#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 94 of 1
it was the British empire after all
people from all over the place
That too, but why focus on the actual people of differing ethnicities when you can have self-inserts that don't make sense instead?
As for 2042, instead of locking the character abilities to the characters with cringe voicelines, why not just make those special abilities pickable like the BF4 perk presets for any class.
I play as Tom Cruise lol
right, the top gun knock-off
that's levels of cringeception I didn't even think possible
well Unleast he's easy to spot
And the phantom of the opera guy when baddie
They wanted to focus on lesser known battles. In that regard they didn't add the german and Soviet maps Which were the most requested maps till they cut the game's support
His lines are great
No issue with that, all the power to them had they the time and creative freedom to do it the right way.
allot of the Worst players in the game play him
so you see him allot sniping alone in some bush
on the other side of the map
it's just sad at this point
Like kicking a kid who fell out of his wheelchair
I may not be the best but I’m far from the worst
im not saying that playing him makes you bad
just allot of new players pick him
and they tend to be potato at the game
fair enoght everyone starts somewhere
Could've easily done a campaign story about the Night Witches
it could be worse, they could be dudes that role play a bush
But no, 'Heavy Water but one chick instead of all men team' go brr
Stop it, you'll give 'em ideas
Battlefield Hardline got so much hate because it wasn't a military shooter. They could've just removed the battlefield from the name and the game would've been appreciated. Like Ubisoft removed Tom Clency's name from xdefient after the backlash
One of the five DICE developers left is just chatlurking waiting for more idiotic ideas to somehow make 2042 even worse.
Do you mean Tom Clancey?
They shutdown the studio that was making the campaign
They are making a f2p battle royal which is the worst decision by far
We sometimes play with whole squad as Tom for the best squad screen lol
They can't replicate Warzone's success
you got to please investors somehow, i guess

EA try not to fuck up a 20 year spanning franchise!
CDPR avoids that
Ea : hold my beer
EA :makes the worst possible decisions
We're the biggest investors because without OUR money DICE and EA are roylally fucked
Investors didn't influence cyberpunk
Maybe Investors forced cdpr to launch cyberpunk early
it was more-so covid pushing back their release dates and the public practically kicking their doors down over it.
We are the reason for bad game launches and microtransactions. Stop preordering, and stop buying microtransactions let them learn their lesson
"it not ready"
"give it to us anyway"
"okay"
"why isn't it ready yet"
I got 2042 for free and still paid too much
Money can be returned, time wasted and forever lost can't.
HellDivers 2, Choo Choo Charles, Poppy Playtime and Leathal Company are KILLING these greedy assholes at their own game.
I paid £110 for game, upgraded Xbox to series X especially for it and went back to BFV in 7 days lol
It's beautiful!
Cdpr showed a fake gameplay of the last gen version which wasn't ready and they admitted to it
Should've gotten a refund
I returned cod cold war same day and got a full refund for it.
I’d played too many hours
That game was actually good. Even though the campaign is short
But still better than MW3
Campain was terrible
got as a free monthly a while back, humoured it with a replaythrough and still stand by that fact but at LEAST it respected the contineuity of the original Black Ops.
MWIII was shit, why anyone still pays into cod is beyond me.
F
The game was mostly made during covid
Raven made the campaign while treyarch handled the rest
So was Choo Choo Charles and HellDivers 2, covid delayed a lot of things but the shitty writing is solely to blame on shite development cycles and doctrines.
Holy you must be level 500 twice lol
Ea is the reason why the veteran battlefield devs left
Nah I’m pc.. rip for me I get all the cheaters lmao
The Finals is outperforming bf2042
Awesome!
You know a franchise is dead when mostly people join the official discord just to shit on it
Or rather to simply say that it's shit to put it in better phrasing.
I'm just here to find people that still play BF1 honestly.
It's made by the old battlefield devs
Even better!
DICE's Respawn if you will
EA/Activision is gaming Britain and Respawn/the guys who make The Finals are gaming america.
EA lied about a game le gasp noooo impossible you must just be sexist or something! (this is sarcasam)
Ea and Activision are based in the US
Yeah I’ve been 500 for a long while
Need squad bf1
No I mean imperialistic assholes that want to chokehold everything and force it all under their shitty doctrines meanwhile TitanFall and Finals are free to be made how they want to be
Ea killed Titanfall
Respawn's in their name, they'll be free one day.
Just as we wait for Jack to find BT, we must ourselves wait in turn for TitanFall 3.
I'm not above going Biblical with my distane for modern gaming, but that'd be for another time.
Good talk Dell.
TF3 isnt coming , just saying
blame the BR trend for Apex, respawn killed off TF3 development due to BR trend. EA didnt even know at all about TF3 was in the works. EA never heard about TF3 at all.
They pulled Respawn off of TF3 to focus on Apex and wokeified TitanFall's story
TitanFall 2's teasers was just to hype up the ice age baby with radiation poisoning and leukimia powers for Apex
EA had nothing to do with TF3
EA never knew about TF3. only respawn themselves did all of this.
we never asked for this and yet it was shat upon our doorstep in a flaming bag
fire that bastard without pension
They only made the first playable mission before dropping the development
Respawn CEO Vince Zampella choice to follow the BR trend
they also talked about why they followed the BR trend in the article
That's why the next battlefield gonna have a BR?
most likely
I just hope they don’t treat it the same way as they do WZ for cod. Make it the golden child over the official game itself.
whoever thought that was a smart move to drop all of this, but this idiot calling it a 'right call' to drop titanfall 3 needs to be fired
hes not a idiot. its just how game industry adapt to make bank
foresight to drop a less profitable venture that could have just been average
respectable decision
It will be used to sell you specialist skins and other microtransactions. The next bf is getting back the class system but it may have characters similar to bf5 which was profitable for EA
Vince Zampella criticized BF2042. That gives me hope for the next game but still EA can't be trusted
EA publish the game. Not the inside, behind the scenes making the game.
Zampella is a very smart person. He just dosent want the community to backlash on them like 2042. Even tho 2042 is a great game itself.
The beginning is rough but that’s the past. Atleast is not another BF4 launch disaster.
We would've gladly PAID for TF3!
They could've made Apex ledgends too, they could've had both with the money made from Apex, we could've gotten BT back god damn it!
Bullshit, everyone was posting and talking about it when the teasters were happening, the servers were fixed, the game's videos on youtube had 100s of thousands of views on average.
WE. ARE. HERE. god damn it!
How the gaming industry is. It won’t do great.
It’s only a small fanbase for it. A lot of people moved on from apex and TF games. Let’s see how their next Titanfall universe game will be like.
A small fanbase? you call 500k people willing to pay 60-70USD each for TitanFall 3 'small'?
That'd be 35 Million dollars right there.
Not even counting expansions that could be added like multiplayer map packs or better yet a DLC features like adding the TitanFall 1 maps and titans into it as well?
So if the game does come out and flop because it’s exactly just like TF2 as a reskin. It will sell and do very well?
I don’t think respawn wants to do that unless they reboot the TF series.
Given the fact Titanfall 2 was released between BF1 and Infinite Warfare, despite that, it STILL stands as one of the most active games from 2016.
Plenty of people talking about titanfall 3 on youtube.
steam alone 
Respawn said it won’t happen. I still don’t understand why they hope for it to happen.
It won’t ever come out.
Unless they fully reboot it.
Apex did that already because it's cannon to be another timeline
Keep in mind that it's cannon apex is in a diferent universe
It’s the same universe. What are you on?
I remember hearing that the mirage from titanfall's universe swapped places with the Apex universe's Mirage
I could be wrong on that, it's been a while since I last bothered to keep up with that.
Apex universe is based off of TF universe
It’s essentially a TF spinoff as a BR game
Apex is basically linked to TF universe either way.
@tawny geyser please only use the lfg channel for this
My bad, I’m not familiar with discord etiquette. Will do
W pfp 
2042 is a great game?? 😂😂😂😂
What's that?
d
Wouldn’t worry - there were multiple off-topic posts before you asked about BF and they were fine apparently.
Hello, I need help, I can't open Battlefield 4 from Steam, it appears that it is running but nothing appears, if you can help me it would be a great help
Hey I’ve had this problem in the past, either try to restart your pc or reinstall the game if restart didn’t work
I've BF1 but no clue on the peacekeeper
In a woooooooorrrld of pure imagination
2042 is poopie
They shifted all of their resources towards the next game. BF2042 can't be fixed
It was unfixable from release
Vince Zampella said BF2042 stayed too far from what battlefield is
They are better off not making the same mistakes in the next game
BF2042 is certainly not great. Unfortunately it will be regarded as the worst battlefield in the entire series. Hardline used to hold that position
Yep - no focusing on making the game so inclusive at the cost of ending up with a crap, unplayable game
They ignored the warnings from the beginning
Bad launch wasn't much of a problem compared to the other serious issues it had that they no way will be able to reverse it like balancing, specialists, lack of destructions
Even BF4 had a launch as bad as BF2042
BF4 didn't have the questionable design elements
dude still trying to act like 2042 launch was even in the same universe of bad as bf4 launch...
Bugs/balance issues is one thing, but to remove half the core features is another.
id argue they just doubled down on core features
large scale combined arms warfare sandbox shooter
locked loadouts and the originals scoreboard are not "core features"
its insane what people will chalk up as a core feature just to try to make dice/ea look worse for some reason
whats the goal "hur dur, multi million/billion dollar companies didnt make the best product they could and made a few million less than they wanted. I WIN"
different types of Bad.
BF4 was a good game that didnt work
2042 was a bad game
yea a game not working at all is much worse than a disappointing game..
if you cant understand that then.. idk what to tell you
But also means that, once those bugs are fixed, you have a good game.
2042 has to try and ship-of-theseus itself into a good product and only half succeeded
cool? we were only talking about launch and how one dude is trying to act like they are the same
BF4 is more enjoyable than BF2042
the point is that theyre not exactly comparable and that "2042 was worse" is not invalid depending on what you mean by bad.
Bad as in "the state of the game in this moment is bad", bf4. Bad as in "the state of this game has bad consequences", 2042
Buggy launch can be fixed but questionable design choices can't be reversed
i mean.. the criteria was set as launch.. which bf4 launch was objectively worse.. to try to argue anything else is just moronic...
to try to argue anything else is just moronic
you miss the point
i mean.. they can and did.. they did change specialists..
Bf2042 fixed the bugs that it had at launch but they can't get rid of the questionable design choices now
id argue you miss the point..
they CAN, they just wont for whatever reason
they did change all the maps, kind of bring back locked loadouts, etc
they have literally made changes... what are you talking about
the maps are still terrible, theyre just slightly less terrible
The classic soldiers aren't there. BF2042 feels like a hero shooter. They copied it from warzone and apex legends
xD
They can't add it now either
quality is not a design choice...
and?
is reading that hard for you? the topic went from bf4 launch vs 2042 launch and you didnt grasp that, and now its about changing design choices and you bring up quality...
like literally.. can you not read?
in smaller buildings like its always been EXCEPT bf4 and levolution
I can read. Ive explained to you the difference between the launches, and you just dont care.
There is a significant difference between bad launch and questionable design choices
i dont care about you changing goal posts...
no goal posts have been changed
LOL ok
you literally just brought up the quality of the maps when we were talking about changing design choices..
why is it the people with default pfp the ones that cant understand shit
Bad launch wasn't a problem for BF2042, there are several games that had bad launches and recovered from it like BF4. But you can't reverse bad design choices
map quality is a result of how the map is designed.
This should be obvious
Like you can't get rid of specialists now
did i not just spend the last 5 minutes showcasing how they were changing bad designs.. hence they CAN reverse them..
Replacing specialists with the classic soldiers aswell?
the original map designs were large and empty, so they cut back on being large and empty, that is literally reversing their map designs
Portal have it
that doesnt mean they are good maps still..
They added cover. The maps are still plauged with extremely open areas and flow horribly. The fundamental design of the maps could not be changed without making new maps. This only makes them slightly better.
quality and design choices are different..
ill pick up a religion and pray for you two, because you guys need it
one is a result of the other
the design choices that lead to these maps being bad cannot be reversed without cutting the map.
They can only be mitigated
Blame 128 players
no
thats not the issue with these maps
(but yes, is another game design choice that cant be reversed)
take notes Nyphon
BF4 and 2042 can’t be compared similarly besides broken launches. It’s more of a problem that it’s been over 10 years and Battlefield titles are still releasing the same way than anything else. But BF4 enjoyed the simplicity of being an expanded version of BF3, which was already a commercially successful title, while also adding more content on top of it, 2042 has no real foundation in the franchise and it’s just so removed from any of its predecessors in all but what the frostbite engine allows them to do with a lot of players and vehicles
it’s been over 10 years and Battlefield titles are still releasing the same way than anything else
you underappreciate all the new and unique ways BF can fuck up
They got rid of the legacy features, that's the issue

They should've just copied BF4. Most people would've appreciated it
But EA told DICE to copy what's popular, hence that got BF2042 in the situation that it is now today
People can't blame everything on bad launch
Even BF5 had a bad launch
This is why art direction is imo still absolutely important, because every game as far as gameplay goes actually tends to have a few shitty choices and balancing problems, DICE always made immersive games with destruction and their thematic consistency
DICE always made immersive games with destruction and their thematic consistency
battlefield v lmao
well BF1 and prior that is
Those people are no longer at DICE even more people left after BF2042's bad launch
I honestly haven’t enjoyed any BF published since BF1 for that reason
Interesting
I wonder how much of a component just the PR surrounding DICE was for how many devs left
It was known since BF5 but people didn't pay attention to it till BF2042's bad launch
I suspect it was internal. BFV's design, marketing, and live service heavily suggested that there was absolutely no vision for the game
Something was going to hell behind the scenes and the game was changing tone and gameplay wildly
After BF2042's launch people started to put things together and connect everything on what went wrong
Id argue there was 3 seperate visions for BFV going at once
- BF1 in WW2
- A battlefield 2 esque game, with slower and more tactical elements
- A very outlandish, somewhat silly game
I love Bf1 but there’s only servers in my region at night, and I play bfv occasionally should I get the bf2042?
Bfv launch was actually solid. Did you even play at launch? Do you just make shit up?
Patrick Solderlund left after BF5's launch and formed Embark studios where most DICE devs went. People didn't care cause Patrick Solderlund said something that caused the preorder sales to drop
5 was a bit rocky compared to 1
It had bugs, and a whole controversy
but its just totally overshadowed by 4 and 2042
The first 2 make the most sense to me cause bfv was a weird amalgamation of mechanics like attrition that just did not make sense to me
Almost every mp game has bugs at launch… imaging citing a shitty trailer and what a ceo said to why bfv launch was bad….
The correlation is astonishing
BF5 got better like 2 years later
The game needed contents
It launched with 2 less maps than bf1 irrc
All I really know about BFVs life besides content dripfeeding was TTK changes and horrible visibility (which… also never got fixed unfortunately)
Players were begging for maps and content in general
you really are making shit up
you say that like thats not a sizable hit.
I truly believe you have no clue what you’re talking about most of the time
It’s not nearly as short on content as people make it out to be.
It was the smallest BF since BF3, and the live service was both excruciatingly slow and heavily focused on stuff noone really cared about.
Well yea. It was also for the time major content was free too.
Not to mention a number of guns and modes that were announced for launch getting delayed.
No one said it was perfect, but to act like it was bad is just not true
He literally sourced a trailer and what a ceo said as a reason for why it was a bad launch, like that matters
Well personally i think BFV is just not that good of a game.
But, I think the launch is only "fine" when compared to how catastrophic other BF launches have been
I mean.. I think only bf1 launch was better..
Bf1 was the only good launch in the last decade yes
Yes let’s understand the things are not only black and white. Bfv launch was far from bad, it wasn’t perfect either but not even close to bad.
Ironically launch was better than some weeks later, because when they started patching was when there was a lot of problems.
Actual problems like black screens and not being able to be revived.
launch is arguably better than now on PC since BFV has been disemboweled by hackers
I think the worst thing at launch was balance… that was honestly it. There wasn’t anything game breaking or major problems. Standard weird bugs and poor balancing.
Bf5 launch wasn't as bad as BF2042 or even as BF4
8 maps was a hard sell. Yes its slightly less than 1 but 1 was slightly less than 4 and you could see these games starting to shrink.
The lack of boats also stung for me.
Nothing was worse than bf4 launch… why is this hard for you to understand?
we understand what you mean by this.
we just dont care, because you are using a different metric than us
A game not functional at all for 7 months is a pretty damning metric
BF5 needed balancing and contents. These were the primary issues but the game got better 2 years later
Why you choose not to use that metric is weird
I have explained the rationale. You can take it or leave it.
So have I
When they bought iwo jima expansion if I remember correctly
And I’ll just outright say you’re rational is weird af
Whatever you say, BF4 had the worst launch in the entire series
It’s like saying you’d rather have a car that doesn’t run vs a car that runs you just don’t like it
Both are unacceptable
This is not a matter of opinion my guy…
Id argue something reversible is better than something not reversible, even if the reversible thing is worse at the time.
The difference between a broken car that can be fixed into a good car vs a car that sucks
I see why you disagree. But I cant see why you find this completely irrational
You get the difference between something not working and personal preferences in not liking something right?
Reminds me of the thought experiment of the ship of theseus. whether an object is the same object after having had all of its original components replaced
Because if you did you would realize that just not liking something is acceptable…
Something not functioning is not acceptable…
You can take someone for court for something not working, you can’t take them to court because you didn’t like it
You can if you were mislead
This really isn’t a hard concept
Maybe for you it is, but it’s really not hard to understand
Oh yea people actually did try to sue over bf4 too
nothing about 42's launch design is acceptable. This is not a school project, simply functioning is not the only standard
I understand, both are worse. Yeah BF2042 is playable but it's not as good compared to it's predecessors, that's the main problem
How many out of these they fixed it by now?
TLDR
I already know stupid shit like voip is in there too
Something no one uses but so many people cried about
I understand the differences. But both are not acceptable
To you. One is objective the other is subjective…
I remember people in bf1 doing the exact same thing after the “they shall not pass” dlc came out
and those were PAID for dlc
like yea.. the slow content of bfv was annoying, but at least that shit was free
They shall not pass was the first DLC tbf and i think it came out like months after the release of BF1
Granted with premium you got a whole lot more content despite the release intervals
October 2016 from release to March 2017 for they shall not pass
didnt the first map for bfv come out like a month after launch?
What?? It had no scoreboards, stats, persistent servers, server browser, proper squad control, platoons - the list goes on
I’ve played and loved each BF before - this was the first I hated
I’d rather pay and be guaranteed the content in a timely manner
VOIP is critical for finding like minded players to play with. I think I literally disagree with almost everything you have to say lol
the only time i've ever used voip in battlefield was to Insult a Cheater i and my friend where troling
so the enemy could kill them
we body blocked them
so i honeslty agree that Voip in battlefield is a bit of a joke and preaty much is Never used
even if you squad mates in V for example have a microphone
you never accualy hear anyone use there Microphone
unless they are trolling by mic spaming or acidently press ALT the push to talk key while Alt tabing to check discord or something
or if someone is complaning that : oh you Suck because you didin't revive me weee im so angry

Well if it were not for VOIP I would not now never play without a minimum of one full squad in party talking/making call outs
well you are on consol, there it's compleatly different
ONG - that’s the point, over time you find the team players
i never realy found a single player i would like to play with exept my accualy friends
in BFV
i did add a few players on Ea App that i did have fun playing with, but they never joined my game after wards
on Consols Voip is realy usefull, on PC ? not so much
Fair enough
for Voip with randoms to work it would require the randoms to accualy work with you
and lissen
i guess if you have realy new players and they are willing to cooperate you can make them play better
insted of aimlessly sitting in the back as scout
I now have a network of so many players I play with regularly (who I found on game chat)
had a scoreboard, just a weird one, had stats just weird again, ill just agree to the others because those are still not core features either.. idk what you consider core but QOL features are certainly not them.
i have found a bunch of players in different games i play BF with
but never found one in BF it self
Most of them in Vermintide 2
thats youre choice, i think i could wait and get more maps/weapons for free eventually, i guess its a matter of patience?
i have thousands of hours across several bf titles.. i would honestly guess ive heard less than 30 people use it in all that time...
No. It’s a matter of not being a cheap skate.
Like Oliver said - maybe console is different
lol youve tried the "skill check" approach before and that didnt work, i can tell you the cheap approach wont work either
again, it was annoying at the time, but its really not a big ask to wait a little to get maps..
Disagree. People like you play bf all the time and cost per min of entertainment is nothing. Yet you don’t pay the cost of one night out for more content- ridiculous.
i mean.. you can disagree all you want, doesnt really amount to much
not only that but i paid for map packs a bunch before and it sucked for various reasons outside of JUST the cost
Cheap skate - go get a job
split player base, not being able to play said packs because X friend doesnt have it, weapons being p2w, etc etc
didnt take long for you to devolve to baseless takes
It’s true though - our hobby is cheap compared to most
nothing about what you just said is true...
i literally just told you i paid for the map packs before..
Luke Skywalker quotes now lol
not wanting all the negatives that come with paid dlc because i have a bit of patience and prefer free things doesnt mean im a cheap skate
No, it really does
usually we disagree but you dont devolve to meme tier troll but somethings different today
2 bottles of wine
hi, does anyone play bf3? it looks like a dead game
on VU, yes
Don’t stand for this, say something scandalous about his mother
WR is gonna be my main game
when it drops
same
but its not bad to come back to VU once the next patch drops for the bot
I been playing 2042 over any battlefield lately. Once WR drops. It’s gonna be with my 3-4 games I grind out on
Other battlefield games bored me now
Please do, I can’t stand her
BF4 is the gigaChad
Again we disagree
Does anyone know why when I connect to a specific server in Battlefield 3 then when there is a message "connecting" nothing happens? On any other server I can play and my favorite one stopped responding.
hey you guys still good pilot a helicopter in bf4?
cause damn im starting to get pretty good at it.
even after 10 years since release.
how? :D i dont know how to fly god helicopter and jets, planes in every bf.. :D
but every 140lvl in planes are crazy...
I got the definitive edition upgrade for BFV, didn't get the BF1 bonus weapons, so much for that failed venture. At least now I don't ever need to touch the fucking thing ever again.
Softlocking guns behind a FOMO paywall that can't be accessed anymore, yet another on the forever mounting list of reasons why Battlefield's died off.
bf1 weapons in bfv?
I sometimes wish i never got the definitive upgrade cause id have a progression loop to look forward to
You can spend like 25 or so hours just focusing on what you’re gonna strategize unlocking
no i think someone misstook the BFV pre order bouns pack in BF1
There was a pre-order bonus to get five limited time BF1 weapons as an incentive to shill out money for BFV before any gameplay trailer even dropped.
it kinda sucks that we can't get the variants from that DLC now in 1
because they have different stats
bouta say bfv have bfv weapons, not bf1
A few although I’m not aware of a pre order pack. I wonder how the selbstlader m1916 plays in v
No, five exclusive weapons for BF1 that were promotional for a BFV pre-order https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Jb49wf16kA
the M1941 johnson and it have allmost the same stats
I mean hell, if they just sold this bundle for 5USD I'd buy it as an add-on. It could be a BF1 micro-update with a few tweaks and fixes to the multiplayer.
they are the LONG range semi autos for assault
That’s unfortunate because the Johnson still sounds and feels really good
they shoot slower but have better damage at range
That makes sense actually
the diffrence is that the M1916 fits this role way better
then the M1941
the M1941 has it's advantages over the M1916
but the M1916 simply has bigger mags
so it's better
and the advantages of the M1941 don't help at it's intended range
I wish BFV had retained different iron sight magnifications tbh
Or an iron sight slider option like the actual guns have
Zeroing on all guns would be kind of redundant
Not really, it's not exclusive to scopes.
i know it's not
the bazooka has zeroing too
and real life guns can zero to around 800 meters
and the ones in WW2 where mostly to 2000 meters
like the Pistol C96 had Sights up to 800 meters
or the Browning high power
lol
but even in V because of damage drop off it would not be usefull unless your playing Scout with bolt actions
or Assault with the Longer range semi autos
How the hell is a c96 even tapping someone at 800 meters
Ask the Mauzer company why they made C96's with sights that could be zeroed to 800 meters

all that aside, the send-off update for BF1 should've just included a dlc package that included the 5 pre-order weapons and all the dogtags that were formerly limited time events.
Because softlocking content behind 'be there or miss out forever' sucks.
if you want to see how it looked like
That's because the RO series is actually good
with gun mechanics that is.
yea
the MP40 with expanded mags accualy shows you how it worked
in real life
because the germans did not make expanded mags for it
insted they made a variant of the MP40 where you would have two Mags in one mag well
and would slide the other mag it place after the first one was empty (something like the Burton from BF1)
and other cool details
probobly if BFV was like BF1 and had a variant system they would have shown that
On a general note i imagine taping maps together would just make the gun that much heavier on one side but hell it’d come in clutch in a firefight
the germans wanted to have the magazine size of the PPSH so they created this variant of the MP40
it's called the MP40 II (roman number 2)
but to be fair the germans made so many wacky and stupid guns they could have made a whole game with just this firearms
and nothing else
Funny STG44 with Bent barrel to fire around corners
or Late war last ditch conversions of Italian carcano rifles turning them it to one shot rifles
stuff like that
I saw this, how would that even work
Cause I’d assume the rifling would have to be super intricate
i honestly have no idea
given the MP40's symitry it wouldn't be an issue
loony toons ahhhhh lookin' gun
That'd be wolfenstein
no im not saying they should have done that
im just saying that there is so many wacky weapons you could fill an entires games worth of guns with it
That'd be starwars, every gun from george lucas' designs were based off of and built around real life fire arms.
- if you would do Realistic german Alt history WW2 guns they would preaty much just be a Pre alpha version of the G3 or MP5
because preaty much the G3 and MP5 are directly linked to the STG44
because the G3 was made by ex mauser enginiers working in spain on all ready existing designes from the war years
Wonder why they went to Spain….

But im guessing that’s why the FAL was technically Spanish in origin?
the FN Fal was a Belgian made gun made for the british
it has no connection
to the G3 or STG44
in spain it had a different name
it became the main weapon of the german military because the belgains did not want to give germany a licence to manufacture the FN fal
and it was simply cheaper and easier to get the mauser enginiers back from spain to make the G3
it was a all ready used and tested designe by the spanish military
I find it difficult to say which one i like more, cause the G3 looks amazing but the FAL is iconic
the FN FAL was the right arm of the free world
every western nation exept the USA used the FN FAL in some extent
and the french but we don't talk about them
lol
Cold War France makes me roll my eyes
france has a complicated history so they where doing there own thing
True, although i found it funny how Charles de Gaulle apparently was like “France has no friends, only interests” despite having to be liberated
well to be fair the USA did fuck over the british and french after the war
during the suez crisis
I think I remember the US just not wanting to piss the soviets off hence they refused to help the UK/france
Although im not gonna lie i think threatening to kick France and the UK from NATO was bluff

Didn’t the UK only finish paying off WW2 debt to the US in like, in the last decade
2006 if im not mistaken
if Ukraine wins the war with russia they probably won't pay off the debt till 2070
well to be fair better to win a war and pay debt then lose
True that
I played Battlefield 1 a lot with Xbox game pass and i was asking myself, if i buy It, will i be able to play the dlc's in some way for free? (The ea version doesn't include Revolution)
Can we get a cold war era battlefield after the next battlefield?
Yes. There is a weekly playlist (or was, not sure its still up, you can check), that cycles between the dlcs each week. It is free
What about weapons?
And i am talking about server browser only
no
they should be visible on the server browser.
Thing is Im pretty sure BF1 only sells revolution version these days so this probably isnt an issue
Is the Battlefield 1 from EA app Revolution?
idk check
I am from mobile rn, but last time i saw no Revolution in the title
If there's even a 'next' battlefield. They're pouring everything into 2042.
The next battlefield is coming out in 2025
2042 is at the end of it's lifecycle
put that plague dog down already it's suffered enough
if im not mistaken dice sayed the won't abandon 2042 like BFV
so they will support it until the next game is released
Dice also said so many things about BF2042. How many of those were true?
well we will see
Like next gen destruction in an interview
checks the bullshit-O-meter none of it really
well they thorougly destroyed our trust, 5D gaming destruction counts I guess?
They killed battlefront 2 and BF5 in favor of BF2042
AND killed off legacy title multiplayer functionality.
Most people won't play it if the next one is not worse than the previous one
Most people play BF5 more than BF2042
I mean shit, it's like they wanted to force everyone to stop comparing portal's shitbooted classic maps the older ones that actually were fun to play
They killed portal aswell
And BF1 still sees about 3-4K daily
no kidding
everyone's talking about HellDivers 2 and The Trials
I sometimes wonder if there's old developers on burner accounts here watching all their work and countless hours of programming go to waste.
Most people won't touch the current one if the next one is not worse than its predecessors
they have better things to do
Don't you mean better than its predecessors?
given BFV and 2042 still being clowned on and ignored overall outside of a few diehard stans that'll buy into battlefield no matter what?
The old devs didn't like BF2042. One dev who worked on BFBC2 till BF4 shared that bF2042 is not what battlefield is about
well the old devs made the old game's, i doubt they care much for the newer games
And yet when I say the same thing I get flamed for being a 'nostalgia junky' or what have you.
BF1 was the last real Battlefield.
purely personal opinion honestly
Most left due to EA's management and greed. They don't accept new ideas. That's why the finals is more successful than BF2042
I'd say 'mismanagment' is more fitting
The hype went down for that game
only hype people have is to watch it die out
ok cool
BF5 didn't get better until 2 years later when they dropped important expansions
I haven’t either tbh, preferably waiting for more casual ish game modes
kind of suprised that it's still has so many players, the finals that is
and even then it was 'I'm diet tom cruse with none of the fame and all the topgun cringe I can muster I have sunglasses look at how cool I am'.
Its f2p, and the destruction that battlefield players wants
The Finals destructions are server side
well i had games to play that interested me more like signalis and BF3
il try it when i have the time
They killed the game with that
It's cod pandering at its absolute worst
elite skins is the last problem to worry about
not to mention the annoying animations the elites did
honeslty the elite skins are more like the rainbow six ones then the cod ones
It was supposed to be a ww2 game so it was supposed to get german and Soviet maps
'look at me I'm a fistpumping scott, look I'm pulling down my sunglasses to be all edgy I'm so cool'. christ if I came out of a coma and saw only that end of game animation I'd think it a cod game
With all the censorship included as an added bonus too
not much can really be said that hasn't ben ran into the dirt yet about BFV and 2042's shitty shortcomings.
The old dice talents ended up in so many places
may they find true Valhalla and rest.
xD. very true indeed
the playerbase killed portal, frankly
They didn't add new maps from the previous games to portal
the playerbase killed BF2042 as a whole
doesnt really matter. The main game was more important, and from day 1 portal was flooded with xp farms and garbage hardcore modes
We can see that in BF2042
dice is just revving it
blame the playerbase. not the devs
also, past battlefield maps dont work with 2042 era
compared to 2042 maps
They could make it for BF2042 like they made the other maps. They don't have to brainstorm the new map as the maps are already there
The dev that specifically made portal is now working on the next battlefield
Some of the best maps in 2042 are the ones ripped from Battlefield 3 which is telling
they also have to make them from the ground up for portal also
Everyone is on board with the next game. DICE is handling everything related to BF2042 now. Criterion, Ripple Effects, ea gotenberg worked on BF2042
Now they are busy on the next game
i wonder how long the next bf2042 session is gonna be. the last one was quite long
They are timing it based on the next battlefield release
Hello, my game BF2042 keeps crashing after laucnhing, I arrive to game menu and the game crash and i get back to ea app. I tried everything ...
S7 could be the last season for BF2042
maybe the same or back to normal season duration
S8 as far leakers know of
Error message?
nope
I think anti cheat whith season 7 screen shwos up before game starts but no clue why
yesterday i played peacefully
some Anti cheats boots up before game or with the official game launch
okok so that shouldnt be the problem ??
no
ummm, have you tried reinstalling?
are u overclocked or default settings?
task manager and close EA app
okok
then try launching the game through exe file
Tried reinstalling the EA app?
try this. open "NVIDIA Desktop Manager", then go to the "3D Settings" and you need to change "Power management mode" to "Performance" on either "General Settings Tab" or "Program Settings Tab."
i expect to be in the menu for 10 sec max
known as Nvidia control panel
it crashed
okok ive seen that laready let me try
its alrdy on ''normal''
swap to performance mode
ok
someone had an issue with 4000 series and that helped them, idk if it could help you
how much ram do you have
16 Go
i5-12
512Go SSD not full
I played this week, my laptop is freshly new
I even tried deleting logitch g hub app, I thought it was the anti cheat not liking this app
@cunning light sorry to ping you but do you know to fix this?
i tried deleting game cache
he tried everything but still crashes
i had time to adjust my game video settings to normal
The easter egg revolver
no idea, could be anything really
i tried to help him, maybe a mem leak idk
idk how to fix that tho. never had that issue
He could just buy a console 🙂
In season 7, DICE could bring back the following things: button to change teams; assistance counts as kill; balancing teams in the match; IMPROVE MATCHMAKING; clan tag;
Also bring more infantry maps to rotate with redacted and also more infantry modes.
For the portal: add more old maps, content and weapons. (Sry my bad english)
More 'legacy features' I presume?
Features that were already present in previous bfs
probably going to be paid DLC at this rate.
changing team def wont comeback.
But need balancing teams in the match
battlefield dosent have that. only custom hosted servers
"for just 5 dollars you can swap teams, one charge per swap"
that will be called P2W tbh
It's EA, that's basically the case already with the BFV preorder weapons you'd get for BF1.
o enemy team is winning, imma swap team to make my W/L better
battlefield isnt around p2w
Or maybe we're tired of carrying deadweights that camp in spawn instead of being useful and PTFO.
battlefield also dont have matchmaking system. team balancing is essentially SBMM
See, out of 32 players on a team, over 25 don't do anything other than basically throw the match for some reason. It's like you need to shove a cattle prod up their arses to get 'em moving. It's ridiculous how many times a match is lost because nobody pushes back and actually holds objectives.
That's what I've been saying but some dumbies think they're completely different despite the auto-balance and SBMM being mechanically the same thing in concept.
yes. thats why BF4 paid custom servers have it. even then it dont balance properly. to many people and takes to long to form a good "balanced" match.
that and the badmins just turn that into stat scumming lobbies where the sweat platoons are all on the same team.
dice offically dont have that system in play because isnt cod or anything like those. very different game. battlefield alone is ment for casual play.
Almost all those matches are 140s on one side versus 50s or lower on the other side..
Despite that being the intended design, it's insanely competitive these days.
the player can be playing it like its comp but at the end of the day, its not a comp game.
battlefield isnt market for comp.
just a casual sandbox shooter with vehicles and big maps.
it does have comp alike modes, but still isnt market for comp game as a whole still
By design? No. By collective playstyle of other players? Yes.
not everyone thinks alike
On PlayStation that's a different story.
this is across the board, including playstation
Might be different depending on what platform it's played on but BF1 is rife with sweats and competive players on PSN.
And the vast majority of what I've seen is comeptitive in nature.
yea, that you seen. but battlefield community as a whole isnt sweaty or comp players on all platforms. of what you seen is very low number of players. especially since you see it on one platform
And yet it's consistent enough to be the status quo for me.
the sweatiest battlefield games i experienced between all platforms is PC.
Isn’t there a 2042 channel for this?
That's why I specify PSN.
Thank you (some of us try to forget the latest BF)
yes but you said you only seen it on PS. you never stated other platforms also
Here here!
I said 'at least on PSN'.
right here I said it.
"BF1 is rife with sweats and competive players on PSN". so technically you experienced BF1 on PS only
that's why I specified on PSN, because I didn't play it anywhere else other than the 360 before ea killed BC2 servers.
Why would I commentate on it collectively when I've only any 'modern' experience on PSN.
yes but say that 100% is the total playerbase between all platforms right. 33% since battlefield is only on 3 platforms (xbox, PS and PC). about half of that is 16.5% is comp/sweaty players on average (for example). since not everyone plays sweaty/comp in battlefield games in general. so at most you only experienced less than that 16.5% since BF1 is one game. overall its a small %. by that statement.
i wish xbox and PS give out their playercounts.
Is the Battlefield 1 on EA app the Revolution version?
it'd still be more than half since 15 is half of 30
And for clarity I only mention BF1 because that's the only battlefield still active that's fun, but the same issue's on BF4, and V as well.
hardline's sadly dead on PSN
the 16.5 percent is the PS% in half between sweaty and casuals
16.5% of the entire player base
BF5 seems a lot more populated than 1 for me on ps4 and pc
Yeah, BFV is far more active than BF1
Keep in mind BFV was a free monthly last year for PSN
Yeah I was just saying I don’t think bf1 is more populated atm. BF1 was given for free for ages on ps plus as well
BFV has been far more active than BF1 since it was released on Xbox
that'd be xbox, I'm talking playstation
When was this? It was never advertised that it was a free monthly.
That I've seen at least.
PlayStation collection via ps plus, it was was part of that for years
you mean the premium thing?
No, PS collection was offered free if you had ps5 until last year on basic ps plus and you got to keep the games
You telling me more people play BF1 than BFV on PS???
rip bf3
Depends
they kill those servers too?
BFV is naturally more active on most platforms since it’s the game everyone went to if they didn’t want to play 2042. It’s just the next most recent game
guys
is the battlefield 1 from ea app the revolution version?
and if not, if i buy the premium pass alone, do i get the base game also???
Yeah that’s what I thought too
in battlefield 1
does anyone else have problem proning sometimes?
i go prone without any issues and then randomly i get up
Can you get some sort of picture of the difference between the gap MG34 & MG42 by playing BF5 as it unfolds in reality ?
The firing rate and velocity seem to match quite well. Can you form a kind of picture of how they do it in reality with using BF5 as starting point
the mg34 fires slightly slower than irl
fair enough, but there are quite a few on reddits who don't agree with me
I first asked how the mg34 would do on omaha beach instead of the mg42 and then I mentioned the BF5 as a notable example with forming an image of sort
They would perform roughly the same
got a bunch of thumbs down for some reason i don't know. They claim I can't use BF5 as a comparison
Pretty sure they haven't played BF5 once
well, you are using an unrealistic videogame to judge real life combat
As I mentioned. Isn't BF5 a real life simulator, but the point was to form a kind of image
That is a stupid way to go about it. In real life the finer "stats" of a weapon are not really that important compared to the general design of the weapon
Minor things like firerate become overblown in importance and soft factors like weight or reliability are entirely lost.
Are they completely right or partially right
They are completely right
The MG42 is a better product overall, its simpler to make, easier to swap the barrel, and has a higher fire rate. But when shit hits the fan the only true difference will the be the fear factor. And not by that much
Why are they absolutely right when the weapons are quite similar apart from the rate of fire and the barrel thing
are you asking if they are right that its better or if they are right that it is stupid to use bfv?
I mentioned that it was possible to form some kind of image playing BF5. Not in the right way per se, but somewhat legitimate
it was, after all, an indirect reference
you can get some kind of image, but its not going to be a complete one and can sometimes lead you astray.
For example, were you to use BFV as an example one could conclude that the M1 Garand suffers in stopping power compared to the bolt actions other nations use. This would be false.
Id say for this example the comparison is mostly fine but its not a good method
my example is within reason ?
i got close to -16 thumbs down by mentioning BF5 as a simulative comparison
You shouldnt be using BFV as a substitute for research, and you certainly should not be worked up over 16 downvotes on reddit
42 has the faster ttk at short and medium distances. 34 is noted beyond medium distance. I mentioned that and it is probably somewhat correct if we assume that they hold the trigger
Here is the thing about TTK: in real life it does not matter. There is no "Ttk" when you send a full powered cartridge through a mans chest
They are down. Incapacitated or dead on the spot
What I missed is that an experienced shooter shoots at intervals in burst
You are right. In addition, the Mauser cartridge is more powerful than today's NATO caliber
It also misses the LMG's purpose. LMGs, especially large ones such as the 42, are designed as suppressive weapons, and the core of infantry tactics. BFV has no suppression whatsoever, and players are completely disorganized.
half true. NATO still has a fully powered cartridge and its used in medium machine guns like the M240.
What I originally wondered was whether the positive qualities of the 34 would make up for cons such as lower rof
more control and less ammo consumption
and the main point I want to get across is that these differences are minor
as it is portrayed in films, it is suppression and high cone of fire that play an important role for those who defend
I personally wouldn’t say so
What you think. Would they keep the beach longer or shorter in case so
they would keep the beach for the same amount of time
if they had maxim guns from ww1 it would make no difference lol
What I don't understand is why there were no snipers to take out those in the bunkers
there was much more happening at Omaha than machine guns
Notably, the air force and navy failed to take out the defensive structures.
There were. This is not a videogame.
there is a good reason why the MG42 repleaced the MG34 in the ground role, it was cheaper
They weren't quite unsuccessful
but as we say, Maxim could do it satisfactorily well
believe it or not when you are on an open beach with little cover its not exactly the easiest to beam a guy in a bunker 100-500 yards away
while your geting shot at too
Well obviously it ain’t that hard cause i did it in cod ww2
This could all be resolved if dice simply added an Omaha Beach map, nah just playing
Ive yet to see a game where the omaha beach map was actually good
doing an amphibous landing well is hard in games
Those circumstances were pretty suicidal to be fair
I’m surprised it worked but world history is a lot better since it did
Omaha can be played in multiple games. Among other things, day of defeat source
no its not they just choose a spot that was notorious for being a slaughter and then seem suprised when the map doesnt play well
even BFV does a amphibous landing style map terribly on breakthrough Pacific storm
Why didn't the Germans open fire while they were on their way to the beach
when the defenders are good the atackers are compleatly hopeless
It was unwise anyway
The allies had spawn protection
UsefulSponge. Please, for the love of god, read a book
Getting blasted by zeros and chi has on Iwo Jima beach: 
Im begging you Sponge
the germans where kind of occupied by being Bombed
lol
eat a bun
well unleast the beach on iwo jima is probobly the easiest objective to take
i've Never seen the atackers fail to take the beach
in the first 2 minuts
My luck is always getting the teams that completely stalemate
Like I dont mean to be rude but most of these questions seem to come entirley from watching saving private ryan and not reading about how these battles actually play out
Fine, sorry
ya cant use movies and videogames to learn unless theres like a codex or something.
How much of a difference is there really from how it is portrayed in the media and how it unfolded

immense
imagine watching enemy at the gates and thinking that's how the battle of stalingrad looked like
Enemy at the gates and it’s consequences on history
Real warfare is slow and terrifying. Its at long distances. You will more often be killed by artillery than any gunfight.
Arillery is the God of war
In reality, the Allied soldiers used water pistols and firecrackers as grenades 😂
Every Arm chair historian playing HOI4 : the soviets um like gunned down there own guys because they run away
at the very least it shows the battle of stalingrad. There is a shocking number of people who dont even know about the eastern front, and much more who dont realize it was the majority of the war
for many, ww2 is the events of band of brothers
pretty much
Imagine learning about ww2 history for the first time in cod vanguard

Ill give them one thing, their stalingrad environment is actually very good.
well outside of that everything is cursed
actually its one of the only missions that does not seem to utterly bastardize its history.
The main issues are equipment which, frankly, is very overblown in terms of importance by "gamers".
no one forced the devs to add cursed guns to the campaign
maybe managment but we don't know that

world at war had the loved by everyone Nydar 47 sight but just in multiplayer
not in campaign
sure but also who. gives. a. fuck.
videogames have created an obsession with historical guns that leads to idiotic shit like "would dday be different if they had mg34s"
Guns cause violence
People are so focused on learning about the toys they use in videogames that they loose sight of the actual events theyre used in.
Its the deadliest battle in human history and the only meaning they can find in it is whether the panzer 3 or 4 was more common.
Unless a game is a simulator, like HLL or PS, this stuff isnt important
Violence simulator
The consensus seems to be that the MG34 could do just as well if I'm not mistaken

Pretty much
But maxim is probably a bit excessive
not like the germans JUST used german equipment on dday, there where mostly poorly armed fortress divisions with captured equipment and low quality personel
the Ukrainians make use of the maxim even today cause of shortage of weapons and some have tried to enhance it somewhat
well most people "Stick to tanks" while learning history as some say, learning about the overall picture of the war is simply boring to most and would rather talk about tanks or guns
because that's what interested them the most
because they play war thunder.
They treat history like videogame lore
this is where all the "What if germany did X to win the war" pops up so much
And it is not bad to take in this stuff, but the sheer importance imbued upon it is maddening
well mostly because allot of media turned history in to stories
More or less related to the accual events in question

- all the alt history stuff that turns history in to literal video game lore
I feel like even if they captured the Caucasus they wouldn’t have held on long enough/still been able to fix the issue of how much oil Germany was consuming
even if the germans had oil they would run out of soldiers and other war material before the allies would
- they would just hold out long enoght to be the first nation to be nuked
true
The hoi4 mod TNO has, interesting lore
Somehow Germany makes the nuke first and bombs Pearl Harbor with it to force a us surrender
And operation sea lion apparently works
people who made it just wanted to create that setting and did not realy care if it was realistic for it to happen
it's fiction after all
Or HOI4s thousand week reich, the UK sues for peace with Germany after the fall of France but the US and UK still fight Japan
True, it’s within suspension of disbelief IMO, i just commented since you mentioned alt history stuff
out of all of them this is at least the most plausible to me.
TNO and Kaiserreich are HOI4s more famous alt history mods, both have interesting lore albeit i imagine for you (since you seem really educated on history) you might find it more funny than anything else
I do enjoy kaiserreich
Oh thats cool
especially all the effort that goes into its world
honestly it would be cool if someone made a Non grand strategy game in that setting
Id play the shit out of an FPS in kaiserreich
Second american civil war Battle royale mode
TNO might be interesting in an FPS setting since Russia basically Balkanizes into 300 warlord states, stuff in Africa, Europe, Asia, etc

Would also be interesting to explore an alternative history Cold War Germany and japans militaries
Battlefield cold war
TNO is just kind of funny to me. Id call it the "funny schizo mod" but then there the actual funny schizo mod where you make the finno-egyptian union
Battlefield kaiserreich 
There should be a battlefield game set in the cold war. Where the factions would the nato members and the Eastern bloc and other communist states like Vietnam
TNO has some stuff I just hate, like burgundy, it just makes no sense to me
Battlefield should have a game set in 70s and 80s
ill be honest, "cold war battlefield" is just really uninspired to me.
Battlefield Vietnam
If there was a battlefield inspired by black ops Cold War or black ops 1 that shit would be fire
Imagine large scale battles on bay of pigs
Cause the next battlefield is gonna continue where bf2042 left off
its just people going through the US high school history curriculum and half the time they dont even know what a CW bf would look like
Cold war had indirect battles.
"oh we had ww1 and ww2 then the next should be the cold war" and then the critical thought stops there
it's ether : What if cod black ops or cold war gone hot or vietnam
It’d have to be a gone hot scenario cause otherwise our options would be a bunch of random and really spread out events
They can include locations like Angola, southeast Asia, Cuba, possibly Alaska as alternative history
They can include the soviet union locations
don't get me wrong i do like the idea but it's the most common thing people say they would like to see in the next Battlefield game be a cold war one
not a bad idea just uninspired
Cod cw did pretty well
Battlefield could do better with cold war as there are so many materials related to cold war
but to be fair if 83' is accualy coming back in to development, every person that wanted a cold war FPS game will be happy with that game
god I hope this game plays like Ro2
i mean it was made by antimater games so the devs of RS2
They can include espionage missions as single player
and the new studio is made up by ex antimater games devs
it's a multiplayer only game
Yeah. But Ro2 just hits so much better than Rs2. Feels weightier in a way
Can Add operation rolling thunder in bf cw
🥱
true, but i understand why they made it like that in RS2
and based off the old stuff they shown of it was meant to be RS2 2.0 pretty much
Their critical thought stopped after bf5 and started to copy from other games in bf2042
I mean part of it is just the setting. you got body armor and intermediate rounds. But I do hope stuff like the aggressive suppression or zooming in when breathing in returns
i just realized
the antimater games youtube channel just got renamed
to the new name of the studio
Didn't the studio get shutdown?
They cancelled a single player game too
yes but all the old devs got back together and got the rights to 83' back
aparently the studio is even in the same building as the old one
they preaty much just rebranded

IGI seems to be canceled for good
is worth to buy bf3 rn?
did you play it before ?
Who down to play bfv
no longer
bf3 has few servers and is effectively a worse version of bf4
If you're on PC, and would like to optionally have AI bots, install VU for the game
I suggest it
now only bf4, its great
i am
??
And install VU
BF3 is BF4 but older and allot more janky
- battle log is terrible
I’ve been trying to find teammates to play bfv that have mics
yeah i heard bf4 is like better copy of 3
Although 4 still doesn't have what 3 do
if it was just the game being a worse version of 4 then it would be fine
but battle log makes it allot worse
when it works it's not too bad
but if you get issues then it's pain
bf3 plays 150people its pretty dead
Might as well play with bots only
nah there is a decent players base in EU
That's the only way
there is around 4 to 5 full servers in EU
ftr that is only on steam and doesnt count origin
- yeah
I'll give you a dollar if those server have dlc maps and different game mode

they have diffrent gamemodes and dlc maps
Prove it
okay thx, maybe i will buy it idk :D 2e :D
Show me squad deathmatch
there is a populated ukranian server
24/7 strike at karkand
Gun master
Rush on armored strike maps
just at peek hours
Show me that too
yes sir
i literly got all achivments legit this year
lol
unless this gamemodes where not availeble how could i unlock them ?
Achievements on all game modes?
I wonder if next bf would be great like 4, and i guess it could be set in vietnam time, bcs ww1,ww2, modern are already, what do you think guys
Would be nice to have the game include AI bots and solo mode
yes i played every gamemode except air superiority but you don't even need the ribbon for it to get the decorated Achievement
I'm gonna guess some achievements are staged
