#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 3478 of 1
When you get off a good Battlefield 4 rush sesh and realize that's the first time you enjoyed yourself after many months of Warzone
Sheeesh
Yeah
I have a good specialisations set up for it aswell do you want it
is it 4x explosive cannons by any chance? 
Probably i dont know what it is but i know its good
Great news dude! Have fun trying out new stuff 
6x machine guns > 4x explosive cannons
idk i got more kills with the machine guns than the explosive cannons
The explosive mgs are easier to use on infantry
But
More guns makes it easier to defend yourself
i found the machine guns easier on infantry tbh
id usually do 90 damage with the explosive cannons
I miss it when the zeros fire rate was untouched with the 4x to 6x guns
They just tore planes to shrede
But hey, the corsair at least is untouched
i prefer vehicles in bf5
except when i first started playing
i was a nasty sniper
mmgs are also fun
planes 4eva 
that’s fresh
i stole the enemy little bird in a game of rush once
was the greatest time of my life
i think with ea play you get the vehicle bundle
o wait u on pc doe
dont they still have it? idk
Idk what you talking abt
But i like to grind from zero so
Apart from jets and helos
Oh btw i got a 25 killstreak that match
Idk how
EA Play (formally EA Access) or Origin Access
I dont have that
ahhhh gotcha
Who here thinks that all the YouTubers already played BF6
No they haven't
they havent
Which youtubers your talking about
Ahhh ur right, Just jackfrags then
Gotta be Inugami Korone, clearly.
NDA contract type beat
is the game in alpha yet?
No bruh
waiting for BF6 open beta 
Hi
it’s only 4-6 months away
Open beta be like half a year away
It do be comin doe
beta will probably be in august
august/sep
Isnt the open beta usually just 1 month before release?
ima go check bf5 open beta
reveal will be anywhere between April and June
end of august/start of september
If it hasn’t been revealed by July I’ll be surprised
April-May is the range
Didn’t EA say that BF6 was releasing holiday 2021?
I’m expecting a May reveal
Might be earlier
Cause they already have the reveal trailer done
I’d like an April reveal but still here’s hoping
Reveal in April and Release in September
So then they’d have to reveal it in the spring

based on previous releases, probably around mid-late October
I wouldn’t mind another November release
all I can guarantee is that this will overshadow cod
or november like bf5..
rumoured reveal for late march
I’d say teaser late march
most games released in October
reveal early april
Hoping they'll delay it till march
probably bordering it
why
So they can iron it out
So it can be polished as much as possible
I can understand why but still
I mean
Although a Korean War CoD sounds good, they could just shoehorn it in with Cold War since that was kind of one of the proxy conflicts of it
they were given an entire extra year
The open beta might help
BF6 is gonna have all eyes upon it
From that point they can figure if they need to polish it more
all I hope is that it won't be available on older consoles...
why?
it will but it won’t be developed by DICE
That would be financial suicide
I think they’ll have dedicated servers for next gen consoles
Itll be stupid
are we going to have to explain this again?
So stupid
this was confirmed
i dont want it to be live service aaaaaaaa
it will be available on last gen consoles
I don’t wanna have to explain it
S x
sex
Xbox sex 

Noooo
Why would they tho, could they even downscale the game for older consoles? Especially with the scale etc they are hyping.
but dice isnt developing the PS4 and Xbox 1 versions
neither
Listen as long as the launch is silky smooth unlike cyberpunk I’m gonna be happy
Inhibit the higher player cap and keep 32v32 on old gen
I'm not quite up to date. Do you have a source?
im definitely gonna get a next gen console for BF6
Yeah but current gen can already handle 100 player combat @prime pine
Theyll advertise the new bf on special next gen consoles too I bet
I don’t have the link give me some time to look for it
like the battlefield 1 edition xbox? @prime pine
Yeah. It's not just player count, but other tech that they'll probably implement into 6.
Bf4 and bf5s player counts are the same but actual game is much different
or battlefield 5
Yeah exactly final
that’d be mint
Thats one thing they they could do to downscale it, but there is also more things they can do to increasse performance, that i think might be hard to do depending on how the game is in the first place.
last gen can handle higher player counts
Because people are still looking for next gen consoles as it literally just started
I don’t see why we can’t just increase it from 64 to 88 players
44vs44 would be nice
We dont know how big the final count will be
40v40 would even be good
Thanks. Just tag me pls, I'm off for the next few hours
40 to 40 or 50 to 50
Yeah but the community is dead set for 128 player games
didnt MW do ground war with 50v50?
We still don't know
that ran well on my xbox one s
I thought it was 32v32
My biggest issue is that if they go big, are they doing it for the sake of being big or do they actually want to make it bigger
Yeah, but Ground War also doesn't have the complicated tech that Battlefield games use.
Theyre different games
if they downscale the game, graphics, destruction and player count will probably be the ones to lose out
ground war maps are smaller compared to battlefield anyway
also much less open
Well time to get some kolibri kills
ground war maps have lots of buildings and barricades and such while BF maps are much more open for vehicles
90%, minimum, of battlefields player base will still be playing previous generation consoles by the release of battlefield 6. by not having the game release on previous generations with the same promises as the next generation editions would be ‘financial suicide’ as @finite gull kindly put it; even more so of a financial suicide if they don’t have cross generation play.
you can literally get juggernaut by camping with a thermal scope and the AX-50
I am on 640 kills rn
bruh
Would be nice if I could get 700 kills today
yea
even if more BF6 players move to next gen
EA isn’t gonna lose their chance at making money
I’d say Battlefield 7 would be more stable enough for a next gen release
thats like what
3 years away?
4?
idk
The new battlefield being released on old gen would lead to designers having to care how it functions on there, with it's probably reduced playercounts, inferior graphics, etc etc.
This would lead to the new version not being top priority above all else, thus it would be dumbed down.
In regards to how to use the new consoles, I think upping player counts is always more important than graphics or physics or even map size. Many battlefield 4 maps feel relatively empty at 32v32
I can see that. But I can also see DICE trying to put all their chips in a next gen exclusive game to take advantage of the tech in PS5 and XBSeX.
Both, supporting a game on last gen and new gen, have pro's and con's
Yea golmud is so empty as infantry
Yeah Golmud sucks as infantry
Supporting both platforms brings you a bit more money from the start
Because at this point, PS4 and XBOne will be holding it back.
I would say downscale map size for last gen as well I guess
But supporting a game on new gen helps in the long run
I reckon like bf4 it'll be the last game for last gen @eager shore
Also I feel battlefield 3 had generally better maps than bf4, as bf3 had sectors of the map that were where infantry went, and other sectors where vehicles dominated, battlefield 4 has a lot of maps that are totally open and it leads to being infantry just feeling like ur a chump
I’m assuming new gen servers won’t be as full
yes
Actually we had hardline
Dawnbreaker was great for
well, there is an extremely simple solution to new gen servers, cross platform play like CoD
Infantry n Vehicles
But dice didn't make hardline
Hardline maps were sick though
and if battlefield 6 is not cross plat that's a huge issue
they helped
Yeah hardline maps were dope
Hardline was good
Criterion made hardline?
Visceral
Visceral
Idk
Hardline in general was going the right way I think
Ahhh ok
It had some really interesting maps
hardline maps were swag
But if we had 64 v 64 then we could have lots of vehicles, lots of infantry ,and maybe make vehicles more powerful
Bank job
and had good graphics
i liked the night railway map
Grow house,
I’m kinda split about criterion joining the BF6 development team
like if it's 64v64 we could keep vehicle #s the same, but buff them so you actually want to use them
I’m not really bothered about it
because on one hand I want a new battlefield
cuz rn in battlefield 4 a lot of vehicles str8 up suck like the transport heli
im not too big on NFS
but on the other hand it’s gonna delay NFS
64 vs 64 sounds pretty cool, but my worry is if the network performance would be any good. Also if the maps suit it aswell.
Transport heli is good, just often ditched lmao
no one cares about NFS
I’m big on both of those
maybe thats just me but
shut
im assuming battlefield is a bigger IP than NFS
transport helos miniguns can shred fighters or attack jets
its true tho
I fucking hate ppl that use Jets or Helis just to get from a to b
And then intentionally crash the vehicle
while you're inside
Battlefield: Need for battle 
it’s really sad that I have more kills with the transport helis than any other vehicle
LOL
the developers needn’t change much at all for the previous generation. we have seen that previous generation can handle prestigious graphics, for a large scale multiplayer shooter, as so clearly represented by battlefield v. the game runs well. i just can’t see how it would be such a difficult task to increase the in-match player count for last generation consoles with the correct optimisation at hand. of course next generation will have superior graphics, but that could and should be the only difference.
I just kolibri’d a 150 and he left the game
needn't..
gg
let’s have a new game mode for BF6 where everyone Is zooming around in super cars shooting at each other
destruction too @golden walrus
@golden walrus nah next gen would more easily handle stupid player counts like 64 v64 or even 128 v 128
I mean I won’t to blow up skyscrapers next gen
want*
its 3 am
my english is dying
fact is battlefield has only really regressed since bf4
to be fair they aren’t familiar with the PS5
reduce the graphical quality of destruction and you have a smooth game for last generation
You do have to consider network performance.
BF4 had the problem where dice didn’t know how to work with the PS4
I'd say BF has made significant progress in a number of ways since BF4
there has been no new technical aspect or gameplay aspect in bf1 or bfv, combined with horrendous marketing for bfv, and overall ww1 -> ww2 is a horrible idea esp when ur ww1 game more looks like ww2 cuz you refused to make bolt actions popular
Yes it has
yes, it would easily handle higher player counts. that’s not what i’m saying. i’m saying the previous generation can also handle higher player counts as so clearly shown in modern warfare’s warzone
warzone is decentralized
yea
I've actually been playing a fair amount of BF1 recently
so like you aren't getting player 63's packets 2km north of u
And all its doing is making me realize how much better BFV is 
also fighting in Warzone is much smaller
so in reality warzone is actually a game where at best u run into maybe 30 guys
and the server doesn't need to send you the other 70
this entirely depends on the scale of the maps that the developers create
but in WZ there is rumble mode
if everyone dropped into the same spot in warzone, base ps4/xbox one would get sub 20 fps
BF5 has some better sides but overall i would say bf1 is the better battlefield game out of those too
basically a massive tdm with 100 players
I think bf6 being rush as main mode rather than conquest would be cool
every other factor is a complete goldmine for bf1
100p TDM?
Have been realizing what a mistake conquest was in bf4
yes
Don't get me wrong, BF1 isn't a bad game, but my god is the gameplay awful sometimes
no doubt. with the added player count, map size would have to be increased. double the player count, double the map size.
idk i enjoy it alot
it worked fine on my PS4
I see. Things like how the weapons work etc... in bf5 is superior imo
Playing more BF1 has made me realize just how much better BFV's gunplay is personally. Not to say the BFV's is perfect, but its SUCH a step in the right direction
plus casual players dont really pay attention to the bad sides and instead look at the hundreds upon hundreds of good things bf1 did
before I learned about RBD I didn’t know why my shots weren’t hitting
At times bf5 recoil etc is borderline too much but i am overall happy with it ngl
It gives more life to the weapons basicaly
And thats not to mention all the other little QoL things that BFV has over BF1, like being able to throw back grenades or squad revive are both pretty major things that I'm so used to having.
meh those are a given for the newest game in the series
I kinda want standard issue weapons back from BF4
Oh and being able to manually lean or lay down on your back
Oh ya those are pretty decent, ngl i kind of miss the revive tool tho.
its like calling bf1 dead because bf5 isnt
Ah laying on your back really reminded me of r6 lul
dont add PLD javelins in BF6 ty
I'm not bashing BF1 for not having it, I'm just saying BFV made some major improvements in those areas
btw another cool thing in bf5 is alot of items have collision vs bullets, say like grenades.
@queen canopy being able to nit pick your options and improve your aim
Is a big one too
oh yeah im not denying it
Is bf4 dead?
I hated bf1 guns
So is it worth getting
Been playing bf4 this weekend
yes
hmmm
Absolutely
Torn between bf1 and bf4
There is soo much sandbox in bf5 than ever before imo. you can even spawn without weapons as an example, doubt it would be used alot but the fact that its there is amazing.
im having a ton of issues with bfv and its specialization system rn and its really annoying me
@golden walrus nah I think, map size does not increase at the same rate of player count, otherwise increasing player count makes no sense anyways
ofc ideal map size is probably a relation where map size is dependent on playercount
but i dont think it's n=n
it's prob n = 2/3 * n or something, not sure what they use to quantify it
but yeah
map size increases at a fraction of player count increase
Honestly it depends on the map
in any game
Thats the big complaint I had though, BF1 guns are just impossible to control sometimes. With BFV, if I have an SMG or something and I get into a fight at like medium range, I'm at a disadvantage but I at least can still land shots. With BF1 though, I felt like a lot of the time getting into a fight at like 30m I just had to sit there and let the guy kill me because recoil was near impossible to control, especially if they "suppress" me
yes
A map like Silk Road might use more
Silk Road 64v64 would be so dope
Random bullet deviation cough
Metro is way better than locker
hyup.
The disease of bf1
Both are bad maps.
😔
Metro 64v64 would be hilarious
Agreed
Oof
the embodiment of chaos
RBD was in most bf games yet bf1 is hated on for it
Even more smoke?
in general bf3 maps are better than bf4
esp base bf4 maps suck
1 rpg shot = 20 kills
Base bf 4 maps were okay
also a big problem with bf4 is AA guns can sit outside of the map for enemy team
agreed. i over exaggerated. i would suggest a 50% map size increase for a 100% player count increase.
which like
Yes lol
destroys the game
Firing into smoke
AA gun is way too good
and if they sit outside map u cant do anything to them
that's not really the problem
AA is annoying
BF5 AA would like to know your location
I think its because it was most apparent in BF1. I've played a fair amount of BF4 for example, which IIRC has it as well, but didn't feel completely useless at 30m
AA is generally too good anyways
the problem is that you can't really get away from them
Buff
like
look at Zavod 311 for example
The AA's just sit in their spawn, overlooking the entire map
also i feel as a response to the 32v32 modes the vehicles in bf4 kinda suck
You literally can't fly
Imagine being able to fly a helicopter on Silk Road
like a tank should take 4 guys to take down, minimum
🤣
Any tank can kill you from anywhere there
but it feels like in bf4 u kinda just commit suicide if you don't play uber defensively in vehicles
Overall, even with BF4, I felt like there were far fewer deaths that were actually the result of my opponent outperforming me as opposed to me being unable to do anything.
You shoot at the heli once, flies back to base, AA covers them
The carbine damage module sucks and y’all can’t change my mind
one word: ace 52 cqb
The amount of times I died to bf4 environmental damage 😔
carbines generally too good in bf4 yeah
for the brief time that i played bf4 i did not like playing against heli’s 
@golden walrus then just take the AA and sit outside the map
At range carbines are trash
But let’s all agree on one thing
nothing the helis can do about it at all
UCAV is amazing
Even at medium
😎
Fuck ucav
theyre not meant for mid range
Irl they are tho
Spotted someone who doesn’t have UCAV
Which is why the damage module sucks ass
😳
irl isnt battlefield
But honestly
Battlefield should make an attempt to be realistic
Yes
Hell nah
I’m only using mostly UCAV today
For all my kills
In the weapons department I mean
Realistic games suck bro go play Insurgency Sandstorm or Arma for an example
And 50 explosive kills
I’m referring to the weapon mechanics
trust me you do not want to play a "realistic" game with 128v128 random console teammates with no mics
Yeah
i hear that
alright numero 1 shooting full auto irl is easier than in battlefield
They shouldn’t have carbines dropping off at 15 meters
Battlefield is more or less a casual game
numero 2 shotguns would be incredibly busted if it were realistic
Battlefield is very much a casual game
numero 3, snipers would suck compared to scoped ARs
Yeah
trust me u do not want realistic firearms in games
Oh damn made me remember
u do not know what you are saying
wtf we just won 1 - 0 in conquest pacific storm ahahahaha
Why is sniping so easy in bf v?
I’m basically talking about carbines specifically, the damage module sucks and they should be more like ARs
When you both run out of ammo in mag
In bf 4
And run around each other spamming F
🤣
Until the animation actually works
I love how that gif is of WW2, but it got put with BF1 since thats the only major "World War" game that was out at the time lol
lol
ok fr tho going from ww1 (with really what are ww2 style weapons) straight to ww2, was such a dumb fucking idea
proof?
It fucking better not be
Yeah lol
Nah its not lol
Bf 6 emotes
Proof?
Doing that floss on the campers
I was obviously joking
There is literally close to no info regarding bf 6
It’s wack
The M2 slam is like a kind of mine
And half the carbines
I do love leaving 3 anti tank mines on a road which only lets you go through a specific spot
And then at some random time in the round
Getting 4 free kills
I’m just running and suddenly I’m being flushed with points
at mines in bf4 are wack
Because low and behold, it doesn’t make sense when the SAME caliber, fired from a barrel only SLIGHTLY shorter barrel, has damage drop off at like 15 meters when the other has drop off at way longer
IRNV in tanks can detect them
@gleaming beacon yeah but then every gun would be the same
cuz they're all in 5.56, 5.45, 7.62x39, 7.62x51,
pretty much
and all of them have 16" to 24" barrels
and the benefits of an 8" barrel over 16" in battlefield are really not a thing
Its more for balance I think
yeah exactly
tarkov has some serious benefits to short barreled rifles
like if u go in dorms on customs with an 8" barrel it snags less
If BF was all about realism, you wouldn't be able to survive a headshot from anything
trust me bro u dont want ur 24" barrel to snag on a wall in battlefield
it'd suck lol
Or in BFV for example, you wouldn't need to shoot someone multiple times with an M1 Garand because they'd be dead after the first shot to the chest
If battlefield was about realism i probably wouldn't play it 
you could shoot a guy 20 times in the chest and he'd take no damage
fair enough
if he has lvl 3a plates
i mean he'd be hurting but not like, dying
and then you'd basically end up targeting legs
with the calibers that suck at AP
like Tarkov
trust me u dont want realistic guns in battlefield, tarkov has them, go try that
It does have its realistic sides but they keep it still arcade like in some aspects imo. Bf5 i consider being the most realistic like game yet. The only main problem i have with bf5 is the ttk.
I had to repair my lav twice once when someone had placed at mines

At some flag
indeed
I find bfv rly fun now lol since Ive started using the lewis gun
Things like vehicle animations and soo on i consider realistic like. Wish they excluded those exit vehicle animations, those are pushing it to much imo.
Its pretty decent
its op lol
So its Hngra now 
insta death machine
lul
hm
It’s cool that you and I seem to know about firearms, and basically what I think needs to change in bf6 is pretty much just integrating the carbines and ARs since the difference from 20 to 14.5 really isn’t that much
In the range of average engagement anyways
Famas go brrt
Use the L85A2 instead
@gleaming beacon so basically there are different ranges that a firearm will pen armor, and different ranges that it will reliably fragment in a human body
For instance M4 with m855 will not reliably fragment past 100m, so it's pretty possible to just poke a hole at 100m or farther with a 14.5 in barrel
Where as if you had that 20" og M16 barrel you get an extra 100m of reliable fragmentation or so
Armor piercing ammunition also leads to generally less reliable fragmentation in the body, and ammo that reliably fragments in the body, will not pen as well
Famas is actually good though
Funnily enough if you are wearing body armor, then the m855 or m855a1 ammo is more likely to fragment into your body, because it will tend to spall as it goes through the armor, but if you werent wearing armor it'd be a straight hole
Yes but the range of average engagement in game are not at that distance, which is why they should make it a much slighter difference
The goal of modern ammunition is either to pen, or break up in the body and hit as many organs as possible
Yep
aek is much better and easier to get
so yeah, 14.5" and 20", in a game, aren't a big diff
Yeah
or scar h for chonky bullets and high dmg
Fair
tbh I think they should str8 up remove carbines
Famas is something you need to surely kill one person
carbines let any class be decent in every circumstance
Yes
Just make them slightly less ranged ARs
the medic should just be a mid range god, engi close range, etc etc
just give all carbine class weapons to the medic
and give DMRs to everyone
but im not sure if players would like that
even tho it'd make classes more important
Pdws would be nice as all kit
yup
But idc
pdws are quite good
cuz if u meet a vehicle as medic ur fucked
Yeah
apart from the p90 or something
It gets pretty annoying sometimes
Plop a smoke grenade
and this leads to playing a vehicle being annoying
You play as medic and you encounter a vehicle and youre fucked regardless
and I think engis being allowed to have carbines was a big mistake
it makes medic not matter as much
anyone tell me a good shotgun and sniper to use in bf1
Also I cannot explain my rage sometimes after getting shredded by an attack heli on shanghai 30 times in a row
But sorta same with vehicles because you're the biggest threat
Infantry to vehicles balance has always been iffy, vehicles are meant to be powerful versus infantry, you have to run
shotgun: model 10a hunter
sniper: gewehr 98 sniper
Vehicles are worth a lot
You take them out, that's a massive piece of fire power gone
Perhaps it is just Hngra
Not really tbh
A5 is underrated
my hero my legend always there when i need assistance
an LAV can easily die from 2-3 engis
XD
and since 80% of all players are engis
If you take out a plane harassing your team, your team has breathing room
If you take out a tank at a crucial point your team have increased chances to win over it
LAVs can die from 1 skilled engie
Unless said plane is a crappy pilot
an engine hit from an rpg-7vZ does like 50 dmg to a lav
True but on a 1:1 basis
but what if you use a plane to sacrifice killing a tank
Eh

Not counting active protection tho
pretty sure the rpg has a sabot rocket so the active protection doesnt do anything against it
since no explosive payload
just pure pënetration
In game Ive been stopped by it
No active protection works regardless
Considering game balance, a big powerful rocket
If you cant check it, everyone may as well not use the smaw
Do y’all prefer the SMAW or RPG
RPG
but smaw in bf3
Whut
You cant choose your launcher in bf3 anyways
you can as an engie
Cause default smaw for Americans and rpg for russians
yeah i prefer the smaw in general over the rpg in bf3
Tbh any is fine
Think of it like this
Imagine a white basic tube that works in game
When you play either side, it'll have a faction side appropriate skin
So its the same but different
A good rpg hit from an engi can easily mobilize a lav
And they can then get a second shot out
The rpg in bf4 had a larger emphasis on critical hits
MBT law is THE infantry rpg
Why would you use that
its so good lol
TOW is bad
But it does like 50dmg to tanks
it does like 23 for me
Well i got 40-50 hits alot
i go with HE Shell + canister shell
yeah
Does canister do good dmg against infantry
HE Shell + canister shell + active protection + reactive armour
yeah it 1hks infantry
at any range
The tow is so fucking good
meh i like it on the IFV but its plain dogshit in attack helis

that means you can prone camp 
i use prone occasionally if i need to either regen or hold an objective that’s overrun
no
oh
once you've got a gun unlocked you can use it whenever
unless you're playing a community game with custom weapon limits but even then it would just be "no semi auto rifles"
yeah theres community servers that restrict certain gun classes
or historically accurate servers
holy shit that was one hell of a shot
bruh
i have never seen anyone pull one of these in bfv
requires a bit of setup because you have to get an assault player into the plane to start with
I Fliegered that dude from the match cuz he left lmao
bro i never even thought about that, it’s complex
When dice doesn’t gives you the option to change your pilot so you have to do it yourself

Sickest shit I've ever done on bfv
Now do that with a panzerfaust 
sticky grenade 
What about tnt?
TNT throwing range is wack
i remember this old swbf2015 clip where someone used the jump pack and dropped a proximity mine powerup on... either an airspeeder or an A wing
which took a few seconds to arm then detected the pilot and detonated to kill it
tbh ultimate challenge would probably be the shaped charge lol, since you have to judge the timing for it to arm and throw distance
if someone successfully takes down a plane with a type 99 mine ill be mindblown
i wonder if you can even OHK it
re-downloaded bf1, anything i should know before i hop back in?
On one occasion my zero was destroyed by a sniper - i was barely floating on the ocean on 1 health lmao
I'm still shocked that I even did it lmao
The weirdest thing I've been shot by was when I was flying with meme on how a guy shot me with a boys
During wake island
Honestly
Share it on reddit

Lol
i cn't remember if i noscoped a plane the other day with a kar98 or if i dreamed it lmao
I shot down a plane with a lee-enfield once
But it was a private match so it doesn’t really count
i shot down a plane with a selbslader 1916
because i don't typically dream/remember them but also i feel like i would have mentioned it here at the time
I used to AT grenade planes in BF1
There was a time where I flew into an enemy bomber
low flying heavy bomber pilots are kek worthy
Also I hate how AT rocket guns only do like 20 damage to bombers
I was busy headed to the resupply station on fjell and was watching my back for fighters, then all of a sudden oh hi there
i'm still yet to hit a panzerfaust or bazooka on a plane, but i've taken them down with tank cannons, calliope rockets, field guns, and one time a PIAT... by accident
So basically
We all cant hit planes on purpose yet they MIRACLIOUSLY end up in our line of fire
im monke
player count is lower than before but its rising nowadays
since people are waiting for 6 and bf1 is a fun game to play in waiting
Seen this?
Motherfucker aimed for another bomba but hit a completely different target
guys in BF5 how do i destroy aircraft?
Wdym
funny you should bring that up right now 
fligerfaust, aa tanks, aa stationary weapons
Planes
Does anyone on BFV have the MAB38 fully Golded. I’m having extreme difficulty trying to do so. I either have to get over7 30m kills in a life or 25 over 30m in a round. Any tips?
fligerfaust?
if we're talking about stationary weapons:
https://strawpoll.com/w7yb354ku
a man portable anti air launcher in assault
or get in a plane and do the dirty work manually
Which includes the flakpanzer, fliegerfaust, flak 38, 40mm aa or valentine aa
The second option is to sit on a fighter and pursue enemy planes.
valentine archer gunner seat is pogger
Bombers are literally just giant fuck off planes
I meant with planes lol
Yeah
Flying an attack plane in BF1 letting my backseat hammer a heavy bomber was fun as shit
i dont like jets in bf4 due to the lack of them
We might get a function where jets may have a co pilot
Yes
Actually
Even though I’ve become absolute ass at flying in BF1
the attack planes gunner was basically a second driver
Co pilots would be pog
You guys know on bf3 an bf4 how a tank gunner can SOFLAM?
yup
I’d love more teamplay in vehicles
Imagine in the new game if theyre doing jets, the co pilot can actually do that.
Yeah exactly
ohhh thatd be amazing
The pilot can run more powerful rockets in place
and give the gunner a 20mm Vulcan and thats a plane crew
Maybe don’t neuter single person use but allow for a big power boost with multiple people
Like laser guideds, e,g javelin rockets which can OHK planes
Yeah
Let the main pilot work with their cannons
Kinda like a sloop in SoT
It’s manageable just fine with a single person but an effective 2 man crew can be a force to be reckoned with
You guys know that campaign mission in bf3 where you're the co pilot in a jet guiding heatseakers and using the flares?
Kek
yeah its iconic af
Thats what I had in mind minus the flare part
What about solo players though
Yeah angra to be fair youre most likely to take over the pilot seat and kamikaze the jet into a tank
No offence
is that even a offense
I dunno
Maybe the copilot could do air to ground stuff and spotting
While the pilot does air to air
what
They guide the laser guideds and get massive amounts of points
125 per vehicle kill, 50 per infantry kill
that's one of the worst idea's I've heard so far
Well how else does a co pilot help when the main pilot controls the guns
You don't need a co-pilot in the first place
yeah i think for battlefield the ideal concept for most vehicles is a solo player can handle them just fine but you get an advantage from having a competent co-pilot/gunner/whatever
If you give them more flares that way thats sorta just makes solo piloting even worse
co-pilot isnt really the word for it
No ones saying to have a required copilot lol
The thing about this convo is how do you make team work with out forcing it
more or less the gunner
bruh
No co-pilot
Here’s the thing way
Just like in BF3 and 4
Actually, like the attack heli. Give the co pilot tv guided missiles on the jet.
Just go play bf4 if you dont want a copilot
^
This way you can have team work but not actually force it.
what
I’ll try to kamikaze with the given planes/Jets that bf6 had and if I successfully do it that means more kamikazes but if I don’t then I’ll use the planes/jets normally

I dont see the problem with a co pilot
Gunner =/= copilot lolmao
Its the same like with tanks
Pilot seat still has full control of the plane, gunner seat controls more powerful air to ground stuff or missiles or something.
But tanks don't need gunners, its such a stupid idea!
You can tank solo but with a gunner ur much more powerful
The other guy can jump out, shoot, then repair
Its with an attack helicopter
The main pilot just has rockets and tows but the gunner has a 30mm cannon that just SHREDS infantry
But bf6 attack heli shouldn't be like bf3s
Would be cool for strike aircraft
Kek
I dont know what to comment on for AT helis
Theyre incredibly powerful and are an absolute fucking scourge to deal with
I’m gonna get so good at RPGing helis mark my words lol
Gta has some nice pilot and co pilot helis
But at the same time
what’s a good bf1 assault weapon
Theyre meant to be an attack heli theyre meant to be scary
Repetierpistole M1912.16 experimental
Reckon we may get the SRAW again
@charred ridge automatico hellriegel and smg08/18
Whats max rank in bf1
159
you should have the automatico then
150*
Shut

Any rumors of a new bf game?
Haven’t been following or players for months and months
Rumors?
Nothing credible @potent cipher
Theres no rumors it is coming
We’re supposed to start getting official info in the next couple months though
🤨
Thats exactly what everyone else wants
Or bad company 3, that would be preferred
It’s not confirmed to be modern...but it seems to be the most likely
I think they should let Bad Company sit
i want vietnam
I just really hope it’s good, really liked BF1 when it came out, BFV was okay but got stale for me pretty quick
I’ve already heard 2 wasn’t as good as 1, I’d hate to see them try to reboot it and have it flop
battlefield 1 is a masterpiece
Vietnam is too restrictive of a setting
Bc1 was console only
yesssir
Bc2 was great
You get zero map variety
how?
BC2 was one of my favorite games ever
They did have urban battles in veitnam
It’s Vietnam, your map options are Jungle, more jungle, and the odd urban map thrown in
And that’s it
For a modern title, that’s pitiful
jungle but caves map
I would like modern, but not sure what conflict
And caves
Look at the last few games we’ve gotten, they’ve had maps and settings all around the world, creating incredible variety
With more caves
It’d be a shame to restrict ourselves to pretty much jungle: the game
Just miss the modern weapons, attachments, vehicles, etc but I don’t want anything futuristic
Meh i wouldnt
If BF1 taught me anything, it’s that experimental weapons are fucking dope
I dont want to see laser weapons and stuff
W
Not saying laser weapons, that’s why I say near future
Still using bullets, but DICE gets to get creative with gun design
I’d be okay with near future as long as the conflict/weapons are realistic
sheesh
While still throwing in familiar stuff like AKs and M4s and whatever
Aek
I’d just honestly really like another game to play, going to hopefully buy a PC with my stimulus check and miss having a shooter to play because recently there hasn’t been anything interesting to me
2042 is only about 20 years in the future folks
I’d be fine with 2042, maybe conflict with China lol
Well future technically kicks in tomorrow Hngra 
''only 20 years'' just think about how much the world has developed in the last 20 years
but future modern or future future 
And think about the next 20
Ok, but what I’m saying is it’d still be pretty grounded in our present day reality @gilded zenith
We aren’t gonna have HALO tech in 20 years
Who knows what will happen in 20 years
Well ig if its futuristic they can do whatever they want
That’s the point
If BFV has taught me anything, it’s that DICE wants creative freedom
Future gives them that, setting it close to our present day reality keeps it grounded to an extent
introducing the all new ADVANCED MOVEMENT SYSTEM
Double jump jetpack
They’re not gonna do exosuits lmao
Full body armor
Yeah no I’d rather movement stay grounded
In what way would you say?
same
Flying tanks
AW movement was chaotic af
It’s possible to do future without exosuits, CoD just left a bad taste in everyone’s mouth over that
Bf2142 had hover tanks right
I dont get the idea of double jumps and stuff
What do you mean?
And wall riding
How would the creativity be limited? That is what i mean.
I think there was a video of someone getting a tank ontop of the tower in shanghai
Seriously, as a stand-alone game, IW had an excellent campaign and its art design is easily my favorite in the CoD franchise and in most any game I’ve played
Could they do it similar to Titanfall?
halo
Battlefield: Andromeda
By setting it in the near future, there’s an extent to which DICE would need to keep things grounded in our reality in terms of world building. The world will look different, but the world we live in today won’t be totally gone, meaning things like M4’s, AKs and whatnot would likely still be around in some form, meaning there’s a degree of familiarity there
Titanfall is distinctly Titanfall, I’d rather DICE stay clear of that
Though Titanfall is very cool
So you saying just different building architecture?

