#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages ¡ Page 3273 of 1
Battlefield 5?
Well, Isle is one of the coolest looking elites
Of course bf5
okey my friend
What game?
Do we know when BF6 is gonna hit?
no first bf0.5 then bf6 fdice logic)
I had BF4 and it was super fun on XBOX
Ik I felt bad
But, Iâm on PC, which is way better, and now I want to try out BF again, do we know when BF6 is coming? Iâm really excited for next gen graphics and my laptop gpu heating itself to death!
Discrete 2060
I run at 1080p and get GOOD frames, but like, with next gen graphics on highest
Mmmm
Itâs a laptop 2060
Oh
whaat how
I run everything at highest normally
Which 1080p doesnât really show to well
But, itâs fineeee
gpu 1080 on high settings 150fps, but then monitor is limited to 144fps so ig
My 13 yo cousin got him a $4k setup but only plays mc and roblox đ¤ˇđťââď¸
Wait what was the first Battlefield
BF
Battlefield 1942
Ok
BF1942
I like to call it the demo for Battlefront V
BF2 was the best
Especially Battlefields V's Pacific War
jk
Hello, Can I ask a question?
Go ahead?
How much time does it take for EA support to respond to the ticket
too long
and it's been weekend so that could have been one reason
chat is of course quicker than email
i chatted with them
Question when was Battle field I released
I know BF1 was like.. 4 years ago
Donât know 1942
Uh
1942 came out.. 18 years ago?
Maybe 19?
So how did we get Battlefield I in 2016 looking so good but then we look at Battle Front 2 in 2017
I mean like wtf
Does anyone have Strong FPS drops in BF5?
I mean, battlefront 2 looked nice I think
Not really sometimes but not all the time
Compared to the og no
But then we look at BF 1 and 5 they blow all out the water
Yea
Well of course it would look better
So how did we get a graphic drop
Then shouldn't we be getting graphics like Pong graphics
Iâm just not following here-
Eh

battlefield 6 release year?
next year
bf1 has been the best battlefield since 1942
and is stillt he best
imo
too bad that the playerbase is shrinking day by day
happy enough that i can find a full operations server that stay full over a few hours
The only good battlefields in my opinion are 1942 4 and 1
I didnât like 3 for the sole reason of that fucking blue tint
Never minded the blue tint
And the weird controller mapping
And from what I know battlefield 6 is gonna be pretty much bf3
i think playerbase of battlefield 4 is the biggest by far?
No lol
i mean like bf4 is the most active battlefield playerbase?
No lol
which bf then??
5
oh really
Latest game
well i thought bf4 cuz bfv got 2 much negative reviews
ÂŻ\_(ă)_/ÂŻ
ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
Review bombed
If you don't like the era, just go for 4
Man I am have been just vibing to polish cow while playing BF1
It's still active enough to play
its all about that flir and ir
The only bf game that's truly dead is hardline
idk if its dead.. there are still players and servers
Yeah few Servers are there to play but not many
so its not dead..
No but you can't play every Gamemode
doesn't really matter..
its like bfv i play only conquest and breakthrough.. so i dont really mind the other game modes
on hardline i played only conquest
so.. yeah it worked out
@lunar lion excuse me but why did i get a "blm" announcement on my bfv game?
I'm unable to see the problem
he's the admin of the discord server.. he's not a game dev..
and so what if you got it?..
He's obviously informed about the game!
its not like they have it written on your tank while you play
I mean I'm here to play a game not see some stupid none sense.
If you are going to complain atleast about something that makes sense
But why did they have to list it anyway?
because its 2020.. deal with it
Just move on lul
So what you are saying is, that they were forced to put it on their game or get cyberbullied in twitter?
horrible.
If you are going to get butthurted by this I can't take you seriously anymore
what i am saying henrik is that you're a dummy.. and its funny your fuse lighted up so late...
Damn you're right, it might be an encrypted message! but to whom...
how does it feel to be a dumbass trying to get some attention of something that everyone already managed to put behind them?
bad i guess..
anyway.. have a good one
Just enjoying the time we had.
why you guys keep joining vc then leaving....
yeah sure, you can maybe find one or so populated server, but it's not as active still as the other ones. I don't see recommending a game if there's not enough variety of choosing a server in a bf game.
is bf hardline still playable?
If you can find a game sure
Yeah it's really fun if you have found a Game
helo

lmao felt that
I love the song
id love to have a squad again to vibe in operations with
BFV>BF1>BF4
I can't judge bf4 but I agree with 1 and v
Yay, i now have the same amount of time in BF1 and BFV

I have issues
So you are an Air Superiority player
Bf4 ps4, stuck on connecting
Then you play a lot of BF3
basically
What's your overall time played?
nice
What's the difference between the normal and Lawrence of Arabia's SMLE bf1
Nothing really
Found a Panzer IV completely unattended in the middle of our line.
Went and appropriated it.
Topped the scoreboard despite not even intending to have a damn tank to begin with.
Thankfully, the specs on it were good ones. The AP shell on that thing is damned effective.
Cod is better

Also there was some idiot advancing his Sherman towards us with his rear presented.
It became a race between me and our Sturmtiger to see who'd nail him first.
I won.
Though only barely because he fired a shot between my two that went just a bit wide.
Forgot the part where I asked
According to the Battlefield wiki, you're actually right.
https://battlefield.fandom.com/wiki/Battlefield_4#:~:text=The singleplayer campaign is set,at an all-time high.
DICE knew what will happen 6 years ago
like wth
Does this mean...Shanghai is going to get leveled by the end of this year?! D:
Oh no
Fuck
Red said context 
From what i gather, people are saying that BF4 is forshadowing 2020 events, with the collapse of the largest observe dish or sth
@untold helm
its fun
But im guessing, its forshadowing of the Lebanon and Yemen wars that came in 2007 till 2015
Oh in that sense
with a bot changer thing
yeah đ I liked BF2
BF6 is probably going to be larger, number of players on a map wise
and probably larger battlefields as well
128v128 games, with HUGE maps
hope they add bots
Depending on the hype it will get, i don't think they will need to actually
My guess is that there will be still 32v32, 64v64 and 128v128 game modes
"just play the campaign then lol" 
And seeing how Breakthrough was popularized with BF1 and BFV, still having pretty much full servers on that game mode in BFV. A 128v128 breakthrough would be actually pretty kewl if you ask me
Although, the thing I'm hoping for the most, is sniper class server limits
It would be bad if like 50 out of the 128 players were recons xd
personally i doubt we'll see any increase in player count, or not any large increases
purely from a design/gameplay perspective, doubling the player count brings issues where you have to completely rethink map design and balance
Well they have said that during internal testing, the 120 players per team was a sweet spot. Them also trying 200v200
can you provide an official source for that?
i think people are reading into the scale comments way too much tbh
1000v 1000 literal warzone 
its basically just a marketing thing that they say before every launch - it doesnt necessarily mean anything really
Yeah I will try to find it, I've seen it in one of the videos of Jack frags or maybe LvlCap
bfv had 'never before seen scale' with the largest single structure in any battlefield game (the twisted steel bridge) and Hamada being the largest multiplayer map in the franchise, bf1 had the first iteration of operations which was something completely new, it also had the largest player-controlled vehicles
stuff like that, its marketing so you can pick and choose and make vague statements that are technically true but maybe not what people interpreted them to mean
honestly same with leaks that don't provide any actual evidence other than "dude trust me". a datamine is a lot more substantial, but a guy making a vague statement on twitter with nothing to substantiate his claims isnt worth paying attention to
yup yup, it's smart to stay critical about the information people "leak" đ
@brave coral Ok, seems im mistaken and the info about the playercount was an "insider leak". Saying that the maps are being designed for 128+ players in mind, but 32v32 will also be in the game
That was posted by a somewhat credible leaker on twitter named Tom Henderson, like 95% of his leaks were truthful, but yeah, take it with a grain of salt nontheless, its not official news, so there is no data to back that claim back
i have seen that but as i said, best to not really pay attention to it since the only credibility the leak has is that the guy claims to be an insider
realistically all of his leaks have just been reasonable educated guesses which were vague enough that if theyâre correct he can go âyeah i was right hahaâ and if theyâre wrong he can just go âwelp guess they changed their mind /shrugâ
take a shot everytime DICE says "never seen before" on an upcoming game
You want us to end up in the hospital or what?
Tbh, every next BF title has something nothing seen before in the franchise xD
If its non-calculated destructions, to fluid animations, scale of structures, scale of maps....they always bring something new to the series
non-scripted destructions*
Take a shot everytime Apple says "this is the most powerful phone ever created" lmao
yes thatâs what i mean, based on that clip from ea play it could well be destruction stuff which would be cool
What'd make it dynamic?
They call it dynamic but the animation are just repeated
Take a shot every time I kamikaze 
true dynamic destruction would be very taxing on the server/systems
With the next gen thing it should be possible atleast
itâs always going to be limited to a certain degree of scripted-ness
There's like 5-6 million messages here
A destruction system would be simple enough
Better get drinking
Sorry I was typing without thinking
A destruction system thats simple and workable is all we need
I would like it if we could rebuild full walls, doesn't have to be straight concrete it could just be a weaker wooden wall
Imagine blowing up a power line and the entire map's power goes down
Wouldn't make a difference
But immersion
It would get annoying
you can make it a bit more dynamic/varied but while you could feasibly get close to full fluidity, would it actually bring that much to the game considering the work youâd have to put in and the downsides of it
probably not
I dont get it though, how would it be Immersive if it happened all the time predictably?
Sorry I just don't see it
Well, if you shoot a wall, you expect it to fall down, not to float up đ
Immersive in the way that if you were to blow up a power line in another game, the map's power for buildings and shit don't go down
I can imagine if a hard building gets punished HEAVILY and then the external lights went off signifying that its been hit hard
i have to say, i would like to see better bullet pen mechanics in the next game (potentially changeable with attachments if we get a gunsmith-esque system)
Well BFV did have un-scripted destruction, but it was segmented. With the effects of the crumbling bits being calculated on the go, but it was still segmented so you would assume that if you shoot a wall, only that part of the wall will fall down etc.
The next step would be procedural destruction on a larger scale, one segment affecting the other
Or maybe even blowing a dam to dry the river out on a map so they can't use gunboats to flank
Many things can be done
Now if we want to talk destruction on an absolute massive scale,
Breaking PCs and consoles alike
Well, seeing at the demo they released earlier this year, they are diving into procedural un-scripted destruction
Total destruction physics in cities
i mean there wasnât actually anything saying that
we saw like a 10 second clip of part of a building collapsing
Collapsing skyscrapers left and right, dust clouds covering your entire screen
Utter fucking chaos
That's why I said it would break consoles and PCs alike
Oh
Can't
Damn I'm tired
that would be incredibly taxing likely on servers and client systems alike
and as i said, just because you could feasibly do it with a high end system, doesnât mean that itâs actually a good idea
Lads easy fix
Not if the Server is only responsible for the end result and the clients PC is responsible for physics calculations
Have a nuke hit the map make everyoneâs screen turn white or black and have the city destroyed then your screen fades to normal

Hey we won!
Collapses of fucking radiation sickness
if all the computing power and resources are going into this thing just to make a destruction system, what is going to be the impact on the rest of the game? thatâs a lot of budget, youâre going to see significant performance drops
ive seen more taxing effects from particle physics to swarm physics....destruction isn't that taxing really if you do it right
Its not a lot of budget
You just need to build the buildings in a different way model wise
the rest is done by the physics engine
Yea but it has to be procedurally generated
They don't need to build each building bit by bit like lego. Its procedual. You really need only the skeleton or refrence point for the engine to calculate the rest
True
the final shot of this, when the space anomaly crashes into the building, those building are procedurally generated, those aren't real buildings modelled by hand
and the physics system done the rest of the job
Destruction can be simple not crazy
ofc BF6 wouldnt be on that scale, but that just proves the point that we have the knowledge on how to execute this types of physics since 2017
They toned back the destruction on bf3 cause on bad co2 maps would literally have no cover
The way I see things, BF6 will be the final game unless we decide to go back to the future in 2021
Actually
That's a damn good coincidence
So make it grand in scale
Nah, BF2142 was bad xD
Oh yeah 2142
It was a cool concept, but Dice shouldnt do that
I just looked up "Battlefield 20" and saw 2021 and 25 without realizing they were not Battlefield games
Just a movie and a release date
So I'm stupid
2142
xD
But as I was saying
BF6, if it's the last of the series
Needs to be epic in scale and grandeur
Something to go out with a thermonuclear bang
But what could be greater in scale than a cold war gone hot?
BFV already had a longer than usual support cycle tbh
And them probably also going to re-do Firestorm for the next BF title
If they can support the game for longer, with more updates, keep it afloat for longer, they would have the time to think and develop another title calmly without any rush
The last thing we need is for them to rush it
If its modern, then boy, there are hundreds of weapons and maps they could add
Yeah but where's the uniqueness? It would be all the same tech we see today
Not really
God knows they'll just make it another China and Russia against NATO
there are a lot of weapons not shown in recent FPS games
Weapons yes,
With even tanks like the PL-01
But overall technology?
If we do cold war, it could be a very interesting experience
We wont do cold war
There were tons of testing and prototypes
Dice never done cold war
Imagine a game dev making a fps that doesn't hate russians
The world was on the cusp of opening a technological gate
and looking how they are retracing their foot steps, the new BF would be around BF2 and BF3
So they skip straight to modern after WW2, eh?
With the Kazakhstan easter egg....The Kazak war was in BF2
Yup
just like they did before
BF1943 and straight to BF2
They want to one up CoD. Would be dumb to go to Cold War, when CoD releases yearly, they would be stuck on Cold War for the next 2 years minimum whilst CoD will bring modern warfare... Something the BF community wants
I would like something fresh
Modern war just doesn't seem to have that
It would just be another BF3 or BF4
Yeah, the most loved games in the series xD
Most loved, but if you make another modern Battlefield, some people would simply say BF3 or 4 did it better, you know people would.
Modern war does not add anything new to the table
You can try to argue that,
Allow me to once again say that near future is the way to go
But I'm not going to have a other battlefield that's gonna grow stale because it's being static
Imagine a battlefield game with the weapon design of Infinite Warfare or Cyberpunk 2077
You could get Battlefield 2042 and have all the grit a future design can have (something that seems to be in high demand) and also have all the creative freedom DICE can handle.
I think it could be smth similiar to the bf4 dlc that ads railguns (dont remember the name)
Sounds like it
Either way....you can't tell me future shit isn't cool lmao
Final stand was very nice, it added a good bit to the table
Why shouldn't they do a 2142? When you can be creative as all hell
The future would be nice, but cold war could still be pretty nice if we want to stay in conventional warfare
Idk man
The shit i take rn seems pretty similiar to the shit i will take 10 years later
Maybe just me tho
Well a 2143, w/e
But future wouldn't be too bad
Tbh airborne was lovely 
But people will screech that its ripping off cod
I'd prefer 2042 frankly
Kek
Final stand is a good balance of modern and future
Cod and Battlefield have been competing for years, people will screech about it
2142 just seems too far future
2142 would basically be mechs and shit, lasers, starfighters and jump packs
Which could be jolly fun, in all rights
Sure
Jump packs that are properly balanced then sure
I'd rather it not look like Halo though
But its not quite mechs and shit
Besides, I think the PAC used plasma based weaponry
I honestly hate the way Halo looks, its too shiny
And the E.U used old ballistics
(not that I think Halo is bad, just the design isn't for me)
Never played Halo.
I'm a playstation kid
The only one I played was reach
And that was at a friend's house
I never really played it either
Or just make it the great emu war
Either way....2042 would be cool change my mind lul
Thanks for reminding us of how Australia lost a war with a population of flightless birds
It would be cool to see how the tech progressed to 2142
Yeah
Just play Titanfall then if you want 2042 or 2142 xD
Titanfall is too close to CoD for my tastes
Nerf birb
I want the scale of Battlefield
then play Planetside 2
(also titanfall kinda dyin lul)
Planetside is walking simulator with guns basically
There is a reason why Infinite war failed
It's fun for it's massive scale, large assaults on fortified positions,
Infinite warfare failed despite the fact that as usual its sales went really well?
And we all know how much everyone was saying BF1 was better
But other than that,
Do you think theoritically smth like warhammer 40k would work?
Or is that just too silly
If you minimize it to imperial guard vs orks and keep it on the groud it could work as a form of spinoff
Hey I got to the right level for a weapon left mid game now it says that it will unlock next round Iâve played 13 rounds since that
I actually asked about a 40k Battlefield
Still nothing
Play a full game of combined arms
Honestly, I think it would be too unbalanced
@queen canopy Infinite warfare sold 1.8mil while BF1 sold 5.1mil xD
excuse me? neither of those numbers are correct 
in the launch period (first month or two) IW outsold bf1
no but he put the decimal there he clearly knows what hes talking about
The faction strenght doesn't have to be role friendly
bf1 does have more cumulative sales by this point but thatâs not exactly surprising
In my experience, infinite warfare was really quiet
Looking at Launch period sales, No Man's Sky was one of the best selling games in that case đ¤ˇââď¸
Did people love No Mans sky? no they didnt
Turn your audio up
and Infinite Warfare saw a 50% decrease later on
with BF1 surpassing it
not to mention that Infinite Warfare got 2 nominations, while BF1 got i think 8 and won one of them
I didn't mean it like that snoop
Cod mostly makes cash grab games. Very mediocre, but interesting enough to draw people in
I mean, the news
Newer cod games anyway
17 nominations and 1 win actually
Infinity ward did a good job
They are simple, casual fun
But they do get greedy ye
There are always people to buy the new cod games regardless, bf1 may of been better recieved but infinite as a whole got more sales.
Infinite warfare is also one of the most hated trailer on YT with 3.9mil dislikes, and only 630k likes đ¤ˇââď¸
BF1 was better than Infinite Warfare
Doesnt determine sales
The butchered space oddity sadly but eh
Yeah
@tawdry folio huh
@sour stratus BF1 outsold Infinite Warfare and Titanfall 2 combined, despite Infinite warfare having better launch sales....
Veri funi
that says something right there
and as mentioned before, CoD has a fanbase that automatically buys new titles
Do bf1 sales include copies that came with the xbox one?
Honestly im hoping the new gen doesnt do what the last gen did
Where devs decided that every game needs a battle royalr
Titanfall 2 was pretty good, not gonna lie though
I loved the fluid movement system
Water with the alt account again
@ancient ocean Most were Playstation players actually, with PC and Xbox having similar numbers
Pretty sure that answer tactically makes no sense
But the Xbox + BF1 bundle probably still counts as a sale a
Seeing how other bundles were present, people chose the BF1 + Xbox bundle
Still are purchasing the game alongside the console
Either way, point being, players don't really want futuristic FPS games from CoD and BF
besides that wouldnt make much sense
since Dice has the Battlefront series
Futuristic settings can work
so why would they make a game competing with their own game?
People just don't know what they want from a futuristic setting without butting heads with everyone else
Actually Ive seen a lot of that want another bf 2041 or whatever year it is
People don't know what they really want
And ive seen more wanting BF2, BF3 and BF4 style game
A game can do extremely well if the base game play is good enough.
Why not both đ¤ˇââď¸
People are the problem, we should get rid of them
Cold war + BF2 style
BF2 or BFT2?
Because that abbreviation is starting to get confusing
I'm just gonna start using BFT for Battlefront
BF2 đ Battlefield
I hate that abbreviation too....i type in BF2 in google thinking about Battlefield 2 and Battlefront 2 pops up like REEEEEE
Bf2 = battlefield 2, sw:bf2 = star wars battlefront 2
Well we will learn in Spring what the setting of BF6 will be
^
I want a polished game
i want weapon customization back tbh
like attachments and stuff
not just scopes and paintjobs
The present day seting is boring, I cant wait to go to generic modern town in the desert number 933
I just want bikini tacticool outfits đŤ
Bad
Yeah that's what I said
Modern is becoming stale
It's the same thing over and over again
Oh look at that, an Abrams! As If I haven't seen a thousand of those already. And we're fighting in China? Wow, big surprise
The generic stuff is def bad. But imagine if they put maps in india, Australia, africa, interesting places in Europe, a melting Antarctica research facility
It's why I suggested Cold War for how broad it could be
There are a multitude of battles to do
They can do so much more with a faux reality modern take.
An advance on Paris, East Berlin
cough near future allows for creative freedom and new settings cough
Or maybe Soviet Operations in middle east as a forward operations region
Soviet air-dropping over the west coast or in Alaska
Im kinda tired of russians as enemy tho xd or placed in some eastern europe decrepit looking environment
Take the DC missions setting from MW2, turn them into a Battlefield map
a ice themed map sounds kinda fire tho
Anyway
But thats what people will expect from a cold war gamw
Why not the US on the offensive, change things up?
Ice map plus destruction + flooding areas = cool
Big nationalistic surge occurs in some timeline and we get a lot more aggressive
Ultranationalist infighting
Sure
Cavemen vs computerwarriors
Take the MW storyline and turn it on its head
no tech vs tech
You talking abt bf6 or what
monke warfare
It was also basically cops and robbers
I want random chimp event as levolution in BF6
Giving LE some recognition
Maybe the nature balance caused places to flood or become unlivable due frequent natural disasters, so countries greedily try to take over eachothers countries for survival or places not so well traveled. Thus creating the new world war
So basically...prequel to 2142
Sounds like an idea
Just call it bf2021
No
Actually that would be a nice touch
2042 def good xd
I mean 2142 was all about the earth running out of resources and companies and govts fighting over what's left
from what I know at least
So, Corporations become a power of their own, creating their own paramilitary forces to protect assets and to extort other factions through embargo?
Corporations as a military power
Right have some 10 hour a day office worker guy fighting
They still need civilian workers
But with the world collapsing on itself
They need to create an alternative to protecting assets
And the more I think of that
The more I imagine ronald mcdonald in combat gear holding a group of burger king mercs hostage
That would be the government
i am gone for 1 hour and there is 295 messages geez
The battlefield discord experience
yes 
A corporation doesnt need to protect itself by military thats the governments job
Similarly in like ww2 where navies escorted cargo ships
Doesn't mean a company can't start a private military
Their own company doesnt have to build battleships
Tbh, companies these days already become larger than governments these days and can cause influence over citizens due their social media
Well yeah, they would outsource the work to another company
Even when the world is on the brink of collapse, Governments can no longer support funding for corporations, resources are scarce, and there are literal civil wars breaking the world to pieces?
Sounds like Corporations can make a hell of a profit from extortion
Then the world is in pieces
A battlefield with companies taking over territory would be interesting
And at that point anyone who has guns can take territory
Basicly like how isis took territory in iraq and syria cause there wasnt anyone to stop them
Not maybe it should
Technically, this is battlefield
It started on the topic of a futuristic war
And we are listing scenarios
Not always
I'm down with nuclear annihilation
It's a last resort for many world powers
Well i dont think kim jong un doesnt care about losing his population
That's why I said most
Even then, N. Korea isn't a power
Sure it can destroy South Korea,
But as soon as they do that
Only with nukes
We can end them
Hah! If their nukes even work
I'm talking about the thousands of artillery they have in the mountains
They're a chihuahua that's going off all the time
Once they make a move
The us has permanent bases all over near north korea and china
We can utterly destroy them in one swift movement
The only real issue is China will back them up
What's really funny is that you guys think a conflict of that scale could happen without the entire world being destroyed
Guam
Only non nuclear wars would be like the iraq war
Where many countries would pariticipate
There's no way you could start an actual war with N.K without someone else stepping
In
If you had read all that I had said,
You would know I mentioned china
As the real issue
Considering North Korea gets all of its equipment from China
And are very close with each other
Even as a retaliatory strike for attacking South Korea
China will step in and we will have a world war
Tho tbh it would kinda be cool having a war between south and north k cause it's basically just ww1 and also ww2 with the French making a fortified line across the border
admins on community servers can kick people, right?
Just with a lot more artillery
And as always, Switzerland will be minding it's own business in a world war
I doubt they would start with a ground campaign
North Korea has nothing good except artillery
That's their only advantage against South Korea
should i get bf4 premium ??
Their air force is inferior
its about $5 ..
South Korea gets its backing from the united states
Old MiGs from the cold war
i don't know, it's just that in my country it's about 38$ -_-
Us could just bring the ronald reagan in
I mean there's a shit ton of mines out there so it would be rough pushing with infantry even with modern technology for detecting and disabling mines it would still take forever and would still probably miss alot
Thats why you first bomb down all the strategic sites and then advance on foot
Or do a beach landing
South Korea's main options would be paratroopers and aerial strikes
Also south korea has a fairly good navy aswell
I know that
Thats why they loaned the sub afterwards
But sinking one would still leave its strike group left and 10 more carriers
If one would get close to the carrier first
Yo
U know what would be nuts
If bf6 had drivable aircraft carriers
With vehicle spawns on them
Keep in mind that there are several destroyers in a strike group as protection and jets for immediate scrambling to aid as visual recon and anti air defense
1942 had them I believe
1942 had aircraft carriers subs a battleship or a cruiser
Drivable?
Yes
Also that article is so funny because it says "Key point: why are we still building aircraft carriers if the swidish can sink them" yes you lose one aircraft carrier so let's stop building ships for the navy and give up.
If an aircraft carrier would sink they would just build more ships
They have ship building facilities all over the world
Is anyone else having trouble with chat not working on BF V?
And the us has been building alot of lcs ships lately
Unfortunately the problem is expenses
I send a message and nothing happens... only been the last couple weeks
The US is spending money it doesn't have
Guess we just give up now that we lost a ship lmao
Do you reckon the swedish navy have to build their own ships ikea style?
Like imagine you start a whole war with another country and the first battle you retreat and give up after losing 1 soldier.
Well if your country only has 1 soldier...
What is this country, Sealand?
I want sealand as a playable faction in BF2021
World ended in 2020 in nuclear fire
Now there is only sealand
As the world superpower
Some guy named Josh still doesn't believe his luck
Yo
Damn was a round! Outpost Arras, Anti-panzer granade is my friend
"Fixed an issue that was causing for some players who were accessing Battlefield V via EA Play to show as Trial Users"
lol did they finally fix it?
it's been in the game since launch
honestly I dont fully trust that it's been fixed yet
true it is DICE after all ;D
but one can always hope
Not really a fix but I kinda hope they would change at least one of the "Tripoli" iron sights for M1928 Thompson to a M1 Thompson L sight as mostly seen on trailers. All available L sights have camo pattern on them
Whew
Updated loading screens
Funny I was just thinking of that the other day with how they advertised the tow reward
had few good rounds on that hardcore server.. pretty damn good.. (easy as well)
200% damage , no 3rd person on vehicles , no mini map and tk on
pretty awesome
im so happy to see they are still updating Battlefield V, i tought they said "Well this is it".. đ
community servers are pretty good when they have a good set up
well.. they just pushed an on switch on those.. they were in game
and loading screen art isn't really new content..
The name tags change is super welcome
bug fixes pog
EA needs a new anti cheat đŠ
Glad theres an update, sad the contents over
Man i actually really liked this game through its whole life cycle, sad to see the plug pulled
I know im kinda late to being sad lol but ig im not done grieving
I feel you
I finally got fully golden sniper the 99 ariska or whatever its called
whats'the new splash screen? i missed it on pc xD
I heard battlefield 6 is on the way what do you guys think the time period will be
dinosaur era
No
there are prehistoric chickens flying in the eastere gg of bfv tho
pretty much a confirmation
anklytank

Packs of Compsognathus (Compies) as a squad call-in
Kneecapasaur, it caps your kneecaps
Battlefield 19420BC
pteradons flocking out of the sky and grabbing up random raptors
bf19 420, hiphop music
and raggae
vision is always colourful and swaying
Lol
vehicles area lways smoking
Battlefield ant warfare
BFBUGS?
Like bugs life but war
So then we cant complain about actual bugs in the game, cause it will be too confusing if we're talking about developement bugs, or actual bugs in the game đ
Cockroach on Wake Island
Anthills r the objectives
that map would feel huuuge xd
Wake island as a bug but theres also a battle happening at the same time
maybe thats why they're working on npc soldiers đŽ
all makes sense now
fighting on a scale never seen before
Its all coming together
There is a fight that happens off side of Iwo Jima
Yea but theyre pretty low detail
Those ones they were showing looked pretty advanced
Almost like youd be close to them
Close enough to get stepped on
Cockroaches being so strong can be special spawns, like sentry kits mixed with vehicles
Idk abt you guys but this seems like a great idea for battlefield: bug company
@gray saffron lmao
Is EA support chat useful?
yeah
i'm on the queue hoping they will help me to fix bf5
dx12 is off right?
Yup
Yeah I hope
I just played yesterday for the first time
I'm stuck on No.1 on the queue
Battlefield bugs life do be sounding op tho
they fix bugs
they fixed the trial error that a lot of people encounter yesterday đŽ
or today, i lost passage of time
Are the updates weekly?
you didnt get killed by angra yet and the gods are punishing you for that
Wear Hell Hunter
you took ammo you don't need hahahahaha
What's your problem with decent uniforms? :p
HAHAHAHA
get quemadoâd
THAT REMINDS ME
also @prime pine you say that, iâve been killed by a smoke barrage... in a plane
I witnessed someone bail from their half track, then he crawled under the halftrack and promptly burned to death

Did you record it, i believe you but fucking hell.
awwh
Is battlefield 4 worth buying now or useless ?
It's not the fact that I died burned
It's the fact that the half track literally trapped me 
Man's Livin in da future
Ahmad my advice is to buy the permuim version , I am lvl 50 in bf4 i'm just a new player
it was a while ago so i donât have the clip but i remember complaining about it at the time 
but i think it will be alot fun to buy the premuim
Yeah but you get all the dlcs
Premium gives you all the map packs and weapons
and you unlock alot of maps
i think it's alot
because the normal game only has 10 maps
but those maps are usually hardly active though đŚ
Everything looks so good
yeah but there's premuim servers i remeber
Yee
I'm calling the support
Night narvik looks so beautiful
hope they fix my problem
pretty
Pretty pretty shiny shiny
Why is the quality slightly off? :p
looks like bf4
I may of screenshotted it in my touchpad which is of lower quality 
Is it good for 10 euros in origin ?
Its a steal
That's cheap asf
yee thats good price
But if I donât want weapons is it ok to stick with the standard one?
I wanna see the new BFV loading screen
What you guys talking about?
Update 7.3
iâm guessing itâs the one you wanted tbh
definitive cover
Best one
I wonder if the main menu will reflect the grey-blueish scheme or if it will remain orange
Well the update is set to release tomorrow so who knows
hope this update fix the game
It isnât
darn i thought it was lol
@barren hornet wishful thinking there bud
no one corrected me đŚ
Wut are they even changing?
read the link in #game-news and yhou'll find out :3
Yeah it just said various bug fixes
Meanwhile some more bf3
Yeah but his thumb tho
It's just the perspective
Guys, How to connect origin to steam
@sour stratus you canât unsee it
I can
the support told me to connect my origin to steam
i think now itâs been pointed out itâs what i see, but iâm not 100% sure it isnât just lighting + expecting to see it
Thanks alot mate
even if he had 3 right hands i wouldnt mind that much đ
he's not interupting me playing the game
@feral grotto it just looks weird, thatâs all
why the support need to check if i have bf5 or not
i just use my imagination.. he's ok.. and there's a shorter guy behind him going for a hug
Should I make a post highlighting it?
I think itâs just the line from the effect thingy is in just the right spot that it makes it look like the thumb is on the close side
But itâs not
its also the bone of the thumb that look closer.. look at his actual right hand
oh well. its funny
i like it
You are certainly right I think @prime pine đ I pulled it into photoshop and if you change levels and exposure, you can for sure see the thumbnail of the right hand, on the left.
Oh god
I connected steam to origin why didn't the support find it
Dice moment

Reddit punchin the air rn
They are? I better get over there. 
Unfortunately, I have to remove it đŚ Its a repost already.
Aye fuck
i absolutely despise teammates who steal reinforcements
@prime pine YOOOO I DID IT
Lmao
Lmaooooo
Still I love it
isnt the problem that its backwards?
I honestly hope they keep it now
@prime pine upon closer look you can see that it isn't a right hand

