#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 3559 of 1
Well I heard that BF4 was downgraded a bit for PS3
I would be very surprised if a PS4 standard could run this game at 60 fps, it’s almost impossible
i thought bf4 just sucks in general
Largely because it was on every platform
Most battlefields are shit at launch tbh
Can i use puzzle weapons without premium?
honestly
it just feels like vehicles getting insane KD
I mean I didn’t like BF4 that much either but that’s just because I don’t tend to always fall in love with modern combat games
Numerous games support 120hz on PS5 and XSX. Though at a "low" resolution.
https://www.psu.com/news/all-ps5-games-that-support-120-fps-the-smoothest-games-on-playstation-5/
wellllllllll
Shhhhh
it’s solid
Don’t point out the many obvious flaws
idk why but i really dislike the fact that everyone uses 1x scopes
zou zou
wo kan dao le yi ge fei ji
I don't see why if they could get a solid 60fps out of BF on the PS4 and XB1 we can't get 120fps, even if only at 1080p, on PS5 and XSX
wo jin tian shuo zhong wen
(Starts playing bf4)
My gripe with modern combat is none of the guns have any sort of character, no real originality. Since modern combat has essentially turned into crafting multiple guns off AK and M4 bodies and then it just becomes 10 variants of AKs and M4’s half of them firing 5.56 NATO and the rest sitting at 7.62x39 and now even AK firing 5.45 and stuff. Idk ive always liked older wars because all the guns had character and their own ammo of varying capabilities at different ranges
It’s hard to get into
cause you got it yesterday
i'm trying to get into it
using the AK-12 starting weapon
maybe thats why
just hold out until you unlock a good weapon
i liked the ak-12 from r6
Yeah I think that’s why I wasn’t into it
I noticed in BF4 and BF3 everyone uses the same weapon
In BF3 it was the M16A3
aek an94
and aek
AEK was spammed yea
or spas 12
Still not as good as spas slug/frag
rpk
m416
all the guns i’m killed with consistently in bf3
i will admit tho there is some unbalanced gunplay
Sad thing is every class has like 1-2 weapon in each class everyone spammed
looking at you aek and m16a3
Meanwhile every class had like over 10 guns
Then for snipers every kill showed a M98B
The occasional SV98
Is there a hold breath thing for bf1 or bfv?
If battlefield devs knew how to balance guns, modern games would be better IMO
When sniping
yea
Yea
the gun play feels odd
i liked bfv gunplay better
i hate bfv
to many animations
idk guns just feel weird to me
type 100 is good
like that gun
Theres a lot to not like BFV for but I don’t understand the animations thing
to many
More modern games add in and refine more animations for every action
you can’t do anything without an animation
Expect BF6 to have more animations than BFV
I like it, honestly. It makes you think about your actions a bit more.
i liked the animations in bfv
it makes it feel more complete
i don’t want to think about my actions
I know
i’m playing the game for fun
So does DICE
Animations in BF are more immersive than something where I tap someone’s feet with difib and they suddenly get up
Thays What BF players tend to like
doesn’t make the gameplay better imo
makes it worse
like if i were playing for immersion i would love the animation
but i don’t and that’s why i hate them so much
bf1 had perfect animation balancing
The point is you won’t have medics reviving people through doors and around corners without touching the person
medics never revive in bfv
Also people just poofing in and out of vehicles just looks goofy now
Uhhh lmao
bf1 did indeed have good animations
As someone who plays solely medic in BFV
i’m speaking in general
yea i thought bf1 medic revives were kinda goofy
the guy just pulls out needle
i never get revived and i’ll be 2 meters away from some medic
that’s how it was in 4 and 3
I get revived fairly often
it was simple
It was simple then, but also it couldn't really get any better
Which skin is better for m1917?
The unknown soldier or company k
Adding revive animations puts more weight on an already powerful mechanic
so it got worse with bfv
yup
BF3 was defibing people through doors and not even touching them it was so goofy looking to see someone get blown up by a name and I don’t even need to press the difib on him and he gets up
BP bug is back 
let us celebrate
People were just upset that they had to think about who they’re reviving and where
that made it fun

idk it was annoying
Separates the people that just wanted point farm as medic
but i liked it as a feature
And actual good medics
i don’t see why medic farming doesn’t make you a good medic
the only point is that you revive
and that’s what they are doing
I'm debating on whether or not to spend my scraps on m1917 or wait
oh i see what you mean now
Yeah, the magic revives just look stupid now
i mean they would have an animation if the game was being correct
don't do it if you dont use the weapon alot
Reviving in a FPS game is a HUGE deal, it should carry more weight like it does in BFV
so bfv revives aren't magic?
Defibs at the guys feet and since the defib have a defined range? It makes it so I can stand up with my arms not even extending to his body and he gets back up
but keep in mind it came from a time when animations wernt the biggest concern
I use gehwer 98 a lot but i never tried the m1917
they're similar in range
see the difference between you and me i don’t care if it doesn’t make sense
i don’t look that deep into it
i play it to have fun
Oh so do I
I had 2 medics that didn't have revive in their kit
not have a realistic as duck 20 minute animation to revive
I just don’t think it’s fun to revive people through walls
what i’m saying is our opinions on fun are different
so there is no point in arguing why one is better
I mean I agree
i see the difference between you and him
one is trying to say both games are pretty good the other is finding reasons to not like bfv
What I also think is fun is no vehicles so yes it’s probably way different
I mean like poking the air near someone with a needle or defib and that reviving him
I will give it a try to see how it plays
it plays extremely well
yah it might look funny but i never really thought about it you know
Well the headshot shit doesn’t exist yea
use it in any thing but cqc btw
It’s more like not the absurdity of the animation it’s more just it isn’t challenging to be medic
BFV made it more challenging by “okay 2 seconds Im locked”
؟
that is true
Idc about the absurdity it’s a game
I care that it directly impacted the difficulty
imo i’m more worried about the challenge of 32 players coming at me then how fast i can revive someone
and people still will play medic cuz their guns are good in bfv
Exactly, it puts more weight on revives by making them riskier
I mean in BF3 and 4 medics had weapons that were good at medium range tbh. BFV they had SMGs
It also emphasizes staying alive, because if you die in the open, theres next to zero chance you're making it out alive
Most of your engagements become troublesome past 30 meters
Yeah that’s the big difference
tho i'd say medics make or break the games in bfv
they have smokes which can be super helpful or super annoying
Medics make or break too because in BFV they have the strongest gun in the game
Never used smoke myself
And yes even after the nerfs the type 2A is still a beast
i really hate medics in bfv when their brain turns primitive - they see guy need reviving they throw smoke regaredless of it will help a team or not to save the guy
it obscures your teams views
tried using that and i will say im a bit biased twords bfv because it runs lke shot on my pc
but i cant aim with that gun for shit
like teres something about it
Ah Okay yeah I love that gun lmao
it feels like the bearing 9 from siege
Yeah the Type 2A is near useless outside of pissing range
They nerfed the recoil obviously so it’s a little harder to control but it’s amazing
they do that in the open so they dont get shot
You enter a trench with a 2A and that whole trench is sleeping
basically
yea but they'll do it regardless if it's beneficial
if your team is defending and someone is out in the opening wanting a revive and you smoke for him, you obscure your team's view and allow enemy to push you
basically smoking for the enemy
while saving just 1 guy
Eh I mean I wouldn’t push smoke I’d just shoot through it
yah
I’ve got so many kills that way
i cant thing of many situations where thats happneed
as the smoke isnt even that large
just enough to where if you in the center there is about 2 meters around you
like if its breakthrough and your team has mg setup looking at a pass and someone just smokes the place
Either way In BF6 apparently they’re going back to the standard classes
then shoot the smoke
So I think medics will have ARs again
Im a little disappointed because I liked the whole smg stuff
I think its all but confirmed to be modern at this point
but you might not get them
or maybe if you're recon using a sniper
Or what they could do is honestly just let certain roles share specific weapons like they did in 3 and 4
shoot them when the come out of the smoke
grenade the smoke
tehre are so many ways to counter this
and honestly it never happens
but like for breakthrough where you might want to keep the enemy away from you
like i cant think of a time its happened cause the smoke is so smol
Dude recon in BFV Im glad to see go. The fact that they used like DMRs just overshadowed the bolt actions
there not gonna push an open field just cause there is smoke
anyone with 10iq knows the smoke will be gone soon and its to smol
medics and supports in bfv rule the roost
At least in the modern games the bolt actions were heavy hitters with magnum ammo
Yeah medics and support were the kings of the crop in that game
actualy they might
it may surprise you how effective smoke is there
Ammo also seemed to be less on hand so support played a huge role in that game
Hi are the Battlefield 4 and Battlefield 1 servers full with players? I would like to play them again maybe
I hope they make supports viable in the new ones again
they have a solid player count yes
Like lower the ammo pool so they’re actually doing things
and bring back engineer
BF4 yes, BF1 sort of yes but not as much as 4
Engineer is already coming back I think
but i'm saying that it can be detrimental to your team if you're obscuring your team's view of an open field just to save 1 guy
last time i checked enineers and supports wernt the same thing
Alright
agian
shoot through it
or nade it
Henderson I think already shined light on that I think
or wait to shoot people coming out
its very =easy to counter
especially nading it
like if you think enemys are coming then throw a nade
but it's gonna be less effective than having a clear view of a defending position wouldn't you say
maybe that little difference in effectiveness can cause you the game
if you get a hitmarker light that bitch up
it wont
i cant think of a time that a smoke nade 10 meters out have costed me a game
of anything
and not everyone is going to nade/shoot at smoke
The only thing that sucks is the trailer for BF6 is probably next month and then we have to wait another month for the gameplay
all i want in bf6 is the aek, as val, m240b and m60
last i checked bf is not a 1 man army game idk about the effectiveness of 1 guy
But they did say they were ahead of schedule with development
ill be happy with those weapons on their own
Can't wait to see the server blow up when the reveal drops 
but i just want the m60 to sound like bc2s m60
they better be
they killed support for BFV and BF2 and gave them an another year
All I want in BF6 is to not just clone BF3 weapons
w ould you rather have 4 guys or 5?
i mean yea but i don't like having smoke obscure your teams view
like maybe it's an open field leading to a trench like the iwo jima map
BFV support was killed before the game even released. It was already explained actually quite recently the reason BFV felt rushed is because they took people off the team to work on BF6 for next gen. The development cycle will be about 4 years now
ive never seen someone have this big of an issue with smoke
having a clear view of the beachhead would certainly be better than have in smoke
it takes like 5 seconds to go away
you get another man to your team
heck you can push up
i would rather have 6 guys then 5 if im being pushed
plus if they coming through the smoke
its not hard to shoot them when they come out
but agian
They even put criterion on BF6 to actually speed up the process on post launch content
but what if its smoke for them to go into cover like a trench or building
your thining about this to hard
way to hard
smoke
is not taht big of a deal
just kill the guys when you see them next
or nade where you think they are
flush em out
Im more scared for BF because they’re making a BR for the game and I don’t want them to abandon the main game to have a piss match with freaking warzone
i never said it was but what i'm saying is that for medics that smoke the guy they want to revive may be detrimental for the team
Damn that was a good trailer

im being honest i cant think of a time that its ever been detrimental
BF follows trends. They don't set them
Lol
i can think of quite a few times where i'm trying to hit a guy with a slow firing gun like a bolt action then the medic smokes in front me to revive a guy
lol what
its only a battleroyale
Só do all games
then move?
When was the last time bf actually did something revolutionary in gaming
Lol
to where the smoke isnt in ur way
agian
easy fix
not worth complkaining about imo
I like bf, but let's not kid ourselves
I have. Nothing worse than a whole area smoked out so it randomises conflicts. Does my head in.
yes but hes implying 1 smoke
probably about 6 meters uot
to revive a guy
i can see how smoking all of obj is annoying
like in some close quarters like operation underground breakthrough 1 smoke can easily cover an entire choke point
well 64 player servers back in i wanna say 2011
biggest maps
different type of gameplay
desrtution
so many things that battlefield has acheived
Not to mention throwing Call of Duty into near chaos back when BF1 was released
^
Concept of massive maps with a lot of players has been here since bf 1942
i think that's mostly cuz infinite warfare as a concept sucked
exactly
i was piointing out 64 player servers
not all that was specifically aimed at 2011
agian
Is that why CoD WW2 was released as a clear coattail-rider of BF1?
you just contradicted yourself
Exactly, building upon what you created isn't revolutionary
LoL you're just improving a concept
cause huge maps at the time were an accomplishment
Improving a concept is the definition of innovation
^
No game series is revolutionary past the first iteration of it.
I said revolutionary
besides more desruction
Well, then I'm sorry your standards are so high
No one is arguing about innovation
they gained that in newer games
lol exactly
LoL why do gamers get so defensive over a simple discussion
Original games make revolutionary things happen. If you’re expecting older series to become revolutionary Youre waiting a long time
But the game's been innovating for decades
exactly it's just 1 comment i dont get why they're trying to batter down on it
I'm not here to defend cod lmao
I haven't played cod in a decade
Cod has accomplished the ability to make the same game every year and sell more than battlefield tbh
wasnt getting defensive, just stating the facts
and the points
bf4 knocking ghosts too
I have cod but you have to give the game props
Funny how y'all go to attacking cod for some reason
wich is depressing
cod ghosts and its detailed dog models
Not every game can be revolutionary, at that point you fail to have a franchise
based off real life navy seal dogs
Let's not be dumb here, both Ghosts and Infinite Warfare sold way more than BF4 and BF1
yup
No one mentions COD and the BF community still can't help but bring up COD anyway
think you missed the point i was making
It’s the closest competitor
CODMW has the Ground War Conquest copy that I enjoy
I mentioned CoD in response to another point lol
i was pointing out how besides your standards battlefield has made some of the most progress franchise wise and is a good example of how certain game mechanics work
as well as game wise in general
It’s mostly sad because
assuming we get 128 player next game thats crazy
Yeah but why am I being asked about COD when all I'm saying is that BF hasn't done anything truly ground breaking in a long time
Start naming some series that have @twilit fern
there is a difference
jeez doesn't it matter who said what
Don’t worry we will wait
You don't always need groundbreaking, you just need consistent competence
We're not talking about other series here. LoL we're talking about BF
Something Battlefield has been lacking
BF1's level of destruction was pretty ground breaking, there are very few FPS games that have accomplished the same level
Okay so then why criticize BF about it if you can’t name another series that does revolutionary things
the point were making is that your standars are clearly to high and that battlefield has made many revolutionary things you could say
like destruction is a big one
The whole point that we are saying is that no series is just making their next title revolutionary to the last
Levolution was stupid and pointless and I worry that if BF6 takes it to the extreme it's going to be even worse
Battlefield has been lacking Battlefield Bad Company 3
this whole argument stemmed from "battlefield follows trends not set them" comment
this is such a stupid discussion because of that
if any game in the future wants to add desruction they should take a look at how the mechanics for that feature in bf work
Because you were complaining about how BF might be trying to follow the footsteps about warzone
cause i said they didnt
i never understood why people liked it, literally subtracts from gameplay
then he said
who cares
well they havnt done anything revolutionary
They already did @twilit fern with firestorm really
or whatever the word was
Siege of Shanghai is a bad map when the tower goes down
Even tho firestorm was first
agreed
Its good when it's up
I'm not talking about levolution, I'm talking about regular terrain and building destruction
I just don’t want them to try and re compete with warzone
Yep
And my reply was I don't see how you'd expect anything else since BF hasn't been revolutionary in a long time @robust mango
levolution was good
Pretty simple statement
I hate that they toned down destruction from Bad Company 2
in game events basically that changed the layout of the map
If you are going to have it then fucking have it
If you have a revolutionary thing every single game, you fail to have a franchise
i didnt mention cod aw?
And my reply to that is, Name series that have been revolutionary recently
we are assuming it will
i think this discussion is now people disliking something that someone said and going off random tangents
And since you can’t name any, that should tell you something
cod will always outsell but rarely out perform
i think you are miss readig the argument
i think you're reading too much into the argument
Because that's not even a part of the original discussion, which was about your expectation of BF not following trends
Lmao
Long running series arent trying to revolutionize all the time
Battlefield games sell less but have a longer lifespan than COD games
i think your reading to much into fucking smoke grenades
what's this about smoke grenades?
It is completely relevant to your statement then
nothing besides you just spent the past like 15 minutes comkplaining about how they ruin the game
Why are you holding BF to a higher standard than any series ever?
His point is that if very few other games are doing "revolutionary" things, why is it then fair to criticize BF for not always doing it?
yea it seemed that old bf games are pretty good
COD infinite warfare and ww2 kinda got sidelined
@zealous path are we going to be bringing up that shity Battlefield 6 leak on Twitter that sketch or whatever that shit was
but agian its not important so it doesnt really matter
whoa "ruin" is not on the table here
Whats your definition of "revolutionary" anyways? What would a truly revolutionary BF game look like to you? @twilit fern
How's it's relevant? LoL All I said was they I don't see BF not following trends and not be like warzone because they haven't been revolutionary, just like everyone else
I'm not attacking BF, I'm just making a point
"comkplaining" is also not on the table here too man
Lol
Modern Warfare has only gone on this long because Cold War is hated and Warzone keeps the MW client active
you were caomplaining
You could have said “games in general”
This is a certified grug moment
and talking about how it ruined your experience
Because all series of games do this
Yep
but aginan none of this is really relevent to the currect discussion
Warzone was literally just a fortnite response much like Black out was
What are we discussing
i think you're exaggerating here, "caomplaning"
Bunch of BF players getting butt hurt over a small comment lol
hands are cold cant type 
no we just gave you the facts
@proven charm should we bring up that shity Battlefield 6 leak again
and you re made ur comment to
oh god no
Come on
Responding to a point = butthurt? 
it hasnt been revolutionary in a while, when it was, since when has bf been recolutionary
yea i thought this discussion all stemmed from "bf following trends" or something then ppl got all defensive to note everything bf is revolutionary about to defend their game
If you don't want people to respond to your shit, don't post it in a public channel
I just hope BF6 is good. I don't need it to be revolutionary
Fuck it
big difference as there are many points to go over with the second thing i typed
Also I want server renting from day one

Thanks for being sane lol. Idk why that garnered this kinda reaction
https://twitter.com/_Tom_Henderson_/status/1381223507997167616?s=19 here is a shity bf6 leak
Ok, lets start this over. @twilit fern, What would count as "revolutionary"?
they even tried to juxtapose other games even though all you did was mention modern warfare's warzone br gamemode
Whats your definition?
I mentioned it
I actually didn't even mentioned warzone myself, I replied to someone who mentioned warzone
Lol
oh yea something like that
then they started shitting on cod to make bf look better for some reason
Yeah I don't get it
What?
i think both games are good
And of course he's just ignoring me, good discussion bro
Dude you weren’t even reading what is happening
You were talking about smoke grenades for 45 minutes
I've never played warzone, but both series have fallen into the trap of complacency and haven't don't anything new for awhile
Done*
don't think it was 45 mins but ok
The dude literally has been asked what games he finds revolutionary recently but he hasn’t answered
So it’s a useless discussion
does it really matter what is revolutionary
It’s a broken record loop
@queen canopy is this just an argument that is continuously going off track or is leading to something off the topic of Battlefield
its like Issac hasnt even looked into the discussion
When this term is the center of the discussion, an empirical definition of the term is absolutely matters.
Oh no it’s still the topic of BF
hate smoke grenades
Yes, big brain time
What is going on
idk i thought this was chat for battlefield not going around in circles
smoke grenades just say, "hey, i'm over here, come shoot me"
@prime pine Long story short, responding to a point = being butthurt
Blame the other guy then
Ahhhhh
So you going to be staying out this
idk about you guys but i don't want to "dormamu i've come to bargain anymore"
i'm more curious about what you guys think about lack of ribbons in bfv
It's just strange that they want to draw comparisons to other aging series. Like is BF a better game if you were to compare it to the failures of other series? does making it seem like BF sucks less make it a better game? I don't get it
A guy said Battlefield was shitty I believe but when they asked him to know what a revolutionnary game could be, he didn't have any arguments so he just didn't replied lmao
bf4 has tons of ribbons but i feel like they're just rewarding for almost every minute play
I never said it was shitty lmao
Except other series arent failing, that’s why they’re long running
No im gonna have watch this ragon
People are now just making shit up lol
Maybe because you haven't given a standard of revolutionary to compare BF to. Maybe we'd agree with your point if you could provide one?
Lol you're answering to somebody know ? So what is the definition of revolutinnary please ?
You want to wager if something is going to happen
Dice when infinity warfare launched: 
I mean if anyone reads up the chat this guy answered nobody’s question and just continued to do the broken record bit
Look it up in the dictionary
Lol
Yup exactly
You've just said "bf isn't revolutionary"
yea
i want to know about ribbons
LoL and it hasn't been for awhile
We don't mean a dictionary definition. We're asking what a revolutionary game looks like.
Ribbons were removed as they were bugged
Yes as I said it previously, big brain time...
So then what does a revolutionary BF game look like?
in 4?
In 5
Do you think BF has been revolutionary?
Dw ive asked him this 3-4 times he won’t answer because this the part where he says it’s not relevant
In 4 theyre earned after a certain action.
Since you're so eager to defend it
No, I'm just asking what your standards are for "revolutionary"
but was it for the better in general
i thought ribbons were just awarding me for no particular reason even when i'm not trying to strive for it
LoL I merely said don't expect anything new because bf as a series hasn't done anything revolutionary in awhile
People are acting like I shat on the game lol
@prime pine you know this isn't going to end as simply as you think
Thats how ribbons or coins work
BF3 has been at least, maybe BF4 too with levolution engine
most of the time i didn't even know they existed or what the requirements are nor cared enough to do it for them
i didn't care much for the ribbon system in bf4 and i didn't miss them in v, but apparently some people cared for them
Yeah, agreed.
If someone is so determined thinking that they are right they probably won't stop
Each battlefield has had a tried out gimmick. Bf3 pushed the game into new heights with its maps and combat, bf4 pushed for larger scale destruction, bf1 pushed for the whole ww1 setting and bf5 tried with attrition and "unforeseen battles"
Whatever dice tries out next
We have no idea about
I mean, there comes a point in a 20 year franchise where you can only really change so much.
BF6 will just be combating PTSD
It really starts coming down to small refinements
So it has been lol, and two times at least if we don't talk about Bad Company games or Battlefield 2 for example
i love this whole paragraph
monke wise 
The big thing that happened with cod as of recent was their customisation and attempt to jab at battlefield with their maps.
Monke
why tf r u guys still onto this "revolutionary" discussion
it's as if bf is better when it's revolutionary
Yeah and bf3 is a pretty old game, hence I said recently
But you don't have to be revolutionary
Not all the time
Its certainly a big thing but it isn't a requirement
Judging from Henderson’s posts recently, BF6 will have levelution 2.0 with the weather hazards and then also have 64v64 standard battles
You don't have to be, I was using it as a example to say why it's unlikely BF will try to set itself apart by not chasing BR
LoL not as an attack on a series
Exactly, if you have a revolution every single game, you fail to have a franchise
Br is just an alternate game mode based on battlefield
Not old as you describe it and for sure, it's more enjoyable than a lot of nowadays games
Woah, a company following a profitable trend? Shocking!
It would'nt be the standard according to him, 32vs32 is always the standard but 64vs64 will be an option in certains gamemodes
Lmao wtf is this reply. I was replying to someone complaining about BF chasing BR
i mean who cares if bf goes br
Battlefield doesn’t really need to chase BR tbh. There’s already rumors that BF6 is coming to gamepass day 1 since EA plays new releases all go to gamepass, which is going to be a huge huge deal for a BF game of this scale. It’s very beneficial to have access to this game just off gamepass
ppl who don't like br will just not play it
Operations most likely
Clearly the people wanting to find something to nitpick
i mean it could hender the base game itself if they have to focus on making a br at launch as well
Yes I hope, operations gamemode is pretty enjoyable to me
vs making one after laucn like cod
I welcome a battle royale that is being worked under a different studio that isnt dice, obviously with some direction it do itself well.
Remember when cod came out and they didn’t really support the standard multiplayer and all the stuff was pushed into resources for warzone? That’s the only reason why I have a fear
same
Yeah thats a concerning feature. But we may as well wait
yea i guess
maybe pacific update for BFV could've came sooner if they didn't mess with firestorm
but honeslty i don't think one can pinpoint a game's hindrance on the inclusion of a BR mode
I welcome no BR mode lmao, worst video game mode ever to me, useless and it could take so much time to dev that they could put to MP
You know what I've had enough of this whole shity conversation how about this all agree to disagree games that can be revolutionary and be really successful and that some games don't have to be revolutionary to be amazing we all have our own opinions how about we all respect each other's opinions some people think that the game is bad and some people think it's good ok amazing what just end this whole debacle and just agree to disagree
Yup
When they make changes buffs/nerfs around BRs it turns the standard game in a weird direction
Hence why warzone has had recent backlash
yea i agree
this discussion is going no where
I mean for this topic to drop right now it would be a good idea.
yea
I thought this ended minutes ago?
Supposed to be about Battlefield
instead of going around in circles
i'm more curious to know what you guys think about lack of ribbons in bfv
Now we're going to br
We are currently talking about battlefield
Yes really, it's just destroys actual video games
They already have
im ok with it
as long as they dont do what warzone did
and make ther nerfs affect the bsae game
or the buffs
I don’t think it’s been really confirmed that it is making a new BR
It all will be dependent on popularity
Why you can't stick on a certain subject for at least 10 minutes
cause it turns the base gmae to shit
Making the nerfs and buffs the same is just quicker work
We did
And then people told us to stop
So we did
and moved on to know
And then you brought the revolutionary argument up minutes after it ended
praying that if there is a BR it is completely seperate
^ this
Oo its the 15th
you dont have to download the battleroyale
YES PLEASE
That’s the one thing that I’ve been worried about recently
BFV was 90 gigs and that’s understandable
like you have the option to delete one of them
But like, I’m very nervous about the file size
imagine bv but more
I'm sorry maybe when you're typing maybe you need to see what you're pressing you can't really focus on what's happening I don't know
and a battleroyale
I don’t want it to be like 150 gigs
It’s all good no worries, I’m not mad. Just sayin it ended
guifs
I see that
Yeah it’s a lot of space
but if they make the games seperate in terms of downloads
Reminds me when I got an xbox, being amazed how big games were by then as they were 50 gigs.
then i dont care
100 gigs tho would be understandable. Even games like RDR2 were like 100 gigs
We can’t really expect it to be less than BFV
i remember having 200 mb updates thinking 200 is a big number when i was like 7
games are just getting bigger and bigger that's just a fact
Bro look at mw 2019 that bitch takes 225
More graphical fidelity, more audio files etc
r6 with hd texttures is 150gb

You're not wrong there
Hey goopy wanna see the hundy bomb screenshot?
idky they allow you to have eto dwonload 8 fucking multiplayer packs
that are stupid
It should be compressed before release
but cant make warzoen a sperate download
Why the fuck is CoD so bad at keeping their games at a reasonable size
fecking shitters
The updates for MW usually range for 4-8 gigs as well
I don't see the updates anymore I deleted that bitch
Also finally hit a PIAT shot
they probably have so many map fails so they just slide it under the final product
at least Battlefield keeps it simple
so your loading all there shit under the map
yes
simple good
monke like simple
monke how good do simple be
monke
What really needs to be looked at is: not everyone has like 3-4 TBs of space
for now...
Right now SSDs and stuff are more expensive than ever because of shortages
@prime pine do you, da monke like simple
Yes I do
The monke has screenshot
serious?
Flash Storage is super cheap at least where i live
I no have Java no more
F
If you want a good SSD you’re paying a lot
ssd 1 tb is almost $120 usd
thats a lot for people that just want to play games on the occasion
Especially if you want an M.2 Drive you’re paying like 220 for 1 TB
nah i found plenty around 120
Shouldn't be in the technology channel
The Samsung evo?
NVME is like 180 yah
im saying for a genaric decent ssd that isnt meant for people that want to download games at .00002 with the cost of 2 decent ssds that will do the job fine
Like 5 months ago it was more expensive, must be snapping back
where?
here in taiwan m.2 ssds go for less than 100 bucks for 1tb
I will say this tho. It’s sad that currently with all the scalping and stuff going on, it’s actually cheaper to buy a pre built PC which usually is never the case
im thinking about geting that cruxial P2
2 TB of that isnt a bad price
Hello. Maybe sd talk goes to tech?
that one woukld do the job
Not sd. Hardrive.

No its fine. You people got side tracked.
@zealous path this is what was hit earlier
Fg42 does wonders

way i have a question
have you recently been outside
like at all
maby touched some grass
possibly smelt the flowers
The best part is he’s playing BFV. Truly based
i've had similar games using the FG-42 after you suggested it to me. smaller numbers, same ratio. the gun dominates, it's just a shame that there's no extended mag
Yeah thats it biggest weakness
what about the screams of chhildren as you clapped there cheeks
was that fun to listen to

@golden walrus trades in mag for easier recoil management, its beautiful.
Nahhh gotta listen to that avenged sevenfold

diss BFV again, dare you 
oh wait
i'm not in jammies anymore
Is BF6 out yet
I dunno, is it?
For all those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than to Google it for themselves.
i read it wrong, must be a language barrier
Yea
Thanks 

I'm terminally ill pog
i do wish that the FG-42 fired from a closed bolt in single fire, or so i'm told that it does that
It's so fun trying to get some plane kill when there is a lvl 221 with 113 day played max level zero on the other team 🥳
Kek
kek indeed
I'm not that good but I don't know if my controller settings are off or I'm just not able
get into the aa stationaries and blast him
(or fliegerfaust)
or be exotic and drop fire crackers and trick the pilot
you've gotta take him out as infantry to get it to lvl 2
I see you're trying to be an comedian
not really
i haven't watched westie in a while, so i went to his channel to see what he's been doing
and it's just a fucking WALL of Warzone videos
sad
lul
I saw 1 video of him playing PUBG and that was the only thing that wasn't warzone
i know it's his job, but how the fuck do you play a game for that long without losing your mind
especially warzone
i will never understand people who have 100 service stars with guns or are rank 500 in bfv
like are you even a human being
are there even service stars in BFV?
oh yeah
I saw one guy who had like 75 SS with DEBRIS
i've got 2 with cavalry
how is that even possible
Don't understand people playing only one game
Magic
Like ... How...
Again, magic
It's fucking magic
Also I've seen 90 ss with the Kolibri
That guy was a fucking terminator
Yeet
Bipod?
Not an smg or pdw
Well C100 is an exeption
So not everything then
I said like

is it me or battlefield 1 is dead on pc
ive tryed lloading into 2 games of conquests just starts up a new server
Still active lol
There are 1,998 players right now
:/ hmm
what region and mode? if its anything like bfv you might have to use server browser and not matchmaking
for some reason bfv will always put me in an empty server if i do matchmaking
region is where in the world the server is based
mode is the game mode
weird cos conquest and operations are the only 2 modes i can actually get servers on
im na west
then try matching for servers in europe if you dont mind the ping
still rlly weird...
and i went into server browser i foundd like 2 servers for conquest or operations
welp ill just get bfv
wack
servers on xbox are still active ish
EU servers are full btw
stelf
the madlads done it twice
but yes i did have a good game that wasn't fueled by the incompetence of the enemy team
9 of my 10 deaths were to the only good player there, their mvp
when do I get perms to post images here
!!regular
The Regular role is earned by active, positive and resourceful members of the server. Role is earned, not given. With this role you can post/embed images, use some bot commands and change what color you appear in chat.
!!r2
Rule 2: Avoid posting messages outside of designated channels. Read the channel, pins & description before posting. Always respect others in the server. English only!
I can not
no, we cant ban you
Rule 2: Avoid posting messages outside of designated channels. Read the channel, pins & description before posting. Always respect others in the server. English only!
bruh
oh
how to get muted
now we can yes
Mate why are you trying to get banned
what the
having a pissy fit over being told to speak english
maturity 100
grow tf up and grow the front brain
I have a better idea
mute him for funnis
we perm mute him?
nahh lets perm mute him
that would be a lot better
ayyy
There we go
ah he left
sadge
His wish was granted
Lmaoooo
yes
that is a man of sheer will, focus and commitment
i saw him kill three guys with a pencil
uhhh... wrong game?
Mp7 for sure
are bf1 s loading times always so bad
Yes
not bf1s issue
ssd or ram issue on your side
gaymer
his pc proccessing system is slow
Idk, console loading times were hella long for me
makes sense
He’s on console
i load in in just about 20 seconds
Its his power supply 100%, y’all dumb
which platform?
BF1 loading times for me would range from 50 seconds to 90 seconds
And I’m on the first variant Xbox One

so fairly average
Yeah
IDK why but it felt like it loaded faster with better internet. Probably just a placebo effect
idk what yall on about, if you install the game on an SSD you can load into the game faster. on new brand consoles the storage is an SSD so it can be fast as well, on old-gen console loading is slower
What system
Real question is why are you playing BF1
Real question is why you care so much about what other people play
An external drive makes an incredible difference
Real question is why wouldn’t you play BF1?
because he's a bc2 vet
Imagine caring about what other games people are playing
Ah right sorry
Can we coin the term “Battlefield Boomer”?
real question is why would you not play in general?
Ohh just a heads up you’ve got a smudge on your rose tinted glasses there
I don’t care its a question
Anyone who played before or at Bad Company 2
same and i have a pro
Bad game tbh
bf1 is a good game tho im on bf5 but still never stop playing a good game just cuz ppl say so lol
That’s a big claim
Sounds a lot like personal opinion 
The court will now decide your fate
And I don’t even like BF1 that much btw
Indeed glad you could pick that out
regardless we all played it and had fun
If only saying your opinions made them objectively true...
I know this isn’t related but I like your Wizarding World PFP
Imagine
Yeah ok good I wasn’t the only one who noticed that 
He said he likes your PFP














