#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 198 of 1
The game is supposed to be set in 2027-2030
But yes it’s gonna be set in a modern setting
Campaign then could be the catalyst to the multiplayer.
There’s gonna be a campaign
Motive and Criterion are working on it
bf1 is on sale, is it a good cop? dunno how the internet feels about it
Most definitely
Yes, I was implying the event starts late 2026, maybe the campaign plays here and then 2027-2030 that's the events of the multiplayer.
Question is which 2042 operator is returning in campaign
I think we will see younger Boris, maybe Pac, Recker or even Blackburn
No bring new characters
I wanna see Blackburn again so bad.
BF4 had BF3 characters, 2042 had BF4 and BF3 characters, it's a tradition at this point
Maybe give some insight to why he was part of the Boreas facility plotline.
Iirc, Blackburn was part of that plotline, right?
BF4 just had Dima
Yeah
yo yo
Looks like Casper, Mackay, Angel, Boris and Falck can return. First 3 being fresh recruits.
Irish could return too but his VA passed away, so I don't think we will see him.
RIP my guy Cpt. Kimble “Irish” Graves 🫡 Michael K. Williams
Not only VA, actual actor
Yeah
I don't remember much about it honestly, I always preferred 3's campaign
I remember last mission though, and AI partners being useless
I just remember that line cuz it’s in the beginning ish lol launching a noob tube at a chopper while hanging out the side of a jeep 😂
I honestly want to see young Angel or Mackay, especially if they speak like launch 2042 versions 
''That was something right!?'' - Konstantin Anghel
''I am NOT overconfident, I'm just better than everyone else'' Webster Mackay
Skibid toilet
"Burn those motha fuckas" -Irish
Im getting ready for bf6. Went back to windows 10, changed my printer. Getting ready
why go back to windows 10?
Because new shit breaks. My experience in bf4 cte was horrible.
fair enough
Had something to do with windows, the firewall, the anti virus, there was stuttering. I'll work my way up. No one has to do this.
ptsd inducing
i gotta love EA's launcher, its SO BAD
do you guys remember how squad respawns worked in BF2?
could the leader respawn on their squad mates?
Dear Devs,
Please consider Linux in Battlefield Labs and in Battlefield in general. I do not want to play on Windows 11 (telemetry, AI, bad optimization reasons).
Sincerely,
Linux Community
Hey, I have a quick question. I can't join my friend in BF1 and I don't get an invite. Does anyone have a solution?
probably not gonna happen, it's their anticheat
i hear there's a way they can make it compatible with linux but i dunno if that can be done in time for the playtests
The battlefield labs playtest thing isnt working for me
It's Kernel level I assume?
yep
Nah then. I do not want malware nor backdoor on my pc
So I was reading the battlefield timeline because lore… 911 is Canon in the battlefield timeline
"How's your Mom, Nick?" -Captain Julian Dawes
Why wouldn't it be?
Fuck sake
"Donuts spotted!"
BF4 achievements are not working
i played caspian border on the EA PC client and did the torched repair tool and dirty job hidden tunnel achievements. it has been more than 1 day since the match and the achievements are not unlocking
bf labs sign-ins are closed right?
don't think so.
i wanna try another beta
It's closed for me
it was worse than the cyberpunk launch
And what makes it even more worse is that it doesn't have a goddamn campaign
Do we have any Battlefield 2042 pre alpha gameplay. I want to see what it looks like.
About to get it in with the boys on 2042 leggoo
nah i could atleast play 2042 i couldn't even run cyberpunk
I was bummed there was no campaign however I did enjoy reading the lore for 2042 along with the audio/video they put out to help tell the story
It was different
That being said a campaign still would’ve been dope
The reveal trailer
Bye cheater
anyone played new bf6?????????????????????????
\
Mp1st says playtests are happening now
promising
Yes, it takes place in 2100 when the geist from redacted escape and the rampant AI there get on the UESC Marathon and crashland on Tau Ceti IV
raining here so off to play BFV thanks for the good news
Interesting, BFV feels that the TTK is lower than BF3 and BF4
I ahte that we cant change the gender of our character
I never thought they would specifically list the United States worst attack since 1812 as a canon part of the story
bf6 is confirmed to be modern times right?
Basically yeah
do you guys beleive the feubary 12th therory
The amount of snipers in BFV omfg
what is it
when the first bf labs playtest starts
all we know is it's in the coming weeks
i wouldn't discuss theories like that, mods don't like leaks and might class it as one
Im live if yall wanna check me out follow id apperciate the support
Hosting a battlefield hardline server with a 2 year lifespan... Server is named Battlefield Legacy
Consists of conquest large on all vanilla maps
Got a nice 5v5 on Hollywood heights
Xbox by the way
When did it become ok to think a game is “gg” when the whole team was complete trash and barely played?
when are they gonna make the battlefailed like bf2 and not the console kiddy garbage that was BF3
Was 4 better? Or did you hate BF going to console in general?
I mean, BF3 made it a bit more casual, no? And it made Battlefield more widespread
Disagree on that
ok you can disagree but your wrong
why because they made some new assets and animations that make its some how not bf3?
because they improved the engine, the tech, but downgraded some stuff like sound design
BF3 is unique in its approach, BF4 is more modern, yes but it doesnt give the same feel as BF3
its the same engine lmao. what because they added some more advanced things like ray tracing that some how makes it not the same?
Same engine doesnt mean its the same game, from BF3 to BF4 they had good tech advancements and less hindrances
lol they both launched on ps3 and xbox 360...
i like pew pew
God I love these kinda comments
Most passive aggressive asshole style out there lol
you dont even know what a game engine really is. you just using it as a McGuffin term to describe minor differences between games
We got a lotta that here
console players
“Pc MaStEr RaCe HeR hEr “
yawn either a child or too stupid to work a computer. thats 99% of console players, you think anyone that can work will still be on a console?
looks at Unity 3 to 5 Yeah they're the same engine
great example...
They are technically the same engine, but from one version to the other they had massive improvements
Mac Mini for work, PC for steam, PS5 for racing and platform.
so whats the massive improvement of frostbite 3???
Should I go into how long I’ve been PC along side console and handheld?
further more what really did they improve between games?
they replaced the automatic weapons with SMG in the ww1 and 2 titles?
i cant get past that burn those mfer part tried every way
levolution was revolutionary for battlefield series, too bad theyh didnt use it for the other games in the series for now
it wouldnt be possible in BF3, which they focused in the micro destruction
now we have tech for both
They replaced levolution with other "gimmicks". BF1 - Behemoths, BFV - V1 Rockets, 2042 - Tornadoes. They just keep trying to mix up the formula, and of course innovation is important, but they innovate at the expense of tried and true mechanics and features
yup
i get an error when trying to sign up for battlefield labs
Like, as people said, just pick up what they've built upon from previous games and it will be massive success
Correct - but they rarely do it
less maps, less weapons, less gadgets, etc
Its unfortunate what they deprioritize
and when they release new stuff its locked behind bs systems
BF3 and BF4 had the best balance
paid base game, paid premium and done
Paid dlc sucks because it alienates the poorer playerbase behind a paywall
And a lot of times the dlcs die after a new one is introduced or when the game reaches the end of its support
Battle passes imo are worse
Algún español?
Theoretically they're great. As long as the cosmetics don't break my immersion I'm totally fine with a battle pass system
I'd probably prefer a premium pass system though
Even with Firestorm, which I thought was a great BR, it got a couple months of support with a very intriguing story and then it was dropped
then hazard zone is the most half-assed game mode I've seen
bf4 still holds up today
Only thing I dislike about this system is when they treat skins as ‘content’. Like saying an update has new stuff to do and it’s just some skin challenges. Those were really lame in 2042 to no end
Agreed
Hazard zone was so meh
skins are not content
why is the carbine in bf4 so ass this thing has the craziest damage falloff ever
Hazard zone is a cool concept but the maps are so empty and there was nothing to grind for
Firestorm at least had a good base it just didn't appeal to a lot of people because they were still reeling over how bad BFV's launch was
It also wasn't Free to Play which made it far less popular than it could've been
correct
If they put a Battle Royal I hope for the love of good they put it as a separate game
Ah
how does it work
preach
None of that bullshit pack installing that cod has you do now
It's an actual disaster
The COD HQ is the worst system I've ever seen
#fnb-spanish Battlefield V? Alguien
Battlefield was not made for Battle Royale + its completely saturated
And we used to unlock everything with achievements in game. Not this pay wall crap to line greedy pockets
yeah, with also paying for expansions only
that's why i say that expansions are still better than battle passes
Battlefield is actually great for Battle Royale imo. The destruction, the gunplay, the large maps. It has a potential to actually reinvent the Battle Royale genre in a way that hasn't really been done since Apex Legends
If done correctly and with consistent support
Any game is bad as a br in my opinion, I just cannot enjoy a single one
Apex keeps trying to make itself more appealing but just can’t win me over even as a titanfall fanatic and preacher
I'd rather a Portal 2.0 than a Battle Royale probably, but a Battle Royale would be cool so I wouldn't complain either way.
I agree, the issue now is we don’t get a full game at launch we get 60% of a full game. Then they sell us the other 40% and call it dlc
A battlefield game hasn't launched with sufficient enough content to justify its pricetag since BF1, 2042 could probably have justified it if it wasn't so horrendously buggy and missing important necessary Battlefield features
They confirmed there will be another BF Portal, which to me says AI again which isn't exactly a bad thing. I think if they actually COMMITTED to a BR experience, they could make a good one. I'm anticipating seeing the Firestorm theme return since they had some easter eggs in a recent 2042 event
like a LEADERBOARD ON THE MATCH
For the next BF to feel like a complete game at launch it needs to have at least like 10 maps that are actually well designed
omg fr
Or CLASSES
or DESTRUCTION
I personally think bots are fine, I'd prefer if they stayed as an option in Portal or Co-op though
Kind of agree, BRs were exciting when I was average but as soon as you get to a decent level you realize BR is just "FPS with a ton of pointless downtime" and Extraction shooters are BR with even less combat somehow.
I'd love a great coop experience. BF3's coop campaign was great
2042 had destruction but a lot of it was so scaled back
I don't think it qualifies as destruction
And actually implement what 2042 learned over time regarding its overall balance philosophy and what a catastrophe it was for the longest time
BC1 had more destruction than 2042 did
I mean, look at Titanfall, it can work if they are footsoldiers with less health
My biggest problem was the lack of VOIP at launch. I couldn't commminucate with my squadmates like at all, especially because BF2042's commarose doesn't even show up in chat
And it’s the downtime I don’t like :/
I want to be in fights with people that have some level of dynamism to them. I want to be on my toes and while I understand there is depth in forward thinking and pre emptive positioning in a br, I just want there to be action or else it’s just dull
And thus I stay far from them
Bf3 co-op was a great addition to the campaign. DLC for more missions should have been a thing,
I loved BF3 coop. The coop vs AI matches in 2042 are kinda fun, but it doesn't replace awesome squad gameplay
The coop vs ai in 2042 is a lot of fun to grind weapons and attachments. It can get kind of dull after a bit though and it's not as interesting as BF3
100%. I feel like the only way to make BRs more appealing is by reducing the elements that slow things down. Retain MP loadouts, don't make maps so massive that rotations in the first phases take forever and reduce the opportunities for fighting in mid game, and give players utility options as loot resources instead to allow for better end games than a lot of zone RNG forcing some players to just deal with disadvantageous positioning.
It feels like a cop out to grind for weapons and experience though...
It's also a bit baffling that you can't play the pve gamemode offline. In a game with no campaign it still wouldn't be a bad idea to have some sort of offline mode
There needs to be good balance because its so easy to unlock stuff in coop vs ai and I feel like that pulls away from some of the fun of multiplayer matches
The down time is mostly due to the safe zones being too big and not forcing players to actually move.
AI should never be in MP honestly, and especially not as a resource for XP
make the pve give reduced xp
Yeah, the first three closures are basically a non issue because maps and zones are way too big. You end up just having landing fights and then nothing until the last two zones.
I personally don't mind the down time in BRs. Makes the game more tense
me neither
Have to wait in queue
Another massive issue with downtime in BR will always remain however because the very nature of BR forces players who aren't confident in their mechanics to just prioritize staying alive even when good opportunities to fight present themselves.
That’s the very reason I feel warzone kicked off so well when it was introduced. By adding loadouts, bounty contracts and respawns it made it the most cod like battle royale it could have been. But even with those systems I just can’t enjoy it. The one life, loot focused approach just doesn’t do it for me. I feel no matter what, a br just won’t work for me :(
That being said, BRs are still more appealing than extraction shooters or hero shooters to me. Extraction is just BR with even more downtime and emphasis on looting and hero shooters always boil down to support roles just pushing buttons for insane value over good mechanical skill.
Do a battlefield br but make it as tanks or summat drop from plane every other zone but airstrikes you can find
That's alright. Battle Royales aren't for everyone
Personally I enjoy them but I can see the complaints with them
It would be the best if Battlefield INNOVATED and created a different experience that is only in Battlefield. Stop trying to copy trends
Just sucks when that and extraction shooters are the rage right now
Bang on the money, the best way to build a BR is make it as little of a BR as possible in everything but the end game lol. Even Apex is learning that by adding in more opportunities for respawning and retaining gear/armour.
I don’t like tac shooters either so most actually supported comp shooters are off the cards, so I’m stuck with Titanfall and quake
Not gonna lie they're really not the rage. Every major extraction shooter lately has failed and all the major battle royales except fortnite have seen major declines in playercounts
Well, more so in the sense that everyone is trying to make it the rage, and so keep making them or shoving them and the general design decisions surrounding them down our throats
Fair enough
This is exactly where bf fell off. Trying to copy everyone else instead of following what they had been doing in bfbc2,bf3 & 4
Anyways I'm 90% sure the mode Ripple Effect is working on is Portal 2.0, because someone has to work on it lol — unless Ripple Effect is working on two major modes which sounds like a really bad idea because that's why Portal and Hazard Zone were so underbaked
When everyone does the same thing and copies eachother. The hype dies fast
I don’t want a milsim tactical shooter extraction or br game. And off the top of my head we’ve had grey zone, arena breakout, delta force, ground branch, ‘83, not to mention the old ones still getting updates that make them more relevant today. When was the last 6v6 movement arena shooter? Gundam evolution? Now that’s basically died. The finals would be my bread and butter but I dislike team sizes that small too
Eh BF really wasn't trying to do what everyone else was doing until 2042 where it was very clear 90% of the new mechanics were influenced by apex and warzone
deep
I know it’s my fault for being so picky but those preferences just don’t feel like they align with what’s going on right now
Don't remind me of Gundam Evolution 
Loved that to bits. That and splitgate felt like my last hopes
i feel like iv walked into some deep shit
All Apex had to do was reign in AA, deal with the anticheat and visual clutter, and retain the original legend designs being more about utility instead of Yugioh tier power creep where pushing buttons gave incredible value in fights.
cill winston
The finals is super good I really recommend it if you can get passed the small teams. The destruction is some of the best in the industry at the moment and the gunplay is really fun. It's also the best execution of the "FPS game but it's actually a sports game" mini-trend I've seen
Finals just isn't that fun with the L/M/H aspect much less the multiple teams where the losing team always just ends up picking one team to grief instead of win.
I have to disagree with that one heavily I'm afraid
I'd much rather Finals have been one class with more variation of options and 6vs6
I mean, it was showing in BFV trailer
The finals is too sweaty for me, which is unfortunate because is plays so well
Firestorm was bf response to warzone. That was before 2042
The L/M/H isn't my personal favorite but I don't hate it. Plus the matches have always felt fairly well-balanced to me
Eh sort of but firestorm is such a small piece of the puzzle. Adding a new gamemode that's hot atm is different from 2042's "half of our mechanics come from another game, such as tactical sprint or loadouts or hero characters with traits"
and funnily enough, Warzone is goingdown
Firestorm actually came out before Warzone btw
It was moreso the response to Fortnite and PUBG
You know what would be cool? A working Hazard Zone
Yes but after black out
Well yes but you said warzone so I responded appropriately
You know what would be cool? DICE making a good battlefield game for once in 8 years
No, forget hazard zone. It's left such a bad taste in my mouth I just want it gone

It was so fun when I got it working though
But yes you're right. Blackout was 2018. I forgot about that mode like most people though 😭
6 yearsI*
BFV was fine, BF2042 was shit
BF5 was a dumpster fire at launch
Battlefield V and 2042 turned out good after they finally got the hang of it. They still had inexcusable launch states though.
Gotcha… it’s just more example of bf trying to be like other games
Which BF since 3 is not a dumpster fire at layunch?
BF1
So was 4 though. Not as bad as 5 but it was a rough launch to say the least
BF1 had a fairly smooth launch actually
So did Hardline iirc
Hot take but I have loved BF2042 even from launch. Don’t get me wrong it wasn’t launched to expectations but it doesn’t take much to appease my monkey brain and BF2042 hit the right spot
I mean polish wise it wasn't but mechanically it was a dumpster fire the second they nerfed AD.
And seeing bouncing ospreys was really funny lol
Game is good tbh
Agreed, but fairly smooth compared to BF3 and BF4?
I'm a GTA guy so idk
And Dice, I beg. Don’t bring back a battle pass
2042 had a really cool lore and a few good mechanics that I liked even when the launch was shit
BP is definitely back, retention and cosmetics go hand in hand.
Unfortunately they will way too greedy not too
They are gonna bring back a battle pass, this game is gonna be live service
It’s fucking obvious
I'd prefer something similar to Tides of War, that was lit
2042 was the best game for a campaign but the one where they decide ‘nah, it’ll be fine’
Game sales mean nothing to the sheer volume of money you get by having a million casuals drop 15 bucks on a BP every season, let alone cosmetic purchases.
2042 was supposed to be a full fledged BR
If people stop buying the useless garbage in the store they will stop selling it. That’s the only way it will go back to in game achievements
HMMMMMMMMMM ok so now i see BFV's character customization to be quite nice
Good luck with that, even when Apex was in the worst possible state you had people buying every heirloom event for 180 bucks
Weapon customization is limited af, dont like it but fits the theme
Apex is free though
Casual markets don't know how to vote with their wallets
I wouldn't mind if a Battlefield game didn't have a campaign because that's not what I play Battlefield fof, but for 2042 it sucked because there was so few good content to make up for it
Doesn't matter if it's free, 180 bucks on skins is 180 bucks on skins.
That's like BF + Premium every season
What battlefield besides 2042 did not had a campaign? None
It matters when you get the game for free and people can choose to spend money on a game they got for free.
1942, 2, 1943, and 2142 iirc
But no I don’t agree any skins should cost any money
2142 had a campaign but not really a soulful one
Silent protagonist
Ah my bad. That's one of the few Battlefields I haven't played
That said one of my favourite stories is with a silent protagonist…
Vietnam, Heroes, and Play4Free also didn't have a campaign
All the games you mentioned had a campaign
1942 doesn't have a campaign lmao
I know for sure because I've played it
1943 also definitely did not have a campaign
I played that one
I mean what do we want out of a new battlefield game? Back to basics or a leap of faith?
1942 had a campaign but it was similar to Easy Red 2 or Red orchestra
Back to basics for sure. Leaps of faith are too risky right now
Big maps, map evolution, silly strategies and not milking us for every cent
Red Orchestra, that's a name I haven't heard in a long time.
I’m fine with a 64 player map and maybe 128 being introduced later
Red Orchestra is the best WW2 game ever fight me
I don't want 128 players
I don't really count that. There's no story to it, it's just multiplayer with bots
Back to the basics. Bf can’t afford to have another leap of faith disaster
128 players just doesn't really work for Battlefield
128 players can work if they do it right. I don't want that many players close together, but a balanced match with 128 players has potential to be super epic
It’s still a campaign
If you say so
Either way BF1943 still didn't have one
No fighting on that at all, I'm not even big on milsim but the atmosphere and gameplay/maps were top notch. Those RO2 death screams live rent free in my head. I remember playing RO 3.0 mod in high school.
Neither did BF2
RO2 is a great game
Your right on that one
I got 2/4 of those first guesses right lol oops
are the dlcs for bf1 worth it?
Pretty sure you can get them for free now
o
The amount of time I’ve spent waiting to get into a server then it ends up being a premium server….
Not in PS I don’t think
idk i just copped from the steam sale
Ah. Xbox stays winning ig lol
Hey we got the game for free
Yeah cause xbox has ea play and it comes with all the dlcs free. That's my bad guys lol
wait you guys do as well
I forgot about EA play
You can get it on PS but you need to pay for that separately
Yeahh
RO2 was like if BF1 had WW2 setting
On xbox it comes with a gold+ sub
Man if only they let us play online for free
RO2 is a hardcore shooter and like the exact opposite if BF1 gameplay wise
Still a good game though
Like HLL?
Sort of? It's smaller scale
I’m saying like Immersion and Ambiance wise
Ah right
Hmmm maybe. They're both very good in that capacity
RO2 handled it so well because it really depicted the sheer helplessness and horrors of war.
RO 2?
Red Orchestra 2
It truly did
what is that
Hardcore WW2 fps from the late 2000s or early 2010s I believe
I want Bad Company 3 but I gave up on that many years ago lol
2011 yippee I was right. Same launch year as BF3
Personally I do not want that because of EA
Your not the only one
I always loved RO because of the origins too. Imagine just being a small mod team that ends up doing so well they end up getting licenses to make games, and in turn use their platform to help other mod teams and map makers get their start
Shame TWI is not at all the same anymore.
2042 could've been the best BF campaign if they made it like Crysis, Exodus short reminded me of Crysis 3 tbh
Still would’ve been dogshit
God the Exodus short was amazing. Some of the best CG graphics I've ever seen and Michael K. Williams was a fantastic actor, rest his soul.
2042's lore is pretty interesting tbh
I enjoy the old battlefield campaigns even tho I know most only play for the MP
It's just that you need to read player cards in order to follow the story
2042 has great lore. Love that shit. The opening cutscene for 2042 was fantastic
Yeah
But when you get in the actual game...
2042's lore is stupid
The lore and story of BF2042 was good, shame absolutely none of it made it into the maps, character design, aesthetic, or anything really lol
Bro hates fun and whimsy
I mean it’s 2042
Nah I believe it could've been amazing if the game utilised it properly
Well you can blame EA and DICE for removing the Campaign
And had a campaign...
I'm pretty sure the next bf game is going to be like a prequel to bf2042 with more world-building from vince zampella
"The entire world is at war, resources are slim, now here's this verdant untouched area with working sprinkler systems"
I hope next BF's campaign won't be like nuCoD, I don't want the story to ''not end'' just for it to continue in new seasons tbh
If 2042 did had a campaign let’s be fr its would’ve been dogshit.
The whole game is dog shit so yeah probably
The inclusion of No-Pats yet you're fighting the same Specialist with the on the Russian side (Angel vs Angel)...
Bar is low in BF campaigns already, not like other BF games had amazing campaigns
The new modern warfare trilogy sold so hard, first two campaigns were fantastic only for us to get "I wasn't in that tank". Absolute bullshit
The no-pat concept sucks
I love it lore wise
I wish that the next game disowns no pats
You are fighting as nopats in hourglass for what it's worth
I wanna play as soldiers from each country
What’s your hate of missile submarines?
Speaking the language and using the weapons of each nation
Actually the next game is gonna be a reboot to the whole franchise
I don't want boris fighting for the Americans
We don't know that at all stop spreading misinfo lol 😭
I hate skill based matchmaking not submarines 
"Don't be sad, this is just how it works out sometimes" he says while he draws a pistol on himself
It didn't make sense that you're fighting the same specialist or face in the other faction meanwhile in most BF games including BFV there's a distinction between the two factions
No like deadass
"My dad works at ea and he told me"
I’m just hoping we get something like bf3 which to me was the last good battlefield. I did have some fun with 4 despite the issues it had at launch
They literally said they’re gonna be building a connected battlefield universe
The specialists are what ruined the no-pat concept, it's actually good on its face
Tom's leaks aren't always accurate, he said nothing about portal but there are rumors about a portal 2 already
I don't see the word reboot in there anywhere lol
Westie did confirm in a recent video that DICE told him Portal is returning
It's implied
...no not really?
It’s gonna be like MW2019
BF3,4 and 2042 are connected already. How is reboot going to ''connect'' while rebooting the series?
I think it's set after BF4 and before BF2042
Reboot
Most likely
What they could've done is just keep everyone as random grunts and each squad has a random chance to just roll a character from that relevant side. Almost like RNG battle pickups but without any major gameplay imbalances. Would have made for a better integration and allowed for better visual identification of classes/countries.
Every game that comes out after BF2025 is connected to the lore.
Considering 2042 recently had a content drop connecting the game to BFV and a lot of the setting info we have about the next BF game have consistent details with 2042 it sounds like the game isn't a reboot and still is connected to the other games. You don't need to reboot to create a connected universe.
That doesn't mean they need to remove BF3, 4 or 2042 from canon
What connection to BFV?
Bfv and bf2042 are 100 years apart tf you mean connection 
Firestorm experiments happened in the same universe
Solaris and the Firestorms were referenced heavily in the Circle of Hell event.
Yeah
Well Solaris actually made a full on appearance
Bro what
It wasn't Westie but rather Flakfire
Your not making sense
Ah my bad
Thanks for the assist lol
I just want the game to feel more military and geopolitics oriented
They recently connected BFV to BF3, 4 and 2042 universe, they don't need to reboot anything lol
BF4 is in 2020, BF2042 is in 2042, the next game fills in the gap
Let makes everyone play as someone instead of playing as a nobody if that make sense
Because those games were not reboots, this one is gonna be a hard reboot
Ah, I saw the Solis stuff
Sorry if I'm explaining myself poorly I have a habit of writing things and not realizing it doesn't make sense to anyone but me lolol
Buttt labinlima seems to get what I mean lol
Hard fax, I swear if DICE and EA will add another awful skin like the Santa Boris skin or Pink skins...
2042 was heavily geopolitics oriented (lorewise) and the next Battlefield game seems to be credibly featuring NATO so you've got that much so far!
Oh hell no, don't even think about it, don't jinx it 
Bro those stupid skins. Seriously boycotting the next BF if there is goofy crap in it
You seen the uniforms in the bf labs trailer? It seems like they’re gonna have a military theme throughout the game.
Yeah, I feel like having more geopolitical stuff adds a layer of seriousness to battlefield you don't find in other shooter games, it sets the game apart
2042 also connects to 2142 btw
Since season 7 I believe
This is Pre-Alpha. We don't know what the game will feel like
Say all you want about Bf2042 but the loading screens and match insertion flows were the best in the series
Too bad the gameplay felt like the opposite
I would take Tom's ''leaks'' with a grain of salt, he claimed 2042 was getting 3 maps per season, not 1 new map and 1 rework
Maybe that was the original plan but it clearly wasn't the case with the game
I loved BF2042 and in my heart it will always be good 😤
Tom is credible but only partially. Sometimes his details are inconsistent or outdated
His leaks about this bf game had been accurate so far.
That was probably the plan at one point but since the game was s super fund site at launch they had to reroute resources towards fixing things which likely threw everything else off schedule
This is EA and DICE we're talking about... they did it in 2042 and V (to some extent) and they'll surely
do it again with upcoming Battlefield, we need a send a strong message that wacky skins does not belong to Battlefield and make it serious authentic military like how BF3, BF4 and BF1 is
BF2042 is pretty bad, but it does have a grapple hook for high speed grapple hopping, the M44, and the PP29 so it could be worse.
Said nothing about portal
2042 will always be a steaming pile of crap. Even after all their fixes
Battlefield 2042 is pretty good. It just has a lot of integral issues that make it one of my less favorite entries and it feels tonally off compared to other BF games
I would say battlefield is 10x better of skin authenticity than COD
Battlefield doesn't have Nicki Minaj so that's a plus
The Nightbird nonsense really holds it back. I have no clue why they remain so obstinate in balancing it.
There's tons of authentic military gear that DICE and EA can get if they wanted to sell skins like look at MW19's military skins, like they could sell SAS or the JTF2 as skins
BF2042 will always and forever be a big pile of vomit
Hell they could go ham with gas mask skins like in BFV again, I wouldn't mind it
Would rather have that than pink skins and the awful Santa skin
To each their own. There's good stuff there it's not all bad, the world isn't that black and white
BF2042 was very black and white at launch…
If it's Nato vs something like the Warsaw pact, then they could add a ton of skins that are just the soldiers of the participating countries
I hope that's the case
PMC
PMC will be Blackburn's Arkangel imo, if the rumors are true 
I really hope the next Battlefield game has the MEC, they haven't appeared since Bad Company and it's a massive shame
Hmm. They'd def have to make some stuff up for the PMC side then
2042 isn't all bad, but to me it still doesn't feel like a BF game. The movement is like ice skating, they made it to cater to a Fortnite fanbase and it feels that way
The trailer map seems to be desert-themed. So there's probably some middle-eastern maps. MEC would be a good thing to bring back tho
But at the same time they tried putting santa skins or wacky stuffs before BFV launch and it wasn't for the community, they'll would have likely put in the game...
Yeah. But BF3 had middle-eastern maps and no sign of the MEC 😔
I would want to see something different like a Spanish PMC, or an African PMC, or hell even an Asian PMC.
PMC side can have non-NATO nations' gear too, like BF3 had lots of Iranian weaponry, I think PMC side will have Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Iranian etc. equipment.
Who agrees with me
Pan Asian Coalition 
The movement was a downgrade if you ask me when the last game which is BFV had the best movement and all they have to do was improving on BFV's movement
Would def be interesting if parts of the pmc were from various parts of the world. It's likely going to be mostly if not all Russian soldiers disguised as PMC because politics tho
It's definitely gonna be some sort of nato proxy war with a paramilitary funded by Russia or North Korea or some other generic US adversary
Which sounds like absolute heat btw
An Spanish PMC would be tuff ngl
I'd be chill with any nation
Unfortunately I just don't see a reason for Spain to fight NATO lol
What about India?
I think PMC should be a PAC type thing just so we can have more equipment from more nations
Pretty much since they're trying to avoid the real-life politics especially in today's day and age
Considering spain is in nato, yeah
Would India fight on the NATO side or against?
Against most likely
India is historically NATO-allied
Isn't India one of the PAC nations?
In Battlefield? Probably
It’s obviously can be like a rogue pmc group trying to rule the world
Or maybe india would be in a separate war with Pakistan and china who are both against nato thus indirectly making india nato-allied
But in real life they're friends with nato
Battle at Gulf of America
PAC would be Russia + China + North Korea
Please have the PMC be a successor to the MEC funded by Iran that'd be delicious
Case in point CoD Advanced Warfare
No way japan and india are going against nato or EU or the US
Man Kevin Spacey nailed playing as Irons
Well PMC is a PMC, they can even have NATO nationalities and equipment
I'd even be willing to see a South American group of PMCs reminiscent of Cordis Die from BO2
As much of a political bombshell as it would be, would love to see current world politics with Russia, China and NK
Exactly
BF4 was banned in China so will never happen
Better and interesting diversity
EA wants that Chinese money so that wouldn't likely happen
Not happening, they already got a bunch of flack for having the Russian Z symbol in the game because the Ukraine War started not even a year into the games lifecycle
I was pretty happy with that tbh
Because we get less high ping players in our servers 😭
Or cheaters
BF4 was very cheater free mainly due to China banning it, and the Chinese who do get to play it use VPNs and are pretty well-behaved and taught to not use cheats
BF1 and bfv on the other hand..
I think NATO will have EU+US outfits, PMC will have RU+CN+KR outfits, weapons won't be faction locked imo
But chinese community servers handle cheaters incredibly well, they get banned in barely a minute with admins active almost 24x7
The world is too tense right now, probably the tensest since the cold war, so I understand them wanting to fantasize a little bit while still being grounded
Tbf we had BF4 had rental server program and a server browser which is why there wasn't alot of Chinese players especially with the inclusion of the RSP
Last game that had it was BF3 
Realistically it’s gonna be an generic Russian pmc
What about the voicelines though?
There were British uniforms in the trailer
Will nato have random voicelines from each language?
Everyone will speak English 
And American voicelines
PMC?
Maybe if you select a specific nationality's character, like how BFV did
Would be a cool attention to detail
Most likely Russian
Ever since they added the anti-cheat for BFV, most of games that I play recently I haven't encounter any cheaters maybe 1-2 game but not frequently
Like Polish soldier saying kurwa
In our dreams, they speak their actual languages. It's most definitely not happening tho
That'd be a cool level of intrigue, being able to select your characters nationality and have them speak in different languages. Would be a fun and unique customization option
I don't think PMC will be Russian at all
Adds to the immersion by a ton
I think they will be Blackburn's PMC
The bf2042 ai bots had country specific voicelines and wow those were sick
He's a villain in 2042 already
hell nah how did he get here...
Lived long enough to see himself become a villain
Shooting your CO will do that to you...
Last time we had that was in BFV
2042 characters speaks in their own languages too
Faction announcers are always speaking English though
They all speak english?
Whatever language your system is set to ☝️🤓
Boris speaks English with a very rough russian accent
Germany and the Japanese speak with their native tongues
99% yes 1%no
Yes but also some lines in their own languages, like Zain speaks Arabic, Blasco speaks Spanish etc.
Blasco 🤤
I can still hear german soldiers screaming sanitater...
Hey, can i use battlefield soundtrack for my video?
Yeah hopefully
Battlefield 1,3,4,5 were peak 🔥
"The enemy now controls every objective I repeat they control every objective what the fuck are we gonna do about this guys" 
I can hear it
Don't forget BF2 😔

“ Who’s the fucking daddy we are who the bitches they are” 😭😂
Come to think of it, battlefield 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 were really good games
If the next game is named battlefield 6, it better follow suit
Hardline voicelines are unironically good lol
Personally I don't think there's a bad Battlefield game. Some are definitely worse than others though. (Cough 2042)
As long as they're fun i don't mind
"Eh, quit being a bitch and get up" is an actual revive line lol
I'm a filthy casual 
What if next game is called as 2032 
I feel like that title alone would hurt sales 😭
I remember this shit like it was yesterday
Sanitäter!
Yeah I'm in the German Army and when exercising sometimes and you have an officer or a Sergeant shouting orders out in German that's sick and gives even me as a native goosebumps.
Hapbgruppe A, vorrücken! MG - FeuerSchutz!
The russian voicelines in BF3 are too good lol, they say fuck, fucking, or motherfucker like every 5 words
US was the best tho
Tbf if you're in a warzone the last thing you'd be doing is speaking coherently and politely 
Most coolest game trailer:
Battlefield:
- Battlefield 2042(with 2WEI music one)
- Battlefield 5
- Battlefield 4
- Battlefield 1
Other games - Delta Force(with 2WEI music one)
BF1 was great
BF5 trailer was just, no.
What's everyone's favorite opening title screen intro?
Idk man I like 5 but the trailer was definitely one of the worse ones
That fan made trailer I don't know whether you have seen it of BF5 is fire tho
BF1
The reveal trailer was pretty ass but Devastation of Rotterdam is one of my favorite Battlefield trailers
Did 1 have an intro?
2142
Probably the most famous one yeah
I mean BF5 trailer with Japan vs US in pacific
Well if the enemy capture our Base then we're screwed
Does the game have it??
Yes it did
Yeah it's the start to Storm of Steel
2042 for sure
Bruh. I don't think that game has one
Well actually
It does, it's really good
Storm of Steel is miles ahead
That shit grabs you by the ballsack in less than 30 seconds
I know hardline has an intro
https://youtu.be/cnlW4y7YWFg?si=zbVpOGlmDoxnxdUfhttps://youtu.be/yQ9ChMLK1KY?si=iSWgAmPoVIdoe2H9
Putting you on peak my friend
Will EA's Battlefield compete Tencent's Delta Force in Mobile Platform? 🙃
Doesn't this only play when you enter war story mode for the first time
I don't remember
It plays when you open the game for the first time
Wait what?! I thought i can't send link here.
Because autodelete or something. Or worse: Auto Mute/Timeout ☠️
Well damn
How do I sign up for the battlefield labs testing?
The website lol
I want to join BF Labs but my PC: 😭
Imo the best non-first-play intro is tied between 3, 4, and hardline
I think questions like these should be answered in a thread so people don't have to ask and all
https://youtu.be/2VE271DzBk8
Peak BF intro
3 with the flashing screen
Like it just creates a hassle for both us and the person asking
Seizure warning lol
Rtx 2060 minimum and rtx 3060 Ti recommended 💀
BF1 will always be the greatest opening intro ever
Look up battlefield labs sign up
And what are your specs lol
The requirements don't look pretty
Bfv recommended was a GTX 1060 and bf2042 recommended is an rtx 3060, 2 generations of GPUs for slightly worse graphics 
3 is cool, 4 is nostalgic (imo), and Hardline gives you the perfect vibes for the game
This one is 🔥
It successfully shows us how scary is the war...
Is there a window for registration. I’m trying to but I get an error message. Thanks for your help
In 4 I like the different environment shift
Can you post the screenshot in DMs?
Yea same
How do you all feel about robodog? It was kind of a big deal in the 2042 trailer. Did you end up using it? Was it balanced? Useful?
I’m getting the same thing when trying to sign up
From carrier to aircraft, to collapsing building
Nope I didn't care about it lol
BF3 has it's own aura 
And the title screen, showcasing different episodes of operation
Looked cool but eh it's a waste of drop ins
BF3>>>>BF4
Bf3 menu theme was something
I miss BF3 already
Yeah ngl I never use the drop system in BF2042. I use it way more in BFV
It just hurts thinking about how it's collecting dust now
Maybe for infantry but for vehicles 4 was better since you had more than one upgrade slot and you had the FAC boats
I WANT BF3 BACK ALIVE
The starting theme for BF3, holy shit
Sent dm. Thanks again!!
arma 100x better
Long gone. install Vu for AI bots,.and invite friends
Just amazing
It's not the same...
Next Battlefield for sure needs the atmosphere of BF3 and the gameplay of BF4
I miss operation metro and m240b bipods
I wish Battlefield will features Indonesia's war of independence 🙃
Damnit I'm getting nostalgic 
You're loss
BF3's MP still works on PC no?
Servers are dying
Yes but dead servers
Forget about battlelog
I'll try venice unleashed though
Dang that's sad
Nah, not without blue tint
Yea but it’s fucking dead in the water
Like desperately
Shame there's no workout BC2 bot mod
Don't get me started on bc2 I'll tear up on that game
That or Jackfrags making a video on it tbh
General looks of 3, gameplay of 4, atmosphere of 1
Compare BF3 teaser to BF6 teaser, BF3 has an atmosphere we won't ever see sadly: https://youtu.be/3Oz9OajW6zA
Yeah all of that recommendation it felt like the visual of 2042 was a downgrade to BFV
No the game needs to bring us back not flashy trailers
is anyone else having the error registering for the battlefield labs?
And Japan attack on Pearl Harbor
Yeah I've been getting an error message. #battlefield-labs-discussion though :3
The next game must be good of course, I'm saying that I hope BF3 gets more active before the next game comes out
BF Labs registration page:
WAIT WAIT WAIN NO NO NO
I'm letting my bc2 copy rot in my library
Without an official bot mod, I can't play it
If the bf labs registration page was a person he better be paid good 
really? aww man
Huh?
you can probably destinguish gif by url name
That means playtests should start soon
i belive in your imagination guys
it will if they turn on slow mode with like 60 seconds cooldown
I did despite not being in the correct region 
Most definitely next week
i'm in asia so 100% i willnt get to it
I said I'm in Norway and they believed it lol
North America bias
I am too, but you can always lie about your region 
I have like 200 I just don't bother lol
200+ ping is unplayable
I get like 130ms on eu servers
Same with Hardline 🥲
99 of it's 100 players are on singleplayer
Where in Asia are you?
I like the game
It's just....
Need a fucking bot
Russia Primorsky Krai
Hardline was so underrated man
Fr. It was only hated because of it's theming
Why did they abandon bots since 2142. Only to be brought back in the worst BF game
Of all BF games 2042 has bots and you can't even play it without internet connection 
Oh good lord
You'll have better luck in NA servers than EU
It's not like I have freedom to play anything with it
NA is 230
West coast?
I think you can adjust their difficulty, at least there was a setting like that in portal
Still bland and limiting
Hardline destruction was so unique
You can only do conquest and BT
You should get at most 170ms on west coast na servers
And rush through portal only
Judging from distance ofc
not sure i tested it only in BFV so i dont know where server is
Check BF4 battle log
Hardline has debatably the best singleplayer, a decent soundtrack, good gamemodes, pretty good maps, and decent balancing
I'm not in Europe but I will be connected to EU servers effortlessly 
If I'm selected for it
You can't even fucking switch team in solo play
Where are you?
What an embarrassment
Turkey
If you don't mind answering that is
i already registred as Asia and they know i'm russian so train is gone
The best single player goes to BF3
Uh oh yeah I'm sorry for your international reputation man, my country is hated a lot too
I mean you're technically european 
Fair. I'd say the top three are 3, BC2, and Hardline in whatever order
I mean, yeah, I connect to EU servers whenever I play, since there are no ME servers
Man i wish they bring back gunner from BF4 where he has Soflam and HMG
i hate the 2042 vehicles
50 ping is alright
Bf2042 gunners are the best in the series wdym
For German servers
i need too much of them
They have miniguns, rocket pods, mortars, aa flak guns
ability of 1 guy was splitted on 3
The BF3 and BF4 tank gunner '.50 cal hmg' needs 5 shots to kill an enemy 💀
Hardline's singleplayer sucks major booty
for real? i remembered it less
I tested it myself many times
I would say BF3, BC2, BF4
My favorite campaigns are BF3, BF1, and BC2
i believe you
No wonder the gunners are so weak in BF3/4
im gonna implode
BFV The Last Tiger was fire
The only good mission in BF5
True
truth
Nah Tiralleur was pretty good
And Nordlys had fun parts
Hell nah
To each their own
It’s was so bland and boring
nordlys was new SSX part
Deme kinda pissed me off though
I don't remember anything about BF4 campaign honestly
nah international reputation is only politicals yapping i dont care about it
Yeah but yknow it definitely hurts your online experience
I like the BF4 campaign but it's a major step down from BF3
choose between P90 and other 2 guns
BF4 campaign was like a gem covered in turd
As soon as I say what country I'm from, people talk to me weirdly lol
I remember AI partners being useless
yea thats sucks
And last mission
I remember every campaign.
And I thought Tiralleur was a good story.
"Noted leaker Tom Henderson is reporting that the next Battlefield game is introducing a groundbreaking War Correspondent class, offering a fresh, non-combat role on the battlefield. Acting as a neutral spectator, correspondents earn points by surviving in the warzone, capturing high-intensity action in heavily trafficked areas, and transmitting footage to the Broadcast HQ. Teams lose tickets if they kill a correspondent, which DICE hopes will discourage wonton aggression. At the end of each match, players can watch dynamic, AI-curated highlights from the correspondent’s recordings, with an option to disable the correspondent's narration. Additionally, correspondents will be graded by players based on the quality of their coverage, adding a unique layer of interaction and recognition."
YO
COMMANDER ONLINE
I never played BF1 or BFV campaigns
Because I already know why these factions are fighting each other
HELL YEAHH
Where did you see this?
War journalists.
its shame we dont get new campaighn in The Name Of the Tsar DLC
white hardhats
they hurt your tickets by posting misinformation in Twitter
someone will shoot him for the lols
There should be more of a penalty lol
for lols? i will hunt them
Maybe you should die as soon as you shoot one or have your squad leader spank the shit out of you
Link?
Or have your commander/announcer shout slurs at you
This has to be the most useless feature I've ever heard in a while, I don't think it will happen
i think he talks about enemy War Journalists
It doesn't allow me to post links sorry
I don't think war journalists have a side
Who's reporting it?
pain in the ass side they have lol
Shit take
Tom Henderson
No, I'm talking about what news channel.
Hey now it seems pretty cool
just let me call Cruise Missiles and its sold
damn right war journalists with cruise missiles 😭
standby...
I don't want to see AI NPCs running around maps
They aren't even bots lol
also controlling bots squads will be good
like squads of grunts in Titanfall 2
No the journalists will be player controlled
That sounds definitely interesting, if true I'd be excited to see how it turns out. It's definitely a unique mechanic
shut up and take my money
No one will pick that class
The AI is coming up with a story after the firefight.
War correspondents play a massive role in conflicts so including them in an fps is one hell of a concept that sounds very interesting
just give them soflam
I mean it’s makes sense since this game is gonna be taking place during 2027-2030
Basically what I heard was we fight on a map, depending on the % of wins on each team the AI will come up with a story of how the battle went in who's favor.
give them laser guidance and FPV drones
it's still a camera
but with spice
It's basically flight of the pigeon but modern.
day without commiting war crimes 0
Does anybody got the link?
Still on standby.
The ai part makes me nervous if true, I really hope they're not going to be using generative AI willy nilly and replacing voice actors.
It's good to talk about it while we wait on that confirmation though.
can we get AI bots that are actually learning while game existing
bad part they will play as pro some time
It’s make sense tho
Just put them on veteran difficulty.
This game is gonna be taking place during near future
Right but I mean replacing actual human characters with AI generated ones with garbage bland scripts
Yeah, the story is set like a year after when the game drops.
Easy: You vs some shepherds with rusty AKs
Mediun: you vs DPRK army
Hard: you vs US army
Veteran: You vs SkyNet, good luck with that
So there's no news publication, just a writer saying something.
🤦🏿♂️
That appears to be the case. Damn clickbaiters! Interesting concept though!
2042 had that, some bots were appearently teabagging dead players 
Well, an interesting concept if they ever consider something similar. Kinda relieved to hear it wasn't real because I was getting really concerned
I feel like that's a fabrication.
No way they actually got the bots to bag.
yea 2042 bots i can consider pretty smart but TEA BAGGING
FOR REAL?
If the game feels like 3/4 then 👍
Concerned maybe isn't the right word but nervous. Generative AI in art and voice acting is a huge problem in the gaming industry right now
Activision is the worst
Bots are learning from players appearently, they learned the wrong lessons 😂
I can't confirm it but I heard it from some players
Selling AI Slop bundles for 30 bucks
No wonder they never fucking revive me
they also shooting down helis with RPGs
they willnt until area is safe lol
Revive up to last second, stop reviving, throw a smoke and full revive again, typical cycle of bots(and 2042 players) 🤣
Dude I watch swarms run from objectives that don't even belong to us yet, it's infuriating.
The AI in 2042 is good when its good, it really sucks when it's bad though.
imagine commander in BF6 will be able to kick player who not playing objective
0/64 [1]
iykyk
Most WTF trailer. WW2 Army vs Modern Army ☠️
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4qWMcQfOCc
Commander was such a cool mechanic, it's a shame it's been dead since Hardline
super cool concept but was unbalanced cuz if only one side had it, it was rlly OP
They'd be smart to tie a portion of the skin sales to charity links. Doctors Without Borders, veterans care, disaster relief and so on
Dice always does something cool then remove it from other titles for no good reason
why do you play BF then daamn
Not me telling bots to get the cruise missiles just to nuke them with it for being such bad players.
Or Hacker, as it was called in Hardline
Commander, I don't care honestly, I prefer BFV style squad leader function but I would be okay with commander mandatory modes
you should work in EA you are so smart at draining money from players with power of compassion
That's more practical tbh
that's like telling a 2 year old to breakdance while programming
I would camp back at the base
i wish there will be no fancy ass skins
No way I'm going deep in the map
Maybe even a nerfed commander role where you can't send cruise missiles but you can recommend objs to squads and provide them with spotting and intel support from a birds eye view
you are almost useless at that point
squads dont care what you want they are acting on their own
there should be a commander matchmaking, you get into a random server when matchmade with another commander. ping doesn't matter then either
If we had a commander and squad leader calling it in, like the squad leader asks and then commander confirms the ordinance like in 4 but you can only call in what you earned like in V.
commander v commander is way more fun than a singular commander
This
can we get bunch of packs with mil sim skins instead there is so much to add
That'd be a good solution
10 minutes wait time lol
It's worth the wait 
You wouldn't want to play in a game where there's 32 players in NATO and 12 in RU
Bring back gunship
Wasn't the commander role in 4 also playable with a tablet or was that a troll?
for real
yeah it was true, i remember playing it
it was
I want my gunship back
it was my top game while shidding
arent it's easy to shot down
dropping nukes in game while dropping nukes in da toilet
so its too op then
gunship actually weapon againts undeveloped enemy
I've heard a lot of stories of people who would spend long car rides just playing commander the whole time
Commander matchmaking is a good idea imo, if one team has commander then it's going to be extremely hard for team without commander to win, squad call-ins also should be in the game though imo
will we get heroic vehicles then?
Heroic vehicles?
Squad call-ins should definitely return
Churchill Crocodille and stuff like that from BFV
I actually went for an interview but I failed a sneaky shareholder value test. At one point during the interview they said we had to change rooms and while walking to the new room the interview started gasping for breath and then collapsed. She then indicated that she needed her inhaler so of course I grabbed it for her. Wrong move though. They said it was an instant disqualification because I failed to monetize the interaction and did not seize the opportunity to drive recurring revenue.
Ah I see, I don't care about vehicles, I used it to throw V2 missiles at tanks or flags, comes in handy at the last breakthrough sectors 
BFV squad call in. Churchill crocodile sturmtiger and Caliope
In BF6 can we get Abrams X and T-14-152 or something like that
V2s and JB-2s are my shit. I love those fart missiles they're so satisfying
DAMN WHAT
they are living in CP2077 or what
It's a joke don't worry lol
gulp you just made the grave mistake of abbreviating cyberpunk
I think this is the best trailer for BF5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCZLabOywYU
you know, information about all monetization patents make this story possible
Not to mention he just got added to some three letter agency lists
its not my problem you think about it whole time
I always wondered, can you stop a V2 with hitting them with a plane?
I wanted cruise missiles call ins like V's buzzbomb call ins ever since using them, I've only gotten them maybe a couple of handfuls of times in V but the feeling is absolutely amazing.
yes you can
Pretty cool then, never happened to me though
hard to make tho, planes are like always busy
will Active protection be same 6 seconds invulnerability button?
That will make vehicle combat more dominant?
I have no idea, I'm an infantry only player
Battlefield should focus on infantry first vehicle later?
its important for you if you want to destroy vehicles tho
I like infantry vs vehicle combat too
Knowing you were successful enough as a squad to gain enough points to drop a payload of misery and death is the best feeling in the world
no, both is important
infantry first is CoD
no hate to CoD
Naval combat is a must in the next battlefield. That should be the first feedback in battlefield labs
All the 5 naval strike fans will be happy 
How does being able to call in artillery strikes = more powerful vehicles?
In bf2042 vehicles were imbalanced
naval combat? just bring back all Naval Strike shit and it will be ok
no lol
Naval combat is fun but really has been dead since BF1
Vehicle call-in system is inbalanced, since you can bring tanks to the top of skycrapers
That being said Zeburgge Harbor and the other turning tides naval map were good fun
Bf5 sort of had it
Wake island in bf1942 was peak
Not really. Boats and destroyers don't fight each other at all
The only boats are LVCPs and Dingys
It had mounted guns in boats that you could use in iwo jima
Eh yeah I guess
You couldn't really drive them though
Naval combat was quite good in bf4 though
BFV had amphibious tanks though
2042 has them too but like no map has enough water
Even in manifest if you go into the water you can't come out
Maybe Arica harbor
2042 had boats and water in the concept arts. Those never made it in the final game