#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 127 of 1
5 what
The map

WR will handle that
Only you don't play on battlelog
Warsaw Revamped
xD
Not interested in the project?
I don't know about it
Check it out if you're interested
Can anyone help me with Battlefield V crashing? Ive spent like 2 days trying to figure this out
What message comes up
Or does it straight up close
crashes to desktop
I've tried a lot of stuff like unplugging some of my peripherals to see if it was that, buying the game and downloading it on steam instead of using game pass and EA app, I've repaired files on it in the EA app, while I was using Game pass for it I deleted the setting folder in documents cause I saw that somewhere, I've tried borderless mode, and even more.
It succ cheecc
and updated drives, turned off nvidia geforce experience overlay, turned off EA overlay, turned off ambient occlusion
I also see that on Task Manager both CPU and GPU reach 100%, though CPU more often, but IDK if that's all that bad im not a super big computer person
go into settings and set it to dx11
through documents folder- bfv
ok i will try that
check dm
sent where what is
iirc it was a dx issue
those values are already 0 for me
vsync at 0 too?
actually ill just send you my settings
just copy paste
check dm
No one is gonna play that brooo
Whatever you say
xD
imma come back tomorrow but i might just end up refunding BFV on steam. Idk what the problem is\
Only because VU was underwhelming
At least with WR, it's gonna be more ambitious
WR is the jack of all trades, especially with native support on things from VU
is there anybody knows I have issues on BFV multiplayer, whenever i enter any game I get crash instantly and I try almost every possible solutions
i tried
Maybe look it up and don’t run maxed out settings 
my settings didnt fix it either?
what pc specs do you have?
Yep
swear to allah
Not for oce I don't think
Hey uh, can someone help me with my Battlefield V not launching, and instead opening the EA App?
I've had this issue since 2023, When i tried installing Battlefield V on my new gaming laptop, it would be nice if i can play it again
wdym
like when i launch battlefield v, the game opens in the black screen with the loading icon in a corner, and then force quits to the EA App
i can record the thing for you
can anyone help me with this?
I've looked at steam discussions for hours, tried things and still didn't work
Steam isn’t the only place 🤦♂️
EA forms, Reddit. Idk 🤷♂️ other websites in the search results
went and played on some US servers on bf1 holy shit you guys are dogshit
We’re just here for a fun time damnit
no i mean like proper bot activity like its not fun its just pain to play against
BF1 doesn't exactly give players much motivation to get better.
Is it just me or has the game gotten a lot laggier?
Like in terms of frame performance
I'm getting a shitty 24-45 instead of my usual 75~
@past mango did u try to turn off the overlay inside ea app
whats your guys thoughts on Lumphini garden
Come to 2042 US BT servers not even during peak time bud
we are talking BF1
Mentioned US servers first bud, just saying
probably would still be easy
Cool come on over
and im an average skilled player
2042 doesn't have the best Battlefield players. They are all on BF1, BFV and BF4.
2042 is a cartoon game
what was your ping? in some scenarios high ping can lend an advantage.
You got proof of that bud?
Nobody is talking about which game had the best players in the first place but since you brought it up please provide proof
Okay bud
2042 being a cartoon game that is rejected by hardened Battlefield vets
also playing experience. the players on BF1, V and 4 are just better.
most people would agree with it if they are not coping about 2042 like you
That's funny cause I am one and I play 2042 bud
Just a pure 2042 hater
all you do is cope about 2042. it is a dogwater battlefield.

Everyone hates that game vro
Everyone? There's a nice big population on 2042
did you see the stuff about the next battlefield? it is a complete rejection of 2042.
so go cope in 2042 section, this is for real battlefield titles to be discussed
Before we go there please provide that proof
That the best players are on the old games

i dont need to as it is self-evident
Fail response that was edited
i get more challenge on older games than 2042
i removed an accidental slash i typed.... lmao you gotta fight on everything dont you. so pathetic lmao
Going back to 2042 channel so I can stop laughing so hard
anyways i am not going to continue with you so type to nobody as you one of the lowest iq folks on this server
BFV has almost double current population of 2042. BF1 also up on 2042 by a couple thousand. I will leave it at that.
For a hot minute, 2042 was 2x population of BF1 and BFV combined
I think it was couple months ago or less. It been a while
well it isnt rn
and we are only talking PC but i guess to discuss where the best players are PC is where they are not console 
Now is now, now is not later or before
2042 is the current game, it has been battling since day one to gain and retain players.
We don’t rely on aim assist 
fr
Hey do you like mortal kombat 1 the newest one ?
it was slightly better than 11.... i am not content with modern MK fr
But Steam numbers dosent solve anything. EA app, Xbox, PS and other platforms don’t share their numbers or API for games
I haven’t bought mkt but it’s graphics is gorgeous
Steam are where the goats are 
Steam population is very small among of BF players tbh
we the goats
Steam is the best yep
Steam have more issues with EA and Ubi games, compared to EA and Ubi app alone 
MK 11 was so goofy. The last good MK was MK9.
I never buy my Ubi and ea games from Steam
yea this is fr tbh.
I totally agree with you on mk9 the best because mainly 4 people could play that game together it was more fun
People still buy it on steam and blame ea and ubi 
Aye you paid for it on steam. Not ea and Ubi fault
I think MK9, MK Deception and MK II are the goats of MK.
I would love to see 4p back
so I can ask my friends to buy it
EA and Ubi do be goofy.
I am just sick of them releasing a small roster and putting main MK characters as DLC
With money isn’t it
i mean the app even on its own is a mess to use sometimes lol
yea like Shang Tsung should never be a DLC character
yeah it’s like one day they will ask money for scorpion and sub zero

they would make a lot of money that is for sure lmao
Yep
idk i think that would be the final straw tbh
Can we say MK fell off 
people would go gorilla mode over that
yes MK has fallen off a cliff
Which one you prefer tho MK or Tekken or or Street Fighter
well i mean overall series wise MK is my game. but i do find myself playing more Tekken and SF these days.
I am a MK fan 
which character do you main?
you can probs tell i main Scorpion. However over the years I have had times where I have mained Quan Chi, Raiden and Rain.
Quan chi is awesome
I like his abilities more then raiden
That portal things is cool 😎
Should i have minigun or 30m rounds for my little bird
Minigun is the only way
yew new gameeeeeeeeeeee
Soon™ 
sooooooooon
Hey, anyone else having troubles with Battlefield 3 graphics being extremely flickery?
is bfv worth buying still?
Probably
yesssssss
your graphic card
graphic is so cuteeeeee
I shoot an enemy, they die in 50 shots, they return fire, I die in 3 shots
Only in Battlefield
Is BFV still very active on Xbox?
Maybe hit 3 shots
headshots
guys i just buy the battlefield 5 and when i launch game i have " Crash report handler" with ea anticheat, can someone help me pls?
i know fix that
how
Give me a moment I have to remember
this file is not here
I already tried this method but this file is located in the system itself
system file
i cant delete this
system32?
yes
delete
When you delete it you will be able to play, it is not a system file.
why no?
What appears to you?\
Windows won't let me remove it
what
idk why
send me a screenshot
wait
Deleting System 32 fucks up your pc 
Anyone here getting the ea server connection error for BF1
Worked fine yesterday now it times out saying connection error
its ironic that the europeans and americans in bf1 have 'diverse' skins but not the ottoman empire which had Circassians, Arabs, Kurds, Armenians, Syriacs, Azeri, Lebanese, Lazes...
americans? what side
North america or south america
or Central America
BF1 only added minorities when they were easily recognizable by Americans
is anyone playing bf1 operations rn?
north america
yeah and at it was a really big mistake
like on france or usa i can pass but black soldiers on imperial germany on the WESTERN FRONT????
...don't act like you gave a shit about that prior to BF1 though, let's be real.
anyone else here unable to connect to battlefield at all on xbox?
i would indeed give a shit since im a big fan of history and like to play accurate games
theres literally no reason to add those besides pushing an agenda
but theres no point of being against it since its been 8 years already
Maybe contact ea
Support
Sussy
On battlefield 5 can u still get like all skins like u could when it was supported? Or are new players limited to a select few?
I get what Climax means.
I actually didnt pay much attention. I guess he wants a more historically accurate ww1 game or game in general
youtubes not working either so has to be the actual console
Yikes
Oh
Yea your internet is badboy
tbh i dont got a problem with the guns on bf1 even tho they are inaccurate cuz they were not used or used in a very small scale
Restart
i think it brings even more uniqueness
They had to make it that way
Otherwise it would have been boring
Don't let old BF servers die, I beg you EA
reset the entire console to restore its original settings and not even that worked
I used to play on ps4 years ago but on pc now and have nothing and don’t wanna be stuck with only the boring skins
yeah but its still good they gave spotlight to obscure ass weapons like the hellriegel or smg 08
Are tides of war unlocks still in bfv or has all content been removed other than assignment unlocks
I wonder why they never fix the EA anticheat issue in BFV, crash handler report.... they ruined everything
and we can't use mods anymore.... i used use mods
Say bye to bf3 and bf4
Say hi to bf1 and bf 5
😈
EA being EA
its only being shut down on 360/ps3. those consoles are ancient
Really?
Black ops 3 cheater can run codes in your pc
Well, atleast on consokes
Multiplayer clients are whats mostly used rn
Thank the community for creating alternate multiplayer server
Yeah I don't even touch Bo3 without T7 on
ok so i got everything working
but now an interface updates stuck on 97%
i hate this console
i want to hit cancel but what if it breaks again 💀
ok i pressed it and now its stuck on 0%
my god
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
i am on the verge of insanity
this slizzbin of a console is going to make me go insane

Which one
battlefield 1
Thats not a console
I think BF1 would've been a better game if the SMG 08 wasn't in it.
i only use it to down planes these days
🗿
well
actually to bait them
then i slap them with the aa rocket gun
Hellriegal defensive has 120
The Hellriegal is not free of sin.
eh.
i am skeptical, having actually played BF1.
i have 1100 hours 💀
probably worth mentioning i have service stars for both guns 
I don't recall having unlocked the Defensive Hellriegel. At some point I stopped caring about trying to unlock all weapon variants.
defensive is same thing just more upward recoil
bipod and sight do nothing special unless you plan to go prone on a hill
How it's legal to even have online services running in such a compromised state is downright sickening.
Ask Activision
And you know why already
in general
Playing Wake Island Conquest in Battlefield V is so fucking good
there should be a federal law passed that if a game's online functionality is comprimised then all connection abilities are blocked/have the servers shut down until the security breach is cleared up.
I miss when napalm actually had radious
Meanwhile, Europe is onto something good
America is a wasteland for game
Not even the good kind like FallOut
Outside of Detroit, Newark, most of California, New York Shitty, Compton, any border state, and so on
That's regular boring wasteland
That's why it's better to live in underrated places
like space
Pushing the unexpected #BattlefieldHighlights 🤯
Be sure to send us your epic gameplay moments from the #Battlefield for a chance to be featured next! 🏆
Anyone know if there’s any active community servers on BF5, or is it just Official EA servers? 🙂
Anyone to play and chill
Specify. what. platform. you're. ON.
Anyone willing to help me get death from above trophy for the plat I suck at flying planes so it’s going take me forever without some help on bfv ps5
That's the one for taking out manned emplacements right
Get rockets and fire them at flak guns. If you have them lined up properly, it should finish them off
There's alot of community servers for BFV
Amemus
Anyone down to squad up
The game is far from dead
anyone know how to avoid cheaters in bf1
There is no magical solution for it. Just wait for the EA anti cheat that is coming to BF1 now tomorrow and some cheaters will be banned.
some of them. but not most of them, if BFV is any indication.
True
I said some
its overhated
no it's not.
if anything it's underhated.
people don't talk about the issues the game has with it's gameplay enough.
honestly not that bad if u use long-medium range weapons or one kill guns like shotguns
but that's the thing if you have to use specific types of weapons to make a game seem less bad, then it's bad.
arty trucks or camping tanks are 10000% more annoying since u literally cant do nothing about it
because using specific kinds of weapons to make the game seem less bad is just sidestepping the issues with the game
just because you're not experiencing issues doesn't mean they don't exist.
well thats the whole deal of classes
and that's what i think people don't get about BF1.
It has issues, regardless of if you're experiencing them.
thats the problem with old mp games like bf1
people just use the metas instead of trying out all of the weapons like when it first released
but they're doing that because they're sidestepping the issues of the game.
like which issues
Keeping to gunplay specific issues, i'd say visual recoil existing and suppression are the major ones.
Perks are also an issue, creating scenarios where a frag grenade won't one shot someone but you wouldn't be able to know that because you can't see what perks people are running.
grenade spam in general is an issue with that game.
Have they really announced a new anti-cheat for battlefield 1? If so, will they implement it for BF5 as well? 😮
it's not a new anticheat, it's the same one that's in 2042. It's already in BFV.
That’s awesome! 👏🏼🤩
i mean
it's certainly a thing
Though, I don't think it'll be that effective.
I think it probably won't ban most cheaters, and it'll break things that server owners do on their servers, like I'm in a discord of people that run BF1 servers that would kick people for using the SMG08.
The new anticheat would break that.
Did they add the new anticheat yet
Is BFV still pretty active on Xbox?

Always will be. Especially on new gen
It was very active during the weekend, didn't run into any in game regulars
Playing Company Of Heroes 3 (got it 50% off) has me wishing they kept on with BFV
Lots of stuff they could have done with it, the Italian Front for starters
couldve added russia, china and italy ☹️
I love Metro
It was DOA due to wokie revisionism and censorship. BFV could've easily have been a spiritual sucessor to WaW but no, we got diet cod with cringe 'elites' that're just operators under a different name
The BF3 map, the book or the game?
All of them
You lose me the moment you said woke
What else are you going to call it when the history was so heavily and deliberately rewritten by someone that reeked of SBI?
And worse still DICE is a Scandinavian company, the Heavy Water plant story was insanely inaccurate and downright insulting to the MEN that risked everything to destroy that facility.
Jesus Christ shut the fuck up
No, I don't think I will. Don't like what I've to say? Ignore me and move along. You've your right to speak your peace about what you like and dislike, as do I.
Yeah well at least I don’t fly off the handle as soon as I see a woman
That being said, if you don't want to talk to me, move along.
get a reply at 1am yesterday morning
that conversation is still going
good god
What the actual hell are you on about? This isn't some slavering sexist crap, it's quite literally a censorship and rewriting of history that replaced Norwegian men with one singular mary sue.
Nordlys does not depict the heavy water raid.
Its set a few months prior
Just your average discord argument
I don't even know what it's trying to depict honestly, it's set up as such but outside of the 'super hero alk history self insert' chick we play as, the story makes no sense.
The main idea, iirc, was acts of resistance that went undocumented
so, bog standard historical fiction.
Would be neat to see more games dedicate campaigns and stuff to the resistances
the main issue with BFV's war stories is simply that they are not well written
If that's the case, then good concept and understandable to have a level creativity. However this 'undocumented resistence' showcases someone going around and Jane Wicking three different facilities and taking on a sub pen solo.
Last Tiger was the only saving grace.
🇷🇸
Its not even that good. It just hits the bare minimum of having characters with some depth.
it wasnt just writing, the entire visual aesthetic was off
why was the blue viking face paint a thing? (something that is not even historically a thing in either situation)
Even so, it was still better than the rest by contrast. Hell, there were plenty of women that fought on the frontlines, see the USSR for example. The 388th Night Witches, the instance of an all female T34 crew along with various other foot soldiers as well.
this 'undocumented resistence' showcases someone going around and Jane Wicking three different facilities and taking on a sub pen solo.
Its an FPS campaign, this dissonance is constant in the genre. Not much different to the tiger crew taking on an army of shermans like a wehraboos wet dream
CoD 2 shows female soldiers in the Soviet campaign during the Stalingrad battle.
Technically there was a Panther that took down about 30 T34s, and despite it being that kind of stretch, I think it was more meant to showcase the legendary status of the 'King Tiger'.
You are not driving a king tiger
Wait, my bad you're right, the varient of Tiger that was driven
is a Tiger 1 if memory serves.
you just have a normal tiger.
Now, a tiger is a heavy tank, and heavy tanks are usually very strong and not to be dismissed, but the tiger's mythology is overblown. Any 76mm sherman could pen a tiger, and even a 75mm could in the right circumstances
Hence the hell of doing that final arena to get the Last Tiger multiplayer fit for the tank
You see the upgraded firefly Shermans with longer barrels in the campaign.
Even if a tank cant pen it, slamming a shell in the side can deal damage to internals and whatnot. The tiger, on paper, is worse than a panther in most aspects, and the main reason for its good performance is that its a comfortable drive
iirc those are just 76mm shermans
Steering wheel with a differential gear, I remember. But back to the main topic though; Had the developers been given actual creative freedom to make the game as accurate as possible, we'd probably have an entire campaign about the Night Witches.
If they wanted to tell actual 'niche untold and unknown' stories, then there's plenty of options.
I dont know how well a war story based on bombers would play. Plus this would involve making the eastern front, which is a large task
Well that's what we get when you let investors peer pressure a company into making a game early
It's okay to tell a story through the lens of ww2 that didnt actually happen
thats not a time constraint. Shoving in an extra front is just scope creep
Despite its numerous flaws, even 2017's CoDWWII showcases us playing as a believable female character that's doing spy and sabotage mission work.
saving private ryan is not real. its still a great story
personally, I think BFV should have been nothing but the eastern front. This would satisfy most of the developers and players desires.
WaW had both Pacific and Eastern Front.
And BFV has scandanavia, westen europe, and north africa. The same amount of theaters that 1 launched with
So it's not out of the question, it's more-so a challenge to the shite design philosophy that's plagued dice since then.
CoD 2 had the Normandy Breakout, Stalingrad and Afrika Coprs missions.
One of the main reasons BFV's live service was so slow was because they were insistent on setting each map in a new location.
so... 3 theaters
So to say it's not doable isn't an argument I'd gel with. Because it's not about scope, it's about direction and main intent of design. A game from 2005 has more in it than a game from 2018.
it's about direction and main intent of design
managing scope is a large part of maintaining direction and main intent.
Yes, but unlike BFV we actually saw accurately portrayed female soldiers in Stalingrad levels, Sw@stikas and the characters we played as weren't some 'backstory gun-ho' super heros, they were just three of many.
we were discussing scope
And DICE's scope was aimed at microtransactions and skinsets that just bloated the game's files and download size. We should've gotten a game with the scope of locale AND accuracy that could've been.
for the record, I do not think V is a good game. I just think the solution is not what you think it is
scope isnt file size
that is mostly irrelevant to this issue
I know, I mean collectively.
Imagine basically having WAW's visceral dismemberment, and guttural brutalism that shows the reality of war mixed with Battlefield's envromental destruction...
That'd be a game worth playing and the game that V should've been. BF1 nearly had dismemberment but they couldn't get it to work on time for its release. We could've seen them bring that feature back.
Personally, I think V focusing on the wierd niche fronts is a good idea, but they did not execute them properly. Unlike BF1, V does very little to teach people about the events it depicts, and often depicts them incorrectly.
V could have been a game with 5 factions, for example: UK, France, Netherlands, Germany, and Italy. It could have had a codex and operations cutscenes to set the tone. And it could have had a more muted art style instead of cherry picking the most saturated environments possible
Exactly, you don't realize how amazing a game can be when you notice all the next one in line is missing
battlefield isnt going to have dismemberment or crazy gore lmao
You don't appreciate details like that until they're missing.
Barring the cringey and dated grunge metal in the coD WaW reveal trailer, the brutality on display is something that actually says; 'this shit's intense'.
the main reason it cant is because of the revive system. Reviving someone who has had their arm blown off, and watching that arm reattach, is cartoonish
yep
And then cut it to BFV's reveal trailer, you've no real clue what's going on, and then Metal Girl Solid Phantom Pain shows up to save you.
tbh only the russian half of WaW is any good.
The pacific half is generic and doesnt make you think
Even so, is it any more 'cartoonish' than shooting someone with a a rpg and reviving him with paddles after he fell off of a skyscraper.
yes
On the surface, no. But if you understand Indonesian you'd realize you're burning forced concspits that were POWs.
...
fuck
Oh and in the later levels you're killing soldiers wearing glasses, showcasing the decline in the Imperial Japanese manpower lowering conscript standards.
those are neat and dark details but the plot itself doesnt really drive it home, IMO.
Saving Private Ryan pulls the same trick
Oh, and in little resistance, right before you storm the final bunker where you take on the tanks, if you take the left tunnel you can see a soldier quickly prime a grenade off the side of his helmet and then clasps it in his hands pretenging he died from a stomach wound to try and kill the player(us) in a suicide bombing.
It does in the sense of showing how insane the Japanese were with their tactics, rigging bodies with bombs, setting tripwire explosives, and their tactics overall.
having the pacific highlighted by a few subtle details also really doesnt compare well when the russian campaign is all hell breaking loose. The actual characters in the pacific campaign dont play into the themes as well as watching your russian squadmates succumb to bloodlust
yes the japanese were brutal but that on its own isnt making me think. Theres not much to digest there beyond shock value
and the choice to not include the darker realities of the pacific isnt exactly a mistake in Battlefield
Weather or not it's shock value is more subjective I'd say at this point but yeah. Will of The Red Army is quite frankly one of the best soundtracks in any game.
well, what else is there? Does the pacific campaign have you asking any questions like the russian one does?
a ww2 themed game doesnt need to delve deep into the atrocities of the real war
It rather is, it downplays the real life experiences that all sides went through, when it comes to history, it should be shown as true to form as possible. Regardless of what side you see.
Im sorry but how the fuck are you going to incorporate that into conquest?
Yes, actually. "Why'd they kill themselves rather than surrender"
i think making a game at all downplays it tbh, since in no way is war a game
but its also far enough removed that its ok
Take out the cringey elites, remove the inaccuracies and give actual dismemberment...
youre kidding yourself if you think that would make it embody the brutality of the pacific
No, I don't think those changes alone would be enough but it'd be a start.
The game feels so cartoony and overexagerated. Quite frankly the fact DICE has the nerve to call BFV a WWII shooter is sickening in itself.
I mean deeper questions than a historical curiosity.
And let's not forget, there was actual footage from said battles used in the cutscenes of WaW, adding another layer of 'this actually happened'. WaW only has a fair bit of technical inaccuracies that're mostly just division names and the occasional date.
Ok fair enough, BO1's Nova Six campaign mission is a better example of what you're going for I think
bf games are non serious, hollywood esque war experiences
Modern Hollywood sure, but back in the early 2000's there were humourous aspects but it wasn't some pip pip cherreo and fruitloops overwatch shite. The older games were much more grounded.
BFV is just fundamentally a shit game that was made for all the wrong reasons.
no battlefield game ever grasped the seriousness of war, not fully.
The closest was the intro to bf1
it was always hollywood
I get SOME creative liberties are needed for the sake of gameplay functionality in multiplayer and that much I understand, but even so that shouldn't be an excuse to make guns behave so drastically different than their real life counterparts.
its not about the historical innacuracy
It's a fictitious modern setting, I'm not really bothered by that. It's when the setting is historical and not respecting said history that boils my blood molten.
war isnt defined by what gun you have in your hands, thats the least important part
Still, as someone who knows how most of these firearms handle, it pisses me off to see them protrayed so... weakly
let me tell you, if you made a fun arcadey game about omaha and showed it to a guy who lost his legs there, he's not gonna give a fuck if the guy had the wrong rifle.
I think he'd just have a PTSD attack
But still as someone who knows the actual history, in the campaign mode it should be accurate, in multiplayer the weapons are more subjective depending on what the style is. If it's more traditional then yeah the weapons matter but if it's more lese fare and flexable then I'd understand. In that aspect it boils down to the games' directive choices.
the only multiplayer game that I think comes close to getting it is hell let loose, and thats mostly by accident. That game is a miserable, exhausting, and nihilistic experience.
Sounds fun
I've to get going, y'all have a good one
it is fun until you figure out how exploitable its mechanics are
I just find it boring
i dont understand how people get so immersed in such a boring game
its just a roleplaying game i guess
like ww2 dnd
granted, HLL achieves this mostly by accident. It gets these qualities because as a game is frankly poorly designed, especially as a tac shooter.
its not deliberatley nihilistic, but its nihilistic because the devs failed to give you any reason to preserve yourself.
(and in some cases its outright beneficial to die)
this is the case for most milsims. yeah theres a tactical aspect but most people play them just to be immersed.
Me when I accidentally spawn 15 minutes away from the front
me when I need more rocket ammo
hey fam just booted bf1 after not playing since 2016, is it normal for the UI to go away entirely while searching for an operation/quickmatch? and the resolution is stretched?
main menu is fine, in-game is fine, its JUST when you select a mode to queue for
my friend and i eventually realized that this buggy, no-UI world screen was actually a queue lol and we left it instead of backing out
you answered your own question; some of us want that kind of game
specify what platform you're on?
i guess, i think dnd at least has fun systems. hll is a bad shooter
PC
managed to play a few TDM games and a conquest, bummer you cant really get into operations that was my main hope
Yo is anyone here able to help me boost the death from above trophy on battlefield 5
I can’t do it in pub games because I can’t fly planes for shit
Is there still any assignment or tides of war unlocks in the game? Or has everything been removed and are we left with the same couple skins for every gun?
To each their own
More proof there's an active playerbase for Battlefield 1 that're diehard people. A massive and extensive overhaul to fix the game's historical inaccuracies has just been dropped and it looks amazing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFm-XWifajk
Can anyone help me with some co op trophies on bf3? It’s my favourites bf game and since the servers shut down in a month I wanted to get the platinum
Not impressed

how do you black tags in bf1? i keep seeing people have them i want to be cool too
Then make a better one
Busy playing the goat 2042
@tropic vortex is 2042 worth it? ive been on the fence about it for a year
it's really cool how the mouse input is broken and it never got fixed
whats bad about it? genuinely asking
thats all?
there are probably other things but I don't remember.
For me maps are too big, little to no cover for infantry
Also no bloom unlike BF1,3,4 so people can kill you from 100 meters away with SMGs
BFV also had no bloom but effective range in BFV is like 30 meters max for assault rifles and SMGs due to their recoil
Recoil is non existent in 2042
BFV had no bloom because the bloom was converted to recoil.
i see battlefield hates infantry
the lengths modders go for historical accuracy, its gorgeous https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFm-XWifajk
the video is "We Fixed Battlefield 1's Historical Inaccuracies"
It’s a video game. No video game needs to be histrionic accurate
Yo, is this area to find people to play battlefield or nah?
Use #lfg
Appreciate it
We were aware of an issue that resulted in some players being unable to play Strike Team out of this week's rotation on #Battlefield2042.
This has now been resolved and you're now able to matchmake into the mode once again.
Thanks for flagging it to us folks, see you out there!
Real I just watched that
Arty truck not powerful enough
its sad that both cod and battlefield used to be serious about war and portray it how it was and now thats left for both franchises is shitty unrealistic games in where you run around with operators with anime skins
well, spread to recoil did bloom over time
Yeah it worked for cod though. Not so much for battlefield.
that said, the bf1918 mod uniforms look really good.
It gives unique assets to every faction and clears up clutter without loosing the class sillhouettes
it doesnt work for CoD.
why am I supposed to be interested in their 1990's game when I know I will be shooting at the Joker or some stupid shit in 3 months?
When I said it worked, I meant financially.
warzone straight up saved activision's ass
i haev not seen a cod game received positively since mw2019
been planning on downloading that mod for a while but i heard u needed some launcher or something to get it working and im also worried the game might detect it as cheats
Went from honouring the men and women to having niki manag twerking on people.
...i'd say it hasn't really been honoring anyone for a long time
Hell Wolfenstein's more respectable of the Holocaust! And it's alt history.
Once BF1 gets the kernal level AC then the modding tools will be detected as cheats, yes.
You wont get banned, the game just wont start until the mods are removed
At least to CoDWWII's credit they had a level showcasing a camp at the end.
Which sucks bootycheeks
depends if DICE actually does it or not. They got a lot of pushback because the AC effects server plugins
notably it interfered with weapon-bans
this tired old line is cope. we used to have "video games" where people felt that it reflected the historical subject matter just fine. like the more you pull the line out and type it does not make it cogent.
the reason why these games aren't historically accurate is because of politics...identity politics to be exact...Dice and EA like to cater to the "what about me?" crowd. It's just more woke/sjw garbage. If there were women killing men on the battlefield then it makes sense to have them on the frontlines. Then again, I don't really care as long as the game is good meh. Especially in 2042 where there could be women like that for real at that point. Women can shoot better than men can so whatever.
i'd argue for the vast majority of people playing BF1 it didn't really matter.
it mattered to me but I still liked the game
Most people don't really understand enough about WW1 to really care about the inaccuracies and even if they did, you'd have to basically not be playing the game to actually notice them.
most people are dumb though
most people don't know much about history in general
in most cases you woke you go broke
I am aware of that, but knowing every single detail about WW1 is not exactly a reasonable expectation to have of anyone, let alone gamers.
what's considered basics.
like knowing women weren't on the frontlines
that's one
I mean, it's obvious companies are pushing politics in their games same with movies and TV I am not saying everything is woke but yeah
the average IQ in the USA is not even 100 anymore
IQ is a meaningless measurement.
sorry but not sorry
🙄
even with some basic knowledge theyre pretty noticable, but people dont care because the game is still fun and immersive
I'd disagree about it being fun but yeah i guess it can be immersive.
doing the easter egg was pretty immersive.
regardless of what you think, the people playing 1 find it fun
when i wasn't looking at my second monitor for the solutions to the puzzles
felt like i was playing a WW1 themed puzzle game.
the main thing with the immersion is that something doesnt need to be authentic to engross the player. Its the same reason you can get immersed in a fictional world. its mostly coming down to environments, pacing, and sound design.
V fails to engross not because of "le women" but because its a tonal clusterfuck
also cause it's just not a good game even for people that don't care that much about immersion.
Guys? Should I get the Hero’s of the Great War bundle or is it a scam?
its mostly overpriced crap, only grab it if you really want the preorder bonus skins
Any new stuff? Or just skins
just skins. Theres a couple unique knives if they count.
I’m immediately dislike that bundle 😭 and waiting for premium to be on sale.
Thanks man
its just there if people want the old preorder bonuses
Bfv sucks
Anyone willing to join a custom on bfv match need 4 to start I’m trying to get death from above trophy for plat and need someone to sit in a anti air gun while I destroy it 5x
Server name is death from above password is 1234
who want some wang?
you mean 4000 pound bomb and no its the best in the game
kill a tank and everyone around it with one bomb, ez
from showing the senseless violence of humans to having snoop dog smoke a blunt while doing a takedown
tbh that sucks cuz i really would like a skin rework mod
i dont think i ever was able to trully immerse on bf1, every server i join in is just a one sided match where one team just gets constantly destroyed by mortars and arty trucks
the ww1 experience
Guys do i use the UMP 45 or G36C for engineer
G36C is good
I like it
It’s heavy hitting in my opinion
guys i installed bf1 but ea app is saying i dont have access
i cant send screenshot here so please anyone help
i bought the game on steam
are u in the right accout?
which account
the one u bought bf1 from steam
yes i only have one account on steam
on ea i mean
try to link it to steam
If linking accounts in a browser gives you blue screen you probably have completely different issues
in ea app go to accout, manage, then in browser click connections
or just go to https://myaccount.ea.com/cp-ui/connectaccounts/index
bf1 got a new anticheat before 2 or 3 months
ofc its alive and it will stay alive
bf1 campaign is the best campaign in battlefield games
dang thats cool

yo go hop into the game and enjoy
yea i will
So, the reddits kinda dead. ive had a copy of BFV for a while now, my old pc couldnt really run it the best, got a new one this month. Tried to pop it in, and having issues relating to the anti cheat? there uh.... Anyway around that?
btw is there any way to appeal a ban on a official dice server?
a staff banned me cuz i kept killing him
Come on bud I'm sure he did it with good reason
i killed him like 3 times in a row while defending
first he kicked me, when i rejoined he banned me
the takes of the battlefield subreddit frighten me
specially regarding movement
Like bro just play arma
I understand not wanting call of duty warzone level slide cancel bunnyhopping movement but brother i promise yo
"no jumping" what
yes slide should be in the game, everyone can live without slide cancelling thats a warzone streamer thing mostly but lmao
Imo, sliding should be in the game as long as it isn't like every floor was just freshly mopped and polished
should depend on the surface
then again
coding nightmare
would be fun though
sliding 20 cm on rough sand
and then 10 meters on ice
Yeah, if that's possible it'd be really cool. If it isn't, it should be a very short slide you can use to quickly get behind cover
"no movement" so what do we just sit down and dont play the objective
"battlefield is realistic" okay buddy
literally grandpa server 
Battlefield definitely isn't as realistic as the redditors argue, but it's historically been quite slow in terms of movement compared to other arcade shooter franchises
I'm a bit more concerned about TTK
mil sim crowds want their 2-3 shot guns WITH the slow movement which like.. no
Did we forget MW19 played terribly on almost all of its maps except for 3
and that game had "fast" movement
Yeah having an amazing commentary about the US' warcrimes and dirty dealings along with a blind usage of drones from China's market to snoop dog announcers and crap in ghosts.
I kinda like 4's ttk better but V's is good too
BFV's problematic because the weapons don't line up to their actual counterparts, the MG42 does next to no damage and is bizarrely inaccurate, even when mounted/prone with it
That’s a severe skill issue
It’s plenty accurate if you understand the concept of burst fire
man picks the highest rate of fire mmg and doesnt understand why its the least accurate mmg
can we apply brain or what
No big surprise there
Since they are working on the new modern battlefield game but they need to learn their lesson from BF 2042 the mess they created.
Some other things I'm hoping for them to add in the new battlefield game and bring back the old game mode in the previous battlefield games like add bots to fill out the empty map servers when the players rent it, add co-op but make it better where you and your friends can grind so much to level up faster, etc however if they made a terrible mistake again and did not learn their previous mistake hell will break loose
Which battlefield is more popular for matches atm? Bf4 or bf5
I just want a good war fps but battlebit isn’t hitting rn
I just want better solo mode
In bf1 will I have everything unlocked instantly ?
why.. do you say that
not even close
bf1 has about 3 guns per class every other level unlockable at about 200 warbonds per gun
Unless you're competent at the game and score high your class progression will feel infinitely slower compared to titles like Call of Duty
personally it was why I quit BF1 the first time I swapped, even in bf5 I was leveling up at twice the rate I was in 1
the plus side to this is there is a lot more to unlock which keeps you in the game working to be a team player
or you're a dipshit backwoods sniper main who just fires into points and makes like 2500 score off of kills
to give you an idea of progression, my assault class is level 9 rn and i'm at 38 hours total playtime, mained assault until 2 months ago after which I swapped to medic
my assault just got his service assignment done and my medic did the first Service Assignment the first game I picked it up and played with it
tl;dr depends on what class you play and how much of a team player, but nothing instantly
my brother in christ this is entirely false
I do use burst fire, the game just decided the gun is handled by someone with Parkinson's. It's a mounted machine gun and yet it shakes like you're going through an earthquate
*earthquake
That’s odd, i used to regularly duel snipers, and more importantly win, with the 42
How has BFV on PC with modders been lately? Good or bad?
modders?
Hackers
I'm on PS5, maybe that has something to do with it?
That is such intriguing thinking
If not that, then maybe you used it prior to an update, I've been playing the game semi-consistently because some of my friends play it.
Wouldn’t be my first guess but you really stepped out of the box there
I played the game till she was done updating
Other than “oh shit we broke the servers” updates
Did you play it recently? I played it about a day ago and the MMGs just aren't all that accurate. The game has horrible hit registration, which makes no sense, I've low ping and join in-region servers.
Been a hot second since i played
Unless they sneakily changed the recoil patterns and spread since then i don’t see why it would be different now
But who knows
Maybe you missed an update? They constantly were overstretched and understaffed trying to juggle Battlefront 2 and BFV at the same time so odds are they fucked up more than even they realized.
BFV was sadly a greasy shart smear on the McPlayPlace slide.
I must enjoy huffing shit fumes then because i quite enjoyed the game
I’m sure you’d be surprised given the name
what do you think of wolfenstein @tight rain
No, it's decent enough where it actually had things that were worked on for more than five seconds
Never played, seems neat
Mind if I interject with my answer?
you should
i'll allow it
It’s one of those games that I’m interested enough to play, but not enough to actually buy
Mostly out of laziness more so than the money
Gutwrenchingly beautiful and insanely well-written outside of youngblood.
I can shareplay it with you since we're both PSN.
Youngblood is easily ignored.
Nah i’m good thanks
Thanks though
I've seen people claim that it's part of the trilogy, because apparently some people think that The Old Blood is a DLC and doesn't count.
Except it isn't and it does.
It's decent enough but should've been shelved until DooM Eternal was finished. It needed work.
Speaking of ignored does anyone remember that vr game?
i know about it. apparently it wasn't that good.
The timeline to my understanding of the 'modern canonical continuity' is Wolfenstein 2009, Wolfenstein The Old Blood, The New Order, The New Colossus, CyberPilot [PSVR FTW!] and Finally youngblood.
but then again Bethesda's VR things are mostly not great
i donno about the timeline.
I just know that the modern trilogy is The Old Blood, The New Order, and The New Colossus.
CyberPilot is one of those one hour games. It's more a proof of concept but honestly it's got enough personality and creativity to where it's worth buying
It’s not utter shit? I totally thought it would be utter shit
Not really no, only complaint is that it's only an hour long if you know what you're doing because it's rather linear due to it being a VR game so the sense of scope needed to be carefully balanced as to not lose the graphic fidelity. I'd say it was done quite well enough to be enjoyable. It's hard to tell if you only watch the game, because VR is one of those 'lost in transaltion' deals. Like being in a nice park in real life rather than seeing a picture or video.
If you want high rof and accurate use the m1922 or VGO. The mg42 has a very high belt size and rof so you know.
The m1922 is an extremely good mmg
If i want something practical that would be my go to gun
Incredibly based
Mg42 was just a fun gun to use the back of kubelwagons and something.
I never used mmgs a whole lot since I found the bren much more practical.
Sadly the lmgs were a far better choice 98 percent of the time
Can’t say i used em though
I’m a man of consistency
Mmgs were really annoying to die to as it encouraged people to play with the crap visibility and you'd confuse them for dead bodies.
Whenever I used them I made sure not to prone unless it was on a super specific angle.
Windows were my friend.
It was really fun just stopping the enemies from pushing a small area though
Yeah.
Reminds me.
I once abused the bipod on the bren and got some crazy long shots.
Made this one dude pull out the sniper but because I moved back to medium range anchor it served him little use.
The grouping and damage is all off though, the thing has an effective range of 1100 yards in real life yet struggles at barely over 200. Not to mention the ROT is only 970 instead of 1200rpm
It's all off.
That's such a copout excuse for bad design
It was powerful enough.
Games work within their own balance ecosystem.
I don't agree with how cod ww2 dealt with the mg42 but I understand within the context of the game it was done with their mind of how to balance it.
It ain't deep.
yep. modern gamers copout and cope with lines like this all the time.
If a movie has bad writing with annoying characters, you can't just say 'cause it's a movie'. I get that balance is a thing that's needed for the sake of gameplay flow and such, but in BFV the main issues me and most others have is weapons either being insanely and needlessly weakened, or ridiculously overpowered. There's barely more than two guns per class that were practically balanced.
i dont get why people play defense for these companies and their devs so hard lol
i feel like BFV's gunplay in general is a bigger problem than the MG42 not being a death laser.
Half of 'em are like nerf guns and the other half are either insanely overcompensated like the ZH-29 or Type 2A.
Games are more interactive than movies. Plus for the most part most of the guns are balanced pretty alright despite its simplistic damage model.
Zh 29 is a problem yeah.
I don't disagree.
No no, you're right, it is overall. I was just useing that one gun as a 'for isntance'. Sorry it it felt like I was saying it's just a one off
Heavy semis like the selb 1906 and zh plagued the damn game.
Bad Company 2 did it best, all the weapons were powerful, there was more than enough to fit different ranges and playstyles. It was the 'Goldilocks Ratio' of gameplay.
like, if BFV were purely a single player game, then sure, I think the MG42 should be a death laser. Because that would be fun.
But multiplayer, nah, that would get annoying quick.
In the campaign it is yeah.
And combined arms because they use single player weapons which are jeez.
X2 to x3 more powerful than multiplayer weapons?
I know they're ultra scuffed.
yea BC2 was awesome because you saw people using a variety of weapons. unlike these days where you just see the same old tired weapons over and over.
I don't remember anything about BC2's multiplayer.
I can't really comment on bad co 2 because it wasn't my era.
the only thing i remember about BC2 was that it didn't have prone. Which I think was pretty based of them.
I know that there are meta games where you can have super popular weapons but still have a rather balanced diverse cast.
MG3 with acog and magnum bullets in Bad Company 2 was like that @prime pine but the thing was, it was all heavy hitting.
maybe modern BF games should do that.
I know I'm 'Bad Comapny 2ing' all my answers but that game had neigh perfect weapons for each class, the ranges were great for all weapons, and nothing felt 'god mode' tier.
The game had a longer ttk than most battlefield games (6hks was the standard) which made the guns feel pretty much the same.
the problem with the new gen of gamers is they carry on about "meta" too much, like a game has to have a strict meta.... bc2 was just great sandbox pick what you want for your playstyle or purpose and you can have great fun with it whilst remaining competitive.
I did play bad co 2 but not as much as anything else these days.
i mean a problem with them is that a lot of them don't really wanna get better at a game.
The great part about battlefield is that you can pick most guns and farm.
The 'meta' was just the spawncamping with stolen helis and mine spamming but both were decent enough to combat, it was overall down to pure skill
The culture around gaming has changed.
I remember the first time I rented it from BlockBuster.
I can pick up the xm8 and do well. So what.
yea lol
And living your life by trends makes you just as disposable as they are, once that trend fades out, so to does whatever relevance you had with it.
if gaming is a trend it's lasted for a very long time.
“Meta” been in any game. Halo since halo 2 (if that) for the longest meta is br and magnum. BF and COD games both metas is short TTK, easy to control and good mobility
I'm grateful for the last months of bf5 on xbox oce people kept to the automatics for the most part.
The better way of making games is finding a formula and sticking with it, it's like Coka Cola making 'New Coke'. No one wanted it.
would be nice if BF1 kept BF4's quality of life improvement of not having visual recoil.
dont bring up Halo is in this discussion with its limited armory lmao. plus i am talking about how we are in a strict meta era.
UMP45 in OG MW2.
His point was that there's always going to be a meta game.
What matters is how it's balanced around.
my point was we are in a strict meta era.
Or weapon suppresion causing the bullets to cant at 45 degree angles.
the meta is limited
Meta is still within the topic. Small armory of weapons or not. No matter what game. Gos or not. Meta will occur
like you have games where most weapons and tools are excluded outside of the meta
Rune scape have meta since the beginning 
bro Halo is not the right game to bring up here.
BF1 would've been better if it didn't have suppression i think. Like, no suppression, no visual recoil, a slide that works, would be a better game.
Glad that battlefield hasn't always had that.
It still have meta since OG halos
you need to talk about games that have large armory of weapons and tools
Remember Syndrome from Incredibles; "When everyone is super, no one will be" Give ALL of us the hard hitting weapons, make them all do damage. The different firing patterns and range capibilities is what made Bad Company 1, 2, BF3, 4 and hell even HL good.
then you assess how many of them are excluded in comp/high end play
I’m tryna say. Not only new gen gamers rely on meta. People rely on meta cuz its ease of use and it requires lil to no skill
Large is subjective to what era we're talking about though. It's platform generation specific
yea coz it also meant you saw different playstyles, it just made the game more dynamic
me looking at the recon players cosplaying chris kyle and not helping
yes but my point was for the final time that new gen of gamers eat up the strict meta trend and that they are the problem. there is still time to educate them.
maybe different playstyles isn't always a good thing.
Meta trend been in games since beginning of gaming history.
lmao cosplaying chris kyle, i am stealing that one
People will naturally gravitate to the best.
^
And cheesiest.
omg room temp moments in this chan rn
i stole that from someone else so go for it
"STRICT" META
Less is more, like titanfall 1, you had three core chassis' for titans, but it's how they were modified that made the difference.
read what i type please ffs
omg i need to touch grass and speak to some intelligent lifeforms. laters.... geez
When VHX dropped. It was meta due to ease of use and lil to no skill required.
yea titanfall 1 was good like that
It’s still meta even after its nerf.
Would like to see the m16 gain more traction cause it's a great gun.
M16 is amazing
To add onto the Halo argument, the weapons were good because they weren't tampered with, they were left alone and it forced people to get good at the game.
Complaining about how different guns handle overall is a weak argument, back then you learned to work around 'spam guns' until the counters were second nature
How portal guns and 2042 guns differ from a base line is murky.
One thing I enjoy about halo. It still have meta weapons but the skill gap is insane in halo compared to most shooters
Halo is alright though the style of combat isn't for me.
The custom games are great though.
Halo is not a game i can play seriously.
Well given the portal was a puddle when we were promised an ocean is kind of the main reason why I'm rather pissed Bad Company 2's gone. That game was seeing 24/24 player servers. Portal was dead overall and had barely a fraction of the original games' content.
Ok?
I played a lot of ranked in halo games. Halo 4 was my sweatiest. Halo 3, I was to young. So I played for fun
A gap is always closable if you're willing to make the leap
Like most games. But the skill gap between players. It’s actually more noticeable than other shooters today.
OG Halo, yeah. But I can't speak on modern halo because Halo 4's campaign and design pissed me off so much I bought a PS4
It still have a skill gap. Even in today halos.
Its definitely frustrating being part of a metagame when it feels like guns are released broken for the intents of generating revenue versus proper game design.
Also been noticeable since OGs
Also the matter of matchmaking which heavily influences it.
I'll take your word for it broski.
Current, new halo games have a higher skill gap due to the movement. But still there.
True true
Tell me about it, at least in Battlefield 1 the weapons were mostly just different firing patterns. SMG08 being an outlier because the damned thing's fire rate was cranked up to 11 Spinal Tap style for some unknown reason.
The ttk being a factor too.
Bf1's weapon balance for the most part is nothing too out of the ordinary for battlefield.
Hence the lack of any real complaint from me and most others I know who play it.
Bf5's biggest outliers being what. The heavy semis.
Which I don't find too much of an issue because those players stay in their own realm.
The SMG08 shouldn't have been put in the game.
Fully automatics are also really well balanced though the stg 44 being underpowered is unfortunate.
Every server there is apparently.
It's really funny too people complaining about the type 2 a when it kills as fast as the suomi.
It was applicable with all the other experimental weapons that never saw any real frontline service though. Had they not fucked the fire rate I'd have no issue.
eh, 84 round SMG on assault, it already had one of the best guns in the game.
The type 2A's complaints are mostly due to it's magazine size
it didn't need two.
It's just do you like Japanese machine pistol or the anti Russian suomi kp 31.
Worse off bullet retention than the suomi.
5hk versus 4hk with exact same mag sizes.
It was easier to use but ultimately the same gun all in all.
Infact it killed slightly quicker further out but wasn't the most noticeable.
People just use the type 2a because most didn't even look at the other guns. and it's a 'pacific theatre' weapon.
It's a cool gun.
That too.
But still, BFBC2 MG3 with Acog and Magnum ammo my beloved
...forgot i still have BF1 installed.
Pity you're not PSN, I've been dying for active people to play with.
yeah nah i'm not playing battlefield on playstation
why's that?
Psn servers are still up and working. Still lively
Xbox and psn players are mixed tho. Still great game, I put on no hud on and it was soo immersive.
I haven’t played 2042 in like 3 whole weeks
Anyone have the issue where you can't download any of the dlc for bf4 with EA access on PlayStation?
because i don't have one and also i just don't think i'd wanna do that.
who has battelfield 1?
Nobody, it doesn’t exist
Lmao this guy actually fell for the bf1 psyop
Seven nation army? What’s that?
Man I go back and play bf1 and I just realise dice fucked up so many maps by making them conquest assualt
Coz that’s how it is in bfv for new players
Dududuuduuduu duuuu
lol bf1 has few actual good maps gameplay wise
prise, nivelle, argonne, achi are the best inf maps imo
only good ones actually
some people might slide in a spice of fort but theres no real gunplay its just gadget spam
dyna down stairs dyna around corners, 6 gas grenades + 4 at nades + 3 inc + 2 crossbow launcher frags after an ordinary frag type beat fort
servers should ban grenades
makes games unplayable at times
At least those maps gave actually viable flanking routes
The most important thing about Fort De Vaux is that it's not a straight line. It's a square.
This means that there is always at least two ways out of any given situation
You're not just banging your head against a concrete wall
Hell of a lot better than any Metro deriviative
Some guns are good but some are not
Anyone else just keep getting put in games on their owns
conquest
what is like a gernal queue time
like i gotta wait for 10mins or is it short
ok
wish i could send a ss
😭
i am in a conquest match but
i am ALL ALONE
THE FUCK
the game is freaking dead
lol
only in asia i guess 

