#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 95 of 1
im sorry sir but i feel instulted, i had to GRIND the L85 on Squad Deathmatch Strike at karkand 24/7 no tank
and EVERYONE on that god forsaken server is unleast a level 145
lol
- i don't even have enoght people that where willing to help me boost anyways
Ok.. you did well
the struggle was real

even tho it was definitely not worth all the brain cells lost and loads of new ways i came up with to call a individual using an M16A3 with Heavy Barrel and forgrip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4ejs3cZtLg
Holy fuck its almost all I wanted
'83 Through the Gunsights : Weapons and Webcams
if youre curious and dont want to click a link
the knowledge that the devs of the game actually shared the progress back in the day must have been some Ancient secret
known to but a few !

yeah nice virus
somehow I didnt catch that vid.
Does anyone know of a way to get the semi auto sniper with the ribbon on requiring sniper ribbons and c4 kills on naval strike maps?
Were Karkand and Sharqi generally well received by BF2 vets on release in BF3
BF2 feels ancient now. No wonder I stick to Heroes
Its literally youtube.com
Ah BF3 Sharqi, Atack helicopter city

Now in top 50 for orders completed on Xbox (BFV) đ
back to karkand was a good map if relatively shallow in its map placements, but that's what you get with older maps
What's the best bf game
1 for immersion, 4 for sandbox
though 1's sandbox is kickass in its own right
Hardline
Hardline is dead
1, 4, BC2, 3
Hardline is the 2nd worst battlefield after BF2042
Hl hater detected, opinion ignored
HL is liked exclusively by contrarians and hipsters. If it wasnt it would be alive
There is simply nothing better than tasering people plain and simple
you make a good case
It shouldn't have been called battlefield. Just Hardline would've been fine and it wouldn't get the hate it got. It was released relatively close to BF4 that's an another reason it got the hate. Also they didn't support the game properly
Man I guarantee people would have bitched about the name either way
Also EA killed Visceral games so there won't be a Hardline 2
Not battlefield enough to be called battlefield but also not itâs own thing enough to not be a battlefield
you cant have a cop game and not let me abuse my authority on random unarmed strangers
Not being a battlefield would've been better. It could just totally be its own thing. It may not have gotten the hate from battlefield players.
mid game was mid
Better than Bf2042
Aye i reckon it would have gotten less hate without adding battlefield, but honestly the game was doomed to die
Plenty of people would have bitched about it playing like battlefield
Because EA didn't support it properly
And you just get a repeat of what happened here
you keep saying that like that means fucking anything.
repairing a roof is more fun than 2042
But thatâs just my opinion
Hardline had a stable launch compared to BF4
How did ea not support it properly?
Hardline has the core battlefield mechanics that BF2042 mostly got rid of
this man is not real. This man is a parrot with a keyboard
just spews auto generated responses and does not process english
As is the nature of dell
@solar nexus What kind of parrot are you? Are you mayhaps a macaw?
or perhaps a parakeet those are easy to train
Content. Lost players very quickly
I am a human being
It had a full dlc cycle
No you are a laptop brand
đŠ
Campaign's slept on, Multiplayer is a horrid mixup
I preferred it to BF1
It had perfect rental servers
Dell is an actual name and he named himself after the TF2 engineer
Honestly. The campaign was one of the best in Battlefield history imo. It was especially good at it's characterization.
I personally liked the multiplayer. The vehicle mode was the only real advancement it did tho. The only bad thing I can say about it besides for that though is that it's just Bf4 reskinned as a cops vs. crims game
and hardline still feels like a BF game than 2042

Well yeah. It's hard to move away from the battlefield feel when you basically copy/paste the past game and remodel it into cops vs. crims
2042 was made with new devs that knew nothing of what made battlefield, well, battlefield
ye
Battlefield have the same exact core mechanics on every game.
They all play the same.
Itâs just different themes and content which keeps them iconic from each other.
this is not true.
pretty much most BFs have different movement mechanics in some way and spread values especially change alot from game to game as does TTK usually. Then theres BFV which did a ton of crazy shit with its gameplay.
1 also has a ton of rather odd mechanics for many of its weapons.
They all about being an arcade, sandbox game with big teams and vehicles.
They all do the same exact thing.
The core is the same.
until you look under the hood
Commander: am I a joke to you
kinda is given its implementation in 4.
miss the commander in 2 summoning hell from the sky
yes but more importantly he is far more powerful
Theres also actual buildings around the map that are tied to his abilities. You could take them out as a spec ops class and repair them as engineer. Fun minigame
so you'd have actuall artillery pieces and radar stations to use.
Honestly
Commander could summon ammo boxes and drone recon in BF2, which did not have ammo boxes for support or spotting tools for recon. Commander artillery was absolutely devastating.
Wym?
most of the time the commander was just an infantry guy. You dont need to stare at the screen 24/7
well the actual mechainics behind that arcade gameplay and sandbox change wildly from game to game.
As a not so pvp fan, I'll just camp
They all play the same due to the core mechanics. At the end of the day.
this isnt an opinion or generalization, its just flat out incorrect. 1, V, 4, and 42 play quite differently from eachother. V especially
3 doesn't have commander. 4 does
Simple
3 has constant gunship spawn for rush, 4 doesn't
3 and 4 are probably the most similar games of the lot
What's your break
They all play the same. I explained it. Some games have different content and stuff from each other.
This is the reason why.
đ
What is so hard to understand.
Difference in movement speed between the classic and modern BF
Same huh?
Thatâs different
What a shit
The core of the game is just obj focused. Big battles of 64p with vehicles. Which all of them have.
Thatâs the core of battlefield and it revolves around that.
Themes, movement, content, tech ad ect. Is different for every single game. Core donât change. Core is static.
Only
honestly BFV's squad leader call ins serve a very similar role as the commander call ins
- you don't have non stop ENEMY SPOTED spam
thats not the commander, people just think its funny
if im not mistaken the commander can spot enemies throgh his isometric view camera in BF2
that's where all the noise comes from
i could be wrong tho
i think the squad leader call ins are a better system then how dice made the commander in 2, but that's just personal opinion
BFV always gave me the sense that some party in DICE wanted it to be a spiritual successor to BF2, a lot of mechanics gave me that vibe
but the game as a whole ended up unfocused
i wonder how a red orchestra style commander would work in a battlefield game
so you have allot more damage oriented call ins
the Off map AA call in ability from Rising storm 2 would have been a god send when you have one of the Aircraft only dudes on the server in BFV

yknow I never figured out how RO commander works
in RO1 you can mark a location and only call in artilery with the pre set up radios
in it's similar in RO2 but you have allot more abilities
mostly just different artillery types and the respawn wave ability, you use it when allot of your team died at once to get them back in the fight, there is also the scout plane that spots enemies
but in RO2 every one just spams the 105 artillery strike out of the offensive abilities, the Respawn Wave and scout plane have seperate cool downs unlike the Artilery strikes
in RS2 it's identical as RO2 but all the factions have slightly different abilities and you only have access to one Artillery strike and one or two Off map airstrike
so the USA has the spooky while australia has the Cambera bomber etc
and the north vietnamese insted of an airstrike get an AA ability, and insted of having a forced respawn wave spawning where ever the player selected insted they get spawned on the commander (also it does not consume any tickets when the commander activates the respawn wave)
Was completely different for 2042 though đ
It reminds me of Medal of Honor 2010 - the Cruise Missile was tough to get (but a âteam killerâ)
It had promise but the multiplayer maps sucked and the game modes needed more polish.
Also this
Same thing but 128p included. Still doesnât change the core of the franchise.
No, 2042 excluded core features present in the franchise previously. Some have not been added even now. My whole clan had a history of only playing latest BF until new one came out then move to that. This is the first time ever the game was so not fit for purpose that we went back to previous BF.
I never had an issue with 2042. 2042 still have the main core mechanics.
As I said every game is different for their Themes, movement, content, tech and ect.
Specialist or not. Still have the class system. But dosent change the core game.
The game went live with no scoreboard
Most of the legacy features is leadership fault. Still isnât a core mechanic.
Doesn't seem like it's some isolated incident
Layoff the devs who were working on the next game, the lead who was in charge single player also leaves, and another co-founder of Ridgeline also left. Now another lead left
He isnât wrong. New generation doesnât know what makes battlefield⊠battlefield
Core features are what a lot of people expect and play for
That's why bf2042 is doing well. The veterans of the older games left
Thatâs a legacy feature. Not the core.
The legacy features are what made battlefield battlefield
Core defines battlefield
Legacy lol
Will the next battlefield become a victim of this?
So are those core features (which you have now called legacy like a shill would)
Score board isnât what battlefield is known for.
The classic 4 class system with standard solders?
I beg to differ
Core stays the same. Legacy features carries forward from a previous game.
It didn't in bf2042
Thatâs what makes battlefield, battlefield.
Thatâs because of the leadership.
A lot of veteran devs left 2042 due to the leadership.
Yes thatâs a core mechanic. In 2042, itâs a legacy mechanic.
Itâs a legacy in 2042 because the game didnât have 4 main class system and It was added later on. As any other battlefield. Itâs a core mechanic.
BFV was supposed to have specialist but it wasnât finished. So they moved the specialist system to 2042.
It's in portal but portal isn't the primary game mode
Imagine if BFV with specialist system. People will flip shit on them still. Yet it can be different.
Bf5 had characters
did bro really say Battlefield at its core is a scoreboard
Bf2042's specialists make it a hero shooter
Iâm talking about the core of 2042 aka AOW
that's remarkably stupid
Iâm pretty sure they meant itâs a core mechanic, not that the core of battlefield is a scoreboard
Battlefield isn't known for scoreboard
Any game have scoreboard. Itâs not a core mechanic.
The game didn't even have all chat till 2 years later
Tbf, it is really only used to rank yourself against your teammates after the game ends. Iâve never seen someone actively use the scoreboard mid game
Thatâs HD2. Multiple games out there have scoreboards. It still doesnât define battlefield.
What about a single player campaign? which existed from BF2 modern combat till Bf5 some way
Thatâs part of the core, obviously
What about levolution which was in BF4
unessential
Explain?
battlefield is just big battles with vehicles
hence All Out Warfare in 2042 being jjust that
Levolution is what made bf4 top tier imo. Being able to actively change the battle field like you could in an actual war is really good for big battles
I said core feature - these things have become part and parcel of the BF experience
Thatâs what defines battlefield. The core is supposed to have main 4 class system. As for 2042, it didnât start with it, itâs a legacy mechanic. @grand forge
agree
The core never changes .
Thatâs what defines battlefield
Battlefield
As a whole.
Battlefield imo is defined as a large, well, battlefield. No heros, no special gadgets, only soldiers and vehicles driven by them
So when I started playing MP FPS games I was useless. I died over and over but I put time in to get better, improve my results - scoreboards/stats measure this. A lot of players have the same interest.
but it's still not essential to the gameplay
Yes. The rest defines the certain said game or legacy features come to the game later on.
Scoreboard is ideal to have but not essential to gameplay. You donât rely on scoreboard to focus on the obj in middle of a gunfight.
What's the difference between getting rid of legacy features vs core features?
Itâs essential for what I get out of it. Many feel the same (hence they added one in to 2042).
Core is big battles with vehicles and 64p lobbies. Legacy feature comes from a previous battlefield game or the game didnât start out with it.
How does one another affect? Both should be unacceptable
You may be able to shoot virtual guys with guns regardless of whether or not a scoreboard is there but did we all not grow up comparing stats to our friends, using it to check our in game performance, and motivate ourselves to get better or improve a particular stat, some things should just be present and work on day 1 of a games release
Yea. Though, One of the other cores of battlefield is the ability to make your own story. Bf1 and Bf5 were the best at this. Unlike other shooters where you die every 2 seconds, in battlefield you feel like your life both matters a lot and is insignificant to the main battle. This allows you to really feel like you are in the middle of a big war and are an actual soldier
Some other things should also never be removed
I agree.
bvut it is not essential for the game to work
Lack of a scoreboard isn't good. It shouldn't be considered a legacy or a core feature either
Scoreboard dosent mean anything. Itâs that one thing you want to look at, but have no meaning at all to the gameplay.
What about the lack of a server browser which we still don't have for the core game modes
What about having persistent servers for non portal
QoL is a bigger thing than the abbreviation may tell about it, that stuff is pretty much crucial but not in the same way stable servers or proper hitreg may be
People wonât play the game without it and it not being there looks awful on everyone involved
Yeah. A scoreboard is a basic part of most shooters. Not just battlefield. It should just be a basic feature you expect when you buy a shooter like battlefield or cod
Thatâs a legacy. Server browser is the same situation as scoreboard.
Scoreboard is not a selling point for battlefield
^
I don't know about it being legacy or core feature man but I think scoreboard is so basic fucking thing that must be available day one no matter what happens like cmon bro.
again, stupid it was missing we agree
Server browser is really nice to have but doesnât chnage how the game feels. Itâs just an advanced way to pick a match.
again, QOL. Unessential but good to have
They took 4 months after launch to add the scoreboard
Yes
The server browserâs fair
Itâs a cool thing to have but is not essential to the game
Yeah but it's been a year why to talk about it now bro

This shouldnât downplay or pad the importance of it being there regardless though. With all due respect I feel like itâs just semantics to say âwell it should be there but itâs not absolutely crucialâ. When weâre talking about absolutely crucial things weâre talking about like, the most fundamental aspects that nobody thinks about but thatâs just because thatâs how a 70 dollar product should function
Most of missing things was due to leadership of 2042. Majority of it is QoL. 4 main class is a legacy feature. It shouldâve been there from the start, I agree.
what does the server browser add to gameplay
Destruction, class based combat, vehicle combat are the selling points of battlefield but these are somehow removed or downgraded in bf2042
Youâre not going to have the same gameplay experience if you canât fine tune what it is you want
Thatâs QoL. It means nothing to gameplay.
Why should we ask what XYZ feature adds to the game when a lot of these things the franchise had for like the last 2 decades, come on
When they consider a core feature a legacy feature
Server browser is never the main selling point of battlefield. Itâs QoL.
You saying itâs $70 just reminded me of why the âQoL featuresâ that are âunnecessaryâ should be there no matter what. For 1 copy of 2042, I can buy Palworld + Helldivers 2
The single player campaign has been
It wasnât added to the game in the first place or was a feature that was presented in previous games.
I agree
Oh yeah im definitely not saying certain things are exactly selling points for the franchise. But at the same time i dont think that was ever kpâs point
Bro there was scoreboard but not so defined right?
Iâm not gonna shit on dice or ea for things that im not employed there to know for certain ended up a certain way for a particular reason, but at the same time if people elevated their standards to expect these things on day 1 imagine any of these games 1 or 2 years later if they didnât have to focus on fixing a product for an acceptable state
Hear hear!
Yea it was garbage
Like one was âthereâ but our scoreboard friends spirit was not there

People need to elevate their standards all around. The new ceos of gaming need to learn that they canât just push out cash grab after cash grab. We need to stop preordering and supporting bad games or theyâll never stop releasing them
Scoreboard is very important but it's not something that defined battlefield
Server browser is the thing still missing which means my clan canât return to 2042
I feel like scoreboards actually defined fps as a whole and in a couple pretty important aspects, socialization and competition
The scoreboard goes way back to doom 1993
Most fps games follow the design of quake 1999 scoreboard
Quake 1999 itself is interesting
Yep unfortunately
ID software developed the technologies for Quake 1999 that most modern games and almost all fps games uses
COD, CS, TITANFALL, and several others game's game engine is based on the quake engine
Titanfall's engine is actually based on the counter strike's source engine but Source engine is based on the quake engine
Stop buying microtransactions
Support platforms like GOG
What about the other things that are missing?
Global Tug-of-War over the Earth's most vital resource ignites as the Thousand Petals Coalition lands in Chile đšđ±
Full coverage: The Reed Report | Future Rising
đ https://go.ea.com/ReedReport
Full squad control is still missing I believe
Did EA cut the budget of the next battlefield? Since so many layoffs, departures and restructuring related to the next battlefield
Crouch Walk?
Artillery support?
Iâve not played the game for years but sure there are plenty of things still missing
The classic class system with standard solders which is only available in portal
I had a long list at launch (but believe some have been âfixedâ since)
I still think itâs weird thereâs an entire set of character models for the US and RU in game that are simply unplayable. Only for bots
The older battlefield games were detailed. Like if you die you would spawn as a solder of a different model which doesn't exist in bf2042
That gave the impression of battlefield
Isn't it the same as BC1 and forward
Classes have different, singular skins
My list from 2021 was (scoreboard was back by this point):-
Persistent servers
Server browser
Squad control
Smaller (infantry based) modes
Platoons
Stats
VoIP
Get rid of bots
Return of classes
In your own damn dream with the rid bots
Leave all of the chaotic settings for private solo lobbies
Just played The last tiger in battlefield 5 and damm it was good
Well said clef, now threaten his family

itâs the only way
With force
Bots have no place in a multiplayer game
The bots canât be much worse than some of the teammates Iâve had
Then leave them fucking secluded to custom matches
Just go play regular Public lobbies only
An infiltration from within designed to reveal the Thousand Petal Coalition's agenda unmasked an imminent attack in Chile.
LOG: Dec 2048 | Fated Path
đ http://go.ea.com/Specialist-Stories
Soon
They need to go back to BFV, port it to modern consoles, add in 1944/5 Western Front and Eastern Front content, rebrand it and relaunch it as Battlefield 1944.
V would need to be good for that to work
V is a great game
đ
In which BF are air planes hardest to fly?
battlefield 2 probably
Whats wrong with the game
In short it was a rushjob with unrealistic deadlines and EA favoured woke revisionist history rather than maintaining historical truth to the campaign and multiplayer along with codification of many aspects in multiplayer too. It was so bad most veterans of the DICE studios quit and BFV set the foundation of Battlefield's damnation.
Codification of multiplayer ? (if you mean the gameplay then im confuzed)
https://youtu.be/whuxNXrpIl8?si=3d9EGefzA7n5T918 For anyone curious about 2142. Many BF2 maps are now available so you can fight with future weapons in oldschool maps.
Gameplay went from decently paced to 'sprint, slide quickscope'. It sucks because of how inconsistent it is. You need to mount mmgs but they still have insane recoil despite being in a fixed position
You need to do all that for an mmg but someone with a laserbeam smg sprintslides around a corner and eats an entire MG42 salvo only to instantly kill you.
Skill honestly has nothing to do with it really, it's just a rushed barebones mess. And for whatever reason dice didn't learn their lesson when 2042 was in development either.
MMG's have like, no recoil while bipoded so i have no idea where this idea comes from honestly, it is true that you can be melted by other weapons from long range.... but uh what battlefield does not have that issue ?
in BF3 an assault with any assault rifle can laser beam you across the map like it's nothing
the game is slightly faster paced then BF1 but that's not really codification
I use the MG42, even in short bursts it's wiggling all over the place for some reason.
You'd think that but you'd be honestly surprised just how much a 'little different' can be a huge diffrence. Say for example an artiliry piece is notched one half milimeter to the left, might not seem like a lot but it'd be the difference between a miss or a hit.
In an odd reversal of what is usually recommended try mag dumping
What's the correct way to use MMG? If I stay still I became sniper's target practice.
Yep mow down when they funnel through an area
In bfv?
So bfV is bad because you cant control recoil and it has women?
Donât. Itâs a camperâs weapon.
Donât listen to fools
I thought I can go brainless spraying for support and suppression, not necessary kills, on games that I just want to chillout.
Just sounds boring and cynical to me (but each to their own).
Not like I would do that every game tho, just after playing a few games and I'm tired, I usually sit on mounted guns or AA.
depends on map, on more open maps MMG's are useless, but on more close quarters maps like roterdam , provance or devastation they can work, you move from position to position and gun down any enemies that you can see, you will have to master hiding in plain sight and know good places to camp to use this effectively, but just siting in one spot is a horrible idea, you need to relocate after every few kills
same advice applies to AT rifles but they are even more punishing, in both cases Avoid sniper sight lines if possible
the MG42 with 250 round belt and reduced overheating upgrades is the best MMG, you can fire 70 rounds before your gun overheat's, this let's you kill around 8 players in one burst with Average accuracy
Mmg obsession
uhh the next battlefield's development doesn't sound very good so far
I am Heavy Weapons guy, and THIS is my weapon
marcus lehto leaves, ridgeline games shut down, craig morrison leaves
tf goin on man
worst case scenario the next game is another Terrible launch that they will be fixing for 2 years and then abandon to make the next game

im tired boss
Well... Do you have 3 or 4 on PC?
fortunately yes
still sucks to see them fumble it so hard like this
is tiggr at least still a part of developing the next bf?
oh boy someone is about to Preach about "our" lord and savior, Warsaw revamped
Lack of coherent vision. BFV is a mishmash of a BF2 successor, a BF1 clone, and fortnite. Any one of these directions could have made for a decent game but since they never really went in any specific way, the result is a game with serious pacing and tonal issues, a botched live service, and a mountain of cut or unused content
Fortnight ? what 
Heavy inspirations from the overly bright art style & cheery characters, as well as some BR mechanics making their way into the main game.
IDK what else to call it but there was clearly some 3rd vision for the game that only manifested in its art style
given that this was 2018 and everyone was scrambling for a BR, fortnite seems like the main inspiration there
BR mechanics ? the art style part is personal opinion so i won't comment on that
like the game launched without firestorm, im not aware of any mechanics bleeding in to the main game
from firestorm
unless Anti tank rifles count as a mechanic
the most obvious one was probably squad revive. Firestorm was meant to be launch but it was delayed. There was also a mini-br that was one of the gamemodes
yea i played last stand...once
yeah they fucked up those operations hard
eh operations aren't that bad but like 40% of the server like to leave after one of the three battles ends

Squad revive is great
yea squad revives are a good feature in my book
did not say it wasnt. Just said the game was taking inspirations from fortnite in some areas.
other games have a similar mechanic... that are not fortnight
it was 2018. This was just the gaming landscape at the time. every game was taking inspirations and ideas from fortnite
that doesnt mean squad revive is a bad mechanic, thats just its origins
well if you think that is where dice stole...i mean "borrowed" the idea from it's fine by me
no way of knowing for sure
the problem isnt that its taking from it. The problem is that BFV shows evidence of several incompatible visions for the game clashing with eachother.
an overly bright goofy and chaotic BF game could have worked and been good had they not tried to also be a gritty immersive and serious game at the same time.
a problem that extended into 2042 with its jarring ludonarrative dissonance
when new season
Still, BFV is my fave of the BFs Iâve played
what are you guys hoping BF6 is going to be?
I hope it has a working mouse and a server browser 
Perhaps, if I am optimistic, it may hit bare minimum coherency'
i'm hoping Vietnam, you don't see a ton of nam' games around
civil war would be cool too
Nydar 47 reflex sight on my Rifled Musket go brrrr
people are hyped for a setting as if we arent unsure the thing will even have classes
as long as i can be a medic i'm ok with anything
6 needs to play it safe because if 6 fucks up the franchise dies. No history settings should be on the table unless theyre ditching live service.
2042 did flop but one other bad game doesnt mean the series dies
2042 is not the only recent flop. With the shitshow surrounding BFV and SWBF2, the franchise has been in a bad state for 6 years. Another flop means BF would have underperformed and been a center of controversy for a decade straight.
BF1
Not to mention that both 2042 and BF6 have much more resources poured into them
by 2025 it would have been a 9 year old game.
Setting is irrelevant vs quality of the game itself
assuming a minimum of 2 years between BF6 and BF7, a failed BF6 would be a decade of DICE failing to deliver
but the lead dev of TF2 is working on BF6
Not if you love BFV (which many do)
some people like BFV sure but at the end of the day it underperformed in sales due to the PR shitshow and the botched live service lead to it never becoming what EA wanted
i think if BF6 has BFV movement, BF1 classes and good performance they should be perfectly fine
I concede the PR was horrendous at launch
The setting is going to play into the quality and appeal to a degree. Historical games focus much more on immersion while modern games focus more on the sandbox.
i prefer historical
theres also a bit of an issue if you have a historical game and want to base your long term strategy on selling player skins
I FRACKING LOVE HISTORY
Iâve known great games and terrible games in all settings.
not to say one is good or bad. But it will effect the quality because it means they have to execute on different things
you can still do it, it's not impossible to do tasteful skins in a historical game
normally I would hope for a history one too but it is the year of our lord 2024 and AAA studios cannot be trusted to potray history
I just wanna m16a1
but dice probobly can't do it
with BF it's either a hit or a miss
You miss the mechanisms at play here. Yes you can do skins, and yes DICE can do them tastefully. But, unlike what shills love to claim, MTX dont exist soley to keep the lights on. It cant just make money, it needs to make lots of money. And to make lots of money with skins, you need those skins to be noticable and distinct.
BFV and BF1 are still thriving so if DICE makes a good game it will be good for 10 years
i know why they make flashy skins, it's not rocket science now is it
this is the thing with the slippery slope fallacy: it stops being a fallacy when the slope is observably slippery. We have seen this spiral into nonsense again and again and again
we don't need to argue about the next game, it's not like this conversation is going to impact DICE's choices
talking about the next game is pointless because we know nothing 
we know they want to make a BR and that several creative leads have left 
True, this are red flags but that's all
more red flags than the fucking soviet union
yup, we should talk about it when there is a trailer or an announcement, not when the game is coming out in a year or two
and this is before they announce their bad ideas
IDK man Im kind of on the edge of my seat. Can dice outdo themselves and somehow make an even worse game? It will take innovative strategies to fuck up harder
why are you so aggressive about BF6 Nutter. If you aren't excited to play it then just don't, no one is making you
because I find that hyping myself up over an unnanounced game from a franchise with a track record of fucking up launches is cringe.
I want BF6 to be good, fwiw. But there is no reason to have faith in that at current.
i'm not hyping myself up, if the game is bad i won't play it, but you still have to be optimistic about it even if the chances are bad
unleast we will have all the funny glitch compilation videos if it's bad
but you still have to be optimistic
lol no i dont
while im compleatly uninvested
if it's good then it's good, if it's bad then what ever
if its bad then ill just sit back and laugh and boot up BF4 for another 4 years
a life spent being pessimistic is not a fun life no matter what you tell yourself
bro its a shit videogame its not that deep
you think i live a pessimistic life cause im pessimistic about battlefield 6?
no one said it was going to be a crap game, maybe see how you feel about in in a couple of months
couple of months? It releases in 2025 we're not getting news for a year at least
a year then
but there is no use arguing about a game lets just chill out and enjoy the good games we already have
not the ones coming in a year
it might be best to forget about the next BF game till they unleast release a trailer
I can enjoy old BFs and laugh at new BFs at the same time
Ace combat 8 
ngl i have no idea what that game is
Shadow of the Erdtree is the only thing im currently excited for
Ace Combat is a series of Japanese arcade air combat games
i just really want more historical games
it has funny super weapons ala metal gear solid
the dawn of live service has kinda killed history FPS games
i want a renaissance game, or an old America game founding fathers style
war of rights ? maybe hunt showdown ?
boot up old assassin creed games
I WILL STRIKE THESE CRIMINALS DOWN WITH MY MUSKET AS THE FOREFATHERS INTENDED
god dam south canadians and they're founding fathers

*they're
i was thinking more like a old NCY 1790's style
powdered wigs, wooden buildings, George Washington, ect.
Boot up AC3 dude, got a whole game in the colonies
hell Im half sure you get to kill george washington
Europe had more fun stuff happening at the time
he was the fanciest man to ever die of a thoat infection
i know it did oliwier but i'm an American and i enjoy American history (i do like medieval europe though)
1500's medieval Europe, knights and armor
that's the renesans
Medival period ended in 1453
wow a lot older than i thought
i probably like knights and armor because i'm a fantasy nerd
well, when plate armor was invented, firearms where common place in europe by that time
This is why warhammer fantasy is best, because they have GUNS
nah
thats the power of D&D, you can be a human guy or a flying pair of khaki pants
never played D&D
you can do anything without the restraints of code
you can slay a god or make a cult based around the sussy impostor
you can do ANYTHING
as long as the DM allows it
lol yes
Ian Proceeds to gun down everyone with a Famas and a Mat49
Dnd is some good fun
you can make is 7.65 into a bomb, or be infused with the essence of a celestial
"Hello, Ian from forgotten weapons here at the rock island auction house. Today we have the cursed necrosword of algoroch"
dnd in a nutshell
he did the Halo shotgun episode so who knows
That would make for a good npc
D&D aside do you guys have a BF1 medic gun recommendation, i was thinking about getting the RSC 1917 Factory
Same with the Chinese assault rifle
yea
whats funny is that he is not the only gun youtuber to do this
Federov is good
ok thx
can't wait till he does the Aliens pulse rifle
because it's based on the Thompson
Had garand thumb doing the assault rifle and acting as if he was in the human covenant war
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_XGEgRZsAI&t=278s
opticals are ugly
he also did a starship troopers cosplay with the other guy
there gona do Helldivers in no time at this rate
i don't care what they look like as long as they are good
i think trench is best
you get an Assault rifle pretty much
Trailer leaked. The second map is the reused stadium
i sould be able to get it in about an hour or so with waht i have so far
i was thinking about getting BFV
kinda fucked to say "hey we got new maps plural" and have one be the stadium
Even the trailer is too soon to react for some idiots, look at this âContent Creatorâ when watching the 2042 trailer lol:-
are you on PC
ye
Do not get Battlefield V
why
It is catastrophically hacked
people are doing shit Ive never seen before on it.
They can redeploy the whole server, they can spam infinite gadgets, they can use cut weapons. Its just fucked
my friend plays it on PC and he didn't have any trouble with it
it's on and off kind of problem
sometimes you get a cheater on every server
or you don't see them at all
I also dont think V is that good so...
Also if you play on comunity servers the chance of a cheater showing up is allot lower
what is your favotite then Nutter
same thing applies to 1 and 4
i have never seen a cheater in 1 before
1 and 4
same here nutter
1 looks prettier and has better atmosphere than BFV but is inferior in every other area. I always thought it appealed to the masses (casuals) though.
i am crap at this game, 8 minutes, 2 kills
except the gunplay, map design, sandbox, balance, and anti cheat
i was thinking of getting bf5 on pc is hacking really that bad on pc for it ?
first 3 are personal opinion, and number 5 in BF1 is entirely reliant on admins kicking the cheaters
Anti cheat is irrelevant to me (as on console) but actually, Iâll give you balance
It's all or nothing as you battle for Earthâs most valuable resource in a Chilean desert.
đșïž Engage in suburban combat on Haven
đïž Fight on the battle-torn Stadium
đ« Wield New Weapons
đȘ 100 Battle Pass Tiers
Play #Battlefield 2042 Season 7: Turning Point on March 19.
you know people can still hack on concle right, although it does require an external device such as a laptop
Play #battlefield-legacy-titles 2042 Season 7: Turning Point on March 19.
well but unleast on consols they can't crash servers and mass redeploy everyone Yet
nah.
1 is a master with the sandbox, having extremely interactable maps and many outright strange weapons vehicles and gadgets. V only approached this in its pacific content
5's spread to recoil system makes many weapons feel outright terrible and does not remove randomness like people claim
5's launch maps were also almost all incredibly boring and only became decent around season 4
right
A lot of v maps can be strange in breakthrough, aerodrome and fjell come to mind as not being very enjoyable to play on, especially twisted steel
personal opinion, i like the maps and gunplay in V so i disagree
oh my god people still plays bf1 i thought it died
but everyone is entitled to there own opinion
oh of course people still play it
but not too many right
more than enough for a match
its the 2nd most thriving rn
BF1 is in the top 3
wait fr
well, what do you like about them?
i simply like the gunplay, allot of the maps in V are pretty eh but devastation , roterdam and provance are really good
i like the fortification system , how the tanks work in V
the squad call ins are cool
campaigns are Eh but overhated
So you agree with me on the maps then.
Rotterdam and devastation are ok i suppose
yea but allot of the problems that i have with the maps in V are common in BF1 as well
the ones i don't like that is
allot are too open for my liking
just rotterdam tbh.
both roterdam and devastation flow preaty well
and even then I cant get over that rotterdam has the wrong faction
Itâs so rare though itâs a non-problem. You certainly wonât find a post here from me complaining about cheaters.
I feel like open maps flow better in bf1 cause how the gunplay works in that game, youâll deal with prone lmgs and other snipers at range but most players are medic or assault anyway
Dutch faction?
they also flow better because they are better designed in general. Compare the flow of Sinai Desert to Al Sundan.
yeah
Pacific is the worst part of BFV
Le gasp

Al sundan makes me want to cry that map is awful 
Al sudan, walking sim interrupted by occasional bombing
I canât see anyone when theyâre hiding in those damn buildings or sniping in a bush
Most of the Strategic Conquest maps are apart from Provence. The Tactical Conquest rotation is where itâs at.
solomon islands and pacific storm are Fine but iwo jima is getting Bombed by aircraft simulator
I live in breakthrough but tactical conquest was pretty decent when I played it
breakthroght is all fun and games till the atackers start camping in spawn

Al Sundan is fun if you stay in the town area, C, D, E iirc
till the Bombers figure out where all the infantry are and you get farmed by aircraft
or the enemy team get's farmed by aircraft
usualy both teams at once
Wake Conquest is the best map in BFV by far
Solomon in the jungle is okay. Most of the Pacific is oversized, randomized and people lay in undergrowth (so like hide and seek finding that one guy on a flag before you spend the next 20 minutes getting to the next).
Nope, Al Marj & Underground for me.
Solomon is like a solid 7 while Pacific storm is a 6
I don't like cqc maps but I do think the 5 flag variant of Al Marj is pretty good
Provence is my second favorite map
Provance is pretty good
Provence is suprisingly good for a CQ map kitbashed from a tdm map
Provence gets that balance right between infantry and vehicle combat
Provence should be in Tactical. Itâs a great map.
Arras too
shame it's after Panzerstorm in the map rotation
Panzerstorm is not Total pain to play but it's still bad
Yeah my current rotation is Arras through to Devastation then back to Arras.
Yep
arras is preaty decent all things considered
And I believe Al Sundan is after Provence - what a shit sandwich lol
if the staghound was not so busted it would be allot more fun to play
I only really played arras in breakthrough so I canât even say I experienced much of it but

I don't think I actively hate any map in BFV
bro... 27 min round, 8 kills
Al sudan , panzerstorm , Iwo jima and Hamara definitely bring the most suffering
I don't like Fjell, Narvik, and Underground but I don't always back out when they come on
Fjell sucks because it has Aircraft
In Tactical I only dislike Narvik and Mercury
Mercury is another map where aircraft kill the fun
The map also inspires people to ignore objectives and snipe from hills/spawn and sit in spawn with tanks.
i think mercury is accualy best on Outpost because you don't get Bombed 24/7
it's more Fun where your getting shot at by a sniper that can't probobly hit you anyways
then getting non stop bombed by aircraft
that have the AA gun positions memorized and fire there weapons outside of Fligerfaust effective range
Yes.
also, fun fact, so you guys know the Cerveza Cristal beer memes
the game forces you to stay in one spot otherwise you can't aim with it
it's the same map, just in a different game
Cool funfact though.
They couldn't afford the copyright fees to peter pan or snow white, let alone anything else.
apparently it's the cheapest, crappiest beer in Chile, how could they not afford it ?

Simple, they burn every dollar trying to salvage 2042 instead of just canning it entirely and working on a new game.
they cut BC1, 2 and 1943 servers for the sole reason to push the shitty portal mode in 2042
Who knows trailer music name or source from the last battlefield 2042 trailer?
which trailer'd that be?
god it looks like cod
Just watched through it, apparently it's some jank version of the classic battlefield theme
Started replaying BC2 and it's great to see it's still populated. That game aged greatly
the one that dropped about an hour ago?
Wait, what? They killed the servers last year in december
Yep
just yet another stage of company dimentia
Seriously, it feels more shoddy than that 'willy's wonderland' scam in Glasgow.
Is the season out?
Yo guys i'm sorry if this is a wrong channel but if anyone got nordvik "dead-center" skin for ak24 please send me PM i need a favour if you have a minute or two
if only
Waited this long for 3 new weapons & 2 maps? lmao battlefield is trash.
you're gonna make battlefield cry
it really did
It's just missing bots
there was/is a server with bots
fire and frost or something
I think I know what you're referring to
I heard the bots there kind of ass
they are lol
And there's no public download for the mod
So useless
You know what
Had dice never abandoned bots from BC1 upt to V
Maybe I wouldn't be in this mess
too bad they never ported onslaught from console
that was bots coop on mutliplayer maps right
Yes
Honestly
Onslaught reminds me of battlefront 2 coop
Isn't it just attack and defend flag points
something like that
unfortunately bc2 came out during dice's "fuck over pc players" era so we never got bc1, 1943 or onslaught from bc2
why was that
nobody really knows. they just said it would come over and then it didnt
but we got bf play4free so its all good, right?
We already have bf3 VU
And now, bf4 WR coming soon
Worry about the next one
So many bad news recently regarding the next game
Real Cheapy the Cheapskate moment for real.
It's insane how horrid it's all become here.
How do you mean?
the degragation of the battlefield franchise
BF1's obviously not without flaw, it's got plenty of issues but at least in that game you can look pas them
*past
the biggest flaw people point towards in bf1 is also completley placebo
I was always positive about all the BF games I played before 2042 came along
Could you explain? I agree that a lot of flaws people point to for BF1 can be⊠interesting to say the least, Iâm just curious
Agreed, or theyâre not even that bad unless you (generally speaking) have fuzzy memories of the game cause you havenât played it in literal years and youâre defending 2042âŠ.

I was kinda hoping that this new season would draw me back into the game after not playing since season 2. But yea just kinda seems to be more of the same stuff.
BF1 does not have higher spread. Its spread is identical to BF4 for most weapon types, which means it also has less spread than BF3. LMGs, meanwhile, have less spread the more you shoot.
The reason people think BF1 has higher spread is due the firing animations, notably a high visual recoil.
Id say BF1 is about 90% solid, the random bullet deveation is only really bad on LMGs and some SLRs. It makes sense for the LMGs cuz id rather not have 250 round ARs running around
I wish i had better words to describe BF1s gunplay but i can say I donât think itâs even that bad honestly
Sweet spot sucks 100% agreed but the spread is manageable and if anything helps you a lot with how open the maps can be
bullet deveation is only really bad on LMGs
Nope you have to spray with them. They have inverted bloom. The longer you shoot, the more accurate you get
And some vehicle/infantry balance in BF1 is kinda rubbish, mainly the mortar truck and some planes. But if you know your way around the game, you can counter them easily
Sweet spot makes iron sniping viable, and the scout is far from overpowered due to the mechanic. Considering how much missing with a bolt action punishes you the idea of some 1 shot condition beyond headshots is fine, even if wonky
Forgot to say this but the spread is only really bad if you are running and gunning with it. If you mount the bipod the spread is near non existant
I guess the complaint I heard most commonly for it was it was just âtoo easyâ, and yeah theyâd say recon was unbalanced cause of it
But then every now and then the spread for an SLR is really weird and it kinda gets annoying
Id say its only easy for a handful of rifles, ex martini, SMLE, etc
BF1 sniping still takes some skill especially when doing really long range sniping on moving targets
Not as much as BF4 mind you but its there
yeah a solid 85-90% functionality, it varies by match of course
I would agree with that, those 2 seem really punchy from my experience
I dont really see anyone using the martini too much anymore, its kinda a rare sight. Most ppl pick the higher mag capacity rifles over it
For run and gun sniping I mainly use the SMLE, Mosin nagant, and russian 1985
Mostly because they have some really short sweet spot ranges
yeah "too easy" but compared to what? Not the other weapon types certainly. Its only too easy compared to previous game's snipers. But BF1 is set in ww1 and the bolt actions are not just sniper rifles anymore, you need to be able to dive into the shit with them. Plus the sweet spots are usually well below sniping range anyway, rarely exceeding 150m
I never thought about it that way although i totally agree
Yea, like the sweet spot for the m1903 or G98 is a lot closer in range compared to what ranges you normally use the gun
Iâm guessing itâs one of those things people run with to complain about cause itâs easy, especially if they really want to find a reason to critique a game

Yea, BF1 is certainly an easier game to play compared to past BF games. But it doesnt make it a bad game whatsoever
the 1903 has the longest sweet spot in the game too. It doesnt effect long range sniping like at all
Thatâs part of what makes it so engaging to me, I can actually relax and play an fps game. It just feels enjoyable all around, though thatâs my own experience
And in general I feel battlefield isnât a franchise that needs to be treated like it has to cater to the comp community as much as something like CoD
So if âbf1 casualâ is their actual argument, wtf honestly
thats kind of the main critique I see regarding the game from most ppl
The skill depth in BF4 was literally like, mouzou or 313 speed control
bf1's skill cieling is much closer to other games then people realize. Its not very different from BF4
And mouzou was just a complete headache
Thatâs something I used to say a lot, people complain about BF1s movement but itâs honestly very similar to BF4
It's still supported unofficially through Project Rome
why must you hurt me this way
Are you a c-c-console peasant?
Because physical media and actually owning something is better than an over glorified lease that can be revoked at any time
yeah hows that "ownership" working for ya?
pretty great, I can play games from over 20 years ago even now on my GameCube, GameBoy Advance, XBox 360, PS4 and PS5
Orange Box, Halo, Battlefield, COD, Assassin's Creed, Lego Star Wars, Sniper Elite, Just Cause, not counting VR games too
Oh, force unleashed, dead island grand theft auto, army of two
yea its just an updated version of the BF4 movement
with some sliding and being able to vault over objects higher than you
its literally an upgrade from the BF4 movement, idk why ppl hate it. Sure it isnt as fast paced and intricate as BFV movement, but its smooth and noice.
playing BF1 feels as close to a first person assassin's creed game as we'll get
Well BFV was made to bander to the cod kids.
Battlefield
not sure about that one
I felt kinda indifferent about BFV movement, it was okay but too zany for my taste. BF1 movement hits the spot for me
BFV's movement is arguably too fast, to the point where it fucks with the map design
Really? Bad Company 1, bad Company 2 and BF4 on the 360
when you can very quickly vault over stuff suddenly things like walls stop having much meaning
bad Company 2
Also wait is 4 populated on the 360?
Last I checked there's still two or three servers.
damn. Long live the king
Pity Bad Company 1 and 2 were killed off, they still saw active and full lobbies
I was playing 20 player matches
and bad company 2 was killed for what, to push us into 2042's lackluster 'legacy mode' Portal?
i wouldve loved to play some BFBC2 vietnam matches
i have never played a good vietnam era shooter
Same.
Black Ops 1 campaign
trust me, you'll love it.
Gary Oldman's in it
yea ive played that before ofc
and a bit of the MP
But i yearn for a large scale vietnam FPS game on console
shame burning lands imploded
In my opinion itâs good except for back prone and the slide
Its got cool stuff its just too fast all around
fitting, given its name
Best mode to play
Conquest
Rambo mode w/ tanks
Where tht?
Conquest
Only thing better is Rambo-ing with the shot gun
How does people get 3 shot Fliegerfaust?
ammo
if you get ammo from an ammo box or ammo station you get 3 volleys of the fliegerfaust
oh thanks, Imma force my friend to play support đ
not needed, most of the time when you respawn you can grab some extra ammo from the ammo station on the point
but you could do a Funny AA squad of guys with fliger fausts and a support with AA ammo MG42
I noticed the mmg AA ammo, does it hurt a lot?
the AA ammo upgrade on the MG42 makes it do 2x damage against aircraft based of what it says in the game
so if you would be crazy enoght to do this in game you would take the 250 round belt with it
seems like from 1 damage to 2 damage, I have no levels in mmgs, maybe I'll farm it up and take a try
it's because of damage drop off
at close range it accualy does allot of damage
problem is that the Effective range against aircraft is so small
it's a meme
accualy trying to shoot down aircraft with an MMG
so at best the guy on the MMG would be doing a little bit of chip damage to the aircraft
maybe finishing it off after a fligerfaust left it with low hp
or camp the airport

put landmines on the exact location the airplane spawn in
Use a Bazooka
Just a question
Are the in the name of the tsar dlc maps in the basic map rotation in bf1
Itâs sublime imho
Best movement Iâve known in a FPS
Bf5 is majestical such a shame the soviets got cut
Yep (hard to believe they have supported that sack of shit 2042 for longer than they did BFV).
What is the name of the background music in the Season 7 trailer?
Although I have just gone past 90,000 deaths in the game - I still love it
That honestly not a bad idea
thats a hard sell when games like team fortress exist
Yknow Ive seen people say this time and time again but do we actually know they were working on the russians?
Not played that - is it on console?
yes but no. Noone really plays the console version and the movement does not work well with a controller
Iâm not sure actually. While there was datamined weapons and stuff, thereâs guns and skins for factions that arenât in the game that you can buy
Yeah but that move makes it like heâs on the moon - thatâs too much (even for me).
It takes a lot of skill and practice to pull of what he's doing. TF2 is the last active game to have the old art of rocket jumping
Everything there isnt jumping, its momentum from an explosion. You dont feel like youre on the moon, you feel like your flying
If you like fast paced then titanfall is supreme
Also a source engine game. The engine has peak movement
Kinda ironic that the two games with really good movement are both run on source and are both called tf2
New conspiracy just dropped
(and both have been evicerated by automated hackers)
And both franchises were cursed by sourceâs curse of 3
niether needs a sequel, frankly. EA would likely bastardize a titanfall 3
New ea, yea. Ea back when we shouldâve gotten one, nah
what the fuck do you mean by new EA, theyve been shitters for decades
Or well, new respawn. Old respawn actually somewhat cared about titanfall
Eaâs always been money-first yet allergic to money at the same time
All that People found at the time was some concept art and a render of a PPSH of some former dice guy that worked at the time of the PPSHs creation. + the few data minned guns
thats it?
Even after the game launched with finnish and chinese and french and italian guns?
lol
But that was enoght evidence for allot of dudes
Also , Chinese ?
the only nation that really used the KE7 in the war
though IK its not a domestic weapon
Fair enoght then
oh yeah Norway also
some are depending on the gamemode
You can get Lupkow on shock ops
we really need more ppl filling up the mixed conquest lobbies for BF1. Everyone just plays the standard base game conquest only and its annoying
I wanna play albion dammit
Same
I want to play on the dlc maps
But itâs just the base conquest maps I can find
On PC there are usually all map servers in the browser
"usually"
Yeah? Ever joined a lobby that has carrier assault
At least 32 players
I just play conquest. Dont care about CA
and since this guy is playing bf1 ITNOTT he definitley isnt going for the dlc modes.
dont care about the gimmick conquest variant m8.
Whatever
That's my main complaint with the community
Never cared about other maps and modes
90% of the time the mode is either a conquest variant or some tdm sized nonsense
Its just not what Im booting up the game for
Maybe, but not my kind of shit
your loss
Not really, itâs just not my thing
I only tried tf2 once but because of a friend
Iâm curious Nutter. Are you a good BF player?
Im decent. Usually go positive unless Im fucking around. Focus on infantry. Why?
Like to understand the calibre of player Iâm debating with
debate? I just said its your loss if you dont try tf2
Youâve been stating BFV is rubbish for a while
cause I think its rubbish. You have a problem with that?
Just not sure a âusually goes positiveâ player is someone whoâs view I should take seriously
I mean, if you need an excuse to dismiss my opinion, go ahead. If it helps you sleep at night who am I to stop you
Generally though Im not gonna master a game I think is rubbish
Im usually on comm servers for that, unless Im trying some stupid shit and need to play with morons for the bit to work
Poop
anyone have an idea of fixing my problem i been using spectrum for years then all of a sudden since last decvember i been having packet loss when i join servers even in east cost servers im american i get the packet loss icon when im playing and it comes up red with latency icon when match is over i cant play with this i upgraded my wifi im using ethernet im about to throw in the towel for gaming in general i had a technician from spectrum come in today did a thorough investigation and he said everything is clean no packet loss on my end i called sony they told me to use dns 208,67,222,222 and nothing still
Can you call airstrike from a plane in V?
And by the way how can my friends spot infantries/tanks for me? I played 2042 fist and spotting was easy as a button (too easy tho).
You mean like a V1?
I mean Battlefield V, call airstrike as a pilot. Oh yeah it's the V1 rocket, or artillery.
You canât launch them whilst in vehicles
Squad leader needs to be infantry really
you would have to jump out of the airplane, quickly call it in and then jump back in the airplane
so it's pretty much impossible
So I guess using a phone while driving is prohibited. Anyway how can my friends spot tanks/infantries for me? We are new BFV players.
Well I donât fly but you can use flares yourself. Your squad mates can ping enemies (one at a time) but spot will not follow enemy if moves. Recon have flares and other spotting gadgets available to them. Other than that suppress firing on enemy will spot them.
Because realism doesn't matter
Finish it with the plane itself.
Unfortunately that does no damage đ
Not a direct hit?
Well I didnât ask that did I
Maybe you were mistaken
imagine if you did not need a direct hit with the big bombs to kill a full hp tank
that would be even worse then it ready is

all ready some pilots after you shoot them down ONCE will kamikaze you for no reason
And usualy fail
Most definitely direct
a direct bomb is a one hit kill
Times when I hit the tank right next to it was around 56 damage
also depends on what tank because they have different health pools
if you do 56 damage to a light tank then that was a clear miss
probably after a few dozen hours if you become a pilot main you will realize that rockets are just better because you don't need to expose your self to enemy fire lol
and you can do around 80 damage to a medium tank by just spaming rockets at it from beyond effective AA gun range

yea everyone loves being bombed on the bridge on twisted steel by an aircraft that can easily doge all ground fire

such fun
well then unleast your easy to shoot down
lol
all things considered, all the AA weapons are good only if the enemy aircraft is using bombs because they get in to effective range
while rockets can be fired far beyond the Max damage range of AA weapons
- it's much harder to hit an aircraft that far away
- for some reason the japanese 75mm AA/AT gun has a tendency to hit rockets that are being fired at it and not accualy hit the enemy aircraft

Rockets OP dice nerf plz
BF5 anyone ?
Doing that on hamada made players really angry 
Its more practical on wake Island as USA
You get a bazooka and camp
Spawnkilling bombers with the panzerfaust sounds better to me 
Real men spawn camp aircraft with the AT Stick
đ Atacama desert, Chile
Face the heat of the #Battlefield and fight for Earthâs most valuable resource in door-to-door suburban combat.
Jump into Haven for intense, gritty battles on March 19!
Discover Haven, one of two upcoming maps for Season 7: Turning Point on #Battlefield2042 in our latest Dev Notes
We unpack how this location came to be, what direction the team wanted to go in after Redacted, and more
@âBrokenMachine joins us to give you an early look at the map and answer some questions with the Dev Team.
My Facebook BFV XBox group has just hit 2,500 members (not bad considering I did not start it until after 2042 came out),
what are yâallâs average accuracy stats with infantry rifles in bf1? mine is like 30% after the last couple years of using them almost exclusively
Your Update Notes for #Battlefield2042 Season 7: Turning Point is on the way tomorrow!
But let's begin today, by sharing our Dev Notes from the Weapons & Vehicles Teams on where their areas of focus are for Update 7.0.0.
đ§”Learn more details in the thread!
How to enjoy life:
step 1. go to youtube and play battlefield 4 theme
step 2. crank the volume up
step 3. ascend
step 4. break down and cry as you realize those days are gone
#Battlefield 2042 - Season 7 is right around the corner â°
Play on Haven and Stadium, master new weapons and knock down 100 Battle Pass tiers on the way.
Hold nothing back on March 19 đ
especially since for whatever reason there's only privately rented servers left (on psn at least) where any official servers are missing.
Since yesterday when I try to launch Battlefield 3 from EA APP every time I load Battlelog, which has the message "Wrong email or password". I've been playing for many months before, and I didn't have that error. I have to log in manually and so often Battlelog throws errors preventing me from joining the online game and I have to restart my computer several times. Can someone help me and explain what's going on and how to fix it?
Steam has a pretty big sale and I was thinking of buying a new bf game. Which would you recommend bfV or bf2042?
Or perhaps bf3 that is also and option.
In our final Dev Notes ahead of our Update Notes going live tomorrow for #Battlefield2042 Season 7: Turning Point
It's now time to hand things over to the Vehicles Team to relay what they're doing for 7.0.0.
đ§”Get a glimpse in the thread below!
lmao BF3 is dead
I would recommend BF2042 but you should get some other opinions
BF1 is also an option
i already played the living hell out of bf4 and 1
ah
lookin for something different
and bf is probably the game franchise i enjoy the most rn
hmm
i mean bf2042 looks hella different from a normal bf game
but is it a good different?
yeah BFV is just a WWII game
I've played it these past few months and I'm suprisingly enjoying it
a lot of the maps do suck though
If you get a match on spearhead or orbital though you might have the time of your life
honestly ive always found 2-3 maps and only played them
like i play sinmai desert on bf1 the most
in bfV??


