#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages Ā· Page 313 of 1
and bf4s strafing
#streams-and-videos message literally no one asking for anything crazy just have this and the game is beyond better š
literally everything you can do becomes so much better because rotating between positions is much better and you can make better offensive plays
I donāt think more movement would be necessary cause DICE made a pretty intentional move with nerfing it but limiting how many explosives the classes got mightāve helped
I really hope with bf6 they figure out a better progression system than bf2042, like maybe make it much easier to get all the weapons faster and then give players other cosmetic rewards for higher levels
Idk why people are against this. It's not even that fast
Even basic console users should be able to use/track this movement with decent ease
The only "fast movement" I disagree with is stuff that only PC can do easily. And even then, I'd be fine with that as long as they limited crossplay
idk just keep spamming G and tell yourself the game is fun
it really isnt fast
the people that say it is are insanely delusional
the gunning is much better in bf5, though the movement feels like what you'd get in a battle royale so I can understand why people would be against that
the recovery after the slide is just too fast and doesn't punish people abusing it which is what makes it a bad feature
if they nerfed it into a movement that would only be used to reposition that could make it better
I mean you can literally slide up hill
Air strafe, bhop, all that is one thing I can maybe understand. But BFVs slide just exists cause of the backlash from back when dice nerfed slide into the ground with bf1
the more movement you add in fps games the less casual it becomes as well and I don't think this is something dice would want in the current state of everything battlefield
Yeah
I think it undermines the sandbox aspect of battlefield to act like āmovement techā belongs in this franchise at all
I think such high movement has a place in say cod or splitgate (last one is dead af so don't think about this one lmao) but absolutely not in battlefield
I enjoy the game and I think most of the community does too considering itās the most commercially successful entry. Bad balancing yeah absolutely, even BF4 in all its glory has a lot of the same issues you mentioned with bf1
I was actually agreeing with you and saying Iād probably like bf1 even more with less explosive spam
yeah but you said it as if making it gadget spammy is a good fix for removing any form of movement
I could be radical and say I donāt think any movement the human body canāt replicate should belong in arcade FPS but at the very least I can concede on bunnyhops and airstrafe (though slide just needs to be executed)
Oh I don't really care if the movement is realistic to what a human can do in real life, imo gameplay matters more unless you're trying to make a milsim
if the game was set on mars with justification for it having rocket slides i'd be ok with that
I can only assume DICE made the game gadget heavy to make up for lacking movement
just doesn't fit in grounded bf6
which is a horrible decision
Yeah I actually agree, I can excuse advanced movement if the theme maybe supports it
not only the theme necessarily, but also the gameplay itself
high movement doesn't translate well in large maps, 32v32 players games imo
you could take the planetside 2 example but that game doesn't have that much movement aside just a jetpack that basically just allows you to traverse vertically just to get to higher positions on the light assault class
At the very least I am an anti air rocket enjoyer
I find the anti tank rocket too cheesy and boring
Yeah I agree
I mean idk in my opinion whatās the point in the transport vehicles if you can just slide hop everywhere mindlessly lol thereās just too many implications to it. BF works better as a grounded shooter
do you consider bf4 "grounded"
also movement doesnt take away from that grounded gameplay if anything it actually heavily aids you to play the game because you arent forced to make single motion movements or just having lack of movement all together
meaning you can actually play your positions better
locked weapon sets for classes for bf6 makes no sense and will reduce the "battlefield" team coop play because everyone is honna class switch to their favorite gun regardless of class
why is this an issue
the problem with bf5 movement is that sliding has no downside
even delta force does it better
sliding or diving makes you vulnerable if you do it in the open
in bf5 it only gives you an advantage on top of being "too fast" for what it is
if it were like the way sliding works in say modern warfare 2022 then it wouldn't be as problematic
No, people will play the class they want to play just like any other game
Bait?
The system worked fine for 20+ years
also dice is currently leaning towards allowing classes to use any weapon to sell more skins
Overhated game ngl

MW22 was the closest any mainstream game got to being what Iāve been asking for since forever
how is having to use an ar on assault more fun than being able to use any other weapons on it
I don't hate cod games, I'm not the kind to hate games unless they have a terrible flaw or are a buggy mess
I used to hate 2042 because the release was complete buggy garbage
now it's fine but I only got it for 2$ cause I refunded it back when it released
Literally took less than an hour to realise how bad it was
bf2042 was dogshit from release evb knows that its the best newer game for under $5 on steam
All that means is nothing else is dropping besides the annual CoD and sports games
2042 will certainly die as soon as titles like BF6 and even gta 6 drop
Game doesnāt even have persistent servers or a browser for the only played game modes
I mean the numbers clearly show even with a 95% discount people would rather go back to bf5 or bf1 for the same price soooo....

I enjoy it here and there, but most people don't or have simply forgotten about it
which is why they currently have to give away free coins or parts of older battle passes to make people (whales) want to spend whatever money they have left to spend on it
128 is the only decent concept the game has to offer, but funnily enough DICE experimented with 128 and even 256 players as early as BF3 over 10 years ago and came to the conclusion that it just doesnāt work
no shit gta6 is gonna kill everything
Thing is 2042 is so bad that even a non fps game will destroy it
I'm having more fun on delta force than bf2042 rn, which is possibly the worst example of mtx filled spyware 
though the operators in delta force are just as bad as 2042 tbh
Thatās the only thing that kept me from trying it
yeah the operators with cutscenes and stories is just cringe ngl
you guys, what factions do you think we will have on the next btf? They talked about USA vs an european ex-nato faction?? mixed with latinamerican bros
Does anyone know why I suddenly started having over 150ms ping in BF4 and BF1 but not in BFV?
Those are literally the only games giving me trouble
seeing what's happening with them ignoring feedback in labs we're probably going to get a hero shooter slop with fake factions so I wouldn't bet on what factions we're gonna get
CAN YOU USE JOYSTICKS
i dont really know why do they do that, and that doesnt happen only with one company
Literally people is telling them how to make a lot of money and they dont understand
And DICE devs nowadays and more when they teorically remade their workforce should be battlefield veterans or at least know what did work before
It's NATO vs some PMC called Pax Armada
yes thats what I saw, the "PMC" is called "PAX-ARMATA" but, that name sounds Latin, could this faction be made up of latin countries (Spain, Italy, maybe France) and other countries in america, vs the rest of NATO? In 2042 lore its seems that there was a big world war that devastated lots of countries in Europe, without Nukes, russia or USA cant be behind that, or at least not directly.
and also we have Gibraltar battle, and they also speak of an amphibious landing map to recover gibraltar, that means Spain could be in Pax-Armata ...
Idk what they smoked to make the storymode but in the end I hope its good
Because they think the cod and fortnite logic of selling goody skins to casuals will apply to battlefield as well but people who play battlefield are not looking for a cod-like experience, which is why people were so angry when they released the santa skin in 2042. They need to understand battlefield is different compared to those franchises and work on that
This is the main reason why they don't want the classes in the first place, because they believe this will sell them more skins
and compared to cod, as we've seen with 2042, the players will actually leave if they're not pleased, all you have to do is check steamcharts of what happened with 2042, sure they reached 100k top concurrent players, but it dropped extremely fast for such a big franchise
Cod will always thrive even if its core identity is technically dead as of now because it's mostly played by extremely casual players that play 30-45 minutes after work and buy the yearly cod because they don't play anything else
mind you I enjoy cod as well, I just don't buy anything other than the game itself and maybe the battle passes if I manage to finish them (so i can buy the next ones for free)
but battlefield is simply different in what kind of hardcore and casual audience they cater to and they just don't seem to understand that
I don't think any countries are in Pax Armata. There's people from specific countries, but the countries themselves are likely not a part of it
not the countries taking part, but being controlled by force by pax armata yes, just like happened in cod ghost
We will see what this game is about soon
Facts
Lmao ikr
As early as 2011, DICE had already confirmed that their Frostbite engine was capable of up to 256 players and theyād tested this.
Whether this is too chaotic or not is entirely the fault of the game designers, not the player counts.
A simple command hierarchy can prevent relentless chaos (like commander > platoon leader > squad leader like I said).
Bro, thereās literally less than 24 hours until I get my new 5.1 surround sound system
Alright, I'm not exactly sure where to go with this, but I'm having a weird issue with BF4. Basically, a long while back, even though I hadn't purchased it, it said I that owned premium and whatnot and was given the benefits of it. I got the dogtags, the melee weapons, the camos, and I had access to all the DLCs. I just recently reinstalled BF4 and now I have none of it. I have the 2 DLCs that I already owned prior, I still have access to the Premium dogtags, melee weapons, and camos, but not the remaining paid DLCs. Whaaat is going on? 
Guys, is there still the playtest for the new Battlefield?
have you tried doing a google search?
Should I believe Google?
well first two results should give you the answer, pro tip, there is also a way of signing up on the second result, something called BF labs š
šš»š
Yeah its called battlefield labs
Wish I could have the opportunity to talk a lil trashnb listens to meš©
See chat stopped on me again I think it AI
Is better go talk to my AI gr we're going to build a tree house in the tropics loll

Hello! I want to get familiarized with Battlefield Multiplayer before Battlefield 6(?) launches next year(?).
What game would you guys recommend for Xbox. I am OK with either the modern setting of Battlefield 4 or the WW1 setting of Battlefield 1.
I guess mainly what I want to know is, which one has a bigger player population?
BFV
Battlefield 4 if that's feasible, you have to play on community servers to avoid cheaters but that's not fullproof either. If not Battlefield 1 is a great starting point. Start with the campaigns of both games, that will get you familiar with the controls
Heās on Xbox
In terms of player count battlefield 1 and battlefield 5 has a lot more players compared to battlefield 2042.
Since youāre on xbox either bf1 or bf5 will probably be good since you wonāt have loads of cheaters like we have on pc
If you can get it on extreme sale Iād still also recommend bf2042 even if itās not as popular
Yoo guyss
I'm in love with battlefield 1 and V and
I just heard Battlefield 4 servers are being shutdown on consoles
I'm afraid bf 1 will have the same fate in 2-3 years
I hope they don't shut it down i love this game so much š
Hopefully BF6 will be good and we will all be on that by then.
Won't run on my laptop
16 gb ram and intel iris xe
Can barely run rdr2 on 45 fps
They arenāt, that was a mishap
Iāve got consoles (so plug n play).
Battlefield
I've completed the campaign, but got no assignment rewards for Single Player at all, any fixes or just a stupid bug?
For BF4)
after being a fan of bf4, 1, and 5, i snagged 2042 on sale but now i cant play it cuz of this "secure boot" bs??
Battlefield
I mean your fault, it should be enabled by default on recent systems, skill issue + ratio
(/s)
It's a slightly complicated process, but try going on YouTube and search for a guide by EA on how to turn on Secure Boot
the 30,000 players on PS will not be pleased
Sounds like a lucky escape
you need to enable secure boot in the bios
BF 6 will have the same requirement
Is there a reason you're pinging seemingly random people?
theyāre just pinging their teammates in the BFV call š
Good afternoon I am here for Battlefield 6 !
I have played since 1942, but BF2 was the best
Till the aimbotters and ESP users came and destroyed it
Anti cheat is paramount
Thank you mr president
Idk now the amount of players is so small that there is rarely a cheater)))
In bf2 I mean
BF6 is going to be one big beautiful game!
every bit as colourful as Whimsyshire!
there arent 30k players on ps
now I feel like pinging you š¤
Iād give 1 upwards of 5 years on consoles. Still going pretty strong on the player counts
How do I change my avatar of picture ? Any anyone
My lil Milton has been gone for a long time that's why I asked tired of looking at his picture
Discord, i presume?
If on Mobile:
- Go to "You" at the bottom right when browsing channels.
- Tap edit profile.
- Tap your user icon and change image as-desired.
Thank you I'll try that
It worked your da man Thank you
Glad to help! š
Wassup people1
Yo
Bitchin'
I bet you im gonna get banned because of my name
Well being as you are drawing attention to it you might.
sometime in the near future
Release date not confirmed yet (the title has not even been confirmed for that matter).
What you always can read in the Internet is latest until March 2026.
Hi
I need a bf1 achievement in air superiority
How to online baterfield 4 PS3!!!!
@vapid wagon jacobwaliza
@woeful kestrel
@golden dust
@cursive glen
@oblique cape
Yes
Hey, I'm from Poland and I don't understand you very well, so I'm writing in English because I'm using a translator.
Hey, does anyone know why the servers in Baterfield 4 on PS3 aren't working? Write to me and I'll translate it.
Servers are probably down
wait, are the servers on ps3 down and working on ps4 for example?
I would assume I had better just talk here sense the other forums doesn't like my randomness Gat
we do not know we are on pc and ps5
Also PC
Holy shit guys, my new Yamaha YHT-4950U 5.1 surround sound system finally arrived today!
The setup was brutal but worth it. In one week, my replacement remote will arrive. Then, Iāll be able to use the treble/bass equalizer and enable HDMI ARC so I can preserve my gaming TVās HDMI 2.1 features like ALLM, AMD Free Sync, and VRR.
Just make sure you switch off in game music / announcer and mute your mic lol
bf4 ps3 servers no longer exist since the end of 2024
and on PS4 the servers are working
question are people still getting game freeze + game crash after dying. i got that since recently.
i havent played bf 2042 in like a month now because it always crashes after i get killed
seems like this problem also dats a few years back with the same issue
Oh really? What happens if I donāt?
Idk why but I can't do good with the mp18 in battlefield 1
yes
MP18 is not that great
Like its not terrible
Automatico M1918
Its one of the best SMGs in the game
Thompson anihilator też jest S tier

Just give me more damn warbonds
Wdym you cant do good with it?
I feel like almost all BF1 guns are fairly solid and anyone can do decent with them as long as they have some good game sense
I presume its more of an issue with how you play the game rather than the gun
Try medic or support
Support sucks the guns are useless
I do best with either medic or recon
Im gonna rest now
Support ? Useless ? Im offended
The guns are cool but I can't hit shit
Also no explosives
Altho assault's explosives suck anyway to me
The tank squads are just cancer
Support has the crossbow , limpet charge and mortar
And The explosives on assault are very strong
Ye im just
Welp
Could have spent my money better
š¢ š„²
You will have to lern and improve
Thats Just how tanks in BF1 are all the time
Because you need like 3 players to crew all the Guns on most of the tanks
Unless its a artilery truck , light tank or the Saint chamond
Then its usualy one dude
any idea when next play test might be? or if there will be any more or a last one
I more meant two or more tanks sticking to each other
Like last game two saint chamonds watching each other's back and roaming near spawn points
The playtests are under NDA, so no public info is available for when they occur.
what was the month gap between the 1st and 2nd one.
Did you read what I wrote?
That sucks too, in BF1 good tankers can be unstopeble
Much more so then in 4 or V
Does not help that allot of the maps have great sight lines for tanks and snipers
Well assume you are doing this so you can better hear surrounding enemy? Music & announcer are the worst offenders for stopping this.
Battlefield 6 Devs Offer Big Update on āNot Locking Weapons to Classesā Issue. So if they don't lock the classes, it's not battlefield. Not the battlefield I want to play or give them any type of money.
Thatās a big non-problem in the scheme of things
Right. My thing is do you want our money? Make the game how we tell you to make it. If it's not locked then it's just call of duty.
Are you just talking guns or mean gadgets as well?
Well for me itās the gadgets which define the class so of course they need to be locked. But guns, not so much.
Due to 2042 being unplayable, BFV is by far my most played
The SMGs are nice
Oh right ya I see what you mean now
Operation Metro station š¤š
I think guns define classes as well because to me it just makes sense that recon is delegated to snipers/DMRs, assault ARs/carbines, so on so forth. Itās definitely trying to imitate real life squads/platoons but for the āmuh gameplay over realismā crowd, Iāll put it like this: classes arenāt just unique cause a character model or gadget, itās how the weapon loadouts are balanced too
Imo if they can avoid the one-meta issue, then unlocked weapons can work
Whatās that
Basically, if they mess up the balancing, there's going to be 1 AR that is optimal for nearly every range. This essentially means there's no point in using 90% of the other weapons
Over the years different classes have had different gun types. I play Assault (on BFV) if on a tank map, I may play medic if the rest of my squad are non-medic. I think picking classes purely based on gadgets / roles is fine. (Better that than have half the team playing a class because of a meta gun and not performing the role).
its meta
support has some of the fastest ttk weapons in the game
I mean, thatās kinda how itās always been right? Itās what I like bout battlefield.
Yes. Class identity is perhaps the biggest thing that actually makes Battlefield different from some of its competitors in the triple A FPS market and not a glorified large scale CoD, which is why I think weapons being unlocked erodes that sense of identity
The way bf4 implemented it provided a sort of medium for both sides I believe, why not just go for that lol.
I think carbines/PDWs were the āuniversalā options in 4 which was a perfectly good balance
Although 1 and V did just fine without it
Fine with either like
Same
I think at the end of the day itās about gun skin revenue, so I doubt dice and ea will budge
Any other explanation for it is honestly just glorified non issues
They did say theyāll think about the proposal but whateves
@naive nacelle any progress on bf1
EA really needs to give the 1942 or 2 license to aspyr or nightdive so we can actually play the good games in the series again
yall think the new battlefield is gonna be a mess as 2042
Why are xbox players such filthy campers
GUYS HOW I CAN GET THE NEW BF LAB TO TEST THE GAME
the BF4 system is worst of both worlds imo
Each their own I suppose
you lose any class weapon identification because everyone except assault is running carbines or DMRs while guns like PDWs get unfairly gimped by being locked to engineer
no one wants to play engineer on cqc meat grinder maps lol
Is this thing cooking? Do we have a release window?
Guys, I'm in the military and just got back from an underway on my ship recently. It was a month long, so please update me! Did I miss anything? Any news? Etc?
Bug wise yes thatās a given. Design wise, hopefully not
Trying to get a air assault match going in bf1
Can anybody tell me who and why when I jump into some BF1 Ops games some of the weapons are disabled by server settings? š¤
What are the odds bf6 is another flop
IDK
Since they said there will not be class lock weapons. It seems they aproaching again the same thing as BF2042. It will flop, They trying to do a Call of Duty no a Battlefield game.
hopefully it isn't another cash grab and it has some competitive multiplayer.
EA and Crash grab is basically the same bro
rip
I just hopping for the best to be honest. I really dont want this to flop.
I believe 2042 had bigger problems than open class weapons at launch
Yeah, One of them being the clone war. I have no idea how they though having the same face everywhere would be immersive. Lots of bugs, Too arcade and in my opinion Battlefield V had better graphics.
Also was bugged asf.
But classes being useless was a big hit. They really want to approach the Call of Duty way to play this game. Get ready to see Medics using a sniper or a recon using a LMG.
I don't that think open weapons really matters that much
If anyone is interested, Iāve created a bf3 hardcore server for those looking for a break from the futuristic and goofy 2042. Itās named BF3 All out warfare and the code is AB2FF3.
They should just restrict weapon types to classes but give the option to have open selection in custom servers
I have manually updated punkbuster I made it an exception in my firewall I made sure punkbuster B was running in my services I've tried deleting every trace of pb and then reinstalling it I still get randomly kicked by punkbuster
there has got to be a fucken fix
We need a good game with all the expected basic functions (including persistent servers / server browser). The locked weapons āissueā is not going to make or break BF6.
But it will shape the future of all batrlefields
The locked weapon issue is just going to make the game double the garbage if it turns out they screwed up most of the systems
But it is still something people want to see happen it seems
seems like a hyperbole.
Not at all, the class locked weapons is a feature people want across the board it's not that complicated
the people who don't care whether it's on or off don't count in this and the rest is the minority voice and they're the people that are only interested in skins
which is why dice wants to let weapons be usable on any class, for profit
of course that stance makes sense on dice's side, they're only making games for profit I don't blame them for that objective, but I'd rather have them make tons of money while still making good features and not repeating bf2042
sounds like a hyperbole.
Is it just impossible to have a normal conversation on this server ?
I swear the call of duty server has less idiotic answers than this
either you get some child using third grader personal attacks as arguments or you get people like you sounding like a broken record because they're probably just sitting in their bed being bored and all they found to do at this time is just spam the same messages over and over again
legit don't bother responding if that's all you are capable of, it doesn't cost you anything to ignore a conversation you are not interested in, be it because you disagree or because you're bored
There are plenty of people here with reasons beyond just wanting skins. I havenāt bought a single thing beyond the game itself and can say that through conversations here Iām on the fence regarding locked or unlocked
you sound tad bit angry
Iām mostly for them, but the fact that the people who tend to choose a class for the weapon will be consciously choosing a class for the scenario instead of just because it has the gun they want could lead to them actually playing the role
oh it's the clown emoji... you're really angry ....
While sure, most players lack the awareness to make the best use of their role anyway, if the class is a primary choice and not a passive result of these specific players choosing a weapon first, theoretically they should be more aware of the role theyāve picked
Not to mention the different ways to play when these guns are more open. Close up recon is fun, for instance. 4 is the only other game to have that but the recon gadgets all work well for various ranges and it just feels right
In my opinion yeah it has to do with class identity basically, it doesn't break the game completely but classes feel more meaningful in their role when they have their specific equipment, weapon included
You do lose out on a lot of the unique problem solving that forced weapons created however, which is why Iām more for locked than against, as that dynamic and restriction is fun, as well as it being a way to balance classes
No they're not
I mean
most automatics are all pretty samey
the only real outliers are snipers and LMGs
Player desire registered. Weapons disabled for the next BF.
what does that even mean
unironically a battlefield with everyone a M4A1 would probably play well
at least make it a modern gun... everyone gets the mcx spear
I'm pretty sure everyone hates the M7
The biggest concern I have for unlocked is that when previously a weapon could determine the combat strength of a class, if anyone can use the most combat effective weapons then that means theyāll have to vastly overtune perks and gadgets to make the assault classes feel strong. Which means incessant air bursts, instant kill grenade launchers or worseā¦
Before you could just give them pretty okay gadgets and their weapon would make them the primary infantry killer
yeah that's true, the gadget spam would get pretty terrible as it already kinda is
dunno why... stats on it all say it should be better than the m4. But then it comes down to how the game testers feel it should play anyways
there's nothing real about any of the guns in the game
I mean IRL
Gameplay should be a priority over any realism in a battlefield game unless you want to make battlefield similar to squad
I've seen people use realism argument in favour of class locked weapons š
I'm just glad 75% of the population can't figure out how zain works or else we would be in hell constantly
My god yes
I barely see that operator
and thank god
but skilled players using them...
I've got some nasty clips that should not exist
which one is zain? the names don't matter to me
I can't think of any valid gameplay reason for locking weapons (if you're arguing in favour of the BF3/4 system)
you know cover? that concept where if you are behind it you are safe?
yeah, nah. You aren't safe :3
I only know them by their gadgets
Balance, class identity (not realism) which is the core of a battlefield game
airburst
we literally talked about this in the last 10 minutes
ok well BF3/4's system basically had none of that
did we even play the same game
assaults end up dominating any cqc environment, engineers would just run DMRs or Carbines, and PDWs just ended getting neglected due to being class locked to engineer
oh no assault doing what assault is supposed to be designed for
I'm just, not gonna bother anymore...
they shouldn't be allowed to run better weapons than every other class while also being able to self sustain
also not to mention you could run no defibs and heals lol
battlefield 5 is verrry active today š
They should, because it is their role and other classes have other roles
not very well designed.
but I forgot people have had their brains rotten by fortnite and need adhd gameplay (no offense to people with actual adhd but this is what it feels like reading this) gameplay of getting 200 kills per minute
that's literally assault gameplay in 4
The point of assault is to assault, you gotta be joking here
yeah but they shouldn't be able to self sustain
Wait until this guy plays tf2 where the scout can basically do assaulting and self sustain 
if they forced the bf4 assault to use a med box instead of a pouch it would be far better
wouldn't survive a match
so true
assaults pushing into space, letting the team follow by creating pockets of healing
I don't think TF2 is an exactly an apples to applescomparison
Oh behave
the pouches do the same thing but require the person to be aware of others and actually see them as human beings who need support, which most don't seem to XD
What ?
guys the pouches are like stim from Labs š±
š±
anyways the BF4 class system just has the worst from both worlds
it is realy fun to play as though
idk why removed the heal from stims
It's now just footstep sounds and suppression right?
I kinda like that, as instead of being a reactive gadget it's pre emptive, so you can waste it if you time it wrong
but I do still feel like it should get the med box
the way it works in 2042 is fine
Exactly right
State your opinion but donāt claim it to be a fact and shared by everyone else (and those who disagree donāt matter).
This is my opinion based on interactions with friends and the current state of social media related to battlefield
There's a reason why dice decided to ignore feedback on the classes issue and that there was an uproar in response
Yet plenty here are disagreeing with youā¦..
You mean you two ? 
I'm done man, there's just no point
enjoy crying that "bf6 is dead" on release or whatever you do best in those cases
Gadgets need to be locked to class, there is no good reason guns need to be.
We stated all the good reasons before, you're acting like a broken record too
Now you're free to decide to ignore that gameplay balance and class identity is a good thing to have in a shooter game
You mean everyone playing medic in BFV because they have the best guns?
But don't come a pretend those are not good reasons in that context
You mean medic being good in close range to be able to defend and heal teammates like the way they're supposed to be, while you're also ignoring the game has plenty of snipers and supports because of their role ?
You're just completely ignoring the fact classes are supposed to be good at a role but you probably just see the fps genre as "shoot kill shoot kill" and nothing else so i'm not even surprised
it's so funny because the only game with 0 class identity you're using as an example is dead in the water in comparison
the main reason to pick medic is that self sustain and the limitations placed on you by the attrition system. But since others can pick stuff off your back, you are still playing the role and able to heal people up close, within the range the weapon determines.
Yeah it's a strong weapon type, but it serves the class well
color me surprised
Youāre kidding right? You want people picking class for guns and not the role??
You literally have the answer to that if you actually followed the conversation and took time to read
Yes, because that will make people also play the class, even unconsciously, the way it is intended
which is a good thing
gameplay-wise and balance-wise
You mean the class with the best guns, what about the others if guns are not balanced
why is battlefield 1 unable to run with a controller emulator?
the trouble with all this is how much of a reliance your own mindset and approach has on the strength of the system. Some people can't change their approach and require agency, where restriction creates irritation, when others thrive in that kind of environment. So there will always be another perspective
i have a dualshock 4 and i cant run games without an emulator (ds4 windows)
Itās a non-problem in the scheme of things
are you just crying because you died to medics in cqc too much ?
Does anyone use a controller on pc who can help me?
Nah, Iām good
I mean that's what you're doing
š
Medic is my main classā¦..
picks up conversation in the middle, ignores all the arguments, cries about medics killing them in cqc
what do you want me to make out of this ?
The thing is, assaults in bfv are also the tank killers, with some anti infantry as a bonus there. Medics can be considered anti infantry if you want but assaults still have a purpose regardless
How did I cry? I was stating a fact
it's only an issue if the assaults are the infantry killers and medic weapons take over that role
which I don't consider to be the case
I have 130,000 kills as medic in BFV
This chat is why battlefield games have no concurent players
No, you were stating that medics are good in cqc in bf5 which is literally their role because they wouldn't be able to heal or revive otherwise
I mean, more like why bf2042 is dead in the water
it wont kill you to help a new player out
Arguably in BFV the SMGs are as deadly as the ARs
but let's just ignore that and pretend 2042 is better designed overall then bf1, bf5 or even bf4
we are just so immersed in the conversation, that's all.
But I don't use a controller so I couldn't help anyway
i havent played any of them
im trying to get into it but i cant use a godam virtual controller
they literally said assault is designed as a tank killer and that's why ARs aren't as strong against infantry in that game
You basically have no understanding of game design as a player and it shows
The game desnt support playstation controllers and doesnt allow me to emulate an xbox one
i'm done, thanks movement for the talk
What a loser. Hopefully Dice are focusing on important things like persistent servers & server browser
better designed in what
id agree that 2042 is visually muuuuch better designed than 5
and has better audio design
tell me i didn't just read that
Please, tell me I didn't basically just read "bf2042 is more immersive than bf5 and has better audio and graphics"
but 2042 lacks in just game
?
tell me you cant read because no one was talking about immersion
The point of sound design in battlefield is to immerse the player in the action (again, nothing to do with realism itself)
so by stating that you basically just said that which I summed up for you
5 is pretty horrible interms of visuals because it destroys gameplay with how bad the visibility is
which has been nutoriously bad since release
aight I'm done man this chat is completely bonkers
I really hope they decide to take advice from you and that other guy
2042 has great audio design lol
I'm gonna be having fun reading the "bf6 is dead" posts
The average IQ level should triple once you leave
You're just mad you have no understanding in what makes a game feel good to play and balanced 
Oh God, heās still typing
You have no idea about me. I run a massive BF community
?
There you go you just had to say it
How does immersion help with game balance
Now it shows why you think so highly of yourself
No I mean that other guy not you
Mister facebook group admin 
People latch onto whatever keeps them grounded I guess
Youāre the one stating your opinion as āfactsā thatās what brought me to the conversation - your arrogance
I play Medic - we have already covered this
Again, you didn't bother to read the whole conversation so I am not going to bother with you
Neither did you it seems
You joined midway so I did
Hes not 100% wrong on some of his points but hes pretty clueless in some
This guy literally brought the "I have a community" as an argument from authority which in this case is the biggest strawman you could even bring to the table
You literally said everyone who disagrees with you is wrongā¦ā¦
On what point
I mean true, they said medics are powerful against infantry, my answer to that : It is their role in bf5 because assault isn't designed as an infantry killer first
Im talking about you
You joined midway too and your first message is you understanding the term "design" as purely graphical and sound
Literally your first interaction in this conversation is flawed
No
I understand why this chat is dead half the time and the rest of the time it's just people asking how to fix bugs
I only gave 2 aspects of design which 2042 had improved over in 5
First interaction
you understood "designed" as graphics and sound
Yeah i was asking for different design aspects
I was talking about gameplay
so you basically didn't read the previous messages
There's nothing wrong with that
just don't try to add into it
I was also talking about gameplay
Infact i even noted out that battlefield 5 was ass to play because the visibility of that game was so bad
you : id agree that 2042 is visually muuuuch better designed than 5
and has better audio design
you right after : but 2042 lacks in just game
You literally contradicted yourself in two messages back to back
?
so either you were talking about gameplay and just have goldfish memory of your own thoughts
Condradicted myself how
or you were talking about graphical and sound and nothing more because you didn't read or didn't understand the point being made
why am I even bothering 
This conversation will lead nowhere, everyone will stuck to their positions^^
are u able to play battlefield labs?
The fact I have to pull up your own messages and print them out here is just disheartening
the fact that you cant read is the sad part about it lol
It's not even about my position on guns in bf6 anymore, this is literally about proving they don't have a single clue what the f I was talking about because they couldn't bother to read
The history is there, I rest my case, your own messages
i bring up 2 design elements from 1 game that were an improvement over the previous
which are all btw gameplay affecting elements
You LITERALLY said bf2042 was better in game design then INSTANTLY after say it lacks in gameplay in comparison
i didnt talk about 5s gunplay, movemnet, maps, menus, UI, vehicle gameplay
The context behind ābetter designedā is behind classes and weapon distribution, as deduced by the hour long conversation before
where did i say that it was better ingame design
READ your OWN messages IN ORDER š¤£
I understand why school systems are failing now
you cant read it seems
VISUALLY much better designed
right in what
Okay this guy is trolling
you stated that i said that 2042s game design was better than 5s
when i stated that 2042s visual design was better than 5s
i didnt talk about any other aspect aside from visuals within that statement
Not to pull you into this but didn't I literally say they either understood the wrong thing or contradicted themselves ?
Well when we were talking specifically about class and weapon design, bringing up visual and audio design was just sorta irrelevant
youre still failing to show me where i condradicted myself
you : "I was also talking about gameplay"
reading takes skill and its skill that you dont have apparently
Your brain is failing you right now
yes
because VISUALS affect the way the game plays
.
5 sucks ass to play because the visibility is so bad
You are a lost cause
how can you not read i dont get it
You can read out what I printed out for you, no point in going on
You just didn't read and contradicted yourself
it's not worth it
VISUALS are a design aspect, i only talked about VISUALS as a design which directly affects gameplay
There's no point in trying to save face twisting the dialogue that occured
youre literally twisting the dialogue as we speak
firstly you state this (wrong btw, also nice condradiciton)
To put it simply, if this were a court case, it would end in half an hour
you dont understand how to read messages therefor youre making up things
visuals heavily impact gameplay
Youāre on a roll today š
yeah they would have to send you to a reading classes so you could actually be able to read
and understand what people write
keep telling yourself otherwise
imagine calling this a condradicition because you lack reading skills
š
bro fr thought i was calling 2042 a better game when i was talking about 2 design elements š„
now to go read the entirety of chat and see what this guy talked about
so I was right ?
you : id agree that 2042 is visually muuuuch better designed than 5
and has better audio design
you right after : but 2042 lacks in just game
You literally contradicted yourself in two messages back to back
so either you were talking about gameplay and just have goldfish memory of your own thoughts
You didn't read 
love how the arguement isn't going the way anyone wants so you're all devolving into personal insults
right in what
No it devolved into me just pulling up messages showing they just didn't bother reading and now they're just piling up on me because they can't do otherwise 
i only read one statement that you said and responded to that by asking you "designed better in what aspects" then replied to that with "id agree that 2042 is visually muuuuch better designed than 5
and has better audio design"
.
responded to this btw
Oh so you agree you didn't read, got it 
?
There's nothing wrong with that
battlefield community is so clueless its insane
glazing battlefield 5 when it has the worst visual design in the entire franchise
the worst gunplay design in the entire franchise
the worst audio design in the entire franchise
id also argue that the design for skins are worse
but thats more of a timeline thing
it makes sense to have some more goofier/edgier skins in a modern themed game
Outside of this i disagree with everything else
It's so bad it has twice the player count on steam alone compared to bf2042 
i dont see why this matters lol
2042 has less players so therefor 5 has better visuals and audio design? its gunplay is good because it has more players?
"I don't understand why this much better game is almost dead in the water compared to this much worse game in every aspect"
like how does that matter
no youre trying to make an argument that 5 has more players therefor the design elements i listed are ignorable and dont matter purely because it has more players
just to completely avoid my point
what im saying is is that youre comparing garbage to shit
2042s gunplay is terrible, netcode is terrible, the class system is half-assed because its some weird makeshift class system they had to make up
you could say the game engine itself is bad because mouse input lags
you can diasgree but they are bad
Nope its Just your opinion
how will vsync improve mouse input lag thats engine level broken
The skins are crap tho
just shows how clueless you are
so we're taking advice from a guy that has vsync on and complains about input lag now ? 
it isnt
It is
5s visuals were infact so bad that people made meme videos on playing hide and seek
btw
That is a skill issue
Unironicly
there were HUNDREDS of videos on the game about how bad the visibility was
any decent player knows full well how bad the visibility is stop coping about skill issue when your skill level is probably equally as high as those who made the videos
WAS they fixed the visibility later on
they really didnt
No bf2042 has much better visuals and the theme of two metal sheets hitting each other as music while only hearing footsteps is much better 
I never had issues with visibility
This entire interaction ended up culminating to a big skill issue on the user's end 
It is a skill issue really
im a significally better player than probably the both of you combined
so yeah no i dont think theres any skill issue
Lets not forget about the building mechanic and squad call ins, yup
the game runs butter smooth at 120 fps high on my end
let me guess, this guy is trying to run this on his laptop's igpu too 
The gunplay is Not bad
keep in mind that 2042 is engine level broken and has input lag not because of the ingame settings, not because of the fps, not because of vsync, not because of high ping but because the GAME ENGINE is broken
No, runs fine on my end
disable vsync
it doesnt
It does
youre just too garbage at the game to be able to tell
Best movement ever
Now this guy is making up what I'm seeing on my pc 
random recoil is a terrible design
im not

Its not as bad as you make it out to be
reading and remembering the last two seconds of his life isn't his forte
Most Guns don't even have much recoil
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1039675770873851964/1395384340615004291/image.png?ex=687a406f&is=6878eeef&hm=7ae64deb6a2900e4c43cdfd8c2903c066f1694086747dccfef190e37f6139eff& this is dice admitting that they found out about the issue and guess whats still not fixed til this day
proceeds to say my pc can't run the game butter smooth when it in fact does 
it is as bad as i make it out to be because the recoil is infact random
your game can run smooth, you still have mouse input bugs because its bugged within the game engine
It really is not that big of a deal
what i said was that youre too bad at the game to actually notice when theres input delay because you dont have any ability over mouse contorl and cant tell apart when theres lag and when there isnt
either that or you play on a controller
No it doesn't lag
which would make you even more delusional because i was talking about mouse input
no arguments left so let's attack that way
i posted this btw
i can also post videos sec
You are delusional 
There is aparently input lag in 2042 on Mouse and keyboard because dice sayed it exists and they tried to fix it
He is right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLE3_ehRRfc this is "after fix" and its still bad
this is an actual skilled player that actually knows what to look out for and how to aim and has good feel over their mouse and inputs they make
this video was last year
til this day not fixed btw
damn dude went so silent now
thats 1 down
it really is that big of a deal because random recoil is uncontrollable, unmasterable
No i just decided wasting my time on someone as delusional as you is not worth it 
youre calling me delusional after i posted a statement from dice that they will look into the bug which they havent fixed til this day and by proving it by 2 videos
keep coping
Cry more 
why would i cry
youre spamming that im delusional whilist not being able to prove me otherwise
idk you tell me why you are 
im not crying im just posting you 2 videos and a statement to dice to prove you wrong
i wouldnt call it crying
Louder 
damn and he still cant make a good argument back
proceeds to ignore 30 minutes of conversation 
what convo
see
point me to it
this guy is set on a 2 minute auto delete in their brains š¤£
i was legit doing other things
not even archive, straight to the trash bin 
such as posting evidence of me proving that your claim on saying that 2042 mouse bug is not a real thing
you're* 
so yes i wasnt reading whilist searching for videos and dice statements
Uncontrolleble no, unmastereble yes
makes 0 sense
again, sums up to "skill issue" 
if it was controllable is masterable
"skill IssuE" but my stats are 3x of your stats
it is
cope 
something controllable is something you can master
something that you cant control is something you cant master
You can control the recoill
you cant control random recoil and due to the fact that its random each time you fire your weapon its infact unmasterable
i know that you think your 0.6kpm skill level is so high to the point that you can predict the random recoil pattern each time you fire your weapon but truth nuke you arent and no one is
Ad hominem
also
on top of battlefield 5 having random recoil
the weapons are decoupled from screen center
another skill issue
so you cant even aim with screencenter
Anyways
and youre ignoring because you cant argue otherwise
Try playing red orchestra 2 where the same thing is the case
Bro couldn't use his monitor built in crosshair anymore so he'd rather cry about it than learn 
the only skill issue here is you buddinsky
probably cheers from joy when he gets 30 kills in a game
"im so skilled rn š "
None issue, allot of tacticall shooters have that
stop crying we know you're upset 
battlefield is an arcade shooter game
a run and gun game
a respawn shooter even
how does that invalidate their statement š¤£
Red orchestra is a run and gun shooter
because its an element of realism in an arcade video game
and it doesnt work very well
It works fine
has nothing to do with realism you mongatron 
Idk why anyone would complain about it
the fact that you play any other shooter better than 5 is self telling buddy
it's simple : it's easier to cry than learn to get used to something
Ad hominem
decoupled from screencenter means that your bullets go where your gun barrel is pointed towards
boo hoo
Red orchestra 2 is pretty dead according to steamdb
how are all of your arguments so invalid and bad
Whats wrong with that
I have to aim differently in this different game
Tell me
because you cant effectively aim with screencenter
literally what's wrong is that they're not used to it so they just cry about it, doesn't go further than that man
Go play counter strike
None issue
im more used to it than you ever have been
its probably your first time ever even hearing about these things
awww angwy
its a none issue to not efficiently aim in a fps game?
no ones angry it was just a truth nuke

whats funnier is that youre the angry one here because youre perma spamming random insults instead of making proper coherent arguments
Oh no i need to play BFV difrently
either that or completely avoiding and ignoring everything ive stated
wouldn't you know huh
What horror
different in what way
You learn to play acordingly to the game mechanics
What else
you cant learn those mechanics btw
they are random
and btw im 3x better than you
so kinda weird of you to tell me to learn the game
I don't care who you are when your wrong
im not wrong
i am better than you
the game mechanics are bad
everyone decent knows that
but keep telling yourself "boo hoo"
š lolipop for tough boy 
Exactly - thatās why the top players in BFV are consistently good
guys why my battlefield crashes after clicking campaing
"ill just play with my shit mechanics because dice forced it into the game"
Bohooo i hate BFV
Try the Campaign button instead š„ø
yeah thats the only thing youve been able to say
Go ahead keep telling your self that bud
can we get like coherent good points orr
i dont have to because thats quite literally the only thing youve been saying this entire time
Go to hell lmao
"boo hoo" "skill issue" over and over again
you're such a gangster 
still no proper arguments
just spamming nonesense

waiting
You don't deserve good points because you had made none
this is so entertaining
i did
this guy's crashing out
Nah
where did i not make good points
random spread conversion to recoil is an insanely good mechanic in your mind?
which is a mechanic thats on top of your weapon recoil patterns
Oh no my casual arcade FPS has random recoil
you think that decoupling your point of aim is a good fps mechanic?
It is
Play ro2
it doesnt matter if its casual
why
It does
According to stats, heās not even played BFV on his main account
Dude be like decoupiling point of AIM is baaaad untill a level 99 MG42 dude hip fires him from 300 meters in RO2
The game he's talking about is borderline dead btw
would explain why his youtube channel is only bf1 
bro couldn't afford bf5 and bf2042 on sale 
It has servers with players on it so il play it and you can't stop me
š¤·āāļø just an observation
ive linked it several times
same account just go bf5 tab
thats weapon balance issue btw
bro links a random profile while the proofs are on youtube 
?
its my account that i can log into right now
The point of aim is decoupled and its a skill you have to learn to hipfire
stop being dumb
Guys it's a video game not an actual war so why are you going at if for the last hour? It ain't that deep!
takes one to know one huh 
its not a skillful mechanic when you cant control the point your gun barrel is aimed towards
It is and your wrong
im not
You never played a game that does it right
because if it was id know
so bf5 didnt do it right?
this guy's entire arguments so far have been "i'd know cause I am skilled at the game" 
I did not sayyyyy that
you just did

No because you haven't played bf5 clearly which is implied in their messages 
"you never played a game that does it right" but ive played 5 that did it
learn to read
i have
and bf5 does it right 
I did not say that
I sayed its a none issue, not that its good or bad
nah
ya
its an issue if your bullets dont go to the point youre aiming at
skill issue, learn to aim

30% accuraccy
Oh no how terrible ! Anyways
if its not that hard then why are you so bad at the game
bro projecting 
Ad hominem
nah
just posted my stats
wheres yours
links random profile, plays only bf1 on youtube, calls others bad 
its my profile
cries about not being capable of hitting enemies cause of skill issue 
That explains everything about this guy
i have 30% accuraccy
bro searching another random profile for that 
i can quite literally log into that account
anyway that was a fun conversation
i can quite literally even play on that account
why are you talking to yourself
i wonder what archimonks stats are
probs something below 1kpm
3rd grader "mirror" comeback 
Anyways, lets talk about how dogshit the BF1 gunplay is
"3rd grader "mirror" comeback
"
bro not beating the brainrot gen alpha allegations
bf1s gunplay is decent
Nah it sucks
controllable spread, suppression is ass, bullets go where you aim towards
you'd know since that's the only bf game you own 
why
no
yes
It has visual recoil out the ass

yeah visual recoil is ass but its not crazy horrible
you can still aim with screencenter and hit your shots
It's way over tuned for certain guns
i even made a video showing that its not as bad as people say it is
Nah its as bad as people say
The visibility is baaaad
you can quite literally look at my videos on assault weapons and medic ones
Like in BF3
BFV had better visibility
what
What if you you don't have 20 scouts on your team spaming flares
i dont need them
And everyone lost there Q key
because theres 100s of other ques aside from scout flare spots

i dont need to press Q either
guys why my bf closes after clicking campaign
Also if you put brightness on 0
That is not his main account (if his at all)
it is and i can log into it right now
Nah Im Just fucking with you, But serously BFV has decent visibility, BF3 and hardline has way worse
do i need to record myself logging into it or are screenshots fine
Im not going to watch some cherry picked BS
His main account:-
https://battlefieldtracker.com/bf1/profile/origin/I_Pickle_You/overview
would you watch some apple picked BS instead ? 
bf5 "404 player not found" 
bro buying a random account as we speak to pretend
bro editing the html css of the website 
@teal fractal careful with the amount of links, due to the scamming messages the bot is sensitive.
removed your timeout.
thank you
youre posting an account which is my steam account, when i have battlefield 5 bought on my EA account which is the one i sent in
Why for the love of god do you have two EA accounts lol
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1039675770873851964/1395399778644394095/image.png?ex=687a4ed0&is=6878fd50&hm=5f4141ff80aa7ca6777261d2d91cd13a316c137e629bc24b4a4e85dba8e60f07& like idk i can post my ea app page aswell if you really need to investigate that deeply but
i just told you that i have a steam account and an EA account
and its because i got bf5 for 50 cents like several years ago from eneba for EA account
26h playtime on bf5, even if that was your account this is pathetic with how much you'e insisting you're good at it 
and it's not 
You can have an EA accout with Steam BF and games bought with the EA launcher
why does my playtime matter

26 hours !?
my stats are within top 100
Is that a joke
I have 1000+ lol
the k/d don't even remotely match on the two accounts 
ye but you need to do some weird login for that
?
NO lmao
sounds like someone has been experimenting with toggling 
which is why they made a secondary account 
i dont even have bf5 on my other account
I'm talking about bf1 you mongatron 
26 hours ? Opinion ignored
or are you comparing like 2019 bf1 stats to more current bf5 stats?
no, both bf1 because you own it on both 
its like 1kd'ish lower
bro bought bf1 again to hide it 
youre comparing stats from the moment i bought the game from 2018 or 2019 when i had a bad pc to current time stats when i have more skill and a significally better pc
hide what
sure 
are you calling me a cheater lol
Yeah heās created a second account to buff his BF1 stats
Kinda sus
whats sus
Also the stat braging

Lots of sweats do this
No complaining about CHEATERS
real gamers show their progress by sticking to the same account š
In the game with a Cheater problem
i have both public
and of course the username is a random string of characters 
my current and the account from when i bought the game for the first time and put in few hundred hours from my worse pc
not even alters do this, they at least bother picking a name 
its a random ea name that i got i just havent bothered to change it
Dude is complaining about Everything But BFVs largest problem while braging about his stats
That is SUS
can't afford a pc but wastes money on new copies of the same game on a different account 
whats sus
?
i was 14 when i bought my first pc with my own money that i earned by doing part time jobs in the summer
why
bro lying about having worked in his life now š
when will it end

also the new copies are quite literally at most 2 euros
"lemme screenshot my paycheck" š¤
what on earth is that picture

if you think thats insanely expensive and takes a lot of ressources and money to buy a 2 euro game on sale in steam then idk what to tell you man
You complain about Everything in BFV But NOT about the massive cheater issue
You brag about stats
kinda sus if you ask me idk 
youre also calling me a cheater when i have videos uploaded where i play at 4ish kpm at like 3-4kd in battlefield 1 so idk go report them to ea if you think im cheating
