#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 248 of 1
they dont say supressing fire for a reason do they haha
If you want the bullets to stop flying your direction yeah, or you can just move
Dude he’s rage baiting lmao he’s not serious here
Oh, believe me.I know, I just think it's kind of funny
The real question is is why you trying to take on a guy with a two hundred round belt magazine head on
It just sounds like you're bad. At positioning
If there is a guy shooting down a hallway with a two hundred round belt magazine, why are you trying to go right at him instead of around him
I guess working on the assumption that one of these times it'll have to work.
monkey balls
Doubt
Maybe after he has to reload, or he's out of ammo
What does this have to do with suppression at all?
If it was a normal shooter without suppression, the support would still have an advantage
It means that guy is suppressing that general location, trying to prevent enemy movement from that location
The whole purpose of suppression is to lock down an area and prevent people from moving up and down or round that area, or holding them in position
There's an option to turn auto aim off, but I would've guessed you didn't know.
Yes, I lead my own shots.
Auto aim kind of frustrates me from time to time
See? Your argument was invalidated, shut up already.
Coming from the guy who complains about suppression
okay but in battlefield, people can literally be in any position and suppression only requires someone to miss you
making the mechanic a very confusing and tedious thing to deal with
If you just increased the weapon recoil, you would have more consistent and fair engagements and Supports using bipods and cover still have an advantage
it just means that with skill you can challenge the support player but its still harder for you to kill
thats good gunplay
not a system that randomly gives you spread because people shooting past you
Only terrible players that continuously run back in the same area and have terrible positioning complain about suppression
??????????????
YOU CAN GET SUPPRESSION FROM BEING IN ANY POSITION
IT JUST REQUIRES YOUR ENEMY TO MISS
OR SHOOT NEXT TO YOU
thats why that doesnt make sense in battlefield's context
Suppression doesn't always require you to miss. Sometimes you can hit your shots a couple of times and the target will be suppressed. It's just generally, you're shooting in the direction of the enemy to hold them in positions. that way, you can help your team lock down an area. Or make a push suppression has a wide range of things you can do with. It is just people generally say it's bad because i'm.It has people only missing and decreasing your accuracy
Suppression isn't even a real thing lol
Says the troll.
Its just something people made up to get mad at
If you use suppression correctly, it can change the tide of a firefight
Generally, suppression is utilized to hold an enemy in position and keep their heads down.While a flanking element goes around them and destroys the target
but the point is, you dont need an inconsistent and tedious mechanic like suppression to help people lock down an area
Are you learning backwards?
You don't always have to miss your target. To suppress the enemy, you can hit your targets. But generally, suppression is just utilized to hold an enemy in position or hold down an area to prevent somebody from going into said position
But it does help in firefights, suppression is utilized in the real world quite often
okay but this is an arcade FPS
Again it has some levels of realism
and consistency is key to good gameplay
any bullets in a recoil pattern that doesnt hit the player that your aiming at directly due to holding the mouse down should cause some sort of suppression fx
Generally, suppression, rewards players who hold down an area.It punishes players who decide to go through that area or don't move
Backblast is atheistic?
I don't know.I feel like from time to time. The gun play is pretty realistic.
Do you hit one hundred percent of your shots
Do you prefire around corners?
Of course he does.
Its a niche mechanic, more of an attention to detail but its not like everyone is constantly gettting backblast kills
There’s aspects of realism in battlefield, shits more engaging then other arcade shooters
But they're funny to get
I think the term you're looking for is "tactical"
Battlefield is anything but tactical bro
I didn't even want to talk about suppression. I just wanted to talk about the commander role
Commander is cool
tactical doesnt just mean counter strike style gameplay
I know, right.I think they should bring it back
Just because you've never had it utilize in any of your games.As I mean, it didn't provide value in previous games
Maybe go try the rollout for yourself, and you'll see what i'm talking about
Hey, I like commander just like I like suppression, it's unfortunate that some goobers don't appreciate it.
tactical just implies that tactics are streamlined more into the core mechanics of the gameplay
like class gadgets
squad play
I guarantee you plenty of people have used it. I've used it a few people that we've been talking to have said they used it. There's probably a whole community out there, and a whole bunch of youtube videos out there, describing how to utilize commander effectively
I mean it would be cool but I’m not personally so arsed about, never really played 3 or 4 so it’s not my favorite thing in the world, better stuff to be reintroduced and added in
Maybe your right I’ll admit but still though
I still do think though.That a major support role should be brought back into the game
Absolutely, not the map size or the amount of vehicles.
So then go play as the commander
Suppression is then a tactic which you can overcome
One hundred percent with good planning movement, or an explosive
I mean yeah those count too but its mainly the map design more than the size
2042 has maps that dont incentize tactics and just play like wide open shooting fields
supression lovers with 1 KPM
Like I said, just because you're bad at movement, embat at planning, her strategy doesn't mean suppression, was a bad mechanic
🫡
I've had squad mates follow my orders and ive been able to effectively have 1 players drive out a whole squad because i was helping him point out the proximity of enemy players honing in on his position as he was capturing as a commander . commander is useful if you have team-mates that understand the role and how it can change the tide of a war
I think I'd rather have visual suppression with more recoil on all weapons flat
"i love missing and still getting points!"
If you're basing everything around 42, we've already lost what makes Battlefield great.
battlefield isnt about KPM - PTFO
The whole purpose of the support class is to support the team's pushes and assaults and to give ammo
Nope, definitely not
They are meant to lock down.General lanes of travel to prevent enemies from going down that lane
that game is too sandboxy
and kills a lot of tactics that made infantry fun in BF3/BF4
you can be recon and still be at the top of the score board anyone knows that with no kills
depending on the mode and side you're on
I just really think commander should be brought back into most of these battlefields. I can understand why they took it out of battlefield one, but I don't know why they didn't put it back in battlefield, twenty forty two
good luck top fragging each game without running nearby obj
theres people with a jillion kills in breakthrough attack but dont push up for shit
I'd prefer somebody with 20 kills but actually revives and pushes
I still have a lot of ideas of how you can improve the commander role to begin with
High KPM = Average Rush/Breakthrough player.
they gotta bring back commander mode from BF2 fr
cq aswell
it matter in there a lot
I've only ever played the commander role in battlefield.Four and battlefield hard line, I can't really speak on battlefield, too
I mean hes kinda right
a lot of ppl just play breakthrough to frag out
barely any vehicles, clustured infantry spots
cq is better to frag out
in that sense, yeah
average players fuck off until 20 tix left
if were being real
LOL
CQC > Breakthrough
Anyone need a good commander in battlefield.Four
also atleast on Rush, I as a single player can actually determine a match's outcome
it was way more useful in BF2 with artillery strikes, UAV, supply/vehicle drops and you we're also physically there in the game too. Plus you could destroy the enemy commander's assets
See, that's some of the improvements i'm thinking about bringing back in in the new battlefielder, they bring back commander
frontlines are fun aswell
for everyone involved
rush was great in badcompany 1 + 2 // make rush great again
also inf BT is good
Design maps around Rush
Just praying they don't add a bunch of unrealistic skins.
Take us back to the the old days please.
No BS
Yes but behemoths and kits helped.
im stating in terms of map design and pacing for frontlines @full hinge
it felt better IMO
IS this next one going to have a story?
Yeah
Wack
I think in hardline, they just called it a hacker, didn't they
Idk I haven't played hardline lmao
Sick
Fair
It wasn't that bad. It got alot of hate
I liked it
Bit Niche
But fun
But I do think commander would provide a valuable role in this nevada field.It'd be a breath of fresh air. Because you don't really ever see a role like commander in in too many other games
I could see Commander being a thing
I miss being able to use an iPad
I really hope so I probably play infantry more.But I would definitely play the hell out of commander if I got the chance
That shit was cool
maybe if they didn't label it as a battlefield title it wouldn't have gotten so much backlash
the gameplay looks fun in hardline
I love commander but playing as infantry.Is the main purpose of playing battlefield
But I would still play the hell out of commander
Yeah that's fair, it had a good feeling to it. Just different
battlefield has alwasys been land air and sea combat . giving players decisions on how they want to be impactful to winning on the battelfield
sea combat has always been lacking tho
agreed
except in the og BF1942
naval combat
i liked the coastal boats in 4 that was pretty great especially at taking down a10
you could control the big battlecruisers and planes could land and refuel on them in bf1942
yeah i hated when they started taking away the spawn point on the carriers and just spawning planes or jets in the sky
i get why they did it due to spawn issues
i like spawnming in and rushing for that vehicle as a team getting in that boat or jet as a team and taking off. i do hope they add in vehicle locks
Man now I'm kinda wanting to play some battlefield
thinking takeoffs in battlefield is okay in the big 2025
theres no way to make it work
they tried again in bfv and it suffered from the same problems
they could put the bases further away and have multiple AA emplacements that players can control or something
make a battlefield battle royale and make all the developers work on it instead of the game itself that's a great idea
yeah i dont understand the logic in adding br to a game like battlefield
let's be honest nobody wants to play anything else than br br is the superior gamemode
Parking the Destroyer just off C on Wake Island
sounds like hell for the defenders xd
tho its a big target obviously
Ur a clown
I'm just the voice of the community 🤷
That's not the what the voice of community wants
Battlefield should have br but they should be more focused to multiplayer not br
I don't want another warzone but a battlefield game
warzone is more popular means it's better so battlefield need to Compete
fell for the bait
Warzone is shit bruh players are leaving the game since warzone 2
U don't even find the match more quick on warzone
😂😂
weak bait
Imagine saying warzone is popular ☠️☠️☠️☠️
yeah at least some fell for it 😭
U know who play warzone nowdays?
everybody it is so popular
No only tryhard players and streamers who don't have other job than warzone
U don't even know why they are bringing back verdansk do u?
yes to make the game even bigger since everybody loves warzone and miss warzone
No they doing it to revive the playerbase bcuz everything on warzone is shit nowdays
And that's not even gonna work
Bcuz the movement on same map will not bring the feel back like warzone 1
Players will play the old map for like a week and then again leave the game
That's how cod works nowdays
I wish u get some brain cells
😭
i am sure battlefield doesnt need conquest and BT
i wish you get an objective view instead of just throwing at us your subjective view and hate on battle royale
they should be replaced with battle royal
true thank you finally someone with brain cells
so we'll have more players => devs will have more money => devs will add more cool cosmetics like homelander skin from cod
its boring to play a game without pink skins for example
and nicky minaj
i dont like when players could only pick military related skins
thats boring!
snoop dog skin from mw2 was better than any bf soldier skin
🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣
Did u just say pink skins?
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Ur a clown
i love them
are you referrng to clown skin from black ops 6?????
id like to see it aswell!
we both think about same things
it would be so quirky
i love it
☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
true
I can't tell if your joking
Mi tengos autismos
who is joking?
If they really do make this battle royale free I am worried they will focus mainly on the battle royale
The battle royale just isn't a good idea for a bf game
Leo you cannot be Leo for I am the real Leo
it isn't for any game br ruined call of duty and it will ruin bf if it's free
😨
Yeah I don't see the point of this other than money it's not even fun
Battlefield is a military based game
They shouldnt have battle royale at all
It'll just be a mode, dw about it
Hey All I’m new here but been playing BF forever… is there a way to apply for BF6 testing or is it invite only?
BF is supposed to try appeal to many gamers
You sign up on the website
Do you have a link at all
just google battlefield labs. top link
Is anyone else here having problems with the BF1 servers on PlayStation? They all dissappear when you join one
How slim are the chances to be accepted into battlefield labs?
Somebody italian?
Very. Over 1.3 Million people signed up while only a few thousand got invited
I applied but go invited to play skate game instead gg
Did you saw the leaked vídeos that gameplay was a crime so…..
There is no way this is a person playing
I think a battlefield be can be fun
Both have large amount of players, teamwork, destruction, large maps ect
Minor
Dolphin dives do be pog
Once they remove the knockdown system we’ll have a true battlefield again
I am on xbox and was wondering in general if there are no players or something because it’s near impossible to get any game operation/server/quick match unless you play at specific time and even then it’s not even 34 players on both sides these days
disagree, dont allow players to shoot while at it and dont allow to shoot when you land, make it so you have to wait 1 or more seconds to shoot
what is that?
Cant wait for the new bf game to have sbmm and no server browser
It will be based
If there’s sbmm people can’t complain about bad team mates anymore
Cause they belong in that lobby 
We need to demand for a server browser and no SBMM
And persistent servers
but how can the modern audience enjoy the game if they dont get matched up with people they have a chance with?
come on dude,,, you cant leave out the BROADER audience
unironically tho i believe they wont add a server browser, its gonna be just for portal like in 2042
If they want this game to succeed then there should be no SBMM, it doesn’t work for a battlefield game
Early impressions they took Battlefield 3 and 4, and made it look like Battlefield 5. I'm not mad, I just wish I had a code to test it out 🤣
well no matter what the core audience thinks, people will eat it up and spend money on cosmetics so why would they care?
SBMM shouldn't exist in Battlefield. Some games back in the day you just got flooded. It was what it was
So ur not happy?
No, I am extremely pleased with what I see and optimistic
Same, I hope that destruction I saw stays in the final build
any news on the bf4 servers??
Lets say they do just that - if portal was just way better than it was on 2042, would that be a positive?
I just hope Grand Bazar makes a return 🤣
Fighting over B was almost as fun as fighting on the steps on Metro
i guess?
When they adding skins, I need Sabrina Carpenter in BF
Bf2042 personal kdr is like 0.70 or something, bfV kdr is less than 0.40... Feels much harder. Kinda mediocre purchase. I really like bf2042 out of all battlefields except 3
Someone should put in bf labs feedback to bring back paracel storm
With ac 130 gunship
And commander mode
Commander mode would be great. An in game commander mode would be lovely
i vastly prefer 2042 from V , and perform better to it
I will say this tho. I'm not sure if capping points in the new battlefield is like the previous games. But. I would like to see in the beta a test mode with feedback.
Points can't be capped by a solo player. At least 2 players to cap a point, 1v1 will not contest a flag. It simply will be locked.
Secondly a game mode with locked points once capped. Similar to the conquest game mode, but one team is on defend and one team on attack. A large scale, ticket system like conquest.
would be the cherry on top.
I would like to see players feed back on this if it's interesting to them. We all love conquest. Kind of like rush but on a large scale but an objective that needs to take place in order to capture that point
I'm sure what ever they are working on we will all love
Anyone wanna play battlefield five sometime
not a big fan of conquest myself. rush & frontlines.
Buy isn't rush on a smaller map
^
You know what I would really love to see strike at karkand back again
Metro
Classic. Would be nice.
Grand Bazaar, Metro/Op. Underground, Seine Crossing, Redacted, Reclaimed and many others.
if SBBM will be in the next game we'll have the ELO hell discussions from league of legends and counter strike and that they don't belong there
so no SBBM and a server would be welcome change of pace
Another day another no email
we need people to join on BF1 BONK server
Unpopular opinion: bring back Golmud Railway
I never had a problem with it except for the vastness of it with little to do in between. Maybe if they condensed it a little?
Nope. It got moved
prolly one of the admins
No way
Underrated
Remaster Operation Locker and Metro

then Criterion send M3GTR into BF
Yeah that’s an ass map lol. There is worse but I certainly don’t like it
did you know, The Run uses same engine as BF3 and there was a cut asset in BF3 of one of the cars ''Lambo Gallado'' in green colour.
and the run had cut walking/running animations from BF3
I only played THE RUN and my first BF is 4
i played from NFS UG1, and BF2.
idk about 3 and THE RUN
Please have Hotas support and Omni movement on PC thanks
the run was my first on x360
my first NFS is 3
I only missed prostreet,shift and 2015
you missed out on prostreet
others I play them all
I mean I didnt play these
although 2015 ran on BF1 engine, gameplay sucks.
I dont interest in NFS without cops
and it uses 2008 skybox
I didnt buy 2015 bcs its police are so weak
Server browser is mandatory in these kinds of games, sbmm is bad period
cops in carbon not weak ig
or at least is improved upon
i've witnessed them like thrice in my playthrough bro 
I set up my LMG overwatching the other side when the enemies came in from the corridor from C iirc
I hope they don’t tone it down
it will
maybe a bit more briefer
cuz its in pre-alpha
at least 2015 cops are the weakest in NFS series
I think they’re trying to go for realistic dynamic destruction this time, who agrees with me?
lol they moved the channel back
can't make their minds up
also imo Portal is a good idea but it could work more as a Map creator imo
like what Halo had
Now if boosters only had IMAGE PERMS
Terrible idea to take away the art channel
ha ha no perms
The worst maps are the walking simulator ones.
yeah but they want more players because more players=more money

Hope sliding is somewhat like in bfv it made the movement fluid
is lee enfield worth it?
Which i do agree, but what did it lead Battlefield and most of their big franchises to?
Failure
Just make games good and they will make money in the long run
how to report cheater ?
so many cheaters in battlefield 1 server japan
bought this game to have fun, not to be stressed
The long run isnt whats important unfortunately. It's great for US as the customers but all of these companies basically operate in quarterly short-term timelines. In some cases, if they don't hit certain sales marks, they can be open to lawsuits because of contracts tied to those sales numbers.
not according to the player numbers : /
Ah yes the wonders of investors
BF2042 is the least played Battlefield in recent memory
Players dont want what made BF2042 BF2042
We want more BF3, BF4, BF1 and BFV
battlefield fans dont want that*
which server
private or official
I dont mean those specifically, at least PIECES that were praised in those games to be made into the new
which we are already seeing, like BF1's immersion, BFV's movement
Its funny because regardless of that BF2042 is still the least played and the most criticized, it was so bad they had to cut support earlier
cut support earlier? dont remember V? lol
Dont know the private or official. Im always searching the server in server browser. And im sure, i always face the cheater from japan server
That can be set up for the new one? Yes
But those are the ones that can be disconnected from each game and, standalone, can be used in the new game
BF2042 was cut earlier, they lost an entire new season with that because it wasnt profitable
private servers have AI to report cheaters
Random question, I just got back into BF4 and I’m having a lot of trouble inviting and joining friends in private squad before even joining a server. Is this bugged or am I doing something wrong
fg4085, LanFengl1, andsaes, zhouyaoyao911. Those nickname are cheaters, maybe anyone from offcial battlefield can check those son of bii*ch
u need to join their group and send EAID
let me check I have the tool
And still BFV's still more played and praised than BF2042
There’s no option to invite or join the squad. Thinking it’s just bugged, it works out bc we just join the server together, just sucks when we are on opposite teams
Devs figured out its easier to call the customer broke than to Optimize and Improve
longest HS 359m
how about fg4085 and zhouyaoyao911 ? those people are worse
K
cant find fg4085 pls make sure u give me the right EAID
a few studios listen to the people who pay their bills, not many but a few
Executives*
Everything after BFBC2 has been fruitless, BF4 was good for the yrs 2-3, but it was the beginning of "No Story Included" type of games that saturate the market today. look at how quickly EPIC went to shit
already sent you a pic
the DEVS can Refuse, Game Devs used to have Morals to stand on, now there gradeschool teachers waiting on a check
refuse and what, lose their jobs? lmao
i have changed jobs because the buisness didnt align with my values... not everyone is a brainless cad
good for you
good for you too
not everyone can afford to lose their job over some players being unhappy with the state of video games
the bad games are closing studios right now WHAT DO YOU MEAN
either way the studios go down.
clearly not all of them
it's absolutely insane to think people are going to choose to go unemployed because "well game studios are shutting down all the time, who cares if i have a family to feed"
Its the devs that makes the monetization choice? I doubt
Its the devs that send out an unoptimized mess? I doubt
Its the devs that are benefitted by the profits? I doubt
They was in general talking about COD and it gave me the hibbie jibbies
Does anyone know how to find enough people to play War Pigeons or Supply drops? The servers seem always empty.
Due to executive choices, the workers are the ones that suffer the losses
you never have anything of substance to say to anyone, all you can do is lie lol
Battlefield 2042 was rushed, and probably due to exec choice
it's crazy how much you can twist a narrative when you forget all about nuance
I was saying in there I think we should more dynamic entries into matches
it needed more time
Like the US jet opening on golf of Oman
worst next to Hardpoint
devs are definitely choosing to do a poor job, it's totally not because of internal and external pressure forcing them to prioritise different things 👍
Could’ve been great
Great campaign, great weapon control, bad monetization and terrible skins that didnt fit the military design
Not like 2042 that same reused opening
great campaign
um
They added firestorm and gave up on it should’ve just focused on mp
Did BF2042 had a campaign? Oh wait it did not
even tho firestorm was lowkey fun
i hate 2042 but saying V had a good campaign is lmao
You cant even say that about BF2042
not the point...
Like maybe a halo jump from the stratosphere
Why we talking about 2042 I thought we came to a conclusion to never mention its existence
On some Godzilla shit
not only did it have boring af gameplay, the war stories were so cheesy and cringe, only the last tiger was enjoyable
i wonder if some of these guys even play battlefield
Objectively V isn't a bad game
I mean you have that opinion but it's no objective
No its not
Who
Game is more battlefield then 2042
True
I personally hated the open maps, it doesnt fit in the campaign of BF, im more fond of the linear style of the other ones
Why does it matter
5 was good ngl really loved the gameplay
It wasn’t bad man it was a good 1-2 years no great but ok
like 90% of the new members
you cant say that, you were supposed to say "it wasnt that bad" because 2042 is worse!
The question isn't relevant
Still better than BF2042
and that is the entire point
Idk Abt other but @tulip bane is cod fanboy lol
Yes I agree
because they needed all hands on deck to fix 2042 lol
They didn't abandon it, development on it was shorter then other battlefield games so
I stopped 2042 I couldn’t finish 1 match
Yes it is
Fix the unfixable?
Battlefield V isnt shit
yeah, fruitless effort obviously
Bro they was cookin with pacific theater
Why did they abandoned bf3 in a year lol it was good investment bro
to get it out of alpha more like xd
That's not what happened
Don't project your opnion as if it's a whole and it's true
BF3 and BF4 had 2 year cycles, 4 months each dlc
if it was a successful game they would've supported it for 3 years... oh wait they did
Objectively the game isn't shit
back when we got good bf games
3 had less bcuz 4 came in 2012 end atleast the alpha if I'm correct
BF2042 had cut content ROFL
glory days
As if you know how game development works
this guy is always stirring shit, never has anything meaningful to say lmao
No but you clearly don't either
Ignore him he is a cod fanboy not worth arguing with him
He is cod fanboy I mean u cant expect good from him lol
bringing up your imaginary degree is when you know the discussion is over
flood zone needs to be in bf6 or imma crash out
Hey now my degree from the college of reddit is very real
Ty bot
We dont care about 2042 lol sorry
Flood zone was good bf4 map but it's not that great to be revamped ngl
It was
$499,383,303.36in gross revenue since its release. Out of this, the developer had an estimated net revenue of $147,318,074.49.
Tf you mean defending
The game isn't shit
You project your opnion as if it's a whole for everyone else
When mostly it's positive
No its not
Thays just your opinion
"IF MONEYS ITS GOOOD" types always win
But objectively speaking its not bad
when do you think there will be another bf6 test session?
he's the one saying it was unprofitable lmao
Objectively meaning the majority of what people think about it and how the game is as a whole without any opinions in the first place
Not really
No its not
Thays your opnion
But majority of people think the game is good
guess suits had a rough time seeing those numbers
Shitting on the game
compared to bf1, bf5 is just sad, pretty much everyone is a pirate with a hook as a leg and a cape
I think it was even said by EA that it didn't meet the expected sales numbers
You project your opinion that isnt apart of majority lol
There's no hooks or legs???
Wtf?
That was in the gameplay they first showed and they removed that stuff
theres literally a girl in a bf5 trailer with something like that
for another failure lol
this new one looks promising
dont preorder it
BFV was 100% cancelled early on support, there was another entire planned theatre for it and the assets exist proving that it was being worked on.
So by that logic 4 was canceled becuase they stopped with content to make the next game
Makes no sense
ya im not planning on spending a 100 bucks for a battlefield game again
using the trailer for an argument just shows how little you've actually played the game
BFV objectively was a failure and was pulled early to work on a new game
I'm pre ordering
Failure how?
they abandoned it, since it didn't meet the expected sales numbers and they hoped to achieve that with 2042, the love letter to the fans
no im just saying thats how downgraded the trailers went
They gave up on it from all the backlash from the lady in the trailer
mechanical arm
Sales number≠how good the game is lol
yup that was saddd lol
They dont have mechanical arms in the game lol
Good thing BFV didn't do well in either avenue
No I'm just explaining your straw man argument
Didn’t help that ceo was like don’t buy it then
Makes no fucking sense
😂
Stopping development early≠abandon
They were making 2042
Is it hard for you to read?
Brother I'm telling you plainly
Do you not know how to read
💀
I'm done with this argument as this isnt going anywhere
They had to becuase dice shot themselves in the foot bad marketing
Of course it isn't, you're daft as fuck and contradicting yourself
might as well work on smth new
I do and laugh hard 😄
glad i could sus out the worst of this community in 30 mins XD
False narratives and rage bait
We desperately need to see BF6 melee takedown
COUGH* BLOCKED COUGH* COUGH*
Did block me?
game was roasted hard on release
Lmao they blocked me that's wild
they block everyone that doesn't shit on battlefield
🤡
the other guy has like 5 people blocked
they were betting he'd block me too and he did lol
Childish ngl
Not you
@fathom lake
Sissy that blocks everyone
You can do better then that cmon 💀
If your gunna block people for not agreeing with you that's just plain childish
Melee takedown was hilarious
No im not
im genuinely enjoying getting these snowflakes to melt because they wanna play Facebook on Discord
You think stopping development early for the next game=Abandon
Denying something happened is still disagreeing
What a hypocritical statement you just made
They think it didn’t happen. You think it did. There is a disagreement
to me the only good thing abt bf5 was plane gameplay
@finite mauve did you play bf v on release or got it after?
I could say the same for you really
Cus you a jet main like me lol
Not exactly on release i don't remember
But shortly after
Nope
I firmly stand that I'm right
ya lol
More false narratives
No gaslighting
ya bf 2032 was just large scale cod combined arms
Lying or not, it’s still just a disagreement
and the voicelines 💀
Battlefield V came November 2018, 2042 came November 2021. They needed to develop the next game
Not lying
2042 is way ahead of schedule 😂
ea needs to keep nation voicelines from bf1
They are projecting their opinion as if it's as the whole majority of the game
I'm saying OBJECTIVELY
Without opinions the game isnt bad
and they need to be about whats happening and be dynamic
ever seen toddlers fight...
This mans trippin
theres a difference between bad and worse guys
Lol
*worst
they're so cringy, make em funny but realistic like in BF3 and BF4, and fit the realism of BF1 in there
But objectively speaking the game is good.
Ill give you the definition of the word "Objectively" as you don't want to understand
in a way that is not influenced by personal feelings or opinions.
"events should be reported objectively"
anybody else start playing BF for the Collateral Damage system?
ya i loved hearing distant screams in bf1 and when it was dynamic to gas and air strikes
Resfresh my memory
I dont play that game too much
and the screaming wben charging so good
best map in bf v is halvoy
I didn’t like the 💩 train shooting at me tho
I did
you shott things, things break
Stop making up things
Do you not know how to read? You allegedly have a computer degree but you can't seem the read
Golmund
Becuase I haven't played it too too much
Not barely
Just haven't remember the names
Twisted steel
You wish
You dont know how to read
You dont have a degree
Doubt it
You were lying about that
See how easy it is to say someone is lying 💀
owned all the BF4 DLCs but played maybe2 map sets in 4 years XD
Isn’t that the bridge one? It’s pretty good, yeah
Fuck I'm level 92 in battlefield 4 and don't remember all the maps by heart
Doesn't mean anything lol
I don't care really
China rising and second assault dlc
cause locker and golmud railway 24/7 are the only servers? 😂
God forbid someone have an opinion
china rising was aweful unless you camp in choppers
😂
Iwo Jima
There
Lol
Ok?
What are you yapping about
Stop ragebaiting
I didn't see favorite
Iwo was good man Japanese zeros had that dawg in them
it's ok to forget names of maps.
Ok so now you are lying
You never said list favorites
💀
You never said list favorites
conquest was better than breakthrough, last sector on breakthrough was so rough for the attackers
Not the same as favorite💀
Op Locker , to this day, NUCLEAR-HOT DOG WATER
ya
Nope
BfV is already 7 years old. It isn’t terribly old, but it’s not exactly modern or new
Ok im done with this dumb argument as it's going nowhere and you bring things up that aren't relevant as a gotcha
Op Locker was to BF as Nuketown is to Crap of Dog water
Wasn’t better than nashar but it had its moments
can we all mutually bond over hate toward Op Locker?
u said that 10 mins ago and were still here
Well becuase this person decided to bring shit up again and try to get me in to stay in this argument
Imo Locker is the rust of bf. Caspian is more of the nuke town cause iirc it’s the most remade map
No that's just mostly a you opinion
Not majority
He’s clearly baiting
Most people love that mal
locker was only good for farming weapons, aside from that it's just a meat grinder and not really a bf map
i wasnt basing it on reuse, but by the quality of gameplay that can be had on a map meant for Naders
true
Same with metro
its the most uninspired map in the franchise
but the 64 version is something else
I mean Osamu blocks people who don't agree with them and barely even talk to him so I don't expect them to say things worth sense.
🤷🏻♂️
But here we are
not here to humor Fortnite players
Where did you get that astute assumption from?
If you are going to talk to me at least have a coherent sentence that makes sense
Some of the best mp maps was infi focused
💀
imagine having your response reduced to blocked message -- show
Blocking someone for opinions differing from you and barely talking to you is more of a fortnite kid thing to do
Was nice to break away from all the vehicle noise every once in a while
So whats your logic?
blocking someone and still talking to them is crazy
i miss the sniping, good ole 360 no scope days were peak
Imagine blocking me for having differing opinions then you and barely talking to you, THEN you responding with nonsense
Holy shit 🤯🤯
💀💀
That being said
Infantry-based maps are good, but Imo comparing them to vehicle-based maps and saying one of them is better is kinda dumb. They have completely different playstyles that are both fun to play
apples to oranges
OP LOCKER SHOULDVE HAD 2 OUTDOOR LANES
Childish behaviors, you say I'm a "fortnite kid" when thats extremely hypocritical coming from you brother
That would be nice
hate the one shot kill snipers in BF
Tired of people throwing cruise missiles outside lol
I did you just had to run out of bounds 💀
Lol
I almost think Redacted does a better job than op locker sometimes
Also people sometimes go in the ceilings lol
that was my Big phat a$$
loved the =2500 meter shots
i understand why it is, but i dont like it lol
With the 44
actually you know what? Redacted is like a smidge better because it had good flank routes and wider choke entries
Pickups are fine, just dont add the 50 cal
I love destroying boats with the 50 cal
Yo guys
50 cal needs to return
Usas with slugs
we have it already -> called BF2042
^
💀
explosive*
frag rounds
nah the 408 cheytac is realistically better
Honestly. Fair enough lol
and guess what? Its terrible
cant let it be Meta
People say delta force us going to crush the new battlefield when it's just a copy and paste of 2042😂😂
Well not entirely but a lot is sorta
Delta Force is laughably soulless
I love the gun customization
The rest? Its crinchy af
delta force is gonna be the one getting crushed as soon as bf6 is out and people have that to play instead lmao
I've seen them BF6 leaks and I actually kinda like where they're going so far with the HEAVY destruction and more emmersive stuff lol
Lol
WE'VE BEEN ASKING IT FOR YEARS
IKR
lets just hope BF6 mouse input actually works 🙏
the only reason people even give a single shit about delta force is because 2042 failed
Lol
bf6 comes out, everyone forgets df
Id honestly rather play 2042 than DF
Battlefield 6 is going to do well
I hope they add some cool cinematic levelutions again
At least I think seeing as how good pre alpha is
Tbh tho.. I have no clue what they got in mind that'll make BF6 stand out from prev games
if you be in a play test, does it affect your chances of being in another? better or worse
If it has voip the game will be generational
What's voip?
needs to havd prox
Voice in proximity
OHHH YOOO. They gotta add prox chat lol
itd be awesome
Yeah
We dont need innovation
Dude that'd be so bad ass
it would be so useful
We need battlefield
Whats worked in the past
I already know they are innovating a little which is good
By the gameplay
highly doubt, DF is free and will be on mobile
But not too much
like actually giving people information and potential plays would just be fun and practical
they need to Bout face and go back to where they came from and keep goin
they don't really need to make it stand out, they just need it to be good
we need the core base + improvements, that's it
after 2042's launch they need a comeback
Yes
Yeah fair. Especially whe everyone kinds just like... hit Dice in the kneecaps with 2042 lol
it's also a chinese game, so maybe saying it'll get crushed is wishful thinking, but the battlefield fans definitely won't care
And what I've seen it is that pretty much
dont care about DF
whos gonna come to a battlefield that doesnt stand out when they have games like squad and other stuff
it looked good at first but after 2042 anything did
Also the studio is highly rated and is backed good so
Squad, Arma, Ground Branch, Ready or Not are way too different in genres to Battlefield
ya
no im just using it as a comparison
I only play DF with my friend bcs they dont have BF
I just want great weapon and character customization
because it's battlefield, the franchise itself stands out. As long as they make a fun game that gives people the same feeling they had playing BF3/4 it'll be a success
also battlefield doesn't compete with squad or milsims at all lol
I REALLY hope they don't stick iwth the weird CoD like skins like what they did in 2042
Make em look like cool army men ;-;
ya thats what i want
We all hope, make it military like Ghost Recon
Yea
as long as they keep doing labs then well have the game we want
HLL was kinda like bf with the squad classes that’s wat I like. Squad play like in the olden days
Or insurgency sandstorm
i really like how they added dragging they should take the animation concept from like bf3
There has been a discussion of adding one more class, moving away from the 4 classes, to 5
i forgot which game it was gonna be in
BFV
Okay hear me out. I kinda hope they play more into teamplay.
Like sctually working with ur squads
I assume they want to remove medic from support and make it its own class?
A class with the spawn beacon 🙏
no there was an older game that had dragging in a trailer and it looked promising
Yes, makes more sense and adds to the teamplay, but they should also make the squad 5 people
I like looking at spawn beacons lol
no T-UGS, recon grenade is fine
here we go
Mama mia
bf is awesome when everyone is fighting in the same spot its so chaotic
attrition
It shouldnt be forced to the point where its tedious like BFV
Since BF3, the medic had the medibag, support had the ammo bag, recon was recon and engineer the anti vehicle stuff
because players are going to be selfish no matter what
Didnt it have passive heal?
but teamplay should be more "rewarded" and streamlined
I mean, attrition is fine for vehicles
For infantry, limited ammo too, being dependant on others
Also -> I liked how restock worked on Delta Force, it had a cooldown
Just add a prompt to take the bags from them
Assault being a medic at the same time is the death of proper class balance
The option is there
Players have been terrible medics since BF was a thing
BFV medics were built different though
I mean, they could make passive healing slower
And medic healing faster
current BF in a nutshell
It also reduces pushing through and being a one man army
The main issue I can see with 5 classes is guns. Would medic or engineer get smg? What about shotguns, DMRs, etc
Ya cus everyone has stim injection now smh
So it forces you to back down or be with your team
Each class can get access to 2 or more weapon types
Engineers were LMG previous
If you make a class specifically designed around medic gameplay, people will play it more consciously which is all the more reason medic should be separate from Assault
because you're a grunt in the middle of a battlefield, not a one man army
it’s not about you in bf it’s about the team
sure good players can sway the momentum
No? Support has been lmgs as far back as I can remember
Not according to hotshot HadTheBalls over here
💀
That works in a 5v5 or 6v6 but not 32v32
Wasnt support the engineer in 3 and 4?
BFV had a medic class and it was almost the best part about the game because medics actually did their job
Oh btw everyone, HadTheBalls blocked me so dingbat doesn’t know what’s going on if you’re talking to me 😂
Nope. Bf4 was assault, engineer, support, and recon
Medics could work with 2 different weapons -> SMG's or battle rifles
one for up close, one for mid range with slower fire rate
I could kinda get behind that
I’m a fan of medics getting dmrs, but battle rifles would work too
so how would you fight mid range threats?
Medic gets SMG
limits engagment range
forces players to play close to team but powerful in head on enemy engagements
incentivizes healing and rezzing instead of the infinite fragging potential of ARs
This is the way
also give them a smoke launcher
Which could also work for supports or recon
They should but also get access to universal weapons like carbines or shotguns
agreed
I just don’t want one man army in the next BF
It was always a team inspired gameplay
also please make the bullets hit one or more targets (collateral) depending on caliber
Same
Lol
small caliber? Doesnt hit more than one target, medium (rifles) 2 targets, higher calibers? 3 and more with reducing damage
lack of cover, trying to get to someone to revive them, trying to get to the objective, many reasons
That’s why there’s smoke
concealment is different than cover
If you’re not using smoke as medic, that’s on you not the game
Medic should be always moving anyway. The moment you’re on cover it starts locking you down.
If I see y’all spamming smokes and flir. Im coming after you
Tbf, if someone dies with absolutely no cover around them, they deserve to have to respawn
😂
there should be a smaller aoe smoke, but flir jammer
Cause that’s just them not using cover correctly
same
Yep assault and medic here
squad revive helped a lot lol
Is there not a suggestions page? or am i missing it somewhere?
I still prefer assault in 5 for anti vehicle
reddit or playtest access
Assault should just be reduced to
JUST DO DAMAGE TO EVERYTHING
I think that’s what they’re going with. All of the class perks are basically just “take less damage from X”
Could be the "Storm the front" kind of class
So assault will die less when storming the enemy
assault mains rush the front while I sit in the back with bipod m40 😎
I sit in spawn with a bipod mares leg 😎
😂
From what I can tell, we can discuss stuff seen in the widely available leaks
i mean if DICE devs themselves are responding to leaks on twitter
i dont see how us doing the same is any worse
Yea. I don’t think the leaks were planned by them, but they def knew people were going to leak

