#technology
1 messages · Page 327 of 1
if i had to sacrifice aspects to meet a budget, i would sacrifice resolution first, then gsync/freesync, and lastly hz
60 vs 144hz side by side isnt that easy to tell the difference on, especially if you havent spent a lot of time with both
but once you get used to 144hz and then go back to 60 most everyone hates it
i mostly never use vsync so idk if gsync would be a point
i mostly lock fps to 60 for less input lag
vsync introduces input lag, gsync/freesync really doesnt
i play competitive fps with gsync on
I wont really be like that sinc I will work most of the time on my 1440p monitor and then game on my 144hz monitor and I run hald my games on 144 to give a competitive edge (apex, csgo, rogue company)
but if i have vsync of does gsync even matter or is it like extra layer of vsync?
but I prefer visual quality to fps in bf5
i wouldnt use vsync at all other than casual single player games
thats what i doo too
It can be useful on non g sync or freesync monitors no?
i use vsync in gta tho
idk what you mean by extra layer
imo gsync/freesync outright replaces vsync in every scenario
but monitors which dont have gsync or freesync
or better said limited framerate without tearing
its vsync but a marginal input lag increase
i mean, if i lock framerate i do get some tearing.
what about them?
ah so basicaly vsync without input lag then
yes, basically
im sure its way more complicated than that, but thats the end result
like i said, i use gsync while competitive gaming
and im a try hard
nice maybe i should get gsync monitor then, cause like i said most games i play with vsync of at 60 fps. but if i am really competetive much higher fps
im typically top 3% in ranked games
V sync isn't as effective as gsync eithef
G sync can make massive differences, idt v sync can
some of my friends are like : Why would you want 144, the human eye cant see past 24
where tf did this myth come from
i tried my friends 144hz just on desktop it was OMG nice lol
cinema is shot at 24fps
Hey quick question does anyone have the issue that fps just jump from 100 to 40 back and forth? My fps cap was high but it's not stable it's very annoying
some movies at 48fps tho just to add 😛
think the hobbit is one of those movies actually, dont remmeber
i think 24 fps is just the minimum film can get away with without it looking choppy
idk what framerate we cant see past, but we sure can see 144hz ez
its like 300 something
ah i see. havent tried lol. is there even that such screen?
ya, its also the standrard
pretty sure there was a 300hz monitor announced
interesting
there are some 300hz screens but you would need a beestly pc and a hogh budget
ah i see
ehhh, 300hz would be more for the competitive gamer
Asus do a 360hz monitorb
which would 99% likely play at 24" 1080p and play titles like valorant, csgo, overwatch, etc
lol
which on low setting would be easy AF to run
Although the higher fps you go, the smaller the gains get
but 1080p on a 1440p screen looks really pixelated and blurry in the distances
(low settings being comp settings)
can native 1080p be much better?
anyways guys nice chating. will go play game now. see you guys around.
The difference between 30 and 60 is huge, but 144 to 240 is barely noticeable
from 60 to 144 was something like cutting down the response time by half or something crazy
144 to 240 is like a 10% drop
60 to 75 in terms of smoothness is a massive improvement too for some reason
but does native 1080p really look much better than downscaled?
Wdym?
If you put 1080p on a 1440p monitor it will look horrible
If that's what you mean
i dont think monitors have good scaling, if they have scaling at all
outside of dlss, native is always the way to go imo
yeah practically
Just drove 45 mins to try to get a 3090. Had 8 in stock. 0 when I got there. 2 people in line were checking out with them. Sad day.
i mean
kinda had an option to break laws for 45 mins
cops cant be everywhere right
I did drive fast and took chances.
2 people bought 8 cards? 
@storm osprey mr orange cat
i just found out about this thingy
apparently people said its like nvidia dlss
uhhhh, i dont think so
isnt that like the opposite? you render at higher resolution and scale it down?
"VSR allows games to render at higher resolutions (up to 4K; see the ‘Virtual Super Resolution Support’ table, below) and then rescales them down to a lower native display resolution. Using this, you can get quality that rivals up to 4K, even on a 1080p display while playing your favorite games."
yea, afaik DLSS renders at lower resolution, fills in the gap and gives you a higher resolution image

Cyberpunk 2077 Day 1 patch tested in three different resolutions. The game is an open-world, action-adventure story set in Night City, a megalopolis obsessed with power, glamour and body modification. You play as V, a mercenary outlaw going after a one-of-a-kind implant that is the key to immortality. Enjoy the video!
Video Index:
00:00 - 1080p...
tbf low settings dont look all bad
damn, ultra settings with a 3080 at 1440p with rtx on is like 80 fps
that sounds good and bad at the same time xD
ikr
atleast it dont look like doom eternal on the switch
Wish I would have gotten a 3090 this morning 😦
Im running it on my 49" 1440p, but at 1080p, everything on low, and my non Ti 1080 card gets like 50fps lol
oof, thats rough
with what cpu ?
i wonder if i should wait for some optimization
oh we are talking about cp2077
i think i have to lower some of my settings more 
8700k
yeah i thought we were talking about bfv
its not much better on BFV tbh.
At 1440p I get about 40-50fps. 10-20fps with HDR on.
So I have to run BFV at 1080 as well 😦
first world problems with a 49" ultrawide
cant wait to run BFV at 1440p with HDR at 240hz 👌
HDR lowers fps ?
yes
the fuck
I'm not upgrading my monitor until 16K 360Hz is the norm 😤
HDR lowers fps significantly yes
So in like 2050?
my moniter has a HDR option tho , does that mean it lowers my fps in game ?
no, not unless you have hdr enabled
i do
@hardy storm I don't really see the point of anything above 4K unless you're on a 70+ inch TV
what is adaptive sync ?
doesnt windows have shit HDR implementation too?
Its meh
Neither do I. Hence running WQHD. 4k isnt going to be mainstream for at least another 10 years. Think about streaming things right now. 90% of them are still 720p.
I disagree. BF1 for example looks AMAZING with HDR on. Some other games do as well. If your FPS is fine, then enable it.
Yeah movies and TV shows look way better in 720p than games do
afaik tv cant really go above 720p. because of the limited band width of radio waves
over long distances
that may be wrong tho
"TV" meant any streaming service. Hulu/YTTV etc
Can an RTX 3090 handle Cyberpunk 2077? 🤔
MSI Z490 Motherboard
Amazon: https://msi.gm/3n5FQEh
Newegg: https://msi.gm/2JJvlbm
MSI MPG341CQR Monitor
Amazon: https://msi.gm/3oF2dAD
Newegg: https://msi.gm/37RS4d9
MSI CORELIQUID AIO Cooler
Amazon: https://msi.gm/2VZxT7p
Newegg: https://msi.gm/3m5ZgYf
MSI MPG SEKIRA 500X Case
Amazon: https://msi....
his fucking voice but oh well
Remotely monitor and manage your server or PC with Pulseway at https://lmg.gg/pulsewayteams
Check out ORIGIN PC gaming laptops and desktops today at https://bit.ly/2Swgjq6
It's been a few years since we started filming in 8K. But now, the Blackmagic Ursa Mini Pro 12K is out. Can we make 12K videos?
Buy Blackmagic Ursa Mini Pro 12K
On Amazon (...
is that the canadian god of building pc's?
Is the difference between 1440p and 4k that much noticeable?
yes
depends on how close to the screen you sit
but small details blend better on higher resolutions
I still play on 1080p 😛
I'd probably feel like I needed to upgrade all my monitors if I upped the resolution... I like the relatively equal PPI on my monitors
i wish i was at 1080p but it would less good graphics wise
I have a 2x2 monitor configuration
would be cool to have two on top, and then a 32:9 monitor on the bottom
+-------+ +-------+
| | | |
+-------+ +-------+
+-----------------+
| |
+-----------------+
Why not one whole big one?
Yes pretty much
Well, I frequently use 3 of my monitors, and 4 occasionally, so going down to 2+1 ultrawide wouldn't hurt me
buuuut, that being said, I use more than 1 monitor... and a TV just wouldn't do it
Couldn’t you just open multiple windows?
where will I keep those windows when I game?
I mean like multiple tabs that don’t over lap each other
Okay
and whenever I game, I like to have server browser (BF4), discord, and perhaps youtube open on different monitors
Okay
but that 2+1 would cost me something like 2000€, 💸 😫 (if I were to upgrade all my monitors)
my monitor stand could at least handle the weight
That’s good
I mean, it handles 4 monitors right now
So 3 will not be that bad
probably not lol
I remember when I had 5...
Wait for 3080 restock or wait for 3080 Ti???
same chance of getting either one /s
lol
I think im better off getting the 3080. Ti would probably be $2k NZD since 3080 is $1.5k while 3090 is $2.6k
@vagrant quarry 3080Ti is likely to cost $999
$300 more than 3080 just for more VRAM lol
It's not really going to be faster since the 3090 is only like 7% faster than the 3080 lmao
3090 should be a contender for worst parts of the year on Gamers Nexus channel due to its horrible value proposition compared to the 3080 and 6800XT
It's Nvidia's fastest gaming card but it costs more than double the 3080 and offers marginally better performance
Honestly 3090 is aimed for content creation and workloads
It's confirmed that combustion light gas gun shoot the same projectile as railgun.
The difference is railgun uses the electromagnetic force to shoot a projectile while combustion light gas gun uses the explosive force of low molecular-weight combustible gases, such as hydrogen mixed with oxygen to shoot a projectile
If combustion light gas gun had been in video games,the design would have been based of the railgun
Not really the focus of this channel, probably something more appropriate for #general
I think @molten coral ran something like this.
because having one big monitor is not the same thing as having 3 of them, when you game in fullsceen, it takes all the monitor's space
Lads, question
So I've got a dual monitor setup
My game audio is coming out of my headset, but the VOIP is coming from my speakers
What do
in windows in sound settings/sound control panel make sure in playback you have your headset set to default playback device or disable your monitor audio if you don't use it for audio anyways
Thanks chap, I'll give it a go soon
@molten bramble ah ok thanks
Cool, just a bit expensive... and I frankly don't need it atm either way
AMD wins in 1080p lol
For some reason the lower the resolution or graphical settings, the bigger the performance gap
Maybe something to do with RDNA2 arch
Yeah, that's why I'm waiting for RDNA3 to upgrade, there's just no way a first gen raytraced AMD GPU can compete against a Nvidia 2nd gen raytraced GPU (RT wise I mean)
if youre buying any rx 6000 series card right now for 1080p you should at least be a pro gamer with a stupid high refresh rate monitor, or youre an idiot
hell even then pro gamers will turn down settings for visibility/fps, so these cards dont even really apply for that scenario
@latent light Read my currency. Prices in New Zealand is stupid thanks to GST and markup bullshit
But yep 3080 it is. That means new PSU as well
but if you get nvidia youll have to get a much higher psu because its not as efficient as amd
/s
The reasoning as to why even the RX 6800XT beats the RTX 3090 in 1080p:
Ampere is FP32 spam, think Vega, it can't be fed at that low of resolution/graphical details
Ya, that graph is so misleading, I wouldnt read into it much. We dont know how or where the data it uses, was created.
bench marking a 3090 on 1080 would seem like the biggest waste of someones time but hey its 2020 right
1080p too high res for 3090, need 48 gb for that shit. It should be perfect on 240p since it only got 24gb vram.
i think the fact that 6800xt and 3080 are marginally different at 1440p and 3080 wins at 4k is all that people really need to know
how can something with inferior amounts of vram win at 4k
this does not make sense!
10gb is a rip off! ( yet no one complained about 2080ti only getting 1gb more)
the card i wanna get has 8gb
16 gb min 
big oofs
Tank that can spit fire
I hope to see the RTX 3050 match the RTX 2060 or at least beat the GTX 1660Ti in gaming while costing ~$179
Sold
pretty legit
bet that thing gets all the frames too
whoever buys that is set for life
anyone know any good speakers that include a subwoofer for around 50-70 pound
Found a MSI GTX 980Ti Twin Frozr Golden Edition for just $35 they say that it just stopped displaying video
Wonder if it could be baked

I had that card. I loved it.
The whole heatsink is copper and it's a black and gold design
most likely fried
I assume 3080 would be overkill for 1080p 144hz?
yes
But would it still work fine for 1080p if I had the right cpu fir it
100%
Buy Cheap Games: https://bit.ly/2NXI4FI
Ryzen 7 3700X (Stock) vs. i7 10700K (Stock) Test with the New RTX 3080
32GB DDR4 3600MHz CL16 (2x16GB) / Ryzen 7 3700X
32GB DDR4 3200MHz CL16 (2x16GB) / intel i7 10700K
Games: 1080p / Ultra
► 00:01 - Metro Exodus
► 01:01 - The Witcher 3
► 02:04 - Red Dead Redemption 2
► 03:06 - Horizon Zero Dawn
► 04:09 - ...
Because then I would not have to upgrade again fir a while lol
you would be set for ages yeah
Yeah prob going to just do that then when the prices come down then lol
Lol hopefully they come down soon
Guys i need help:
So when I download games through the Origin software it disconnects my network - so that I have to unplug and restart router... Why is this happening? any ideas?
Jumpstarting a psu safe?
I wanna jumpstart my psu when it arrives so I can test my fans
I dont have a motherboard yet
i wouldn't do it
@opaque saddle why?
not sure if your PSU is healthy or not. I know the older PSU may not like low wattage. Although in most of the cases it works fine, people will take words from others if it doesnt and eventually break the psu
@ashen ether
I ordered a CV550
at least i wouldn't even i have 14 years exp working on my desktop
Set to arrive next week
wait till your motherboard arrives then i guess it isnt late
How about jumpstarting a motherboard with a screw
coz if your psu may or may not malfunction and spending more cash on it you have to wait for new parts
Is it safer
Yea
screwdriver is safer but it still have a risk coz i did ruin my psu once
remember what you are trying to do tho
if you got no idea what you are doing or wanting to do, then DONT do it
no worries
I'll see what I can do when my stuff arrives
wait for your motherboard arrived then it wouldnt be too late for you
I ordered a CV550 and 6 fans
Anyways, My fans are 1200rpm max
I bought 6 for $20
Good deal or nah?
Also, my case has an optimal airflow guide
Which is 3 front intake, 2 top intake and 1 rear exhaust
Possitive pressure
yeah
because there are little games that can actually take advantage of a 3080 in 1080p
and there isnt a cpu on earth that wont bottleneck it in certain games
3070 would be alright at 1080p ?
@supple bane there isn't one game out there where a 3080 doesn't get bottlenecked at 1080p
Bottleneck at 1440p too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HaTaE61Gy4&t=174s all cause it doesnt hit 100% usage doesnt mean its a bottleneck....
You guys need to watch jayztwocents video on bottlenecking 1080p is still the dominant resolution on steam and it will be for a very long time. The gtx 1080 was overkill for 1080p when it launched and look how that turned out
what are your expectations. Do you need "the best"? Do you need nvidia? What are some games you want to play at 1080p. Do you have a 144hz monitor?
I would get a 144hz monitor. But I would say I want to be sure I can max out future games with pretty high frame rate as well. And yes I would say I prefer nividia
I guess just the usually AAA games
What cpu do you have/ are getting
That’s what I was going to ask
Not sure what cpu would be good for the 3080
But I have a i5 7500 right now
So then whats your budget like do you have the budget to buy a 300 dollar cpu and a 7000 dollar gpu
700 oops lol
if you need to save money you can get a ton of performance going with the 3070 and save 200 bucks. You just need a budget and expectations.
I have been saving my money for a while to spend on my next upgrade and if the 3080 is only 200 more I would rather just get the 3080
Now
if you get a r5 3600/r7 3700x or intel alternative you wont be sad about it.
This guy has some solid reviews cause he literally put the cpu in the mobo and benches it. Doesnt turn pbo off or change the power limits. Just out of the box vs out of the box
I think I would prob want to get r7 3700x. But are they equal those two cpus?
Equally good
right now the 3600 6 core 12 thread cpu is best bet. The 3700x is a little overkill but if you play like bfv with a 3080 you will be happy to have it. The more gpu you have to run the more cpu usage there is. So It might be like 10% but it might be like 20% on bf6. So take future proofing with a grain of salt
also wait for the 3700x to go on sale. They hit 250 bucks quite often and also look into micro center if you're in the states. Really awesome deals there
0h okay and yeah I kinda want a little bit of future proof tbh like you said for games that are like cpu intensive
3700x/intel 8 core would be perfect
And I guess to in the future in case games start using more cores and stuff
Thanks for the explanation and answering my questions
Not the best with this stuff
Okay cool
Yup i have a intel system with a top of the line nvidia gpu and i hit 80%-90% cpu usage quite a bit but i also hit over 200fps
its a 8 core intel
Damn that sounds nice lol
Well you arent buying "mid range parts" lol you have a top of the line pc in the making
you wont be upset man. Just get a good psu decent mobo and some 3600mhz ddr4 and you wont be able to tell the difference with any other tol pc
Okay is that the speed ryzem CPU’s work best with
the 3700x right? Thats 3600mhz cl 16 i can find some links if you want
Yeah
Yeah in the US
this is 16 gb and cheap for the price.
16 gig is all you need unless you play like escape from tarkov
or MSFS 2020
oh true i forgot about flight sim
its the only game i own that uses 100% of my ram
Oh cool thanks
I played it for like 4 hours and never touched it again 😦
np @opal cliff
I mean escape from tarkov uses 18 gigs in game at 1440p. 15 at 1080p
I have 32 gigs in all my pcs but i dont just game on them
A 3060ti is more than enough for 1080p 144hz gaming right now. The point in buying something for now and not overspending is so you can upgrade sooner when next gen comes and get better performance for cheap.
So 400 dollars for a low tier gpu or 300 dollars more for a top of the line gpu. Spend 700 now or 800 next gen? He wants something now he can play and not worry when new games come out
Gpu is ridiculously easy to swap too so there’s not really a reason to complain about it.
3060 ti is not low tier, and that 300 saved alone in 2-3 could mean getting a much better gpu than the 700 you spend 2-3 years ago
i mean, a 400 dollar gpu right now is beating 700 dollar gpus from last year
selling a used 3060ti vs used 3080 in 3 years id still go with a 3080
gamble based on the market and how thing value going forward
when you can have a gauranteed 300 extra for next gpu upgrade by getting a 3060ti that is perfectly fine for 1080p for at least 2 years
and thats your school of thought i woudnt recommend spending the 400+ dollars on a gpu twice. Aib adds to the price tax etc. Id rather recommend him a top of the line gpu and maybe he will skip whole generations maybe even 2. I mean it is overkill for 1080p right?
400 twice spread apart by 2 years and the new gpu in 2 years will likely beat the 700 you spent 2 years ago with more vram and newer features
and he said he wants top fo the line so it fits what he wants
3080 is definitely overkill for 1080p
like... near everyone is gonna question why youre getting a 3080 for 1080p
so people question why you would get it for 1440p
some*
Its a pc thats a personal computer. he wants the best and he wont be disappointed. It will last him more then 1 generation
also 2080 supers launched at 699. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImaOdWiUK58
Its not winning but its not wide enough to warrant an upgrade and if it was i dont think money would have been the issue
my good pc's monitor didn't come yet so i have to play on a shitty laptop. I want to know if i can run bf4 or bf3 with intel xe graphics and an i7 11th gen?
just a rough guess i would say 10-15% between the two and also spending 700 bucks instead of 400 twice.
xe graphics? or just the igpu? You wont get far if you dont have a dedicated gpu
Well, unless its ryzen apus.
oh you said a laptop got it, yeah it should be able to run it
dont expect 144fps but it should do ok tweaking the setting for like 60 fps ish maybe a touch more
mhm np
@opal cliff we have 2 different options here so what would you do being the buyer. Would you buy a 3060ti for playable 1080p performance and then upgrade when the next 60 ti comes out. Or buy a 3080 with much more performance and maybe skip next generation? Just wondering
ive also asked build pc discords and everyone says 3080 is plain overkill, and questions 3700x instead of an intel or 5600x build
well if you read our conversation i showed him the benchmarks of a 3600, 10600k, 3700x, and a 10700k being pretty close. So When he is looking for long term why tell him to get less cores? If they dont upgrade a cpu for 5-6 years and run top of the line gpus which will use more cpu usage it does kinda make sense. You can take your battles to what ever discord you want to. Im discussing this here. So you had to go talk to some one else for validation. Idc
im trying to get the dude the best use of his money, if you take it personal 🤷
well you always seem to disagree with me. why did you get a 10700k over a 5600x it wasn't much more then your 10700k?
10400 is comparable to 3700x in performance too, but those are 170 bucks
so is a 3600?
those have commonly been above 200 lately
it was like 3+ months ago they were sub 200
you got your 10700k on sale doesn't mean they aren't 350 bucks right n9w
right, and my advice would change on the current market or when he decides to buy
and atm 3600 is OOS other than amazon for 320...
I told him to get a 3600 or a 3700x when its on sale I don't see him buying right now
calm down
Sorry this guy gets away calling people stupid for their preferences
?
3700x is just stupid a 3080 for 1080p is just stupid
suggestion is advice tho, at the end it will be up to the person who wanna buy it.
why don't you guys help the person who needed to most to assist them to make their own decision
I did and they were happy with it, bu nyphon wasnt
and still a 10400 is cheaper
i can not be happy with something and give a different perspective and you can decide to not take it personally
i dont take anything you say personally
But you call people stupid for their suggestions
who should take that comment
you degrade people cause i often dont agree with how you word thing or help people
guys can everyone take a step back please
I can always drop it but this is the third time you just say take a step back
im calm honestly
Its not like im sitting here with veins sticking out of my forehead i dont care past the finger tips what happens to this conversation
this is a way that we can stop people from arguing
idk anything that i have said suggests im having any sort of negative reaction to the topic
Hello
coz we do not want to issue a mute or a warn in order to stop the argument
i guess im an idiot
we all have opinions and it can be vary depending on the perspective from the person who suggested it
So he gets to call people idiots?
you can go back to the first time i recommended a 3700x and he called me stupid for recommending it
so youre gonna pull a general statement from days ago and try to apply it today?
making a stupid decision happens calling people stupid is different
like i personally called you an idiot?
I mean its often enough with you i can quote it?
Well i did recommend a 3080 and or 6800xt for 1080p.
i better leave it here before i get warned for trying to give good advice and just had some random on the other side turn it into an argument
I dont care i just dont think you should be allowed to degrade people
Let's just keep it civil. No need to spark an argument up again.
Got it.
Fine, then let's move on.
sry

So, is a 1660 still a viable card? Actually wondering since i want to make a relatively inexpensive rig as a Christmas present for someone.
🤔
i have a 16 series card
definitely its no 4k contender but its fine lol
what is the command for tech channel again?
i only get 60fps on warzone at 1440p but i only have 8gb ram so yeah
Oh, they don't really care for 4k. Since they mostly play older games, it should be something not that fancy.
whats your budget
Oh btw, the person in question is usually busy with graphic design, as in doing logos and stuff. Would a 6th-7th Gen i7 suffice?
Around 1k, although i have some spare parts left over to cut costs.
if you have it already yeah
for 1080p gaming its pretty ideal as long as you can turn down settings
if you're buying new there are better options
!!build
- What's your budget/currency and country of purchase? Any preferred physical/online shops?
- Gaming? Streaming? What's your resolution/FPS targets? What games are you playing?
- Not gaming or professional/hobby use cases? What are the applications you will use and workload involved? Kindly elaborate as much as possible.
- What else do you need to buy? (monitor, keyboard, mouse, headset, speakers, Windows, WiFi)
- Anything else you want to tell us? RGB, Small Form Factor, already have a part list? Tell us!
- If you have a build list and are looking for a second opinion or are upgrading an existing system, please have a PCPartPicker permalink for it (https://pcpartpicker.com/list)
so 1K USD or 1K Euro? @noble steeple
1k Euro
and what sort of spare parts do you have
Hmmm, as implied, i have indeed a 6th gen i7 and a fitting mainboard as spares
unless you want to spend for on new CPU and motherboard. maybe you should reuse it
and get a better gpu instead?
Oh, they still do a fine job
with 16gb of ram
i meant it does the job since the person who will use it play older games
1k is the maximum amount to spare, however i'd keep it as low as possible since said person is a student
Say, would you recommend a 144Hz monitor with the build? Simple 144Hz, Full-HD
Sure
so...
- GPU
- RAM (16GB - 2x8GB)
- PSU (80+ bronze/silver at least)
- Computer Case (cheap one will do the job)
- 1TB HDD + 500GB SSD
Additional items
6. New 144hz monitor
7. After market CPU cooler
Unsure
8. Mouse and keyboard
depending on your budget, coz the 6th gen i7 can run 144hz 1080p depending on the game, in game graphics settings and the GPU
since the person do graphic design, it is strongly recommended IPS display
Any recommendations in mind?
unfortunately i do not have recommendations in mind coz i tends to NOT pick 1080p 144hz these days
what size will that be
a 21.5"? 24" or 27"(Please do not go for 27", it looks really really bad at 1080P)
24" will more than suffice
how does 27" look bad at 1080p ?
a typical 24" IPS 144hz display will cost around 170-200 Euro
without sales, normal price
the individual pixels at 1080p 27" are pretty large and noticeable
depending on who you are you could be fine with them, but most people ive come across dont like it
Pixel density. Assuming a person who sat in front of the display, the person can see individual pixels from a 27" 1080p
ppi isn't a good way to calculate clear or sharpness
is that why 720p moniters are so small ?
contrast os more important for clarity
keep in mind that, the person uses it as a graphic design tool
I would still look to contrast over size. 92 pixels vs 81 I cant count that type of pixels upclose
id rather have size and clarity to move things around but ppi is bad way to explain. clarity. look at iphomes vs samsungs
I bought a viewsonic vx2758-2kp-mhd for 250 Euro, it has
- 1440p 144hz IPS display
2.Wide color gamut, a (almost) P3 display, 131% srgb
iPhone look great with much less pixels then a Samsung
i swear down tho nacho has that 40 inch moniter thats 1080p ?
hmm ppi is a way to explain the pixel density between 24" and 27" display
I agree for the price that viewpoint would be great
but until iphone 12 most iphones used lcd/led while samsung has been using oled
oled has much better contrast ratio
That's different, it's not 1080p like you think it is
and samsungs generally had better resolutions too
oh
contrast is much better for inage clarity over ppi
Its ultra wide, its the equivalent of having 2 24" 1080p monitors put together
Same size and reso

we were talking about a 27" 1080p display and 24" 1080p display
ohh
i wasn't saying not to get a 24incg i was just saying people blow ppi out of proportion. my gf has a 1080p asus ips and it looks amazing. never thought huh this things pixels look weord or the words come off fuzzy
depending on how far the person is sitting from a 1080p display
in that use case, it will be IPS (Use case: graphics design), 24" 1080p (Requested)
what even is IPS , is it to do with the colouring ?
panel technology
in plane switching
IPS has better colour accuracy and colour gamut
lacks of contrast (compared to VA) and back light bleeding, comes with more expensive cost
is ips still considered generally "slower" than TN?
depends on generation of ips and tn
i know that was a talking point for a while and why most serious gamers used tn
coz 360hz IPS released by asus
this gen ips is 1ms while tn is 0.5
so if youre playing for money tn is likely the way to go still, otherwise get IPS if you can afford
the middle ground is VA but comes with ghosting
Again, said person is a graphic designer, and not a gamer
So clarity over reaction speed
sorry i just got to thinking about the differences and kinda hijacked the topic
Good, so i should look for a decent IPS 24" monitor, preferably with 144Hz
why no 5k apple display? jk jk
it shall be down to, how premium the monitor it will be with less or minimal impact on the 1k euro budget
Exactly
coz IPS displays aren't cheap, they can be expensive if you want the extra premium juice out of it
try hard pc help discord im in list drop
1080p144hz IPS: https://pcpartpicker.com/products/monitor/#r=192001080&F=579120000,647700000&D=144000,280000&sort=price&P=2 (Also check PIxio PX247 and PX248 on Amazon)
If we're going for the 1660, then you can already substract ~230€ from said budget
Monitors, 1080p 144hz IPS, 24in
AOC 24G2
Acer VG240Y Pbiip
Asus VP249QGR
Pixio PX247
MSI OPTIX G241
(UK/EU) Viewsonic XG2405
Acer XV240YP
That MSI sounds familiar
i havent kept up with monitors so i have no input, this is just a list that discord has created
so... down to this
- GPU
- RAM (16GB - 2x8GB)
- PSU (80+ bronze/silver at least)
- Computer Case (cheap one will do the job)
- 1TB HDD + 500GB SSD
Additional items
6. New 1080p 144hz monitor
7. After market CPU cooler
Unsure
8. Mouse and keyboard
im talking like 30 people that contribute compiling data to make lists
i do not see the point paying extra new MB and CPU. it will stay as 6th gen i7
unless they want modern gaming a 6700 would be fine
As for the aftermarket cooler, i already have a spare model as well
this will give us extra flexibility for other parts
damn salty how much extra parts do you have xD
I'm a scavenger and hoarder in that regard
That's how i ended up with 4 SSDs in my system 
unless you wanna use one of the ssd
and put that into the system and get a 1tb hdd or 1tb ssd (SATA)
Nah, i think i'd go with a fresh one, same for the HDD
coz SSD these days are cheap
I'm not fond of reusing storage drives
So why not go for a fresh one. I think for the SSD a 850 EVO will do just fine.
As for the HDD, i surely don't want to go below 7200rpm
actually a 500gb ssd is cheap but 1tb is nicer (which you dont need a HDD)
Call me old fashioned, but i always try to fit in a plain HDD somewhere
What about Seagate Barracuda?
bought
i think a 860 EVO 1tb is around 88Euro
yikes, arent they dram lesss?
yea granty
it was good and im using one of those
sheesh
and you can get a wd blue ssd for like 5 bucks more
whats that do
make it slower or something
so DRAM will speed up your ssd
dram less ssd's have significantly reduced performance
and makes it more durable in general use
basically, outside of nvme, gets an ssd with dram
not writing directly on to the SSD at first
ff sake
Say if i were to go for an SSD/HDD build, is a Hybrid HDD recommendable?
imo no
one thing i dont understand is tho, a 4TB SSD cost 90AUD and a 2TB cost 89UD
it is difficult to answer tenten
coz the price of ssd has comes down to point where
it does not worth paying for HDD and it is a sweet spot for SATA (DRAM) ssd
See, SSDs are clearly nice to speed things up, however i always prefer to have an HDD as a backup solution, as i stated
ok
A bit old fashioned, i know, but i never really ran into trouble with those solutions
dont tell me sorry, its your money
say sorry to yourself
or your mom, idk who paid for this
so... down to this
- GPU
- RAM (16GB - 2x8GB)
- PSU (80+ bronze/silver at least)
- Computer Case (cheap one will do the job)
- 1TB HDD + 250/500GB SATA DRAM SSD
Additional items
6. New 24" IPS 1080p 144hz monitor
nyphon it was 40 pounds
and wd blue was probably 45 pounds
i wouldn't buy cheap ssd...
yeah, it was a bad decision
i still have another space for storage im pretty sure under my gpu
so if i ever need to get something like a samsung ssd i will be able to get one
I wouldnt sweat over owning it. Dram less ssd's used to just be cheaper by a lot. Also go on sale quite a bit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJVuxgfNbzs
Never went wrong with Samsung 
I picked up a toshiba ocz 4 years ago. have tons of games on it and its a second or 2 slower then my 970 evo nvme. If you're moving 100's of gbs at a time sure it isnt worth it
for just gaming samsung ssds are a bit of a waste outside of sales
yeah i have picked a 860 evo 500gb
Even my dram 970 evo 2tb at 90% capacity slows down
the difference between an mx500 and a 970 evo nvme in game loads is usually 2-5 seconds
not that really expensive compared to other brands
nah not really but im always after bang for buck
but every person that i know of with samsung ssd has never failed in the last 5 years
Anyways, what HDDs would you guys recommend?
if i can save 20 bucks and load 2 seconds slower, im saving 20 bucks
tenten...
I wouldn’t recommend any HDD as a system drive.
No, the OS is going to the SSD
SSD for system, HDD for storage.
he wants a HDD tho, which is a pro and a con
The ocz 1tbs go on sale for 60 bucks quite often. Mine is very old and still runs like new
i got a 4TB barracuda for 90 AUD
I run Western Digital Red Pros x2 in my rig.
Hmmm
I was gonna say mech you can get like 8tb for 100bucks
They’re highly reliable with good r/w seek.
Yes
be aware of SMR drive
the SMR drive are less reliable and cost less for consumer and hdd manufacturer to produce, however,most of the new hdd these days are SMR
Only heard good things about Reds
But for a rather simple rig...
I dunno, seems like overkill
if you want cheap seagate barracuda hdd, here is one
https://www.seagate.com/au/en/consumer/backup/expansion-hard-drive/
it is a barracuda drive under the hood
I’ve only had one go bad in ten years with heavy use on two continents. That’s pretty good.
Ah yes, the trick of buying an external HDD, scraping it out and putting it into your rig
and the 4TB barracuda cost about 56 EURO (converted from 90AUD)
And it wasn’t a failure, just started developing bad sectors. So I swapped them both in sequence for new ones with higher seek and increased capacity.
however the 4tb barracuda it isnt as reliable as the server drives tho
I used Seagate in the past, had multiple drive failures. Never again.
i remember seagate drives used to be good, then it is a failure. same as wd
Just get Toshiba. Highest Data Security on the market. The Drives tend to delete themselves if they're unplugged from power.
Jokes aside, WD is a strong contender.
Maxtor drives used to have high reliability as well, but that pretty much went in the shitter mid-2000s
i got one of the maxtor
I still have a wd velociraptor drive that runs just fine
before it got purchased by seagate
10k rpm sounds like a jet taking off. Things great
https://de.pcpartpicker.com/list/qQTwy4
@noble steeple price estimate
Let's see
it doesnt mean you have to purchase all those
but just giving you a price estimate coz people usually buy things at once
Heh, you’ve never heard crazy sounds until you’ve heard a 500Mb (yes, megabyte) drive do it’s thing.
i got one of the 8gb one when i was a kid
Trust me, i had one of those
6th gen cpu uses ddr3 and 4. Thats the 6700k Does he have a mobo that is ddr3?
Damn thing cost us $2,500
actually right
Or my first GB sized HDD. Had to cool it down with a bag of ice because it was actively slowing down my PC
Looks solid
6th gen have mobos that are ddr3 and then alternative ddr4 variants
Reasonable as well
I have one
wait up
updated
coz you know what
if you give it a bit of flexibility in parts with the price estimate provided, you can get a really good monitor and a good GPU at the same time
but.. the problem is
im unsure which monitor to go for
i felt like you can ended up getting a 144hz monitor and a 2060S/KO at the same time within the budget
@chrome skiff unsure which one he got, but usually be around $65 for 2x8GB ram. My friend got one as well
yup just wanted to bring it up so there wasnt any issue buying ram
updated
unsure the wattage with the 1660 super or 2060 SUPER/KO, the PSU can be 600w or something, price can be different as well
on top of that, he got extra 428 Euro to spend on monitor and possible upgrade for GPU to 2060 SUPER/KO
I think I averaged 130W on my 1660Ti
sound about right
but take this as price estimation
coz i do not know which mobo tenten got, whether it is a DDR3 or DDR4 mobo for his 6th i7
Solid card, just no RTX, but wasn’t really playing anything that would have taken advantage of that anyways. For the money, it was a good buy.
hm my 1070ti OC drawing up to 170w on the board draw
God that looks good
Get Amplified with the ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX™ 30 Series based on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture. Built with enhanced RT Cores and Tensor Cores, new streaming multiprocessors, and superfast GDDR6X memory, the ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC White Edition gives rise to amplified gaming with ultra graphics fidelity.
Features:
- White L...
hmm its zotac so youll probably find it in stock 
id buy it if I didn't have one
why is that? quality control is much different then it used to be. they have a range they have to build within and propose a design to be rated for the actual gpu die
I have a zotac amp 980ti runs like new
regardless id buy it that looks super clean
can someone help me pls
my left moniter has gone all weird
that shading
it went like it after i restared my computer
it goes back to normal when i have HDR on but i turned it off like 3 days ago when i found out it lowered FPS but it just went like that
do you have to turn hdr off in the monitors settings as well ?
Cyberbunk 2077 has a load balancing problem with AMD Ryzen CPUs. SMT seems not be used?!
@CDPROJEKTRED @AMD @Thracks https://t.co/bd7oqwsT5P
Cyberpunk using all Intel's CPU threads but not all of AMD Ryzen threads

@supple bane could it be my moniter itself or my graphics card ? if u was to have a guess
monitor settings 100%
https://youtu.be/uyVD_KujAJs ngl the razer case looks alright
My Razer Gaming PC is here! Featuring the newly released Razer Tomahawk ATX PC case! I've brought back the RGB cables too - I thought they'd look quite good in the PC case. Let me know what y'all think of it in the comments! Full Part List - https://techblock.co.uk/pages/pc-build
★ Useful links ★
- Vitamin C on Amazon: https://geni.us/SulaX
- J...
bad airflow
What is it with cases and having the front basically closed with a few holes.
bad airflow ?
yeah looks pretty bad to me lol, but looks can be deceiving i guess
eh
thing i like about the case is how clean it is , not like there is no dust but its build is clean
very much similar to nzxt's cases
jeeez
it wont bottleneck
it just wont reach its full potential
1080p isnt enough to stress a 3080
@proud trellis @supple bane 3080 gets bottlenecked at 1080p for all games and 1440p for most
well, bottleneck isnt the right word imo
i9-10900K nor Ryzen 9 5950X can't max out the RTX 3080 in 1080p and 1440p (ultrawide too)
That indicates CPU bottleneck
long time no see ando btw
hey
I have 95+ % gpu usage at 1080p on my 3080. just tried it out. just like the video I posted earlier of other people showing its not bottlenecked.
the first video is a cpu bottleneck. the second video is a 3080 being high 90% gpu usage in 1080p while clearly having performance gains over a 3070
stop telling people its a bottleneck when it isn't
there is clearly gainz between the 2 gpus at 1080p and 1440p not every game but most
if you pair a 3080 with a old i7 ofc its gonna choke but anything modern would be more then enough
And one more so the gpu % up top shows how much of the gpu is being used. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VetTyhu5cTI
Still a bottleneck nonetheless
define bottleneck
cause the fps also drops going to 1440p meaning the demand is taking away headroom. So it scales correctly
He can explain it if you need help
and LTT
I just showed 4-5 examples of what not being bottlenecked looks like and you still said its bottlenecks so idk how else to help
its not like any of them gained fps going up in resolution
You're not going to gain fps by going up in resolution in any scenario lol
but changing resolution should do something or then it would be limited to the draw calls to the gpu. not on scenario showed that
on jayz 8700k or a 5800x on a 10900k let alone a 5950x
anything semi new has the horse power to push that gpu fine
Then why is the 3080 only 15% faster than the 2080Ti in 1080p but over 50% faster in 4K
Wouldn't that indicate that CPU limits the 3080 in ~1440p
No its the architecture The gpu scales 1x4 they explained it in the keynote. There are plenty of people explaining why the 3080 does better at 4k. It was optimized to do so. That video on bfv shows the 3080 at 1080p being 50 fps faster then a 3070.
and also being well into the 90% gpu usage
With or without DXR and DLSS and HDR
he shows all of it. high vs low dxr on vs off i dont think hdr is on most people dont use hdr right now on pc.
Notice how RTX 3000 series scales better above 1440p while RX 6000 series scales better at 1440p and lower
he literally explains it in 1 whole video. There are 3 games that would be cpu bottlenecks. hitman flight sim and wwz. Those are the only game i know of that have issues not only 1080p issues
Example based on 18 different games, RX 6800XT is 5% faster than the RTX 3090 in 1080p while being 10% slower in 4K
You said it was a cpu bottleneck. You said even a 10900k vs a 5950x bottlenecks it. That was what i was discussing. The cards not scaling correctly is nothing to do with cpu but all in its architecture.
Nothing to do with the cpu
CPU is a big factor
No it isnt watch the videos i posted
I have my 3080 on my 6700k at 4.8ghz and on all my games i get 88%+ usage at 1080p.
not to mention game optimization could be the bigger factor

I mean you can doubt it but jayz simulates 4c4t and it does fine
6700K will bottleneck the fuck out of a 3080 in 1080p lol
one of my friends bought cold war , but he is having low frames , he has a 1650s not im not sure what cpu he has , he has 8gb ram too , he plays 1080p
My brother has a 8086K at 5.3 GHz and a LC 3080, says he experiences bottleneck in some games at 1440p ultrawide and in 1080p no game fully utilizes his 3080
obviously something else is wrong
thats all old i7 and its about 20 fps on average between a 6700k and a 10700k but we wont bring core count into this
I didnt either, i dont have bottlenecks with my 3080 or my amd cards
I main 1440p but i tested 1080p just so im not talking out my ass
not to mention all being stock. the 6700k stock is 4ghz all core. we are at or past the 5ghz barrier
well for intel not amd
Ryzen 5000 shattered the 5GHz barrier
Haven't you been seeing 5900X/5950X hitting 5.1 and 5.2 GHz singlecore
stock? no i havent but i guess i have to explain i meant stock
I have a 5950x i dont need you to explain to me how good or bad the cpus are
its 4.8ghz boost
you can go right to amds website and read the info on it
My brother that I was just talking about builds PCs for people and businesses
Sometimes he plays around and overclocks hardware in those PCs
Ok so he has hands on experience with more then one pc. So do i. And i dont come out telling people its a cpu bottleneck when its clearly not
One computer he was toying with had a 5950X, he told me that 12 cores out of 16 peaked at 5 GHz and 3 of them touched 5.1 GHz
you still havent defined bottleneck. My 5950x with pbo boost into the 5ghz range but that isnt what amd rates them for. Pbo will void warranty per amd due to "overclocking"
Manual clockspeed and voltage is still the way to go
I was referencing a list of old cpus climbing the clock speed ladder and we just recently reached the 5ghz barrier for stock speeds/boosts
This is a whole different conversation
ahh you can lead a horse to water.... yaddy yaddy yah
bottleneck is like
Goku and Vegeta’s fusion dance
if one isnt as strong as the other
bam everythinggoes wrong
i dont think looking at % is the end all say all, my 3080 was using 100% at 1440p with my 4790 but getting 200ish fps in overwatch
now with my 10700k and everything else the same im still getting 100% gpu usage but hitting OW cap fps of 400 consistently
you also had stutters and originally said you were disappointed in the 3080 vs your 1080 when you got it. sounds like there was something else wrong with your pc. My 6700k run about 20 fps behind my 10900k at 1080p
CW runs alright tbf , medium/high settings and get around 80 FPS , just need the 16GB of ram now and i will be fine as it sometimes stutters
cw does run really well im pretty surprised. I used that for my 3080 1080p and it really does run great. unfortunately it hates overclocks from what I've heard and own experience. any oc on my pc cpu or gpu it crashes randomly while playing
Deep dive into how Mac users think
apple stuff is expensive? 
Can say all you want about apple devices but they keep working for the longest time compared to other devices from other brands.
At least from my experience

Original upload by SnapCube youtube channnel
Original Sauce: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGe79n-jcHk
A group of voice actors dub the dialogue from Sonic 06... in one take... with zero rehearsal. This is the result.
(CAST AND CREDITS BELOW)
VOICE CAST:
Sonic - https://twitter.com/SnapsCube
Shadow - http://www.youtube.com/chongoshow/
Silver ...
By January/February 2022, with predicted prices in mind, the best value products available at that time I would suggest: Gigabyte B650-DS3H or ASRock B650M-HDV for ~$90 USD, Ryzen 5 6600 for ~$220 USD and 16GB DDR5 <5200MHz for $100 USD
DDR5 is gonna be expensive, I can't see 16GB of it costing less than $100
Cheap
Anyway, B650 motherboards should actually come out cheaper than B550 did
DDR4 isn't gonna become that much cheaper when DDR5 comes out
Probably just stay the same
Rocket Lake is gonna dethrone Ryzen 5000 in March when it comes to high-end gaming performance
expects over 10% IPC gains over Comet Lake with similar 5.3 GHz boost on the top processor
But we know AMD is good at pricing to compete
Then 6-8 months after Rocket Lake, Ryzen 6000 and DDR5 say hello
Hmmm strange. Was there maybe any recent updates to the game or other variables you could think of that could have affected the fps?
No updates to game in terms of performance. I think something was up with my build but I had a friend with almost the exact same build have problems too.
one of my friends was kinda scamed when a guy built him a pc and put in 1x16gb ram, why is this much slower than my 2x8
hmmm..... this is strange i must say, maybe something with MB/bios?
Ya should always do dual channel for max ram speed.
he doesn't know a lot about pc's and he turned towards me for a budget build: I told him get a 1650 super, ryzen 3 3100 and 16 gigs of ram
He went to a ocmputer centre and the people there build his pc but with only 1x16gb ram
which I wonder why they did that
Because it was cheaper
tbf my friend has a 1650s with 1x8 gb stick
he gets low FPS but it’s because of the single channel , but his 1650s is decent at running Cold War
So you are saying Ram affects fps?
ya 8gb might be to low on most current games i think
single channel ram makes a huge dip in FPS in some games
in what way?
you just get less FPS than you would with dual channel ram set up
How and why?
dunno why im not that tech smart
here's an example with BFV though
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k5wA7EFwpo
i see
I had to upgrade the ram in my sisters PC from 8gb to 16gb because of Minecraft
interesting. is this real?
yeah
dont laugh, i already only got one lol
ah :(
was gonna buy 2nd one later but never got around to it
but the fact of the matter his gpu not running same %
true, but that might be caused by having 1 ram stick :P not sure though
i would recommend having 2 though
it actually does look at benchmarks with single and dual channel ram on bfv
it might have to do with cpu limitation but ai'm not sure
hmmm 
ram should be relatively cheap right now
i need to buy a new set, was looking yesterday actually anyways
could buy on ebay etc... tho
yeah its quite cheap, ur better spending 30$ for thar extra stick than get stuttering
never really belive ram would affect fps anyways. it this video you sent me it only seems to affect gpu usage for some strange reason
still dont actually lol. hmmm.....
btw why is ram usage quite low on singleplayers?
it only seems to spike up in multiplayers
maybe they need more stuff stored to be loaded quickly or something
i must try this when i get 2nd stick actually. but its not like i dont have 100% gpu in games tho
It does ....
4gb ram is unplayable
IMO 8gb is too
hmmm skeptical but i will try it. i mostly get 100% gpu usage if i unlock fps
you can get by with 8 but with stuttering in certain games
I used to play bf5 with 8 with just minor stutters here and there
I have 8 and I get stuttering in BFV and CW
it qas still very playable
is it 1x8 or 2x4?
2x4
whats ur cpu?
hmm....
cause the major reasin for stuttering in bf5 is cpu
an i5-9400f
no
i will check into this ram thing. i still dont belive it at all but i wont rule it out tho
it does run fine when I close everything in the background tho with.little stuttering
I have razer cortex
I run discord at most lol
I’m getting 16gb ram for Xmas anyway tho so I can wait a few days
whats your gpu?
it’s a 1660s
my 3080 will never arrive lmao
still don’t have it ?
can’t u refund ?
you ordered 3 months ago?
damn i ordered 10 days ago lol
rip
hopefully after new years it will be quick
which one did you order btw and EU or?
yeah im from EU
ofc i could refund anytime i want but the prices of rtx3080 have skyrocketed
so i'll rather wait than pay +180€
got mine for 760€
yeah just for that reason im waiting :D
the gpu i ordered would be like 940€ right now
you got founders edition or?
Asus TUF OC
lol that cost about 1k eur here now
i ordered the GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle OC
At the time of ordering
That was the 2nd cheapest option
Cheapest being asus tuf non oc
oh i see
I wanted to get a 3070 FE more then anything
still a lot tho for a budget card ?
it is
lol
why do some people say the rtx 3060 ti is a "mid end card"
"IF IT CANT DO 4K AT 144FPS IT IS ABSLOUTELY WORTHLESS"

RTX 2060 is the best:)))I have 50 60 fps in battlefild on ultra
oof you have a serious cpu bottleneck right there
the rtx 2060 should get 110 fps on ultra
your getting 1650 super performance
whats ur cpu?
maybe they just didnt set prefer max performance in control panel
but is those settings with DXR graphics enabled?
even without doing this...
dxr is more 50-60fps high
hmmmmmmmm,that is bolshet 😦 on all ultra i have 67 -70 fps wtf,you think i have a problem?,i have msi trident 3 ,:((
what?
the game dont opening
new
You have storage?

