#technology
1 messages · Page 396 of 1
should be 2022
ok
or maybe end of 2021
Yeah 2022 mostly
still not at 7nm
like i said above
that number doesnt mean anything
as they are two different measurements taken for intel and amd
Have you guys seen the 3nm TSMC made
amd is gonna go to 5nm
as suggested/covered in this chat recently, the number we are told really doesnt mean much
transistor numbers matter, and how mature the process node is
yes, but thats not yet ready for mass production
if i remember correctly, IBM made a 1nm transistor not long ago
i tend not to concern myself with the tech behind this stuff, its easily way beyond my comprehension, my biggest concern is how much fps i get for the price i paid
but its still just R&D
if a cpu filled with cat pee runs the fastest at the best price, i really dont care
Damn who would buy that lmao
intel's 14nm and amd's 7nm cpus are very similar in transistor size
you wouldnt?
Cpu filled with cat pee why would i buy lol
and i'd assume that intel's 10nm and amd's 5nm will be the same story again
but 7nm is more marketable
cuz its a smaller number
"fastest and best price"
and smaller=better for more casual people
Another question I have why there are only 2 companies making cpus?
Money
not sure thats the truth?
And there arent just 2
I mean popular
as far as brands putting their names on cpus go there amd, intel, apple, qualcom, samsung and probably others
For desktop
granted, idk if TSMC is supplying everyone BUT intel
I know apple yeah they have M1
well for desktop you now have apple, amd and intel
i imagine making cpus is not cheap, and even if you could make them youd have to sell them, and brand recognition goes a long way
other companies didnt innovate fast enough so they ended up obsolete, in the PC marketspace that is
intel came up with x86 cpus
and they license x86 to amd
they were
but due to monopoly laws they had to provide that data to their competitors
cyrix was another notable company that had an x86 license
but they died out in the 90's
there was also a couple of other things why intel agreed to license x86 to amd
but long story short, amd tried to clone intel's cpus
there were some other license which amd managed to reverse engineer and they made a legal copy of a cpu
and intel tried to sue them, and they lost
then amd tried to trademark another thing that was in that cpu that they made
that didnt work out, so in the end, they agreed upon intel licensing x86 to amd
I have important image I want to post here can I dm anyone that can post images to post it?
Ty mate
iirc quality preset isnt the same for fsr and dlss
it could be using a lower resolution image to upscale, which is essentially what the settings mean
That makes sense
im not sure how this works exactly, but from what i gathered if 4k is native, and you do dlss quality, its rendering at 1440p and upscaling
something like ultra performance dlss mode is 720p and upscaling
Yeah I heard about it
(not sure if those numbers are accurate, but an example of what they mean)
720p you’re right
and yea, assuming hwu is putting the settings in order, dlss quality is equivalent to fsr ultra quality
(at least in terms of their ranking within their own tech)
Have you tried dlss yourself?
yes
currently using dlss in rdr 2 to get smooth 60 fps with almost max settings at 4k
Did you notice the difference in quality?
definitely
in rdr 2's case i think it even made the image better
apparently rdr2 had a default level of AA no matter what, which made the game slightly blurry
Lmafo
What about other games
I want to know how worse the image will be in real life scenario compared to native
uhhh cyberpunk was the other game i used it in, that helped a lot in that game too BUT it had bad ghosting in certain scenarios
outside of outliers like ghosting, i honestly dont think many people would be able to tell the difference between native 4k and 4k with quality dlss set on UNLESS they had a side by side
I see gaining couple fps for a bit worse quality isn’t that bad at all
personally, its 100% worth it in most scenarios
Especially in hardware rape games like rdr2 and cyperpunk
yea, where it was a matter of turning down settings to get 60 fps in the first place
lmfao
they cant sell their warranty 
750Watt rig goes brrrrr
You can't get certain prebuilts any more yeah
Can still make your own but people who want to do that are still in the minority
would you guys say its possible to get a 2600x with a 360mm rad to stay at 30 degrees while under load on BF1 ?
no
30 degrees with any cooler under load would need a chiller yeah
Just get a plastic container with ice water in and stick your rad in that
Then swap the ice water out every few minutes 
I plan on moving there with a 10700kf and 3080…
Yikes
I have to smuggle it in.
good shit
Goddayum
Me happy knowing no one is getting those terrible pc's in those states
Oof
That's a massive oof.
Good news is dell sent me out to just straight replace it so he's good now 👍
Damn good on ya Dell.
Just watched jayztwocents video on the ban and it’s only against pre built PCs. They aren’t regulating custom builds.
Makes sense, you could be building a PC with a high wattage CPU and no GPU for instance
I’m just glad I don’t have to worry about it.
Murica F yeah 
I love your banner @lofty light 

Thanks man 
Can someone help me for a sec? Soo im gonna buy a m.2 ssd and i would like to set it as main drive(if im saying that right), but i dont know what will happen with all my progress/ other stuff on my pc.
so you want your os to the m.2?
Yes
there are tools you can use to copy an entire drive onto another one if you want an easy way to not lose all your stuff
Ok were to find that
its recommended to reinstall windows yes. but ive copied drives windows included plenty of times and never had an issue
Is it easy to do?
Maybe im gonna reset it then cuz its also my main gaming pc
are you sure you can boot from the m2 device? this would the first thing i would clear up
yeah some need an update or something for your mobo to recognize the m.2
google your mobo and look for info if it needs an update
Ok
this all might be a massive hassle but m.2 is worth it
i got a 1tb on my laptop
and its insanely fast
Do i look for what gen the slot is?
I wouldnt recommend updating bios if you dont know what you are doing
and i disagree with m.2 being worth it. in terms of load times its barely faster than a regular 2.5"
its benefit comes in the form of transferring data
had a good laugh looking it the forums seeing wd is selling nvme drives with bf2042
could have done that with every other disk aswell
if you have an ssd and you run out of space you can either hook up another ssd or clone the ssd to a bigger ssd
i have an os ssd and a gamedata ssd
yes
Oh
see granty's screenshots
no, only your os stuff is running faster
Ok
basicly gamedata gets loaded into the ram, if gamedata gets loaded from a hdd it get loaded 1/5 slower than from a ssd
Ok thx for info. I think imma go buy a ssd for storage
I will go for SSD for cheaper price. You may not be able to use all NVMe slots
TLC SSD with DRAM is still a good one to choose from
be aware not to get QLC SSD or DRAMless TLC SSD
Is that worse
these are bad. I don't recommend people to get it
coz a typical 500GB or 1TB TLC SSD with DRAM is like $10-20 more than QLC SSD or DRAMless TLC SSD
Ok
TLC SSD with DRAM has a much better longevity and better sustain write speed. MLC is another level, such as 970 PRO or 980 PRO. which works the same as TLC SSD but doubled the price with better longevity
i have a Samsung SSD 860 PRO 2TB which runs great
but the as he said MLC is another level
Is Crucial MX500 a good ssd to go with?
yeah. MLC SSD are really good. I know people who bought 850 PRO when it came out and still using today
plus Samsung gave 10 years warranty (or X amount of TBW) on it
Ok
the mx500 is fine
Ok i will go for that
mx! not bx!
Yes mx
but i usually recommend people to get MX and not BX. If they aren't sure about it, go for samsung
Especially the samsung 870 EVO is cheaper than MX500 in my area
germany -> 870 Evo 240 euro, mx500 180 euro
In my country the samsung is 10e more
the 1TB MX500 cost 116 AUD here, and 870 EVO cost 115 (down to 104 AUD using giftcards)
aud 😄
Wich is better then samaung or crucial
Wrong conclusion. It's nvme isn't worth it, m.2 is still just a formfactor and connector and is capable of both SATA and nvme.
unless you mean nvme
Also, that conclusion might change once the new DirectStorage is implemented in games and Windows.
i will go for samsung with better brand reputation and faster overall speed
Ok thx for your time🙂
Oof
Two years ago i almost made the mistake of buying a gpu with the wrong slot lol
you are right, on both m2 nvme and direct storage
Rgb makes your pc run better right?
faster ofc
yeah, i run a dramless tlc ssd rn, and it's not that durable
No, AMD was officially licenced to manufacture Intel cpus
IBM wanted to have more than 1 source for the cpus they were using
not really
I wrote about 10tb mine is like 95%
it's a dramless tlc ssd and a pretty early one at that
my MLC ssd is at 460 TBW rn
and my samsung only about 11 TB, but it's newest of them
Which Samsung you got
I have one works like a charm
yeah
I heard about a new 980
Get it if you can
anyone bought the oneplus nord 2?
they are not banned, they just require certification
and it's not about power usage while it's being used, it's about energy waste when the computers aren't being used and are idling
oh nvm i think its available tomorrow
there's only a handful of companies with x86 licence, but there's several trying to push ARM cpus into PC market.
What i said was before they got the licence
I know, thats why i said it was before x86 licence
That legal cloning and intel's lawsuit that ultimately failed led to them making an agreement for x86 licence
There were other reasons too
They required more than 1 source
But its a notable one as well
I do love hearing that, much love ❤️ 😄
Someone joins my server: "today you'll be facing my clan" (Just bots all using c4 and nothing else.)
Arm or even RISC-V would be 🔥
Unfortunately x86 will continue to decline in its efficiency because of its age
All the extra stuff pushed onto it for years and years
Backwards compatibility it's great ye but pretty soon ai with allow us to emulate anything efficiently I'm sure.
It's just a matter of time
One day we'll probably platu on how much power we actually need as a consumer too and at that point our phones will probably be powerful enough to run things that are far more complex than our current best pcs can muster
I think my big question is though is vr really the future of gaming?
Will we controller and mouse jockeys get side lined? lol
I'd say vr is the next evolution
Or another way to play games
I don't think m+k and controllers are gonna go anytime soon
It's not practical to play fps games in vr
And other genres as well
yeah i hope RISC-V will do great
Phones won't take over actual work though
Also Intel might buy SiFive, so hopefully Intel will also do well with RISC-V cpus
They're also making RISC-V cpus on intel 7nm
AMD got their RX 6000 series GPUs working with RISC-V processors
Nvm Linux engineer did
Yeah
I think I fixed my FPS problem on my laptop
I increased the dedicated memory for the GPU
That does nothing except for a few old programs
Maybe APU
yes I have
me 2 bro how did you fix it ?
Guys how to fix it this error on battlefield1 (0xc000007b.)??
i think games are gonna go back to cartridges
is this a serious take?
yes
i think theyll be similar to the expandable storage that we see on the series x
sounds wasteful
i remember reading or watching a video that explained why cartridges arent common and at least in that example it was because they are proprietary
ok well you cant expect to play an xbox game on a playstation
so whats the difference
as ssds get cheaper to produce i think it could happen
with games getting bigger and bigger, this would eliminate the need for installs off the disc since its already installed on this high capacity drive that you just plug in
youre not considering how hard it is to distribute physical games compared to digital
well not hard. but costly
there is no advantage for a developer to sell physical copies
that doesnt have to do with a proprietary technology to even get the game on "disc" in the first place @cloud solar
they have to pay for the physical media in the first place, then they have to pay for distribution, they will also need to distribute to hundreds of retailers across the world. and keep up with these retailers quantities and charge rates
all this compares to giving steam a copy and letting them do all the work
honestly i dont think the cost of physical copies is that much, or the logistics being that troublesome
well sure, but i doubt its really a concern
also sure games are getting bigger. but internet speeds are also getting faster around the world
so it cancels out
not only that but most "installs" are patches that come after the disc comes out
id rather not wait 30 minutes to play the game i bought physically
basically in the timeframe it takes to put a game on disc and ship it out globally for a launch date, in that timeframe they work on the game as well
im in a server with 4 other people, ive been friends with them for years. when i first started playing with them they all had really poor internet, like less than 20mbps
fast forward a few years and 3/4 have had their areas covered by fibre and have got 200+
anyway. i cant see physical games making a comeback either
and i hope they dont
it clearly isnt
how are we lame for logically going through why cartridges wont happen?
im not against it myself, i think cartridges are cooler, but that doesnt mean i ignore logic...
youre lame...

the more i think about this the more i disagree
lets say you are some super small indie company with a good idea. see teardown for example.
how would you even begin to ship tens of thousands of drives across the world. to tiny countries with very few potential customers
indie is a pretty niche scenario, and thats what publishers are for
and likely a reason most indie games are digital only
say like, the DRC or something, there may only be like 20 people with a gaming pc in that country. but a dev will want in the best case scenario every single gamer to have the potential to buy their game
and thats why steam is great. because they can.
yea, digital is better, i still dont think for any established dev/pub that physical copies are a concern
they still most likely wont ship to remote or less developed countries tho
because obviously there is less money to be made.
but with digital you instantly give these countries access to your game. and there for reach more customers and make more money
lets be honest though, i doubt those devs/pubs really care about missing out on small countries
yea i get wanting you game to reach the most people, but theres easily a line where its just not worth it
do you need to enable something in the bios of a prime b450m-a in order to make use of 3200mhz ram?
or is that still within the normality range
no
3000?
so ddr4 has a standard speed
its 2133mhz and specific timings
and all ram will run at that
enabling xmp will set it to what the manufacturer rated the sticks, rather than the ddr4 specification
all motherboards
okie
but even 2133mhz ram should have xmp enabled
because its likely the sticks are rated for tighter timings than the ddr4 spec
so enabling xmp will lower the timings
my cousin has a ryzen 5 3600 and needs ram but he's unemployed so every cent counts now, so im not sure wether to suggest him to go for 2666 or 3200
what ram does he has now?
an old crucial ballistix white 2400mhz 8gb module
maybe he could just get only one hyperx fury 8gb 2666 module but i dont like the idea of mixing different brands
on a super tight budget id say go for 2666 mhz from a good brand like corsair and overclocking it
2666 should be able to run at 3000 mhz
my 2133 ram can run at 2666 maybe more
thing is he has a gtx1650 so i dont think he will ever make use of high speed ram
as long as he has that gpu
it affects cpu speed, not gpu speed
he has a good cpu so he should also try get the best ram he can
yeah but his cpu will never need to reach high use
maybe he should get high speed for future investment
yeah but i have many other doubts about that
what if that small 10fps difference only happens when the cpu really needs to go faster because you have a good enough gpu?
if you know what i mean
since his cpu is much better than his gpu, maybe he wont even have that small difference
because even with low ram speed, his cpu is relaxed because the gpu reaches its maximum usage easily since it's a low tier
so theres no point for the cpu to reach 100%
and to be improved
unless it's a ridiculously cpu demanding game i guess
i am thinking that if he gets 2666 or 3200 it wont make any difference nowadays
and that there will possibly be a small difference if he ever gets a stronger gpu
as far as i understand it, high ram usage also means less ram usage, in a good way, less mb's of ram are required
so in a way it's like having a bit more ram
and also helps the cpu work a bit faster too, depending on the situation
but nothing of this will matter if the gpu reaches its limit very easily
so in his case, going for 3200 would only be a future investment, but im asking just in case im missing something
are these decent ram models?
maybe
For some reason I can't run 1440 on my series x and run 7.1 sound... which is fucking weird
like you cant do 1440p and 7.1 at the same time?
Well technically it's either 1080p 120 fps or 1440p 60 fps
Its gotta be a bug or some shit
Please help,
I use 4700U laptop for streaming only on YouTube and i game on 8700k ,1070.
The quality is very bad! I use x264, faster , 11000bits ,2 key frames etc. For 1080p 60!
I stream Apex legends. Please please help me improve my stream quality.
Use higher x264 preset or use nvenc
I would take Corsair Vengeance over it
i would take the cheapest decent ram available
Because first timing is shit cl19 if I’m not mistaken +they use Hynix ram
Hynix is decent
But with Corsair you will get Samsung B
dont like.. 80% of ram kits use hynix or micron?
not all corsair kits use samsung b die either iirc
Corsair mostly uses Samsung
Yeah not all you can search the serial number to make sure
Find Samsung B-Die DDR 4 memory kits on Amazon, Newegg and many more.
yea looking up samsung b die from corsair at 3200 you get 11 options, for 2x8 sticks the cheapest is 200 bucks
no thank you
200$??? tf?
ive never noticed samsung b die to be worth the price hike
i assume youre doing something more than gaming
See if this is samsung or not
Because I’m familiar with Intel and they’ve been good to me
11900K is fine, just a bit overpriced for what it is
It was cheaper than the 5900 where I got it tbh
that doesnt show up as samsung b die from bdie finder
Micro center had it on sale
I really wanted to move to AMD but I am so not familiar with their products so I just went for the 8700K, which is running very well. Think I hit the jackpot on it because I am running it on 5.3GHz at 1.28(or 1.29)v with no issues. Good temps.
I run 4.7 on mine
Exactly that’s what I’m saying @quaint topaz
5.0 is unstable
if you bought an 8700k close to launch thats one hell of a purchase
I’m not familiar with AMD and I wasn’t going to start now
I ran my 5800x @5.05
I bought it at launch
Fun times.
OC boys
It was decently priced, so I'm very happy with my 8700K so far.
Wait this channel is actually populated? Yeah.
I will admit these recent Intel CPUs tend to run pretty cool
AMD has been doing very well though
My i7 7700K ran hot
I remember when games started throwing the i5-6600K on the minimum requirements and I was like fuck, that's my time to upgrade. Looking directly at BF1.
BF1 had a big RAM and CPU rec iirc
The Ram was literally like 12-16 or something for rec
I hope my rtx 2070 super and ryzen 7 2700x will be not too hot
While playing bf 2042
Battlefield games run hard on the cpu, I won't be surprised if a 6 core cpu is going to be the minimum for a playable experience
Ive been changing between Intel and AMD for ages. They are not that different that you need to keep to just one of them imo.
I currently run AMD on my laptop and intel on my desktop
who pinged me
Do a stress test on the cpu and gpu, normally no game exceeds the temps seen in stress tests as they are an artificial work load.
Though I'd get Ryzen if I bought a CPU nowadays I guess
But my 8700K is still great after 4 years
I'm happy 2042 is getting better DLSS support. BFV's DLSS integration is basically pointless, given that it's grayed out for me, for whatever reason If you run DLSS, you'll be good to go.
The 5900x is just so spicy
It goes mostly 75 degrees on cpu and 70 on gpu on stress test soo i guess i should be fine then
Indeed
Yeah, that's not going to be an issue at all
The one thing I just don’t like about AMD is it’s a chore searching through the types of mobos
I'd want one if I bought a CPU nowadays
Did AMD ever come out with their DLSS alternative?
FSR? Yes
Only 2 you should be concerned with are B550 and X570
Isn’t like called uhh FSR
How does that run?
Quite early so far though
There are less amd mobo types than intel heh
Fsr, yes, but it utilizes a different tech than dlss
Yeah dw I didn’t go with those. I went with a Z590
No machine learning?
Decently, but its not DL and not hardware accelerated
It’s almost the same as dlss in performance
Buy Hardware Unboxed merch: https://represent.com/store/hardwareunboxed
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
Join us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxed
Buy relevant products from Amazon, Newegg and others below:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - https://geni.us/yqtTGn3
GeForce RTX 3070 - https://geni...
Everyone can use it though unlike dlss
I remember sitting at the NVIDIA 2018 conference when they first announced the RTX series and I was DROOLING over the tech presentation.
"Whereas DLSS employs artificial intelligence and neural networks to achieve its goals, AMD is instead leaning on advanced spatial upscaling algorithms"
RTX is one of the greatest gimmicks Nvidia has ever had
personally, i think RTX is great
Gimmick? Kinda. Revolutionary? Yes.
Its getting there.
RTX Minecraft, yum yum.
its not a MUST HAVE, but its a damn good bonus for me
More and more games are supporting dlss and raytracing
I call it a gimmick because Nvidia is always pulling something out of their sleeve
The magicians of GPUs
Its not a gimmick, but until the performance impact is small, it won't be used mainstream
It's not something Nvidia started, but they've been doing well with it
Not to mention the other tools that use the tensor cores like rtx voice
i think its unreasonable to ask for small performance impact for ray tracing..
Hell, even 90's era consoles are technically RT capable
The rumored Lovelace 40 series is pushing performance 100% or something faster than the 3090? Kind of insane if that rumor is true
To be able to render path traced reflections and lighting REAL-TIME is a huge thing. While the performance hit is noticeable, think of how that'll become in a few generations.
I want to see ray traced PS2 games
Same way now that ssr has a small performance impact, people won't use the tech until they can run it comfortably. Also the most popular gpus aren't rtx cards, so it will take a minute for rtx to become mainstream
I hope the price tag of a 4090 wont exceed 2000€
Quake with RTX is good 
Intel did RT in 2009 in a multiplayer game
cant wait to play metro exodus in full ray tracing
I will buy anything that gives me RTX Fear
Game?
Why must you do this to me
Let me try to find a video of me shooting a reflection in BFV thinking that's an enemy 🤡
Fear
One of my favorite games I’m sorry Wilde
I consider it a technical masterpiece
It was
Just everything about it from mechanical animations (slide tackling)
To its lighting
The moment I felt incredibly dumb. https://twitter.com/PeterSMK2/status/1235514363190140929
Well that's embarrassing... Maybe I should start playing with RTX off 😂😂 #BattlefieldV #RTXOn https://t.co/gOno0pzTs3
LOOOL
I've done that a couple times, especially during the nvidia RTX event where we all sat down and played BFV with RTX enabled. Reflections were almost mirror like
Metro exodus enhanced edition has option for full RT
If you want to demolish your framerate
Oh metro exodus is another game that kills it so well in RTX
Even on my 2080 ti
I was happy I can play that game at like 95 FPS with full RTX
Control runs like butter with RTX and DLSS
rtx version with dlss had good performance
One thing that games forget to realize is that cars / mirrors / windows get smudges, dirt, and grime on it. Especially cars are not perfect reflections.
i will never use dlss
Whenever someone talks about control. I just get reminded of one very important thing
Wolfenstien Youngblood runs EVEN better. Almost no performance hit with DXR reflections. So good.
why? dlss is incredible...
not until i upgrade to at least 1440p
The most important thing about control is it could hint to Alan Wake 2
I hit my 3070 with it, fun times.
I was averaging 100fps with MEIN LEBEN! settings in Youngblood. 1440p/2080 Ti
the most optimized game ive ever played
hot
I prefer not to use it unless I have to
im on 1080p so dlss is gross looking for me
its free real estate
but i like dlss more than i like 30fps
Rip 3050ti laptop
DXR just... elevates everything. Doesn't elevate performance that's for sure.
https://twitter.com/PeterSMK2/status/1269291736657952769
Pain
when you can turn down settings to get better fps but suddenly thats unacceptable
dude i think the fact that the 1060 out does it should be enough to say that its unacceptable
People want everything maxed but then use dlss
It's because of vram
its also a 3050 ti, its a tier down in terms of expectations
When it's not running out it does better than 1060 by a decent margin
I wish we had Tsushima on pc
Just curious are we ever going to see budget gpus again after this shortage is over, like what happened to the $250 cards, I know inflation but still.
its running at 10 fps
^
now if a 3060 had less vram thats a problem
no its not
In this game
YES IT IS LMAO
soon hopefully, that game was amazing
Cause of vram
gotta pay extra for it 
Then heard next gen version is coming, pain.
In games that are vram limited, the 1060 is better, but a 3050ti will still beat it in other games
at best you could expect a xx50 ti to match a xx60 from a previous generation
Here's some Minecraft RTX. Scrumptious
Uhhh, you don't.
ghost of tsushima is an unforgettable experience imo.
Played Tsushima 60fps last Christmas
Wouldn't mind playing this at 6 fps
Because it's very expensive to do
it actually runs a lot better than you think if you havent fully tried it yet
Honestly im gonna sit either at a 3060ti or a 3070
I'll get a 4k monitor just for that
Both seem pretty good and will last me more a long time
3060 ti is better value
at least in imaginary world where you can get anything for msrp
How long should either one of those last me?
depends on what you want out of them
Look how long the 1060 lasted
through the console generation at least
Yeah I tried this in Germany in a very controlled environment where I had a developer babysit me and telling me to hold W to move. I'm like just let me enjoy the scenery pls
Why Nvidia chose to have 16 GB vram on a laptop 3080 though I've no idea
I have a non LHR card, can't wait for the market to be populated with LHR cards more and more
By the way rtx chauchat looks beautiful
1080p 144hz? probably 5+ years as long as you can turn down settings
So I can trade mine to a card hungry miner
id even say 1440p
i genuinely think the only game that really gave me a sense of atmosphere besides GoT was RDR2
it can definitely do 1440p, but it wont last as long
1080p is just underestimating the 3060 ti
@quaint topaz reckon you can get me rtx chromed fg42? 👀
boo not gonna launch the game now remind me later
BFV looks good, but theres something about the art style of BF1 i cant shake honestly, i think that one hit me the most

Whew
This sounds fucking dumb but I didn't even realise the german recon was black till late 2018
i wonder if theyll add or announce raytracing to 2042
Honestly, that reflection looks TOO good, a puddle never looks that perfect. It needs some inconsistency.
i wont be able to run it but itll be cool to see
You'd be surprised how good puddles can look
I can imagine them doing it sometime into it yeah
Puddles can look good especially if not bothered.
True but this is a war with broken buildings and soldiers running through it
But I understand your point
ill find more examples hold up
This may sound dumb but I cant wait for dynamic puddles
I would like that as well
i hope theres like dynamic terrain in 2042
Im not too super concerned, sorry. What's your estimate on how long it'll last.
idk if we have the power to do what i want to see with it though
Reminds me of a graphical issue with nvidia cards in BF1's early days where puddles looked completely black so you're just staring into the void lol
I wouldn't care if the puddle was infinite just gimme cool effect
i like the tracks in snow
i want to be able to shoot a rocket from a jet at a cliff and cause a landslide of rocks or smth to fall and kill enemies below
too much for current technology probably
That was the most unexpected and impressive thing about BFV's DXR integration. https://twitter.com/PeterSMK2/status/1243794409554153472
Working mirrors in #BattlefieldV with #RTXON
While may not seem like whatever's being rendered in the mirror is highly detailed, but the technology is so fascinating to me... I can't wait to see how games would look like in 5 years from now. 👏
@Battlefield @NVIDIAGeForce https://t.co/lv6usKiETF
Not really
Just a lot of work potentially
Hey Peter reckon we can get some rtx for return to castle wolfenstein???
Rtx looks great and everything but the loss in performance is huge
DLSS helps
heard its not too bad on 3000 cards
Rtx is still in beta
AMD still stink a bit in RT performance
yeah
I mean yeah, I don't think any cards are coming out without DXR support. (Fun fact, Nvidia's 10-series support DXR, at 1-2 fps at native resolution).
AMD sucks when it comes to Gpus
but they showed that theyre capable of making it good with the new consoles so well have to wait for the rx 7000 gpus
Mate driver are far from stable
the 6000 gpus are better than the 3000 gpus in rasterized rendering
There's also decent vulkan RT
and they fixed the drivers
Drivers are fine
the drivers have been fixed for a long time
youre thinking of the launch lol
years, actually.
they got fixed fairly quickly
they fixed their driver situation half way through the life span of rx 5000
3 years would be a safe bet, i expect at 5 youll start really considering an upgrade
i prefer the look of fsr to dlss tbh
Fair enough!
Someone made a open source fsr for proton, I think
of course theres no guarantee on this, vram requirements could jump up in 2 years and ruin that
By the way. Between the 1080ti and 3060ti. What's the difference?
My friend has an rx580 his game was unplayable after updating driver
they are similar
3060 ti is faster unless you run into vram limitations
but the 3060ti has less power draw. and has raytracing abilities
So more efficient
pretty much
Might be a local issue since it isn't a widely reported issue
i still think the best performance for the dollar amount is a 3080
Eh not really
3060 ti is better, probably by 15% if i had to guess
I'm sure many people are running the latest drivers on 580's
Deliver Us the Moon is also a great game with RTX. Runs very well.
6700xt is better imo
Raytracing isn't my concern but a smaller power draw is attractive
And 6800
Isn't the 6000 series better for 1080p
Price to perf doesn't mean much rn though
yea
yes, way.
equal at 1440p, nvidia leads at 4k
isnt this only bc they have dlss?
no
i thought it was
Yeah I was thinking if I wanted 1080 p power well... yeah that but with what I have, it's best to go for 30 series or some shit
Did you see the benchmark vid, I sent you, its not that big of a difference between a 1080ti vs 3060ti, in some games its not even worth upgrading. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugJhVsrjIsE
any reviewer i watched had DLSS off, for obvious reasons
Oh im sorry, no I didn't.
you shouldnt buy anything other than current gen unless you are super tight on budget imo
yes the benchmark suggests
because current gen will offer ALWAYS same or more performance for same or less money
but if you use RT obviously the 3080 kicks ahead
yeah they just havent perfected it
But yeah don't worry, I have an old amd 5800x pro card from the 2012's. You guys reckon a 3060ti is a worth while boost? 
but if its off, then 6800 kicks ahead in 1080p
MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD Gaming Monitor: https://msi.gm/GetOptix
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
Join us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxed
Buy relevant products from Amazon, Newegg and others below:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - https://geni.us/yqtTGn3
GeForce RTX 3070 - https://geni.us/Kfso...
I'd personally go for a 3070
6000 series has lower bandwidth than 3080 up
Watch Dogs Legion - For me some games are really worth playing at 50-60 fps to get that sweet sweet semi-photorealistc look.
so way. when are you planning on getting this pc ?
Especially if you want to dabble in some VR
objectively no, its the 3070 or 3060ti iirc
So I had another question, between the ryzen 5 and ryzen 7, is there really a big difference?
yes
Im just curious
there is a big difference
Ahhh
Depends what you're running
5600x is 6c12t and 5800x is 8c16t for a start
the big difference is literally 2 cores
(not worth the price difference)
and more performance
I dont know that stuff granty
its not worth the price difference no
to you maybe
but there is a difference
Ahhh
some people might need the extra cores
to anyone just gaming...
if you want the cores get the cores 🤷
not yet at least
6900 competes with the 3090 at 1080p without RT, but then again obviously after RT is on, the 6900 just sleeps. Most of the AMD cards are real good this year if you're not going for RT
this isnt some niche statement, if youre just gaming the price increase from 5600x to 5800x is not worth it
Or dlss
Yeah
DLSS might pull 3090 ahead then
Coming from an AMD phenom 2 though, anything is worth it xD
3700x is a great deal
It is, if you want to do some streaming on the side.
Not to say it's bad cause wasn't the phenom 2 actually pretty good for its time?
well yea, but that falls outside of "just gaming"
Streaming you can also just use nvenc
@toxic wigeon I wouldn't upgrade from a 1080ti to a 3060ti as its not a big difference, I think a 3070 is the better choice
get a used 3700x with a b550 or x570 -> upgrade to 5950x in like 5 years -> profit
I just think AMD excels mostly in CPU, but then they preform pretty good for GPU, its just whenever it comes to like the whole new idea for gaming, they tend to sleep
Ah yeah
I sometimes stream VR games over Discord and my friends want to watch, so nvenc isn't an option
3700x at 1080p is pretty meh though
As I've said earlier, I've got an old amd x5800 something and I talked to some people about a gpu around that power range
But yeah
Well yeah, discord streaming..
I wouldn't mind putting in some money for a 3070
Oh, sorry then
Be happy!
Reeeeeee
you know whats not fine? way taking my #1 public chat count title...
Yeah YEAH
take it back then 
The future is now old man!
no
get to spamming!
Talk more!
too many convos recently give me a headache
Don't blame you
or will get me muted
Lol
best i just slow down for now
Completely understandable
So if I can, should I put some money into a ryzen 7 or keep with the 5?
5600x vs 5800x?
Ye
whats your use case?
where 5700x
Practically every day
just gaming, streaming, video editing, etc?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV2oZMUkRFg with a 3080 benchmark
When I get a better comp I'll be able to play beefier games
In AMDs hidden treasure chest
should i go for the 6900xt
I'd say 5800x if you multitask a lot
Those 2 cores will definitely make your day better.
what games do you play?
idk if i should bc i have a feeling that they wont be put in stock as often as the 6800xt
yea, basically if youre only gaming and probably even streaming, 5600x is just fine
@toxic wigeon I don't see a big difference in games, honestly
That cpu usage tho
id personally put the 150 bucks saved from going 5800x into something like a gpu
^
Yep
yeee
Sounds good. I might get a 3060ti or 3070 in the end we'll see.
Sounds great
Sorry. I barely know anything about computers so
apparently 5800x is 50 bucks off atm
sounds decent
My question is that what gpu can match with my i5 9400f without introducing a huge bottleneck. I currently have a 1660 super
well at least on sale in usa
Yeah nah I'll have to spend a couple of months saving up
what you have now is a good pairing
you could probably bump it up to a 3060 without too much of a bottleneck
Yeah it's great, but I want to get a gpu with rtx/dlss and can last until mid current gen/next gen
Honestly. What shibe said, 3060 would probably do you well as it's not too much
Would a 3060ti be fine as well, I don't want a 3060, I don't like the price to performance
yeah 3060 ti should be good too
Cool, I know what I'll get then, thanks!
A 3060ti is a good card
Its just a modern gen 1080ti that's a bit more efficient
You know what’s funny btw
3060 12 GB. 3080 10
No its a modern 1080 ti super max-q, lol
Quality over quantity
I just said that!
Yeah, I was just joking with their weird naming scheme lol
Haha
Nooo you can’t use logic in technology >:(
Watch me do it
How could you
Yeah so it’s kind of the closest performance it seems in the entire line up
are you in stock drops?
No but I've got friends working in stores
BB just had a huge drop 1-2 weeks ago, and they had 3090s going into the next day
Also I'm a gold client in one of the local part shops, so I can see how many GPUs are in stock
How long does it take for gpus to fall under "regular" demand?
ah youre EU, idk the situation there
i say 2022 is likely
Ahhh
Possibly September-ish
like, regular being you can walk into a store without a concern of if stock is there
I was lucky to get mine at MSRP
same, i even got before tarrifs msrp too
What im thinking of doing is that when I have the money is checking a site religiously to see if they have the gpu I want in stock and order it, store it in a drawer and wait until I get my desktop
How btw?
join stock drops
?
I've no reason to upgrade this gen luckily
im going to drive to microcenter for a gpu
Hoping my gpu survives shortage cause there's zero stock here
actually the amount of money id spend on gas would make it cheaper to get it scalped
man i hate this
Microcenter
my friend bought one for me when he was out of state
Cries in microcenter 3 hours away
yeah im like 4 hours away
cmon
he called me when he was in the store and hes like "yeah i picked you up one, heading back now"
Not bad, wouldn't be a bad place to work
im gonna see how much a plane ticket is
based
i live in the 6th most populated city in usa, and we dont have a microcenter in our state...
200$ if i wanted to fly
not including food, hotel, and uber
so itd be like 500$ for the trip alone lmao
Not bad a 500 buck trip for a 400 buck graphics card, so 900 bucks in total
the 6800xt is 650$
even then i was considering going with the 6900xt
which is 1k
Fuck
but the performance increase doesnt seem worth it for the price
Even better, a $1150 dollar trip, very inexpensive
Do top end of the line gpus last long these days?
I know I asked this earlier but generally
How long will the 3080 last you cause if the 1080 lasted a long ass time then... you know?
well you could still game at 1080p on a 980ti
mostly depends on your own expectations
i used a gtx 1080 for 1440p gaming for 5-6 years just fine because im ok with dropping settings
is stockx any good for ordering gpus
Well I meant the 1080ti but ye
I had a 1070 and didnt even need to drop that much
i can get one for 1500 off stockx, idk if this site is a scam or not lmao
For a 3090?
6900 XT
Isn't that 500 over msrp?
500 over
Sorry I meant 500
its the same price as the 6800xt if i got it scalped
Not worth it honestly
3090S TI
i just wanna know if this site is a scam or not
I know its overpriced scalped prices but I don't know if its a scam
everything online says theyre really trustworthy
so apparently they have verification centers where they test and make sure your product is real before they send it to you
idk i might go for it
@quaint sleet idk why theyd lie about that
🤑
aint stonkx just ebay with extra hype?
scalpx
you'll probably get what you ordered but it's way above msrp right
where are you, ak?
????
no best buy or microcenter near you?
thats like standard for scalp prices
18 hours from me
micro center
best buy never has anything ever
they are useless to me
i got mine from BB
In person or online?
That lhr 3090 makes me salivate.
though no AMD cards in stock it seems rn
Market is flooding with amd cards here.
Maybe it's up to vendors
It's not something vendors or aib can set iirc
I mean in first place
They can't do much without nvidias accept
Lightweight mice > heavy mice
I used a g502 for two years and then went to lightweight
no going back
G502 best mice
does b360m ds3h have xmp
this is on the gigabyte site: Support for Extreme Memory Profile (XMP) memory modules To support 2666 MHz or XMP memory, you must install an 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7/i5 processor.
try a lightweight mouse
Lightweight mouse are usually small
G502 fits perfectly with my big hands and palm grip
try the pulsar xlite
big mouse
very very light weight
also cheap
also roccat kpa
roccat is the last brand I'll buy lol
and I hate mouse with holes in it
super uncomfortable
what's wrong with them lmao
pulsar xlite doesn't feel bad
I tried a few roccat's back in 2015 but both times I had the issue of double clicking
So just stopped buying that crap
new roccat mice must have better qc because I only hear good things about their new mice
the kpu and burst pro are both very well loved big mice with no holes
I bought a G502 lightspeed (wireless) like half a year ago
still super happy with it
before that I've used the wired version for almost 5 years
it is a good mouse I've tried the lightspeed
but man I'm telling you if you have a chance try a lightweight mouse on low sens for a bit
Yeah don't think it really matters for me
as I use high sens
I mean in most games I move my mouse a few centimeter to do a 360
damn
im never going back to wired, got a g903, and its just amazing, had g502 before it
Hey guys I currently have a 3600 and a 1060 but I'm planning to upgrade my gpu. What is the strongest GPU I should pair the 3600 with
3070 would be perfect
maybe you can push it to a 3070ti


