#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 247 of 1
yea and love the downed anis they brought back
not into labs yet but them explosions better be michael bay amazing lol
wish they would clean up the animations though
there are leaks on reddit, they're great
tanks spark and sizzle before the turret gets blown sky high
how do i get anti tank grenade kills shits so painful
no spoilers i'm trying to resist the urge lol
are there bot lobbys so i can farm them
pray
i've hated that challenge since launch
fuck this game honestly
whoa buddy
I hope they will make the movements a little faster because in the leaks I found them quite slow, although the movements should not be as fast as on bf2042 they should be a little faster and also add back the slide and no cancel slide
animations are everything
personally as long as it's not cod movement it's fine with me
^
BF4 was perfect imo, though it did get sweaty at times
not a fan of this slide cancelling thing
i try to play BF4 again but the stupid anti cheat won't update lol
Really?
What do you define as sweaty
there is movement tech in the game, most commonly utilised by locker/metro players
but outside those maps in pubs most players just play it "normally"
yea i agree
same
ehhh it could use more work
it is quite janky at times
Yeah I remember getting stuck on shit 2 feet high lol
Im fond of the simple movement, and if they add slide or dolphin dive, add a great punishment for shooting
prone and running doesnt fit lol
yeah it was buggy but I think if it can be polished, it'll turn out really good
I think a refined bfv movement would be good
yup
Prone in bfv can be janky too
but please, if there is sliding and dolphing diving, DONT ALLOW EM TO SHOOT WHILE AT IT
Sometimes you just randomly stand up if you’re on a small rock
Both are mostly used for defensive movement, shouldnt be used for aggression
I think that’s fine
What about dolphin dive but can only shoot with a pistol?
I mean I like the ice skating in bfv but I get ppl who hate it lol
But not like the big guns
just no, have you seen the omnimovement in BO6?
doesnt fit in BF
Seems a bit complex imo, would you press another button?
No I meant I agreed with you
I’m fine with toned down movement just make it smooth
Yeah i get it but maybe if you run out of ammo for the main weapon and switch to pistol
I do love Omni movement though 
Hmm idk I think that could be p abusable
do u guys think the community would like a requirement to use vehicles to prevent ppl just sitting on the menu waiting to spawn things, like a certain amount of points in a game
No
There’s a mode in 2042 that does that I think
Hmm yeah true too
nope
I think a common complaint is if vehicles are based off points the matches snowball
Cause that would mean no vehicles for the first minutes of a match unless it only kicks in after like 5 mins
Yeah whoever gets vehicles first would be at a tremendous advantage
what if a longer cooldown for a player that just used a vehicle?
that could work
i mean, i liked how BF4 worked
That doesn’t seem like it would work well on larger maps
thatd just mean people sitting on menus longer and not helping out
some vehicles spawned on captured flags
Running simulator
yeah thats true
like maybe not put a requirement on all the vehicles just like jets and like really strong tanks
what if a system like titanfall that reduces the cooldown the more you participate in a match?
or would that just make it farmable
The thing is, you’d have to seperate infantry point from vehicle points unless you want the same people getting the vehicles the whole match
that might incentivise people to redeploy as soon as they have enough score
thats a good idea but instead of for the person maybe like the more objectives the faster the timer, kinda like bf5
man there's no good solution to this 😭
Does anyone here have some servers issues with battlefield 1 on consoles? Like soldier progression? Locked weapons etc?
yeah some problems you kinda just have to deal with, trying to make a solution just ends up with more problems
like i think it depended on the ticket system, or maybe it was just the farther the longer the cooldown
That would just mean that the already losing team would be at a disadvantage because they can’t redeploy vehicles as fast
thats true but at least making ppl do something in order to be able to be afk on menus helps out the team
Some ppl play this game to farm infantry in a night bird we have to accept that 
it could be like you have to have a certain objective and if you loose that objective that vehicle is disabled for the time
Like the objective vehicles in 4?
That would be an interesting way to encourage pushing objectives
I don’t see too much of an issue with that
yea they should look at that
Yea. If people have an issue with it, they can equip launchers or use a .50 to make them go away
do vehicle spawns usually take more tickets when they die or smthn?
or you can just learn how to be a good vehicle player
I remember in BF4 everyone would just rush that one flag for the AA or AH, ignoring other flags
and most of the time someone will be camping with a launcher or C4 anyway
oh yea thatd be a problem with this
Aye China rising was really bad for that
but it could be like instead of a certain objective it could be a requirement to capture a set number
AA cant really do anything abt that though
Imo helis were pretty easy to counter in 4 unless the other team had like 4 of them, so heli objective spawns weren’t that bad.
Literally every jeep could damage them with the mounted .50
yea
rogue transmission was on my mind haha
Golmud is what I think of for objective vehicles
The one with heli and other with mortar truck
China rising maps had this bomber you could summon so everyone and their mother would try and get it. Didn’t help you needed to use that bomber to unlock I believe it was the ucav airburst or something
Oh yeah, that one
that wasnt too bad imo, it was only annoying because no one who actually needed the bomber could have a go, it was just active 24/7 and was always occupied
Guilin Peaks, that maps underrated
making a whole server dedicated to battlefield feedback and ideas? it just really needs remastered metro and locker
why not, every battlefield game since 3 has had a metro
I get it, however think of it like this: you have your big conquest maps with your vehicles and objectives, but if you want a bit of an xp grind or a break from serious gameplay, you got metro/locker
i actually liked fort de vaux
It’s the better meat grinder map tbh
for when the game starts instead spawning in vehicles with the menu they should be at main so everyone can run to them
Metro can get stalematey
yeah thats the thing with metro, too cramped
locker did it good though, lots of flanks for the tight spots
they improved on the BF4 version
Am I dumb or like am I doing something wrong? I’ve been trying to get these 40 layers for like months and half a year, done bought premium over console and on pc, don’t see it anywhere on battlelog
Miss the sheer reverb of the explosions and gunfire on de vaux
24/7 insanity
What they should add, is the ability to turn into paper and dodge gunfire via a reduced hitbox
I’m asking here btw because like. Ea support is dookie from a butt
Straight cheeks
What is this 40 layers you are mentioning
Emblem layers
you cant use battlelog to make emblems anymore
it is on the battlefield companion website/app now
It is le so over
@stable sierra
Idk how people can enjoy spamming grenade and spraying into a hallway for an hour
But I agree
BFV Operation Underground be like
I like infantry maps I just think there’s better ones tbh
does anyone if there is a discount on BF1 or BFV on any platform/Launcher?
Fr
No effort was put into that map imo
I love infantry maps.
I’m a medic main
But like
Meat grinders certainly keep the medic work up
Maps where there’s like 1 flanking route and just choke points is not good design for me
ggdeals or isthereanydeals websites. and there is a steam sale on Thursday so probably both games will have a discount
Just medic revive points haven
I play medic
Agreed
To heal myself
Meat grinders ain’t fun
I heal teammates when in need
much obliged
It’s stressful ngl
Pretty chaotic
Stadium from 2042 exists
Its definitely a handful but there is something about the chaos that makes it fun
Agree
Fun but definitely doesn’t make meat grinders great maps for me
I rather an infantry map like they have us during the last season of 2042
dropping 220+ kills on redacted is fun.
Lotta area of chaos but not completely shoe horned into a meat grinder
Redacted is a really fun map for a medic
If you have time to think as a medic on redacted then you aren’t moving around quick enough
pointless to pick a medic in there
maybe only falck or irish
but playing without armour plate in there
nahh
Bruh
But when I use that it doesn’t work, I’m gonna just refund then ngl
Yeah it feels so much more rewarding I love the chaos
Definitely gotta take a breather after the match though
Yeah i feel that
Is there any communication somewhere on the 30GB update I just downloaded for bf2042?
we do got #battlefield-2042
are you sure tou are making emblems in https://companion-api.battlefield.com/companion/login ?
Anyone know how to fix whenever I play bf1 and try to enter a vehicle the server disconnects?
anyways if you are getting emblems from websites like https://en.emblemsbf.com/ make sure you are searching for bf1 emblems
Hi
When you play with R you play with the best. Join the biggest BF6 launch day force today
The future is now.
Yo is the new bf labs scheduled to release this year?
whats the trk like in the new battlefield if it can be discussed
Any suggestions for snipers in bf5?
zh-29 is my go-to
The trusty kar98 for sure
k98k
I think all sniper rifles are great honestly on bfV
every sniper the same for me even on bf1 tbh
same feel for sure.. however on bf1 its a bit different because they all have different 1 shot sweet spots
Yea that's a good one. I know the 1903 has the longest range sweet spot for 1 hit kills
yeah, russia 1895 really good too
i think its actually the weapon i have most kills with
or maybe it is the the gewehr 95 not sure
I was a bread and butter G98 user for a long time. After the DLCs came out I did enjoy the Lebel and Mosin
Not gonna lie lol as much as I love bf4 I think that was one of the worst sniping battlefields out there
No satisfaction what so ever for me but maybe thats just me
The rounds look like soft balls flying thru the air and the scope was like looking through a peep hole in your screen
One thing i'll give the lastest bfs, they do have great sniping especially bf2042...
Thankss
Yea it just wasnt it lol. bf4 is awesome but the sniping just did not feel right
And I always found it funny how all sniper thermal sights were 1x
I love sniping on 2042 with the 6x thermal scope
I haven't played 2042 yet but bf1-4-5 sniping is so good
I think 2042 is a great game if it didn't have the stupid operators
It's definitely a faster paced battlefield but I would dig it if it wasn't for the hero shooter thing
Glad the next bf is staying away from that trash
2042 just had a bad launch thats why it gets shitted on but nowadays it isnt that bad
The worst thing about the operators is that you can basically forget about being rezzed or getting an ammo box
Unless you’re playing break thru and on your squads ass 24/7
"just" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there
it was a catastrophic launch with many fundamental problems
It’s not bad but not great either
but a lot of people haven't played since launch and still treat it like the same game
Hell the launch is arguably the most important part
If 2042 had a decent launch I could see it being relatively popular
eh
if it launched in this state i think it'd be better received, but still the most hated battlefield
It doesn’t matter if the Reddit neckbeards hate it if the casuals like it
And the player count did jump a lot during some sales
Btw I’m talking purely popularity not quality, I don’t love the game either lol
oh popularity yeah probably
indeed and thats why it became such a failure it couldnt recover after fixing everything, thats why devs have to be careful with launches cause one bad launch dooms the game forever especially mp
it 100% wouldnt get the same hate it does
but i dont see it being more popular than 5 and 1 with how roleplayers want atmosphere
You liked sweet spot?
So who da hail here plays bv5
This worked after skimming through a bunch of em, thanks, better than ea support
man i just vibe with a martini henry, having fun hitting shots then the team starts getting steamrolled because there aren't enough medics/assault/support so then i have to switch 😭
reddit bf community is special
full of console players
thats it
i upload my aim clips in there to have some fun from comments
🤣
I got no beef with console just redditors 
they stopped reacting much tho😭
Were they hating on you for being sweaty?
for having aimbot
lol the whole Cronus/xim accusations
aren't they for consoles
Yeah I thought you meant fellow console players hated on you
Cause I see that shit all the time
Nah nvm then
these dudes
Will we see the return of the Bipod Knife in the next battlefield?
i hope so
I’ll literally prepare a bucket right now if dice announces that
need a good subway map
so who else wants me to pop a tit, cus the answer is no
Do I even want to know what you mean by that?
That's how the dude asked me
I started playing games online in 2005 and I’ve never once heard that expression
But I get a strong feeling that in this scenario, ignorance is indeed bliss
Welp, just savin' y'all time if anyone wanna drop in with that kind of talk.
I would love to see customization elements for the soldiers dont get me wrong no pink stuff i wanna see some greedy soldier gear
Government issue chili-Mac rations
np. yeah battlefield companion only supports emblems made for bf1. bf4 emblems dont work
Ghost Recon style?
Did You Know? Codename Eagle – The Birth of Battlefield
Before Battlefield 1942 revolutionized multiplayer warfare, there was Codename Eagle (1999) – the game that started it all! Developed by Refraction Games, this overlooked gem laid the foundation for what would become the Battlefield series.
Set in an alternate history where Russia became the dominant world power in 1917, Codename Eagle featured open-ended gameplay, large maps, and (for its time) groundbreaking vehicle mechanics, allowing players to seamlessly switch between infantry combat, tanks, planes, and more.
After Codename Eagle, Refraction Games merged with DICE (Digital Illusions CE), bringing their innovative ideas to Battlefield 1942 in 2002. The rest is history—spawning one of the most iconic FPS franchises ever.
Have you played Codename Eagle, or did you first jump into the chaos with Battlefield? Let’s talk about it!
#battlefield-legacy-titles #CodenameEagle #FPSHistory 🎮🔥
Just applied for battlefield labs, how do I access it on PS5?
I'm assuming you will be instructed if chosen, assuming you have stated your platform
I guess? I did state my platform just not sure how to access it
When you get confirmation and instructions thereafter at some point unkown how long that is lol
You have to wait for an email, but you also have to get selected
Yes pretty much
does anyone here prefer the new revive system to the old bf4 assault class type revive system
You mean squad mates can revive no matter what class ?
i mainly mean how you go down and have to either wait up to 40 seconds for a revive or opt out of getting revived completly
in bf4 you would just passivly get revived as you played the new system makes you choose
why?
You can Look around you and can choose whats the Situation is if there is a Chance for a medic to revive you or if there is more Enemy Players
And its more emmersive lol
but you dont get to choose if you get revived no? you can only opt out its still up to other players to choose to revive
you could deny revive in bf4 too
imo it should function just like bf4 where you get sent to deploy screen and if someone revives you while you're waiting to deploy then you can either accept or deny the revive
also because now it costs a resource to revive i dont see many people using their stims to revive randoms on the ground. ironically the new system thats supposed to result in more revives just promotes holding space and skipping the revive all together
Just booted it up after buying it and playing it once on release, much has been fixed. Still wickedly broken.
Guess its back to the classics
Does that not feel like they are moving more towards milsim feel to play?
it was unbalanced as hell
make it BFV style, with animation that leaves you vulnerable with squad revive that is slower
Hot take, but battlefield 2042 is just a worse version of Planet Side 2, but with none of the MMO elements, all for the low price of $59
So I saw this 'leak' of BF6 gameplay footage and overall it looks good. My initial feedback:
- Player movement seems rather slow
- Bullet damage should be increased slightly (infantry and vehicle)
- There needs to be a physical effect whenever rockets are launched and exploded to nearby targets. This could be any comob of vision / hearing impairment and knockdown. I've seen infantry take out tanks with rockets closely and they're basically just standing there.
Idk how I feel about this whole “PMC vs NATO” ordeal for BF6
Unless the PMC was on some maps, and then we get say Russia on other maps I wouldn’t mind it. Almost like how Wagner was helping Russia in Ukraine not too long ago
slower movement --> good
ttk looks fine to me
this was never a feature in bf
Haha i loved bf3 but i remember me running around metro and revive 20 people in 2 seconds it was way to fast
bf2 was even faster
i rember one match where we all ran around as medics
we never died
Well movement is slow lime battlefield 4s
Dont tell me imma need to get another game 😤 😒 lol
It's free.
is planetside still alive
- It seems to be dialed back to a slightly faster speed than bf4. Imo this is much better than fast speeds like V or 2042
- Imo TTK is already very fast
- Yeah, I agree. Making explosives have visual power is good
knockback from explosions like bfv would be good
About 1100 players on the weekends. Not nearly it's peak. But it's barely noticeable when playing.
shocking tbh, is it getting updates?
Yes actually
Yea. Having tanks actually rock when hit would be good too. It's a bit underwhelming to hit a tank with a rocket just for it to stay completely still (2042)
Bind reticle to screen center.
No suppression.
No HC modes.
BF4 movement.
Is that a shopping list or
The musts for the new BF game to survive.
Why no suppression? Why no HC modes?
Suppression is effectively a reward for missing your shots.
No HC because it divides player base.
Gotten suppressed a lot? Lmaoo
suppression is good but only as a visual effect
I remember suppressing enemies to allow for team members to push
If it visual, it’s fine, but if it affects ability to hit shots it is genuinely a neurodeficient implementation.
real
Disagree entirely, it adds a layer of tactical gameplay
Wonder if the devs read any of this imput
Instead of „me shoot enemy better than enemy shoot me“
Probably not
Don’t think so either; this discord is in no way representing the customer base
at a fundamental level it rewards poor aim, it's not only just suppression
BF is not a tac shooter nor a milsim; despite the nuerodeficient takes that BF is.
You want tactics? Go play Arma.
Honestly, at this point, I am beginning to think that it is cope that people want to turn BF into a milsim.
If it’s not milsim, then I don’t see anything against suppression as arcade element
Except personal preference
Then you are nuerodeficient.
whatever you’re trying to express with that
EVERYONE'S BATTLEFIELD™
Signing up for labs was broken . Kept sending me back to my ‘alerts’ where it showed I have skate and f1 but no battlefield lol
Suppression is literally the most hated feature from the BF3-BF1 games.
From anyone that is a competent player, at least.
And barring the BF3 blue filter.
This guy knows battlefield. Nobody else does.
I promise not to leak anything
EVERYONE'S BATTLEFIELD™
Must be everyone except me then
Only conquest because more than 1 gamemode divides the player base
HC is good because some players prefer to play it over normal
Wish there were more bf4 servers, would love some conquest on propaganda rn
You only prefer HC if you have skill issues, IME.
I don’t understand the fear of a „divided playerbase“ because it only becomes relevant when most of the playerbase has moved on from the game anyways
Like server population is the only reason one might fear that
HC allows for different tactics and playstyles than normal. It's also slightly more realistic for the realism buffs
He doesn't want to divide the player base because then he won't have anyone to kill for his montages on his 20 subscriber YT channel
Sad!
HC is a breeding ground for campers. Again, if you want tactics, go play Arma, Squad or Insurgency.
I get it. HC is more difficult because shooting back is suddenly not an option anymore
Anime profile pic --> opinion discarded
Or play HC since it's literally just setting changes. There's nothing the devs have to add that they don't already have as server settings in every game
Only normal response I’ve seen here.
lol; lmao even - are you going to argue for no server browser next?
server browser directly helps HC? Iirc HC has never been something matchmaking sends you to
Just to be clear, we are talking about hardcore, right?
HC is just foolish; the server browser tangent is just that - ignoring the HC neurodeficient position that it NEEDS to be included in an arcade shooter.
Kid treats hating HC like a 9-5 gotta respect the hussle
K boomie
Well yeah. A server browser is necessary for BF. It's one of the reasons I don't play 2042. not having it heavily limits choice
Holy shit. Common ground.
I just don't see a reason to not include HC. It's just a server setting preset that people will inevitably make anyways (if they allow us to rent servers)
Will EA address the server crashes on BF4? Been forever and servers still getting attacked 
Trve
so do gamemodes. splitting the player base isn't something we should be worrying about unless it's a massive split like with premium
are there actually devs on this server?
EA took it over a bit ago, so yeah
TDM splits the playerbase, get rid of TDM I do not like TDM
While the divide that Premium did cause was bad, at least the quality of the DLC was vastly better than anything we have seen out of Live Service from BF studios.
Yo just wondering if anyone knows roughly when the beta will be released
Nobody on HC claims they're really good unless they're stupid. A vast majority of people I see on HC are just people hopping on after a 9-5
And that’s an issue because ….?
So you’re just a hater
Yeah … why is that an issue?
No this is Patrick
Is this the krusty Krab
HC players have this tendency of thinking they are better players because “muh tackticks”, but in reality, these players just cannot adapt nor compete against core players.
I don’t see any reason to shit on HC. If people wanna play it let them play it. And the divided playerbase seems like a fake reason to hate. What do you care? If people find joy in it let them
Simple as that.
Lmao I don't think HC did a significant split of the player base in BF4 or BF1. Maybe you're just a 2042 bum, then in that case yeah, your shit dead game got affected.
If you find joy in a HC game mode, just go play Insurgency.
BF games that have had a hardcore mode:
- BC2
- 3
- 4
- HL
- 1
- V
- 2042
So you’re just mad due to some some weird ego issue
Heck yeah great idea should pitch it
I bet people would have fun
Not u tho
If you don't find joy in a HC game mode, dont play it
Like, dont like it dont play hc then lmao
just play normal and let the HC players play HC
yeah I never touch HC lmao but it has its purpose
maybe they make a good enough game where each one has a healthy amount of players /shrug
just a thought
Proof? Where are your numbers to back this up?
Who cares. Really, who cares. BF has thousands of players. Hundreds of thousands at launch. There's enough players to split
Lmao bum 🫵 🤣
it spLitS tHe pLaYeRbaSe
Name one actual downside because you keep repeating that. Are you just butthurt bf3 and bf4 are not as populated as in 2014?
lol if the game dies I'll just play something else
¯_(ツ)_/¯
or just play bf1 or bf4
so many other things to do than be a grown ass man worrying about a videogame dying
🤣
give me one job application
Okay are you ready for the argument
Are you ready
It’s gonna be huge news
Because some people enjoy playing it
Its rage bait guys. Move along.
I know - mindblowing
Because people consistently play it in every game. If people didn't play it, I'd be all for removing it
Anyways, ignored and blocked. Both you comedians
Now to the real question - battlelog yes or no?
always
bf4 servers crashing for anyone?
Could have it. Could not. It has some pretty cool stuff, but imo it should just be integrated into the actual game
doxxing or just something wrong with EA servers
like always
I liked the social media aspect of it, I think it’s something they want to expand with the new title. Actually having a community
had matches restart and servers reboot mid match so annoying lol
I still use battlelog lmao
for some weird reason it only gives accurate players counts
the ingame for BF4 is totally broken and doesn't update a 64/64 server when joined really is just 3 ppl flying around
i just open battlelog verify the playercount and join in game for the last like 3 years lol
cool process though if you had a favorite server go on the site, click play and it will auto boot and join
I liked actually having a profile, you could highlight battle reports and stuff
it was really easy to check challenge progress as well
I wish I could do that. The only bf I play regularly on pc is HL which is 6 feet under and rotting
and stat rundowns
i play conquest and rush a lot and sometimes still get a random double commander like last week
Y'know, if commander returns, having a commander mobile app like 4 could be cool
bored of modern setting >BF1
bored of world war _ setting >BF4 and I juist swap between them lo
l
I don't think it will return, but it would be cool
the ads for the mobile commander were so funny
like man I think I'm gonna go to the cafe grab a coffee then drop cruise missles and quad bikes in a multiplayer match with 64 players
I’m gonna give an unpopular opinion
Bf1 operations and shock operations is fun and immersive
But unbalanced
i have a take that should not be controversail: HC has no place in bf
What’s HC?
hardcore
Oh Hardcore
I can see why, it actively messes with weapon balance
So here’s a few thing wrong with operations and shock operations
Hardcore. Basically just a server preset that some people use that people hate for some reason even though it isn't really ever used in matchmaking or official DICE servers
Hmm I wonder what a lower health pool would do to weapons
- Objectives; I personally believe that when I’m on the attacking team, I spend more time defending then I do attacking and when I’m defending, I spend more time attacking the weakest defended other objective
Simply put if the attackers capture an objective in a sector
It shouldn’t be possible for the defenders to take it back
There isn't much they can do about that. If they changed it to anything else the game would go by in a flash
You are playing defense
You need to learn to defend, letting an objective fall should be punishing
- Spawn timers, defenders should have a 20 second spawn limit at the least
It’s either that or permacapped objectives
I'll listen when you have an argument that isn't just "it splits the playerbase"
Xbox player
Pronouns
Sorry, I'm afraid I'm gonna have to dismiss your opinion. Nothing personal.
since when was being casual bad?
Nothing personal to you either chief, I’ll dismiss yours
Casual as in they enjoy hc? lmao
In which game? I don't remember any of them having one. Maybe 2042, but it was more themed than pure HC
What about what I have to say about balancing bf1s operations?
Obv for another game to have it
Did it? I always thought it was just a server preset since I didn't see a matchmaking thing for it
The casuals are the vast majority of players. If anything, the sweat opinions dont matter
Yes but they are the majority and make up the main buyer and player audience
I think the sweats have better understanding of game mechanics
Grass is green and the sky is blue
Why do you think they’re called sweats?
like still know body complains about 2042 mouse input lol
Pandering to the minority is just bad business and bad community management
yeah, insane
You're saying the majority's opinion doesn't matter. This is literally saying that the minority (the sweats) should be the only people who provide feedback. It would mean that everything panders to the minority
good players provide feedback on what works for them
the majority still knows what they find fun and what they don't, they're not stupid lmao
When you suggested that when the majority doesn’t understand the game when they complain about something gave us that assumption
Are you still talking to the HC clown gang
waste of time fr
I don’t like hardcore myself but i can stick away from it np
Fr. HC doesn't do anything to hurt the game. If someone doesn't like it, they wont play it. If they do like it, they'll play it.
It doesn’t no but it’s the way some people want to play
Let them
It doesn’t hurt anyone else
Because it’s the way they want to play
Absolutely it isn’t, but it’s how they wanna play it
yeah
If someone wants to have a hardcore fast tank spawn server on Golmud railway let them
It's going to happen anyways. As long as people can customize servers, people will make HC. It's literally just a settings preset. There's nothing new they have to add that they wouldn't already add with server hosting
That’s their choice
It’s just a settings preset
Go find a server with regular options
It’s not that big of an issue
As long as MP has a server browser and server hosting, it will appear in the normal game
Me too honestly but it’s how some people wanna play, it’s not a big concern, it’s after all, just a preset for a custom server someone paid for
Here’s an opinion
Operations can replace a campaign
I said it
Eh, they serve different purposes
Get a load of this guy
Ok? Let them
If that’s how they want it let them have it and avoid it
It will do you no harm
A real gamemode that was basically just tweaked server settings
We keep going around this loop
It doesn’t add anything no besides actively mess with the weapon balance but that’s what people want
Let them
Avoid hc lobbies and there’s no issue whatsoever
just have them do what BF4 did and let server host decide settings and content
Operations barely even have a story. Idrc whether we have a campaign or not, but operations does not do enough to replace a campaign
That’s why I said ‘can replace’
If developed further, I believe it can.
But it would have to be different maybe
Or maybe perhaps an online campaign would work better
Battlefield is the only game series I’d advocate for that
Besides let’s be honest battlefield campaigns are usually disregarded
Not ignored, disregarded
You know who Irish, Dima, Blackburn is etc
Exactly
Make it an online campaign similar to operations
Take notes from titanfall 1s campaign
The scope of all out battle simulator is too large for the prespective of one soldier
I don't really think you can develop it to that level without major issues. For example, how would the matches themselves work? Would you just be joining random servers on the designated map with story missions you have to do? That would basically just be MP with extra steps
There needs to be all out battle
For one I would be suggesting adding the same level of immersion like bf1 did, second I would also advise specific built maps
It was filled with issues
The best one was through mud and blood
no one remembers any bf campaign tbh
the issue with specific maps is when the player count gets low. What if you can't complete the story at all because there isn't enough players to fill the match you need?
What’s even worse is that Avanti Savoia which depicted the arditi (an elite Italian shock trooper unit famous for using knives and grenades) and portrayed them instead with the sentry kit from MP
Imo the most memorable was HL, but it didn't get the attention it deserved because, well, HL
Imagine how fun it would be storming enemy trenches like how the arditi actually did from a gameplay prespective?
I’m sorry? Hardline?
Most memorable campaign?
Over battlefield 3?
COPS and ROBBERS, a rare campaign story in major FPS titles
I sadly have not gotten the chance to play 3. I want to tho and my ranking will probably change based on what I hear of it
It was memorable for me because of it's tv-show theming. BF4 is a close second for me, but it's hurt by an incomplete storyline
i remember the fact that it was a cop tv show
but i couldn't tell you a single character's name
Neither could I
most memorable for me is prob bf4
4 has the most memorable characters
in BF3 you played as blackburn with a bunch of redacted info
you keep getting interogated into the next story
Recker and Irish are really memorable
They arent very memorable yeah
"i dont wanna die listening to this song" ... memorable
I heard they will put in more effort for bf6 story
i wouldnt bother with making a campaign if i was dice
What do y'all think about unlocking guns via the campaign? I think it's a cool idea
Considering they put a whole studio on it, yeah
If not then people will ignore and play multiplayer anyway
IM SICK OF BATTLE ROAYALES
theres different studios working on these
Battleroyales have to be the most boring gamemode to exist lowkey
they already have been on the decline, bf is crazy late to the party
yeah
Well yeah. They're the main studio. They aren't using their devs for it though
Idk i wont judge yet, i expect story to be mid but good enough
Hunt Showdown used to be pretty good for an extraction shooter, other than that I don't really like BRs
BRs are dead, what's left is cheat vs cheat matches (aim assist vs external hacks)
facts
May he rest in peace.
H1Z1 days were lit
Imo BRs are already dead. Fortnite is the only one that's gonna last more than a few months. Even CoD is debating pulling the plug on Warzone
if you are bad at shooters like me you spend more time loading into a BR or looting the starting area than playing the game
yeah they were cool for like 2 or three years
yep
fuck bf br
cod needs to hurry up and get rid of that shit
they dont even know how to manage their own br
cod already sucks so much ass anyway
its pretty embarrassing
if it's on the 2042 engine and they still haven't fixed the input, all the people coming from other games are going to catch on immediately and trash the game everywhere
I don't think it'll be massively buggy since they're doing a lot of playtesting, but yeah. It's most likely just going to be generic slop
yeah they dropped the ball after mw2019
did they fix bf4 server ?
Frostbite is worse than Unity when it comes to bugs
yeah was just playing a couple of hours ago
ty i will go see
COD omnimovement and ultra fast paced combat has slowly killed the game, plus excessive microtransactions... yikes. it used to be a more true to action gameplay style like medal of honor... what slop it turned into
it hurts playing 2042 due to that sometimes
it hurts all the time
2042 doesnt feel like a bf for me
just have to alt f4 it most times i play nowadays
ass on all the way
As someone who has debated selling my soul to Unity, yes. Unity's bugs self-solve after you scream at it enough. Frostbite doesn't even give you that comfort
at this point Delta force is a free version of BF2042... and its not bad considering its free
delta is better then 2042 100%
cod was always comparatively fast to other games, the only difference now is that aim assist (autorotation on both sticks) lets you ignore the increased speed and new mechanics
aim assist fucked cod
matchmaking fucked cod
lol been playing for 2 hours, have yet to win a game tonight. why's playing with randoms so difficult to win a game?
this is ridiculous
SBMM also hurts multiplayer. if i wanted to play a similar skill level that already has a name... caled RANKED
yep and sbmm
What’s the point of getting best squad or being in top 4 if you keep losing games as a team
Also mono threading. Newer unity versions have the ability to add multi-threading, but it's something you have to actively turn on
watch the next battlefield game have sbmm
one must imagine sisyphus happy
SBMM is fine but CoD does not use SBMM they use their manipulative EOMM made by Demonware (fitting name), SBMM compared to CoDs EOMM is like a piece of cake
to add sbmm they'd have to remove the server browser. Idk about anyone else, but I'm not buying the game if it doesn't include something as basic as a server browser
sbmm is not fine
it ruined modern fps

Not really but at this point I'm fine with it after dealing with their eomm for so long. but yeah I would prefer it to not exist
i hope they realize this is a selling point for most people
its fun to bounce between taking out noobs, and being destroyed by a pro. you have a good time, and also learn a ton. better than having to be sweaty in every CASUAL match all the time.
did they even state why theres no server browser
I don't believe so. There's one in portal, but not in the normal mp. Maybe they thought it would suffice
Server browsers are great though. it sucks trying to load into a game mode, just to be stuck in a pre game lobby that is being seeded by NOBODY and have to back out and try again over and over. I would rather just find a 3/4 full lobby to dive into
Fr. It also allows you to somewhat pick what map you want to join, what server rules you want, etc
its not usually a big deal when the game launches and the playerbase is high, but when the hype dies down a server browser is king.
the new generation of fps kids are scared of server browsers
it's something i hear from old tf2 players that are still sticking around
BF3 and BF4 just had a quick matchmaking option if you didnt want to look
yea. matchmaking is essential when pop is high while server browsers are essential when pop is low
imagine playing squad, arma(any version) or even hell let loose without a server browser. that would be miserable. Although those are FAR more MIL-SIM than BF.
oh god no
It also makes it easy to host a server with adjusted settings per the wishes of the host, which could make a content restricted server or even a HC mode as much as some people dont like it
squad community would be in shambles
BF in my experience has never been a modders game, but the modding community can keep a decent game going for many YEARS after the hype train leaves the station. Even without mods specifically, adjustable setting servers can be a partial cure to that.
at this point i think they need to clamp down and make it impossible to create HC servers so i don't have to read the opinions of people who trolled themselves into thinking BF is a sim franchise
least obvious rage bait ever
yep
Always has been a MilSim
Always will be a MilSim
I'm joking 
I felt so cringe typing that
go play arma if you want that
if you talk to bf4 hc people you'll understand immediately
Ready or Not is alright
I guess for PvP I'd play Insurgency but I think that game is dying
Sandstorm? Yeah, PvP is dying. PvE is what I see played the most
Yeah that, I played some PvE a while ago, not bad
I prefer to play modded PvE. Improved AI is scary when there's 500 of them coming after your team of 10
500 
That's only the annoying loud ones. I played hc a lot and never thought it was a sim. It's just bf with faster ttk, less spotting, and no vehicle 3rd person
hyperbole. Though, it can def get to like 75-100 at a time depending on the map and server settings
Any news on Battlefield 6?
how long does it take to usually get accepted for BF6 playtest
Have you signed up for Battlefield Studios?
there is no playtest. take ur meds NOW!!
Random
Not a time you get accepted
Its just chance
A dev said getting accepted to the test on March 7th was basically winning the lottery
my bad man im j fried rn
when is Bf4 going to be fixxxeedd omg I'm tryna play
I was playing all day no issues
only if you are from console. pc is having issues for 3 weeks now
Played yesterday on PC and no issues, maybe I got lucky
yes you got. 5 min browsing reddit or ea forums and you can see plenty of ppl reporting server issues
I'm on PC playing Europe servers
You guys think the PAX Armada could be a precursor to the MEC faction we fight in Bad Company?
Which battlefield yall think has the best campaign
Bad company
what's good people
The moral opposite of bad people
Ba dum tssk
crickets
any news on when the next playtest will be for "BF6"?
i just saw someone cheating in BFV
they were rapid firing a panzerbusche
they went 2-4 before they got caught lmao
why is it that cheaters get very obvious cheats but STILL suck at the game?
They get cheats because they are bad
and dont understand the game
If you play well then you must be cheating in their mind
but i mean you're already cheating
the sky's the limit
and it was on a community server
🤷♂️
i'm not saying cheating is good
but if you're going to cheat, why limit yourself
as if cheating a little is better than cheating a lot
I mean the pzb thing is just a game exploit not actual hacks
So it’s not like shooting it semi auto will fix their shit aim
what? how does it work?
I’m not sure tbh but I know it’s a thing
maybe in a couple of weeks
maybe in the weekend after this one
i doubt they'll be that frequent. my guess is once a month
idk how long it takes to integrate all that feedback
maybe as time goes on it'll become more frequent
yeah im thinking they wont 100% implement it
and just test different stuff before
Wonder when the Beta will be
A few weeks before the game releases most likely. 2026 for sure.
Month or 2
Usually when a beta us out the game releases in like 1 or 2 months
Or so
I wonder if they're thinking about Fall 2025
I know GTA VI is slated for that time frame but GTA and Battlefield are totally different
I hope it relases in just a good solid state so sick of games coming out broken this day and age
By the leaks the game looks amazing
I know right ive heard like rubble and building parts fall off to damage vehicles and stuff so destruction phyisics back to awesome
Have you seen the leaks?
It's been done before, just a matter of implementation
ive only seen the images and the officeal sneak peak but not the leaks although did watch a video of someone discussing what they saw
Dms
ive seen alot of the leaks but unfortunately cant discuss 
Any chance for getting the commander role back into this battlefield?
yea it sucks. i need a place to discuss the leaks but i don't have anywhere to talk about it lol
doubtful
Seriously?? It was such an underrated role, I feel like there could be some really good replayabilitie and game diversity that can come from it.
it has potential
This needs to happen
It really does, and I've got a few ideas on how to improve it, making it a real support role
I know right, there's been so much I've thought of to make it better
ppl will complain its too MILSIM to have it back in the game. The newer Generation wants COD out of Battlefield just run and gun twitch shooter stuff. if you wants tactical and slower paced strategic moments - you will get shut down
commander roles and comms should happen with comms being able to talk with all squads leads . chain of command type stuff
If battlefield is trying to go for a bit of realism, then a commander would be the way. It did wonders in BF and hardline, and every ground major ground offensive has a TOC to give support where needed
BF4*
im with you 100 percent on it and want it
COD is a arcade shooter. battlefield is a sandbox shooter there is a difference
Some of my ideas where, being able to respawn vehicles quicker or possibly instantly, or be able to call in a naval/artillery strike
You have a variety of weapons/vehicles/gear to play with as a sandbox. Just like Halo.
Dropping tanks, or other vehicles where needed, or calling in air strikes
"Battlefield" is generally considered not to be an arcade shooter; instead, it's categorized as a military first-person shooter with a focus on large-scale, team-based combat, emphasizing tactics and combined arms warfare, which sets it apart from the faster-paced, more casual gameplay of arcade shooters
ive been playing since 03 bro but ok haha
Battlefield is 1000% an arcade shooter
Just as grok, or Googles AI overview.
Look regardless of what it is I just think that the commander role should be brought back into the game, and expanded on.
relatively quick TTK, fast paced movement, simple but somewhat dynamic gunplay and generally unpunishing gameplay loop
theres also so many features that make combat accessible
you can play the game with a COD mentality and have no trouble
there are so many CoD players in 2042 it's fucking rancid
The fast paced movement is a post 2016 thing.
its literally not
I feel like the BF series had a pretty big focus on realism and team play. For the most part.
BF4 was fast af
You had insane air accelaration in 4, fast af sprint, really good jump velocity
It definitely can, go back to BF 4, the commander can provide a wide range of support and team play potential
Wow, you fall fast.
And no sprint wasn't fast in 4
True but they shifted to players relying on each other or calling in their own support directly, cutting out the commander.
Its fast as the average COD title, maybe not like BO6/CW fast
also unlike COD, you had way better air accelaration
and control
ZouZous were possible because of this
so how can u say it add no real value if you have never used it
I kinda feel like we should go back to the team somewhat relying on the commander for bigger support calls, like how it was in BF 4 or hardline
Battlefield needs to stop copying CoD and does its own thing
are you kidding did you even play bf2
I only used commander to drop care packages on teammates
I played commander, what ruined it imo was the players that wouldn't listen, even when you give them incentives.
what
I know, but BF audience is aimed at casuals as well 'us', who have to be forced to rely on particular features to use them. It wouldn't be expected for them to attempt to communicate and coordinate with someone, that's asking too much.
it's because the players don't want to be nagged by a commander
It was quite useful, and could tip the battle. The commander could call for recon UAVs, EMP UAVs, supply drops, vehicle drops, cruise missiles, AC 130s and even give infantry field upgrades.
The biggest thing battlefield struggles with is incentivizing people to play the objective
more noticeable in non cq modes
neither do you. you pulled that metric out of nowhere
breakthrough and rush are unplayable 50% of the time because everyone camps and only pushes on like 25 tix left
some ppl on youtube are stating dragging bodies adds no real value . so immersion adds no real value haha .
what does that have to do with anything
Because they target casuals mixed with tactical gamers who need little incentive other than the fact its an obj.
And it was quite helpful to them I'm sure
I meant on top of teammates 
There's nowhere online where it says battlefield is an arcade shooter so until you give your source, you're wrong.
Yeah I tried recently and I've had a few good ones but a lot of the time people just don't care
yea?
not in a million years
You dont need a source for claiming Battlefield is an arcade shooter
2026 100%
Maybe BF6 will be fun guys. It is the main thing.
It's like one of the easiest games to hop on and play
for any casual audience
theres so many streamlined mechanics that differ it from a milsim
Just bring back the dialogue, wheel and request it that's a way to mitigate the issue
video games are so complex now that i think the only way "arcade" can apply to a game is if it's literally an arcade game
Let's be honest someone is gonna nag at someone
Yeah it is an arcade shooter with light tactical elements
That's unfortunate
yea but you can turn off chat and mute people
I could ask you the same.
lmao
3D spotting, virtually no recoil, lineant movement speed and gunplay, fast respawn, health regen, barely any attrition mechanics (except BFV)
and i could list more
its one of the easiest shooters to play
tanks that lob shells about 600m lmao
WITH INFINITE AMMO BTW
These guys want to just run around and have a twitch shooter with no comms no communication. They just want to be a universal soldier with perks -the types that Dont play to objective and to base things off kill count. They will do anything to destroy the core features battlefield use to have that were good and taken out of the game for feature that call of duty kinda gross ! battlefield was not an arcade shooter and definitely was NOT a Milsim shooter. it sat in between till it leaned towards being an arcade shooter trying to pull in COD numbers which they couldnt do and never will
I mean the worst you'll get is the commander telling your squat to go to an objective and try to help you every now and then
Thats not what I want
or what anyone here wants
hell let loose is not even milsim its arcade milsim
arma is milsim which i dont want battlefield to be
I think Battlefield should stay an arcade title and not adopt redundant milsim mechanics that have never been in the franchise.
Just because I say that though doesnt mean I want it to completely negate any tactical element that makes battlefield unique, in fact I think Battlefield could lean into squad/teamplay even more than it has (BFV had a really good foundation for this)
I don't think so.
Let's be honest though how often do you see a role like the commander role in games, being able to provide support where needed, and possibly tipping the fight in your teams favor
I mean when 70% of the playerbase praises maps like Metro...
what
I've played multiple battlefields over the years, if you're talking about 2042, I've got thousands of kills, 1, thousands again, 3, 4, thousands, I've played enough to know what I'm talking about.
You sound extremely ignorant.
Cod is its biggest competitor but it doesn't mean they chase the same gameplay, you're full of hot air.
BF has been really no where near COD, but I do think bring back the commander would be a breath of fresh air
Just because YOU SAY it doesn't make it true.
Battlefield is usually treated like a COD title with bigger maps for most of the fanbase
the meta for the past decade has literally been
Choose Assault or Support class
Bunker on random objective
Kill a lot
Revive teammates
Force swap to Engineer if vehicles get too annoying
enders is trash
you sound like you have no soul haha
Let me guess, y'all haven't even unlocked every weapon attachment or vehicle augmentation either?
Enders is usually ostracized by the community because of his personality, but almost none of his takes are actually that nonsensical. Infact, his opinions are pretty adjacent with most of DICE's gameplay direction.
end of discussion
Recon was really good if you used the class correctly, I always got an PDW and placed a spawn beacon at the best position for hard pushes
yeah unfortunately most recons dont do that
Recon is honestly the class that needs to most retouching
No it's not, you just don't realize how the argument was settled in front of you.
its so polarizing how he could either be super valuable or the most shit teammates at the same time
I loved doing that I got lots of killes and objective caps. Plus is wasn't all that good a sniping
It's called the fifth but that's not the point.
Nice, target me because I have a Halo helmet.
and its a damn good console pleb game
nothing wrong with console gamers but ok
He's just mad his arguments fall flat
its arena adjacent 🙂
tf2 is not an arena shooter but its based off tournament style ?
also that was bait
I still think commander had a good spot in battlefield, and should make a come back.
I don't know about that one but maybe
thats like saying lets not support flight sticks for jet pilots because it adds no value
No that was true, it was on iPad.
I've met plenty that does, I've used it a lot and have saved games because of it
bro commander on locker was so clutch
I know I'm just saying don't bring it back to IPad, because no one really used the app
You're just a real ray of sunshine aren't ya?
Stop trying to make Battlefield COD.
Ok you know what that would be funny to type in the chat
commander was cool because when i wasnt at my pc i would use it on my phone and it worked for game session on work lunch breaks and actually won a few matches because we had a commander
Suppression was a good feature.
It definitely added value, just because you never seen it doesn't mean it wasn't usefull
Try not being shot at instead of running in with your balls to the wall.
Guys
In a way it was
Yea suppression is a good thing
alot complained on suppression. i liked it but it was also annoying.
Forces enemy players to atleast get the fuck away
No I literally haven't even played squad, nor did I like 42, I liked 3 and 4, which had suppression and weight.
No actual player even used the mechanic intentionally, except for like 4 supports spamming a hallway making people's screens a blurry mess and terrible weapon spread
yeah no thanks
Try it out
This is why you sound ignorant.
weight as in, a weight system?
Still though regardless of its inclusion it still kept you from pushing that hallway, so suppressing your enemy does work, and should be rewarded
bf3 and 4 did have weight to the weapons and the sway and feeling. suppression was great for snipers
I feel like no one even knew about the mechanic
It made gunfights inconsistent more so than discouraging people to push
This is what i mean, it wasnt even a conscious mechanic for most players
This makes me worried for the next title
players just accepted their bullets not leading anywhere
they want to run around and no scope hahaa
Guns aren’t lasers, they can’t just be consistent, just have good recoil control and simply get better at the game
thats why we have spread
Well you also got to think a lot of people that usually play battlefield don't even suppression even means
and I advocate for higher recoil in Battlefield
Nah not really
only want find a way to enemies back and kill them all with dynamite
It kinda did
battlefields suppression was nothing like squads
If guns had actual recoil along with spread, you wouldnt need suppression to make everyone stop laser beaming
It wasn't much be there was some reward to it
thats why suppression is a bandaid fix
its a mechanic that creates tediousness instead of a solid gunplay system
You guys say it adds nothing then say how it causes you to not push a certain direction, that’s the point, your being suppressed causes theirs a haul of bullets coming your way, just simply rotate or lob a grenade or something
Or get a tank
If you can
Suppressing fire quite literally STOPS THE ENEMMY FROM DOING WHATEVER THEY WERE DOING.
One of the few mechanics that actually immerses you cause your screen going blurry reflects how an actual person would experience a hail of bullets going their way
yeah I know but that doesnt mean the recoil wasnt non-existent. I just like gunplay that gives guns a skillgap
also suppression was in BF4
it can pin a sniper down cuz he has to go prone and wait for the fx to clear up
or pin a squad down
yes
But it makes sense though, if you was getting shot at like that would you want to put your head up?
Blud I think you just get nervous cause you didn’t have the jump on the player lmao, jokes aside simply get good, it’s a good mechanic
And this too, I've machine gun sniper nests for this very reason.
but I prefer guns to have a bit more recoil so it makes close range engagements also more skill based
thats just my preference though
You simply are just crying that people shoot at you in a shooting game
I've used the mechanic, to make solid pushes on players that wouldn't move.
Or to at least delay them and hold them back so we can capture an objective
like i said i liked it but i think it could be more controlled suppression . like laying down LMG fire at a squad from a distance would cause the suppression effect. but up close this would not take place
No doubt about it, but it depends on the situation
I just wanted to talk about the commander role, and how it should be brought back
Like I said, battlefield tries for realism.If you is getting shot at by a hala bullets, would you wanna poke your head out there and try to shoot back
Yea but I’m punishing you because you desided to not take your shot so imma send lead your way at 1,150 rpm and make you seethe cause you can’t do anything about
Suppression works more effectively in a milsim title because people are more intentional with their combat engagements
Suppression doesnt work in battlefield because there's already a spread mechanic that discentivizes people from mindlessly spraying their weapons
and its a mechanic 90% of players arent really conscious of.
So in battlefield's context, suppression just rewards missing players
There's definitely some realism in battlefield, and how suppression works in battlefield is definitely pretty realistic
It would make more sense to either nail the spread mechanic or increase recoil than add another layer of spread to a game with spread already
it makes no sense
If i've got a bunch of bullets whizing over my head and I try to shoot back.I'm not exactly gonna be as accurate.When i'm shooting back at them
So, you get shot at a bunch, your character reacts similar to an actually person by getting tunnel vision and not being able to acurrately shoot back when bullets are flying directly at him? Are you dumb?
I wish I could post screenshots and videos to show you guys how wrong you are about suppression, it doesn't 'reward you for missing players' it quite literally helps your squad and team which itself gives you assist points.
Whatever you say bud it just sounds like you have bad positioning
That is true for the most part, but no sane soldier is gonna put his head up when he's got hails of bullets flying over his head
NPC
A video game that tries for some realism
Literally, pinning enemy players down with bullets going their way stops them from pushing and go behind cover, allowing your squad more time to do whatever else they need to
Even trained soldiers have a tendency to freak out
Okay so, bullets shot past you make your gun more inaccurate. Does that stop people from pushing? No, it just confuses players 50% of the time for why their shots are inconsistent
Look, but you're entitled to your own opinion from the sounds of it. Youre just are really bad at positioning
straight BOT
I don’t see their messages - but ask them about hardcore servers
If you want gunplay to be more intense and skill based, just increase the recoil
That balanced between arcadyness and milsim, lob a grenade and forget hoe, your just mad support fucks you up when you camp in the back of the map
recoil is a more consistent and conciously implied mechanic
It's not an arcade shooter
i would say supression is there to help those in large scale battles determine situational awareness when alot is going on screen without having directional indicators on where the fire is coming from.
You're entitled to your own opinion bud
thats visually but its also a gunplay affected mechanic
visual suppression is fine as long as its not BF3 level
Does it say battlefield is an arcade shooter? Because I don't see it anywhere
So? Get behind cover
Look at the end of the day.I just wanted to talk about the commander role
Is suppression in battlefield really the argument rn
YOU CAN STILL GET SUPPRESSION BEHIND COVER
Gotta love zoomers trying to gaslight you into believing your favorite FPS wasn't ever like you remembered it.
when you start adding in UI elements for hit marks and where things are coming from that when it starts to become arcade like
Apparently so
So then what you said before is an opinion, then
You can’t just laser someone because they shot at you, also just rotate
You guys are upset cause you can’t outplay a support lmao
I usually just pop a frag in their general direction
A support already has the advantage by headglitching?
So why make that more complex with more spread?
why not just increase the recoil?
Holy fucking shit you suck at the game
????????
Explosives are pretty useful to move somebody out from an area
“Head glitching” you mean peaking???!
And not a lot of people utilize the destruction mechanics to rotate
A good support player will always prone or headglitch
THEY ARE TO FAR AWAY??? HAHAHHAHAHA
otherwise they literally die instantly
So going prone is head glitching now?
Maybe sometimes, but that's not always the case
please read
I did
