#battlefield-6
1 messages · Page 464 of 1
Aim is the counter skill
And aim is something I like being tested
Bf has always had the perfect balance of aim checks and casual experiences
Just updated my BF Discord Avatar. 🙂 I'm ready for BF6. Roll on the 10th October.
Let's go but I want one for myself too
🫡

Well yeah I said bugs should be fixed
If there ever is a wozo or a zozo or whatever in BF6 that shit needs to be patched asap
I still had the most fun playing bf4 than any other battlefield game, never using those types of movement bugs even when playing in sweaty community server where people would use them lol. Bf4 is just that good of a game.
100 times out of 100 i would prefer BC2's movement over anything remotely resembling "omni-movement"
I can't play older battlefield games for long, or BF1, just cause bf4 is such a gem
i cannot get behind bf1's gunplay
Not just movement just everything
I’d go for 2042’s bhops as the primary movement if I could choose. It was the perfect balance of everything people could want
Bf1 has no movement and slow TTK which means it's impossible basically to outplay multiple enemies at once.
It becomes boring and purely positional gameplay.
Didn't 2042 just have the running jump bhopping thing
yeah you still see pp29 sweats abusing that today
Yeah, slide accel into bhop. I liked that
Idk I don't want that shit in Battlefield games just have a normal slide or jump shotting with some aiming penalty
an actual penalty was 4's problem, it had none
You couldn't shoot while jumping
Well 2042’s had benefits and tradeoffs, which makes it fair to me
That's the penalty. If it had a slide it would probably behave the same.
I honestly want that for BF6. Buff movement but make it impossible to shoot whilst jumping or sliding.
Jump strafing being a thing without the ability to shoot at the same time seems balanced to me
If they allowed for bhopping and gave slide an accel boost but removed shooting in the air I’d probably be happy
What about color correction and filtering? BF6Because the discussion on Reddit end up in dead end. And we didn't know if they worked on it or they just ignored it.
Creates distance that the enemy needs to correct to, but gives them some time to do so, which the peeker can still benefit from without it being pointless
what business does any sort of bunnyhop have being in battlefield
It's okay for games to experiment and have weird shit like the bhopping combo in 2042 but it shouldn't be adopted going forward lol. Just maintain it as a legacy thing in the original game for people who like it.
that shit came from source games and should stay there
Modern source games don't have it even
what are we calling modern
has there been any indication as to whether or not the vehicles are gonna get thermal optics?
CS2 doesn't have bhopping, you can enable it in custom game modes but no in the main game.
Modern source as in Source 2
thing is, since bf4 was my first, that is my standard for what bf should do. Even without exploits I've just lived with and enjoyed dealing with it's movement system. I see 2042 as a weaker version of it, v weaker still, then 6, then 1
cs2 is not only source 2 but is the only one of its kind
gmod and any sort of source dm game has it
Tools are becoming available for developers so hopefully we'll see more
Gmod 2 out in the next 10 years hopefully.
I too wish BF6 took more inspiration from BF4 than BF2 or BF3.
To me bf4 is just a superior game
all in all I just want enough movement for it to not feel like i'm playing GRAW 2 when peeking, and to have some more reactionary gameplay in fights
Hopefully them fixing the max sway penalty should make jump shotting more viable
I still think Hipfire is overpowered but whatever lol bandait fix for jump shotting feeling shit
I do find it strange though when some people say they want bfv's slide back and say 6's is abhorrent, despite v's doing more of what they dislike in terms of movement potential
oh well, that's how it goes
Remove prone from the video game 
Many aren't based enough to appreciate this stance.
either way I'm keen to see how 6's mechanics end up come launch. Will be waiting to watch some gameplay before purchasing of course, cause lots can change
Already preordered even if they completely remove movement from the game it'll be better than BF1 and I still had fun with bf1
Just remove infantry gameplay and make the game Commander Mode only. 64 Commanders on 1 match 
Take your Ws when you can
Holy based @knotty grotto
given how few shooters I play now, I will happily take even a half W
I count third person shooters as shooty games too tbh they still require aiming
But yeah not many first person shooters with longevity nowadays
I also do but I don’t play TPS Shooters unless they are Looter Shooter games like The Division or Destiny
Arc Raiders seems goated
if you like extraction
The game looks good but it being Third Person Extraction Shooter turned me off
I don't really lol but arc Raiders is a lot more than your average extraction shooter
I like my PvP/Extraction shooters on first person perspective
It does make them more hardcore
More competitive
an extraction shooter with robots
if I want to play a pvp game i'd rather just be fighting the people in it
The robots are pve but there are players too
The reason why I don’t like Third Person on PvP games is because you can use the Third Person perspective to get the info you couldn’t on First Person perspective
Like imagine you think you are safe but a guy is completely seeing you while hiding on a corner that you cannot see
Eh I recently watched Kelski review of arc Raiders and he addresses this. It's not invalid take but it takes a different kind of skill in 3rd person games than 1st person.
Tldr you have to reposition and can't just ego push.
It gives an “advantage”(I know its not a really big one but still) over other players
It requires a different skill than in 1st person games
Yea
a skill that I just can't enjoy
It's okay to dislike that fundamentally
Atleast I know what I dislike instead of going “game bad it will die”
So the BF6 BR looks actually good that's nice
third person stealth games make use of the perspective in it's balance, but I can't help but feel like pvp shooters that use it just strip away elements rather than replace it
I haven't yet found a situation or game where I feel the perspective doesn't do that
We are not allowed to talk about Labs content
The BF6 BR looks theoretically nice
i once got invited to the closed labs test, but cant find the email. i only saw the email when it was too late. how tf do i get in? im confused.
I meant just in terms of what it's going to be like free to play and not tied to a shitty Battlefield game 
So that bf6 br labs devlog looks actually good that's nice
Yea
where did they say that?
Isn't it pretty much confirmed
Honestly, Firestorm on V could have been WAY better if it was actually F2P
you tell me
did sirland confirm it?
I don't think they have but if it's not free to play then it's dead on arrival
Its not officially confirmed but its been leaked since the beginning of Labs
All the competition BR is free to play
It'd be extremely idiotic to require a full purchase of the base game
They made that mistake twice
cod4 remake flashbacks...
It would be a stupid move to make the same mistake they did on Firestorm
it was a stupid move to try br again yet here we are
who knows
COD4R was a Panic button move from Activision
but knowing them, it could easily be info they withhold until they want to make a big flashy announcement about it
No. BR in battlefield would probably work well and it has never actually been tried.
2 previous iterations were not free to play and tied to the 2 worst Battlefield games ever fucking made. It's completely unfair to claim the BR failed.
As long as its good and doesnt take away from the main resources(which it doesnt we know that) I dont really care about BF having another attempt on BR
BFV was a great game
I want 256 player conquest and rush🗣️
I would play Warzone but COD is dogshit pay2win and BF's BR looks similar but better in every way
God no
well it's existence means that resources are being diverted, as ripple could be working on the base game just as much
BFV Firestorm was great, but it had the same problems as BO4 Blackout. BF2042 Hazard Zone was completely done wrong
256 on locker/metro
128 Locker 4000 tickets see you there

i joined a game and my team won 5 seconds later, guess im just that good 
They did say back on Labs announcement Ripple Effect is only working on their part which they kept it hidden while talked about what DICE, MOTIVE and Critereon did
can you survive more than 10 seconds after spawning in 256 locker/metro?
When I join late we always lose
Unless you camp at HQ, No
but in truth I don't care about br, never have, and won't ever play it, so if it works then that's great, otherwise I just hope they don't take more from the base game dev team to work on it
It's meant to attract new players to Battlefield it's not made for existing playerbase
isnt it literally an entirely different studio they outsourced the BR to?
No its not outsourced
okay but the studio working on the BR is seperate from the core game no?
Ripple Effect is a part of Battlefield Studios and owned by EA
3 different studios working on single player, MP and BR. Pretty good plan not to interfere with each other much.
if they balance the movement and other mechanics around BR then i will commit sudoku
They just happen to be only working on the BR for BF6
Nah they should have completely separate balancing
Nah, mechanics are balanced for the main MP
Pls seperate files
They confirmed it
Dont want 200gb again💀
so different movement in br and regular mp?
A content creator did show a modular download UI inbuilt to the game
No not movement but gun balancing maybe
no idea, that was just a hope

but it would make sense to at least do cstom weapon balancing
Gonna uninstall single player after beating it and keep BR and MP assuming BR isn't poopy
There are multiple armor plates and shit in BR that don't exist in MP
Same
The Open Beta had UI Customize options for the Armor Plates but it did nothing
That's just how BRs work usually
Cant wait for the ‘top 100 streamer br moments must watch #br #newbf’ videos to get spammed on yt
The tank shell does not discriminate
Can't wait for the gameSprout compilations to return
It will kill everyone equally fosho
Stonemountain64 yolo on the bf needs to return for this
It was hilarious on 3
People need to stop posting thumbnails with guns man get creative
Holding the gun whilst looking at the sun gets boring the 100th time you see it
if I do vids I'll just do nice screenshots of the environment with no gun
Thumbnails are ez nowadays: settings>turn everything off>ss> turn everything back on
Cough Gravity
One thing I hope the BR changes is the ability to choose which mission you wanna do instead of it being forced to you AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND ACCORDING TO THE BLOG POST
What? U dont want to eliminate 100 players while doing a headtrick and playing a guitar for 1 minute after getting the kill?
can't wait for the 'get 50 kills while jump shotting'
What I mean is the ability to choose between Contract A and B instead of forcing me to do Contract A only
That’s how I understood how the missions will work on the blog post
Your reward
I could be wrong and I hope I am wrong
REAL
(Though I'd prefer those to soulless Gen. AI thumbnails)
REAL
AI use in moderation is fine but some people really overdo it and all of it ends up looking identical
I love this sticker. That remind me some vtuber...
every vtuber ever with pink hair and cat ears
Is that burnice???
what’s the release time frame I just saw some sponsored post on instagram talking about “early access september 25”
Thats not real
The release is October 10th and there is no mention of early access
Minato Aqua
Well I want to try Portal setup before game is released on 10th October...
bf6

i hope we will get a preload of bf6
So you can download it before it launches?
Would be great because my downloadspeed is... Yeah... Kinda slow
Would be great
Normaly you can perload 2-3 days before relase day so probs around 7th or 8th of october i would say we can preload
yea it wouled be cool
Nice
I hope the campaign will be cool too. Because Battlefield campaigns are very nice
Guilds: 2,153 (2,159)
-------
Version: 7.0.0
Owner: @imdarkdiamond
-------
Uptime: 1 days 7 hours 34 minutes 4 seconds
Shards: 2 (Currently on shard 0)
Cluster: 0```
yes but i hope we dont get pay to win or stupid pink skins like in cod
i heard something about that they wont put in skins like COD for the "beginning". LEt's hope it will stay like this
I dont want stupid skins like cod
hope that too
Yeah the last campaign i liked was BF4 but BF1 and BFV werent bad just felt more of a multiplayer tutorial
same
I still don’t like the phantom edition skins changes but I’m still looking forward to the skins
I hope there will be some good destruction like Battlefield 4 too. Because the skyscraper destruction like battlefield 4 was soooo nice tbh.
They call it tactical destruction and they added some scripted stuff but not major
No Levolution iirc
Oh, yeah... The pre order skins from the phantom edition already are a little bit too much in my opinion
I’m fine with the previous gear, just don’t like the red and black color scheme
But i dont want to sound like i hate every skin beside military skins. They surely can add some skins but i just dont want stupid skins like COD
We are getting some bandana skins and some skins that look like paintball gear
Do they have any intentions on fixing the destruction? Not sure why a sledge hammer can knock down a building and a frag grenade destroys a city
the paintball 'gear' is actually ballistic masks
they are based off i think the british commandos on sweden iirc, the ballistic masks are just a custom thing tbh
the bandana skins seems like PMC's or military dudes wearing stuff they have on them
That’s what I was thinking
The further you go in the pass the longer it takes to earn a pip via xp
Missions give a fixed pip rate for progression and are the overall best way to progress the pass (especially in later tiers)
Ty bro, im stuck in tier 47
(The pips are those dots of progression per tier)
You don’t need to really play anymore tbh. If you do next week’s missions and the week after you’re done
I would just wait for the mission’s to refresh unless you do enjoy playing the game
to be done with XP at each week:
W4: 40.8
W5: 47.2
W6: 53.6
(Assumes you no longer gain xp and only progress via missions)
With this work at level 43 I missed some weeks of missions
Nah
I don’t think they will because destrucion is made with BR in mind
Thats kinda dope its hilarious but dope
How is the game i see gameplay everywhere but cant afford to buy the game
Hi everyone
Has anyone heard of the ‘persistent’ game mode, a lot of the community liked.
So I'm hearing there was backlash over the words of a certain unnamed gamedev. I can understand that mob mentality can be tough to manage but why are the developers activly deleteing post on the steam community page for talking about it? I'm seeing posts where no names or call to actions are being made, they just simply say that they "refunded their preorder" and getting their threads deleted and even in some cases their accounts banned. Not feeling this is in very good taste.
Progressives run this discord you're gonba get banned.
Tuff question : why do a lot of ‘battlefield’ vets enjoy milsim alternatives. For example,
Squad
Arma
He’ll let loose
Also, could that also tell us what a ‘battlefield’ game could ‘ also’ be.
People who like fps games typically like most fps games 😛 Besides, competition keeps the industry healthy.
@sour copper then its just proving everyone's points then now isn't it, I actually liked the game during beta testing. i NEVER buy full retail games i was considering purchasing at the full 70$ which is steep, ban me for saying nearly nothing and I wont even play their f2p battle royal.
hello
You can thrust vector in bf6 jets
Which means you have more control than ever and do some top gear/ ace combat shenanigans
Meaning jets are scarier that ever for everyone else
Assuming they play the game and don't just do barrell rolls until they're shot down haha
no no no💔
im ok with a vietnam skin if it's authentic
Battlefield is like a stepping stone for cod players to get a taste of something better then those people want more and get into more mil sim and fall back to battlefield for more casual gaming
anyhow, i just found out the stealth attack helis from 2042 are real and being made by sikorsky
I am about to drop unemployed hours into bf6 when it drops
half the conversations here end up being like "bef6 is so cod cool guys cod i hope it goes well at cod launch"
Thanks for the message, That’s true, but still doesn’t answer the question. “Next please” <with all due respect.
I've been the main character of every game I've ever played. You can't "next please" the main character. parody
I like your point, please develop on my dilemma, based off your assessment. “could a BFBC3+ squad based ‘spin off” work.
Or even, BFBC3+ Squad based game ‘suit’ a good ‘theme’ to a milsim battlefield alternative.
Baring in mind, squad was touted as the true BF2 ‘spiritual’ successor. That says a lot, especially coming from a lot of ‘core’ battlefield type of players.
Boneless gaming
I like that good comeback.
Maybe because a lot of them are older and moved to those games awhile back?
I like that, no one can argue against the point though, for once 🤣 That shows a good sign and what ‘another’ expression of what a battlefield game could also be.
anddd my comment was deleted - good show
Stop posting political shit in the game discussion then
supported the franchise for 20+ years man
Good observation, that’s very plausible. Although, could show what a battlefield game ‘could be’ which is my main point.
Could be but then it would be a different type of BF game we have come use to
Is it October 10th yet
Yeah, that’s why I am also saying to the same effect. ‘A yearly battlefield’ could work. Alternating between the ‘main instalment’ but, not a every ‘other’ year battlefield. But, an additional battlefield in one year. < two battlefields for 4 years until the next one.
I don't understand the obsession with remaking the entire game every year. Why not just sell map packs? I don't get why they need to remake EVERYTHING.
We''ll be fine if the grass physics stays the same for 5 years lol
Would prefer this much better. Imagine a ‘legacy’ bundle. So, BF6 gets a bundle of 3 new maps from every battlefield from BF2 (BFMC2) included to BF6 every quarter year.
They want what COD has
yearly games and a BR that gets updated along with them
I mean, I get it, but it seems kind of short sighted. Knock down the competition with better value then upscale monetization when you have a monopoly on the genre.
They're just skipping to step 2 without step 1 lol
Cod will probably start busting out remastered golden age cods
19 days to go
I agree with Chris, if they can ‘reimagine’ <key word or ‘remaster’ three maps from every game, even 2142 ‘but what it would look almost 100 years in the past. That’s would be a great challenge for the studios. A complete ‘legacy’ bundle pack including ‘All Battlefields’ but, ‘reimagined’ so, doesn’t have to be ‘same era’ could be in the same game setting year as BF6 ‘2027’
If you’re making yearly releases then the least you can do is make each a slightly different experience
Yeah trying to beat COD at its own game will not work
This is exactly what I think when people by EA FC every year
Its legit the same copy n paste shi every year
I'm just going to enjoy BF for as long as I can until they turn it into a yearly cash grab if they even do that is
man i want to play battlefield and not have to wait 18 days but at the same time bf2042 is so toxic
apparently, if you fly the mi240 faster than 60 mph people start to panic
I still have 20 levels to finish that free battle pass
i finished it like a week ago
I haven’t been too diligent on it since sometimes it just feels like a chore
i cant wait to fly the blackhawk so fast and agressively people think i'm about to crash without realizing that flying is just jumping and missing the ground on the way back down
i have airmen and seamen in my blood
Please read this re-edit debate : https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/s/uVFd1oUsxy
how a yearly ‘battlefield’ could work.
to be fair, i actually have a lineage completely covered in seamen. my grandpa fought the japanese on a ship and my great uncle was on a pt boat in vietnam
why does every team in BF6 have the same exact tanks?
Why not add Leopards, Charioteers, T-90s, Type99, K2's.
Terrible
lol shhhhhh you're not allowed to notice
is this a reference to something I know or dont know
no I'm just being silly sry
They need to definetly add more modern tanks. Not every modern battlefield game can just be an Abrams tank constantly
The tanks will have skins when the game releases won't they?
and it would help to know which vehicles and tanks are on which team just from how they look. where some tanks can be used for different roles
skins only change the color, not the 3d model or performance
True that.
There it is
bobos binted?
Boat goes binted
Do you know if Battlefield 6 campaign will be released earlier or on October 10th?
Nope, i do not know
Gold morning
Battlefield
Good evening-do you know yet if FPV kamikaze drones make it into Battlefield six, especially for Battle Royale? They're nowhere on the gadget list for the other modes.
be careful you'll start another fight
Wait what 😂 I would neva
Only way I can see it working is if the game is simply called Battlefield and releases during next gen. We stop getting new games and the current one just keeps getting update with new modes and maps and such.
A call of duty style yearly release would bomb.
18 MORE DAYS
18 more days for black ops 7
Yearly battlefield would be so awful
Bi-yearly release could work, wouldn’t mind having this followed with a Bad Company 3 in two years - Still cheerleaders to be saved
A 2-3 year official life cycle with constant updates and map additions would be great, and by maps and seasons I mean more than the 1 map 2042 would get every now and then. If they continue with more community additions like in BF4 they can make it the next BF4 where even a decent handful of people are playing it a decade later. Also, yearly makes it so that there arent that many jumps in advancement. The OG Modern Warfare up to Black Ops 2 had decent jumps between those 2 games, but at least every other title had similar mechanics with just a fresh coat of paint and minor tweaks(nothing new I know). If EA wants their 100 million player base this is how they can do it
Never played the BC games, but yeah hope to see BC3 some time in the future.
BC is what introduced us to destruction. First time experiencing that was magical.
My dream is BC3 from old devs through use of a contract.
I remember seeing the "shoot through walls" tech for the first time and thinking it was magic lol
I was quite young 😛
I was 19
They can tone down the destruction value of some things
No idea. Assume it comes out when the game is released until DICE or EA states otherwise
But they can’t alter model changing or chain destruction as core systems
Well, you can put C4 on the Recon drone. As far for launch of the game that’s the closest we have
Bad company 2 was a once in a lifetime thing it’s not gonna happen to that degree again imo
Maybe on Season 1 or beyond they can add the UCAV but again we dont know yet
The production team behind that game had developers from infinity ward and dice
Mostly dice but due to a certain hiccup from Activision a lot of Infinity ward devs took a second job at Dice working on Bad company 2
It legit had some of the best industry veterans from 2 studios
Have ya'll started fighting yet?
Most of dice’s veteran staff left after battlefield 5 anyways.
No, its calm for now. I assume Reddit is as always, horrible
The subreddit seems chill imo
I see a lot of people sayin "good shot" on clips
Why?
This chat usually descends to madness from time to time
Ah
"From time to time"
Nah, it happens a lot more than that XD
Also, welcome Babu
Yea, daily arguments and ragebaits are plentiful
You can also put m2 slams I would assume. If not that’s kinda silly
In theory you should be able to
Had someone say "I'm a retired 25 year old."
Bro, jobless does not equal retired 🤣
They can’t really alter chain destruction or model switching destruction but I do think they can reduce the destruction value on grenades and the hammer significantly
Retired in 25….. dawg 💀
Do you wanna see the screenshot?
Retiring at 25 with a bank balance of $5 goes crazy
Chain destruction in bf6 basically is a system that when you implement x destructive force to break something that force chains into Y objects
Uh yes, 911
I'd like to report a murder
They could change the value but I honestly don’t expect them to because it would make those utilities kinda useless
Like imagine a sledgehammer taking 5 hits to destroy a floor
I think making the hammer swing take like 2-3 swings to break open something is fine considering it is a melee weapon every class can equip
If it was a gadget I would say it could remain as is. But it’s not
Does the wedgehammer kill in 2 hits?
WEDGEHAMMER I DIDNT EVEN REALIZE LMFAO
But also consider the following: funny

Could be neat if they made sledghammer support-only so all classes have destruction abilities
That would be cool tbh

Unless I'm being dumb and forgot a support gadget that can destroy stuff
Mortar if one wishes to troll
But it kinda sucks in this game
Now, something funny to do with the hammer would be to let it damage vehicle part health XD
The airburst grenade launcher, the mortars…
It actually damages vehicles
Man, I remember going in to my local Gamestation to trade in some games for the 360, I was going to buy like 3-4 used games… The I saw the grenade with a smile and I used all my trade value for that one game, I was addicted to battlefield until the BF4 release which threw me of the franchise until BF1
No fuckin way 
You know a game is good when the balance decisions no longer make sense
Eh. Imo airburst shouldn't do a lot of environment damage. It's an anti-personnel launcher
Not sure how much but a reveal short mentioned it damages vehicles
I think considering it’s a melee weapon I would get rid of the vehicle damage and make it cost 2-3 swings to break something.
Alternatively class lock the melee weapon to a particular class.
Yeah it shouldn’t but I think it still has some destruction ability
I can see the squads of people vehicle hunting with sledgehammers now
Probably. They were slightly overzealous with the amount of destruction normal gadgets can do
Unironically I feel like recon could use the hammer considering it’s the least played class
It doesn’t fit or make sense but that melee weapon is just so strong.
Either class lock it, make it a gadget, or nerf it
One of the three
Hell you could even nerf it by giving it limited uses
But I would prefer just making it require more swings
Recon does need something. Wasn't the spawn beacon removed without anything being added to the class?
Yea, but personally Recon’s gadget lineup is already fine IMO
I am not playing R6 siege warfare edition
It’s a video game
I don’t remember a defib giving people life for being shot in the head or a blow torch fixing a tank on fire irl
But it’s a video game
Sniper decoy’s, Laser designators, drones. C4’s, Claymores and Tracer Darts
You know what.
You got me there
Ngl them making it so gadgets don’t refresh anymore further makes me wanna main support @craggy tapir
No the “R6 Siege Warfare” is referencing to how Ubisoft “balances” stuff by just nerfing and removing it from characters
They should bring back the one bridge repair thing from 4
Some random building should be able to be magically repaired with a repair torch lol
Unironically this but attach the effect to a gadget on engineer
Or melee weapon for engineer only
It would take like 3-5 swings to fix up tho I think that’s fair
No, I was saying that Sledge's sledgehammer breaks in like 5-6 hits
I've used one, they do not break easily
Give engineer brick and mortar so they can rebuild the map 🗣️
I would unironically be cool with that
Give us engineering vehicles too
It could even give score if you repair structures near allies @craggy tapir
X amount of score per ally near the structure you repair.
The EOD Bot
Thats not an engineering vehicle tho.
I mean shite like the Centurion AVRE or the M287
its a deployable enginner gadget
Would be neat. I do feel like support's shield thing is only semi-realistic choice they had though
V's building system only really made sense for that time period
Ik, but still
For more vehicles, add some funny ones like Engineering vehicles that use big boy BESH rounds
If the team doesn’t want to reduce the destruction value on easy to access/small scale stuff like the hammer and grenade making the engineer capable of repair feels fine to me tbh
There would be a bar you’d have to finish to have the repair go through
So you kinda expose yourself making a loud noise for other people to come and kill you.
Stopping the repair would reset the bar obv.
Add the chally 2 - Would like to see someone slide in to my 120mm BESH
The Centurion AVRE has a 203mm BESH round XD
Fair. It'd def make it more interesting cause you could have people reinforcing chokepoints and capture points after they're leveled by a push
No, but we can fix that
"You see that building gunner?"
"Yes sir!"
"I don't wanna see it anymore."
Uh everyone skull react this XD
We need a deployable burger king so the game's realistic
Yeah, but the AVRE is to old, though is we do those rules, let’s just add the 4005 🌚 The prototype autoloading variant 😂😂😂
Doom barn
I do like how bad company 2 became more serious. Third one should go straight up dark.
blindfolds him
You won, but uh...
Buildings still there
Directions were followed to the tee. Closing contract.
Im going to be so real, they wont ever attempt to make a Bad Company 3. Devs at DICE said back then sometime that they geniunely do not know how to re capture what made Bad Company 2 so good
Well yes...
But actually no
The number you have dialed is no longer in service. Goodbye
If I write the script for it and its awesome would they do it?
What set it apart from the main modern games like 3 and 4? At first I thought the BC games were set in Vietnam
That was an expansion
It starts with a “clean house” type mission, after clearing the first house, Haggard just says f this and brings the next building down
🚬
Wonder what they're going to attempt after 6
Doubt it'd be modern, ww1, ww2, or futuristic. Maybe something like cold war or Vietnam could be cool
Who do I gotta beg around here to playtest some? Cuz I'm down
Ya cold war would be solid.
I really want a 2142 sequel so bad
Same on 2142
2242
Y'know, the nightvision mission teased in the trailer gives me hope that we'll get a "clean house" style mission in 6's campaign
FYI I would only be down for this if:
A: Titan mode returns
B: the team actually innovates the sci fi genre with this
2299...the future is on sale
Or what about Battlefield 40k?
A major issue with COD is it literally does 0 innovation with the sci fi shooter genre
That's just Titanfall
It literally copy pastes what titanfall does but worse.
It was such a tease, hopefully they show more of that mission at the Tokyo Game Show
Give it another 5 years and then hopefully they can do 2003 era War on Terror type setting
I assume it would be the continuation of 6, as they said they wanna create a Battlefield Unlverse
Especially since nobody gonna be able to run squad now
Most of what it set apart was its extremely increased destruction. Being for consoles first and its unique story
What do you think about a stream well when the streamer is just showing a gameplay of smth that he's playing without mic or cam
I need a good quiet stealthy mission in a battlefield campaign
Why I think they wont do Future Battlefield for some time is that 2042 happened
Got to have the Night Shift 2.0
Perhaps. Really depends on if the previous games are still in the timeline
If so, then an actual continuation of 4's campaign could be cool. Maybe with a war stories style to showcase how the war went instead of leaving us on the second part of a three part campaign. Though, I would prefer a more unique theme
Destruction that threw map design out a window. You could level the entire map to the ground
It’s more chaotic but I prefer when it’s a lil more tuned down personally. I do actually like good maps
Someone told me 3, 4, V, Hardline (tv show), 6, 2042, and 2142 are all connected
As far as we know its still in the line. The current timeline looks like BF3->BF4->BF6->BF2042->BF2142(the reason why 2042 and 2142 are connected is the Phantom Program PC’s heavily hinted at the events of 2142)
Well destruction is already a mainstay in BF titles, I guess the tone of the main story. I get that BF wants to be semi-grounded in its tone and theme, but the main characters in BF3 and BF4 were so damn forgettable.
No confirmation on 6 but the rest yeah
noone cares though
Bad Company and Bad Company 2’s story was the best ones
If 6 is in the old timeline, then yes. The president in 6's trailer looks a lot like an in-universe actor in Hardline so I'd lean more towards yes
Hopefully BF6 will have a better story and better characters. If they can at least match BC games Ill be happy with it
In technicality they are but we have no solid proof besides the BF3, 4 and 2042 connection
Thanks for sharing your ancient knowledge Da Bumer
In BF3 and BF1 you can play as characters name Blackburn
Yea
The characters should be interesting since they said that you aren't playing the same character in every mission
Well actually every modern Battlefield is SOMEWHAT connected via the Phantom Program
(You control the whole squad throughout the campaign)
We will see more about the campaign on Tokyo Game Show
Getting invested in lore they havent planned always works out well
Id be fine with being the grunt in each mission who gets their 15 minutes of fame while the side character(s) steal the show. Like a Hi-Fi Rush situation where youre the protagonist of the game, but a side character in the grand scheme of things
That tank driver in BF3 is for sure a phantom now
Schizo or is that actual lore
Flag Charlie and been urinated on
Yeah. Honestly, I preferred the war stories style over a steady campaign. It showcased how one person can't change the tides of war
Fits battlefield better than the typical campaign style
Apples objective has been moved slightly to the left by the Cat Behemoth Sgt
No its actually real. BF4, 1, V and 2042 have all Phantom Program Easter eggs, BF3 and 4 are hard connected. The only game that stays in the air about this is Hardline as its campaign is a Tv Show and MP is Cops vs Robbers
Would be cool to see war stories but with some main character in the background. In the end the structure of how they do it is whatever, just make it damn interesting
Then again the dude who lead the first Monder Warfare and Titanfall is behind the reins so I have good confidence in that
6 could connect Hardline's campaign if the theory about the president being an actor in it is true
😴
Seems to be the same voice actor but it could be unrelated
18 days 16 hours 8 minutes and 40 second until bf6
Yea, it can but I dont expect it
Hardline’s story is best where its at IMO. Its a Crime Drama TV show
We are so back
Ya están jugando el batle Royale
Hardline in general is underrated. There's only like 1 bad map, gunplay is solid, vehicles were amazing to drive, the new gamemodes they added were amazing, etc
Was the bad map the mansion?
Im the hardest Hardline glazer in my friend group man
The city block map
Downtown? Dude that map is goated
Not downtown. The map the size of CoD's shipment
Oh, that one. OK
I forgot its name but remember the map you are talking about
I recently played hardline for the first time. Campaign is cringe snoozefest but the MP is really really fun.
I think it's literally called "The Block"
We should get a flooded city as a naval map
@hallow geode
Hollywood Heights wasn't amazing, but it was a good limited-vehicle map
We also getting another map similar to that
Damn, you know they holding naval back for a full season drop/update
Next expansion has to be Europe though since first one is California
I'll settle for at least one map
I heard rumors about it being in Japan
That one has to be naval
Naval Strike 2.0 would be goated
Kinda wish HL was more active in its later life. I never got a chance to fully experience the later DLC maps like Thin Ice, Train Dodge, Alcatraz, Pacific Highway, or Diversion
Supposedly the are doing a remake each season and the remake is the area it is based on. So there was Downtown, Talah Market, and Propaganda. So we could see a return to Iran or (North) Korea
What are people’s thoughts on proper night maps or night variants?
FLIR city
Would be amazing if they did it like Night Woods
Pitch black requiring flir or nvg to see 5 feet infront of you
Seeing 32 IR lasers pointed at me would make me need to empty my bucket
Weightily, I can hardly wait to play 128 players in conjunction with conquest large 128 maps on BATTLEFIELD 6. The total surface area of Earth is approximately 510 million square kilometers (197 million square miles), with about 29% (149 million km²) being land and 71% (361 million km²) being covered by water. US population is over 342,034,000 people. RU population is over 143,000,000 people. CN population is over 1,400,000,000 people. UK population is over 69,000,000 people. NATO population is over 958,000,000 people. CSTO population is over 173,000,000 people. SCO population is over 3,300,000,000 people.
... wut
If I'm playing night map in bf4 I'm throwing on my LA camo
Yeah Id like some original night maps, or even a night themed season
Not that I have a massive interest in it but I feel like the BR would insane with the sun turned off and the firestorm
Personally I would love if each season had 1 original map and 1 remastered map, giving us 2 maps per season basically
But obviously that would be less for some people
We are getting 3 to 4 with first season
Would be neat to see them all based around the same location. It'd allow them to showcase how the war is going with new seasons being new offensives
Craving to frolic BATTLEFIELD 6 128 players in conjunction with conquest large 128 map, weightily.
Yea, like each season having its own region
Didnt they say they were just gonna stick to 64 player matches for 6?
Also what does "weightily" mean in this context lol
3 maps, 2 vehicles, 6 weapons per season would be comfortable
They are. 128 is not being added to 6
You can probably make a 128 player server using portal though
Season 1 has 2 new MP maps, Downtown remake, and supposedly launching the same time as BR so possibly a new BR map each season
Yea, I assume the 128 player thing would be BR Portal matches I assume
They are sticking to 128 player matches, otherwise they will be bankrupt.
BR is 100 players
Ok guys, we have reached the ragebait hour
Ok but what does "weightily" mean
They can change it after testing
'in an important and serious way'
Is English your first language?
Not trying to be antagonistic, weightily just isn't used and I'm curious
Well yeah. I doubt they will though since the typical number is 100. Increasing the player count would only make matchmaking times worse
I grasped English language. You did not grasp English language?
I'm English native, brother
Infact it's the only language I know lol
That is not how you use weightily. It's not meant as a side-note to "enhance" your arguement...
Also, they're doing 64 player. Not 128.
If anything 128 players will be a Portal option, otherwise we wont see it at all in BF6
yeah cod won
This bait stale as hell bruh you gotta get a ziploc bag or smth
Codfish
Squad call ins would be nice to see again
Would be good if they aren't going to add a commander
By the way, I like your profile picture. I reminds me of the Shadow Money Wizard Gang. (I mean this genuinely, I actually do like it)
Weightily. 128 players in conjunction with conquest large 128 maps are the superbest, etc.
no i would prefer a commander that was actively playing and calling down useful stuff for the team when they have time .....than a squad call in just because you suck at the game doesn't mean you need to add in a feature because you can't rally your team together
Ty I appreciate it ♥️
Should I add a gold chain to it lmao it might go hard
That'd be sick.
Shouldn't wish death on anyone
Politics be gone. This is not the place. Dice will handle it internally if it's true
@craggy tapir lets hope
They should know that BF doesn't need that type of backlash right now
If you do then there is something wrong
Thank you lurking admins for keeping this from getting too political
Break all the players' legs! You should only be able to crawl to the control point
im sorry im just mad bro
A prone only mode would go hard ngl
Not according to DICE devs, they supposedly said that it wasnt all that popular so they canned it
Lets just remove the entire infantry gameplay. Only Commander Mode
The leopard crawl bros
TPS War Sims will be back
Dolphin dives only
Wonder if I could do that in portal
Maybe
Full helldiver movement
Everyone is now a dwarf. Crouch sprinting only
Did I hear a Rock and Stone?
Dwarven sprint
FOR KARL!
ROCK
AND
STOOOONE!!!
WE'RE RICH
🍄
MUSHROOM
Lol
🍄
🍄
I swear the word “Dwarf” is an activation code for Sleeper DRG Fan’s
🍄
@edgy bone @whole forge Have you guys heard about Space Jump? Its very similar to DRG but more classic people in space scifi against robots
🍄
I did, I might grab it after its first patches
🍄
🍄🟫
LOOK OVER HERE
I try to not pay attention to new games, not a lot of money goin around rn if you catch my cold
Cover your mouth
I don't wanna be muffled
🍄
Found out about it yesterday and it seemed tempting, but I am almost of of space on my ssd
This is a genuine question as a non USA citizen - Has it crossed anyone’s mind that they are doing a FIRESTORM BR in Cali? Aren’t they hit with wildfires every year?
MUSHROOM
🍄
Badger
Sybau NERD 🤡
This is now a Deep Rock Galactic channel
CRINGE SLOW MODE
It could geniunely be just a design choice based on the games setting
I bet the BR has its lore that will justify why the map is on California
I've yet to see anyone up in arms about it here but I also live in the Midwest and don't talk to anyone
There were tornadoes in midwest maps on Hardline and flooding in flood prone areas in China, lol it doesnt really matter
Again, just outside looking in, it was the first thing I said when I saw the tease - Was waiting for that annual American media hating on games for absolutely 0 reason
I think a giant fire is on brand for Battlefield. Look at Operation Firestorm, Caspian Border, and Iberian Offensive. Theres always someone in the room that says "You know what this map needs? Hills on fire!"
They'll find other less meaningful reasons to throw insanely huge fits dw, it'll come
Lmao I experienced a wildfire clsoe by a while back and said lol its fine I used to have them nearby all the time when my roommates were banging on my door at 6am. I woke up like 2 hours later to see ash raining down from the sky filled with smoke with an orange-red Sun and people scrambling to throw shit in their cars.
lmao whoops
Speaking of which, I can’t wait for the ‘burnt’ skins to make their return
I stayed for another 2 days til they said if I dont leave now Ill have to be bussed when they do formal evac so I noped out of there
What burnt skins? I know you can catch on fire now in MP
The past two games they have added these burnt skins, seems to go with your theme of more fire
Bfv
Ddint play those games so I wouldnt know
Firestorm
Make skins for the vehicles that are just the models for when theyre destroyed
2nd best br in my opinion
What's 1
Pubg
Haven't heard that name in years
Wouldn’t mind seeing some Russian tanks with some cope cages
Thats how good it is
What about h1z1 lol
Preferred pubg
Did you play radical heights lol
Yeah i wanna see the Pax tanks and what theyll look like
No
What about 1v100 for the 360?
I haven't heard of that one
They are getting the leopard and the IFV we saw in the beta and nato is getting the Abrams with the Bradley
Pubg is being upscaled for new gen.
Soon I hope.
Would be cool to see more European armour in the game
Thats my dayz go to
It would make more sense. Pax is Balkans, Algeria, and Tajikistan
If you're skipping launch when are you playing
I hope we can unlock some cosmetics from playing the campaign, The Last Tiger style
I saw them confirm the countries somewhere. Also explains while theres an assault on Gibraltar since even tho is connected to Spain, it still has close proximity to Algeria
Kinda glad theyre going for countries that werent the big powers in the last 100 years
I found the leak but I can't send, Espada seems to be Spain though, Espada means sword in Spanish too
NATO: UK, US, Egypt
Pax: Spain, Balkan, Maghreb
At least for now, we will probably get more factions after launch
There is a lot of countries they could do, especially with it being as open with nato and pax and I wouldn’t be surprised if we didn’t see more sub factions added to the game
We will probably get Georgia since it's hinted at the reveal teaser
When during the trailer
We could get France-based maps too
Getting a non-ww2 Paris map could be nice
I feel like theyve been consistent with putting vanilla MP maps based on campaign locations in the past. So far its just Gibralter, Cairo, NYC, and Tajikistan.
This is the stuff of nightmares
Would be cool if they released extra campaign missions every season. Doubt it’d ever happen, but it’d be cool
Make em co-op missions
Nah, they won't update campaign 😂 We will probably just get trailer for post launch maps, half of the trailer will be battlepass content
Oh def. The campaign style they’re going for isn’t good for extra missions anyways. It’d work 10x better if they did a war stories style
Every season could add a new war story that follows the events of the released maps
Basically just a playable version of the lore they loved to release alongside 2042’s seasons
this is the Rush I remember in BF3 and BF4, but as soon DICE made Breakthrough, it took all the things from Rush, and turned it into this small infantry only game mode, that honestly nobody ask for, the only difference between Rush and Breakthrough, Rush, you have to destroy the MCOM, while Breakthrough you have to capture the control point https://youtu.be/bbuFjzFp5RU?si=hAxoUW_6Ck1zSYJ3
I need October 10 to be release I’m bored haven’t played any games since the beta. Lucky my job and college work help me past the time
Remember when it was called "Gold Rush"?
Name checks out
Boat goes binted
no.
i wish i had the mindset of seeing my work as a way to pass the time lol
instead it just feels like something that holds me back from doing my hobbies 😭
I have no choice since I’m bored of the games I have now. But when the game drops my life is complete
yeah i've felt burnt out from a lot of games recently
I also go to them gym tryna build strength if im stress
The only NATO members left after most of the members left are U.S., UK and Egypt
So it’s safe to assume that most ex-NATO countries are backing Pax Armata
So Spanish mercs, pmcs or black ops/deniable operators in Pax Armata is not a surprise
Got laid off with several hundred others earlier this year, the amount of hobbying I got done in such a short time was massive
It is but playing video games keeps me out of trouble😂😂
Just do a push up every time you got ignored by a teammate while requesting for a revive 
Sorry you got played off
I do push up every time a teammate gives up whenever I try to revive them
i'm someone with an obsessive personality so i have a tendency to burn myself out whenever i have a lot of free time
no worries, I was covered, just wish the game had dropped earlier
That’s less common in the beta who knows it’s likely a thing at launch
I’ve seen that a lot in BF2042 anyway 
could've been the first 100 colonel
If BF3 and BF6 are in the same timeline I doubt we will fight in Paris given that it’s still irradiated most likely
For anyone don’t become a teacher cuz a lot of kids don’t know how to read or care about school. Parents are being entitled saying my kid can’t fail and don’t have to do homework
Oh yeah. Forgot that happened lol
Depends on what country you’re from but in my country education definitely is valued 
I want to fight on a bigger New York map and LA
Yeah would be great to have some vehicle combat in NY and LA
Even within America it changes depending on where you are. Rural vs Urban makes a major difference
America education for elementary is getting worse
For something tropical let Pax attack Florida too
That would be fire Miami or D.C
D.C has to happen cuz the trailer saw the White House
The American side isn’t even military. It’s just the local crazies that ignored the evacuation order
DC only got a river but lorewise it won’t make sense for the Pax Armata to get that far
Unless we got a MW2 2009 situation again
Never played cod back then
Yeah. DC being attacked means something has gone crazy wrong cause DC is one of the most heavily protected places in America
Though, that could work for the global scene they’re trying to show
Well maybe in later seasons they could do that but tbh I prefer naval maps
Ik the game is mostly based around the Atlantic, but a Hawaii map could be cool
I love wanting to talk portal in the portal chat but everyone uses it for everything else so it’s always locked..
How long do yall think it’ll take for someone to make a makeshift operation metro/locker map in portal?
For a ahitty one made of primitives not long for a faithful recreation with full art done a bit
Pax Armata could also attack the US’s East Asian/Pacific military bases
But I guess it’s too far probably
That’s funny I was looking at Hawaii on 3D sat for good map locations for portal
It’d be unlikely unless an Asian country joins pax. Crossing the entirety of Europe, Asia, and the pacific just to hit a few bases wouldn’t be worth it
Maybe a third party will take advantage
Like the BRIC countries
A weakened NATO also will likely make Russia attack Europe as well
So it’s possible for a three way war of sorts
from what I remember Blackburn is the one who owns Pax Armata, so he will do whatever will benefit him the most
I could see them doing Russia but china isn’t going to happen. They don’t want 6 to be banned like 4 was
For a moment I was questioning if I was on the battlefield server until i saw pax armata too much politics
People love to bring politics into this server for some reason
Because it's offensive, shocking and edgy
The lurking admins take care of a good amount of them tho
We’re just discussing the BF6 lore and politics
Aka 14 year olds going through a weird highschool phase
Remember the premise of BF6 is very political lmao
Fractured NATO vs ex-NATO members funding a powerful pmc to destroy the NATO remnants? lol ofc it’s political
I know im talking about rl politics
Nah it make sense is about the pax armata new faction
Well yeah. It can get out of hand sometimes tho
I think im lost, the idea is not like all big government vs a corpo type union using the pmc (pax armata)
From what I can tell, something happened that caused nato to break up and some ex-nato countries started supporting a large pmc called pax armada
Some think that pax is Blackburn’s pmc that was talked about in 2042 but it’s unconfirmed
So battlefield 6 and 2042 are in the same universe?
Perhaps. We don’t know yet
So is just theories right? Nothing more than the campaign trailer?
I personally hope it is cause we could then get more info about the wars in 3 and 4
Yeah. Apparently something in Tokyo is going to show off more campaign stuff tho
Me too, i would be awesome and i was talking with someone in general about everything being in the same universe like with random dialogue like, hey Alex you remember that thing that happend in miami?
(Sept 26th at the Tokyo Game Show 2025)
IT WAS NO 25?
What?
I take things off my calendar to see the event, thankfully the next days are gonna be all free
I hope they reference the characters from 3 and 4. Having recker be an admiral or something would be cool
Yeah, that would be cool, at least something like that would make the community wish for a book or something else, i always love the history of all battlefield games and i wish a more... More ways to see that universe
I have high expectations for the battlefield 6 campaign
Is the shot delay after a full reload animation still going to be in the final game. That extra lil motion before you can shoot is a joke. Remove that please
Just add Battle Royale mode in 2042 no need for bf6 🤌
I'm hoping the BR is totally separate from the rest of the game
Bro the withdrawals are real. Dice Pls 😭😭😭
realest statment thus far
The basic iron sights for the m4a1 need to be changed tbh
Why
Cuz it’s using the wrong iron sights?
A lot of m4s used the carry handle iron sights
Plus if they add the carry handle as a default iron sight, the gun itself would look a lot better than its old iron sights
the game is set in 2027, not having a carry handle is fine lol
When can I put a carry handle on my Ak 
Heck, can I do that and then convert it to accept p90 mags
Dead game already. Do better Dice
Needs default 5x scope, iron sights should be unlocked
Nah, default sight should be the carry handle
BT is made to be big Rush
Type 20 is one of the weapons leaked and it's probably coming with a Japanese season
You guys think we'll get more guns after release :D
M4 sights we have are clearer. Gameplay > realism
Wait is b6 gonna have story?
maybe one day we'll have a game that does sight rendering realistically...
Yes
Wdym?
irl you would not see the housing of sight, only the reticle or front sight
assuming you have both eyes open
Realism feels a lot better tbh
I doubt there will be a sale until maybe 6 months out
Hands down the bf6 needs the m24 and the cheytac
it's not even realistic because most M4's don't have carry handles lol
Random hot take:
I saw the post on the subreddit a few days ago where the consensus was that sniping was too easy in BF6 beta. I think the automatic ranging with sniper attachment is actually going to make sniping in this game way more fun, and feel more like BF1. I think this is mainly because the sample size of people that have used and know how to take advantage of this attachment have been the ones playing the game so far.
From the stats posted to the BF twitter, 19% of the deployments in the beta were Recon. Among Recon players, I would bet only half actually will utilize the auto-zeroing every time they shoot. The extra key/button presses needed to do that every shot actually adds enough of a barrier to the skill gap that you can distinguish yourself in a game if you know the trick and have a good round.
With these assumptions and for a game of 64 players, we would expect 6 Recon that actively take advantage of it. 3 per side. To me, that feels more balanced, idk. I think if you're running around in the open a bunch and get picked off by a skilled sniper, that kinda makes sense and rewards more strategic movement.
I’m definitely gonna be finding some epic sniper spots on downtown at launch
the m2010 is already in the game + no one uses the intervention lol...
The cheytac was the most used gun in bf4,plus the m24 was iconic in bc2
play a milsim game?
Nah, I think the auto zeroing would be fine if there was a multi-second delay to hit targets standing still, or other snipers. That way a good sniper can counter against the time it takes for the zeroing to work its magic. I suck at using jets and I would use them more of the projectiles from the main canon were the size of a transport jeep, but then that would take away from those that are actually skilled with using jets
I miss when games had real gun names
I don't really care as long as the model and animations are realistic
and I think BF6's fake designations are cute
I dont disagree that it makes sniping easier, I just think that people assume all snipers are going to be taking advantage of it, which I disagree with. In reality not many snipers will exist per round that know how to use it
Give us the option to change the names of guns in game.
There, no the responsibility is off there hands
maybe they'll let us name weapon packages like blueprints in MW19
You can bind scope zeroing and holding breath to the same button(your ADS button), sniping is literally point and click in BF6
I don't disagree with this, I'm just saying not everyone will know how to use it to their advantage
Nah, game will be unplayable just like how everyone abused shotguns in the beta
Maybe 15 years ago people wouldnt know about a certain attachment or meta, but I can easily see it being heard that it turns it into easy mode. I just think it adds more to the BS factor of things how at a perfect position you can snipe at the flag nearest to the enemy's HQ from your own HQ.
On top of that factoring in things like bullet drop and distance is part of Battlefield's identity and just makes it just like every other FPS sniper
That's why I'm a launch skipper 😂
meh at least snipers are a lil bit less annoying to deal with
You know what I hope gets added when the game comes out. A steam game profile, That would be sick.
Im glad they turned down the glint
I think assumes that a large % of the players online are actually clued into the discussion about the game like that, which I just think isn't the case
Especially at launch when it's filled with new players
I think it will make snipers even more annoying, they didn't nerfed sniper velocity, bullet drop, base damage or sweet spot, you just won't be able to see them 
Use your points at the point shop for a cool background or something like that.
Theres tons of vids that will be made about the meta guns for things. Plenty of people search up "Best weapon in game" and will find discussions and videos for it. They dont need to partcipate, everyonehas already done it for them.
good thing 80% of them can't hit their shots
I always figured 3 shots to limbs, 2 shots to chest, and 1 shot to the head is fine for sniper damage.
they need to bring suppression for snipers
Fr, not like BF3 suppression that affected bullet spread, but just visual supression
lil scope sway would be nice
If every sniper is doing it, then I agree it would be too oppressive. That would be 6 snipers per side per round on average that are pointing and clicking at range. I just don't think everyone who is sniping is going to be doing it, and its more likely to be a % around 50%
it's still bad game design
snipers rn are overtuned with sweet spot, auto zeroing and no supression
Like if you are 100% locked in and are being suppressed and want to risk it you can at great disadvantage, but not to the point where point blank shotgun will do nothing
When it comes to the "skill gap" being closed with respect to sniping I think it simultaneously rewards good movement on the map to avoid sniper fire. Using smokes, cover, etc, which more than offsets the fun, and gives the bonus of making sniping way more satisfying for the ones skilled enough to use the tactic
Maybe if they made the range finder have a range from like 100-250m 250-500m so it still took some adjustments or skill but you don't have to be a pro or make 5 adjustments before you get a kill.
I feel like if youre that guy who can snipe people consistently across the map to hold down a flag I feel like you gotta earn that.
I like the idea of just bringing back how it used to be for BF3/4 with zeroing your scope, but make it in 50m increments instead of 100m
I personally enjoyed the sniping in the beta, but I'll never be a recon main so I didn't exactly mind the game making it easier on people like myself, but the rangefinder might of been too easy
I think this is so easily countered though, with a bit of smoke and good movement its not that difficult
I feel the second dmr was honestly better than running a sniper most of the time. Just spamming 2 shots to the body from 300 meters
Sniper worst class they need all the buffs they can get
Idk if I would say that. There was already enough snipers in the beta lmao. I know there's counters but it doesn't make it less annoying to see 10 snipers camping in their spawn.
Based on beta stats they were least played
I just hope there’s a ton of different 1st person melee animations. 2042 melee animations are so jarring because they are 3rd person views.
Real.
The sniping in bf6 is the easiest of all the frostbite bf games
correlation does not mean causation
19% Recon in beta and I think only 50% will take advantage of the attachment
Minimal bullet drop, range finder attachment that autos to the exact distance, fast bullet travel
You forget the reality that assaults will soon realize they can dual wield a sniper and an m4a1 while using a spawn beacon
What are the chances of commander mode coming back
I would argue the recon in the beta was extremely strong, TUGs, Beacon and C4 were crazy if you doing a CQC flanking playstyle
As long as it takes like 50 points or something it'll probably be fine. They do have to make it accessible for New players
I liked it more than assault but the beacon moving to assault is huge imo
Beacon was the overall strongest gadget for objective harassment imo.
yeah I might actually play assault now with that change
They prob had least winrate too
is there any evidence for this?
Personally recon should have rao or blast cos gadget in bf6
they should have the blasco gadget
I gave stats from beta and you literally ignored it so why care abt evidence
Yea because half of them sat in spawn the whole game lmao.
you do realise low pick rate doesn't mean the class is weak
if you weren't a numpty that sits at spawn with a sniper getting 1 kill every 3 minutes you'd realise that the class was really good
but it does say on avg the amount per class you can expect
Most competitive games the highest pickrate is usually strongest and lowest is usually weakest unlesss ppl just like looks of character or whatever
But also to be fair we only had one map that sniping was even fun on
But theres not even any cosmetics yet its just classes really and its open weapons
battlefield isn't a competitive game tho
I want 3 things to happen before launch:
-class lock the sniper in open weapons to recon to promote more recon play and less assault play. The sniper is the most class defining weapon type.
-nerf or class lock the hammer melee weapon. For the former make it take 2-3 swings to break through.
-make sniping have less bullet speed and/or more drop. Also remove the ability to auto zero with the range finder.
a majority of the players in the beta were just doing whatever, I doubt many people were actually evaluating class viability outside of them feeling the urge to snipe or whatever
Its arcade shooter ppl pick the most fun class and its usually means most strongest class
Assault is overall the best solo class imo
assault is not the strongest class
Assault should only be able to have a shotgun as a gadget no dmrs
support was more sustainable for solo players imo
You mean for the secondary weapon?
I would argue assault was the weakest class in the beta
Omg what
If I'm not mistaken it was a gadget slot
their class gadget is pretty bad
weapon sling is a one trick pony
Assault had grenade launchers that can unads you and do like 60% hp with wide aoe
I gotta disagree dual nade launchers was kinda funny to spam
Assault is pretty bad now ngl
Support APS in the final game 😛
They decoupled fast hp regen and faster strafe speed perks
I meant the stim, the GLs were pretty good
Stim useless but assault had passive that makes them heal faster
Oh yea I kept using it like the stim in call of duty
or I could just play support with the supply crate and regen instantly + the ability to revive any teammate
It doesn't work though, that's the issue, it doesn't give you hp or doesn't start your hp regen
The health Regen made supports super important.
by far the best class in the game for infantry players
Tbf the hp regen delay in bf6 is 5 seconds vs other battlefields having way longer periods
Yea that's my point is was a let down lol, but supports are important because of it
with open weapons I think the medic should be relegated back to assault lmao
Bf4 was like 15 seconds
I think assault is the strongest in multiplayer but the weakest in the battle Royale
I think dual weapons, spawn beacon, launchers, and that ladder give assault a clear playstyle as a sorta breacher
it should be like 7 seconds, 15 is way too long
Yeah it should be like 7. 5 is too quick
5 seconds is good, they should revert hp regen change though
yeah they're like a psuedo-squad leader
BF6 has fast TTK already, it shouldn't take 30 seconds to get back to fight 😂
It was 20 HPS before it’s 10 HPS now.
Yeah, fast regen was good
It takes max 10 seconds. (Not accounting for suppression)
It makes you need to play as a team more though every class has a place.
15 seconds, used to be 10
5 seconds waiting for regen to start, 10 seconds waiting for hp to refill
I mean I think they did that change to promote support a bit more idk.
it should be fine on the larger maps
Support already bypasses hp regen though
yeah having too slow of a regen just makes support the de facto infantry class
I would like to see DICE try manual healing again
Curious to see if there are under barrel anti vehicle launchers
If you're playing with your squad Regen is not a problem. Or just playing near your team there's bound to be one support
If so then support+bag is really flexible
Could work if everyone has like 5-10 med pouches lol
Or stims
Kinda like BO4
yeah I was thinking something like attrition from BFV, except everyone could carry 5 heals, along with some downtime to heal where you can't use your gun
I mean at least everything is more balanced then 2042. I don't even feel like playing support on that game
Support is the only thing I do play on 2042 these days
I just wish this game didn’t have dog water map design man
I personally don't see a point. Unless I have to get kills with grenades for a challenge.
I actually liked the mechanics of that one
They need to bring back parcel storm with the ship crashing onto shore
I just like to help the team. That’s really it. I find medic gameplay the most compelling.
Support is busted in 2042 what
I use medic to heal myself and ignore my teammates

Play falk, run the SFAR with 3 under barrel grenade attachments, use the ammo box, run smoke grenades
You have a healing gun for yourself and allies and every ammo box you throw down gives you 4 grenades instantly
It’s incredible how much better Falck is to the other supports.
The plus system breaks the grenade economy of 2042 massively.
The defibs are kinda useless and the engineer is almost a must with all the vehicles running around
Brother use the fragmentation under barrel launcher
AP 40mm 😛
Each deal 20 damage to a vehicle
I mean I never played when bf2042 was new so at this point team play is dead in that game so that might be why.
Yea after you get 300 kills with the ak to unlock it
I haven’t played the game since beta. Tried the beta. Hated it. Never bought the game until like 3 ish weeks ago for 3 bucks for the bf6 pass
It’s just really easy to assess the systems in 2042 immediately for what they are if you use the full sandbox in the franchise constantly
Aerial vehicles are busted, tanks are sitting ducks that die, ammo box is busted due to the plus system, and the guns lack recoil so TTK and utility is mostly what matters from weapons
The vehicles in that game are just Soo strong because how many there are so I just main engineer
Also smokes are required
Playing 2042 without smokes is mental. You will die way too often simply trekking across the horrendous map design of that game
I would argue the tanks are balls but the aerial vehicles are nutty.
The best tanks in the franchise easily go to bf5 handily.
They should revert smoke changes, every class should have smokes
Shizz could go through buildings like they were made of paper mache
I would disagree because tanks take no skill to top the leaderboard. Just play cautious and rack up kills
Ah yes play cautious
Against people running a specialist that have remote controlled rockets 💀
Just pre-ordered BF6 Phantom edition.. .can't wait. =o)
why did they do that 😭
But you can play cover and all the upgrades make it really hard to die
What smoke change 
If you say some insanity like:
only support can run smokes
Or
They reduced smokes to 1.
I’m going to lose my mind
Did mine like a week ago. Can’t come soon enough. I’m dying for a game to sink my teeth into rn.
As a support main did you try the defibs in beta
The beta over or they still doing some?
Labs testing only
Of course. Used it more than the drag revive in some cases.
Too much surströmming
Honestly the funnest time I had was getting a quad kill with the defibs
spent like $200 pre-ordering 2 games for oct.... then im going to spend another 200 for november
They were a little cracked in the beta
they will do everything except add numerical health values to the HUD
Only support has smokes 
Don't say that. We don't need them getting nerfed lmao
k, been trying to get back into the Labs discord again, i deleted by mistake but i keep getting the run around trying to e-mail EA and labs e-mail but i get no help.
I think they already have been. (I think, could be wrong)
I’ve watched a lot of the new footage but I haven’t seen any of the content creators playing support much
I hope they didn't kill them because the bf 2042 defibs make me hate support
what's wrong with the defibs?
I never use them in 2042. I just do the animation.
Yea that's kinda my point there's no use in pulling them out even.
that's fine
Agreed. I think 6 strikes a better balance. They’re faster than the drag.
But you could spam them like crazy. There was no cooldown on them.
they're worse than the BF1 syringe 😬
Nooo. You couldn’t revive nearly as quickly in 1
Maybe just make the charge longer instead of bf 2042 where's there's not even an animation you're just stuck there spamming left click with the defibs in your hand
Yeah I don’t think they should do anything too drastic. You should get a small cooldown after like 3 quick revives or something.
I got like 67 revives and 20 kills in the beta with only defibs so anything big nerf would just ruin the class for me
Make them work like in the old games
Kills are whatever. They still need to be full charged to get a kill so that’s fine.
They were better back then
In what way
nah 20 hp revives were awful
The spam revives in 6 bring you up at 50. And holding charge can get them to 100
The cool down, animation and pixel count
Just take away no charge revives and make charged revives be 50. That would be better without them feeling useless
charged revives at 50 is crazy
There is a new animation in the new footage. Better feedback too with a very visual blue lightning thingy when you actually get the rez.
I think a full charge should be full HP
Yea well you get like no health in bf2042 if a squad mate revives you at least so I'm used to it
well that's because they're not medic
Yeah only medics revive at full
2042 support is just the best class in that game and it's not even close
I would rather that then sitting there getting shot at for 3 seconds while I wait on my defibs to charge
The game is also dog water and I'm only playing it for free bf6 stuff (and cuz my friends are on it)
I'm still gonna have to disagree there. The TV rocket and c5 is too good to pass up on. Especially with open weapons
Luckily my grind is almost over. I’m at like 49. Between the challenges tomorrow and next week I’ll have it done easily.
Like that's actually so dumb that your rockets recharge
Unless the enemy team has a good heli pilot support is just too strong to pass up on. Even if you have a good heli pilot on the enemy team you want like 2 supports and 2 engineers
Engineer is on par honestly.
the ammo box in 2042 is busted
The TV missile is one of the worst gadgets in the history of the game
Chill on tank, constantly repair, hold objective, rpg7 to knock out incoming vehicles.
Yea and most of the vehicles dominating the whole team have a pocket engineer constantly repairing
F tier rage bait
We don't need that negativity in here. The copium is too strong for your kind
Thanks for confirming your lack of intelligence by being incapable of discerning facts from opinions
F tier rage bait (again)
Yea no your argument just lost validity because you tried to insult someone who disagreed with you but nice rage bait anyway
So you're saying.. this is just another echo chamber for delusional melons to bounce their shitty opinions off each other & have no opposing views?
I mean I love disrupting echo chambers on my free time 😄
Dang someone got butt hurt that his ragebait failed and he tried to lash out at random strangers because of it