#battlefield-2042
1 messages Β· Page 305 of 1
nah
When is double xp coming to Friday night battlefield?
that's a great point. when u look at it that way it definitely doesn't seem right that kills are 2 points and flags are only 3 points on leaderboard
My point is: if you got 10 kills in the span of a minute, a player who decided to use that minute to cap a single flag likely would have swung more tickets in your teams favor.
Obviously you can't have caps without good combat either, but my point is still the same in general
Im not even so much worried that thats their leaderboard score, but as far as importance for team succcess
I don't think it's even a question
I'd still always be in the middle of the leaderboard either way 
Update on 10th of 11th?
At least ur not bottom of the board
yeah ha, I'm usually able to hang in the top 20 consistently thankfully, even on crappy rounds I can usually pull something together. I'm rarely #1 though just because Im no crackshot
ye, but the leaderboard should more accurately reflect that. if they just make it count 4 points i think it would be in a better spot 
yeah, it would probably get complicated though. Like, I think caps at 3 or even 2 makes sense
if netrualizes are 4 or something

Game is easier on past gen
Hell maybe objective time is even a more accurate metric, but thats like, a weird metric to measure
Which just reminded me
I mean i play the obj i guess (go where all the bad guys are)
theres no combat bonus for killing a player while capping, or killing a capping enemy right?
For sure, not to say combat players aren't PTFOing
you need good combat to be able to advance
A lot of times people will complain "wtf are you doing go cap!?" but it's not like folks aren't trying, the other team is just better combat-wise
Winning your on-on-ones is a big factor
Or they should do it that way and not show an "3x" to the players.. just show some score like the top player has 526 points in the flag category or whatever
idk
i guess i can see why they did it this way tho
Fr id rather have 31 good combat players than 31 "obj player" boris and irish mains that go negative
Yeah like: 1pt for a capturing tick, 1pt for a defending tick, and higher points for caps/neutralizes (20/30) or something. But yeah thats too complicated and messy for a board

yeah I mean, if you rush into an objective and just die, you're not ever really capping haha
I've always said PTFO comes down to, is what you're doing directly contributing to your team's ability to play their role
For example snipers can PTFO. If you're able to snipe at and kill playrs who are trying to cap
thats huge
which includes killing players
If you're hanging back at base trying to go for 1000m snipes, thats not PTFOing
Sniper players tbh usually contribute the least to the team
usually, but it all depends
I mean
A good counter sniper can make an attackers push in BT easier
again it comes down to, are you doing your role with a purpose
does it assist teammates in other ways
Sniping is a practice that is genuinely incompatible with multiplayer FPS games as a whole. It just is.
I wish I got good points for clearing surrounding area of enemies coming to the obj that's being capped by team
Im not a good sniper... at allπ ill stick to fragging
I don't snipe often, but when I do I sometimes get a lower objective score because I flank to the peremiter of the objective while my teammates go in, and I try to give them cover and soften the targets at the objective
So sure my caps is lower, but I know I helped the team advance and cap
I'd rather do that than run in and die
It doesnt help the game wont let me map holding my breath because of my controls
300m snipes without holding breath is surprisingly hard
why is there no range finding
Yeah as long as ur helping
This is 2042 we find the range in our heads. Skill issue
But if u wanna find range cant u just ping?
I've seen people ping to find distance
yeah thats probably the best way to do it - or fire a shot at a wall and gauge where it lands
No zeroing is what sucks
Like how it works? Or why it exists?
It's an offset, so if you zero at 200m, a target 200m away would land on crosshair center
Ohhh ok
if you were zeroed at 200m, and a target was 50m away, you'd need to aim UNDER them to hit where you want to aim
To be honest, though, zeroing is only worth doing if you're shooting at people standing still, or you're shooting at an exact specific range, no more or less.
yeah, once you land a shot and get a sense for where they're landing, you can usually mentally retain that aim point
Long range engagement in bf4 was enjoyable because of the zeroing feature
Miss those days
oddly enough I found myself doing ***better ***with the GOL's 12x scope which has NO mil dots or demarcations on it
long range engagement in BF4 was boring as shit and never contributed to anything beyond Youtube clips.
I'll have to take try it
Gol is just fun to use cause the sound is awesome
BC2 and BF3's sound design were incredible
I'm enjoying it so far along with the p90
I never liked the GOL Magnum in BF4
Sometimes I feel like I'm shooting BBs with the p90 tho
there was always an odd delay after shooting before it would do the bolt animation
the M40 seemed like a better sniper rifle.
Fnb?
P90 is good too yeah
I actually started to even get the hang of the M16 too, a little bit
I threw the m16 away almost immediately
Update?
update
I want assist counts as kill back
it kicks around like mule, you pretty much always need to tap fire
and even then, still is wild
to be fair, the recoil the M16 has seems to be visual, mostly.
True
Did not have a problem recoil wise, but the ttk on the other hand
try the m60
Fard
its straight up poo
Poopy doodoo
i kinda wish the pkp nerf wasn't so harsh
yeah it was op but it had a cool feel to it
now it's trashwater
nah now its strictly a cqc gun

Why did they change the Portal Servers?
No MP Rush anymore! π²
which its very good at
is it tho
yes

they do it every week lol
but can u run n gun with it

yeah thats definitely the worst of the vault weps ha
Yeah, but on Tuesdays! π
skill issue
well i guess I'll try pkp with cqc focus
just pre aim everything
Boring
so the trigger delay doesn't screw you over
oh yeah PKP is insanely good
but definitely better at CQB, it can hang in mid with a bipod too
Bf2042 sucked so badly on launch
facts
Mw2 topped it by a mile even in beta

How
Mw2 felt like dog shit
mw2 icarus lmg is goddamn beast
Movement was gross asf
the list is too long
Movement was just like every cod game bro π wdym "movement was gross asf"
It's in beta too, not much to expect
its slower than cod 2
It popped off tho
A vegetable has a better movement system
Movement in MW22 was just like every CoD game
do you get off on lying
was there this thing in MW2 that if you like slide and jumped you went flying forward or something? I only watched a bit of it
Mw19 movement felt better
nope
There wasn't slide, they instead added dolphin dive back in
Compared to bf2042 movement, it's ass
No, you're probably thinking of the dolphin dive
It seems to me like they are trying to make the 3 new series distinct... MW with the boring pre-aim playstyle, black ops with the more traditional cod style, and advanced warfare with the... y'know, jetpacks
they completely neutered everything that made you move faster
ah
slide was in the MW22 beta, it was just entirely gutted so nobody ever used it
I'm on console so idfk
Did pc have dolphin dive and slide?
yeah of course you don't
It had both
I just remember seeing like what seemed to be a huge speed boost forward in mid air AND while ADS
why would those two things be exclusive to PC?
More buttons to press
The game is crossplay.
I don't fucking know, i don't play on console.
get back buttons bro
That caused a dolphin dive
you could change it
I don't play competitively or anything I don't need it
FPS are semi unplayable without back buttons
I play simply for fun
bro
it's not for competitive lmao
Ground war and invasion was awesome imo
having back buttons is literally more fun
I know but I don't really care that much to buy back buttons
I would just see clips of everyone jumping around (like the 15 sec around here)
https://youtu.be/ej4HW3vbaUQ?t=246
Maybe I just don't understand CoD anymore though
Cant wait for release to play it again
yeah was pretty good, but i didn't like the Sa'id map
that's just tac sprinting and jumping my guy
Bunny hopping was huge

do people enjoy playing the game like that ha? cause that movement seemed to be everywhere
After the beta it kind of transferred into my 2042 gameplay
And the Sarrif Bay map needs way more transport vehicle placed around the map
Yes.
Like wayy more
Sa'id map was nice in my opinion, just a problem with snipers. I liked to sit in a helicopter and drop people off at the sites while fighting people on the ground, then the helicopter would get too damaged and autopilot would come off and I'd be jumping out of a crashing helicopter mid air, narrowly escaping the explosion

Ground war really felt like a movie, especially on new gen consoles and pc
gw maps were all doodoo
Ok
Now u cappin
50 buildings with 50 doors and windows each
Fr
Yes
Sarrif bay would be an absolutely FIRE battlefield map
The ground war maps had a major problem with too much verticality. All of the rooftops were accessible and frankly, that's a massive problem for readability.
completely wrecked any flow to the maps
You talking strictly about said rn bro
Imagine getting off lying
it has the same problem
I know man
Ok i can agree about the buildings having too many accessible areas
as all the gw maps
another reason why warzone sux 
Yeah, snipers were really annoying but you get used to it, and once you spot them it's easy to avoid/kill them because of the obvious glare they make
and that's the problem stemming from using shitty BR design philosophies with the buildings
Even better if you have high alert
its unfortunate that they didnt tailor the maps to normal mp
not just snipers, just random people camping rooftops and shooting down from them, or trying to climb a building and getting shot from a different rooftop behind you.
You'll need fast reflexes though
Oh that's annoying too
Flood zone / pearl market moment 
They'll probably do something about that before launch
so: in MW2 you can ADS in mid-jump, and in 2042 you can't right?
Yeah..
not happening
their focus is wz2
That's good
Fuck Warzone.
Warzone one was ass tho
Cant wait to see what they do to fix it later with the new one
Warzone 1 was closer to being a decent game than Warzone 2 seems to be from what i saw of it
Gameplay was just not good
yeah they're going hard on pve shit
It's hard to explain but it just wasn't good
which i dont think many really care for in wz
A lot of hype for the new one is building up
Sarrif bay map's central area with lots of buildings is fun as fuck in invasion though. And aside from the buildings issue and the current lack of transport vehicles around the map, the GW version of it is a really solid Battlefield map
Like, Warzone 2 seems to be Warzone but they're taking every measure possible to slow shit down, making it so you have to access a separate inventory screen to pick stuff up from chests rather than just picking stuff up off the ground, the changes to movement and gunplay overall
Invasion on sarrif bay was peak of the mw2 beta for me
Really fantastic in that central urban area
And i didn't get to play on the santa sena map
I just enjoyed getting in the big tactical van (forgot name) and just running people over in said
I mostly just enjoyed the vehicles in said

just hope they place more transports (quads and buggies) around sarrif bay
and that some of the other GW maps are also that good
Yeah
how was Santa SeΓ±a
Good barrel for scar? Using high power drum
Probably played it just don't know the name
Doez FNB still exicst with devs ...?
yeah it was a third map in gw/invasion, not many people got a chance to play it cuz they removed it after a bug was found
it has a highway with abandoned cars down the middle
it's a gw map that isn't from the wz2 map
There was a glitch where if you spawn a load out drop on water it would fly into the air at Mach 3

Hype 
Awesome that it wasn't just cut up Warzone 2 map either
I got early access to the beta because of xfinity
I'm keen for more invasion, these dense map areas seen in the GW maps are great for it
I'm hoping we get at least two more GW maps at launch, hopefully both made for GW like Santa Sena
lots of cool wz2 POIs to make potentially good gw maps from
like that huge castle POI
sheeeesh
fort de vaux 2.0
I saved my gameplay from Santa Sena.
https://youtu.be/BesFweIpcTs

Gonna be a fun month jamming mw2 while waiting for s3

Just still need to figure out what to do this month 
Its funny, the Scar was the best gun in the beta and imo its the best gun in 2042
icarus lmg >
Skip to 40s https://youtu.be/e6hTlvPujcM
Also we need the drill charge in 2042. Would make the lack of destruction on most of the maps less of an issue

mw2 sound design feels like it takes a quality hit the further things are away and the more sounds it has to process at once
So in gw the soun quality feels dogshit
noooo think about the heckin boris players who run on the ground and don't use any of the map vehicles or call in vehicles then complain about the maps being too big
but in 6v6 the sound design is incredible in many aspects
but quality still kinda feels like it's going through some shitty quality degrading filter
they still need to turn down the fucking footstep audio
you already completed season 2?!
The slow aim movement speed compared to MacKay makes it a chore to use any other specialist imo
yes, if only they could make some sort of... mechanized horse, that you wouldn't have to feed or take out for walks and stuff...
I actually dig that idea but they wouldn't do it sadly
Itβs literally the same
They got 0 creativity in how they handle the technology of the near future
just "uhh the boston dynamics dog is in battle now"
wildly impractical to ride unless you're injured
plus it looks more like a cow 
Lmfao
the should add a robo specialist
Send this person to prison.
I mean lots of improvements to be made in 20 years...
So sundance

DICE should add the warthog in 2042 tbh
if they gave the recon the RAM physics, it is halfway to warthog
Facts 
and mechs
Sundance look so good they got redditors feeling confused
would be funny if i could pay the VA for Sundance to say "cope and seethe"
I mean have u seen that dumpy
yeah but her hairline when she braids her hair tho π
idk i put the goggles up on the hairline, looks sick
dice when zero people complain about a feature and they decide to remake it anyway
Redditors when a character can move decently fast
When i saw that sundance booty i knew i was theysexual 
"NO, I REFUSE to play as that stinky Rao to deny enemy stealth helicopters an attack run, I will NOT use the wildcat AA to shred stealth helicopters, DICE should stop being lazy and NERF THEM ALREADY!!! 


"
redditors when anything happens
Sundance looking kinda unflattering in the new event skin tho, tf are they wearing a plastic bag for pants
This discord is not much different in that regard. Just depends on time of day.
thats true too
redditors when good players post clips
honestly, the internet in general
down horrendous π
reddit and twitter
I'm reminded of the twitter comments in that clip that was posted by the BF Twitter of some guy quickscoping a bunch of people
Redditors when the bit is over now
yeah I was surprised by just how many people were complaining in the comments
Oh god, I read those too.
Hold on lemme find the post and i'll read some of the comments
no in fact, they were simply saying 'this isn't battlefield!' and saying 'bf is just cod now', when gameplay like this has practically always existed
nooooo, I want to keep my sanity ;(
One thing is for sure, i want the grapple and wingsuit to return in some form in the next game.
no
Everyone decides their own identity for the Battlefield series, and half of the arguments come down to "No True Scotsman".
Console-PC crossplay as the default is incredibly stupid. Other EA studios figured out a perfect solution to this issue, but alas.
there are vast differences in terms of movement and gunplay, but in none of them is quickscoping or getting streaks seen as 'anti-battlefield'
Found the post
but the reality is that it is physically impossible to please the entire playerbase, there will be some who want one kind of gameplay and others who want a different style of gameplay, so there will always be a point of contention
If BF4 had an fov slider, ran at higher than 900p, and still had official DICE servers up I'd still play that.
Can't deal with the 60fov
Yeah, to Battlefield's credit though, it has always stayed in the same relative space, more or less, in my opinion - when you consider the era of the gaming landscape
It's been consistent in that "not a milsim, but not an arena shooter"
with large battles + vehicles
for starters you've got screen centre aiming, spread to recoil, a slide with less rotation, no traversal sprint to name a few things
"they copied cod" mfs when i take them back in time to when their favourite BF copied cod:
Current director of the Battlefield franchise straight up said DICE strayed to far from what Battlefield is supposed to be with 2042.

"It's interesting that official page sharing cheating content"
"Hit Markers when not aiming at the person, i've screenshotted it here. Might be worth NOT resharing cheaters? He's using Aimbot+silent Aim"
"wow, so much skill get them all from behind"
"and this is exactly why you've lost your core community"
"this is why PC should be seperated from console"
"Sharing cheaters now? Good job! Notice he wasn't even aiming at people at first and still getting hit registers too?"
"This sniper does not kill with one shot"
That's why you move to PC haha
bfv added this stupid thing where the crosshair will shake, and it fires at the crosshair instead of screen centre
i like when people dont know game mechanics
yeah in some aspects it did - but I think that's the result of them trying to make too many changes AT ONCE
BF is simcade sandbox warfare... simply put
yeah, it was honestly a relief to see it reverted to that system
i meant with the comments thing
They never should have removed classes for one, that was a rookie mistake
Like Specialists are ***fine ***if executed well if they were kept more within the class system. It wasn't going to be the reason why the game failed alone.
But they also changed the maps and lacked variety
and they also messed with the vehicle ecosystem, etc.
specifically the last one about the sws not being OHK when it very much does have a 20m OHK range lol
And that's the core of BF, and that core is very much present in 2042 and i love it
I still can't believe that we have 128 players but only two armor per team.
Specialists don't really work well with the whole "arcadey sandbox" gameplay.
Games with specialist characters that work are very much not sandboxes.
We had 4-6 tanks per team in most of the post-launch BFV maps
the worst part about specialists for me were their personalities, and the fact that they took away a fundamental gameplay system for the purpose of making Β£
Did you just reply to yourself haha
I think what theyre doing with the rework in late S3 is where it will be best executed
I think what they're doing with the rework is a bandaid.
because the class divisions, whle technically there, meaning nothing really
If it's how specialists launched, I think it would have been more accepted
Yes, pretty normal to expand on a previous thought
I agree
Right now you can do any team role with any specialist
And imo they are still going to half ass the classes in season 3 by not locking weapons to classes
There's not enough weapons in the game to justify doing that.
To be honest, I care less about that and dont mind the weapon freedom. Weapon choice does not define teamplay role as much as gadgets do
and.... THAT
not enough wepaons
There is actually
weapons shouldn't be class restricted anyway man. except for removing snipers from support
the specialist gadgets themselves are one thing that made them an annoying system. I mean an automated turret? Wallhacks? I hate those
A medic who is locked to healing/resupply/revives but uses an LMG vs an AR vs an SMG is still a support player
The time it's taken them to add Portal guns to AoW is absurd, especially since they don't even work right and don't have 2042 attachments
I swear one intern must be doing it themselves
A medic who can have a rocket launcher is a support AND an engineer, and that was the problem IMO
And don't even have T1 skins
you could have too many "jack of all trades"
which is why the class system re-instroduction will still leave them feeling out of place in my eyes
but it's worth waiting to see
I don't mind th gadgets themselves. BF has always had cool gadgets
Yeah, but when u get to sniper an actual problem arises. A support with a sniper isn't a support anymore, they're just a useless camper sniper with more camping gear
but wallhacks, that's too far
I'll be honest I did not like the all class weapons in BF3 and BF4. I'm glad they removed them for BFV
perhaps
eh Battlefield never had gadgets that approached what the specialists have in 2042
BF2 had an expansion pack with a grappling gun that would leave behind a rope that teammates could climb
So if someone wants to snipe but be the person who resupplies themselves and other snipers with them, they are still closer to support than Recon IMO
yup, and the zipline!
yeah it would be shitty to force one class to purely use snipers
but removing it from one class can be justified
perhaps, but like I said, there is no sniper class π
so I dont mind the weapon freedom
classes to me more signify teamplay role
and thats where gadgets are huge
Outside of maybe Angel, the old lady and Irish none of the specialist gadgets really have a teamwork focus
and why they should be locked
having locked weapons with this existing weapon pool would just be cruel
Nah I don't see it like that. Sundance performs their team role of being a striker/blitz player
2042 is anti-teamwork. It rewards lone wolfing unlike any Battlefield before it
well i hate losing certain specialist/gadget combos but that's the whole point of this thing, to restrict things in order to create proper class roles, and restricting sniper away from support class is part of that

100%
locked weapons does create an interesting team dynamic in terms of where classes are positioned on the frontline, which in turn ensures a constant loop that involves all those classes

I hope it gives vehicles more life too. Tanks especially have been hurt incredibly due to any soldier being a threat
anyone can have M5s or AAs or C5
Plus now thanks to Lis you can't even hide behind cover to repair
yeah, thanks Lis.
2042 has the worst vehicle play of any Battlefield game
Seriously, giving her TV missiles was a mistake
It should take 5 C5 to kill a tank, 4 to kill a Wildcat
I do think too many classes have C5 in the proposed system
Should spawn with a max of 3
don't like 3 classes still have C5?
yes tbh
Did they release an overview of their proposed class layout?
yeah somewhere lemme find it
The tank main cannon and the Wildcat 40mm and 57mm should do more damage to infantry.
i know, i explained what my thoughts on that are
The 57mm should have the same more splash damage, right now I think it's 3-4 splash shots to kill, you need a direct hit to kill
yeah so Assault + Recon get C5... so Assault, Engineer, and Recon all can still have viable vehicle destruction
Y
I think Recon should not have C5 access IMO
Because if any player can handle every scenario, it encourages a "best in slot" mentality
Ur a support sniper? Oof bruh, i guess this is why class rework was asked for, so that can't happen
Rock Paper Scissors doesnt work if you can throw both Rock and Paper at the same time
Then u have nothing to worry about man
Weapons wont be a problem for you though, you can still use what you want weapon wise
so you can choose your engagement distance
They won't restrict weapons, except potentially to fix problem area. Assault with smg is perfectly fine
BFV support and Assault could have anti-tank mines and the lunge mine, but only the Assault could have dynamite
I don't believe the Recon had any anti-vehicle ability at all
Which is how it should be imo
yeah which is why I'd prefer they dont have C5. Still subject to change hopefully
Medics and recons should not be able to challenge tanks
This is the most recent list (again, may change)
Assault - Smoke Grenade Launcher, C5 Explosives, IBA Armor Plate
Support - Ammo Crate, Smoke Grenade Launcher, Medical Crate, M18 Claymore
Engineer - Anti-Tank Mine, Recoilless M5, FXM-33 AA Missile, FGM-148 Javelin, EOD Bot
Recon - T-UGS, Prox Sensor, SOFLAM, C5 Explosives, Tracer Dart Gun
the only ones that should be worried are snipers who wanna use support class
I found out through some testing the other day that it does the same amount of damage as a side on shot with the gustav, regardless of angle unless it is down towards the turret, where it pulls of a glitch shot and does a little more
In addition to Recon losing C5, I think Support should give Claymores to Recon
Oh that's going to be fun, snipers with infinite ammo and infinite claymores
honestly fuck claymores, why even add those to the game
This is why weapons need class locked
and move irish deployable cover to support 
ha let anyone use it you mean?
we know why
and make only the APS Irish specific?
Its not a bad idea actually
yeah i know why, doesn't mean i can't hate it.
They need to up the aim movement speed for everyone to be close to MacKay's and find a new passive bonus for MacKay
oh I hate it too
I don't think that's necessary ha
Its so fucking slow
lightened stock moment
Even BFV has a faster aim movement speed on average
ADS is meant to be a risk/reward though. You expose yourself, but also tighten your accuracy
isnt it weapon dependent too?
Its one reason why I find the gunplay in 2042 to be lackluster, even after the latest patch
LMGs are slower ADS move speed I think
since I prefer tracking scenarios i'd personally like to see a faster strafe speed across the board
ADS shouldn't be a risk-reward thing, not when it's the only reasonable method of engaging enemies.
right but thats where I think Battlefield stays away from being an arena shooter, where it's constant ADS + movement
It forces a choice of when and where you pause for a moment
so if you do it in the middle of a field you're probably dead
Honestly why not make it more of an arena shooter. It's already very arcadey.
My problem is it's slower than BFV. This is one thing that should be consistent between games
I'm sure we've had this convo before and I'll just say my same answer of, it's not what BF has traditionally done, and a lot a long-term fans would probably not enjoy it as much
i haven't used hipfire at all in all the time i've played, ads is just consistent and that's what I need
when Zampella talks about what straying away from what BF is, moving it to arena shooter would be... a significant departure
even if it is a bit arcadey, which is true and really always has been
To be fair, what Battlefield has traditionally done is not always the best idea.
A real arcade shooter has no penalty for hipfire, like the original Star Wars Battlefront games and the 2015 Battlefront.
Iirc Battlefield 1943 didn't have a hipfire penalty either
No not always, but if the game changes too much it's not always good for the identity. It's never going to be able to hang with a direct competition to CoD
is it not just considered an arena shooter, but on a big map
so BF kind of needs to carve its own space
it could, especially with the direction MW22 is taking.
where it's trying to be a more tactical shooter.
it is funny how MW2 seems to be moving in BFs direction
again, I wonder if they see it as a market they could tap into
it's funny but it's also terrible
There aren't any good popular tactical shooters on the market
R6S is trash
MW2 being more tactical is welcomed imo
idk what yall are tolkin bout
But what we really need is for Sony to revive SOCOM.
I'd probably enjoy it more, but idk if I could bring myself to playing CoD again after not having played it for so long π
I think it's dogshit, scrapping what potential MW19 had in an attempt to cater to the realism focused "tactical" crowd.
ok so this is a perfect example though
they want their cod subseries to be distinct and mw is choosing to be tactical one
you're a CoD fan generally, but are upset that it's changing so much right? @eager spire
Its funny, Battlefield 1942, Call of Duty 1, and SOCOM 1 all launched the same year
I haven't been a CoD fan since Black Ops 3, really.
Right ok.. so THAT FEELING you have
is exactly why Battlefield shouldn't steer away so much from its space
because longterm BF fans will feel the same way you do
By 2005 both COD and SOCOM had added large objective based modes with vehicles
i'm just confused why they'd change the game's design so drastically, cod from an outside perspective has always been about fast paced gameplay
So devs were copying Battlefield first
Imagine advanced warfare 2 has ground war or breakthrough mode 
Battlefield has always had immense potential as a franchise and the space it carved out, it just never quite got the same popularity as CoD
Advanced warfare 2 ground war would be interesting AF
Again, this might be Microsoft/Activision trying to capitalize on that BF crowd
or maybe as devs that type of game excites them more
Activision cared more about COD than EA did Battlefield
I think so too
they gave it substantially better marketing, etc.
They gave them the resources to do yearly releases since the start

and CoD also hit the console market earlier if I recall
2042 marketing was on point tho
Battlefield didn't come to console until Battlefield 2 Modern Combat in 2005 but it wasn't that popular
COD came to console in 2004 with COD1 Finest Hour
COD2 launched on 360 alongside PC and was insanely popular
ah so closer than I thought then
but yeah CoD had always had the console market more
Battlefield didn't really achieve popularity on console until 2010 with Bad Company 2
yup
I'd say BF3 was also when it truly took off and went "mainstream"
with consoles
6th gen console multiplayer was a different ball of wax, it was essentially PC multiplayer. Server browsers, PC hosted and rental servers, etc
I'm super pissed we've regressed on that front, again
I'll never forgive DICE for not having an RSP for BFV and outright removing the server browser for 2042
I remember buying a year of a Star Wars Battlefront II server for $60 from Art of War Central for the PS2 version of the game.
I'll be honest, I'm probably in the minority but I don't mind no server browser for the core BF experience.
I recall going back to the BF2 days and spending so much friggen time trying to find a good STOCK server experience, without mod abuse (ideally a DICE official server), and all of the maps, stock settings, etc.
I do hate how the 2042 matchmaking will match you into insanely dumb matches though, like <50 tickets remaining
But in general I wasted more time trying to find a good stock experience without mod abuse in the browser in those older games than I do now
plus it helps cut down on team stacking and all that
If the match is nearly over, I don't care if new players aren't filling in and it whittles down to bots, the match is almost over anyway - just get those players in a new fresh match
The solution would be to have plenty of stock DICE servers and make it so only stock rule servers can be matchmade into
I suppose BF3/BF4 (and others) did that too huh
if supported with a good team balance between rounds, I'd be fine with that
I just in general don't see as big of a need for a browser when dealing with stock experiences though. For custom experiences, totally - it's needed.
maybe the crux of the issue though truly, is that custom experiences get relegated to Portal only and often don't have the same degree of progression
The problem is no server browser and no rental servers puts the games at the mercy of EA/DICE to die when they want them to die.
I just want the ability to select the map and gamemode, as well as actually have a community feeling
It also destroys the community aspect of the game
Communities would develop around servers, encouraging games to be played for longer than execs want.




π
Any way to unlock weapon attachments faster? Any game mode recommendations?
Usually AVG 40+ kills per game, but sometimes as I'm using new weapons I can't do as well with out the extended mag.
hardcore tdm servers with full progression 
game plays rly good after recent updates imho
Itβs against AI
Yes
Hmm I may try it tomorrow, probably be boring tho

Speaking of weapon skins, low-key tempted to buy one either the scar or AK
Run into a million of them every game
Yeah I know and k30 aswell
Yuppp, love being killed half way across the map by someone using the k30
K30 ontop none stop
m16 need weapon skin
is it even possible for the next battlefield to be any good
All vault weapons need skins
Most of the talent is gone, but it has a new director .
So maybe?
people are camping house in battlefield
Yes
I want the t1 on my p90
i want all black skins so gun can look gun metal black instead of wierd gray color
lIke that k30 skin
Thatd be cool
were getting all white skins in liquidator event though
Makes me want to have a pure white gun
lol
Lit
Is this like, do you have time to talk about our lord and savior ar15
yes
lIke I think the dm7 should be full auto
its so sleek and shoots so crispy
if the bsv can be an AR and smh why can't the dm7
smg
its the perfect looking rife, tactical, light, and packs a punch
if only it was full auto
hEllo?
Dm7 would be so OP
SFAR is really strong
Also DM7 in full auto would be sick, maybe it can only be switched into full auto with the close combat mags equipped? That would make it pretty fair imo
it's like a 4-5 hit kill or more with close combat rounds at medium to longer range which is pretty standard for ARs
Sorry, got pulled away for IRL stuff. Uh, the thing about this is, there are different types of longtime battlefield fan, and frankly, some of the ideas they have of what Battlefield should be are frankly terrible. By and large, I feel like people think Battlefield is more than it really is, like people think it was this massive immersive milsim type thing, but it really wasn't, it never has been, officially.
Like, I see some of the things that people who think that way suggest and frankly they all seem terrible from a gameplay perspective.
yes exactly
LIke?
The DM7 is supposed to be the Daniel Defense DDM4 V7 PRO which is an AR-15 style carbine chambered in 5.56x45 NATO. I think it's also not designed with a select-fire receiver because it's intended for civilian and law enforcement use. AKA, it can't be full-auto. Guess they were trying to keep it as accurate to the real life weapon as possible.
The in game model has a selct fire switch
So does the civilian version IRL
It just serves as a safety switch if I'm not mistaken
full auto with cqb rounds would be awesome
agreed
if the bsv can do it so can the dm7

βjust give every gun automatic fireβ is kindaβ¦ not interesting
its the dm7 specifivaly
Well how many people know their favorite weapon has an alternate firing mode
True, the BSV-M is technically two weapons combined in one. They simply mushed them together because they wanted the functionality of both. So it would've been even simpler to just make the 2042 version of the DDM4 V7 have a full-auto option
it deserves full auto
Is there a specific setting to turn on to use my controller on pc?
It makes perfect sense with the DM7 though. It's literally just an AR-15 carbine
i think its plug and play
All the inputs are like random buttons its weird
i do feel like this kinda highlights a flaw of the weapon customisation and the plus system, i do like the idea behind the plus system but in a way it limits what customisation you can add
Controller mapping
?
compared to something like MW gunsmith
Oh yeah big time. I'm really sad we can't have a grip and a laser sight on our ARs. It really makes no sense
Wdym

so like it makes sense for the bsv to be able to function like the vss and the as val, itβs basically the same gun, MW also took that approach - the thing with the plus system is because you can have smg and sniper/dmr ammo available to switch between it has this weird mix
It's mostly people asking for a change that would benefit them so they don't have to learn mechanics
But then those same people call for realism
More players in a match, we've seen the effects of it in gameplay now and aside from the people who prefer the more chaotic nature of things for whatever reason, i imagine a lot of people would agree that it's a detriment to both gameplay and map design. I've also seen people claim that Hardcore should be how Battlefield is played, cause it's "more realistic". Hardcore is a fundamentally unbalanced mode and it shouldn't exist.
Yeah, i see that a lot, really.
compared to MW where you either have it set up with DMR rounds and then whatever other attachments or SMG rounds and your attachments
too many players, ill give u that
but hc is by far the most balanced mode
all guns r good in hc
and it takes skill
real skill
Tbh, all arcade fps games should look to what cod has done with weapon customization
this also isnβt supposed to be like i think MW is incredible, i donβt enjoy it much but i think the gunsmith system is a cool mechanic
Like its crazy, semi auto lmg is great when using long range attachments
bruh
Why is the menu so buggyt with a controller
its true
Like quite literally half the buttons just dont work
The game isnt tracking my progress :(
Cuz controllers are for consoles
Which why would you want to use a Controller on pc
I'd love to use m and k on my console
Because its crossplay?
Crossplay doesn't mean that
uhh
And because vehicles suck ass on pc
Vehicles suck in general
And why would they supportt controllers if it doesnt work
You are just a very negative person
i use the old controls scheme for vehicles
Where?
How
Sorry I should just be blind and positive
controls-> buttons -> alternate or something youll see it
You're the only one allowed to be negative
for vehicles
My fault
like pilot
Hardcore is by far the most balanced mode
Okay but here's the thing about that, Hardcore is literally equalizing everything and removing all other aspects of skill from the game. It removes all intended balance, therefore, it is not balanced.
i think a neat implementation of both gunsmith esque customisation and a plus system type mechanic would be dividing them into parts and attachments - parts being things you canβt change without a full field strip, attachments being bits that you just wack on some picatinny rail or mlock or whatever, and those are the things you keep in your plus menu
Yeah I feel the same way. Played MW (2019) a bit and it was somewhat fun but I'll always be a battlefield player. The gunsmith is my absolute favorite part about the game and MW2's attention to detail is awfully enticing combined with the knowledge that the gunsmith system is returning...
it is too, its super tactical methodic and intense thus adding a layer of having to be careful and smart with all guns being good equals balance
which probably does kinda end up a bit overcomplicated and potentially just keeps the plus system for the sake of it, but hey i do like the idea of tuning your weapon on the fly
me too
It's super tactical methodic
Probably in an organized setting, but in public lobbies? No it isn't.
If every shot is a kill, there is no balance
it is
Indeed
blueberry lives matter
but the plus system that lets you tune on the fly, shouldn't also severely limit your ability to customize your weapon in the menus before going into a match
it just does still feel a bit weird that you slap an smg mag into an AR and itβs apparently also a full conversion kit
dice hardcore
Hard-core is where you go unlock shit shit that requires kills
It doesn't change how movement works, it doesn't change how gunplay works, it only effects your health and HUD, it doesn't make the game any more tactical than it already is.
Yup
but like clipping off a foregrip and replacing it with a different style? yeah go ahead
does cuz now u arent running around jumpshotting
Yes the fuck I am.
It really doesn't matter your attachment loadout in hard core
stead ur peaking corners and being patient
Because there's nothing stopping me from doing so.
Spray and pray and still do the same damage as a sniper
go run into someoes sights then
u prob suck at hc
It's not hard.
In any setup
Hardcore is not hard at all.
who wants to be good at hc
No you just got proven wrong and now rely on jokes
@violet meteor not exactly, 60 HP still requires more than one shot on most guns except for bolt actions. Bolt actions get massively buffed in Hardcore, cause they don't need to headshot to oneshot out to the head.
I'm speaking more to portal hc
from medium range
Those 8000000000000 servers lol
Hardcore basically removes the difference between Shotguns and Sniper Rifles.
if i wanted an actual hardcore experience iβd play something built from the ground up for it, if i wanted the experience that battlefield hardcore provided iβd play idk quake or some shit lol
Quake would require more skill.
Mmmm quake
hc takes skill u dont have
What skill
true fps skill
Point
Shoot
Such skill
Hc requires no skill
does too
The ceiling is the below the floor you died on
What skill does Hardcore require that Core doesn't?
core cuts you slack with so many shots to kill somone
i think tuning stuff so you have like 80 health or something can add something but the average hardcore server is just slap on some dumb health + bullet speed modifiers so you just point and click once because everyone dies in one bullet and itβs borderline hitscan
60 health is what were talking about
so you actually have to aim and control your fire rather than getting a single shot on target
also its like apex takes no skill, apex ttk is so high ud have to be a child to think apex takes skil
hang on no that says itβs the other way round
If you're saying hc requires skill then you're not talking about weapons
Talking about doing anything you can to not get shot once
its like two or threebut the trick is to react faster than them or catch them of guard
hc rewards faster reaction time\
π€·ββοΈπ
im the hc advocate here to dispell any ill speak of the best preset
That's not true in the slightest.
win a game then
fastest ttk in apex is kraber headshot and even then its a down state
yes cause it's a BR
apex cuts u so much slack with shields and ttk and down state its ob a childs game
even arena have shields
You're ridiculous. You have no concept of what actually takes skill.
but i do like the notion that βfaster ttk means more skillβ i think itβs very funny and completely one dimensional
csgo takes skill hc takes skill apex doesnt
Oh yeah, Quake, well known for it's incredibly fast TTK
if arenas didnt have shields then yeah
Love it
BlackHair would fucking hate arena shooters.
actually does
No it doesn't.
When i say arena shooters i am not talking about Overwatch and CoD.
halo
quake has 1 shot rocket kills
No it doesn't?
At the very least, 2 shot rockets.
And that varies depending on how much armor someone has.
Like, you need to understand, you are not at all qualified to talk about what takes skill when you admitted yourself that you larp on BF Hardcore.
You don't know anything.
yeah so what i larp, u saying that is basically a hate crie, and also i am really good at fps games and played a big variety of em so i think i am qualified
I've played a big variety of FPS games as well, but from what you've said and claimed here today, you don't know what you're talking about.
coming from the one whoas scared of a hc lobby like its the 6 ft end at the pool
If you were actually good at video games you would know that having a low TTK actually takes less skill, because there isn't as much outplay potential, there's no need for tracking targets, there's no need for target prioritization.
Bold of you to assume i haven't played hardcore, I've experienced it.
theres way more outplay potential in low ttk just take overwatch, somone comes from behind u jump double jump back 1 shot headshot
boom
prolly sucked at it the way u talk about it
ok, but hc takes more skill
I did that with a burst AK12.
Oh still at it
every gun good in hc
burst ak 12 like one burst kill
Agree to disagree
A burst AK-12. It was easy as fuck.
1 burst kill

Nah more like 2 bursts when you take spread into account
You're not gonna convince each other
if ur aim is bad
This was literally with a broken right mouse button, fucking flickering ADS. I didn't need really good aim to do this. It was easy.
Lol
u should see my controller with drift
Man I love getting beamed across the map by K30s and G57s.
I don't know if I can buy another Battlefield with unrestricted crossplay.
oof
do you have crossplay on
i just drove from spawn to A back to C and to E without seeing a single player on hourglass, besides in vehicles
guess ill leave and and find another map lmao
thats like 4 minutes of not a soul

"EA is launching the new EA app, which will replace Origin on Windows PC. EA says it is faster and more reliable.
Origin players: Your games and progress will be transferred over."
Is this a thing for EA's games on Steam yet? Or I still have to use Origin thing?
u c wat i wrote with emoticons?
Thatβs a good question, I feel rA desktop would be prioritised over origin if you had both installed
had both installed before, for game pass and normal EA games. Both used to be refuse to run unless one got uninstalled but they fix it. I want to get rid the Origin because I can't disable overlay on steam version and has to purposely break their file just so the overlay can't run
dont u need like a tag or something
Ah so maybe youβd have to uninstall one in order for steam to load those games properly?
yeah, used to. If I want game pass to run game I have to uninstall Origin, but If I want to play game that only work with Origin, I have to uninstall EA desktop
i just play on xbox i dek wat ur goin on about
they even have some kind of message compare EA Desktop and Origin talking about two heroes can't co-exist something like that 
The EA App is dogshit, i've tried installing it, it literally would not let me log in.
What games currently only work on origin?
Wolves can't use computers
can't remember, but atleast I know If your EA's games are on Steam, you must use Origin like I'm having BF2042 on Steam right now. But If you got xbox game pass you have to use EA desktop
Wait do you have to reinstall your games when switching launchers?
I can just let the game launcher reallocate the game folder after I reinstall the launcher back. But as I said they fixed it so now It's not a problem anymore so you can have both installed without any problem
but I still hate Origin because for reason I can't completely disable it's overlay so I have to break their igo64.dll to break the overlay
I've never had to deal with Origin's overlay. It just never comes up.
Is anyone else getting kicked for EAC policy violations for no reason? I dont use hacks, and my aim proves how trash I really am. I got kicked from an AI Breakthrough Solo/Co-op match for cheating against bots? Any fix for this?
it work for normal Origin, just not if your game is on Steam. Even if you have the overlay origin disable in setting
Strange
Iβll test that out tomorrow to see if Iβve got it but Iβve literally never even opened the overlay
but anyway my death wish is them get rid of Origin 
origin is the OG launcher lol
Idk how but I made 1200 dollars in sales calls tonight.
Other than the UI being weird sometimes the Origin launcher is pretty good now
Its not the nightmare it was a couple years ago
During the origin install process there's an option to disable the overlay entirely, its a stupid spot for it but it's there. They should have an option to disable it in game like any other overlay does still but at least you don't have to fiddle with the .dll stuff to do it
It works, unlike the EA App.
EA app is a dumpster fire
I hate the EA App.
I just use it to buy and play games, no point using any friend features or whatnot so I for one donβt have any real opinions of it
When it comes to gaming with friends I'll say steam still does it smoother than most but I'm not usually adding people on steam anymore anyways with discord existing
I don't even add people on Xbox
Actually one thing I was doing with origin was adding any good pilots I come across in bf
Or just good players in general after we chat about mechanics and whatnot for a few rounds
Is battlefield 5 still active
Only bf game that is dying is Hardline sadly.
Ok thanks
Itβs 8 dollars on Microsoft store and I was planning on getting it
BF hardline died ages ago
The americanos donβt like this game. Look at how died this chat is in the americanos hours.
there is an option to disable Origin overlay, just that It does nothing if you launch your game through Steam
They have a different taste
If you disable it during the install process like I said that's the only way I know how to disable it if you're launching via steam
Its inconvenient that you can't just generally disable it and you have to do specific shit to keep it off tho
I really wish you didn't just unlock all the attachments and that for the vault weapons
or If the process to disable it that painful that I have to reinstall the launcher just to have it work effectively, then I might as well just delete igo64, samething that completely disable the overlay
I don't really mind it tbh
That's fair, I just try and avoid deleting files if possible it makes hiccups sometimes
Imagine if they actually did the weapons so it can have camos and that
I really would like the vault weapons to be able to use 2042 attachments
I still found at least 1 or 2 servers on xbox active
I mean what's the reason why the vault weapons can't have camos ?
Would take up unnecessary time
How is it unnecessary
Because these weapons are coming to the main game so why not
whats the best attachments for m5a3
I really hope they add the G3 that's literally the only vault weapon i want
Been wanting the G3 in AOW since the game released i want it so badly
holy shit man 4th time this game with the ADS bug after exiting a vehicle 
im logging off and getting ready for dnd smh i was doing good too
@ripe hedge
nice they brought back the crossbow+knife gammode
but crossbow more fun and takedowns are lame af
why is melee a three shot now wtf
maybe its just this mode
hmm, It seem I don't have the option to disable Origin overlay while in installation process. And now they make it more complicated because by installed EA app it also uninstall Origin, BF2042 still not available on EA app, only the EA pass Pro version is on EA app.
just dont use EA App, make sure the game isnt running, go into origin and you should be able to change in-game settings
you can rename a file in game settings to disable overlay
what if I want to run game on xbox game pass then it force use ea app? meanwhile I also have game on Steam that use Origin only until they do something about it
that how I always do, delete igo64
you cant
since ea app is still technically beta, i dont think other launchers support it
well technically i dont think the game itself supports it
cause 2042 on steam is built with origin, and hence, launches with origin.
but because they said the app is left the beta phase, so i thought it otherwise guess it still the same thing
still hasnt taken fully over for origin yet
if only it could be remastered dead space, no more origin or ea app. Just simple account linking for data sharing and that it
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
i do hope ea app gets working and working well soon, much better looking than origin when i last used it
i do also wish that 2042 and other games used it over origin, but idk guess we gotta just wait
Remember that software EA stated that would read your computerβs hardware and software to detect cheats?
Pepperridge Farm remembers
Easy Anti Cheat?
Damn look terrible
what looks terrible
seriusly?
punkbuster?
Welcome to Even Balance, Inc., home of the PunkBuster anti-cheat system.
looks like it hasnt been used since bfh
what
what
what?
sounds like a major skill issue

On born
every anti-cheat software do that
is there no halloween event announced
well the community doesnt like cool so it wont happen
i dont think battlefield ever had things like helloween stuff added
imagine Santa Claus skin when it's christmas? I can't 
still waiting on my christmas tank
Common community L

No fun boot lickers
Trick or treat, before Halloween comes they better give us something
well they better give us AK-47 back aswell
Pumpkin head dozer would be lit
if it says error you just gotta wait a few minutes
i think it took mine like 5 minutes the last time i bought for some reason. idk if the update messed it up or what
lmao
can u still get the guns from the old bp?
ty i dont see that, its doesnt appear
yeah idk how it works tho. i heard you can do it through assignments
ahh
you dont have a store?
its blank screen there
how the hell do you have an odd number of boins
did you buy a fucked up bundle?

since the bundles been shit ive bought 1 or 2 items per





i cant even buy bf points
