#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 3546 of 1
A lot of people really don't like the fact that theres no Eastern Front too
The worst part is they priritized fake tom cruise over the eastern front or Normandy
Like me
Tbh bf5 did lacked bit of content
we did get Russian weapons
But
rmn50 mortar
The gave 1940s op metro
Panzerstorm is too open. I mean i know its a vehicle tank map but still yeah it needs a small town somewhere in the middle
How would an elite get in the way of a map
When that is made by an entirely different team
Yeah, those are two completely different teams working on that
yep
I was waiting for d day map
play iwo jima
Same
D-Day map would've been probably mediocre at best
^
Agreed
Like Iwo Jima, pretty solid on BT, and awful on CQ
Would just have been a plane farming mess like iwo jima
Its not a huge loss to me considering that fact
And to be fair, we did get Iwo Jima which is almost as big of a landing
Tru
Iwo jima was a great map

Still i
There was alot of maps they could of done
Not to mention that Provence was the location of Operation Dragoon, which was D-Day's southern cousin
S
Major battles
Tru
And we got a lot of other major battles most games don't touch
Thats what pisses me off
Eh. With games people are always going to say "they could have"
I mean DICE can still make content
When they feel like it
They have all the files ready
I agree. cod ww2 had the opposite problem too many locations that had already been covered. In this game the locations were so unknows no one gave a fuck
DICE is choosing to make content for BF6 though, which is good
BFV's a bit of a sinking ship
Or at least slightly listing to port 
so you've mentioned
Id rather dice focus on the next game
TIL
Tru
ive never had such a good time lol
Agreef
But modern day again
Like why
Its simple
Its what a lot of people want
Lots of creative freedom
Not really people still play bf5
Thats true
...yes, they do. But in terms of PR its been in a sorry state since launch
People still play BF1, but I'd hardly call it alive
They really need to refresh
yeah
People dont play BF4 on PC cause DICE dont support the 7 year old game
And DICE isn't supporting BFV anymore, whats your point?
Becuase its a fucking banger
But i think an early cold war era proxy war would be pretty cool. Korea or nam
Well thats PR not playerbase 🤗
If you have bad PR, you don't have a playerbase
Yeah
Were you asleep for the entire prelaunch marketing for BFV?
It was a trainwreck, for which people STILL have issues
Well its up to players lol
Like me
BF5s PR was bad until abt pacific update
And for a lot of players, they chose not to buy because of that PR.
The trailer for that was pog AF
Its how it works
And that really has affected this game's longetivity
yeah
The pr went to shit when 5.2 came out
I brought bf5
why
You don't represent the entire market
I bought it too
And a lot of people didn't
Weapon balance, engineer
Neither you
He has a point
Neither of us do, good job.
Yeah weapon balance in BF5 seems...a bit crap
Agreed
You only 1 out of million
*is
And so are you, why'd you bring up the point?
It was even worse in 5.2 engineer
Im only saaying that cuz i only play BF4 and the weapon balance there was amazing
How many copies bf5 sold....
Exactly
We don't represent the greater audience as a whole.
There are basically no dumb overpowered guns
And a lot of people chose not to buy because of PR
Remeber the bf1 trailer
yeah
Ppl got so damn hyped
I remember thinking a lot of things about BF4 gun balance
Tbh "amazing" was not one of them
And it destrowed cod infinite warfare
Tons of people bought BF1 because of the great PR
Exactly
Exactoy my point
yeah
Guns were turned into peashooters and made meta Guns even more prevalent
Thats what i like about battlefield tbh gun balance
The trailers are unforgettable
I watch em to this day
"PR isn't playerbase" except when the state of your PR often directly affects the size of your playerbase
yeah didnt the FG-42 do like 8 damage in 5.2
Exactly
PR dont mean much its about money
I dont give a damn about the over use of the Guns but the stg 44 was the only gun worth a damn in 5.2
Wut
uhhh yes it does
What are you even trying to say at this point 
bf4 aek hits dif
But seriously BF1 feels so...'honest' besides the occasional sweats in TDM
Can you please use uh, i dunno, LOGIC?
People still buy it 🤣🤣
Actually, most of slow-shooters were powerful back then, if anything
I guess it feels honest because WW1 and no fancy gadgets
Exactly
bf1 looks good sucks i didnt play it in prime
well its decently well balanced
You wonder why people hate BFV? Go look at the comment section for the BFV reveal trailer and tell me how PR doesn't matter
@solid hinge
Thats the depressing part
They gutted the fuck out of the fg42 in 5.2, it was an assault rifle not an smg. An actual submachine gun like the type 100 had better killing power at a range.
It's still active
And a lot of people don't
Is ur english just bad elias?
Exactly
yesh
Bren, semis not called M1 Carbine or G1-5 and a good couple of other guns actually raked in 5.2... FG has been done dirty tho
bf4 ultra still holds up
uh huh
It does
People still today write BFV off solely because of what they saw in the prelaunch marketing.
you can have johnny cash PR like bf1 did even if game good or bad but money matters
The one thing 5.2 did right was balancing some of the semis out better and making things like the mp40 decent but as a whole it was a really shit update
The only "overpowered" guns in BF4 are arguably the M416 and ACE 23 and still they do have their weaknesses
Exactly its a scar that will never heal
soo no one cares that there's black people and women in BF1?
Yeah
ACE wasn't anywhere near overpowered outside first few months
Good
Its cuz they did it right
You have google check how much units and money made from bf5
If anything, it was upper average for most of game's cycle
People are selective over their outrage mani lmao
not as much as BF1
This game taught me about the Harlem Hellfighters and that was cool
I think BF5 only sold abt 8 mil copies
Thats still a success...but IIRC its mid-tier for the franchise
yeah
Instead of putting women just like that they added women with the russians saying that the women were a part of the womens battalion of death
BF5 wasnt a sucess but it was still good
Most people that haven't played BFV have a negative opinion of the game
Yeah
And no one has a problem with black people
And they use critisms from launch
It seems so. If anything I'd expect the old gamer excuse for playing as a woman "i dont wanna stare at a dude's ass"
And thats entirely due to BFV's marketing
From what I recall, if anything, 1 sales were an aberration (in a positive way), historically
continued support and listening to the consumers is what made BFV successful in the end
except for racist morons
bye
I actually...genuinely enjoy BF1's campaigns
yeah
Usually I wouldn't care about FPS campaigns but this is good
BF1s war stories are good
Only thing that i disliked about bf1 was clunky weapon selection
If you want a fun challenge, abandon the tank after Finch dies in "Through Mud and Blood" and advance on foot
The game lets you do it
To many repeated weapons
They brought back metro
Like maybe something with more range or damage or ammo
oh boy they brought back a solid C-tier map the game is saved
lol
Ww1 didnt make much guns as you see in bf1 most of them have pre builds
pre builds? 
Variants kind of felt like an answer to people being clueless about how attachments should be picked in 4
Sweeper then sweeper with optic then sweeper with foregrip
Yeah
What’s everyone’s fave Conquest maps on BFV?
Variants eh
1 has the best sight/scope customization from all recent BFs easily though
Thats the definition of Variants.
Thats literally the point
How are you not getting this
Oh yeah, I always ran irons on 2x
I don't think its a great system, but its still as intended
Also, aiming reticle variety
So bf6 will have m4 foregrip m4 holosight m4 regular?
No
The only interesting variants were when they actually changed how the gun worked. E.g model 8 extended, full auto m1907, m1903 experimental
BFV didn't
I think itll have attachments
We don't know what BF6 is gonna look like
Which saved me from horror of having to use chevrons and post sights
this too
because WW2 guns rarely had any attachments or anything so specs made more sense
Bf1 did 🤣 DICE rushed that game quick

dice rushed.. bf1?
no they didnt
Like bf5
are you drugged wheeze
He is



Hardline was a fun game
BF1 was probably one of the most polished titles on release this series has had
Bf1 was one of the most stable games in the franchise I have ever played
Even if it was unbalanced as shit
He calls BF1 rushed and can't understand why people don't like BFV...
only problem is how long TSNP took to release
yeah
BFV is the definition of rushed
mhm
but the dlcs were polished af
bf1 isnt rushed
Yeah russian DLC was amazing
Nearly every problem BFV has can be attributed to DICE not having the time they needed
Agreed but weapon selection was rushed they could of had customized gun
No
bf1 remains my favourite bf game to this day
My least fave (but only played three)
Speaking of which BFV barely has attachments
They tried a completely different system, calling that rushed just has no weight.
So having an attachment system would be kinda weird
some thing applies
BUT MUH REFLEX SIGHTS
Well not the ones you know but theres thing called R&D
m...m...muh....muh ACOG....
bf1 is good but i prefer bfv
WUH ABUH MOH HOLO SIGHT
Grug want ACOG in ww1
It would be nice if specs at least had a physical effect on the gun
Grug want
OOG
Grug smash rock
A skeleton stock fg42
Roaaat
Theres old ww1 silencer before ww2
caps
yeah that they literally never used
.......
but did it work?
not well i bet
Whats R&D?
what
Omg

........
See the difference is that they also could have made BF1 an accurate title, where everyone was given just a bolt action rifle, with none of the things that make BF1 what it is. Saying they "could" have done something is near pointless
everyone gangsta till dot dot dot dot dot dot dot dot
Anyways
yeah
I actually enjoyed gun balancing in 1 the most
In big part because it fit my own style the most
WW1 was basically fought with only bolt actions
Yeah they did R&D in ww1
i loved it too
Yes, and that brought us 75% of the guns BF1 has.
Artillery was a big part of it too
And there was no gun that would dab on people almost regardless of range, like it was the case in 3, 4 and V
well i mean for infantry weapons
everyone gets a bolt action and sits in a trench all game
historical accuracy 100
""""""Fun""""""""
I think arty actually caused the most deaths
AKA Verdun
yes
I think the germans took mp18s with them for their raiding parties
i still play iron sight bolties in BFV
I was gonna say verdun
But im not sure
woooo party

yeah but prolly only a few
So wait, Elias, do you think WW1 was fought with a lot of SMGs and Semis?
Americans even took shotguns
Tell me your joking
Yeah, it was part of that late war storm troop doctrine
Yay I found the server
...no
hello

Welcome!
Hello
Tell me in which time period cause pre war was semi auto
Storm troops were basically an evolution of trench raiders
yeah
SMG, sidearm, short melee weapon and a fuckton of grenades
what timeline are you in right now
WW2 was the first war to see semi-autos in widespread use. 98% of the weapons used by standard infantry in WW1 were sidearms or bolt-action rifles
Or melee, most of the time
Semis were invented in like the 1890s i think
But basically weren't used for military purposes
Yeah
Shovel 
And even in WW2 semi-auto was at most a specialist weapon in most of armies other than US
Not in any notable use until WW2
Pumps and bolt actions are cheaper and have greater reliability i think?
Though there were far more SMGs in WW2
Aight i gotta go
See ya
Also, matter of ammo management
I mean WW1, 1914-1918.
The higher rate of fire, the more likely soldiers are to waste ammunition
So that was a factor in some cases too
oh boy wikipedia article
That link means nothing in itself
semis in Great War were VERY sparsely used
And actually more often in the air than on the ground
Still used today
Before they figured out how to make MGs work properly with planes
How maany model changes have tanks had in battlefield games
What do you mean?
?
Wait
literally everything there is bolt action in terms of rifles
So
You kids never use wikipedia?
you just proved our point
Anything besides MGs, bolt actions, and sidearms were VERY sparsely used
You guys know the model big bess was in a war story?
Most of the guns in BF1 hardly saw use
If they even existed at all
(See: Hellriegel)
Could just be an end of war british land crawler
Like i said smg where used lol bolt action you saying people where sniping
Mondragon is a good example
Yes. Yes they were.
Ww1 was chaod
Germans had couple thousand, army tried them, turned out they were trash in combat conditions and binned them
Chaos
Bolt actions were the standard.
And flying corps took them in instead
Thing about battlefield is that its always had the most experimental to discontoninued to unknown weapons
Go watch 1917 and tell me how many SMGs and semis you see @solid hinge
Semi auto dude
Semis weren't used 
F2000 i think for example has been discontinued yet bf4 a game based in the mid 2020's features it
They were experimental at best
Wgen was ww1 dude
Semis were a fraction of a percent of personal arms in WW1
When
1914-1918
1914-1918
Good
2010 - 2056
Selbstlader 1916 was a very expensive gun and so you basically never saw it
There were not Semis in widespread use during WW1
Who manufactured guns
it was something like that
Bf1 has them
I play bf1 all the time
I think that was month, not day
And BF1 is an awful depiction of WW1 as it was
If you're learning WW1 history from BF1...I'm sorry but you're just fooling yourself
Main gun selb gun
I heard Verdun is better
actually, no, I'm talking trash, that was ~400 aircrew lost in a month
it was an absurd amount in 1 day
Bloody April, 1917
Bf1 has good description
yeah whenever i learn about ww1 in history i learn about a royal marine with a hellriegel and howdah pistol
Here's the thing
Maybe its time to shift 60% in school then gaming
BF1 is Great War-based, not Great War-recreating
...idk
Wish i was a troll
I'm off to do shopping
cya
You alright there
I do too...holy fuck. Semi automatics were experimental most of the time in WW1, and when they were used they were mostly used for anti-air purposes. They saw basically no use with standard infantry.
Semis by the time I would assume were still fairly new and expensive
Not to mention that almost every SMG in BF1 basically didn't exist or wasn't adopted
The MP-18 is about the only exception to that
The game would be a lot easier to make if it was just 1 rifle for each faction 😄
they're just there for gameplay reasons
There is
I know, but this mans saying that its an accurate depiction
Theres an infantry variant for the m1903... but thats only in back to basics
When your in war you use anything to win
are you telling that i can't Avante Savoia my way across the battlefield?
bruh
Closest you got is the experimental which may be switched to bolt
Laser beam
I'm honestly just gonna have to move on, I don't get how someone is this stupid
I hate to say it but holy fuck you just do not understand anything about WW1 do you
Still used automatic weapons late in the war
Or about how weapon R&D actually works
In miniscule numbers, and most of the time they were anti-air use.
Basic research would tell you this.
Go watch 1917 and tell me how many Semi-autos you see
Smgs are expensive to produce back then
i still have to fully watch 1917
As were semis
c4 truckers had a movie night where we watched it and my wifi cut out through it
Yeah
I hope bf6 is as fictional and historical unaccurate as flip just so these discussions seize to happen. People using bf1 for their school essays, people mislearning things as facts. Xd
Agreed
Still used in war......
Barely.
You already posted that.
The story is somewhat fictional tbh, since a casualty of 1600 men in an attack was a miracle back then
I have a problem
@solid hinge Go watch Forgotten Weapons' videos on WW1 weapons
argh
I can’t buy guns with war bonds in battlefield 1 and I can’t buy battlepacks with scraps
🏴☠️
its been disabled
It has?
Why i need watch a video when you can research it yourself 🤔
Wait rly?
we need a !!battlepacks tag for zeppelin
There’s a bug lately
!!bf1
The video also counts as research
That people sometimes randomly get like 1000+ battlepacks
Is there like a !!help
Because you're linking an obscure wikipedia list of weapons used in WW1 without actually reading any of the articles
Hold up what?
Wiki isn't research
To see all of the things we can do
Plus theres some guns in bf1 thats made up
So...they removed it completely
Fuck EA
Oh I was wondering if my wifi was bad or something cause I couldn’t buy guns
They removed buying things cuz ppl got free stuff
Also the forgotten weapons dude helped with the research of guns in bf1 if i recall correctly.
No, they just disabled it to fix the problem
The guns aren't made up their what dice thinks they might look like if they had ever been produced
I can't open all these battlepacks I wasn't supposed to get and were given to me through a bug! Fuck EA for not letting me exploit the game!

Like their skins worth anything lol
“NO MAKE THEM SPEND MONEY!”
“B-But sir...we can’t?”
“THEN DELETE IT!”
Well thats what i said some are made up
Just give us all the skins for free ffs
I just need to do a challenge
Christ mate, it ain’t about skins
You stopped supporting this game long ago
Its about sending a message 
Skins don't do anything except look cool
We live in a society
You got google to your finger tips to do research lol
Thats how DICE do research for historical games
I have. I've also taken advanced history classes and know that most of the guns in BF1 were barely used
DICE doesn't use google for their research
I would hope they don't use wikipedia lol
wdym dice clearly use wikipedia for their research
now add acogs and reflex sights
since wiki.p.9ne.dia said its true that ww1 had these
Tactical musket
Don't forget to velcro a rear sight and lazer
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying these guns didnt exist. I'm saying that they basically didn't see use in any notable numbers for most of the guns in BF1. They are only in BF1 because no one who plays BF would want to play a game based on how the war was ACTUALLY fought.
Sometimes you have to sacrifice some historical accuracy to make a fun and enjoyable game
Exactly ^
you mean u
I mean what?
What is this conversation?
I don't even know man
Yes
its elias whos smoking from a bong and speaking to us at the same time

Bf6 could have rail gun that shoots nuclear warheads
Thought I should add that a number of guns in BF1 basically didn't exist either, such as the Hellriegel
Which is why i find it hypocritical of people to say they love bf1 but shit on bfv when they both have their fair share of historical accuracy issues :3
are we still going on about this?
Female soldiers doesn’t make the game more fun
yup @golden walrus
They contribute nothing to the game
It does for me
They don't detract from it either
except a minor immersion loss
Kinda major tbh
Not really, no
Stop lying 🤣🤣🤣
I just cant lol
"I don't want to agree with you or acknowledge that you're right, so I'm going to call you a liar"
why would he lie about that?

Im stating facts not trying to be "right"
Do historyclasses go in depth about details such as which weapons specifically were used and how much?
Like I don’t hate bfv, I’m just disappointed
yeah gecko stop lying
It could have been something awesome
gecko you betta keep it shut before we hear anymore tattle tails
But you're not stating facts, semi-automatic weapons saw very limited use in WW1.
Not in debt, but depending the history class, they do go in depth.
Thats just not a fact.
I love bfv, can't play the old ones anymore after it. But it's the gunplay and movement that does it i think
Gunplay and movement is good indeed
this guy thought similar and identical had the same definition
immersion is many things, could be argued that it increases the immersion for people that want to experience playing a woman
But the game lack atmosphere or not as much as bf1
All because women?
The introduction of guns crate is good, I like that
oh my god, you're so right
People talk about the graphics in bfv, that it's not warlike enough. It's like people think it's not sunny or bright in wars. Spoiler: ||it is||
What's atmosphere when you're a german soldier in a French tank in the middle of amiens where they never fought in?
nah theres so many reasons
yup
That’s one thing, the second thing is the graphics are really saturated
It looks too bright
i haven't seen anyone say bfv is more atmospheric than bf1 so far
would be funny to see
I just said it
Omg
Its almost like the world doesn't automatically grey out when theres a war on 
I think parts of BFV was more atmospheric than parts of BF1 and vice versa
That’s not the problem tho, you can make the battlefield sunny all you want
or.. a german soldier in the pacific islands with a type 2a that was used in very limited amount sliding like a person on a rainy football field
Here's the question. Why would you produce semis which were more expensive at the time when you could just produce a bolt action in big mass.
But where’s the smoke?
Not to mention that the Hellriegel is one of the most widely used weapons in BF1, a gun that, by our knowledge, only exists in three photographs from testing, meaning it likely didn't even work. You think thats an accurate depiction of WW1?
You'd develop semis for later when you find a way to develop one for cheaper and thats about it. They were a larger part of ww2 as they were more well understood.
Alongside automatics
Some people feel gain a larger sense of atmosphere from realism while for others it might be music, explosions, amount of players, carnage, dialogue etc. etc.
Where’s places that got bombed into oblivion?
Yeah, so your argument is that they're both as atmospheric. Not one is better than the other and that's my point.
shits more common in the game than the Lee Enfield
Literally Devastation 
but thats not my argument
Imagine if they made bfv without semis tho. Would it sell enough? There has to be a balance. Battlefield is not a war LARP thing. Its not even a milsim. It's arcade
bf1 is by far more atmospheric on operations with no hud
Ehhh, just as a game it'd be annoying to not feature semis
As your previous game had them
BF1's main selling point is immersion
Ww2 was known for semi automatic and automatic weaponry rise though
fort de vaux for one is very damned atmospheric since there's no vehicles
Which was the annoyance with medic because they lost semis and gained submachine guns
But eh
Which I can't give it enough credit for considering all the historical stuff. Its so easy to overlook because it feels real
Ww1 was all about bolties. Automatic gujs were mostly just used stationary
Hello everyone
Which unfortunately leads to cases of people like Mr. Money over here.
i guess i get a heavy sense of atmosphere from realism, hence my statement about the minor immersion loss influenced by the addition of women to the game, it's subjective
If you want to include women in your game, do it like bf1
You said automatic guns never existed in ww1
I given you wikipedia that has sources on it
At no point did I say that. I've said that most of the guns in BF1 barely existed IRL, with the only exception for SMGs being the MP-18.
And you read through each and every one of those articles, yes?
I don't play strategic a lot, but out of all the tactical maps in bfv, the ones that remind me the most about my war experience are arras, marita and mercury. Especially the dense building areas
Well yeah i said some guns where made up some where used
*were
"Some"
DICE made up some
Made up?
yes, with a little historical accuracy. in the russian revolution, everyone took arms, including the women
Which ones

Gas grenade is somewhat fictional so...
All of the guns in BF1 have some historical record. The thing is, those historical records, most of the time, are restricted to experimental technology
better than a gas mortar
They’re just lazy to change the player models
I don't think it would be very fun to haul around giant canisters of mustard gas
I can literally look up the guns to confirm their existence
don't say it
stationary weapon
you said it

I said about this earlier
Every single gun in bf1 was at least made from a prototype in ww1
Non of them are technically made up
Exactly
Just a recreation of what they might have been
But the thing is, most of them never made it past the prototype stage
Or were developed too late in the war to see widespread use
Imagine of the americans had the tommy gun
See: RSC M1917, Farquhar-Hill
Kinda like how they are (allegedly) gonna incorporate future guns in bf6 which are under development now. It's fine imo
so in some ways just bringing life back to the person who designed the firearms and said persons creation
the tommy gun is in the game btw
I know
and annhilator
Literally the m1919 is just the first ever Thompson
Yep
But in the actual ww1 it was still a prototype
Broke: hating bfv for historical inaccuracies
Woke: hating bfv because it divided the fanbase
is anyone else having the issue where the progress for the operation campaign is not being recorded or saved?
All the guns you get for preordering bfv don't count
why not 
Because their supposed to be from ww2
Bfv was a rushed game anyway
Or before
per order weapon lives matter
Hope they make a better ww2 game in the future
fedorov degtyarev op
I wish I ordered bfv
BF6 will either pull everyone down into the same shithole and bring us together again negatively or it will gorilla glue the fanbase together positively
Great now you did research
Because I really want to try the m1922
its very cheap to get a code for it
Really?
...or were too unreliable in the field to be used by infy (Mondragon)
Bruh I've been trying to say this to you the entire time
I haven't just done research just now, I've been trying to tell you this the whole time 
I'm so tired
The future of this franchise is the same as the Arditi’s motto: “o la vittoria, o tutti accoppati “
We either win, all we all die
Imagine having having less or the same amount of bullets as a revolver, this post was made my SMLE mkIII gang
exactly
That's kinda how war works ngl
I don't think its that simple
Sometimes the victory can be just as bad a defeat
BFV is widely looked at as a failure, when in reality it did decently well financially and is the most populated game in the franchise right now
they should completely reinvent Battlefield if it is to be successful
And frankly takes a lot of steps in the right direction IMO
Oh I thought it was being said in the real sense nvm lmao
A 98% casualty rate VICTORY
If bfv launched in its current state it would be OK imo. And then follow up with more content and support
That’s the same for every battlefield games when they’re the newest in their franchise
It wasn't for BF1
Not by my experience
BF1 was struggling long before BFV came out
it has to be so jam packed full of content within the first 2 years or it will flop
populated cus its the newest
bf1 had it the same
Yeah...sounds like you just have high standards my guy
See?
who? me? yes
All bf games launch kinda doo doo
bad launch =/= bad game
Twee is the most based man in this discord server
Based Twee
bad launch doesn't mean bad game, look at BFV, it's a decent game with a very rough launch
I mesn
based twee
based
thats what =/= means
Its like fucking up a handshake but your performance slowly increases, no matter how high up you got. Your boss will remember you for the handshake.
*whether
≠
the =/= basically meaning not equal to
Weather whether
≠ gang
3head moment
How
Don't do dis to us
this symbol yes, i've just never seen it written as =/=
≠
ezpz
No you werent
≠
...yes I was.
≠
Just give it a break
Oh my god
troll
I dont wanna scroll all the way up
Well thats not my problem
The convo was going nowhere and youre bringing it back up for reasons I cannot understand. Just, stop.
≠
elias please stop
All im saying in ww1 they where smg used in mid to late war and semi autos
you're invalidating yourself more and more
I believe the RSC 1917 saw some use?
every word you say makes you less credible
not a substantial amount, just more than other semi auto rifles*
Not trying to be "right" but state facts
Last warning. STOP
RSC 1917 and the MP-18 are the few exceptions when it comes to semiautos and SMGs respectively, and even they didn't see huge use
Id reccomend you to as well gecko. Just put it behind us.
Everything else pretty much didn't make it past the experimental phase besides bolt actions and heavy MGs
I wish bfv has codex entries
Its still used....thou
Reading them is a blast
I just gave you wikipedia
Ignore him
yes they were used but they weren't nearly as widespread as bolt actions
some of the weapons never even saw combat
oh god please no 
Tea. Stop.
You meet bullet to the face
sure
Say that to the people I've impaled Elias.

It works sometimes it doesn't
i didn't see it, i'm sorry 
All fine
I love bayoneting people with the Scar

Honkidy honk
Well depends on which cause in bf1 theres some that where used some never bothered
For fuck
Like in ww2 they had experimental nvg
i just said that but it's finished, we're moving on
Uh oh
holy fuck ELIAS
!!ban @solid hinge stfu
Night vision goggles
Rip my man
may thou moderators repost this sentence
i want attachments for my repair tool
A scope would be nice
40x scope on the repair tool
please
Bayonet too
Flaming repair tool
Hollow point repair tool
Bf5 should of had night vision scope
@golden walrus repair tool attachments when?
Literally the M3 Carbine
that gun is dumb
It is
High Explosive Anti Tank Repair Tool
tagged dice, we should get it in the next title
when we getting the 🅱️ESH Repair tool though
Repair Tool Trench
Repair Tool Sweeper
Repair Tool Storm
Repair Tool Experimental
sabot repair tool
what if i need a Repair Tool for my Repair Tool?
Repair Tool Marksman
what is the best bf for u ?
Personally I prefer BFV
Repair tool plane
Brrrr
bf heroes
BOOM
Battlefield Vietnam from 2004 was the best Battlefield because it was the Battlefield I had the most fun in probably.
Actually talk of repair tool... nahh
whats better buying: 1.Bf3 and Bf5 or 2.Any call of duty game
You do know heroes was made before fortnite right
Get bf5 for now
The multiplayer may be bs but at least the matchmaking isn't rigged just cause you're a good player lmao
i will buy it when i have money
who want play bf5 now ?
not as much as fallout 76
Nah, get V. Its a solid game and a good amount of content for the pricetag.
just buy the game when it’s cheap
only content you're going to get is constantly getting killed by people using the same meta guns
buy on instant gaming
it’s not bad if it’s cheap
Wait for sale
Metas aren't nearly as pronounced as things like BF1.
buy at 60$ its a good price
most weapons are viable in bf1
Or...you're gonna tell me the StG is meta
Ah yes, SMG 08/18 and Annihilator Trench
That why everyones using the Hellriegel and the SMG 08/18?
what is the best weapon for doc in bf5 pliz
type 100 is good though
Type 100 is eh
Type 100 is pretty good yeah
Theres no definite best weapon but I can advise some really good weapons for the class
honestly, the “meta” weapons for bf1 aren’t really the meta. in bf1 it feels like I can use whatever I want and do good
Im more versed in support soo I can give a better opinion there
this
You can do the same in bf5
you can actually counter the metas in bf1
it will be easier to list the guns not “meta” in bf1 than list the ones that are
I can run around with an mp40 and get an easy 50 to 60 kills with it, but I usually choose the fg42 which is my child.
Ehh, after returning to BF1 recently, its really stupid to me how some weapons are just universally better than others in every way
no
The hellriegel for example is just stupidly more accurate than just about every other SMG
But the Ribey only has 25 rounds, Hellriegel has over twice that and a faster rate of fire
zh and krag are universally better than most other snipers
Ribeyrolles can also beam people across the map
either way thats about 3 viable SMGs total. In BFV, you can realistically do well with just about any SMG
mp18 is viable
Automatico is viable
I've nearly dropped 100 kills with the Type 100 in one match
rsc smg is viable if you know how to use it
The only ones that will give you the most trouble is the sten and mp40 in bf5 but asides from that theyre not too had
Bad
Thats not how Meta works
The only bad guns in bf5 just involve the mp40, sten, and type 97 mg really
Meta often refers to the top
The MP-40 and Sten aren't even that bad though
yes, and I’m saying you can be top with most of them
Yo quick question, I have BF1, should I get BFV?
From what I've heard, Meta refers to "Most Effective Tactic Available"
Give it a shot, especially if you can find it on discount
Which one do you think is more fun and immersive when it comes to mutliplayer?
While its easy to say this small group is meta, really theyre the best choices for what they do.
Bf5 is more fun
Less bs
BF1 nails atmosphere and immersion, but BFV has much better (and faster) gunplay
Almost all of the medic rifles are very good
Alright, is BFV's FPS better than BF1?
The fg42 and bar for support are meta yet they don't completely crush everything else
Or same FPS
Alr
Imo no but its preference
I prefer WW2 games so I think I'd enjoy BFV a lot more
Be prepared though, you die (and kill) much faster in BFV than in BF1.
in what world
Do they have a sten?
Yep
Guns reward control
Its the default medic SMG as well
So you can beam people with them when you learn to control
Have you even played BFV?
Its lightning fast compared to BF1
Also note the higher power creep
I'm playing it right now
Cause you know. Guns go as high as 670 to 720 rpm
it really doesn't
Yeah, the only gun that looks like a beamer in bf1 is the automatico. There are others but less used
Having played both BF1 and BFV recently, I can definitively say BFV's is much faster
It was even faster at launch but they slowed it down
They pretty much slightly slowed it
Most ARs/SMGs/Semiauto weapons are 3-5 BTK at close range in BFV
ar's are a 4btk and smgs are a 5btk (most of them)
3btk for smgs would only go to the greaser
yeah thats true
all of them are somewhere near 3 btk
then theres the zh and 1906
the 2 single most balanced, fair and fun weapons in bfv /s
The chauchat is pretty fun too
its amazing
Thing is actually pretty well balanced but thats just me saying
i only use hard hitters in bfv
shame the tripoli mag skins are broken for chauchat :<
uhu 😭
but its got literal physics on it for some reason
i have to resort to using the default mag skin
yup, but ill watch it again
Oh shit sorry





