED BATTLEFIELD
BF1 cherry picking historical accuracy to allow a non functional experimental SMG to exist in their immersive WW1 experience challenge
We could all go play Day of Defeat: Source. The best world war 2 game
BF1 is fine. But it’s not really WW1
If we let them do what they wanted, it wouldn’t have been
true, it beats the piss out of BFV any day 
Sometimes I wonder if the series would get better if DICE just stopped listening to the community
but why though?
And tbh? Yeah no it probably wouldn’t
But
I think there would be improvements in places
Dey Ruined Battlefield! 
There would certainly be new ideas
old game good new game bad
Yknow there was a time in the BFV community where I thought we had moved past the “wHy dIdNt DiCe aDd tHe SovIetS doNt tHeY kNoW iT wAS sO bIG” type posts. I was wrong
I heard so many people say they wouldn’t flip on BFV after 2042. Wonder where they are now
This server should add the old man from the "they ruined battlefield" video as an emoji/sticker

God as much as I love BFV the community around it actually sucks
Especially those armchair historians
These motherfuckers thought DICE would add the Soviets because of one LMG
We had a Finnish LMG but where’s the continuation war?
What about Polish and French weapons?
Wish they would’ve add Russia
Personally I think they should’ve fleshed out the pacific and American Western fronts more before moving on to the Eastern front
I just wish the LAD actually got added. It had everything done. And a belt fed normal LMG would’ve been great
just survive long enough to see Battlefield 10, np
PPSH-41/43, DP27, Mosin Nagant, SVT, PTRS-41, Avtomat.
All i wanted from BFV was that USA team should have atom bomb 
As much as I loved BFV
Trueee
There’s not enough pacific or naval content
I'm kinda glad we didn't get the soviets solely because I really didn't need people to be LARPing Enemy at the Gates 24/7
Because people seriously misinterpret that movie
No dude that just enhances the gaming experiensh 🤓
Or go with the whole Soviet "human wave" myth
BuT mUh SovIet aRmY! I wAnT tO bLaSt KatYuShA wHiLe kiLliNG fAsCisTs!
As if that whole thing doesn't come almost exclusively from german postwar memoirs
Made to, yknow, make the Germans look good
so have you noticed the meta of what you're all complaining about yet?
agreed
After watching LazerPig’s T-34 video and reading and seeing so much stuff about the Soviets in WW2 I’m really beginning to doubt them as a “good” force
They were fucking villains
"how dare other people have fun in my game"
There's so many misconceptions about WW2 in general
This is a mild nitpick. But I wish the American boats in the pacific worked like the bridge boats in BF1.
Being that the bridge drops on shore, and as long as the boats are there, you can spawn on them. You could only spawn on the US boats, even if docked, when there was somebody in it already.
Like it doesn't even stop at the Germans and Soviets
Normally we wouldn’t have a problem but when you have so many people like fucking fantasizing it becomes gross
japan vs china action pleas
I want you to read what I’m about to say in the most fluttery voice you can pull off
“Imagine if DICE had added the Soviets! Imagine the fights in Stalingrad and Berlin!’
We need a Battlefield Civil War (USA Civil War) please!
Read that quote in the most pitchy and fluttery voice you can
And you will likely see where our problem lies
Battlefield-Napolean
Battlefield 2242
Battlefield 1842
but at the same time, are you taking the defense of a lack of inclusion of a historic faction in a WW2 game a bit far? I'm not out here "needing" anything, but why not have more WW2 factions in your WW2 game if you can fit it in?
battlefield agincourt
Because it may not be necessary. I would’ve liked to see DICE do more with the factions we had post 5.0. I would’ve loved to see the UK vs Japan.
360 noscope with an english longbow
The Soviets are not the end all be all
yes even further future

this is gaming, nothing is really necessary. it's all arbritrary. I'm sure there are many WW2 games that have russian and german factions that don't touch other factions.
Battle on other planets
Will you be fine with titanfall 2 type movement 
Didn't Red Orchestra only have USSR and Germany until the Rising Sun expansion?
no

I'll take 2 of this please
but respawn's star wars fps should have titanfall type movement
What i want is a 128 player , fully destructible environment, titanfall 2 type battlefield game 
It should be a Jedi Knight reboot
I want CoD: IW's setting (but no boost packs or anything)
Because IW is fucking cool and I love it and fuck you if you disagree I will not debate this
Leaks show IW maps and operators coming to MW2022
broooo
no jetpacks 
(But not actually fuck you because thats mean <3)
Battlefield 2242
Just wouldn't go over well with this community...and probably wouldn't play great either
That's also true tho 
I hope it's something cool
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lUoA9q0jnM Titanfall 2 memories
Throwback to when I predicted 2042 like a year before it was revealed
I wouldn’t mind if 2042 leaned a little harder into the whole futuristic warfare type thing
This is a game 20 years in the future and everything is still basically the same
That leaked tank tho 
One word: mechs
I mean there's still some pretty cool future stuff..but yeah
Not mechs
yeah I'm not vibing with mechs
L
I want more tanks and IFVs and cool shit
Where's that hover tank from BF4?
I mean, beyond the internet, everything is pretty much the same as it was in 2002
Yeah thank you Dreyfuss lol
well we get rail gun tank in s3
Normally I would agree except the military is expanding rapidly
The US just accepted a new light tank
Russia is busy trying to not fuck up its future arsenal
Not that it really has one nor can it afford it lol
The F-35 is moving into a more production phase
And yet they still fuck it up
i wonder how they'll balance the rail gun, like what will its pros and cons be?
Literally 20 T-14s
Low fire rate?
I think I heard stuff about T-62's in Ukraine?
military hardware has seen very little change in the last 20 years 
For example, the F/A-18, seems like a modern and contemporary 4th gen fighter, right? How about the F-22? That thing looks like it's from the future!
Oh and the Cobra maneuver
Which was already done by the fucking AVRO VULCAN
Which has exactly zero tactical use in a modern dogfight
What do you think will be the pros and cons of the rail gun tank cannon in 2042? For balancing
wait are you talking about the engine whistle?
(mainly because dogfighting as we often think of it is dead)
The SU-57 would be shot out of the sky miles before it even comes within dogfighting distance of an F-35
the Su-57 isn't the first jet to have a high pitched whistle lmao
the F4U Corsair did it first smh
and it's entirely a harmonics thing. plus as a stealth fighter it's not about "audible detection" or anything like that anyway.
Yeah if you’re a stealth fighter and you sound like nails across a chalkboard that’s bad
No one wanna speculate on how they'll balance the 2042 rail gun? 
i mean, generally, you're at high altitude + far away, sniping with missiles
Modern 5th gen fighters have moved away from the concept of dogfighting
it's just different here because the average gamer can barely drive a buggy in BF games
like the community of people who still need vehicle buffs, incase they crash into the side of a building lmao
i do, but i got bored wanted to try out burst
what was your engagement range? anyway SVK silenced with standard issue mags
thank me later
infinite ammo vehicles, regeneration. It's a wonder people in air vehicles die at all, even with all the AA, and every soldier with shoulder launched AA missiles, and every rat with them too
Can someone just explain 2042's lore so far? With Oz and all those characters?
those crows definitely have heat seekers too
Or better yet, provide any links for the same?
mid usually
close range was ok cuz i run lazer sight
The Wizard of Oz
Never played the game, and I've gained some interest in its lore.
Hello our clan is having a in-house rush scrim tonight (@8:30est) and we’re a few short DM if you’re interested.
Quite some time before 2042, the worlds powers begin to crumble due to environmental issues mostly stemming from human induced global warming acceleration. People begin to overthrow and leave nations and fall into the protection of corporations or patron-less association aka Non-Patriated civilians (NoPats)
!!lfg
ℹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-crossplay #lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
some of them are just mercenaries-like, others are bad like "Oz's" group dark market traders
Oz's group and possibly some others helping him conduct a series of actions all in the plan to have the last 2 super powers fight each other, apparently that's Russia vs U.S. in the war of 2042
and no pat specialists are called in for special missions by both sides for key blah blah blah.
Oz is more than likely the one who spawns tornados in so many maps.
Hi there, does anyone have the same problem when getting on a quad bike? I sit in it and after that my character model stays in a sitting position, and I drive on. I can see myself in third person.
you can go get the specialist lore by unlocking that by playing them enough and viewing the special player profile cards
Bring back exodus conquest
or going to the official website
Still makes no sense that the ACW-R only holds 26 rounds
I literally own the magazine it uses
and I can confirm it holds 30 rounds
In 2042 we also don’t use artillery or ac130s or boats so I think a lot of stuff doesn’t make sense
Only takes 1 AA for stealth heli mains to dip and reappear 1 min later to bomb you
Stealth heli shouldn’t have been added. It’s pretty balanced now though
it shouldnt be able to destroy a wildcat in one run
just click heads
I have
click 480 more heads
Oh wait, 479*
Such a beautiful thing too. But yeah no vehicle should have infinite ammo. No player should either, except Angel via the call in drop.
ammo crate??

the loadout picker... crate thing that falls from the sky. angel specific
Making vehicles have ammo would suck
yes
but u forgot players that choose ammo crate should also have infinite ammo... and players that utilize others' ammo crates
it'd be balanced. and realistic
Quick question - whats the exact deal of the dev´s removing Exodus every 2-3 weeks?
mode rotation
or wait
Because boats at sea get people sea sick
does it not get replaced by anything?

fine, angel gets double ammo and 2 call ins max per life lol
@tame cobalt it does, now Master of Arms I believe is in place
That was the best part of BFV
then there's ur answer
It would suck for most vehicles. Tanks would be awful because then they would have to turn around and get ammo after getting to the front line. It worked in battlefield 5 but it would not work here. Especially with the maps being so big.
Yeah but it worked for 5, wouldn’t work as well here.

I think it would work.
You just can't be spraying rounds at everything.
Tanks already get destroyed in .5 seconds because everyone and their mom has AT capability
Kind of, havent been able to see any pattern or anouncements how this rotation works
That's also why I think tank armor needs buffed.
BFV did exactly what y’all are talking about, yknow.
A game I still play. Religiously. Lol
If you want a case study on how that would go, there you are.
Bf5 was an amazing game. With tanks actually feeling like tanks
this would be amazing actually. you'd see more realistic comms and the game would again be more balanced.

What's that fast vehicle that has a turret on top?
More realistic comms??? Lmao
It’s the new “tank”
Tuk tuk (s3 version)
I mean, my tank crews and I communicate very well on BFV.

"out of ammo, can't support your push any longer, estimated time of return x minutes"
Either Bolte or RAM
i'm thinking from a CQ128 perspective
(the best mode)
it'd be a more entrenched game, less wild
cuz as of right now, and as of every BF game prior, it's a farming simulator. with infantry being the crops and vehicles being the farm tools.
It would be very simple. Tank and full crew pushes a line with a surplus of infantry or other support elements. Tank expends ammo. Tank resupplies at closest area, with a small infantry contingent to make sure they don't get wrecked.
Then the tank returns to whatever line established.
Vehicles also do minimal damage in this game
That's another big problem, as a tank round should wriggity wreck someone.
say that to little bird pilots with like, any skill. or any stealth heli
or the eblc ram
And that's also why part of your support element consists of AA units.
Choppers also do no damage
even the buggies in this game are mad cray at the moment
The 70mm rockets are a JOKE
Limited ammo would work if the infantry blueberries didn’t bitch so hard
Balance schmalance. Who needs it? Am I right?
“Too many vehicles, too much damage” cry
you can wreck people and vehicles with those buggies so quic
definitely not enough vehicles
but their damage can stay the same for all I care. I got no skill issue with them lol
even if the jet required you to fly away to an air base for a refill, I'd still dominate with it. and i still kill infantry with it too even though it's harder
we should have faster vehicle spawns, and 2 jets, 2 attack helies, 2 little birds, 2 stealths, 2 transports, 2 uh.. whatever else flies i dunno
and 2 of everything on the ground, all at the same time.
longer rounds (less bleed) but also all vehicles have ammo limits. there, i've balanced 2042 and made it more fun at the same time.
Yes
More damage from tanks definitely
70mm rockets need damage buff
Same with 127mm
Not a lot tho
i think tanks are fine damage wise. the real issue is other things having too much HP. so... transports all need an HP nerf
there's no reason for them to be so.... tanky. in the sky or on the ground
the idea of an aircraft of any sort surviving a tank round... lol
i've noticed it's been like 3+ shots on the ground to take out MAVs. so maybe that's repairing. regardless I don't know what space age stuff they're using that makes them able to survive so many tank rounds. Atleast a full mobility "kill" after 2
That’s true
I think it’s because of things like fucking c5
It’s literally because of just design flaws coming to fruition
exactly yeah
The fact that everyone could ANY GUN ANY SPECIALIST ANY EQUPMENT
Just fucks anything else that doesn’t do with infantry
well now i disagree, cuz i like the freedom
how many c5 is it to kill a mav?
i think people carry like 3 max so 3 C5 probably kills a mav
You like the freedom, but that doesn’t mean it’s what’s good for the game
Now the question stands
what's wrong with any gun
It’s why every other battlefield, including this one in season 3, is going back to classes
Because it doesn’t make fucking sense
lol?
A MEDIC DOESNT RUN AROUND AITH AN LMG
you guys need to stop playing video games
And get a hint of reality
Lmao
Huh
that was literally the medic gun in bad company 2
Bad Company 2 had LMG Medics
saying it with capslock doesn't make it impossible for a medic IRL to run around with an LMG.
Medics carried lmgs along with various other guns in reality
no one cares
Most medics weren't even allowed to carry firearms
this is a game
Talking about immersion, fuck immersion
if you unlock super capslock, you can make it impossible for medics to run around with specic weapons you don't want them to though.
Realism in videogames are boring and terrible
Unless you are into that shit
then play arma
Back in ww2 medics mainly didn't have guns and if they had to they'd pick one up from a fallen solider
or squad
to unlock super capslock, it's just 12 easy monthly payments of $4000 to me
So his whole argument is stupid
bfv medics would have no guns if @cosmic sequoia had his say
If you want realism go play realistic theme games, not cod or battlefield
lol leave the poor soul alone
"rEaLiTy"
would be an interesting concept but it wouldn't be a good game, especially for multiplayer.
Dumb concept for fictional games
Yeah no one would be a medic
"DoCtOrS cAnT LiFt ThInGs!"
They would have to make medics invincible because you were supposed to kill them
Really dumb when bunny hopping and slide cancelling exist
i still think they are making one fundamental mistake with their design of the 2042 classes
Nope, they have smaller guns
And bunny hopping only is remotely viable if you use Mackay
bhopping is a thing in 2042 tho
you just said it wasn't a thing and then said it was viable with mackay
make up your mind
Oh like a pistol, that would be fun would it.
So fun
Don't really see bunny hopping
It's not a thing outside of mackay
I do see people sliding a lot though
Nope, like an SMG. Like most medic classes in other battlefields
And most people that use Mackay don't even know you can some what bunny hop
it's really sad that 2042 is showing up the current CoD game in terms of player movement
like seriously how do you lose to Battlefield like that
like look at all the logical fallacies these restrictionists want
Honestly any gun on any class isn’t that bad, but any equipment on any specialist is just awful
support can revive anyone in game right now using paddles. but people who aren't support can revive anyone in their squad.... using paddles... lmao
New dev team with no help from older devs. It makes sense
Bad company 2 medic - LMGs
Bf4 medic - assault rifles
Bf1 medic - DMRs
Bfv medic - SMGs
...

That’s fine but any gun is not good
Homies heal homies not some stranger
Unless you are a support
The only problem area is medic with sniper. They can just make that one restriction. Anything else more would provide ZERO benefit
On the same token medics shouldn’t have LMGs
Dmrs again. With how many people camp. The vcar could be an exception
that makes zero sense
I think every class should only have smgs
oi, leave my DMRs and sniper rifles alone. gun freedom
Smgs are cool and better
ya damn restrictionists
Only smgs in the game

No other guns
Makes zero sense? Use the same logic on why snipers shouldn’t be allowed
what's the logic, explain that.
Prove me wrong under 500 feet
can't use the same logic since they have different play styles
Do they?
Shotgun 
yes.
Aw shit I legit forgot shotguns exist
Lmg players should be no where near the front line
BaTtLeFiElD gAmEs ShOuLdN't HaVe sNiPeRs!
Idk how the he'll I forgot shotguns exist lmfaooo
I see no logic here
Aside from shotguns
The logic is aside from shotguns smgs are all you need
Shotguns in this game underperforms except that auto
Ehhhhhhhhh not true
Was talking about the other bullshit that was being said
would be an interesting concept to see how people would play a BF game without them, though. Especially considering really good snipers in a BF game are a rarity, so you just have a lot of people trying to be Chris Kyle and failing.
Nvm@im just done some people with no idea on anything military sit in here and just circle jerk each other. Why don’t we just follow the tried and true and somewhat realistic aspect of making classes? Gun restrictions make realistic and practical sense. A medic should not have a sniper or a LMG. They should be on the front line with an SMG reviving people.
Whoops my bad
"Some people with no idea on anything military" don't care, didn't ask
O_O
It's alright
Go play squad
it uses the concepts of war and militaries as a backdrop for a sandbox shooter
that's it
God the of course it’s the cringe 12 year old and the unidentified object trying to make changes
Just cringe
Just go play cod or something
It’s simple
Battlefield isn't a realistic game, hell they promote the random bullshit we do in the franchise
It will never be realistic
lmao I even hear cod is trying to move towards realism and it's pissing off their cod crowd
yeah it's cause IW is huffing their own farts at the minute
Realism hurts games that aren't made for realism
where shall the whiners who cry when they die to anything find a home?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
If Tipping point is one of the featured modes in portal tomorrow Imma be playing a looot of 2042 tomorrow
I wouldn’t mind the restrictions if it was like bf 3/4, with a variety of weapons to use. 1 and 5 was just shit when it came to that.
"No Shotguns, Snipers or DMRs: Full run and gun. Fast Respawn. Everybody revives or they get banned: THE GAME"
go there... wherever that game is lol
That sounds terrible
Sounds like a domination/TDM locker server i used to moderate on BF4. It was fun actually. Lot of decent people on there.
so what you're trying to say is, you liked a server that was essentially a daycare for crybabies?
i'm not even saying these people are rare but, trying to make core battlefield that is just weird, annoying and tiring to see
Implying shotguns aren't run and gun
For once, this chat has made it where the players are terrible at game ideas
I think you're confused.
you realise i was mocking their terrible ideas right?
Yeah, I just blatantly said it
Oh fuck yourself, man. shotguns are blatantly unbalanced bullshit anyway, banning them is justified. If you can't play the game without them you shouldn't be playing the game at all.

LOL
As long there isn't a boycott over removing shotguns from videogames it should stay
gun that is really good at a certain range exists. "BAN IT!"
They are impossible to properly balance in terms of a multiplayer shooter, though.
i don't use buckshot or any spread shot because I find it too easy at close range but I still like the challenge of going up against people using them.
So are one shot snipers but I don't see the problem with them either
snipers in BF are balanced by the virtue of requiring headshots to one shot. Shotguns do not require this. In fact they don't require any aim at all.
I said one shot, no need for a head shot to kill
Okay well i'm talking in the context of Battlefield.
blebblebeeld
"ThAt WeApOn PoSeS a ThReAt AnD rEqUiReS mE tO rEtHiNk My AdVaNcEmEnT sTrAtEgY................. BAN IT"
bleblebbleedleb
There is one for battlefield, it's that large sniper that has a huge bullet drop
NTW-50
^
The Battlefield Kraber
I think they are based off the same weapon
nope, nevermind, forgot what the Kraber was
The Kraber is in fact “most likely based on the South African NTW-20” according to google
Even if shotguns were the only gun that is op no matter how many nerfs they get, they are just too iconic to remove
I think they should be removed. At least from multiplayer shooters.
gotta cater to the lowest common denominator, i guess.
Thanks Liquipedia
Yup
guys they just aren't overpowered. they're the concept of an SMG, but instant. They could nerf them by giving people full body armor OR people could just realise that running and gunning is NOT a real world tactic
That's true
lmao
People could just realize that running and gunning is NOT a real world tactic
consider this: i am well aware of that, but this is a video game, so what is not a real world tactic is irrelevant
At least the MCS-880 isn't like the MCS-870 from WW3 which can one shot from like 30m
Also, not everyone is a run and gun, people like camping
jesus christ.
videogames are allowed to be realistic in different places
shotguns shred people up who aren't prepared? great.
I believe there needs to be a counter to run and guns
Here's the shotty loadout: https://www.tactigamer.com/gallery/category/11-world-war-3-loadouts/
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWcemHtTSe31FbFa3yvvkoQ/join
Music: https://www.epidemicsound.com/referral/exg1nz/
My Discord: https://discord.gg/VjTn7X2
WHICH IS WHY CAMPING EXIST
i mean there is, it's called being good at aiming and listening
you don't need a one shot hipfire gun to counter running and gunning.
better players do that all of the time without that.
Then you don't need smgs
why would you not need SMG's?
Honestly I just want more carbines. AM-40 is a good carbine
SMG's existence in games are justified because SMG's can't get 0 TTK.
Shotguns can and that's the problem.
No it's not even close.
It's close
no.
slaps SWS-10 this shotgun baby fires a ridiculously accurate slug from a rifled barrel, comes in a variety of colours, and can fit so many 1 shot kills in it!
why would SMG's promote a toxic play style?
Here's my woke mindset, everything is toxic
The whole aggressive run and gun, you thrive on that rpm
Don't see how that's toxic.
Then I don't see how shotguns are op
that is basic CQB, yes.
Shotguns are just difficult to balance imo
our shotgun hate friend doesn't realise that pointing smgs with high damage in the general direction of target at appropriate range, with enough damage and hip firing, can actually replicate the effectivity of some shotguns.
except it can't
But it can
because no matter how fast an SMG can kill, it can never equal shotguns. Because SMG's cannot achieve a TTK of 0.
You cannot one shot someone with an SMG.
But you can get a closer time to kill
12m Auto with Slug go bang bang dead
Smgs don’t have a short TTK at all though
They can achieve that 0 TTK at some long ranges, though. The potential is the problem, the consistency is irrelevant.
No
wait what?...... lol
The fuck
They do with a high rpm and damage
That’s why I stopped using them unless they’ve been totally reworked lol
Yeah if you’re like up the guys ass
Which can be easy in closer ranges like a shotgun
Yeah
mythical gamer babies. "How dare any weapon have a realistic TTK"
They’re in the same playing field
Hardcore mode would like to have a word with you all.
You just have to be close to have good effectiveness
Want to remove shotguns, then remove smgs or remove their high rpm






