#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 148 of 1
you should not have said anything negative about me
i will just next time dont say anything like that
you were not
Yes i was
you were not
lololol
Yeah i was
thats how he got banned last time 
1 v1 knives only. It's the only logical solution.
Not gonna happen, ping difference would make it unplayable
you also dont have to say about that to me i am being respectful towards you also never said a word to you
So he's got...THE HACKS
Knives only hainan resort
I'm not saying that
Like the good old days
Playing BFV made me appretiate no attachments honestly more than anything, every gun has an innate strength and weakness, every gun has a unique reload(more than 1 for some weapons such as Garand). Was really fun to experiment and max all the weapons.
I really think there should be like, a basic AKM in the next battlefield. You can't put any attachments on it besides a suppressor, it has higher recoil that you can't change, but it's also like, SCAR-H levels of strong if you can aim with it.
I think they should add some WW2 weapons because why not
nah
I want StG or PPSh
It depends
Like
I like MW19 and it had some WW2 guns but at the same time I feel like they should use the modern theme for actual, modern guns
BC2 had WW2 weapons
bc2 had the thomspon and garand I think...
Also Type 100
BC2 also had the XM8.
Man....I loved that game so much.
We don’t get that much content in these games nowadays. I’d be underwhelmed waiting 2 months for some WW2 guns instead of what’s coming out nowadays
the sound design and destruction were sooooo good
There’s only a couple ww2 guns I’d make an exception for: the kar98 and the garand
I would rather want PPSh with 71 round mag
Personally I love the enfield....
The enfield is pretty nice too
I’m a fan of ww1-2 bolt actions/semi auto rifles so I wouldn’t mind them being in game I guess
Make it a 71 round mag high rpm weapon with lots of recoil
And no attachments besides maybe nydar
I pretty much only played with bolt actions in bf1.
Same
I only ever play recon when I play it cause the bolt actions
The way I see it specializations were how they could give players attachment esque perks and bonuses without actual attachments cause of the theme
Yeah
It was fine in BFV
I would rather want attachments in a modern game
mosin, ppsh kar98,mg42, stg and thomson, garand
the more time passes the more I appreciate bfv gameplay. Still absolutely insane how they pretty much abandoned it and added zero eastern front aspects of the war
BF1 has more soviet weaponry than BFV 
The lack of eastern front content is what keeps me away from it personally speaking
I don’t like how they portrayed the war for 1, it left a bunch of potential unturned 2, and 3 just has weird gameplay design choices
Making a ww2 game with no German vs Russian faction is mind boggling
Yeah
I liked how you couldn't just run around with a lmg though
I dislike that
MMGs are useless
And LMGs had like 20 rounds
Basically assault-lite
One example of weird gameplay design was how they did mmgs
The most famous machine gun of the war, the mg42, makes you prone or mount to use it, meanwhile some guy can slide around up hill with a zk and delete you
Biggest enemy of MMG users are snipers imo
Whenever you see that glint you just need to pack it up
One positive aspect of 2042 is how balanced it is at least for infantry gameplay
does anyone knows how to really fix error get device removed reason?
lol idk I kinda liked how you had to go prone or mount the machine guns. but im probably in the minority
I didn’t because it made LMGs useless
Support is my least played class because of that
Only LMG with acceptable mag size was Lewis and it was terrible unless you want to supress people
i liked the fg42
It’s not that they’re the problem so much as it is the rest of the game isn’t really following the same tactical principle if that makes sense
Anyone has had or has a problem where the game just doesn't launch and windows itself stops working? Ngl, I am far from having a top of the line PC, but this thing used to run battlefield V butter smooth, but now it straight up doesn't open, I am currently monitoring it on resource manager, it has 300 mb of used RAM, 0% CPU activity and everything else on the computer is crashing, even if the CPU and the RAM and GPU aren't even being used not even close to the max
Which is strange because bfv removed 3d spotting and added attrition for the same tactical/teamplay reasons. But then smgs come along.. 
And now not even task manager is responding, nor the windows ui
Some people said they made BFV issues work with downgrading their drivers
Interesting, like GPU drivers?
Yes
Give it a few kicks as well
I see, imma restart the Pc and see if I can downgrade them
LMG
it's kind of one of the earliest squad support weapons
a similar situation would be like the US Stinger made from downed M1919 light versions
it performs like a lmg
Most other LMGs aren’t as CQC focused
it isn't either, that's just how you're using it
BAR and FG42 are like assault weapons for support class because of that imo
High RPM and high recoil bruh, no one will use them to hit players beyond 30 meters
they definitely would
Bren or Madsen are like true LMGs
that's why the BAR has a slow fire mode
Long range weapons with little recoil
You can with M1907 too but it’s definitely a close range weapon, it has that SMG energy
use the bipod?
Bipod doesn’t help that much honestly
does if you use it
FG42 with single fire is really decent though
just do short bursts
I tried that with 3x scope and it felt good
Many SMGs has bipods too though
Doesn’t mean they are long range weapons
name one smg with a bipod
do they have em ingame?
Yes
I'd bet the spearholders that use those guns have never equipped a bipod
ZK had a bipod in reality too I think
FG42 is pretty much a battle rifle
made from the MG42 to fit paratrooper service to ugprade the kar98
plus its a cool looking gun...
or reinstalling windows. I know dumb xD
anyone here know of any Milsim Groups?
you know who also knows about milsim groups
Been trying like hell to get enough people together to play Hardline on PC but no luck. The game is absolutely dead. Sucks because it was a pretty decent game!
isn't there like a single european s erver running ?

Ppl used to play it i remember i was playing it like half a year ago.
anyone need one for BF1 hmu
Battlefield 1805 when (napoleonic wars)
Bf1 and V is where its at
If only game has bot option
what the best guns for battlefield 2042
holdfast
Whats that
there ARE games about 1800s wars like civil war, napoleonic, etc
you won't find a big dev doing them really cause you can't run around with a SMG spraying blindly
I still play BF3, BF4, and BF1 often. Hardline is the only one that just gets no love anymore.
Yea, there is always one or two servers available but there is never anyone in them.
Hardline isn't a bad game. Infact, I consider it to be one of the best in the series. It's was doomed to fail though.
Adding a cops vs. crims game into a military-based franchise was just doomed to fail
Yea, that's a fair point. I really enjoyed the game but it definitely wasn't traditional Battlefield, as far as setting and theme.
Still has souls than 2042
And that's embarrassing
did anyone ever have issue with sending in-game chat message in bf
, I hit enter after typing a message and poof nothing.
it might be that your chat is hidden
press h while in game to cycle through show/popup/hide
I can see the chat, but can't send messages.
lol even when you press j, k or l?
in BFV if i swap out an assignment that has partial progress will that progress save if i reactivate it later
Yes
Have to say, one of the most annoying things about BFV is you can’t set a new assignments in between rounds.
Reported
I'm going insane trying to complete this assignment
on bf1
getting headshots with the farquar hill feels impossible dude
anyone wanna play bf1 (new to the game)
im up for playing if anyone wants to
ATTENZIONE, AVVISTATO UN ESPLORATORE NEMICO 🗣️🗣️
im up are you?
ok
I gotta say, Heroes was totally binge-worthy, but it had its share of major flaws all the way through.
It was totally one-sided, just raking in cash without helping the community at all.
For real, Heroes could've been like Fortnite way back if the devs had actually given a hoot and tuned into what the players were saying.
Heroes at core had some solid potential, but it totally went off the rails with that pay-to-win nonsense, and that killed it in the end. They were all about pumping out weapon skins on top of skins without fixing any of the weapon balance.
I mean, folks were totally buzzing for some changes, but EA just ditched the majority of the players, no doubt.
I know I asked this already but can I 100% get the peacekeeper solo?
You can. You'll probably need some help from the BFEE people for morse code and stuff like that, but you can do it by yourself.
Ighty thanks!
it's a huge pain for something that is basically a fancy worse obrez
In Battlefield 1, the screen flickers when squeezing with a gun, is this feature turned off or do I need to press a button?
what do you mean ?
When you squeeze it on top of each other, the camera slides upwards.
would you have a video, I don't think I understand what you mean
I can't assign a video
in this chat here you mean ?
When I press and hold the fire button, the gun slides upwards, so I can say that the screen flickers.
It happens very often when you're trying to hit someone
Could it be because of the gun?
maybe
Nope
on PC at least there is a screen shake option which can be adjusted
to me it sounds more like recoil
On PlayStation?
I looked there
Watch video
https://streamable.com/kdmoqk
ECOLE UN ESPLORATORE ENEMICO AVISTATO 🗣️ 🔥
how do i fix the "you have been kicked by punkbuster" bug since punkbuster doesnt update anymore. I feel like ive dont everything
Trying to play BF1 but keep getting an error sayng "Detected AMD Radeon Drivers 0.0.0" even though my drivers are up to date
hgave you tried installing direct X ?
Uninstall your cheats
Really hope the next battlefield goes back to ww1 or a ww2 game or more on the military side of things again like bf3-4
And with 1 character for each class not 4-3 for each class
Quite weird how 2042 was made
I don't hate or like the game it's alright just not a release of a battlefield game I was hoping to see
Sounds like it’ll be more like the traditional battlefields you know
can you guys take away that timer when ppl join
i just did a top scoreboard match on bf4 and some one said gg to me refering to my clantag [ZEUS]
lmao
It’s already been confirmed to be modern theme
For every new upcoming battlefield game
Will it ever go back to old military like bf3-4
And will we get any more campaign battlefield games
And will it carry on copying cod with all this sliding mechanic
If it has a slide I hope the movement also has momentum and a grounded feel. Nothing confirmed on anything but modern theme and campaign
For the next game specifically
BF naming is weird and not meant to be consistent in any way
Boyfriend 6 boyfriend 2042
I mean I guess BFV is 5 but I’ve heard some people say it’s a reference to v for victory day
2042 is “6” based off the naming that started with bf3 going onward
lol yeah probably
battlefield would go hard ngl
If they are going back to the orutes with the next game "BATTLEFIELD" would be a good title
to show a new beginning
Battlefield the one
Battlefield: A New Hope
From my view i do think there are 3 different names. Battlefield, Battlefield 6 or Battlefield Bad Company 3. Last one i guess depends if game has singleplayer and on the singleplayer itself
@supple raptor interesting
I'll record a video to show how it looks for me, I'm on PC though
Nah, that's if BF2025 flops, it will be 3+4 as remakes of BF3 and 4
It would be BC3 in name only, I don't think it makes sense to name it BC3(jets didn't existed in BC, also had less players per server than 3-4, no proning too).
They should name it BF6 or BF2033 or something imo
But I think they will name it just Battlefield
So if they called it bad company 3 it could not have proning? 🤷
It wouldn't play like Bad Company
Not really
Also higly unlikley they will just use short name like BF6 or what ever
Battlefield is the brand 
Reboots are common nowadays
I don't really see what your point is 🤔
Also concept art they shared gives me that vibe
Reboots are common to give new players a welcome, no one wants to start from 6th game of a franchise, not even for online shooters
MW19 reboot sold more than OG MW1-2-3 combined I think
Because reboots exists to welcome people who heard about how good X game is but didn't played them back then
Same case with remakes honestly
Then in your opinion why did they name those 2 games bad company? 🤔
I dunno
Bad Company games has their own unique rules and gameplay aside from mainline BF games though
They were created for consoles first and foremost unlike other BF games
No point being argumentative just to be argumentative. Those two game names are based on their singleplayer 
Like I said, if they call it Bad Company 3 but it plays like BF3-4-2042 instead of BC1-2 then what's the point?
Call it something else at that point
If they call it bad company 3 then it will have singleplayer and that singleplayer will be obviously connected too 1 and 2
Yes
But I don't think DICE can make a good BC3 lol
It would be like 2042's launch humor
Who knows, helps being a bit positive
I'm positive for the game
Which gun should I buy because of the gun?
2042 didn't have a great launch and disapointed many for sure, but i do think they have done a good job making the game better. Still have some mehhh flaws ofc. I doubt we will see that bad launch state again from a Battlefield game
I'd try other weapons as well
never say never 🤣

I mean, true. But i would be suprised if it happened again really, specially for the next game
But I don't think they should desecrate the name of a dead subseries for cheap nostalgia bait 🤷 Imagine if BF2042 was named BF4: 2 or BF2142: 0 or something
They will name what ever they will name it, just wanted to share what is most likley from my view 
I see
I think it will be just Battlefield like I said
I would rather want them to name it BF6 though
I dislike reboots, they are confusing people
Yep it could be just that, we will figure that out when the time comes
Do you mean they will straight up just call it BF6 or do you mean Battlefield 6 you just typed short version?
I am quite confident we will never see a short name like that as title for the games if that is what you saying
tbh if you go with the naming next bf should be bf 7
since 2042 was 6
but it might be called bf modern warfare or some shit
Oh I meant Battlefield 6
Battlefield Battle Ops
Technically it would be called battlefield 12
This excludes hardline and heroes as they aren't in my eyes really that part of the franchise if that makes sense
Yeah kind of figured but wanted to ask 😛
Yeah
Almost all ''non mainline'' games such as 2142, Bad Company etc. are practically mainline anyways
well yeah, name is whatever it's what they'll deliver which matters
If they deliver BF4.5 people will be more than happy imo
It can be anything really, but we all know it will have the Battlefield part in it 
would be funny if they'd fail, recently checked the sales numbers for bf games and going from 21 mil sold copies for bf 1 to 7 mil and eventually 5 mil for 2042 it must have shocked the leadership
Yeah i wouldn't call those spinoffs like hardline and heroes
If next BF fails I think they will just remake old games lol
For easy moneygrab
Think it would be a bit weird naming like that maybe, but it would give some expectations i guess. Although they say they going back to core 3/4 i do think there will be a lot of changes/upgrades outside that 🤔
they'll fail those hard and imagine the skins...
remaking with the current leadership, big no no
I meant the content dude, not the name 😭
Oh 
I think if it plays like a modern version of BF4 people will be more than happy
Dead Space Remake was good
well that's SP, probably less likely to make it fail
something tells me though is that some part will stir up controversy
Yeah for sure, and i think they got that if you read the ign article. I kind of consider 2042 now like a modern version of 4 but it still has some of the strange and weird changes that too me dont make sense.
My biggest gripe with 2042 are performance and mouse input issue
It still runs bad, mouse input is still not fixed
Guns also sound bad compared to other BF games imo
They really need to make them sound good again
Yeah i hear people complain about the input, personally i never really noticed it. But maybe that is linked to lower fps? 🤷
If playing 128p you do need somewhat beafy cpu for sure
Cant play with potato 😛
@sterile jolt wish those would be the only ones
It's random, my bullets sometimes just don't hit the enemy even when I'm unloading a mag
imo maps and the game feel are the worst, plus the specialists, where you see 20 mckay in a game
Specialists wouldn't be that bad if they had proper military gear imo
Specialists at the current state plays like BFV's combat roles
They should bring that feature back in BF6 though
And give more than 2 combat roles per class
Some of the guns are ok sounding but not really great. Most of this probably comes down to how they are processed and end up sounding kind of artificial in 2042. 5 overall had the best audio in the frenchise soo far, they even had interior recording of weapons making them sounding more real when fired in interiors. 5 also sounds much better and sound much less artificial. Talking about first person sound, third person and distance sound decent i'd say
I wish I could hear tanks in bf V, they are more silent than a gun prone in grass
.
I don't think it's just that, when I played with 416 and M16 in 2042 they felt like BF3 weapons
I think they cheaped out on using real gun sounds or something
416 and M16 feels really good to shoot
M416 and M16 is one of the guns in 2042 that sounds the most artifical too me
I disliked when you have attached the m320 too them they use the launcher iron sight rather than just crosshair, just having cross hair and slight zoom when you right click feels really good
Maybe that's the case but they sound like how they were in BF3 which is a plus in my book
Tbh i dont think they sound the same
I think they had no time for new sounds
There is new sounds though
I wouldn't call it muffled but kind of artificial for first person sounds
This also depends on some of the guns too ofc
I still play bf 3 and the audio there is very crisp
imo 2042 is inferior to the previous titles
well it has bot battles, that makes it automatically superior to bf3
whcih also had quicktime events, one of the great sins of gaming
one that can not be forgiven
true bots made a comeback , reminds me of bf 2
at least you can play the game modes that are less populated
bf3 and 4 just copied 2's setting, so no original ideas just tunnels and new maps
bf1 had original ideas but no bots
the story was ok for bf1 and 5
I was trying to type something
and instead it like... changed the visual mode of discord and time stamped everything and made it ugly
ok there we go
it was compact mode
aka shit mode
Was there UCAV in bf2?
If my memory serves me right the commander had it
so there was the UAV, can't find anything regarding UCAV, that was in bf 4
It was proven to be in but its fixed now more or less
I had an issue with input in 2042 once but ironically had the exact same issue on bf1 so i knew how to fix it
What was the issue? 🤔
In my case my game settings just kept corrupting lol
I made a backup of my settings folder
I just replaced the settings folder and it fixed it for me
But i dont think its the same issue others have had
Ah
Personally i haven't noticed anything too bad. Maybe i have but i have bad memory sooo 
Probably would have remembered though if it was big problem too me
Idk mouse bugs usually come with some other issues aswell, textures not loading properly, weird render scaling issues, weird stutters and freezes
I forced myself to play bf1 like that for the longest time til i just tested replacing my settings folder with my friends settings folder
I see, i see. Could be something weird happening
https://youtu.be/ie1B1H20X1Y?si=kuBUJ-urYlQO-2Au 3:10 when it was supposedly an issue for everyone though
But that was then, like 2-3 years ago
I havent seen anyone complain about it in the past 1-2 years
And the only people that claim it to be an issue havent even touched the game in like 3 years+
The simple feeling of coming home by those freezing temperatures, launching BF3 and having a nice meal on the way

i need some intelligent people to play bf5
I just like 3 more 
Hmm i'll try to anwser that with bullet points :
- better gunplay (personal opinion)
- better maps (DLC included)
- better pace/speed of combat
- no hitbox breaking "movement" (zouzou/rouzou and all that)
- better balance overall
- less content but every weapon feels more unique, each have their own gimmick/pattern
- less populated servers therefore less "abusers" (there are still there but in a different way)
BF4 has huge improvements, levelution, better QoL, settings to tweak and much more but... BF3 just feels right, y'know
I'm also burnt out from BF4, played it way too much with a drastic "tryhard" mentality so i'm kinda done and can't enjoy it no more
still a fantastic game nonetheless

Wish we got more BF3 maps in 2042, Noshahr Canals is fantastic but I would've loved to see Metro and Davamand Peak
I don't think old maps works well with the new pacing of the combat and all the insane gadget and tools we have to practically...break the map flow. The ones we have on 2042 right now shows how good this old maps are but also how terribly they play with the new gameplay. BF3 maps (for the most part) are a testament of good design overall, everything seems well thought, from red zones, boundaries, objectives placement, flow, pacing, cover for infantry, open area for vehicles and on and on
The fact that the old maps plays somewhat better than strictly newer ones even with the "fresh/improved" gameplay speaks volumes
Because it was designed for 64 players
Also we all know now that Portal and everything around it was a missed opportunity
First sector of noshahr has lots of cover, 90% of the 2042 maps are empty and only in last sector you will have cover
Yep that too
Agreed
it is just the better number, the best player count
I'm not necessarily against more players but 128 players are demanding for my PC lol, they should instead go for 80 or something if they want to have another XL or Chaos version of the maps they are going to have
I also don't think 128p is bad per say, it is just that in the case of 2042, things didn't worked out so I'd rather take the safe bet and go back to what Battlefield can do best : a 64p experience that is solid from the ground up
and maybe they can do some limited events where the player count is higher like let's say Rush XL comes back and instead of 64p, it's like 80 or something
But I want the core experience "untainted" if I'm being honest, we can have silly fun on temporary or limited playlists maybe
ahah
if you can get it for cheap DLC included, you're in for a treat
server population is somewhat low, depending on region and timezone but there are the usual full CQ/Rush servers
oh, you can check server browser same way as BF4 through Battlelog so that way, you know when to hop in
just make sure to click on the server, check the player list and see if it's real players or bots/seeds
its pointless
DLC is mostly dead
I'd still get the full premium on a sale if I wouldn't have it, difference is 1-2 bucks and there are a couple of servers that have the full rotation
and if 1-2 bucks are big money then you shouldn't buy it at all
on pc or console?
on pc well now i just connected back
I encounter the no connection thing here and there
especially when starting the game
thats not good
Screw battlelog
Just wait for WR instead
had an even worst issue in bf 1 from april to october, where I kept getting the error ''you have lost the connection to the session''
kept contacting support once a week 1
eventually the issue was gone after the new EAAC
tried my secondary account on the same pc and laptop and it worked fine
maybe it's an issue with older accounts can't say but I'm glad I can play bf 1 on official servers again
funny enough I wasn't losing connection to custom servers though
stupid question but I'm not at my PC so I can't check
when do you unlock the prototype Thomson in BF1
annihilator or whatever it's called
100 kills with primary weapons as Assault
25 kills with sidearms as Assault
Storm
50 kills with the Annihilator Trench
10 kills with the Sickle
yeah its such a turn off for me in bf4
that you have to put in a lot of effort to play decently
idk just abusing glitches, a lot of people using filters on top of the game and whatnot its pretty cheesy to play at high level
bf1 for me is my favorite, you dont really need to try extremely hard to do really well and its less of a button smash game, more tactical in a sense just that gunfights kinda lack for me
100% agreed
alr so you get it fairly early
it's stats seems pretty good and I love the way it looks so I'll probably main it w the patrol carbine and the uh
frommor stop?
frommer stop
BRO
SOME FUCKING TANK WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MAP HOLDING ALL SITES AND MY SPAWN
IT DESTOYED MY PLANE LIKE 6 TIMES
AND I DONT EVEN HAVE TIME TO GET IN POSITION TO SHOOT
AND THROWING BOMBS IS OUT OF THE EQUATION
HOW TF DO U DEAL WITH THESE NERDS
git gud
How you limit FPS from the main menu?
Leave game
If teams are heavily unbalanced then even a giga cracked player cant pull back from it
BF1 was my least played BF as a whole, never got to like the game. It sure as hell is pretty and sound good, you can feel the love pouring from every corner of it. But the gameplay overall, the introduction of some of the worst ideas of the franchise (of a shooter even) made me not stay long. I did play it for 400h still, because it is Battlefield after all but man..
And I know I'm in the minority for that opinion 
I was just on BF1 and even though I have played that game for a long time the trenches on River Somme will always give me good jumpscares
Ye some mechanics are pretty bad
Like what
Sweetspot, new players/bad players have some extra assists, auto balance is pretty bad, fuck gas, climbing is bugged, a lot of revive bugs
Then you cant melee elite kits at times it just bounces back on you
Why
“I love being disorted by my own teammates” 
Makes it feel more unique game
Bf5 and 2042 are just so bland, Battlefield 1 at least had its own unique mechanics going for it and its not like it is difficult to press t for the gas mask
Battlefield 1 ingeneral has a really bad issue with gadget/nade spam
Thats why i dont like the gunfights in 1
You can shoot at a person and he wont shoot back he just spams nades on you
I just dont like games after Battlefield 1 because 5 is just a more arcade like version of it and 2042 is 2042
2042 is only good if you dont look at it like a battlefield series game
Either way annoying youre without ads and have garbage line of sight lol
Its not even a good nade its just purely annoying
The nades dont even go off fast enough to where you cant get away from them though
Every 3iq npc spams it like their life depends on it
A nade could be infront of me and i could get away fast enough without getting one hit by it
Depends on nade
And distance
If someone is close enough to be in a gun fight you can see the symbol and get away where it wont be the grenade that kills you
Frag grenades you cant really get away from, inc nades you cant get away from, impact you cant get away from
At you cant get away from specifc range
You think people just go in and see someone point blank and throw a grenade at them?
Also low levels have magnetic nades lol
what
Basically nades are tracking enemies/ leaning more towards at where the enemies are
Its assisted
that explains a lot
It could be clearly missing and it still chases after you or has a weird random drop
I havent had that happen to the point ive noticed it
Also low levels have shorter times til it explodes
I have 2k hours in bf1 ive played too much of it
Theres so much garbage in that game
Majority of the maps arent very well balanced even
You see the garbage in that game though and look at what comes after it and it is even worse
Theres ideally 3 maps that have good balance/ are easy to balance
I think 5 would play out a lot better with moderated community servers
That and they should have made it more a step away from one
2042 is better just boring to play because everyones either new to fps or new to battlefield
2042 would be amazing if they didnt have 2 good maps with it
Bf1 also has only 3-4 good maps lol
A lot of battlefield maps suck depending on mode
Have you tried any 2042 map and not seen a shit ton of snipers all camped in the back?
No
2042 out of all of the alive Battlefield games has the issue the worst
so real
they really flubbed the map selection
but the game is so good
satisfying vehicle combat, clean gunplay, good equipment variety
wingsuit in a tornado is also just sexy
The maps are okay imo just boring, takes 0 mastery
I never really was into battlefield for any of that competitive mastery shit, you have COD for that and COD is horrid
New COD is horrid
battlefield 3 and 4 have it beat in map selection for sure
there's like 2 maps in 2042 that compare to the classics
Orbital is the best map
Competitive mastery shit? Lol
Haven is really good
I just play it for stupid fun
Ye
I never understood people taking Battlefield serious
No one does just people play with their mind in it
hourglass is alright
A lot of people sadly do and especially in 2042
- theres comp games in older battlefield games
Hourglass makes me want to die
kaleidoscope is alright
Thats cool I just never understood why 🤣
4 was very competitive, bad company 2 still hosts competitive events
Theres also a pro scene in bf lol
There is a pro scene in every game
V is upgrade
Because they like to play it with their mind in it and perform good? Lol
It just makes me laugh at a lot of games because it looks stupid
Why
also trying really hard in videogames is fun when you're an adult and don't get upset about the results after
people who shit on others for taking a match seriously usually just absolutely suck ass at the game
respectfully
Yeah exactly, the issue is the people who take it competitive and then get pissed when they lose
I hate those 2
I like Spearhead, Redacted and Reclaimed most
Redacted is horrid
Id agree for 5 and 4 those are 3iq buttonsmash games but bf1 high level gameplay is nothing like that
Bf2042 isnt like that either its also more tactical and slower
BF1 high level gameplay is camping, when you take out movement you won't have offensive options besides camping
It isnt
sitting in the trench with a shotgun is just cheap
yeah gonna have to +1 you on this
"spam down a doorway" simulator
but not in a fun way like Metro
in a shit way
Look at MW19 before people figured out how slide cancelling works, game went from camper's CoD to movement god's CoD
i been playing CoD/battlefield since like 2009 and I have NEVER understood people complaining about camping
If you take out movement, you won't have offensive options to engage with the enemies, people who holds the angles will win 90% of the time
Whay
if you refuse to stay in one place for any reason, tactical or otherwise, you're kind of a moron
It gets annoying having to watch your feet for people shooting up the bung hole laying down
You can legit push up and move forward using objects
that's why you check corners and your surroundings which is a basic principle of any remotely competitive shooter game
Look at any high kill cq game from any actual good player
like day one skills
No one is camping
No one camps, they always just go into the noob lobbies and get Youtube clips to post online 🤣
No
Only skill gap in BF1 is map/game knowledge, once you get to learn it there are no other skills to develop, yeah you can learn power positions in maps and flanking routes but that's it
Absolutely false
You can't even do basic jumpshots in BF1 afaik
Im one of the highest kpm players in eu and i specifically only play harder lobbies lol
Why would you do that lol its corny as hell
When your gameplay revolves around buttonsmashing its pretty braindead
He feels like a badass when he can do that and say "gg close game" after you win
Takes 0 thought
Buttonmashing is braindead, that's why 90% of the players are filtered by it 
how does one buttonsmash in battlefield
It's literally skill gap
define this for me
im also curious
Hella skill cap 💀
Click more buttons
0 thought for positioning just spam movement and win
More buttons to give you more options, such as sliding, back proning, manual leaning, snaking etc.
we are talking about keyboard right?
Positioning is also important in BFV
still have no idea how one button mashes in a shooter game
that's fighting game terminology
what like hipfiring???
Thats jsut being a cod bro
why would anyone play warzone to begin with
if you are playing warzone you deserve to get shit on by a flying nicki minaj
trash ass game 😂
Not really
But yeah
More important compared to a lot of cods lol
only good battle royale there EVER was, Blackout
the rest suck ass
Fortnite was okay for like the first 6 months too
Battlefield 5's most important part is how long you can spam bombs on people for kills in a plane
Jumpshots are positioning, you can't initiate jumpshot mid fight and expect to win, look at how Nicki jumpshots from cover to mess up with the enemy line of sights
You can spam slide and just escape mostly every gunfight with barely any damage in 5
Idk garbage mindset to make bad positioning unpunishing
Jumpshots are a good way for 9 year olds to feel cool in shooters, it doesnt take skill to pick up
Sliding isn't any faster than running in BFV
Yes
Its harder to hit a slider dumbass
But you can cheese out of gunfights with it
Not really, BF3 had jumpshotting, 4 had it, it's the BF1 that had it nerfed
Imo bad positioning shouldnt be fixable with insane movement
Only in 5 you could shoot mid jump though, in 3-4-1 you had to stop to shoot
you wouldn't last 3 minutes in a Quake III lobby 😂
Ye i woudlnt
insane movement in an arena shooter is great if done tastefully
like rocket jumping in team fortress
Agreed
that warzone clip looks like absolute shit
But those are maps revolved around good movement
So it takes some actual thought to play it
But those same movement based players will just get bamboozled in a tactical fps game so lol
I see it so much in bf1 where theres some people trying to play it like its cod
Just to get 2kpm at below 1kd
i always see people talk about bf1 in here is that like the consensus best game in the franchise?
in terms of what's playable in 2025
Its just what comes after it is shit
with active players not too antequated like a BC2
It was voted by community to be the best bf game in the series
I see
So ig it would make sense
I don't have many hours on it but I still remember being very impressed
I gotta redownload it
I think what holds up for Bf1 is the graphics
Bf5 and 42 are kinda dead on their community purely because imo they didnt really support communities the same way
No one chats in 5 for example incomparison to 1
42 you'll still get a full server in any mode during reasonable hours
it's just the first half of it might be full of bots
but they fill up
42 removed enemy chat all together
even 128 players
that pisses me off
Then community servers arent a thing anymore
You can enable it via settings
Actually?
Yeah
Well either way no one prolly uses it lol
Movement is good if done tastefully*
V's movement is tasteful imo, 2042's is lacking in comparison to V but still has nice ideas(momentum based sliding)
I dislike BO6 though, dolphin diving is respawn button 90% of the time
Too sweaty
I wouldn't had that many issues with it if I could just dropshot after running, but despite 1326 options you can't assign different keybinds to prone and dolphin diving at the same time, it just doesn't work
Damn, you guys have been going at it after my initial message lol
Dropshotting is useful and consistent 100% of the time unlike dolphin diving
I wish we could go back to that era of shooters where there was only ONE sprint speed
I hate TacSprint with all my heart in every game
It's cheap and rarely see that in warzone
I wouldn't mind sliding like in 2042, something simple and effective. The BFV one is really good but abusable too often, the BF1 is trash...literal dead slide and breaks any momentum (they nerfed it too much)
and I'd prefer not to have all the shenanigans from COD, slide canceling and all (while it's good, it's just too much imo)
There is a reason why I love BF3, it is the simplicity at first glance of its very mechanics but then you create your own skillgap by mastering them
BF3 was the perfect pace, speed and movement overall. You could maybe add a slide but that's it...

Battlefield Mobile was the best one
Never got to play it, how was it ?
Oh god it was shitty

All mobile games are
Yeah...never been a mobile gamer. Never really been a mobile person either, I hate spending time on my phone lol
My phone is only for FLAC files and messaging with the occasional Youtube video
CoD MWIII on the Nintendo DS was a banger
oof, that looks ...rough to say the least
Dropshotting is more useful in close quarters, that's why you won't see it in warzone, jumpshotting is more useful in mid range, sliding is useful in everywhere, dolphin diving is only useful to get into cover but you can just slide to do that instead
yeah...
Nah I did play b06 free trial and it was nonstop sliding everywhere
Sliding is everywhere in BO6
Because they nerfed it with messing the keybinds
99% of the time you are running when you encounter an enemy that's why it's harder to dropshot
You can accidentally dolphin dive when you want to dropshot too
Which is basically a respawn button
Dolphin diving is only useful when you use it like BFV's back proning
I want to see some aspects of it, such as freeform running
Not the entire package though
And definitely not dolphin diving
multidirectional sprinting ? hmm
that could work but that could also brings some hitboxes issues
Karaoke exists
Im not sure how you would do that with a gun in hand but it is a thing
like a case of BF4 zouzou/rouzou and all that issues lol
also what about the strafe speeds ? are they impacted by the omni movement ?
I didn't played BO6, can't really tell besides watching videos
Strafe speeds should be effected by weapon attachments imo
No it's not
Strafe speeds are linked to weapon type and attachments
can't you essentially Q/D spam while sprinting in a form of "strafing"
without ADS i mean
Q/D spam?
Oh okay

You can't shoot while you are doing that so I don't think it would be useful
BO6 doesn't have ''run & gun'' perk for a good reason
It would break the game because people would abuse the sprinting speed to hipfire
Yeah I was thinking that
I saw it as a superior form of peaking angles/corners by spaming left/right while sprinting, gathering the info about the enemy whereabouts and then going into ads > kill
I mostly just jump the angles and ADS lol
was about to say, in a way of replacing the usual jump peek lol
did COD kept the lil' bunny hop from 2019 ?
in a way, very similar to what we have now in 2042

I don't think so
People invented the term g-slide though lol
You can jump and then slide which will give you a huge speed and momentum
Especially useful in Zombies
g slide? bro that shit existed since HL1's GS engine.
battlefield 4 directx error getdeviceremovedreason
Any idea how to fix this?
I was just on YouTube watching a video from Hinachi about what his next bf will probably be like
and there was a moment when he said that supposedly the next game in the franchise won't have that mechanic that is in 2042 in which when you run out of ammo clips, whoever plays on PC for example, just press "t" and change but in the next won't have that
but he said that next bf will apparently have the slide but won't have a tactical race
and so it's something that makes me discouraged from playing because it doesn't have the tactical race at least
and that's why developers should listen to the community more because without players buying the game, the company goes bankrupt

PlusSystem won't be missed
TacSprint can be gone too, I wouldn't mind
the only real way to find out is by partaking the playtests
I dislike tactical sprint, there should be only 1 sprint speed
Plus system should stay imo but I'm glad ammo types won't exist, all the weapons should just have ''standard issue'' type
Tac sprint makes no sense in 2042 anyways, in CoD you can sprint forever but you can tac sprint for a short duration. In 2042 you can both sprint and tac sprint forever so it makes 0 sense.
I understand your indignation but the point is that developers must please the majority of the community and this includes players who like mechanics that exist in 2042 and mechanics that don't exist
I particularly like the 128 players and the mechanic of running as much as I want with the gun raised (tactical running) because it makes the player's life a lot quicker because if you look at it in reality, if there is only the "standard" run with the gun lowered , you'll see that it gets "tiring"
and in 2042 for example, there is the sliding mechanic but the bad thing is that there is no option to deactivate this mechanic and I say this because there are times when you are in the middle of the conflict and you press to CROUCH but your soldier ends up sliding and you die " for free"
🤳
They can keep the animation but I still dislike having 2 sprint speeds, I don't have an issue with the animation but practicality. There should be only 1 sprint speed imo. 128 players aren't coming back imo. Too demanding for the engine. I think they should instead try 96 or 80 players for XL or Chaos versions of the maps though.
I wonder since they’re going back to 64p they’ll use the older engine anyways.

I'm sad that there probably won't even be a separate mode for 128 in the next game because only 64 is already a thing of the past and there's no problem with having more than 100 players in the match if they make a well-optimized game, like Warzone for example. there to "prove" because there are almost 200 players per game
Yeah.. from what I heard in the news, the developers are going to return to the essence of the game that was BF 3 and 4 but I'm sure it will be a BF 4 with improved graphics
Ok while that sounds unanimously exciting, I hope they’ll take liberties from bfv too I like some of the mechanics there.
2042's maps are horrid because they were designed around 128 players, they thought having 2-3 central ''engagement zones'' in conquest would be enough to keep people interested in it but result is a barren wasteland between those engagement zones with nothing in it. 90% of the maps are like Discarded(worst map in the game imo).
Maybe if it ran better on my PC my opinion would differ but no reason to do big number for the sake of big number. I want to play a game that plays well from weapons to classes to map design.
you should just pick up fortnite
Isn't Fortnite the game that allows more than 100+ players? Next BF won't have 128 that's for sure.
I've been playing Battlefield 4 for over a year now. The PP-2000 is pretty sweet.
yeah it's mostly filled with kiddos tho : ) so it's not the same kind of community
in 2042 you can hipfire from like 30m away with a 6 ft cone with the pp2000
Are you underage?
Vince Zampella himself said they wanted to keep it at 64 players just to make the maps more dense and less spaced out. Literally one of the few official info we have about the next BF, alongside return of proper class system and modern setting.
@sterile jolt i love our class system lol what do you not like about it? and can you define modern settings? also whotf is wince zampella? and did he say ONLY or also orrrrr what. Are they creating 128 maps too? maybe 64 map versions AND 128 versions? maybe a rush version who knows. thoughts?
He said specialists won't return, it will be a proper class system like any BF before 2042. He said they are open to 128 players idea but they are designing the game around 64 players rather than 128, maps will be more dense with less empty space between flags. Zampella is an intern at EA, he just started making video games, no idea why they decided to use him as the face of new BF though 
maybe he just wasn't supposed to talk about it 😛 @sterile jolt
I put your answer in the translator and when I read the name of the map you mentioned, at first I didn't understand what you were referring to so I had to Google "name of the map you mentioned bf 2042" and then yes I saw it it was the rubble and man.. this is one of my favorite maps for the simple fact that at the end of the game, a soundtrack plays which in my opinion is very good but I also agree with you that there is no point in making maps large if most of the space is empty, especially because of the rubble, for example, when you are on foot running towards a flag, depending on where you are, you don't even have any object to use as cover
anyone?
is battlefield V bazooka still obtainable?
How do we change team in 2042
#game-news message ACTUAL IFVS LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOO
wrong channel
Tf is a IFVS 
Sounds like some #battlefield-2042 shit
Nvm thought this was general
'but but the new age demographic that doesn't exist that cried about the games before' I'm more burnt than blackened toast with all that corp bullshit too mate. I replayed 2042 recently and it sucks harder than a Dyson vacuum. Only saving grace was the concept of being able to swap attachments and ammo types in real time. The transports are open canopy with no front armour making them fucking useless, the vehicles melt like candyfloss in water and by god help you if you say something wrong in the text/voice chat because 'we're a diverse gaming group that doesn't discriminate' despite being willing to ban anyone who so much as says a 'bad word' like it's a pre-school.
buy cod? There's more than 90% of features missing in that game, it's not even a game but an overhyped tech demo at best.
Cod is sweaty and shit
They literally lost 50% of the player base in 1 month
In October 2024 there were above 300k players then in December 2024 they lost 145k players
Yeah they got rid of all the hackers bud
Good thing very good thing
its soo much better to play without sliding in bf4 compared to bf2025
I’m playing battlefield 5 like it’s Battlefront 2 and good news it’s 100% viable.
lol
People are bringing wonder weapons to warzone now lol
I see warzone as some type of hangout full of dumb players with plenty of funny moments
imagine battlefield with the cod scorestreak system
So BfV but everybody gets the squad leader system?
ye
What about a battlefield with the battlefront 2 third person toggle?
Surely EA wouldn't send a cease and desist to em
any FPS without sliding is superior in my book
true
but doubt the next bf will be without it
yeah
ISTG if the next bf doesn't have a permanent hardcore mode imma be so mad
and night maps
from the investor's clips we did get, it seems to build on 2042's movement system
at least that the feeling I am getting
hope not, bf2042 movement is trash
Yeah that’ll be dumb
Still a year to go so a lot can change in the meantime
might even say, a lot WILL change
In Update 8.4, you'll find a new XP event that recognizes the act of taking out another jet while airborne after leaving your aircraft.
You'll receive 1337 XP and the "Fractal Reasoning" Playcard.
This marks the first time the RendeZook has been officially recognized as an XP event in a Battlefield game!
It goes to show that it starts with you when it comes to Battlefield - even the moments that continue to ripple through time from years ago to today.
We salute you. 🫡🐧
Make battlefield great again
"DICE PLEASE"
Not really, if anything that clip doesn't show tac sprint, I think we will get a new movement system, hopefully closer to V with 2042's momentum
this shows the early build of the new frostbite engine.
Man all that battle droid wrist rocketing sure did help me with using rocket launchers against infantry in battlefield.
I kinda can’t stop using launchers now..too satisfying
Well that and all the 'you'll lose your account if you curse in game chat' pansy ass sissy shit. CoD was the former king of shit talking. I mean you needed dictionaries at your side for the homebrew insults that were thrown about.
"I mean you needed dictionaries at your side for the homebrew insults that were thrown about."
You are overestimating the intelligence of the average CoD player
all they would do is just shout slurs or talk about your mom, it's not that deep.
My question is, will the next battlefield have a solo mode with multiplayer progression. It’d be huge step backwards not to have it.
Battlefield 5 could have been one of the greats with that.
Now when the servers shut down it’ll just be gone.
What
You can do that in BFV
Combined whatever mode
I used it to grind many of my gold camos
You realize that any "solo mode" would still be running on EA servers/require an online connection for DRM purposes, and it'd still be gone if those servers were to be shut down for any reason, right?
like
I'm talking the 2009-2012 days.
I still think you're heavily overestimating their intelligence.
Because I was alive during 2009-2012.
a functional PVE game mode would be amazing, Bad Company 2 had that!
I was playing cod since 2006 so
My condolences
ok
Tell me about it, watching a franchise go from respecting WWII history and modern conflicts to ghosts- present is saddening
Brain damage? CoD 2 and 3 were my first two cod games, then Modern Warfare and so on
yes.
Well that's rather presumptuous, I enjoyed the multiplayer and campaigns of older cods because they were actually fun to play. ghosts and onward is where the issues started becoming more and more.
I didn't care much for OG MW2.
Okay?
Holy crap that was hilarious. I was driving my tank in 3rd person in BF5 and this dude was hiding praying I didn’t see him and then I blasted him from third person
what tank were you using?
What.
what would you change
2042 movement is quite decent, its VERY basic yes, but… how would you have it
Not him but controllable slide, crouch running, back proning, I also would like to see freeform running from BO6
I'm fine with or without leaning
Exactly like BFV - the peak of FPS movement
id also like to see an interesting weapon roster
yeah the m4a1, AK and mp5 are popular weapons but it would be very cool to see interesting choices
i wouldn't mind some returning guns from 2042
AC9, XCE, SWS, MP9, VHX, RM68, SVK
To name a few
i want the drauger to return too
love the glided Jdam and korsene bomb
just fix how it collides with objects
bad argument try again
and the vector
vector is 100% going to be in the game
i hardly see modern battlefields implented this weapon
its the new pop culture futuristic smg
p90 erasure smh
all the SMGs from 2042 could return
imo
add the mp7, p90 and mpx and it's set
except the pp19
that one can be left behind in 2042
Do you actually use that gun on the regular? You must have skill issues bud
I haven't touched that gun in a while because im focusing on other guns, once again bad argument + resorting to insults.
try again next time, cheers.
Totally your opinion
You want to bring up a gun you don't even use
And want to say bad argument
Funny bro
All SMGs from 2042 are good picks for modern settings, much better than having the MP5, UZI and the other generic smg choices
idc talk to the wall
The thing is PDWs are starting to become bit of an obsolete weapon type, most special forces operatives and police force just use regular assault rifles nowadays.
I mean in real war some countries allow their soldiers to carry like 3 weapons
smg is mostly a close range weapons
Very often regular infantry aren't even issued pistol sidearms, those are usually just for SOF and officers.
Actually correction, SMGs are starting to be obsolete, PDW is just a broad term that can include assault rifles as well.
But yeah mainly due to body armor and the fact that we have carbines with rifle calibers that can use suppressors. That is what kind of replaced the SMG.
i was gonna say
i doubt the next battlefield wont have the smg category
But it would be interesting to see them be a global weapon category for all classes that isn't as powerful as the class specific categories
think of it like this
The problem is just that not many SMGs are being made anymore, so they're going to run into a wall of what put into the game.
Assault class - Assault Rifles
Engineer - Battle Rifles (or something else)
Support - LMGs
Recon - Sniper Rifles
Shared - SMG, DMR, Shotgun/"Utility"
that's true
They could also have a category "PDW" that would be a mix of SMG and short barrel rifles meant for CQB.
I don't care about SMGs honestly because in 2042 they are just worse ARs, in V they are better ARs for some reason though 
Watch them add a new weapon category that's just:
FPV drone 
Since that seems to be one of the more common weapons on the modern battlefield
"Improvised"
Also added to vehicles, so you can have vans that have been turned into transport vehicles
"that's a nice meta AR unfortunately, pipebomb!"
I would lock Shotguns to Assault, Engineer and SMGs to Recon, Support, otherwise good list
DMR and utility weapons should be shared
Yep, meta class in BFV is medic
anyone know an easy way to level up the m44
hello guys im new here and have a story to tell
I've been working all day to get the Peacemaker in battlefield 1, and I'm on the final step, but there's no servers on Passchendaele. Which is where I need to be
and I've waited for hours and hours for a server to appear, but none have. I didn't want to resort to this, but I joined the discord just to ask someone if they could lend a hand by opening an Xbox server?
if anyone here owns one currently anyway
Instead of US vs Russia in BF6, I hope it's NATO vs a coalition of terrorist organizations working together.
I hope it’s Battlefield One 2: the sequel
My idea for the look of the OPFOR faction would resemble something like ISIS or the Taliban
The faction's name would be the Middle Eastern Coalition
Boring
Rumors are saying it's NATO vs a rogue PMC
battlefield with fictional generic setting nr 29356
It’s already been leaked that it’s NATO or U.S. against a large (I think Russian) PMC
So basically just the US vs Makarov’s pmc from the recent modern warfare games
"recent"
Did Makarov use a PMC in the originals? I can't remember them too well so I just went with the recent ones
I hope we will get different cosmetics and character models for nationalities from NATO, I mean... World War 3 has them, every season brings tons of different character models and weaponry from those nations and that game has like AA budget
PMC faction can get non-NATO nations' cosmetics and weaponry too, like Korea, Japan, Iran etc.
Never forget better voice acting
Battlefield with Insurgency Sandstorm or Ghost Recon Breakpoint levels of customization/skins would go crazy
Y'know, I really hope EA follows Sony with their new changes
What's that
They're killing off live service games
Concord did so bad that they're looking at all their projects and have already killed 2 live service games
Next BF will be live service though
Sadly, yeah. It's too late to make it not live service
One of the reasons why BF went live service is because of BF1 funnily
But for future games, it could be good
Just don't do what 2042 did
And honestly, BF isn't the typical live-service style
Non premium owners felt left out because premium owners were constantly getting new content, so they decided to ditch premium model in favor of live service, now everyone gets to play the same maps and weapons
My main problem with live service is the limited time content
That shit drives me insane
Don't think previous BF had that issue
Most live-services are meant to be updated forever with no sequel. But Battlefield is unique because it still focuses on sequels while keeping the current game alive with live service
2 maps and 4 weapons per season would be good imo, maybe 1-2 vehicles and 1-2 gadgets too
Helldivers did live service the best imo
Their "battle passes" are forever
Whatever it is
I would've bought battle passes in 2042 but there are no new battle passes so I can't give my money to EA 
Could be cool if they were called something like operations and you'd have to select an operation to put exp into it
You mean against bots?
Yes
Oh okay
- Better bots
A co-op like what 3 had would be amazing
- all maps and modes available
I don't want better bots honestly
Meh
Bots are good as long as they're off by default on normal servers
If bots act like campaign, I'm not interested
There are rumors about bots being in Delta Force and Call of Duty, even when devs says they aren't in the game
That's why I don't want them to make better bots
If that isn't happening
Bots should be obvious
Yea. I honestly really like the way 2042 did it
The bots themselves weren't the best, but the way they were indicated as bots was amazing
You can only play conquest and bt with them
Secondly, bots are limiting in terms of behaviors
They don't even play as specials
Bots shouldn't replace human players, bots should be obviously bots, if you blur the lines then you will get skill based bots rumors, Delta Force's playtests were unplayable for good players because bots were aimbotting them through the smoke and they were ignoring bad players
Imo Insurgency Sandstorm is the best example of how to do bots
