#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 3602 of 1
there is absolutely no reason why they wouldnt have the capability
This
this simply makes no sense for a literal start of the next gen battlefield game
going back on a team size we've seen for over a decade
Because it has been said several times last year by Dice itself when they made a presentation of graphics new ôssibilities for next games lol
okay well i can tell you right now
indie games with high textural design have higher player size
Lol maybe
so its absolutely unbelievable to think it would be this way
If there's 64 vs 64 and 32 vs 32 servers, guess which lobby players will choose
But I don't see why Battlefield is forced to follow that way
if its next gen only, there wont be a 32v32 standard
uhh because its not about being forced
its about staying competitively relevant
Just stand with a 32vs32 standard isn't a problem at all as battlefield games function like it for years now
which since BF is making another BR game
they must want to be competitive in the shooter market
Maybe 32vs32 if they are attracted by closest combats, don't think 64vs64 is perfect mode lol we didn't even see it
32v32 just seems less exciting when battlefield used to be the game that felt huge, why would they take away the staple of their design?
Competitivity isn't only about map sizesbut content and gameplay I think
even RS2 has like 128 player megaservers
which happen to be the most popular in that game
Why wouldn't it be perfect, you'll have to see the maps first
content and gameplay but its also about what battlefield brings to the table that other games dont
Yes hut it's RS2, not battlefield
The only way you're seeing this negatively is due to how we're conditioned to see BF maps via 32 vs 32 eyes
tell me what battlefield brings to the table, and then you will realize in the literal "title" of the game what the appeal is
Why would it be lol, a lot of problems can disturb the experience and especially when it's the first time battlefield is experiencing that mode
I think in order for Metro to be remade for 64 vs 64, they have to extend subway spawn point to the park
All BF3 and BF4 maps and content did a good job at their time, large scales made battlefield great andd I think it will stay great even if they don't put 64vs64 as as standrard lol
meh
i think adding more cover would be fine
reduces sniping
and adds the requirement to push to the objective
I think it'll be hilarious when it turns out to not be 64 vs 64 but instead it's like 40 vs 40 or something lol
Game is 8 years old
Lol not really, it's just that people think 64vs64 is the more important innovation from Battlefield history while it's just game size, I don't see it negatively but I don't expect it to be perfect as it's the first time they do this
If they end up making the maps even bigger and keeping 32v32
It will feel like a wasteland
At least conquest 100% will
Rush/operations will be fine because sections
Goodbye conquest community if that happens
And still completely playables and funs nowadays, the proof 32vs32 can stay for the standard
People don’t want a repeat of an 8 year old game though
I personally don't know what they'll make BF6 worthwhile besides updated graphics if it wasn't for the higher lobby player limit
No just reduce the size for 32vs32 matches like they do for tdm as I said it previously
if they add old maps ill defintly play it
If they wanted to save the last 4 years of development they could have saved a lot of money if they just released a 32v32 BF game remastered
like from bf3
32vs32 come back doesn't mean it will be a repeat
TDM is not a standard
Conquest and rush is the standard
They’re the most popular modes
Exactly, and with those came the standard of player count
Me too, maybe it's one of the more important things to me
I look at BF4/BF1/BFV these days, no server ran TDM lmao
That’s not proving your point
I didn't talk about a remastered neither lol
You have to be trolling at this point
The moment you repeated TDM
As a standard
That’s not a standard game mode
TDM or domination for example, just wanted to show you they already can reduce map size without making them "empty"
Every single map that BF makes revolves around conquest and rush/operations
that is not a STANDARD
they reduce it REGARDLESS
Because the game mode ISNT a standard game mode it gets REDUCED
W-What if they add a street level on top of subway in Operation Metro for the 128 player remake? 
I didn't say tdm was a standard at all lmao, don't make me say things I never said
i can find lots of tdm servers
like on bf3 the most played server is noshahr tdm
one of the most played
You don't have to put capital letters on all your sentences, and I can totally read it proprely without it lol 
Back when I played BF3, the most popular lobby was Operation Metro Conquest
And this was during a period the game was pretty much dead
Yes Noshar tdm is still playable often
Operation Metro was also the more popular on BF4 just because all the community love it, doesn't mean it's the standard in reality
???
metro is great for infantry gameplay
Conquest is standard
for me i feel like bf3 didnt get vehicles right that much
Yes it represents the very cool side of Battlefield infantry games, but tbh not the more representative map of Battlefield games I think
yeah
I didn't say the contrary lmao don't be offended, I said Metro wasn't the standard Battlefield map
If people are playing battlefield to not play against vehicles they’re really in the wrong franchise
I also think it
tell that to all the locker players
That's way even if Metro is cool, it's not the best Battlefield map ever as there are no vehicles
Locker crazy players make me sick
Ayy lmao
Like if you only want to play infantry combat everyday, you can switch to COD
COD infantry gameplay sucks
Yes it's bad af lmao
Battlefield infantry gameplay is great, of course people want inf only maps
That’s true
My favorite map is still Achi Baba from BF1
No one likes arty trucks
Inf only 👍
That's the reason cod players go to battlefield to play infantry only and play MP like it was singleplayer and they are alone in the game lol
something like devastation in bfv i feel like is really great
Achi Baba, more like mortar fest
But it really ticks me off when people rave about dying to vehicles....like, you made the decision to play battlefield, dont be surprised when an integral part of the game comes into play every once in a while
usually a bad player gets the tank so its mostly infantry only
River Somme, more like sniper’s paradise
Not when your in Aus servers, the tankers here are hell
Lmao they accept infantry but not vehicles which literally are the most important thing which make Battlefield so epic
luckily im eu
because its just the best
no questions
I think the thing is if you're not an Engineer, you have to depend on your engineers, and no one wants to do that
It's a big part but as the vast majority of the team is on foot it's not the biggest
Having 4 tanks with your squad and a recon with a soflam on silk road gotta be the dopest shit ever
In a row, firing at shit from mountains
i dont understand staff shell tanks
The best thing that ever happened to me in bf1 was when i was scout in sinai desert. And some guy tried to run me over with the armored car, so i used my k bullets to disable his vehicle. And when he got out, i no scoped him.
just boring
especially in silk road
they never take objectives only the ones that are the closest
and just end up losing
Or you just have to learn how to use vehicles wthout having to repair it every seconds, and I promise it's not so hard
and getting 0 kills
The war on silk road is basically who gets into the bomber plane hut
Are canister round suppose to act like a shotgun? I haven't used it in a while so i don't remember
Not the vast majority on all maps tbh, play golmud and you'll see it
Yup
Those are still the minority of maps though
golmud has too many vehicles and its too open
And maps like Panzerstorm are the worst I've ever played on battlefield
Yo im new to battlefield 4
Maybe, but I always played Battlefield because it's not infantry only
What should i do to get better
play
Yes tbh not my favorite map at all, was just an example
M416
What mode is the best?
conquest
The best gun?
Operation
And gow do i make loadouts?
I think so, but not others
hes talking about bf4 @naive relic
Oh ok sorry
Get similar to most of class available and try to use variety of weapons available, then try to play vehicles to take advantages from it
at the menu screen in a game theres assault, engineer, support, recon
start with assault
dont advertise here
So can i edit that in game?
yeah
theres all your weapons and everything
Thanks
its the same for all battlefields
Ok
@buoyant grail don't advertise here, only in #streams-and-videos
So conquest is the best?
Sry guys
yeah its the most played
Bf1 on ps4 is literal hell
Large or small?
conquest large has more servers
Pushing enemy to their base
When one team holds all the flags and basically just holds a line at the enemy spawn
And not letting them leave
Oh
Not fun
Basically when your team holds all the flags and just keeps killing everyone at their spawn so they cant get out
Unless your the one doing it
It’s boring
Thoughts on levolution and desirability for BF6?
Wouldn’t mind some large map events, if any of the rumors prove to be true, that may be what we get
baseraping for both sides isnt fun
Why not?
I've always enjoyed it when we were the one winning
It was a one-and-done thing
I was wondering, what is like going from 60hz to 144?
Does it help at all with aiming/tracking?
In one match we got baseraped for a while, then we pushed them back and ended up pushing them to their base and won the match
Thunderstorm, sandstorm, snowstorm 
That sounds awesome
yeah
wow
Tanks rolled out, choppers flying by supporting each other
If you went back to 60 do you think you’d play as well?
not really
Interesting
as someone who plays csgo on 30fps, i think 60 is enough to compete.
Cause I’m working on tracking and general aim, but I wonder if my monitor is holding me back
if you have the money and a good enough pc go for it
I’ve been watching sabelo and he’s on like 360hz
I will do once GPUs are purchasable
i dont think thats true tho
check your specs and ensure they aren’t bottlenecking FPS performance if you upgrade your monitor
some people dont like to sit inside a tank to get an inflated K/D
they actually like to have high stakes
its why tactical conquest exists
less vehicles
exactly
and rush
like even devs realize vehicles are overbearing
conquest it only works because the players are so spread out around the map
The choppers
i dont care about my kd even if im infantry or in a vehicle
Well I’ll be getting my hands on a 3080 as soon as possible
breakthrough is the best mode in battlefield 5, change my mind
Sounds good 
put the same number of vehicles that exist in conquest in a rush match and it would be unbearable
So next year?
it is the best mode
Yeah 😭
I know, I’m not saying everyone has to use vehicles. I’m just saying it’s an integral part of the series and people shouldn’t be so surprised to have to deal with one once in a while
killing vehicles is fun
people shouldnt be surprised tho that there are servers dedicated to not dealing with them
theres a reason why turning vehicles off exists
The balancing of those vehicles is obviously an issue sometimes, but there’s a reason conquest levels of vehicles aren’t present on those smaller modes
i got 4 repair tool kills in a shanghai match once
yeah but they are super hard to kill
balancing vehicles in battlefield has always been a joke
i did enough dmg with the smaw and finished off with the tool
they never know how to get it right
jihad jeep to obliterate tanks
the damage towards vehicles should be high because they can always repair them
but they never make it that way because they dont want vehicle only players to bitch on forums
whens the battlefield 6 trailer cmng
never
remember BF1 launch with the power of that solo driven tank that would always get like 60+ kills and the guy would never die
Has anyone here managed to get a 3080?
Vehicles are really not that hard to take out, like do you really expect to be infantry and you alone take out a whole tank
with explosives?
That's just dumb and unrealistic as hell
yeah id assume with rockets designed to destroy tanks
its not about realism
its about balance
BF has never been about realism lmao
They’re supposed to be powerful, if that’s what you mean. If vehicles weren’t powerful, theyd be pointless to have in the game
It is balanced, a tank destroys shit so rightly so if you encounter one directly you should die
It’s about believability, not realism
if you want to talk about realism, how come i cant kill someone with 1 shot to the chest with a .50 caliber sniper rifle yet in a standard mode?
because Balance
battlefield was never realistic alright
Because that would be too over powered and everyone would be going around 1 shotting people making every other gun in the game almost useless
tanks on the other hand pretty much have the easiest time sitting back and racking up to the top of the board with 0- sub 5 deaths a game
Doesn’t mean vehicles shouldn’t be powerful, but counterable
In my experience vehicles are not easy to use
the plungers
If you do not know what your doing you will die
are quite effective to destroy vehicles
what battlefield game are you playing where vehicles arent easy to use
BF4
BF4 iirc the tanks are pretty easy to manage
You know the other team has tanks too right
lmao its hilarious how a fucking plunger does more damage to tanks than rocket launchers
yeah
and just like the other teams tanks
theyre mostly looking out for infantry kills
So what if you encounter a good tank player and you have no clue how to defend yourself
Your obviously going to die
helicopters are the one thing that even infantry can actually manage to destroy
Vehicles take out vehicles I think that's the point in a war
Infantry can take out tanks no issue if they play their cards right
^
its satisfying to get that perfect shot on a helicopter
infantry can take out tanks if theyre spamming it from all different angles
I’ve destroyed 2-3 tanks in one life in BFV on a number of occasions
if the tank doesnt have aps i can take one out easily
does driving a plane into an enemy tank destroy it
thats because BFV didnt have over oppressive tanks
kamikaze type shi
What?? Teamwork in battlefield is beneficial?
especially the bazooka was nerfed
There needs to be a reason to use tanks, if they are easily taken out what is the point of having them
the difference is
in BFV
you can solo take out a tank as an infantry
if you know what you're doing
I don't know about BFV but in BF4 generally vehicle battles are pretty hard
all of the previous games, it required a ton of work
especially BF1 which is the most laughable
Considering you get hit sometimes by multiple tanks, AA's LAV's, helicopters
Infantry with RPGs
imagine the hardest tank to kill in any bf game
C4 dudes
and it takes place in ww1
the tanks with the worst armor known in history of all tank combat
People tryna crash into you with c4 quads
Not to mention if your dumb enough to drive a tank into a conquest point chances are you will die
even at point blank they couldnt kill them
It's really not easy being vehicles
again it all goes down to balance i dont see why people dont understand its all dependent on how fast it takes to kill a tank
Since when did taking out vehicles in battlefield become hard? It's literally the easiest thing. Come back to me when you've played hell let loose and have bazooka or panzerschrek shots ricochet due to the angle of armor or just get absorbed into the outer layer completely.
maybe some one can help me with unica 6 quest?
how much damage does the launcher do vs how much ammo does it have
exactly
BF tanks are a walk in the park compared to other games
I'm talking about BF4 I don't know about any other game after BF4
okay well that game is way in the past
and even then the vehicles were easy
BFV at least was a step in the right direction in infantry being able to combat tanks by themselves
and most of the time its because they actually have sufficient ammo in their AT kit to kill a tank
I think overall though the balance between vehicles and infantry in BF4 is reasonable
As a tank, if not countered with vehicles or certain equipment you can wreck infantry
Doesn’t make it any less valid lol
Well its not an AH cannon
However if the other team has support from certain types of equipment and vehicles they should be able to defend
And they can
(anti horse)
it does because BF has changed since 8 years ago
AA should be able to obliterate a horse
No
??????????
Then don’t talk about “all the previous bf games” and not want to bring up previous bf games
the tanks are still easy to use
AA is meant for planes not frikkin horses
Whatever happened to balance, not realism?
the same thing that happened to your "belivability"
I keep getting killed by choppers or by campers on top of a roof
Bammdle fiemld
It doesn't matter if AA is used for planes. A flesh target getting hit by flak would absolutely destroy it lol
^
AA not taking out a horse sounds very stupid and like a badly designed mechanic
And flak was even used for tanks by the Germans due to the 88 being so effective lol
was a moving death machine
yeah
And any bullet to the head would mean lights out. Guess we’re selective about when we care about balance
I love how it was designed as an AA cannon but it was better for tanks
Thats always gonna be hilarious
i would hope we see that in every BF game moving forward
i like fast TTK
It should be a mode maybe, not a default thing
the faster the TTK the faster a tanks TTK could be too, which would be awesome
It’s called Hardcore, try it out sometime.
Should be a mode day 1. I'm tired of them releasing half assed hardcore modes like halfway through the life cycle lol
Fuck fast TTK
so bf6, which time is it gnna be set in?
no because hardcore does it way way over the top for BF
but headshots killing you instantly should bea given
Ah yes fast ttk is horrible. Shooting a man 10 times is fun lol
if you make it so all the damage kills you instantly like HC
it just becomes a camp fest
but if you make headshots do a massive amount of damage it says okay
im hearing its set in 2030 with robot dogs
most shots will always be to the body
I generally find hardcore more fun but it's probably because I snipe so I just get a ton of kills
sorta like rainbow 6?
play anything frontline and its a nightmare
yeah Siege, CS
Eh
Hardcore imo is just more realistic, no longer do you have to worry much about your location being marked and every tank in the area knowing your there
Thats not my fav
literally most games make the headshot pretty much instantly kill you
yeah its nice for snipers
not for people who actually have to do objectives
If you shoot a gun the enemy shouldn't know where you are
you know how annoying hard core rush is?
playing as someone who isnt sitting back
and sniping
Hardcore is fun because it can make any gun viable and encourages a slower pace. It's why Squad and tarkov etc are such big successes well plus other factors of course. Just hope the next title in BF has hardcore mode officially supported day 1 as a side mode for people that want it
They might look into Squad and reasons for its success though
its not as successful as people think
I hate when ur on the minimap when u fire
Dude you’ve practically been begging for BF to be squad for the past 10 minutes lmao
its all time peak is 14K players, thats literally nothing compared to normal shooters
One shot headshots, faster TTK...
In may 2019 Squad sold 1 million copies
That makes everyone blindly choose suppressors over everything else
BFV had a faster ttk
Its not fun
faster ttk is not just squad lmao
theres a million games with a ttk where im not plugging 10 rounds into someone
all of which are not squad
and if you think thats all that squad is
you've never played squad
G is clueless lol
If ur just describing what u want BF6 to be and it sounds exactly like squad then just play fecking squad
never said any of that
It's huge aswell you need to play with a good squad for it to be fun on a good well made server
i hate milsims with a passion so nobody got what i was saying at all
i guess shooting someone with 20 rounds in a mag is the only way the game can be battlefield
anything less is squad
If you jump into it like battlefield you'll go into a field and just get shot and thats it
even though in BFV you're dead in 2-3 from any semi auto rifle
You'll have no idea where anyone is
and 4-5 from any smg
Just don't get shot
and AR's its like 2-3
Well you might, depends on the server
and squad isnt even popular
same
english only
15K all time record peak player count?
its still a niche game because of its community
the game would have more players if the milsim community didnt gatekeep
but you dont have a mic? Kicked
Not following my orders? Kicked
You picked marksman? Dont go that we need someone to play medic
Medic not always near the squad? Kicked
milsims are more for people willing to roleplay and play as an actual soldier
Most people do not give a shit about roleplaying
mhm
Not really, if you do want to do it and learn then it's pretty fun
I dont understand milsims
i can play and a squad and not get kicked for just me having fun playing the game
Squad doesn't even have many milsim servers. You are more so thinking arma lol
when you play squad, you need to follow orders or you dont get to play
uhh even if theyre not roleplaying
the Sl's kick you if you dont follow orders
or stick with them
that happens absolutely in any server
Sounds like you are over generalizing
That doesn't always happen
Some SL's are dicks true
it happens so commonly that it is what it is
if you dont speak on your mic
they usually kick you
I can see that happening
or set the squad up as "mics only"
Because it’s a Milsim game, teamwork and following orders is part of the game
It’s not a casual shooter like BF
It is a milsim and if you've played GTARP a absolute ton of these admins are dicks
Yeah exactly
They’re vastly different franchises
thats why i like BF
and not squad
but a fast ttk is not just "squad"
you can still have efficient killing times
in a casual shooter
But that one BTK to the head thing you’re talking about a while ago is exactly what’s in squad
Competitive or tactical shooters, which isn’t what BF is
G have you ever played squad? Dumbing it down to only having a fast TTK to it is seriously funny
@queen canopy Do you prefer hardcore or normal BF?

insurgency isnt competitive
its pretty arcade style with a fast ttk
it may be on a tactical side, but its also pretty arcady
i mean you could say bf has squad based game modes that make it tactical
Im not saying a fast TTK is all Squad is, don’t worry. I’m not that dumb lol
just like insurgency has like game mode that require capturing points like battlefield and the gunfights are pretty fast ttk but have an arcade set up
in fact its like a 1-2 shot kill in insurgency
1 for snipers
actually
the best comparison
planet side 2 actually has a low ttk
as dead as that game is
its literally the closest thing to a battlefield like game
even that trash heroes and generals game has a very low ttk
stop the flood tho
I just don’t want my exact damage to be my score
Like getting 26 16 21 points
When we can just get 100 for a kill and 25 for headshot and like 10 for a squad assist
I hope it wont
No ea play games on ps plus please
Gatekeeper
Instead of another aaa game
Bruh
Either squadrons or bfv
I j wanna bomb some noobs who don’t got a fligurfaust (can’t spell)

My guees are gran turismo sport and crash bandicoot n sane trilogy
For ps plus may 2021 games
If you want to slaughter some noobs you are already on console breda
There are many of them
Uh no bunch of sweats imo
Or how about sony goes on a hiatus and you get no ps plus games for May
I was stoked when I first got the game
Then they tell about Japanese moral and proud
Anyone knows what happens to online save data if battlefield is deleted from your origin account?
sony is slacking so hard this gen
Erased to atoms
and the only reason theyre doing it too is because ps5 is still somehow the fastest selling console
You sure?
No clue
😔
i havent used my ps5 for literally anything since demon souls came out in november
Only reason of exclusive games that i buy ps generation
i mean it doesnt really matter when we really havent seen an exclusive
Everybody knows xbox's hardware way better
Cause EA support keep answering the wrong question in broken english
Maybe for trophy hunters and people dont want to lose their friend base on ps
True.
yeah but you wont just lose the friend base
literally the one thing ps5 has over the xsx is exclusives
Xbox got some great games lined up. Most excited for stalker but they recently acquired bethesda as well
nothing more and nothing less
yeah except we are still waiting to see some exclusives that ps5 has
Microsoft has been much better about bringing all their games to pc as well which is great
xsx has gamepass which is honestly amazing
So the upcoming Indiana Jones game only on Xbox?
Who knows. Probably xbox and pc
over 200 free games for 10 pounds (or 1 pound on offer)
i mean the biggest concern for sony players right now is they still oddly think starfield is coming to ps5, and it most likely isnt
Xbox has all their games on the microsoft store and windows
Does origin allow you to buy a game you already own?
Well steam I mean
Meanwhile sony tries to keep away companies like capcom from gamepass as their answer to that service 😂
its like they convinced themselves that its coming
I hope xbox gatekeeps though to their own platform and pc. Sony can dig themselves a grave for all I care lol
you know if sony made any effort to backwards compatibility and opened up a gamepass to ps4, ps3 and ps2 titles they'd have more subs than xbox
but for some reason they never make some of the most obvious business decisions ever
The only game i would go backwards is fifa world cup 2014
theres a load of ps2 games id replay on a ps5
Why they didnt release on next gen (2013) tho
all i can hope for is they dont release BF6 on last gen
that will raise a lot of concerns for me
wow just got 3 hackers in a match, being invisible and killing people with machete or sometihng lol
if bf6 wants to be a success at all
So with the backwards comp in xbox, the battlefield 3 is crossplay with x360 and xbox one, series?
Named like dks7c384kd283o3ks as level 4?
If it's on last gen just hope it's a 3rd party studio and completely separate from the man development porting it
nah sum level 150 guy that was invisible with a tag
It wouldn't be
yeah if it was last gen it would still be them
but the battle size would be downgraded
graphics downgraded
levelution downgraded
They should honestly just skip it. Such a downgraded experience isn't worth it lol
There is still quite a bit of people on last gen though
Sounds like a those people problem?
It all depends on how many there is
Its not just their problem, its also EA/DICE's bottom line's problem
Especially if the shortage continues
Shortage is going to continue into 2022. Nothing EA/ Dice can do about that
And my point is, they're not gonna just give up on selling to the vast majority of people who still don't have the new consoles
In year ending december 2020 PSN had 114 million active monthly users
It'd be a bit dumb not to port
Even for an odd chance of it being bad
Well we have no idea what they are planning. In a perfect world they'd skip it but yeah it will most likely end up on last gen. But if they plan crossplay and don't want the game to be held back in terms of hardware it should just be crossplay for old gen and then crossplay for new gen/ pc opt in.
Keep them completely separate
I mean MW exists on PS4 and it's pretty good and people play competitively on it so I don't see why they wouldn't be able to port it properly
if they actually give in
and downgrade the game for a console that will be almost 9 years old
theyre going to potentially kill off the good start they could have for a game they plant to maintain as this generations battlefield
It doesn't matter how old the console is, it matters how many people still have it and use it
yeah
Once again, BF4 was split between gens, and its still doing just fine
Just depends on what the next BF is. If the 128 player rumors plus other stuff are true that's going to be way more performance impacting than modern warfare
8 million ps5 consoles have been sold
That's true
theres like 20+ million GP users
if they put it on gamepass
theyd have absolutely no problem having a playerbase
theres like no AAA games coming this year besides halo, and thats probably in december
Bf4 didn't have crossplay though. I'm guessing for their next title that's planned. Makes things a lot harder
I don't see them making 128 player servers a default thing. 128, 64 and 32 servers will likely be available
I really want crossplay
yeah it can keep it alive
They should remove 32 then and keep it 128 and 64
plus the holiday sales for consoles for next gen will be huge
I'm not talking about crossplay, as much as I'm talking about the game not being held back too much by being split between generations
Theres nothing worse than wanting to play with some of ur friends but u find out they're on different platforms
It's not much so that they won't have a playerbase, just from a business and marketing perspective ignoring so so many active monthly users who would potentially buy the game is dumb and they love money.
i cant see why they would sacrifice overall sales in the long run just to get sales from people on ps4 and xbox this fall so that they can abandon the entire title on that console and then complain on the forums about how the ps5 and xbxs version doesnt feel like next gen
We have literally no idea what the new game is. I think the scope of this upcoming title in terms of hardware is going to be a lot bigger than bf4
Sorry meant to
i sincerely hope they wont give in to people who have 8 year old consoles
But even considering that it's not smart not to port to last gen, there could be development limits that force them to not be able to support last gen
consumers are so fucking fickle its unreal
all i can hope is that cyberpunk scared every single AAA company
is it possible to lower landing gear in bfv?
Yeah I honestly doubt that 128 player servers and better evolution etc could work on last gen. Don't know why I'd need to explain that though
Last gen is severely dated now
They very well could dumb down a ton of stuff to make last gen supported though I don't see that being such a hard task from their perspective but I don't know much about game development specifically just development in general
last gen is so far behind
And the Xbox 360 was dated when BF4 came out
and look how launch BF4 was
And look how just fine the game's doing now
Of course it was and bf4 was hindered on last gen as a result
Well was the xbox one hard to find when BF4 came out?
Lesser player servers, lesser graphics, adjusted building crumbling physics, it's not really stuff that would be hard to adjust or require any more work
But it wasn't held back on the current gen
Did you not remember the launch of bf4? That game was a steaming pile of garbage until Dice la fixed itt lol
Launched in a terrible state
And its doing fine now
uhhh i can find more full servers on bf1 and bfv than 4
After years of work
regardless of if they can do it or not its a waste of resources
You seem to forget that
better to have it go towards new stuff instead of old gen console optimization
i mean people stick to bf4 off of the fact that modern combat fans and the whole "ahh just a better bf3"
but yet even the most generally criticized bf game has the most players
Year ending April 2020 Xbox Live has 90 million active monthly users
I agree. I dont expect it to run 128 or something thay requires a ton of work on old gen
Guys, can you buy a game on origin that you already "own"? In this case BF 4
all i can say is, if they plan on holding back this battlefield game for ps4 and xbox fans
we better get a battlefield in 2022 or 2023 thats not shit
because its going to be massively held back
In 1 year? A battlefield game?
every time i try to connect to a server in BF4 it says you disconnected from the game session. is there anything i can do?
There are more old gen consoles than new gen consoles so they woyld be leaving out a majority
Is your punkbuster on?
from the ambitions that they seem to have for this game, i just dont realistically see them letting it run on a base xbox one
What's the issue with them porting a slightly worse version to last gen
i think so. how can i check?
Extra work
It doesn't ruin your experience
this does not matter, in a year that console is on its way out 100%
wasted resources that could go towards new stuff
this is what i dont understand, literally the console will be entering 1 year into its lifespan
why would you WASTE future sales
just for beginning sales
they want the game to be this generations battlefield game
You don't know if it's wasted resources, it could be a good investment
Think about it this way
¯_(ツ)_/¯
the game releases right
and its held back
by old gen
"hope you guys enjoy the game we plan to keep for this entire gen"
According to the leak though and the way they set this game up in their blog post it seems like it will not be coming to last gen
Hey
Needs to be next gen only (just hope Xbox can deal with the demand)
Anyone
I don't think anyone here is saying its good for the game, I think we're saying its unlikely they wont
meanwhile other shooters surpass it within 12 months
Yep. I gotta plan for building a pc
imagine a company like DICE with EA resourced being surpassed by a 10 man dev team
all because they made a game designed for next gen
and battlefield chose to stick to a console that will be thrown away the moment a consumer can get their hands on a console
I don't think it's BF 4 server fault
Then What Happen
Majority of consumers that own console likely will not be able to afford the next gen for another 2 years after release
with the fact that next gen just flies off the shelves as it comes in, i can easily see them realizing new gen will sell more consoles than old gen for both systems and its more likely they will stick to new gen because of long term sales instead of just selling a lot in the first few months and then dying later on because the game doesnt feel next gen and its hindered
Are you already in a server playing when it disconnects?
that is completely not true lol
The whole selling point of console is that it's affordable
Or you can't connect at all?
Can't Connect
you had to spend the same amount pretty much for a ps4-ps4 pro
Close and open the game?
I Can Go To The Game
500 dollars even a high school kid could make in 1 month
the new console is not that expensive
It Says Lost Connect
Close and open
its very basic, in fact its more cost efficient than an old console
Game
But My Ping Is Actually Fine :v
👏
Random disconnections.... Yeah i get them
2 Days Ago I've Got Same Issues
He can't connect at all he says
Odd
I am aware of the random disconnects
Same People Even Has The Same Problem
Most annoying stuff ever
i would absolutely hate for a next gen battlefield to be ruined by consumers that simply didnt keep track of getting their hands on a new console or havent upgraded to PC in the past 8 years
Its not the fact that people don't want to buy the new consoles, its that they sell out so damn fast that no one can really get their hands on them effectively
They're being bought faster than they can be made
they actually run a ps queue every single week
its mostly about the fact that people dont keep track of it
they just want to be able to open a site
and click add to cart
and checkout
to get my ps5 i had to wake up at 5 am and go on best buy just to order it, but it was up for 1 hr and 45 minutes
before completely selling out
and that was november 24th 2020
shouldnt have to do that
i mean if you want something
you just need to know how to get your hands on it
if you expecting a surplus during covid thats your fault
But... that's not okay
People don't have to go out of their way
If they don't want to
but the fact that the store was in stock for almost 2 hours and not 2 minutes?
and guess what
To get something like a console
they can get a "too bad"
"why are you guys leaving us out, we didnt want to actually go out of our way, so you should go out of you way to downgrade a product for us"
how does that work?
at leats make an effort
and guess what
Humans don't work together very effectively
they get that game as next gen only
Especially "gamer" type
Their problem
if the game is next gen only
the only people crying will be anyone not in next gen or pc
not the business
hell if they go on gamepass? they basically get paid by microsoft to be there
my point is, they shouldnt downgrade a game because of people who couldnt keep up
They are trying to stay close to market demand
You don't make a product like a game cut off from big market if you want to profit
i mean market demand rn is new console, the supply is low and the demand is extremely high, anyone else could obviously see its more beneficial in the long run to make a game for next gen, so that they get long term sales
Short term vs long term
do you want a product to sell for 1 year
or for 7
They make a game for last gen, it will never feel like the game was worth it for new gen
other games will surpass it
and it will be left behind
they make a game fit for something to be supported for years to come in next gen
Majority of people wouldn’t be able to play if it was current gen only. And their sales would suffer.
and they have years worth of potential customers because it will hold up against other games
not if they put it on gamepass tbh
BF1 is the height of battlefield
which was what 16 million sales?
it has the highest record number of sales
it was like 16-20
im not angry
id be angry if they destroyed the game they plan to use for this gen over last gen
BF1 might have had most sales, but BF4 was overall more popular I’m pretty sure.
i doubt that
if the current player base does not exist in bf4 how could it be more popular
That was also one of the biggest PR successes in recent history, zzzy
hardline has less players than bf4 so you cant make the "its newer"
We all remember how big of a hype train BF1 rode
But...at the same time, it now has serious playercount issues
In my experience, at least
at the rate that sony is going with ps5 production
they've just about reached 9 million sales
bf1 has more players it seems than 4
in fact it does
theres less active servers on bf4 than 1
and even less in 1 than 5
hardline has the least
Is that just active official servers though?
hardline is actually the worst populated bf game besides like the very very old ones
Or does that include custom servers?
Wth is he trying to say at this point
No with bf4
with bf4 customs are all really thats played a lot
you have officials up for conq
which are usually full
Thats still players though
yeah but what i mean is
Of course there’s less active servers, it’s 8 years old compared to 5.
ye
bf1 has more players alone
explain hardline
Are you saying new gen games have more players that ones with both old gen and new gen?
Hardline flopped, easy
Okay so
we can now say
good games outplay bad ones
bf1 sold more
and has more players
thats not hard to understand
its the most popular battlefield to date sales alone
BFV may have more population because newer
ahem: 13 million players?
but newer does not ALWAYS mean more
Thats a flop?
Sales doesn’t mean success
i mean its more popular than 4
Well...it does to an extent
its also more popular than bf4 on steam as well
and more popular than BFV
BFV has more players than 1 funny enough
bf1 and 4 are the most prestigious games of the franchise
but id say bf1 is more well recieved
yes
Lmao
BFV has wayyy more players, but BF1 is better received
true
bf5 is empty wdym
its not
Cuz it’s newer

No lol
Its far from empty
Its super well populated
Someone hasn't seen BF V servers
What servers or regions are you playing on
i sleep
hell let me just say this
europe
wot

even on STEAM, battlefield 4 has a 24 hour peak of 3.8K
Everytime he plays on BFV servers he closes his eyes
Europe has servers if I remember correctly
bf1 has a 24 hr peak of 8K
So to him it's empty
BF1 and BF5 are known to have broken server browsers ig
How tf does JackFrags get all of his footage then
EU servers are super popular on all platforms
Or Lossy
Most BF1 conquest servers are either in U.S.A, Germany, or Ireland
BF1 will show me not the same results everytime i spam the refresh button
Another dimension duh
Or any BF YouTuber that lives in the EU
battlefield 5 has a ton of filled servers, people say its dead because theyre mad its populated
Understandable
still waiting for a full game of Firestorm tho 
Dead game amiright
Has anyone here ever hosted servers for any of the games?
BF players are so cocky god damn
Time to try to buy BF 4 on an account I already own
worse than COD
Looks pretty dead. I mean you see the 64/64 player server? Absolute ghost town

I'm thinking of setting up a few servers for BF6 when it drops
Yeah
I hope they have BF4 styled rented servers.
Theres only like 3000 fucking players on at the same time
@finite whale people are mad
Does BFV have custom player-ran servers?
Hurr durr grug say geam dead grug funni now humm
There are, but they're fairly few and far between tbh
Dude says BFV is dead and has no servers. We prove them otherwise.
Dude follows up by saying that BF1 and BFV have always had sucky server browsers, we prove him otherwise
Dude calls us cocky. And it’s the only correct statement
yeah the officials usually are flooded
Rented servers came 2 years after release lol
Yeah
the worst thing about this community is they hate games in the series and are mad when people like them
Welcome to the internet
like cod players somehow maintain the ability to always stick together
doesn't change the fact that i find no server with people no matter what setting i put on
dude loses argument, fucking leaves and probably starts a new one
BF players are a whole different breed
if i refresh it will show one server, refresh again and it will disappear
Well then go to the BF1 subreddit and look at how they are able to find servers
@solid hinge yeah man no servers
then its buggy, doesnt mean that its dead
bruh
Every battlefield subreddit before V has something pinned about how to find servers
Yeah
i didn't said BF5 was dead
I hate when people say a game is dead
i said Firestorm was dead.
What the fuck.
Yes you did
yeah just firestorm right?
i said "firestorm is dead" it's pretty different

Hey guys anyone down for decoding for the peacekeeper
whats really surprising is somehow firestorm sometimes still has games going on
Bruh I'm literally linking your own goddamn comments 
Ok, here's 4K, RAYTRACED FOOTAGE of you saying it
The Peacekeeper looks like a beast
😎 This mans blind tho
it doesn't mean the same thing but aight
i bet hes deleted it now
You can’t just pull up cctv footage wdym
VAC BAN

So can we agree that this man is blind?
dude literally states BFV is empty, implying that BF5 is dead. Then takes that as “I said firestorm was dead”
Seems legit
literaly no fucking argument
"this man"
sTiLl LoOkInG fOr ThE bF5 iS dEaD
bf5 aint dead
No
We don’t mock each other
Bf5 should be dead though. Such a terrible game lol
We only mock clowns
when it's dead it's probably the players playing older bf games
We mock you when you’re wrong and you act like you’re not
You just dont have a convicing argument
bf1 or bf4
wow.. such a friendly community


