#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 191 of 1
Speaking of tanks, I wonder how they'll play that route. Scary tanks or just "respect its space"
It makes perfect sense cmon
true
This guy just wants cod with bigger maps lmao
Keeps the snipers off of rooftops
Its still an arcade shooter, but with a tactical lean
You're making assumptions about what level of suppression a soldier would have to take before the effect kicks in. It can be tweaked to a level that would make it consistent with the scenarios described
i don't see how anyone can compensate against increased bullet spread other than by just shooting more
Its what I just said it was cmon lol. And thats def how the casual audience sees it
I don't agree with bullet spread. I'm speaking on aim sway
i see this place is active a lot more again. people buying into the hype?
Actually, you could use mortars to displace people from heavily defended positions.
i don't agree with changing accuracy or spread but i think sway is fine
lots of discussions about mechanics we'd like to see in the next battlefield
If we're talking about staying true the identity of the game, yes casual perception is a huge component of what that identity is
Things like that are ok. But I "still" (maybe call me classic or even old, Im ok with that) have the opinion that everyone should have the same options as a basis. For example: In the older Battlefield titles you had 3 weapons per class, but an insane amount of gadgets that you had to earn by playing and unlocking it (can be challenges, can be rank). So the higher your rank was, you were able to use these things to progress on objectives and maps. However, there you were forced to really play by skill and with your team as everyone had the same weapons and no adjustments possible (of course, we are talking about 15+ years of how old these games were). That created awesome teamplay and vehicles had a totally different meaning due to that.
allow more classes to have rpg's thanks
it is a waste of time they wont read anything here lol
good to gather our thoughts for feedback though imo
in that case i don't find it as egregious, aim sway when suppressed could work if done carefully
It's simply not. BF incorporates a complex physics system, terrain deformation, bullet drop physics, bullet spread, gravity, complex recoil and recovery systems, and more. There's nothing among that that suggest Arcade game. Go look at steam under the arcade category and tell me if you see BF there. I'll wait
Why has this community gaslit itself into thinking battlefield is basically arma at this point
Yea bullet spread would be a bad mechanic
bf4 is what i'd like personally, it feels balanced
I hope next BF has an overpowered slide that grants you 40 meter travel distance in 3 seconds 
bf is not an arcade shooter lol. it is not milsim either.
No one sees battlefield as tactical
people need to learn what the word arcade means lol
kids using words they dont understand
Yea, agreed. But aesthetic realism means for the most part if the average person does something, it should respond like they expect it to
quake 3 arena is what you're looking for with rocket jumps 😂
Ight
If I throw a flashbang, you should be seriously concussed. If I spray an LMG at you, you shouldn't just be able to pop up and headshot me
At least without a lot of skill
Should players be punished for playing aggresive and moving around the map
Well.. half half. If you have a good squad, you can change the whole situation 😉 There used to be Battlefield Clans and even Clan fights where positioning and "tactics" mattered
Suppression shouldn’t effect spread imo
Serious question
there is absolutely no shot you're trying to argue battlefield isn't an arcade shooter
battlefield is closer to cod than it is to any milsim
that depends
It shouldnt be that easy, but by good defense you get punished by getting shot ;D
Its an arcade shooter but still a sim lite imo
bf is not an arcade shooter. pleaser learn the words you are using. bf is not a milsim either.
CoD has bullet drop, it’s a milisim 
On what
its nowhere near arcade either
I mean that's just bad company 2
Yes, but still hundrets of miles away from CoD
it's absolutely an arcade shooter, having realistic features doesn't stop that
i would say it is somewhere near the middle
You're not acting in good faith. I've given you two excellent examples of what arcade games are with Google images and even Steam category. You've cravenly failed to address either of them. Additionally I've taken a extremely reasonable position which is that BF is not an arcade shooter but neither is it a mil sim. I haven't even claimed it's right in the middle of those two. It's likely close to the arcade side of things if put on a scale but it is decidely and irrefutably not an arcade game by any reasonable standard of the word
Closer, but it's attempt is to capture a realistic experience while retaining the fun of the arcade gameplay loop
Suppression adds to a realistic experience
I dislike having to unlock gadgets
Almost, bad company 2 had way more weapons and less gadgets. However the vehicle gameplay was balanced pretty well
Should players be punished for playing slow and methodically?
nice argument
My point exactly. Its perceived as a tactical shooter. Players expect it to behave as a tactical shooter
Here’s the thing that is flat out impossible by design
Can you explain why? Then you rank in-game "matters"
counter it then sport
Aim sway is good
Because it offers a close enough experience for people to be satisfied lol
It isn't and you know this
right over your head
battlefield is an arcade shooter
are battlefield and time crisis similar games?
answer
Like I said, people just want a realistic immersive experience. Or at least their idea of realism. Thats what battlefield offers. Semi-tactical arcade shooter
You can have the fastest most agile movement, but a player holding a corner will ALWAYS have the advantage over the fast player entering the room, the only way to punish slower players would be to just… smite them for standing still which isnt good gameplay design either
Alright nvm lmaoooooooooooooooo
i don't argue after ad hominems, try someone else 👍
Because it limits creativity, it's fake progression. Rank should give me skins and player cards etc. Not gadgets. I dislike having to unlock gadgets or weapons with rank. I want to be able to use all weapons from the start and all gadgets from the start. Rank can give me skins or player cards instead. I'm fine with attachment grind though. The more I use a weapon the more attachments it should have.
Another option would be to negate their cover
Oh I haven't been talking about mechanics? I didn't list a series of mechanics earlier? You have a horrible problem with the truth. But here, search for the sym data browser and then find BF4 1 or V on there and look at the files there. Does anything there look remotely arcade like? I don't think you grasp how insulting what you're saying is to the developers. If it were just an arcade game they wouldn't have the litany of issues they have and they'd be able to pump the games out in months rather than years
And have a superflat map
is battlefield a similar game to time crisis? answer the question.
Also yea you shouldn't just be sprinting around corners, getting killed for doing that makes sense lol
We're talking about battlefield. Run in there with a vehicle and they lose. If they're using a vehicle to play slow they lose to aggressive anti vehicle gadgets. Literally most things are countered by an aggressive helicopter
Y'all excited for the new Battlefield?
No just blow it up lol
It should work as a slightly enhanced version of what you can do irl
Only if robodog returns
the reason these people calling battlefield an arcade shooter wont answer the time crisis question is they know they get caught up using arcade shooter term wrong lol. gotta love kids thinking they know it all.
No cod movement, but short slides to get behind cover are fine
Sliding should never work as an offensive action: as in sliding towards an enemy shooting at you
What do we understand by cod movement
Bf isn't an arcade shooter nor is it a milsim
BF isn't arcade, C4s jeep into enemy spawn
I'm fired up, especially since BF 2042 shite the bed
Don't know why it has to fit in either of those boxes
exactly
Mainly the sliding and zippyness of it all
BF isn't arcade, rendezooks a jet
coz it dont fit arcade shooter at all
Its both arcade and tactical
play time crisis quickly to learn what an arcade shooter is kids
What about games like mw19 and mw22
Still cod movement, very snappy
Mw22 def has sliding lol
Bf needs the killzone 2 movement
Cod games have cod movement is a crazy statement? lol
Are we calling snappy movement a bad thing?
For battlefield yes
Are you serious?
I shouldn't be able to handle a lmg like its nothing
I shouldn't be able to zip around the map like its nothing
launches a tank into a helicopter
Battlefield isn't really know for snappy cod movement tbh they got crouch running though
I shouldn't be able to slide into a room and melt you with an smg, or dive into a room with a shotgun
have you played time crisis?
Tacsprint is cool tho
I do not agree. There should be mechanics to unlock certain gadgets if you play very well with your team or your squad. Of course Skins and cards are ok, but having all gadgets from the beginning is no progression for me personally. As mentioned, it makes your rank "matter" and not the appearance that actually I don't care about. Thus grinding should be about these gadgets. Of course not to heavily but to make you play the game and maybe strengthen teamplay and taking care of your team/squad.
Is arma not in the milsimcat because you can do stupid stuff in it?
I do not agree at all ngl
Well its all opinion based, I like the grind and unlocking new weapons as I go on
so the strat would be to stay in the back of the spawn behind cover
because time crisis is an arcade shooter. the correct use of the term arcade shooter applies to that game not bf
Also forces me to play with weapons I wouldn't normally use and adapt
BF3 is super snappy
You hit the button and you do what it does
They should be "limited" to not have people sliding around and to slower the overall gameplay to not have CoD feelings in the end
because you are too young to know the terms. still time to educate yourselves.
So movement should be unresponsive and stance changing should be slow and punishing
No it would be to move methodically. If you know someone's in a room flash it, enter carefully, or use the destruction mechanic
Battlefield is more like a mil themed sandbox than it is an arcade shooter
Fair
I will be rank 100 before I hit 100th hour anyways, it's just needless grind imo. I don't want to be level 5 recon in order to unlock spawn beacon or TUGS
I think movement needs to be agile rather than super fast
Older BF games played fine without needless gadget grind
even the modern use of arcade dont fit bf. bf has too much complexity to fit in that term but it doesnt have enough complexity to fit in milsim either.
Not really, switch from sprinting forward to backing up takes a second. Same with rounding a corner
Kind of, again sliding and diving should be defensive rather than offensive
…that’s how it is in games like mw2 tho
it is an arcade shooter though, that is a tag that fits it. yes it is a light gun shooter however also an arcade shooter lol.
Ok lol
mw3… well no, sliding in that game is entirely offensive
I think it shouldn't be
💩
nah both fit
You shouldn't slide at a person shooting at you lol
Hello
game isn't like cod
"I'M BEING PUNISHED!!!"
Why should it? It doesn't make sense and breaks immersion
It feels like 2042 or V honestly, but it's been a while since I played it
anyways done arguing with children. stay in school kids.
Right lol
^
i don't like sliding in shooters tbh, it feels dumb
I don't know if it was just the controllers or what. But older games definitely have a weird deadzone when it comes to switching up directions
Thats why I said: Unlocking should be bound to certain squad-points or challenges, not level.
i get you may slide or jump into prone to get cover, not to run faster and get behind corners for a kill
Yea you shouldn't be sliding 24/7 tho lol thats the thing. Maybe a movement penalty after just sliding or something, like it takes a huge chunk out of your stamina
Agreed
Idk, bf4 movement with diving and a slide (aswell as mantling over objects) would be spot on for me ngl
It's because of screen shake imo, makes people think BF3 or 4 were slower than what they were
this is not a military sim but it shouldn't be apex or cod either
Bfv movement was fine
I think that would ruin a lot of the feel and appeal of the game
They were slower in some aspects but not in sprint to fire
Chat Gpt: "The recent entries in the Battlefield series are best described as somewhere in between arcade shooters and mil-sim games, but they lean more toward arcade-style realism rather than full military simulation (mil-sim)."
Gpt lol
Chat gpt: Final Verdict:
The Battlefield series is best described as a "tactical arcade shooter" or a "casual mil-sim"—offering a mix of realism and accessible action. If you want more arcade-style gameplay, Call of Duty is a better fit, while Arma or Squad are for hardcore mil-sim fans.
Well we just have to disagree on this
Couldn't exactly juke someone's aim though. It was either they caught you or you didn't fire first
Just gotta see how the next bf turns out
MWII was more milisim than 2042
thing is
Hope they remove the 12g frags
Ahhh might be right lmao
I mostly remember that you had to unlock your gadgets until Battlefield 4 or 1? And as mentioned. It should not be things where you need heavy grind for. But a certain "behavior" in-game, teamplay and time played on the battlefield
2042 was prob the further we ever got from a realistic arcade shooter xD
I think if its ridiculous to think about an action person doing, it prob shouldn't be in the game
I mean BF2 or 2142, you had most of the stuff unlocked from the start
Bf4 had those shitty cases you had to open
all the AI currently sucks they all look at me like im a tree and walk away ask the weather and it shows me a place in south america lol
Im more concerned that it might be quite a while until Bf6 comes out and until then… the mp fps space is rough lol
Lmaoo come on
Yea lol
I think they just want to corner jump people
slower, mwII hardly fits as milsim
It has milsim influence for sure
bf3/bf4 and bf1 together would have been a great game but no lets do bf5 that pos
Historically, I'm bf, you would just get rid of the corner in question
we couldn't even peek corners fast and im ok with that, if you played certain fps by ubisoft you'd know how quickly it turns dumb when you can spam leaning left and right
This isn't really a reaction based game like cod is tho
oh no the reaction stuff is diff i see it its takes a while for my eyes to connect to my hands also every game i play stutters when i ads so theres that
They could bring back the leaning mechanic in bf4
Yes, we're coming closer 😉 A mixture is key 👍
You could
nah you're moving very fast past an enemy making your hitbox smaller because you're crouching... it's really dumb
I genuinely use that often
You could jumpshot corners in 3 and 4
Same. Super handy against snipers
nah only when standing near a corner, you can't press 2 keys to lean left/right
You ever see someone slide into a hallway in cqb video lmao
Doesn't always work against fast pace enemies...
You could get rid of 90% of corners in bf3-4
You can jump peek instead though
real
Hopefully we can have 6 man squads in new one
I peeked and still get my head fucked
¿? what issue? i'm saying its dumb and doesn't belong here is all
Killed from 100m
Lol yeah
Why do pro gamers complain about the game not being rewarding to "competitive" players when the only thing they want is for it to fit the exact kind of playstyle they're good at
how did bf3 and bf4 happen like how is that older with worse tech
do you want to wallrun too?
You should be trying to adapt with the game's mechanics
or maybe just install Titanfall/Cod and do that
I don't go over to cod and say this game should nerf movement lol
They fired the devs behind those titles
No one wants wall running bruh
Lmao good bait
What I want isn't unlocking gadgets I already unlocked in BF3 or 4 though I would rather unlock free skins and calling cards for my character if I want to unlock something
Or attachments for weapons. Gadget unlocking is just boring, some classes will be useless for hours.
ah did they rehire them for this?
Not engaging
In close combat, yes. In mid to long range, no 😉
Nope, those devs are now working on The Finals
not even in close combat will any soldier ever crouch slide shoot to be "aggresive"
Turning the corner and just meeting a tank lol
every game that has had the mechanic turned into a dumb fest of people surfing the map lol
Hey man quick question, does the videogame need to be based on real life combat scenarios?
Wallrunning shouldn't exist in BF imo, next CoD will look ridiculous with it
Next cod will look ridiculous period
ill never understand people with money they make the worst mistakes but they say the poor people dumb nah those devs used to be poor prob they was some cheap white boys then they turned out better idk why not just pay them what they worth and keep them on staff why fire them THEY MAKE U GREAT MONEY
as long as it's not detrimental to the gameplay like it always has been
I was not talking about sliding. Just relating to reaction time
ah I know but he is
Here’s the thing real life combat isnt fun, should the videogame not be fun?
My experience with and cqb in battlefield usually end up being " I can just destroy this building", "can someone shove a tank in here??", or "man operation metro sure is smokey today"
just needs to be bf4 with like a 15% increase to everything and its perfect
Metro experience: How many humans can I jam through this elevator?
did you not read my comment? if it's not fun it's detrimental to the gameplay, it's mostly an arcade shooter not a milsim like I've said
Or just use an RPG, C4, Grenade Launcher ;D
EoD bot
Fast reactions usually aren't rewarded in cqb maps in battlefield since most cqb maps are literal hallways filled with smoke and grenades. 99% of the time, someone will already be looking at the corner/hallway your trying to go down
Noshar tdm
Close Quarters dlc
both had very intense cq
you either had quick reaction or you couldn't play those game modes/maps
oooh that reminds me does anyone know what time the game is set like early 2000s 2010s? cause like the gear could be very nice or well rough alot of cw shit that hasnt got fazed out yet or the mega spending we did in the middle east could be pretty good id like to see the expo stuff yehhh hehehehe
also people didn't skateboard through the map and still played aggresive, VERY aggresive
that's more a metro thing
locker is just metro 2.0 with snow tbh
nah closer quarters map were better for that
metro in bf3 is the best
Meanwhile I! 3, 5 CQC MAPS
propaganda was ok but from time to time tanks would say hello from the railroad xD
Nah, they've been starring at the corner the whole match along with the whole team. That's the essence of op metro, op locker, and redacted
I hope they remastered those in 6
BF3 had better maps for infantry imo, like the market, azadi palace, etc
even bazar was fun
Bring back dawnbreaker
Bring back armored strike
bring back orbital 
Gunship and commander unleash havoc
even though LAV would be really strong if people ignore it
Parcel storm is a classic
ah paracel is love <3 I honestly didn't appreciate enough when i played 4
now I miss it
I like Bazaar up until that one dirt bag besides to camp at the top of the staircase overlooking the market
Sunken Dragon is goated too
Paracel is… ok ig
Yes I like that one too
That ship cutting through the map??? 🤌 Chef's kiss 🤌
It’s been fuckin years since i touched BF4 i do not remember BF4 maps that well
Blame the servers
boats and jets would roleplay a bit and infantry would dive and rush through the bushes, it was quite fun
because every server is just locker
Whats ur top 3 maps
What's the one map where it's just a bunch of multi level Chinese apartments crammed together called?
Makes me wish game had AI bots from the start
Yes it was great map. But the graphics was crap
community has awful taste xD you try to play older titles and it's just the worst maps on repeat that have players
cant wait for the little bird i hope they dont fuck my girl up this time
Oh, you're one of those guys
vehicles better have indepth mechanics so shitters with zero skill can't farm with it
gotta go fast and brrrr
little bird is either extremely broken or awful.. no mid ground
decent pilots with repair bots were the most boring and painful thing in the world
The little bird guys got my Rorsch nerfed 😦
imma get me a new flight stick for this
i had a friend who was very good with it i honestly refused to repair him i'd just jump off xD
do not use a flight stick for battlefield
dang no love for back to karkand
My favorite map lowkey is silk road
It was better for chopper sniping 😦
nah i did for bf4 worked great and that was a $15 one from magicmart
Sniping tho
That's classic right there. The remastered in bf3 was nice
how should sniping work in bf6
all they did was add a longer delay between shots afaik
it's a shame really
What's crazy is that bf4 had 33 maps before the service ended while 2042...
Maybe your filter was not set properly or even excluded it? 
True but it doesn't have to be. It can be easily tweaked. It needs to lose the homing missile dodging and below radar needs to be scrapped and then it can return to its mission of being a transport that can also provide a modicum of support firepower instead of the god tier evasion master that can also sponge damage thanks to the onboard repairs
Nerfed damage against vehicles
cause i’ll be honest i fw the 2042 sniping ngl
it was probably the best dlc with close quarters (different style tho)
well, it was a bit too good
3/4 maps were extremely fun
What's CRAZY is that 80% of them were good
the little bird isnt supposed to have guided rockets
from what you're saying you just played bf3 recently right
Remember the days in BF3 walking up a hallway or in metro and facing the flashlights of death? 😄 You could see nothing 😄
Lol yes they were and judging from your list it's obvious why you didn't think they were
didn't seem to have played back then
many ppl got just the base game free, and most servers arent running premium like before
C.I.A?
karkand was prob the most voted maps when metro/bazar werent in the list xD at least in conquest
Having night vision on just to get a flashlight to the face lol
Lol definitely a tourist
Regarding maps, everyone has different taste. Its just different opinions. So: There should be many different maps to keep the gameplay refreshing
Sick, let me put that on the fridge so everyone can see
Gotta pump them numbers up brotha
Key words "the game". Singular
After the game becomes outdated that’s how it always is
honestly wish you did, not joking, you missed out on some of the best maps :(
it's a shame really
🔥
Never got the crossbow quest done which bugs me to this day
Did you at least get the crossbow in the forest community map?
The phantom bow yes
idk why don't they just make premium go with base game it's been more than 10 years
On my current account
BF3 man what a classic
and they made ton of content that none can enjoy
My 2 others I did the phantom op program Easter egg
i had a lot of fun with dirt bikes and ctf xD
Im out for today. Have a good night 
The whole bf4 with dlc is 4bucks rn
i honestly don't know i bough a physical copy with premium, and it was just a key for Origin
On Xbox atleast
Easter eggs are also something I'd like back
idk what the hell did they do on steam because it was years after
Anybody have a playtest available when they login yet?
Nothing like hunting for the megalodon with the community
I’ll say this again for the crowd that wasn’t here. We need paid dlc back for the devs to actually put some real work into maps and Easter eggs. With a battle pass and live service system they have no reason to actually try to make good and fun maps with great ees
okay just checked and steam only has premium version of the game
and it's just 4 € lol
but bf3 was given for free in Origin before it existed on steam, so maybe thats why there's many ppl just playing non dlc content
One last word on that from my side: I would now do so as I now have a regular income compared to being in school and university when BF3 and 4 were released 😅
Hopefully there's a section in the paperwork after this "pre-alpha" test
ah no... universty only... Bad company 1 & 2 was school 😄
was trying to find a short video to show talah market you'd prob love that one @rich ember
but every video is like 10-12 min montages xD
so many routes to flank, houses, etc
But then again, we're way past that development phase to change the monetization model
remake bf3 i'm in 
the fact that we're hoping for a scoreboard truly says everything
Think of the rush we’ll get when it has one though
wdym i hope we get a scoreboard hahah
What did 2042 have on launch?
Not much
it had shitty performance
the worst map design in history of Battlefield
among other things
that's honestly my biggest concern i know they can do fun gameplay but maps are so important and they've become so bad at it
Hold on, Hourglass is easily the best map to ever launch in battlefield history
Hey now stranded released during season 2 not launch
Guys come on, Battlefield 2042 clearly has the best graphics in any Battlefield game
Which version of it?
Any because they all are great
bf3 has the best graphics

Ok first off
If you look at the amount of pixels per texture
it is clearly a graphic marvel

high resolution doesnt mean it looks better
Ok be real I annoyed myself just saying Reddit talking points all over
That was horrid im not doing that again
Hey guys every map we made kinda sucks
Add containers!
Battlefield 1 is my favorite, then comes 4
1 was ok but then I played 4 and that was the perfect game
4, hardline and bfbc2 were the best... bf3 I did not play enough to judge but I think it would also be in this list.
biggest issue is them having bit off more than they could chew
they were struggling to make good 64 player maps
idk what they were fucking thinking with 128 players
bf3 had the best campaign though
4 my only issue was all of those damn campaign bugs
true @wooden grove
newer bf players think multiplayer is everything so
bf3/bf4 was decent enough for campaign to be valid
bf1 storytelling was interesting that they wanted to encompass a lot of different sectors but it felt too short for me to really create a connection with the characters
bfv was...aside from the french black soliders and the last tiger they were pretty ass
I did not like bf4 campaign it was boring
I never saw the point of campaing for BF honestly.. Just jumped right into playing the game smoking noobs
BF3 had the best campaign. BF1 had the best graphics, mechanics, and most unique. BF4 is the GOAT. Also, i loved BF2142 back in the day. I just love mechs lol
I'm convinced bf3 was just a way for Dice to flex the frostbite engine so hard
that nordlys campaign was fucking dogshit
BF4 campaign is low-key boring in my opinion
bf1 was good as a first game but honestly looking back it sucked
bf1 was when the game started going bad
facts
They could have just remade BF4 and id buy it
played a ton and I was having a blast
Atmosphere was great
no it is so unrealistic verdun did it better
Bf4 had a much larger audiance than bf1.. for a reason.. not saying it was 100% trash.. just not as great as priors
bf1 is a cinematic game
Is it easy to find a match? I'm debating between buying BF1 or BFV
in a perfect universe, we could've gotten a Battlefield friends set in BF1
but the gameplay itself is shallow, and pretty bad
bf1 hit the right spot at the right time when everyone was siiick of modern/future fps shooters it was a welcome addition
On steam I believe bf1 is the game with the highest player count
if you're a fan of WW1 games, BF1 is the way to go
if you're a fan of ww-1 setting games*
if you wanted authentic ww1 game experience verdun and isonzo exists
BF1 is hardly an accurate description of WWI lol. But I love be game with a burning passion
the campaign is a mix bag but holy shit the intro is just amazing
they stretched the boundaries of arsenals to make gameplay more diverse. even then they stuck to the whole ww1 ear setting so i enjoyed it
I really like the visuals from BFV but i've heard BF1 is unique and inmersive, are they both well optimized?
In my experience they are both well optimized yeah
it's authentic enough to not notice the historical innacuracies
I wish BTW didn’t die immediately on release
The game mode they used to run with only bolt-actions was great.
back to basics? yeah except one thing
the snipers had the dogshit mechanism called sweetspot
A large sum of the arsenal being prototypes isn’t hardly something to look over
I think they both have great visuals but bf1 has a much more bleak color palette which contributes to the feeling of the game
and certain countries were given really decent ones with good sweetspot
gotta love the leveloutions tho
BF1 >
Yessir
a range of distance a sniper can kill from 1 hit to the chest
Was the problem that they OHK at all? Or just that the range wasn't tuned well?
Well the reason is that a modern setting appeals to people more than ww1 lol. The game in itself was great
I love the dedication they put on the hellriegle despite the lack of records of the gun being fired ever
only gun that i kinda forgave for sweet spot was martini since it was a single shot, but even then the range of the sweet spot should be heavily diluted
BF1 should not be taken as an accurate depiction of the war in the slightest. Should be taken as a jumping off point for further research into the war, and being a game for dumb fun. Nothing more
So the problem was not that they one-shot, just that the range at which did was arbitrary?
I like a OHK sniper, I'm just wondering if I'm in a small minority.
i don't care about how much the war is accurately depicted but the game itself is very shallow in terms of skill gap and tools. the biggest problem is things like gas and mortars were just annoying
I do like bf1 resurrecting weapons lost to history
Snipers should have one shot range in 10 meters imo
Maybe look at the context of what I was replying to and you would see I was being ironic.
Or 5 meters
airsoft i guess lol
If I point blank someone with a sniper he should be dead
kinda sad that we will never know how the hellriegle really work
Not every game needs to be in depth mechanically, sometimes a game can just be simple fun
it is. thats how it worked in bf3 and 4
that shit was hours ago but I was joking
a game can be fun with enough elements for things to master etc
the game ended up listening too much to the casual community and removed every form of skill expression, and thats when a lot of the players left
bf1 is dumb fun though. auto pilot and just hipfire and chill
Well that’s why BF4 exists I suppose
BF4 was super fun on ps3.
only movement in game was the slide and they basically made is useless
albeit, release state slide was horrid
old timey game old timey folks,
bro you play Roblox willingly shut your mouth youngin
my friend wanted to play Doors.
We have been with the BF ride since 2002 with BF 1942.. ALL the iterations built on each other in a good way... since BF4 tried to impersonate other games and stopped being BF IMO.... COD does a great job at gound to ground combat.. BF will never be that.. fortnite does battle royale but NO one does what BF used to do.. 😕 that's my 2 cents as an old timer
Oop gonna get warned again
BF4 Didn't "Impersonate" Other Games, tf are you talking about.
maybe insporation?, Not copying fully. (Mb for the garbage spelling)
I suppose you can say that they impersonated cod with the increase in freedom with weapon attachments but by that logic every modern fps impersonated fortnite with some sort of battle pass
atleast Battlefield didn't add a battle pass.
thank god
2042 and 5 both had one
.
and I just had to remove it because someone just dmed me with death threats.
I hope next game won't have a stupid gunsmithing system
No lmao it wasn't you
seriously.
also does anyone know the chances of getting into the BFL playtest?
BF4 has perfect amounts of attachment slots imo, we don't need to change barrel and grip and stock of each gun
dang.
guy who doesn't know how firearms works spotted ]
Bolt is usually tied to grips, stock can have recoil springs which would destroy the weapon if changed
do huh??????????????
youre kidding? right?
yeah thats a bit off haha
what firearm is the bolt tied specifically to the grip
AK has that afaik
Not the bolt but firing mechanism of M4
oh he means the lower, I think
i think he means the fire control group
like with the internal hammer and stuff
yes
WHAT TIME IS EVERYTHING KICKING OFF TOMORROW
yeah youre confusing us buddy you want to elaborate wht you meant more?
sorry for cap
I can't send a pic, I'm not a gun expert but most weapons has parts tied to other specific parts like AK's recoil springs and stock
fist of all the trigger group is what it is called
The grip is still swappable so what youre saying is confusing
brain go whooooo couldnt think of it
the ak recoil spring is in no way associated with the stock
i rlly want an AK12 but theyre super expensive
they them you are in need of an understanding in real life. it dont matter what gear is on the weapon. It matters on the shooters skill
oh really 20 pus year sin the military and anexpert marksman and a certified armorer
I confuse it with some other weapon then
you can still put aftermarket parts on an ak
There are weapons with recoil springs attached to stock 🤷
as you say they all work togethor. people need facts to put them into check
look at the sag chassis
dawg the conversation was always about firearms parts
this is also the battlefield discord server, real weird place to beef
I can take 45 cal and hit a target at 100 yds not by the hardware but by the skill
9mm better tho
typicaly no slide they are located in side the action behind the carrier group or bolt
its not the hardware that makes the weapon better only the shooter
from what i was reading it didnt
sim out here just swinging in the dark haha
i am out there lurking in the dark for the first shot.
the reason for all of this was discussing swappable parts on weapons in game
then we made 3 left turns somewhere
yeah someone started real life so i chimed in
i thought it was cool in 2042 but i dont think id like to see it in the new one
So back to my previous question what time does it kick off tomorrow
I think the way Delta Force did it is perfect but thats askin too much for a BF game
I liked BF1's weapon variant system. Means you spend less time in a menu worrying about +0.05% diagonal recoil control and more time actually shooting them.
Delta Force is awful
my email said friday that they will start testing
i havent gotten any emails about testing
didnt say the game was #1 buddy just said I like the realistic weapon options
oh well i am sorry. I swore something saying the 7th of feb but no time
Some people refuses to make sniper gunsmithing guides for it because he knows it would make the game unplayable 
huh?
What are you on about?
slide
ok
Most famous DF youtuber refuses to teach people how to build no scope, max velocity , max fire rate snipers because you can create abominations like that in gunsmithing
Are we still talking about battlefield
one reason he wont is probably 2 reason
how do i know if ive properly signed up for the labs testing
Delta Force
1 he dont like people and laszy
ok?
2 hes hacking
If the games in pre alpha I'm really not that concerned about a sniper defect, if that's your point here
People still ask him his weapon codes lol despite him explaining how he builds his weapons, gunsmithing is just copy pasting loadouts from youtubers for 90% of the people. 0 originality.
again were talking about weapon customization here haha I dont know how so many wires got crossed in the last 10 min but breathe fellas were just chattin
@ivory hull hello, I just wanted to know if it was possible on Battlefield 2025 to play keyboard mouse on console, because no EA game allows it, it would not only be cool for people who prefer a gaming device, but also a way to possibly get more players in my case. thank you for your response have a nice day. kisses from France, your most loyal fan base
yea but ive not gotten an email
and? what does that have to do with the fact that being able to built your weapon out to your liking and playstyle is bad?
That's why I don't like it, give me a laser, a grip, a red dot and maybe a compensator. 4 slots that can fix all the issues.
or what makes that bad is what I mean
ohhhhhhhhh i see i see
i sure hope i get selected
then that must mean simblade got selected, congrats dude
well i can say i have done builds people have recommended in delta force and they still are laser beaming like no other. mine has the same build they are using and recoil is still huge
Well Slide alot of us are gun owners in the real world and I love matching my real stuff in game, just cause its fun
have you seen the pr57
ty dye
I havnt no
I been testing for 25 years
It just makes base weapons feel worse, BO6 launched with horrible idle sway, horrible visual recoil, horrible ADS/STF speeds for example. They tuned it down a lot after the release but idea was releasing shit base guns only for them to be good with gunsmithing.
keltec just released a top loading 5.7 pistol
No one is doing the cosmetic aspect, at best there will be let's say M16 skins that turns it into a Commando
Ya lost be at anything CoD related, but I get what youre saying kinda. Im good if it was all cosmetic. BUT loadouts make people play more and they are a business
i just want the game to feel like battlefield, 2042 just was super floaty and the gunplay wasnt that great to me
what i find un pc gaming people using controller and having aim ssist on. That gives them an unfair advantage on the field. I know of one player who uses the controller and the mouse at same time
he is dead on accurate
mnk is objectively better imo, aim assist is super strong in other games but pretty weak in others
It works like that in Delta Force too, base guns are just weak without tons of attachments to mitigate their negatives
@ivory hull hello, I just wanted to know if it was possible on Battlefield 2025 to play keyboard mouse on console, because no EA game allows it, it would not only be cool for people who prefer a gaming device, but also a way to possibly get more players in my case. thank you for your response have a nice day. kisses from France, your most loyal fan base
there is a device but it is going to be banned for use in most games for console to allow mouse and keyboard
I disagree while they may not be as accurate the damage stays mostly the same it mostly changes the fall off rates at range
the kronos adapter i might be spelling it wrong
You can turn low TTK weapons into laserbeams with gunsmithing
that thing looks kinda junky man haha
its keltec so im not surprised
Call of duty are ok on that, and every other game nexy generation
keltec crap weapons
atually the cod has announced that it will enforce bans n the kronos at one time
I jsut watched a YT short where the thing self disassembles in his hand while showing the load feature haha
kronos has aimbot and wire hacks able to be programmed into it. It is like the mda hack. it external devices that make it hard to catch
i wish HK were a fan of the poors so i didnt have to get a loan for a rifle
haha thats no lie sir
either they cant ship to the states or its ridiculously expensive
i am sig sauer fan in real life. but thy never add them into the game
shate tarkov
I was able to pick up a german sig before the factory closed and it was super pricey
i wouldnt carry a p320 though, dont need it exploding in my holster at the range
i have in my arsenal 2 sig p320 xzp and m17
but investments I guess haha
well i mean things like MP7s and g36
On my rught ar10 dmr i have the 1x10 tango sig sauer site
HK is all over. you can buy them at bass pro scheels and cabelas
Xbox bf4 has a air superiority lobby that's not locked behind a password
Currently in it wanting to unlock ucav
it might but less likely for mac
Is the new game just called Battlefield?
Battlefield Labs but maybe it'll be called Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 is 2042.
The next one will either just be a name like hardline or a date, bet.
fieldstruggles
haven't paid attention in a few days since signing up for Labs, any other news come out yet?
battlefield 3 remastered????
not remastered, this would look like more remake
oh okay
I feel like it would be weird if they did a bf3 remake
capcom does
Capcom is being kept afloat by their great remakes
It honestly is impressive how good their remakes are.
I feel like it would be better if they did bf2 or something
Especially when all their other recent games have been meh at best
Bf3 still looks fine
Yeah, 'cept for that art direction lol
yeap re4 remake was awesome but i knew what to expect every corner of the game
Re4 remake is so good
you mean bad company?
2142 is in a weird spot. It's one of the most highly regarded battlefield games but due to it's release proximity to BF2 it sold like shit. It's the lowest selling game of the franchise.
i played it when i was a kid but it was a crack mod or something
i was playing with bots
but you right that was realy good game
But i remember being so good
I would love for a 2142 remake or sequel. It gives DICE the room to really stretch out and create something unique given it's future tech.
It would be so cool
They aren't beholden to the fanboys of M16A4s and shit wanting so much realism in weaponry
it is good even right now cuz of the nostalgia of course but there are people who create servers and plays
india and russia i think
Yeah theres this thing called bf2hub
You can still play it but you need a disc i think
i played 2142 with ps2 that was not good at ps 2 i can tell
Nah
Titan Mode definitely needs a comeback. The community has been clammoring for it for a decade and they still have yet to do it.
That needs to make a come back with any game
id love 1943 to come back
I've only ever watched people play it but it looked really good
I always take self hosted servers over official
2142 wasn't on PS2 bruh
bf2 players have their own community i think
yeahh i remembered right now the game i played called modern combat or something . but it was bf
I don't think any Battlefield was on PS2
let me check
Maybe BF2: Modern Combat?
I hated that game
IIRC it was Battlefield mostly in name lol
yeaah it was modern combat
I had that game on the 360
but they look same actualy
what do you guys think about this year? can we expect really nice games this year? or next year?
dark ages you mean
Probably
if gta6 flops I flop
Yeah
i 100% believe in rockstar though
What do yall think the best rockstar game is
we all do believe rockstar they never fail but we, pc player will have to wait one year longer
My wishlist for the next BF is basically this:
Battlefield 3/Battlefield 4 era modern combat and a combination of the destruction mechanics.
Battlefield 2 diversity in play style and map design
Battlefield 1 and Battlefield V player movement and ambience
Battlefield 2042 literally only the wingsuit and the gun rose thing that lets you change attachments and ammo type
Battlefield 2142 Titan Mode
Gta san andreas is my goat
Also a return of commander mode.
no question about it
its rdr2 but gta6 will be beter
nostalgia bro
Bf2 maps
it is all nostalgia
Modern Combat was
Return to Karkand is the best expansion for a battlefield game for a reason after all
Facts
bf42 was not so bad i think but yeah you right bf4 or bf3 are much better right now
if there are remastered versions of these game i would play those rather than bf42
I take it back, I would also like the environmental effects from 2042
2042 overhated
The weather effects as well as the effect your feet and vehicles have on the ground is an awesome thing
but why
I want the grit of V with the landscape and destruction of 4
Well 2042 is a solid game right now after release ofc
Throw in the story/mayhem of BC2
If I was faced with choosing destruction levels, I'd go BF3 over BF4. They really toned it down in BF4 in favor of "Levelution"
2042 is a beautiful game though, Hourglass is probably the best looking battlefield map ever
The only objectively bad battlefield is 2042
Now you gonna trigger everyone 🤣😂
V was good
I love BFV. I don't think it's deserved nearly the flack it got
Hey Battlefield 3/4/1 is still the best
the thing i dont like this game is just one thing and that is scope mechanichs
it doesnt look realistic
every bf games are realistic than cod games
2042 was trash at first but it's enjoyable now
People are shitting on EA when the only objectively bad battlefield game was 2042
Like that was the only one
People be saying don't pre order and no trust yet that was their only objectively bad game
🤦♂️
Nothing has held a candle to BF3 though. Great launch, great life cycle.
BF4 was a mess for nearly the first year. Also you're forgetting Hardline lol
Battlefield 4 launch:
Hardline was good
Overhated
Like I said
The only objectively bad game was 2042
Fun story, bad multi
Hardline was goodish, I think it would've done better if it wasn't marketed as a Battlefield game
Every recent fifa, bfh also wasn’t too great
Lol the story was like a like a show😂
They also needed better gunplay in BFH
Random: BF4 intro is GOAT
The guns in BFH felt like shooting pellet guns
i have bf series just bf 1 and 42 ill buy v too
but i wish i could buy 4 too but i dont want to buy this game because i cant rely on this you know. bf3 servers are shot down as far as i know. bf 4 will shut down too
Too much spread
Is BF3 shut down? I swear the servers are still up
ending was bad
i need to check. i was watching a youtuber and heard this info
if you sacrificed irish ur a bum
lol
Xbox 360 only
i didnt play to the end i dont have the game
but i played with ps3 at internet cafe
but i couldnt finish the game
I'm really hoping they don't add anymore unnecessary drivel in the next game. These games don't need a BR mode. They've tried it twice and failed both times so hopefully they learn that lesson and focus more on the core game.
anybody wanna play bf3 coop with me on pc
I'd argue that none of them except the BC series need single player either
I don’t remember what it was
Hello everyone, unfortunately a date has just been unveiled to close the Battlefield 3 online service, on November 7, 2024 we will no longer be able to connect and play online.
Just said the intro is GOAT
Disappointing, but it is a 14 year old game at this point.
same age with arma 3 yea?
Shoot V trailer was better than the game itself
arma 3 servers are still up
Nah Arma 3 is a couple years newer. And their servers aren't reliant on EA Backbone iirc
Any emails yet?
where i can sign up for the labs
mass effect 3 servers are still up
i tried to sign up but queue it wasnt working i think
theres a link in the direct-communications tab
so i cant play coop on bf3 with anyone?
the queue was gone for me
Isn't ME3 peer-to-peer?
4, 1, and V had great trailers
How come this server is huge but theres scarcely any people in the lfg channels
1 by far had the best trailers
Im tryna find some homies to play with
bro
Prolly folks playing in their own community servers
Statistics
The true Battlefield way to find homies is befriend one person on a server, play the night, then you never see them again for 10 weeks and they barely remember you
ahh I see. let me know if there's any links you got for me lol. Trying to find a group
That would be nice but people use mics very infrequently
are you trolling?
Personally I dont understand the drama either
Statistics and general respect probably. It may not be something any of us subscribe to, but I feel like someone that goes by they/them/she/attack helicopter won't appreciate being addressed as he/him
bf1 all dlc trophies, have rented map and doing tomorrow dm me and ill add to a gc, ps4/5
Yeah, I don't understand why people take simple consideration as an attack on their very foundations.
I was not aware I was genuinely blocked for making a joke about Battlefield 2042 defenders
Millions of women fought with prosthetic arms they were the majority in WWII
ANYBODY FOR BF3 COOP?
lol
if anything, the trailer should have hand more of them
why would you have a wwii game and only have males...that not realistic is it?
I don't understand the backlash tbh, I thought it was just a fun little thing in the trailer.
Like it or not, women play games so it's nice to give them a character reflective of themselves.
Accurate to history or not
Yeah the exploitation of people's wallets is getting pretty fucking outta hand with AAA devs
no one said women don't play games...but its a game based on WORLD WAR II...
what are we even talking about lol
Who cares when it's set? It's not a sim, it's an arcade shooter.
I'd take issue if it was Arma 3 or Hell Let Loose
settings from that time
just make up everything. go crazy right?
you can't be serious
Right
No battlefield game is realistic lol
It didn't depict the gritty dark setting of WWII like CoD WaW with the Frostbite engine. I think this is what the core (older) Battlefield fans wanted, but instead we got a depiction of a very small part of history. Yes, of course it is just a video game, albeit an arcade shooter too, but its previous releases like Battlefield 3-Battlefield 1 were a much darker tone, depicted a more realistic or at least expected setting, and were all around better marketed games in general.
you don't get the difference between realism and just changing history?
BF3 was blue and BF4 wasn't gritty either. BFV had color, yeah but so did the countries and time. There were forests and shit back then.
BFV is arguably fairly gritty
Terhan highway was dark
A night time map does not gritty make
ikr, I think its kind of a disservice to not show the hell soldiers went thru in WWII and instead make some ridiculous rare scenario that doesn't resonate with WWII combat
I didnt know you meant dark as in gritty i wasnt paying attention
exactly. I don't get the cope to say other wise
One thing I think we can all agree on: The next BF needs a limit on sniper rifles.
Nah
6 snipers per team max
some of these takes in here tonight have been all time bad lol
Honestly just want a better bf4..
Recon class as a whole is fine to not cap, just cap the amount of active sniper slots in a server.
I hope Ill get to chance play it signed up right now
How many times you chucklefucks been in a tight game only to lose because 16 people are sniping from the uncap
Lets make it so the only weapons you can use are the AEK and M416
with labs?
Found the uncap sniper
I bet you operate MAA from the uncap too
Is battlefield 1 dead on PlayStation?
I think anything without crossplay rn is dead unfortunately
I bet you use Active Radar Missiles too
Or just full servers all around
Nope
BF4 was much less grittier than BF3, but the initial trailer showing the first 17minutes of gameplay off the single player did show some grittiness, at least darker than the BFV first trailer imo
sniper recon is good but you always spotted by other recons cuz of the scope light
but there is a real device for this where you can put on your scope and your location becomes harder to see
Trailers don't count, gameplay does sir
The next Battlefield just needs to slow the game down a bit and im chillin
Same
I don't understand how identity got conflated with politics
They're just acknowledging people's existence
u right. bf always makes good trailers we need to wait for gameplay footages
I liked the bf4 plotline about the whole revolution in china and stuff
it def could have been done better though
it was with bf2 till to the bf4
Nah
bad company series for real for me
if 2042 actually leaned into its story it would've been alot better
Nah dawg, BF2 had no realism whatsoever lol
damn
People get authenticity confused with realism
Story?
realism would be like arma or something
resource wars, fallen countries, crazy climate shit
That's what I've been saying. They either are slow or are doing it on purpose to push their stance
Oh oh true. Yeah I don’t know why they never expanded on it all.
no way they don't get it
Because it's the year of our lord 2025 and other people than white dudes exist?
Facts
Global warming disputes 🙂
The battlefield footage looks good so far. Can't wait to try the game out. I like battlefield a lot
I swear, 25 years ago this shit wouldn't have mattered. American's have been exposed to too much extremism if they're this up in arms over women and gay folks in media
why talk about people exisitng?
2042's story would've actually been depressing af
what does that have to do with the quality of
Could’ve made a statement tho or a “imagine if” moment
2042 would've done better if it had Titan mode and Walkers, change my mind.
what do you think happen next. they already destroyed our ubisfoft. we lost prience of persia games, and good ac games. the last and best ac game was unity
I think the newer Battlefield fan-base (those who entered the franchise with BFV & BF2042) can't fathom what they missed out on when BF peaked with BFBC2-Battlefield 1. BFV & BF2042 are really bad representations of what made the franchise so good.
what does any of this have to do with battlefield?
Absolutely insane
you make a great point there
Ives Guillemot ruined ubisoft. I'll never forgive that frog piece of shit for ruining Siege.
Ngl i think the bad company 1 and 2 are overrated
I've played all the battlefield games. I plan on playing this battlefield and so on
Battlefield is forever a staple in my game library
a lot of games peaked around that time and pre 2010s too
People overrate the campaigns in those games so hard
How can anyone see what happened to the franchise with V and 2042 and defend those games lol
Don't forget what happened with BF2042's launch and all the missing core mechanics it had. But we can still be hopeful. I am especially hopeful I can play test the pre-alpha versions of what the dev teams have been working on to really give them constructive feedback.
I've played since BF1942 came out in 2002 when I was 10. If anyone in this conversation knows what makes Battlefield i'm definitely one of them.
siege was better when released cuz of the.. idont know cool and dark feelings. now it doesnt feel real
not so much fps but I felt like since we are talking about story for war themed games, I felt like World In Conflict did it really well
"legacy features" lol
me too
All battlefield campaigns are trash ngl
That's what we are here for to improve the game with our opinions. I'm sure they won't make that mistake again. 🤞
I'll be honest, I don't judge BF games on their campaign since 99% of my playtime is in multiplayer
Maybe not bf1
They took it from Tactical shooter to Arcade Hero Shooter and removed some aspects of destruction that were core to the gameplay.
But its still mid
cod makes games every year. but bf does not make every game every year. but surely makes much better than cod
the shanghai level was my favorite tbh
Talking about Siege, not BF here lol
I still like siege ngl
People like that lack the ability to acknowledge all of the small details that shape a video game.
u guys know the game called area f2?
Its in my top 10 for sure
that game takes years off my life i cant play it anymore
even then im pretty sure people dont consider siege very tactical
I like being tortured
i got spawn peeked in ranked like 5 years ago and dropped it
Cod would be a better game of itself if they would allow more time in development. Hackers have gone wild too.
I had around 2000 hours from beta Siege though 2019 when they ruined it.
siege is js esports shooting larping as a tactical game
They didnt RUIN it
they can kick you out literally in the game. there is a hack for it
They ruined it.
It's being addressed! Or they say.. time will only tell
I don't play seige like because I prefer the older Rainbow Six games, but even I admit its a solid game
just not what I wanted
There's no real incentive for devs to eliminate ALL the hackers because the measures necessary to truly permanently ban players would also cut them off from those sweet, sweet repeat purchases.
Facts
It was objectively better during year 1,2 and 3 though ofc
You're right
They can do hardware bans like tons of other games do, but then they'd lose out on cash-cow hackers buying the game 15 times
Gotta pad those numbers
Good, we need folks like you! The franchise lost its identity with BF2042. Battlefield worked so well before that with classes with restrictions for balancing
That's the sad part about it. Greed! They have to fill their pockets.
i think it would great if they make system where hacker players plays with hacker players and nonhacker players with nonhacker players. Im saying this cuz hacking will be available for anyone forever
2042 isn't ideal but it is entertaining in it's current state. They had some good ideas, like Portal, but definitely a lot of flops.
Facts
I only played it for about a week then went back to 4
100%
Real
Got to go. Creating content for my viewers. Later everyone. Hope everyone here gets a chance at playing the alpha in Battlefield
Like I said earlier, BFH would've performed much better if it was marketed outsie of the BF franchise.
and good story line i did play this with ps3 at the time
BF Hardline's problem is when and how it was released
Nah the story is trash
because it was a solid game
Agreed, though they frustratingly removed the superior vaulting of BFV and peek/lean.
Tbf you literally said the same thing about bf1 like 10 minutes ago
Bf1 clears hardline even though i like hardline
Exactly
Naaahhhh being able to crouch run and go supine was great
Its not mid
I never even thought of that being Activision's potential reasoning for not handling the hacker situation, but now that you mention it...sounds like classic Activision to me lol
hacker jail time
how can i play
One of the things BF1 did incredibly well, besides the ambience of the environment, was the raw power the gunplay felt it had.
lol
You shoot a rifle and it feels so much more powerful than modern era shooters.
I strongly disagree
Actually nah i dont
I think thats just what makes the game fun
Artillery trucks are trash though
I will hunt and have fun. That's what games are.
The cavalry is ridiculous