#technology
1 messages ยท Page 461 of 1
CL163200 is equivalent to the now released bin's on DDR5
CL163600, doesn't exist in performance class for DDR5 (yet) in any meaningful quantity
Ahhh
"MSRP" are simply manufacturer recommended prices, they don't apply to general consumers
there's no law saying they need to exist, it's simply price guidance for AIBs to implement for factoring in price categories that they need for their costs on their end
other way round, ryzen 6000 was never skipped, Zen 2 was AMDs first major entry into the mobile SOC market for laptops blah blah which is why the naming rule got segmented, simple rule is +2 from each generation from 3000 is the desktop platform, which they've stuck by, ryzen 6000 is the Zen 3 equivalent for laptops
+2 for each generation on the desktop side and +1 for the architecture on the laptops is how their naming convention works
ryzen 9000 will be Zen 5 blah blah
yes, but rates of 7000 doesn't matter on DDR4, literally, the key architecture change of moving away from synchronous executions rates is highly critical to DDR5 over DDR4 for speeds as fast as that, the reason that performance flatlines, and even, gets worse on DDR4 at exceptional clocks is because you are bottlenecked on a hardware level
so the future proofing argument is actually, technically true on DDR5, you are much better off buying some cheapo kit (cheap by scalper prices) of DDR5 than some super heavily binned version of ddr4
I think I might just skip this gen and wait for everything to become cheaper
you'll be waiting a while
I can wait.
a year?
Yes. Though I'm aware things won't settle that quickly and easily
ehh it's not that straightforward
in the way you're thinking
prices right now are actually not that half bad in terms of hardware shortage rates compared to history, waiting for the next generation means you are paying higher scalped prices next year
not anytime soon, in terms of product development
next generation will be even worse than now
RTX 4080 will be scalped worse than the 3080 and in lower supply
people waiting for a shortage to stop are hoping for a dream, it's not ending anytime soon
or being alleviated
What's the primary reason for the shortage? Just covid?
it isn't in AMDs or nvidias interest for it to end, and they will do what they can to ensure it can continue
Crypto mining is still in too high of demand for prices to come down
no
Covid has near nothing to do with the shortage minus some mediocre product shortages like MOSFETs and neither does mining
miners make up a tiny category of all GPUs sold and nothing has changed from that
it's to do with supply wafer capacity shortages at TSMC for node demand and it's getting worse not better
Gamers buy only 1 GPU, miners buy thousands
they don't buy thousands, this is a misconception
the majority of miners are actually small time miners
aka, regular people
they make up the majority of contributions on the Blockchain and high scale operations have always been tiny in terms of their capacity
it is little to no difference in terms of tens of millions of supply per year
GPU production is so much higher than previous years yet still in very low supply lmao
people blaming miners are looking for excuses to avoid where the real problem is, because things such as industry demand isn't something people can wrap their head around that easily
and it's not an easy answer either so just look where the nearest second best excuse is, convenient for right now it's miners
Guess in that same term scalpers too
well scalpers are a problem, but what people don't think about is that the majority of scalpers are again regular people
me and you, because nobody wants to admit they themselves would like to take advantage for their own profit from such a situation
Human nature is selfishness
Just out right ridiculous that these people can hoard these things
not a new problem
Do amd cards get scalped just as badly?
has happened literally every single generation
ehh not as bad as Nvidia
AMD GPUs are in low production because gaming consoles and CPUs are higher priority
because the PC market has been indoctrinated for years into this false narrative of Nvidia good AMD bad bs
and still is
Well good for people like you then!
cracking a nut like Nvidia is much more difficult than intel
people aren't smart and the false majority belief penetrates much worse than intel
mostly because the GPU market has been dominated much longer than the CPU market
Nvidia is extremely difficult to compete against since they rule the datacenter
That's their most profitable market
Hopefully Intel will catch up but considering due to how innefficient they are I doubt they'd do soon
eh Intel's problems are self inflicted they will always suffer from this until 2025
up to that point it's AMDs gain
AMD literally depended on a loan from Ferrari to build themselves back up
If they simply didn't suck so much power up would you be a bit more serious about them?
it's not that simple
Or is it more than that
they can't simply just not suck more power up
to do that they need to willingly give up pursuing things like higher clock speeds and at the same time give up gains in the gaming market
Intel's power problems today were predicted over a decade ago now, people wonder why it happens, it isn't that difficult to figure out
Guess it's a thing where you gotta keep going otherwise you fizzle out
it's a microarchitecture level problem
Intel's microarchitecture is built on skylake, and has been more or less the exact same for over 15 years
it was never designed for this type of scalability because the core series when it came out didn't require it
wind back time intel dominated in performance because the core series architecture was great, it's why AMD excel today because the Zen architecture was built from scratch
Pentium was mediocre, was never Intel's main focus either
happens to be a lot of intel nowadays
and they're still using that microarchitecture, and will be till 2025
I got pentium and phenom mixed up -.-
phenom was a straight failure
Pentium was helped by the laptop market, it had that at least
Lunar Lake is new microarch?
Haha phenom 2 go brr lol. So intel requires a new motherboard every what, 4 years?
I thought it was Alder, Raptor, Meteor and Lunar
So Ryzen 10000 competitor
9000
every year pretty much
it isn't like AMD where you can scale performance linearly with efficiency so can use the same socket
Zen 5 is 8000 series in 2023, Zen 5+ or Zen 6 is 9000 series in 2024
Intel's power consumption is entirely unpredictable (core series plagues it)
Every year wtf
Zen 5 is ryzen 9000, 8000 is Zen 4 for laptops
Zen 6, Zen 7, etc
Zen 5 will face Meteor-Lake
something they "did" do better was with the monolithic die
but that's going away, has already
What is that?
it's how the CPU is manufactured
ryzen uses a process called chiplets for their design and intel (used) essentially one massive die to create the chip
but it's prohibitively expensive and costly so intel are moving over to the same approach
Power limits of Zen 4 are much higher than previous gens, might see comparable power draw to Intel
Theyre copying it in due of convenience alright, but how did mono do so well?
What did it do so well
monolithic wasn't a new concept
I hope you don't mind these questions
every manufacturer did it, it was the conventional approach to hardware design
well, old approach, now
Nvidia AMD intel etc all used it
the problem is monolithic on new nodes is exceptionally expensive because of the failure rate that they have
Ahh got it
think of it this way, it's like buying a piece of concrete trying to find gold inside it, but the only thing you're wanting is the gold
and the newer type of concrete has less gold
and the newer concrete is more expensive than the last, you see the problem
Yea
Im curious to see how hot these new amd CPUs will run as the mention of power earlier
RX 6500XT aka Navi 24 is on 6nm because a small chip on a newer node will have much better yields than a larger chip
thermals isn't nearly as much of a problem for AMD compared to intel
their chiplet design means they can allow for these types of high heat with no issue (which is why ryzen excels at higher than "normal" voltages)
Intel's problem is because the chip is more condensed there is little to no room for high concentrations of heat (because it will fail literally)
When I did research for the 5800x I was really scared due to how hot it ran and what a good fan was for it
But... yeah
what you're probably not aware of is the cores themselves are physically in different segments on ryzen
whereas they (were) on one location on intel
Its more even than concentrated
it's what CCX means, core complex
as in, a complex of cores together
ryzen uses a design of multiple CCXs to allow for the cores to communicate with each other, meaning each CCX has much more room for heat because they aren't all together in one place compared to Intel's CPU design
^
kinda wish they didnt use tsmc for their gpus
Nvidia will move over aswell to a chiplet design aswell
yeah
eh well Intel's node is garbage you put that inside a GPU you're going to get space heaters even worse than Nvidia
current compared to the closest second best being, Samsung
which, is like comparing a jaguar and lion in a race
yeah TSMC is light years ahead of intel and Samsung it's pretty miserable, but it won't change for probably over even 5 years from now
sadly
2nd gen Intel Arc GPUs will have chiplets and maybe even 3D stacking, comes out 1H 2023
Intel will release a new generation of GPUs every year, unlike AMD and Nvidia who do it every 2 years
they removed q1 2022 from their website for arc

yeah I'm not expecting intel to release a new generation every year
it's an ambition, but it's basically not happening
Arc GPUs were originally planned for 2020 but that was a claim from 2019
precisely
unless they intend to paper launch each generation which that would be very stupid, that timeline for turnaround is a pipedream
it'll take them a few years at a minimum to get their driver stack right nevermind actual products coming out
In 2019 Intel head GPU designer Raja even stated that Intel GPUs will tackle the mid-range at around the $200 mark in 2020
It's 2022 now

koduri has a history of over anticipating things people inside AMD hated him for it
Raja is probably blacklisted from Radeon 
Although Vega wasn't really bad
In fact Vega was a big success for enterprise stuff
Vega is still used in CDNA
absolutely not
he didn't make vega
koduri was the brain child behind Navi, as much as the internal drama he made internally because he's a selfish person who was wanting to be the CEO of RTG, he's a great designer
he took a lot of shit because of his bs again over marketing of Vega as a Volta competitor, but he didn't make it
Vega 56 matches or beats GTX 1080 these days
I think the HBM2 in Vega is what made it futureproof because of memory bandwidth
eh it's that and Vega was ahead of its time, it's a PS3 situation of GPUs basically
the "fine wine AMD" trope was always true
HD 7970 proved that
AMD always had a problem of trying to engineer radical solutions to advance performance, and they did work, but they were never an intel or Nvidia in the market which could force it's adoption
which is why Vega was seen as a laughing stock, for years even
Vega was a joke because of pricing
the actual architecture is great, but they were proprietary solutions
good luck trying to get developers to turn them on when nobody used your GPUs to begin with
Vega 56 was priced like $70 higher than a GTX 1070 in 2017 and performed similar or worse while consuming a lot more power
Nowadays it performs a lot better
thank AMD realising they had to give a shit about their driver stack before 6000 hit the market
pretty much the entire development team got axed for their driver maintenance for incompetence
did the same thing with their marketing division aswell
Bro, I mean clock almost near 7000 on DDR5
DDR5 Hynix Ic
oh gotcha
Also intel power efficiency is better than zen3 for now. Zen4 will prob be better.
Is a Minigun always externally powered?If a rotary gun is not externally powered,isn't it a Minigun?Doesn't a Minigun use the same propellant as firearms?
Hardware unbox tested the 12700 with 65w power limit and it beat 5800X in almost everything and tied it in gaming
It's an electric motor that rotates it
Hence the huge battery they come with
Or vehicle mounts
Ryzen uses tsmn 12nm IO with tsmc 7nm node. Intel uses Intel 10nm aka intel 7 (which is slightly denser than tsmc 7nm). Intel has surpassed Zen3 in power efficiency. This is why Intel is hyped about their 12th gen mobile chips.
@quick locust ah ok thanks for the informations,if I'm correct,Minigun is not a firearm and is always externally powered
It is a firearm?
It's just the electric motor that rotates the assembly which makes it cycle
bit of an odd claim lol
it isn't for up for debate who's more efficient than the other, Zen is just more efficient clock for clock
Nope
and gaming performance is a total bad measurement for measuring efficiency
like absolutely terrible
Ampere best for clock for clock efficiency
no, it's not
12700
you've said this numerous times and it's just false
It's not false lol
Ampere does great in effiency
Look at the benchmarks
(Not nvidia's ampere but the company ampere)
perhaps actually find a way to measure efficiency
because gaming performance isn't measuring efficiency
Did you look at the video at all?
yes I've seen HWUB's video of ADL lol
and had you paid attention PL limits is not how you test efficiency
especially not using a game
Gaming performance is actually the worst workload you can use to measure power draw
^
Yeah
Yeah but 12700 best 5800x in non gaming as well
I wasn't talking about gaming
Yall literally didn't watch the video

It literally yeeted a 5800X in cinebench at 65W
12700 has more cores too
not sure if you actually paid attention for how CPU efficiency is measured by IPC lol
because this isn't it
total fantasy you're conjuring up
because that's how you measure CPU efficiency per clock
not PL stages
That's where Ampere does pretty good
Better than Epyc
Although lower clocks in normal use
Stock vs stock, core vs core, an Alder-Lake P-core will draw more than 2x the power of a Zen 3 core
yeah this isn't up for dispute
and anyone measuring 'CPU efficiency' on power targets has 0 clue how efficiency is measured to begin with
Zen's only disadvantage in efficiency is the I/O die consumes more power than Intel's I/O
That's only it
yeah unfortunately IF massive heat with constant communication
I'm confused then how did a 65W 12700 can go win a 5800X with 105W
because you totally misunderstand how efficiency on a CPU is measured
frame rate has nothing to do with it PL targets are entirely arbitrary and have no influence on how efficient a core is
I wasn't talking about gaming
hello guys im not able to connect my ps4 controller to the game, idk what im doing wrong everything seems to work trough steam bigger picture on other games, just as i sart battlefiels 2042 the controller won't react
I mean isn't real life power efficiency doing the most task with the least power?
that doesn't matter
"real life" power efficiency is entirely subjective and entirely why you do not measure things based on nothing
there are objective standards to these things and it's why they are used
So you are saying at the same clock speed a 5600x is more power efficient than 12600k
yes
OK I'll test that next week
well, I don't know
Yeah it is
but yeah it will be
Test 5600X vs 12600K both at 4 GHz all-core fixed
Sure. Next week
You guys are actually jokes. Yall think a 12700 at 65w have higher clock speed than a 5800X at 105W
?
Higher single-core boost maybe
Like I don't see in anyway intel is less power efficient. After testing zen3 alot.
I've 5950X unleashed without power limit.
..?
why do you keep bringing up power targets? we are talking about core efficiency?
Because you keep comparing a k series sku with PL
U never showed me anything that proves zen3 being more power efficient at the same clock speed.
no, we've told you 5 times now, that core for core, clock for clock, Zen 3 is more efficient than ADL
Where is the proof?
have you even listened? unlocking it has nothing to do with it
OK. Show me then.
test it yourself lol, I showed you integer clock speeds last time, and you refused to listen
so you can see for yourself
you remember this chart right?
you think ADL is 2x more efficient than 11th? yeah, even intel, never claimed that
Ryzen 6000 hitting 5 GHz in laptops is pretty exciting
ryzen core efficiency has always been a bloodbath with intel, to claim otherwise is laughable to be quite honest
this is Zen 2 aswell
Which website is that I wanna read the thing
Wish there were more zen laptops though
Alright @pale quartz what's the test method you want me to do
Static oc both 5600X and 12600k (e cores disabled) at 4ghz on the verge of R23 stability.
Look at both power consumption and score.
Sounds fair?
Ryzen 6000 laptops are way more efficient than 5000 series, better optimized power usage, claiming that laptops will have up to 70% better battery life
And zen3 is a bloodbath to intel in power efficiency tsmc 7nm vs intel 14nm no duh
But intel is on 10nm now, aka intel 7 that's slightly denser than tsmc 7nm
Use common sense.
Intel 10nm is closer to TSMC 6nm
Amd laptop is about to be goated
Esp gpu wise
Light laptop esp
No way Nvidia can beat tsmc 6nm
Ryzen 6000 APUs in a <2 kg super ultrathin laptop will be in their own league
Yeah
RDNA2 iGPU in the 6800U can hit 2.4 GHz boost within 15W power envelope
Best Vega iGPU can do 2.2 GHz with 45+W
not exactly sure you bothered listening to me for the last 6 times now
No I believe you for now I just wanna test it myself.
it's pretty simple, measure it properly as I originally said, lock one core on each to a specific clock speed and measure single FP int consumption
youve now measured CPU core efficiency
wait why single fp int consumption
Why do I care about single core efficiency.
because how much power is drawn on a single core is how you measure how efficient a core is lol
it doesn't matter if you care or not
lol i never claimed core efficiency. I meant power efficiency of cpu
You keep talking about other stuff
not sure if you know math, efficiency is a measurement of power, you measure a single core as the result is multiplicative to the the number of cores on a system
result*(insert number of cores)=total efficiency draw
I care about cpu efficiency as a whole. Not one core lol. How a cpu act as one
then you've got a skewed view of what efficiency is
that isn't a real life test
it's an arbitrary test that has no valid meaning to any conclusion
because there is no such thing as "whole CPU efficiency"
usual
Nice.
I'll explain why your thinking is flawed, you need to measure single cores as no core on a processor is equal
you need to aggregate the result, hence, one core
I'll do cinebench R23 single core
My bad
Is that good?
I'll lock both cpu static oc at 4ghz on brink of stability
Do single core test.
Good?
In your uefi
you need to measure power consumption, not the score
Did they test it like that?
fun science experiment for a slideshow
:P
same problem
hwinfo will report entire power consumption, since, well, the other cores are running
pretty much, its why core efficiency is rarely measured
Very
cause its painstaking
how do you mean?
eh, you can say its more powerful, i suppose, but thats variable on well a lot
the workload, ISA being used, what not
Of course.
start getting into the territory of accelerators for that type of thing, which is ehh generally
Eh I'll just listen to you I guess. Not sure if I want to go through the slideshow lol
core efficiency was done by nemes, he's sadistic enough to actually do these types of measurements
But general use wise intel non k sku is still Hella power efficient
yeah theres no question ADL is power efficient for daily things
Nemes more like memes
its just the cores themselves arent remotely close to zen for efficiency, architecture woes 101
had intel not dominated the market for nigh on 7 years perhaps things would be diff, but here we are
Rip to people buying rkl
I am mad at intel think 4 cores 4 thread is enough a long time ago
My friends 6600k struggling
you would have hated what they wanted to do, even just 4 years ago
intel's plan was to have 6 cores be the top of the line well in 2019
sounds crazy, by todays metrics
Damn
yeah pretty much what happens when one company dominates an industry for, well, over half a decade
I love competition.
when ryzen 1000 arrived they were already preparing developer migrations for 6 cores to be the premium product
8 cores was to be the highest by 2021, of course with HT segregation
RKL is sooo bad
Tuned a guys 11700k can't even stable 4.6ghz all core
yeah intel would prefer RKL to never had existed
somehow it was a worse situation than even bulldozer
Like my friends PC company skipped RKL
As they should
Hey its great for avx512๐คฃ
its a shame RKL was never supposed to be a bad processor aswell
11900k was supposed to be a 10c/20t zen 2 competitor
but instead we got, well, the monstrosity that it was
11900k with 10 cores on 10nm would be great
Yeah intel's 14nm to 10nm jump was too big
was actually the reverse
11900k was built for 10nm
its why its such a god awful product, it had to be backported to 14nm
I know.
oh gotcha
fact a 12400 beats a 8 core processor is.. yikes enough
Knowing my friend's 12600k with xmp 3600 cl14 xmp will beat my 10850k with 4000 cl15 manual tuned sucks LOL
I won't say obsolete. It will still be good. Just not the best haha.
well no of course it will still be good.
but the "13600k" or what ever amd has will be faster for the same price. or the "13400f will be the same for less. its obsolete because there is no point buying it anymore, not because its slow
the 10850k is still a killer cpu. but its obsolete
True.
I think I'm going meteor lake
By that time hopefully the equivalent of Bdie comes for ddr5
AMD mobile GPU gets fewer PCIe lanes on desktop In case you missed it, one of AMDโs board partners confirms desktop Navi 24 is limited to four lanes of PCI Express 4.0 interface On the ASRock website, one can find pictures and detailed specifications of the Radeon RX 6500 XT, the latest member of the [โฆ]

would the new 3050 be able to run bf2042 with a ryzen 7 2700x
no idea, it isnt out yet
oh yeah it isnโt
most likely yes since in benchmarks shown by nvidia its twice better than 1650 lol
Guys what is a good cpu under 250$ to pair with rx 5500 xt
Intel i3 9100F is good budget pair
Yes but it will likely be bottlenecked by the gpu
not so much in 2042 and similiar games
There are some laws to it, but yeah it doesn't apply on a consumer level, just manufacturer and retailer. The manufacturer can actually take action against a retailer for selling lower or higher then MSRP. Too bad theses scalpers aren't being punished, and right now Manufacturers probably liking the situation. It's not an enforcement its an option to protect Manufacturers.
"I donโt have an exact number of years but I would say that you should expect that AM5 will be a long-lived platform as AM4 has been. I think weโre expecting AM4 to stay in the marketplace for quite some years and it will be sort of an overlapping type of thing.โ
โ Dr. Lisa Su
Zen 3D may not be the last products for AM4
Zen 4 isn't gonna be on AM4 obviously
Perhaps there will be a Zen 3D+ with 6nm cores and 3D cache
I kinda don't understand what does 3d cache do I'm a bit lost with that?
Basically more cache
So 3D stacked cache? Is that all?
Yeah it's stacked L3 32MB L3 32MB L2 32MB
Alrighty I am wondering if anyone else has or had the same issue? My fps just in the main screen drops insane amounts and is making the game unplayable. This only occurred after the big update any fixes? Bf2042
Is it in Multiplayer 128?
When the game is loaded up before the big update I had played just fine and now playing the game again from reinstalling it its worse than dog shizz
main screen is where it starts
that main screen when the boat is cruising through the water?
after that
RTX Card?
2080 super
CPU?
The only game have problems. AMD 3700x
Try disabling Ray Tracing, and DLSS
Im on default and those are not on
Cyberpunk I am able to use raytracing and Control ult edition what makes this game so special
you getting about 120FPS in game?
do you have any custom settings in NVCP
no
Geforce Experience?
pulling it up now
DSR factors might be ON
there are also DSR settings in game and in Nvidia control panel.
you can also increase the size of shader cache.
there are some windows settings as well that can cause issues.
under Windows Settings Gaming
Turn off game capture (Game DVR)
Turn ON Game Mode.
Windows Settings Display scroll to Graphics settings
Turn off Hardware-Accelerated GPU Scheduling
Variable Refresh On or Off might help.
.
Also make sure ShadowPlay is disabled in Geforce Experience
.
These are just recommendations.
Deleting your old settings folder and starting from default might help.
i have a r5 3600 and it works really good
12600kf is the same price and significantly faster
Buying old hardware is never a good idea
At this point I'm more afraid of getting the wrong power supply and it suddenly going up in flames
I know not to select giga but you know
Facts. unless of course it's an insanely great price and gets you the performance you need, but yeah always buy the latest most powerful that you can, or you will be upgrading sooner then later..
I've purchased maybe hundreds of power supplies over the years, and only had one failure & it was replaced under lifetime warranty which was an Ultra X3 1600 watt that just couldn't power 3 GTX 285's under load, the replacement is going stong after 12 years. never a fire or anything like that from any power supply. I have a few that have bad capacitors from being left plugged in for many years, but never a fire, or even smoke that I can remember of.
Fair enough
but that one going around from newegg though
come to think of it, the ones with bad caps, are usually Dell, or cheap off brand.
that's pretty difficult to do
I did purchase an HP used with a bad PSU, that I replaced
90% of one's are totally fine if you're concerned Corsair have the best reputation
others will work totally fine.. gigabyte, maybe not
How is the Corsair Rm850 v2?
very good I've got the rm850x
Well I think it just had the Gigabyte name was manufactured by some other company
I'll certainly keep an eye on it, The other thing i'm so concerned about as well is it fitting into my desktop
I'm looking at the lian li II performance
But i should be fine
I should just stop stressing so much lmao
I've used a quite a few Corsair PSU's even cheap ones, and all work fine
it did to an (extent) but gigabyte do have some custom modifications to the supply itself
will be totally fine for fitting lol
that I didn't know
it's mostly nonsignificant additional VRMs most "impactful", to the extent that 2/3 additional ones are even that useful
I even bought a buch of Bestec power supplies and work good on budget PCs
I wouldn't use one in a gaming rig though
I actually used one to power a GPU in a system for testing as a dual PSU temporarily as I didn't have a larger PSU on hand.
I have not used Gigabyte very much. never a Gigabyte PSU that I can remember
ok
this might help
it was made by fans/community from ltt (the youtube channel)
gigabyte psus are bombs basically
then steam should redownload them
Ok
@toxic wigeon yea just follow revans tier list and cross reference prices
Aye
It's nice to see my current PSU on the list without any issues.
EVGA GQ 850W, upgraded 3 years ago from the earlier mentioned X3 1600w. No longer needed that much power. Also the B 600w I've been using quite a few cause I was getting them at a really good price. Still have 1 in stock.
8700K, 2080 ti
Day trading moment
Is this legit?
Yea but idk why heโs promoting it here
wow nice setup
i can hear Deco's blood boiling from here
prefer nvidia? no. radeon better. you're not allowed to be entitled to opinion. your opinion is subject to termination EX 12.612 seconds.
Is a Molotov cocktail considered a kind of grenade?
well I'd say it is
Ah ok thanks guys
thrifty manโs*
Scam
Glad I don't use Wi-Fi in my PCs, only mobile devices
Mine is
Intel i7 5930k (Just got a 6950X today)
Corsair 3200MHZ 32GBx4 (Quad Channel)
EVGA RTX 2080 XC2 Ultra (3 Slot) (Powerlink)
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe 500GB (OS)
Samsung 980 NVMe 1TB
Western Digital SN750 EK 1TB
Samsung 850 Pro SATA
Western Digital Black 2TB
Western Digital Red 4TB
Western Digital Blue 640GB
6 Western Digital Blacks 1TB x 6 RAID 0
Creative Soundblaster Z
Maybe better to just look at my Build Log... or Rebuild log actually
https://builds.gg/builds/raid-red-rtx-ws-14981
I'm will be installing the 6950x this weekend, I need to clean my rad, and install new fans in the Corsair H110 (NO RGB NO iCUE)
Damn nice score.
I just installed the new CPU, first time installed a new CPU, and got every device reinstalled, then have 1 Unknown Device in device manager, can't figure what it is, going to yank 13 drives, and install windows fresh and see if it's the CPU, or just my old os needs to be reinstalled.. I'll run Timespy once I get it figured out, I won't score as high as yours, but I expect I significant increase from old CPU.
RX 480/580 still goated for value
You can use ryzen master to see what kind of sample you have.
Plat gold sliver so forth
What's different between them
Oh, just silicone lottery. It roughly gives you an idea how it will overclock.
It's like the SP aka silicone prediction on higher tier Asus motherboard for Intel.
Does anyone have experience with Intel Turboboost Technology
Intel States you do not need to install any software that its built in and automatic, can be Enabled/Disabled in BIOS.
My issue is that I get a Unknown Device in device manager if I do not install Intel Turbo Boost Technology 3.0.
Any Ideas?
Well I uninstalled the turboboost software, and manually installed the driver. will see if it will boost now
hello to all my friends my card is gtx860m 4gb when i enter the game the main picture comes and the game freezes my system has 16gb ram i7 4 generation can it be a system error
when i connect it later, my video card is not up to date, can it be because bf5 plays very easily gtx860m 4gb
Okay so the 6950X I got as a Blem/Scratch etc on Ebay works perfectly, and passes intel CPU Ident as Genuine. At stock 3.0GHZ It exceeds the 5930K @4.5GHZ in almost everything except Fire Strike. https://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/26952505/fs/26885993 It nearly doubles the Cinebench R20 score.
Now to test BF2042
battlefield happened
Can you tell me what this is? Iโm curious
I need some help. BF2042 keeps starting up in setup mode as if I'm playing the game for the first time. I'm on pc, have already allowed firewall access and restarted my computer but I keep being brought to the initial setup mode.
ok
its a known bug you can backup your settings from documents/bf2042/settings and copy those files
happened to me many times now i simply replace the files with the backup i made when it happens
if there is anyone familiar with being on pc but playing with controllers can you please pm me. i juat got a new controller and it works fine with every other game i have but 2042. just looking for help. thank you
?
Wait for a better gpu
Wonder how long it would take for a 4080 to be out of stock
It's already out of stock! lol.
RTX 4000 series supply will be lower than 3000 series and will be in higher demand too
just perfect
ffs
i want to upgrade when 4000 series comes out aswell 
gonna need a loan from a bank to build a pc at this rate
There's some stock here of gpus in retail
But expensive
Easier to get than Ps5s though which has always been nonexistent
lol do the manufactures even care at this point?
wonder what the profit margin is for these newer gpus, would seem like the price increase on the consumer is going up faster than the manufactures cost
basically what theyre doing while people are pissed "we dont have any stock to buy from" 
Its the most convenient and this is the perfect time for that unfort
They sell anything they produce
Though they can't increase it that fast, takes long to expand production
I thought that 5nm would be in better stock than the 7nm process with samsung?
Samsung 28-in Odyssey G70A UHD 3840x2160 144Hz Gaming Monitor LS28AG700NNXZA
I have an Xbox Series X
DDR5 only because they don't want you to pair the iGPU with DDR4 bandwidth it would probably be only 15% faster than Vega iGPU if it was DDR4
How much chat before you can post pics?
lower as in price, or lower performance?
or production?
All I know is I want this possible scenario which is about a year or less away.
Intel 13-Series X 56-core/112-thread CPU
8 channel DDR5 Memory
112 lanes of PCIe 5.0```
Hopefully will have the K model HEDT or cheaper workstation CPUs
Is it just for looks as a320 doesn't support oc
Doesn't need OC
Yes
Also actual performance
5950X doesn't draw as much as you think
Not much more wattage and current draw than a R7 1700X but less than a 2700X
Due to the age of 300 series motherboards, getting Ryzen 5000 to perform well is not an easy task. There are several blockers in place, including IRM definitions and current capabilities from the motherboards VRM -- which for most 300 series boards, is notably weaker than that of B550 and X570 boards. As a result, the boards can't deliver enough power to Ryzen 5000 chips to perform adequately on 500 series boards.
I mean I wouldn't be apposed to doing it, but only if I already had a 300 board, and could get a 5000 chip for a good deal
I have B350 board
drops Bristol Ridge 7th Gen A-series and Athlon X4 series CPU support entirely to make that happen
If you're just gaming a 5950X wouldn't have problems on a A320 board but prolonged Aida64 or prime95 run, then you might risk blowing the VRM 
so as long as you don't have one of those cpus before flashing the bios
Wouldn't be surprised to see 5800X3D on 300 series boards
yeah it should work seeing its just updated on chip cache
I would say this $200 CPU is performing great, I can get another .5GHZ really easy, maybe go to 5GHZ on all cores. It's staying at or under 40c at load 4.0GHZ https://valid.x86.fr/bench/3na067/20
Beating a 5800X multithread. https://valid.x86.fr/bench/3na067/12
is ot 4ghz all core?
i mean 4ghz all core at 40c is pretty good
i have a 9900ks 5.1ghz all cores and man that thing gets hot
Interesting, Though please speak English.
Sony wrong channel! My bad!
Haha its fine
8 channel ddr5 boards are going to be nice
at what load voltage ?
honestly cant remember
check -_-
in school rn lol
LOOOL
The fact you have a 9900ks and are "in school" makes me sadge
Get a job smh 
does someone here have b560 and can tell me if it supports cpu overclocking ?
intel says no but then theres gigabyte showing off a 5.1ghz 11900k on b560
Does anyone know when game chat is coming
nope
only ram overclocking
i mean im 18 im not like 12
is that oc or only normal single core boost
also the 560 only supports ram oc
normal all core oc
Okay cool thank you so much
Surface Laptop SE has replaceable components, including the keyboard, display, and battery. Watch Branden demonstrate how to take the device apart with minimal tools.
Microsoft recommends that you seek professional assistance for device repairs and that you use caution if undertaking "do it yourself" repairs.
I bumped it up to 4.3 and it got hot was hitting 64 max. Weird that only 300mhz and it wants a lot of power. Also it scored lower in Firestrike combined test, so it's not 100% stable 1.3v@4.3 so 4.0 is the max I want to take it.
This is both CPUs overclocked to the max. I would say fairly equal for this benchmark, but the 6950x has so much more advantage. You can see the differences in physics scores and graphics scores, totally different CPUs & it shows. https://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/26964715/fs/26885993
5930k - 3100 Cinebench R20)```
๐ซ
64 max isnt bad
as long as its below 80-85 i d keep going
remember 100c is still in spec
well at 100c a cpu would probably power off or throttle
can you check load voltage now xd ?
ok its about 1.4v
1.39-1.40
on prime95
do you survive cinebench ?
yes
(r15)
lower voltage cant run 5.1
i honestly use r23
but i think prime95 small ftts hits the cpu harder
tried lower voltage and it blue screened
lol
whats power draw during a run ?
temps ? my cpu goes full sun mode on each core and instadies if i run cb or high power consumption prime95 setting
cooler lmao ?
aio beating 2x360 + d5 apparently
i had a delidded 9900k direct die with lm didnt change anything, benchmark start -> instant 100C -> dead
damn
mine doesnt hit 100 but i had to adjuct voltage and i will probably try 5.0 ghz all core at 1.3
i have a really good cpu block but it cant do anything against the initial heat, i will test if its my cpu block on my brothers system later his block is a heatkiller iv pro
also perhaps silicon lottery
and are you testing it with prime 95 wich uses avx
2nd 9900k in a row that thinks its a sun
nope
prime95 small ffts is probably the most stressfull test for a cpu
and uses avx
it basically use 100% of the tdp
i run 5.2ghz 1.42V idle and 1.37V load, i can run low power prime95 settings 150-200W and play games and stuff
but the second i run cinebench or idk blender no chance
you should try the "small ffts" option on prime95 to really test your cooler
and also what paste do you use
the "test" will result in instant death
kryonaut
nah at max it will shut down or crash
yeah thats what i mean with death xd
lol
anyway i use liquid metal and also it probablt helps that i dont live in rhe middle of a desert
(its like 19c in my room)
20C in my room as well
you could try liquid metal i guess its like 5 times more thermally conductive than krynaut
that said ... you really need to put very very little
if you put too much you can fry the cpu or vrms
i used lm on a delidded + direct die 9900k didnt do aynthing sure i might get a tiny bit better temps but that wont fix my cpu going full sun mode and crashing right away
i knew that the 9900k was hot but alright also i have the 9900ks wich might be a better silicon
i also cba cleaning my cooler again, polished it when i sold the delidded 9900k nickel plating still bad for lm
when i got it was like 50 dollars more than normal k before well people started scalping it
im sure they didnt change anything about the package still horrible for thermals
whats your max oc ?
5.2 but it reached 95-96
as i said mine is 5.2 "daily" minus cinebench and stupid hot prime 95
and sometimes it can reach more and throttles
so i prefer 5.1 wich is safer
also because well if it runs cooler its probably gonna last longer
yeah i would just ignore benchmark temps for daily though and take the +100mhz i mean thats exactly what i do i get like 70C during bf2042
at least if your really not running any programs that could lead to problems
Oh 64 is very good, but a 24c difference in just 300mhz isn't worth it for me, I like 4GHZ at 40c much better, and the performance is wack at 4.3
you know that even 80-85 is good right
and you can gain quite a bit of performance too
i d overclock until i hit 80c max
i mean like dude you cant damage your cpu at those temps
yeah I know, but there is no real advantage other then benchmarking
no ...
in some games there is a lot
like csgo
rainbow six
or cpu bounds games
and even battlefield 2042
if you re cpu bound
my GPU is running 100% full boost, and cpu is at like 22%
anyway it would still be better in general
for example csgo basically doesnt use gpu in 1080p
stock clock is 3.0GHZ I think 4.0GHZ is plenty good
i d go for 4.5
its a big difference
also what cooler do you have
and what cpu
from what I have read, 4.3 is the max it will go
like i have a i9 that runs at 85 max and its fine
it's more of Workstation/Server CPU
i mean ... you could try 4.4 worst thing it could happen is a blue screen
but alright lol
like it uses almost 300 watts
at 5.1 ghz all cores
if it was a mainstream cpu I would, but it's really not that type of cpu
it's more like a xeon
well ... even a xeon can be overclock lol
i saw a threadripped overclock video on yt
Absolutely
thing was so fast
which is why I did go 1.3GHZ over stock
like almost 5 ghz
i mean is the max boost speed 3ghz
also its 14nm
max boost on 1 core is 4ghz
so you set 4ghz all cores basically
well ... thats not the biggest oc but alright
i mean thats not a xeon at all thats like the k version of a cpu but with more cores afaik
It's a worstation/server CPU, for X99/c216
it's not for z series
This board will take ecc memory and xeon CPUs
still unlocked, anyway found some posts on reddit of some people pushing it to 4.7 at 1.3v
yeah like 5 years ago?
post was from 119d ago
Well my motherboard is the X99 FTW first version X99, and I've been using it for 7 years
It's vital I don't break it right now, I use it for real business stuff
it's not a toy machine
But I get it
The biggest problem was all the BIOS Updates since Spectre Meltdown caused some overclocks to fail, and performance drops
The most I would do is 4.3 @ 1.3 volts and call it good
you can disable those protection in windows with a tool called inspectre
Sounds like a good idea
"Hack The Gibson" lol..
That reminds, I think I looked at this before, and same line came to mind, other then Gibson Guitars. from the movie hacker "Hack The Gibson Computer"
I like how they only way to download a program that disables a protection code is from an untrusted download source.
actually there is a download link, my mind learned to block out banners from all the time on the pc from ad banners through 1999 and on. it looks like a 2000's banner ad
https://www.techpowerup.com/290751/amd-wanting-to-time-launch-of-am5-platform-with-ddr5-availability
It would seem that AMD is concerned about DDR5 memory availability in the market, at least based on an interview that Tom's Hardware had with David McAfee, the Corporate VP and GM of the Client Channel business at AMD. It's not just about availability it seems, but also pricing, as McAfee is quoted ...
i just installed bf5 on the ea launcher and the play button isnt there its replaced by a loading button the games been loading for about an hour anyone know how to fix this
@flat mica just delete and redownload i dunno
I would say repair it, But I don't see that option in EA Desktop, But it does repair through Origin.
Bruh..
honestly i disabled them especially because to create a spectre/meltdown virus you need a lot of time and effort and perhaps acces to the victims pc
more detailed post about what i just said https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/kp6b6i/how_bad_is_it_to_disable_specter_and_meltdown/ghvejbu/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
I feel the same way. It seems silly to think we have some valuable data on our little PC's
I get slammed on and chastised for running 6 HDD raid 0 array with L1 / L2 Cache, like saying if I lose 1 drive I lose all my data, and I'm like, same goes for your single disk setup.. lol.. the difference is what you put on it, and what you have backed up.. Super fast large budget reliable storage.
As far as the bios, you could just flash to an older bios and the performance and overclock back. which I have reverted to 2.02 from 2.08 to get higher scores.
I mean I'm only like 3000 points from world record firestrike score for my CPU.
which isnt really saying much.
well if you disable the protection in windows you gain like 5-10% more perf
i tested this and i got a higher score on cinebench
The kool thing is I have double bios, so I can actually run 2 different versions, which I usually run 1 stock, and 1 overclock, so I can run 2.02 or whatever before spectre/md and also I have other drives I run windows on, so like 2nd bios 2.02 with windows 10 InSpectrre
With just a flip of little dip switch
I set to Windows Mgr #2 as default boot drive.
so with PC off, flip bios switch, turn on PC, boom whole nuther experirnce
Why does reddit lock topics?, I hate that.
Man I lost my reddit login info.
The 3090ti reminds me of the titan gpus for some reason
probably better then a titan at least price wise.
but with a 450+ watts tdp
it do be slow sometimes
Hi gamers wonder if yous can help, series x gamer and tried all ways to bring up the chat screen after the game, even tried to sign a button/trigger.. is there any problems what yous know of for xbox users
ask the real ea support
Being honest, i've never heard of the Titan GPU's
I'd assume they were to some degree, Successful enough they made the Titan RTX.
Titan is a bit of a weird place between HEDT and desktop
tbf its a laptop "u" cpu
also it could be thermal throttling
what temp
also you could probably increase power limit even if its a laptop cpu
not that you should but you probably can
the 3090ti is actually worse than the titan cards
the titans are server class GPUs meaning Nvidia actually have to give a shit about power draw, which is why they're built on TSMC, not compared to your consumer class cards where you can skimp out for every bit of profit
@latent light do you use a news aggregator or are you going to all these sites by hand?
I appreciate you posting these articles btw 
Ampere on TSMC N7 woulda been pretty damn good
Either on random tech servers or just news that pops up everytime I load google
what does checking the ''disable windows path limit'' on qbittorent setup do?
will it harm my pc?
windows has a 260 character limit for file paths and the setting disables that
no
should i enable or disable it?
idk i dont use qbittorent
NVIDIA responds to Radeon Super Resolution upscaling with Deep Learning Dynamic Super Resolution downscaling tech At CES 2022 AMD announced it is releasing a new feature based on FidelityFX Super Resolution called RSR (Radeon Super Resolution). The company confirmed that this technology will arrive with the new drivers somewhere in the first qua...
Wish 2880x1620 resolution was more common in displays
Theyโve partnered with reshade to add a ray tracing filter to all games
yay, 3080+
More like 3080T more ram same cores. nevermind you beat me to it.
Why can't they just concentrate on a damn GPU, and stop jacking around. They can't make enough of what they already have.
GT/GTS/GTX/+/++/Ultra
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
Join us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxed
Buy relevant products from Amazon, Newegg and others below:
Intel Core i9-12900K: https://geni.us/xEZFptS
Intel Core i9-12900KF: https://geni.us/hCMbu
Intel Core i7-12700K: https://geni.us/8KvA
Intel Core i7-1...
so is it basically DSR but it uses less pixles for upscaling because it uses the AI?
still trying to figure out if this is a FPS jump or it just improves DSR FPS
no
the pixel count does not change, the processing time is reduced by this, that is all
it is not an "FPS jump", you need to use DSR to use it whatsoever
Intel i3-12100F cheap AF
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBDFCoGhZ4g
It's also already up on the PassMark site with 1 sample looking good for a $100 CPU. https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-i3-12100F-vs-Intel-i7-6950X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-5800X-vs-Intel-i9-12900K/4670vs2792vs3481vs3869vs4597
Single thread performance beating 5800x so far. but again only 1 sample vs 3330 samples.
Chinese exclusive i5-12490F up to 15% faster than 12400/12400F
So can they ship them to other countries?
Couldn't a full auto PCP air rifle have been useful in the modern military with a projectile as deadly as a firearm's bullet?
Apparently Canon ships drm protection with its ink but because of the shortage they're forced not to with their ink.
In this video I discuss Canon being forced to manufacture printer ink cartridges without DRM computer chips on them.
โฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒHelp Support the Channel by Donating Crypto๐ฒ๐ต๐ฐโฟ
Monero
45F2bNHVcRzXVBsvZ5giyvKGAgm6LFhMsjUUVPTEtdgJJ5SNyxzSNUmFSBR5qCCWLpjiUjYMkmZoX9b3cChNjvxR7kvh436
Bitcoin
3MMKHXPQrGHEsmdHaAGD59FWhKFGeUsAxV
Ethereum
0xeA4DA3F9BAb091Eb8...
Yeah I figured to look that up just incase
I quit using ink 10-12 years ago, went through thousands of dollars with Canon, HP, Lexmark, etc.. on ink and printers before realizing Ink Cartridges are literally and factually a scam. I started using Brother Laser Printers, and have had 0 issues in 10-12 years with 3 printers. and have saved so much money. Look up "Scam Ink Cartridges" and learn about, it's worth looking into I promise. https://youtu.be/AHX6tHdQGiQ
6500XT (PCIe x4), not good for 3.0 maybe. 4.0 okay.
Anyone here able to help me with a weird issue
I'll cut to the chase
I can't find/enable image scaling despite having all the requirements for it
how do those printers work without ink?
Laser, some kind of powder IDK. All I know is they work always, and hardly ever need a cartridge. 100% reliable, and have never broke down. 2 B&W, and 1 color. no matter how long they set and not get used, they still work great.
The ink jet printers would always dry up, and clog or something, it's almost like I needed a new printer every time I printed something.
.
My wife prints up to 200-300 pages at a time, and they just keep going.
OMG I can't believe I never saw this video about the 30-Series Nvidia cards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq1MaRWmqhc
Ah ok thanks for the informations
lol
Embed is not loading
I think you have to have some special role to embed pics and vids.
no
yes, booster and regular
๐ฑ
Exactly
Anyone got any advice on using a 4k monitor to game at 1440p? I have an rtx 2060 and able to set the monitor to 1440p via the scaling resolution option in nvidia control panel. Id like to read up more about it but most things i've found on the internet are a year old. Anyone have any information or websites i can look at?
Out of curiosity, why do you not want to use native resolution?
More fps if i use it at a lower resolution.
I'm hoping
I tend not to use the 4k monitor for gaming, more for working on.
Just thought I'd experiment
dlss?
nvidia nis?
or even amd fsr
Yes, this is what i was hoping to find more information on. I thought with all this new tech, 1440p on the 4k monitor would be doable
you can
you can change resolution in nvidia control panel
Yeah i've done that and the monitors set at 1440p.
or you can use 4k with dlls or nvidia nis
Ok, i plan to try them all and see which i like best.
dlss is the best one
I'm assuming i then set the game to 1440p in its display settings
try to play a game that supports it an use performace or balwnced mode
i d try native res
then enable dlss
btw not wll games suppory it
So 2160p then put on dlss on balanced/quality/performance/ultra performance <--- which of those would you suggest.
BF2042 does
try performance and check fps anf image quality
and find a balance beetwen those
ok will try. Going on your info i found a link titled 'Nvidia Image Scaling Analysis Versus FSR & DLSS' so i'll have a read
dlss>fsr>nis
dlss can only be used on 20-30 series gpu
yeah, got the 2060
nis works also on 10 series but it can be ver blurry
anyway try both balanced and performance mode
To try nis, i need my monitor set at 4k, but the game ro run at 1440p?
yes but try dlss first
try all the options and check fps too
btw nis is under manage 3d settings in nvdia control panel
Yeah i got it thanks. Update: settings at medium with dlss at ultra performance gets me a whole 41fps and goes down hill with the other options. Even game Settings on low only gets me a max of 46fps
Using NIS with graphics at low with dlss at Ultra performanced got me 55fps
you re not supposed to use nis with dlss i think
i mean like why use at the same time
it would give you so much blur
simply setup nis nvidia control panel (pick the right sharpness setting you like) then go in the game (dont change the monitor resolution from nvidia control panel) and set in game resolution ti what you want (lower than native)
also you should watch this video https://youtu.be/EFY7_H6rvEw
Yeah, i just tried it again with dlss off and the fps dropped compared to having it set at ultra performance.
@lunar dawn
ultra performance dlss is very blurry imo
Best expereince I've had so far is monitor at 1440p and game set for 1440p.
thats because you have a gpu meant to be used for 1080p
it literally has only 6gbs of vram
anyway also performance chart at the end
very good video
Yeah, I have a profile using afterburner that OC's the gpu and ram. Will try that next.
also you can go below 1440p with nis
enable it then go to the in game settings in bf 2042
Rx 6600 + i5 10400f good combo?
(not the normal display ones)
then set the resolution to whatever you want
(dont try to go super low or its gonna be very very blurry)
yes
always thought mixing a rx6600 with a AMD cpu for 'rage mode'@cursive ermine
Ok ๐
i honestly would get a 3060 but a 6600 is very good
3060 is more expensive
i mean 3060 has nvec encoder and if you stream or record thats better
Above my budget lol
and has dlss
wich sucks compared to dlss
@cursive ermine 5600x not that bad a price. https://gamerslens.com/amd-rage-mode/
because dlss uses ai
while fsr is good it will never be as good
but anyway get the 6600 then lol its still a good card
Hm alright
Isn't DLSS useless/pointless for 1080P?
no
balanced/quality is very good for 1080p
