#battlefield-6
1 messages · Page 414 of 1
mine are bad :(
I played the map a bit and the amount of flares and tracer that are firing out of the map is making me both blind and get tinnitus
Kinda felt. I played nothing but hard tho so it was kinda difficult on locker
We smoking something awright
i mean medic can kinda support the score with revives
not even because of stats but because i wasnt going to play like siege of shangai and golmund railway and hainan resort
yeah but they're saying kills are less valuable on other classes which makes literally 0 sense
Baffled that peoples still thing they did well when they lost more tickets with their low kd and not taking flags
why are you assuming in this scenario that they arent taking flags? why cant people do their role and also get high kd and get flags?
lol yall are so dumb it /bf6stats overview username
It literally doesnt. In BF4 and BF1 you could hit top of the leaderboard with a horrid KD by accomplishing what youre supposed to do. If a tank stays alive because 2 engineers sat on it and they both have horrid KDs I aint saying shit.
Guys stop shooting enemies if you are not an assault class!!!
medic is generally the strongest class in the entire game when it comes to killing
in 6 not really
purely because of self heal
no your not allowed to kill people on medic you have to only revive people!!!!!
If you play support / engineer you are to lay out 5% accuracy suppression fire, nothing else!!!!!
I generalised it, i did not mention him. But the lobby stats dont lie, every game thd same…
you're not supporting my class fantasy !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i mean assault wasnt very strong i feel like having a wall and heals with ammo was much better tbh
2042, 5 and 1 medic in general are the best killing class
don't shoot medics (and make sure you dont bear arms as medics too)
Please tell me your not calling people dumb when you had the internet at your fingertips and failed to look up something basic and something that's also in your damn email 🙄
I replied to wrong person oops
I wish there was an actions per minute metric we could see
recon was the best imo, because fucking regenerating c4 and beacon and uav
God I need BF1 bolt actions on medic again.
there are kills per minute on tracker to see
the second strongest class was scout in bf6 and support was imo the best
Medics should have red cross armbands, and you should get punished for killing them too!!!!!
wtf are you talking about? im talking about using the bot in #stats 💀
I am just talking about this guy saying kills arent as valuable on other classes than assault which is one of the top 3 worst takes I've heard on this discord so far
Isn’t the assault class in BF 6 supposed to be a basic Frontline soldier?
I mean it kind of makes sense for his role, but I would get why that makes the class boring and uninteresting to use as he doesn’t really have any special gadgets/abilities aside from just breaking shit I guess
idk, i felt recon was better than support in 6 beta
yeah i played recon a lot too, but the wall was just too good tbh
I want to see all actions like dropping meds, revives, kills etc
not your wall anymore with my c4 >:)
yeah but there is no game that has that
Plenty of games have that?
Theyre giving assault respawn beacons. This now means they can bring their whole squad up to the front lines, or feed the enemy team tickets.
also I was using recon a lot to foward deploy the squad
which
it should be a frontline soldier but it doesnt have good self sustain to continue playing frontlines
anyway 345 revives is ok, i totally forgot how to use the defibs the first weekend
you dont really have to waddle back to your team on support
I personally been playing engineer
Nah the game ain’t sweaty just aim center mass like in Halo and let the gun do the rest of the work.
you really shouldve aimed head in halo but ok
k100 my beloved
Google it and you’ll find a huge list of games
Headshot only!
so you cant name one
League of Legends?
Headshot only bf would be an interesting
moba is cheating imo
Engineer is gonna be a rare breed in BF6 with how bad LMGs are and the fact theyre bringing back closed class weapons before even balancing the weapons.
Okay lets switch the topic from larping larrys to snipers oneshotting in specific parts of a body!!! (Bad aimers crutch)
Yes. Which the full stats are online and in your email. Which you also had to ask before even attempting to look for it 🤣
Those are 1&2 combined.
there were bf4 custom servers like that back in the day
Daaaaang dawg
Reminds me of the Overwatch aim training modes haha
name 10 books! and no it does not have that
master troll right here i bow down 😭
Fortnite
What
this chat is going insane
It’s a good thing my brothers wedding is on the 18th and it’s a Saturday. I get atleast a week of battlefield 6.
Wdym?
This is important information for me to know as an engineer dude 
thats spm technically
Not a troll. You just made your self look dumb when they litterly gave you the resources before you even asked. Then even sent the email so you can have a downloaded image of your stats
Congratulations to your brother!
Can we start putting together a list of game modes from BF3 ? that gun mode where you get upgraded to a new gun after every kill, good times
the more actions you do per minute the higher your score per minute
Happy Wedding to your brother
gun game has been in all recent bf i think
thats not what i asked 😂 😂 😂
that a totally different game and stats shown yeah the transparancy on a competitive game is higher
Pickle, wasn’t your score like 18k per game tho?
LMgs = Trash. People will only swap for anti tank. If Recon and their drones arent doing it 10x better, that is.
you could suggest it to TRN but i doubt they would make such stats its a bit random
actual horrid take
That and repairing
No each of those gives a different score I want the individual actions taken. This shows the intensity that the player is playing at an not just plopping down a TUGS
@balmy yew If this were a WW1 or WW2 game, I would say one shot, one kill for snipers makes sense. In a modern game, not so much. Modern body armor is a factor.
you realize that we are getting bf4 restricted class system?
Yall know casual players wont touch it. Them LMGs were so ass in the beta.
you can just play carbines
then you are the casual if you thought lmg was ass
They are the same stats. So it is completely relevant to exactly what you were asking for. I just gave you a more detailed version
there's gonna be both last i knew
truth is i could take you down with a knife so this what this good and bad talk is unemployment at a certain point
Yeah, but it’s not even for the realistic part. It gets me riled up seeing I killed somebody with a body shot, you know what I mean, feels kinda unfair
like i am sorry, going 36-0 does not happen with any gun that isnt called kts100
idk tbh, they kinda have to pick one and if it would be one then it would be locked because everyones begging about it
Wait did someone just say LMGs are trash lol
I tried them. They are ass. Felt like I was shooting people with spitballs, even with headshots.
yes, someone legit said lmg was trash in beta
Are we talking about modes ?
Still hard for me to play bf 2042 after bf6, it was just so damn better 😭
in 6? yes lol
not kts lol
I didn't have much of a problem with them. Use the bipod and it is a killing machine. The trade off is being stationary
Yeah, they’re going to be experimenting with both open and close weapon class playlists
I mean for many people, them even doing this is a bit weird because I can kind of foresee this kind of separating the player in terms of what they want, and also the simple fact that matchmaking may be a little bit screwed but eh
I felt that way to tbh but tbf my shit was wack first couple of games
Oh I thought he meant just overall. Was gonna say, that sounds like a solo COD streamer sentence lol
Lmg damage is too low if it’s already got a slow debuff
you still didnt answer the question 😭 im done bro
the beta lmgs atleast were way too slow compared to other weapons and werent very crazy good in midrange
I said Google it. I did you just didnt pay attention
L110 was ok ish, kts was insane in any range that isnt close range
Did you use them like Rambo or did you lay down hellfire lol
but they cant really be much faster anyway
What? The no recoil lmg was insane long and mid range
Lmg wasn’t completely ass but wasn’t great either
yeah let everyone use the same class weapon and so there is no variety great!!! Obviously there are stronger and weaker weapons, but every weapon has a low enough time to kill
i play normally aka not spamming random fire at people
Exactly. Carbines and assault rifles did a better job midrange and SMGs were there for close range.
I would say they need a little more power and a headshot should always be a kill regardless the gun
even in close range kts have the troll 2 headshot kill
Unfortunately u can only get week 2 stats now cause they are the same link
Those weiners
yea ill google the bot commands used in stats instead of here where the bot is you right 😂
One of the BEST games to get LMGs right I've noticed is Helldivers 2. Man you can go prone and just mow down enemies like you're mowing the grass
I def got some nice feeds w lmg
you cant compare lmg balance from a pve game to a pvp game
helldivers isnt pvp, and the machine gun isnt that good in hd2
bf4 for example had terrible lmg balance, bf1 had it the best imho
there are so many better stratagem equips
how many people get close 2 headshots not many so and 3 shot nvo on body is better
can your nvo kill in 3 shots at 100m?
Yeah but the damage is ass. Id rather have a little kick to my gun then hit my enemy with spitballs. Recoil aint nowhere near bad in the beta. Nothing really had much kick.
You cant use Google correctly
https://www.ea.com/en/games/battlefield/battlefield-6/player-stats
There's a few of them. But you find choke points in BF and you can pretty much do the same thing. That's why I always loved Hardcore modes. One dude doesn't die, see where you're at in death video, and then come hunt you.
Just wait till the rest of the ARs come out
didnt really like the way they did mgs/lmgs in bf5 but the light ones were pretty fun to play
I felt the LMGs in BF1 were way underpowered on release. In BF4 hardcore they were great
probably some nice ones in there
the point of kts was to control engagement distances
im good dawg 👍
Everything in hc is great that’s the point lol
For open weapon classes, they are trying to sort of mitigate that with “signature weapon traits” as you probably seen in the beta
For example, only recon can hold their breath when using sniper rifles and there’s no movement penalty with LMGs for the support class
Eh… you may ask why they’re going through all this trouble and they should just close the weapon classes for the entire game which… eh fair
It don't matter for me, I'm M4 guy till I die. I like using stuff I own irl. Now I need them to add a KS7 to the shotguns
i figured it out
Yeah but you are asking for a complete package gun, good ttk + no recoil+ low bloom
I'm so happy they are testing dedicated hardcore modes in Labs right now.
https://www.ea.com/en/games/battlefield/battlefield-6/player-stats
Nah let's see your week 2 stats. Mine were shit considering i just reviving tanked alot
ooooooo thats good to know!
kts had horrible bloom tho
Are you telling me in a mode where everything kills super fast...Everything is good?
lmgs in bf1 are veeeery strong lol, they dont have a large ttk drop off at distance like other weapons do
I think there’s an m4 in the AR category at some point
when i fight a close quarters on a map with close quarter i will use the nvo and ofcourse weapons are at different ranges different good. Stop making these mental gymnastics. With this argument we could take every sniper and say its the best because it oneshot headshot kills somebody
I didn’t notice it, just gotta hit your shots unc!
parabellum ttk at 100+ meters is like 340ms?
would be nice to put a ugl on it
Prolly just be an M16A4. Or an HK416, we already got the HK417 in Beta. Wasn't the 417 a Carbine in beta?
its in #stats
Yeah. Odd, a gun feels like a gun and not like a super soaker. Lol
what im saying is unlike the opinion of some people above, lmg in 6 was not a weak class
I heard they are making tap-firing a lot better too. That'll help a ton.
It was which through me off becuase I could have sworn the 417 was a dmr in bf3 lol
they need to bring back reverse spread from bf1 imo it was the best way to make lmgs feel good imo
fuck no to reverse spread imo
It should be irl they have longer barrel and shooting .308 lol
Add some bloom then idc. Or add a little recoil. Most people here have played a FPS before we can adjust to recoil.
yes and no they definitly overplay it the kts100 is good but not that good
That's combined stats
The M16 platform is probably gonna make a appearance in the AR category
Same shit as the M4… just bigger
Damage at distance they were very good. That I'll gice you. I just remember at launch they were like squirt guns. For a war that gave birth to the machine gun, it was a disappointment. Lol.
correct
its a good way to even out ads times, not make them op but not bad in close range and medium range accuraccy is better
the problem is i dont know how can they buff kts without making it stupid, unless they do a flat buff to body damage and change synthetic rounds to the 1.7x while keeping the headshot damage so it would be more consistent?
Yeah ofc, I’m not saying recoil should be lowered matter of fact I think for most guns it should be higher especially good ttk guns
Wthelly
It was the weakest class. Still will be. Shotties hardly got a major nerf. Aint no reason to take a LMG over a carbine, SMG, or Assault rifle.
I'd assume so. If the Army sticks with this MCX irl it'll still be 10+ years before all the M16s and M4s get replaced lol.
what do they call it the one they are using the XM7?
they should not buff that gun they could buff the other lmg but not the kts100 it would eliminate the point of this weapon being for long range medic fights to counter sniper
i love lmg
they already adjusted it by the update we had
Found it. Your week 2 is negotiable considering how much you played
Oh I didnt get too much time to play weekend 2.
atleast they stated that they adjusted midrange gunfights to require bursting more often
i mean how would you buff L110 though, aside from ads it already have close to ar performance
Ay don’t be picking on people now!
Yeah the MCX Spear
From the promotional materials, yeah that gun is coming to the game
update after beta not during beta, there were no changes in beta
Im not. It was just a stated fact
What are you going by? KDR? I stuck with a dude who was new to BF when the beta was going on, he couldn't kill shit but was showing him how just be a support player, and he was scoring Top 5 quite a bit getting jack shit for kills lol
I can make an NGSW US Army loadout 🗣️ 🔥
Ah okay. Either way Im fine with it. Im fine with more recoil for quicker TTK.
they re-adjusted ttk aswell
This might be why I didn't have an issue the LMGs. Most of my time with them was in week 2.
Ttk should be 0, 1 bullet kills you with no revive
probably going to be around bf3 ttk times or slightly slower
they should buff and nerf it at the same time. It should have more firepower and much more recoil and the player carrying that weapon should have much less mobility
Yeah I only got to play Thursday and Friday.
BF3 or BF5 TTK would be cool to me
HC BF6 when?
Nevarrr
Lemme ping Dice devs here rq
@dicedevs
Bold move
bold
Labs is testing Hardcore right now.
omg
Has anyone been playing some Battlefield 5 waiting for 6? I really regret skipping out on this one. I might suck at it but man, TTK feels good and tanks feel great too.
Peak
Dragon Valley’s loading screen is PEAK
Isn't contents of labs under strict NDA
A dice dev here please don't ping me... This is a warning
i hope bf6 will bring in more intellectuals that will strive the hardcore larpers away
Bruhhhhhh
Ew. Please dont mention that game to me again.
I can't get thew time to learn flying planes in BFV because level 500 dudes wont get taken down once all game
It will be the other way around
Yes
But that means nothing to the people who want to leak it
100%, but you gotta chill with the larp too
I hope there’s hc servers man so if people complain about ttk they pile jus play that
There was a battlefield 5 😉
Omg I never knew
Better than 2042 tho lol. Last Battlefield I spent a lot of time in was Battlefield 1. Didn't even play that game all the way through once PUBG got big.
That one Chinese guy comes to mind. Dude leaks more footage than a faulty faucet does water
BFV had the best vehicle system in a BF game in awhile. I loved how you had to replenish ammo. The ammo and repair points made vehicle warfare balanced.
Worst of the WW2 BF games unfortunately.
idk a lot of good bf4 players are coming back, probs some good cod players going to transfer over
Ik it existed. Never played it
Complaining about the ttk being to short on some guns does not then make playing a mode where the ttk is short for everything a solution
This came from the devs. Let me see if I can find the article.
Gotta ask who pre ordered here?
I never played Bf4 😔 being poor sucks
Idk man I had more fun flying around on hovercraft (they finally hovered really high in the sky) vs BFV on launch.
bf4 isnt very great these days anyway tbh
I'm still on the fence. Cyberpunk burned me too much
plays nothing like it used to
I've only heard people say the TTK is too slow in beta. Which I agree, 1 or 2 less rounds to kill would have been perfect imo
Oh fuck you too? I got nasty PTSD from that one.
Cyberpunk is much better now
Ah so I'd die in 1.5s than 2s, swell
Stalker 2 is pulling a Cyberpunk. Crap at launch, but you can feel like it'll be good in a year or two
i dont get why hardcore/milsim players complain about the ttk tbh
If u still own cyberpunk u should try the game again
Inverse, people have been saying it’s too low not slow
I played it at launch day, finished the game in two weeks and never touched it again
Ttk/ttd was fine imo idk what the complaining was about
The only game Im giving the benefit of that too is No Mans Sky. Sean Murray has earned my forgiveness.
My Xbone started smoking on launch day. I couldnt believe it. It had surviged Ark, GTA V, all that, to almost die to Cyberpunk.
below 200ms and like less than 10 frame ttd's arent fine
I didn't complain really about TTK as I i'll get what I want in a Hardcore mode. I just felt like 3 or 4 shots to the head with hollowpoints was too much
Stalker 2 is my main game if there’s an argument about UE5
I hate that Engine man
stalker 2 recent reviews are much worse and the game costs 110 euros on the ultimate edition
Source: I played stalker 2 on launch day
Sony pulled cyberpunk off ps4 ps store, remember that?
Idk what that means mate I just know I found it enjoyable personally
Yessir I was mad Microsoft didn't do the same
https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/news/community-update-battlefield-labs-testing
In this article EA discusses at the bottom concerning Hardcore.
Every UE5 game seems to look and feel the same.
What’s the issue with that engine? I heard that the main issue is that developers apparently suck at optimizing their games on it or whatever
Yeah I like the ttk being 4-5 shots, just the aiming and combat style I prefer. But those other modes will work out for you :)
Yeah, they run like crap too lol. Supposedly Stalker 2 is updating to the newest version and that's supposed to help a lot.
I LOVE UE5
3 FRAMES PER SECOND
100% GPU USAGE
MELTING CPU
you get 1 frame ttd's even at like 240ms ttks if the player that killed you has cringe ping and itll feel worse and more inconsistent in bf6
yeah 4-5 shots is a standard for bf tbh
Thank
Devs rely WAYYY too much on framgen nowadays. That's what I liked in BF6 beta, I didn't use DLSS or framegen at all. And I was getting 100fps on medium
bf6 was pretty well optimized yes
Just use dlss bro just use fsr bro, don't you like smudgy frames bro?
Native is KING
Well, that’s because battlefield six is still using the frostbite engine, is it not? 🗣️ 🔥
Yep, and BF6 ran great
dlss and framegen are more realistic because reality is dystopian and full of AI slop
Siege of Shanghai and op locker on bf6 would hit like crack
Bf7 on ue5
My friends group was all fine.
Ranges from shitty shit shit to
7950x3d/5090
Yeah, I had very little issues
The only major issues that I really had gameplay wise was rubber band, but that was at the very end of the open beta so it wasn’t bad
I did have some UI issues with certain attachments, not wanting to equip to that gun when I’m in a match only.. that’s fine
The only issues I had were infinite loading screens when loading into a match during beta 1
I didn’t know. I had a nice experience. It was 8 out of 10.
I had that a couple times but other than that I had a flawless experience
The game would start loading up the match then it'd suddenly go to the splash screen with the loading icon. My mouse's RGB kept blinking
It was weird
siedge of shanghai but let engineers rebuild the tower because the map is more fun with it up but levolution is also cool
I dunno if I gotta mess with mouse smoothing or something in the settings in BF5, but I cannot land shots like I could in BF6. I still gotta mess around with it
Maybe just a crumb of level evolution. Elevators crashing
The levolution looks cool but C becomes aids afterwards
tower going down is iconic, i'm afraid engineers rebuilding it is the only solution
Last zone on Cairo breakthrough is pure brainrot, it reminded me of Shanghai gameplay I saw back in the day
I've been wanting Kharg Island to be remade forever. That was prolly my favorite map besides Damavand Peak.
This is why locker is so nice
Locker? I barely know 'er!
Devs don’t pretend it’s a coherent map, the sheer chaos is so unapologetic
Every battlefield has that one choke point map where you just chuck shit through a doorway for half an hour and I wouldn’t have it any other way
lis missle players, dm
It’s fun, you “bf vets” always got something to complain about
I think I liked Metro more than Lockers
honestly i hope to get some shanghai vibes on that new york map, very hot take probably but i think battlefield is the most fun when it's all out warfare without jets
I’m glazing op locker ffs
Jets are cool but I exclusively use them on suicide missions ngl
ye i thought my pc wouldnt run it very well either
but had 100fps on a 8gb card
i just feel like the gameplay dynamics between infantry and helicopters is a bit different when helis don't poop themselves about jets
Same, I'm on a 4060 and was getting 100fps on medium/high
huh on what res
warzone is 100x better than bf
1440, and Wasnt using DLSS or anything either
Unsuccessful ragebait 💔
are you sure you didnt have frame gen on
im sure I dropped to 70-70fps often
good! believe that! what a shame you won't join us on battlefield really 😢
Nah I was on Native. I also have 32gb RAM on an i511400 if that matters much
was my fps that much lower then? because i was 1080p all low on a rx6650xt
nah I actually hate cod and love bf. Yall have been complaining about bf for over an hour so I thought I would try to unite yall
weird my friend with a 3060ti was playing low 1440p at 100 fps aswell
Real talk bf6 is a solid 7/10 rn with empire state bringing it down 2 points
and 4060 isnt much more powerful from a 3060ti
yeah my budy was runing the same on that card too
is it bad i actually love empire state lol
i don't even play battlefield i thought it's a cross stitching server tbh
lol
I was mainly on medium just put particles and stuff to high if i remember right
It’s like a wannabe locker, infantry only map that fails because the choke points aren’t good enough so you just end up getting fucked
If someone else can enjoy it happy for them at least 😂
still weird
i wish we had an infantry-only map that replicated a gimmick from bc2 squad deathmatch (or am i thinking of something else?) where there was a neutral apc spawn as a little side-objective to either use for advantage or destroy asap to deny the advantage
umm i think BF4 had a counter-strike bomb mode but it never went far but i dont remember what ur saying
Battlefield 6 is the #12 best selling game on Steam right now. Black Ops 7 is #152 lol
Bo7 will still outsell, not an indictment on bf but cod is just that massive as a franchise
Well what has just started circulating around about portal in the past couple hours makes me pretty confident it will actually outsell BO7
if the beta is to go by, bf6 deserves it, probably won't happen but it damn sure deserves it. it's definitely the most fun i think i've ever had in a battlefield game before
Agreed
Nah casual fan base is just massive for cod, like even if battlefield 6 is a better game by every metric ( and it absolutely is) the sheer amount of people who just know cod as that gun game propels it far and beyond
lis missle players, dm
"that gun game" lol
Excuse me. About portal in BF6 is it possible to create new entire map?
I believe so
I wish I can make de_dust...
Or Cold Storage from Halo
My buddy and I never lost on that map, 4 controller games lol
de_dust2 really finds its way into every game where you can create a map lol
Mario kart levels in portal will hit like crack
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/988837269689483285/1410661875766530078/image.png?ex=68b1d4c0&is=68b08340&hm=081e131efd4201479af003789b9620723a83c52ebf3712d27bf74f404b29a110& https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1404558469687803904/1410685014214971442/5574069409876937621.mov?ex=68b1ea4c&is=68b098cc&hm=101cadfd35056341469c9fdd09906a6962aae07c4a2b1e3c377b7e4bb53efdc4& https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1404558469687803904/1410656035777286376/sadc_1.png?ex=68b1cf4f&is=68b07dcf&hm=753df6413c6d7fe2421292cf17e9fa6f09e4df44be770157bd1110d77906f738& https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/988837269689483285/1410690006980362400/image.png?ex=68b1eef3&is=68b09d73&hm=582f6a378bb07c546cadc8a90b8b684f4bfdac2b424f6240556bc9e930958305& https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1404558469687803904/1410686982635655168/31.png?ex=68b1ec21&is=68b09aa1&hm=69bfdca5befb5da7f338d41b41ab346d4c171135187c250b7ccf2a0755e17e66&
You ever play mcc?
BF6 needs to give us the option to declutter and customize the hud, remove or heavily nerf sliding and to release far more big maps for me to consider buying, I know big maps are coming but they should be the overwhelming majority, not 2 or 3. Focus on making a good BF and if the COD community like it and want to come play amazing but dont pander to them
i mean if a map can be made dust 2 will just be made
yep, a classic
Dust 2 overrated af
Classic inferno legendary
de_cbble is the best map in CS and nothing comes close
the best Battlefield map however is Empire State
lol
Lol Halo 3 on Xbox like '08 not MCC
No ik, I was just asking
have you guys seen jackfrags video on the range finder for the sniper?
I think I played some MCC though.
Hi, can Dice please add an in-game built in benchmark. A simple 2 min run would be appreciated.
for bf6?
oh, he just released it like an hour ago
dust 2 is just a very good casual map
comp wise dust 2 is absolute ass
dust 2 is boring tbh
Guys, it appears that OFS will have the following vehicles per team:
- 3 tanks
- possibly 2 LAVs
- 1 attack jet
- 1 fighter jet
- 1 attack heli
- 1 transport heli
- 3 transport vehicles
- 2 possibly buggies or quads
i mean if you have played it a thousand times yes its boring
which we all have
yeah
its like a near 20 year old map or something soon
and it has always been popular and ported to a million other shooters
pretty crazy tbh
imagine a battlefield large map sized dust 2
Finally got my new PC finished and she is ready for BF6 Baby! Ryzen 7 9800X3D / RTX 5080
I was playing the Beta on my i7 9700 / RTX 2080 Super So I can't wait to feel and see the difference
remake amiens 1:1 in bf portal
that map shouldve never existed in the first place
What
Yeah I was watching it and tbh I'm in 100% agreement with him when it comes to that range finde r
I think it compares too much to the call of duty style of sniping and it just doesn't feel right to me
Sniping was done masterfully in 3,4 and 1 and it should be more along the lines of those games
the hold range finder* function to get a perfect shot everytime should go imo
the hold B key thing
Jack is a really good PC gamer and in the hands of other people with the same skill level it legit feels like they're hacking when they're just using a broken game mechanic
he's got a good pont, it takes the skill out of long range sniping tbh
at least that is what it looks like in the video, i never tried that attachment in the open beta
That's probably why I felt like people were hacking whenever they were sniping
Especially on that map
i mean
Super long range sniping is so bitchmade of a strat, 80% of the time your no hitting shit or getting hitmarkers, but 100% of the time free dogtags for me
they can just make range finder a higher cost item
Nah that won't solve it. They need to nerf it
also saying broadly have a hang of bullet drop is any skill is kinda just not ture
with any experience you can just hit the shots very easily
also LRF is very real and imo shoiuld be in the game
Yeah cause it's skillful when you have an attachment that does it for you
That's the point of it. It completely takes the skill out of using a sniper rifle in game. It's almost comparable to call of duty style of sniper gameplay.
so is real life
Range finders have been in battlefield before and worked fine but it doesn't give you instant headshots from 10000meters away
make the LRF cost more, and maybe make it not instantly adjust to balance it out
it doesnt give you instant headshots in 6 either, so idk what you are talking about
You should watvh the video I'm talking about
i literally used LRF in beta, i think i know how it works
Mfs with the SRR61 and 40X/Range Finder are always bottom leaderboard material
I just watched it. I dk sounds op out of the box. I already have a idea sounds crazy but might be crazy lol. Irons sights with or without the Lazer lol. No one could find you but you can see them lol.
Thinkin they are Chris Kyles god given gift at sniping 🥀
Just imagine it in a hardcore mode
Broken asf
literally just shoot people normally in hc makes them die anyways, why do you need a attachment that have a cost to do the exact same thing
If you think THATS broken you havent played enough hardcore
depends on how the health and stuff is set
Rip 😭. Say this is for you Chris well coding the game lol
I don't play hardcore enough to say so I just imagine it would be.
At least based off from the video.
I never liked hardcore except in battlefield 1
O hell yeah. Montage for days.
RSC instakilled like the bolt actions
HARDCORE 300% DAMAGE AFGHANISTAN SIMULATOR
Essentially what that range finder is
literally use a regular gun that shoots faster defeats any amount of use of sniper
honestly the only thing I hope is that 4x lower mag optics don't get scope glint
people die in one shot anyways why choose the gun that shoots slower
i love low magnification scopes, and the fact they gave you no glint compared to long range scopes was a huge plus in 4
and have worse ammo capacity btw
Can't shoot what you can't see good sir!
if you can see me i can see you
Maybe? But range is still my friend.
All I'm saying is that they need to nerf it. delay it in a cool down.
Or something to make it less over powered
Making the attachment cost more won't change it. Cause if a noob can headshot people from 10000 meters across the map with little to no effort says a lot
It doesn't take that long to unlock weapon attachments
ah nvm I've been running volley pod, maybe thats what is doing all the damage and not the grenade launcher
idk which one it is, one of the two is insane
I don't think an attachment is going to magically make you good
tbh theres plenty of attachments that make you go from crazy recoil to none so its not impossible that it will make you play better but no it wont make you a better player
Attachments won’t save 5% accuracy suppression fire Andy’s
no unfortunately not
Yeah, I was watching some guy's videos about Counter-Strike and their "sight to shoot" speed stat lol. Rangefinder won't help if you're slow
It's not going to instantly make you good but it significantly shortens the gap in skill in a concerning amount
i didn't snipe much in the beta. but 2042 and bf6 are the same engine. with my sws in 2042 lr barrel and hp ammo i get 0 bullet drop over 400m. why are you guys worried about range finder lol
eh I dont think its concerning, everyone gets attachments and it does not take long at all so concern is probably not the correct word
2042 is still very different compared to prior battlefield titles
Time to damage speed lol
@floral rampart the mods banned my tank gunner
Noooooooooo!!
well even with the default recon sniper loadout i felt like in beta there was like no bullet drop. so i feel like bf6 might be worse
That is right, legit 0 drop on snipers
Sniping in 3, 4 and 1 was a lot more satisfying and rewarding to me and I feel should be more like those games then what the route is going now
they're taking us out slowly
They won’t take me alive

Poor fish
bf1 and bf6 sniping is so talentless its actually embarrassing
sweetspot should never be a thing in any fps game
i was actually amazed that they put it back into the game
that was like the last thing that i expected them to do
i was so sure it would be a never to return feature
Hurry up October
im sure 4 studios and all their youtubers as consultants can make 1 decent game between them. It would almost be hard to mess it up
Hope y’all have a good day 😄
You too ❤️
Right!!
Tbh I'd rather have small maps than 2042 maps
But also I liked the medal of honor reboots
Can’t get here fast enough
large maps were never good tbh
Cairo was the right size for me
I also liked the one in brooklyn
we will probably have muuuuch larger maps lol, but i really hope we get more of cairo sized maps
The fourth one there was my least favorite
idk i had mixed feelings about the new york one
too many angles too many windows too much verticality it was just kinda aids to play but it was no where near as bad as a lot of the maps we have had in the past
cod snipers require skill
I liked the destructable sky bridge
idk how cod snipers work
but snipers in bf should always be 1htk head 2htk body at all distances
makes sniping less appealing and reduces rat gameplay + much more rewarding to play
lots of rooms you could enter with doors glued shut, just wierd
Did you play at all this weekend ?
COD is always one tap to the head
thats not a bad thing, it would be bad if you could access those rooms
yeah thats more skill requiring
you can, thats my point
too bad that cod takes away any skill depth by the most overpowered and untalented aim assist there is
oh i misread mb
Not really, is point and click the fact snipers work in cqb says it requires next to no skill
it made me think of warzone, and never running into that 'locked' door problem
i really hope there will be more similar maps to cairo thats like the best map you could have in a battlefield type game
minimal but easy to predict/read verticality and good path ways/routes so you cant really get into a stalemate unless the team is just that bad
like talah market, prise de tahure type maps
body shots?
sure 1 or 2 maps like Cairo is ok but if half the maps are closed in with no verticality the games basically dead
depends
no it really doesn't, snipers just don't require skill in CoD in CQB or at long range, it's point and click with minimal drop or lead required. Go play arma where sniping requires actual skill
If I played arma I'd do it to be AFSOC
lol no
bf5 is full of garbage and every community server is made around tight closed in maps with limited verticality with few exceptional
infantry only servers have always been popular aswell when it came to smaller closed maps
You know what? Bet, I'm gonna play arma
lol yes, the most played maps on BF4 are smaller maps like Zavod and Flood Zone mid size maps with verticality
what kills bf5 for me is that it's WW2 but ppl got all these goofy guns, outfits etc etc
ill live with floodzone and zavod its not super crazy
but if youre going to pull golmund railway, sinai desert, panzer storm then you should just be fired imo
al marj is insanely goated
like maps like that play the best
I haven't played any battlefield after BF4 as there trash
Golmud ain’t that bad
It gets annoying as an infantry player after a while, but it’s a pretty good vehicle and air map. The village is also neat with the multiple layers
it is bad thats why every bf4 server on golmud has fast vehicle respawn
its just an empty flat map its so boring
It’s bad, yeah. It just isn’t as bad as you said before
you die to random things the entire game you cant do anything you cant go anywhere its just slop
HL was good
quentin scar was terrible, legoland was terrible
would have been good if they didn't tie it to the battlefield name
al suldan sucked
never understood this mindset tbh
I actually agree to that, yeah. It would’ve been amazing if it wasn’t called BF hardline and was instead just hardline
Too many people were disappointed by a non-military bf game
game is good maps were better than 4s seemingly
It was a good game overall though
mechanically the same pretty much
just nothing I want from a game called battlefield
I can only think of 1 bad map. And it was a city block infantry-only map
Did you just say you haven't played a video game because you believe it's trash? Lol did you mean to say you haven't played any game after 4 for more than a few hours because you found them trash?
games after 4 were trash
Cos it reads as "I heard game was bad so didn't play game"
bf1 was slop, bf5 was even worse, 2042 was worse aswell, og bf4 players are only now coming back on bf6 lol
2042 is a statistical anomaly so it shouldn’t be included in the median
Just because gunplay in BF1 was not great doesn't mean it wasn't an absolute immersion masterpiece
gunplay in bf1 was good
Can confirm this is accurate. The last BF game I played was BF4. Haven’t played any since. (Other than trying them but not enjoying them).
If gunplay was good for you then the game should be an 11/10 lol
it was the cut out movement, the terrible maps, just outright annoying vehicles such as ilya muromets, mortar truck, gadgets are cancer
suppression was ass, sweetspot is terrible
gunplay means the guns mechanics, its just 1 of many things necessary for a good game
bf1s gunplay is literally the same from bf3 lol
played the closed alphas, betas, and demos of every battlefield since BF3.
so your were playing COD 🥹
Obviously I ain't just talking about one thing. I of course implied that if gunplay is good to you then the rest of the game being peak should round it up to 11/10
what was wrong with the gunplay? its the same gunplay in bf6 lol what are you talking about
nah is a reskin of battlefronts gunplay you can feel it in the lmg the most
eh
the only bad mechanics were suppression and sweetspot
cod makes fun game modes at least
In what milkyway galaxy is BF1 gunplay the same as BF6 lol
the only difference is TTK's
Hope the BR delivers. So far it sounds incredible. ( so far)
and less visual recoil and ads isnt tied to screen center but aim is tied to ads
Alright got arma, and it's downloaded
and no aids suppression that influences your accuraccy
sounds? where are these updates
Now I'm gonna go AFSOC there and see how it helps
Google is free 😉
do you even know what is gunplay? youre talking about the guns mechanics that affect the gunplay right? like you arent misunderstanding that?
it better be good, only 2 big maps at launch isnt it
then again it makes sense since BR is a huge one
because its the same mechanics since bf3 that were in bf4 and same mechanics in 1
After the last 2 garbage games, As long as they are good it’s totally ok. They will add more
5 and 2042 were different and now we are back to those mechanics in 6
its the best gunplay you could have in battlefield tbh
Arm3 was lovely when you followed a squad leader who knew what they were doing. I used to fly squads in the heli back and forth to base
BR map also looks very cool. The residential area with palm trees looks great
When you shoot a gun in BF1 the way the gun reacts relative to what happens to the enemy and the distance of drop of and all these things. It is wildly different from any other BF game. In BF4 or BF6 I have options. In BF1 I just hold left click and the enemy dies. It's boring
thats literally every game lol
Interesting
either you burst, tap, spray
HL’s Hotwire beats out 99% of cod’s gamemodes
Why would you burst or tap in BF1? What's the benefit?
ready to state fire and you have to pace your shots to decrease spread
the same things as in bf3 and bf4 btw
lmgs worked different they had reverse spread, the longer you fired the more accurate they got
but its the same thing at the end, increase/decrease of spread with minimal recoil
reading ur name makes wanna play bf4
"The longer you fire the more accurate they get"..... that's a boring mechanic lol
i never beat the story, too stuck on bf3. bf4 is good
that was 10 years ago. The modes in 6 are bad and barely work
its the best way to even out large magazine, high rpm guns, instead of cutting ads speeds and making it inconsistent at everything
Eh. It forces you to choose between conserving ammo and having more accurate fire
They need to be tweaked, yeah. They’re pretty much the same as they have always been tho
Fair enough if people like that. That ain't for me. I like more traditional gunplay
i mean bf4 lmgs were just better AR's on a lot of maps
Everytime you die in bf4 to an lmg the red highlight is always some dude prone behind a smoke
100 bullet mags that you could endlessly fire without cool downs
oh man dont forget the recoil, where is it
What was that game mode in Halo where you held a skull in your hand, you were the target, you could throw/pass it to other players. Give me that, give me Search and Destroy with 1 life each, give me prop hunt. Then add your team deathmatches and all the usual zzz stuff
thats why bf1s lmgs worked so good because they werent accurate until you fired a few shots on them, so they werent better than smgs particularly but not super bad in cqc
they needed to become accurate after sometime so they werent exactly better than rifles when it came to like more accurate midrange gameplay
but they werent bad in anything it was like an all trick pony
All the guns play the exact same in bf6 its kinda lame. Theres no variation like you're talking about in bf1
not exactly, they all still have cons and pros
smgs melt people at close ranges but dont out ttk rifles when AR/carbines space them, smgs have faster reloads, faster ads times, larger mags to compensate
Don’t play Battlefield 4
AR's are better midrange but also decent at close range just not as fast ads and not as accurate hipfire with slower reloads, lmgs are bad in both currently
its on battlefield reddit
atleast if we compare beta AR's/Carbines/smgs to lmgs
battlefield subreddit. Theres a video
slow ads, slow reload, dont have good hipfire dont have good midrange
its unavailable cant see it
looks...uhhhhh
I never felt at a disadvantage at any range running an SMG during the beta
how is there only 1 leaker for it? did it just come out in BF labs?
i definitely wanted to be closer to people with an smg compared to AR's the damage drop of was definitely there
ooh swimming and diving confirmed
but yes you could still kill people at like 20m fine its always been that way
I mean like 100m+
will i get banned if i send a link for reddit
youre judging distance wrong then
Not an issue tap firing with smg
the video is taken down anyway
doesnt look too exciting anyway
oh right
WAIT DID THEY DISABLE DMS HERE?
yes
if you share or talk about leaks you get banned
its your settings
shit add me as a friend for a minute then send it then unfriend me after @acoustic plume
its only 40 days til bf6 why even care about leaks atp
this isnt anything of that nature, its my spotify playlist
for reference the only leaks im referring to are the ones coming from pipes for water
sent
@acoustic plume try seeing if you can message anyone else in this server if not, its probably cus they stopped DMs between users which means you have to add them as a friend and stuff
has there been a leak?
I heard if you leak bf6 then john dice runs yo block and steals yo air fryer 😭
I think the BR will be a good addition and fun
I've come to the conclusion Conquest on BF is finished as most people dont PTFO so breakthrough is where the future is
even rank 300+ players on BFV not PTFO
no wonder the bf6 maps look like shit, this map in fantastic
I'm hoping the small- and mid-sized maps gain the most favor as the large ones are always so boring.
Last weekend i did! Are they gonna run it every weekend till it drops?
Kill count and death count should be wiped away so people cant care about KDR and only if the team wins
They will always care, even the people that try to pretend otherwise.
I will always be an OBJ Score player
fun fact they dont ptfo because they cant or dont kill anyone
or just die alot
why do they bother playing then when they can go and play leisure suit larry
they also die because they dont or cant kill anyone so they lose gunfights meaning they lose map control and then lose objectives with it and lose when attacking objectives
Because they paid just like you, eh?
they should never touch fps games imo
pay for something else you're more suited to
Big ass maps typically solve the whole problem of people not PTFOing because its not some dense ass area where players are all in, you have to run and find enemies at the objective which means you are either defending or attacking
should be perma banned for game grief
Remember when Battlefield V had a big screen that said "play the way you want"? We do.
or camping with a sniper rifle
it makes it worse because it gives more areas for people to not do anything in
cairo for example is a good map because it pushes people to play into gunfights
Exactly, remember BF2 or earlier?
you cant camp anywhere particularly you cant like wander off into random parts of the map
you dont want a BO6 bullet map and you dont want a BR size map sure
but the point is, Battlefield has historically struck the perfect balance
no its been horrible ever since 4
large maps destroy infantry to vehicle balance heavily
I do. And people voted with their wallets by buying later titles in the series that don't have all the downsides of BF2.
I disagree here
Whole Lotta yapping in here
Yeah, I don't find any new maps too remarkable
go play golmund railway and come back to me
or sinai desert, or panzer storm
when I say big, im saying i want maps sized like Gulf of Oman, Karkand, Dragon Valley, Zavod 311
those arent big
I do HATE Caspian Border though
Caspian is good
please keep caspian dice, thanks. like dont add to bf6
i know, im just showing you what i meant by "big maps"
just from what I saw on beta, give me Cairo and like 10 more maps like cairo.... Iberian was also solid..... but Lib peak was "meh" and NY was downright not good
That's a strange way of talking
Nosehair Canals 24x7 TDM with 2,000 tickets.
comrad
Yeah, I did that ha ha
Cairo is what any bf map should be imo and yeah iberian was good too
al marj would be cool to have, propaganda would be cool, talah market would be cool, prise de tahure, marita
just felt cairo struck the perfect balance for infantry where objectives where spread, but still runnable, vehicles had a role, but weren't super dominating, and the shooting lanes/flank angles/funnel points where well designed
yeah exactly
and you didnt get shat on from like 400000 windows and 300000 different levels of building
Cairo is just the inverse of Caspian Border, its also problematic
you want maps like Gulf of Oman and Karkand which are still a bit spread out
Cairo is too compact from how its layout looks and plays
they do have another Egypt map thats way better than it though
40 more days
it's a long time
I disagree with ibberian being good, its just a buch og grey alleys and a few buildings
read a book
the layout is good though? middle objective with 4 objectives in diamond shape around it have always played good
"40 days and 40 nights" - Bible
and Iberian Offensive is far worse, its too dense, again its that CoD-esque map design that Zampella should have not brought over to Battlefield, I get it for Titanfall and CoD but not BF
maps are meant to be spread out, buildings are meant to be a bit apart from each other
you want the map to be dense in a 32v32 game lol
Any small map is a cod map you heard it here first
best example of this is literally Gulf of Oman, that's how a BF map should be
did you play bff3
the opposite lol
karkand was a great example of infantry. buildings dont need to be far
I wonder how eren would think about bazaar
buildings in Karkand were more apart than the buildings in Cairo lol
Close Quarters Conquest is where it's at. And Scavenger. And Gun Game. And TDM.
if the maps are open and barrand youll just have 2042 maps all over again, sinai desert, golmund railway, panzer storm etc its just garbage to play lol
i guess bf3 just did it well
I actually like Bazaar for like an Infantry map sure, that's actually where I think they got the inspiration for Cairo
but we dont need just maps like Bazaar and Cairo, we need maps like Gulf of Oman and Dragon Valley lol
none of which is battlefield
youll die frome everywhere you never have a good spot to be at so you never have good control over your own gameplay
Maps too small, cod maps, maps too big, 2042 slop, truly incredible
going onto the problem maps, im curious to see if they do any structural adjustment to empire state..... Haven't met a single person who liked that map yet.... and even as somone who prefers smaller/more action maps, I really didn't enjoy empire state
i see your point though
2042 is NOT the only game that done this 💀 and you are misrepresenting 2042's issues, it wasnt map size, it was map design and layout
i know thats why i also named a map from bf1, bf4, bf5
If 2042 didn't stack 2 objectives right by each other then another 2 miles away and you had cover then big maps are good
and those are 1 of many examples lol
like Orbital's problem wasnt that it was big, it was literally just empty and flat which was a nightmare for anyone who wasnt a sniper player
you can have big maps, they need to be designed properly that's the point
then youll just have another bf5 where you find 1 engagement every hour
hi
Orbital flat.... he has to be trolling
we are playing an fps game where we want to shoot and fight other players im not playing hide and seek with grass hoppers
okay? do you want interactions like BO6 bullet? this isnt CoD bro lol
i actually kinda like the close quarters engagment, but too much isnt battlefield.
pre-rework lmao, look at the original version of Orbital
apparently battlefield has been cod for so many years now, ever since 2011
Why would I talk about pre rework when it's not the current version who cares what it was
That's my point though is having the objectives setup to where you can rotate pretty fast to them. Like liberation peak was only mid size but you never felt like you were playing run simulator
COD is also always one tap to the body
every year when a battlefield game comes everythings cod
Truly tiring
no one has ever called BF3 and BF4 Call of Duty, at least from what i have seen, Battlefield is about Conquest mainly and its medium to large sized maps
Again, this isnt Call of Duty, its that way, to the door on your left
People saw sliding and fast fov movement and they blamed cod when games like quake did it 10 years earlier
if they dont get these dlc's right, the next annual releases- we are screwed
you cant say any of the maps showcased yet though are good surely, especially if you'f played the whole franchise
internet was full of forums where people complained about dense and small map sizes and cried that this and that is cod
They did in fact call it COD when those two releases came out.
Battlefield is technically meant to move slow, this isnt Titanfall
Just gonna point out that regardless of whatever BF WAS in the past, the beta was super well received for the kind of combat we had in beta... I think the older more bf purist people are gonna be in for a shock when new development ends up favoring more maps like Cairo than maps like Lib Peak
I didn't know you were the creative director for dice my bad
i quarantee you that the same people spamming cod on reddit are the same people who spammed forums on bf3/4 being cod
okay but in all fairness like i was 9 so i wouldnt read some internet forum
Liberation peak was decent for a medium sized map.
Dice confirmed bf6 won't have ray tracing in future
I actually agree with that
@vocal sedge "nobody called bf3/4 cod" 'actually yes they did", "okay well I was too young I wouldn't know" 
Is bf6 finally gonna be the cod killer we want?
its their conservative mark from relativeness, dont take it seriously
i am being serious though lmao
Cod is killing themselves especially if black ops 7 isn't similar to black ops 1-3
I'm going to play both BF6 and the new COD
do you think a 9 year old is browsing an internet forum? do you have a braincell?
no one was comparing cod to bf3, cod was a lot more basic in 2011
if B07 reception is any judge, it'll be both bf6 being good and B07 being bad
You said something you clearly didn't know then your excuse was you were too young
And when BF3 came out there was a vocal minority that complained about the movement being faster but now days everyone looks back at BC1/BC2 as being clunky due to their movement mechanics.
COD is included on Xbox lol
Bo7 preorder number is quite lower than usual
I remember the E3 reveal like it was yesterday haha
It doesn't matter regardless, since bo7 is gonna be on gamepass so a lot of people are gonna play it anyway
right but i played CoD back then too and BF, they didnt feel the same at all so i'd assume everyone would at least feel similar, again you arent proving you understand Battlefield's map design, you are changing the topic, the point is, Battlefield's maps should be designed like Gulf of Oman, Dragon Valley, Zavod 311, Karkand, etc
It was amazing, wasn't it?
gaming truely is great without knowing what internet forums are
Yes you feeling that they weren't similar at the age of 9 is sure proof that nobody else in the world compared cod to bf3 can you read what you're typing please like come on
buildings are too densely pact in Cairo and Iberian Offensive, that's the problem, the map needs to be more spread out
they would never play the same regardless of the map
so are we going to go back to the main topic or are you deflecting because you cant counter-argue?
If they incorporated every good mechanic from every battlefield it would be game of the year. Like levolution and the ships wrecking in battlefield 4
I'm not deflecting you got called out on a lie
i dont care if they dont play the same, they should be designed like that and that is it, no one wants CoD map design
i dont understand why anyone would ever want a map thats full of unreadable angles, verticality a map so open that it allows people to kill you from 800 meters
Many countries have dense urban environments, though
again are we gonna go back to the main topic about Battlefield map design or are we gonna keep coping?
and yet those where the two most enjoyed maps on beta.... eventually D1CE is going to have to go where the fanbase wants
i can see why dice doesnt listen to us now
You're the only one coping here, the rest of us are having sensible points
its the dads who have a 65inch
We don't have COD map design. You are referring to a very specific 3-lane setup with that reference.
they were enjoyable sure i actually dont deny that, but like those asking about where the big maps are, that's where im at
yeah thats what they said in 2011 too
what else is new
Bro how would he know that he was 9 
again are we going to talk about the maps i mentioned and why they should be like that or are you going to pretend every map is Grand Bazaar? 😄
i dont care what they said in 2011, thats how it should be and thats it lol
Yeah you can't explain how any bf6 map is cod style
okay bud have a nice day 😄
yeah thats what they said in 2011 too
why
I think COD has a different style
yeah and i literally couldnt care less, i want my medium to big BF maps not just vehicles shoved in clearly infantry designed maps
What are there more people who won't be happy no matter what they do? lol
nowadays yeah, way worse these days
lol
That's why it feels really pointless engaging with some people you know it's not gonna go anywhere but sometimes you like to be optimistic
Didn't they already announce BF6 will have the biggest map in BF history?
BO6 bullet was like the worst you can get lmao
but cairo vehicles will play a lot better than vehicles compared to for example mercury or panzer storm lol
Mirak Valley?
what is the biggest map in bf history
and thats all because the map isnt open and it doesnt allow vehicles to camp from the otherside of the map
Gotta be paracel storm no ?
they always say that
if I remember right Mirak was close to the same size as one of the largest
Maybe bf3 golmud
depends what mode you play in
there is still an answer to be said
you have clear routes and clear angles you need to hold with the tank you have good cover with the tank, literally a good map for vehicles
Well its a rush map fore sure
yeah but again Battlefield is about open maps dude, thats the point of the game, you are meant to feel like you are in a Battlefield, nothing wrong with the small infantry maps, im not saying they should go
But we still need the big maps, that's part of this franchise's DNA, changing that IS reducing it to Call of Duty Ground War levels is my point
Cap, people were calling BF3 as COD, BF2 boomers specifically did
Yeah true. My only complain in beta was movement (they already said they nerfing movement) and TTK was a little slow (BF6 Labs is testing dedicated Hardcore Modes right now), and the smaller maps (pretty sure they anounced bigges map in BF history and Firestorm coming back) so I'm pretty damn happy where I come from lol
i was thinking bandar desert from bf3
we will have big maps they will play like ass though
where are all the fields
yeah especially after the BF3 Metro beta
the map they posted in one of the photos already looks terrible
well yeah my first BF game was BF2 (too young to play it at launch but it was still the first one i played when i was bit older)
Yeah I was fine with the movement changes I didn't care strongly one way or another
there's also going to be a big shift I think from players new to the series looking at the giant maps, and running distance between objectives, then just blacklisting those maps
they will play like ass for you but amazing for me, to each their own i guess, i wouldnt advocate against you having your smaller maps, but i dont think we should advocate against big maps either
Like what would actually make some of you guys happy though? Serious question. I feel like the only thing that would make some dudes happy is a BF3/4 remaster and add NOTHING.
It might be good in BT tbh, I hated BT in all 4 maps we played
But people were being very disingenuous about why they wanted movement changes
BT plays better in bigger maps imo
You didn't like Liberation Peak? I liked it
BT is terrible in all the maps imo
BT?
Im sorry but mirak valley looks incrediably unbalanced. the 3 maps that go to the teams side on the left??
Conquest was vastly better
yeah whats BT
Breakthrough just had to many attackers sniping to make it fun when half of the attackers are sitting in spawn
dw rework coming soon like all the 2042 maps got 🤣
BT is Breakthrough.
Oh, Breakthrough
white dots are going to be glints, therse like 6 different levels to the last building
ohhhh Breakthough... I personally think they should ditch that and refine Rush. Rush was EPIC in BF3 and I was one of the boomers against it at first
Is bf labs still open since alpha?
so cringe, they never learn when it comes to tall buildings with endless amount of windows
Conquest until BF7
They should both ditch BT and Rush imo, Frontlines is vastly better than both
oh wow, i didnt think patches were operated on such a magnitude
Well, you guys gotta play Hardcore if you dont like glint. Or am I wrong did they still have glint in HC?
shitters at dice
They need to redesign empire state imo, that map felt bad on every game mode... And super bad on a few of them
and then have fun playing towards that high building, half the enemy team will afk prone with scout rifles and sweetspot you while you cant do anything
Empire State was good imo
Glint is a function of magnification on scope, so HC mode would have glint
I've been defending BF6 like crazy but you are 100% right. That map SUCKED. Add destruction or something....
Honestly If they give us some maps of all sizes and you can choose what you wanna play and theres cover and you aren't playing run simulator nobody can complain
then have fun clearing that building because its going to be insanely camped
f(glint)=mag>4
The issue with Rush and Breakthrough is that Conquest map design generally doesn't work well with the other game modes.
same for vise versa
Well they should add an option if you wanna rent a server to turn that off.
I think rush and breakthrough have a problem that lies more in the game mode than the map for balancing, obviously it's both but I think it's more of the game mode
Indeed.
"you don't see that" option
the maps that we played in beta were imo obvious cq maps
I had to google that due to my memory. I still cant fathom exactly how big it was though, I remember playing it.
they should make BT specific and cq specific maps imo it would just be so much better to play
Snipers annoy tf out of me but I have a feeling I'll find a BF6 server that is as "milsim" as possible and call that home
were there glints on zavod graveyard shift
the best looking map imo
Mannn I forgot about Zavod. If there's an infantry map I love it's that and Karkand
i play with the hud off and go slow so i just want the friendly/enemy skins to stay recognisable. and the ping system barely works. Game modes are unimaginative and sad. Other than that i think its fine. If they cant figure out gunplay and movement by themselves idk what to say
nah bf3 rush for example played insanely good and it was because they made bf3 maps specifically for rush
Zavod at night was the bomb.
they should have it where you aim iron sight and when you want to scope you open the flap on your scope and refine your aim
Yeah I guess
close quarters, aftermath and karkand. my dlc wishlist
They should defo bring back night operations
Does anyone know the song that was played during the bf6 reveal trailer?
Yeah but it was the bf3 theme with like another song or smth
I just want to see Damavand, Kharg Island, Karkand, Gulf of Oman, Zavod, damn Im missing some lol. Soooo many good maps
How about we see new maps why do people want old maps so bad lol
Theres been many good maps in BF history
Gulf of Oman should defo return
Areca harbour on rush was one of my favourites also on conquest
yes. Bob Dylan master of war. just type bob dylan bf6 remix, it will be the first result
man dont get me going. what a fantastic time. i hope those talented devs are doing well haha
shit I forgot about that map too, awesome
Alright thanks!
I might play a lot of domination in bf6 it was really good tbh
but theres a BFBC2 map I forget the name of which is also a fond memory albeit a vague one
panama canal?
This is why Portal was the most dropped game mode of all time. They had something that was GUARUNTEED money in that, and they fumbled.... HARD
The only bc2 map I recall is where you deploy in little army desert base there's 2 tanks next to each other then go out and blow stuff up
its weird psychology. i guess old map inspired
If portal is like halo reach forge I'm never leaving battlefield again
Majority of old maps are pretty terrible tbh
Old map inspired is better I guess, I just get bored of having the same map every time, give them the opportunity to make the next golmud or firestorm you know what I mean
we also need like a mostly interior based infantry map like Operation Locker in Battlefield 6
Redacted was that for 2042
And majority of older maps wouldnt even play good with bf6 mechanics and balance
Old maps are just safe for them to make and they're iconic
what a statement
That was a rumor
no it had a river running alongside it, there were a lot of single storey buildings near the end you could jump through or in rush mode go across roof's
No it was posted by an exec. But it was one guy so it's not likely. It was what he wanted to see. But you get enough people like him calling the shots, and you get another COD
Nope it was a rumor by a journalist said he interviewed the guy who "CLAIMED" that he said that
If bf6 goes well then it can go on for 5 years like every other game now days. Just make money off cosmetics like everyone else
Well I'll be damned then. I hope you're right. Because besides hearing that crap I feel like they have actually been listening and doing well.
CSGO, overwatch, Fortnite etc
lol no, we need Battlefield 7 like at least 2 to 3 years after
im thinking of oasis
Just keep it realistic and I'd be buying them to support the game. Kinda like how Squad added emotes
Fortnite has cooked the brains of many
They should stay on 6 for 5 years imo
If they improve on the game constantly and the community loves it enough then they won't have to
It just has such wide range of content on it and the game runs really good
i dont think BF6 will have that long of a lifecycle, depends, if they go and do Battlefront 3 after then probably
You don't think that based on what
Like imagine if battlefield 6 has hundreds of fans made maps that are great then nobody will wanna leave
yes
Depends how well this Battle Royale goes too. I'm honestly excited about that, because if it weren't for Firestorm being WW2, I think it would have been big
2042 had a 4 year life cycle and it has like 1/4th of the content bf6 will have lol
2042 had a 3-4 year lifecycle and it sucked
at least they dont have p2w gambling crates for perma-buffs
yet
ok listen, maybe i played the franchise since BF2? maybe think dummy? how many Battlefield games do we have? 18 right? how old is the franchise? 23 years, now do the math
2042 shouldnt even have Battlefield's name on it
nor should Hardline imo
it has tainted it. I agree, but Hardline at least played good
again i think it depends on what they want to do next
I doubt Battlefront 3 will ever happen
Is there 18 battlefield games ? Holy I missed a couple lmfao (this is sarcasm)
same, im hoping Titanfall gets tried
2042 might of sucked but they had to add to it because it was so bad. Imagine if they added all that to a good battlefield
Its like what 24 year old franchise
2142 was worse than 2042
Pretty crazy tbh
HOW
Yes but there's not 18 battlefield games only 13
bro doesnt know, if we dont count the spinoffs, its 15, but the spin offs counted, its 18, there's a Battlefield game typically 2 - 3 years, its based off common sense dude
2142 has functional mouse input
I am guessing you never played Titan Mode
And better maps
I wish I got to play 2142 more
Please dice please, release Bad Company 3 before this annual release window. Phuck every other game haha
I remember playing it on my dads computer
Unique modes too, carrier assault isn't the same as titan assault
You showed up to have the worst battlefield take. Worse then xqc
Bad Company 3 could defo come out 2027/2028 if Battlefield 6 does well
Lmfao
medic player that cannot change his playstyle type of opinion fr fr 🤡
Imagine BF6 has 5 year lifecycle but they release Bad Company campaign "Chapters" every year.
Battlefield 2143: Bad Company 3. That's the future.
Definitely
i miss bf6💔
you might have just did something
Why do I not make big decisions at EA?
@hollow harbor Help this anime watcher has been baiting for 45 minutes
unc he got both consoles 😭
bros coping cus he came from CoD and he's still crying
Nah its just a terrible map outright
You almost make that sound like a bad thing. Almost.
He said bf6 will have a 2 year life cycle 
How long was Battlefield 1's life cycle again? you know the best selling BF :DDDD
Long corridors nothing between them uninteresting gameplay tank is so free to farm in that map its just depressingly boring
this BR is elongating it by another 7 years
Are any of you on PC? How did the beta run for you? I get like 30-40fps on Stalker 2. But hopped on Battlefield 6 Beta with an i5 11400, 32GB RAM, and a lowly RTX4060 and got 100+fps on medium settings
and what if the BR fails?
40000 windows
i cannot put myself subject to his baits he has both console tags 💀
3
I'm getting too old for this the young bloods are getting better
I can agree with you there ngl
like a fucking dream tbh, 9800x3d and 5070 ti 1440p, easy near 200
yeah you're just too distracted which to preaim with your DMR
i dont think it will cause if its like firestorm it should be alright
but noooo the 27486 rocks in achi baba is totally not the same principle
2028 does feel like the right time for something new, if the BR fails, Battlefield 2143 or Bad Company 3
oh yeah i forgot I was on 1440p as well. Well damn man. First beta ever than was optimized then? lol
If the br fails then that's more resources for the actual game
HE SAID 2143 
we need more training to keep up unc 
they wouldnt do that though, they want to make more Battlefield games, wasnt there a thing about annual BF releases (thats terrible though) but BF is typically 2 - 3 years given no problems
felt like it, at least to me
I'm tapping out of this absolute insanity
Bro I've been playing BFV to bide my time before BF6 along with Helldivers 2. And I SUCK at BF5. I dunno man the mouse feels so wierd
we actually had 2 Battlefield games release a year apart once
Hardline and Battlefield 1 are just a bit over a year apart, March 2015 to October 2016 iirc
if unc is tapping out , i wouldn't dare tune in
Visceral Games made Hardline while DICE made Battlefield 1
might dice be that agile moving on their feet or will they stick to a static money plan before the next project
whats so bad abt that
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1093559356966043728/1411856837535338546/image.png?ex=68b62da5&is=68b4dc25&hm=8e9d2db5488ae91df68ffbc96789e41059b799e2104929a1aaa44937094fdc06& mightve missed a few corridors with nothing between them not sure
he's pretending he's a BF fan and fumbling, ignore him
Brodie they are not making 2142 sequel to be 2143 can we be serious for a minute
Well I would hope they learn because Call of duty has told them exactly what not to do at this point
he has his twitter account tagged to his discord 😭
Yep this, but I dont hate Hardline. I dont think it should have been a BF title, but still a reeeeallly good game
ohhhhh alr alr
at least hes not on bluesky XDXD
Hardline was good yeah, it just sucks it was given the Battlefield name
it's not just dice these days it's ripple effect and 2 othe rdevs
You couldn't come close to my stats in bf6 or 2042 lil man
Look at black ops 6. They focused on warzone and it fucking sucked because of it
REAL