#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 3388 of 1
Hell yea
It also has better gunplay
I mean yah you don’t need premium
I didn’t get premium
bfv had a free live service, so everything other than cosmetics came free
guns, maps, mods, etc
depending on the premium/edition you buy its mostly getting cosmetics or getting weapons unlocked instantly instead of working/buying them
Deluxe Edition of BFV more or less unlocks all unlockable weapons n stuff while giving you some 60$ of elite skins
And I believe there's more to it
Do you guys think spotting should be in BF6 or no
That's a tough one
I think they should keep 3D spotting to a minimum
The mechanic is good, but it needs to be adapted
I'd like spotting scopes to work in a way where they only spot a target when you're actually honed in on them
And not spot them after
BFV had a lot of steps in the right direction, all it would take is a little bit of tweaking of those mechanics in a some places and we'd be golden
Mhm
Most of BFV's mechanics are top notch, now it's tweaking and perfecting them
3D Spotting is one that needs to be changed a bit to be better balanced
Same with a lot of the movement stuff, it was miles above BF1.
Many miles, the movement in BFV may be some of the smoothest of any game
I'd like to see a plethora of new animations for navigating certain obstacles and objects
i enjoy the movement in BF5, I just would like a slightly faster animation speed for certain stuff, like getting in and out of vehicles for example
I really wanna see more support for vehicle customization early on
Even now in BFV it's not the best
But we went 2 years without a proper vehicle customization system
We were tossed a handful of skins in the beginning, and a year and a half after launch we finally got dressings
cosmetic customizations are pretty low on the "why is this fps game good" hierarchy if you ask me
Oh it's not a necessity for sure
But it's one of the smaller details that really needs to be done earlier this time
Hopefully they don't botch the marketing again
@brave coral
If the marketing and launch is strong we will be living like kings most likely with BF6
L
Nice
Anyone know why the game runs so poorly on PC? I have a RTX 2070 SUPER and it runs at 10fps for the first 5 minutes of every match and I am not sure what to do I have tried every simple step I can think of
make sure you use directx 11
and also, the first time you play on a map, it loads all the shaders and stuff, so it can make game stutter in the beginning
the 2nd time you play that map, or just after a while it should stop
but directx 12 will lower your fps to the ground
Hello, is there anyone from Latin America who plays BFV and speaks Spanish?
!!lfg
ℹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
Am I the only person who thinks that MW style weapon customization would actually be bad for BF6?
How come fox lad isn’t in the squad 
people have been calling for MW style customization
no, and previous bf titles have had this as well
my main problem with it is that there are normally a few attachments that are objectively the best for 95% of the weapons and everyone uses them
IMO, a mix of BF3 and BF4 customization would be best
Yea but it was pretty bad ass in MW to make new guns with just attachments
not that theres anything wrong with people using the same thing, but theres no pros vs cons scenarios
for example: everyone uses the longest barrel
idk how many guns mw has, but CW doesnt have much, so thats another thing to consider
MW has a lot
the shorter barrels are never used
Depends on your setup and the map
Who is using the longest barrels on a tiny map cause that increases ads time
dont get me wrong, i like mw/cw customization too, but when it comes to in game use of it its rather minor
but the meta is long barrels
are you thinking warzone?
I mostly play MP
oh wait yea
Warzone is completely different cause the meta is a lot tighter
warzone long barrel is meta for dmg range and recoil iirc
obviously since you are likely to get into a longer range engagement than small maps in base mp
They could probably balance the system to suit the gameplay of BF
ehhh, id rather them focus on the in game action than outside sources
#1: no barrel attachments
Idk
i think keeping it simple with a tree is good
I hate the tree
BF3, BF4 or BFV style customization
while the customization is cool and i like seeing the differences, its rather daunting to wonder about what all of it means
and then how long it takes to earn unlocks is annoying
with maybe some more attachments
Not really
MW tells you what everything does for example
CW goes even further by giving more exact numbers iirc
CW does
but mw would just say "reduced recoil"
and youre left wondering wtf that exactly means
So use the CW system
Reduces recoil :D
I say if we do MW style, we simplify it
even simplifying things there are 2 main types of recoil
No barrels, no stocks, one single extended mags attachment
they could easily fix that
@uneven hollow ez
wow very epic desertion
Siege im pretty sure has attachments for horizontal and vertical recoil

nice top squad tho
yea we won
too bad i wasnt there 
Too simple
would’ve been nice if you where
At the minimum we should get attachments for barrel, mag, grip, sights, and stock
the problem with barrels
Is that It would bypass the balancing
How
BF has 4 classes
nah not really
Each with a specific weapon type
More options is never a bad thing if they're properly balanced
like you can relatively easily just go “hmm if we did this it would have this effect so we won’t do that”
With barrels, you could make a assault rifle a laser or something
Which is what I want and Dice definitely has the capability of doing
The server went 15v15
i just dont understand putting in the effort to flesh out an attachment system that will complicate balancing and will essentially result in everyone running the same attachments

then everyone plays assault instead of the other classes
There is always gonna be a meta, should we remove the less used weapons cause they're bad and just make everyone use the meta weapons?
Or remove the meta weapons
thats an extremely complicated topic, much like attachments, to simplify like that
yea
The answer isn't removing the good attachments its balancing them
no one suggested that answer afaik
In COD it works because any person can use any weapon
Well you guys are advocating for a simplified system with less attachments
In Battlefield, weapons depend on class
im not against meta, i just dont get putting in dev time for a system that will be boiled down to "use these 95% of the time"
yea
Well then that dev will have done a bad job balancing
No, no matter what some attachments will just always be used
considering this is a casual title where people can randomly get a tank and triple their kdas.... i dont think balancing is even a prerequisite
Same thing can be said about anything else
Some weapons will always be used, STG for example or Hellreigel.
yeah i’d rather have the option even if there are certain stats that will be more attractive
and then everyone is running around with an AEK with a long barrel and lasering people from across the map
obviously meta builds will lean towards reduced horizontal recoil, probably reload speed, ADS but the option to build some janky SCAR PDW or whatever is still there
Which isn't necessarily an issue if you balance the attachments correctly
So we nerf it like anything else?
its not only about attachments
yeah you can quite easily just go “ok so we don’t make it so guns can do this”
youre oversimplifying again
Its really not that complicated imo
i think its way more complicated than you are leading on
If one attachment is overperfoming you can nerf it like you'd nerf anything else
How so?
If MW could pull it off I think the professionals at dice can look at the system and apply it to battlefield because it really should become a new standard
because in bfv you have to consider how an attachment works on a series of different guns that are locked to certain roles and how those roles are meant to engage with the gameplay
I’m sure it’s not that difficult to change a variable or 2 in code
then do it yourself and make bank 🤷
I'm confident they could do it at dice and balance it properly
why not? you sound like you could do it and they make ungodly amounts of money and its just a variable in code
with all that said, it sounds silly to not do it yourself
you can still just... have it do different things on different guns if it has too much of an effect on one stat for particular weapons
so now youre adding more and more dials to tune to balance
all this for a casual title sounds a bit much
I think I'm getting what your saying @dense bone
i think it is easy to fall into the mindset of “well they did it like this in a different game”
There's gotta be something for us hardcore players
Casuals will probably choose whatever looks cool/makes all the stat bars go up
i dont think this is a hardcore vs casual scenario
considering how i play games id easily fall under the hardcore crowd
Especially compared to that god awful upgrade tree
objectively speaking, theres nothing wrong with it
realistically though they can just have all the attachments have a max of like 10% change and give most of them some small drawbacks and ultimately it’s going to end up in a state where you can’t change the gun super significantly
you just dont like it and to you, by default, that means its bad
Yeah how is longer barrel make range better harder to understand than magic skill tree
I like the upgrade tree 
i dont even like it, i just dont see a problem with it
I don’t think it’s terrible I just think an actual attachment system is far better
honestly i've always been an attachment guy
agreed, but its not worth the dev time imo
instead of upgrade tree
I don't like it because of the lack of physical changes to the weapons. For one when you have a badass looking gun in cod or an older battlefield title you get that bigger sense of progression. Haven't played BF5 in a minute but iirc there is no physical changes to the weapons.
Cod and battlefield are very different
i just like picking attachments since it allows more combinations of perks
Facts I like unlocking my attachments at the very least but trees are annoying
Not in the grand scheme of things
ok no
Also I was comparing level of casualness
im sorry but "physical changes to a weapon" is probably one of the weakest reason to advocate for cod style attachment system i can think of
To which they are very similar
upgrade tree was fine in bfv since you can’t really stick a ton of attachments on ww2 guns (not that it stopped cod)
Yeah attachments are better but I still like the upgrade tree in 5 
I mean that’s one the biggest reasons I prefer it, also it just makes sense logically
You get so much more out of a weapon when you can see the changes being made it to imo, especially on the level MW does it
idk, im in the camp that a gun can look like a rectangle with or without attachements, 90% of what i care about is the gameplay and the mechanics
How bout we just have guns with no models
It doesn’t really matter
And it would save dev time
i wouldnt mind
Like bruh
I just like a cool looking gun ngl
if youre being honest with yourself, does it really matter?
Yes
In a way it does
It enhances the experience
The whole point of a video game especially battlefeild is to be emesrsed in whatever ur doing
Fighting a war would be a little strange with no gun
Gaming is to have fun most of the times
95% of the reason i play games, especially MP games is to shit on other people
If it was something like a simulator maybe but generally is for the fun factor 
and i will shit on other players with a box gun if its objectively better vs a cool looking gun with worse stats
Then why tf do u play battlefeild and fucking csgo or some shit
heres something crazy, i play everything for different reasons
but even so, im going in to shit on people
thats what i find fun
Some people including me, don't mind a nice looking game
i dont either...
do i want csgo levels of balance and competition with bfv graphics? yes
BF1 looked better ngl
that doesnt negate the priority in games
its a game, gameplay is first
We can have an attachment system and gameplay together
Graphics is something most people shouldn't really care
we have people that care about player skins in a fps...
You can have a nice looking game and have dogshit mechanics
people are not logical
I'm not saying that I'm just saying that for some people and especially the casuals, graphics are a important part of the game
No they aren't....
Good graphics and bad mechanics, bad graphics and good mechanics
Bad graphics with good mechanics all the way of necessary 
If graphics weren't important i don't see why the industry is always pushing graphics
Ugh had my first good pilot game but end up getting no wingman, amazing :(
I don't want a cool looking gun in a game where gameplay is pure garbage
my main point is adding dev time to attachments that will be simplified and near universally used, when that dev time could be towards something more meaningful in game
it just doesnt sound worth it
if they add it, whatever, i really dont care, i just dont get the near "need" people place on attachments like it makes the action of actually playing the game that much better
customization should be there
I've said it before, the system doesn't have to be simplified down to one meta if they do a job balancing with pros and cons to every attachment
But not super complex
maybe thats why bfv has low recoil? they basically standardized all the standard attachments people normally added and then added the trees
Add this magazine for an extra 100 rounds but you run slower or ads slower
like.. if everyone is adding hrec reduction, faster ads, etc
make the base game play like that already
Ok look let’s say they take MW customization and apply it
people are gonna run certain attachments no matter what
If there is a longer barrel option, they will run this due to better dmg at range
Then you balance it out
Largest capacity mags will always be used
Look at MW
or you apply them at base game level and skip the leg work
MW doesn’t have big sight lines or fields or such
90% of people are using 90% of these attachments? thats base game now
unless you play ground war
You can make the biggest baddest weapon with the best mag, barrel, and stock you give a con to each attachment
And even that’s a stretch
but most of the time the pros completely outweigh the cons
they aren't at all
So we make the cons worse
Most battlefield games maps have big long sightlines
You can get the biggest baddest weapon to camp and hold a field
But have added recoil to balance it out
Or whatever
Add overheating to the barrel when you equip the best one
but that’s not gonna stop them
they are gonna find another attachment and everyone will use that
dude, look at MW
But to have something that fit the most common playstyles
First, it was the M4
Something is always gonna be the best
Everyone is gonna just use the M4 so why bother making any other weapons
etc.
Doesn't make any sense
look, I will go onto Cod discord and ask best setups for different weapons in MW
In every game there's gonna be the best strat and the best weapon and the best attachments
Which doesn't mean that you have to remove all the other options
and I can guarantee that they will all involve the same types of attachments
imma go ask
Everyone's just gonna use the gas grenade so might aswell just remove the other grenades
seems trivial
you keep using that scenario
when no one is talking about taking anything away
you are only talking about adding
Cause thats what it sounds like your saying
Everyone is just gonna use one set of attachments so just remove everything else and simplify it
what im saying is...
that
Wdym by standardized
using x,y, and z attachments 95% of the time
Is Battlefield 1 a good game to purchase in 2021?
Exactly
Yes
depends what you want, id say no though
yes
So your saying because everyone will use the same attachments that the system will be a waste of time?
I am mainly looking for a fun, thrilling, multi-player experience, will I get that with BF 1?
bfv is probably the most populated bf titles on any platform, and bfv mechanics are likely going to be in bf6, which bfv mechanics are unique
yeah, bf1 has that
thats not me saying that, thats how it is
Alright, I just got 10 Dollars, and I am getting 50 Dollars in a few days, so I was just wondering if BF 1 will be a good choice for 10 dollars, thanks.
i wouldnt put the effort into baking 10 different cookies if people are only gonna eat 2 of them
@red garnet the difference between BF5 and BF1 is just preference
Alright, thanks.
i mean.. if you think gunplay and movement differences arent important
Oh wait, one more question, is BF1 popular? Like If I go into a match, will there actually be people, or will it be like 3 people lol.
What system?
PC - Origin
yeah its got a little less than bf5
bfv will very likely be less of a concern since its newer
Plenty of players
and considering bf1 is 6 years old
Alright, thank you all for answering my questions!
semantics
The game isn't 5 yet
bf1 is older, it will logically have less people
it has like 1k less average people
Still gotta wait for its birthday and then it will be 5
do we have players counts all of a sudden?
I'm applying that argument to other things like weapons, the majority of players and especially the sweaty ones are just gonna use the STG for example so why add other rifles when no one will use it.
steam doesnt count origin player counts im assuming
^
it doesn't, but it does say something
I never have issues finding a game on BF1 on origin
neither
because weapons can be forcefully made to actually be different
i think there was like 20 - 30 open one morning i played
Anyone still play bad company 2?
!!lfg
ℹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
And the attachments can't?
Just started playing recently for the first time in like 5 years
You can't make a fast reload mag and a extended mag
they can, but i already think adding attachments is not worth the squeeze, so why would i promote complicating attachments even more?
Alright fasho
It doesn't have to be complicated
For each gun add attachments that can meanigfuly change how the weapon acts with pros and cons
the alternative as having static attachments, now you want to forcefully make them different which applies to what? just specific weapons? add pros and cons? both scenarios are "making it more complicated"
The conversion kits are good example in MW
that is more complicated...
even if it is a minute addition, adding anything more is by definition "more complicated"
But its not a giant leap
never said it was
ive only said MORE complicated
you simplified it to being generally complicated
So what's the issue if we can add another level of depth without it being a huge leap in how complicated it is
I hope a sale for the definitive upgrade of bf5 comes out soon
They've already done attachments in other games
hey its my name in the screenshot dont worry about what i was saying its cool
how much did you guys pay for bf4?
We just want more meaningful ones
and i didnt think attachments were worth it then, in cod, or in the future
Why not
because they are trivial
For you maybe
But I'd like as much content possible for my $60 game and the most options possible
i mean, i focus on gameplay and being effective, so this "for me" scenario should apply to just about anyone that plays a game for gameplay...
if you play a game for gun fashion designer thats up to you
Then don't mess with the attachment system?
You can still be effective with the default guns in CW and MW
i got it through ea pass
ahh
these guys are just gonna ignore you btw
cause i just got a pc and looking for a good price for bf4
More options is never a bad thing
effective - successful in producing a desired or intended result.
my desired or intended results are playing as best as i can
ea pass you get battlefield 3, 4, 1, v, and hardline
figured 1 year is worth the price since bf6 will be out by the time it expires
What is gonna take to make a new weapon with the attachments
Too many choices gives less choice if that makes sense
no idea what you are saying/asking here
you can also checck g2a but just buy from a high reviewed seller
In the menu and stuff how long would it take to make a new weapon
i dont think recommending sights like g2a are allowed here
not sure, thats a grey area thing
thought i was legit site
I bought all my BF games off G2A
still dont know what youre asking internet
I'm asking why are you acting like adding an attachment system is gonna take you out of the ganeplay for a long time
You said you focus on actual gameplay
i remember the bf4 esl tournament the players had kinguin sponser on their shirts
"if they add it, whatever, i really dont care"
Did you say that?
i focus on gameplay yes, how does that in turn mean adding attachments will be detrimental?
Thats what I'm asking you
it doesnt
How does attachments negatively affect your gameplay
it doesnt
So what's the issue
i dont get how you came to that conclusion
it adds .1% to me liking the game more
is it worth it? id say no
thats what ive been saying this whole time
idk
Riddle me that
i think you assumed this was an opposing argument and felt attacked
I was under the impression that you thought an attachment would negatively affect the game
no... for maybe the 4th time, i just dont think its worth the dev time
Heh
if they do add it, it will be a cool bonus, but in no way will its inclusion meaningfully increase my enjoyment of the game
like i said before, i just dont understand how people hype up attachments like it will make the game significantly better
indeed
Man I'm dumb
i guess?
now stop 
i was mostly trying to pick your brain to see your reasoning for why its so good
everything i said was an explanation of why i dont think it matters
bf6 can have the most complicated attachment system ever, and it will be a small bonus for me, and i will still think it wasnt worth the work
My closing statements: More options in games is never a bad thing if the default options are good enough for the average player

I wish that bf6 won't do what bf4 (and maybe BF3 idk didn't play a whole lot) did and make the underbarrel 40mm useless
Yes 😻
might aswell just use the HE nade launcher cuz then you get to have a grip attachment
what did the underbarrel 40mm do?
pretty self explanatory...
its an underbarrel grenade launcher. but it was pretty useless
because if you just equip the HE nade launcher, you get to keep a grip attachment for your gun
idk man
being faster is pretty important
I think the explosive raidus was way smaller than the HE
though having a grip attachments sounds better, better doesnt mean the alternative is useless
I know but i wouldn't use a 40mm very close range I'd shoot it from cover
i havent touched bf3/4 in ages so idk
it is what it is
wouldnt the 40mm be better for vehicles?
I'm not sure I think they're both the same for vehicle damage
but I wouldn't really use It to shoot vehicles do idk
It really depends on the type of round
For example, a 40mm HET (T = Tandem) is highly effective against Infantry
a 40mm HEDP (Dual Purpose) is effective against Light Armored Vehicles (like BTRs) and infantry
bleh
I wouldn't use them to shoot at vehicles personally anyways
a 40mm HEAP (Armor Piercing) if effective against IFV like BMPs
don't you only get one Version of the 40mm with the under barrel one?
the variations are for the other grenade launcher thats not under barrel
The M230
Will someone help me get the peace keeper? pc
!!lfg @vernal burrow
ℹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
having to use outside programs was such a pain lmao
i liked the second stage though in soissons
Idea for BF6: Anti-vehicle grenade launcher
whats the point when they're probably just gonna add an RPG
So assault can have a legit Anti-vehicle option
which dogtags do you need?
all of them
there are some that have to be done alone
including the skin
i was hoping for someone to hop into a voice call with em to guide me thru the entire easter egg but thats alot to ask for
a conflict can be done with others
the bfee community are really friendly
and helpful
someone would probably help you all the way through
joined the match when people were already on a couple k score with a handful of kills
outscored my team by like 4k lol
Jeez

i was gonna say “a kill for every mm of tank gun” but you were british so it doesn’t work 
but the bren is nice
Are you sure I am bri ish on that pic 
picked it up again with iron sights, very accurate and punchy
Bren looks the the Madsen from BF1 but somehow even wierder
wait i forgot the faction symbols and confused myself 
bren is very damn good

i picked it up and cleared an objective as a recon
can i ask another dumb newb question?
Sure!
i will say the iron sights make it a tad awkward for close range 1v1s but it’s a slower firing lmg so it’s awkward up close anyway
its gold plated irons are the real deal
if i kill someone, pickup their gun and i don't currently own it, do i get to keep it or does it go away after i die?
very damn accurate
It goes away after you die

I WANT MORE GUNS
no once you die and respawn you’ll come back with your selected loadout
i didn't think that was the case
you should be able to buy over half the guns for company coin (in bfv that is) and then the rest you just get by playing
Unlock system would be pointless if that was the case
im on bf4
But I killed drx 2 times as the enemy 
Ayy, me too!
yeah you get some through just playing and levelling up, and then some are locked behind challenges ranging from “ok seems reasonable” to “that’s literally not possible in 2021”
mostly dlc weapons though
im buying the packs if they go on sale this month or next
Imagine how scary snipers would be with Dynamic scope glint
yeah it would mostly just be annoying lol
shit i just realised i should have clipped this thing earlier
i got like 5 bazooka kills in a row lmao
bfv
Dayum, really?
5 
More fun
Bf1 for me
What does that have to do with anything lol
gunplay feels far more player controlled, gameplay is smoother, and there’s a lot more stuff in bf1 that just feels cheese
Nah which game do you prefer
Tbh V
Tank combat on 1 
1 is alright
I’ve never heard someone call gameplay cheese lmao
but yeah i was on underground going into the last sector, aimed at a corner of that overview window the germans stand in and fired all my shots and got a kill every time 
Pog?
The reason I’ll go with bf1 is cuz it actually feels like your in the battle, and there are so many cool moments compared to bfV e.g running across a German blimp, somehow surviving the fall landing behind enemy territory and getting a nine kill streak, however in bfV half the team camps planes and most of the time I die to planes not actual enemies
both have their pros and cons
yeah in bf1 i feel like a ww1 soldier
Tbh v I’m more based on with planes
This is the way
it is
Feel*
Take forever to kill
Ya know?
Yea planes in bf1 are poo
i prefer bombers in bf5 but fighters in bf1
They always fly into the resupply
Tanks in 1 are bad 
Ur bad
explain how
Toasted
And keep using it so they don’t die until they are saved by their teammates on AA or wingman
Or atleast worse than 5 
you can't call them bad without backing yourself up
Plane combat very balanced Uwu
I agree with mando
I mean in v I play as both kinds of planes lads 
angra i kamikazed a flakpanzer just now
Bomb the feckers with the bomber plane and kamikaze the non believers
Ayo?
Clip lad 
lemme get it
thanky lad

Am cool 
Such cinematic poses
I hate that map but the clip was sick
This is a newer kamikaze clip that I have 
Got more 
Dayum
sadly the flakpanzer didnt die
Dayum
wait lemme send another one
On one hand, I want to enter a puma to level it up, but on the other hand I don't want to burden my mobile spawn points
time for the vibe checked
Decisions decisions
Idk what a puma is
Armored Car
Good
You had your chance to kamikaze me earlier
Why would you want to level up a car with Heinz beans cans flex taped to it
You will never lay a hand on me

Heinz beans cans = bulletproof
Because I'm strange that way
I am the sniping god
Tbh armored cars can be pog 
I just wrote a bunch of JavaScript functions centered around battlefield info
If you play them right
Yeah
Only problem is that they can't last through a firefight especially against armor
We talking about BFV or BF1?
V
Just grab lads to be armored cars 
Armored cars are surprisingly effective in V
Haha greyhound go brrr
The greyhound and puma have APCR which can really fuck up tanks
Some lads and I picked some armored cars when they where released and I basically rammed into the tanks
And the Staghound has rockets which are fucking mean
My dumbass wants to run the armored car like an authentic armored car and keep the 20mm
Also does it annoy anyone else that in the Chapter 2 trailer we can visibly see people behind the gun of the Valentine archer?
Couldn't just have a ghost tank
armoured cars are good for blitzkrieg tactics on hamada or al sundan
Yeah but instead we have netting in game
since theyre both open maps
Speaking of it I remember going with the other 3 Sherman's in Panzerstorm once all together
You know, they should make it so that vehicles in their default skin change color with the general environment
And literally deleted instantly a panzer 4 
Like German and British Vehicles on Hamada take on a beige color
Only thing is, is that British Vehicles used slices of blue and orange
On their vehicles
So it would be a skin of its own and would render the crusader skin useless
Tank skin called crusader yet no crusader in game

It was named that for Operation Crusader
Italian headgear but no Italians
A Jackson would’ve been nice
Staghound for us would’ve been Pog 
theres an american tank destroyer in the files
Definitely
@proven charm there is?
Americans already have the greyhound thought
yeah
Which one
it somewhat works
Need a Wolverine and a Chaffee for the pacific maps
But staghound with the mounted rockets 
Chaffee was used as a patrol vehicle in the late stages of the war
I thought the Chaffee was only in Europe
Mostly in the pacific Islands
not sure, it looked like the chassis of a light tank with a 6pdr ontop
75mm gun in a rally car 
You got an image? @proven charm
@uneven hollow
there should be a vid on YouTube, ill link you it once i find it
► Liked this video? consider subscribing :)
https://www.youtube.com/c/DANNYonPC?sub_confirmation=1
► DANNYonDISCORD! https://discord.gg/SUxAbeX
►Join my Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/DANNYonPC
► Buy my shirts! https://teespring.com/nl/stores/dannyonpc
► My twitter - https://twitter.com/DANNYonPC
► My PC - http://pastebin.com/Rv8uYACR
► Dont l...
Oh that video
Thats a hummel
There’s no American TD in that one
poggers lad
isnt the bishop an american td?
British
You have the Hummel, Grille/Marder, Bishop, and AVRE
As was the Sexton
Does anyone know how why shadow play would record a black screen? The clips have audio but no video
thats how i pick off my targets, i just fly in a straight line and wait for people to shoot at me
then kamikaze
How’s everyone’s day going
Alright
going fine
I have mastered the art of not raging on Battlefield 1
How would the game have handled a Tiger 2?
Eh
The Tiger 2 actually was surprising mobile for being a 75 ton tank
Perhaps not the fastest

Implying it wouldnt run out of fuel or break down
I dont reckon the Tiger 2 is capable of maintaining its top speed
Would have been a skin of the tiger 1 except bigger and durable with even shittier deployment range
I'm talking about breaking down
190 Gallon fuel tank
everybody gangsta until the transmission breaks 😳
Yeah
Ironically had the Tiger 2 not suffered from an underpowered transmission and engine, it probably would’ve been a lot more terrifying than it was
I mean, not that it wasnt already
Want to know terrifying? Nashorn. Marder.
Long range,
Very good guns
Cost effective
Yeah but both were tank destroyers (with the rhino being on the edge of being an SPG)
And had like paper thin armor
Could still nail any allied vehicle
Oh definitely
German guns tended to fuck up most allied tanks.
Which is why the Churchill had the highest survivability rating
If the moon was made out of cheese how would that affect your daily life?
Umm
Well
The fish would prolly bite less why
And
Itd be less bright outside at night
And
It might idk
Why
I’d be down to eat some moon cheese
blue moon cheese
Same
there wouldnt be moon left today if it was cheesy
all the nasa employees would have aten it
What would it taste like tho?
cheese, probably
Saw a guy say that BF should be a war simulator 
I responded to him with all the issues that would come with it
And he responded “oh cmon man stop with the details”
Cheese is disgusting

Ruining his dream man
I even sent a message saying you can’t have your cake and eat it too
Noooooo!!! Stop pointing out flaws in my fever dream, DICE should do it anyways because it’d be cool and totally marketable to BFs current audience!!!!
Hehe reasons go Your weapon would run the risk of jamming and then you’d have to disassemble it in order to fix it
Yes, DICE. Add the RNG weapon disabling mechanic. People will love it.
People praise that in previous Battlefield games do they not? 
Who is dice’s market audience anyway
Us
Well, I guessed that part
And everyone that would be interested in playing FPS
Why’d y’all add BF1 helmets in BF5
Why not
It’s epic
But like was it an update I missed
I just copped the stormtrooper helmet
Did you add any BF1 helmets for teams other than Germany?
Idk ask dice or something
I mean if you count the standard brodie helmet for the UK?
But they already have some BF1 helmets in there
I ruined a SWAT stack lmao
I joined the server and we were being all capped and got in a G6 and did my thing. 90% left the server and we came back hard lmao
Did they messaged you
i never knew the emp could do this

i love me some bf4 strafing
also can dawnbreaker be removed from large conquest
why are there 2 jets there if you cant use them
impossible to do manuevers
No but I did get called a hacker by some rando
i would like to address a problem with emblems in bf5
tell me it
whenever you equip an emblem it wont let you unequip it
yep
ive got it too
uh im not sure on a fix at all, might need to contact ea support
!!support
ℹ️ Have an issue with Battlefield or your EA/Origin account? Contact EA Help:
If you need to contact the EA Help team for questions you might have regarding game or account issues, head over to https://help.ea.com
ℹ️ Have thoughts to share regarding Battlefield? Submit your feedback:
If you want to help the Battlefield team with constructive feedback to make the title/franchise even better, head over to https://forums.battlefield.com/en-us/categories/battlefield-v-general-discussion
ℹ️ Have you encountered a bug? Report it:
If you have previously unknown technical issues you'd like to highlight, head over to https://answers.ea.com/t5/Bug-Reports/i/m-p/7141703
ℹ️ Have an issue related to the Official Battlefield Discord server? Let us know:
If you need help related to this Discord server you can send a Direct Message (DM) to our ModMail bot! Please know that we can not help you with any game or account issues!
no im asking ea/dice to fix it
i know there are ea staff in here
Whats a swat stack
Interesting
Is BF6 gonna be modern
Probably
A near future would be cool like BO2 but a little less
R6 kinda had that vibe with futuristic like technology that was somewhat believable but recently they've taken it a bit far

Emp phase?
I just realized my account got hacked awhile back because I have a lot of hours in BF4 but I've never played BF4 
What a nice hacker
Well the hacker left you bf4 for free
I continue on conquest and operation in BF1.
my main modes are conquest, tdm and rush
oh
They all left lol. when I joined there were at least 12
Frontline was a pretty pogger mode as well
hmm.. i am unsure if i tried it ngl. but most the modes i have tried has been nice actually
Ya twee goin thru an emp phase
is it the one you can only move 1 flag at the time?
Yea
ya that was kind of cool to be honest
A good Frontline match lasts for hours lol

haha
Tug of war
Iirc yea
Because the timer kept stopping.
In bfv if used to be a thing but not anymore
oh i see. what does lirc means?
If I remember correctly
ah it was an i i tought it was L lol

So what is you all’s favorite DLC on Battlefield 1?
All of them
Apocalypse was probably the best
Along with Russia
🙏
I like the russian dlc a lot bc of the epic music after matchs.
- Apocalypse
- Russia
- Turning Tides
- French
I honestly prefer the season pass cause there is a garuantee you get content
Check this shit out. Nailed a dude with a 380 slung 400+ meters like a damn artillery. For the record, I did not hit a tank like I thought, but a spawn beacon, which makes the same sound as when a tank is destroyed
Niceeee
Gotta feel just a bit sorry for the poor bastard. Imagine tearing it up on the battlefield, and suddenly hearing a giant whooshing sound followed by a massive explosion
Yeah I like that too. I once destroyed a Dreadnought with a torpedo so it was cool
ℹ Looking for Players to play with?
Head over to the Looking For Games channel category.
Please remember to state your region when looking for players to play with!
#lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation
ok
will there be more small patches for bfv like the one we had in november?
Probably, yeah. They said they're going to maintain QoL stuff for the time being, just no new major content.
what if they suddenly come up and say "Hey! heres the new Russian dlc" 😳
ahh just a pipe dream
why do people constantly beg for that? it's not like it will really change anything
yeah but....u know...would be cool
nothing
haha...we wish
oh

maybe if the game didnt receive so much hate, we would have got it
whatever lets look forward to bf 6 i guess
lol its gonna be modern
im pretty sure it will have the Russian faction
Making the game 128 players is like trying to save a relationship by having kids
Modern is not boring
Modern has helicopters
And helicopters fundamentally can not be boring
Better than planes that go 2 miles an hour
i mean people can have their preferences
Nah if you think a modern battlefield game is boring then you're probably boring


i have hope in battlfield so its gonna be good
I never heard of those @solid hinge
not even close
Just give me battlefield 4 weapon customization, helicopters and a functional game at launch and im a happy camper
Ill settle for functional at launch even
Right? Just some new graphics and maps
Just fix the game
bfvs movement
Right there with you @fossil heron
A new engine is needed for 128 players and they haven't hinted at one
A new engine has been needed for the last 2 titles
Frostbite 3? 😮
I got an idea to help bf6 sales: all they gotta do is tweet "we don't have sbmm" and boom! sales up
Im thinking..an improved BFV but bf4 style...we’ll see
Frostbite 2 works fine for madden and fifa so I doubt we'll ever see FB3
ha...they should make firestorm free ..might help with marketing
i havent played a single game of firestorm
Neither have I
I did
Not waiting an hour for a match thats empty to start
i want to play it
I forgot firestorm even existed
Actually we did find an almost full match no so long ago 
Frostbite 3 is the current engine version first released with battlefield 4
They always have a good story
i mean what were they thinking releasing a BR behind a paywall that doesnt even have crossplay smh
well these days if I want to play firestorm I play squads as a solo, at least you will find a game
They had China in bf4
Ayyye lucky as heck
oh lol
I wonder if the next bf will continue to have server browser. It better lol
yeah it better
Server browser is a must i'd say. But even better battlelog
worst part of battlefront 2 is no browser
Stay gold ponyfield
I'm just very worried because there wasn't one in swbf2
true
was there one in bf5? I haven't played it in a year so I forgot
yep
never really enjoyed that game for long
then again, at the time I had an i5 4690k that couldn't keep up with the game. Constant 30-40 fps even on low-medium
There is a server browser in bf5 but its hidden behind the name advanced search i think
I have a ryzen 5 3600 that could probably eat the game up for breakfast, but I no longer have interest in bf5 to even check
oh cool, that's helpful to know
I think the game protection is the cause of the unreasonable cpu usage in that game
game protection?
Well what I was very confused about was in bf1, my i5 4690k + 980 would easily hit 100 fps on high, but in bf5, high gets me 60 fps only in like...really open conquest modes with almost no firefight
the non existent anti cheat?
Denuvo. Heard it eats cpu
oh
How
so its like a anti cheat that prevents game file editing?
like pirracy
They should make 2 seperate versions if they are gonna use Denuvo as its only singleplayer it protects. Mutiplayer does check if you own the game anyways i'd expect
lol


