#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 3681 of 1
But there are so finished gadgets that do not need em
I think battlefield v could’ve done better if it went with its original route and created some kind of warped ww2 game
I mean to be fair no WW2 game puts swastikas in their games anymore. should we stop putting any games in WW2 setting because they just cant get the historical symbolism right? @barren sail
COD WW2, 2017
fard
Four people would buy it? That's concerning.
One year prior
Uhh when was there swastikas in ww2, i dont remember that being in there?
😄
Im talking about gameplay limitations.
Chat is too fast 
I recall seeing a few
didnt they literally just take out swastikas from a remaster of Medal of Honor frontline?
In some countries swastika is forbidden to distribute
Well I have nothing new to play
I'd be getting the game regardless in the end. Maybe.
They did that in commandos remaster too
I think only in Germany and maybe Austria
I'd hold off pre ordering it until the open beta is released.
But I would argue that they can do a local censorship instead of total censorship like wolfenstain did
Germany, austria, korea etx
What happened in Korea?
I'd hold off pre ordering it until the open beta is released.
It just is
@crisp nymph this is actually correct so i am wrong, but just for clarification, they did not allow any swastikas in any multiplayer setting, no maps or emblems could be swastikas
They don't like that kind of imagery. Neither do they allow rising sun stuff
Good plan
Imperial japanese symbolism*
i wouldnt be surprised if rising sun got censored if they did a remaster
welp encountered 2 hackers in one server...
Ah ok well seems weird that they would do that since it’s not like the multiplayer could be downloaded separately
I wish there was a rising sun flag in BFV would’ve looked cool
i think there was imperial japanese symbolism in rising storm could be wrong tho @gray saffron
The thing is, you're allowed to use the symbols in germany if it's totally anti-that. So thats why wolfenstein gets away with it as it just makes fun of them and youre always shooting them. In bf you play both sides, so that wouldn't really work.
like for example, if you need to grab obscure and unused equipment to flesh out your gameplay, and fictional uniforms to flesh out your customization system, then wouldnt it be easier and more effective to set the game in a fictional place?
Define hackers
It stroke me that German officers didn’t have any insignia I. Their u ifor@s
rip
Like they were totally blank
They could have simply had Skills
the bad german symbols ban in video games in germany got lifted a few years ago
but that just means "lets only make ww2 games with the same areas, the same guns over and over"
Until ze feld grau uniforms :3
But swastica is censored in German versions of wolfenstain
But those are one of the only historically accurate uniforms
would you really want BFV to have like the only common weapons used int ww2? that weapon pool would be so freaking small its unbelievable. especially based on the fact we would have used these weapons for 2 decades in a handful of other games
As well as ss
Im saying the opposite, bfv could have been better had it not been set in history at all.
Mitler himself
BFV took prototype weaponry and implemented it in the game which proved to add more interesting guns to the mix to make for a better video game, not make for a better historical documentary
Honestly I think leaving out the swastika was dumb but I don’t care enough to get upset about it
Hmm strange
its like playing assassins creed and saying "why didnt they give us the actual crusades"
and they could have added even more interesting weaponry if they didnt limit themselves to a real world time period
It wasn’t at all a documentary some war stories were fiction Baden in historicall reality but some were rewriting the history straight away
Imagine if DICE focused on more modern or current world games instead of taking it back in time, we would have a even more polished "Battlefield"TM
but that doesnt mean it was a good idea

its something they can look at and be like "ah yes i loved reading up on ww2 and i love the time period and the battle areas"
anyone wanna run it on ps4 bf 5?
Well the last 4 out of 5 games would be modern (if BFV was modern) so then people would be complaining about the excessive use of the modern setting
Idk i dont want modern shooters forever
^
doesnt have to be modern.
I mean to just shows with the game
Cheers to this
i dont want to see the same m4's and ak's a million freaking times
and all the guns practically taking on the looks of m4's and ak/ or scar builds
Battlefield 5 at its core lacks content simply
I would make it this way , once a year or two the Setting Changes
im not saying this dude
If we got anything close to modern I would want something like Kuwait and desert storm but it actually becomes an all out invasion of Iraq so we at least have some historical weapons and whatnot
So every Setting has a Chance
sounds good to me
Problem is that a lot of the fanbase thinks this way tho
well if you want a fantasy game set in different parts of the past and present with completely original fire arms they'd essentially need to probably consult with fire arm experts on what it would look like and going about manufacturing an actual gun to get the models out and then have concept artists basically draw the model etc. its easy for them to obviously model guns that exist or had model plans that already documented how the gun would look, function, fire, and the cartridge used
It would be good if battlefield did it set like this
- Modern
- Futuristic
- Historical
- Semi modern (1990s or 1980s maybe)
This would in my opinion be ideal for the next few games to entail
like remember when people joked that bfv was steampunk?
That could have been a great setting for the gameplay and tone bfv tried to make
Say they focused on current/modern settings they could develop an insane amount of uniquely made maps each new battlefield, new mechanics, improve things, redo stuff. They probably improved the engine by doing the games right now but none of the maps are likely usable in newer modern type games
i mean i have no problem with themed BF games
Yes and Change it every year or so
Hence why I said earlier if BFV kept going with the kind of warped WW2 universe it would’ve played off well
but what does the community as a whole thing
Bf6 modern, bf hardline 2 (copy paste of bf6, but cop and robbers lmao), then bf2143 
do you think they would play a steampunk bfv or a ww2 shooter
most of this comes down to marketing. WW1 had 0 appeal before the bf1 trailer
what has the larger appeal
Steampunk Shooter would be Cool
In a chaotic sense I think most people would go with steampunk personally
ww1 had appeal btw and it guess what kept its appeal
the fact that it played like every single war that isnt ww1
Better Steampunk then again WW2
Imagine playing a true WW1 game though
Bf1 is nothing like ww1
Most people were begging for a ww1 battlefield
Esoecially that trailer
^
exactly @gray saffron
like, begging
when people had heard it was ww1 they thought it would suck until the trailer released
Lol
hence its success
Sitting in a trench for 6 days while you get bombarded with artillery and gas
imagine if BF1 was historically accurate
Then going over the top to get slaughtered
we'd be fucking sleeping
unironically a better game
‘Trench warfare’
okay so you realize ww1 how that went down
It wouldn’t be fun for the community save some of the people who want a hyper realistic setting
youve played btw you know that it works
Also a lot of automatic guns
One fecking map at launch had a ton of trenches... One. Xd
but really though, lets not pretend that hype isnt 99% marketing
sitting in a trench dying from either artillery or disease/famine and then whenever we decide to charge 70% of us die and the entire map is just a few trench systems and a big open land
Best part no frenchies at launch :3 they were added last dlc i believe. Despite them having the most iconic battles of ww1
first dlc
St. Quinton’s scar or something
that game doesnt even play like WW1 either tho
and we definitely know that
Ye
Sounds cool for a holdfast type game
Already forgot the names of the bf1 maps
yes it does. For whatever reason, ww1 is the only war where people think of the time between battles rather then the battles themselves
Lol
Also can someone explain to me what the 42MD is I’ve seen so many people have that tag
Is it a platoon?
‘The Alps map’
Yup
Amazing response and explanation
But not the suez one 
theres no way in hell in ww1 people were moving around in squad formations that small and doing flanking maneuvers. it was mass infantry. now if you want btw to be more realistic in its engagements we should have had alpine fighting on the eastern front, the western front was a push and pull system that constantly was about movement and overpowering of large forces and the use of military bombardments. not "okay 10 of us are going to move 200 yards away from the entire unit and capture this flag" if anything verdun had a more realistic attitude of movement @barren sail
We're an anti-platoon. Founded when the server was spammed by real military division (md) platoons trying to recruit people for their milsim business. So we formed one that's the complete opposite :3
Empires edge
Do you guys do anything or?
Fao fortress was abysmal either way
I’ve never had a balanced game on that map
Lol
Everyone can join, but there's one requirement. Knowing how to add the tag in your nickname :3 amd na, we are too spread out and from every platform. We only exist on discord xd
Ye desert operations were unbalanced
WW1 was trench warfare 90% of the time
yeah im aware
but alpine fighting had more skirmishing
One of two things always happen
- One team blitzes the map and finishes in 15 seconds or the defenders hold the entire time
- It gets stuck at one point and literally nothing happens for 20 minutes
BTW is a game that literally does not play like a ww1 shooter either which is why i dont know why it was brought up
BF VII: The Roman Empire
Best war strategy is terrain
no game ever will play exactly the way ww1 was fought, it simply wouldnt be appealing
people see the front line barely move and assume that meant soldiers werent moving, when in reality ww1 was a rapid back and forth over the same territory. btw gets this right, matching the real world accounts rather then the stereotypes. Platoons in ww1 were divided into 10 man sections just like ww2. Armies went over the top in mass but once the army was in range of the enemy it would play out like the game, minus any of it's melee speed shenanigans.
Not on the western front from the firsthand accounts I’ve read
but thats now how people play BTW
Except for late stage
people play btw like its squad with a ww1 skin
which is completely historically inaccurate
Minus the Yolo bayonet charges
i mean it is
but it isnt
the devs have said multiple times to the community that this game is different from squad and they are not squad devs trying to make ww1 squad
lol
so either you know more than the devs and theyre lying to the entire community
It's video game at the end of the day with realistic elements
some realistic elements
i mean the devs are just wrong there
i wouldnt call BTW a super hardcore shooters
Yes
how are the people making their own game wrong?
ez, they think they made something they didnt.
happens all the time
If we had a actual WW1 game I would want it to focus on the eastern, African, Asian, and balkan fronts since those moved the most
i dont think game development works like that tho
Literally leave the western one mostly ignored for once
how could an entire team all be confused to the direction all at once
Squad arma battlefield Swat mil sim if you like to call are videogame still
different genres tho
lol throwing in bf with squad and arma
Last I check it's a game lol
still a different genre
It's video game
wots swat 4 like
Mil sim in bf4
but BTW doesnt even have elements of hardcore/realistic shooters that even arcade games have
amazing
I can still replicate doing wacky stuff in arma
Ill give you an example. BTW community says RO series is more arcade style, but that game also has vital systems and semi realistic projectiles: you know where shotguns can kill you at 50m
Besides arma you said it your self military simulator like any fps
Verdun is an extremely underrated game huh
BTW has damage drop off with rifles at 100m which makes no actual sense
at 100m if you got hit with a ww1 rifle to the chest, you'd be sleeping
Well running around with a bolt action rifles in mostly dead servers doesn’t sound fun to me
At least it’s realistic
dont sell it short
I’d probably get it if it had a large player base
That proves how boring historical accurate ww1 game would be
Exactly
an actual ww1 game will always be niche btw
I already said the vast majority wouldn’t enjoy a extremely accurate WW1 game
but back to what I was saying, if the setting doesnt fit the game youre making, why put your game in that setting? Just because? For the sake of trends? Youre just limiting yourself and youll either do a disservice to the setting or the gameplay. Bf1 had 0 reason to be set in ww1 and probably could have done more with its gameplay had it been in a fictional setting. The hype doesnt really mean much because most of this comes down to how good youre trailer is. The look and gameplay of a game dont exist in a vacuum, theyre part of a whole.
It's video game
Battlefield popularized ww1 because it kept everything interesting about ww1 and then upped that by 100%, added prototypes and made the game basically feel like you're playing a bf shooter with a ww1 skin
verdun was an 8 year old indie game with no marketing
... point being?
bruv
i remember playing it back in 2013-2014
Battlefield popularized ww1 because it kept everything interesting about ww1 and then upped that by 100%, added prototypes and made the game basically feel like you're playing a bf shooter with a ww1 skin that effectively removed the point of the setting. Why not make a ficitonal war in the 20's?
It's made to be fun lol
They are making a second sequel focused on the alps between Austria Hungary and Italy
I may get it
the point of the setting doesnt need to be bound to historical standards
Yes I know, and earlier I was arguing how a realistic WW1 game wouldn’t be feasible for a video game to the vast majority
the point is that if you dont abide by the standards then there isnt a point in using the setting
ww1 is interesting when you dont make the game play like ww1 played out. thats not fun for the majority. WW1 was fought in such a strange way compared to most wars
Alt history?
yeah it wouldnt be fun at all
yeah, why not?
Depends on the audenice
So from the bronze silver and gold f17, which one do you think it’s better?
all battlefield games dont need to abide by anything because its a video game
I may enjoy a realistic WW1 game if I had at least 10 people to play it with so that we could actually communicate attacks
nobody is going to go to school with a project on ww1 showing footage of BF1 and showing off the equipment used
Honestly I can’t quite pick one all of them look good
Like all video games lol
exactly
wha?
Dice said ww1 is what the war would have been like
Arma doing Vietnam mod
I give dice credit for getting their research done right but it wasn’t really that accurate a game
its not about what they need to do its about what they should do. Im not worried about misinforming people or disrespecting history. And its not like im saying it should be illegal. im saying that picking a setting that fits your gameplay could make the game better
That be fun bunny hopping shooting
Who is several people and why is he always typing?
people almost get infuriated that a WORK OF FICTION can be set in a HISTORICAL TIME PERIOD without representing every single iota of information down to the last letter on accuracy. It simply is not appealing, and frankly we'd never actually get authentic world war games due to atrocities committed (mostly ww2)
yes
Oh yeah speaking of that
the appeal is marketing dude
if bf1 had great marketing
and then the game played like shit
About 3 years ago a game developer tried to make a game about the hol*caust
what legacy would it hold
Censored the word because I dunno if it would get deleted or not
BF1 had a lot of chaos due to the amount of explosives, but I don't remember a good thing about it's gun-play
Other than, the Parabellum brrrt
BF1 gunplay felt jank
Especially since you can't shoot while in the air
theres already a few games that depict that event and one of them is extremely controversial and the other one is darkest of days and it was a game on the ps2 where you go back into wars and one mission has you in a camp
Recoil on some weapons like the ribeyrolles was stupid
Or the trench gun
Battlefield V feels like an upgrade to Battlefield 1 tbh
agreed
Sort of
You couldn’t shoot with it past 20 feet
especially with the gunplay
It feels like a distorted expansion pack to me
Only gunplay
It's a shotgun, that's its intended purpose.
I can also never understand how people raged over the shotguns in BF1
Sorry i meant the other trench gun
I mean, gun-play is a big part of a shooter.
M1919
oh
The father of the Tommy gun
Da chicago typewritah
Most of a First Person Shooter is it's gun-play, unless it's focusing on story telling then that's fine.
though not every game needs to have sweaty, high skill ceiling gunplay. Bf1 is fun due to its sandbox.
paulie get da god damn tommy gun
yes.
If an FPS has bad gunplay, it's fucked.
not quite, alot are heavily based on movement or communication
its not about sweat, its about how the guns feel to fire and how those mechanics work, like how fluid they fit in with the rest of the mechanics
Outside of text chat, not much of battlefield has communication
sweat shooters are literally just people following a meta using in game equipment thats overtuned
Communication isn't always crucial in FPS's
COUGH COUGH FFAR
See CoD lol
Yeah
thats what i like about bf
There is zero teamwork in COD
i dont always need to speak
I should have clarified. Certain games are based on movement or comms. Bf isnt
yeah
well unless you count project reality
BF still has strategy to it tho. i hate when people actually say BF games have 0 tactics in play when people play that game
The only time people have used VOIP in CoD (except for like actual competitive play) is tell the other team in death chat "Your mother" for the second they can speak
Your gunplay skills can be potato aim but if you have good tactics, coordiantion, and teamwork, then you can really help out your team.
Unless it’s a tactical (and possibly in the next battlefield) strategic shooter
like, kinda? Theres alot of items where I can just lobotomize myself and use effectively
I mean 128 players will require some level of communication beyond “request ammo, request order, thank you” etc
from flanking, to spotting, to c4 cars, to plane and vehicle tactics to literally most aspects of holding points
BF's gameplay itself has tactics built into how the community utilizes the game itself
hope bf6 isnt.
Talk with your squad, but you don't always need to talk with your squad
theres multiple creative ways this happens
yeah
i REFUSE to believe BF has 0 tactics
C4 TRUCKING BAYBEEEEEE
As long as you do your part your squad will understand and follow
i absolutely REFUSE
I think it would be cool
LESSGOOOOO
yooo what’s up guys
the cieling
facts
The thing is is that every shooter has tactics
gas prices
and not everyone sees that
The only time where I can say a FPS game did NOT have tactics is CTF-1v1-Joust
Battlefield has tactics but zerging isn't one of them.
but like, theres alot of games that do it better, and I have the most fun with bf's shenanigans rather then tactics
oof.
If you get the reference then, have a golden star
wish people could see it how it is, instead of assuming milsims are the only games with tactics
Can you name me one currently available FPS for console that is strategy based?
For those that don't know CTF-1v1-Joust is a map that's literally a 10m straight line in Unreal Tournament :p
for console
RIP
milsims do inlvole tactics just a lot more than most shooters
Then my point stands
Wait so a guy wants a milsim for console right?
Correct
Hell let loose is coming out if you want that. Or enlisted lmao
yeah but theyre not the only one with tactics
Who the fuck would take battlefield as a Mil Sim
When the heck is the damn trailer im bored as heck
enlisted is not a milsim
I’m getting hell let loose yeah
enlisted is the exact opposite of a milsim
HUHUH IM BETTER THAN YOU BECAUSE I HAVE A $5000 PC THAT MAKES GEAMS LOOK 15% BETTER THAN $500 CONSOLES HUHUHHUH
enlisted is actually a scam tbh, its just warthunder with soldiers
Battlefield is not a milsim
But you know as bare minimum as they are, first person shooters have tactics.
Mil sim not even genre but groups who play with tactics
I don't think that's the point he was making, Engie.
I play war Thunder, made by the same devs as enlisted. Dunno if I want to get enlisted honestly
Doom 4, eternal, serious sam, battlefield, cod
Kind like roleplay gsmed
uhhh, bruh there just arent milsims on console. No elitism here
The trailer will come when you stop asking, i can garuntee it.
Games
@robust mango i would have played enlisted if not for stupid bots in the game
They better make a player vs player only
Basically
Lone Fighter mode exists, you have to unlock it
its a good thing those bots saved you from a jank game
There is a mode for that
oh.
the bots are the only remotely unique part of the game
Same shit servers, bugs, and graphics from what I’ve seen
I didn't spend 5000 on my pc :(
Dumbassery on my end oops
There's mil sim on console lol
Im just refusing to play enlisted because there's no oce servers
lol classic console gamer
Only play war Thunder now for da phantom grind
@icy sluice how many players on each team?
I dont need shit on top of shit in a game like that
I don't recall, I never played it lol
We need more OCE servers for games so way can play
Not just me, for other people here
GIB WAY THE SERVERS
Gib Way
Oh yeah and everyone else there i guess
I swear if it had atleast a 32v32 multiplayer i would have played it
u mean insurgency?
We allowed to talk about the bf6 leaks here or nah?
just move 
a sandwich
I would love to Gib Way :D
They are Chill here
@solid hinge allowed but dont take them as facts
and I am sure he knows what I mean by that >:D
you can but i'll probably complain about them a lot
Imagine if the next battlefield is WW2 but eastern front LOL
I wouldn't mind it tbh
That would be stupid PR standpoint
The next bf is probably going to be modern
Plus people would love to have Russians without a Type 2a 
enlisted is just boring. You dont have much freedom to enjoy it casually nor is there enough communication to enjoy it as a tactical game. You just grind.
Game got cancelled on console I believe
then what milsim?
love this Discussions
In generally I trust what Tom Henderson says since he's been right about alot of stuff in the past
Enlisted is just bare bones with controls, no y axis invert, no fov toggle. Just annoying
NOOOOO
You can technically have a mil-sim Battlefield but like, it would have to be custom servers under some kind of "Games-Master"
Military simulator is basically groups who roleplaying any fps games lol
If you want milsim
Why do people want bf to be a milsim
i dont know
Because of the freedom and control Battlefield has
Go play arma, Hell let loose and squad
I dont but there are some
Because they like milsims? I don't know.
Exactly
BF is not a milsim game.
Took the words from my mouth
its the console guys who want bf to be a milsim. Those arent options for them yet
Thankfully
There are Mil-Sim platoons for Battlefield, and a lot of people advertise some in #739938247089848351
Its for casuals scrubs, not hardcore fanatics.
nah it is but its not well defined
its more of a fan group than anything
Isnt HLL available on consoles?
no
To buy other games
it will once it releases
I just want a MF PC dammit
Honestly BF hardcore is a cool spinoff
The amount of Mil-Sims that exist on Battlefield V is surprising
Get it
Pcs aren't as expensive as most people think
So many german mds though, wtf
- i dont have any monies
- i have no space to put it tho
I built a decent pc for $800 before the prices fucked up
Theyre complicated. If you want something good it costs a bit.
Thats true you can find some Parts cheaper if you keep looking
Get a job then lol
yeah, BEFORE.
"lol just stop being poor"
@barren sail plenty of places are hiring
american healthcare system moment
but yeah Id much rather a new game be the console milsim rather then battlefield
Cause I dont think most people play bf for the tactics
I play for the fun
Brbrbrbrt
I mean u can't complain about not having money if u haven't even tried to get a job at all lmao
nah man, you gotta play for the shenanigans
Most of that crowd just plays Mil-sims like Squad.
I do
C4 truckin baybeeee
yup, and given a choice between squad or bf frankenstiened into a sim id take squad in a heartbeat
So do you guys think we'll actually get a bf announcement this week
yes
Le no.
bf6 is not real
Likely
dice have made a fake aaa game to dupe us. If they release anything then its a fake leak
Life is a hoax too kinda

Bf announcements prob gonna happen either this week or next week
Ups its Top Secret
I'm predicting the 18th is the reveal Date
calling it now, we wont see anything till EA play
Nah they've never done it like that
we'd've heard about some stream or something if it were sooner
a Livestream Event would be Cool , better then Just a Trailer
unless its like bf5's stream
Usually they have a closed alpha in between the reveal and ea play
ooh what if its called Battlefield 5 and Battlefield V is meant to be read literally
Battlefield V but i always say 5 instead V
If Tom is right this game is suppose to be a significant leap in technology with frostbite
just go back and dub over all the trailers where they say "five"
Haha but since it means five its the same
nah its "battlefield vee" now
the v stands for vorld var two
You put two Vs together and you get a W
I just wonder why is Tom Henderson now like the only Battlefield Leaker ?
Does anyone know if the bv5 syringe glitch still works?
if you take weltkreig and spell it phonetically you get a v
@rigid bobcat he has been accurate with his leaks for so many other things
Until now
Also he seems pretty chill
what has he leaked?
He is Chill
But imo a bit taken to Seriously
@barren sail pretty sure he leaked mw2019 cold war warzone and even bf1
He did
if somebody had leaked bfv a few months before the reveal, theyd have been entriely wrong. not because of an unreliable source, but because so much had been changed
Many people be disappointed by how inaccurate the leaks are
bf1 was the almightydaq who then went on to make a fake bfv leak
What is a Leak even nowadays ? Saying Predictable things what everyone can do or actually hacking their Servers ?
Also the things tom has said seem like pretty standard things for bf
Anybody can predict cod games same thing all year
this or actual journalists leaking
doesnt really help his case. Its the specific things like the rocket that Im watching for
Ye
like jason schrier is a journalist and he leaks all the time
Pretty much
It does
Y
remember when people said the KOTOR remake was fake, and then he confirmed it, and then the developers actually confirmed it after
Leaks are hypothetical assumption
Seen it coming
And his sketches turned out to be real as those leaked screenshots came out as well as the audio...
But i mean everyone can do that
i mean sekiro was leaked on 4chan
before the game actually even saw the teaser
the screenshots and audio are kinda questionable. They seem to be based on tom's leaks and not the other way around
Yep that's why take with a grain of salt
Not really
as was diablo 4 leaked 1 year in advance down to the guy literally describing the entire blizzcon trailer and what we would see
And how many false leaks have there been compared to true ones @robust mango
Idk that game
Ye thats why i named myself after Tom Henderson 
like, the only things in the audio leak that are actually understandable are things tom had mentioned
If Tom Henderson leaks are accurate, you guys have to buy me BF6
the point is about false or real %'s the point is you have to remain neutral because unless you have perfect source evidence leakers are wrong, its basically "undecided until proven right or wrong"
the elden ring leak is something that couldnt be faked
this
they even confirmed that the trailer was old
and the bf1 leak would have to be an extremely lucky guess
What trailer?
Think of a leaker like whistle blower
people literally just assume all leaks are fake with no evidence, its just as stupid as people who believe every leak
UHH UHH IT WAS ONLY A JOKE HAHAHHA
The things he has said also make alot of sense in terms of what the next Gen consoles have as they have ssds now and the new bf is suppose to have larger and more dynamic maps
was snowden wrong?
Ironic.
What was a joke?
Did he actually ever show something ?
He worked for CIA
Whats so ironic about that?
Do people still play firestorm?
Tom is on twitter
i mean where do you think leaks come from
Lol
inside sources
No lmao
@sullen tree no lol
snowden was the source as he was the whistleblower
Why
Was it terrible?
The devs didn’t update it at all
in the gaming industry its mostly an insider leaking to a whistleblower
But did you saw any Proof or just talking ?
zzzy used to belive eeeeeeevery leak ever made
I can tell your really young how the corporate world works even for employee
proof that snowden was right?
Yes i always saw him just ye guys i have leaks bla bla but cant show
Wait why are you guys talking about Edward Snowden
leek
Proof?
snowden is a playable character in bf6
he had actual documents that literally connected verizon with providing the NSA with phone record details illegally
Does Snowden have the bf6 trailer
Oh....
Mfw game leak translates to geopolitical events
he also exposed PRISM
No, but I do
Nah he in jail he can’t
No... don't add politics to the game please!!!
no he isnt
How is he in jail?
Is tom a dice employee?
We know what we must do
Oh I thought he was in jail
But i mean everyone with a Brain could think that someone can Hack your Phone and that the Government is Probably Watching you
@solid hinge Nope, but could he know one? sure
Break him out
hes been living in russia
Wait I’m thinking of Assange
how do you think perfect dark and fable were leaked well in advance of Xbox showing
Haha z tell me your joking
Some Leaks can be meant to be ..
let me drive the snobot as an engineer gadget
You guys better pay me up if Tom Henderson is accurate about everything
In the campaign you play as Edward Snowden trying to hack the US government
I think Leaks actually help create even more Hype more Sells
How did the smash characters get leaked before being revealed?
the 007 game is fake
8 months in advance
Stick to your point about battlefield 6 leaks
could it be people know other people
Yes
Or they are meant to be
No
You think those leaks are true?
heres the biggest difference between what im saying and what you are trying to say
Yes or no
henderson is an inside job by ubisoft cause theyre scared of battlefield hardline 2
you are trying to say with 0 evidence that someone is wrong. i am saying until theres evidence they can neither be right or wrong
I only think a few leaks are true for sure
Game would be bad
false
"well shit this guy is DEFINITELY the murderer, who needs to wait for a trial"
Not all yes
Modern, extensive player count, and V-22s being a usable vehicle
BFH2 can't touch TD2
Kiddo you can believe what you
More like true
im most likely older than you just saying
Complete the word
There is no evidence to prove Henderson right but nothing to prove him wrong
🤣
I'm 28 lol
nvm
Whats so funny?
SHIT
Ga
IM 26
We are all kind of hendersons
Missing a letter
it wont let me complete, its censored
highly doubt what
Then do space 
nup
Correct. I am a extension of his subconscience
Crazy
Bruh

Tom henderson leaks are alleged
i have bamboozed the rules
henderson is a fraud sell out
that supports either side
Henderson speaks the truth and makes sense
all im saying is you cant simply say someone is wrong with 0 evidence
Oh naw my internet shut down after bean said the word
blind trust
its still the same logic as assuming someone is guilty with 0 evidence
Pictures he posted are render drawing
Sorry but the dictionary says false
https://imgur.com/a/f3Yz7zM
lol
Oh and yes, battle passes are the best thing in the world
Saying they real
which pictures
Objectively bad take.
the ones he didnt leak himself?
you know someone else leaked those photos
he did not leak those
henderson will get exposed and hell come out w "it was just a joke guys"
I think Henderson will probably be right with about 25% of the stuff he said
id believe the screenshots if they showed anything tom didnt talk about
I hate when I ask a question on tiktok people will just like the video and not comment a answer
No way he got from zoom call when your ip address can be tracked
Also
henderson major leak was just the sketches everything else is in thin air but it sounds legit
However since Tom’s first Twitter acc got deleted I will admit it seems a bit odd
And the two Screenshots
im going to say rn if henderson is wrong, his entire community that he just built is over. The only reason some people believe him is it almost seems like reputation suicide to carry a lie this far. he will by far the most hated "leaker" and nobody will let this go
the law only means something if youre caught.
pp
Data can be tracked
also we had leaks for both bf1 and swbf2 geonosis
well IP doesnt really matter
He can't hide data
the 2 screenshots werent by him, he did the sketches and someone sent same ones but with colours filled etc
if you use a VPN
EA owns the internet
u mean the NSA?
Thats why i think that someone wants Tom to " leak " them
ye but tom wont leak anything now
89 dollars a month
No, EA, they watch everything. This is why no dice game has ever been leaked in the history of the company
he knows EA will chase him
If he is on a NDA no wonder
gotta home 4chan leaks more
its all a ploy
Ye
*hope
or... hear me out... they are just really good at securing their shit
unlike cod
Cod probably doesn’t care that much since it usually gets them hype
true
To make it simple Dice has private servers with source codes
EA is pupeteering henderson its all a con
no you see EA is a shadow government and secretly owns all the service providers
off topic but Black Ops CW was wayyyyy too overhyped
damn move to my state
Now yuo see
its 35 a month for fiber net
And now the game is hated
yup
and of course, to make sure it always works, dice employees are locked in their offices, never to leave
Henderson is really just AI created by monkeys working at EA
Cold War has a good campaign and zombies will do better when they choose to actually update it lmao
cold war has a good but too short campaign
Lol part of being a dev
agreed
You were saying?
LMAO
Yeah and the “story changes” don’t do a whole lot since they all happen at the end
looks like a fake dictionary to me
I dont see alot of battlefield youtubers
Its real though
I can name 4 currently
they're being taken out by EA
theres not a market for them so theres not alot
Nice
how do I know your not hom tenderson and this is a fake leak of dictionary 2?
Yeah that’s true I know someone who was locked out of his channel for about half a year, claims EA did it
its all about money at the end of the day
Dunno if it’s true
Tomorrow Idk which battlefield game I wanna stream
I am Ned Flanderson, and this is a real leak of dictionary 3. What do you mean leak of dictionary 2?
1942
Thats Epic , Saved it
Battlefield YouTubers also have NDA if they flyout to UK to get bf6 footage
I meant this
The only battlefield I have in bf4 bf1 and bf5
Cool beans
I have the teaser trailer for dictionary 4.
The Picture
cringe
just pirate 1942. Ea doesnt even sell it anymore
WOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
tell me your toxic without telling me your toxic
brooo
I think I am lol
i still have 1942
I dont have the game and I wont pirate the game
I do think at least jackfrags has played or seen BF6
it was my favorite battlefield until Hardline came out
Who knows lol
i didnt play BC2. ik im a swine
Wait are you serious
yeh
i loved hardlines campain and the mp was dumb fun
Ea made it free in like 2014 and then pulled it from the store. Any moral issues are void here cause its the only way to actually play the game
They should sell bf6 on ps4 and xbox one
BRO THERE WAS THE AMERICAN DREAM
It looks like it had good close quarters infantry I’ll say that
U TELLIN ME YOU DONT WANT AN AMERICAN DREAM IRL
Thats for sure probably under NDA
I doubt they will be able to handle 128 players
NDA?
on ps4? hell no
I think they would
Is there a bomber spawn in guilin peaks
Non disclousure Agreement
it gotta be nex-gen only if its 128
If they do get released on Xbox one and ps4 it will be devolved no doubt with graphics, damage, and player count
cringe legal shit
oh yeah. itll prob be like BF4 remastered for last-gen
but hey i aint complaining
I can’t see them releasing the same full game on those consoles without making a modified watered down version
henderson is the big brother of the bf community rn he is brainwashing everyone apart of EAs plan, they are going to nuke jackfrags channel with copyright strikes and dont be surprised when this leaker go's missing EA has been on the watch and are in tight security mode be careful with what you share you could be next also don't tell anyone i said this but the mods here are apart of this con force, not directly but part of their duty is to enforce this censorship for EA
Because I know alot of people dont have the next gen
If they keep the same game for both gens or probably means that the game won’t be as extreme in player count and whatnot as we hoped
i dont. out of a group of 120 i have, only 9 have a ps5
Yeah because of scalpers and the excessively slow production
9/120
I will try to get the series X for my birthday
That’s 3 in 40
I dont even have a ps5
im not going for nexgen. imma get a pc instead
Literally 1984
There's plenty of series s
My birthday is mai 31 and I know I'm getting 100 dollars
pc is a better long term investment tbh
Yeah S tho
Buy 1 lol
Perhaps
pc cringe tho
so?
I don’t think 100 dollars will be enough for a console
so enjoy spending 2000 dollars on a machine you'll play cool math games on
thats the best analogy ive ever heard
Sorry I'm French Canadian
u mean snowy aussie?
Quebecois 🤢
imagine Quebec or however tf u spell it
Shut up
Eh I’m just joking
Victoria CHAD
I only ironically dislike Quebec people
jkjk im American
Anyone on ps4
yerrrr
That’s a somewhat different story
I fucking hate french from france
Do you play breakthrough ?
i hate Europe as a whole, exept Norway. Norways pretty cool
Kind of new that’s what I’ve been playing that and conquest
which game?
I only hate france that is all
Breakthrough BF5
Are you playing now or no
What is breakthrough
Lol why France
Because most of them that come here in Quebec are insulting our language and they think they are the superior french
Well they can think they are better all they want. At the end of the day they are flawed just like everyone else.
Why the Beethoven pfp?
Fair enough
Yes that I say to them all the time and dont want to listen to me
Far away then that
isnt that just french culture?
Yeah that’s why I don’t like French people
Franco-Prussia war
Not at all
Yeah that as well but technically it is classified as Napoleon
Since well
Napoleon 3
Pretty sure the entire west got dunked on by the VC.
I just tested my stream because it's been a month I haven't streamed
France and America only
Yeah and now afghan
China as well
Guerilla tactics win wars now
Yep
They got dunked on for thousands of years
That’s cause we start big dummy wars. But let’s not get into that.
its cause not being seen is more important then honor or skill
Blame bush Sr all I can say
We have a total of 1703 years of wars
They were infact, in the trees.
Punji Traps
nice
They’re creative as fuck ngl
cause sandbox shenanagains
I miss bf vietnam
They were more motivated to fight, most boys from the states were drafted and did not want to be there.
Yes
Tbh why united states lost to Viet Cong they underestimate
Forest Traps
They didn’t really underestimate
For every 20 (confirmed) Vietnam soldiers lost, 1 American was
It was much more of a public support war
Really but remember 20 more grew
We just want independence, north and south unite
We don’t care about Cold War bullshit
From a manpower standpoint also no
Cold war still today with china
Did the US lose Vietnam? Yes. Did they underestimate the Vietnamese? No.
How you define that?
in brutal honesty, no
bomber kinda easy kills once you learn how to use it
They did underestimate us
As I stated, K/D, equipment lost, etc
It’s hard to find servers
That’s why
Vietnam had far more damage than america did post war
I’m also on xbox btw
any all maps conquest server will go to CR map or Whiteout eventually
(on PC at least)
(never played console)
Remember the jungle can eat you up in nam with tigers and poison snakes etc also logestics is key
I literally talked to my grandpa about his war experience I know what happened
See a huge 500lb kitty cat
yea i don't really think the americans underestimated the VC (infantry PROBABLY did) but rather did not know how to handle their tactics
Correct
I always want one
They weren’t used to asymmetrical warfare and they didn’t have public support
Maybe a cheetah
Logistically they were winning
we've always gone against very upfront enemies, even the japanese in WWII, their violence was upfront
i'm working on philosophy homework and typed half a sentence and stopped typing it 
Also bombing us did help the Viet Cong
What
Go back studying
on a bit of a break, final is tomorrow
I’m confused what you are trying to say
Vietnamese disliked united states
Yes
that being said i'm fucked
No
Wtf are we talking about
Good Luck
The bombing and massacres helped the Vietnamese population start supporting the northern forces
viet war
Back then? Yes. Now? No
Oh ok
Yeah
However many southern Vietnamese didn’t like the northern government due to their brutal tactics and left the country
Birth defects from agent orange passed down generations will do that
from a piloting standpoint the viet war was cool
first combat helis
some really sexy planes
I like the suav but I suck at using a sniper
Yeah cool until a MiG-21 shoots you down because phantoms are flying Napalm missions and can’t provide air cover
Oh, you’re talking about the Vietnam war?
don't need to snipe to be recon
Ironically the Vietnamese and Americans are now basically allies
Since they were invaded by China in the 80s
Same deal with Japan
We kinda forced them to become allies is the difference
Sorta ig
How do I snipe in bf4
By using a sniper
Get good at sniping
I really can’t provide any good tips rbh
We want to be allies with us before ww2
We literally dropped two suns on them. Of course they'd become very cooperative with us
also F-14 Tomcat
with variable sweep wings
Didnt Hoh Chi Minh want Vietnam to become an American protectorate
F-14 wasn’t used over Vietnam
I have meme
If it was it would’ve been at a very light number
It was technically an independence movement in his own words
Sniping in bf4 is like slaping someone
Hm
It’s not only about the two countries being cooperative. WW2 destroyed Japan’s economy and most of the country was in poverty. The US provided assistance
- unlock SRR-61
- get kills with it on hardcore until you have bipod and 40x *and range finder
- equip Duckweed or Quick Response
- go to any Naval Strike map
- lay down on carrier
- get 4 kills
It does nothing
We hate to be protectorate
I was implying that they had no other choice
(at least 2 kills have to be on non-moving targets)
