#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 305 of 1
Hell ya
Again this ain’t about age haha yall are getting it twisted . I’m talking about the entitled mfs
read man
I think he’s an alpha. They rant about age lol
who reports after smth so little.. oh I kno the salty type that lose or get killed and have to “get back”
like why didn’t they put a score board in 2042… ohh idk guys to protect the … you guess it sawfties
Yea they had to “add a legacy feature”
Participation trophy 🏆 here you go
Called a flipping scoreboard 😂
💀💀💀💀
Smh
not true, people are still toxic
No no, it’s “you seriously s#ck, but here’s your trophy”
Calls it toxic lol
“Toxic” was just an average day on the lobbies 😂😂
Yes!! That’s my point . People will still be “toxic” even if they don’t verbally take action lol
so why punish the rest of the player base
Because they must make it a safer environment
never said it wasn;t
“It’s just a game”
“Cry about it”
“Just trying to have fun”
“Sorry you can’t just have fun”
In reality like really tho even if they have a prox chat function
People will still be in a discord anyways
Unless they make it like search in mw2 where it forced you to be in game chat
lol
I just see a lot of censorship being implemented in the next BF
Not a probably, it’s a guaranteed. I never disagreed with you about 4s launch being bad but the reason why people mention it is totally irrelevant when it comes to 42
Let’s not downplay the issue of 2042s launch and existence because of “well what about bf4” when that game at least had its core foundation correct, that’s how we get to this point
Bf4 was still at least toleratable and bit close to bf3
42 tho…. 🤢
It was also a launch title for the ps4 xbone lol wasn’t a to of options out there
I’ll reiterate my point again for clarity’s sake: people act like bf4 and 2042 were in the exact same boat therefore they’d end up having the exact same endgame reception. Not even remotely. That’s what I meant about people exaggerating BF4s case
Like the original convo was something about expecting bugs but what’s more important is the core foundation
Bf3 had bugs too
Bugs gon be bugs


Cleanse the world of them for democracy
Democracy is an illusion
This world is is run by the Illuminati and fallen angels

Bro missed the reference
Oh it was a reference lol
Bad company 2 reference?
Not even close 😂
Hmm
Helldivers 2
Trust me bro

Trust me as far as you can throw me and you’ll be fine
lol
Kinda did but it’s cool lol


I hath spokeneth.
MY MAN
THIS IS DOPE
read every single sentence
Well done
Itching to play bf 6

I like the extensive customization
Crazy
I won’t mind having my own unique nameless soldiers
Ok that’s cool
Will body armor make a return?
Or heavy armor
Not aesthetic wise, but actual plates that can protect u from damages
Like in 2042
Ahh I see. I'm not sure about that, actually but I'm gonna assume so since plates are becoming quite prevalent in modern FPS games
Ok that’s cool
Let’s hope ur right
Do you know anything about gun customization
Like when ur actually in the field
You can't plate a face though, so shots to the dome are still lethal
I see I see
Yeah, it will essentially be a deeper load out customisation as compared to BF2042 - something similar to COD, minus wacky skins. Although they could still be an option down the line. Hoping not personally, but yeah. Slightly deeper customisation.
That’s even better
Ty Blackbeard
Not sure if they're keeping the radial, quick swap menu for weapon attachments though.
Never thought idnthank a pirate
I heard they removed that
But im not sure
Atleast I haven’t seen any in leaked videos
I actually wouldn't be mad if they did. I found it to be a distraction lol. I'd rather just have a gun set up and roll with it, not mess around with attachments on the go. I realise that's nitpicky though, and others might enjoy that level of accessibility
There's a reason dual optics exist.
It’s just I lost count of how many times I switched from my thermal scope with a 2.5 magnification to A red dot sight for close quarters
Using a dmr btw lol
This isn’t bad either tbh
Exactly. Having that accessibility is handy, but it also becomes a bit of a liability and another thing you have to micro manage during a game. For me personally, I'd rather just get stuck in and not change optics every two seconds depending on the context.
Yeah
Do you know anything about resupplynstations ?
If it’s even included
I heard bf 5 had it
I'm not sure yet, but I do believe the resupply points for vehicles feature BFV had could be making a return. Not confirmed though.
Is that what you're referring to then?
Ok dope
Yes
Man
I hope they release bf6 this year
That was a nice feature, I agree with you. Vehicles should have to resupply, especially helos and jets.
YES
hate that infinite ammo crap

You might be looking at late this year. If we're lucky. It's already in the testing stage now, so that's a good sign.
We can all hope
Might get it before GTA6, like everything else 😂
Lmao
Ya
I might preorder too
Which I haven’t done for since bf3
🖤
I like that zampella dude. Isn’t he the one in charge of bf 6? I feel like we can trust him lol

Wait for more info first, but yeah. They're definitely trying to make up for BF2042 this time 😅 It seems they've looked at the feedback from that game, but also seen what appeals across modern FPS games, while also going back to their roots. The customisation option is a good one because it's something that keeps players coming back; being able to have your own character, personalise them and bring your own feel to the battlefield (within realistic boundaries) is very appealing. They've looked at games like Ghost Recon Wildlands and Breakpoint, Sandstorm Insurgency, Arma and many other modern shooters in the extraction style market and seen that people love customisation.
Zampella got your back, bro.
YEA
TOOK THE WORDS RIGHT OUTBOF MY MOUTH
that’s what I want
lol
lol
I haven’t played breakpoint but I’ve seen the videos
Customization looks sooo cool
You can look unique while still looking like a badass modern day soldier

Brother, that's what we all want lol. Took them long enough. They did good with BFV, but discontinued it for COD style operator/heroes so they could sell skins. Though this marketing strategy does work on some people, it's not a good long term strategy for credibility and replayability regardless of whether the options were aesthetic or not. Having your own character, and having it feel personalised is much more appealing.
And for those who want to simply play as a no name grunt again, well you can do that too. Or you can choose to make your character more of an operator style, rather than a boots-on-the-ground private. The choice is yours.
100%. I played Breakpoint and Wildlands to death. Amazing customisation.
True. Bf 2042 is kinda dead right now.
Actually im gonna have to disagree with the replay ability part
Each operators require a slightly different play style, so if u get bored u can just switch operators and try something different
I’m like 300 hours in and I switched from Crawford, Zain to rao
My next one is probably Sundance
I’ve seen some crazy stunts ppl do with Sundance lol
Okay, I agree with that. I meant that being able to customise your own solider is infinitely more replayable though because you can create a limitless end of playstyles and aesthetics to fit your own vision
Yes

But this is what I was referring to. With Sundance, you're stuck to a certain aesthetic
I see I see

One thing I don’t like about bf 2042 are the limited skins available that are for free
Like raos headgear for example
I see like 5 or 6 “different“ headgears that look exactly the same
Do u still play bf 2042 Blackbeard?
I think skins should just be sold as whole sets. Like BF1 but with actual variety
Being able to customize every little bit of gear just leads to people looking weird to spite other people
Basically makes no difference from just giving people CoD esque skins
No way Jose
I prefer the much deeper customization
I honestly don’t think gun balancing should revolve around a system where your effective range can be adapted perfectly on the fly. People should consider their loadout before spawning in and play around it or switch classes. A good middle ground option would be keeping a plus menu-esque system but only allow players to change attachments on objectives the team owns
I mean I do support gunsmith in battlefield so….. fine
Give me good character customization too
Are u excited for update 8.9
Mass effect skins
That’s for 2042 right? Naw I’m not
no
Not lately I don't. I play a lot of Arma Reforger atm.
Is it just me or are all pro bf players using throwing knives
Alguien pa Jugar BF1 con mic?
You know. I like to look at old trailers of games. I recently saw the BFV trailer that had Beat The Devil's Tattoo in it. And that one ship blowing up in the distance reminds me a lot of the destroyers blowing up in BF1 lmao
They should work on bf5 again smh.
They should do it like Gameloft
They still maintaining both asphalt 8 and 9
BF V for old world war era and BF VI for modern/future era
They should bring bundles back in bf5
What bundles
i wanna do the eidolon assignment with someone so bad if ur up hmu on ps my PSN name is MrDopeMedic
BF6 better be good if they want to increase recruiting numbers for WW3
Wdym very cod
LMAO NETCODE ISSUES FEELS COD?
you always can go back to BF4
bro has not played bf4 release
If the guns are laser beams im going to be so disappointed. I don’t want a gunplay experience yet again where I’m shot across the map and where guns have no depth
Fivemen its one of those ppl who just want to bash ppl with no proof
? bf4 release had horrible netcode bro
so?
CoD netcode has definitely been garbage these last few years. But in CoDs case it’s probably a mix of SBMM and servers being garbage
your point is?
i see no poitn
point
lol
research?
dummy
i played the labs test
stfu kid
hahaha
if you're gonna state things like its facts. then back it up
what a tool
and i haven't?? lmao
state things?
listen BRO i played the labs test
so
your just one of those ppl who like to start chat fights and bla bla bla
boring like the masses of human
EU statement at its finest
its not like your the only one acting like this Fiveguy
EU or US statement doesnt matter
Chill before they come at us about big box stores or parking lots again
lmaoo
no idea what you guys are on about but
going outside and touching grass might help?
maybe go outside in your wonderful USA country in LA i heard its pretty nice there right now
nice protest going on
Well LA is one city in a country of 350 million people with diverse cultures and dynamics
lol he is pressed lmao
But
seems like EU is the better deal
naw
than USA but keep staying delusional
im glad that one statement about EU was enough to throw you over the edge
The LA riots aren’t necessarily new btw that happens like every 30 years for some reason
Kinda where the roof Koreans thing comes from
USA is nothing else than SHIELD for ISRAEL if you dont understand that your just not on my level

LMFAO ok this has to be ragebait
has to be truthbait
btw
iam not preordering BF6 like i said
no recoil
net code issues
maps were very cod close quarters
vehicles needs improvement
alot of stuff to work on
before you talk about release
lol recoil has been near non-existent for a while in bf4 games
its mostly just spread values
and terrible mechanics like spread to recoil conversion like in bfv
bf4 actually has recoil maybe not as strong as BF3 but its still there
biggest issue i felt was the fact that aim point is tied to the reticle...AGAIN
i guess you never played BF4 before
a mistake they made in bfv
just get the game shoot at the wall and tell me about recoil and spread
Aim being at the barrel helps mitigate headglitching right
besides barrel and grips
lmao i used to play bf4 on console in the states while studying there, only got the pc version after the service ended
iam one of the best in BF4 and Battlefield in General on Console
is this meyeq?
no wonder
iam a Battlefield Veteran so
another weird smiley
my poor eyes getting cringed on with a teary smiley
meyeq? is that one of those saudi bf players?
New to the server but not discord so I’m confused about this person
They are full of it.
full or empty facts are facts
idk it's either a good ragebaiter or some average EU gamer
my tons of scoreboard pics and videos shows me the proof that iam still pretty good at battlefield most of the time
mmm
you wish Fiveguys
you wish
btw iam not talking about being good sitting in a chopper 24/7 no no
iam talking about actually skill on land like a Man not that vehicle camp playstyle
everybody can camp on a helicopter or Tank
not really that hard
IGN ? i mean what scored did IGN gave BF4?
score*
in game name
Won’t share stats
its not the stats
? you are the one bragging about your skill. let's see the logistics then
lol ok
its the Account iam worried
sure i would if the Account will be save afterwards
which iam not sure nowadays about
Nice excuse
if you make ultimatum statements and don't back it up with proof, you just look like a tool
Yoda says: i risk better not Account this
Won’t share stats as bad.
its not like i wont show its like i said the Account name i want to save from ppl like you that maybe hack my Account or stuff like that?
?????????????
what the fuck is this excuse lmao
No one hacking your account 🤣
with hacking i mean
Not with just your username anyway
getting the password
Yeah dark side stats are terrible
for example
lol
Darkside is not the name i play on console
it used to be back in the PS3 era
okay that's all fine and dandy, so can you share your username? your username is not enough to hack, nor would i ever feel the need to do so when i have my own acc
Doesn’t matter what your name is. No reason not to put them. Only reason is you are lying about being good to a bunch of strangers on discord.
i dont need to lie about my experiences
attempting to seek validation from strangers who didn't ask about your stats. people confront you and ask for proof, but now you're too afraid your username reveal would cause someone to hack it?
since you guys act like ppl with a feministic touch
well iam not sure if you guys would share my username
which i dont really want
you never know with human beings
always stress always a fight
never ending fight
Battlefield PTSD
the main point of playing games is to have fun, idrc about your stats
Shared my stats multiple times. Nice try
shared on PC version?
Yes
the only reason why this whole thing popped up is you make cringe ultimatum statements like "im the best player", and claim to have tons of proof for such, but you refuse to share it
well i said i play on Console
so
btw iam also not playing a Battlefield game to have a nice K/D ppl like Enders think K/D is important in a Battlefield game
Doesn’t matter. You showed off as best console player now hiding stats. We know why. Conversation is done.
but not for the Old man like me
yeah no i can see you're a lying egotistical consoloid, just share stats
I'm assuming they're open to feedback from the testers? Otherwise what's the point. Hopefully if they get your feedback, it should help get us some recoil.
even Delta force had more Recoil on guns lol
PSN:Agent_JackBauer9
there it is
lets hope i dont regret it lol
but you never know
hidden stats on bf2042, bfv kd 1.4 kpm 1.03
LOL
i dont play bf2042
i said
i play BF4
BF2042 i played the least
obviously because BF4 is better
and BFV is also kinda whack
mmm, so all of a sudden your godly skills on bf4 become a 1kd 1kpm player in bf1,v,and probably 2042 that you conveniently hid
?
i never talked about bf2042
nor i did about BFV
i talk about BF4 skills
why bf1?
bro
cant you read?
i play most of my time on BF4
indeed. but you gave us your ID. so i used it as a metric to see what you've played, if you're a "battlefield veteran"
so i checked your other BF games
what game's recoil would you want it to feel more like?
cuz i gotta use something aside from bftracker to find it
i see
to lazy i see
i mean BF1 is ok but BF4 is way better in my book
BF4 for me is the last good Battlefield
everything after BF4 was kinda trash
Well, the thing is that I'm not entirely sure yet since I haven't tested BF6. For all I know, it could be good. I only have this man's word to go on, but that said - MW2019 had pretty good recoil.
CoD simply has better gunplay mechanics tbh they just need to take a page out of their book
so like i thought? https://gametools.network/stats/ps4/name/Agent_JackBauer9?game=bf1
wait why does it go to bf1
the FROSTBITE engine issues
one sec
with all the betas and alphas
MW19 had some laser beams cheese itself though so I’d say somewhere between MW22/23
Actually, yeah I agree. MW2 had great recoil. The gun play on that was probably the most fun I've had in an FPS.
Bro, facts
only issue with mw2 was the fact that the ttk was blisteringly fast and so camping-encouraged
dont forget Fiveguy
with all the terrible handling
Well yeah, ignoring the ludicrous COD TTK the gunplay is actually smooth.
wasn't particularly hard to control
yup
best battlefield console player with 1kd 1kpm
Fivemenk if you would play vs me i would beat iam sure about it
MW2s camping problem is a bit cumulative. I blame the footsteps being ridiculously loud as well as the maps being unnecessarily complicated
who said Battlefield is all about kd?
you dont understand the concept of what a battlefield is
yeah if i was using a controller, i probably might lose a few lives to you at first
game
Well, that depends on the weapon. M4 platforms in real life aren't hard to control if you're proficient, but they still give a good kick.
oh boy not this whole kd/kpm is not ptfo bs again
you do recognize that to be the top of the scoreboard most of the time you dont need the most kills?
What do ya'll think is the In-lore explanation for the escalation and peacemaker easter eggs in BF1?
I actually got to be top of the scoreboard for doing objectives and resupplies
so is it moreso the visual effects of recoil you want over anything actually challenging?
killing enemies to stop their approach to the objectives/ cutting flanks is crucial for winning
but keep coping and crying that your resupplies and heals are what wins the game
he doesn't say cringe ultimatum statements like "i am the best"
I am the best🤓
MW2 guns were pretty difficult to control unless you went all in on recoil control attachments. Most of the time bursting or tapping was encouraged. Visual recoil just adds that extra layer of immersion that sells the experience
if you have to screenshot your leaderboard scores then yeah... that tells me everything
but i guess from console to discord or PC its hard to share
I don't personally see how visual recoil adds to immersion but my only playtime with mw2 was with the busted semi autos :/
People are too critical on visual recoil, at the end of the day a video game can only simulate recoil so many ways
you know Fivemenk i play Battlefield since Battlefield 2 on PC son
As I said, I'd have to test Battlefield 6 myself, but personally I think recoil should be grounded in realism. It's nice to have a laser beam, but that would feel too easy and I think learning to manage recoil brings more reward. So long as the recoil isn't absurd. Different attachments of course can mitigate recoil. It's difficult to say though. I would just say try to make it as realistic as possible, visually and mechanically.
oh boy here we go
iam not some 21 year old youngling starting at BFV
another BF2 vet
iam old son
but not as old as the Sniper grandpa on Youtube he is amazinh
never make cringe statements about being the best or nothing
bad company 2 sadly they closed the server
why is it cringe?
i could play bf4 right now on console
and kicking ppls ass
It just makes it “feel” like there’s more recoil. The best option is somewhere in the middle, raise recoil values but add some visual recoil
its a normal routine for me lol
it's an ultimatum statement that lacks any substance and evidence
Visual recoil or actual recoil don’t necessarily have to be mutually exclusive in my opinion
and i find it hard to believe you're hardly the best with a 1kd and 1kpm
what more proof do you need bro?
HAHAHAH
you see
conquest is not about KD
get it?
i guess you dont get it
because i know players that know how to play the game with good kd, and being good at objective play
since you played to much COD
I don’t want recoil so bad I shoot 5 bullets and I’m already staring at the sky but yknow
holding angles, locking down flanks
sure sure probably ENDERS or Jackfrags sure
on PC
but like i said
i play on console
jackfrags is an average player
No, but you want the gun to feel like a beast that can be tamed with good control and handling.
Fivemenk let us see your console statx
stats
but you will never show them
since iam a Man and your the girl here
iam pretty sure Five you will not show ur stats on here
that's what it sounds like some people want which I find crazy
a weapon that has no recoil its not fun since there is no skill ceiling and no learning curve so whats the point ?
if you shoot a AK47 in a game and it has no 0 recoil like why?
Has to be a middle ground. Not laser beams, but not allahu ackbaring into the abyss either. It's actually complicated because of the different weapon types, calibers and attachments etc. Weapons and gunplay need a lot of care to get right.
Nah even I would quit playing if it was that bad, at the end of the day it’s still an arcade game
i mean just take bad company 2s recoild or bf3 recoil and put it in BF6 copy ans paste
but i can tell you guys 1 thing
for some reason
the Labs test was pretty fun to play
even with the issues
and i dont even know why
i guess it was the sound and atmosphere which was good
i can assure you guys
the labs weapon sound was top notch
pretty good
That's good then, that means they have nailed a good gameplay formula. Just needs some refinements here and there
I’m ngl guns need to be bass heavy this time around
no complain about weapon sound at all
oh yeah but what was weird is
that all classes had all weapons lol
That needs to change
and support had a medic pack or supply crate
fix the aiming point of reference tied to the reticle first, if anything
terrible dogshit decision to repeat the mistakes of bfv
i dont like the idea that the Assaul class is not a medic anymore but i guess
aim with the screen center like every fps
they want to reinvent the wheel
so basically the Support class support you with ammonution or Medic pack but you cant equip both at the same time from what i remember
I just hope they don't go the Black Ops 6 route
Tame it back down to a MW2 feel
BO6? there's so many things that went wrong that i can't specify your issue
tbh I'd much rather have spread than much recoil. It's annoying with a random recoil system that can just choose to mess you up as it pleases at any point in the spray, when spread is at least a consistent gain in inaccuracy
and kinda small
So far it doesn’t sound like there’s anything that is so baked into the games code that it can’t be reverted, so I guess all we can do is stay vocal about these things and see what happens
when i played the labs test there was no big open field
it was like one of this BFV maps
The weapons should all have a unique recoil and spread
with alot of buildings
there needs to be spread implemented
lots of options for cover even after destruction occurs which is good
i don't need dogshit maps that's just literally open for the sake of laziness
it was very shiet on that map to drive a LAV
around
since it was more infantry focused
Did you play the Abassid map? What was it like?
I mean I guess bf6 can just carbon copy bf4 at the very least. Cumulative spread that encourages tap firing at greater distances
basically all you need
i think i played 2 maps one of them was Abassid but like i said
recoil doesn't need to be heavy
otherwise controller users will complain as they just wouldn't be able to tackle it
bf4 gunplay,vehicle design and mechanics,movement/good infantry map design of bf1 is all they really need to fucking do
what i dont liked about it you could close double doors like in cod
i wanna do the eidolon assignment with someone so bad if ur up hmu on ps my PSN name is MrDopeMedic
alot of windows you can camp from
That's not a bad thing. To me it looks great for CQB, but I don't have the full scope of the map size. Just looked very city oriented
basically the map was more like a BFV design
Yeah they should keep it simple
i think BFVish i would call the design behing it
How does the game look graphically?
imagine like a combination of devastation and amiens
grahpically its pretty good for an Alpha
that's the gameplay flow
i have to give them that props
btw i played the PS5 labs test version no idea about pc graphics
visuals, people have split opinions
but for the ps5 pro i have it looked stunning to me
personally, i couldn't shake off the fact it reminded me a bit too much of cod mw2019
From what I've seen, the lighting is pretty amazing
still ways to go. good place to start but it's rough
i think maybe there was like a sound bug or gltich but thats normal i guess for an alpha labs test
MW19 was the latest generation-defining COD, so...
Was about to say that too
idk that one bfv map
that is true, but i did play a lot of 2019 so
BF needs its own version of MW19, and MW19 didn’t just raise the standards for CoD, it’s forcing battlefield into a whole reset as well
I'm guessing character customisation is limited for the tests?
and basically that Abassid map had the church side
i didnt saw any character custom but alot of weapon custom
won't be long till you see recons in skin suits
Apparently they're going to be implementing character customisation much like BFV had. So I'm guessing that's been left out for now
but for some reason the weapon custom didnt really changed the weapon behaviour the way i would like to see
Well that's another concern. It should
i know i will get in the trouble most likely
but
if i can
i might can share some video
but
Like making the goofiest looking character as much as possible?
its difficult
That’s what I’m worried about too
More like Ghost Recon style customisation. No goofy shit
i would be absolutely shocked if they keep even the first battlepass all military style
but actually what concerned me besides the low recoil was the hit reg was way off most of my 1v1 gunfights
I wonder how it went if bf1 had character customization?
Terribly
you should somebody point blank in the chest
and somehow they had like 66hp or more
shotguns were basically one shot weapon
i remember that
BF1 moved the focus off customization but made up for it with the character models changing depending on the maps. British faction doesn’t use the same uniforms in base game maps as like, Achi Baba or even zeebrugge
It's a good trade off
they could have taken some gameplay freedom and made something unique
instead of stale ass variants
but from what i remember so far there was no meta weapon or meta weapon specific from what i can remember
this just in - a server performance stress test might have poor server performance
Only problem I have with variants is they were displayed in the weapons menu which bloats the actual weapon count
yeah
what a surprise
Assault weapons were kicking ass
ARs being strong
even Lmgs coudnt compete but they seem buffed a bit from dps
i could kill alot of ppl like 6 of them i have a video of that with an LMG
it was crazy
It really is. I’d be ok with losing character customization for rigid but immersive outfits that people can’t “grief” by throwing together things that clearly don’t match just to piss people off, basically no better than the skins you see in CoD anyways
LMGs are a terrible weapon class in video games. make them feel too light, just becomes a big mag AR. make em too heavy, no one uses it because it feels shitty
I have a report here. I did share it earlier but for some reason it was silently removed, so I'll share it again:
- Back to Class-Based System – No Specialist Heroes
DICE is moving away from Battlefield 2042’s Specialist/Hero model. Expect a return to traditional Assault, Engineer, Support, Recon roles.
Instead of unique Specialists, you’ll choose from one of those core classes—each with specific roles and perks, though still retaining some flexibility via weapon proficiency systems.
- Nameless Soldiers, Not Branded Operators
Unlike BF 2042, the new game will feature your own soldier, not locked to story‑driven operators with preset voices and personalities.
Players and fans are emphasizing generic, immortal soldiers, allowing everyone to create their own identity without narrative characters taking the spotlight.
- Customization: Tactical, Modular, Realistic
Expect a mix akin to Battlefield V and Ghost Recon—granular gear customization (helmets, vests, backpacks, gloves, boots, etc.).
Customization will maintain military credibility and clear class silhouettes, so you can easily tell who’s a medic, engineer, etc.
Focus will be on realistic gear and colorways, not over-the-top cosmetics. Some players hope wackier skins (like in BR modes) are kept separate.
- Futuristic-Modern Hybrid Gear
The game is set in the near future (~10 years ahead) with contemporary soldiers using advanced tech—robots, drones, modern drones/jets/tanks.
Soldier attire is expected to be grounded, mainly realistic modern gear with subtle futuristic touches (e.g., smart helmets or advanced camo), but not sci-fi armor or exoskeletons.
in BF4 i tried lmg and its sadly not good
make them work only when stationary, to hold down areas - it's campy
i like LMG but i think Bad company 2 they were the best weapon
guess what bfv did exactly that
but not really in BF3 or BF4
and everyone fucking hated it
MMGs would’ve been fine had BFV not allowed people to fly around the map with every other weapon type
I think a toned down customization like changing just your helmets, webbings and nothing else would've been fine
Ban sliding as a mechanic
sliding is fine
in battlefield series, the most broken was release state bf1 slide. everything other is fine
It doesn’t make sense to put an MMG esque mechanic in a modern themed BF tho. LMGs/GPMGs replaced everything else that isn’t vehicle mounted
probably never gonna use LMGs anyway in a modern game so
ARs SMGs are where its at
LMGs need to have gameplay incentives beyond big mag count like
I may be in the minority with this opinion but
Give them OG suppression
if you mean suppression that rewards missed shots by making it near impossible for the enemy to fire
Yeah something like that
that is an absolutely horrible idea
What idea?
It was only bad because everything under the sun had it for some reason
suppression should never affect the actual ability of a player to counter
only for visual
Like pistols definitely do not need suppression and that’s just, physics
Idk it’s not great, it’s a dated mechanic but it’s something I think would be funny to see
I mean we wanna make LMGs useful right
What can we even do to suppression?
As annoying as the suppression is in Hell Let Loose, that's probably the way it should go for this game
Sure, but it is mil-simmy
it's an arcadey large scale combat arms game
It has definitely always played with more tactical aspects
that has the military THEMEs
I mean the whole combined arms thing for one
you're not gonna tell me that tarkov/arma/squad plays like battlefield
I think it should lean more towards mil-sim, but not fully. COD leans away from mil-sim
elaborate on why you think so
CoD will become an arena shooter at this point
Because I think people are dying for a grittier game, not arcade
I just want battlefield
With a bunch of speedy crackheads
bf1 has a gritty atmosphere while being an arcade shooter
everyone and their mother loves worshipping that game
There’s no way people won’t get tired of it eventually
Exactly. So keep that formula
How are you playing two games simultaneously?
absolutely terrible idea
I mean the pendulum is just taking forever to swing
aside from graphical fidelity and atmopshere of the game
Remember the gorilla movement😭
bf1 had absolutely shallow, cheesy gameplay
You say its a terrible idea, yet BF1 is one of the most celebrated in the franchise lol
That's a Lil harsh
bf1 is a great cinematic experience. Gameplay mechanics wise, there is way too many issues for people to praise it
Idk the biggest complaint I seen for BF1s gameplay is that it was “too casual” which might just be the moozoo players from BF4 in disguise
Everything else? Annoying at worst
absolute cheese cannons everywhere in the game
So you do want a more realistic experience then?
I’ll only give BF1 gameplay critiques 1 point for mortars. They’re broken in BF1. That’s it
I'm a bit confused as to what you want from this game
i stated it earlier but probably got lost in the argument with the best battlefield player on console with a 1kd 1kpm
Sweet spot? Snipe back bro
Spread? Half of the maps are literally designed after real world locations so it’s a balancing factor
Uhhh skill gap movement? …..
bf1 is just sort of chill compared to the other ones
You say it's broken I say it's accurate
not much tension, not much challenge
which I guess is why people like it
but I just like having a little more juice
bf4 movement/gunplay/vehicle mechanics and depth, with the atmosphere of bf1
BF4 movement is not real
Literally no movement in that game besides a genuinely cracked bug
Moozoo is not movement, it is an exploit
those are absolutely exploits i agree
so ofc i don't want an exploit to come back
but the ability to air strafe in bf4, with a relatively fast sprint speed and all, was just about perfect
Hilariously just like the real ww1
I genuinely think the BF6 gameplay is slower than 4s
I think BF6 should be challenging, but not a ridiculous amount so that new players can at least maintain interest. It needs to lean more towards mil-sim IMO, but not fully. There needs to be a fine balance between arcade elements and mil-sim, but lean more on it being a challenge. It's more rewarding that way, and as I said, people are craving something grittier. Arcadey shit has been done to death.
Honestly I shouldn’t say no movement my bad that’s not even true. I played on console so that’s where my experience comes from, air strafe is about it and idek what that is so I’m not qualified to speak on it
airstrafe isn't
But I’ve unironically seen people say “just adapt bro” to moozoo like bro, hell no
You change your direction in mid air while jumping, that's air strafe in its purest form
the other stuff I don't mind never seeing again, but airstrafe and momentum preserving slides was fun as hell
You can jump and change your direction 90° to strafe around a corner, for example
ominidirectional slide with a cooldown, bf4 airstrafing
In my opinion video game movement should always be based on what an actual human body can do unless we’re in the era of jetpacks or cybernetic machines or something wacky like that
boom, movement that is deep enough but not overwhelming
Changing direction while jumping while fun for some makes 0 sense to me so I’m not for it
i'd rather just go for something that's fun
My personal pet peeve, but I really don't want to see Sliding in any FPSs outside Titanfall
games need skill gap, a way for outmanevering your opponent
Yeah, keep that Max Payne shit out of here. You should be able to leap forward into a prone from a sprint and that's it. MW2 nailed that
and "positioning" shouldn't be the only key factor to a gunfight aside from literal basics like aiming
I can suspend my disbelief enough to not care about sliding, but instead see it's implications on gameplay and just whether it's fun to engage with
No one even replying to anyone here awesome I want to yell into the void more
That + back prone, manual leaning and maybe climbing is what I think of when I hear “movement”
I’ll get to it bro I won’t abandon you
you have the right to have an opinion
doesn't mean i'll agree, but your voice can be said
Thank you!! <33
I replied to this btw
AAHH THANK YOU!!
im not gonna bash you for having a different view
some people have their playstyles
they prefer to keep things more cinematic and realistic by not using movement mechanics
some like to go all out and test their limit
I mean I don’t deny that it feels fun probably because it’s just like scrolling. Just the same repetitive motion over and over. But sliding is just dumb depending on the game
plenty of good players that don't need to adhd cod tktok to do good
Yeah, I like back prone too. That makes sense. Basically MW2 had all of these nailed apart from leaning corners.
BO6 has the auto lean on corners which is a nice feature. I would take the best elements from both games and combine them. Keep sliding, but punish trying to over use it.
it should always be about positioning and awareness
but movement is also a key factor for some players to learn, that can help them outmatch opponents through proper use
which is why i said slide with an internal cd
I feel like it just quickly devolves into a bunch of spam to win buttons tbh
if spammed,it will leave you an even easier target than just strafing
It also kills games over time when everyone who didn’t “adapt” to flying around on the floor leaves the game
people fly around in bf4 even when it was actively being supported
still had great amount of players with varying levels of skill
Genuine question were people zoozooing around in 2013-15
idk exactly when it was like figured out
but once i learned about the med pack trick
This is why I say it shook should lean towards mil-sim. Mil-sims punish you for trying to play like a cod sweat.
Sure I can understand the perception that it's the same thing over and over, but it's more than that. A slide, air strafe, bhop can turn fights into more actual 1v1 fights by avoiding fire and re engaging, THAT's the fun part. Instead of slicing every single corner and making it a who sees who first, it's an actual fight
i did abuse it a bit too much
I want to assume sometime after 2020 because what else did people have to do besides sit indoors and break games for fun
bf will always require positioning but movement like that just makes it more intense
having too predictable of a game makes you lose interest
you see anyone do anything but strafe or crouch bounce in bf1 when they engage in gunfights?
the whole reason I dislike games like siege, cs etc is because it's just checking the same parts of the map each time, starting from the same place and learning stuff as if it's a text book
bf and other movement games just feel so much more dynamic
exactly. i'm not trying to memorize games lmao
Will never touch siege or CS in my life tbh
Well if that kind of movement must stay, then at least slow it down. Black Ops 6 is way too slippery. I actually think ADHD is a requirement for that game
You can't jump shoot in bf1
blackbeard
Didn't siege write out the main villains or smth?
absolutely sad because bf1 used to have some really engaging gunfights with the movement
it was a bit ridic but
At this point what hasn’t siege rewritten
Yessir
so many ways to outmanuever
and yeah, dying to someone with good movement is annoying, but it also teaches you a lot on how to engage your gunfights as well
it's strange cause siege has some rather quick strafe directional changes, no spread on it's weapons, fun recoil - all things that make strafe fights actually fun. But it's a tac shooter
do you bot walk next to cover and shoot standing still, or find a way to slide peek a corner to aggressively push?
iits always good for the comrades
But you just said positioning and awareness is important. The kind of movement kings we're talking about don't care about positioning, it's about outmaneouvering
trust me, not everyone is a locker sweat
And that's when the game loses its tactical edge
When everyone is slide cancelling and swan diving all over the place
in the end, understanding map design is the most important
everything needs to be balanced, and that's what their playtest hopefully aims to accomplish
I’ll maybe concede on bunny hopping or jumping corners, but fights aren’t more “engaging” if you gotta claw the controller or keyboard tbh (imo). It’s just going to create exhaustion faster. I will literally play a game longer if fights are more tactical or at least grounded
2 matches of MW3 and I log off
look at what happened to cod. zero reason for cover when you can zoom around the map like a sugarglider after snorting crack
wdym claw
That's my point. We don't want that to happen to BF
Oh dude there’s a whole method to it
not much I can say since it's clear we both have completely different preferences
hence why i highlight balance
Like you literally claw your controller with one hand lmao some guy in here a couple years ago said he did it to play 2042
having a positional-focused game but also allowing some units of freedom for movement, to have a skill gap
controller whole another world out there
I think that’s what it comes down to cause I see where you’re coming from too
But I think objectively speaking
BF works best as a grounded sandbox that focuses on overall teamplay. Not these personalized ‘movement’ mechanics
i think personally, mr movement lover would agree with me
hence his name
positioning is important
but there needs to be ways to outmanuever an opponent
Like fights aren’t any less personal in 1 compared to 2042. I still want to kill you if it’s showing me I’m going 1-3 against you on the death screen
for my sacrifice?
Preferences or not, Battlefield should be grounded in realism first and foremost as it always has been. People can push the mechanics of the game and create "Battlefield Moments" but it should not be like an arena shooter where everyone is an acrobatic gunslinger. There needs to be some realism to the movement
you don't get slide hopped by a pp29 in bf1 so
If I get slide hopped in any game
I'd rather get slide hopped then other things in BF1
I was trying to find an emoji that works but nvm
gassed, mortared, bombed, sweetspotted, suppressed, lit on fire by flares
fucking zero skill game
worst game ever ❓
BF1 hate is insane genuinely
I personally detest movement kings. It's not even the getting outplayed that bothers me, just seeing people play like that makes me irrationally annoyed. It ruins immersion too.
well bf4 was my first bf, and that's my basis. The idea of movement is what got me hooked - the idea of systems that require time to learn and utilise, and doing so has you feeling the impact of your actions more. Since bf4 was my first, I base most of my preferences surrounding bf around that
That's what they call themselves
it's valid, it's like the worst playing BF game
Ridiculous
how.
People who hop corners. I want to punch them in the face in real life. On god
Yeah 😂
Watched what?
Bf1 outperforms in visuals and infantry map designs. Everything else is just.. shallow and not this gold everyone speaks of
No idea
Oh I didn't see it. My bad
Bf1 was the most fun before the apocalypse dlc. Which is ironic
tdm maps maybe? because conquest...
Idk man. BF4 is the north star but SHTF after 1, that’s just objectively true in every regard. People said, “nah, we don’t want BF1” so then we got 2 completely garbage games afterwards. Not that it makes 1 perfect. It’s certainly flawed. But I think it’s usually exaggerated
nvm i remember the tdm matches i played 
Only real complaint is the elevation of each spawn
BFV is better than 1 💔
if we're talking about gameplay
No
The brits get farmed on achi baba
0 3D spotting is good
^
Explain
I got the opposite in one match
Doritosfield is not exactly exciting
I think it's a good thing to get people to use their eyes
I think it just results in more deaths to campers than necessary. There’s like a whole thing about being shot from bushes or by someone you swore was dead
ah yes. lets play with 31 random people and lets not communicate where the enemy is
Only issue with bfv and eyes is the terrible color palette
I don't really care about that
I’d probably excuse a lack of 3d spotting if character models didn’t constantly blend into the environment
Minimaps exist for a reason
camo doing its job
😃
🧠 📉 ⏩
Couldnt agree more
Ironically now it sounds more like you’re defending a milsim mechanic in BF more than I would
Minimaps are still present and present more information than whats in your player screen
When has camo ever mattered in BF besides basically being dependent upon “ooh this looks cool”
V is like the 1 game where camo actually has a function and that would probably be okay if it weren’t for other ways V was balanced
I was jesting but muh visibility is such an annoying complaint
Just watched a gameplay clip from BF6, and I gotta be real again... They need to remove women from the front line lol
this is the reason we don't get night maps anymore
Nah dw im not like pressed or anything
Oh nah not the women in shooters talk
It’s not an annoying complaint it’s genuinely valid, 3d spotting would’ve alleviated a lot of it. It’s why 2042 brought it right back
FIVE
Hearing a woman screech in the battlefield just ain't right
who cares
And about the minimap thing I’m going to be real with you
it's modern combat
Tunnel vision, perks, I ain’t doing all that
Yeah, women are still not on the front lines of any theatre
Sure it doesnt offer the vibes of bf3 for example
Just being honest
it's a game vro
I honestly never bother with BFs minimap because oftentimes I think there’s too much on it
Did you hear women screeching in BF4? Nope. And that game kicks fucking ass
yeah BF4 for me is the last stronghold for Battlefield games in general
stick to it then
I hate minimaps in CoD/BF in general cause the gameplay is just too fast paced for me to keep glancing up at it every few seconds. But that’s honestly just me
Mates
Okay, and enjoy your strong independent screechers lmao
Is the M1918 a meta gun or the MP-18?
if we're going to be pedantic you should be complaining about inaccurate solider kits
But still minimap doesn’t fix the entire issue. I mean this was a consistent problem Vs entire life
idc sorry
juju i sent you a private message
1918 im assuming its the automatico
Also are we getting into the women debate because all I will say is this
Yep
They have their pros and cons @pure kraken
And it's this attitude that ruins modern FPS games
But which gun is more toxic?
Lower fire rate, better dmg dropoff
I do not care about creative liberty depending on the themes constraints when quotas and arcade game design elements still need to be addressed, but throwing history out the window for the sake of it is just dumb
Well I do have some opinions
1918 is more the meta so
Smg08 is the most toxic though
Zero skill cheese weapon
ah yes. not the greed and incompetence of big studios. but women voice 🧠 📉 ⏩
“It’s just a game” is such a bad cop out, as if video games are the only medium of entertainment where people can’t expect some degree of realism or at least atmosphere
With gaming being more accessible than ever, it’s important for businesses to try and tend to more audience. Im not a big fan of hearing those horrible screams in my games either but it is what it is
M1918
High Fire rate
Better hip fire
High recoil at ADS
Low Mag.
MP-18
High mag
Decent recoil
Imagine creating a game based on the events of thr 300 Spartans and they made half the army screeching women. Some in here will say "idc", and I'll say no shit. What a way to ruin a good thing. It's not sexism, it's about congruence
It’s also just ethically disrespectful to actual veterans and historical figures for DICE to do what they did so I mean
Funnily enough, if the mp18 fires at the same rpm it actually has more recoil
I mean yeah at the same time it's Battlefield
the weapon and soldiers have never been authentic
Ye but for some reason I can control it
if you really care about that stuff you should pick up Squad or arma
A lot of bf1 “recoil” is visual and mainly attributed to spread
that's why it doesn't really bother me
Usually for a mix of legal/creative liberty reasons. But there’s a difference between that and Vs existence
So anyways I already got the Fedorov
Try and find an empty server, dump a mag at the wall, and observe the gun flying around
5 should've been an alt history WW2 game
But in reality, the recoil is very miniscule
good point but its not 300 lmao also pubg had women and it is one of the most played fps game of the last decade. again greed and incompetence > women voice
Yeah, but they never went full redard until they started adding more and more women. It ruins immersion for me personally, because I know women are not on a front line slaying badguys. They're just not.
you also don't see US soldiers running around with eastern weaponary
Bfv would have been better received as an imaginary steampunk ww2 or slightly after ww2
but hey
Like wolfenstein
I'm not the sexist guy here
I have a response for this that I want you to consider
What if I just want Battlefield to be like older battlefield games where the standard I have was met in my eyes? Not because it was entirely realistic, but because it was atmospheric enough for me to excuse an error here or there
dunno why i have to point such simple thing lol
Like people always assume people are asking for BF or CoD to be a milsim when really we’re just citing older BF/CoD games as examples
I don't see how woman break this standard
That would've been awesome as hell
it's on the same level as inaccurate equipment and gear to me
Example: I love BF1 which has an entire mini campaign dedicated to a female character. I don’t care because it’s grounded in reality. V?
Literal meme
I do treat fictional modern conflicts differently to like historical stuff
when i played the bf labs test i saw some jump shooting and stuff but it seems not that strong
Yeah but pubg is ridiculous anyway. Random people parachuting into some non descript land with the simple aim of killing each other down to the last man. It's not realistic at all, so I don't care. Whereas Battlefield is grounded in realism. That's why it bothers me. Its the same reaosn I couldn't care about women in Apex Legends or any other ridiculous arena shooter
That would have allowed creative weapon designs, cool map concepts (US in siege, etc), and interesting cosmetics, doesnt make the presence of women in wars weird
BFV and CoD vanguard both should’ve just been steampunk-esque WW2 games then I wouldn’t care. But don’t gaslight your players with nonsense revisionism
video games are not meant to be realistic. next
If it’s a fictional modern conflict I genuinely wouldn’t care at all if character models were women
Cause it makes sense that western armies might do such a thing
which is what BF6 is doing
WW2 though, I’m not even being sexist when I say that just was not happening
Personally i think it was a fuckup to add it to a historical war where 99 percent were men, but again. Times are different
You know what’s funny tho, I would’ve loved a BFV war story in an alternate timeline where the game is good where the WASPs get militarized and that’s a whole thing. Or the Soviet women tankers/snipers
i feel like that frantic AREA 51 caller i got get ahhhh !
Game companies really dont give a shit about much but appealing to as many people
And making money
Lol, right which is why I don't complain about playing as Crash Bandicoot fucking girlfriend. Context matters. If you're making a war simulator, based on real world authenticity - Even if it is just a game, it should be authentic. Women should not be the main characters in a fucking war sim lol
They could make up battles in a world war setting and I probably wouldn’t even notice lol
If they really cared about players live service wouldnt be used as a way to dripfeed lazy content
Neither are movies, people love fury despite how hilariously inaccurate it was cause it at least tries (well, a better example would be band of brothers, actually)
depends on what the creators are going for
battlefield is not a war sim
not even arma 3 is a war simulator. only if you install several mods.
My bad I hopped into the convo late fighting for BF1s honor so I wasn’t sure if the convo was about V or 6
I just mentioned the thing in general
they should continue the 2035 setting 🤫
i would say Battlefield is a like semi tactic war game but not a Warsim like Arma but i dont want it to be a simulator
enlist and go to ukraine and that is you war simulator
The only big issue with your statements (which deep inside I agree) is the wishes of players and the goal of the devs dont always line up
Right, and yet there are no women to be seen in Arma 3 lol. So it at least respects realism
and the woman screaming is kinda a turn off but i guess iam used to it from BFV
Band of brothers had a inaccuracy where one of the spot light characters passed away in 1963 but in reality they died in the 2000's
And now the next bf game is being realistic by adding them too :)
Games are more accessible than ever, and greed has overtaken the gaming industry. They want to appeal as big of a player base as possible for sales and revenue. Authenticity and player wishes comes second if not third
Something like that is kinda ridiculous to get messed up, but it’s not impossible to overlook
Women screaming is only a turn off when it's in Battlefield and they're asking for a medic lol
Bfv was a stretch to put women into. Not entirely agreeable in their decisions
The weird thing in general is, historical consistency goes out the window specifically with WW2 video games. Why
there is
But modern games.. i really cant say much
