#technology
1 messages · Page 426 of 1
what problems are you have in particular?
when im on 2042 the game only uses about 10 - 15% of my cpu n gpu but when i tab out or press the windows key it boosts up to higher % usage
any suggestions on why this is happening ? it was working fine and now all of sudden ive had this issue
my pc is ryzen 5 5600x rtx3070 16gb ram
low fps low usage
"DirectX function "GetDeviceRemovedReason" failed with DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_HUNG ("The GPU will not respond to more commands"). The GPU: "AMD Radeon RX 6900XT", Driver: 21.10.1(21.30.24.01-210929A-372232C-RadeonSoftware): This error is usually caused by the graphics driver crashing; try installing the latest drivers"
each 5 to 10 min.
lol
in bf2042 if i right click whilst in heli
or alt tab whilst in a match
whenever i ADS i just lose all of my fps based on magnification
the HARM scope cuts my fps to 30, x6 sniper scope cuts it to 8 fps
anyone know of a controller that lets you remap via their 3rd party app?
I want to map the accelerate and reverse to the trigger buttons LT & RT
Ye idk its 100% the game updated bios updated all my drivers actually, Checked that everything is running at the right speeds tested other games, Still 50-60 fps low settings 2042
Have to restart my computer when I log out and then try to log back in to play every time
I have problems in error “there is a problem with your game is step. Please reinstall your games.” but please help me?
My game opens in windowed mode, wont let me change between borderless/fullscreen/windowed, wont let me change resolution, wont let me select device in video settings, cpu between 60-100% with gpu between 1-5%. i get no more than 10 fps in menu and no more than 5 fps in game.
my game crashes before i can see any kind of menu, so yey? 😆
join the refund club
got it with my 3090... and have ea play pro... just my luck
Hey i got a question, how can i make my gpu be 100% used because i am trying to play battlefield and i get really low fps even on low graphics.
the simple answer, you dont, because other tasks on your system depend on the GPU to be utilised not just the game
so unless you want your system freezing and not responding, you can do that
anyone having issues with game chat?
known issue
so its not just me then lol
correct
okay cool... gotta love betas

Could the Ryzen 5600G(Vega 7) APU be able to run 2042 at more or less a good enough frame rate? I don't have it but I'm just asking cuz it's very likely that once i buy a PC someday it will probably be one with integrated graphics since GPUs are so expensive
simple answer no
What if they add FSR?
FSR will be added, it still wont run it with a stable framerate
I have a gtx 2042 and im getting 2042 frames per second is it broken idkplease halp me guys
both, technically speaking
there is no ideal scenario for it
i think there is cause i was seeing some big benefits in BF5 when i had a weak cpu
but then i upped my CPU and future frame rendering wasnt nearly as impactful
but that might be my confirmation bias
Sorry if I'm in the wrong place, but does anyone have any clue what may be causing my character to stare at the sky the whole game?
I've tried unbinding and rebinding. No dice. I've unplugged my cintiq to check for conflicts.
Horizontal movement works. I can invert my vertical and it will make me stare at the ground
I just want to look at the game's performance and maybe gauge how badly i need to upgrade :/
sooo im on a 1650 super but only getting 20 frames on everything low is that normal?
I have the DirectX error as well: "DirectX function "GetDeviceRemovedReason" failed with DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_HUNG ("The GPU will not respond to more commands"). This error is usually caused by the graphics driver crashing; try installing the latest drivers". I have tried most solutions and they won't work. Any tips?
when im tring to play like movement or aiming its delayed quite
and i cant get kills
what cpu and what resolution
i got it, but im on i5 9400f 1920x1080
im also on an i5 9400f at the same res getting about 80ish fps
The reason why i was asking before is because i am running bf 2042 on all low at 30-40 fps with a rtx 3060 with a ryzen 7 2700 and i can't figured out what is causing this low fps (v-sync is off)
They need to rename this channel to community tech support
the game is in beta, optimisation is the last thing they work on
Its mostly gonna be cpu bottleneck especially on low graphics
Why does the game not recognize my side buttons on the mouse and wheel click for key binding? :/
@crimson stream
I did, i click it and the game doesn't recognize it. It doesn't do anything
alright genuine question for techies I have a 2080 rtx and ryzen 5 3600 but my fps on beta stays on about 50 to 80 max at every graphic setting from low to ultra meanwhile some people reporting with worse hardware hitting higher fps
install directx from microsoft's site
my cpu utilization runs about 50% gpu utilization 40 to 60%
3600 is your bottleneck
this game is immensely harsh on single core performance
but cpu is a 6 core processor? anything i can do ?
amount of cores dosn't matter
it's the performance of each core
wich amd still has a hard time with
ahhh so what do you suggest for a fix?
wait for release, performance will help
whenever i try to load into bf2042 its just a black screen
like my lobby is fine but the actual game dont work
do you think they will optimize it to work better?
Yes, the game doesn't look no where near on how it performs.
so performance increase will be coming
sweet ill wait till then to start worrying in mean time ill enjoy my 60 fps lol
Also this game will have dlss to save you, so no matter what happens. You will get much more fps at release
Anyone know where I can submit a bug ticket, when I launch the game it just restarts my game. Never had this problem with any game before
On EAs website
I Hate how I have a 3070 and I’m only getting 75 FPS at max on ultra, I know it’s the beta but damn
anyone else surpised by how smooth it is running, im on a 7700k, 1080, and i can run 1440p at high with 80-90% CPU usage and no more than 5% gpu perfectly
from i saw those specs shouldn't be able to run it at high...
It’s weid
agreed
but i would expect to also be lagging, but nothing
maybe they still haven't optimized
Ofcourse they havent
It runs way too bad on good systems
Or has very varied performance
How bad do you guys think an rx580 is for this game? I probably want to upgrade my processor sooner or later (r7 1700)
I've not really been able to gauge my performance well
i don't know amd much to compare, but im running great on a 7700k
so im trying to play 2042 on RX 580, Ryzen 7 3800x. all on low settings and my shit is getting blasted bro, like absolutely trash frames, ive tried to overclock to see if that even helps and it didnt. I've heard it sometimes a game want use all 8 cores, could that be my issues
also, since i'm not really a pc guy
@bold forge bro are u even able to play it
yes i can open it and get in a game
Expect like 10fps
how many frames
ehhh i have that type of stuff disabled because it messes with stuff whenever i try to use photoshop, zbrush, etc
i see average fps, but i left it on the menu overnight
is there a way to find current?
Performance tab - Overlay on right side and click show metrics overlay
so i get over 60 most of the time
CPU?
as in which one or the utilization %?
lol sorry it's a ryzen 7 1700. One of the older models, and it's using 60% cpu
I want to upgrade everything, but finding stuff rn is so weird
So we found someone that's running the game correctly performance
he is in my discord now, 10600k 2060super, 100% usage on gpu and the guy is getting 115fps on 1080p high
So seems random people are getting the correct performance
so it is a bug limiting preformance\
hi issue
dell g3 3590
i5-9300h
1660ti
getting less than 25 fps
with 100% cpu usage on the beta
and bf5
the game gives me an error when running can i show it to someone (bf4)
same issue and same laptop xd
How’s the minimum requirement a Ryzen 5 3600 and only an i5 does battlefield just run like fucking shit on amd ?
no idea here too
Cause our machines should be above the minimum requirement
By a good bit
U had similar issues in bf5?
bf5 was great for me
What fps u got?
maybe try closing some background apps in task manager
i got around 70 in medium
tats too low must be 100 cpu usage try closing app in task manager while running the game
yep
Low cpu usage is fine
Can someone help me with the Directx error I have a 2060 and update and reinstalled drivers a bunch and reinstalled the game a bunch for the beta
have you tried reinstalling directx?
Yeah I tried reinstalling drivers, directx, the game itself
Nothing seems to be working
does anyone know im getting around 75% gpu usage and 80% cpu usage? 5600x 3070 16gb.
I use an i5 and a radeon r9 290x and geet like 12fps with 2550x1440
with lowest presets
Check task manager for the process that’s using the most cpu or your gpu memory
bro
I've never been more scared lol, I just got a dead pixel on my main monitor
but i can put my fucking mouse over it
idk whats causing it, but it nearly gave me a heart attack
it'll probably rectify
anyone else have OBS absolutely cry out in pain when attempting to stream the beta (single PC setup)? everything about the stream was running fine until i launched 2042 then frames started skipping/dropping like crazy. no problems in some of the latest titles (warzone, destiny 2, BFV, etc.)
I should clarify, the game itself runs perfectly fine on my rig when I'm not streaming. It's just OBS that is having the issues. Even when OBS was having a hard time the game was still fluid on my end.
uninstall ALL of the dell bloatware, and i mean anything not necessary to your computer running except the applications you use regularily.
i dont know then
any antivirus, any application where there is dell written on it
like dell command center or mcaffee
Anyone using 8gb ram and its lagging hard in 2042? is it my pc or the game optimizations itself?
my spec: GTX 1650Super
Amd ryzen5 3600x if its my pc should i only upgrade my ram or gpu too 
yeah its still in beta
no your pc is fine but make sure you have dual-channel ram
my gf is called dell so probs not a good idea for me
and possibly upgrade to 16gb in the futur
lmao
What 16gb ram you recommend me for buying and..power supply its a pre built 
Hi guys, my computer crashes before i can launch the game when I launch bf2042 . I got Ryzen 5 5600x 3060ti 16gigs of ram. Anyone got ideas why doesnt happen on other games
Sorry to bother anyone but could someone who has the beta just check if it is in GeForce Experience
i got a i5 8400 (runs around 3.0ghz consistent), RTX 2070 super, game is on SSD, and 16 gb ram, and my computer struggles to maintain 60 fps at times on low
anyone know why, just a beta thing or?
check task manager
Settings? Res?
my i5 9400f is so high use 90% all of the time is this beta or will be better
Thats alot
I decided to try bf2042 on my cheap laptop cus I still haven't built my pc and I'm getting 15 to 25 fps on 720p low.
I guess that's expected
yahh bro is so hard to rann.. my cpu like crying fro halp.. if u have 4 core only, well coffine dance
4 core 4 thread or lower
I wish they let us join 64 player server and not lock to 128 player server
I know 128 server is more fun and appeals to more people but imo they should have some 64 player servers for those with low end pcs
my plane is only upgrade my gpu, the gpu price is ridiculous, now i have to upgrade cpu to
my god.. only just want to play this game
everything is low, ambient occ is off, res is 1920x1080
your cpu speed is really slow. it shouldnt be that slow, 3ghz is below standard
tf? last i checked it wasnt horrible it was average. did we just jump a decade
it should be around 4.0 GHz
and when I first started I was playing all high and it was very smooth, then I disconnected and it all went to shit
mybee the beta hoply it get better on day 1
I researched this one and it seemed good, the price was like 400 aud now Im looking and there are better ones for cheaper
what the fuck
when did you buy it?...
the i5 8400 is old as hell
12th gen will be here soon
hmm I cant even load into a game now, i just get kicked
would intel i5-11600k work well?
when did you buy the one you have?
like last year
damn. thats bad.. sadly your motherboard doesnt support 11th gen cpus and idk if any other gen really
I dont think so
you would need a new motherboard
wtf so a 200 dollar motherboard which is what I got it for cant even support newer stuff
no it cant. price doesnt determine quality or how new it is. You should have done some research on what you bought
I legit did, I thought all this was decent enough
doesnt matter tho, I cant even click the play button in menus ffs
aight just Got the BETA, Updated Drivers n booted the Game, Game Freezes and my PC Re-Boots every Single Time, Yall got any idea's
Oh Wait im a Dumbass, Open beta Access is on the 8th
Had that same problem for some reason apparently it’s common
if your pc has one module of 8gb ram, get another one to have 8+8. It will make a significant difference
most likely a background process or windows set up problem. Or maybe you are running the game at higher than 1080p
the 8400 is decent enough, you are just having a set up problem
I'm playing the game with a 5900x and a 2080ti and performance is terrible can barely get 100 fps on low/med.
using 6900xt, 5900x, 64gb @ 3200mhz ram and get 60fps gg
the performance of the beta is inconsistent
Yeah
varies depending on the player
ive seen people run it at steady 70fps on a 1060
and rx570
The performance of the beta is a meme.
well, it's a beta
it's not an open beta
Yes it is.
Also don't forget this build is multiple months old.
It's going open tomorrow.
the future isn't now, young man
maybe I can send a bomb to the studio so the beta never goes open so i would still be right
what is the channel for tech support?? beacuse have an error with directx
i guess this would be a good channel for that, or maybe #battlefield-2042
ok, thank you
I'm just questioning why they would even release this beta if the end product will be so different.
because, as far as I understand it, the purpose of introducing a beta to the public is to test problems
Well they said that the version they currently have has better performace and fidelity, I think the beta is just for ironing out any bugs and maybe slight balancing
shouldnt be too different
Any bugs...?
I experienced 15 separate bugs within 30 minutes of playing.
Like...what would they even be testing? Our sanity?
I only experienced maybe 3 or 4 throught my 5h play session yesterday
buggiest thing I had was elevators
possibly
My settings never save, elevator bugs, death animation bugs, players lag around with no actual server lag, there are tons of stutters, there are a ton of texture bugs, the aim sensitivity itself should be considered a bug, you cannot aim the gun on a jeep, the sound is incredibly quiet on max...
I could keep going.
First thirty minutes.
And I'm playing at 30fps at minimum on a PC that runs BFV at 100 on ultra.
Again performance and stutters ae said to be a non issue
you should get a core2duo e7200 bro
the rest is relatively easily fixable
totally agree with you on performance
its ass at best
I understand that people are saying that it'll be fixed, but...
I won't believe it until I see it.
fair enough it is DICE at the end
hmm as far as I remember, every single battlefield game that came out before was heavy on performance until a patch soon after release, like one or two months after I think
takes them forever to do anything
Yeah.
I do not believe these people who are saying it'll be fixed in a month.
I've never seen performance in a game fixed within a year, let alone a month.
I'm really hoping what they said about the beta being months old and performance being better is true
really wanting this battlefield to be good
Yeah, I just don't think they're release this beta if they had a better version.
hated BFV, BF1 was ok and BF4 was ages ago
I feel like this is what we're gonna get on launch, based on past experience with Battlefield.
you're right but we arent developers so we dont really know how it works I guess
stop scaring me
I've followed too many launches at this point. I've never seen any game get optimized the way that people are saying this one will.
Ever...
BF1 had a decent beta and alpha from what I remember
I loved BF1's alpha and beta.
It was incredible.
Even BFV had a great beta.
Better than the actual full release.
BF4 had a terrible beta but the final product (after many months) was amazing
hopefully we wont be waiting long
it's almost as if people don't read
no need to be condescending mate
Nyx just doesnt trust them
which is understandable
"Minor Performance Issues."

I literally run Cyberpunk 2077 better than this game.
the game which has DLSS turned on by default? that should be a given
you're expecting that a full game that has been out for months wouldn't perform better than a beta version of a game? seems rather odd
I'm expecting that it won't perform much better.
Performance needs to double for this to be playable for most people.
And I've never seen ANY game double performance in a couple of months before launch.
It'd be a miracle.
And I'll be happy if it happens.
But I'm not going to count on it.
it's almost as if beta builds are not representative of performance for a final product for that reason, and shouldn't be used for it
I'm not sure why you're assuming performance will double in a couple of months.
That doesn't happen.
if performance doubled, I would be running at 240 frames, what I'm telling you is what you're experiencing is not an accurate indicator of the final game
and stop assuming it is
Stop assuming that everything will magically be fixed in the new build.
The odds are that it will not.
fixing needs engagement
if devs need to do very quick release of the game
the thing is already sus
This game is being pushed out the door too quickly, like CP 2077.
I'm not assuming they will or won't, you're literally conflating that performance has to supposedly double, or that it's a bug
??
it can't be both
That is not a coherent sentence.
the performance wont double
Performance would need to double for this game to be playable for most people.
this game is put on modification of already estabilished engine
The bugs are an entirely separate issue.
I've followed too many launches at this point. I've never seen any game get optimized the way that people are saying this one will.
so which is it? is it because it's an beta build and bugs exist, or is the game fundamentally unoptimised?
unless they completely skipped optimization and just wanted to release as quick of possible and threw in a lot of performance breaking bugs
You clearly understand nothing about game development. This beta build is not good enough to have been just a few months before launch.
The issues could not be fixed in that time.
"I've followed too many launches at this point. I've never seen any game get optimized the way that people are saying this one will." I did but it was indie studio that gained budget and multithreaded the game
see I do because the "vast majority" of the playerbase are not complaining about performance, and are literally playing the game right now
its almost as if your experience is not the experience of others
which is why it's called a, beta, for a reason
Actually no, everyone knows the performance is awful.
alpha* 
@cold phoenix what settings
really? who is everyone?
And my other friend gets 80 with a 3080...
Exactly, yeah.
people who come here to this discord? sorry the player count massively dwarfs that
That's what another friend gets with a 3080.
I have talked to about 50 people about this.
They all agree.
Pretty big sample size.
Go to YouTube.
And see the same thing.
I don't know what you're on about.
It's literally a well known fact that it runs poorly.
you think 50 people is a massive sample size for a game that sells millions of copies at its launch?
that's absolutely tiny

Jesus Christ dude. Are you trying to say the performance is good?
Because it's not.
surely majority of people who have 1060 or lower and needto play on low dont complain
They can't play. They run 30 frames or less.
Ahahah
yes, because we're playing different games here apparently, and I've spent the last 20 minutes here trying to tell you that what you're playing right now is not a accurate indicator of the final game for a literal reason
Are you playing the final game?

no, which is the point
So we're playing the same game.
Which performs badly.
Objectively.
No one is getting good performance from this beta.
uh, sorry, been having quite good performance
I can run this game at 1440p max settings at 130 frames, which isn't possible on cyberpunk
since you used cyberpunk before for some reason
So you have a 3090 or 3080.
no I have a 6800xt
Very similar card, then.
no they're quite different
130fps?
That's not great performance at all. It's...acceptable.
different architectures
you mean in closed room on server with 0 players?
No shit.
not great performance?
Similar performace.
130 frames at max settings is not great performance?
im just watching people having 75-90 fps with 6800xt 1440p
with oced 9600k
What is your CPU?
I have a 5900x, and yeah, the game is heavily CPU bound lol
Figured as much, yeah.
that level of performance is normal on a 9600k
It's 100% CPU usage constantly.
no it's simply down to single threaded IPC
nah thats not right
if it's taxing 100% of your CPU that's just a hardware limitation and not a game issue
that is, lack of cores
timings?
cl16
ah there's the reason
not sure why my performance is so bad
bad binned memory
lol
3200mhz CL16 is mid-high range.
not sure how you came to that conclusion?
Ahahahah
it is yeah
why tf would memory matter
it's not
Bruh...
cl163200 is literally the normal for ddr4 lol
No it's not.
it has terrible die bins for a reason
even then
The base is 2133mhz, not 3200mhz.
ryzen performance is always heavily influenced by the memory
it isnt
It will if the optimization is trash.
not 50fps mate
yes, it is lol
thats a myth since 3xxx came out
bruh
Jesus Christ dude.
3xxx has so much cache it doesnt matter unless you run turtle memory
huh?
What memory do you have, then?
you know why CCX latency matters right?
I checked hardware unboxed and gamers nexus
and why ryzen 5000 has a interconnected CCX?
What memory are you using?
3200mhz cl16 is great for ryzen
I use cl153600 memory, micron e-die, aka, high binned memory
Yeah...that's not enough to boost 50 frames homie. Something else is up.
yeah, as I said it's almost as if people need to stop taking the performance of the beta for a reason literally for the final game
regardless I dont know how you're getting 130fps
Except it runs horribly on almost every PC, and even with yours it doesn't run incredibly well.
either it's BS or you're on spawn screen most of the time
what?
is it so hard to understand that bugs exist and that my performance numbers are what you will actually be getting for the final game?
So both of my PCs have the same bug?
And all of my friends do as well?
Seems kind of sus.
well had you known numerous people have these issues on loads of betas, yeah, the answer is yes
I mean, I hope they fix it, but I'm not going to believe it until I see it.
I haven't seen a beta perform this poorly in years.
The performance here is on the level of Star Citizen.
the beta is infact quite well received, it's done well, as I said people had literal crashing in new world's and you think people took that as a final indicator for the final game? no, so stop thinking 2042 is the exception for some reason
New World's beta performs exactly the same as the final game though.

And that was a year ago.
no, it doesn't, it had massive jittering frame drops performance issues
The performance in the game is utterly awful still. Just the same as it was when I played it last June.
graphical glitches the lot, because, it's a beta
big shocker the final game didn't have any of them
so stop taking things when it's said in the game itself as a final indicator of how a game will turn out
I played the beta and the final game. They've changed almost nothing.
That's not a good example.
I got terrible frames then and I get terrible frames now.
it is, because you're using your experience as some sort of validator for how everyone else is supposedly doing
You literally just did that.
deco is having some weird experience with having 130fps
no, I was talking about how others experienced it, not me
I'm not sure why you seem to think that you are the authority on what everyone is experiencing.
You seem to be the anomaly.
So am I.
the only people i have seen having 130 fps on youtube is when powerful gpu was used at 1080p on low
The performance is the same in New World.
lmao
Literally exactly the same.
Yeah...
I never played the beta for new world's lol I'm telling you how the people who did play it did
does this game look visually much better than bf V ?
Ehh...not really.
what at 1080p/console/pc?
pc yes it's there
Was about to ask if anyone else be laggung cuz my 3080ti be struggling on high settings 1440p at 90 fps😂
Yes.
ultra is a different level of game detail it is noticeable
you need 11gen intel
yeah
Apparently I need 12th gen Intel.
Yeah but they also havent added dlss or dx12 yet right?
Oh yeah, I'm thrilled to start using DLSS on my 1000 series.
That'll fix my issues.

you've got a 1000 series class GPU? yeah no wonder you're having problems lol
you really think that?
Uhh...yes.
Deco u seem to not understand how optimization works.
How do you refund the game?
1080ti is not the supreme card of its time anymore lol
No kidding, but it's still...what...12th strongest?
1080ti is more than well enough to run 60 fps on bf and newer titles.
gtx 1080 should still be able to run all AAA games at 60++fps ultra 1080p
If my gpu is at 100% utilisation does that mean even if the game has better optimisation, my fps will be the same?
I literally play BFV at 100fps on 4K ultra.
LOL
I don't think my GPU is the issue here.
yeah it's not we've already established you are CPU bound
A 7700K should not lock me to 45-50 frames.

That's literally Star Citizen/Cyberpunk 2077 levels of optimization.
yeah but even my i7 11700k 3080ti will run the game at 100 fps if i look into a wall at 1440p
Does anyone know why performance on some systems on the new beta is crap. I get massive frame drops. And can only run about 60-80fps get drops down to 20fps on respawn.
I doesnt matter what graphics settings I set it to or if I use 4k or 1080p
I have a 5950x with a rtx 3090 and 32gb ram
a 7700k which has 8 threads? I literally hit 50% utilisation with a 5900x, you are core bound lol
My buddy has a 10900K and a 3080 and can't get of 100.
i run 3080ti at 1440p and i get the samexD
yeah no amount of game optimization is going to fix your problem you are hardware bound
You're acting like a 7700K is a 40fps chip.
Bruh.
No.
doubt this game uses more than 8 threads
Jesus Christ.
I literally hit 50% utilisation on a 24 thread system?
Like massive frame drops to the point unplayable but my friends on a lower end system with higher frames and stable
that's 12 threads?
If I'm hardware bound, then why am I able to play other modern titles at 100+ frames?
people were telling me that my gtx 1080 is old when i hit 40fps in cyberpunk 2077 on low 🤡
Its because of beta so yeah its a 3 month old version
battlefield has used more than 8 threads for years lol
not at all
And I play old BF at 100fps+.
I also benched this game on my laptop and got similar results.
I'm telling you your problems with framerate will still exist because you are hardware bound
i see the same fps for people with 5600x and 5900x
no matter what they achieve
If I'm hardware bound, that means the optimization is terrible. Because I'm not hardware bound for other games.
Ahahah
yeah, because it's a 12 thread system
??
Yeah but that makes no sense cuz i get the same as him with a 3080ti and he runs a 1080 so how do u explain that? lol
I played this game with my laptop, which has 16 threads and 8 cores, and I got the same issue.
you wonder why new worlds stutters on your final release?
It's not stuttering, it's just poorly optimized.
but your claim of bv v using more than 8 threads is false
oh right yeah it's the game
just look at benchmarks
no point talking to someone who thinks ram would tank fps by 50
True.
it's not your core limitation
It doesn't stutter you boob.
Just gets bad frames.

literal thing which is called stuttering, frame timing drops lol
I'm sorry, but a 7700K is not a CPU that you cannot play games on.
Its entertaining seeing you guys argue
yeah it's just not one youre going to get adequate performance with lol
if someone says a game can use more than 8 threads without it being some rendering simulator i have big doubts
Ever argued witha. brick? we have apperantly
I do though.
Just not in poorly optimized games.
then you're not living in 2021
sorry lol
You've already lost this argument if you're saying that a 7700K shouldn't be able to run 2042 smoothly.
I don't even know what to say anymore bro.
did you ever try programming a game
That's why our modern games are so poorly optimized.
games have used more than 8 threads for years
@pale quartz then how do i fix my fps? if hes hardware bound and i am def not with my build, how come my fps still wont hit close to 100 but around 70-85
stop saying they haven't you
I played it on a CPU with 16 threads. No change.

cyberpunk, battlefield 5
you said bv v does but it doesnt
ok?
Yeah, I don't know what the hell he's on about.
And like I've already said.
I benched it with 16 threads.
No change.
So....
core scaling is not how performance is measured right that's single core IPC?
When beta?
this guy spouts a load of jargon but doesnt know what he's talking abour
Now.
yesterday
Exactly.
😄
no.. that's how games are benchmarked
He acts like he knows, but he doesn't.
Well hopefully improves
know what?
i7-10870H roughly matches the performance of the 7700K in speed and has double the threads, and I get the same result with it.
So you're really not making a decent argument here.
it 100% will or they will lose many followers.
7700K is not simply "too weak" for modern games.
what do you think I'm saying trying to defend the game running at 50 frames? I'm telling you that even if they manage to achieve 60 you're still going to run into problems
It'll be Deco alone in a 128 man lobby.
This.
I get decent FPS, but after playing a few hours it does stutter quite a bit, and images start to disappear . . .
remind me of the meme ”this is fine” sips coffe
SO I restart and its all good for a while
Exactly i cant really play the beta anymore
That bad?
I'm enjoying it
Imma just enjoy it cuz i spent 6 k on a setup for battlefield🤣
you are totally core bound and no amount of final game optimisation can change that, that will reflect in the final game
the frame issues will be fixed
No, I will not...
your core usage will not
My core usage is fine.
max utilisation is not fine sorry
He could just change it in the files for the final release.
It's not ideal, but it runs games just fine until I can upgrade.
your system literally has no room whatsoever to make needed core adjustments
@wintry prairie What fps are you getting?
that's a big problem
It's a bit of an issue, but I mean...
120+
7700K isn't exactly a poverty spec chip.
Oh nice!
There are many people running much older stuff than me.
what u running?
If you're saying I can't run this game with a 7700K, you're saying that this game will essentially fail to reach the mass market.
I'm not saying that
5900X/3080ti/64GB RAM
I'm saying don't expect the game to run flawlessly with it
Nice
Nice
you'll get that, with the odd occasional system freeze probably
Back to playing 🙂
8700K at 5.0 GHz and 3600 cl 14
bye

Fck me i want 150+😂
new world uses million threads huh
So they're not an issue.
what settings cut i wont even reach 100 fps with 3080ti
For real, but it doesn't look like it's gonna happen for me, hahahah.
I get higher with a 2080 ti
Uhh....no, if I can't see it, it's not an issue.

So I dunno
Super ultra
out of sight doesn't mean issues don't exist 
All other games i run ultra settings 200 fps😂
When we're literally talking about graphics, actually...it does.

next time try claiming games don't use more than 8 threads
see how that goes
you know why malware is so effective right?
because no one sees it?

The entire point of performance is what I see and feel.
If I don't see and feel an issue, there is no issue.
wtf
not at all actually
ive heard people who had no issue with cyberpunk because it felt good at 1080p on their rtx 3080
And what I feel is fine.
lol
So I'm not seeing an issue here.
really? open up the game with a frame timings indicator
you'll quickly change your opinion
I'm more focused on the dog shit performance aspect of it.
What are you claiming that it affects?
My aim?
My running?
What?
no it's going to affect your overall experience

The majority of pc players use pascal gpus
If they cant hit 60 then whats the point
this isn't really what controversial? it's just hardware limitations
?
A new game that can't be handled by a 7700K and a 1080 Ti? Less than 5% of the population of gamers even own something as powerful as that.
I'm not talking about your framerate
I'm talking about what might come to happen which supposedly is a game issue when the final game is out
If it becomes unplayable on a 7700K, it is a game issue bro.
This is not a poverty spec CPU.
It's still considered high range for the vast majority of gamers.
unplayable can mean a lot of different things
someone running at 120 frames can have a game be unplayable because of stuttering, someone running at 40 means it's unplayable because it's not at 60
I don't have stuttering issues.
yeah, im telling you that it can occur on the final release, and that if it does its not a game issue
your frame issues will be fixed
things like that cannot however
Are you saying that this issue exists in every other game?
Or that it will only exist in this game?
Because I do not have any issues anywhere else.
which one? the frame issue or core bound problems?
Core.
no it doesn't exist in every other game, it does cross game boundaries though
not every game uses more than 8 threads
2042 is a game that does, for better or worse
^
frame issues are solveable issues
things that are core limited however cannot be fixed via software
So you're saying that 2042 is going to be poorly optimized for any CPU that doesn't have 12-16 threads?
Which would mean that the game is poorly optimized.

Unless you delete a ton of stuff like cyberpunk on base consoles lol
Considering that most people don't have monster CPUs.
multicore scaling has become important over the years, in engines and in games themselves, 8 threads are no longer the target priority
lmao true
games aren't built to be optimised for 8 threads anymore
They removed like all traffic cause of the cpu
Regardless, this CPU runs just fine in games with more than 8 threads.
I've already done it quite a few times.
There are no major issues that make the game unfun or unplayable.
^ which is why the Xbox version has been very smooth for users on it
well, port, is the word I suppose
7c14t is an option but most arent
IBM has smt8
pretty sure it has horrid latency aswell?
yeah not as if you're running your memory bandwidth seriously through smt8
Hold up, I just went to go have a gander at the recommended specs for this game...
And it recommends two 8 thread CPUs.

If this doesn't run smoothly on a 7700K, that would be...questionable.
it does not, there are 2 different target recommendations
the game will run "fine"
just don't be anticipating issues not to occur
thnx
you'll get your game to be fine/smooth, not problematic however
I don't think that anyone is concerned about the potential for a mild stutter sometimes. It just has to be playable 70-80 frames for a shooter.
The only friends I have who can play it are running high end 30 series cards right now.
you'd be surprised at the amount of people even now who are concerned for mild stutters in games like bf4
and that's over 5 years old at this point
I mean, sure, a better CPU will be nice when I get a chance to upgrade, but I've played both BF4 and BFV perfectly fine with no stuttering at all on this PC.
BFV especially runs incredibly well.
And yeah, I get 200+ fps in BF4, hahah.
Smooth as silk.
while not looking much worse than new bfs 💀
yeah you'll be fine, for the game, if that's all you're wanting, these types of issues occur quite commonly on beta builds
it'll be fixed for the final game
there was this dude yesterday saying his bf4 lagged on his gtx1070. Turns out he was playing 4k.
I highly doubt it'll get fixed. I'd rather they just implemented some ultra low settings for the rest of us to play it.
I remember getting the tag notification
The low settings aren't low enough, ahahah.
think you'd need pacman at that point low already looks like a different game
I'm thinking of something like ARK or War Thunder minimum settings.
Max textures and resolution, with everything else on minimum.
I want 120 frames.
For a shooter.
Not really bothered with what it looks like.
I've played too many competitive games on trash tier settings at super high FPS already.
Usually I can get about 240 frames out of my laptop on minimum, but it's around 60 in 2042.
eh not wrong seen the zealots of csgo where 500 frames is mandatory
Yeah, when it's just about getting kills, I really don't care what the game looks like.
its noticeable on 60hz display
if you have close to 60fps the drops can still be horrible
Anything below 100 is just painful for me in a shooter.
and input lag
Yeah, that's what I'm saying...
I'm not seeing where the performance went.
Especially on minimum.
It already looks like dog water.
bf4 mostly needs texture update and that 3D mesh for ground forgot how its called
Yeah.
ive tried 4-8k textures in skyrim
I really do hope it gets fixed.
basically no fps difference almost
Textures only really use up VRAM.
just way more memory usage
did you check msi afterburner
if msi afterburner says that it might be driver issue
It could be, I'll try looking at drivers again tomorrow.
Overall though, it just seems like everyone has this problem.
and bfv is bigger than bf4
There's also the 128 man server aspect.
maybe there is issue of the engine rendering the entire map
I suspect it might be the rendering of all of the players.
Which would explain the CPU strain.
did you compare 64 player vs 128
I didn't get a lot of time to do that because I was trying other things, but I did notice that if you spawn in first and start running around, your frames are about 50% higher.
wtf
The baffling thing was that I did most of this testing on my laptop, which ended up going to 100% CPU at 8% GPU usage despite having 8 cores and 16 threads.
And then I tested with Discord streaming, and that took me from 60 frames to 45 frames.
BF4 frames are just so high anyway, hahah.
and few players vs 64
in bf4?
2042
no clue
I didn't see them.
But yeah, closing Discord gave me like 10 frames.
And streaming cut my frames by about 25%.
Which is very strange on a PC that has an 8 core CPU.
I've never seen it go to 100% in any game.
discord streaming doesnt steal much fps
Yeah, I've never seen it do that before.
its using very very low quality streaming preset
I wish I could experiment more, but this god damned settings bug keeps resetting my settings every time I go into a new match.
Such a pain.
Servers are down anyway.
Never mind, they're up.
There's only 128.

This game literally doesn't even come close to using 100% of my CPU.

And yet it did when I had 16 threads.
But on my 7700K it doesn't.
CPU is at 70%...
GPU at 40%...
the beta is only optimized for specific hardware
Seems to be utterly embarrassing on Nvidia GPUs right now, yeah.
yeah my 7700 is at 100% while my 1080 is at 30%
getting 50 fps while on lowest and 1080
p
Performance is a joke currently
Updated to windows 11 if you need help downloading it lmk I can assist you
windows 11 wont improve performance
It’s actually been known to brick performance in some games.
I heard other wise
Maybe the video I watched could have been giving me mixed information but windows recently made it public officially
Windows 11 doesnt change anything I have it still same issues I've been reading and I'm on a maxed out rig with 3090
Damn I have a 5800x with a 5700xt and I didn’t have any problems playing until I switched to my laptop and it was ass my laptop has a 1660ti with a I 7 9750
Yeah seems this time around nvidia are getting problems but our 6800xt testers are facing low gpu usage. So far found only 2 people without the performance bug (2060s/3060 user, proof was shown)
it honestly feels like future frame rendering is completely broken for majority of people atm.
Yeah so basically I have a 5950x and rtx3090. Doesn't matter what I set the graphics to low-ultra or 1080p-4k I still get 60-80fps with frame drops
what is your ram capacity and speed.
I fixed the stutter issue but massive frame drops all the time to 20-40fps
Ram is 32gb set to 3200hz I think maybe 3600 can't remember off the top of my head
We noticed people with bdie ram get immense fps boost atm
You think they would add voip in the release to communicate better with teammates around the field ?
yes its just disabled for the beta
Nice
makes sense since open beta would just have 8 year olds screaming the .n. word.
Facts but why would they release such a old version for the beta
Kinda sus I really hope release is ok
It’s likely going to be a fiasco.
You would never release this version of the game unless you were really behind.
It’s the worst beta I’ve ever seen for any game.
I’ve played better alphas.
you guys talking about the performance of the game on pc?
Why when I up settings from medium to high I go from 100fps to 3fps.
I have a:
- 3070
- i7-8700k 5ghz
- 32gb ram
Yeah.
Oh I’m on windows 11
o_O
Yeah my 3080 only does avg 80 fps on 1440p high but the 99% is like 50
I’m also playing on 4k
Imagine having a 3080 lol
I get the same on high and low for the most part. Maybe a 10-20 increase when I drop the settings.
could anyone give me a hand with solving the Anti cheat error (#0000000D). im unable to launch BF2042 and would appreciate any help
I’m going to record this, I up 1 setting and my fps goes from 100 to like 5
trust me I saw no difference between my 3080 or 2080 lol
game doesnt even use all the gpu
its always stuck at 70%
pls nvidia add dlss to this game or get the devs to optimise it.
Yeah.
It’s just an absolute mess.
Completely random if it’ll work well.
Used 8% of my laptop’s GPU…
Any fix to the game literally not opening. I see the EAC thing and then it just stops running on steam
Actually ima just assume the beta isn't worth it anymore seen too many negative reviews
Yeah, you’re better off just waiting for launch.
I played about 4 hrs and called it quits
It’s a joke.
Just unfinished mess
I tried to get into it, but I just can’t deal with how horrible it feels.
Performance is horrific.
I spent 3 hours trying to fix this so if it ain't worth it then I'll hold off
Don’t bother with this beta, yeah.
Without it playing stable it just feels terrible to pkay
Sweet ily guys thank you
If it ran buttery smooth like bf4 it would be great
I love a lot of games with awful performance, but you cannot have this in an FPS.
I only found 1 fix that actually helps for stutters thats it
It’s really surprising after the optimization of the last two titles.


