#technology
1 messages · Page 403 of 1
so basically enhances your graphics by a bit?
then why are some people saying that it gave them more fps
dunno
might be true for some games
but
the difference would still be super small
i'll just keep it on i guess
it's a new version of the overall graphics holder or something like that
keep it on if you have a high end pc yeah
https://www.cdkoffers.com
30% software discount code: GE25
3% game discount code: GE3
The Biggest March Sale: https://www.cdkoffers.com/sales
Windows 10 Pro OEM key: https://bit.ly/2vfKucI
Office 2016: https://bit.ly/3aBenUX
Office 2019: https://bit.ly/2GcGdJn
Windows 10 pro OEM +Office 2019 package: https://bit.ly/2Orz0Jx
DirectX 11 vs. Direc...
you seriously saying your pc is kinda bad when you have a 5800 and a 3060ti?
this isn't the meme channel
bruh, i bet 90% of the people here have 5950x and 3090
what's dx11?
was it before dx12
?
firstly, no. Secondly, anybody that got a 3090 for gaming is a dumbass. Third, less than 1% of worldwide pc players got a 3090
the fact that you dont have the best pc hardware that exists on earth doesnt mean you have a bad pc
there's literally nothing your pc cannot run at 60fps and 1080p and almost nothing that cannot run at 120fps too
more than half people that play videogames do so in consoles, the most powerful console out there isn't stronger than your pc. In the remaining almost half of the playerbase, half people use integrated graphics and laptops both worse than your pc
Why the middle finger lol
hi, does BF5 server having issue, game keep disconnecting me, I can't go online 😦
Probably a console player
does anyone know if EKWBs classic and quantum kits are compattablkewn with each other?
Ask them ;)
it is, though
sure, dx12 supports raytracing
but except that it's supposed to be more optimized
https://www.amazon.com/Intel-i7-9700K-Desktop-Processor-Unlocked/dp/B07HHN6KBZ/ref=sr_1_3?dchild=1&keywords=intel+i7-9700k&qid=1628240204&s=electronics&sr=1-3 + https://asrock.com/MB/Intel/B365 Phantom Gaming 4/index.asp ⁉️ ⁉️ ⁉️ current motherboard
Supports 9th and 8th Gen Intel Core™ processors (Socket 1151); Supports DDR4 2666 MHz; 2 PCIe 3.0 x16, 2 PCIe 3.0 x1, 1 M.2 Key E for WiFi; AMD Quad CrossFireX™; Graphics Output Options: HDMI, Display Port; 7.1 CH HD Audio (Realtek ALC1200 Audio Codec), Supports DTS Connect; 6 SATA3, 1 Ultra M.2 (PCIe Gen3 x4), 1 Ultra M.2 (PCIe Gen3 x4 & SATA3)...
Umm if i’m not mistaken i7 9700k is 8C 8T
So why?
Yes
i have 6
You have i5 8th gen?
i5-9400
How much will you pay for the i7 9700k?
what gpu do you have? @visual quail
im not sure its worth upgrading to a 9700k from a 9400
and you are paying extra for an overclockable chip on a motherboard that doesnt support overclocking
you are also buying a cpu that is now 2 generations old.
so basiclally no, dont.
Does anyone here have some experience with Steinberg UR22 ? There is one for sale at 50 euros and I was wondering if these work when playing games too. I'm planning on using XLR mics because these mics are damn good at a cheap price and my headphones will sound better. But I'm worried about potential sound latency
is anyone in need of a 3070 not being sold at a stupid scalper price?
so
i sent my pc to warranty and they mounted a 240mm cooler
so i hope i wont have heat issues now
You think a i5 7600k may run bf2042 ?
I have a gtx 1660 super with that
yeah your good
im havin a problem connecting to ea servers on bf5
that's not what the benchmark videos show as a result. The only exception being Frostbite games which only have an increase of like 5fps still
ye that's typical
still debating sending back my 3060
why, if i may ask
Poor performance
whats ur cpu?
i7 8700k clocked at 4.9ghz
i could
id go for 3070
it wont die if you treat it decently enough tho
ah yes that was a poor upgrading choice ngl
there is something seriously wrong with your setup if a 1070ti is outperfoming a 3060 at all
it was still a poor upgrade, but it should still be an upgrade at that
^
hello guys, are there any chances of aio spilling water/bursting?
i bought an aio but im kinda nervous
Oh i'm aware, but for the games I play, my 1070ti was showing its age
and no, there is no chance of that happening
well i sent it to warranty, the guy said he changed the paste but it was still running hot
well. i doubt you will do any overclocking so enjoy the wasted money i guess 
yeah i probably wont but i just wanted to be sure
like i said. wasted money.

if you want to cool your cpu better than with the stock cooler just in case, get an hyper 212 or an id se 903, not watercooling
its a r5 3600 that wont be overclocked
or just get a decent aio
I've had a corsair one for 3 years running max half the time and no problems they have made many improvements to the AIOs over the years just don't buy anything off-hand stuff
its a 65w chip.
off hand?
you mean like 2nd hand or something
my cousin's r5 3600 gets to almost 80 very frequently tbh id put an hyper 212 or something similar to it, but not water cooling or anything more expensive than that
a small but big enough dedicated dissipation will do
shrug
might be his small case
and lack of case fans
but then again it's winter here
yeah a stock cooler relies on good airflow
so idk
well true I do haave 8 fans
i built his pc on a normie office case because he bought the parts last year soon after the global quarantine and importations of these products were closed for some time so any normal case was like 300usd
so i used one from my workplace
he should get a bigger one now tbh but he's unemployed now so
problems
I meant to say like bad brands the ones that have poor quality control or any used ones 😕 just saying
I've always bought new
^
Si
anyone has an idea what is the difference between these two?
Title
Realtek HD Universal Driver
Version
6.0.9202.1
Release Date
2021-07-28
File Size
50 MB
2021/08/6-21:51:40
Realtek High Definition Audio Driver
Version
6.0.1.8703
Release Date
2019-06-03
File Size
264.97 MB
2021/08/6-21:51:58
i guess standard definition versus high definition?
dunno
if you got an usb headset id go for the latter
wait both say hd
nvm
yeah, the other one says universal
dunno what to pick tho, but the other one is old
what's so suspicious is the latest had its file size less
while the old is big
i've always used the normal one
the 2019 ver?
yea
oh, i see
aesthetics i guess
True
but im not going to risk 1500 dollar components for "aesthetics"
i seee, i guess ill choose this too, realtek drivers from windows update gives me stutter sounds 😂
so i figured, maybe searching my motherboard model and look for its driver might fix it
That's what I'm saying I rather buy something a bit more expensive and top brand than something a few bucks off
yeah
wdym sent benchmarks
she asked for some images about my 3060 benchmarks
which are 100% fine
but in-game performance is fucking shite
how much shite
but like
only game that runs well is r6s
its most likely not the gpu tbh
did you like, plug the pcie wire
are you sure your pc is detecting all the ram modules
are you sure youre not overheating
Surprisingly my 3060 only requires 1 power cable
Yes, all temps are good
is your game installed in an ssd or hdd
3060 doesn't require the power to utilize 2 power cables so makes sense
if hdd, check the hdd usage on task manager
I understand that, it's just surprising for me since all my previous cards ran on 2
Post them here let's see them
newer generations require less power
give some of us the pictures and we will post them here
You don't know how much power of those 2 cables they actually used. Many cards have 1 more power connector than needed in case users do some heavy overclocking + because they sell better.
Alright, the benchmarks are 100% normal from what I was told a few weeks ago
What are your specs like
Cpu
Motherboard
Memory
Storage
what psu do you have
corsair rm850
Not bad
did you upgrade your drivers
What about the other specs
the storage is very important and you havent responded to that yet
Okay so;
i7 8700k 4.9ghz (all cores)
Corsair Vengeance 32gb (2x16) 3000mhz
Asus TUF RTX 3060v2 OC
Corsair RM850
NZXT Kraken x62 AIO
Gigabyte z370xp
Samsung M.2 NVMe 250gb
Toshiba 2TB hdd x2
Kingston 120gb SSD (OS)
sorry was typing
if the drive where the game is installed is being stressed at 100% by some background process, the games wont run properly
Drivers are updated btw
U good
I uninstalled with DDU then reinstalled
check the hdd usage
How much was the motherboard
check everything on task manager next time you play a game
Uhh it was meant to be 200 at the time but I paid £100
are you sure your computer is detecting your gpu
did you plug your monitor wire into the gpu and not the motherboard
sorry if these are dumb questions ive seen plenty of people doing this wrongly
Whenever i check my task manager, literally nothing is on 100% usage
not even my storage drives
Yes, both my DP and HDMI are in the GPU
DP?
I run my main monitor off DP, second one is HDMI since it doens't support DP
Display Port
let me grab a link
what frame rate do you get in other demanding games
Wouldn't class GTA as "demanding" but 60fps on low
Insurgency Sandstorm around 60-70 on low
Rainbow six siege is 400+ which is the only game that runs properly
I don't play any other demanding games
also i need a proper definition of games running like shit
Did you put the ram in the right slots
Yes
ram is corsair vengeance 2x16 (32gb) 3000mhz
gta can run on lower than 60fps on all maxed settings on a 3060 i think, its highest settings aren't well optimized, it wouldnt surprise me
idk about insurgency though
GTA likes 1 very fast CPU core more than anything else.
Insurgency I'm meant to run perfectly fine max apparently
Buy Gamekeys at CDKeys ►https://www.cdkeys.com/?mw_aref=JansnBenchmarks
Please hit the thumbs up button and subscribe if you like what you see.
Recorded with my dedicated RECORDING/STREAMING PC via Capture Card.
This video was directly Captured from my ULTRAWIDE GAMING Monitor OR my OLED 4K HDR GAMING TV.
Support me by becoming a Member on thi...
40fps
I'm aware minecraft is poorly optimised but
40fps on a not even demanding shader
Non-shader it's around 200, which my 1070ti got double
this is not your gpus fault, its the game's poor optimization fault, and you need more games to test than just 3
download some battlefield
how does it run it
So, everything max with DX12, no raytracing n stuff
70fps
On low, maximum i hit was 80
What games you run
are you 100% sure youre not getting high temps during the game
Open task manager and play your games and see what's happening sometimes its just one thing
That's good
Cpu stays below 70*C
what about the gpu
doesn't go above 60
it's the triple fan bigboi
that one
Also, my card has a switch built-in.
Performance mode - quiet mode
Performance mode averages 60fps less than Quiet mode
as far as i can tell, gpus dont just give little power as a faulty feature, they either work or dont work, or give you visual glitches like lines over the screen. At least this is how it has been all of my life and I've never heard of a case proving the opposite. I really think there's some small thing in some configuration or something plugged in wrongly
I checked everything when I plugged it in, the power cable was in tight, checked my PSU to see if it came loose or not
It sags a bit but that isn't the issue
if i couldnt find any explanation id bullshit something to the seller like the pcie slot not working
even though i don't think that's the case
well it's on finance

i get it's on pcie 3.0 but even then it shouldn't cause any issues
i pay monthly for it
when did you get it
ic
and i have a return open, so I can send it back until august 28th
I am getting low fps on my rtx 2060 on battlefield 5.
Avg of 45, sometimes 60.
On other games I get 100+ fps on max settings, but BF5 I can't even hit 60 on low.
tbf a 2060 and 3060 aren't that much different
on a lower res, 1080p no frame difference 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdPtd-1Xjcw&ab_channel=BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS lots of difference??
3% OFF with coupon code "BFG" - https://hitech-gamer.com/BFG
▼Timestamps & PC Specs▼
🎮 Games
00:00 Intro
00:12 Cyberpunk 2077
00:45 Cyberpunk 2077 - Ray Tracing
01:46 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
02:56 Doom Eternal
04:02 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
05:14 Red Dead Redemption 2
06:27 Watch Dogs: Legion
07:39 Microsoft Flight Simulator
08:51 Ho...
GL
ah yes a 40fps difference is a lot my bad
anyone here know Refractor engine that use to Create game Battlefield?
no
i think ik why my game broke
go on
that wouldn't fuck your download up
idk then
on ultra?
@languid ermine Have you checked your temps while playing?
its a laptop, 75 cpu and 50 gpu
ah
i5 9th gen, rtx 2060, 16gb ram
Laptop GPUs are typically weaker than a Desktop GPU
throttle point is 98 for both btw
Yeah, your temps are fine
only by 1% low
and not much difference
3% increase
for desktop
ill just assume the game is ass in optimization
i get 100-200 on ultra in bf1
tbh bf1 is even better
tbf same
BF1 ultra around 180
I guess . . . I was playing BF4 and was hitting the FPS cap of 200 on a 1080ti, I'll have to check BFV
BF V was supposed to be optimised, DLSS, etc. . . . I guess not
Not sure if I want to install it now, lol
the graphics of bf1 burn my eyes
ouch
bf1 is the best
i loved the graphics for BF1 tbf
in optimization graphic ratio
bf1 is great
I've played most all BF games, but skipped BF1 and 5. I just got them though, but have not intstalled them.
bf1 is great
yes exactly, lets flash 500% saturation in a foggy battlefield
yeah it is dark
bfV literally has no optimization
well
I enjoyed 3&4 a lot
my 1070ti got more frames than my 3060
I just upgraded, but my 1080ti ran BF4 GREAT
Which it shouldn't . . . somethings not right
tell me about it
im starting to think BFV has no support for rtx features
cant enable dlss
you got DX12 turned on?
I'm 99% sure I read that BFV has DLSS
and I have no experience with first gen rtx cards
Oh, DLSS only wrks with SPECIFIC cards at a SPECIFIC resolution, UGH!
"To turn on DXR ray tracing and DLSS in Battlefield V on GeForce RTX PCs and laptops, follow these steps:
Install our new Game Ready Driver
Install Windows 10 October 2018 update (version 1809, or higher)
Download the new February 13th Battlefield V game update from Origin
With everything installed and updated, head to the Graphics Setting menu in Battlefield V, enable DirectX 12, restart the game if prompted, click on Advanced Settings, enable DXR and restart the game if prompted, enable NVIDIA DLSS, then scroll down and select a detail level for the “DXR Reflections Quality” setting."
More info here:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/gfecnt/battlefield-v-metro-exodus-ray-tracing-dlss/
AI-powered Deep Learning performance-enhancing tech comes to Battlefield V in its next update, and Metro Exodus launches February 15 with a complete suite of NVIDIA RTX technology.
directx 12 not sulported for mgpu
I'm installing BFV now to test it.
bf1 is fun bl
Not sure how he got 30 tflops from
It won't let me run DLSS either . . .
Getting around 150 fps
My $150 RX 580 is outperforming your RTX 2060 lol
why did so few people get the rx590? i always hear about 570 and 580 but never about 590
590 came out so much later
Polaris arch has been out for over 5 years now
i heard the 590 was discontinued shortly after release because some came faulty is that true?
wasnt 590 not a lot of performance gains, hotter and used more power?
No
Difference between rx 590 and rx 580 is small and rx 580 is a lot cheaper
iirc there was just no real reason to buy a 590
RX 590 is a 580 that's on 12nm instead of 14nm
in my country i remember seeing the rx570 for 10k pesos, the 580 for 13k pesos and the 590 for 15k pesos so i naturally went for the 590. Meanwhile, the 1660 was 19k and 1660 super 25k
The efficiency gains from the slightly better node was used for extra clockspeeds
i got cold war with my 3080..
Infinite sadness
I remember at some point you got 3 brand new AAA games with purchase of a $300 RX 5600XT
was that at the height of their gpus have problems though?
hell i bought a 5700 myself that i had problems with
Yeah I remember people complained a lot about rx 5000 series
Drivers
Factory defect,drivers problems and more shit
RX 5000 series was pretty much a beta
First major change to Radeon in a decade lol
Had teething problems
I've heard that RX 5000 series had issues down to the silicon
navi 1 is like ryzen 1xxx
the concept of the arch wasnt made to be very good in first gen
First gen Zen was meant to be chiplet based like Zen2 but AMD just didn't have time or money to implement it
Plus if they did use 14nm for a chiplet design it probably would of capped out at 4 cores/8 threads but would of had higher per-core performance than monolithic Zen
so what is the new navi 31 again
Dual.gpu chiplets 3d. Stacking infinity fabric working as singular gpu?
From.leaks
3D stacked Infinity Cache, up to 512MB
2 graphics chips, 1 main chip and a slave chip that uses some interconnect to make it act like 1 chip
Intel is doing this too with DG2
Up to 2.5x higher rasterization
3x more cores
32GB VRAM
256-bit bus
18 Gbps GDDR6
If you have 1080p or 1440p monitor, don't bother buying the RTX 4090 or RX 7900XT
4K 144Hz gonna become way more viable
Perhaps even 4K 240Hz as well lol
Navi 31 gonna be around $2000 msrp
Easily
No matter if my settings where high or low my fps was the same, around 160 fps
Is 1440p worth to upgrade to?
so how big are the chances that rtx 4070 consumes more power than rtx 3090? because sites say that recommended for 3900x and rtx 3090 is a 850w psu. which is what im using today
depends, if you want 27" or bigger, yes, if youre fine with 24" no.
im getting 60 fps
tf
reinstalled
Honestly im pretty satisfied with 1080p 24” but I’m planning to get RTX 3060ti and some people told me that I won’t benefit from it
That the gpu is meant for 1440p
bf5 has always had random performance problems
uhhh those people are talking out their ass @keen shore
if youre 1080p 60fps gaming, sure thats a bit of a waste
So they’re saying that I won’t use the full power of the gpu
144hz
i mean, on games like overwatch youll murder fps even at max settings
but games like rdr 2, cyberpunk, metro, valhalla, etc at max settings youll sit around 144 fps
yeah it depends on the game, my gtx 1070 can run bf5 in 1440p almost maxsettings with 60fps. while i only get like 40fps in 1080p in heavier games like rdr2
3060 ti for 1080p 144hz is basically an "ultra settings 1080p" card
If I can achieve 100+ framerates on single player games I’m fine with it
would you recommend a cpu upgrade or should I stick with what I own?
Ryzen 5 3600
which is?
yea looking at 3060 ti benchmarks its not even over 144 fps for most games at max settings
So the cpu isn’t good enough?
sorry i didnt see the reply
3600 is basically perfect
yea you COULD get a 5600x and get decent gains, but imo not worth the money
Alrighty everything is perfect so far
I think I’ll stick with 3600
I’ll only upgrade the gpu
And probably get a decent ips monitor
TN sucks
yea 3600 to 5600x is like 10% difference
thats a lot of new messages
10% because the game is on ultra which is gpu bound or whatever
its not purely gpu bound, its still 1080p
if you complain about ultra, complain its not 720p resolution
Ok still if you want to see a difference you gotta use low settings
so yea, complain its not 720p then, because that will show even more of a difference
Let’s be honest who uses 720p in 2021
lets be honest, using ultra for benchmarking isnt something to complain about
are you mad its not a full stop cpu benchmark, or that its not hitting a number you thought/want it to?
Nah I’m just saying it’s not 10% + I don’t really give a fk
whats the alternative to if these games were played using low/med? 5% more of a difference? not really a hard sell
next lets complain that we arent using esport only titles at comp settings at 1080p...
Imagine comparing a gpus and turn settings to low
it is 10% given all the information shown there
pretty fast
its not like its misleading
youre complaints arent even aimed at me, but basically every youtuber running benchmarks
even tech jesus (gamersnexus) uses high settings
go to their youtube comments, not me
lol I’m not complaining about you
youre complaining about numbers i provided like im doing something fishy
the only thing i didnt provide in that screenshot was the test bench
outside of that the numbers and info is there, i just gave a percentage difference
Well yeah because that’s incorrect numbers
its not...
you want different numbers under a different circumstance, the screenshot shows the circumstance of how those numbers exist...
Can you give me the video
if i said the difference between 3600 vs 5600x at 4k ultra is only 5% thats not "incorrect numbers"
be quiet! Silent Base 802: https://www.bequiet.com/en/case/2047
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
Join us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxed
Buy relevant products from Amazon, Newegg and others below:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - https://geni.us/yqtTGn3
GeForce RTX 3070 - https://geni.us/Kfs...
what are you suggesting? a blanket statement like "5600x is 15% faster than 3600"?
Can I dm you?
sure
its not gonna change these facts but im interested to see what "ah ha" moment you got coming
so we got a smaller sample pool, csgo, no mention of settings used, and you want to say this is more accurate?
I will check the settings also I will give you the video link
so at best you can get rid of 1 of the 3 problems i just brought up
im already sus of those numbers too, especially for SOTR
Hardware unboxed mostly benchmarked game that need more gpu than cpu
I think it’s just the games both used in their benchmarks is what makes the difference
Jarrod is legit
im looking up other games benchmarks against his games and none of them are getting over 30% increase in performance
(talking about SOTR and death stranding)
Yeah it’s more of which games you’re talking about
well his 36% increase claims on SOTR and death stranding seem like complete bs from what im doing the math on for other benchmarks
and seems oddly high considering the type of games those are especially in relation to csgo
hell and these benchmarks im cross referencing are commonly using a 3080 vs that dudes 2080ti
Jarrod used an rtx 3090
csgo is cpu dependant
And hardware unboxed used rx 6800 I believe?
I’ve looked at Gamer nexus benchmarks and 43% increase in SOTR medium setting
18% in Rdr2 medium/custom setting
5600X is 48% faster than 3600 in CSGO at 1080p low
Even bigger difference in League and dota iirc
If you turn settings down to get max performance as possible for competitive, 5600X is much better option imo
Easily, but idk if I would suggest upgrading over a 3600 still
Yeah 3600 is still viable for 144hz
Also 5600X runs cooler despite being an X model, due to how wide Zen3 cores are, it helps with spreading heat out
Zen2 was toasty ngl
3600 is guaranteed to hit 90C under load with stock cooler
That’s amazing but price plays a role here
MSRP?
It better be like $200
Yeah they also should work on equivalent to GeForce experience
And fix that shit naming
Geforce experience? Nah that's meh except for shadowplay
Instant replay,Ansel
what about 165hz
For a game like Battlefield V, no
I imagine Battlefield players with 165+Hz monitors play at low/medium settings
not me
On a 3080ti I'm getting around 160 fps on a 360hz monitor
¯_(ツ)_/¯
in BFV
low/medium/high settings
sounds like a bottleneck
Could be, I get 200 in BF4
yeah sounds like a bottleneck as i get 130 with my 3060
is your panel 1080p
Yes
3080ti is a 4k card so youre losing a bit of performance there
around %25 fps loss
I use a 1440 too for other stuff, but for 1st person shooters, the 1080
What gpu would you reccomend for 360hz on a 1080p?
Because I achieve that in other games
i dont know im not really that knowledgeable about computers yet lol
i dont want to make you buy a gpu that you will regret later
the 3080ti is arguably the best gaming gpu out right now. So if I can't achieve it with this card, it can't be achieved.
in more demanding games your best bet is overclocked cpu with highest single core speeds possible
and 3080ti
even ram speeds will matter
what does dx12 do
i turned it on in bf5 and for the first few minutes using it everything stuttered but after that it was good but i dont see any performance increase
yh
Dx12 is needed for raytracing
Other that that from my experience
It can provide more stable fps across the board
from what i remember
Game uses dx11 by default prob
i see but is there any other reason to have it on other than turning on rtx?
i dont want to use rtx
so should i use it anyway or take it off
No need if you don't want
Need a better CPU, like i5-11600K or Ryzen 5600X
7900X is holding back the 3080Ti at 1080p
OK, ty!
yeah get at least 3200mhz-3600mhz
oh ok
horrible timings though 😩
lmao yes
Does 1080p look bad on a 1440p monitor?
1080 is usually bad for monitors bigger than 24' id say
it depends on how far you are from the monitor
if you are not natively running 1080p on a 1440p monitor it will be less sharp than 1080p on a 1080p monitor
caca to you too
Usually im too close to the monitor
Just in case if I want some extra frames I’ll change resolution to 1080
if I can’t reach my monitor’s refresh rate
Is 1440 worth the money ?
I haven’t seen one with my own eyes so I can’t tell the difference between 1080 and 1440
1440p is a bit sharper/noticeable but if you really care about fps or have a graphics card lower than a 1660super/1660/1070 i would recommend going down to 1080 144hz
1080p is not that bad
1080p at high Hz is great
I agree 1080p is still great
bruh i went back to bf1 and i get frame drops below 60 on all graphic settings in some clusterfucky moments and this never happened to me on bfv
is bf1 optimized worse?
do you use windows 11?
it's sharp enouph and gives you lots of fps
(and is cheaper than other options)
no, w10
!!specs
!!specs
Currently there are no official PC specifications released by DICE for the full release of Battlefield 2042.
Can you find one with latency lower than 19?
I would rather have a 3200 cl14 than 4000+ cl19
Especially for gaming
@arctic crag tune it down yourself
tuning ram is a pain in the ass
What's your guys's opinion on the Ryzen 7 3800x?
I would rather have that than a 3700x but I would rather have a 3900x over that.

But great CPU. I would imagine it is still great value for money.
Ye i'm looking at it, How tanky it is looks good
i dont know how prices are like there but the 5600x is faster and the same price
Is Reddit down?
You can also get a 10700k in the same price range and get the cores ipc and the price all in one
this is true
does somebody know a good wireless headset under 100 euros?
but it will need a more expensive motherboard.
what are we talking? It will work fine in a b board if you're not over clocking and b boards are under 100 bucks.
If they went intel they could make it work but 289 for a 3700x or 5600x its all close enough that intel offers the cores and ipc in the price range even if the mobos are little more expensive for the z series
Corsair hs70s go for 99 bucks sometimes and they have been very reliable and sound great. Also the hyper x flights are good and have insane battery life like 30+ hours iirc
i didnt read euros im sorry but they are still good suggestions
unless you specifically need a headset. get a usb mic and a decent pair of headphones
^
a headset would be better for my setup
m40x's and a fifine k669b will give better mic and audio quality for the same money
maybe a bit more
if you want a wired headset corsair makes the hs60 which is just wired hs70's if iirc
then hyper x also makes great wired headsets like the cloud x alpha
the day i stop shilling the k669b will be the day i die 
in terms of clarity its on par with a yeti imo, but its a bit tinny, yeti has a warmer more pleasing sound to it.
still such a good mic for 40 bucks
I never got a usb mic i do music and voices overs so ive had xlr for a long time but its not 40 dollar mic either
Shure has the sm58 and its xlr but no phantom power and its been on sale for 50 bucks time to time, best non powered mic ive heard in a long time
i wont ever go back to a headset, but i also wont go to XLR probably
its just too much hassle to me, i dont do anything that requires an excellent mic, so just being able to plug it in and forget about it is great
its your preference like i said i needed a mic that i could play guitar and violin into and make sure it didnt act up
Got a snowball mic and it's actually pretty decent
Bit awkward but it really does do the job
i think the k669b sounds better
yeah and the mic you have is perfect for that, i have a deeper boomy voice and when i used my usb mics it sounded so unnatural and flat i had to get depth back into it
I'll look at that Granty
the snowball has better noise cancellation
It's so weird
whats the difference between the HS50 and the HS60?
lemme see
timestamped
Today I review the FiFine K669 USB Podcast Mic which is a $25 Budget USB Microphone that performs pretty well for the price. It likely won't work well for any professional applications, but for personal use, it should be sufficient.
Buy it on Amazon
Global: https://geni.us/k669
NOTE (FULL DISCLOSURE): If you purchase an item using my amazon li...
the same from what im reading, the hs50 from reading reviews seems to be heavier and tighter clamping force and not as premium feeling. But everything audio wise looks to be the same.
oh and the 60's go louder
kk
what bit does windows let you run the k669b in?
one moment
Im gonna grab one and see if its something the young ones can use and not destroy
my only complaint about it is that in my experience its sensitive to distance
if you calibrate your levels at a certain distance from your mouth, then put it away, the next day when you move it back to use it may be just a few inches closer or further than it was yesterday
and that will result in you being either silent or deafening
Oh i have that issue with windows in general i dont think thats your mic i have a mic 50x the price and it still does that on my pc
can someone help me my vsync isnt working fine, my monitor has 75hz and when i turn on vsync in battlefield its locked to 60fps
is the resolution in battlefield set to say 1920x1080p 75hz it should say 75hz
there isnt any just 50 and 60
does windows show its 75hz?
how do you mean
what gpu
1060 6gb
go to control panel for nvidia
on the left look for change resolution
select native resolution and then refresh rate make sure it says 75
its 1080p with 75
Im not quite sure then alpha, you dont have you engine fps set to 60 do you?
i overclocked my monitor on 75hz from 60 in other games its working fine
I understand but battlefield has an engine limiter and a resolution limiter, im just asking if they are both set to or above 75
how do you mean with engine
what battlefield?
5
so bfv has a resolution option where you have to choose 1920x1080 75hz , then in advanced there is an option near the top about the max fps or engine limiter idk what its call off hand
framerate limiter
i really dont have the 75hz one
and when i turn off vsync its lagging and i dont know why
its not smooth anymore
Im sorry im not quite sure then how to offer more help
okay thx anyway
i dont have a gsync monitor and what is freesync
i fixed it
i just went on fullscreen windowed
Freesync is AMDs alternative to gsync
Not really AMD's since its open source
dual
Do you think an i5 9400f and gtx1660 super can run the new bf game?
Probably
just wait until they release the specs
Do you guys think the spec requirements for the full game will increase from the technical playtest?
Id guess decrease if anything
As they will be spending this time optimising the game
Maybe but the playtest is greybox, so wouldn't it be less demanding than the full release? Despite future optimization?
The playtest build will most likely be an older build
Without all performance fixes and optimizations
Last couple of weeks should be for optimizing and fixing bugs
So they got plenty of time
It could be more demanding on some of the hardware while less demanding on other types of hardware, compared to the full release. We simply don't know.
It should be ok for 1080p
60 fps
i5... oof
How does the gtx 1070 compare to the 1660?
they are about the same i believe
about same performance
Oh okay
● GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 1660 6GB GAMING X 6G
● GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 8GB GAMING 8G
● CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K 4.8GHz, Hexa Core, 12 Threads / Coffee Lake
● Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H55
● Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON
● PSU: MODECOM VOLCANO 750W 120mm 80 Plus
● RAM: G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 16GB (2x8GB) 3000MHz CL16 1.35V XMP 2...
1070 is a bit faster
Oh what’s the website?
deos bfv run good with an i5 10400f and a gtx 1660 super?
yes
because its a gpu heavy game
thats normal
trolling?
when is teh gpu too hot?
it will never get too hot
the pc will turn off before then
but if you are reaching 90c you should look into it
when i run bfv it gets around 65°C to 70 is it bad when i play with that for a couple hours?
no thats very good
wtf
my gpu goes upto 86c when playing demanding games
people really dont have faith in hardware's ability to do the right thing
80 is high, 90 is worrying. 70 is expected during games
i always thought my pc is going up in flames soon
no...
you got nothing to worry about
just remember, the computer knows more about its self and what is right and wrong than you do
way more
but i guess im so worried because my fans get so loud
if something is wrong, it will protect its self
the user doesnt need to worry, unless they want to
why did you get a pc that you have no idea whats capable of then? in short, yes, ofc it will run the new bf game
if it gets too hot its going to shut it self off
the new bfv game has high demaniung specs
the offical specs haven't been released yet so how would you know?
Those are usually for high graphical settings
i checked the ea website lol
ok whatever yes go get a 5800x and a 3090, the only way to play games
as the game becomes optimised
because its obvious?
any game will run
unless they use linux or whatever
they never asked if itll run 4k on steady fps or 120 or 144fps or anything
ah uh
puts gun back
it unnerves me a little how so many people get hardware without researching any benchmark first
i was just wondering if my pc could run it...
define run
im not being sarcastic, its a serious question
if my pc could handle bf 2042
handle... as in what
able to run it to a playable degree for people with the lowest standards?
it can be interpreted widely
bruh
yes the game will launch when you click play
i was just wondering if my pc could run the game
lol
how is that so hard to understand
because my spces could not be up to par?
i thought the specs in the ea website were the req ones
but they arent
my bad
just chill lol
its gonna be like, at least 10 years before your pc cant launch a game because of outdated specs
!!specs
Currently there are no official PC specifications released by DICE for the full release of Battlefield 2042.
what ando is saying is that you have a good pc that can run anything. you shouldnt need to ask if it can run anything
because it can run anything
i remember when i used to ask if my pc could run anything 
in your defense
your pc was cursed
it ran bfv like a slideshow for some reason
how did that go
did you fix that in the end
its fine now
i just launched it one day and i could run it fine again idk how
the curse must of been removed ig
i see
That site is unreliable at best
how am i supposed to know
there are many articles showing some sort of evidence (dont ask me about it, im just quoting what i see) about the site being biased towards intel
1660S is pretty much on par with 1070 in terms of performance, while a 1660 is slightly slower, in older titles the fps difference is like 1-3 fps in favor of 1660S, in more newer titles 1660S is a little bit more faster than that, but that's due to architectural improvements
usually the gtx 1070 is a bit faster, but the gtx 1660 with gddr6 can be faster in some newer titles
Oh okay thanks
Rx 5600xt vs an rtx 2060
Similar
performance on par but 2060 with dlss would win if supported
Well DICE, EA and the Frostbite engine are official partners to implement FSR so I'd be surprised if it isn't
fsr can be implemented easily
no reason to not do it
someone added fsr as a mod to gta 5
not much long after they released fsr source code
It took some devs 2 hours to implement it
i capped my FPS and my usage lowered by like 20%
bfv is poorly optimised
did you cap your frames?
tried that as well
performance hardly changed
I get a 3060 isn't as powerful
but it still isn't right
60fps in what
bfv?
you either have vsync on
or 60hz cap
or rivatunner or some other third party software capping it
bfv isn't poorly optimized
@weary cypress
guys is an i5 11400f a good cpu to pair with a 3060ti?
intel just why?
i went from amd to intel because the 10400f and 11400f are some of the best values out there
wait you went form amd to intel why?which amd cpu u had ?
the thing is that u intel cpu dont age well enough compared to any of the ryzen counterparts and u dont always have to go for the highest option youve got until u r using it for way way more than gaming mostly rendering
i know but ive done my research and these two intel cpus seem to be of excellent value
as far as intel goes ive got no more knowledge for them but if you think it is good for you well then its good for you
thx man just wanted to know if i should take an i7 instead or a 5600/5600x
ryzen 5600 no idea about the price right now but if you can get it youve just got a banger of a deal
Ryzen 5600X will be a much better option for CPU right now, even the Ryzen 5 3600X is great for budget mid tier gaming and other work. AMD at the moment have been dominating the market with CPU. Though you will never go wrong with Intel either. The equivalent would be Intel 10700k. If you want it mostly for gaming I'd go for the Ryzen otherwise if you need more workload I'd get Intel. Either way both are good options for Mid tier.
No worries mate! Its a good CPU, and you'll get decent FPS in most games. Can't go wrong with it.
bfv has better optimisation than bf1 did
yeah but it also looks worse
and has less objects in general
most of the maps in V are just fields
yeah man thx
plastic chair because it flexible not only that but you also can stack it
the amazon basics office chair
cheap in price, comfortable and feels premium
can't recommend it enouph
idk amazon doesn't have a lot of things for here
DDR5 will create more heat than DDR4 despite having lower power draw
"DDR5 could conceivably run much hotter than DDR4. They've moved voltage regulation off the motherboard itself, and now it's on the chip. So you actually could be pumping a lot more heat into DDR5 modules."
Active DIMM cooling will make a comeback lol
i dont mind that as long as it looks good
I wonder why 3600mhz isn’t stable in b450 unlike b550
Even tho in mobo website it’s rated to support up to 4400mhz
Everything is producing more heat these days. Every generation is faster, but also produce more heat. High end computers are at the point you can't have them in a small room without heating up the entire room so it is uncomfortable.
Yeah
SSDs also
Which is why m.2 is getting replaced as a form factor
To E.1 S and L
for servers at least, dunno about consumer machines
Yeah I know
Will be later i guess
They can't really continue as is on high end, already putting ridiculous heatsink on them
I wonder how my very old, GPU GTX 780 would last with the new game 😂 How long till it burns? (Lowkey wanna test it HAH)
(And no, I do not use this GPU, its stored away, I got a new one)
It will overheat though
why would it?
So you are saying, that it could run the game?
Yeah
Time flies damn.
Indeed
I still remember considering buying a ps4 at launch
Since I bought my ps3 at launch
Sooo... apparently the latest Nvidia drivers can cause the system to not post correctly... y'all be careful out there.
Guess ill skip these then
not post correctly?
Not post correctly?
Post means you boot into OS basically
Oh
oh
Have not heard of anything like that from the 471.41 WHQL drivers
Ill skip those drivers then
I haven't still found any info about this
can't find any posts like this on nvidia sub or disc or amd sub or disc or wccftech or videocardz
POST is not done by the OS, rather it's test by the components themselves in firmware
OS is not loaded at that point yet
https://answers.ea.com/t5/Battlefield-1/PC-BF1-will-not-launch-Solved-using-regedit/td-p/6230008 @fast veldt
Can't find the activation folder under Image file execution options what should i do
i believe it stands for pre operating system test. so that is somewhat obvious 
ok googling that tells me that is not true
its power on self test
not sure where i got that from then
I know this isn’t really technology related but recently for some reason when I go to the sever browser in bf1 to look for games in just conquest I only see east cost severs now and like zero west coast severs. Before I saw a good mix of both. Just curious if anyone knows how to fix this?
Sorry one last thing. If you could run bf5 good for the most part will you most likely be able to run 2042 some what well
depends on how you define "good for the most part" and "somewhat well"
also remember we don't know how demanding or well or badly optimized the game will be
but if you run bfv at like 80fps on high graphic settings, I wouldn't worry
Unless it's my motherboard
