#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 128 of 1
4pm was the most active time iirc, so in like 3 hours
👍
Does anyone know any NA bf1 servers?
go to server pick thingy
Operations are lively but any mode has players
Are you using Matchmaking or Server Browser? Gotta use the latter
Gotta love hitting people with the SMLE/Pistol combo
Plus I need it to get muh obrez
Got 4 kills last match like that, ONE away from the gun unlock
conquest and then mixed maps
Yeah you have to use server browser :/
👍
Two whole weeks of YouTube videos "bf1 in 2024!" Meanwhile NONE of them showed how to actually get into a game, luckily this discord along with reddit and other YouTube vids cleared it up
Server browser's no good here
There's like two servers left that run custom settings (bad ones too) so you need to fiddle with the search just to find them
i only see a link
well sorryyyyyyyy for still not having embed perm
My battlefield V won’t load on pc, it starts to and shows in the taskbar then just closes, does anyone know any fixes? I’ve gone on ea app and cleared cache and also restarted in task manager the ea service stuff
Is it on DX11?
Did you even try looking up the issue on the internet?
Do you have the recommended requirements?
Is your GPU drivers updated?
I had exact same issue, reinstall EA app completly and its gonna run, at least it did for me
Just reinstalling the game atm, I’ve got plenty others to play so if it don’t work I’ll leave it
PS5 is worth it if you've desire to play physical games and VR too.
I've got it on PSN.
Hi, guys. Is anybody know what with Battlefield 3 CO OP? We tried to play with friend but can't connect to each other
can we customize feet in next bf????
Calling all bf4 players add me PSN same name as discord
I have PC bro
guys can someone help me grind?
i need 20 more infantry kills in an aerial vehicle
did you try launching the app from the ea app?
anyone else is missing class assignments?
Does anyone know how you can like launch yourself out of your jet on BF4 on console instead of just falling out of your jet?
What are best chill servers in
?
If I remember correctly I think you need to hold jump and press the exit button
How do I disable the laser on a weapon in
?
V or X iirc 
Thanks fam

@solid carbon Edit: I meant how to disable it by default
To avoid disable it every time
i dont think thats possible
Unless I unequip my weapon of the laser
yep

MX4 = best ingeneer weapon
Odd, it should 'auto eject' you by pressing the 'leave vehicle' button
Sparrow?
Who still does bf4 Milsim on Xbox!?
@shell oasis
Does M2 Slams or C4 do more damage when attached to a vehicle like a tank?
because they both come in 3
I’m pretty sure C4. I’ve completely destroyed a tank with 3 C4s before but could never do it with M2s
Did you ever find the solution?
Hello, does anyone play BFV or BF2042 in China? I'm having the 'you seem to be offline' error message and tried everything to make it work
i think my friend is having that issue too, but in the USA. when he researched it, it seems to still be an unsolved mystery
Only a PC problem
Reinstalling it worked for a moment but crashed again, just uninstalled fully now I’ll find another game
Try to run the game as admin
Anyone got any good battlefield 1 servers to join? I just recently got the game back and it's only giving me the option to one server to join in. Any other game I tried joining is got like three people at most
Does someone have an equivalent of the MX4 but recharges faster?
How can I unlock class mastery assignments in BFV?
I’ve reached to level 20 yet they aren’t in my assignments tab
its a bug. you will have to contact ea for support
In order to complete operations codex do I have to play only when dice make operation campaign event or are they still valid if a play on a normal operation server?
will someone play bf1? squad 1
Bf1 is so gosh damn good
Could be due to the Chinese censorship guidelines blocking the game, it's the only guess I can feasibly make.
https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1frevgn/ukraine_is_using_vampire_drones_to_drop_robot/ i hope we get robo dog again in the next Battlefield
It's definitely blocked here, as are 1000's of other games, but usually with the Chinese Ping Helper apps ( a kind of VPN) I'm able to play absolutely everything... except BFV and BF2042! Last year they worked, but EA put somekind of Anti-VPN measures up I think
anyways , thanks for replying , glad I'm not the only sucker with this 'Ea offline' issue
I'll try with another VPN see if it helps ( I doubt it)
I want to see BFV's movement in BF6 honestly
Such as leaning, controllable slide, rolling and prone states
Yo dice pls cook

Yo dice give us modding tools like bf2
Made me think of the 700mb worth of lightmap samples you needed to download, but then at like 300kb/s 
300kb ain't bad

At that time i was happy, really
So are the hit and kill sounds in BF5
They probably did that because there were hackers going about through VPNs to bypass EA account bans.
very confused on the instructions. I got EA installed, I don't think I got EA/Origin helper disabled, idk where "plugin-free game launching" in my profile settings and I tried both Firefox and chrome to open Battlefield 3
will the next battlefield game be good
yo @vagrant sail , will the next battlefield game be good ? Or do we have to wait 2 years for it to be stable and then it get dropped after another year
if the next game sucks as much at launch as bf5 and 2042 , can u guys make another mirror's edge before EA closes you down too
the folx who made bf1 left
Yes but I'm hoping Vince and Byron pulled everyone's heads outta their respective asses and told them to lock in
if whoever decided that the bf5 trailer should have a cyborg lady with a cricket bat still works at dice/ea , we have no hope
He could be a janitor but that's it
Although it was probably a she let's be honest...
Well shit, I remember hearing that Rump3l (the guy who did cry of fear) was hired at dice but has mostly doing music so idk
it s insane how bf5 and 2042 had the same problem but opposite
(I think I just broke some discord rules for sexism)
bf5 was alright with a shitty trailer and 2042 had an awesome trailer and it was awful at launch
Make BF 3.4
ayy lmao , there s a comment on the 2042 trailer youtube page that describes it perfectly
`It's like watching your parents wedding video after they divorced
`
Haha saw that one
that was hardline 
Make bf 4.3 lol
hardline was so good
I hope EA grows a pair and puts China in the game again
If it's set in 2027 China would be a huuuuuge player in any war
what makes me sad is this trailer proves that they know what their fans want and what they’re expecting, and they just chose not to do it
lol
It proves the trailer team should make the game and not the trailers lol
lel
it s crazy how awful the bf5 trailer is
the trailer for the paciific dlc is very good
and the bf1 trailers were awesome
It literally starts with a giant horse nose taking up the whole screen 😂
especially apocalypse
Followed by a cyborg woman fighting on the front lines in the Netherlands.... lmao like what???
which one are you talking about
The reveal trailer
And the audacity to change the Norwegian storyline and make it a daughter and mother when irl it was like a dozen guys
oh yeah
Completely disrespectful
You can't just change history and try to take the glory away from the actual people of the time just because they were men
The statue thing is a horse head
Reverse sexism is strong at DICE
the trailer starts with marble horse head , a teddybear and 2 beers on the side of the tank
which i think is a churchill
wtf
i am rewatching the bf5 trailer now
How the hell do they go from BF1 to V in two years?? 😂😂😀
Absolute disgrace
Bring back rated M warfare and voice lines... Also let's be honest even today 90% of combat roles are men. So let's make the classes and skins MEN
Not 50/50 for "inclusiveness"
jesus christ , it's worse than i ve remembered
😑
the 1/3 makes no sense
the 2nd third shows the new gameplay features like the crouch running and getting blown away and stuff like the v2 rocket and the fortifications which is fine
and the last 3rd goes back to nonesense
it's incredible
bf5 could had gotten away with just being bf5 with a ww2 skin
i commend them for choosing greece and norway for the maps
but i dont get why they didnt commit all the way with the player models
"hey let's make a ww2 game about the lesser known battles, but let's make sure to satisfy absolutely nobody by trying to change history"
why i am fighting as Sergeant Daquan against Oberleutnant Tashimoto in Norway
I can't 😂
and they had the nerve to say : don't like it , don't buy it
and bf5 barely got a dlc
How dare you speak of the objectively superior content model 😡
It got chapters because live service is better 😎
is there any game which managed to pull the battlepass format besided fortnite?
Oddly enough Halo Infinite did a good job at it
i dont see any point in buying cosmetics for battlefield
i played a lot of tf2 which arguably started the lootbox trend but at least there u can trade your items
so at least u have a reason to gamble
that s good
I HAVE NO REASON TO GET COSMETICS IN BATTLEFIELD GAMES
maybe the higher ups will see this
Battlefield should go back to earnable cosmetics and make their money from game sales, server rentals, and DLCs which means go back to premium lol
bf5's cosmetics werent that bad but they should had restricted them based on the maps
lel
(I'm definitely getting banned from this server lol)
my wish is that the next battlefield will bring portal 2 with most of the older games remastered and start a bf eco system
And a map editor/builder similar to forge
yes
And mode creator
tf2 still has way more players than most of the battefield titles
and it s almost 20 years old
It's because it's good
and it still makes valve a lot of money
BF hasn't released a good title in 8 years
5 is alright
Peak irrelevancy
some of the mapst suck
but the crouch running , the call ins and the fortifications are good
BFV was a 5/10 BF which makes it a 7/10 FPS
Amemus
2042 was the close tbh
Not sure if you are talking trailer or launch
Watch Elon buy EA and rename Battlefield to Xfield lol
Are you talking trailers or launch?
The trailers I'd argue were right there with 1 up until launch when everything fell apart
when you capture a sector in operations in 1 , the music swells up and everybody scream and you push forward
2042 doesnt even come close to that
So you aren't talking trailers? You are talking launch?
the 1st trailer for 2042 is awesome
i am talking about the game overall
i thought presentation meant the atmosphere the game overall
not only the trailers
sry , english is not my 1st language
All good
Presentation generally means the first the impressions, or the selling/marketing of the product
how do you call the graphics , music , theme and sound design of a game though
anyway
that screaming charge when you capture a sector in bf1 is unrivaled
I would say the "experience"
i guess that would make sense
the worst thing about bf1 , is the lady announcer
i like her in the menu
where she acts as a tour guide respectful of the events
can you choose something like an officer telling u to advance?
i know there s a make voice too but it s the same tonej
You can change it to a dude
he still is a museum tour right?
?
how does the dude say : "we've captured objective apples" ?
well yeah
in bf 4 , you d have someone radio in telling u u got an objective
i like bf1 for being very respectful towards the time period and having the operation screen and the intro cinematics trying to be historicaly accurate
that s great
and the announcer lady is very good outside the game
especially when telling the players about alt hist outcomes of the battles
Agreed
I don't mind her but now that you pointed this out I might hate her next time I hop into a game lol
in conquest she s alright
in operations she clashes with the music sometimes
I've honestly only played conquest a handful of times in 1
me too
I'm always playing operations
Same
the first time ive played operations , i expected the objective announcer would be the same person from the intro cinematics
if u were to get a speech whenever you advanced a sector instead of the announcer lady , i wouldnt had minded her so much
it seems like the 2nd biggest missed opportunity
the 1st being not having 2 more dlcs
one in the colonial theatres (so they can add black people because they need too) and one in the balkans
hell , add a japanese dlc too
maybe if they have a soul in them , add some alt history too
mexico vs us for example
i would had taken a dlc taking place in the east african campaign instead of turning tides to be honest
First game on BFV and cheater ended the game or something, I alt f4d. Is that common?
agree but limit the sliding 🙂
Leap into chaos 💥🤯 #BattlefieldHighlights
Be sure to send us your epic gameplay moments from the #Battlefield for a chance to be featured next! 🏆
Is there a way to link steam with another EA App account?
It is possible, but I don't remember how it is done
But are you about to lose count or something?
i found it i think
oh, good, What battlefield do you play?
I'm new here, returning player to Battlefeild on console. Anyone play on PS5?
BFV is good
My favorite BF after 3
It has 2 big issues though
1- Anti cheat, I still see players with this setup 
2- Lack of eastern front
BF1 has more WW2 Russian weaponry in it than BFV
If they also wanted to do ''woman in WW2'' aspect they should've added Russian campaign honestly
Soviet female snipers actually played a role in WW2
Also a minor nitpick which is lack of smoke grenades for assault and support class
They are extremely good in BFV
But only medic and recon can use them
I mostly play as medic and recon anyways but when I need an anti tank I can't go to the objective and destroy the tank due to lack of smokes and ending up in the crossfire on the way to objective
Will admit it’s crazy how often you could be on Iwo Jima for instance and nobody but yourself uses smokes
One medic can cover what feels like an entire push with just their starting smokes
I gave BFV's slide as an example because it's not fast really, it's slow but controllable, 2042's slide however is fast but you can't control it that's why I don't like it, slide in BFV isn't faster than running or first jumping speed, first jumps are always faster in fact, subsequent jumps are slower though because of momentum
Imo, they need to completely remove “tactical” sprinting in the next bf. There’s just no point to having 2 different sprint speeds
And I’m pretty sure they didn’t even do it right in 2042. Like, from what I’ve seen, tac sprinting doesn’t make aiming down sights take longer so there’s no point in normally sprinting
hard rn

It seems to affect the sprint to fire times over ads speeds, so there’s that. But for the most part it’s there to offset the huge maps we had and still have for the most part. I’m indifferent as it’s removal won’t change too much for me
Tac sprint is just bad overall imo
I don’t hate or love it, but I’ll admit I always use it
Yeah I do in 2042 because otherwise people get the advantage. But as an overall feature. Shouldn't be in BF to begin with
tac sprint bad. tac sprint only exist because 128. 128 bad.
128 people = multiplayer. Therefore multiplayer bad
but 64 player good. multiplayer good.
happi
Battlefield bad
unhappi
in BF1, is Burton the only gun with a bayonet that support has?
I don't think so,probably have more support
anyone else missing their class assignments in bf5?
Did DICE really nerf the Gewehr 43? Cuz it's still feels busted
SARs are generally underrated
Three shot kill at most reasonable ranges is not to be sneezed at
I see, was annoyed getting killed by one especially on maps like Iwo Jima and Assault players having the ghillie suit skins
Those skins were a mistake
I believe that skins should be class locked
There's a bunch that are clearly meant for certain classes already
Literally it's hard to spot some of them in the map especially on conquest
At least in Breakthrough it's linear
Like the ones carrying a whole heap of spare ammo obviously being for Support
Also is there a way to grind the vehicles faster? since I just recently returned playing BFV
Not really. You're just gonna have to get them when you can
amemus
nope, you're stuck with your low level vehicles against fully leveled players for a while, enjoy

1 and 5
there a way to reset BF1 stats?
Well, if you want we can play sometime
I think you can't do that
How is battlefield 5?
@plucky cairn I know I may be in the minority but Battlefield 5 may be my favorite. Theres not much better than playing a round of breakthrough and taking over Iwo Jima.
whens the next news on new battlefield
Gewehr 43 is okay but nowhere near as good as Gewehr 1-5 or Turner
So many people sleeps on Gewehr 1-5 despite it having 3 body shot potential up to 50 meters like the rest of the semi autos while also having 30 round mag and lightened stock
Turner is in somewhere between 43 and 1-5
Faster than 43 with bigger mag, better range and smaller mag size than 1-5
Idk I usually ran across alot of Assault players using the Gewehr 43 than the 1-5 or Turner especially on large maps like Panzerstorm or Iwo Jima
Man 
I think people sleep on 1-5 due to how ARlike it is
You need to be spammy which you might as well use an AR at that point
G43 is better than 1-5 and Turner at range though but honestly at that range might as well use a sniper
Yes
People told me to ask for EA help but they don’t seem helpful 
I have intense lag issues in India for bf5
Need a fix guys
Ping if you guys have any
Amogus
Amogsus
Company of Heroes 1 has a particular detail in its MG-42 that I've never seen in any other game, not even Battlefield
Namely, the thing actually has non-disintegrating belts that are visibly extracted from the chamber in one piece as it fires
BF1 has a few MGs with similar ones on its drum mags, but nothing like this is in V
COH is especially impressive here because that game came out in like 2008
And it's an RTS, so little details like that would never be missed
Yeah pretty active for a decade old game
yes
how big is the community on Xbox for BF1?
AMOGUS
On PSN it is, can't speak for Xbox or PC.
Idk maybe as good as PS or PC I would say
You know what I take it back, screw them also how the hell this gun kills so fast in close range especially if I have a Type-2A
Gewehr 1-5 is a bs gun no doubt
Got killed alot by this gun especially on high-level players
Some highlights from Battlefield 2 (2005) mod, hope you enjoy and maybe you join to us 😄 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t75pde7SnFI
Many SMGs and ARs has better damage output than Type 2A
Even obscure stuff like EMP which has a better TTK
if the medal asks to place on the top 5 of the round does this work if i join in a server with 5 people on my team
Honestly I agree I started using the Thompson and that gun shreds especially on medium ranges
Yeah
People use Type 2A because you have so many bullets with so much speed
It makes it seem OP
BF infantry meta has always tended towards having the largest magazine you can muster
Because none of these idiots can aim
Or they can and that makes them much more of a problem because now the fuckers don't even need to reload
Get rid of drum mags in 2042
lmg go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
I mean, i think there are bigger problems than drum mags existing
so why did bfv have an update on steam >.....>
New anti-cheat to improve security.
so does that mean bf1 got its anti cheat too?
I'm not entirely sure, I'm on PSN.
odd well nice to see did notice a lack of a few cheaters that werfe getting pretty blatent
Imagine if they put that much effort into their games on the regular instead of making cosmetics and shit.
Also welcome to the server.
ohhhhh ive been here on and off since beta test for bf1 i just dont like having servers to games i dont play clutering discord
@vale grail so just me or do tank shells seem to curve at you? im guessing tank and plane hit detection is client side ?
Fuck if I know outside of the fact I watched multiple direct hits not register.
shrugs bf1 made more since bfv its wierddddd
And the shells curve depending on what angle you're on
BF1 was made by a bunch of passionate developers that made a love letter to history, BFV was so horridly restrictive and censored with all the revisionism crap it caused said passionate developers to quit en mass creating a massive vacuum in company members that knew how to make Battlefield games.
That and on top of 2042 just being a shit game by design, it's a miracle that DICE and EA aren't filing for bankruptcy.
EA still have their cash cows
makes me wonder hmmm bf1 and bfv are both frostbite. what is reaalllly stopping the devs from going back. i mean the balance in both is bad. bfv the k31 hads semi hit detection and the infer basically crashes people
odd cause the earnings calls and my stocks in ea say other wise
So they aren't making money anymore?
ohhh they are just not on pc or consoles
most here have forgotten that ea has a massive moblie department
why do you think they tried forcing the battlefield app on us
They scrapped mobile battlefield like, a year or two ago.
Simple, they're not the same group of developers and BF1's on an older version of frostbite that they're not trained on.
Their mobile revenue is smaller than their PC revenue though
unless im reading these stats wrong
Even if they were I highly doubt they're breaking even, even Disney said that they've gone too far and gotten greedy. Fucking Dinsey!
you do realize how frostbite works??? its not easy but its far more cost effective to update the engines
The game won't magically update if you change the engine, that's like putting a modern V8 into a Model T. Neither are compatible.
public stats and the stuff share holders get is usually a bit different as they cant give the public a full picture
And yet they expect people to pay into something that's only partial data? Honestly if you're buying stocks that're going into something you can only get a glimpse at then it's on you if it goes to shit.
frostbite is an odd engine but you do realise that consoles you a generation older frostbite then the pc version ?
Even so, the current developers are all the people hired to replace the ones who left during BFV's development. They don't have training on the older varients of the frostbite engine.
And even if they did I've been asking for months for a legacy of life update for BF1 but I didn't get shit in terms of progress.
shrugs fair enough.
ill just stop fighting it and be a good boy and eat the newest slop
They've got one Ace in The Hole with the TitanFall 2 developer spearheading the next Battlefield game, they better not burn it.
What the actual hell are you on about, no one's saying to play or buy into BFV or 2042.
You can just play the older games like I do.
as xDefiant has shown, do not discount the possibility of a game being bad just because someone from a good game is involved with it.
now i never said that buttttt ok
Hell, the campaign alone for Bad Company 2 is more fun in one level than the entirety of 2042's multiplayer.
Titanfall 2 was good because of everyone working on it, not just one guy.
you literally just did man...
Because of the lead guy's directing helping out with the game's core design. He's working solo with DICE to make the next Battlefield game as far as I remember without any Respawn people joining in.
ok?
still. don't discount the possibility. one guy alone does not make a good game.
I know, that's why I'm calling him the Ace in The Hole, it's a guarantied win for DICE if they're smart about it.
I'm holding out a tepidly lukewarm hope but they better bring the heat if they expect more than that from me and anyone else.
That being said, BFV crashing literally every single time I try to load into a multiplayer game is insane!
I literally have to join a server twice to actually play.
It's a feature at that point
2042 is still frostbite
every game since bf4 is on frostbite 3
mhm but frostbite 3 wasnt based on the frostbite engine. it was a modded engine. frostbite 4 was in house
battlefield 4 really mastered frostbite 3's features
but they really toned that down game by game, except for the graphics
my battlefield hardline progress appears on the battlelog website, but when i start up the game it's stuck at the start, and i can only start the prologue
if anyone knows a solution to this, please let me know
i believe hardline servers where all shut down a few months back no?
i was playing ok a couple days or a week ago, and i could also play a bit of the multiplayer
unless it's just the cloud saves and the official servers that got screwed
reinstalling the game rn, gonna see if that solves it
i also found online it might have something to do with windows defender, but didn't find a concrete solution
why bf3 servers showing full players but when i join its empty no one play lol ?
so is it just me or scoping in with the m3 infer insta crashes you ? EDIT. this is bfV and the k31 still has dodgy hit reg
It’s a deliberately exploited bug by server owners. Bf4 had the same problem
Anyone tryna play battlefield V I'm on PlayStation
Pretty much my reason especially on BFV, I usually get 3-5 multi kills especially on breakthrough
he knows what’s up
Whom here knows about this? https://youtu.be/0vqMfcD1-OY?si=N-Fs7uJMQ3KW-Dzc
Totally not a bot
Me? No, I'm human 🙂 It's a link to the Battlefield inspired show called Rush.
thats exactly what a bot would say
lol, no worries man
👽 ^
I think bf1 > bf42
Quick Question can i Start Battlefield V without an Internet connection?
bf 2042 > bf1 > bf42
Na lowkey they should revive bf1 if they want battlefield to rival cod again bf1 best bf game
They made apex to rival cod bud
why
😢
we need xbox to rival playstation
Same way we need bf to rival cod
Life is empty without rivalries
Like a batman without a joker
How life feels rn
Since they said they'd do community testing early next year, do you think we'll see bf6 gameplay in like February, March? That'd be earlier than what we're used to.
It better be smthing set in recent times or the past
They already proved they can’t pull off the future thing right 😭
Imagine bf4 free for all
Nah, Conquest is still my go to mode since it's more open unlike BT. I only play BT when I want more intensity
More like a featured reason not to pre-order whatever the fuck comes next.
literally any hardcore server
They did well enough with 2142, the Final Fronts BF4 DLC had the beginings of the 2142 storyline seen with the hover tanks, the titan hovership and Giants of Corellia map.
😧🥃
yes
w opinion
wtf is 2042 even eww
id be happy if they make battlefield 3 alive again
You should always pre order, what can go wrong?
Thing about conquest is that it attracts alot of new players and it becomes boring with easy kills after about 200 hours even with sweats in the mix, BT is always competitive
Yo, just curious I’m playing assault in battlefield five and are there any weapon skins you can get for it?
2042 dont have a tv missle in heli ?
does ppl in bf5 even party up
What platform are you on?
PC
An okay, well on XBox a lot party up
We party more on playstation
I bet, I hate playing BFV solo
That's the best way to play V
Solo? Nah, after 6 years of the game it’s friends that keep it interesting
Dang I didn't last more than 2 days on V
I can do 6 years on 2042 cause well it's the goat
The exact opposite to me 😂
its dead

has anyone been able to fix the error where it wants me to reset my password to play online on BF4? i’ve reset password a handful of times and still get the same screen.
Cuz 5 was a higher skill gap and a harder learning curve. In my opinion it was better for competitive players.
I just returned to bfv after a year and within a month got a group of about 50-60 active players that host community games daily. Such as squad conquest, rush, domination, and frontlines.
If your interested in joining PM me
We are north American mostly
Funny enough, I’m returning tonight after a 2 month break on Overwatch. I have a clan and also run a big Xbox Facebook community so always have folk to play with.
Oh dam we are on PSN lol
Good luck to yah tho bro. Lots of new players
At least for PSN side
You too
why is V higher skill gap
what makes it diff
its the only battlefield game i play so idk
Doesn't take any skill to play V at all, it's 100% teamwork and patience
wat teamwork
In 2042 you can actually solo deep in enemy territory and out smart the enemy
pc bf5 my teammate cant even speak english
Exactly that's why V is trash
I know sweats who can solo carry a team on BFV
You never played in a competitive battlefield league then
It takes plenty of skill
No it doesn't dude
Plus he likes 2042 😂😂😂
That's your assumption
I quit 2042 cuz there is no competitive players to recruit lol
2042 is the most competitive game in history
Pshhh
Players here hate 2042 cause they got rekt and feelings hurt
this is the first time i hear ppl associating battlefield with competitive
2042 is boring cuz I was top player every round
Ridiculous statement, I know the competitive players on Xbox and none of them stayed on 2042. Many went back to BFV whilst others changed franchise.
Look up Esports Battlefield League.
There were other leagues that shut down too.
Shut down cuz 2042 was nothing close to being competitive
Really? Esport in BF? Oh please
Look it up, cant doubt it till you check if it was real
Died in BFV a lot cuz of the updates not being what they were supposed to be
Then 2042 buried it
say
what is squad order
in bf5
i got a weekly assignment on it but idk what it is
im guessing its not the same as daily order
But still, Conquest is the bread and butter of Battlefield. It should always be the main mode unless we're talking about Bad Company since that game's main mode was always Rush
Rush XL >
Rush XL is cancer
Tbf BF4 had an E-Sports but died after 1 and a half year afaik
Heh
I still want variety
I didn't say taking the other modes, I just said Conquest should be the main mode
We could as Breakthrough as well
And yet, these servers always have conquest
Ass
Well people like conquest, just gonna have to deal with it
It's not even my favorite
Again you're gonna have to do deal with it cuz majority like conquest
And this is why AI bot is a need
Couldn't care less honestly since the AI bots in 2042 was alright so I could expect they'll put them in the next Battlefield
Yessir revive the franchise
in a match when a squad leader points out a capture point, that's called a "squad order" ya gotta cap some points
Anyone want to join my squad on battlefield 1 today? I got the server number ready for ya
if they are programmed correctly
they cannot be basic and boring
atm, BF4 will soon have one with WR
What platform
Battlefield
Anyone for some bf2042 ps
I got my own playlist for maps, Argonne Forest, ballroom blitz,river somme,st quieten scar,passchendaele,amiens, Verdun heights,sossions
is there a game mode on bfV for just planes?
Lol even bf2 still has some community esports
Bf3/4 and 1 and 5 and 2042 host comp events
Lol since when was bf teambased
You get rolled the moment a good player joins the game
Gameplay wise? Hard call tbh
Id say 42 gunfights are much better since people actually use guns in that game
Bf1 players spam nades at you first thing they see you
And story wise and aesthetic wise too
This is what pulled ppl tbh
It only had 3 good campaigns realisticly
Most of the maps are pretty bad based on balance factor and gameplay wise
I could get 40 kills alone with spamming dynamite and nades in fort
42 has grenade spam but its not as braindead as 1
Getting shot a crossbow nade at you thats magnetic and explodes on impact by some low lvl dice buffed player out of pure luck grinds gears pretty hard
So no it doesnt have great gameplay
42 has bad players but theres some good to it, easy to pick up for new coming pc players/fps players, no complex or bs mechanics
Just kinda bland for a bf game
Literally everything all at once.
Is there a LFG for BF1 here or should I find a different discord?
yes
so im cvrashing going into matches in BFV ummmm im confused ?
The first ever pre-order I lost out on was 2042, paid my £100 (or whatever it was) and left game after 10 days. I’m not going to cry about it though, it’s not even one meal out with the family.
No bud you got the pre order bonus

ic ty
DLC prices are low as of today.
The battlefield reddit and community’s takes worry me for the next title more than dice at this point we do NOT need battlefield tarkov at all
Like guys, no matter how fast you design your game, if you wanna play slow, camping and slower playstyles are always viable, unless they make players explode, please dont limit the rest of us that want to push objectives more aggresively
I dont think anyone’s asking for slide cancelling MW3 level movement, just let me dolphin dive into cover bruh
I think they'll slow it down but by how much is the question.
holli
Uhhh no thanks
I mean sure i’d like to to dive backwards or sideways but thats it
Maybe omnidirectional sprinting?
They’ll nerf the slide most likely
I hope they dont touch the ttk
Specially if they’re slowing movement down
hot take but MW22’s movement could work well in a battlefield title, it’s agile but not over the top, diving would be great for getting out of danger, the jumping ADS penalty kinda sucks but it could be tweaked
They will buff it
Does anybody play battlefield 1 or 5
I'm trying MW right now and oh my god this game is a fucking disaster
You thought 2042's skins were dumb? I'm constantly getting shot at by literal clowns.
And yet despite everyone having the most garish skins of all time, I still can't see the bastards
Not specifically that game, you're better off going to #lfg-pc #lfg-xbox #lfg-playstation channels and posting there.
The game's running on Amtrak.OS, I've had the same issues too.
No need to compare 2042 to that circus
Spawns are a disaster too
Just today I spawned in between two guys in the middle of a pitched firefight
I didn't even have time to get my gun up
The entire game is just a clusterfuck

Would anyone mind if I go on a touch of a rant?
guys despite my steam account being linked to my ea account battlefield 1 is not there in the ea site library
why
i tried to link it from the web but it says i cant since it is already linked
how did yall run the game ?
M1917 is moderately op in BF1
I bought it on EA's site (Origin back in the day) but a google search tells me to A: Wait a bit for the sites to refresh, B: Close/Open EA Play, C: Sign out of/Sign into EA Play and D: Uninstall/Reinstall EA Play
You might also just be able to run the game from Steam
IMHO it's OK. The suppressed variant is great, with a nice sweet spot for mid-range and a silencer is a W, but I find it's normal irons kinda meh, and it kinda gets outclassed on both ends.
Try waiting a day first
Then go to B
Then C
Then D
man this is ridiculous
I know it sucks, but technology is pain
why cant they not make a launcher
Are u kiddin'. It's clearly more than ok concerning balance
It's actually a something close to a laser
...The bolt action?
IDK, man. It's EA. Mostly, they expect you to have bought the game on EA and play it from there
Clearly the best ones are the SMLE and the Lebel.
(The Lebel may not actually be good but I like it so neh)
Lebel is great but the downside is the slow reload
thanks for the help btw
MG's are braindead if you get up against a window
because the bipod removes all recoil and spread
which is very cool and not annoying at all
The M1917 is a tad op at least
Also, hot take; I'm BIG on the M1903 Springfield. LOVE the Experimental
yeah but if you're playing Scout properly you're not gonna be close enough for that to matter
also you can cancel the reload.
Campaign 1-10?
it's good
I'm also big on the Henry, even post-nerf
Nah
Pedersen device on the springfield
Multiplayer mostly
Campaign?
What about campaign?
i love somehow always being in the sweetspot of the Martini Henry for some reason
didnt work
For me, it's the sound
never played it cause i'm on PC and i am not playing the game at 60 FOV
I've hit 300+ yard shots on running soldiers with the irons
They do SHIT damage, but god the sound is good
meh.
Us almost settled for the intermediate pedersen cartridge
And there is nothing like getting hot and getting kill after kill in the sweet spot
.276 Pedersen
Also; hot take; I HATE the interplay between vehicles and infantry in BF games
It's always my least favourite part of BF games
fuck the sweet spot mechanic though
it's dumb, and i hate it.
Yes and no. I personally like it, but I see why you dislike it
well yeah i can see why you like it because you don't feel like getting headshots.
The sweet spot mechanism is good in its own way
i tried signing using my steam account but i get an error page in the web
I'd say on scoped variants it's unfair
Letting someone miss headshots at range where the opponent can't fire back sucks
BUT
It works really well when you're at midrange with something like the Martini
Where the opponent can engage
And where you should get rewarded for hitting the shot
honestly, i feel like un-scoped bolts should've just had an extended close range one shot. like up to 15 meters as opposed to like 5.
none of this "oh it one shots if they're this distance away but if they're any further or closer than it doesn't" nonsense
I did not know about bolt cycling on the general liu rifle
OR
real big hot take here
guys how can i delete my ea account ?
make it so unscoped bolts can't oneshot to the body at all, but they have quicker bolt speed compared to scoped variants.
why do you want that?
Making it easier to 2-3 shot someone to the body.
i bought battle fielkd on steam and it wont let me run it
their launcher doesnt recognize the game and it wont let me link my steam account as it says it is already linked or the web page gives me an error page
so i am startinhg from the ground
I get it
i have nothing on it anyways but preogression of cod mobile
oh thats activisin
my bad
like, make it so Bolt Actions can't one shot to the body at all, but they can one shot to the head, and Infantry/Unscoped bolts have faster bolt chambering speed, so it's more possible to get kills in relatively close range with 'em despite taking 2-3 shots to the body.
The problem with making it doable to 2-hit to the body is that you can never 2 hit to the body. You land one, and then die to the spray of an automatic weapon. I like sweet spots for unscoped weapons, because it rewards the more difficult aiming of an unscoped rifle with a greater ability to one-hit
On scoped weapons, sure it's BS. You have a scope, land the hit to the head. But without a scope, it's fine I think
"The problem with making it doable to 2-hit to the body is that you can never 2 hit to the body."
yes you can actually. aiming with the iron sight bolts is not that hard, especially considering you shoot from screen center in BF1 unlike something like BFV.
is it a bit harder? maybe. but i wouldn't say it's not possible.
I can never get 2 shots off. I shoot once, try to cycle, and die to the Automatico/Hellriegal/MP18/SMG08 in my face
i mean unless you're playing against The Flash then the issue there is that you're getting too close.
like i said i don't think it's that hard.
this is silly, body shot > switch to sidearm to quickly finish is a bf1 classic
like I could see this working out in like, mid-range. Like I said as well, they can still one shot, they can just only do that to the head.
So if getting two shots off in close range is an issue, then try aiming for the head.
which honestly you should try to be doing anyway.
like, my thinking here is that Sweet Spot is a dumb mechanic and the idea that it exists for the sake of the Infantry Bolts is kind of stupid considering it's entirely possible to make them play differently from the scoped bolts without turning them into basically shotguns with arbitrary one shot ranges.
sweet spot is a truly awful idea. but i dont know if dice learned anything as the ntw50 exists
like, it is genuinely possible to get two shots off provided you're not literally in someone else's face
it's crazy to say it isn't
like maybe it'd be a bit dicey with the normal bolt chamber speeds, but I did say that infantry bolts should have faster bolt speed.
i don't think that's an unreasonable benefit for them to have considering they have no scope and are expected to be used at closer ranges
I feel like it’s so hard to fly a plane in battlefield 5, not because it’s hard to maneuver or bomb but there’s always some sweaty duo that meat ride each other every single time, so when I attack one of them the other one comes to help
Like bro leave me alone I just wanna bomb with my JU in peace
yeah flying planes is generally hard, people spend a lot of time playing just to learn how to do that.
But how am I gonna counter two spitfires that are duod??
gotta find a friend of your own so you can bait them into fliegerfausts
¯_(ツ)_/¯
ask someone who is better at flying planes.
generally teamwork is required to beat teamwork
not always of course but its the best bet
My teammates don’t even help me when I’m attacked, they just run away waiting for them to be next lmao
yeah randoms are reliable in one way: they're not reliable
don't rely on randoms.
I feel like u need a balance between fighters and bombers, but everyone plays bomber to get that quadruple kills
but with a friend you can bait pilots into easy deaths
get friends, or play with people that are better.
like even as a tanker ive shot down low flying planes that a friend baits them into
with a fliegerfaust its even easier
I get that this is more intuitive, but is this actually better? Do we want the bolt action rifles to be close range cannons that can challenge shotguns?
not really which is why i proposed the "they can't one shot to the body at all but infantry bolts have quicker bolt chambering speed so getting two body shots to get a kill is more viable. they can still one shot to the head naturally" thing.
you know thats already a thing right?
in like one gun, the Russian 1895 Trench, yes.
sweet spot aside I do wish there were more carbines.
Its wierd, only a few weapons have carbine versions and half the time its on a weapon that didnt actually have carbine version.
carbines would've been nice but it would be better if infantry bolts weren't just used as a scapegoat for the inclusion of a really bad and annoying mechanic
I think it's annoying.
i find getting oneshotted to the body at an arbitrary range annoying.
aint arbitrary, usually the size is a balancing factor. From a player pov, a 1 shot kill from far away isnt too different if its sweet spot or just a headshot. Either way its an instant kill from someone you probably couldnt engage with. Only way to make it different is if you use sweetspot as an excuse.
headshots are usually earned though, like a vast majority of the time. Sweetspot bodyshots though, are mostly accidental, you can't really gauge if someone is in your sweet spot as you're playing, they just shoot at anyone they can see and occasionally someone will die due to the sweetspot mechanic.
you can't really gauge if someone is in your sweet spot as you're playing
its called depth perception
with enough practice, sure you can. Hell thats not even a skill unique to BF1, any BF game with bullet drop rewards learning this
have you tried?
Tried what
learning how to guage distance in game
Never spent time trying to do that specifically. I generally just keep rifles in BF1 sighted at like 100m and that works most of the time.
I don't really use iron sight bolts at all, i usually just use the Lebel sniper.
because the lebel is cool.
it is
like
I usually just go for headshots. because that makes sense.
like, people say that sweet spot promotes playing more actively
but to be honest, just making infantry bolts rechamber quicker would accomplish basically the same thing
while not resulting in bodyshot one shot kills.
like i am generally of the opinion that body shot oneshot kills should be limited as much as possible.
explosions are fine.
Id look into trying to guage the sweet spot. Even if a headshot is still a 1 shot kill, a sweet spot shot to the body can be faster or more reliable. (think, for example, the awp vs the scout in cs).
the scout can only one shot to the head tho
exactly
also we're talking about a one life format on significantly smaller maps
its true in all cs modes
both the scout and the awp are 1 shots to the head, but the awp is signifigantly more dangerous because an awper can kill much more reliably. The awp has a much larger margin for error.
yeah, i know. I just don't think that's necessary to have in all games.
im not even saying that it is. Just saying that if youre using the lebel a bunch, its still worth learning the 1 shot range.
i know the one shot range, it's any range that i can get a headshot out to.
if the margin of error didnt matter, we'd see a scout meta in cs for sure. give it a try
i didn't say it didn't matter
also, we're not talking about CS.
is there anything that makes the comparison invalid? If anything I cant think of a better example to demonstrate how 1 shot hitbox size effects a players lethality.
It's generally a widely held opinion that sweet spot was not a great mechanic, though, and the reason that's the case is obvious, nobody likes getting oneshotted to the body. People attribute it's existence to iron sight bolts, but I think iron sight bolts could've been tweaked to make the mechanic not necessary while also differentiating them from the scoped bolts in how they're used.
it'd be kind of akin to the medic SLR's but slower and mostly killing in two shots at most engagement ranges, as well as having the possibility to oneshot to the head with good aim.
which i think is a fine compromise.
I think you misunderstand my point.
Im not arguing whether its a good mechanic atm. We've had that conversation before, and its not like BF1 is going to remove it, nor do I think its gonna be brought back ever. Hell Im not even sure WW1 will ever be done again.
What I am saying is that you, if you decide to play BF1 with the lebel again, should learn that mechanic. Im saying that, in the game that exists, its worth practicing how to guage distance, and that at any skill level this can make you a better player.
perhaps. It's unlikely that i'll play BF1 again though.
I like thinking about how it could've been a better game.
instead of being a nice art piece to walk around in.
if you want my radical take: i think it should have leaned further into ww1 weaponry.
A mechanic like sweet spot, or a similar compromise like the trench variants, only exists because these slow firing weapons need to compete with weapon types that came decades later. If the game was built around most people having crappy, slow and hard hitting weapons, then not only would those weapons be easier to translate to the sandbox, but the game would also be even more of a unqiue and fun experience
maybe they shouldn't have had SMG's at all.
theyd be a good pickup weapon.
nah fuck elite classes
just a pickup weapon
1800 RPM SMG with 500 HP, fuck that meme
how anyone thought that was acceptable is beyond me
1800 is insane
500 HP is insane.
The BF1918 mod (the one for BF1942) is able to split the weapons up pretty evenly: rifles, carbines, pistols, and mgs.
Once again Ive never felt annoyed by elite kits.They have an achilles heel with the bayonet, dogshit hp regen that forces them to stay by medics, and usually youre alerted if one spawns nearby. Theyre just fun to play and fight.
i hate the concept of them. like i said, 1800 RPM SMG with 500 HP.
Only real thing that bothers me is that the mg08/15 should have been an infantry weapon, I dont see why the standard german lmg should be limited to that.
i mean the other MG's are good in BF1 i donno why that one needed to be there
like
Elite Classes and Behemoths should've been exclusive elements in Operations.
Like, limit them to that big theatrical thing, get 'em out of normal gamemodes so i can play like Conquest or whatever and not see them.
theyre fun.
If you think they're fun then you could go play Operations.
pickups are fun when they dont make you into 5x health damage sponges
It's a win-win. You get to play a mode with them and I can play modes that don't have them.
so the sandbox mode has fun sandbox elements removed and thats a win-win because...
like I said, removed from the sandbox mode
or just make them not stupid
operations is part of the sandbox
yes but other modes are much more restrictive. Conquest is the most receptive (not sure if thats the best word) for player freedom.
i don't think it is but i don't know what you're trying to say anyway.
in operations you are limited to one section of the map, and that section will gradually move. In conquest you can go anywhere, whenever you want. As a mode, conquest leans far more into the sandbox aspect of battlefield, because it is the mode that best enables the player to do what they want.
but here's the thing: Operations could've done with more unique elements anyway, people aren't a fan of the pickups that turn people into bullet sponges and also the losing team getting massive vehicles in modes like Conquest and Rush. A simple solution to the problem is to put those elements in Operations and leave them in there, so people who want a more standard BF experience can get it, while people who wanna play with those things can go play Operations.
funny how the new battlefield anti cheat is basicly just 2 layers of punkbuster anti cheat they made waaaay back in bf3 and it shows up 24/7 on your task manager XD
that's funny
anti cheat must work pretty good since ive never ran into a cheater
youre just kneecapping conquest.
If someone is butthurt over fun sandbox mechanics, they are free to play tdm or dom.
this isn't even an original viewpoint i've literally taken this viewpoint from NickelBF's BF1 review.
who?
Former BF competitive player. Really good at the game.
Played with and against the best players in the world on BF4.
and?
ok.
Im not sure if thats supposed to mean anything to me
probably doesn't.
but yeah, I donno, I don't think saying stuff like elite kits and behemoths should've been exclusive to operations is really kneecapping Conquest. if anything, I think their existence kneecaps Conquest.
the bonus hp sort of makes sense in the context of 64 player operations, maybe. but in conquest its ass
pure ass
I think, if you have this take, you might fundamentally misunderstand why people enjoy and still play BF1.
comp play in bf hahaaa that like saying your a comp cod player. comp is a joke that feeds money to a few rich people and gives no one value its why comp leagues are drying and dying in mass
and you might fundamentally misunderstand why people like classic battlefield
which bf1 conquest is not
never said it was. 1s probably the most unique of the bunch.
it was, but it also wasnt a huge scene
microscopic at best
bf and cod are brain dead games that aanyhone can pick up and learn and master in hours. as the decades have gone by they have dumbed them even more so younger generations can understand
comp is gonna exist for any large game like this. Its just with battlefield most players arent really playing it to master it.
pretty sure the lead gameplay dev for dice is a bf4 comp player
I mean I understand perfectly why people enjoy and play BF1. Because it looks pretty and they wanna be "immersed".
unless hes gone now too haha
...With how 2042 turned out, I don't think that's true.
only games with a company willing to take a massssive lost every quarter has a one after all LoL literally losts billions a year on there comp leagues
i mean the titles are nebulous but I'm pretty sure he got that title after 2042 came out
plenty of BF games look pretty. But that wears off over time. If the cinematics were the only thing holding it together, operations would be the only popular mdoe. People still play 1 because, shockingly, they find it fun. Most people in the game right now are having fun.
that would imply he had that job while 2042 was still getting updates
theres a reason so many "comp" focused games died in under a year. people want fun not sweat
or hes working on the next game
games arent produced in a year
🦜
i never played bf1 in its prime rip
Because most of the people playing BF1 are not really concerned about good gameplay. You barely see any serious discussion about BF1's gameplay, most of the talk about it is the graphics and it being immersive.
its why the finals its still alive even if i never touched it. they arent focused on comp play just a fun game
And yet, theyre having fun. Oh sure the immersion is talked about a ton, the game hit it out of the park in that regard so thats what sticks with people. But you hop on right now and you find a bunch of servers of people having fun.
which begs the question, what is good gameplay?
You don't see people talking about how it's ridiculous that they put visual recoil back in after removing it in BF4. You don't see people talking about suppression being a bad mechanic. Sight sway, weapon balance, sweet spot, most BF1 players don't give a shit about any of that.
you definitley see people talk about weapon balance
Not in my experience.
where i can get help?
this is a case of survivor bias
the smg08 is still talked about to this day
was there ever a broken gun in 2042?
the people that would have complained about that shit dont care about bf1 anymore
haha
when game came out there was 1 working gun

1 gun
as it should because who the hell decided to add that thing to the game
Assault didn't need an 84 round SMG.
Its not like 1's a small playerbase. Its retention is roughly the same as the others around it, if not slightly better.
at least, judging by steam
problem with bfv is they need 1 maybe 2 balance passes and to fix the didgy hit reg on the k31 anddddd the infer still crashing people on amd .. bf1 ehhhhh there are a few things that need serious balancing
BFV's main problem is spread to recoil conversion.
better then bf1 cone bull
(every bf game has a cone of fire)
spread is a fine mechanic, BF1's problem is visual recoil with spread + no visual indicator for spread
BF1 used to have tracers in first person for this reason but they got removed
trueee but this is literally made rtto be not accurate unless 3 things are set
1 also did not convey suppression well which lead to people misinterpeting it as normal spread
my only issue with suppression is that it can be accidentally procced.
It needs to require continuous fire or something.
I don't like my aim being effected by someone shooting near me and missing.
I don't think that's a unreasonable thing to dislike.
and missing.
Yeah exactly. It needs to be intentional
Like, if there has to be a suppression effect in game, it shouldn't effect your aim. maybe effect visibility and hearing, but you should still be able to aim and hit things.
make it psychotic and work like squad 
wouldn't work in a game like Battlefield.
(yea that was a joke)
I think as an intentional debuff, supression can improve the game by allowing players to disadvantage people who are huddled up in a corner, and by allowing people to defend themselves when engaged with an enemy who out ranges them. This is especially good for providing counterplay against snipers who've historically been a pain in the ass to make fun to fight for developers.
The main issues come when suppression is applied by complete accident or when its poorly conveyed to the player. In these cases it just feels fucking random as opposed to a play the enemy has made.
Suppression should be a visual distraction rather than your bullets becoming special ed
I'm gonna be honest with you, I think snipers are generally fucking worthless in a game like this where people respawn.
:I
sure, but the interaction is still gonna be more enjoyable and deep when you have a choice to do something to the sniper as opposed to praying he has bad aim.
Snipers are going to be in the game regardless.
I guess. Tbh I just don't see the point of having them at all. Especially since it creates the problem of people trying to cosplay chris kyle and not helping.
you dont see the point of having sniper rifles in battlefield.. at all
see thats just unreasonable lol
snipers are fun. when they're not op
why is that unreasonable? They're a specialist role irl anyway.
because fun?
It helps at least at helping players push an objective without a player firing down from a building or hill.
yes, watching like 5 people think they're Chris Kyle is very fun
THIS IS THE SITUATIONS THEY CREATE
those people should play Hell Let Loose but cant figure it out
ultimatley its down to the reasons people play BF. For the most part, people arent here to win at all costs. Its not a game like counter strike or deadlock where people are coming in with the intention of mastering everything. People play BF because its a fun sandbox, the objectives only serve to funnel people together to fight.
The sniper serves a purpose by adding to the sandbox, its for people who want to play as a sniper. Its there because sniping is fun. it is the value in of itself.
or play Sniper Ghost Warrior Contracts.
sniper elite
I suspect they'd be dissapointed by HLL's sniper
i mean only jokingly idk if the sniper elite multiplayer is playable
and they're not disappointed getting less than 10 kills in a full game somehow
me personally i do not understand that
Theyre going for the 500m shot dopamine hit
bf franchise has some of the weirdest passive players outside of tarkov
absolute specimens
Most are just modern gamers, the vets never leave the recliner.
Its not really too hard to put together. Theyre going for long shots because they find it fun, and they dont give a shit about their place on the scoreboard.





