#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 4091 of 1
no matter how high altitude i go their shells somehow still reach me
heheheh fuck pilots aa every match
Meh like there’s no delay
delay for what

man
at least there's a rear gunner seat
and no heatseekers
therefore ww1/2 ultimately better than modern war
Imo, the credits are enough of a grind as it is tbh
like, get rid of the required number of kills or headshots with a specific gun and just set an amount of warbonds for them
sorry, this was about the service assignments and what can be done to reduce the grind
some of the service assignments can be way too grindy and i think having a set amount of credits for an assignment is enough because each match doesn't give you a lot of warbonds anyway so farming enough to get them all could be enough of a grind
So like do you grind often
For all the guns in bf1, there's a bit of a grind yea
yeah it's 100% worth to just buy the packs for bf1
still need to do missions but skips all credits
what do you mean by credits
the money thing of bf1
is bf1 dead or worth playing? is it better than bfv?
um i have an issue with bfv,i get sound in the menu but after i joined multiplayer theres no sound
i tried reinstalling but still didnt work
it's worth it
even dlc maps are populated
theres more players on BF1 than 2042
It's warbonds
oh thanks
i had my head stuck in star wars
then what are scraps then?
yes scraps
hey guys
hey king
which game i should buy bf3, bf4, or bf1
do you like modern war or ww1? @noble wharf
nobody plays bf3 ?
a few do
but bf 4 premium
bf5
yes the edition
what about battlefield hardline
also few players
bf5?
definitive edition
this game has the biggest players
wow
bf5 is sick man
i have ea desktop
has players too
its has more players than bf4?
bf5 dosent have russian faction
it does
really
idk how they make ww2 games without russia man
yes the big fanbase
and its dosent have italy faction
bf 1942 is better than bf5 i guess
@potent rivet @noble wharf #battlefield-legacy-titles message
play whatever u want im just letting u know bf5 has best player base
but bf4 premium?
you do like modern war the must right?
and i like ww2
its very weird that bf5 dosent have ussr and italy
but bf 1942 have
its not really weird it doesnt have italy
but its super weird about russia because 80% war happened there
they stopped supporting the game too early
in mid 2020
bf hardline is heist war
bro idk how game makers
these devs and stuff dont know what players want
what players want brings them money
and they do oppose of what players want
absolute morons
Soviets were in the game files
really?
they probably gave up for making 2042
i wish bf5 have mod for ussr
bf4 have chinese faction
when john cena joins to china faction from BF4
bf4 premium edition it is
does bf4 have American maps
does anyone plays naval maps?
in bf4 premium
you have DLCS in premium right?
idk about american but theres water maps in the aus bf4 server
they retired it for recent games
Because the players don’t write the game. The players do not control the devs. The players are not in control of what goes into the game.
The players might have an effect on what changes within the game, and it is important to listen to feedback as a dev, but at the forefront of the argument - players do not all want the same thing. Battlefield would be a complete train wreck if the players were in more control than the devs. I’m glad the devs have a spine
what spine man devs decide to stop developing bf5 rus faction to make glitchy 2042 and ruin franchise
haha what spine tell me @finite gull
who cares man its ww2 game without soviets
Please go into the files and tell me where I can see Soviet skins
no excuses
There are torpedo boats in the files
devs are molested high schoolers who do programming for living man
they direct how game goes
they are told what to do
By who
what do i know
why should i bother finding out i dont care
Then don’t make the argument
Man wait until you see BF1943
its like making vietnam war game without american soldiers rofl
It really isn’t tho
isnt?
Because BFV still has some core factions
70% ww2 casualties if not more in ww2 are on eastern front
I find it would be more upsetting if BFV didn’t have Germany
Because that’s the whole crux of WW2
germany and russia are equal figures in ww2
Also it kinda goes against the developers philosophy of “untold stories of WW2”
uk and french were irrelevant in ww2 man they would get overrun ez
I admit they could’ve found something a little bit obscure in the eastern front
The fuck
What about the pacific
Keep in mind
The Uk was deployed in
Europe
North Africa
And Southeast Asia
The Us was also deployed to these fronts
And the pacific
France fought in Europe and Africa
I will admit that the USSR was by far the largest force in Europe
But even then
You cannot discount these other forces just because
HuRr dUrr mE wAnT my KomMunIsm gIanT
Who are you talking to
Ok and how do I not know what I’m talking about anymore than you
You said I do not know what I’m talking about
Prove it
If Russia never got involved and Germany left them alone
I will admit the war would’ve gone on for longer
But Germany can only have so many resources
Also the topic of the US comes into play
Keep in mind
At this time
The Us had a gigantic navy
And several military branches that were well trained
The tanks needed work but the Sherman would’ve come online in time
Idk you brought it up
How were they desperate?
By 1943 the Us and UK were pushing through Italy
Define very beginning
Like 1939? Or 1941
Even then
The Allies were not desperate
In any degree
There was a coup in 1941 in Yugoslavia
And then Germany invaded Yugoslavia
Yeah I’ll give you that
But even then
The Allies were not at any risk of desperation
The Uk was busy fighting in Asia and North Africa in 1941
The Germany was setting it sights on Russia and failing to capture Greece
Which is a big oof
Yeah let’s get back to battlefield
guys keep it on topic
Dunno
TBh I’m a little more disappointed in the lack of Japanese anything
And the lack of naval combat
You guys like wooden boats?
I would like them to go back and add Battle of the Bulge and El Alamein
Because judging by 2042
These assets were meant for BFV
Kursk would’ve been cool
IMO I would’ve liked to see a Tiger 2 in game
K then
That gave off “valid argument I have not. Clown emoji I must send” energy


Did his name start with the word Adolf?
probably one of the dumbest History opinions I've seen
The UK was a lynchpin with its colonial army. It commanded the forces of Australia, Canada, India etc.
Frances army at the time was like the biggest in Europe. They lost bc tactics. They also had a massive colonial empire.
70% ww2 casualties were on the eastern front bc it was the most harsh front. You're fighting in snow. The germans were not properly equipped for snow. The Russians used zerg tactics from starcraft and didn't give their soldiers weapons half the time.
I agree that Russia should be in a WW2 game tho. The fact that it isn't is very, very stupid. The reason they didn't include it is probably bc of sales.
Well the Russians utilised female snipers so they could always take the progressive angle lol
what kinda dumb shit did I just walk into
That's German propaganda, mostly comes from post-war memoirs written by German officers to make themselves look as good as possible. The Red Army used conventional field tactics just like everyone else, the human wave narrative is more or less an exception that proves the rule.
On top of that, it wasn't the snow that was necessarily the issue for the Germans as much as it was the logistical nightmare that came from the extreme mud that formed once all that snow melted, coupled with overextended supply lines in an already short on supply military
People really like to give Germany crap for invading during the winter
When they fail to realize operation Barbarossa started in June
But yeah Germany was fucked regardless
that is my point. They got bogged down and weren't prepared for winter. I did oversimplify for sake of discussion tho
That was German propaganda made in the cold war to justify their "superior" troops losing to the "inferior" ones
Also there’s a common belief that the Soviets kinda just “took” the German invasion for a while before retaliating
afaik, didn't the germans mostly just run out of steam basically? not enough men, supplies, oil and other resources etc?
cuz they seemed to do fine for the first few months
Germany was heading to take oil fields that were in the southern USSR
But they rerouted a panzer division too early
And it went up in smoke
TBH
Germany was fucked after Stalingrad
The UK had liberated Scandinavia
Which cut off Germany’s iron supply
Germany was running low on that black water
And they had lost Italy
Even if they'd secured that oil, it would've only delayed the inevitible
Exactly
Once America entered the war on the allies side kinda over innit
Even if they had the oil for vehicles, they didn't have the manpower to operate them, nor the training to do so effectively
That’s true
Germany never would have won, plain and simple. No matter what way it went, WW2 was going to be a loss.
But also the higher ups were really horny for the mustache man’s “wunderwaffe” program
moustache man might have been correct about moscow though, i dont think taking it would have won them the war
going for the oil was probably the best choice
Also Russia relocated most of their factories during the invasion
He had about 2/3 of Russia to retreat into and you know damn well he was gonna put every man woman and child between him and the Germans
yeah, he had no problems about sacrificing some pawns either
and even if you get to moscow, can you actually take it?
Also I love the Idea behind the continuation war
Germany was like
Hey Finland want to give them what’s good?
And Finland was just “yeah”
Even if they didn't reroute the panzer division, the Germans would've lost
The Soviets were defending in mountain terrain, and they got supply from both a- through Iran via British help
B- Astrakhan
A would be point less because the Iranian border was near baku, so taking baku would defeat the entire purpose
And
taking astrakhan is impossible, because Stalingrad is in the way, and look at astrakhan's terrain
And besides, the Soviets would rather wreck the oil fields than see it fall in German hands
There were plans to relocate the government to another city rather than surrender in the event Moscow fell
yeah that makes sense
I’m still gonna give the USSR shit for butchering the T-34
what do you mean butchering it?
The original “prototype” if you can call it
Had a bit of a trial
It was being developed I think towards a Ukrainian area
A lot of people don't realize that taking Moscow didn't have nearly the same strategic significance as taking a city like Paris
And the original creator of it drove it all the way to I think Moscow or Leningrad
Where then it had to be driven to Karelia and back
The Soviets adopted it
And proceeded to make it worse
I understand the whole “streamlined production” idea
But it just kinda got worse
This led to T-34s being inconsistent between tanks
One would work flawlessly
The same model but different tank would barely get off the factory floor
The part's weren't interchangeable, for example, A tank made in Gorky couldn't have it's parts switched with a tank from the kharkov tank factory
That’s true
Didn't it have as many mechanical problems as German tanks?
t34 had some real mechanical issues yeah, mostly it didnt matter all that much because they had so many
Why?
The threat of Soviet factories being destroyed was gone
I’m not really sure
I like to believe that the USSR adopted a policy of “if it works for 30 minutes, give it 30 minutes of worthwhile combat”
Just throw it at the enemy
And the revolutionary sloped armor took up so much space from the tank
I wouldn’t really call it revolutionary
That could be used for radios or something else
I'm using the term loosely
yeah, the soviets realized their errors if you look at the later t34's where it wasn't fully sloped on the sides
later Soviet tanks like the KV-2 and the IS-2 worked well in terms of quality
Although the T-34's were superior to Panzer IV, the Germans used movement well to kill them off
Paper superiority doesn't matter, and this applies to all sides
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Brody_(1941)
You think Moscow isn't as important as Paris?
Censoring history very nice
He means Russia is vast, and they can relocate to a new city, and Russia is a whole different animal, both geographically and politically
Exactly
Compared to France
Not that easy
Leningrad was under siege for years and stalingrad was a huge battlefield
These were the major obstacles of the Germans
And Moscow which was the capital ofc
The Germans were at the end of their rope logistically
They couldn't take the street to street battle the Soviets wanted them to fight
So they couldn't even take Moscow if they wished
Deleted again
You seige a city if you know you couldn't take it by storm
The Russians wanted the Germans to charge their fortifications in Leningrad, and they even booby trapped the city to the brim
The Germans didn't take the bait
Basically true
A big part of the population lived in these cities and the western borders
Strategically, yes. Paris was/is pretty much the beating heart of France, whereas Moscow was, strategically speaking, much less so. Still an important city, but where France had zero chance of continuing as a standing nation once Paris fell, all the Soviets would've suffered a bit of a symbolic loss. Like I said, the Soviets would have just retreated a bit further, and once Germany inevitably ran out of steam, practically waltzed back into the city.
Not saying Moscow isn't important. It just wouldn't have been a war-ending loss had it fell.
They probably would have added them in bf5 if development was continued
Not just a symbolic loss
That's a bit of an oversimplification, I'll admit, but you get the point. It wouldn't have been a fatal blow.
Yeah ofc
Obviously there's other losses suffered if you lose a city like that, but yeah you get what I'm saying
The allies messed up so badly
If they were ready from the start they wouldn't have lost France like that and possibly the war would have ended quicker
Maybe the ussr would see an opportunity to take some lands from Germany while it's busy too
You have to fundamentally change a lot of who the Allies were for that to happen
Its easy to say that with hindsight, but we have to keep in mind things can look a lot different in the moment.
The French were a pretty big power at the time and they could hurt germany a lot
Yeah they were to afraid of starting a second war that their weakness started it anyway
Europe was still reeling from the aftermath of what was, to them at the time, the worst war they could possibly have imagined. No one (besides Germany for the most part) was in any rush to get back into a militaristic state of mind
The ussr was
Military History Visualized did a great video explaining why Germany did so well in the early months/years of WW2
And always was
Thats why it was invading nearby countries from the ex russian empire
Well yeah, it was a militaristic state from the start, just like Germany at the time
And getting in trouble with Japan
Didn't stop them from getting caught completely with their pants down in the opening stages of Barbarossa
Japan was a bad Ally for Germany 😂
Probably not a ton different tbh. I think Alternate History Hub covered that one
Well he wasn't only Jewish but he did have experience from the russian civil war,more than stalin
Honestly the Axis in general was a mess. They were less allies and more or less like-minded states with somewhat common enemies.
Why
Japan was strong
They took a big chunk of China and went down to southern Asia conquering most of it
They attacked the US and got the us in the war before Germany was done with Europe
Pearl Harbor was more or less an inevitability
The Americans were already supplying europe with war materiel
It was Japan's best bad choice of an array of even worse choices, they had no better options.
But they could have waited
Wouldn't be much different
The US already had Japan in a stranglehold just through oil embargoes, there wasn't much more waiting for Japan
Until Germany was ready
Germany was never going to be ready, especially not in the time Japan had left
But it was just Britain left
Which they never would have gotten to, people underestimate how much of a defensive powerhouse the English Channel is, especially considering the strength of the Royal Navy
The Germans and soviets were just buying time with ribbentrop-molotov
True
Why way msg deleted?
moustache man's name is banned
Also yeah the USSR wasn't gonna sit around much longer, both Stalin and funny moustache boi knew it was only a matter of time
Bro we are all into history
We don’t need to ban names we all know he’s evil
Stalin didn't bother getting ready from the start
Its for the best. One, it gives spammers a bit less ammo, and two...we can all talk about him without saying his name and know exactly who it is, its fine.
There is an image of stalins reaction when he received the news that Germany was invading the soviet union
Its just common practice on public servers like this
True
also who could blame moustache man, on their western border the soviets had annexed or invaded: Finland, lithuania, latvia, estonia, poland and a lil bit of Romania (?)
Its not like he didn't think it was gonna happen, he wasn't an idiot
Winter always saves Russia
the idea that the soviets would attack germany as well isnt far off
Yeah
He started it all?
Yeah he kinda Destroyed all his hopes by invading Russia
The ussr invaded Finland because of their location being close to leningrad
They saw how the Germans could use that
Or the allies even
Since the allies did offer help to finland
No they tried
moustache man said that molotov told him "finland is a threat to our existance" 
Finland denied
Yeah
Lol makes 100% sense
That was an inevitability, frankly. For him to not make that decision, you have to fundamentally change who he was and what his beliefs were. At that point, you probably don't get anything close to what happened.
regardless of what the truth is, he seemed pretty convinced of it as well
that germany would get attacked

I would strongly recommend you guys check out Potential History on YT, he did a great couple videos on why Germany never would have won WW2
That wasn't as likely
I mean If he would have taken Britain over then the allies would have a hard time taking back France
Once again, this is clear with hindsight, but was less clear in the moment.
Funny moustache lad should’ve read his history book 

He’s truly a pog lad
True
But unironically
Thats a big if though. Taking Britain wouldn't have been easy, if they could even get there in the first place.
soviets did not look very impressive vs finland though
For a time he did have air superiority of the channel
But then he blew it by starting to bomb London itself
Mannerheim got them good
The only reason the Normandy landings happened is because the Allies controlled the channel. If Germany had attempted to land in Britain (Operation Sealion), it would have been a turkey shoot for the RAF and Royal Navy
Which was quickly lost, nowhere near enough time for an invasion.
Most of the German army was occupied on the eastern front
If the soviets weren't fighting yet then it could have turned out badly for the allies at Normandy
Dunkirk was a success though, due in no small part to the efforts of British/Allied pilots.
They say ww2 was won by American steel,British intelligence and Soviet blood
I don’t know if you can call retreat for France success
I mean they saved more than they thought they were going to
I mean that’s good
By 1941, Germany's air superiority was all but lost after the Battle of Britain. If that same Luftwaffe had attempted to cover an amphibious landing on the British Isles, it would've been a disaster.
Yeah mhm
I mean it was a successful retreat. Obviously no military victory, don't get me wrong lol
Because they lost it when I started bombing British cities Because mustache man Was upset that they found Berlin I gave Britain time to repair their planes
Ueah 😂
Thought you’re gonna call the Afghanistan retreat success
🤣
Did you hear that?
People are calling the US Afghanistan withdrawal a success
If France had gotten ready from the start and didn't make stupid strategic mistakes they could have probably held the Germans long enough for the Americans to arrive
Just like ww1
I'm saying the RAF successfully covered the Allies retreat from Europe. Yeah the Luftwaffe got in a few hits but it was far from a turkey shoot.
Maybe but who knows if the us would have joined without being attacked
Japan would still attack pearl harbor
Its not a victory by any means, but thats a lot of troops and resources that lived to fight another day and that came back into play later
True
That wouldn't change
If the Germans made nukes first 
Who knows if Germany was still locked in heavy fighting I don’t know if Japan wanna risk it
The Americans did take German scientists for their nuke programs so it's not impossible if they wanted them
🕺
Now I’m not saying it’ll be pog but
Also they would have to deal with the consequences of using them on European territory
And Germany was spending all its resources on the war effort and couldn’t risk wasting resources on experimental things
Lol
There was that ohka after all
but like we need bigger boom
Japan had to risk it, thats why the attacked. Japan didn't attack PH because Germany was doing well, they attacked because they needed to deal a devastating blow to the US Navy so they could secure territory and vital resources to just keep themselves alive.
Then you could say the same about the soviets inventing the tsar Bomba at the time
That’s a bit much
The American nukes played a role in stopping them from expanding more
It ended the war early
And possibly stoped Russia from getting more Japan’s land
But its the truth. We're really overstating the level of collaboration Germany and Japan had here, Japan very much had to work in its own interests here.
Yes
Also a correction
It wasn't "Russia" it was the Soviet Union as a whole
Yeah and mustache man blender by declaring war in the US Because technically he didn’t have to
More importantly...it saved probably millions of lives in the long run. Japan's entire populous was prepared to fight to the death, which would have meant the oceans running red with blood from the amount of bloodshed on both sides during a conventional invasion
Mhm 100%
That’s what I meant
A naval invasion wouldn't be ideal in Japan
But he did, and he was prepared to. Like the Soviet Union, he saw war with the US as an inevitability as well, not to mention the fact that they were already practically fighting the US as it was given how involved US industry was in the war
naval invasions aren't ideal in general
and then the Sun was dropped twice
But wouldn’t you want to start off as long as possible
His main problem was having too many enemies at once
He just kept declaring war
Yes, but once again, Germany didn't really have time...not to mention the fact that war with Japan inherently meant war with Germany to most of the US as it was
Even if Germany didn't declare war on the US, the US probably would have declared war on Germany. There's a reason the US developed a "Germany first" policy
Yeah also the Americans studied the battle of Gallipoli in ww1 before they tried Normandy,so they wouldn't get destroyed by going blind unlike the British empire did
True
This helped them with the planning and avoiding making the same mistakes so they don't get locked there
They totally wouldn't want that
Mhm but D day had a lot of luck

Yeah but if Germany had sent all its forces there it would have been bad
Because the allies had hardly any tanks on the field
Look what happened during the battle of Gallipoli to the British empire,they were bled down and forced to retreat eventually without making any gains
Also ww2 technology got to favor the attackers
Yeah
Since tanks and planes were being used more and more
They were used before but new designs were much better obviously
Ok
Yes but the soviets were mass producing during the war and they built up a huge number of tanks and planes
The Americans too
They were the biggest powers at the time so
guys, how do I claim my lewis? i bought a pack of skins for nothing thinking i would win the lewis but they told me i need to rescue her, and don't know how i do it ( in battlefield 5)
You mean the actual gun or the skin you bought?
i bought the skin thinking i would win the gun
but actually it was just a pack of skins even
doesn't work that way, you have to unlock the gun
how?
Play as Support until you get to Rank 10 as Support
i'm already patent 10 in support
Then switch to it
and then I do what?
Put the skin on
but i don't have the gun
Are you sure you're rank 10 as Support then?
yes
Then equip the gun by going to "Your Company" then the Support person, then press on whatever primary, and go to Lewis Gun.
I mean on d day
i'll check here
Hey guys
Yo
Ah
is it locked
Restart your game, BFV is a glitchy game
i'm gonna send the print on your pv
i restarted 5 times
👍
Did anyone else think the audio was terrible on bf4 operation locker? I don't remember hearing anything but grenades and rpgs and screams of prisoners
what's the best ar + smg in bfv
I prefer using the 1-5 at times
The 1-5 is better at closer ranges and has less recoil
battlefield 1 has 8 servers on PS5 is that bad?
Thats not great i suppose
is there a bf1 only discord
Not an official one, no.
the SAR?!
nah, g1-5 all day, best gun in game and thats FACTS
liberator pistol:
Anyone ever used the javelin in BF4
its pretty fun on lancang dam in my experience
it's an open enough map to actually make decent use of it
can snipe boats from D
Yeah just avoid Sinai desert unless you wanna play prone scout
he did this to us
how do I get scapegoat if there are no lobbies for it on bf1
Or artytruck and planes like me.. its basiclly my favourite map
Get a buddy who uses pld and fuck up some vehicles…
Sinai is fun occasionally
does the premium version of bf4 expire when my ea play does?
Plataform?
Pc
No
Why use the truck
It's useless literally
how does a gentleman go about unlocking hardline emblem pieces in the year of our lord 2022
bf5 grease gun my beloved
If you cant play it yes….
But then every tank is useless
No?
You can help out the team a lot more than with the useless artillery truck
The only useful variant is the aa
Any other tank can be a lot more useful
Hello, I have a bug in Battlefield 4. Always when I want to connect to the game I get a "You have lost connection" help please
Did you guys see the petition on Change.org for battlefield 2042??? It’s got over 60,000 signatures already and 22,000+ donations from battlefield players who want to sue EA/DICE or demand a refund

I just want the game to go f2p
so that I can play it
but the operator voicelines at end of game make me want to shoot myself
smart plan
It’s Change.org. It’s not gonna do anything
When has change.org ever done anything lmao
Players did a petition for DICE to revive BFV’s content supply, and last o checked, nothings changed
They did it for SWBF2 as well
.-- .... .. -.-. .... / .. ... / -... . - - . .-. ..--.. / -... .- - - .-.. . ..-. .. . .-.. -.. / .---- / --- .-. / -... .- - - .-.. . ..-. .. . .-.. -.. / ....- ..--..
English would be great
The mortar truck is pretty good if you can get the right positioning
Nah
It's just for kd
It's literally worthless to your team
Why not use a tank that can push the enemies and help your team actually win
I play BF 4 for competitive gameplay 1 or 5 for immersion, and 2042 when I hate myself
Is BFV underrated?
Yes
Snap back to reality

Next gen update with the removal of random recoil, no health attrition, ray tracing with the eastern front would be incredible.
Fedorov, svt 40, ppsh 41 and 43, dp29 and the lad, mosin nagant and the ptrd
That would be a dream
Thats never gonna happen
They've stopped working on bf5 for years now
And the obrez too
Which is basically a short mosin
Just like in bf1
i want to kill sturm tiger with KV 2 thats will be fun
Obrez not 100% sure how'd they balance it that time
doesnt the Obrez have a 1 shot kill range but it's like point blank???
next gen
how biased
Hey, does anyone here play BF1?
I see on steamcharts that there are 5k players, rn but when I go into the server browser I can't find a server with a single player
Anyone wanna help me and one friend on BF3 PC to unlock the S-TAC we just need 2 people to join
!!lfg
ℹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
So I'm just wondering where those players are
I assume in custom games?
I mean ray tracing for next gen with general graphical improvements just for them but still everything for everyone.
Maybe try to use the server browser filter
Done that
that's weird
Even in custom games I can't find any players
all game modes
Clearly there are servers with people, I just don't know how to find them
Free slots?
Yep
tried to do none?
Yeah, none are full lol
yeah
There's not even a single one with a single player
Join and wait for queue
Whenever I do that it fails
Yeah sometimes it's either empty or filled
I never have a good time with queue unfortunately in BFV
always have to rely on the server browser
Ok!
Got it! 🙂
Thanks

Full server too 😄
@left patrol look up how to set up bf1 filters to find servers
👍
How do yall plane in this game? Mouse and keyboard?

Yes
On pc
Also bind pitch up to space
Yeah you need to fix the server browser filters @left patrol
There's literally tons of servers active
Got it. Yeah, having a very hard time planing in bfv
and yeah, figured out bf1. Thanks guys! 🙂
Yo anyone wanna play battlefield 1
Also what’s the best way to do the bf1 campaign
Pls no spoiler
Just play?there is no best way to do a singleplayer campaign
hyrdoxid acid is so good ngl
Both
i have a question, i was thinking on getting battlefield 1 or 5 and was leaning on 1 will it be a good decision for the amount of players on bf1?
i dont know about bf1 because i havent played its multiplayer yet but bfV has some absolutely horrendous spawns most of the time
Both have a good amount for their age
Especially bf5
ok, i just don’t want to get bf1 and no one is playing it
BF1 spawns are better
And it doesn't kick you out if you spawn on a squadmate who enters combat
How many people are even still playing BF1 on PS4/5 along with PS5 depending on like NA?
quite a few
#lfg-playstation compadre
anyone want to play BF1 asia?
I wish getting the same sensitivity across the games would be easier
What’s your region
Oceania only has one full server
Bro, literally all the servers for bfv are in asia. My ping at minimum is 170. Is that the only way to play?
What?
There's like 20 in Europe right now
And like 30 in NA
And 10 in Oce
Asia has like 3 servers
It just gets you killed along with your squad member
How many more hours for new weekly
Hi i need help in btv with trophy it called call em in dm me please
if you are a regular user or boost server
otherwise you can only post link to picture or ask someone to post it for you
I need help in bfv
With what?
with trophy call em in
Whats the assignment?
In Multiplayer, as a squad leader call in 2 reinforcements in a round
achievement art makes for a cool background
@serene venture join a full squad with someone as squad leader and request orders until you get squad leader if the old leader didnt accept
hey
Really?
Better than bf games and bf 2042
Does it have US forces and British forces?
i didnt play it myself, but since I hadn't heard anything about it lately, i assumed it was dying off
Bf 5 is better than vanguard
bf5 is still fun
Really
Bf 5 have factions
But vanguard dosent have
I really want to crack vanguard
Have you heard of plutonium and X labs
Its a cod multiplayer cracked modification client
havent heard about it
but then again i dont play cod either
not sure cracks and stuff is allowed conversation here btw 🙂
I swear
Clan stacks piss me off so badly in pubs
Especially when for some reason the games puts all the stacks on one team and the other is all just random no clans
Change server
Anyone notice that when they start up BFV the music always takes like 15 seconds to kick in?
Or is it just me
Cause it seems to have been happening ever since the server restart
Yo.. bfv under no flag.. the life goes on letter isn't there.. any other places it could be?
Nvm, did a full restart and now it's there
Truly is 
It’s pog in its own way
i will buy BF bundle but bf hardline dosent include 😦
Big oof
yoo guys i bought BF Bundle 😎
dont worry i have premium edition the three games
like BF 4, BF1 And BF5
guys

Hey umm ..... I just bought bf3 on steam but i don't know how to play multiplayer. Can someone help me pls?
Open bf3 battlelog from Microsoft edge or Firefox instead of chrome or it may not work
Copy paste the link from the tab that opens when you press play on the game(if on chrome) and paste it on one of the above
Then just go to multi-player and server browser
okay, I'll try when I'm home because I'm still on my way home and stuck in traffic
👍
Ye I’ve never been able to play multiplayer while stuck in traffic either.
Man BF1 is awesome
for sure
so much content
one of my favourite FPSs of all time ngl
I’m just playing it right now which is hard to do considering it’s not overly populated on OCE
and yeah, it’s just...stunning
So close to a perfect game, there’s a few things I would change
But just...the MAPS, AMAZING
All of them
Why are Air Assault servers empty all the time?
Well the game is quite a few years old
"no contact with EA Online. please try again later" umm Help?
What do the cheater come from
Hell
Yo ingame I have 30fps but in loadingscreen 300fps and in the videos the boys with my graphikcard have 100fps
But I have 30
Whats your graphics card and cpu?
Wait
And what settings are you trying to run it at?
Yeah that's a pretty underpowered machine, so getting 30 fps sounds par for the course. You're just running it at 1080p?
Are you looking at videos of the game being played on those specs? All of the ones I find get about 20 - 30 frames
You're getting the preformance you should expect on the hardware you have
Under no flag was a bit tough on hard-core ngl
Idek if I want to attempt nordlys on it lol
Seems we don't even get any achievement for hardcore
Ah there is.. and I believe I read that if you do them all hard-core, it unlocks the medium and hard too
Nordlys is easy on hardcore, just stay undetected for it
Or at least for most of it
It's definitely one of the easier campaigns to beat on the harder difficulty
Wow.. doing nordlys, destroyed all the searchlights I seen, go and save her, come back outside and they're all backk on
Lmao well.. I destroyed 2 more I had already destroyed and noe the challenge is complete. Nice
Is it just me or does anyone else get thrown into a empty lobby of breakthrough all the time. It's a new issue I have been having.
Okkk ain't no way I haven't stopped at all the fires
Isn't there #FridayNightBattlefield for last gen? 😕 ...can't find it in portal
Is that on PS4
it's the case for all platforms
Yes @teal whale
Okay and thx 🙏
For what? 😀
Giving me a chance to unlock the new weekly mission
best bf1 maps imo (on operations):
- Cape Helles: the normandy landing of ww1
- Fao Fortress: just good and cool
- Achi Baba: "HOLY SHIIIII-"
is anyone else having a hard time finding players on ps4?
Any game that has the game mode operation is good
Fao is kinda ass but if you like it then ok
Also cape helles is a pain for the attackers if the defenders aren't complete noobs
Atmospherically those maps are good…but balance wise they’ve got issues
Wrong Chat but what's your platform and region
Fao is actually not terrible on operations
But what the fuck are those other 2 nominations
?????
It's meh
👍
Yeah definitely not top 3 material
Use the lfg chat
But cape hell es is hellish on operations
Cape helles is indeed hell
And then achi baba follows that up where you'll only have one battalion left anyway
My top 3 for ops would be
1:Tsaritsyn
2:Verdun heights
3:Somme(shock ops but still ops)
With passchendaele and st Quentin coming close
This is the Cinematic story intro for Battlefield 2042... ENJOY! :D
➤Twitter: https://twitter.com/TBagGamingYT
➤Discord: https://discord.gg/tbag
➤Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tbaggaming/
➤Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/tbaggamingyt
➤Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TBagGamingYT
➤Business Enquiries: tbaggaming.business@gmail.com
#...
this is genuinely a masterpiece of an intro
anyone here want to play on my portal server, it's filling u
Shame the game that follows… isn’t
BF4 BEST BF
4 and 1 are my favs to be fair to both you
Never seen that before, thats pretty nifty
I’m a little mad that BFV never add the switch team button
Bf1
All the fighting in fao fortress happens in suwanda redoubt and the town
Fighting in the fort is a bit modest
passchendaele has operation mode??
Nah
i just realised i never played verdun
battlefiled20-42fps
Would like to play verdun but im pretty sure there aint many people playing it
nah but like what are their critiques
like why is it bad, theres gotta be a reason somewhere
You could look it up
Nah but just saying
Other than ops
But If I have to put ops only then I would place zeebrugge there
I hve never played operations on bf1 cause it's too inactive
It's not
use server browser not quick match
Can I run BFV on 4GB ram if i use low graphics?
Set your filters right
why is everyone angry at no team switch? i dont even know the purpose of team switch
Mostly to play with friends and to balance the game out
oh
What region are you in
Or for sweats to abuse it and stack together with other sweats
Just so they don't have competition and stomp the other team
im back to bf1 after nearly 1 year of not playing
fucking amazing game
best bf game by far alongside bf4
bf4 and 1 are 2 games that are the closest bf games to perfection
OCE
OCE is kinda dead
I play on EU and I find servers almost always
Also depends on time and day
yah my region is the worst
honestly I think it's pretty overrated
what do you like about it?
Agree
everything
literally
even things that are hated by the community
One of the things that makes the game most unfun for me is frequency of base trapping
I would enjoy Battlefield 1 more if Conquest's rules weren't fundamentally flawed.
Plus that terrible map voting system.
The reason behemoths exist is to prevent spawn camping but I think it proves how fundamentally flawed balance is, where you need them to keep balance. Because from experience they only prevent that base camping 50% of the time
They are cool and probably the only big innovation BF1 brought that I like
i got a kill with a C4, a dmr and a shotgun and have 3 sniper rifle ribbons, why don't i get need only one?
and yes i also have premium and china rising
and did the kills in one round
whats wrong with the rules lol
and i love the map voting system myself idk
Why are there hardly any servers on bf1 Oceania?
For what
yo
What assignment
Bc Oceania is less populated ofc

still such a good looking game
im on xbox one btw
so 2013 or under tech being able to look that nice is kinda surprising
Unlike other Battlefield games, Battlefield 1's Conquest scoring system add to a team's score based on the total amount of flags a team has. This means that comebacks from a losing team is near impossible because the winning team is still constantly getting points as long as they have at least 1 flag. This is on top of kills.
Meanwhile, other Battlefield games bleed tickets/respawns based on which team has the majority of flags (aside from kills). That means a losing team has a change to make a comeback by stopping the ticket bleed if they can hold the majority of flags long enough.
It's nice playing the popular maps until you realize that popular maps are all that anyone plays. The DLC maps you paid for? You'll never play them because they get voted less often than base game maps.
works the exact same way, the team that has more flags gets more points in every bf game
you can choose which maps you want if you go under quick play there are options for just dlc maps
or you can server browser them
Nevermind, I don't think I explained the system well enough. Because 1's Conquest rules are different from other Battlefield games.
Scoring system is terrible in BF1
i dont get whats different in that and in bf4
or in 5
the more flags you have the more points
same thing as in bf1
Yes, but only if you hold the majority of flags.
You don't get points in BF4 or BFV if you hold a minority of flags
But you do in BF1
Not as many as if you held a majority but if you already have a big lead it's unlikely for that to change
wouldnt it be better because if you dont have any of the points you arent getting any tickets for even minority of the flags
Exactly. Meanwhile in 1 you still get points even if you do not hold the majority.
so still the one holding most points will win either way
Nope
You can establish an early game lead of ~200 pts pretty easily
And you don't have enough time late game to pull that back
If you could cut off the other teams points from holding a majority you could
But you can't the other team is still earning points
Unless you literally back cap everything
well you still have to cut them off from holding majority of them
It doesn't matter
They're lead is strong enough that it's too late to change
Maybe if score went to 1500 you could do it
But there isn't enough time for it to make a difference
200 points lead isnt too late, maybe 300-400 then its certain fucked
And why increase the score threshold when you could just use the other system that worked far better to begin with
It's not impossible but it's extremely unlikely
Whereas in BFV you could easily bring that back
Or BF4/BF3 etc.
yeah but bf5 sucked in every other thing imo
That's not the argument.
well yeah lol
So you're saying you understand the flaw in BF1's Conquest rules. Got it.
i just didnt like the weapons and vehicles in it
the movement also felt too over the top after bf4 and bf1
tanks were underwhelming
they werent scary like in bf1
But far stronger than BF3/4
i also just had more fun with bf1 tanks tbh
Getting back to the original topic, BF1's Conquest rules is why I don't take the game mode seriously in BF1.
behemoths i actually missed i found them cool
Just play to have fun and that's it.
well thats all that these games were made for lol
I just don't want to play operations all the time cause I end up taking it way too seriously
casual games are all to play for fun
And it's next to impossible for attackers to actually win a full operation
And attack is the actual fun side to play as on operations
although i actually find attacking more fun than defending
You're missing the point, kid. You play a competitive game to try and win. And since BF1's Conquest is objectively bad, you can really only play to improve your own gameplay.
ah yes the good old kid move
Or have fun or whatever.
I just don't get why they changed what wasn't broke to begin with
theres no ranked system so theres nothing competitive about it
Yeah, it was fine in beta.
It's just unsatisfying
Then they just decided to change it at the last moment and stuck with it for some reason.
what are you competing with? theres nothing to compete lol
I've had close games where I know I should've won instead
But it just feels awful because of the shit scoring system
its not like cs go with a big comp background
There's still 2 different teams idk what you're arguing
Battlefield is a casual competitive game, but a competitive game nonetheless. Of course you want to try and get your team to win.
theres no actual competitions
Ofc there'll be some level of competition
tf is a casual competitive game LOL
Even if at the end of the day battlefield is pretty casual
its not like LoL, cs go, valorant or overwatch
theres no competitive background to it
Va LUL rant
Okay but like I said there's still 2 teams so there's going to be some level of competition regardless
So you're saying you don't try to win the match. You just fut around getting kills, not caring about PTFOing.
Maybe you personally don't care if you lose or win
But a lot of people generally want to try to win
ofc i play to win but its not a competitive game
So you're competing to win then!
i dont go in it worrying about my skill because one persons skill doesnt matter in a 32v32
So when they lose to a broken system it leaves a bad taste in your mouth
theres no rank system its just 32v32 game
this truly be a kek momento
