#battlefield-6
1 messages Ā· Page 435 of 1
Hey guys, got an invite for the playtest on friday, but i need to click on the rsvp button to take part but i wont work?!?! Anyone got a fix for this problem or the same problem?
Also, friendly C4 on the cockpit messes with the first person UI so they have rectangles and blue icons in front of them
I heard they sent out a 2nd email to fix this issue
Ah thx you, hope it will arrive soon. The email says i have to click the button until 12 am today
what's wrong with the a-10?
The a10 makes my thing tingle
u can also check https://www.ea.com/playtesting
If the 2042 countdown is accurate: <t:1760108400:F>
Thank you !
All good! Neuken in de keuken by the way.
Xddd
Battlefield 6 will shock the world to its core
Absolutely will, question is whether that'll be a positive or negative shock.
Time can only tell. Either way, the world will use it as a new era moving forward
bf6 will take over fps games
I oddly would not mind if the game was delayed to mid november
Probably so. There's unfortunately a plethora of way DICE/EA can screw this up both in term of release and post-release decisions.
since I have a 6 hour exam I have to study for and take in mid october
i would not mind if it was delayed until next year
š£ļø
Best of luck on the exam boyo
Yeah... EA loves to screw things up man. At least it won't be like BO6... I hope
Pain is temporary, success is permanent
What's the subject? Far eastern pre-historic animal migrations?

The wise has spoken
Bf6 will not only take over fps games, but it will teach all of em a lesson
i wish they kept the beta running until the game officially launches
HELL YEAH!
HELL YEAH
I'm trying so hard to not fall into the Führerbunker mindset with regard to BF6, but I will admit that the game has infiltrated my cart on a few occassions.
Oh boy, sounds great. I remember a three hourish one I had to take once. Multiple choice then three very different essays on material we had no clue the contents of until the time started ticking.
is it too late to get an invite if I just joined the playtest platform now and completed my preferences? 
Well, Ive become a fallen soldier... But at least I know it will make 2042 nothing after playinf the beta
dental admissions test.
Includes:
perceptual ability
biology
chemistry
organic chemistry
reading section (very boring scientific articles)
math section (easy)
a bit over 280 problems in 4 hours and 15 minutes.
Check in and out time of 45 minutes (average)
break period of 1 hour (2, 30 minute sessions)
It is just based on drawing names out of a hat, so as long as they are still drawing, no.
I like dentistry but some of the stuff on this exam has no actual relation to the field
Oh dear, an aspiring dentist in our midst.
One of the most well paid jobs
I don't really wanna be a dentist exactly. I want more difficult procedures. The goal is maxillofacial surgery.
Tragically, all medical professionals here are criminally underpaid.
In my country they turn golden
My man wants to time travel to 1919 and do facial reconstruction surgery.
Damm
This inflation gonna kill us all
it's more like tooth, jaw, and gum surgery.
Fair enough, either way, best of luck, chappy.
some degrees of skull and mouth but mostly those 3
tbf 2042's sheer development cycle if you showed its details to any sane human being
they would also say before its release that: yes this will be a steaming pile of dog water
without even seeing gameplay I would argue
I could detail that if you would be interested
I'm a nerd
Tbf, after playing the beta for BF6, BF2042 feels like a step backwards. Obviously im used to it now, but man that took a while
yeah but 2042's failures and why bf6 is even remotely as good as it is has a lot to do with
very odd choices from ea compounding with 2042
and back pedaling on those choices with time, budget, a good dev lead with experience in the industry (vince zampella), etc for bf6
the details of those choices range from the game lead of 2042 formerly being the game lead of candy crush mobile (ie a yes man) to covid railing the entire production in many spectacular ways to Executives feeling the game was "ahead of schedule" based on concept art
Well the BF6 devs havenāt touched a BF before
and a loooot more which was wayyyy worse
Hence why it plays like cod
they also brought in experienced developers who know what they're doing
From other titles
some of the best veterans at respawn were repositioned to lead this game
those fellas have been in the industry since the original cod leaving infinity ward after mw2 (2009)
Hence why the Frostbite engine was so hard work with for 42 lol
No one left with the proper experience or expertise on it
it hadn't been significantly updated since 2016. Most veterans left with the new creative direction 2042 was going in
why EA would do an engine update for their game of a large scale with nobody experienced to work with it?
now of all times (when they want to implement business practices that would cause veterans to leave)
people said this about bf3 when it came out
who knows
Cause clever management
i just dont see how its similar to cod at all lmao if i did the movement i did in cod in bf6 id usually always get gunned down because ADS times are so much slower after jumping or sliding
One thing that has always confused me is how stakeholders can push for stupid mechanics that are universally distained within gaming circles. Like, given the amount of cash-money these people have, you'd think they'd be good at research and reasonably want the game to succeed so they can make money off of it.
they need buzz words for share holders. Executives need something at investor meetings to make investors confident in their shares to not sell
Most shareholders donāt know about the product in reality
"ah yes we have this 128 player huge thing with major engine updates never before seen with a BR"
They just see numbers
"after apex has done well we felt it best to actually shift to a hero shooter"
I got an invite from BFlabs to test it out. How does it work? Has anyone done this before?
"seeing the success of a game like tarkov we felt maybe doing an extraction shooter would be best considering the market of hero shooters right now"
I get that but I still don't get why they wouldn't do research on it to see why some elements are a bad idea.
All of what you would be asking would be under the NDA you signed, there should be an email/discord for you to ask questions.
stuff like that is what makes a game like 2042 only have 1 year and 3 months of actual post production development time
the game being in concept and pre production for 3 years and 9 months is insane
Because thatās too much work to do for an investment
Thanks
Itās large corporations that usually hold majority shares in EA, not individual shareholders
They just have businesses analytics that look at their numbers and decide to execute or not
their new buzz word is thankfully something easy where they can't screw up "we have given the reins for our next title to a veteran in the game industry."
Okay, yeah, that's fair enough.
thank the lord
and pass the ammunition
Even Take Two (parent company of Rockstar Games) has share holder meetings. They also have to throw buzz words and expectations in there
idk how any sane person thought having the game lead for your major ip should be someone whose only major prior work experience as a game lead was flipping candy crush mobile (this was for 2042)
thank god it's no longer that person
And weāll all stay free
"What a time to be alive"
You posited it was for a yes man and maybe so, I think it was because the one who has experience with that addiction-forming rabbit role was probably wanted to try to create a similar style success with cash flow.
genuinely insane how contradicting the marketing and lore/theme of the game was
its so clear that there was a massive difference in who thought what about 2042
I feel it's more so likely for a yes man. A guy like vince wouldn't stand for 3 direction shifts no matter the reason
Apex Legends was the driving factor lol
An infinite cash stream
Idk the rest of the song.
well the opposite actually
2042 was in development prior to apex. It was originally slated to be the major BR game EA wanted to push
i also blame shitty deadlines for 2042s failure since the dev team were tasked to make a game JUST for BR but a year into dev they did the ol switcheroo and asked for a classic BF experience
then they had the audacity to not give any more delays
EA didn't put much effort into apex, respawn and Vince did. They screwed with it post launch once vince left handling apex.
I honestly canāt get behind or believe the āit was a BRā stuff.
Yeah some elements look like it could have been, but itās such a bewilderingly stupid idea that I canāt even imagine ea would do that
it's a lot more than that tbh
definitely is, i just dumbed it down a ton
it shifted from initally being a mainline BF game, to being a dedicated BR, to being a hero shooter, to being an extraction shooter with specialists as a monetization option.
but its still large enough to be a major reason
thats even worse lmao
imagine being a dev that just joined DICE and having to deal with all the changes
it canned its br because it saw no reason to make a BR after:
A: firestorm failed
B: they didn't want to create competition with Apex at that time in the market. It would be making competition for your own IP
It seems like 2042 will be more popular at launch but bf6 will be more positive
If I had a controller of any kind, I would currently spam the X button to express my doubt.
popular in all the bad ways lol
is there any chane a BF2042 coin carried in BF6?
Popular as in player count
The amount of people playing and talking about it
like the currency?
again not popular at all. the talk surrounding the game was negative. the beta was poorly received. the initial player base was low. the player base rapidly dwindled within a month
yes
i think bf6 cosmetic system is alot different so they probably wouldnt carry over
camos coming back and supposedly different parts can be customised on the kits except the class identifiers
Popular doesnāt always need positive
Battlefield camos have always been lame
The word you're looking for is infamous
im fine with them if theyre free
skins should be paid/obtainable through challenges like in 2042
or notorious
Battlefield Currencies have never carried over before, likely will not this time.
If you have some, best to use for tier skips at this point.
i agree, camo should be customizable in the attachment
Popular works fine for what I said either way doesnāt matter
I liked BF4s camos, they were grounded and realistic. Granted some outliers like the DICE (LA) / CTE camos and what not but still.
That one camo I was able to access during the beta looked nice.
Language depends on social contexts and such, and using popular language negatively in some contexts could work. But when comparing two titles like bf6 and 2042 directly you should use language with more subtext/connotation imo.
It's like saying a hearty welcome or a cordial reception mean the same thing. They technically do but the connotations behind them paint distinct imagery and feelings.
Tbh I wouldn't mind an ability to repaint various components on the weapon separately, similar to Ghost Recon Breakpoint.
Breakpoint is ass compared to wildlands imo
really wish custom emblems could come back but its always more harm than good sadly
Well, I used Breakpoint as an example because my only memory from Wildlands is eating ice cream and becoming immortal.
lol what
IF we see the return of platoons, I wouldn't mind having custom emblems as a platoon size dependent feature.
I think they are gonna follow a very similar system when it comes to skins from 2042 but obviously more realistic
yeah similar to payday 3, camos should not be applied to all corners of the weapon
yea no doubt, that model makes quite a lot of money while still being accessible for most f2p and with grunt soldiers coming back i doubt most people would even care if they didnt have any
Payday 3, what a disappointment. Single player is still technically a "beta."
My PC at the time wasn't the best so when me and a few friends went to assault a convoy in a heli they all died while the enemies didn't render for me so therefore I was immortal and could revive all of them and I happened to be eating ice cream irl at that time.
Is BF price gonna stay 69.99 after release as well?
you need to wait for a good steam sale tbh.
Seems like s Ubisoft game
Yeah exactly if they stick to their word on having grounded skins it will be really take it or leave it you wonāt feel like you are forced to buy shit
Oh yeah.
IIRC BF doesn't go on sale for almost a year after release
Iāve been playing since 1942 so itās good to see the game going back to a decent place
That's generally how these games get their best price drop offs
i agree, a heist that only a little. but im talking customizable weapon camo
Beta was great but not holding my breathe
if they do stuff like giving us irish's tombstone skin for free itd be peak
and it was really easy to do
For at least 6 months probably why ?
correct.
This might be the first game I'm purchasing full price near launch since borderlands 3
Was just asking to know whether I should buy now or wait for release
Wait for release.
Still havenāt managed to play it cause I gotta make an account to get on but I make an account then try sign in and it says passwords incorrect so I change it and it tells me password canāt be the same as previous one no matter what š
the preorder bonus is a skin that's kinda eh
Yeah hopefully man
Why would the price go up/down after preorder phase is over ?
Breakpoint is good in its own way imo .. i think they leaned a little too much into "survival" for their fanbase (and it was pretty buggy at first)
I'm not preordering tbh
Even how bf4 gave you multiplayer items from the campaign Iād love that to come back
Sounds about right.
Either way if you like the game and know you will play it might aswell preorder
Usually preorder price is higher than release price since it contains extra stuff no?
they r working on a new Ghost Recon game
No ..?
... and Div 3
Yep, I'm rather excited for that.
whats ur opinion on battle pickups?
no
Only reason I am is for tombstone pack š„
me too š
preorder price is never more than launch price
Like the weapons you could find scattered around the place ?
yea
Bring it back personally they weāre great
honestly, there needs to be an option for the skins:
1 - keep skins on
2 - toggle skins off
3 - toggle skins on, but only what you want to see so that you can see those who are wearing those specific skins. example, i can only see the no-pat skin in the nato assault, the bf3 us recon in the nato recon, the bf4 chinese support on the pax armata support, and the bf4 chinese engineer on the pax armata engineer (customization)
Some were shit some were OP
Imma be real. The chances of me using that skin post launch are beyond slim. I swear almost every pre order skin I've got or seen someone else get they never use at some point
i want nato to stay as tan and green while pax as black and whatever color the player wants
choices are like the easiest way to please everybody tbh id be surprised if they dont include it
If they do this then they better make the most outrageous skins ever tbh
Yeah thatās fair if you arenāt gonna use it no point spending money on a game that might not take off
I just want it cause it takes me back to bf4 days
would be nice but something something share holders not liking cosmetics having less "visual weight" and maybe making a consumer not wanna get it to "show off"
It's not even that tho like. I genuinely have 0 memory of a time I've used a pre order skin or have had a single friend or person I've met in an lfg post use a preorder skin
its a really thin line but i genuinely believe anime/cartoon skins could be a thing if theyre just spray painted onto the vehicle/weapon very subtly
it's up to the player on what they want to see
i for sure dont wanna see clowns in my battlefield
hell, i'd rather have tactical anime girls skins than have beavis and butthead skins in battlefield 6 /s
i think 2042 handled it well without breaking the immersion too much
most of the skins the game sells or allows you to earn generally make you just... not ever equip the pre order skin
ok jk on the anime girls
You like anime girls ?
we have nato engineer and pax armata scout
in a shooter? nah.
Some of them can be neat characters tho in their shows/manga
but all jokes aside, having anime girls as a skin is going too far
better to have a police skin running around than that
I wouldn't even want a police skin lmao
having the actual characters as they are in bf6 is way too much
Military Police 
Oh please no anime skins
which is why id rather them just be spray paints or smth
Anime girl gun skins are fine. In general gun skins can be more loose
ehhhhh
i'd rather be boots on the ground and be a nameless soldier than play as captain price

No thanks.
as in like their actual character from the show appear in the game itself and not as artwork or a separate decal/skin
š¤ what about locally hosted skins
like ones that can only appear to the user?
Nah that would be client side skins
But same thing so yea
You're not seeing what gun skin another player has unless it's like the current BO6 trash
I like cosmetics that fit the tone/vibe of the artstyle/aesthetic.
Halo and Battlefield have clear benchmarks for things that are clearly within and outside of the artstyle of those games
theres plenty of cases where soldiers customise their own guns and vehicles with drawings or decals so i dont really mind a lil personality thats in the same form factor
I think itās a knifeās edge issue. People would feel let down if you couldnāt see their $4.99 skin
I meannn most guns are full gray so if you see a glowing pink anime girl gun Iād think it would stand out
like halo straight up can do samurai esque armor (it has). The original halo was inspired by 90s to 80s pop culture including gundam and anime for a lot of its aesthetic choices.
Doesn't matter, it's a slippery slope that I would rather not go down.
i feel like warframe does cosmetics well, allowing verified creators on steam to make their own models whilst fitting the tone of the game
ghost in a shell contributed a lot to the futuristic retro cassette aesthetic
Well locally hosted skins would technically be free your thinking about client side skins š
So I guess we're not allowed those 2042 BP skins because they are orange?
only bad thing tbh EA gets money hungry so damn easily
Tragically so, yes.
Kj donāt lie, you have a anime as your banner you love anime girls
Explain, I donāt think I understand
How would a locally hosted skin be free
š„ i hope you stub your toes, you damn feet lover
wtf ? I love oranges
Modification
There is a legitimate consideration for cheapening the product to some degree
They don't completely hate and disregard the sizable demographic that wants the game to be atleast slightly grounded
Otherwise the game would be full neon slop from the get go
Bananas > oranges
The banana bee ??
Itās a public company, so itās their objective unfortunately
Change your name to it then if you really think that option is valid
ā
Yessir
Yeah thats obvious to me, I just feel like if they saw anime skins becoming a big success theyd be willing to push the boundaries further
The most beautiful thing ive ever seen in my life, is a bananana, next to a bananaaaaaaa!!!
Okay fine you got me 
albeit theres a possibility where that isnt the case
Banana! Banana! Banana!
Girls Und Panzer crossover when.
inb4 ea makes battlefield anime/weeaboo version
tbh I struggle to choose a favorite fruit
Hell I used to hate honey dew but then I discovered the rare 1% instance you get truly fully ripe honey dew
sign me up
I hope they stick to realistic, grounded skins. I don't care that there are velcro cat ears some people put on their FAST ballistic helmets in Ukraine, or that some guy in Afghanistan put an anime girl sticker on his rifle. I don't think it belongs in the type of game Battlefield strives to be.
(joke)
I chase this high in fruit
Same here. Strawberry... Raspberry... Blueberry, green apple, red apple.... Too many
serious question, how will we recongnise the enemy based on uniforms after BF6 release with skins?
apples I'm hella picky on. Honey crisp all the way. Macintosh sucks
We don't know.
Gimme green apples and ill be a happy man. I love sour stuff
Hell yeah, amen to that.
they're fun but honey crisp is that perfect meld of sweet and sour
ur not wrong i feel like battlefield knows its serious but not too serious. Its a thing thats easily highlighted in old bf4 trailers
bf2042 kinda just did it for nostalgia bait
Boomers having an aneurism when they get told Battlefield has always been an arcade shooter
when has it not been
What? How long have you been sitting on this information?
Thats true... I just love to go full sour because... Idk man, its addictive as hell
no joke they're a breed of apple that was intentionally cross bred by the university of minnesota's apple breeding program.
A lot of people think BF is a milsim
those people are unfun and stupid
lmfao it definitely isn't.
At most it's a realism-leaning arcade shooter.
This is a milsim, here we follow the chain of command and only deploy as ordered!
And I rarely use that term
Realism is getting blown up by a tank and getting defibrillated
straight up this is the only reason milsims exist in BF and battlefront 2. They're there to create this stupid power dynamic of ranks that limit the tactics and things you can use in a game so people can feel "superior"
although i do wish more infantry actually gathered around the tank to push and use it as cover
BRUH
i feel like people underestimate how good a full squad on a tank and an ifv on one team could be when trying to push or hold objectives
Yes. Also why roleplay server exists in other games. Its people finally having power they lack IRL
nah good roleplays can be genuinely cool. It's like dnd it's improv
But a sticker decal on a gun is unrealistic, apparently
there's also bad roleplays
we don't talk about those
It's like saying milisms suck (relative to things like bf milsims and battlefront 2 milsims) when arma exists
MW19 larpers š
I mean, not entirely true. I have been in a variety of milsim groups for Arma games since like 2015 and some of them are like that, with the "sir" and "attention on deck" shit but those tend to die off rather quickly. My current milsim group is just people who like more structured enjoyment, where the chain of command acts more as a method to handle administrative tasks.
Well that is a different sort of roleplay, when itās just structure like that
I still remember when a bunch of buddies and I found this super douchey role play server in the battlefront 2 discord and they thought they were "so professional".
We challenged their role play to a 20 v 20 game on the xbox japanese servers (they were console players and my buds all had xboxes and pcs).
We absolutely demolished them it wasn't even close
They insisted on 4 rematches and got murdered every time
They had stupid rules like: oh you can't play x class unless you're y rank.
ohhh you can't use these guns or this star card.
OHHH only the top rank players (the ones who sucked balls at the game) can play the heroes
meanwhile me and my friend Vesh just molly wopped them as Anakin and obi wan with our other 18 buds railing them with all the tools the game's sandbox had ā ļø
hell we even had a bot to play star wars music in the background (we switched to fortunate son and immigrant song when we boarded their capital ship and blew it the hell up)
truly wonderous times
I wonder what battlefield could of been as a milsim
Probably HLL.
Likely not as popular tbh
HLL still plays like battlefield lol
frankly idk how it would release the time it did as a milsim
the technology for that wasn't really there at the time
it made its mark being what it was at the scale it was at the right time
Boring camping
and mostly continued innovating its franchise from there
A very very slow, slow battlefield, haha.
I still remember having a two minute respawn penalty from blueberries running into my artillery fire(and some shots that were just too close).
Popularity, sales, sure would be much less. However, as a game could it be better. I feel, itās a paradox, an arcade type game would obviously sell better. Although, on the other hand, I feel a milsim would āenhanceā the Battlefield experience. But that being said, would be a greater contradiction to the āgamesā objectives set out by EA ect.
I love when blueberries bomb the objective and get 9 friendly kills and 0 enemies
Thatās true
And use all the ammo resources
Always give them a good old headshot when I play as commander

I somewhat disagree
a milsim is not what battlefield is
Dun dundun dun
battlefield started as a fun arcade shooter
No, this is Patrick
and still is. It's all about a crazy fun bombastic sandbox mixed with moments of strategy and coordination
a RenDezook and sending a c-4 tank to the top of shanghai tower are as much battlefield moments as the slower and more tactile gameplay
Only in battlefieldā¢
Don't forget attaching c4 to a jeep
Did my first RenDezook two days ago, jumped out and RPGāed the enemy
strategy
Cant even fly planes ;-;
an enemy or an enemy jet/heli?
I never got a tank on top of shanghai. But I did get an LAV once
I removed all the enemies with an attack helicopter
the fellas and frankly the whole server were losing it lol
On Shanghai
Battlefield subreddit is controlled by EA, as soon as you critique map size you get shadowbanned
i can type anything else, anywhere no problem
as soon as I critique BF6 I get shadowbanned
Really?
yes
i made two comments
one with BF3 helicopter looking at kharg island
and one with bf6 helicopter looking at liberation peak
for comparison only
instantly got shadowbanned
How u knew u were shadowban
and you're certain you didn't use any particular language?
you have stats under comments on newer version of site, no views at all, your profile picture gets hidden and you cant use messaging system
Not just map size Iāve had similar experiences just critiquing other games by EA
is battleyard 6 offensive?
Damm
so i am not the only one
some mf posted how BF2042 had very bland and boring looking maps
and it had bunch of upvotes
Nah I copped a 3 day time out for talking about poorly of apex legends š
i am no fan but they were very pretty
and you have instantly some dudes agreeing
i see people popping up the "looks like bf1" comments as well
i am like...where? how does mirak look like bf1? just because it has trenches?
anyone who though sobek was big will be furious on release, mark my words
Arcade games plays better too
Real war is miserable, video games should be fun
people should watch ukraine war if they want to see mil simulator in real time
its just bunch of young men dying to drones
bf3 was most realistic shooter of all time, the only difference was instead of drone its ah1z viper farming people at caspian border/noshahr canals
So do I, I also critique my own argument. Because, what a āBattlefieldā experience is has changed and adapted somewhat.
They do, especially in a world where their is a demand for instant gratification.
It just installed it for me and runs via both lmao
it's basically the same as Ubisoft when u try to play R6
Finally got the grind done in 2042 now to just do the weeklies and I will have everything from the battlepass
Low key hating that grind
Yeah well people can buy it now if they really donāt wanna play but I canāt imagine spending money on a dead game only to spend 100+ more on the new game
lmao the missions arent that hard to complete just play like 2-4 hours per week and thats it
but it isnt fun at all
And i bet 99% of people dont even know its like 80% playercards and other useless shit
Yeah especially this weeks completed em in one game
all I want is that chinese engineer skin
Yeah but not gonna lie
Need that megalodon player icon
I got both 
Ok but would you pay for it š
I wanted everything up to the Chinese engineer but hey if Iāve gone that far I might aswell finish it
Oh not in a million years š
Weeklies will give people enough points to complete the pass, it's not efficient to AFK farm on portal
Iām Australian so if I brought the entire pass from level 1 itād be 130+$ ontop of the 100-150$ Iāll spend on bf6
yeah im going to finish it too
No fucking thank you
I donāt hate the 2042 skin at the end but I canāt say itās the game I wanna be reminiscing on while playing 6
Yeah I didnāt even afk
Casper drone farming or just playing normally got me the ranks I needed
Iāll scream like a child if I get meleeād but a dude with the 2042 skin
I wonder if the whole of nyc is going to be burning / destroyed on the campaign š¤ perhaps you can see one special tower fallingš¤
RELEASE THE DAMN GAME 
I NEED IT NOW
Don't be sad that's just how it works out sometimes
Iām so confused
What do you mean by that Edmundo
You don't remember the voice line meme Angel had in 2042?
i dont know a single 2042 characters name other than Irish
Oh nah I guess that one flew right over my head I second what dot said by not knowing any other operator name
I only know Irish and the ones Iāve been using to grind š
One thing Iād love to see carry over/keep being released when bf6 is released is the battlefield friends player card backgrounds
I doubt it will happen but would be great
Oh god the stealth jets in BF6 have thrust vectoring
I'm glad first season isn't one map but like three even if 1 or two of them are remastered ones. Are we gonna get a Dirty Harry revolver in the first season?
what matters is the turn speed
i didnt even see if it was buffed in a clip
yup, you will enjoy slightly more realistic jets or else
Hopefully no realistic shotguns others be too OP
ngl after dealing with 2042s shotties i'd enjoy slightly more realistic shotguns in 6
more akin to 4 would be good
TFW I want realism in my games but not that kind of realism
Bf6 player count dropped to almost 0, what a flop
Before nerf/removal the master key was realistic
typically when people ask for realism in something like BF its an emulation of an aspect of realism they're actually asking for
I mean hey jets are going to be hilarious in this game
Need to implement blackouts
looking forward to the dogfight evolution tbh
You are pulling too much Gs. Blacks out and crashes
We have attack jets that can fire AGMs in the opposite direction of their flight path, stealth jets than can actually thrust vector, and all kinds of stuff
Speaking of war thunder we should get a yearly April fools event
My biggest concern was that in the beta air to air dogfights became largely tricky because of how quick the spread on the jet cannons occurred. This made dogfighting annoying because you couldnāt track your target effectively
this just sounds stupid
rapidly increasing spread on jets? do they have arms and muscles?
There is no rendezook sticker
Weāre⦠weāre gonna read that one more time. The main cannon on the F-16 in the beta had too much spread which only increased when firing making tracking air targets, specifically other jets, difficult
the gun barrels must be made of plastic X)
i'm not arguing against you lmao
Ah
its more like
"rapidly increasing spread on an aircraft mounted main gun" is hilarious
hope its reduced or removed
ANGEL DOES IT AGAIN!
do we know if the Campaign will have Multiplayer unlocks?
You have to play on hardest difficulty to unlock multiplayer
With the teammates I get im surprised they managed to press the Play button
Sooo spawn beacon was moved to assault. But if weapons stay open. We will just have assault players equiping bolt guns with beacons in the mountains... What was solved here?
Assault is the new recon
Pretty much what I'm thinking.
I will call this class⦠ASSAULT RECON
Recon will just be recon cuz it will only provide intel
You can only crouch sprint if you beat the campaign 10 times without dying
with the beacon, a ladder and open weapons. yeah pretty much, also run an smg if someone gets close
Oh right... Double primary. 𤣠... Oh man!
So its also a rush clash now?
Assault rush recon it is
Should just give assault some healing item for vehicles and humans
All in 1 class
and it has the launchers lmao
It comes equipped with pocked vehicles to btw so u can deploy vehicles on the go
Double primary cuts the ammo pool by a lot. So an Assault with Sniper Carbine is going to get 2 kills before needing to resupply
Spawn a plane in the middle of a building!!!
Just respawn on your beacon when out of ammo.
it has a beacon, just respawn. dnt think campers care
What kd
If they dedicate themselves to the mountain they could drop the second primary for another launcher. Get all the ammo back if it becomes an issue. So many options!
y'all see the support and engineer up on a tower with snipers, trophy systems, anti vehicle, and infinite ammo. lol
Yeah... I somewhat enjoyed open weapons. But the more I think about it ... It just kills balance for a little bit of freedom.
If they choose one they will 100% go with open
Only 1 month left soldiers!
kills the balance and ppl will just meta chase, removes any need to run other weapons. In closed if the meta is an AR for example, a team full of Assaults would suffer
Ladders are gonna be so abused
on that note in a closed system, the Engineer should get the carbines and make the SMGs available to the rest. No point on running smg when the M4 is just better.
Agreed, it was already shown as all the default modes in the beta. Locked was only there to quell the complaints.
yeah open should be a portal thing
you can escape open weapon, but you cant escape bland, terrible and uninspired map design
That's just weapon balance. The m4 could be nerfed to the ground by launch
Drop the game
Only like one of them is like that in bf6
m4 isn't inherently better than SMG's just by name. DICE gotta balance that stuff
"They ruined battlefield". In old man voice in battlefield friends
Is there actually any information if the current BFC from 2042 will transfer to BF6? @gaunt arch
I highly doubt it
No
just an example, but Carbine feel better as a class weapon imo, but it wont matter since they're going open
BF4 is less balanced than 2042
Balance is unrelated to class locks
I would argue BFV is less balanced than 2042 too despite having stricter class locks than BF4
Hard to swallow pill right there
Saying anything bad about bf4 will get you attacked by the nostalgia nerds
bf4 is perfect game after all
so perfect i still remember getting banned for sniping the heli pilot because literally all anti air measures are banned
bf4 was riddled with "hackers"
They should keep them unlocked imo, it makes no difference but there are more of the silent majority played with unlocked weapons than with locked weapons. Class lock advocates are most likely minority. Keeping them both in main matchmaking makes no sense when Portal already allows whatever class lock you want to implement. You can probably disable entire weapon classes and give everyone an AR or something too if you want to lol.
One month away from release
BFC?
in game currency
Wut? Only Closed weapons playlist was Conquest, and Open had every game mode
Game currency
second weekend, the one I had more time to play, the closed playlist was both conquest and breakthrough
Guys, I think BFC is the game currency
Class locking or unlocking divides playerbase for no reason. DICE should pick a lane and give the other option in portal.
they did, open it is
It is
Like cod points, BFC=battlefield coins
Too many servers not allowing stingers and iglas was ridiculous
Glad air vehicles wonāt be much of an issue in BF6
Those who know: 
Those who donāt know: 
Fun server pls add to favorites
No stinger
No iglas
No rpg
Dont kill admin
No t-bagging
Have fun
I played open as I didnāt want to pick class because of the guns
bf4 fixed my marriage and my relationship with my kids
And I wasnāt even married prior to playing it, nor did I have kids!
playing 2042 with 10-15 people feels cool when youre tired of dying every 10 seconds
Ah, the downsides to private servers that always get forgotten
Depending on if an adult is running it the admin is just another internet janitor to deal with
Lol.... quit trolling
how long did It take yall to finish bf2042 pass?
hours or days? i got it yesterday
Wish EA/dice would remaster BF4 on consoles. The resolution is so poor that it's painful to play on the console. I think 2042 is fun but I just can't play it waiting for BF6. I've tried.
i agree with you but BF4 would not need remaster the game is perfect as it is like bf3 i kinda worried if they wanted to remaster BF4 it would go closer to COD gameplay or closer to 2042 its good as it is, but i agree 2042 isnt that game after BF6 beta while waiting for release.. helldivers 2 are here thank god
I know why they won't. They know if BF3/BF4 was remastered on console no one would be on 2042. At all.
well 2042 will die either way
When I mean remaster on console I'm just referring to res and textures. Leave everything else the way it is. That's what I mean. The res is below 1080p n console and just looks horrible.
Well, it's an older game, and it's perfect as is
The gameplay would be too slow for nowadays. Even if i'd like to see the endurance bar come back to slow the game a bit and be less callofish. only this would change the entire game
gameplay would be good..
In fact BF4 on consoles is unplayable because of the res and aliasing. It's so bad. You can't see in the distance. PC is fine though but the console is where I play the most so.
play it 10minutes in 2025 without nostalgia to feel that it would be good in 2025 unfortunatly
Understandable tbh especially on larger screens
im only on PC past 5 years i did good choice
well maybe u just miss the simple times not the game
I just moved to pc before the bf6 beta the difference in pc gaming from console is insane wish I did it sooner !
Sucks because honestly the only version of bf on consoles that looks decent visually is 2042 but it's not what I want to play. It is what it is.
Was using controller on pc but still worked super well
Didnāt feel at too much of a disadvantage which was surprising
thats what everybody saying i know PC is pricy but its only way to fully get on gaming
Facts
Yh I agree
Just got to wait for bf6
either way playing fast shooting game on console is ass
i cant say shit about racing games on console tho
The fps on pc definitely makes it so much better
yeah its overall just better for gaming
Like GTAV Legacy & Enhanced
New textures + RTX
Yes. Exactly. The gameplay is what makes it great but the visuals are so poor on console it's unplayable. Granted the game is old etc so I get it but the consoles we have today can easily match the pc at high settings.
But I know if EA/dice did that many would skip every other bf altogether.
I have 20 hours in bf4 the past 2 weeks lmao it's still great idk what yall smokin
To me it's easy money. Charge $10 quid for enhanced versions. I'd pay for it np whatsoever.
did i sold all my 10 ct cs 2 skins and my steam cards cause im broke but i want bf6 ? maybe
Are you blind. What are you smokin. The graphics are below 1080p and aliasing is piss poor on console. If you think playing BF3/BF4 console on a 65 inch OLED is fine. I want to know what your smokin. I need it.
71 ⬠steam balance rn
I play on pc
Gotcha. We're not talking about PC. We're talking specifically about console. Yes the PC is fine.
Ah I thought part of the convo was that bf4 gameplay wouldn't be fun in 2025 for some reason lol
Why not just get ea play pro
Wait til month of release and only pay $16.99 for it
one time payment > monthly payment
And if you happen to not like it you can save yourself money
Plus you get bonus skins
Just go to Blockbuster and get it for a weekend. Stop overthinking it.
no blockbuster in my country xD
Bro gonna roll up with tha redbox bf6 š
a good reshade to enhance it a bit ahah
How?
I genuinely don't notice the difference in graphics of bf3/4 and 6
Like yeah if you... aren't playing thr game and instead are looking for rocks and bugs on the ground the differences are obvious
Otherwise it's basically the same lol
this I agree with
The leap in graphics from 2013 to 2025 for some games is kinda pathetic and weak tbh
We definitely are in the Era of diminishing returns
i meant in details between BF3 and BF5
i dont consider bf6 a battlefield game
i am number 1 bf 6 hater
You will take our ray traced shadows that you wont ever notice for -50% fps, and you will enjoy it
didnt they said they will remove raytracing?
Real lmao
Gotta prop up the bit mining hardware market somehow
na its clearly not a battlefield
yes sir i will buy 3000 dollar graphics card for 50fps AI generated frames performance
i will do the needful
I can't say yet whether bf6 will be a "battlefield experience" or not tbh
The beta was fun, but I didn't get to play enough and on a wide enough array of maps to tell tbh
I agree with that. If you look at BF3/BF4 visually they were ahead of their time. They still hold up today when playing on pc. This new generation of devs just doesn't hit the same. The dice we knew before isn't the same as today. Not saying the devs of today aren't talented but the work of today doesn't hit the same. If you weren't around before you wouldn't understand.
Oi peasants
go look at arc raiders, thats old dice
Will BF6 have big maps like bf4
yeah true
no, best I can do is New Sobek Corner
All complaints aside
Bf6 has fantastic performance atleast which can't be said for many modern titles lol
easy to have good performance with CSGO maps
That's why arc raiders looks phenomenal and it plays well. Look whose developing it. You just proved my point.
No disagreement there. Absolutely.
i mean I am fully in agreement with you
it goes BFV -> Arc Raiders for old DICE
BF2042 and BF6 are abominations
weird to see people agreeing each other in a game
Lol. Agreement does happen.
It'd less "big maps" that's my concern and pacing and speed of the games
Quicker respawns, quicker health regen, wackier movement lends itself to lots of stupid Rambo larp gameplay rather than "battlefield" gameplay
so ill just hop in with pineapple on pizza
i dont judge tbh
yeah the ribbons dog tags everything, and the weapons all the weapons!
wish I could post images here
I think over time with seasons we'll see more big open maps. We'll have some at launch but I do see a positive future.
levelation is what we need
to show certain clowns just how small truly Sobek is
oh yes BF6 will have rly good future, hope devs dont fck it up
Bf3 and bf4 are still my beloved titles to this day
I'd gladly keep playing bf4 if I didn't have that looming kinda "angst" about the game population eventually puttering out and it actually dying for good and not having "liveliness" about it
best I can do is helicopter rocket pods damage dropoff after 100 meters
I want to see naval combat come back. That naval warfare dlc that came out. Memories.
it all can come
go home, u drunk
best I can do is that small puddle in Empire State
If they can fix the stupid land vehicles first, then yeah, sea would be cool
Massive battleships with sharks and spaceships coming from the oceanfloor
I really really want wake island and paracel storm again
Although driving the jeeps already did feel like trying to sail
Empire doesn't exist. Lol. That's the one map that I don't count.
šÆ
I've watched enough and played the open betas. If they want to impress me they can do it at launch.
iv seen so much leaks i just cant talk about that here so i dont get ban again
did you see Sobek?
They want me to convince myself to buy the game. It's not my job to do that; it's theirs.
i dont want another ban
If you want to see great big open maps for bf6 they're out there. Will not comment where. Do a Google search and the truth shall set you free.
Thankfully they ditched the ray tracing
Badlands is big map? Mirak Valley?
Who cares where now? The where should have been the beta.
Badlands is same size as liberation peak
Mirak Valley is the big one
A BF6 Campaign mission will be shown at TGS
Mirak Valley is big in theory, in practice its small
was it a product where you get it? if yes look at the details maybe you get it per email on release? if nothing stands there write a email to intel or the place you buyed it
two flags right next to HQ, village and trenches are basically unplayable
I Wonder which one it will be
only middle portion and C are playable
Probably the NVG mission or the mission where we parachute into Gibraltar
Anyone doing a wait and see or preordering?
@outer thistle why dont you move over to Call of Duty discord?
I really need to see BF4 vibes, because that's what I loved about the game. The open beta was too small maps and respawn killing too fast
wdym?
Ray tracing is too taxing. You can still achieve phenomenal lighting and reflections without it. It's not necessary all the time. It's really not. Would I like to see it yes but it's too demanding for what bf is trying to do.
if you defend this game, you are the one who should move to CoD discord
All I know is
I bought bf2042 for $3 thinking it can't be that bad
And oh boy. It really really was that bad, including the portal "bf3" modes
AWFUL
Though if they want to add ray tracing throw it on campaign only
I really will be happy if bf6 just isn't... THAT
Well beta told me it wasn't that
I am willing to buy BF6, but it needs to feel like BF4. BF4 was amazing
That would be a good trade off but we haven't seen the campaign yet so your idea depends upon how the campaign is.
did you buy it in a store?
BETA didnt convince me
did they asked you for your email?
i buyed too the phantom edition after first beta im still hyped
i feel sorry for you that it didnt.
me as a 34y boomer got huge oldschool bf vibes
Yeah probably give us the most āonly in battlefieldā mission
I agree the open beta didn't convince me either in the beginning because the small cramped spaces really irked me but I'll be spending a lot of time in the map editor for portal. So I'm good. Plus what I mentioned earlier about Google. The big maps we haven't played yet and from what I've seen they look great.
you need to use layout of given maps to build a map
you cant just do it from sratch
scratcg
Likewise been around since 42 and I gotta say ima be back on battlefield like itās back in the day the bf6 beta got me hooked
Donāt get me wrong thereās a lot Iād like changed/fixed but itās great
what makes me chilled about is the fact that the last weeks/months you saw how devs listened to feedback.
Still expensive tho, 69 euros...
I know but you can place objects around. Move things. Like that map with the mountain. On breakthrough it was so difficult because the first point was like seeing cigarette lighters at a rock concert. Snipers everywhere. I will fix that. Add more objects to block off that noise.
Yeah same also the beta build we got was months older then the build they were still working on so the finished product will be very different but very similar
it would be funny for community to make better map than DICE themselves, but because map is modified it wont get Verified status in Portal
100-150 AUD
Greetings gamers... in preparation for BF 6 I wanted to enhance my experience a little and need this channel's sage advice. First my system is an I7-13700, 32 gig ram My GPU is currently an RTX 3060 (8GB) and I've decided to jump ship back to AMD because I'm not a competitive gamer and want good stuff but doesn't have to be top tier so I'm probably going to get the Radeon RXāÆ9060āÆXT (16āÆGB). I was considering the RTX 5060 TI 16GB but I save 80.00 going AMD plus they are pretty close ...good enough for me .
My question: I'm wanting to finally move from 1080p to 2K only (not going 4k due to GPU strain) so I will be looking to get a monitor now for this since my RTX 3060 can handle it until I get the new card.
So, here is where you peeps come in... I'm wanting a 32" 2K IPS- HDR 400+ certified monitor and I'm thinking curved, high refresh rate, would like adaptive sync for both free and g-sync yada yada and wanted to see if you guys are using a 27" flat panel at 2K or using a 32" curved and would the pixel difference between the two be that noticeable? What are some recommendations? I'm looking to cap my spending around $250.00 and it doesn't have to be a mainstream brand as long is it is highly rated. Thoughts?
99 euros for me
I already have ideas on how I want to change some of the layouts of the maps. Not all were a problem but some of the placements were just piss poor.
Yeah brooklyns layout was terrible from spawns to objectives etc I hated that map
Thatās the only map I really had big issues with
You know that's going to happen. Absolutely šÆ.
9060xt should be paired with very good processors, cant pull the weight on itso wn
base is 69, premium 99
dude I'm running a I7-13th generation 13700 it is a "very good processor"
then you are set
Some maps in the open beta I liked. Had no issue with checkpoint placement but some were just terrible. I plan on fixing that. For sure.
I've got a cursed build
I'm running an i7-9800X and a 3070 ti lol
you are going to love capture points of Sobek and Badlands, I am sure of it! Worst in the franchise without a single doubt!
what type of monitor are you using. I'm thinking of getting a 32" 2K IPS HDR 400 + adaptive sync... or better to get 27" IPS Flat?
its a common thing to happen
even CS implemented custom maps in the official game
why is that cursed?
i am using a laptop, i just saw 9060xt benchmarks with 9800x3d
Because the i7-9800x is not only very very old now. But also a bizarro socket that's very rare
Empire needs work. Mountain map with the sniper rock concert needs adjusting. The Cairo map I enjoyed but the checkpoint placement needs to be spread more. That other map. Can't think of it. Same. Checkpoints need spacing.
naive af but I applaud the optimism to believe this is something EA will allow, they wont even allow server browser like BFV
I see. I don't know much of this stuff, old guy I am, but my research tells me my I7-13700 is pretty good and future proofed for a bit
32 is too big if you're sitting at a desk imo
Who knows. The launch versions may be different and I won't have to change anything. We shall see.
where do you plan to place the checkpoints my friend, there is legit no space to put them anywhere?
my point was that its not uncommong that communitys build "better" maps than the devs
Well yeah it's literally 4 generations ahead of the 9800 lel
You're probably good
yes but Valve and EA are pretty different companies, Valve +Steam have long history of community collaboration
I wonder if we can remove a checkpoint. See where I'm going. We don't know the specifics of the map editor yet so who knows.
3 flag liberation peak, or maybe 4 would be good conquest small map
so guys opinions on which monitor to get............see above
Exactly.
get the 24-27 inch mointor with 144hz
legit dont matter which one as long as it isnt from temu
Cairo didn't need all of those checkpoints. It really didn't. Same with the others you mentioned.
are 32" IPS Curved not good for 2K due to pixel density or ????
Your in my mind space with the map editor now ruthlezZ. Now your understanding.
temu sell PC parts as well?
just project the game directly onto your eyeballs. it curves itself
new dice has no balls, look at the whole map of liberation peak, forest and mountains included, they could move the bases all the way down the road, enable mountain above C to be playable and have objective at top, add cable you can latch onto and drop into either base map or forest, add another objective deep into the valley between the mountains looking at liberation peak, add one objective on top of each mountain. Boom, you have best Battlefield map ever made
For me 32" is just too big for me like I'd need a deeper desk
i think you can have 32 inch IPS displays in different pixel density options.
Also you're asking for a lot of features with a 250 budget
its mountain not map
I think the ones who will benefit the most out of the portal map editor in bf6 will be the old skool players.
yes, did you read my comment? imagine that map I just wrote
it would be one of the best
not getting feedback...is there a more appropriate place to post my question?
this is a bf server. ask in a server where you can find display nerds
Yeah bro. That would be awesome and is definitely workable. If I think what I believe the portal will be.
Is there anymore beta testing going to be available or is that it now until release?
i would never leave that map, ever
nothing till release
legit only thing i would play
Ah whatās this about battlefield labs then got told to sign up to get invited or something
check #battlefield-labs-discussion channel for that. its a private playtest that only a few people are invited to
oh, neat site
Same. Which is why this version of the portal can be game changing. The portal editor in 2042 I feel was a good idea but the scope of how it could be wasn't realized.
The portal mode in 2042 is a beta.
Dice should allow people to matchmake into Portal, just have filter to be selected called VERIFIED / CUSTOM and allow people to matchmake into custom maps like we discuss here
the fact this is not gonna happen is travesty
what kind of monitors are you guys using for Battlefield 6?
144hz msi laptop monitor
works very nice
not sure how big though
less than 27 inches 100%
i had 27 inch monitor before and if i build a new pc i will get one again with 144hz
I agree but who knows. We really don't know what the final version of portal will be. Until the game launches everything is really a work in progress.
we will see, right now i am extremely disappointed
in every way imaginable
Hell what you and I are thinking may not even be available to do. I hope our ideas do come to a reality though.
27 inch is the sweet spot for me
is that due to pixel density versus a 32" curved. I assume your 27" is IPS flat?
BREAKING: New look at #Battlefield6's campaign at Tokyo Game Show on September 26th.
ļøļø
ļøļø"13:00 to 14:00 ā Battlefield 6: Single-Player Live Showcase ā The developers and English voice actors of Battlefield 6 introduce the upcoming first-person shooter, including a look at the single-player story mode. Featuring executive special producer Phillipe Ducharme and senior creative director Roman Campos-Oriola."
ļøļø
ļøļøAccording to the Computer Entertainment Supplier's Association (CESA), #Battlefield6 will have its own booth at Tokyo Game Show where developers will talk about the appeal of this game, "including solo play and storytelling."
ļøļø
ļøļøfinalweapon.net/2025/09/09/tokyo-game-show-2025-event-stage-official-program-schedule-livestream/
i dont think it will be available, if it is damn liberation peak might become actual PEAK
I have an AOC 27" curved IPS 280 mhz 1ms gysunc monitor
If the portal map editor gives us the opportunity to actually alter the maps to our liking lll be happy.
BUT only 1080p
Is curved better or straight
thats 10 years away
Mine is flat yeah I just like the size of 27"
makes little difference
meaning the pixel density of a 27" flat versus a 32" curved is minimal visual goodness differnce?
I mean if you didn't like the beta you will probably not like the full game.
I mean there's no difference either way pixel density is not a factor with curved, the panel is still the same
1440p will be ok on 32"
probably? i am not gonna buy for at least a year, if it eclipses two i will never buy it
Don't have space for a curve. I do have two monitors though. One is pretty much a dedicated discord monitor.
How many Inches is best
i think 24 for fps
I think unless it's curved 27 is the way to go
27/32 is the defacto standard
then you will wait for BF7
is it worth to preorder?
but do not get an LCD monitor if you can they are terrible compared to oled
I respect his decision. I'm not gonna say go buy it or else
i am going to BFV, I counted 65 full eu servers yesterday
only you know the answer
so if you do a 27" flat only.. I"ve heard that before
what do you think sir
great. seems like BFV is still active
can't afford Oled but guess I'd get an IPS
I just think curved you want to go wide
idk. Did you play the beta?
i am surprised, its so active its crazy for a 7 year old BF game
That's fine just stay away from TN. Horrible
i dont. for some skins and a token. I dont want the stuff, but i will get the game
sadly i dont have the access
bf3 was dead in 2016
is there such a thing as a 27" curved wide or ultra wide ...?
like legit dead
I am talking about open beta
what about bf4 and 1
What resolution is the 32 inch is it 1440p?
I wish those skins were just solid black
bf4 is half dead, bf1 is going a bit smaller than bfv
no
it would be 2K yes 1440 p
Any other shooters you play Ruthless?
i played the whole beta with the hud off so yes, Skins being a real uniform is super important to me for recognising the enemy
well then its hard to know if you will like it or not. if you can afford it then sure. at the end of the day, it depends on what your specific situation is
It was black VS desert camo. pretty cool. afraid they will blend too much
any other opinion
Oh man I want adaptive camo to come back
i want EA to collaborate with Embark and TTKgames to make BF2142 remaster
i would have no life for 10 years straight
Or better yet make 2143
YES YE SYES
SHUHIA TAIBA FROSTIBTE ENGINE TITAN MODE
idc about next bf game without embark/ttkgames involved
thats the old dice
look at arc raiders, it screams battlefield
I guess you like the finals?
love the game, hate art direction
Arc raiders sounds like hazard zone
Arc Raiders is gonna be the BF6 Killer. š
fax
Plays different save for the BR mode in bf6
If it kills anything it kills the BR mode
Anyone play musket shooters? I enjoy holdfast myself
Yeah but from the beta, from what I saw, there's no real heart of BF in BF6 standard play...the BR was the only thing that might have saved them. Gameplay will get stale, small maps, no commander...fast paced instead of a balance between say Hell Let Loose and COD...it's leaning to heavily toward zoomer shooter.
yeeeeee
bloodborne is just something else
Nothing like doing one shot and then going stabby stabby
Fromsoft revitalised my interest in videogames
i am literally building PC just to run max settings future fromsoft titles
i am in love with miyazakis vision of video games
I haven't decided if I want to upgrade or get the PS6 next gen
ps6 will be 800 dollars and have no games calling it right now
This just depends on perspective of the series. This game has a lot of the "heart of BF" for those of us who came on to the series in BF3 days
I dunno I expect that launch of BF6 is gonna be huge, then 2 months down the road 80% of those players will be gone.
20% of remaining initial 500k players is still 100k players š¤·āāļø
bait
But financially, I think they're going to turn a profit...there's still hope for BF games, but they need to go back to BF2 and BF3...examine why they were regarded as the best...and emulate those games...instead of trying to cater to modern audiences with the zoomer mentality.
Well that is my limit for the system
It will have physical at least.
And no, I dont expect 500k concurrent for BF6 at launch...I expect 200-300k...cuz you have to remember the Beta was free, the asking price for this game is not worth what was shown...imo...and many people ain't gonna shell out 80 for something that isn't even really BF.
Im just not sure how you can think thats not what Bf6 is doing...like the BF6 beta was the first time in years I felt like I was actually playing battlefield again like I did when I was a kid playing Bf3
Played beta for bf6. Enjoyed it. Played beta for 2042. What is this crap?
It LOOKs like BF, it SOUNDs like BF...it's basically a coat of paint over 2042, with Operators removed.
That's a huge improvement though
This is the most insane take of all time, the game plays so differently
They can keep operators though in BR if they want but keep it out of the main game
ehhhh its a slipperly slope I feel like you give an inch you lose a mile š
It's slower...yes, but there's still tons of bugs...tons of small maps...2042 had too much space, this has too little...shrug...it's going to appeal to a certain crowd, I 100% agree...it's not going to fail as hard as 2042...but it's not going to retain long term...beyond the 2-3 months timeframe.
I'm just saying BR being a free mode doesn't have to follow the constraints of boots on the ground in the main game
BF6 is complete reverse of BF2042, like legit total opposite, anyone saying anything else is coping hard
Seriously I can't think of anyways for ladders not to be abused
they just focused on stable launch and marketing
The main thing is it felt 100 x better than 2042.
they will get their money and move on after one year tops
i am going to laugh hard when it happens
"Still tons of bugs" the beta was the least buggy BF Beta I have ever played and I have played a few. Also there are large maps coming, they have made it very clear. Op firestorm is going to be in game and Mirak is apparently the largest. Then on top of that the leaks for the 3 upcoming maps after launch look like they will be larger maps too. I am not sure what gives you this sentiment
What is there to cope? There were no airfields...the planes take off mid flight...like, there's no large maps...like actual large maps, nothing shown was memorable...just typical CQC Urban Zones...it was a poor showing imo.
not a bad opener, but you're jumping to the 2042 comparisons too early. For the best bait you really gotta hook people in
Think they got new director for the new game
i will never forgive EA for not making eastern front in BFV with yugoslavia and soviet union
youre not gonna laugh you'll just be mad about something else
i didnt follow battlefield franchise for past 10 years, left at the peak of it and came back to these abominations of games, i am right to be pissed
Ya they should have given us a big map in the beta. But the main game it's there apparently
I left after BF1. Which was a good area to leave at
We'll see...but a promise of "A big Map is there guys" just give us the 80 dollars...is not a risk Im taking, I'll wait and see.
This is how the betas almost always have gone, the open play tests use small maps to test server performance. We know we are getting larger maps. Firestorm has airfield we know for sure, I wouldn't be surprised if Mirak does too. But also not having an airfield isnt some doomsday game killing loss??
It's $70
guys please stop, engaging wtih this guy it's obvious bait holy shit
The big maps are there. Google is your friend.
And thats fair, you arent required to buy the game. But having such a doomer outlook on it with such unrealistic reasoning isnt fair
It was exactly the kind of maps I like (apart from the one with all the snipers hidden in the hill)
LMAO why are you baiting him so hard
who in the gods name is calling the remaining maps big
How am I baiting, I think the game was poor...thats not a bait, it's my honest opinion...I think it's rushed, I think that the game isn't going to retain beyond 2 months...if it's all true or false who cares...we're just feeding poppa EA either way.
Tomorrow marks the day it will officially be exactly 1 MONTH to go š„³
That BF3 remastered map? Think they are making that area a no play zone
you are completely right my friend, they are in for the rude awakening, we legit just didnt see manhattan and eastwood which are 100% no bigger than badlands
these maps are TINY
Like, you trust the same people that are giving you Madden every year? Like cmon,.
Lmao. Well I don't want to get banned but I can certainly lead in the direction of where to look. There are plenty of vids leaked.
Zavod 311 mogs them completely in size
The tiny maps are good and all. But we do need variety
Smaller maps are better for running n gunning
https://x.com/Battlefield/status/1965434837013065959/photo/1 - Brave the heat as infantry, advance the frontline in a tank, or take to the skies in an attack helicopter. š„
New Sobek City takes you to the outskirts of Cairo, Egypt. Play #Battlefield 6 - October 10 š
Seems like there will be a good mix of 3 small, 3 medium, and 3 large maps at launch which to me is perfect.
And thats what I said, I said it will cater to a certain audience...that audience is the COD audience...they are attempting to just do direct competition with COD instead of embracing what made BF unique and loved to begin with...and that's going to be their downfall.
no bro you see dragon valley is bigger therefore this map is tiny cod gameplay and battlefield is dead RIP bf6 killed by vince zampella
I liked the beta. That was all that mattered
Dunno, Iāve never enjoyed a CoD in my life but it caters to me and my friends.
Bf6 destruction is the best in the series
Truuuue. Not a true battlefield map unless it matches up to the size of an IRL city
Agreed
IF IT DOSEN'T TAKE 20 IRL MINUTES BETWEEN OBJECTVES ITS TOO SMALL. CODFIELD 6 COMING OCTOBER 10TH 2025 GET READY FOR REAL SHOOTER GAMEPLAY
Guns confirmed to get mud caked effects on them š„°š„°š„°
Yes but that shouldn't be the entirety of the game which is exactly what that open beta impression gave. However, like I mentioned use google. There are plentyyyy of vids showing big maps. I think it was a huge mistake to not at least show one big map in that open beta. It's biting them in the foot. Stupidity.
And dirty clothes
clears throat
Smaller maps probably gave them more combat data
To each their own, I wanted to like BF6...and on the surface, I did spend 30 hours in the Beta....it's not terrible by any stretch...but honestly for what they want for the asking price...I'll wait for it to move to Gamepass...and in the meantime if I want a BF-like I'll mess with Delta Force...and I'll just enjoy Arc Raiders when it drops...that's just my t ake.
2,629,945 seconds remaining until Battlefield 6
THANK YOU
Each map should be MINIMUM the size of vice city in GTA 6 or it's over
hmmm yes this larger map gave us lots of useful data of people running for 5 minutes and getting sniped or assblasted by a tank, very insightful
Bruh big maps are so bad just look at 2042
I donāt even know what the asking price is (but still gonna buy it)
fun fact: Roman Campos-Oriola was the lead designer of Ghost Recon Future Soldier and Director of the Dead Space Remake while Phillipe Ducharme had various roles in Army of Two (1 & 2) and Assassin's Creed 3. Phillip is now the executive special producer of the Campaign and Roman is the senior creative director of the Campaign
they should add "HD micro destruction" like that bf3 Close Quarters dlc
They may be cooking
That excuse has been given but in all due respect that's absolute bull and a cop out. Not on your part. The devs and Dice.
fushe pass clears eternity of bf6 and bf2042
game from 100 years ago
churchill was alive when bf2 was made
They may be cooking
you guys are all wrong bf3 is a cod clone I miss the good old days when battlefield was good and now all thee cod kids just play bf3.
im sticking with the REAL BATTLEFIELD game bf2 modern combat
Big maps is walking simulator and die to vehicle and snipers
i had 1.3k hours in bf3 and you are spot on
it was huge departure at the time from old bf design
and bad one as well
Nah modern combat mobile game is the true battlefield experience
BF2 was IMO the best BF...it was well rounded, the vehicles were meaningful...maps were good...not great, but if they had just moved that game design into a better graphical presentation and audio...and somehow added the destruction, and a center piece on each map for mass destruction...but kept everything form BF2 about the same...you'd have a winner.
wow holy shit someone who's smart and realizes this community is an actual cyclic clone of itself
no no you misunderstood
bf 1943 >
bf3 WAS a cod clone at the time
Iām going back to Pong!
wow dice cant believe they're switching bf2 to a modern setting... literally copying call of duty. all these kids these days don't understand that REAL battlefield is bf1942. all this jump shooting and small maps is literally a cod clone....
BF2142, was the most awesome...with potential...they need to do 2142 again with the Titan Mode, I'd be there.
YELL IT INTO EXISTENCE
but not battleyard 2142, actual battlefield please
Bru no one was alive when it came out
not like mirak garden or new sobek village
Or we could go wild...and make BF - Medeival Warfare...and only have Archers and Melee...let's do it...let's do it, but make it massive...with destruction from Balistas and Trebuchets...let's do it...better than Chiv, Mordhau...better than Kingmakers...let's do it!
did you mean 2042?
Naw 2142
Ah, so weāre also getting the UH 60 in bf6
2142 had a flying mothership called Titan Mode...you launched ICBMs at it to take down shields, then blew up the core...it was amazing
it had free DLC
Cool universe, abysmally dogshit gunplay. And I say this as someone whose first Battlefield game was 2142 back in '07 
oh yes gunplay was terrible
bf2 as well
Yea they just need to tighten the actual gunplay up, but Titan Mode...that was so good.
thats why i said, port Battlefield V mechanics into BF2142 and its something I willl play for 5k hours
at least
in fact, BFV got bunch of stuff from older games
like limited ammo on vehicles
Vehicle need to die in 1 rpg hit like in real life
one can dream though and to hope and cope for better future titles
for now we get battleyard 6
They should make a campaign DLC for BF6 that takes place in 2042
and they need to go back in time to stop the game from being made?
Final mission is in Dice studio
The Abrams can tank dozens of RPG-7 warheads. If the game were that realistic PAX AT gunners would be cooked lol
Javelin 1 shot
True
In the final mission you have to deal with EA's stock holders, lmao
For me BF3 was the best
That one is impossible to beat without the game turning to crap
No-Russian but with EA's stock holders
Instead of shooting bullets it's throwing paper plans at all the civilians
lol
exactly XD
Anybody else concerned about the Sledge Hammer causing too much damage to buildings?
yes. Even bullets were shown to take down entire buildings just by shooting them, its silly. Needs much much more Micro-Destruction
Is it gonna be its oen gadget or just a passive / part of the base kit?
its Melee, instead of your knife
Ok then it depends how fast / often you can use it

