#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 3387 of 1
I agree, tbh.
Its pretty clear that EA wanted BF1 2.0, and rushed it out the door long before it was ready

However, since launch, the game's state has improved significantly
Like you can't tell me you don't get goosebumps watching bf1 trailer even in 2021
but they coulndt wait much longer cause they spit out like game every 3 years
they should have gone pacific from the start
and it would've been much better accepted
At launch I wouldn't exactly say this with full confidence, but now I can say that BFV is a good game.
Looking at a lot of the stuff, it seems fairly clear to me they were originally planning on doing US v Germany to start
Well...you can...
steamcharts is so wack
Ya make the same ww2 game everyone else has and go with dday, that would have been cool alright
^^^
Eastern front is a big part of it, but you don't necessarily need to cover the eastern front.
dday overused
Yes
Agreed
Battlefield works well in d-day situation though
yup
Would BFV have been better off with Eastern Front? Maybe.
^^^
yeah too bad bfv didnt have eastern front and dday
I mean pacific was well done
I would have hated dice if they did dday
But eastern front would gave brought that darkness of ww2
I don't think I would've hated it, but I also don't really think a D-Day map would've fit very well
no Im glad they didnt add dday
Or played very well, more rather
D day they could just do paratroopers
They gave us awesome beach landings without doing dday anyways
iwo jima is kind of dday anyway yep
Exactly
it would have to be breakthrough
Which would've been fun, but then the CQ players are SoL.
i feell like if your gonna make a ww2 game at least add d-day
Yes but there is a reason I don't like beach landing maps. If the enemy team is competent your just gonna be massctrd on the shore
Same problem with Iwo Jima actually, amazing on breakthrough, but awful on conquest
yeah
D day the beach landings are overused but I wouldn't mind paratroopers the night before
dday I feel would play too much like iwo jima
Dday map would have had tons of spots to hold up and tons of people would have raged over campers, even tho it's not really camping on a dday map
If only Grand Ops hadn't flopped 
Agreed @queen canopy
it would also be unbalanced because of the hills
german team would be op
well that would make it somewhat realistic
and it could have its own seperate gamemode
called
I mean some of them were pretty fun but others where really bad like hamada
I have to say the music and overall immersion is a bit lack luster in Bfv as well. That's one thing I feel bf1 did better capturing the meat grinder of ww1
D-Day
Again for me lesser known fronts are
bfv doesnt feel like ww2
I mean battlefield borrows from history and doesn't use it completely so I'd say they could have a modified d-day
Italian front
👍
BF1's immersion is easily its strongest point, but unfortunately its also just about its only strong point
u dont need to make a bf1 v2
yup
no, maps
maps are rad in bf1
thats immersion
It feels like ww1
Even some maps were weak in BF1 though. Suez Canal was just...oof to me.
immerdion contains a lot of things if you follow this
yeah
Bf1 immersion is not the only good part about it and I'm tired of people saying that, if it was true it wouldn't still be as popular as it is
im tired of sinai
Agreed @ancient ocean
I feel like people milk the fuck outta sinai
See, thats why I can really support BF1's atmosphere, because it somehow manages to feel like WW1 despite being a frankly awful depiction of the war as it was
its only popular as it is is cause there is one other game that has been made from its release
no, it became awfully popular in 2016
and bf3 still has a player base that you can always find a server to play on
unless your AU
Same with one 😒
1 is more recent though and caters to a more broad audience
Same
lol I dont regret it tho!
dont mind me gaining about 80 hours this month considering i couldnt play for a week
yes anotehr bf3 fan
At the end of the day people play what they like. No need to argue about who's game is better. Like modern play modern. Like historical play historical. That's what's great about bf.
love that game
I put more time than I should have in far cry 5 and rdr2 
I played those a ton aswell
Put more time in insurgency and hell let loose also postscriptum
lmao same! bf3 was my first bf game I got at launch, very good memories
i put to much time into seige on ps4 considering i cant even get my 230 hours and level 107 back
And arma star wars mod 🙂
rdr2 is just a masterpiece, its like an awesome movie
far cry 5 is just replayable and fun as fuck
i got it around when bf4 launched cause i had just gotten an xbox 360
Rdr2 story was very good
preffered it over bf4 in every way
I see!
Rdr2 is such a great game, also just makes me sad every time I think of the story, such a sad ending, and I don't mean that as in the game was bad for people who haven't played it
i bought the online multiplayer wich i thought was ok
Indeed
the fact they are going back to modern day and I hear possibly 128 player maps?? I'm all in for this one
110%
128 aka clusterfuck mode
lmao!
but i got bored after a about 80 hours of beating peaple to death
Well they should appropriately increase map size
get da story
facts
It's gonna feel like planetside I bet lul
I legit would do sniper and spotters squad in bf4 and just enjoy the heads being blown off
See y'all in the evening it's college time for me
👀 🤯
honestly it was worth 60 bucks
60??
So many people have spread rumors of 128 players that they pretty much have to do that now or so many people will be like "wtf where's the 128 player games like you promised us"
uhmm we never promised anything
they will have 64 player battles im sure tho aswell
128 player servers are going to be dead so quick
whoops there goes 64 players in our 128 server
can thank content creators
the idea that it would only be 128 player modes Is rediculous js
I wouldnt like it
Oh God it's gonna be horrible if they do 128 because they will also do 64 and if they design maps around 128 then it will be awful with 64
I have faith in dice!
Or they will make maps sized for both then there will just be too many maps with less effort in them

128 is ok, just need that healthy balance of vehicles
yes
thats what they did in some of the dlcs for bf3
a few of the dlcs i think had like 5 or 6 objs
Omg 128 players all in tanks would be a fucking nightmare on battlefield
mabby more i cant remeber
and then bf6 turns out to be:
muricans vs aliens ON MARS
they can scale larger maps down tho I'd they design them decently So that 64 player matches on the same. maps as 128 doesn't feel wierd
just dreaming
😋
scale?
America goes to war with every other fucking country
so youd end up with huge ass houses
Do you mean make a big map for 128 and then only use like half of it for 64?
yea
That would
thats how they always do it
Suck
yah for insitnce cod jut puts random ass crates in the middle of a map
Dice wouldnt have the patience
Because making a map for 128 would be more like a long line like hamada so that all 128 players wouldn't be in some circle so to shrink that it would just make it a bad map
hamada is pretty crappy
ya they did the best thing they could possibly have done.... took a year off to work on a better game
hello ppls how we doing this morning
Ik but with 128 players it would probably be pretty fun
I'd enjoy it
Same, it does a pretty good job at separating the players so it's not a clusterfuck, well most of the time
idc what map i'm playing, i just play no matter how crappy the maps or guns are
tho i like rotterdam and those urban maps
So 128 would be amazing, especially with people that actually push around the center of the map, like having a decent size battle at the airstrip on hamada when it's not even the main battle would be fun
Imagine 128 on breakthrough
I hope the maps are HUGE
i wish they stayed with firestorm. It really had some potential.
i just want them to make it so there can be more then two jets in the sky
It's better than warzone ngl
Tho I also feel that 128 would feel a bit strange as a modern game for battlefield
I'm talking like arma type big
having to travel huge distances to get to certain objectives
yeah
It'd get boring if it was like arma
that wouldnt be fun at all
Battlefield 4 has long enough time to walk
yah a little more compact battlefield isnt rly a mil sim
arma isnt bf
Especially in big maps
Well then they would have to make it so they are basically none effective to ground so that a Group of aces can't destroy an entire team
well with bigger maps it would make snse
plus there are people that sit in AAAs all game
It'd make alot more sense to have 4 now
and 2 never really works out
Especially if they are doubling player size
Bigger map would probably be more open and have less cover like panzerstorm so then they would still destroy ground
make it more tactical
Most bf players don't have brains
exactly let's get rid of the weak
I can agree on that
agian the AAA take out jets so easily
I mean I want the maps to be bigger than in BFV. In the Army they teach you to walk more instead of a vehicle so you can sneak up on any enemy's that might be at your objective. And battlefield should have that kind or realism where in BF5 you can see when a enemy is coming from like across the map.
Jarheads, all of them
A good pilot can easily stay out of there croshairs
ya exactly.. people having to take time to think about how to approach an objective instead of everyone jumping on atvs and zooming threw the maps
I think what they should do is have a large run up time like in firestorm then from there do what they will
thats true for the most part besides the fact that the AAA have full 360 view
Still
you should be scared to drive on an open rode to an objective!
but you said good pilot and not everyone is a good pilot
Oh lord I'm a bad jet pilot
example a
Did you read my original response to you
wich one?
I'm not gonna lie in BFV I take like a vehicle to get to the objective and either get rocketed or shot. sometimes I try to sneak up on a objective and a fricking sniper gets me or when I get to the objective I get gunned down.
I said if a group of aces got together, because you said you wanted more than 2 jets in the sky at a time
.
This one
Oh ya
in a modern age there will be AA and a good amount of it
Sorry
yah becasue first off there are other jets, AAA, locked rockets, VIPERS, and agian just because there are people good at a video game doesnt mean we shouldnt make it more fun
If they do allow more aircraft at once them just make them less effective to ground, that's all I'm saying
especially casue when im infantry i almost never die to planes
Hard for people to get good with them sense they spawn so little so there being more will mean alot more people getting good with them
I'm have to play bf4 today it's been awhile
not rly cause there is stil an enemy team to fight and im sure they would add another AAA
Why tf are you saying aaa it's aa
well boys
oops
BFV for me is coming sometime next week
I only played BF 1 and 5 on ps4 of I was to get one for pc what would yall recommend?
Get BF4
I got it hahaha
Oh
ya first bf I played on pc
Then ones a good choice then
tried but couldn't find it on the ps store like wtf 😐

damn 15 bucks
wait what
oh shit
beasttttt
WHATTTT
I BOUGHT IT ON AMAZON FOR 19
You could be me
oh
i got the ea play
DAMN IT THAT MAKES ME MAD
I'm not even mad about paying so much, I've spent more than my money's worth on it
35 on origin
i would buy bf games on origin
cause you have to make an origin account regardless
Ya I got an account but I cant pay 50 for bfv
I'd be re buying it
I can just suck it up and get a month or 2 of psn and play there
I'm extremely excited
ive been waiting since bf4 sincei didnt like that game
Hey guys, I downloaded BC2 and Im looking for some MP servers but Im not sure where to go or what to do
Check all gamemodes in your region
Its not showing any servers
I suppose its the best to keep your expectations neutral regardless if the earlier games was great or not so great. Personaly i am abit excited and hyped for any info ngl. But still having mixed feelings on what is to come. Hope is atleast high.
Would there be a reason why it doesnt show any servers for me?
Then I got nothing
Howdy
Random question but do you think an AT rifle in BF6 would make sense? The only one i can think of for that role would be the M82 Barrett.
Hello
Yo
Should I upgrade battlefield V to definitive edition
Idk, I don't have it
It’s only like 10 dollars
what do you get?
I think you unlock all guns and get a bunch of cosmetics
Every weapon, gadget, and vehicle I think too
As well as all the elites
It's more than worth your money if it's 10$ still
bf3 looks god damn amazing for its age
should i get bf5 or bf1
Nah. I think it would get kinda boring if you had all weapons and gadgets to start.
should i get bf5 or bf1
Depends
Armour has gotten so thick and the things needed to penetrative armour would destroy the bullet
if you want to carry over mechanics that will likely be in bf6, get bfv
it's a 6 year old game
should i get bf4 if i have bf3 already
not only that but i assume bfv is more active on any platform
I know but for gameplay reasons it would be cool.
I use boys at rifle a lot
Don't need another annoying thing
@charred ridge What platform are you on
pc
Ah, no clue then, I'd check how lively the servers are first
But I'd assume BF1 would be doing the best rn
I think it wouldn't be that annoying if it were more for disabling parts, not destroying tanks altogether.
bf1 has more servers open on pv
BFV has a lively community on Xbox
pc
People don't even use them on tanks they use them to hide in some obscure part of the map and get cheap kills on people.
I do tho
Fair point, just look at the boys at back in bf5
complete jackasses, those guys.
Because why not
what yall think of bf4
Mastapeece
Eh
fun game
should i buy that rather than bf1?
eh
no
Probably
bf4 is a tryhard breeding ground
Panzerbusche squad
Heck
I don’t use mainly on tanks
But to get in some shots and lower their hp a little
i use tanks if i can sit at spawn and kill
it can disable tank parts easily
the weakest of places would be the tracks or the engine
try to disable those
In coordination with a tank, it's incredibly potent
I do randomly sometimes
AT Rifles aren't really worth the hassle, as soon as you hit the tank... that mofo knows where to aim next
AT rifle is good for mental warfare.. ppl take a little dmg and freakout alot
oh no, wouldn't expect to find you there 
wonder what a missle flying at high speeds does to a bush with someone in it 
And hide there until they decide to go away
Or be a big brain and coordinate with other AT or armor
So they can't take time to target you
Well people in tanks aren’t exactly the smartest
Bruh
Sometimes
I agree entirely, 90% of tankers are smooth brained
yeah you would have to find the odd first timer in a tank not to take aim or the odd shot
sometimes i shoot if i miss, meh it's on AT rifle
What makes pubs so much fun is being able to stomp on every tanker with ease
if the tank goes into dense areas with no inf... it's bad news for the tank
pak 40s scare tankers soooo much 
Tank in an open area=ded
If you can't range the 40 on your first shot you shouldn't be driving a tank
Tanks on Golmud in BF4=pAin.
(S)pain
theres a 6pdr on pacific storm that can reck lvt's about to land
exactly
I know exactly which 6pdr you're talking about
It's a fat F
I see people die to it every game
yeah
LVTs look like shermans with water wings on.
What?
ka-mi is better than the lvt
Arguable
Ka-Mi has that tower in the back that makes it impossible to see your direct rear
faster in water and land
the lvt is made out of paper and the ka-mi is made out of actual metal
ive taken out dozens of shermans with my ka-mi
That's.. incredibly depressing
its easy af
sherman drivers usually think theyre slick because theyre driving a medium tank then they go kaboom
Weenie pubs tankers
arent they broken in bf5
lovely
LVT's look kinda worse than normal tanks
For way too long of a time
Hello, what is te best gun in assault in BFV?
LVTs aren't supposed to be used for combat like any other tank is
based off the chassis of the buffalo
I like the ribey rolles 1918
STG 44 probably
Sturmgewehr 1-5
Oh ok, and in medic?
yeah the sturmgehwer is like the jack of all trades
Probably Suomi or Type 2A
stg 44
Suomi I'd say
Is the boys good?
I use the MP40 its good
I personally run MAB 38
type 2a or grease gun
I use it against tanks
Hey how much storage is BF5 on PS4?
I got 167gb of free storage and it doesn't want to download
107 gb
It seems that everybody uses the revolver MK6 in BF5 as their secondary.
Daaamn
Any one wants a ps4 na bfv code
I thought it's like 43
Mk IV is probably the best secondary
@jade lintel i use de Luger
I got 1
it's just over 100GB for sure
It's the Model 27 but with a faster ROF
What's that?
PO8
P08
Ok
PO8
I use the Repetierpistole
I use the model 27
Repetierpistole looks cool
I don't like the reloading of that gun
Swag
Yeah, I agree there
Isn't it with stripper clips?
I don't use secondaries unless I'm still in combat and need to draw them immediately
Yes
It uses strippers
I like the model 27 but it fires too slowly
I don't like stripper clips
The reloading is like to the reloading of M1 Garand
Without the PING
@ornate shuttle theres hardly a single "the best" for said class
theres a lot of niches that different guns fit
I know
guys, is it possible to pin bfv somehow to the taskbar?
id say overall the g1-5 is the best assault weapon though as long as youre are playing close to med range
^
doesnt work, doesnt show up as option
Whenever I play BFV I need to shut down everytab as its so laggy
(and one of 3 weapons i consider op)
Y play with medic, and i like the MP40
sounds like you have a low core count cpu
I like the Bf1/hardline pistol system cuz in BF4 pistols are all universal but it doesn't matter since anyone with the g18 uses it and same with the Mark 6 revolver in BF5
i think mp40 is rather counter intuitive to the strengths of the medic class and its intended range you will lose to a bunch of other things
thats a bit of min maxing in a casual game though
yea but engaging in cqc is medics biggest strength
Depends on your weapon
medic itself is ideal for cqc
smoke to get into your range, infinite heals to stay topped, and universal revives
It's also ideal for armor support, which is where the longer range, slower firing smgs stand on top
if youre using smoke to get into your ideal range with something like an mp40 youre going to lose to a bunch of other guns that perform better
medic CAN do longer range, but it handily loses to just about every other classes weapons for mp40s intended range
I typically speak from a hc perspective where your gun doesn't matter as long as you can control it and hit targets
its like recons p08c or trench weapons, their ideal use range means they get wrecked by anything else supposed to be used at that range
hc?
hardcore
Hardcore is where, as the name implies, things get hard
i wouldnt say hard
its first see first win where rof prevails and snipers are god
that mode is mostly based on reaction time and decent aim
I run hc servers where pistols carbines, bolt action carbines, and self loading rifles are all banned
my computer is slow
So it's an even playing field and you need to actually have a brain to snipe
Instead of going "durhhhhhh I spam semi auto sniper"
Even with one taps a lot of people can't hit targets while sniping
well that sounds better, but id still rather not play hardcore
Hardcore just heightens up the need for quick thinking
does it do like more damage
Sturm has better rof
Stg 1-5 is a great all rounder, the 44 is just a bit more controllable.
No recoil Ribey
Ribey has lower rof and ttk, but has near zero recoil
stg44 has less recoil than stg 1-5
Keep on with the 1-5 as its a great gun
Oh
1-5 in the end will serve you better
Ok
There's virtually zero difference
Yeah
1-5 kicks and builds up quicker with its recoil
^
And with higher fov and ads fov on, recoil is practically nonexistent for most guns
However with a ratio you can control it fine.
Lower rof and ttk
1-5 will win 9/10 times in cqc and medium range with recoil specs
Not to mention it's the weapon of choice for the top players
On the assault class
You shouldn't need to use an assault rifle past that range
Yeah
the point in going out that far is that the difference is marginal even at that distance
so the "ttk advantage" is pretty useless, so might as well as use the easier weapon...
Yeah
I'm saying there's no point in firing that far anyways in bfv
cool? no one is having that topic...
But I've always found the 1-5 smoother, and easier to handle
On top of the better rof
only reason the faster rof would really be a point is if you have high ping
otherwise the end result is a similar ttk that is marginally different even at 50m+, so might as well as use the easier to control weapon imo
Yeah
It'll come down to preference then, considering they're both incredibly easy to use
You play both and decide
They're op so if you get good with either you'll stomp
What about the M2 carbine
A lot of people say its bad
But loses majority of it's effectiveness beyond cqc
Oh
stg 1-5 is like 9/10 cqc, 8/10 medium range, while stg44 is like 8/10 cqc, and 9/10 at medium range
Whats the difference between the m2 and the 1907
(arbitrary numbers, just an example of how minorly different these 2 are)
M2 is 20/10 cqc 3/10 medium range
Lower mag size but it will tear through anything
1907 mag size is wack
It's about adapting to the gun, any gun will feel weird at first
imagine picking a cqc focus weapon and only having 21 rounds and not being able to self heal
Plus adapting settings to make control easier is a great choice
M1907 is only the best because it will shred anything in a 1v1 gunfight
After that
RIP
oh
yea but how often do you expect 1v1 when there are 32 enemies?
they have anti tank weapons
and up close m1907 matches suomi
You're at a huge disadvantage running it when you have 33% smaller mags than 3 of the 5 assault rifles
The big thing about the m1907 compared to actual submachine guns is the range is that in comparison
Its what makes things like the bar potent
We don't need to discuss LMGs here, they are the true kings of the field
lmao
We'll have a war discussing them
right, and medic has tools to be cqc focused, i personally think its a bit weird to go cqc on assault when thats not their strong suite
on top of that if you have a cqc focus itch on assault go g1-5 and challenge just about any cqc focused weapon while also being well equipped at range
I feel like assault is the jack of all trades master of none
pretty much
yeah
well.. medium range i will say they dominate with SARs
and their "jack of all trade" title is a bit misleading, since they are a bit too good at everything than most would expect with that title
also on the topic of this balancing i guess i should note im on pc
aim assist alone would probably change balancing on console
yep
Hey does anyone know what the first 24gb of data allow you to do? (PS4 download)
If I had to guess I'd say it's only story mode, with online being available after the full 107gb
Couldn't find it on Google
Why are BF4 admins so salty when you kill them? Kicked me because I killed him twice in a row with my tank when he is in a scout heli
anyone know why nvidia dlss is greyed out? i'm on a 3070 at 1440p, already enabled dx12 and dxr then restarted the game a few times
Is the ariska 99 good for sniping
yeah it’s very solid for all purpose sniping
thx I am rank 2 for sniping
So whats the best of the 3
M1907 sf?
Best all purpose sniper is enfield or gewer
Gewer pretty nice
Use to hate it
Enfield prolly my fav tho
Love the versatility
only thing is scope is ass
Kar 98 gewer krag and enfield
All u need
Love gewers reload
Where do u buy skins with company coins
i have no idea where to even begin with this...
same
best of what 3? are you asking and expecting a reply or asking and answering on your own?
lee is only good with iron sights iirc, put any other sight on it ruins its ROF
The m1907 takes a whole mag to kill one person'
no lol
then you're aiming for your enemies toenails
I remember T bag making a vid how it was nerfed 1 year ago I think
im gonna assume youre thinking of 5.2 with the fg42
that was a huge thing for a moment
5.2 fg42 was almost usless
13 hits to kill someone with an lmg is stupid no matter what
idk, i used it at that point and still did good
i just didnt use it beyond 30m
under 30m the thing shredded
It was an assault rifle for support, It didn't need to be toned back at all.
If they wanted to make the underdog weapons fine, fiddle with their ranges and values instead of nerfing the others just for some weird ass thing.
i dont think it was a "toned back" scenario, but a "category change"
basically went from an AR to an smg
Which it didn't need at all because it wasn't an smg
fg42 in 5.2 was fine for its intended role
It really did, it may of been still usable but it was so shit.
dice literally said its intention and people ignored it and complained it sucked at range
The type 100 did better overall than an lmg, and thats fucking stupid.
maybe for a large capacity weapons it’s fine, but the FG42 has a 20rd mag
thats opposite of what i would expect as balanced
Really what it had versus the stg 1-5 was lower horizontal recoil
Intentions aside, the gun was gonna suck with that nerf
thats kind of huge though
but does that require making it a 13 HIT gun at range?
I think the complaint is that the gun didn't make sense to be as weak as it was given its IRL role
theres other viable options
It is but on that, 5-9 to 6-13. They were balanced on rate of fires but they couldn't properly fix it.
A big old rifle round taking 13 bullets to kill at midrange just...felt off
The gun's got a thump to it, and it was very unsatisfying
It’s a big gun
this is really the only reasonable argument imo, and thats even kind of a lame argument considering its a game
A gun like that shouldn't take 13 hits to kill someone, when it was reduced to 9 it was still very bad.
4-6/7 rewards the user more for controlling their gun reliably at a range.
converting caliber to arbitrary hitpoints and number dmg values is a flawed system in the first place
well I would expect a full rifle round to do more damage then a tiny little pistol round
but thats not logical at the same time
I'm not so sure about caliber and all that, otherwise a .45 round would put your lights out. Its just that the feel of the gun was much heavier than it hit back in 5.2, which led to it just not working well
https://images.app.goo.gl/Tjec5cjgqZYD8nBy6
This is the bullet the FG42 used
The bullet spongeyness also started quickly
Which felt unnatural
idk, i think im being pretty objective here since i dont have knowledge of these weapons at all
so im purely basing their performance based on what they do in game
Just bought battlefield V and it keeps starting with the intro
the fact is fg42 for its intended purpose in 5.2 was a decent gun that fell off at range hard
the only way to argue against that is to bring in outside sources to make a claim for why it was bad/wrong/off/etc
May as well just use the 44 which was the better all rounder, or an actual smg from medic like the type 100 considering how powerful those two were during the time.
Fg42 had nothing on either due to lmg handling either
ok
basically, if this wasnt a game based on real shit there would be no valid way to complain about the funtion of fg42 in 5.2
Which is clunkier than the assault rifle sprint out time (while seems to be a small different is still quite big)
670 Territory means all rounder not smg
in WW2, the FG42 was supposed to be an LMG that weighed no more than a Kar98, was select fire and could mount a scope for sniping
thats cool
it was supposed to be capable at range
If a gun outside of a submachine gun has a high rof then the easy fix to balance them is give them wild recoil values and a smaller mag.
again, the only complaints to be had are referring to outside game sources
I mean once again thats bringing in irl stuff, as opposed to an intended, in-game role
Which is valid, but it still felt off.
to me its weird people want to bring irl examples to prove a point but to only a certain degree
I keep on bringing it up, it was an assault rifle before and being changed to an smg without any changes to make it more cqb friendly made it fall flat to other guns, as again, the suomi or type 100.
lets go all out and have an lmg that uses the caliber rounds as a sniper be 2btk to kill
even though rof is way faster
like it doesnt make sense
Sure it had almost no recoil but its damage range well pfft what the fuck does that matter anymore.
was still a decent gun despite other guns being better, which will always be the case
cant use relative to disregard
What monke weapons are being discussed now
fg42 in 5.2 patch
The bananathrower
It was an assault rifle that was pinpoint then it was changed to an smg with inferior sprint out and mag, yeah as an assault rifle it had inferior mag size still but it had control going for it.
It was a good gun then
i dont think discussing what it was before or after has any bearing on what they tried to do besides asking why change it in the first place
Now that its been almost reverted its an incredibly good gun for support.
its not like you were forced to keep using it and there wasnt a replacement within the LMG role either
Its now an all rounder for the support, up there with the Bar for an aggressive mg for support.
It feels like it would be perfect in either Assault or Support
I hope we get battle rifles
We better
Yeah it fits that heavy AR role right now, which I think is where it should've stayed
Yus
13 BTK just didn't feel right with it
i personally loved picking a gun everyone said was useless, and then shit on the entire server because im not dumb and know how to play a weapon to its strengths...
If I wanted an smg I'd pick medic which sponges bullets
I enjoy just choosing guns no one runs
This was me in BF1 with the Lewis Gun
Who cares about high time-to-kill when aim punch doesn't give a shit about time-to-kill
I'm not saying it was useless. It was good in its role, but it didn't feel like it belonged there
shoot first, make their screen shake, and win
yes, if you are trying to be effective, if youre trying to send a message, stomping a server with 5.2 fg42 was a good way to do that
If you can beam someone's head you will always win
Pick a weaker gun and shove it in their faces
If I wanted to make a difference right round there I'd pick medic
If I wanted to anchor id abuse slow auto bar
Cause that shit was stupid
i just kind of hate that the community can complain so much that dice gets rid of something unique in favor of being slightly different
While yeah on one part everyone gravitates to one gun or yada yada, Doing that kind of patch made shit even worse.
now we have 50+ primary weapons that most of them can said to be the same to 5 other weapons
If you wanted to be successfull now or at launch just pick the stg 1-5, fg42, bren ( i can list a lot but I won't for the sake of space)
As they are easy to use
5.2 /.2 stg 44 why the fuck not, the 1-5 unnecessarily... weak
Chunky was going through my head
It made more people go for the 44 instead of trying anything else as they would fuck you over.
As I said, if you wanted to make underdogs good, You can buff their stats.
i mean, 5.2 was huge changes at once, of course it wasnt balanced
Mp40 and sten could have used a 568 fire rate with maybe better range to compensate without reducing range of the other guns
Ooooor another gun could have had less recoil, those are better changes as it makes the higher up players want to experiment more.
If you wanted to make snipers more lethal, as they did, increase their bullet velocity.
Dead game
understandable, it did come out 2+ years ago and its a "blockbuster" title, that normally loses players once the next "blockbuster" comes
No dude he said it's dead so obviously it's dead
I mean
He clearly knows more than we do
Oh right sorry, its not mainstream craze so its obviously dead
Nah, still going strong
Don't give the rand attention
his argument is foolproof
bf5 is dead

hey look we got another comedian
no bf5 is dead bad game

Play fallout 76
:troll:

perhaps a fetus
ah yes, the classic "bfv bad"
without providing any reason why 
Nope, you don't need to. Just say "bfv bad" and watch the liberal tears fall
this guy gets it
upvotes on the left folks
Ooook
I got banned from the Xbox discord for saying shit 😔
U are my friends now
omggggg bad word
ban
Fuck
Poop
omggg offensive
ban
Shit and cum


Tbh this is some really shitty shitpost hours
in #battlefield-legacy-titles no less

if you say a cuss word, then you are like, if you say a cuss word and you go to jail, and if you go to jail and if you say a cuss word
you are gonna eat broccoli and other vegetables for your whole life

:(((((((( bad offensive
ban
fine, alright
Hey how do you report a hacker?
the EMP is so good in bf5
what platform you on?
PC
on pc theres a report system built into origin
find the hackers profile and report them therw
there
Ah ok thanks for the help
no problemo
Salut personne pour jouer sur PC a BFV
@hot juniper Moi stuvv
Can we cuss in here?
yea
K
Is nyphon a Pokemon
NOOOOOOOO
Whats the fastest bullet velocity sniper
I forgot fucking paste again
-granty
is that for his pc build in tech?
¯_(ツ)_/¯
K my aim is so perfect i need a gun that hits wherever i put them crosshairs
Reccomend krag or kar
i like krag more, but i really dont think theres much of a difference
i think i liked the krag sight more
i prefer kar but yeah as you said, differences are pretty minimal
kar just looks and sounds nicer imo
Seems when u dont harden scope Kat is more swaying
The krag easy to snipe without holdin breath more
But idk krag seems to miss some perfect shots sometimes
Some guns just dont suit people
i used ross just one time i liked it
but i think in BF1 it was better
for me the best sniper is the Kar, gewer 95 its better but i cant use it
m95 is probably the nicest bolt action imo
versatile, consistent, high damage, and a very nice 3x scope
plus top tier reloads
in brazil we laugh with kkk, not lmao, lol, etc
Sucks at moving targets sucks at range has bad bullet drop
Only perk is fast cycle
But enfield better at that
i like the reload animation
Id say enfield and gewer r the most "versatile" of all
yeah
But the krag n kar good for long range
i like the mas 44
3 shot kill pretty good
but like, a lot of semi auto rifles are good
Can anybody help me with my bf 5?
AGm42 is real shit hate that gun
what you need
I can hear people ingame, but its not thoru my headset, but my screen. How do i change it?
try settings and audio
I know, but i dont know what to do after that..
never saw people with that problem
are you on pc?
Yup
Thats cool
if only the ross had a straight pull bolt in bf5
it has a lot of recoil
itd make it viable
Check your audio devices in game settings.... look for something that says output audio and make sure that is set for whatever your headphones are plugged into
Bfv is better then bf1 but bf3 is the superior game imo
Wow
No no no
No
what
Bf1 doesn’t have that many players
I mean you can’t play the game is there arnt players
Idk
and still can find servers
Yah I said that too
Yeah I'd recommend BFV
I mean you can get bf1 if you want you can still find games but I would say bfv
Though if you can find BF1 for cheap it can't hurt to snag it too yeah


