#battlefield-legacy-titles
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
I started online fps on Medal of Honor 2010 which was also a DICE game. When our clan looked for a new game we wanted another DICE/Frostbite engine and Hardline just happened to have come out. Loved it - had 64 player TDM and brilliant rental servers.
Medal of Honor 2010 bugged me because it was quite clearly just reskinned Bad Company 2.
I could clearly tell it was, even had a lot of the same weapon animations.
I wouldn’t have known
Loved the cruise missile in MoH 2010
didn't play much of MoH 2010. Wasn't into it.
would've liked to try Warfighter but apparently that's just fucking dead.
Funny thing is I only got the game as had to pick a second free game with Xbox 360. I got the console for Halo but ended up getting obsessed with MoH
pewpewpew ur ded
That’s what happens in FPS games
I just got around to opening the game and checking my key bindings, there is no lean in BF4
technically there is but it's a contextual lean
there's no dedicated buttons for it
Yeah that's what I mean, no manual press E or Q to lean like in some older games
Lol I played lots of MoH cuz I tried it in beta and liked it but that was before I knew about battlefield really
weird
ps4 controller has it
Tfw battlefield on console is the better version
They have been pretty much identical since BF4 really in terms of feature set. BF3 on consoles the hardware just wasn't there for full player count and the larger maps.
That's why I thought a BF3 remaster on console would be a cool thing
Eh it doesn’t really matter, the contextual leaning works fine on BF4 PC, and it’s not like leaning is used that much anyway.
Yeah I never really liked the manual lean mechanic in games.
When I first played MP I just kept getting killed over and over but something about the game gripped me. I just had a desire to work it out and get decent so after spending God knows how long dying, I got somewhat decent at it.
That’s the fun of MP fps games to me, the challenge of working at the game to get better. Unfortunately a lot of folk don’t have the patience then DiCE feel they need to make the game more inclusive (at the cost of removing the competitiveness fun out if it)
That started with BF1.
BF1 was loved by the casuals, that’s for sure. But that said, seemed to cater to both types of player.
Nah, it catered to casuals mostly. There was barely anything there for the competitive player, and the game was largely considered a failure on that front.
Yet BFV felt less casual (and certainly was not loved by the casual players so much). I loved Squad Conquest.
BFV certainly appealed to casuals, competitive players didn’t appreciate the random recoil, and map design and visibility were criticized.
Also, the Type 2A was in the game, as well as shotguns.
All I heard from casuals is getting killed to much by sweats. Since when have shotguns not been in game? Most sweats use the ZK anyway.
reminder: shaking your head at a tank won't spare you
It was mostly dipshits stacking rather than people being good at the game most of the time, and I’m sorry, but shotguns don’t have a place in a competitive game.
But jumping on top and tbagging it might lol
yeah i did it to my own allied light tank
fucker was shaking his head for a while
stopped once i got off
💀
From what I remember they banned half the guns in comp games
Lol
Yeah cause the game certainly wasn’t made for it without that.
Have to do that to make it viable.
Anyway, I’m tired.
lol well I guess as a newish player I do like that there are more "casual" modes like domination, tdm or frontlines in bf1 as soon as I go into conquest I just get rekt from all sides lol
spawn campers 🙂
especially big maps
War Pigeon is pretty fun
everyone chasing the chicken
lol yeah war pigeons is pretty great
big vehicle maps are a struggle I guess you need to just learn how to play there differently but I absolutely suck at vehicles
to deal with vehicle campers
yeah that mode shows actual teamplay for once lmao the whole team just protecting you and following you
get yourself a dedicated squad meant for vehicle hunting
full AT team
🙂
one rocket gun is enough to give pressure to a tank
imagine your entire squad just sync together and attack the same tank
with the at nades
and the rocket gun
#Sex
I tend to find the smaller infantry based Tactical Conquest maps are more the challenge. The Strategic Conquest maps on BFV tend to be full of more casual players so lots of enemy who don’t know how to shoot
im having problems launching bf3 and i need some help would anyone be willing to vc and help me out
hi
Question, is it me or do ground textures in bf1 only load when you are in a certain range? It seems that, especially in monte grappa, the soil textures are extremely low unless using the sniper zoom in long ranges
It makes the game look low res in a way
hmm I havent really noticed that
does bf1 feels like bfV?
I want to download new game and thinking about either warzone or bf1
(I have bf2042 and bfV atm)
as hole hackers in bfv )):
Unless you’re on console
Yes. Battlefield games have very agressive LOD bias.
Anything that's not point blank to you turns into a minecraft texture or disappears completely.
No.
perfect, downloading it rn 🙂
👍
No.
okay
i like the QBU
all I know is that generally bf1 is considered superior to bf 5
it definitely wins in immersion aspect
Oof forgot that in older battlefield games, suppression actually fucks your accuracy
Yeah but gameplay is superior on BFV
havent played it so i wouldnt know
but from what i've seen it does annoy me all the different looking soldiers and well random woman soldiers lol
Yeah but again, that’s immersion/aesthetics.
yeah pretty important to me its why bf1 completely got me into bf again lol
As much as I like immersion I prioritise gameplay so have in game music, announcer and cinematic effects etc switched off on BFV
I prefer BF1 for the maps, immersion and operations
BF5 I didn’t mind after all the updates but would rather just play BF1
BF1 maps are so hectic
I did like the maps on BF1
what do peopoel play most in bf1?
I only dont like the night maps lol they are atmospheric and cool but jesus so hard to see enemies
also any guns that are consider op and shit
or any other tips like settings or something
!settings
last time i played bf1 everyone and their mom used the hellriegel
for settings i watched this while its on console most tips apply to pc too except the sensivity
but for me i think the biggest change is making your minimap bigger and more zoomed out
i have no idea about weapons im still trying out all of them I try to get service star on all primaries lol
FOV, sensitivity, turning off all the ‘distractions’ are prime settings to adjust
FOV is really weird in both bf4 and 1 and probably all others lol I got it to 90 horizontal but its more like 110
i turn off depth of field on the iron sight
okay
i just turn off the field
does it have the cofference thing
however is that spelled
prob yes
ayyy it downloaded
time to nolife this shit for 5h straight
might order pizza
gamer moment
gamer moment, spend 6 hours in the lobby deciding what your character will look like, even though you will hardly even see the appearance yourselves
On BFV I just run Tom Cruise & Phantom of the Opera guys
I think default on BFV (console) is 55 but a lot of sweats go 100+. I go between at 74
yea on PC its 55 which is 70 something horizontal
im at 74 which is 90 horizontal but its actually 106 horizontal according to mouse sensitvity calculators
i loved bfv's character creation, but i think most people don't even mess with it. I see default characters all the time
Can anyone on xbox spare some time to help me get 10 jet kills on BF4? Need the UCAV assignment/achievement and it's awful
@stuck cypress if i was u, id try to get the attack jet on golmud, fly really close to spawn and try to pick off tanks/infantry that get spotted near ur side of the map
u could also try crashing repeatedly into the hainan resort rooftop and hope for roadkills
try dx12, should give more fps, but at the same time could be stuttery so just try it
I have, nobody is interested in even answering, unlike superturret who's at least given me some advice
all low for try hard settings, personally i do high textures still since i dont like the look of low textures
I went all low/off but texture qualified and filtering ultra
How about mesh quality?
Also how people play here
Quick match?
for bf1? no idea, i dont like bf1
Oh ok
One moreee questionn, my bfV keeps crashing without error message
Any idea why
theres like.. 50 possible things
Idk if I like bf1 either
So damn, encountered an AEK sweat.
And whoever said bf1 loooks better then bfV 
Less fps and stutters like crazy
:(
welp go back to dx11
Whats the difference?
Ah i csn just google
Sorry for pinging you 10 times in row
no worries
Not AEK user, AEK sweat. Like running and jumping around, hyper af.
why do I have to complete the bfv prologue every time I start the game?
You can find assignment only servers and ask someone to let you kill them until you get what you need
Almost as bad a plane sweats
Not the first time, kinda odd it’s mostly on rush servers
Nah
They're at locker/metro servers
On rush rarely,except if it's a small map
Like these 2
Zavod rush is pretty small
Yeah it has a lot of cq so
Kinda spectated one and he was jumping and sprinting. Like yikes, lay off the crack good sir
It's not difficult to counter
Then there's me who primarily uses the 870 as its got ridiculous range and a big OHK area
Defensive counters the shotgun up close if it isn't a headshot
Meanwhile with me struggling to hit shit with LMGs
MG4 or PKP with suppressors are amazing
Well you're on console so aiming is harder
PKP with flir, suppressor and bipod in hard-core is basically cheating XD
u paid for the "elite" skins?
And yet PC folks complain about aim assist
That's why hardcore is garbage
Well on games like cod aim assist is strong
But on bf not so much
I'm a former console player too,started bf in console
Aiming is a lot easier on pc in bf for sure
Yeah. Sometimes when there is multiple enemies, aim assist would actually start fucking you up
Nah, got Boins from assignments
That's true
RPK-12 is my fav. Basically an AR for the support class
It's a bad gun tbh
But as you're in console it's more viable due to its control and recoil
Anyway if someone here plays bf1 , whazs most played gamemode
Otherwise on pc bigger lmgs dominate
Yeah, The LMGs are pretty easy in newer battlefields cause of better LMG mechanics but ones in BF4 are unforgiving if you can’t maintain recoil
This is why I don’t play much of support class with lmgs, (mostly carbines)
I’m mostly an engineer tank driver
Don’t expect me to drive any air vehicles lol. You’re about to see a speedrun of a chopper going into the ground real quick
Conquest and operations
You can if you tap fire
But lower recoil lmgs are easier on console
On pc meanwhile,lmgs like the PKP,AWS,MG4 are used mostly
I use the RPK as it's pretty fun and decent on most ranges,sort of an all rounder with a decent mag size
And carbines are good,controllable and very viable with all classes
How do people even use smg at long fire at this game
There is only ironsight right?
No reddots or something like that
What game?
For long range use lmgs and snipers
Okay
And if I want to play conquest, i need to server browser or conquest?,
In server browser there is litteraly 1 game
And quick match i get into empty server
(pc eu)
Make sure to enable full as a slot option
Yeah by default, the game often shows servers that have a few slots open, many servers are full so they don’t show up
Also BF4 tank mains, which is better, AP or Sabot
Any meta gunsm
Becuase i play like shit stm ahha
Server browser
Sort by most players
Not a tank main but I use them often if they're available
AP is better for actual rushing and supporting infantry while Sabot is better for longer range and tank vs tank
Try different things and see what you like
There is no meta
Okay
Smg's looks to hard play with
Btw i found this low ling network smoothing
Never sqe this in any other bf game
I have 35ms
Should i use that?
just user server browser lol no point messing with quickmatch it will just put you into empty servers
cuz dice actually worked on bf 1 
Should I get Battlefield 1 or 5
V
both have their pros and cons 
bfv is objectively a better game considering it has better gameplay
Ngl the hover tank, despite it being a tank, the handling on it is weird
if you care about immersion and atmoshpere in a "competitive" online fps, then yea, bf1 is your pick
Gunplay yes, kinda wish it had more content though
it has like.. 6 less maps than bf1 and it was all free
Still, would have preferred some maps like berlin or something but hey, I’m not saying BFV is a shit game, Its very good where it’s currently at, just wished there was more to it
ah you mean more ww2 content
after trying out both bfV for sure
i mean.. we are using discord
BfV plays like it could be competitive fps, bf1 on other hand feels like playing singleplayer
And iz looks great but it just doesn't feel as good as bfV
I was just wondering, I have ea play, but my internet is so slow it will take me 2 days of download 24 hours a day, if nobody else uses the internet. I'm biased towards 5 but my friend really likes 1 so I'm stuck
Also bfV has more players
They want to play bf1 and I want to play bf5
Tell em to try bfV :)
But if ur playing with friends, bf1 might see better
But bfV better overall for sure
I forgot how fun the MAV is
can anyone help me with bf3 i keep getting an error
the error is you are not playing bf4
so could someone tell me how to get the new spawn beacon that looks like a satelite in bf2042? ive been seeing it for a few days now and have no clue how to get it
I think it’s from the new vehicle, it can be placed down and can be used by a full team
Just play forgotten hope 2 has all Russian dlc you desire
I tried utilizing the bipods in BF4 m, pretty fun but the fastest way to invite a sniper round to your skull
every MG camper in BF1 too ^
each time I see a proned MG user in BF1 they get a free gift
Ahhhh
2042 played better than BFV😂 the guns in BFV have random ass recoil patters(hell wouldn’t even be considered patterns since the recoil is all over the place with each time you go full auto)
When i first played ,2042 the guns felt soulless and I've used almost all those guns in every call of duty and battlefield game
2042 does not even deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as BFV. BFV is 100x the better game.
Do people still play BF4 over on PC? Been debating on rebuying it sence I gotta itch to scratch with it
Wait for Steam sales
That could take awhile, my itch is now
Does 5 still have active players?
It’s the most active currently. I play on EU & US East servers on Xbox and plenty of servers
I thought 2042 had more players and gotten better, has it not? Maybe I will get back into 5
It's active on BF1 too
Random recoil is shit.
I prefer it over spread but honestly. 2042's gunplay I prefer over 5. Which is something i thought I'd never say.
And bf5 has good gunplay.
Cool beans
The only numbers we can see are Steam (which although show a recent boost with S2 still put BFV ahead). Other than that I just go my my Xbox friends list (where many more seem to be playing V than 2042).
I mean as they have said there are no plans now to add persistent servers/server browser to main game I won’t try 2042 again.
But even if that does not bother you, clips like this should:-
https://twitter.com/zenafpsx/status/1569482622090506240?s=21&t=XYyfqSvR2CZHYio_CD9iZQ

Well it does not happen in BFV
I FINALLY GOT THE UCAV
Grats
Friendly enemy pilot let me kill them 5 times for the ribbon on a pretty dead Golmud server
Now I've got to learn to fly the ucav for the 20 kills for airburst assignment
Japanese moment
Don't detonate it too early,make sure you're close to the enemy with it because the camera can be deceiving
now get ucav explosive that took me a few hrs
Hardcore lockers is probably the best way for me to get it. I've already got the bomber ribbons sorted from a 24/7 silk road server last night
Hardcore isn't that good for it
On core it works good as well
If you get it right you can one shot lots of people at once
What soldier aim sensitivity do you guys use on BFV. (I’m building mine up slowly).
13 sensitivitiy (800dpi)
Zoom aim sens 100%
Its almost same across all bf titles
Once you find sweet spot pretty sure you can use it in any battlefield
Just increased mine to 50
Dpi?
I might have 850 aswelll, not sure I know first number is 8
I was at 20 sensitivity at start, but found at lower sens really helped to aim
Especially when aiming down site
Think default on console was 35 so have gradually been increasing
👌
3% 1600 dpi
60% on all BF games, but I play console. I like being able to snap around when being shot at
Oh so now BFV is the one with random recoil?
Jesus fucking christ all you people want is flat-shooting lasers.
You never would've survived BF1.
random recoil kinda sucks but unless you're in a comp shooter it doesn't really matter
i'd rather everyone learn to deal with recoil on the go than learn the same motion a million times to laser people
It's a balancing factor, really. It only really becomes an issue if you can't be arsed to learn your positioning and to actually control your damn fire.
"Why isn't spray-and-pray with an SMG working at 150 metres"
It's not even that random.
Wrong. Unlike BFV 2042 still has support and has gotten better. Bfv has not changed performance wise since I last played seriously a few years ago
I am fine with controlling recoil. And there being a pattern to work towards learning. But there just simply isn’t a pattern in bfv. It’s random af and I have to swipe my mouse all across the keyboard just to hope that I can control that random ass recoil
Patterns are detrimental to balance. This ain’t counterstrike
Wrong. 2042 is still lacking basic core (not legacy) features. On top of this DICE have confirmed some are not even on the roadmap to be added. Right now BFV is a much more playable/better looking game.
I run a whole community of BF players who feel the same way.
Damn. I feel bad for them jk. I used to be big into bfv. So I feel like I can say stuff about it. The maps are nice on bfv I will say that. The movement in bfv is superb. The weapons however are atrocious
View it less as a pattern and more as a cone. Your job is to make sure your fire cone isn’t larger than the enemy you’re shooting at, whether through positioning or fire control.
I mean that’s pretty generic across all games. Only different is a pattern that you’re trying to make is smaller than the enemies pattern
i really dont think the shooting mechanics between bfv and 2042 are all that different, other than marksmen rifles in 2042 sucking way more than in bfv
I played a lot of BF1 & BFV (lvl 500 in V) and love BF1’s immersion/atmosphere but feel BFV beats it easily in the gameplay department
its like... a small shift in recoil vs spread between the two, and its not even a drastic difference. definitely not a big difference like bf1 to bfv
I always felt that bfv’s guns were super consistent anyway, perhaps even too consistent at times.
Bf1’s guns feel as ramshackle as their designs suggest, and it fits pretty well.
Yep, mostly like lasers
bf1 was just spread based, old school shooting mechanics really
i dont think it was a design choice per say
Still not as extreme as bf4’s spread.
This I agree. The marksman rifles suck ass in 2042
well yea.. thats an even older title. i think it was natural over time that devs realized spread based recoil is bad and wanted to reduce rng
I think the improved feedback with the weapons worked to Bf1’s favour.
All them moving parts and visual recoil fit better than bf4’s totally random fire.
Basically, you can get a better feel for your weapon and learn its quirks just by looking at it in action.
still lacking core features
Doesn't elaborate what those are
to me CORE features are things like movement and shooting
Same lol
you know.. the core of a game
Bit imo 5 and 2042 is a bit of an unfair comparison. 5 went through its life cycle and is a finished game, 2042 is only on season 2
even if you expand it to the core of a franchise, the main core of battlefield is still in 2042... large scale combined warfare
true, bfv was pretty bad in the same time frame in regards to content
it did have server browser and persistent lobbies which is a clans "must haves" so i assume he is talking about those as "core features"
Even without those, it's still battlefield
There's guns, vehicles, conquest, destruction
of course, thats why i put "core" in quotation marks, i dont think they count as core, even by definition
its a staple feature of the series though
Battlefield Vietnam 2 when 🤓
i'd argue against that it went through its life cycle tho
my guess is that before release they had plenty of more content planned than we got after launch, and their interviews and information would indicate that as well, its just that not enough ppl played it
Yeah
DİCE REMOVE THE ALL HACKERS FROM BF5
heheheheheheheahahahaaahahohohohohhhhoooh good one

BFV had all the core features (apart from rental servers) at launch
Those and full squad control are the three main ones still missing.
i personally wouldnt call those core features
No scoreboard, no stats, no Platoons were all missing at launch
there is a scoreboard
there are stats
still no platoons but you can just make a discord server or actually identify your friends instead of requiring a chat tag
mouse input that works is a core feature. that's not in the game. I don't know if you can choose what squad you wanna switch to yet.
whats the point of arguing about this clearly 2042 was poopoo doopoo why defending it
2042 is not a good bf game, that doesnt justifying outright lying because "lul 2042 sucsks"
well it's not a good game overall.
the game actually got updated since launch in case you didn't know
All the features I have mentioned give BF enjoyment from a competitive perspective. They tried to wash the game of all this so no one had a sense of doing better than other players. It also made it impossible for clans.
they've been trying to do that since BF1.
Well they finally got what they wanted lol
yup.
as someone that has been in scrim clans and is a sweaty try hard, leaning into the casual nature of a bf title only makes sense
id argue as a company NOT doing that would just be dumb
I was continuing the list with those which were not there from launch but you’re right - Platoons is still not there
yeah but completely cutting off the competitive community and disregarding any and all feedback they had?
Regardless of what you feel about them, they're the people that know the game better than most people.
i mean... it does PERSONALLY affect me (im in a clan still that would scrim if 2042 would cater to it), and id still agree on the companies decision to phase it out
Tonight I was on BFV with 6 clan mates - we all got into same server immediately, on same team - playing the part of the rotation we like. You cannot do basic things like this on the main game of 2042
I don't agree. Especially when it results in 2042 being the way it is.
as a consumer and as a tryhard player of course i want my preferred play style to be at least optional, but again, i completely understand it from a business side
but it's barely worked out for them from a business side, the reputation of the game's been ruined from it's launch. It'll never be as good as people wanted it to be.
All I know is I have hundreds of players in my FB community who have remained on a previous BF (rather than be in the latest) for the first time.
i dont think theres a strong correlation between catering to try hards and 2042 being a public opinion "disaster"
of course they likely lost out on some sales and that added to the resentment of 2042, but lets not act like 95% of BF sales dont come from casuals that move on to the next "blockbuster" title when it comes
You need the support of that vocal hardcore/long term community though
If the game's not gonna be built to take seriously, nobody's going to.
Exactly
like sure you've got people streaming it now but as soon as something better comes along, they're gone. Some Battlefield streamers are already putting time into other games on stream rather than continuing to play 2042, or have stopped streaming.
ehhh, i mean, i guess we will see how that goes with 2042? it definitely doesnt cater to try hard/clans, so if it has legs then that will be disproven
There is no faith in this game.
taken seriously how? its not like fortnite is a game anyone takes serious and look at its success...
C’mon - it’s already a complete flop
people take fortnite seriously tho
It's not like Fortnite is a game anyone takes seriously
People do indeed take Fortnite seriously as a game.
as far as player retention is concerned we absolutely have no factors to actually make this statement
BF Content creators are struggling due to the way it has bombed
@rich ember not in the sense of this topic
you can say someone takes anything serious
To see BFV with more Steam players tells you all you need to know
geoguessing is taking serious
????????? what the fuck do you mean, are you seriously implying people don't play Fortnite on a competitive/tryhard level?
not implying that, thanks for at least asking (even though i think you were just trying to draw a conclusion)
That's what i was saying. Fortnite at least works as a game that could be taken seriously in a competitive sense, so people do.
not even the whole picture for numbers, bfv being 5-10 bucks and even free for the last 2 years, and those numbers spiking VERY largely because of asia regions are things to consider (and to try to suggest bfv could only be doing better than 2042 because of try hard catering is a bit misguided imo)
2042 is not that way. Not just because the mouse input isn't up to par, but also because the game lacks any serious depth to most of it's mechanics, and it doesn't even allow for basic things like spectator, platoons, or switching to a specific squad.
Just saying the numbers indicate it’s a flop.
i think tryhards played BFV to spite it, honestly.
of course, doesnt mean the entirety of the 20k spikes are try hards that are playing bfv because 2042 lacks features they want...
spikes are only 11k now
lads taking games seriously is indeed kek
There are more tryhards in Asian regions for these battlefield games
trust me
I've been there
:')))
Completely merciless
@@
ive heard its mostly hackers.. but i cant prove that one way or another so 🤷
Well if it's community server then hackers aren't the issue
Oh no, people could just be playing BFV casually because it has features 2042 lacks
Asians tend to stack together
<@ <@
Over time your team will lose players throughout the match
Getting bullied up down left right A B X Y L1 L2 R1 R2
It do be like that most of the time tho
I can only speak from my own clan - our MO has always been simple, get latest BF, just play this game for its full lifecycle until next one comes out, then move to new one, rinse, repeat. This is first time we have all gone back to previous one (despite each of us spending over £100 on it)
And yes hackers are obvious but only in DICE official servers for PC
hell, i'm watching a streamer who was dedicated to streaming BF, but they're not playing 2042 right now. They're playing Shatterline.
i think people are getting the perception i think 2042 caters to try hards or is popular.. never said anything like that
not entirely sure the point of saying a streamer isnt playing 2042 anymore in that case
The streamer in question streamed the entirety of BFV.
They played that game every day.
and thats a point to be made why?
I think it says something when they were willing to put up with BFV for that long, but 2042 comes out and they're looking for other games to play.
yea.. bfv is the better game, way better
they started streaming with BF1. By all accounts they are a serious BF player.
bfv is my favorite bf title, and i only barely enjoy 2042 more than bf1, so its 2nd to last in my rankings
the only thing ive talked against is random correlations
I like BF4. I don't care for the random recoil that BFV introduced.
Thank you. I’m not the only who hates that recoil bs in bfv
I'm brand new to discord and it's saying cuz I can't play firestorm in battlefield 5 can someone help.
Or I can't play firestorm in battlefield 5 no servers will load how do I fix that?
i highly doubt anyone is playing firestorm
dead mode
it was pretty active for 3 months, at least i was playing it and commonly getting into full lobbies for a while
I think I only ever played one match, and I can't say I was too impressed
I think it was just ill timed and not thought through well enough
competing with other big BR games, it didn't really stand a chance
and I think that hazard zone has kinda ended up in the same state, an extraction style mode modeled after similar games, that just falls flat
after 1 match you hated looting, and thats like... a large part of a br
yeah I remember it being bad
didnt help a fix took forever to come
I think really it comes down to audience, people don't buy battlefield games for BRs or extraction games, they come for the gold standard, conquest, breakthrough, rush
if people wanna play other game modes, they are better off playing other games
Firestorm looked decent
i personally think if it launched with decent looting and f2p it could have been a decent hit
from devs who are experienced working on those styles of games
Yeah I would like to play it how are you playing firestorm it has not and will not load me into no lobby
definitely not a warzone, apex or fortnite, but bigger than hyperscape or realm royale
oh yeah I do agree that if both firestorm and hazard zone released as a free2play mode it would have absolutely made a difference
would have introduced people to both BFV and 2042 and potentially gotten more sales that way
I think DICE did actually try and make it F2P but i heard they ran into some legal issues about that
well, 2042 needed work either way so maybe it wouldn't have helped much
really?
thats interesting
Yeah i'm not 100% sure if it's true because a friend told me
I mean BF is their property, and they are a subsidiary of EA who likely would have had to sign off on the decision, but I see no reason why they wouldn't necessarily
can't imagine what sort of legal troubles could come from it
yea that sounds like bs imo
I can't either but i'm not actually saul goodman here
well, it was a missed opportunity for sure
and theres not much they can do about it now, just up to DICE to make the right decisions going forward
which is pretty much a 50/50 at this point lol
For modern DICE? That'd be quite hard.
indeed
Firestorm was a BR when people were getting sick of BR's, and also i heard that it didn't even work properly as a BR
I think for people to really trust them again there needs to be massive changes to 2042, and massive behind the scenes changes within their teams and management. Even then its gonna take a long time to get some semblance of a good reputation
and Hazard Zone is a pale imitation of a type of game that is way more complex mechanically than DICE can work with.
If people were getting sick of BRs at the time then why did warzone pop off like half a year later?
didn't firestorm come out around the same time as warzone?
I don't know.
No i don't think it did
I think firestorm came out in 2019
Probably cause Warzone worked better as a BR compared to Firestorm.
it was a standard BR, the only bad thing was killing a player and trying to loot them, it was fortnites loot system but items didnt spread out enough to be able to select 1 item efficiently
oh so firestorm came out a while before warzone, and then warzone buried it and shat on its grave
lmao
well it was free too..
yea FS came out early 2019, when warzone dropped absolutely no reason to play FS
Nah warzone basically doesnt have looting
i do wish they got rid of the loadout package and of course hackers
Warzone does have looting but there's no dedicated inventory, you just pick up shit.
warzone is just a race to get enough money to get your op weapon loadout and go from there]
Anything you need (ammo and armour) you automatically pick up, the only things you really need to choose from that you can find on the ground are guns, lethals/tacticals, streaks, and field upgrades
I only played warzone during lockdown in 2020, whenever my friends were free to join in. Was fun during that time, but I've never been a massive fan of BR games. It was more just having fun with friends that was the good part, I didn't care for the rest.
Honestly, Warzone was better when they had the mode that made it so you couldn't get your loadout as quickly because it was more expensive
Compared to fortnite where you need to carefully choose your items, like taking EITHER an extra gun or a sheild potion for example
Honestly, the integration of Warzone with every CoD game that came out after it was a mistake.
that was most likely due to the tie in with MW, where it basically used the exact same system
because people largely didn't care about the CoD's that came out after MW19, they just bought them because it was paid access to the next loadout meta.
The file size makes me want to drink bleach
was easier to just use modern warfares existing weapon-carry and loadout system than develop a different one for warzone
it was definitely a mistake
the cold war integration was lazy
and then getting rid of verdansk was just the nail in the coffin
the vanguard warzone is just pathetic
yeah but allowing players to call in loadouts made in multiplayer with perks was a really annoying choice.'
It made the first half of the game pointless because you don't give a shit about ground loot, you just wanna get your meta loadout as fast as possible.
sure it's "unique", but it's not a great idea
I liked that I could hop in MW multiplayer to level up my gear and then carry it over to warzone, felt like a unified experience
I think people like warzone because it's got less of the more tedious parts of BR games
i only assume they designed it this way to increase sales of every CoD game after Warzone.
Because Black Ops Cold War and Vanguard were not that good.
considering that a lot of guns in COD are generally fucking awful without specific attachments that are meta, trying to play with ground loot only sounds kinda painful
I believe they fixed that in Iron Trials, where ground loot had weapon attachments that were more fitting to the meta.
I'm not fan of BR's at all but I liked warzone the most, fortnite is third person which I hate, apex has hero abilities which I hate so warzone is like the only real choice lol
I didn't stick around for iron trials, so I don't know much about it
I didn't play it, i just saw footage of people playing it and they seemed to like it.
yeah I think I saw a jackfrags video on it
was quite a while ago
I guess we will have to see how warzone 2 pans out, its hopefully gonna have a similar feel to early MW19 warzone, but perhaps they will change up some stuff to make it different again
I would hope so anyway
Honestly i should get back into fortnite but with MW22 around the corner I don't think i'll be able to stay interested in it
lol i tried it recently after a while its so wild its like going to 5 year olds mind seeing darth vader shoot goku
after it became such a big pop culture thing and saw every 7 year old screaming about it, I knew I would never go anywhere near it
Fortnite is a literal shit stain on gaming
I can't stand children, so I would never willingly go play a game where most of the playerbase is made up of them
fortnite no build is fucking great
granted i only play it with a group of friends so its not like im queuing with random kids that scream in a mic

I can attest to this

I havent played no build but it looks pretty fun
ive played a bunch of BRs, skipped fortnite because of the building, started playing when no build came, and i bought a season and got to lvl 110
No build is pretty damn fun
y and team up?
1,3,4,5
Join me on BF1, all add me in Origin pls. BF1 channel
shit, anything I can join you on?
i want obliteration in 2042
I want sky scraper destruction in 2042
Make them ALL be able to be destroyed
Yeah you play firestorm now right
Battlefield
Man I just can’t play Rotterdam
It used to play differently but has got somewhat more campy with snipers on bridge, in corner by waterfront, MGs in those buildings around C (which are not on the objective).
I’m just awful at city maps, I guess
U just gotta use the rapid fire thompson and hang out between D and E
It’s so hard for me to make enemies out unless they’re clearly out in the open and moving around. All the dark shapes and gray of the distance makes them so hard for me to make anything out. And they’ll usually kill me way before I can see them
I love devastation
Trying to take B is a nightmare from me. Attack for the left or up the middle, enemies in every alley that I never see until I’m dead. Attack from the waterside and there’s snipers at D or on the train bridge that’ll pick me off
D & E is the best area but we cap anything which needs capping
And A is just annoying because there’s always at least one enemy somewhere that you’ll never find. Whole team will be combing the area and not see a thing, so they move on until maybe a single squad is left, or two guys. Then suddenly 90% of the enemy team is there to slaughter them, take A then take three other points seemingly simultaneously
Every. Time.
D is nice to drop your bombs on
I usually look for spawn beacons at the back of the bridge when clearing A. Top and bottom
Yeah often right at the very ends
There is a player on Xbox who only plays Rotterdam on the German team
He never plays other maps
Guess he doesn’t like Holland
He spends most of his time in one room of the building across the road over looking C
Has trip wires on the stairs and camps there most the match
Imagine having a game like BFV with all its modes, maps and spending all your time in one room lol
Sounds lame
I usually make it my goal to revenge kill ppl like that
I’ve even put V1s on him lol
Totally worth it
If I had to play only one map ever in BFV, I guess it’s tied with Panzerstorm and Provence
I love Provence (the Strategic map that’s actually good). Wish it was on Tactical
Pushing from D to E as the Americans is the most fun imo
Yea I love saving a v1 for some dude camping a artillery piece or a tank sitting on resupply
Then assaulting C from the side or between B and C to entrap the Germans
Send a Greyhound into the town to fuck some shit up, while the other tanks hold the enemy at bay among the outskirts
We mostly play the town area A, B & C
Is a good map for bombs
What I hate is fighting around A, the church mostly. Always some guy tucked away somewhere, leaving my team to look around fruitlessly and give his teammates time to catch up while our guard is down and stomp us
I feel like that greyhound with the speed upgrade is the fastest armored vehicle in a bf title
Overall the town is great for fast firing SMGs with all those tight streets & allys
They are fairly quick but only drive tanks I steal
Yeah I have used MP40 a lot - think I’m #3 in world in Xbox for most kills
But the ZK is the sweats go to
I like MP40, Model 37, Type 100, Type 2A, Ribbeyrolles, Trench Carbine & AP mines
G43s my most used gun, just cause I like seeing those stripper clips go in
Not used that much (possibly only in FS)
On release it was kinda OP then got nerfed to shit
Now it's just a shitty version of the johnson rifle
damn
i hate it
i much prefer the m2 carbine and the sten
idk why
anyone still play bf 1?
its still a absolute masterpiece
same with bf 4
Yes.
BF1 is quite the lit game and yes
You get to experience weapons you never used before
In typical FPS games
especially historical ones
yeah but gameplay wise it’s BF4 but worse with gimped movement and a useless slide.
I am coming
Em one second I ll find it 😂
GiorgosAEK123
I added you
Ok
Yea I am online
How to chat on discord fom console https://youtube.com/shorts/nX_KIAlTFBI?feature=share
https://streamable.com/bgbkz9 i would be pissed if this was me
at least it wasnt 20hp
+bonus reload sound
BF1 is my first Battlefield. I've been playing every day for almost 7 weeks and mostly Operations, Conquest and Team Deathmatch. My aim is terrible. I am Supporter and Assault main but walk out of most rounds with about 6 kills and 15 losses. But I don't feel like I'm improving at all and I hope someone can help me here
I have no idea how to get more kills and die less
For aim find a good sensitivity you like,high low or in-between
Also the starter guns on all classes are good enough,make sure to use your gadgets often and right
Don't go too far from your team,wait for medics and resupplies,use smoke on operations
thank you 👍
You're welcome
And also pay attention to what the weapon variant you use is good for
(Description)
my favourite guns are parabellum mg14/17 and m1917 mg telescopic. relative easy to use
The MG telescopic is good for defending while the parabellum is for rushing
They can work either way but it's more difficult
Later on you can do assignments for new weapons,specializations etc
It's better if you leave them for later when you get used to the game more
i almost have every support weapons
but Sometimes i get sniped every minute from a other spot and this is at my spawn
😂
usually on monte grappa 
Bad map
Yeah only for defenders while the attackers die over and over
It do be like that
Unless the defenders are the worst,or the attackers push together which never happens
Especially the cathedral
Lol attackers never sync in pushing together
Everyone be camping to be careful of their KD
Xd
FML right?
Yes
People throwing explosives instead of smokes
On maps like that the attackers 40% of the time never get past the cathedral,50% of the time get stuck in the bunker and the rest win due to bad defense
Ah yes with the fortress gun
No one or rarely people utilize the motorbike in the map tho
That shit is good for flanking
And being a spanner
Spawner*
It gets blown up in 2min max
Only tanks can work in that map for pushing
And lots of teammates pushing
Attackers climb the hill most of the time
High ground advantage for defenders
💀
Amiens have that chokehold at C and D
Worst part of the map
Amiens is winnable at least
Tank defenders just take up that single lane
Not too hard to get them
Yesterday I got one through the smoke due to them not moving and took it
Me neither,but we won somehow
Would appreciate a squad full of tank hunters
It's really important to swipe that camping landship off the ground
You can do that yourself too
Squad is easier of course
Or you can flank,jump off a plane and explode them
I mean yeah I do have priorities when it comes to clearing myself
But if your squad didn't follow up despite leadership
I'll just go full clown
Get in a squad that does push
You can't win the match yourself but get close to it at least
Tall order cause that's rare to find
Yes,but usually the ones on the top of the leaderboard do
No matter how much you camp,you can't get as many points as you would if you rushed
That's what I notice
i am the captain now
No you're not
Why does it say it does not create a votekick system on the servers? this would prevent cheaters 😥
BFV is full
it would more likely be used to abuse random people other than cheaters
considering how many times ive been accused of hacking when im not even THAT good is also concerning
if only dice made a battlefield bad company 3
idk i mean bad company 2 was good game and I spent a lot of time in it but I think bf3 was far superior
I assume alot of people still play bf4?
yes i am
its hard to know exact number but it seems about on par with bf 1 I think bf 5 is still the most populated
I see well thankfully i own both so i can just choose which to play
Just make like minded friends in game
Killing a tank with a support’s repair tool has gotta be the funniest and also most satisfying wya to kill a vehicle I’ve encountered
everytime i kill a tank with the hammer in bf1 i type all caps HAVE AT THEE
wow..
That or tbag the tank til the driver gets so pissed off he jumps out, you kill him and take the tank
Destroying the AMTRAC in bf4 with an EOD bot be like
Nope
yes
can I get help here anywhere about issues with bfv?
nvm the problem just got solved
Or a tank in bf1 with a repair tool
Well the tank can just run over it if the driver isn't dumb
But
I cant get into BFV Online

Dice needs to focus on another pasion project
Cause BF1 was there last one
And after that sorta just dropped after BFV
The old studio is gone after the end of bf1 so who knows,maybe in the future they can get together a similarly good one
I know
Not firestorm lol
Still sadden about it
Hell even when they had the Star Wars team pack up and focus on 2042
Isn't that dead
Star wars bf
That’s what battlefront is for
And idk why
Tbh knowing dice they might do a battlefront 3
With BF meaning battlefront btw
Or focus on battlefront 2 later
They can still add a shit ton of battles from the Star Wars show they missing out
They already working on the next battlefield
Apparently gonna take place in the gulf or Iraq war
I forgor the leaks
Real?
Yeah probably
An actual modern bf up to standards would be good
2042 had us in the first half..
Yeah
But would be in interesting still
Cause all the factions they can add into one cause
NATO vs Warsaw
Play as American or British or ect you pick

They were supposed to do this now with the no pats thing
Cold war is good as a setting too
Yeah
Actually it continues from bf3 to 4,since you try to prevent the war from happening but in 4 its gone hot
Actual post ww2 cold war would be nice though
Yeah?
Because base game is better
Eh
The final dlc for BF4 was a alt reality
To when tombstone failed in the campaign
Final stand?
Yeah
Well from the bf2042 trailer it looked like the ending where Irish lives is the actual one
honestly it would've been funny if the ending where they all blew up was canon.
Recker is the protagonist who never speaks for some reason
So we won't see him likely again
they wont unfortunately
Watch the trailer
Not exactly a trailer,more of a video that explains what happens after bf4
I finally got it, after like 3 years. UCAV with airburst
he speaks once at the beginning of the game
so he has a voice but just never says anything.
Which is funny considering iirc he's meant to be the leader of the squad or whatever, but since he doesn't talk everyone just kind of talks for him
He says 1 word
yes but he does talk
Well yeah
But it would be weird to suddenly make him actually talk in the future
He only says like "fuck" or something in the start
yeah, in response to his gun being out of bullets
which is an understandable reaction to have but going mute out of trauma from it is an odd decision
imagine being a mute soldier irl in military lmao
That wouldn't really work
i'm not sure if being mute is a disqualifying factor in the military, but then again i've not really looked into it. Would also depend on how desperate the military gets.
May not be fit for active duty, but there’s still plenty of other roles one might be able to have
it was just unnecesary to make him mute but well who cares bf4 story is forgettable at best
¯_(ツ)_/¯
i don't think the game would've been that improved with Recker's commentary.
i completely forgot what was bf3 even about
BF3 is about a fictional "War of 2014" and takes place over the span of about 9 months with most of the story taking place in Iran-Iraq. There's a nuke.
Not by itself but reports etc are required
all i remember about bf3 campaign was it had some pretty spiffy face animations, at least at the time
The only thing i remember about BF3 is a couple conversations from the beginning of the game, between two non-player soldiers.
"Yo, does anyone else really not get what the fuck we're doin' here?"
"Quit being a fuckin' hippie, Montez."
"Just sayin' bro, if this is about the PLR, we should be in Iran, not Iraq."
"They're crossing borders, dog. The PLR are the right people, they don't make 'em any righter."
"So, what happens if the PLR take over? Country run by terrorists ain't good."
"Bro, America was founded by terrorists, for terrorists. What do you think the fuckin' revolutionary war was? History is determined by the motherfuckin' victor."
"How did you even get into the marines?"
It's weird, none of the conversations that happen after this point are like this.
d e e p
Bf3 has a pretty good campaign especially compared to the new ones
i mean yeah, deeper than you'd expect but it's limited to one mission and doesn't really amount to anything so
i never cared for bf campaigns, id rather have that manpower go to making multiplayer
bf3 no doubt made history in bf but a threequel to bad company can be used to redeem dice and ea after 2042's negative responses
unless dice decided to start updating older bf games
i can't resume my download of BFV after pausing it and closing the EA app. it won't let me start or resume it or anything
it says it's downloading but it isn't
yeaah...this right here says to me whether they make a campaign or not does not really matter lol not making campaign wont make the game not shit
same with cod black ops 4 I think it was? the one with no campaign it didnt made the multiplayer somehow superior
nevermind, fixed it
am i the only one who wonders why the marines if BF4 used multicam instead of marpat
also why isnt marpat the default option for camo
i donno.
i didn't really care that much. What i wanna know is why pure black was considered a developer only item.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VERIy7MzHdg i dont get people who said bf4 was trash, this is just one of many cinematics that look way better than bf2042's trailers while using in-game footage
Why dice no add voice volume on console....
Made me laugh how content creators (like the Squid guy) filmed themselves jumping for joy and crying over cutscene trailers for 2042
Like you can literally lower in main audio volume and still hear ppl talking because they didnt bother adding voice volume to bfv....
Thing is though, I was one of the fans who adored the 2042 trailers. Especially the rendezook and c4 launch being shown in trailers. Cut to the game after the trailers and it felt like we were heavily scammed
The trailer really was a community favourite.
Sending a kubelwagon into an osprey.
Rendezooking an su 57.
hi I'm thinking about buying 2042 today, is the game in a good enough state to play now? is it good? what do you guys think do you recommend me getting it or nah?
🤣
I'm guessing that's a no
depends on your platform
console, maybe, if your standards are low enough
PC, no.
I'm on PC
lol
I'll think about it then
60 euros is a lot of money for a game that isn't good
ah then the answer is no
good because i was taken from
my stupid self bought the game on overhype and i regret it to this day
I didn't, mostly cause i was skeptical of 128 players and Portal. Turns out i was right to be.
hmm alright thank you guys
I guess I won't buy it for a while then
I think if there's a good enough discount I'll get it
the ultimate edition is discounted and became 72$ down from 110
until 29th September
i'm on ps4 so idk the exact price in other ports and regions
Is there an airborne mission for marita?
on steam everything is still full price unfortunately
Anyone play bf1 on xbox one?
Absolutely not
Vince Zampella acknowledges DICE just "strayed a little too far from what Battlefield is with #battlefield-legacy-titles2042. "They tried to do a couple things that were maybe ambitious: grow the player count, etc...I don’t think they spent enough time iterating on what makes that fun."
(For the next battlefield) - "It’s a whole new structure. We’re putting multiple studios together. We’re bringing the best talent together and giving them the time to do something amazing."
Opinions on this?
I'll believe it when i see it, Vince.
I wish they'd do a Battlefield about the Vietnam war
anyways since you guys discouraged me from buying 2042 I will redownload Bf V
2042 is Fine as a game rn
They did a while back right when the series first started, I wish they could do it again tho
Better graphics, better frostbite engine
yeah I have played battlefield Vietnam and the Vietnam expansion for BC2
personally I think the Vietnam expansion for BC2 is the best battlefield experience I've ever had
that was perfection
that trailer^ is awesome
I heard it’s either they do modern setting or a Cold War setting
Since I know DICE loves changing the game every time they might go with a Cold War setting which I would love for
But what ever happens they do that isn’t what 2042 was im all in
I'd honestly preorder if it was cold war
I doubt they'll go modern day again tbh
I hope not at least
there are so many alternatives on the market for that
I will wait but I love battlefield so knowing my self I would prolly pre order later on
Honestly, I just wish Viceral wasn't murdered by EA. Would've loved a sequel to Hardline. The story was great and the multiplayer is still my favourite from the franchise
It's awful that none of the Hardline content is in Portal either, considering one of the main devs from Hardline is one of the main Portal Devs...
Hardline and 2042 are the only battlefield games I've never played
oh and 2142
idk modern setting rarely catches my excitement
bf 4 was good
2042 looks to be good on yt but I don't think I wanna pay 60 euros for a game that barely anyone can recommend
I wish Viceral wasn't murdered by EA Either. But then again I also wish the same for Black Box Studios.
Hardline is good but if you're on PC, there's not many active servers for it, unfortunately.
and also the campaign has a hard capped FOV
yeah the setting in hardline isn't my thing tbh
i'm not that picky.
Loved Hardline
Loved BF2 and BF2142
shame that EA pulled the plug on official multiplayer for those games
at least keep BF2 online and on steam
pls
Quick question, is hardline playerbase still active
hangar 21 in asanproblem to work in 4 people can help me I wonder if they can help me ?
in bf 4
for some reason i cant go online in bf1? something wrong with it or my side?
nvm it was my internet outage
how can i get a ghille suit in BFV?
I wonder if 4 people can help the me to buy a bow in bf4
you can get the bow solo
It's in the armory, the hide and seek collection costs 30,000 
Which anti-tank launcher in BFV does the most damage? I’ve tried looking this up but find mixed or inconclusive results
pretty sure the best is the bazooka, but not because of it doing the most dmg but having more rounds
PIAT has the most damage but least range
Got it. I also thought I read somewhere that the PIAT is actually a mortar?
Lmao
its 2042s younger brother
Yeah I haven’t bought a COD since Black Ops 2



