#battlefield-6
1 messages ¡ Page 429 of 1
Sounds more like Planetside
Yeah, the person said make a PVE mode because BF already possesses the framework for team play
The AI in 2042 is terrible compared to CoD MW2. If they can fix the AI it could be interesting.
HD is a very specific type of game and the pve element is just one thing where the entire game is revolved around it, it's not really practical you could make a Helldivers esque thing in a battlefield game
the entire loop from dropping into missions to leaving and going to different planets is to give the impression of a war against the automatons/bugs/illuminate and where the player is expendable
Expendable you say.... maybe a good mode for... wait for it... BF Bad Company 3!
if they hit it good with 6
then it might be time for a crack at Bad Company after that
doubt it
where can i post pictures?
you cant
đ
I have played and enjoyed every battlefield game since 1942, with the exception of 2142 (didn't play it due to not having a PC at the time) and 2042 (garbage)
So Im hopeful that BF6 gets this right
BC/battlefield 3/4 are quite different games, I'd hazard most of the playerbase who are wanting 3 or 4 have not even touched bc1 or 2
i have a question
in bf6 concept art thereâs the pictures of the tanks rolling across the golf course but looking at the images and gameplay weâve seen there is no map like that?
also the rhib boat in the cracked canal
yeah cause not all the maps have been shown yet
it's just concept art, that's what it's there for, to show concepts, not things reflective material in game
I wasn't a huge fan of BFBC1, but I didn't play it much because I was serving in the military then and didn't have much time on my hands. I loved BFBC2. I loved BF3 and BF4.
most of the time they are implemented in a game but that's not guaranteed
that would be like damn cuz that picture is so fkn badass
Supposedly the golf course will be featured in the campaign and possibly the Battle Royale map.
cool
can we talk abt leaks here
read the rules before doing so
ok
I think we are in for a lot of surprises over the next few weeks as the release gets closer. The marketing for this game has been very well done, almost Rockstar levels of anticipation.
that br map that has been circulating tht golf course is like 2 holes đ
i hope so
my biggest concern:
bf portal will be same fate as 2042
I wouldnt worry too much about it. If it looks like that when EA officially shares their BR map then we can panic. I'm giving them the benefit of doubt right now. They're cooking.
I would be lying if I said that wasn't a concern of mine, but there are few things that give me hope. Arma Reforger has provided console gamers a lot of flexibility and creativity in Game Master. Seeing what EA has shared so far, they are gravitating towards the play having more tools which will likely give that mode more interest and long term replayability.
one caveat here
thatâs fair i think the image was fan made but i am a bit bummed from what iâve heard itâs more of a fictional LA than like sunset boulevard
the portal creator for Godot looked like it was a wrapper via the desktop, so console users probably can't make them anyways
This is true. Even GameMaster in Arma Reforger had limitations for console. However, the PC fan base has churned out some amazing game modes and mods. Likely not getting mods, but that is fine.
more tools are great 2042 was extremely lackluster but iâd hate to click portal and seeing servers with 14/64 players again
My biggest disappointment concerning Portal in 2042 was it was a shell of the mode EA advertised. It was heavily implied that customization between eras was going to be present. BF3 skins having BF1942 weapons and BFBC2 vehicles for example.
I was very skeptical of a portal mode anyways tbh and would have preferred it wasn't done after 2042 but eh we'll see
Imo the new portal shouldnât even be called portal. It doesnât resemble the old portal at all and is more akin to Haloâs forge mode
yes but what if itâs the same story again? all iâve seen is building ramps with cars falling and a lot of jets but what if thatâs the most you can do? i havenât seen any terrain generation yet but i mightâve missed something
Terrain manipulation has been soft confirmed
it has?
im glad i can use a rpg and surface to air missile at the same time. it suxs having to switch it out all the time in bf2042.
In the pc trailer (at least I think it was the pc trailer) there was a tool shown for a second or so that is named like a typical terrain editing tool
I agree 100%. My pre-order is dependent on Portal. Right now they havent shared enough. I want Portal as it was supposed to be. I want it to be a true BF playground that expanded assets from previous games and had no barriers to those assets. I want to mix and match and create. You can't truly create in Portal 2042.
oh damn well if that's the case then maybe it can work after all
a deeper dive trailer would be great
It reminded me of Arma Reforger's Game Master. When EA confirmed AI scripting it made me think of that even more so.
I still have large question marks over the campaign as it stands but eh oh well
They should change it
BF has never really been a campaign-heavy game, even though I've played all of them
yeah they all suck in one form or another
I was in here a few days ago ranting about battlefield 3 and 4s
Looks like we will understand the situations that happen in multiplayer
Shhh don't let the august/sep 2025 joinee cod kiddies get mad
nah
Just what makes sense to me
they have shown, glimpses of it, the trailer with the president is the core part around the campaign story
just there's been little to none outside of that
HLâs is the only good campaign Iâve played. Heard 3âs was good tho
4 feels like you have only played 2/3 of the campaign when you finish
The war stories of 1 and V are pretty good, though they arenât true campaigns
3s is terrible tldr
id have to say it's the worst so called campaign in the entire franchise
Kinda funny that (imo) the best campaign wasnât made by dice
Thatâs probably whatâs going to save 6âs campaign tbh. Just keep dice out of story decisions
pretty much
have you played the portal mode yet if I may ask?
I played BF3s campaign because it released a week before full release. It was the same for BF4, but it had weapons you could only unlock by playing the campaign like the M249
New or old?
bf6 portal mode
no why
ah, then nvm
iâm basing my assumptions of what weâve seen in trailers
not even an assumption more of a concern
damn going back to BF1 and apparently I must have played on xbox and not PC or something, because my account's fresh
that's alright, I played the mode, I think we are in for a good time, gameplay wise
after I finish the 2042 pass what do I even do? go back to ravenfield?
thatâs good to know. i was worried itâd just be climb a tower or shoot a bunch of jets for the preset game modes
well
the foundation and possibilities are there, and really good. but we will still have to see what they will give us
if they eventually give us the ability to create our own maps (from an empty template or from the ground up with a terrain generator) I will get every microtransaction and consume so much
I enjoy campaigns :(
same
But it's just never been the focus of the series
"POWERFUL CREATOR TOOLS:
Includes Spatial Editing (map/geo editing),"
If that doesn't mean terrain deformation they need to be taken outside and shot
yeah that is the quesiton what they will give us. if we get full acces and possibilities for portal, we will have infinite options to creat anything
it doesn't
You can edit some of the objects and props in the world, but you can't edit the actual base of the map, not much of it anyways
I assume not. Otherwise it would have been shown already
Practice flying to be ready for bf6
i thought 2042 would give us it all đ but if they are confident in what theyâre giving us iâm hoping theyâll drop a more deep dive
I hope they eventually look into giving us more freedoms like being able to completely change hte map, though this is already leagues ahead of 2042
But the way they word it..
how exactly do we know that?
godot screenshots
bc didn't they say they will give people the option to create custom gamemodes, maps etc etc
what screenshots?
It's very sneaky wording if terrain deformation isn't there.
imo they wouldâve shown player made maps if that was coming
But I don't expect it
I do assume we will be able to create maps from scratch, but I have no way of knowing. I just assume it will be something like fortnite map creation or something
geometry doesn't refer to the base of the map, it is just a generic term
I know.
i just hope we can do modes like zombie escape
Still...sneaky prawns
it is map editing and not map creation to be fair
custom gamemodes yes, custom maps.. sort of
I think that is good enough?
it is way better than 2042
Farcry on the Xbox 360 had terrain editing. Can't be too hard to add 1 sculpt tool Dice.
it would be nice if they could at the very least create some blank and empty maps as a base
but this is battlefield and not farcry
and this is20 years later too
age of empire in idfk, 1900 had terrain editing, it's not about possibilities, it's about giving people the options
far cry is also a single player game
it's not bc they can't, it's bc they don't want to (if they really don't give us the option)
which we do not even know
Map editor was for multiplayer
like be fr, poeple will always complain about every little detail just for the sake of complaining xD
That's not true 
True
it is true xD
No it's not 
it is, there will always be people to complain, no matter what haha
Anyway boys. Goodnight. Have a good'un
bye bye đ
Though the standard has been set, games should have a campaign if they've had a campaign for years, if it doesn't, the gameplay should be impeccable (but BF2042 and Black ops 4 didn't and they both didn't do great or just flopped)
Does anyone know if the camo patterns of our soldier skins will be customizable?
ngl
campaign is for me atleast, a must have. even if it isn't a lore masterpiece, atleast something to experience is always important to me atleast
I was very pleased about the bf4 campaign, despite it "not being good" it was fun to play and enjoyable
ffs someone deal with the spammer please
direct message
Does anyone know if the camo pattern on your soldier will be change able
MODSS
Is there no way to ping moderators?
why do you need to ping mods?
Any bf gamers from Belgium
How do you expect EA to sell DLC maps if we could create our own? They learned way back during BF2 that if you give tools to people to create maps, then it will hurt DLC map sales.
That's not why. Look at Reforger, it's main selling point is that it's moddable.
they're not selling dlc for bf6 they're selling skins
maps, weapons, and modes will be post launch content in free updates
one such map has already leaked for season 1. Along with more weapons than the 44 already planned for launch
I honestly wish they'd go back to the old days of releasing expansion DLC. I'd pay $20 for installments of DLC like Back to Karkand, Aftermath, ect
they're generally trying to sell skins with their post launch model and free br mode
Not comparing publicly traded EA slop to Bohemia đ
I think bf6's dlc model might be what I'm fine with if it's akin to titanfall 2
the lead of battlefield 6 is the legendary vince zampella
Yeah yeah ill believe it when I see it in action
I think the biggest reason is they don't want a game to last longer than they want it to. If BF6 has all those modding tools, nobody gonna wanna get BF7 right away.
If you could have created maps and guns in MW2019, nobody would have really bought anything that's come after that lol
Dice imagining bankruptcy at the thought of BF1 modder tools
BF1 is good lol. I'd be worried too. I mean, besides this BF6 grind, BF1 and BFV had more players than 2042 lol
who if you don't know:
-was the game lead of medal of honor allied assault with help from steven spielberg and his friend Jason west
-was the game lead with Jason west for every cod until MW2 (2009)
-helped with badcompany 2's development with devs from his studio infinityward significantly
-was fired from activision from his own Studio for giving his employees a second job at DICE temporarily since activision got greedy and didn't give employee bonuses for mw2 2009 despite it being the most successful cod (they gave them for every other COD)
-made respawn and most of infinity ward's veteran devs and talent left to make titanfall 1 as a double A studio
-Sold to EA for 400 million and made Titanfall 2, apex (at launch which EA ruined post launch after 2022 when a contract clause ended), and the jedi games
Yep bf1 led the charts for years in many stints, its own peak, during bfvâs falloff, during 2042âs falloff and the road to bf6 beta. If it had mod tools to the extent of turning it modern, than there would be little reason to purchase a new bf
for context the game lead of 2042 was the game lead of candy crush mobile and most of the veteran devs of dice left after bf5 due to executive decisions ruining creative freedom
they wanted a yes man for that game to approve every executive decision no matter how destructive or unsustainable to the game it was
that explains a lot
atop this 2042 tried to do a frostbite engine update which they hadn't done a major one since 2016. After the majority of the veterans left newbies had to figure out and update the engine without experience with it.
indeed
the idea of applying successes of apex into bf worries alot of legacy bf players tbh otherwise his resume is stronk
there's a LOT of reasons 2042 failed. I could go into the leasing system (they had to lease systems from microsoft and sony to remotely stream the OSs of the ps4, xbox one, series x, and ps5 from home leading to various builds of the game that had to be stitched together), the issues with handling the xbox one and ps4 OS, how covid harmed plans even further, the fact EA executives thought they were ahead of schedule based on flipping concept art and not the actual game so they didn't delay or give time to breathe, the fact the game only had 1 year and 3 months of post production development which led to an all hands on deck situation that had employees from battlefront 2 and battlefield 5 removed from making post launch content to work on 2042.
also the fact the game went from a br, to a hero shooter, to an extraction shooter thanks to a lap dog approving every single executive decision no matter how destructive it was to the production cycle
2042 feels like if someone with exeptional skills made a battlefield experience in fortnite with the UE editor
it's not even close that would actually be better
in fact hold up I can provide a visual example of this being better
Just like some skilled induvidials made a classic COD experience on Roblox
It's amazing to see what people are capable of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWUpnQLmgyk&t=585s&pp=ygUJZXhvIG1lY2hh
this is one developer (he got like 4 other people in the last few years) who has been making the same indie game for 9+years on unreal
I really hope we get a Star Wars battlefront 2 battle pass for BF6 since EA have made both
that shizz isn't happening
I like crazy skins like some of the COD skins that actually fits Trayarch's universe, and the robotic skins in 2042, but BF6 gotta be careful with skins. In my opinion, skins can never got too far, as long as they fit the narrative of the game itself
I think it will for year 2
For context Apex after 2022 went down hill for a few reasons.
-Vince completely left the project
-EA along side the 400 million dollar merger was contractually obligated to give 140 million dollars of bonuses to respawn employees. This made firing or threatening to fire respawn devs hard cuz doing so meant having to pay them the bonuses without using the bonus cut as leave
-after the bonuses ended EA has since railed apex's monetization
-recently they cancelled titanfall 3 which was set to release late 2026 to early 2027 and fired 100 employees at respawn and a total of 400 employees at EA to please shareholders
If we got a new BF2142 ish game, then star wars crossovers would be alright
It makes sense when you think about it
I actually enjoyed the crossover skins they provided for 2042
I would just save the cross over for like a futuristic battlefield akin to 2142. EA might even try battlefront 3 with the clamoring for it, considering the battlefront 2 resurgence.
Dead Space for example. Robot skins are cool too
I want to run around as Darth Vader whilst reviving people as a medic
hahah
at some point compromising aesthetic for a quick buck can ruin a game's IP reputation looks at cod
give me a tldr fr
that is the tldr in bullet points
just skip bullet point 2 it's the longest (though somewhat important)
so basically ea
long story short, yeah. Just specific reasons for EA railage
Perhaps we could get a LABUBU skin for them recons hiding in the bushes with big smiles
battlefront 3 before allat frfr
bf 2142 is based tbh. It just performed bad cuz it released at the wrong time
nah it was just mid
No man I've wanted a 2142 game for a while, always though it looked amazing and DICE always just teased ut afterwards with DLC's for BF3 and BF4 hinting to 2142'
not really it designed its entire sandbox around the titan game mode (which was revolutionary and promptly abandoned due to the fact the game only sold 220k copies)
this is like saying bad company 2 is mid because its sandbox was built for rush
It's about time they stopped hinting and actually gave us that experience again, even if it happens to be a smaller filler game like Hardline
2142 was a mid game AT BEST and realistically SUCKED lol did u play?
Praying for bad company 3 or 2143 for the next game
i play it to this day
there's literally a mod community to play it today
yeah see ur opinion is irrelevant because that game is ass
do you know what the titan game mode is
i just remember 2142 being horrible and playing bf2 mods instead until 3 came out
Thats maybe the strangest part, how it seems universal to anyone who played the titan mode, that it's the best mode DICE ever made. I believe them after I saw how good it looked, but it's insane how they never brought it back
then your opinion is likely invalid because you likely didn't play the flagship reason the game existed and still has a dedicated playerbase
Wrong.
They kinda brought it back in 4 with carrier assault but it wasnât quite the same
2142 was not a good game 
not even close shizz was so mid
did you like carrier assault in bf4?
The titan mode made conquest look like domination from cod on nuketown or something else small
if you did you liked a worse version of 2142 in every single way.
hats a good point
it was a decent mode idk been a while
I think your lack of memory might be deceiving you
if you don't even know what titan mode is I doubt you fully experienced the game
I also believe 2142 failed for the same reason as Hardline. They were filler games, that came out while the previous game were still going stong
yeah 2142 was definitely ass and bf2 was way better during that time until 3
Had they released as actual titles, I bet thing would have looked better for them both
Gotta tell you chump, its not happening.
maybe 2143, but bad company 3 would only come out if it's the end of the BATTLEFIELD franchise and they had one last shot.
what made 2142 ass was maps were cooked and the weapons were just dookie
the same battlefield game with open as hell maps, hit scan sniping, and the strongest aerial vehicles in the series
Battlefield 2 is an arcadey product of its time that I respect and love but in no way could it be released in the modern era
it's in fact notable how any remaster of battlefield 2's maps have to make significant changes to the map design to function in the modern era without it being open fields of death
with like 2 exceptions
cant name 2 other good games with projectile velocity bullets in 2004 tho
not gonna defend hitscan but lets not act like there was other options
that's not my point tbf. I'm saying it's a product of its time
I guess this is the reason why I'm the only one, not mad at EA's idea to make Battlefield annualy
MAYBE THEN would they have balls enough to bring back these smaller titles like 2142, hardline, bad company, instead of keeping it safe every 4th year because a fail would be to catastrophic
these aspects may be disliked ânowadaysâ but the game was good
It all coems down to execution I guess
UNLIKE ASS 2142 WHICH SUCKED
the game was good for its time. It's like me going up to someone and saying borderlands is better than borderlands 2
2142 wasnt good ur missing this key point (it was not good)
how old were you when you played 2142?
who in their right mind loads up 2142 in 2025 đ
me â ď¸
shiiiit like 10 Maybe
well no doy your child brain couldn't comprehend jack
hell nah bruh i was on arma 2 the next year
but yeah 2142 was ASS and not good because maps and guns suck and just weird
arma is cool. But I'm not gonna act like it's better designed that battlefield.
Arma's focus on realism leads to a lack of good game design.
To be fair, most people who were adult and played 2142 at its time, do seem to want it back
real
would be nice to see more fun games that were not afraid to fail sometimes
if you were at least like 14-21 playing 2142 you loved that game most likely
u cant say i was too skill issue to appreciate 2142 if i appreciated bf2 while being a skill issued 8 year old fym
too many games now adays have huge budgets and long developement time, which makes them less likely to take risks. All because of publishers, investors and what ever else
2142 was way more complicated than bf2 bruh.
The map design wasn't open, the air vehicles and vehicles in general weren't op, there was laser drop, etc
acting like i couldnt tell which game was good as a young jit đ
the fact lasers had more bullet drop than bullets in battlefield 2 is saying something
â ď¸
Guys guys... Every Battlefield has a Hardline
it didnt matter because the 32v gameplay with vehicles was dank
unlike ass 2142
2 was way better than bf2142 and 2142 was also an ass game on god no cap frfr
I will be a martyr and end the argument.
BF4 is worse than both of them.
32 player matches with good map design, bullet drop, mechs, a better squad system, and literal flying titans in the sky that required you to aim missle systems at them via capture points and breach their shield to either
A: continue shooting missile systems at them
B: invade the ship with your only spawns into the ship being your commander. You had to breach various parts of the ship to reach the generator and blow it up. Then get the hell out for a bonus before it exploded.
bf4 at launch? Sure buggy mess. Also a lot of the maps only favored large scale gameplay with only a few of the launch maps like parcel storm and siege of shangahi being goated
bf4 with dlc? no way
ass
you are forgetting that the game sucked bro
the mech was jank
if you dislike the game after seeing at least a retrospective on the game and seeing the gameplay with your own eyes today
then I can't really change your opinion
its literally not a good game the gameplay was ass the maps were ass the vehicles were ass
nothing could convince you of this truth?
if you watch the video I'll take your opinion seriously you were 10
I can't take you seriously if your opinion is based on being 10
not to say being a child entirely invalidates opinions
Watch your tone unc
my bad i wasnt 40 in 2006
brother I'm 22 I just played the game when I was 16 using mods
I'm younger than you "unc"
I think
buddy bf2 modded was superior đ¤Śđ˝ââď¸ you wouldnt know about it youngbuck
Absolute Cinema
brother I literally played that shizz when I was 18
Itâs ass now fym
it doesn't detract from its design issues. But I do respect it as a product of its time
it's ass because people got good at playing games
If you guys could keep this up until BF6 launhc, time will go by much faster. I'm sure
Buddy your judging it from 2018 đ¤Ą
Your on thin ice pal, it was very good back in the day
I'm studying for a 6 hour exam on my other monitor so i'm not really wasting my time tbh
I fully respect battlefield 2. I love it as a product of its time akin to how I love borderlands
I think you are pasting your study text in the wrong chat box though
No kid you are disputing that bf2142 was better than bf2 during the run up to bf3 which is not true đ¤Ą
2142 was ass đ
Youngbuck wouldnât know about bf2 modded days
Seems like all your research is going to dicsocrd instead on word or whatever you use
I'm listening to a video lecture
Watch your tone
Aslo I think you are wasting time. Since you brought that up
You gotta draw a HARDLINE with that tone.
Unless you want people punching u back to 2015.
Iâm setting this youngbuck straight, bf2142 was ass, by the time you played it bf1 was out, bf2 was superior in the time đŻ
But to say hit scan snipers, the most op vehicles in the series (notably air vehicles), very open map design (excluding karkand and jalabad), and some questionable sandbox choices can be done in the modern day is crazy.
it's a great game I have full respect for but it's not a game you could do again today with how experienced players and the overall player base has gotten.
Youngbuck was suckling on his momma when bf3 beta was online đą
hahaha jesus
Dice make it easy for more than 4 friends to find each other in a server!!!
Youngjitlingbuck, you think 2142 had better maps? đđđđ¤Śđ˝ââď¸
Brother I was reading flipping bf3 forums when I was 7. (I had a weird set of parents that showed me, paused, and explained schindlers list when I was like 5, leading to pretty early maturity among other things)
Sure thing, will do
Even then people complained about bf3 being too cod like because of metro
Bro your a strike at karkand hater
I said the literal opposite
How is your studying going
And when we take turns with attack and defense and keep servers persistent!! That is all lol
pretty good listening to an alpha substitutions to carbonyls video rn
âOpen mapsâ yeah if you think running thru the middle is valid
This was before map design being scattered with cover everywhere was considered necessary, nobody said this back then because competitors offered worse maps đđ¤Ąđ¤Śđ˝ââď¸
some maps
entire map size of 1 flag on wake island tho
it wasn't nearly as large scale but still
I liked valhala
the maps on 2142 were pure ass tho
and sand trap
if you played them on any game mode other than titan...
I can't disagree the conquest variants were in fact bad.
But this is like saying most of bad company 2s maps suck cuz they were built for rush
Youngbuck thinks 2142 is a good game đ
I would love to see the titan game mode again, and an actual good game with the same vision as 2142 had. The game was total jank in a lot of ways, but it had vibe for sure. It was a "good game" but absolutely not by DICE's standards. Thats where I will leave it
you literally called me an unc when you're older
there was no such thing as a bad mode in bf2 đ¤Ą
SONNYBOY you played it in 2018 đđđ
Lower your tone.
https://youtu.be/_UvGLWwP488?si=3mzmK56TepNf4-vw if you haven't played it I highly recommend checking this video on the topic tbh it's a nice retrospective
brother you raised it đ
you called me older when I'm younger than you
what does that even say â ď¸
Watch your mouth when around your elders
youngbuck
is battlefield 5 still alive
Barely
uh huh
Long story short, Lungebob says 2142 was a bad game, Da Babu won't have it 
2042
Shit has like 2 servers
i mean 2142
Me and ANYONE who played it before bf3 released
I won't have it when his only experience with the game was when bro was 10 and he won't even bother watching the video I linked
Oh i see haha
ITS ASS
at least watch the video otherwise I can't take anything you say beyond this point seriously regardless of what it is
True that, you can find a lot of people say how certain aspects of the game was the best Battlefield ever had, but you'll have to look hard to find someone who say the whole game was good. Because it wasn't
I watched schindlers list when I was 5 and was forced to read the Quran, Bhagavad Gita, torah, Vedas, some buddhist texts, and bible between the ages of 8 and 9 cuz my parents were hella brown and wanted me to "be more open minded"
Because that shit was garbage đđđ
weird parenting strategy but I didn't mind it in retrospect
I dont think most people support scammers tbh
this has nothing to do first person shooters đđđđđđ
Don't forget to breath now
you played 2142 when you were 10
I was reading a flipping bible at 9 and played 2142 when I was 16
â ď¸ what do you think
Tone.
Lower it. Now
Before you know it, your whole life story lies embedded in a battlefield-6 channel dedicated to a video game
Lilbraâ you didnât even exist when the 2142 trailer dropped đąđ¤Ąđ
2142 IS ASS
I'm guessing the game won't change even if that video gets more views lol
Now we can finally talk about how bad CODFIELD 6: Copefield Of Duty is
Cod6 only good to play with kid đ
time to go to sleep, it's 06:22AM over here
CODFIELD 6 NEEDS BATTLE ROYALE AND BATTLEPASS ASAP!
GET RID OF THESE STUPID âCLASSESâ AND JUST LET US USE WHAT WE WANT.
ALSO THE SLIDE IS TOO SLOW AND ITS SO STUPID THAT THERES AN ACCURACY PENALTY FOR JUMPING. WTF?
THEY SHOULD SCRAP EVERY GAME MODE WITH MORE THAN 8V8 AND ONLY USE LIKE 1/5th OF THE MAP ITS TOO BIG RN. REVIVING IS POINTLESS
ALSO REMOVE TICKETS FROM CONQUEST AND MAKE IT JUST BASED ON KILLS
Nah i only ever use that game when kid wanna split screen. Otherwise i dont play that shit
Why wouldnât you want another game mode ? If you donât like it just donât enter it
Battlefield 6 could use more cyberwarfare type stuff
Like ?
hacking vehicles, disabling some electronics like spawn beacons and stuff
None of the current vehicles we have seen use electronics to drive so that doesnât make much sense and for electronics just shoot them and they get destroyed
maybe their targetting system
So rockets ? Just use chaff
some of their lock on and countermeasures could be hacked
Countermeasures arenât electronic they are mechanical
does it require electronics to get the mechanical parts going?
Piston and Macro explosion to push it out away from the vehicle
Thatâs where the famous doot sound comes from
can't imagine the technology in BF6
maybe it's time Battlefield expanded more in cyberwarfare considering how effective it is IRL
can it be oct 10th yet plz?
DDoS Pulse: briefly blinds enemy minimaps/comms and a GPS Jammer: disrupts vehicle HUDs or missile lock-ons, would be the only thing that makes sense but they are both useless and a waste of time to implement
Most other cyber warfare wouldnât make sense nor would work
Dude. Wtf is your problem? Go shill for Children's Online Daycare Body Odor 6 elsewhere
we could also use Cyberwarfare against Recon's drone
you fell for their trap card
I know
...
I don't care
fair enough
And thus, harmony.
but could probably work against recon drones
I'm super excited for BF6 though. CoD doesn't stand a chance against a real man's game
Or you could just shoot it down instead of wasting a class just for that đ wouldnât make sense in bf6
sometimes you wanna be a little more "covert"
shooting it down can sometimes give away your position
If it works like in 2042 hacking anything gives your position away aswell
it's a little quiet and sometimes the enemy can't determine where the shots came from
also a waste of bullets
Wasting bullets doesnât matter much there are ammo boxes all over the map
aside from if you're behind enemy lines
When you kill someone you can take their ammo
There is an irony to this statement lol
The game lead of bf6 was the game lead and founder to cod. He led the development of every cod until mw2 (2009).
sometimes you do not want to kill the guy atleast not yet
He also led:
medal of honor allied assault
titanfall 1-2
the jedi games
apex legends (at launch, he was removed from the project after launch)
And BF portal for 2042 (only portal)
If youâre not gonna kill anyone yet why worry about ammo ?
in contrast the game lead of bf2042 was the game lead of candy crush mobile â ď¸ EA really wanted a yes man for that game lol
TF2 is a really slept on game
All the guns have plenty of magazines unless you miss a few mags itâs nothing to worry about
Vince zampella is just that goated
I want to get behind the enemy line and cause more chaos than killing one guy, keeping them alive assuming they have not seen me will give off the illusion that they're alone and don't gotta be paranoid of someone sneaking around
But enough of that, I'm so ready to play some firestorm again
use a suppressed AR and the spawn beacon on the assault at launch
I have to re-read this message until I realize you're referring to Titan fall
Yeah
Also why all the sneaking around ? Your supposed to move with your team, either way you can just run and place a spawn beacon then spawn their when itâs clear
often times, I pick my fights carefully, I might harvest more fruit than what I first see
Titanfall 2 is one of the best shooters out there, but it got released at a bad time
Vince is the equivalent of the biggest "screw you executives I wanna make a game" game developers in the industry lol
sometimes I wanna take the enemy by surprise
that is until he gets removed from the projects he works on
Read second half

use the spawn beacon with your squad. Have your squad run suppressors and support (maybe an engineer or a recon for info)
Or you could just drop in with a helicopter
Yeah but that's less "flanky" and tactile tbh
and the helis in bf6 are on 3 maps
and are way less maneuverable in general
If they fly right above the ground people wonât notice you getting out youâd be surprised
the better option (if this isn't a bug) is to abuse free look shooting
in bf6 you can literally turn your camera in any direction with free look and guns/rockets will aim in that direction despite the fact your front view isn't in that direction
Whatâs the difference from just turning your character
the difference is time of your vehicle turning and having to front face the gun
the free look option you can literally shoot guns and rockets 180Âş behind you
let me provide a visual example
This is free look on jets. This can also be applied to helis as well. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/T-YUajTOybc
for context no other bf game has had this before so I'm unsure if this is a bug or a feature
I was watching some footage of gameplay, and I noticed that the map modelled after the upper part of Brooklyn Heights has the wrong speed limit posted on the street modelled after Vine St.
It should be 20, not 35.
35 is way too high for a street like that
The devs clearly have no regard for transportation safety and regulation
Someone could get hurt
I think the AG missiles in the Jet has a first-person targeting pod that autolevels the jet and lets you target in any direction so I think it's intentional.
COPEFIELD 6 OF DUTY NEEDS A FAZTER SLIDE
I wanna see a Battlefield 6 trailer introducing the factions
I wanna see the speed limit fixed
it's by all means more realistic btw. I'm just saying it hasn't existed in prior bf games that I'm not sure
Whoâs playing on pc?
the factions are the most cringe part about the whole game lol, NATO vs "made up evil group to not make the real evils russia or china mad"
theres not much fomo in it except the tombstone pack, and you can get codes for em elsewhere anyway most likely
yeah nato (usa, uk and egypt for some reason) and pax armata supported by most of the ex-nato members are the factions
its just basically a nato proxy civil war
in the campaign itll be about a usmc marine raider unit called dagger 3-1 vs pax armata mercs most likely
hop of bf2 modern combat guyz #screenshots-and-clips message
recorded on a real modded ps2 with a genki shadowcast 2 capture card and an mayflash ps2 to hdmi adapter
absolutely no interest in playing that lol
if you want "rare skins" grind the 2042 pass
the amount of the final bf6 player base that will have the bf4 engineer skin and whatever that skin is at the end of the 2042 pass will be minimal
given it's largely cuz 2042 is kinda dog water
The Sovereign Soldier skin is the T60, repping the No-Pat logo.
Ill have that tomorrow, that tier 60 Will be more rare, i Heard a lot of guys doing only BF4 engineer
Does anybody knows if there will be an app like the cod companion for loadouts
Only something like battlenet/battlelog like bf 4
what class is it for?
ik the bf4 one is the engineer for obvious reasons.
But Idk if the last skin is assault or support
I'm feeling support
I hope Support if it is class restricted, since I never play Assault.
it most likely will be class restricted
the bf4 skin is clearly for the engineer
also imma be real I think bf6 assault is a bit interesting with the move of the spawn beacon
having a spawn beacon, ladder, hammer to breach buildings, assortment of launchers, stims, and the ability to dual wield primaries is neat
that last one is questionable with being able to dual wield a sniper and a shotgun/carbine with the spawn beacon
I mostly only played support and engineer in the beta. Sometimes recon for spawn beacon
The spawn beacon and maybe the ladder would be reasons I may start playing as it as I usually end up a vanguard(as a Medic or Recon..) because nobody wants to PTFO.
I feel like the team should at least consider restricting the sniper to the recon for open weapons for 2 reasons.
1 it feels like the recon lacks the most identity rn
2 assault dual wielding a sniper+another weapon with the spawn beacon is kinda stupid
the recon is basically the info class but you don't really get that info until you get your uav
given a headshot kill with a sniper making a player incapable of getting revived is neat
I think locking sniper to recon defines the class a lot more compared to locking other weapons to other classes
Much as I love open weapons(with that previously discussed middle ground being something I am open to), I do agree that the sniper simply has no place anywhere other than with a recon person(minus maybe engineer given lack of binoculars for tanker spotting assistance).
The UAV is weirdly implemented though considering it is centered on you, you cannot set a spot I do not think.
I'm kinda chill with the other weapons as they aren't as defining as yk
a long range one shot
suppression in bf6 isn't that crazy so lmgs aren't all that
smgs are flexible and very versatile but they kinda need to nerf the m4 imo
the fact the m4 was more controllable and had a better ttk than both is crazy work (especially considering it had a faster fire rate and damage profile)
looking for repairmen for my heli, dm
m4a1: 900 rpm 25 damage (4 shots)
mp7: 947 rpm 16 damage (7 shots)
sgx: 830 rpm 25 damage (4 shots)
Is there a way to ask questions related to bf 6, that are not answered in their faq?
you could ask away here rq
it's kinda hard to get official team answers imma be real with you
Yeah, that is what I was already thinking sadly...
you could ask away
they might have already discussed the topic in which case I can potentially provide an answer
or it was leaked in labs or something
I really wanna get a clear picture of the battle pass in the game
How it works, what it offers, if it is a fomo fest or like halo
yeah that's not really something we can see rn unfortunately
Most likely
They may have not even finalized the contents or features in progressing/maintaining the pass yet so
I wouldn't worry too much about it tbh
I never really concerned myself with passes anymore cuz I'm way too busy for that
any other questions?
How long the live service is gonna be and what exactly they smoked, when saying that they wanna make battlefield an annual release
They smoked the money they expect to roll in with the 100 million players they are expecting to draw to BF6.
battlefield will not become an annual release for at least 4 years potentially more
It wants to start forming multiple dedicated teams to make annual releases
Just mimicing call of duty
essentially 4 dev teams working on battlefield each doing the usual 4 year cycle that battlefield has always had
the main issue with this is the dev teams conflicting with eachother and innovating/going in too similar or too different directions
The reality check is gonna be insane
cod has a 2-3 year dev cycle btw
which isn't comparable to BF's pretty consistent 4 with the only real exception being 2042
Still not worth throwing the other franchises under the bus
I mean
Need for speed is probably never gonna see another release again
I wouldn't mind if it's like
ok so we got one team making old school era battlefield games (ww1, cold war, vietnam, ww2, etc)
we got one team making modern era battlefield games
we got one team making futuristic battlefield games
we got one team doing experimental ones
the fact 2142 hasn't recieved a sequel is a sad reality
if it's all 4 teams just making the same thing it can get uhhh
old real fast
and cod's issues stem from more a leadership and executive problem standpoint more so than their release schedule
ever since vince zampella and jason west were fired the games have never been the same in the multiplayer department imo
Wish we got something set in Japan, or multiple maps in different countries instead of open world. Something like a modern day underground
Heat was ok but unbound felt even worse
Never gonna happen. Not worth to produce in EA's eyes
I honestly don't think Pax Armata is entirely evil (Totally not paid by them)
Tho would be interesting to hear Russian Voices and Chinese Voices among Pax Mercs
sad cause theres nothing really to compete with it, everything else is closer to simulator
And monetization issue, along with AI. Voice actors not being protected from the use of AI, items and skins being partly AI generated
Legally speaking those Russians and Chinese members are not formally part of the Russian Armed Forces or the People's Liberation Army
Idk, even by BF3 having Russian bad guys was a pretty tired trend
Largely down to leadership and executive issues
Vince wouldn't allow that type of nonsense
Pax Armata could probably be around a morally gray area
i loved it. why did we regress. whos really gonna complain about it
The franchise's biggest innovations in the MP department since he left were:
skin progression with black ops 1-2
gunplay in MW 2019 (which had horrendous map design so... ehhh?)
Most of the og cod team is also gone. They all left with Vince to found respawn
Dima makes some interesting points
Pax Armata vs NATO is awesome idea
Since he's not anywhere close to his leaders to prosecute him for his insubordination, he takes his chance to show a little bit of humanity that would normally get him court martialed
I guess Pax's motives could be boiled down that Alliances don't do much to prevent war and mass killings so they take matters into their own hands
i'd love it if we have police vs pax armata sleeper agents
after all, the reveal trailer showed police running with the military
and i'd love bf6 more if season 2 goes to asia
But also Pax are paid to do what they're paid to do, regardless of who hires them
There is si much they can do
Probably shoving iwo jima into the mix again
Content for 5 years easy
I wanna see a Philippine map where Pax Armata tries to cut off US navsl support
With water and naval fights
screw that
i wanna see two maps that take place in osaka
it'd be cool to see a fight while the cherry blossoms are blooming
pink leaves falling while being splattered with blood
A Japan map? Not a bad idea
not exactly
Ill be hype if bf6 will add those OP Attack/Battle boats
Like the dreadnought from bf1?
asian nato will have the japanese
asian pax will have southeast asians
pax is a private military composed of Ex nato soldiers that didn't belong to the U.S (the U.S makes up 2/3rds of Nato's budget/staff) and soldiers that back the pax financially from those countries.
It's basically what if the U.S army didn't belong to one country
No joke the U.S military is by all accounts privatized. The only element that isn't is the staff
I can imagine the Police being implemented in some maps where they're the first to respond and that includes the SWAT
is there a chance they add russian voices like bf3?
if the staff was something owned by private corporations that the U.S paid for or alternatively something that didn't soley belong to the U.S and would be accessible by multiple nations backing the troops directly.
The U.S military would literally be private
The attack is so sudden that the Police are gonna be the first one to do the firefight
every other element of the U.S military in terms of how it produces its weapons, naval carriers, aircraft, etc are all private
If they know how to make such weapons, they also know how to destroy it
lmao i kinda like this
bf6 is taking a direction that seems to involve russia and china the least to ensure the title can release in those countries without controversy
in all fairness, this is the closest we'll get to a us vs europe in battlefield
real
At that point just add Russian and Chinese voices among the Pax Soldiers
pax is european...
but im still baffled as to how the hell the franchise has not gone to having eastern factions in the game
so far, it's only china, vietnam, and ww2 japan
i wanna see modern japan and southeast asian insurgents
if they'll be in nato and pax, that's fine
I know but it's likely they can get recruits from former Spetsnaz maybe PLA soldiers
wouldnt make sense if its a multinational pmc unless they make it so chinese and russians have specific units that deploy in certain maps
maybe if they make another china dlc (which i doubt)
I don't see why russia or china has any interest in france seceding from U.S relations in entirety
and in the case of china modern china has no reason to antagonize the u.s
isnt china in the universe having a civil war rn
Unless the Chinese and Russian members of Pax Armata are in it for the money
i mean not sure how long its been going on but its a plausible reason for them not to really include them
looking for repair guys, dm
Being the producer country to the U.S's tertiary economy and all of europe is enough money
is there proof that bf3 and bf4 are connected to bf6?
Blackburn
nah its all just speculation but logically itd make sense if most of europe decided to drop nato after france literally got nuked
bf4 is connected to bf3
bf4 is connected to 2042.
2042 is connected to bf6
i know bf3, bf4, and 2042 are connected
i just dont recall or see any proof that bf6 is connected to them
how do you figure that 2042 takes place decades ahead of bf3 and 4
tbh, i dont see the 2042 and bf6 connection
all i know is they're 15 years apart
Are they really? Or is that what the news says lol
a country that calls itself a "Democracy" starting a conquest war against a neighbor who has done absolutely nothing? how can a country be more evil?
itd be nice to see them atleast try to connect it somewhat, seeing as the baltic firestorms start in 2028 and bf6 takes place in 2027 (we also have iberian offensive with the burning in the background)
they dont even have to be bad guys, just another team u play as
if you play a Democracy in Hearts of Iron you don't even have the option to start a conquest war, since that is not something a Democracy can do
shit, now that i think about it
it might make sense
Every country in history technically lol. I'm not saying they're "good". But there's a lot more to the story than, "Russia bad" and they had no reason.
I think the U.S being blamed for nuking france in bf3 might be a good reason for france to secede from NATO
đ¤ˇââď¸
Its a pretty tiring trope tho. I wanna see shit like US vs France or Scotland. Shit out of left field but still works on a story level
just sayin
yea its stated that it wrecked havoc from kyiv to berlin (which isnt really anywhere near gibraltar) but who knows there could always be retcons
tbh nato members are probably so shitty to each other that it disbanded ingame
just make the UN be as bad as the LON and there u have it
I forgot where I saw it but I think Egypt is part of NATO
yea they are
NATO is mainly so the military industrial complex makes trillions of $$ lol
i wonder what led to ex-nato members wanting to destroy the US and its now only two allies in bf6 lmao
Egypt, UK and US are the remnants of NATO or something like that
The league of nations sucked immense balls because it lacked the military power to make any of its decisions mean jack
yeah true but to leave it, someone or something happened that is so unforgiveable
It failed to prevent ww2 because it doesn't have the gigantic stick to waive around that is the U.S military
US being absent quite literally killed it tbh
also im still wondering how pax armata has THAT much money
yeah apparently, bro imagine pissing 30+ nations and now youre just reduced to 3
I been trying to get into BFV but man. I CANNOT find a damn gun I like
woodrow wilson probably felt so awesome making everyone form the LON and then not joining it
deadass
"Go figure it out"
wtf did these 3 do to get such hate that the ex-nato made a coalition to destroy them
i wonder
well the US went off and started like 2 giant conflicts within 10 years and got france nuked (from the french perspective)
i wonder how southeast asia is doing in bf6
US started do become evil and ask for money in return for military aid instead of giving it out for free like they always have
I don't think any sane country is gonna say "yeah let's go to war with the U.S" when the more sane option is "let's trade with the U.S and optimize comparative advantage"
I like the Thompson but man, anything further than 50m away and it's like I'm throwing a handful of gravel lol
war is just no longer financially sustainable. It's merely a political maneuver.
well the whole world is going to hell so no one is really acting rationally
i also dont like bfv tbh, im kinda enjoying bf2042 because of the free pass grind
side note but the african soldiers (pax) and egyptian soldiers (nato) look so damn cool
why tf is pax launching a ground invasion of brooklyn?!??!
ASEAN is probably still burning
the better question is how
corruption's already settling all of it lmao no need for war
I don't understand any of the logistics of bf6's world building ngl
Im sure the main characters of the campaign will say exactly this
Bf has always had spotty world building
maybe bf just said fuck it and went with the traditional nonsense world building that 3 and 4 did
understandable i guess, but still
I assume we'll get some kind of explanation in the campaign about how Pax got so much power
it seems to be continuing it tbh. The fact Solomon nuked france and is a CIA operative pins a lot of the blame of France getting demolished on the U.S.
Which would be a valid reason to crash out and secede from nato.
Pax Armata could take advantage of it to set up offices for recruitments
I think they pick out places around the world for mp maps, then build the story around that
ngl the plot is like some bf2042 lore but i guess its intriguing enough that i wanna play the campaign. gives me the og mw2 and mw3 vibes
2042 had some fire lore
true, i could see them springing up one by one in countries like that
i am so mad that they marketed the whole climate change and no pat thing and then proceeded to do absolutely nothing with it
flooded london in a trailer and you DONT make that a map?
Too bad its just in character descriptions
as quite a few are alligned with the US or NATO so with the increasing corruption, they could very well just open their arms to the local populace
They could recruit former members of PAF to conduct jungle operations
Maybe security and PR campaign
i really hope they introduce more units as the game goes on
i got a warning just for saying factual truths, moderation is so sad these days
hi! i thought if we were part of previous labs tests that we could play the newer ones? how do I confirm this?
what month did you join the lab test?
i swear
hopefully but reducing em to 3 countries can be problematic
couldve been a better flood zone tbh
may
Only way for Pax Armata to remain in southeast asia is to have a good PR
may was not the labs invite. It was the stress test invite.
but maybe in the lore they get new nato members maybe or some will rejoin
so much talk ab environmental collapse in 2042 but we just get a sandstorm and some tornadoes?
with pax armata it can be any country anyway
yea im wondering how theyre even standing with just 3 countries, also seems like an odd selection
Part of me really wants like a BF:Apocalypse spin off or something that serves as a 2042 sequel focusing on the worldwide collapse that is largely implied to be impending
I want a 2142 sequel
The only benefit 2042 got from not having a campaign was that they could make maps all over the world instead of just 2-4 countries like in most BF titles. Too bad those maps are mostly shit
yup, but we will see how itll turn out
I wanna see the JSDF as a faction for a JP map
they shouldve just done another war stories campaign and that wouldve helped mesh the specialists a lot better
yup wouldve preferred that tbh
honestly feels like they shouldve not named it battlefield but set it in the universe, idk
well EA wanted a franchise tbh. cod basically killed medal of honor so battlefield is the only one that can potentially beat or compete against it
For bf6 I would like to see maybe turkey added as a faction for NATO, and like greece for pax
I wanna see a campaign where we could play in the perspective of PAX and our decision can actually matter
didnt the US get exposed for their secrets of trying to make another W.M.D in the ending of 2042 whilst Oz uses that same satellite to terraform some place in africa and name it Namaqualand for the no-pats? Also the thousand petals coalition which seems like it could actually bring about a new future for alot of asian countries
at least we got like... stranded?
pretty sure the EU is trying to get back on its feet or something
thats funny because both are nato members while egypt aint but is in the game
nato membership is all over the place but its fiction anyway
so glad theres no all chat if this happens
I just find it truly insane that there would be a realm where countries would willingly secede from nato
I imagine egypt got into nato because they got attacked by (I presume) the africa pax group
Stranded in the middle of nowhere with no cover
hey hey now. Stranded is a good map. It actually has a flow and the central ship+zip lines
is stranded the panama one?
yeah makes sense, i think the focus is i guess medtierrean, the eastern europe and ofc atlantic theaters of war
big fat park in the middle and a few buildings with basically no degrading whatsoever
god I hate that map so much, most post launch maps were decent but I cant stand the openness of that one (stranded)
which makes sense for a technically a nato civil war
just looks way too clean for a world thats supposed to be doing really bad with weather
well like in real life ethiopia (I think) dammed the nile and egypt is not happy about that at all
I found stranded to have some of the most cover lol what?
it's literally 4 points around the map with tons of cover with 2 points in the ship. The distance between the ship and the points in the ends aren't far. Atop this you can parachute off the ship and zipline to these points
I kinda hope BF6 goes global
What pistols you guys wanna see?
sort of like WW2 w multiple different fronts around the world but in a modern setting
most of bf2042's maps are dog water mind you but stranded is the exception if anything
Glock 17. Fully auto. Suppressed. Nothing else
everytime I play it the map flow is just scrambling around on an objective while you get sniped from 10 people on the ship meanwhile a helicopter flies over and turns you into pink mist
mk23, m1911, g18 etc whatever nato spec ops and tier 1s use
Low-key would like to see some WW2 Pistols, not really practical for today's warfare but pretty much an heirloom
do you play 128 or 64
ive only ever played it on 64
Then I'm beyond confused
hopefully they revisit korea in bf6, would be cool to see sk vs nk if that happens
Im kinda glad season 1 is Cali themed. Happy that its there but also out the way to see more maps around the globe
if there are 10 snipers on the ship you're going to win that game off of sheer objective advantage if you run smokes
I assume they want to get the major US places out of the way so they dont have people begging for them throughout the games lifespan
would be nice yup but the season 1 maps seemed focused on US and some of the other nato places
Game campaign was leaked. At the start you will need to follow Harriet Tubman and break free as a slave
yeah one thing that bothered me before is there was never really any maps on US soil so its cool to see
we'll probably get the BR alongside season 1 cus thats also in california
I have a theory that each season will have a remake of a beloved favorite map, then 2 new maps in that region + BR map in the same region too. Would explain, Downtown, Eastwood, Badlands, and the BR map
so pax armata got the budget and manpower to both invade east and west of the usa lol
Propaganda was one of the leaked remakes right? so maybe we will get a korea season
I kinda hope downtown lets u play as police but its quite a low chance
or theres the chance the packaged remaster wont always be tied to the theme
bf hardline voicelines were so peak
i prefer that assault and support are the cops while engineer and recon are the soldiers
Yeah thats what i figure. 3 MP maps and a BR map every season
given theres us bases there wont be surprise if we got east asian maps as well. im sure pax will attack them as well to truly cripple usa across the globe
still criminal that we have no police and military working together in battlefield yet
only seen in the bf6 reveal
Also explains why BR wont be there at launch
no doubt cops have assault ladders (atleast for their swat units)
.....?
campaign mission I would imagine
Wtf would the police do
In a realm where the military are ever involved police would evacuate the scene immediately
unless it's some werido sci fi police
yup nypd fighting off pax armata with the marine raiders maybe
aside from evacuation, do the same thing the military does albeit limited
Thats what I was hoping for too. Then again the last one is Talah Market so idk how I feel about new Iran maps when that was just most of BF3
theyre shown in the reveal trailer running amongst the us military in new york so im assuming its that urgent
police and military cooperate pretty often
not at all. their only job would be evac and leave
yes but they don't fight on the front lines lmao
they handle evacuation and get out of dodge
that's their job. They're public servants. Not soldiers
with fighting on the streets they will definitely try to help especially if overwhelmed
Legit maybe only on domestic soil lol. Otherwise they have 0 involvement
yea realistically theyd be helping civs but maybe there might be a mission where they help in a firefight for that purpose
even on domestic soil if a military conflict randomly occurred their job would be evac
last time i saw cops and military working together, that was world in conflict when the soviets invaded seattle
and that was during the cold war and the game is from the 2000s
I can imagine they would still defend civilians, but wouldnt have like a battle strategy or something
Me when the K9 tries to bite my main battle tank
I feel like people are genuinely tripping balls rn
would be interesting if u play as a police at the start of the attack and then shift to marine raiders but i doubt it
brooklyn is getting invaded, I would not be shocked to see NYPD swat helping to hold down a frontline until backup comes
police will be part of the resistance ofc, but they will not be really are capable to fight a properly equipped paramilitary force that got jets and tanks like the pax
There is a reason hardline failedâŚ
We do not wanna be police
In what fantasy realm do you think police get involved in military affairs. Public servants designed for evacuation and public service. Rare exceptions being swat units for higher level operations (that rarely reach military grade).
In a battlefield
Would be cool for the escalation mode they havent released details on
doesnt mean it was bad but it just shifted too heavily outside of the bf identity
you obviously cant mobilize the US military to the middle of NYC in time to defend an attack
doesnt mean you cant include it for a small portion of the campaign
(assuming the attack is by surprise)
i think hardline was released at the wrong time
had hardline came out after bf1, i think it might've been loved a bit more
i think armed civilians will also try to make militias and resistance groups
You obviously would know if an invading force was coming
Mainland USA
doesnt seem like they knew in the trailer
with the current politics and stuff it probably will be controversial tbh
maybe with 2-3 days notice, still cant prepare a proper defense force in the largest city in the country in that time
fair
just going off how theyre showing it tbh realistically itd probably never happen
At best the military get involved in police affairs (even then this can be considered as constitutionally immoral on some occasions).
The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 literally prevents the use of military personel for domestic law enforcement excluding exceptions in the insurrection act.
In no realm are police getting involved in military operations. It's the other way around and it's Rare
the description of the empire state map is that NY got bombed by cruise missiles so its a surprise attack
You have the national guard and the IRF
I'd bet the NY/us invasion stuff will come first like how it was in the MW3 campaign, our marine raider team takes out some important doo-dad and pushes pax into retreat, then they go abroad to take out the top guy (presumably the ginger we saw in the trailer)
Do people even read the law bro. Am I just crazy 
I uh, think New York had a surprise attack before
I dont think it applies in universe cause i doubt whoever made the campaign thought about it
yes and police were involved in evacuating people
Not sure how you do a surprise attack on New York when you need to cross the Atlantic first
that's their job
sleeper cells would be my guess
the children yearn for more campaign details
In the trailer thereâs Spanish helicopters?
most likely they used some sophisticated stealth subs or whatever lol
this pax armata is well funded so no surprise
Im trying my hardest not to get banned here lol
DICE: so pax just invented teleportation
Sleeper helicoptersđ
moving like goku

maybe pax did what the russians from mw2 did? disable the american satellites to launch a new york attack?
Stealth submarine that can carry attack helicopters hmm
getting through U.S airspace or waters with a military force is genuinely crazy stuff
they used a underwater tunnel
Holy budget
Imma be real with you rq. I don't like COD's plots at all. The characters are cool but still the plots in retrospective are pretty nonsensical.
Across the Atlantic
In any case they probably dumbed down the US just so they could make it happen
they are in cargo ships declared as veilguard copies so nobody cared to check tbh lmao
The entire Pax Armata was staying at a motel across the street from the NSA.
And they sent their war plans via SMS
The biggest thing that carry cod campaigns are the characters and action set pieces. The level design is barely existent. The fact infinite warfare has the most enemy variety is saying something. The story is generally: how can we make this sound as cool to a teenager as possible
even if it doesn't make any sense
yeah theyre fictional war stories even the bf6 premise is ridiculous asf all military veterans and war planners will call it dogshit fiction
but theyre entertainment anyway so np
They attacked with a cruise missle, yet the Brooklyn Bridge just so happens to catch on fire. Hmm curious
The reason the war stories were dope is because they focused on characters imo
the stories were so character driven and particular that they didn't have room to over preoccupy themselves with a plot to the point the plot could contradict basic logic
we don't talk about the ww2 ones in bf5
yeah but the only characters that are iconic in BF history are the bad company characters and perhaps irish and blackburn
except the last tiger
the rest have their moments but theyre just one off characters
Last tiger goated
bad company 2 was peak cuz it wasn't trying to be realistic it knew what it was and wore it proudly
I honestly did not care for BF3 story at all. Dima was ok. Bf4 story was serviceable
I wish I could go back in time and have the entirety of the bf5 campaign be about the last tiger tbh.
Having the crew grow together, learn their individual stories and hardships, seeing new members join and leave/die, etc
you need to be an EA exec for that
I wonder what they will do to fill Irishâs part now that he is dead irl
I just hope with BF6 they make likeable characters.
As he was alive in 2042
real
well they can recast but who knows
And I pray recker is back
like at the very least if bf is going to do the cod route with its plot and combat/level design
at least make the characters likeable
The tombstone cameo will probably be pac
Well if there is a tombstone cameo that is
Why even pac lol, he was a minor role
Cus heâs the preorder skin
Yeah but that is what confuses me
It feels like forced nostalgia
Giving such a minor role skin
Recker feels inconsequential. Said like 2 words the whole campaign. At least with Irish he had some character development
âShitâ
Sorry, 1 word
i guess inspired from how cod do preorder bonuses now, with iconic cod characters as preorder bonuses
I feel like the only world building that made sense in the battlefield original narrative department was 2142
in a world where resources are dry due to a second ice age
Yeah but at least give more iconic skins then
yeah I could see the east and west dividing and fighting eachother for the remaining resources
well what do you have in mind
I mean, if we're talking water wars its more than likely gonna be your next door neighbor than some field half way across the world
Like when the world is literally: ok you need to have control over just the middle east and north africa to exist
yeah then people will kill eachother
Kovic would be cool
Hannah would make sense considering we know sheâs alive now and they decided to drop that info with the road to bf6 update specifically
Would like to see returning characters for sure. If not, I really hope they have something decent if theyre starting from a blank slate
How is she alive?
Was she not the canon to go and use the explosive
The world of 2142 has an ice age so bad that the north and south pole creep inward, akin to how the original ice age was due to a mass depletion of green house gases and co2 emissions from a set of devices designed to handle global warming that went wrong when done on a mass scale.
Itâs not explained yet but sheâs the person behind the phantom program in bf2042
We need phantom program back in bf6
we already got irish for 2042 but hannah, or roland or kovic would be awesome
Damn, they are really stirring all around with the story
It's literally just: we need to get into north africa and the middle east to live. There are 7 billion people
Seems like they donât really know what to make
we gotta reduce the amount of people living there
They donât want to create a new timeline so theyâve crammed a lot of conflict in a few short years
eh kinda makes sense if u read but yea it can seem overall the place
I think it will probably start with invading the country next to you because they have more water
like blackburn is the ceo of arkangel corporation and hes behind the creation of the clones (involved in the mass kidnapping of no-pats) but he tries to save his own ass which comes to bite him in the back
Guy who did the Titanfall games is director, so we're hoping for something good
Didnât they also recruit ex cod guy yeah
Oh neat
not really no lol
water filtration has always existed. There simply isn't a market for it when the global supply of natural freshwater is so high
you can in fact filter salt water into fresh drinkable water
It's just not worth the effort or resources for any sane business in the modern era
if the world reached a point where there is a water scarcity that market would have a reason to exist
Water filtration is just a question of money
But then you start fighting over who gets to own that water
Because now youâre paying someone to filter it and make it drinkable
why do that when you can pivot your resources into forming a water filtration system akin to hydro plants
I just hope it isnt just more generic war story with massive set pieces. I love the set pieces dont get me wrong, but it feels like another generic military story will be annoying. Theyve proven theyre capable with BF1 and BC, so I hope they at least have something slightly better than BF4
a resource shortage of something like water only makes sense amidst an environmental crisis
Can Mongolia, for example manage that themselves though? Then they become attached to a larger power like China to get a necessary resource such as water
where the environment itself is to harsh to exist in due to sheer heat, extreme weather conditions, or cold
well the premise definitely is like mw2 and mw3 so hopefully it got iconic and likeable characters
Ye they got their own captain price
Basically small countries get screwed and it becomes a turf war of who gets to screw over which little nations
because it is in fact cheaper.
Also in the case of china and the U.S these countries have the resources to invest in water filtration but again. Why do any of that for a market that doesn't exist
What I really wanna see again is co-op mode again
Make it 4 players with a full squad
Portal horde mode
Hmm yup true hopefully this Dagger 3-1 is like the 141
Or custom campaing in portal by community
again you don't need a water filtration market when something called idk free fresh water exists for companies to sell
or even better, who knows 
when natural fresh water sources dwindle then that opens the door for a water filtration market to exist
no sane human is investing in that rn
I mean, if they can make it so that theres some light mission elements here and there instead of just sending all o fthe AI at once then sure, id be down
Hell yeah
Imagine Battlefield with Zombie mode
Zombiefield
Not very zombie
It kinda existed
Just pax armada running towards u with a hammer to crush your head
In 42
infected?
Get into the heli
Fly away
I don't want a zombie mode. The only zombie games worth a damn is DayZ and Left 4 Dead
Yes, on redacted
cod zombies is alright i guess
I kinda wanna see something like that again, not canon to the BF6 lore
I guess you're just a nameless grunt trying to escape or something, pick up guns and meet up with AI survivors
@compact musk btw it costs between 5 to 10 dollars for 1000 gallons of fresh water via desalination
but again why spend any of that money and develop the plant for it when actual free fresh water exists
I never really got into any zombie stuff. Zombies in videogames is like basic "girls" and pumkpin spice
Pax armata with hammers đ¨
500 of them at once
Constantly reloading
Getting your head crushed ain't a n option
this is also a much more popular market in some regions btw like the middle east
depends tbh but some zombie games are definitely better than others
anyways water rant over. Idk why but I get pressed when people mention things that make... no real logistical sense for some reason.
Yes, and what if that free fresh water exists outside of your country's borders and you so happen to have a surplus of military armaments' compared to the country that has that water
"Protected by Javelin Anti cheat"
trade.....
trade is always cheaper than war in the modern world
by a metric mile
War is better tho
war is a political agenda in the modern world it has no practical financial incentive
Good for investments
Not unless youre a Rothschild lol
this is not the same as funding militaries btw. this is its own frame of market.
Having a military and using it are 2 very different things
I want the javelin anticheat to work like, when they detect a cheater, the cheater gets jumped by 50 pax armata with hammers
only Pax will have hammers?
Jumpscare of a dude with a hammer smashing your screen from the inside
Germany is basically the titular example of how war can rail your country
hell you can even look at the winning side: britain
They literally seceded from all colonial activities because they were no longer financially sustainable because the toll of war was that bad for the central nation and its infrastructure on maintaining colonial activities
britain got a hard time after ww2, lost its empire
now in bf6 itll have a hard time again
Would be a funny sight if they were greeted with a sledgehammer
But hey they got 45 trillion dollars out of india
that were burned on maintaining colonial rule over india...
colonialism is more profitable than war but it too is not the most sustainable
well couldve been another 45 trillion and more if they didnt lose it tbh
not exactly the mine deposits, land, infrastructure, etc were all used and up in flames post ww2
anyway im rooting for nato in bf6
they left all colonial activities after ideal usage, and after the infrastructure post-WW2 collapsed
trade and commerce are just the most financially stable strategies in the modern world.
Being colonial is weird in this day and age
it's largely because the resource rich areas (like the americas) and the economically developed regions (like India and Africa) have been drained or occupied.
Is it not the other way?
Resources and economics
The americas wouldnât be much without foreign imports
in the case of India the country went from having around 30-35% of the world's gdp
to dog water
the americas were extremely resource rich compared to Europe at the time.
What do you think would have been easier for the Dole fruit company? Do active trade with the natives on Hawaii or send like 20 guys with guns and hold their queen and gunpoint and force them to grow pineapples for free?
it was large swathes of largely unoccupied land with tons of deposits for mining silver, gold, farm land, and tons of biome diversity
espeically when economies based themselves on silver and gold standards back then
this was the cold war era. A lot of the U.S's decisions in this era kinda
or wait no I'm tripping