#technology
1 messages · Page 51 of 1
Please do not tag mods that are not active in chat 😄

By the way guys just a big disclaimer. Deco is someone who I trust with this kind of stuff. Just don't go installing random software unless you are absolutely sure.
It's super cool tho
deco never showed the virustotal link, so you never know
Haha
will updating the dlss dlls yourself trigger some anti-cheat
nah it won't trigger
the dll is signed by Nvidia, if it was different a anti cheat would detect it but to do that it'd need to be a (custom) dll
aka you'd need to break it apart and modify it
it's actually a backdoor program I've got control of your pc now
Deco is in your walls
time to set up background miner
xP
Behold peasants. The ROG STRIX RTX 4090
Nice!
Very nice. Going to run minesweeper like crazy
Now I gotta wait for the case and my next payday where I get fans, thermal paste, white cables, and the windows 11 operating system
I want 4090 tbh but for the same price I can buy a professionally handcrafted USA guitar 
Waiting for next gen until I even wanna think of replacing my 3080ti
This is everything I have now
I'm gonna get a 4070 with single 8-pin connector
@toxic wigeon fyi I'm just going to change the integration to have the user supply the path directory for where the games are installed for ea play and battle.net, fixes the problem
So I got a small cardboard stand with it, a ring, and the screwdriver
Oh and this as well
same here but the XTX
Same here but if you subtract 20003D from the first and 1300XT from the 2nd 
If you care about value and can survive a while on current gpu i'd waited until 50 series 
Like if you take the example from 3090 to 4080, 4080 is about 40% faster from what i know. So thinking maybe you can see similar gains or at least lower price for same performance 🤷 That is ofc if you care about value
I am gonna wait for the 50 series myself
Eitherway, nice specs bro 😛
I'll check the 50 series later on.
Or I just skip the 50 series and go for a 60 series
Oh cheap probably not, but i would be pretty confident it might be up to half price cheaper
nope
Like a 4090 ain't becoming a budget and outdated GPU anytime soon
What gpu you got now?
expect the 1200 range roughly
The 4090 Rog strix
If you are talking about the PC I'm using currently it's a 20 series
Well, i expect around that but more 1000k maybe 🤷
so 2 generation upgrade, same as i will. I have 3070 now
I may just do a consistent 2 gen or 3 gen upgrade
If gains are worth the price
@pale quartz cheapest 4080 prices are basically half of cheapest 4090 here. But i am staying positive for somewhat better pricing even better vram. Didn't they do better prices for recent 4070's? So there might be some price reduction, but we'll have to see 🤷
Ti super or what not
4080/4090 performance difference is roughly 35%, the 4090 will already downgrade in price so they wont have the 5080 be cheap, they will artificially limit supply if required to maintain msrp for blackwell
The 3090 as an example is nobody selling new now, i know it's a bit late to mention it considering the time since release. Last sold was at same as the price was for the most time, and some even more expensive. The 4090 will drop out of market here quite qick too i am thinking, for new ones*
yes thats done by nvidia to maintain high prices, once blackwell launches they will begin ceasing production of lovelace products to dry up supply in the second hand market, the GPU market is engineered by nvidia
🤷
Eitherway it's usually more benifical buying newer series than older ones, value wise
That was my point
though all id recc is a am5 contact frame
doesn't do much with temps like some intel cpu but
the shape of the chip is, wonky and thermal paste clean up </3
@toxic wigeon https://github.com/Recol/DLSS-Updater/releases/tag/V1.2.4 custom handling is done for epic games and ea play now, it will detect them correctly
have fun building it 
Have fun putting your life savings into a box* 
I doubt 5080 comes close to 4090, I think 4090 will still be in 2nd place, behind 5090
maybe unless they go beyond 256-bit for 5080
If this is strictly for gaming then this is an embarrassingly waste of money
4090 has better uses
But enjoy your build I guess
Just gotta make it negative huh. Lol
Yeah that shit cost 2k but It'll last me longer than the current PC ever did
Last me up until 60-70 series
I’m on a 4070ti or 7900XT in my case, also you are using water cooling sooo enjoy a 5 year water cooling lifespan… yeah odd isn’t it well known water cooling breaks your pc faster than your cpu and GPU will wear.
Hope you are willing to filter that shit every 3-4 months
Why the fuck are you that negative for
I’m very negative because 10+ years doing this.. it’s draining and I’ve seen to many mistakes 
Chill
I'll get a new cooling system then not that hard.
Oooh it's going to break. Yeah I'm aware it's going to break, everything does, nothing can last forever
Like chill out, yeah the floor is made out of floor
Yeah I know that, that's why I did research. I'm fully aware of the lifetime of these products especially the AIO.
LQ III or II my phone is tiny
I'll switch it out with either another AIO or a Fan cooler
AIO's you can't refill should be illegal. Pretty big waste.
Are you on a 7800X3D?
It’s the best X3D model at 88W and doesn’t need water cooling
If it’s an X then 🔥 
It’s hard to see it
I’m on all air cooling avg 45C-53C in all gaming scenarios, unless it’s loading or intense game with lots of simulation at 60C which is 25C below critical
Are you living in 15C ambient 😄
That and have a higher risk of leakage
The mistake of installing water cooling but not having a back valve to drain 
Happened too many times
Like it could extend the lifespan but like I don't want this thing to leak ever and the AIOs that are popular are good enough that leakages are very rare
Humans have added fillports that don't leak for ages. AIO's should be part of that proud tradition.
Maybe in the next generation of AIOs
zen 4 boost range for clocks goes up to 90 degrees, 85 isn't a critical level
downclocking won't kick in till it hits 95 degrees sustained, it's the normal boost range
Fair I also just leave everything on auto with adrenaline
It does what it needs to do well
overclocking is dead anyways it should be removed entirely
yeah hardware is already at redline at stock from factory anyways, just gives users a false sense of security when they're in fact causing silent bit rot on their system unknowingly
the amount of users who have ecc is also tiny
or if you're unlucky enough to own 13th/14th gen a potentially ticking time bomb of it dying entirely
Observers x3d is gonna run cold
Ice
Will i see a noticeable performance decline going 4k over 1440p with the following gear: 12900KS & 4090 OC
Secondly. I guess that cpu is still fine for the time being. No reason to look for newer ?
I think soo too tbh. This also comes down to when next gen consoles gonna release, i am thinking that could impact and increase base hardware requirements for games
Also, you don't have to worry one bit about vram for the moment too
I got my 3070 in january 2021, haven't fully reached its limit yet even. The 8gb has for sure though
For gaming*
Power supply makers preparing their wattage calculator for next-gen GPUs It is likely not a leak, but the timing is interesting. Seasonic, who maintains their own list of existing and upcoming hardware, has updated their power calculator to list NVIDIA’s unreleased RTX 50 series. Surprisingly, this list includes actual TDP values, which had not ...
i might have to go ahead and get a 4070 since I don't want to adapt to new 16-pin standard

Why though?
Also these are comfirmed wattage i would assume? 🤔
A: yes you will, Nvidia GPUs become constricted by IPC on the processor, with a 4090 you won't be able to max utilisation because of the 12900k, the effect will be lessened if you intend for 4k directly but it will still be there
no processor can actually fully use a 4090 as is
I am ready to buy this 
Directly from psu, no unnecessary adapters
he'll need to move to it anyways because Radeon themselves are transferring over
the atx 3 spec isn't new at this point

8-pins for days
Got and 750 myself atm, waiting for 5070/5080 specs to see which i am going to buy
Just get this one 😛
I will move to Battlemage then 
never got any generic 16 pin cable
it has to be specific to your power supply manufacturer due to the pin layout design
you risk a fire otherwise
Its type 4 corsair cable
Mhm
I have type 4 psu
So no problem
not guaranteed, you'll need to check Corsair themselves
even cross type 4 isn't fully compatible with all their PSUs
well theyre only targeting up to the xtx next generation so
My pcie/cpu is type 4 at least
Imagine not reading on this then buying 1000 dollar gpu, can't even refund it lol
yeah one con most consumers will pass by
yeah 7900XTX is supposed to remain fastest Radeon GPU for raw performance anyway, I think RDNA4 ray-tracing will be a good bit faster than XTX
it will but it won't matter
since the highest end target for rasterisation is the same RT advancements will be diminished
Me as i know stuff can change quite fast with tech i read on this to make sure if psu is compatible or not
top RDNA4 is like 5070Ti competitor
I just have the XT and I’m running circles around the XTX xD
much more expensive than that, worth the price, absolutely not

If laugh if we don’t go to 50 series and go to double digits like RTX2 50
xD
Blackwell advancements are not double digits
I guess time will tell
it's in efficiency mainly
Battlemage seems to be competitive with 4070 or 3080
yeah battlemage will come out in the year 2030
by the time it's already out it's already doa
8800XT has to be $500 at max or it will not outsell the 4070 Super or 7800XT
top end RDNA4 price targets rn are about the 750 mark

they may change closer to launch but rough price guidance
well, yeah, their top target is the xtx
the second product down is the xt
what happens when you need to redesign a graphics card mid cycle
MCM GCDs did not work out at all 
RDNA4 is a filler generation it will fix the hardware defects with 3 but nothing more
To go back to wattage for a moment. The 3080 ti max out at 350W and a 750w psu is recomended with the 165w i9-10980XE. So guess if i buy 5080 i might not need to upgrade psu 🤷 🤔
do not buy a 5080 if you're running that lol
RDNA5 might not be MCM for GCDs either, memory/cache chiplets only
that processor is going to need to be upgraded aswell
but 120w
Is less than the i9-10980XE
Perhaps 🤷 We'll see whats recomended anyway on release i guess. Also might be i just get the 5070 if performance/price is nice, that would live fine with 750w psu
segmentation is up in the air for RTX 5000 series, 5080 could end up 320-bit on very cut-down GB202 silicon, or it could end up with same specs as the 4080 Super
as an idea zen 2/3 with a 4090 wall it currently
your IPC on 10th gen is about 40% slower than zen 3
so you won't even hit the tdp target for a 5080 if you buy it
10980XE is just a matured 7980XE
yeah for that level of rasterisation it's a no go a 4080 is not even advised
4070 Ti Super
you can get away with old processors with Radeon but Nvidia never
Was thinking in terms of wattage usage. I am still getting the 7800x3d
If you talking about performance of the cpu to hit TDP
nope, just on the graphics card
the wattage is arbitrary here
because youre IPC walled from the getgo the power draw will never hit max
Bought it, so far no complains. for the price per performance I get, its a solid investment 
What do you mean? I dont know fancy english 
7800x3d i am viewing as great cpu
essentially the problem is you are single core bound on the processor, in shorter terms you will not be able to hit the max wattage draw from a (potential 5080) because of that with your 10th gen, so any wattage difference is negated
if you are talking about a 7800x3d then that changes and no longer applies but with 10th gen that's the case
you think 5000 series will have an exclusive new version of DLSS
Let me put this way. 3080ti 350w gpu, nvidia recomend 750w cpu with 165w cpu which in the recomendation case was i9-10980XE. The 7800x3d is 120w, so i am thinking maybe it will be fine with 750 again. But i still have feeling i might upgrade psu anyway
yes so with any potential 5080 your wattage regardless of its tdp will be less, so if it's 450, you'll actually only be able to get it to say 350, etc
you don't have the problem with your 3080ti, but you will if you upgrade the GPU to a 4090/5080
I see, so probably need to upgrade then if 350w gpu for 5080
What i understand at least
essentially yeah
I see, i am 100% the 5070 wont need new psu though. It should also have plenty of wattage headroom on 750 i am thinking
Maybe, but i can't think of what 🤷
I don't have internals on the 5070 currently so I don't have a clue about power draw targets for it as of now, but if you're going that route it's a fair assessment to assume
5070 likely launch around January-March anyway
I have a feeling buying 5080 might not be worth, but have to wait and see. Maybe just going 4070 ti super would be fine enough, comes down to new features, performance and price if it will be 50 series or not
Not big problem tbh for me. I can survive on what i have just need some more patience
The gpu is capable just upgrading is basically patience matter. Well, also some vram issues though
Me want BMG

that thing will need to go in a museum

But yeah ARL will be huge upgrade for me, but will need to upgrade a whole lot of stuff
Not sure if I will go new case or not as well
What about my old 4th gen 
virus processor
I mean most of my workplace use windows XP and 7 computers
Connected online with an AV making everything so slow

Used to have one, is your 5800x a bit spicy as well?
Yeah, but isn't that normal for them? 
what
Reading above. The 4090 was first touted as drawing 450 watts of power. Ada was proven that to be wrong, so the 5090 drawing 500 and the 5080 drawing 350 is a load of crap
Ada architecture is actually super efficient
It was proven you could literally cut the 4090 in half with Riva Tuner/MSI Afterburner or any of the 3rd party tuning apps and still retain 90% performance
Seasonic leaking 500 watts is simply another gimmick to buy something you don't need.
Don't get me wrong. Seasonic makes top tier power supplies. But 500 watts is absurd.
Never released RTX 4070 with AD104-275 GPU and 10GB VRAM spotted It looks like somebody is now selling a once-forgotten RTX 4070 sample that was never made into an official product. What we often say is that just because multiple sources do not agree on the specs, and each source seems to have different […]
so d0k should build an antenna 👀?
Get wired headphones.
You can listen to music with wired headphones.
ok you win DX
sus
Like wireless mice, they are really good now. I have a 6xx with a schiit stack but for gaming I use Arctis nova 7
To extreme audiophiles, yes
To 97% of humans on planet earth, indiscernable really
Not like they have studio level equipment to compare with
And the average guy isn't going to fork over thrice the money for something like a deezer or tidal hifi sub or start collecting flacs.
I mean you can hear when audio is compressed easily. It sounds muddy and like you're in a closet.
It's like when you cover your ears.
The price of good wireless audio hardware, is not worth it. Especially when even the best will sound worse than mid tier wired cans.
It's worth it if you don't sit at home all the time
You can't just fold wired cans easily into a small carrying case and slip them on and instantly connect to your phone while on the train or something.
It's about convenience
If barely travel then yeah your reasoning would make sense if you only buy headphones based on the sound quality alone.
I mean, you can. And you dont have to charge your headphones. Which is a massive inconvenience to me
I do travel, and I use a separate pair of wired headphones for that purpose
We're talking about large overhead wireless headphones. The truly wireless earbuds I consider to be much better in handling compressed audio than the overhead wireless headphones.
When paired to phones, the earbuds sound fine, but when you pair it to a computer, oh my jesus is it horrid.
I don't really need to bother with battery until after a few days for me, and even then I can just put it on charge while sleeping on that odd day I need to.
Windows doesn't support those better codecs out of the box unfortunately
they do
ldac etc are supported
support is based on the specific network receiver not windows itself
You need A2dp or something to support that right
But if you need to bring a charging cable with you everywhere, doesn't that negate the whole "We dont need to worry about a cable" part?
To each their own to be fair, convenience for you and I are going to be different situations. I basically have a home setup, then a separate travel setup (same mouse, travel headset is wired and has a built in mic). Then I just use a small pair of noise cancelling earbuds for use with tablet/phone, ETC
True, but you also bring your phone charger with you, mine also charge with usb c so it's not really a hassle for me 
Fair point too.
Any wireless headsets ive tried have left a lot to be desired. So I just stick to wired.
Yeah, I hate Windows support for bluetooth.
Makes me want to switch to a macbook pro.
windows supports Bluetooth, essentially them all, aptX, aptX HD and ldac are supported
prepare to be disappointed lol
SBC only for non iPhone headphones
Windows? Couldnt be me
The only time the bluetooth connection is stable is when the device comes with an adapter even if you have bluetooth built into the motherboard.
well yeah cause the receiver in your board is probably ass
I've tried bluetooth headphones across all motherboards of bad quality and premium quality. They're all bad.
they're not

mt7922 Bluetooth is fine as is the last 2 generations of intel receivers
well they do because it's factually not correct
Maybe all the motherboards I've tried are faulty.
That'd be an amazing coincidence if they were.
if you don't actually read the board specification, you're going to get ass quality, is how it works
need to know what you're buying
no I mean the actual onboard components
What else would you mean?
the internal hardware the board is using, the thing that isn't mentioned in reviews, or otherwise
Another reason they are crap tho, no? you need to both have good and expensive headpones, and a premium tier motherboard. This just makes me went them less
Yep. That's what everyone should do.
e.g. aquantia nic etc
Did they use realtek receivers
Those are horrible
yes and no, most of Bluetooth wireless power is by the master host rather than the slave, as is the same with WiFi, it's only really the case if it's a really budget piece of headphones that it matters to a big extent
most headphones are similar enough in maturity for hardware that it's negligible
What do you guys consider premium wireless overhead headphones? Audio-Technica and Sennheiser massive cans?

Sony is good value 
sony XM4
Ew.
in terms of Bluetooth ldac/aptX HD would be classified as premium tier
no they don't lol
ldac is Sonys codec
they don't pay the license
sennheiser supports aptX/aptX HD and aptX low latency it doesn't support ldac
I mean the equivalence.
there's no equivalent
ldac is the highest bandwidth stream codec there is for Bluetooth
So, you're saying Sony is the only way to get okay sounding wireless overhead headphones?
no
Sounds like a horrible market.
there's just no "equivalent" for Bluetooth codec
Everything being said here just makes me want wireless less and less lol.
LDAC transmission is as close to lossless as is possible for Bluetooth it doesn't have a competitor
once you go wireless with the whxms, you never go back unless you have really good wired cans
it's that high that you physically can't hear it, ironically
My beloved wired headphones are $500.
I got them for $180 from a friend who resold them to me.
Because he loved his Sennheiser HD650s more.
I accidentally convinced him to get the ones he sold to me because I was telling him how great they were. He bought them again for the second time.
OOF
Oh, I have 2 pairs of the K702s and I fucking hate them lol
Didn't like the suspension system?
Or, didn't like the flat signature?
I hear the K702s were a bit bass boosted.
They're the ones Quincy Jones worked on right?
Dont like anything about them. the build quality is crap. Those mini XLRs come lose and I got nothign but issues from them.
Oh yeah, I can see that. They're worse quality than the K701.
3 sets, all 3 had the same issue. Returned one, got a replacement...after 1 month of use, same issue again. Amd im not at all rough with hardware. It sits on my desk and doesnt get moved
I currently just use 1 of 3 pairs. I use a set of Sennheisser 560S, Audio Technica ATH AD700X or Bayerdynamic DT 900 Pro X
Too many headphones. I can't collect stuff. Only things I collect are gears in MMORPGs.
Yup, thats them. the headband is rigid, the auto adjustment doesnt work well...and the material is not comfortable for long periods of wear
I make music, so I use different headphones and speakers for mixing from time to time
The only items I can think about collecting one day are books I've read if I'm in a place in life to settle down in one area enough.
I love my AKG headband.
I wear them 14 hours a day everyday.

Had them since 2013.
700x goated for sound whoring in fps games
its borderline hacks imo
Nova Pro Wireless is real expensive af if I'm just going to listen to music only
The Strix Go 2.4 is on sale right now for SGD $125
Slightly cheaper than the last wired headset I purchased from Asus
Curved is cringe
2000 on a monitor also. Jesus
Intel LGA-1700 support to be continued Intel to support LGA-1700 with the Bartlett-S update and its brand new 12 P-Core only die. Contrary to what Intel taught us to expect from its CPU architecture planning, the LGA-1700 platform will not end with the release of Arrow Lake-S, which uses a different socket. Instead, Intel will […]
12 P-cores

Intel should release cpus that don't rapidly degrade and die
tldr:
it has hdmi 2./DP 1.4a with DSC
the aspect ratio is non standard but not necessarily a deal breaker, if you like that size of monitor it's good
price is ok relative to AUD
Haha

Well Intel UK
I just want a new headphone wireless using 2.4GHZ RF
But I need the specs first

Purpose: just for music
Really puts the 'ultra' in ultrawide
am I just a jealous poor kid, or do I seriously think I twist my neck enough looking around at a 34 inch ultrawide to know that I'd have serious comfort issues if I had to game on that thing?
and that pixel density..argh
I would 100% buy this if it had higher ppi
if it had a higher ppi my video card would become a toaster oven coil
Sorry. DSC?
display stream compression
Oh yeah.
Not that I think it'll reach that consistently but 240hz 4k with dp 1.4 feels rude.
Does dsc assist in that or what.
yes
without it it wouldn't be possible
all DP1.4a monitors essentially need to use it to read ultra high bandwidth rates
Does it fuck up the quality by a noticeable amount or nah
no quality difference at all
Oh baby
it does affect things somewhat but nothing that matters for your use case
Yeah. Though I would like to know. Like what?
DLDSR can't be used with DSC, it's restricted in the driver and a few other things
largely stuff that doesn't matter
Yeah I was gonna say what is that but I feel like if it was important to me as a whole then yeah.
I was at Harvey's and tested it.
It's absolutely massive dude.
Actual behemoth of a monitor.
The colours seem so much clearer.
even better is it supports gsync so you won't actually be seeing the best version of it
Can ultra wides split themselves up?
You do not need another cable for this either no?
well you do because splitting it up means to another input
Yeah I thought so.
I guess that's one annoying limitation is no 2 DP ports but it's not like I'm going to be playing two games at all.
yeah it doesn't support 2 DP ports because it's technically already combining 2 to be able to output that high a resolution at that framerate
I heard something about OS issues if the two monitors are running at separate frame rates.
So I guess I'll have to do some weird shit to get that set up.
you want 2 monitors with that huge thing
if you split it up it may cause issues but it shouldnt be necessary explicitly, windows 11 has the virtual window manager for different desktops
Nah Deco I'll buy a second one of that monitor and stack it vertically.
one key combo and you can switch to whatever else it is
That's my dream.
good way to end up with paralysis
Hahahaha
you'd have huge power draw issues with 2 of those monitors
not the monitor itself but the graphics card
once you enter ultra huge monitor territory because the bandwidth requirements are so high idle will be higher, 2 of those will easily be about 50w combined
Oh that's true.
Yeah.
I don't plan on getting this anytime soon.
I may never. But it's a super fun early theoriticial idea.
Lovelace essentially fixed the large idle problem, it's more prolific on older generations and Radeon cards
Really just a matter of being built up around it.
Actually I do need your opinion. What's the best budget card right now? @pale quartz
I was thinking the 3060ti but I wonder what else.
uhhh depends
1080p.
4060ti
When I upgrade this December to the 9800x3d I'm gonna give my sister my old motherboard and she can't exactly use a gtx 770 4 gig with it LOL.
Oooo
4060ti for sure then
frame gen with DLSS and 16gb of vram, will be more than enough for any 1080p game
Yeah exactly.
She doesn't need power but she needs a card that's good with my CPU.
If that makes sense.
yeah it'll be fine for it
Graphics card.
Yeah for sure she'll be looking at second hand cards.
300 is really good.
But the title a bit err
Yeah ahah
Radeon is a no go option for 1080p and ampere cards can't practically be justified imo with the feature difference
with the 4060ti she'll get nvenc AV1 for streaming and frame generation, world of a difference
Shame too because I really like amd for their vram.
they can't record 1080p videos correctly so there you go
about where Radeon are nowadays
fsr is also garbage at 1080p compared to dlss
man you guys get screwed on prices. 4060 ti was 300 bucks a couple of weeks ago here
aussie dollars tho
If you want an excellent computer building experience, use chat GPT. I'm not even fucking around. I picked every component and had it walk me through construction. It was easier than scouring the internet looking for advice
and I heart this thing now
not a good idea lol
That's fine. The thing 3 feet in front of me disagrees, but you've got your perspective I guess.
no i mean it cant give you accurate guidance for personalisation
It can give me suggestions and I can decide yes or no
its just an LLM, it has no concept or understanding of what a end user requires, the suggestions you will be given are just generic in nature
and I'm not a weeb or a 14 year old girl, it's a computer. it is black and white.
..?
as far as personalization goes
maybe I need to find an example so this makes a little more sense..
for example
Damn $446 usd dollar
this information is way out of date lol
it doesnt know anything about current trends and its bad if you are seeking guidance on relevant pc parts
it knows what parts are compatible, I can look at reviews
you're right, my computer is a fucking dumpster fire
i've brought shame to my dojo
im not saying your pc is bad
im saying its not correct to say it is good for providing pc specific part recommendations
With all due respect, Deco. Subjective reviews from users are about as meaningful as an AI's summary of them
You're telling me to research to see what people say about items. Those reviews are subjective, are they not.
no
Your opinion of a card is objective? what?
you have objective reviewers of hardware like hardware unboxed, gamers nexus and others, its not an opinion
they do actual benchmarking
you do know chat gpt 4o can actively use search engines and it looks at review websites, right?
and youre still wrong about that lol, because its blocked by the vast majority of websites
it doesnt use search engines either
the only search engine it uses is bing
Holy shit you're stupid. You're just fucking moving the goal posts to avoid being wrong, and it's obnoxious.
uh?
Good bye
my guy if you did 2 seconds of looking you would know that the GPU chatgpt recommended in that isnt enough for modern titles with vram requirements
if you want to be lazy thats fine but dont go on and say its some god like thing when it has no conception about what its talking about
How much? Also getting new parts tomorrow 👀 Now i just need to be patient for the 50 series 
Lol, who would buy a 3060ti now
12GB is more or less the minimum now
according to that guy you should cause ChatGPT says so
It said 3060ti for 1080p?
I don't like those tiers of gpus, but theres no reason to buy a 3060ti 12gb,when you can get a newer 4060ti with 16gbs
exactly
For probably cheaper
And which will use less power, requiring less of a powerful psu
someone buying a 3060ti is going to be very disappointed when their textures look like ass in any new game
For 1080p that should be ok
Even horizon forbidden west stutters like crazy with high textures on 8gb cards.
yeah essentially
going to get infinitely worse once games migrate over to UE5.4 aswell
Damn even 16gb at 1080p, games going crazy
I am actually really suprised too see that for 1080p i didn't know it was that much
RT multiplies your memory usage big time, but it's also cause the consoles have 16GB of unified memory
Here, I updated it for you
so the days of 8GB are essentially dead
Maybe i should get card with more vram then specially since i am considering 1440p at one point
For sure
HAHA
yeah that totally works
ddr4 memory with a DDR5 platform
actual stupidity
Arent the ram pretty similar price anyway too? 🤔
yeah the only problem is you can't fit it in the motherboard lol
it even recommended rgb
AM5 is DDR5 only
Got my hands on some 6000mhz cl30 sticks
processor?
about 180 usd, a bit expensive imo
Went for the 7800x3d
eh you could have got cheaper memory but DDR5 is that cheap it's probably not worth it
these are extremely modern titles at high settings though, it mostly depends on what you play
im getting away with 10gb at 1440p because i mostly play esport titles at low settings
I want to play max any game 
rtx on too?
I didnt even get too use all of my 3070 cause the damn vram
pfft dont even know those requirements
Vram 
first descendant is also a memory hog aswell like 10GB at 1080p with RT
yea im saying idk vram requirements for modern titles at max settings with rt on
I have a pair of 6400mhz sticks. At the time it seemed like the most reasonable sweetspot that was possible and once I got rid of my defective Gigabyte motherboard that Gigabytes inept support people couldn't find any fault with they luckily run perfect. Always seem to have bad luck with memory.
Vram 
all of it
damn 10gb while not even looking that good
if this is Ryzen the IMC only guarantees up to 6000, zen 5 has support for 6400 though
meh it's ok, not great but it's alright
DLAA support etc is pretty neat
I am here hoping the 5070/5080 will have more than 16gb 
just kills your performance in the process
bet 5080 comes with 16gb
they gave the 4060ti 16gb so id expect they would
Funny thing i would be suprised and not suprised at the same time
This is my 7900X. I know the "guarantee" but those are useless - it's all about what is realistic when it's my luck with memory 😄
fair
its basically how nvidia segments their gpus. the performance as of late usually hits higher than their vram allows
^
I mean, vram starting to get really limited from the looks of it
i mean you can run ddr5-7600+ on zen4 if you fiddle around and have decent memory+imc
yeah not even nvidia can rest behind it even more, so much so they literally had to a recall
not at 1:1 you cant
Yeah i didnt even get to use all of my 3070 
you have to 2:1 for that
The 12GB vram on my 3080ti is what I dislike about it the most. Should really have come with 16GB.
hmm 4080 super has 16gb of vram.. so maybe we will get a slight bump for 5080, though id still bet 16gb
they recalled the 4080 at launch which had 12gb
so id be surprised if the 5080 has less than 16
zen4 doesnt really have 1:1/1:2 anymore as far as i understand it. it all runs async. tho 2:3 is preferred from what ive heard (2ghz fabric and 3 ghz mem)
Ngl would have been 🤡 release anyway
im not one for complaining about vram limitations, but if a 5080 comes with less than 16gb thats just bs
they do, 1:1 is guaranteed up to 6000, past that is 2:1 since the fclk is decoupled, you are always going to get worse when you enter 2:1 territory unless you can hit like 8000 because of the IF
since it's vcache latency is way more important than actual bandwidth
cache misses are critical
It's Nvidia, I would not be surprised if they released a 5085 with more memory if they could earn lots of money from it.
sure
5080 super or ti or something 
often why you have sudden tanking of performance randomly and your 0.1% lows crash
2:1 is useful if you have a clock gen on your board but those are few and far between
eclk premium is absurd
yep
not even x670e boards have it until the 600 territory without other compromises it's crazy
but given how much they charge you for a postcode display it shouldnt surprise anyone
sadly
You know nvidia wouldn't dare because ram cost money and they'll still force games to use 8gb
vram
NV use texture compression but the problem is someone buying a Blackwell card and crashing when they enable DLSS and RT is a big issue
oh, the 5085 would cost vastly more, too much, ofc.
so they caused their own situation
ah the 5085, also I already have a photo of the 50 series
The rare image of the nvidia 5000 series

does nvidias memory compression really help that much?
from what ive seen that only reduces usage by roughly 500mb-1gb in most games
well, put it this way
if it wasnt you would have users on 1050tis complaining why they are getting out of video errors
essentially it's the best in terms of what there is with competitors (Radeon), the problem is testing it is highly variable on the card itself
the amount it downscales it significantly less with say a 4090 compared to a 3060 etc
which is, what it's supposed to do, so in that regard it's a pretty decent, but not so much for budget users
I can't stand TYC but yeah essentially the problem is testing it per game will produce different results
and using different cards will also produce different results
so it's a chicken and egg situation
if you switch on say DLSS and then RT that's another factor where logic goes out the window
then you have.. DLAA, ray reconstruction, and 50 other massive VRAM things which will change (that) result
even the quality of what you're using for DLSS upscaling will influence it
can you send me an article on it?
thx
relevant section is near the bottom if you don't want to read through the entirety
the tldr is it's not one form of compression algorithm, but a scalable one which changes depending on how much VRAM is free on the card itself at one time (for example if it's using texture streaming etc)
that specifically is up to the developer themselves but, same idea
i know that. i just thought this would need to be implemented by devs on the software side
like astc in this article.
nah, that's the magic of it, it's implemented in the driver itself, so all the developer has to do is use whatever framework e.g. dx12 or whatever to use it
and it's more or less handled automatically
they can choose to use their own specific one if they want, which is why when you change game that becomes a problem
whats the advantage of nvidia then? because astc is supported by basically everyone
On iGPUs, yes.
^
fair enough
Do you have a desk that can support it

you know how, todays desk are
I wonder, did they ever make an ultrawide crt for pc
LAN party ready! ™️
Yeah there's a good boost in power.
about a 55% increase in performance
50-60% depending on the game
Thanks Deco
I guess a bit overkill for a future battlefield game in 1440p?
I haven't bought it yet btw
not particularly
decent chance a 4090 for the next game will be considered "high tier" rather than overkill by the time the next game launches, 4080 will also drop its classification by then
more or less ye
GARBAGE CHAIR:
https://thermaltakeusa.com/products/cyberchair-e500-ggc-eg5-bblfdm-01
https://amzn.to/4cIG6To
GOOD CHAIR:
https://amzn.to/3WoxOKD
https://amzn.to/3Sf60Wz
BILL BURR: https://youtu.be/FxINJzqzn4w
https://youtu.be/XP8EFgq_ETU
https://youtu.be/OQzWPR4H-SU
👉 Merchandise: https://store.rossmanngroup.com/memes-dreams.html
🔵 Cheesy mugs ...
wow a chinese company has terrible customer service, now please tell me something new Louis 
well taiwanese but doesn't matter
Oooh what he said 

Cheaper SKUs for AM5 According to Italian media Bits and Chips, AMD is reportedly launching a new series of budget CPUs for AM5 socket. Currently, the cheapest AMD Ryzen 7000 CPU is the Ryzen 5 7500F, a 6-core variant sold exclusively in certain markets. It is relatively easy to find on platforms like Aliexpress for […]
Athlon and Ryzen 3 lineup based on Zen 4, CPUs in the $70-100 range
AM5 now even cheaper to adopt
I would steer people from buying B550 + 5700X/5800X3D right now and buy B650 + R5 7600 or upcoming R3 7300 instead
RTX 5070 and 5080 gonna be disappointing unless they can keep price equal or lower than 4000 series
5000 series might as well be a refresh unless you're talking about the 5090
Also I heard there cpu have an igpu pretty powerful near a gtx 1070
Strix Halo is the name, has more iGPU compute units than PS5, also newer generation and better ray-tracing accelerators
Memory bandwidth limitation won’t let it perform at GTX 1070 level imo
What you mean, it is ddr5
If they could find a way to pair it with GDDR6, it could be faster than RTX 4060
But LPDDR5x-8000 is weak compared to memory that dedicated GPUs use
Intel is very likely to overtake AMD in the APU/iGPU market within the next year since AMD doesn’t want to innovate and sticks with slow ass DDR5/LDDR5 instead of using HBM or a big cache
What you mean intel is going ddr6?
No Intel uses HBM as a cache for iGPU
If CPU performance were a foot race, extra cache is like giving one of the CPUs a car while the other one remains on foot
Cache makes CPUs with memory limitations faster
If that's the case then i waited for nothing
Well, depends on performance as well
Should add 18/20gb vram too 
Also make it even bigger
and heavier
Make sure you have to buy a new case to use such a gpu
can anyone help me find a certain setting that increases my audio volume?
in windows this is located under volume mixer, alternatively your output sounds for devices will have it's audio lowered
Sony wh1000xm5
?
I should mention that would be with EQ
It has too much bass without
If you don't use EQ probably the Audeze Maxwell are the best
AMD Ryzen 9000 CCD uses TSMC 4nm N4P node AMD has released detailed information about the Zen5 manufacturing node and compute chiplet die sizes. This was part of the Zen5 Tech Day, which covered AMD’s next-generation architecture for desktops and mobile devices. The company confirmed that the CCD, codenamed Eldora, fits up to 8 Zen5 […]
TSMC 4nm N4P
bois
I need some help
ea launcher is fucked and I am unable to start any ea game including battlefield ofc, I am stuck at the "preparing game" screen. Tried everything I could think of and still same shit happening anyone knows what could be the issue?
hell nah
whats your purpose and budget?
and if you want in ear or just regular headphones open or close back?
and what is really your focus of use
Read context
I did read lol
he literally said he owns the sennheiser 650
Those aren't wireless over ears
wireless no
but when someone says they own such headphones they're used of good audio quality
not sony's mid tier sound quality
Sony wh1000xm5 with eq is not mid tier, its the best closed back you can get
its not even good
Hypothetical if I was in the market. I already have my dream overear headphones.
I have AKG K701.
Best mid-tier sound stage is the K701.
They are
I use my airpods and airpods pro for wireless. They're amazing for that.
With EQ
I have the airpods pro 2. They're solid. But I still hands down say the buds 2 pro were the best true wireless audio I tried so far
There are headphones that take to EQ better than others, XM5 is one of those. With EQ they are top tier
but thats earbuds
What manufacturer?
samsung. But lemme check something
I wouldn't recommend iems
Bass sucks and tonal balance is too inconsistent with iems, along with the imaging/soundstage being poor
lemme check prices first
Then I wonder why musicians use it the most on stage
Isolation
sure lmao
Iems lands are complete different story compared to headphones
@mild aspen I know you have open back because the 650 are
I have IEMs that I never use.
I'm not in the market right now. It's hypothetical.
also maybe the Audio-Technica ATH-WB2022
I am waiting for Fiio to re-release their IEM wireless adapters.
yeh you got that option
Iam not a fan of it because they look weird
but I use IEM's at work
and I got a pair of IE 200 atm with aftermarket cable and tips for comfort
and they do a solid job. Not an aggressive bass and I manage to configure stuff on linux to balance a bit
but the big plus is the fact they sit well on the year and I can be like 5-6 hours straight with them on
at home I use my HD 600
I used to use my AKG K701 at home a lot, but I read and use my iPad a lot, so they slide down my head when I look down.
good choice
thing is wireless headphones I still admit most arent really interesting
unless you want something with anc, most for sound work are imo ASS
but like I said its mostly down to the purpose itself
my issue with the buds 2 pro were the fact they wouldnt sit on my ear and would tend to fall off. Traded them for the airpods pro 2 on teh sacrifice of audio quality
but they airpods pro 2 site well on the ear and have a much better anc too
thats an example. Yet I still say the best true wireless earbuds I tried in terms of audio quality are teh samsung buds 2 pro (I guess thats becasue AKG was involved).
I like Linsoul earbuds
@mild aspen but if you dont care about active noise cancelation and shit like that
Sennheiser Momentum 4 wireless or Audio-Technica ATH-WB2022 the my personal opinion
on my quick thought of sound and stage sound 
Momentum 4 are terrible
ah guess the brand is TIN HiFi
but I don't see any other products that store sells besides those earbuds
imo I dont think they're terrible. The only issue is the ANC. Thing about headphones most people forget or dont even know its down to the user
recommendations are nearly something maybe close of what they're looking for, not something you should straight up advice and then you get disappointed after purschase such thing
Go to the brands section on the website they have a bunch of others
usually its also a trial and error type of purschase since again, its down to you own ear and we dont have the same hearing
I tend to slip from sony because Iam just not a fun of their audio signature per experiencie
but people at my work like it, can't judge that
Your own hearing doesnt matter that much
HD600 is a top tier choice for anyone
No such thing
There's the best and shades away from that
yeh but the HD 600 out of the box for me I dont like it. Only post tunning I do
Let me guess not enough bass and slightly too little treble?
hum bass wise I didnt even increased much. only played a bit on the treble
like I said I did it to my liking
nope
but I will always say this and defend that audio is like food
its down to your own taste
The music is the food
The headphones are your toothpaste
I only care about noise cancellation when I'm outside.
yeh on that case is hard. The wireless market is weird. Imo I would stick with the airpods pro 2 for that kind of case. Although you might want to have explore some options.
I dont know about the samsung buds 3 pro. Did read some reviews people liked the audio quality and said the ANC was good too. I dont know I havent tried
Yeah, I am fine with the airpods pro.
and thats something I strongly disagree with. But you do you chief.
I wont judge opinions
thing is I can't use audio to judge something that is human and different of taste to each individual
Honestly I still remember hearing meaty bass for the first time getting my first serious pair of headphones.
But since then headsets have pretty much been the same.
because if you tell me music is my food. And I enjoy a shit ton of genres of music. Which I do
vs someone who only like idk EDM
The audiophile industry is really weird cause it's either you don't notice or there are people who can identify the tiniest things.
No such thing as taste
Well there is but not to the degree you think
The taste comes with how much bass you want
There is still 90% objective
I love bass to shit but I know my mate who doesn't. That is taste.
so you just counter your own argument by saying its a matter of fact human taste and not general
thanks
end of conversation
Was gonna say.
Hd600 is the best headphone regardless
You can just EQ more bass if you want
its not about being the best or not
Because audio is objective
Second best to Audeze LCD-5
Which are $5k
for me its the most enjoyable to use at the price range I bought them
but I think you dont even understand the point
ok nice try troll
Okay whats the point
Not a troll
I've researched audio for close to a year now
yes thanks. Thing is I can't always rely on reviews or whatever you read online. Most of the audiophiles is their own judgment and for a grant something for you might sound not how they describe
like someone can describe what is like tasting of an apple but then you try it and might not taste how they told you it did
same thing literally with audio
I could describe my own headphones as really good considering what they do but it doesn't tell you much at all because I'm not deep into that industry
In agreeance to what you said about reviews.
thing I learn about the audiophile thing is the amount of biased towards certain products
and literally I trust nothing
and again I didnt buy teh HD 600 because they're really good and praise, its because of budget I had vs what I was looking for
Just learn to read frequency response graphs
they landed to be the best pick
In all the time I've used wireless earplug phones. I will confidently say the beats are the one of the best ones there.
But purely because I speak from hey the quality of these and comfort of these earphones are massive step up.
Plus they double as fridge magnets!
Now learn about audio drivers, the software/hardware filtering. what a DAC and also eletrical noise
maybe you gonna enjoy how deep the audiophile crused stuff goes towards
None of that matters
Just get an audibly transparent dac/amp
The drivers quality is visible in the frequency response graph
and the different of fully analog sound filtering vs digital
There is no difference
Digital is rated slightly higher in blind tests
Iam pretty sure you never studied eletronics lol
I dont need to
please dont say you're talking about the harman target graph
please dont say its that
The frequency response of the headphone
that doesnt matter
Lol
and again humans have different frequency range they listen to
frequency ranges do vary from human to human
Read up on some Sean olive papers or Axel grell lectures or Oratory1990 comments
No
The best audio researchers and engineers in the world disagree with you
The guy who made your headphones the HD600 disagrees with you
Iam not even talking about headphones or sound engineering
human earing is variable
You said frequency response doesnt matter
Up to 3 kHz its not
its proven that the older you get the less you hear
And it gets progressively more variable past that point
or less frequency ranges
You can just increase the treble then
Not hard
What
You're showing a linear decrease in treble across each 20 years of age
Which can easily be remedied with a simple high shelf
That you may not even want because the sound engineers themselves might have the same amount of hearing loss
yeh you're a troll
Sure dude
you dont even understand the natural ear and ear drum has its own limitations and degrades over time
The lead sennheiser audio engineer is a troll too i suppose
Along with the president of the audio engineering society
genetics play the biggest role in any of your 5 senses
no, the lead sennheiser audio engineer makes and tunes a product for a type of audio enjoyers
Stop
You already conceded your earlier argument with that
You said frequency response does not matter now you're saying they tune it for a specific person
Which is not true either, because everyone loves the HD600
ok, I recorded that you're a troll and Iam going ahead not keep going with this bait
All the top researchers and engineers are trolls except for JusticeJoker
You're just too smart
But if you wanna know the best headphones out there by general public and audiophiles are the Sennheiser HE-1.
just saying
I can pull up countless threads of people saying the He-1 is mediocre and the HD600 series beats it
Which is true
The he-1 is tuned to excite listeners at the listening booth
gtx 650




